Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-03-03; Planning Commission; ; CUP 09-04 - SQUIRES DAM COMMUNICATION SITEThe City of Carlsbad Planning Department A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Conditional Use Permit Extension Item No. P.C. AGENDA OF: March 3, 2010 Application complete date: May 19, 2009 Project Planner: Chris Sexton Project Engineer: David Rick SUBJECT: CUP 09-04 - SQUIRES DAM COMMUNICATION SITE - Request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the approval of a Wireless Communication Facility consisting of seven (7) digital dish antennas, three (3) omni-directional antennas, and 24 panel antennas located on a 150 foot tall lattice tower north of Squires Dam in the OS (Open Space) Zone and in Local Facilities Management Zone 15. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6572 APPROVING CUP 09-04 for a period often (10) years (from March 3, 2010 to March 2, 2020), based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II.INTRODUCTION This Conditional Use Permit will allow for the approval of a Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) consisting of seven (7) digital dish antennas, three (3) omni-directional antennas, and 24 panel antennas located on a 150 foot tall lattice tower, a 484 square foot equipment building, an emergency generator, and an 80 square foot enclosure to house a water tank. The original Conditional Use Permit (CUP 87-07(B)x2) for this use expired on June 14, 2004 prior to the applicant submitting a CUP extension application. Accordingly, a new CUP is required to approve this use. Consequently, the analysis in the staff report assumes that the WCF use does not currently exist. The project does not comply with all applicable City WCF standards and guidelines, however all necessary findings can be made for the approval being requested. The Planning Commission is the final decision making body for this project. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND On September 16, 1987, the Planning Commission approved CUP 87-07 to allow the construction of a 150 foot tall lattice tower to operate a WCF with six (6) whip antennas, (4) dish antennas and an equipment enclosure. Since the original approval and through the amendment process, a water tank and additional antennas on the tower have been approved. Currently, there are seven (7) digital dish antennas, three (3) omni-directional antennas, and 24 panel antennas. On July 18, 2001, the Planning Commission approved CUP 87-07(B)x2 to allow the continued operation of this WCF for a period of five years. Condition No. 4 of the approving CUP Resolution No. 4983 specifies that CUP 87-07(B)x2 is granted for a period of 5 years but may beo CUP 09-04 - SQUIRES DAM COMMUNICATION SITE March 3, 2010 Page 2 extended upon written application of the permittee (Daly International for Verizon Wireless). Because the applicant did not submit a CUP extension application in a timely manner as required, a new Conditional Use Permit application is required to request the approval of this use. Accordingly, the analysis in the staff report assumes that the WCF use does not currently exist. This item was previously scheduled for the Planning Commission hearing on June 17, 2009. However, upon receipt of a public letter of comment, staff requested that the project be continued to an unspecified date to enable the project applicant to provide additional project documentation in support of the project. The applicant has submitted a letter (see Attachment 9) and additional technical studies in response to issues identified in the aforementioned public comment letter. Similar to other older WCF's in the City, this WCF was originally approved (September 16, 1987) prior to the adoption of City Council Policy No.64 - Wireless Communication Facilities (WCF) on October 3, 2001 and does not comply with all of the Policy's design guidelines. Specifically, Policy No. 64 requires that WCF's that are located next to a residential zone should be setback from the zone boundary a minimum distance equal to the above-ground height of the antenna. The existing 150 foot tall WCF lattice tower is setback approximately 75 feet from the nearest residential property line in the City of Vista. Section 21.42.140(B)(165) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC) establishes two processes for approving/extending a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a WCF: one for a WCF that complies with Policy No.64 and a second one for a WCF that does not comply with Policy No.64. WCF applications that comply with the location and design guidelines of Policy No.64 can be processed as a minor (administrative) CUP and those that do not comply (including this WCF) must be processed before the Planning Commission. Furthermore, Section 21.42.120 of the CMC delegates authority to the decision-making body to approve exemptions to specific development standards (i.e.; setbacks, building height, lot area and off-street parking) through the CUP process. The project site is located adjacent to single-family residential uses located in the City of Vista to the immediate east and is otherwise surrounded by open space to the north, south and west. The proposed project is subject to the following regulations: A. Open Space General Plan Land Use Designation; B. Open Space Zone (OS) (Chapter 21.33 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); C. Conditional Use Permit Regulations (Chapter 21.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); D. City Council Policy Statement: Policy No. 64 - Wireless Communication Facilities; and E. Growth Management (Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code) and the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15. CUP 09-04 - SQUIRES DAM COMMUNICATION SITE March 3, 2010 Page 3 IV. ANALYSIS A. Open Space General Plan (OS) Land Use Designation The WCF is located on a parcel designated as Open Space (OS) on the City's General Plan Land Use Map. The WCF at this location is consistent with the Open Space General Plan Land Use designation in that the Open Space Land Use designation does not preclude the provision of WCF uses and it is conditionally permitted by the implementing Open Space zone. The WCF project will also serve communication and emergency service needs of surrounding residential, business and community uses. Therefore, the proposed WCF use is consistent with the OS General Plan Land Use designation. B. Open Space (OS) Zone, Chapter 21.33 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code The WCF is located within the Open Space (OS) Zone. Wireless Communication Facilities are allowed in all zones including the Open Space (OS) zone with approval of a CUP. The required CUP findings (discussed in Section C below) can be made for the proposed WCF as it is a desirable public convenience. The antennas are mounted onto a 150 foot tall lattice tower. The existing tower height exceeds the maximum 25 foot height limit of the OS zone. However, pursuant to Section 21.42.120 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC), a higher structure height may be approved through a CUP issued by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission has approved the height of this tower four times - in the original 1987 CUP and three subsequent extensions. Pursuant to the applicant's project justification letter, the WCF cannot operate at a lower height and maintain similar wireless coverage and microwave interconnection without severely impacting Verizon Wireless system reliability. C. Conditional Use Permit Regulations, Chapter 21.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code Conditional uses such as WCF's possess unique and special characteristics that make it impractical to include them as permitted uses "by right" in any of the various zoning classifications (i.e. open space, residential, commercial, office or industrial). The authority for the location and operation of these uses is subject to City Council Policy Statement No. 64 - Wireless Communication Facilities Policy (see discussion D below), Planning Commission review and the issuance of a CUP. Staff has reviewed the project and found that all necessary findings can be made to approve the CUP. The required findings and satisfaction of these findings are provided in Table 1 below: CUP 09-04 - SQUIRES DAM COMMUNICATION SITE March 3, 2010 Page 4 TABLE 1 - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS FINDING PROJECT CONSISTENCY That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community and is in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan, including, if applicable, the certified local coastal plan, specific plan or master plan. The WCF use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community because of the benefit and demand for digital communications and data transmissions for businesses, individuals, public agencies, and emergency service systems. The WCF is consistent with the General Plan in that the Open Space Land Use designation allows the installation of WCF uses. C.I7. of the Implementing Policies and Action Programs in the Open Space Element of the General Plan is to provide the public with essential utilities, public facilities and services. That the requested use is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. The WCF use is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located in that the proposed CUP application does not propose any modifications to the existing facility or site. The Wind Load Study for the project (Next Step Design Inc., September 2009) concludes that the tower is structurally sound as designed and therefore is not physically detrimental to adjacent residential uses. The project also complies with the City's Noise Guidelines Manual to ensure that the existing WCF noise emissions remain compatible with the existing residences. Although the existing 150 lattice tower is clearly visible to the public, the use is not considered detrimental (from a health and safety perspective) to the existing residential uses. The visual nuisance of this WCF facility is minimized in that the antennas are mounted as close to the tower as technically possible. CUP 09-04 - SQUIRES DAM COMMUNICATION SITE March 3, 2010 PageS TABLE 1 - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS CONTINUED FINDING PROJECT CONSISTENCY That the site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, parking, loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this code and required by the planning director, planning commission or city council, in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. That the site for the WCF conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking, loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this code and required by the planning commission, in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. The WCF is proposed on an existing lattice tower that was approved and constructed as CUP 87-07, 75 feet from the nearest residential property line. The tower location was dictated by policies in place at that time and the operational needs of the applicant. City Council Policy 64 currently identifies existing lattice towers as a preferred location for new WCFs. That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use. That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use in that the only street system required is the existing access road to the site, and this road will continue to be maintained. No traffic is generated by the existing use except for one monthly on-site maintenance visit. D. City Council Policy Statement No. 64 - Wireless Communication Facilities The City Council adopted a policy (City Council Policy No. 64) regarding prioritization for the location of Wireless Communication Facilities (WCF) within the City on October 3, 2001. The location guidelines state that WCFs should be located on buildings or structures and not on vacant land. In addition, preferred locations of WCFs, in order of priority, are industrial, commercial, public, other non-residential, public and private utility installations in residential and open space zones, parks, or community facility property. This WCF is located in an Open Space (OS) zone on public property near Maerkle Reservoir. The WCF is also located adjacent to (75 feet east of) existing single-family residences located in the City of Vista. Location Guideline A.l.g. of Policy No. 64 specifically identifies this existing communications tower near Maerkle Reservoir as a preferred location for a WCF. In support of the need to maintain the WCF at this location, the applicant has submitted coverage maps indicating the coverage for this facility (see Attachments 10 & 11). There are no other properties within the City that have a non-residential land use designation and are at a high enough elevation to meet the required WCF coverage objectives as the existing site. This site is located at one of the highest points in the City and in addition is an important site for cellular CUP 09-04 - SQUIRES DAM COMMUNICATION SITE March 3, 2010 Page 6 communications since the WCF is a major microwave hub which is used to transmit wireless communication signals out to other locations. As discussed previously, the design guidelines of City Council Policy No. 64 generally require that all aspects of a WCF, including the supports, antennas, screening methods, and equipment should exhibit "stealth" design techniques so they visually blend into the background or the surface onto which they are mounted. However, in recognition of the fact that ground-mounted lattice towers are very difficult to stealth, City Council Policy No. 64 further specifies that: 1) new lattice towers should not be permitted in the City and 2) for existing lattice towers, all antennas are to be located as close as possible to the tower to be less noticeable. While Policy No. 64 clearly discourages the construction of new lattice towers for WCF's, the fact remains that this lattice tower, which currently exists as previously approved, is clearly identified as a preferred location for WCF's by Policy No. 64. After many months of negotiating with the applicant to redesign the facility to be more stealth in appearance, staff recommends support of the continued operation of this WCF for the following reasons. At the time CUP 87-07(B) was approved, City Council Policy No. 64 (which requires stealth design) had not been adopted; the applicant has steadfastly contended that new technology is not available to replace the current equipment with "stealth" devices; and the only available tower designs for the Wireless Communication Facility are either a lattice tower or mono-pole. Mono-poles can be disguised as trees to provide a stealth design; however, at this site, the determining factor for the original lattice tower is the capability such facility provides for the location of multiple antennas on a single tower given the potential wind loads at this elevation. Additionally, the wireless cellular industry does not have mono-palms or other types of trees at the height required for the cell site to work effectively. Policy No. 64 also specifies that WCF's that are located next to a residential zone should be setback from the zone boundary a minimum distance equal to the above-ground height of the antenna. The existing 150 foot tall WCF lattice tower is setback approximately 75 feet from the nearest residential property line. Staff negotiated earnestly to increase the setback on the WCF to 150 feet minimum. However, the applicant's response letter (see Attachment 9) documents that it would be extremely difficult and costly to relocate the WCF to achieve a 150 foot setback from the property line of the adjacent single-family residences located in the City of Vista. The specific location of the tower was originally chosen because of the tower's line-of-sight requirements and the Federal Communications Commission's requirements which preclude interference with existing uses. Cablevision's tower (located south of the project) predated the WCF. The WCF had to locate outside of Cablevision's transmit/receive signal paths and had to locate where its signals were not impacted by Cablevision's facility. The WCF would not impact Palomar Airport. By choosing this particular site, the WCF complied with FCC and FAA standards. The WCF is setback much more than the 150 feet from the nearest residential zone boundary in the City of Carlsbad. It would be costly and difficult to move the lattice tower and would temporarily disrupt service. Additionally, the applicant also has a license agreement for a particular portion of the property on which the lattice is on. Verizon Wireless would have to either lease additional space or negotiate a different lease. As previously discussed in Section B of this report, the WCF cannot operate at a lower height and maintain similar wireless coverage and microwave interconnection without severely impacting Verizon Wireless' system reliability. CUP 09-04 - SQUIRES DAM COMMUNICATION SITE March 3, 2010 Page 7 Staff has historically performed annual reviews of the project in accordance with the conditions of approval. At each of the annual inspections, the project site was determined to be in compliance with the conditions of approval for the project. The Planning Department is recommending that the Conditional Use Permit (CUP 09-04) be approved from March 3, 2010 for a period often years through March 2, 2020. E. Growth Management The WCF is located in Local Facilities Management Zone 15. The existing operation and installation of any new facilities on the existing site and monthly facility maintenance visits will not result in increased public facilities demands; therefore, the proposal will not exceed performance standards for public facilities. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary of Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15301, (Existing Facilities) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Additionally, as Verizon must comply with FCC regulations, radio frequency emissions from the existing facility are below levels established as acceptable by the FCC, and are therefore not considered a health hazard. In making this determination, the Planning Director has found that the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 of the State CEQA Guidelines do not apply to this project. A Notice of Exemption shall be filed with the County Clerk upon approval of the project. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6572 2. Location Map 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4983, dated July 18, 2001 4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3784 dated August 2, 1995 5. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3334 dated February 19, 1992 6. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2680 dated September 16, 1987 7. Disclosure Statement 8. Background Data Sheet 9. Letter from Carole McCallum dated June 17, 2009 10. Letter from Ron Kemp dated June 17, 2009 11. Applicant Response Letter 12. Coverage Exhibit of Existing Locations and Surrounding Sites 13. Coverage Exhibit without the Existing Locations and Surrounding Sites 14. Reduced Exhibits 15. Exhibits "A"-"E" dated March 3, 2010 NOT TO SCALE SITEMAP Squires Dam CUP 09-04 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4983 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A FIVE YEAR EXTENSION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO 4 JUNE 15, 2004 ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF SUNNY CREEK ROAD BETWEEN SEQUOIA CREST AND SQUIRES DAM IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 6 ZONE 15. CASE NAME: SQUIRES DAM COMMUNICATIONS SITE 7 CASE NO.: CUP 87-07(B)X2 8 WHEREAS, Verizon Wireless, "Developer," has filed a verified application with 9 the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by the City of Carlsbad, "Owner," described as 10 Portion of Lot C of Rancho Agua Hedionda in the City of 11 Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map No. 823 filed in the office of the County Recorder of 12 San Diego, November 16,1896. 13 ("the Property"); and 14 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a time extension for 15 a Conditional Use Permit Extension as shown on Exhibit(s) "A" - "B" dated July 18, 2001, on16 17 file in the Carlsbad Planning Department SQUIRES DAM COMMUNICATIONS SITE - 18 CUP 87-07(B)x2 as provided by the conditions of approval of CUP 87-07(B) and Chapter 21.42 19 and/or 21.50 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 9ft WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 18th day of July 2001, hold a 21 duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and 22 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony 23 and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors 25 relating to the CUP Extension. 26 WHEREAS, on August 2, 1995, the Planning Commission approved CUP 87- 2? 07(B) as described and conditioned in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3784. 98 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 2 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning 3 Commission APPROVES SQUIRES DAM COMMUNICATIONS SITE - CUP 87-07(B)x2 effective retroactively to June 14,1999 based on the following 4 findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings; 6 1. The adopted findings for CUP 87-07(B) which are contained in Planning Commission 7 Resolution No. 3784 apply to this extension. 8 Conditions; 9 1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be 10 implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to 11 revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to 13 compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of 14 this Conditional Use Permit. 15 2. All conditions of approval imposed upon Conditional Use Permit CUP 87-07(B) as stated in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3784 shall apply as conditions of approval for CUP 87-07(B)x2 except Condition No. 4 which is replaced by Condition No. 4 below. 17 3. This Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Director on a yearly basis 18 to determine if all conditions of this permit have been met and that the use does not have a substantial negative effect on surrounding properties or the public health and welfare. If 19 the Planning Director determines that the use has such substantial negative effects, the ,-« Planning Director shall recommend that the Planning Commission, after providing the permittee the opportunity to be heard, add additional conditions to reduce or eliminate the 21 substantial negative effects. 22 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of 5 years from June 15, 1999 through June 14,2004. This permit may be revoked at any time after a public hearing, if 3 it is found that the use has a substantial detrimental effect on surrounding land uses and 24 the public's health and welfare, or the conditions imposed herein have not been met. This permit may be extended for a reasonable period of time not to exceed 5 years upon 25 written application of the permittee made no less than 90 days prior to the expiration date. The Planning Commission may not grant such extension, unless it finds that there 26 are no substantial negative effects on surrounding land uses or the public's health and welfare. If a substantial negative effect on surrounding land uses or the public's health and welfare is found, the extension shall be denied or granted with conditions which will 28 eliminate or substantially reduce such effects. There is no limit to the number of extensions the Planning Commission may grant. PCRESONO.4983 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 IS 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 18th day of July 2001 by the following vote, to wit: AYES:Chairperson Segall, Commissioners Baker, Compas, Heineman, Nielsen, and Trigas NOES: ABSENT: Commissioner L'Heureux ABSTAIN: SEGALL, Jgnairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: MICHAEL J. Planning Director PCRESONO.4983 -3- 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3784 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN 3 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87-07 TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL ANTENNAE ON AN EXISTING4 TOWER ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF - SUNNY CREEK ROAD BETWEEN SEQUOIA CREST AND SQUIRES DAM. 6 CASE NAME: SQUIRES DAM COMMUNICATIONS SITE CASE NO: CUP 87-07(B) 7 WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad 8 and referred to the Planning Commission; andy 10 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Conditional 11 Use Permit Amendment as provided by Chapter 21.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 12 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning 13 Commission did, on the 2nd day of August, 1995, hold a duly noticed public hearing to 14 consider said application on property described as: 15 Portion of Lot C of Rancho Agua Hedionda in the City of 16 Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according 17 to Map No. 823 filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego, November 16, 1896. 18 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony 19 and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all 21 factors relating to CUP 87-07(B). 22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning 23 Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 24 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 25 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission 26 APPROVES CUP 87-07(B), based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: 28 1 Findings:2 1. The Planning Director has found that, based on the EIA Part-II, this Subsequent Project was described in the MEIR 93-01 as within its scope; AND there will be no 4 additional significant effect, not analyzed therein; AND that no new or additional mitigation measures or alternatives are required; AND that therefore this Subsequent 5 Project is within the scope of the prior EIR, and no new environmental document nor Public Resources Code 21081 findings are required.6 7 2. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in conformance with the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan, based on the 8 following: 9 a. The City has previously determined, through the approval of CUP 87-07, that the presence of the communications tower and related structures is consistent with the General Plan. The provision of additional antennae on this existing 11 tower will continue to be consistent with the originally approved use. 12 3. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the applicable local facilities management plan, and all City public facility policies and ordinances since: 14 a. All necessary public improvements have been provided or are required as 15 conditions of approval. 1® 4. That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community in that there has been a dramatic increase in the demand for cellular telephones; is essentially in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the 18 General Plan in that the General Plan and zoning allows the location of radio and television antennae towers in the OS designation and zone; and is not detrimental 19 to existing uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the use is located, in that the tower is an existing use and the addition of more antennae will remain 20 compatible with surrounding uses. 21 5. That the site for the use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, in 22 that the requested addition of more antennae to the existing tower will require no additional area. 23 6. That all the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood has been 25 provided and will be maintained, in that the tower and related structures are enclosed in a chain link fence which will continue to be maintained. No additional 26 features will be required by the addition of more antennae. 27 7. That the street system serving the use is adequate to properly handle all traffic 2g generated by the use, in that the only street system required is the existing access PC RESO 3784 1 road to the site, and this road will continue to be maintained. No traffic is generated by the existing use, and no traffic will be generated by the addition of 2 more antennae. 3 Conditions; 4 1. The conditions of approval contained herein supersede those contained in Planning 5 Commission Resolution No. 3334 dated February 19,1992. 2. The Planning Commission does hereby approve the Conditional Use Permit 7 Amendment for the additional antennae project entitled "Squires Dam Communications Site", dated August 2, 1995, (Exhibits "A" - "B") on file in the 8 Planning Department and incorporated by this reference), subject to the conditions herein set forth. Staff is authorized and directed to make or require the Developer 9 to make all corrections and modifications to the documents, as necessary to make I o them internally consistent and conform to Planning Commission's final action on the Project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. I1 Any proposed development substantially different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. 12 13 3. If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so 14 implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny or further condition issuance 15 of all future building permits, deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages 17 for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Resolution. 18 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted until June 15, 1999, to coincide with.the expiration of the lease. This Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed by the 2Q Planning Director on a yearly basis to determine if all conditions of this permit have been met and that the use does not have a substantial negative effect on surrounding 21 properties or the public health and welfare. If the Planning Director determines that the use has such substantial negative effects, the Planning Director shall recommend 22 that the Planning Commission, after providing the permittee the opportunity to be heard, add additional conditions to reduce or eliminate the substantial negative effects. This permit may be revoked at any time after a public hearing, if it is found 24 that the use has a substantial detrimental effect on surrounding land uses and the public's health and welfare, or the conditions imposed herein have not been met. 25 This permit may be extended for a reasonable period of time not to exceed five (5) years upon written application of the permittee made no less than 90 days prior to the expiration date. The Planning Commission may not grant such extension, unless 27 it finds that there are no substantial negative effects on surrounding land uses or the public's health and welfare. If a substantial negative effect on surrounding land uses 28 PC RESO 3784 3 1 or the public's health and welfare is found, the extension shall be denied or granted with conditions which will eliminate or substantially reduce such effects. There is no 2 limit to the number of extensions the Planning Commission may grant. 3 5. The Developer shall report, in writing, to the Planning Director within 30 days, any 4 address change from that which is shown on the conditional use permit application. 5 6. No outdoor storage of material shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire Chief. In such instance a storage plan will be submitted for approval by the Fire Chief and the Planning Director. 7. The applicant shall maintain a six-foot high chain link fence around the site 8 perimeter. 9 8. The applicant shall maintain a beacon light at the top of the tower as required by the FAA and the FCC. 11 9. No signs or signage/logos of any kind are allowed on the site, or on the support tower, or on any of the existing or proposed antennae. 12 10. The maximum number of antennae allowed on this tower shall be fifty-six (56) and shall consist of a maximum of 30 directional (panel) antennae, a maximum of 6 14 omni-directional (whip) antennae, and a maximum of 20 digital (dish) antennae. These dishes may have varying locations on the tower as needed to perform their 15 functions. However, the dish antennae may be placed on the tower at a height no lower than 55 feet on centerline from the ground. No antennae beyond this number 16 are allowed without a CUP amendment. 11. All maintenance of the site is to be performed during daylight hours only, except in 18 the case of an emergency. 19 Code Reminders: 20 This Project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not 21 limited to, the following code requirements: 22 12. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of 23 building permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provide herein. 24 25 26 27 OQ PC RESO 3784 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 2nd day of August, 1995, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Welshons; Commissioners Nielsen and Savary. NOES: Commissioners Erwin and Monroy. ABSENT: Commissioner Noble. ABSTAIN: Commissioner Compas. U/MMkA^ KIM WELSHONS, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: 1ICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER PLANNING DIRECTOR PC RESO 3784 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3334 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2 24 25 26 27 58 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW RETENTION OF TWO DISHES AND NINE ADDITIONAL ANTENNA DISHES TO BE PLACED ON AN EXISTING 150 FOOT TOWER TO GIVE A TOTAL OF ELEVEN ANTENNA DISHES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SQUIRES DAM AT THE END OF SUNNY CREEK ROAD. CASE NAME: SQUIRES DAM COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY CASE NO: CUP 87-7fAl WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning Commission did, on the 19th day of February, 1992, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider said application on property described as: A portion of Lot "C" of Rancho Agua Hedionda, according to Map No. 823 as filed in the office of the County Recorder, County of San Diego, State of California, on November 16, 1896. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to CUP 87-7(A). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission APPROVES CUP 87-7(A), based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findins: 1 1. That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the 2 community, is essentially in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the general plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located because the 4 existing 150 foot high tower with two existing antenna dishes provide an important public utility and the nine additional antenna dishes will help to further 5 strengthen a link in the region-wide cellular communications system; 2. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate „ the use since the 150 foot high supported tower is already in place and this conditional use permit amendment involves adding nine antenna dishes and 8 allowing for their relocation as needed; 3. That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood will be provided and maintained; all features required by CUP 87-7 have been adequately provided and maintained and are adequate for this CUP amendment proposal to add nine additional antenna dishes; in addition, the 12 applicant, after public discussion, had agreed to revise the landscape plan to remove the existing eucalyptus trees and replace them with another tree/plant type; 14 4. That the unpaved access road servicing the antenna tower and equipment storage 15 building is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use. 16 5. All conditions of approvals of CUP 87-7 nave teen found to be adequate and have been incorporated into this resolution so that this resolution contains all the findings and conditions of approval for this communications facility use. 18 6. Staff has inspected this use per the conditions of approval of CUP 87-7 and has 19 found the project to be in compliance with them. Staff has no documented complaints from this use. The proposal to add nine antenna dishes is in 20 conformance with the purpose and approval of CUP 87-7. 7. The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate 22 condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available 23 concurrent with need as required by the General Plan. P4.8. This project is consistent with the City's Growth Management Ordinance as it has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of tke Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15. 26 9. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, 27 or new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan or prepared pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project. 10, This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on January 9, 1992, and approved by the Planning Commission on February 19, 1992. In approving this Negative Declaration the Planning Commission has considered the initial study, the staff analysis, all required mitigation measures and any written comments received regarding the significant effects this project could have on the environment. Conditions: Q 1. Approval is granted for CUP 87-7(A), as shown on Exhibit(s) "A"-"C", dated 9 February 19, 1992, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise 10 noted in these conditions. 2. The conditions of Planning Commission Resolution 2680 for CUP 87-7, dated -. 2 September 16, 1987, on file in the Planning Department are not incorporated herein by reference. The conditions applicable to the project are only those listed 13 in the Planning Commission Resolutions of approval for CUP 87-7(A). 14 3. The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24" x 36", mylar copy of the Site Plan as approved by the Planning Commission. The Site Plan shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The Plan copy shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to building, grading or improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first. 17 4. This project is also approved under the express condition that the applicant pay the public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 and as _ Q amended from time to time, and any development fees established by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other 20 ordinance adopted to implement a growth management system or facilities and improvement plan and to fulfill the subdivided agreement to pay the public 21 facilities fee dated May 20, 1987, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk and is incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not paid this application will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project will be void. 23 5. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation required by the Zone 24 15 Local Facilities Management Plan approved by the City Council on April 10, 1990, incorporated herein and on file in the Planning Department and any future 25 amendments to the Plan made prior to the issuance of building permits. 26 PC RESO NO. 3334 -3- 27 28 6. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law 2 on this project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 65913.5. If any such condition is determined to be 3 invalid this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. 5 7. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of 6 building permit issuance. 8. This conditional use permit is granted for a period of five years. This conditional _ use permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Director on a yearly basis to determine if all conditions of this permit have been met and that the use does not 9 have a significant detrimental impact on surrounding properties or the public health and welfare. If the Planning Director determines that the use has such 10 significant adverse impacts, the Planning Director shall recommend that the Planning Commission, after providing the permittee the opportunity to be heard,11 add additional conditions to mitigate the significant adverse impacts. This permit , g may be revoked at any time after a public hearing, if it is found that the use has a significant detrimental affect on surrounding land uses and the public's health 13 and welfare, or the conditions imposed herein have not been met. This permit may be extended for a reasonable period of time not to exceed five years upon 14 written application of the permittee made no less than 90 days prior to the expiration date. In granting such extension, the Planning Commission shall find that no substantial adverse affect on surrounding land uses or the public's health •i g and welfare will result because of the continuation of the permitted use. If a substantial adverse affect on surrounding land uses or the public's health and 17 welfare is found, the extension shall be considered as an original application for a conditional use permit. There is no limit to the number of extensions the 18 Planning Commission may grant. 19 9. If the property owner/owners' address changes from that which is shown on the 20 conditional use permit application, a notice of a change of address shall be reported, in writing, to the Planning Department within 30 days. 21 10. No outdoor storage of material shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire Chief, in such instance a storage plan will be submitted for approval by the Fire Chief and the Planning Director. 24 11. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 25 26 PC RESO NO. 3334 -4- 27 28 12. The applicant shall maintain a six foot high chain linked fence around the site perimeter as shown on Exhibit "A". 13. The applicant shall maintain a beacon light at the top of the tower as required by the FAA and FCC. 14. The applicant shall submit proof of FAA clearance prior to issuance of any building permits for antenna dish installations. 15. The site currently contains a 150 foot high antenna tower and an equipment shelter as approved by CUP 87-7. This CUP Amendment specifically allows for: a water tank and generator with an enclosure as shown on Exhibits "A" and "B" and; the placement of up to nine additional antenna dishes. A maximum of eleven dishes are permitted by this CUP Amendment with the existing or proposed dish diameters as shown on Exhibit "B". These dishes may have variable locations on the tower as needed to perform their function. Any impacts resulting from this allowance will cause this CUP to be brought forward to the Planning Commission for resolution. 16. No signs or signage/logos of any kind are allowed on the site, or the support „ 8 9 12 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 tower or on any of the existing or proposed antenna dishes. 17. A hold harmless agreement to the satisfaction of the City Attorney and Planning Director shall be submitted and approved prior to issuance of building permits. 18. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to replace the existing eucalyptus trees with another type of plant subject to the review and approval of the Planning Director. PC RESO NO. 3334 -5- 1 2 5 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of February, 1992, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: Chairman Erwin, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm, Holmes, Savary, Noble & Hall. None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. ATTEST: MICHAEL J. HOTZMILEER PLANNING DIRECTOR PC RESO NO. 3334 /&V/V. TOM ERWIN, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION -6- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 231 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2680 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A 150 FOOT TELECOMMUNICATIONS ANTENNA TOWER AND A 4-84- SQUARE FOOT EQUIPMENT STORAGE BUILDING ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH OF SIDE OF SQUIRE'S DAM AT THE END OF SUNNYCREEK ROAD. APPLICANT: PACTEL (KEARNY MESA) CASE NO; CUP 87-7 WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning Commission did, on the 16th day of September, 1987, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider said application on property described as: A portion of Lot "C" of Rancho Agua Hedionda, County of San Diego, State of California, Map No. 823 filed in the Office of the County Recorder November 16, 1896. WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering a'll testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to CUP 87- 7. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: (A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. (B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission APPROVES CUP 87-7, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: findings; 1 . The antenna tower and equipment storage building are a necessary feature in the development of the community. They _ are essentially in harmony with the elements and objectives of the General Plan and, as proposed or conditioned, will not be 2 detrimental to existing or specifically permitted land uses in the R-A-10 zone. jr 2. The 5,625 square foot lot is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the A-8A- square foot equipment building and the antenna tower with a base of 23 feet by 23 feet by 23 feet. 3. The unpaved road servicing the antenna tower and equipment storage building is adequate to handle the traffic generated by the project. 7 All necessary design features such as fences, setbacks, and Q landscaping are provided for as conditions of approval. Sufficient landscaping has been provided as an adequate buffer zone between the proposed project and the surrounding neighborhood. The project is consistent with all City public facilities and ordinances since the applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available concurrent with need as required by the General Plan. 14 6. This project is consistent with the City's Growth Management 15 Ordinance as it has been conditioned to comply with any requirements approved as part of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 15. 17 1. The project will not cause any significant environmental impacts, an.d a Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on August 12, 1987, and approved by the Planning Commission on September 16, 1987. 19 8. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in 2Q public facility fee, or new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional requirements 21 established by a local facilities management plan adopted by the City of Carlsbad. This will ensure continued availability 22 °f public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project 23 Conditions 24 Approval is granted for CUP 87-7 as shown on Exhibits "A" 25 through "E", dated May 14, 1987, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development shall 25 occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions. 27 PC RESO NO. 2680 -2- 28 , 2. This project is also approved under the express condition that the applicant pay the public facilities fee adopted by the 2 City Council on Culy 28, 1987, and any development fees established by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of 2 the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordinance adopted to implement a growth management system or facilities and * improvement plan and to fulfill the subdivider's agreement to pay the public facilities fee dated Duly 28, 1987, and the e agreement to pay the Growth Management Fee dated May 20, 1987, copies of which are on file with the City Clerk and are g incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not paid this application will not be consistent with the General Plan and tj approval for this project shall be void. o 3. The land use requested in application CUP 87-7 and approved by Resolution No. 2680 is a 150 foot antenna tower and a 4-84- square foot equipment storage building. b. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date of project approval. 5. The applicant shall prepare a 2V x 36" reproducible mylar of the final site plan incorporating the conditions contained 13 herein. Said site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. 15 6. This conditional use permit is granted for a period of five years. This conditional use permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Director on a yearly basis to determine if all conditions of this permit have been met and that the use does not have a significant detrimental impact on surrounding properties or the public health and welfare. If the Planning Director determines that the use has such significant adverse impacts, the Planning Director shall recommend that the Planning Commission, after providing the permittee the opportunity to be heard, add additional conditions to mitigate 20 tne significant adverse impacts. This permit may be revoked at any time after a public hearing, if it is found that the 21 use has a significant detrimental affect on surrounding land uses and the public's health and welfare, or the conditions 22 imposed herein have not been met. This permit may be extended for a reasonable period of time not to exceed five years upon 23 written application of the permittee made not less than 90 days prior to the expiration date. In granting such 24 extension, the Planning Commission shall find that no substantial adverse affect on surrounding land uses or the 25 public's health and welfare will result because of the continuation of the permitted use. If a substantial adverse 25 affect on surrounding land uses or the public's health and welfare is found, the extension shall be considered as an 27 | original application for a conditional use permit. There is no limit to the number of-extensions the Planning Commission 2g may grant. PC RESO NO. 2680 -3- 7. The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irriga- tion plan which shall be submitted to and approved by the 2 Planning Director prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, whichever occurs first. 3 8. The applicant will provide for a six-foot chainlinked fence 4 surrounding the project. 5 9. No outdoor storage of material shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire Chief. In such instance a storage plan Q will be submitted for approval by the Fire Chief and the Planning Director. 7 10. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation 8 required by Zone 15 Local Facilities Management Plan and any future amendments made prior to the issuance of building g permits 10 11. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance. 12 12. The applicant shall provide a beacon light at the top of the tower as required by the FAA and FCC. 13 13. The applicant shall submit proof of FAA clearance prior to 14 issuance of building permits 15 14-. The maximum number of micro-wave dishes added to the tower shall be four. Any additional units will necessitate an 16 amendment to this conditional use permit. 17 18 19 //// 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PC RESO NO. 2680 -4- 1 2 5 4 5! 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 16th day of September, 1987, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairman Marcus, Commissioners Hall, Schramm and Holmes. NOES: Commissioners McFadden and McBane. ABSENT: Commissioner Schlehuber. ABSTAIN: None. MARY M CARLSB US, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: MICHAEL 0. HOLmiLLE<£ PLANNING DIRECTOR PC RESO NO. 2680 -5- City of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. 2. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person ff££L Title PePfig5gNiT\An\££ Address I 55D5 Corp/Part Title Address OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) f~x ^ Corp/PartPerson Title Address /ZffV Title (bV 'Address 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust Title Title Address Address 4.Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? Yes NNo If yes,please indicate person(s): NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of owner/date Sig if applicant/date T T Prir/t or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 12/06 Page 2 of 2 Verizon Wireless 15505 Sand Canyon Avenue Building D-l Irvine, California 92618-3114 (949) 286-7000 February 12, 2007 In Reference To: The Planning Consortium, Inc., and its employees as agents and representatives for Verizon Wireless To Whom It May Concern: The Planning Consortium, Inc., and its employees, is an authorized agent and representative of Verizon Wireless and has been contracted to design Verizon Wireless telecommunication facilities, perform real estate leasing, and obtain land use entitlements and other permits. As an authorized agent and representative of Verizon Wireless, The Planning Consortium, Inc. may sign, submit and review land use applications and other discretionary and ministerial permits, as well negotiate leases and accept conditions of approval on our behalf. If there are any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, ""~~ Leslie Vartanian Site Development Manager Verizon Wireless 15505 Sand Canyon Avenue Irvine, California 92618 (949) 286-8623 BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO:CUP 09-04 CASE NAME: SQUIRES DAM COMMUNICATION SITE APPLICANT: Daly International REQUEST AND LOCATION: To allow the continued operation of an unmanned Wireless Communication Facility located on a 150 foot tall lattice tower located north of Squires Dam. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of Lot C of Rancho Agua Hedionda in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map No. 823 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego, November 16, 1896. APN: 169-500-05 & 169-230-02 Acres: N/A Proposed No. of Lots/Units: N/A GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Existing Land Use Designation: OS Proposed Land Use Designation: N/A Density Allowed: N/A Density Proposed: N/A Existing Zone: OS Proposed Zone: N/A Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: Zoning General Plan Current Land Use Site North South East West Open Space Open Space Open Space City of Vista Open Space Open Space Open Space Squires Dam Residential Open Space Wireless Communication Facility Vacant Water Reservoir Residential Agriculture LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Coastal Zone: | | Yes [X] No Local Coastal Program Segment: N/A Within Appeal Jurisdiction: I I Yes 1X1 No Coastal Development Permit: I I Yes IX! No Local Coastal Program Amendment: I I Yes 1X1 No Existing LCP Land Use Designation: N/A Proposed LCP Land Use Designation: N/A Existing LCP Zone: N/A Proposed LCP Zone: N/A Revised 01/06 PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: Carlsbad Unified Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): N/A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT IXI Categorical Exemption, Section 15301, "Existing Facilities" I | Negative Declaration, issued N/A I | Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated N/A D Other, N/A Revised 01/06 To: City of Carlsbad Planning Commission Carlsbad City Council Members City of Vista residents living adjacent to the Squires Dam property Public Hearing Attendees FROM: Carole McCallum (home owner of one of the adjacent homes) ~? CO" c^- ' ' ~{J* &~*? 1611-AS.Melrose304;Vista,CA 92081 Re: Public Hearing re: Squires Dam Communication Site Scheduled for: C- Wednesday 1 7/Jun/09 As a long-time resident of one of the Vista home adjacent to the Squires Dam property I have been regularly been adversely affected by and on occasion felt that my safety and the safety of my family and neighbors has been jeopardized by activates associated with the Wireless Communication Facility located on the Squires Dam property. I respectfully request the Planning Commission NOT renew the conditional use permit unless adequate mitigation is taken to address the three issues listed below. I would be happy to work with Commission members and representatives of the Wireless communication company to reach agreement regarding mitigation of these issues. Safety and quality of life risks resulting from the ongoing presence of the Wireless Communication Facility on the Squires Dam property ISSUE 1. 2. 3. Equipment in the facility building makes very loud humming noises on a cyclical basis throughout the day and night. The maximum volume of the noise has increased over the years and can disrupt sleep during the night. Wireless company employees and/or contractors work at the facility after business hours, often after midnight or throughout the night. On these occasions they disrupt sleep and create anxiety. On some occasions these workers have brought dogs on site, played loud music and otherwise disrupted the peace. On at least one occasion law enforcement was called and had a threatening encounter with these workers. The tower is an "attractive nuisance" which draws youths who engage in risky behavior including underage drinking, PROPOSED MITIGATION Wireless company to add noise insulation or take other engineering steps to reduce maximum noise level. Designate the facility as a day time only service facility. Wireless company to provide company and law enforcement contact info to neighbors to facilitate reporting of trespass and/or after hours service. Wireless company to educate local law enforcement and neighbors on protocol for reporting disturbances. Wireless company and law enforcement contact info to neighbors to facilitate reporting of trespass and/or after hours service. June 17, 2009 Planning Commission City of Carlsbad * RE: Item #2 on the Agenda for June 17, 2009, CUP 09-04 Squires Dam Communication Site My name is Ron Kemp and I live at 2089 Sequoia Crest, Vista, California. I received a Notice of Public Hearing for this item tonight because I live within 600 feet of the site. I would like to present the following comments for your consideration at the Public Hearing tonight. • I take issue with Finding Number 5, that the proposed Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) is consistent with City Council Policy 64. The finding is inherently inconsistent as it states that the WCF is consistent with the policy and then goes on to say that at the time the original CUP was approved Council Policy 64 had not been adopted. The implication being that it should not apply to the existing use. However, the old CUP expired in 2004. This is a NEW application and not a renewal of the old CUP; therefore I believe the Commission can apply this Policy. • Council Policy 64 requires among other things, that the applicant submit Color photo- simulation exhibits, prepared to scale, of the proposed WCF to show what the project would look like at its proposed location and from surrounding viewpoints. This is not needed at the Planning Director discretion, but it would be very helpful for the Planning Commission to see what the visual impact of this tower is on the neighborhood. • In considering a Conditional Use Permit for a WCF, the Planning Commission should consider the following factors: a. Compliance with these guidelines (Council Policy 64) b. Height and setbacks. c. Proximity to residential uses. d. The nature of uses on adjacent and nearby property. e. Surrounding topography and landscaping. f. Quality and compatibility of design and screening. g. Impacts on public views and the visual quality of the surrounding area, h. Availability of other facilities and buildings for collocation I do not believe the Staff Report and the Findings demonstrate that all these factors were analyzed. The height limit for buildings in this zone is 25 feet. There is no discussion of why a ISO foot tower is appropriate. The structure is supposed to be setback at least the height of the tower from any residential zone. It is not and there is no discussion of this requirement. The policy states: "no WCF should be installed on an exposed ridgeline or in a location readily visible from a public place, recreation area, scenic area or residential area unless it is satisfactorily located and/or screened so it is hidden or disguised." It is all of these things. When the CUP permitting process was updated in 2006, the staff report to the Planning Commission recommended that CUPs for WCF continue to be approved for a limited period of time. This was based on Policy 64 and the strong promotion of the use of stealth design techniques and to provide the City the opportunity to ensure that all older WCFs are updated to the latest stealth design. Other than an assertion in the staff report that the applicant has stated that there is no existing technology that can replace this WCF, there is no other evidence of whether or not this is true. I have lived in the neighborhood for five years and have not experienced any winds there that are stronger than any other area locally. There should be more in keeping with the Policy and the stated aims of the City. * Lastly, it appears that the Disclosure Statement is deficient. The owner information is blank, but it is signed off by Cynthia Haas of the City of Carlsbad. I may be mistaken, but I believe the property is owned by the Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD) since it is on the Squires Dam site. The authorized signature for CMWD may be necessary for this application. Thank you for considering my comments. Ron Kemp 2089 Sequoia Crest Vista, CA 92081 •HI Davis Wright L!! TremaineLLp Suite 800 505 Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA 94111-6533 Suzanne Toller 415.276.6536 tel 415.276.4836 fax suzannetoller@dwt.com September 30,2009 Via Overnight Delivery Chris Sexton City Planner City of Carlsbad Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 Re: CUP Application 09-04 - Squires Dam WCF Dear Ms. Sexton: You have asked us to provide you with certain additional information and documentation with respect to Verizon Wireless's application for Conditional Use Permit 09-04 for its existing Squires Dam site,1 including information that is responsive to concerns raised about the site in letters submitted by two City of Vista residents living near the site.2 More specifically, this letter and accompanying exhibits contain the following: (1) a description of how Squires Dam complies with nearly all of Policy 64's permissive guidelines; (2) studies establishing that the site is in compliance with other applicable federal and local laws, regulations and ordinances; and (3) steps Verizon Wireless is willing to take to address neighbors' concerns. BACKGROUND Verizon Wireless leases certain space in Carlsbad, California from the Carlsbad Municipal Water District. Verizon Wireless owns and operates a wireless communications facility ("Squires Dam WCF") on the lease area. Squires Dam WCF includes a lattice tower, which is 150 feet tall and contains 9 digital dish ant'ennas, 4 omni-directional antennas, and 27 panel antennas. The site also includes a 484 square foot equipment building, an emergency generator, and an 80 square foot enclosure to house a water tank. These facilities are located in a fenced enclosure near Maerkle Reservoir, which is zoned as Open Space Zone. 1 Additional information, particularly with regard to Policy 64 compliance, was submitted to the Planning Staff in letters from Daly International dated September 30, 2008 and May 6, 2009. 2 See Letter from Carol McCallum and June 17, 2009 Letter from Ron Kemp. DWT 13404525vl 0052051-012724 Anchorage Bellevue Los Angeles New York Portland San Francisco Seattle Shanghai Washington. D.C. www.dwt.com Chris Sexton September 30, 2009 Page 2 The operation of the Squires Dam WCF was originally approved by the City of Carlsbad in 1987 (CUP 87-7), and was extended three times: CUP 87-7 was approved in 1992; CUP 87-7(B) was approved in 1995; CUP 87-07(B)x2 issued in 2001 (that CUP has now expired). A new CUP application, CUP 09-04, was filed in 2009 for the continued operation of Squires Dam WCF. The matter came for hearing before the Carlsbad Planning Commission on June 17,2009, with a recommendation of approval from staff. However, the matter was continued at the request of staff, so that additional documentation could be obtained. The application is now scheduled to be heard by the Planning Commission at its November 18, 2009 meeting. SUMMARY • Squires Dam WCF complies with nearly all of Policy 64's permissive guidelines. In the instances in which Squires Dam WCF does not meet Policy 64's recommendations, there are compelling justifications for the Planning Commission to exercise its discretion in approving the CUP. • Noise, RF / EME and wind load studies all establish that Squires Dam WCF is in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations and ordinances, as well as Policy 64's guidelines, where applicable. • Verizon Wireless is willing to work with neighbors to address neighbors' concerns. ANALYSIS 1) Procedure for CUP Approval and Applicability of Policy 64 The City Council adopted Policy 64 on October 1, 2001. Policy 64 establishes review and operation guidelines for WCFs but significantly, Policy 64 is just that - a policy, and not a legally binding ordinance or law. This fact is reflected not only in the name of the document but in the type of language used throughout; the criteria in the Policy 64 is almost entirely couched in permissive "should" terms rather than mandatory "must" terms. In particular, Policy 64's discussion around stealth design and setbacks are presented in permissive terms. In other words, most of the WCF criteria provided in Policy 64 are recommendations and not requirements. The non-mandatory nature of Policy 64 is further reflected in the Carlsbad Municipal Code - specifically Section 21.42.140(B)(165), which sets forth the process for obtaining a conditional use permit for a wireless communication facility. Specifically, Section 21.42.140(B)(165) establishes two processes for obtaining a permit for a WCF: one for a site that complies with Policy 64, and a second one for a site that does not comply with Policy 64. DWT 13404525v 1 0052051-012724 Chris Sexton September 30, 2009 Page 3 WCF applications that are consistent with the preferred location and the stealth design review and approval guidelines of Policy 64 can be processed as a minor CUP. WCF applications that do not comply with the preferred location and the stealth design review and approval guidelines of Policy 64 must be processed as a CUP in accordance with "Process Two" as provided at Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.42.070(A)(2). Process Two requires that the CUP application come before the Planning Commission for approval at a properly noticed public hearing. At the hearing, the Planning Commission hears the matter, and may approve the CUP if, from the evidence presented at the hearing, all of the findings of fact in Section 21.42.030 are met. Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.42.030(A) provides a list of four findings of fact that must be established in order for a CUP to issue. These are: 1) that the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community; 2) that the requested use is not detrimental to existing or permitted uses; 3) that the site for the proposed use can accommodate the development features required by the planning commission to integrate the uses into the neighborhood; and (4) that the street system serving the proposed use is adequate. In short, CUPs for WCFs in Carlsbad are not required to comply with Policy 64 guidelines in order to be approved. The Planning Commission has the discretion to approve a CUP application even if some or all of the permissive Policy 64 guidelines are not met. This letter is intended to provide the Planning Commission and its staff with additional evidence and analysis demonstrating that Squires Dam WCF meets many, but not all, elements of the permissive Policy 64 guidelines. In the instances where Squires Dam does meet the guideline, the Planning Commission must make a series of fact findings described above. The proposed Planning Commission Resolution No. 6572 (CUP 09-04) includes each required finding of fact. This letter is intended to provide additional support for those findings of fact. 2) Physical Features of Squires Dam. A) Setback Issue/ Site Relocation The Squires Dam WCF tower is set back approximately 75 feet from the nearest residential property line. Policy 64 provides that WCFs that are located "next to a residential zone" should be set back from the "residential zone boundary" a minimum distance equal to the above-ground height of the antennae. This section of Policy 64 is discretionary, not mandatory, 3 it is relevant to note that, in fact, Squires Dam is set back much more than 150 feet from the nearest residential zone boundary in the City of Carlsbad. While the site is located approximately 75 feet from the nearest residential zone boundary in the City of Vista, it is located hundreds if not thousands of feet away from the nearest residential zone boundary in Carlsbad. DWT 13404525vl 0052051-012724 Chris Sexton September 30, 2009 Page 4 and this provision of Policy 64 explicitly gives the Planning Commission the discretion to decrease or increase the setback (Policy 64, Section B5(c)). As an initial matter, it does not make sense to apply this guideline to an existing facility. The Squires Dam WCF site was constructed in its current location before there were any set back guidelines. Requiring Verizon Wireless to move a site merely to comply with this non- mandatory guideline would be extremely difficult and costly, and would provide no significant benefit. There are a number of issues with moving the site. First, moving the tower back an additional 75 feet would take the tower outside of Verizon Wireless's existing leasehold area. Meeting the setback guideline would therefore require Verizon Wireless to either lease additional space, or negotiate a different lease. It is unclear if additional space meeting the setback guideline is currently available for lease, and how much additional expense the new land and lease would cause Verizon Wireless to incur. Further, even if Verizon Wireless could secure additional/different lease space, the WCF could not be moved without great expense. Verizon Wireless engineers estimate that it would cost at least $750,000 (three quarters of a million dollars) to move the tower to any other location. This would be an extraordinary expense for Verizon Wireless to incur so as to comply with a discretionary guideline. Moreover, the relocation of the tower back an additional 75 feet would have little benefit in hiding the tower. At 150 feet tall, the tower would still be visible even if it were set back. Finally, to the extent that the purpose of the set back guideline is safety related, there should be no concern abut the stability of the tower. The tower is a three sided lattice type construction. As our wind-load study demonstrates, the tower is structurally sound given the amount of wind in the area. Moreover, the tower has been in place for 20 years without issue. « B) Height of Tower. Policy 64 states that a WCF "should adhere to the existing height limitations" of the zone in which it is located (Policy 64, Section B4). Squires Dam is located in an Open Space Zone. Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.33.060 provides that buildings or structures in Open Space Zones shall not exceed 25 feet in height "unless a higher elevation is approved by a conditional use permit issued by the planning commission." The Planning Commission has approved the height of this tower four times - in the original 1987 CUP and three extensions thereto. For the reasons provided below, the Planning Commission should approve the continued operation of the 150 foot tower, as it has in prior CUPs for this site, because the tower cannot operate at a lower height and maintain substantially similar wireless coverage and microwave interconnection. DWT 13404525vl 0052051-012724 Chris Sexton September 30, 2009 Page 5 (i) Radio (Wireless) Coverage The tower must be 150 feet in order to provide the current level of radio (wireless) coverage. Today, the site provides service to residents and persons traveling through the cities of Carlsbad and Vista. The site's coverage area includes numerous residences in Carlsbad and Vista, as well as commercial areas including the Melrose Plaza shopping mall, and recreational facilities including Ocean Hills Country Club and Shadowridge Golf Course. If the site were reduced in height to 25 feet, significant gaps in coverage would result. This, in turn, would result in substantial dissatisfaction among Verizon Wireless customers, and would jeopardize the public's safety by adversely impacting customers' ability to make 911 calls. Further, the creation of such gaps in coverage would also run afoul of Policy 64 and federal law, which requires that localities not "prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services."4 (ii) Microwave Interconnection The heights and sizes of the microwave antennas at Squires Dam cannot be reduced without severely impacting Verizon Wireless's system reliability in North San Diego County. Squires Dam WCF is a major microwave hub for Verizon Wireless; the site supports 9 microwave dishes that ultimately link to 20 other sites - all of which are interconnected to Verizon Wireless's switch through the Squires Dam connections to the Black Mountain and San Marcos sites. To put it plainly, these 20 sites - which serve thousands of customers - would not work without the microwave dishes located at the Squires Dam site. The loss of Squires Dam WCF would impact thousands of customers who rely on Squires Dam and the 20 interconnected sites for wireless communication and broadband data transmission at home, at work, and in transit. Moreover, the site needs to maintain its current height in order to support the microwave network. The microwave dishes range in height on the tower from a low of 60 feet to a high of 150. Lowering the height of the tower to 25 feet would make the site unworkable as a microwave hub, effectively "knocking out" each of the 20 sites linked to Squires Dam WCF. Microwave interconnection is vital to insure system availability in good conditions and bad, because microwave interconnect inherently more reliable than a landline interconnect. For example, in the recent San Diego County fires, Verizon Wireless was able to keep 99% of its system up by having a large microwave network. Other carriers lost many cell sites due to lease lines and/or fiber being damaged by the fire (which could take weeks or months to replace). 4 47 USC 332(c)(7); Policy 64, pg 3. DWT 13404525v 1 0052051-012724 Chris Sexton September 30, 2009 Page 6 Reducing the height and size of the tower would therefore pose substantial risks to public health and safety in the area. C) Tower Markings and Color. A question has been raised with regard to whether the tower could be re-painted a more neutral color, particularly since Policy 64 suggests that WCFs "should exhibit 'stealth' design techniques so they visually blend into the background" (Policy 64, Section Bl). However, Policy 64 Section BIO also states that "WCFs should comply with all FCC, FAA" and other requirements. In this case, the Squires Dam WCF has been painted, marked and lighted to meet FAA guidelines. More specifically, Verizon Wireless requested that the FAA conduct an aeronautical study for the Squires Dam site under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. Section 44718. The aeronautical study revealed that the structure does exceed obstruction standards, but would not be a hazard to air navigation provided that the structure continues to be marked and lighted to meet the FAA guidelines.5 The FAA guidelines require, in part, that towers be painted alternate bands of aviation orange and white.6 Therefore, the Squires Dam WCF cannot be painted to match the background without creating a hazard to aerial navigation. D) Panel Mounts. Policy 64 Section B8.b states that on existing lattice towers, antennas "should be mounted as close as possible to the tower" so they are less noticeable. Most of the antennas on the Squires Dam tower meet this guideline. All of the microwave dishes are flush mounted to the tower as are most of the panel antennas. Most of the panel antennas (15 total, 5 per side) are mounted directly onto the tower itself There are an additional 12 antennas (4 per side) that are mounted to a pipe that is directly attached to the tower. The pipe-mounted antennas "stick out" a bit more from the tower, but are configured in this manner for technical reasons (per Verizon Wireless engineers, they need to be spaced at least 2 feet apart to avoid interference.) The only antennas that extend any significant distance from the tower are the omni directional antennas. 5 See 7/12/06 FAA Notice of Determination, attached as Exhibit A. 6 Advisory Circular AC 70/7460-1K ("Advisory Circular") chapters 3, 4, 5 and 12 (see Exhibit B). In particular, Advisory Circular Chapter 3 describes marking guidelines to make certain structures conspicuous to pilots during daylight hours. Section 33d provides that "alternate bands of aviation orange and white are normally displayed on...communication towers and catenary support structures." (Advisory Circular, pg 5.) Color bands for structures between 10.5 and 700 feet should have a width of 1/7 of the structure's height (Advisory Circular, pg. 6). Advisory Circular Chapter 4 describes obstruction lighting systems used to identify structures that an aeronautical study determines require additional conspicuity. Section 42a recommends flashing beacons and/or steady burning lights during nighttime (Advisory Circular, pg. 9). Chapter 5 addresses the use of red obstruction lights to increase conspicuity during nighttime. Section 53 provides that structures of 150' or less should have two or more steady burning (L-810) lights (Advisory Circular, pg. 13). DWT 13404525vl 0052051-012724 Chris Sexton September 30, 2009 PageS 3) Verizon Wireless Has Taken Steps to Address Neighbors' Concerns. Two Vista residents have submitted letters to the Carlsbad Planning Commission expressing concerns about the Squires Dam WCF. One neighbor, Ron Kemp, largely expressed concerns about the site's compliance with Policy 64; his concerns are addressed in this letter. A second neighbor, Ms. McCallum raised concerns about the site's maintenance and security. Specifically, she expressed a desire for Verizon Wireless to designate the facility as a day-time only service facility, to increase signage and to educate neighbors about methods of reporting trespass at the site. The CUP already designates the site as a day-time service facility, and Verizon Wireless reaffirms its commitment to comply with this requirement. In addition, Verizon Wireless is in the process of adding additional signs to the site. Finally, Verizon Wireless welcomes all opportunities to work with residents and neighbors to help them understand the nature of wireless networks and to discuss safety issues including trespass. Verizon Wireless encourages neighbors, include Ms. McCallum, to contact Verizon Wireless's 24-hour call-in center to report any site issues at (800) 299-0826, Option #6, or (858) 467-2525. CONCLUSION Squires Dam WCF complies with nearly all of the Policy 64 guidelines. In the few instances in which Squires Dam WCF does not meet the guidelines, there are compelling reasons and evidence supporting the Commission's use of its discretion to approve the CUP application. In addition, noise, RF / EME and wind load studies all establish that Squires Dam WCF is in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations and ordinances, as well as Policy 64 's guidelines, where applicable. Finally, Verizon Wireless is willing to work with neighbors to address neighbors' and residents reasonable concerns about the site. Very truly yours, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP /Suzanne Toller/ Enclosures cc: Cathy Bardenstein, Verizon Wireless John Bitterly, Planning Consortium DWT 13404525v 1 0052051-012724 EXHIBIT A SQUIRES DAM FAA NOTICE OF DETERMINATION Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Airspace Branch, ASW-520 2601 Meacham Blvd. Fort Worth, TX 76137-0520 Issued Date: 07/12/2006 Aeronautical Study No. 2006-AWP-4322-OE Prior Study No. 2005-AWP-5917-OE Carl Manson Jr. Verizon Wireless LLC One Verizon Place (GA3B1REG) Alpharetta, GA 30004 ** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION ** The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under ... the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerning: Structure: Antenna - Side Mount Location: Squires Dam, CA Latitude: 33-9-13.10 N NAD 83 Longitude: 117-15-22.10 W Heights: 163 feet above ground level (AGL) 703 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure does exceed obstruction standards but would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s), if any, is(are) met: As a condition to this Determination, the structure should continue to be marked and/or lighted utilizing paint/red lights. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights, frequency(ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates, heights, and frequencies or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including .-increase to heights, power, or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc., which may be used during actual construction of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body. A copy of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal Communications Commission if the structure is subject to their licensing authority. This aeronautical study included evaluation of a 163 foot AGL structure that exists at this time. Actfion will be taken to ensure aeronautical charts are updated to reflect this existing height and the most current coordinates/ elevation as indicated in the above description. Page 1 If we can be of further assistance, please contact our office at (310)725-6557. On any future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 2006-AWP-4322-OE. •Signature Control No: 473375-477420 (EBO) Karen McDonald Specialist Attachment(s) Frequency Data Map cc: NACO w/map 05-1843 Page 2 Frequency Data for ASN 2006-AWP-4322-OE LOW FREQUENCY 806 824 851 869 896 901 930 931 932 935 940 1850 1930 2305 2345 10 HIGH FREQUENCY 824 849 866 894 901 902 931 932 932.5 940 941 1910 1990 2310 2360 12 FREQUENCY UNIT MHz MHz MHz MHz MHz MHz MHz MHz MHz MHz MHz MHz MHz MHz MHz GHz ERP 500 500 500 500 500 7 3500 3500 17 1000 3500 1640 1640 2000 2000 58.9 ERP UNIT W W W W W W W W dBW W W W W W W dBm Page 3 Map for ASN 2006-AWP-4322-OE . f ^/ "^-™ rsfl l'^//y Page 4 EXHIBIT B FAA ADVISORY CIRCULAR AC 70/7460-IK U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration ADVISORY CIRCULAR inr-aaoor(SUm-fTIm) 1*5l'-I75rf (*Z7«-U>i) UBI'-IWO1 {3ZQ«-427«0 AC 70/7460-1K -g. = L-S10 Obstruction Marking and Lighting B-2 B-3 B-4 8-5 B-6 Ituin ISOtt. (77m) Effective: 2/1/07 Initiated by: System Operations Services Subject: CHANGE 2 TO OBSTRUCTION Date: 2/1/07 AC No.: 70/7460-IK MARKING AND LIGHTING Initiated by: AJR-3 3 Change: 2 1. PURPOSE. This change amends the Federal Aviation Administration's standards for marking and lighting structures to promote aviation safety. The change number and date of the change material are located at the top of the page. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This change is effective February 1, 2007. 3. EXPLANATION OF CHANGES. a. Table of Contents. Change pages i through iii. b. Page 1. Paragraph 1. Reporting Requirements. Incorporated the word "Title" in reference to the 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR part 77). FAA Regional Air Traffic Division office to read Obstruction Evaluation service (OES). FAA website to read http://oeaaa.faa.gov. c. Page 1. Paragraph 4. Supplemental Notice Requirement (subpart b). FAA Regional Air Traffic Division office to read OES. d. Page 1. Paragraph 5. Modifications and Deviations (subpart a). FAA Regional Air Traffic Division office to read OES. e. Page 1. Paragraph 5. Modifications and Deviations (subpart c). FAA Regional office to read OES. f. Page 2. Paragraph 5. Modifications and Deviations (subpart d). Removed period to create one sentence. g. Page 2. Paragraph 7. Metric Units. And to read however. h. Page 3. Paragraph 23. Light Failure Notification (subpart b). Nearest to read appropriate. FAA's website to read web. Website www.faa.gov/ats/ata/ata400 to read http://www.afss.com. i. Page 4. Paragraph 24. Notification of Restoration. Removed AFSS. j. Page 5. Paragraph 32. Paint Standards. Removed a comma after "Since". k. Page 5. Paragraph 33. Paint Patterns (subpart d. Alternate Bands). Removed number 6. Number 7 to read number 6. 1. Page 9. Paragraph 41. Standards. TASC to read OTS. SVC-121.23 to read M-30. m. Page 14. Paragraph 55. Wind Turbine Structures. .Removed. The paragraph numbers that follow have been changed accordingly. n. Page 18. Paragraph 65. Wind Turbine Structures. Removed. The paragraph numbers that follow have been changed accordingly. o. Page 20. Paragraph 77. Radio and Television Towers and Similar Skeletal Structures. Excluding to read including. p. Page 23. Paragraph 85. Wind Turbine Structures. Removed. The paragraph number that follows has been changed accordingly. q. Page 33-34. Chapter 13. Marking and Lighting Wind Turbine Farms. Added. r. Page Al-3. Appendix 1. Verbiage removed under first structure. Nancy B. Kalinowski Director, System Operations Airspace and Aeronautical Information Management PAGE CONTROL CHART Remove Pages i through iii 1-5 9 14 18-34 Al-3 AC Dated 8/1/00 8/1/00 3/1/00 3/1/00 3/1/00 8/1/00 70/7460-1K CHG 2 Insert Pages i through iii 1-5 9 14 18-34 Al-3 Dated 1/1/07 1/1/07 1/1/07 1/1/07 • 1/1/07 1/1/07 2/1/07 AC70/7460-1KCHG2 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. ADMINISTRATIVE AND GENERAL PROCEDURES 1. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 1 2. PRECONSTRUCTION NOTICE 1 3. FAA ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 1 4. SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE REQUIREMENT 1 5. MODIFICATIONS AND DEVIATIONS 1 6. ADDITIONAL NOTIFICATION ..2 7. METRIC UNITS 2 CHAPTER 2. GENERAL 20. STRUCTURES TO BE MARKED AND LIGHTED .. 3 21. GUYED STRUCTURES..... 3 22. MARKING AND LIGHTING EQUIPMENT 3 23. LIGHT FAILURE NOTIFICATION 3 24. NOTIFICATION OF RESTORATION 4 25. FCC REQUIREMENT....: 4 CHAPTER 3. MARKING GUIDELINES 30. PURPOSE 5 31. PAINT COLORS 5 32. PAINT STANDARDS 5 33. PAINT PATTERNS ; 5 34. MARKERS : 6 35. UNUSUAL COMPLEXITIES 7 36. OMISSION OR ALTERNATIVES TO MARKING 7 CHAPTER 4. LIGHTING GUIDELINE 40. PURPOSE ..:.' 9 41. STANDARDS : 9 42. LIGHTING SYSTEMS.. :... 9 43. CATENARY LIGHTING 10 44. INSPECTION, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE 10 45. NONSTANDARD LIGHTS ; 10 46. PLACEMENT FACTORS :.. 10 47. MONITORING OBSTRUCTION LIGHTS : 11 48. ICE SHIELDS 11 49. DISTRACTION 11 CHAPTER 5. RED OBSTRUCTION LIGHT SYSTEM .50. PURPOSE 13 51. STANDARDS 13 52. CONTROL DEVICE 13 53. POLES, TOWERS, AND SIMILAR SKELETAL STRUCTURES 13 54. CHIMNEYS, FLARE STACKS, AND SIMILAR SOLID STRUCTURES 14 55. GROUP OF OBSTRUCTIONS 14 56. ALTERNATE METHOD OF DISPLAYING OBSTRUCTION LIGHTS 15 57. PROMINENT BUILDINGS, BRIDGES, AND SIMILAR EXTENSIVE OBSTRUCTIONS 15 Table of Contents AC 70/7460-1K CHG 2 2/1/07 CHAPTER 6. MEDIUM INTENSITY FLASHING WHITE OBSTRUCTION LIGHT SYSTEMS 60. PURPOSE 17 61. STANDARDS 17 62. RADIO AND TELEVISION TOWERS AND SIMILAR SKELETAL STRUCTURES 17 63. CONTROL DEVICE 17 64. CHIMNEYS, FLARE STACKS, AND SIMILAR SOLID STRUCTURES 18 65. GROUP OF OBSTRUCTIONS 18 66. SPECIAL CASES 18 67. PROMINENT BUILDINGS AND SIMILAR EXTENSIVE OBSTRUCTIONS , 18 CHAPTER 7. HIGH INTENSITY FLASHING WHITE OBSTRUCTION LIGHT SYSTEMS 70. PURPOSE „. .19 71. STANDARDS 19 72. CONTROL DEVICE 19 73. UNITS PER LEVEL , 19 74. INSTALLATION GUIDANCE 19 75. ANTENNA OR SIMILAR APPURTENANCE LIGHT , 20 76. CHIMNEYS, FLARE STACKS, AND SIMILAR SOLID STRUCTURES 20 77. RADIO AND TELEVISION TOWERS AND SIMILAR SKELETAL STRUCTURES 20 78. HYPERBOLIC COOLING TOWERS 20 79. PROMINENT BUILDINGS AND SIMILAR EXTENSIVE OBSTRUCTIONS 21 CHAPTER 8. DUAL LIGHTING WITH RED/MEDIUM INTENSITY FLASHING WHITE SYSTEMS 80. PURPOSE „ ! 23 81. LNSTALLATION .,.„.. 23 82. OPERATION •. 23 83. CONTROL DEVICE.. ..23 84. ANTENNA OR SIMILAR APPURTENANCE LIGHT 23 85. OMISSION OF MARKING 23 CHAPTER 9. DUAL LIGHTING WITH RED/HIGH INTENSITY FLASHING WHITE SYSTEMS 90. PURPOSE :. 25 91. INSTALLATION..... 25 92. OPERATION 25 93. CONTROL DEVICE 25 94. ANTENNA OR SIMILAR APPURTENANCE LIGHT 25 95. OMISSION OF MARKING 25 CHAPTER 10. MARKING AND LIGHTING OF CATENARY AND CATENARY SUPPORT STRUCTURES 100. PURPOSE '..:•- 27 101. CATENARY MARKING STANDARDS 27 102. CATENARY LIGHTING STANDARDS 27 103. CONTROL DEVICE 28 104. AREA SURROUNDING CATENARY SUPPORT STRUCTURES 28 105. THREE OR MORE CATENARY SUPPORT STRUCTURES 28 Table of Contents 2/1/07 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 2 CHAPTER 11. MARKING AND LIGHTING MOORED BALLOONS AND KITES 110. PURPOSE 29 111. STANDARDS 29 112. MARKING 29 113. PURPOSE 29 114. OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS 29 CHAPTER 12. MARKING AND LIGHTING EQUIPMENT AND INFORMATION 120. PURPOSE 31 121. PAINT STANDARD 31 122. AVAILABILITY OF SPECIFICATIONS.. 31 123. LIGHTS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT .31 124. AVAILABILITY 32 CHAPTER 13. MARKING AND LIGHTING WIND TURBINE FARMS 130. PURPOSE 33 131. GENERAL STANDARDS 33 132. WIND TURBINE CONFIGURATIONS 33 133. MARKING STANDARDS 33 134. LIGHTING STANDARDS 33 APPENDIX 1: SPECIFICATIONS FOR OBSTRUCTION LIGHTING EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION APPENDIX , Al-2 APPENDIX 2. MISCELLANEOUS 1. RATIONALE FOR OBSTRUCTION LIGHT INTENSITIES. , , A2-1 2. DISTANCE VERSUS INTENSITIES A2-1 3. CONCLUSION A2-1 4. DEFINITIONS A2-1 5. LIGHTING SYSTEM CONFIGURATION. A2-2 Table of Contents iii 2/1/07 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 2 CHAPTER 1. ADMINISTRATIVE AND GENERAL PROCEDURES 1. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS A sponsor proposing any type of construction or alteration of a structure that may affect the National Airspace System (NAS) is required under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR part 77) to notify the FAA by completing the Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration form (FAA Form 7460-1). The form should be sent to the Obstruction Evaluation service (OES). Copies of FAA Form 7460-1 may be obtained from OES, Airports District Office or FAA Website at http://oeaaa.faa.gov. 2. PRECONSTRUCTION NOTICE The notice must be submitted: a. At least 30 days prior to the date of proposed construction or alteration is to begin. b. On or before the date an application for a construction permit is filed with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). (The FCC advises its applicants to file with the FAA well in advance of the 30-day period in order to expedite FCC processing.) 3. FAA ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The FAA will acknowledge, in writing, receipt of each FAA Form 7460-1 notice received. 4. SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE REQUIREMENT a. If required, the FAA will include a FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, with a determination. b. FAA Form 7460-2 Part 1 is to be completed and sent to the FAA at least 48 hours prior to starting the actual construction or alteration of a structure. Additionally, Part 2 shall be submitted no later than 5 days after the structure has reached its greatest height. The form should be sent to the OES. c. In addition, supplemental notice shall be submitted upon abandonment of construction. d. Letters are acceptable in cases where the construction/alteration is temporary or a proposal is abandoned. This notification process is designed to permit the FAA the necessary time-to change affected procedures and/or minimum flight altitudes, and to otherwise alert airmen of the structure's presence. Note- NOTJFICATION AS REQUIRED IN THE DETERMINATION IS CRITICAL TO A VIA TION SAFETY. 5. MODIFICATIONS AND DEVIATIONS a. Requests for modification or deviation from the standards outlined in this AC must be submitted to the OES. The sponsor is responsible for adhering to | approved marking and/or lighting limitations, and/or recommendations given, and should notify the FAA and FCC (for those structures regulated by the FCC) prior to removal of marking and/or lighting. A request received after a determination is issued may require a new study and- could result in a new determination. b. Modifications. Modifications will be based on whether or not they impact aviation safety. Examples of modifications that may be considered: 1. Marking and/or Lighting Only a Portion of an Object The object may be so located with respect to other objects or terrain that only a portion of it needs to be marked or lighted. 2. No Marking and/or Lighting. The object may be so located with respect to other objects or terrain, removed from the general flow of air traffic, or may be so conspicuous by its shape, size, or color that marking or lighting would .serve no useful purpose. 3. Voluntary Marking and/or Lighting. The object may be so located with respect to other objects or terrain that the sponsor feels increased conspicuity would better serve aviation safety. Sponsors who desire to voluntarily mark and/or light their structure should request the proper marking and/or lighting from the FAA to ensure no aviation safety issues -are impacted. 4. Marking or Lighting an Object in Accordance with the Standards for an Object of Greater Height or Size. The object may present such an extraordinary hazard potential that higher standards may be recommended for increased conspicuity to ensure the safety to air navigation. c. Deviations. The OES conducts an aeronautical | study of the proposed deviation(s) and forwards its recommendation to FAA headquarters in Washington, DC, for final approval. Examples of deviations that may be considered: 1. Colors of objects. 2. Dimensions of color bands or rectangles. 3. Colors/types of lights. 4. Basic signals and intensity of lighting. Chapl AC 70/7460-1K CHG 2 2/1/07 5. Night/day lighting combinations. 6. Flash rate. d. The FAA strongly recommends that owners become familiar with the different types of lighting systems and to specifically request the type of lighting system desired when submitting FAA Form 7460-1. (This request should be noted in "item 2.D" of the FAA form.) Information on these systems can be found in Chapter 12, Table 4 of this AC. While the FAA will make every effort to accommodate the structure sponsor's request, sponsors should also request information from system manufacturers in order to determine which system best meets their needs based on purpose, installation, and maintenance costs. 6. ADDITIONAL NOTIFICATION Sponsors are reminded that any change to the submitted information on which the FAA has based its determination, including modification, deviation or optional upgrade to white lighting on structures which are regulated by the FCC, must also be filed with the FCC prior to making the change for proper authorization and annotations of obstruction marking and lighting. These structures will be ''subject to inspection and enforcement of marking and lighting requirements by the FCC. FCC Forms and Bulletins can be obtained from the FCC's National Call Center at 1-888-CALL-FCC (1-888-225-5322). Upon completion of the actual change, notify the Aeronautical Charting office at: NOAA/NOS Aeronautical Charting Division Station 5601, N/ACC113 1305 East-West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910-3233 7. METRIC UNITS To promote an orderly transition to metric units, sponsors should include both English and metric (SI units) dimensions. The metric conversions may not be exact equivalents, however, until there is an official changeover to the metric system, the English dimensions will govern. Chap 1 2/1/07 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 2 CHAPTER 2. GENERAL 20. STRUCTURES TO BE MARKED AND LIGHTED Any temporary or permanent structure, including all appurtenances, that exceeds an overall height of 200 feet (61m) above ground level (AGL) or exceeds any obstruction standard contained in 14 CFR part 77, should normally be marked and/or lighted. However, an FAA aeronautical study may reveal that the absence of marking and/or lighting will not impair aviation safety. Conversely, the object may present such an extraordinary hazard potential that higher standards may be recommended for increased conspicuity to ensure safety to air navigation. Normally outside commercial lighting is not considered sufficient reason to omit recommended marking and/or lighting. Recommendations on marking and/or lighting structures can vary depending on terrain features, weather patterns, geographic location, and in the case of wind turbines, number of structures and overall layout of design. The FAA may also recommend marking and/or lighting a structure that does not exceed 200 (61m) feet AGL or 14 CFR part 77 standards because of its particular location. 21. GUYED STRUCTURES The guys of a 2,000-foot (610m) skeletal tower are anchored from 1,600 feet (488m) to 2,000 feet (610m) from the base of the structure. This places a portion of the guys 1,500 feet (458m) from the tower at a height of between 125 feet (38m) to 500 feet (153m) AGL. 14 CFR part 91, section 119, requires pilots, when operating over other than congested areas, to remain at least 500 feet (153m) from man- made structures. Therefore, the tower must be cleared by 2,000 feet (610m) horizontally to avoid all guy wires. Properly maintained marking and lighting are important for increased conspicuity since the guys of a structure are difficult to see until aircraft are dangerously close. 22. MARKING AND LIGHTING EQUIPMENT Considerable effort and research have been expended in determining the minimum marking and lighting systems or quality of materials that will produce an acceptable level of safety to air navigation. The FAA will recommend the use of only those marking and lighting systems that meet established technical standards. While additional lights may be desirable to identify an obstruction to air navigation and may, on occasion be recommended, the FAA will recommend minimum standards in the interest of safety, economy, and related concerns. Therefore, to provide an adequate level of safety, obstruction lighting systems should be installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the recommended standards herein. 23. LIGHT FAILURE NOTIFICATION a. Sponsors should keep in mind that conspicuity is achieved only when all recommended lights are working. Partial equipment outages decrease the margin of safety. Any outage should be corrected as soon as possible. Failure of a steady burning side or intermediate light should be corrected as soon as possible, but notification is not required. b. Any failure or malfunction that lasts more than thirty (30) minutes and affects a top light or flashing obstruction light, regardless of its position, should be reported immediately to the appropriate flight service station (FSS) so a Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) can be issued. Toll-free numbers for FSS are listed in most telephone books or on the web at http://www.afss.com. This report should contain.the . following information: 1. Name of persons or organizations reporting light failures including any title, address, and telephone number. . 2. The type of structure. 3. Location of structure (including latitude and longitude, if known, prominent structures, landmarks, etc.). 4. Height of structure above ground level (AGL)/above mean sea level (AMSL), if known. 5. A return to service date. 6. FCC Antenna Registration Number (for structures that are regulated by the FCC). Nute- 1. When the primary lamp in a double obstruction light fails, and the secondary lamp comes on, no report is required. However, when one of the lamps in an incandescent L-864 flashing red beacon fails, it should be reported. 2. After 15 days, the NOTAM is automatically deleted from the system. The sponsor is responsible for calling the nearest FSS to extend the outage date or to report a return to service date. Chap 2 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 2 2/1/07 24. NOTIFICATION OF RESTORATION 25. FCC REQUIREMENT As soon as normal operation is restored, notify the FCC licensees are required to file an environmental same FSS that received the notification of failure. assessment with the Commission when seeking The FCC advises that noncompliance with authorization for the use of the high intensity flashing notification procedures could subject its sponsor to white lighting system on structures located in penalties or monetary forfeitures. ' residential neighborhoods, as defined by the applicable zoning law. Chap 2 2/1/07 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 2 CHAPTER 3. MARKING GUIDLINES 30. PURPOSE This chapter provides recommended guidelines to make certain structures conspicuous to pilots during daylight hours. One way of achieving this conspicuity is by painting and/or marking these structures. Recommendations on marking structures can vary depending on terrain features, weather patterns, geographic location, and in the case of wind turbines, number of structures and overall layout of design. 31. PAINT COLORS Alternate sections of aviation orange and white paint should be used as they provide maximum visibility of an obstruction by contrast in colors. 32. PAINT STANDARDS The following standards should be followed. To be effective, the paint used should meet specific color requirements when freshly applied to a structure. Since all outdoor paints deteriorate with time and it is not practical to give a maintenance schedule for all climates, surfaces should be repainted when the color changes noticeably or its effectiveness is reduced by scaling, oxidation, . chipping, or layers of contamination. a. Materials and Application. Quality paint and materials should be selected to provide extra years of service. The paint should be compatible with the surfaces to be painted, including any previous coatings, and suitable for the environmental conditions. Surface preparation and paint application should be in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. In-Service Aviation Orange Color Tolerance Charts are available from private suppliers for determining when repainting is required. The color should be sampled on the upper half of the structure, since weathering is greater there. b. Surfaces Not Requiring Paint. Ladders, decks, . and walkways of steel towers and similar structures need not be painted if a smooth surface presents a potential hazard to maintenance personnel. Paint may also be omitted from precision or critical surfaces if it would have an adverse effect on the transmission or radiation characteristics of a signal. However, the overall marking effect of the structure should not be reduced. c. Skeletal Structures. Complete all marking/painting prior to or immediately upon completion of construction. This applies to catenary support structures, radio and television towers, and similar skeletal structures. To be effective, paint should be applied to all inner and outer surfaces of the framework. 33. PAINT PATTERNS Paint patterns of various types are used to mark structures. The pattern to be used is determined by the size and shape of the structure. The following patterns are recommended. a. Solid Pattern. Obstacles should be colored aviation orange if the structure has both horizontal and vertical dimensions not exceeding 10.5 feet (3.2m). b. Checkerboard Pattern. Alternating rectangles of aviation orange and white are normally displayed on the following structures: 1. Water, gas, and gram storage tanks. 2. Buildings, as required. 3. Large structures exceeding 10.5 feet (3.2m) across having a horizontal dimension that is equal to or greater than the vertical dimension. c. Size of Patterns. . Sides of the checkerboard pattern should measure not less than 5 feet (1.5m) or more than 20 feet (6m) and should be as nearly square as possible. However,,'if it is impractical because of the size or shape of a structure, the patterns may have sides less than 5 feet (1.5m). When possible, corner surfaces should be colored orange. d. Alternate Bands. Alternate bands of aviation orange and white are normally displayed on the following structures: 1. Communication towers arid catenary support structures. 2. Poles. 3. Smokestacks. . 4. Skeletal framework of storage tanks and similar structures. 5. Structures which appear narrow from a side view, that are 10.5 feet (3.2m) or more across and the horizontal dimension is less than the vertical dimension. 6. Coaxial cable, conduits, and other cables attached to the face of a tower. Chap 3 AC 70/7460-1K 03/1/00 e. Color Band Characteristics. Bands for structures of any height should be: 1. Equal in width, provided each band is not less than l'/2 feet (0.5m) or more than 100 feet (31m) wide. 2. Perpendicular to the vertical axis with the bands at the top and bottom ends colored orange. 3. An odd number of bands on the structure. 4. Approximately one-seventh the height if the structure is 700 feet (214m) AGL or less. For each additional 200 feet (61m) or fraction thereof, add one (1) additional orange and one (1) additional white band. 5. Equal and in proportion to the structure's height AGL. Structure Height to Bandwidth Ratio Example: If a Structure is: Greater Than 10.5 feet (3.2m) 701 feet (214m) 901 feet (275m) 1,1 00 feet (336m) But Not More Than 700 feet (214m) 900 feet (275m) 1,1 00 feet (336m) 1,3 00 feet (397m) Band Width V7 of height '/9 of height Vn of height Vn of height TBLl f. Structures With a Cover or Roof. If the structure has a cover or roof, the highest orange band should be continued to cover the entire top of the structure. g. Skeletal Structures Atop Buildings. If a flagpole, skeletal structure, or similar object is erected on top of a building, the combined height of the object and building will determine whether marking is recommended; however, only the height of the object under study determines the width of the color bands. h. Partial Marking. If marking is recommended for only a portion of a structure because of shielding by other objects or terrain, the width of the bands should be determined by the overall height of the structure. A minimum of three bands should be displayed on the upper portion of the structure. i. Teardrop Pattern. Spherical water storage tanks with a single circular standpipe support may be marked in a teardrop-striped pattern. The tank should show alternate stripes of aviation orange and white. The stripes should extend from the top center of the tank to its supporting standpipe. The width of the stripes should be equal, and the width of each stripe at the greatest girth of the tank should not be less than 5 feet (1.5m) nor more than 15 feet (4.6m). j. Community Names. If it is desirable to paint the name of the community on the side of a tank, the stripe pattern may be broken to serve this purpose. This open area should have a maximum height of 3 feet (0.9m). k. Exceptions. Structural designs not conducive to standard markings may be marked as follows: 1. If it is not practical to color the roof of a structure in a checkerboard pattern, it may be colored solid orange. 2. If a spherical structure is not suitable for an exact checkerboard pattern, the shape of the rectangles may be modified to fit the shape of the surface. 3. Storage tanks not suitable for a checkerboard pattern may be colored by alternating bands of. aviation orange and white or a limited checkerboard pattern applied to the upper one-third of the structure. 4. The skeletal framework of certain water, gas, and grain, storage tanks may. be excluded from the checkerboard pattern. 34. MARKERS Markers are used to highlight, structures when it is impractical to make them conspicuous by painting. Markers may also be used in addition to aviation orange and white paint when additional conspicuiry is necessary for aviation safety. They should be displayed in conspicuous positions on or adjacent to the structures so as to retain the general definition of the structure. They should be recognizable in clear air from a distance of at least 4,000 feet (1219m) and in all directions from which aircraft are likely to approach. Markers should be distinctively shaped, i.e., spherical or cylindrical, so they are not mistaken for items that are used to convey other information. They should be replaced when faded or otherwise deteriorated. Chap 3 8/1/00 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 1 a. Spherical Markers. Spherical markers are used to identify overhead wires. Markers may be of another shape, i.e., cylindrical, provided the projected area of such markers will not be less than that presented by a spherical marker. 1. Size and Color. The diameter of the markers used on extensive catenary wires across canyons, lakes, rivers, etc., should be not less than 36 inches (91cm). Smaller 20-inch (51cm) spheres are permitted on less extensive power lines or on power lines below 50 feet (15m) above the ground and within 1,500 feet (458m) of an airport runway end. Each marker should be a solid color such as aviation orange, white, or yellow. 2. Installations. (a) Spacing. Markers should be spaced equally along the wire at intervals of approximately 200 feet (61m) or a fraction thereof. Intervals between markers should be less in critical areas near runway ends (i.e., 30 to 50 feet (10m to 15m)). They should be displayed on the highest wire or by another means at the same height as the highest wire. Where there is more than one wire at the highest point, the markers may be installed alternately along each wire if the distance between adjacent markers meets the spacing standard. This method allows the weight and wind loading factors to be distributed. (b) Pattern. An alternating color scheme provides the most conspicuity against all backgrounds. Mark overhead wires by alternating solid colored markers of aviation orange, white, and yellow. Normally, an orange sphere is placed at each end of a line and the spacing is adjusted (not to exceed 200 feet (61m)) to accommodate the rest of the markers. When less than four markers are used, they should all be aviation orange. b. Flag Markers. Flags are used to mark certain structures or objects when it is technically impractical to use spherical markers or painting. Some examples are temporary construction equipment, cranes, derricks, oil and other drilling rigs. Catenaries should use spherical markers. 1. Minimum Size. Each side, of the flag marker should be at least 2 feet (0.6m) in length. 2. Color Patterns. Flags should be colored as follows: (a) Solid. Aviation orange. (b) Orange and White. Arrange two triangular sections, one aviation orange and the other white to form a rectangle. (c) Checkerboard. Flags 3 feet (0.9m) or larger should be a checkerboard pattern of aviation orange and white squares, each 1 foot (0.3m) plus or minus 10 percent. 3. Shape. Flags should be rectangular in shape and have stiffeners to keep them from drooping in calm wind. 4. Display. Flag markers should be displayed around, on top, or along the highest edge of the obstruction. When flags are used to mark extensive or closely grouped obstructions, they should be displayed approximately 50 feet (15m) apart. The flag stakes should be of such strength and height that they will support the flags above all surrounding ground, structures, and/or objects of natural growth. 35. UNUSUAL COMPLEXITIES The FAA may also recommend appropriate marking in an area where obstructions are so grouped as to present a common obstruction to air navigation. 36. OMISSION OR ALTERNATIVES TO MARKING There are two alternatives to marking. Either alternative requires FAA review and concurrence. a. High Intensity Flashing White Lighting Systems. The high intensity, lighting systems are more effective than aviation orange and white paint and therefore can be recommended instead of marking. This is particularly true under certain ambient light conditions involving the position of the sun relative to the direction of flight. When high intensity lighting systems are operated during daytime and twilight, other methods of marking may be omitted. When operated 24 hours a day, other methods of marking and lighting may be omitted. b. Medium Intensity Flashing White Lighting Systems. When medium intensity lighting systems are operated during daytime and twilight on structures 500 feet (153m) AGL or less, other methods of marking may be omitted. When operated 24 hours a day on structures 500 feet (153m) AGL or less, other methods of marking and lighting may be omitted. Note- SPONSORS MUST ENSURE THAT ALTERNATIVES TO MARKING ARE COORDINATED WITH THE FCC FOR STRUCTURES UNDER ITS JURISDICTION PRIOR TO MAKING THE CHANGE. Chap 3 2/1/07 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 2 CHAPTER 4. LIGHTING GUIDELINE 40. PURPOSE This chapter describes the various obstruction lighting systems used to identify structures that an aeronautical study has determined will require added conspicuity. The lighting standards in this circular are the minimum necessary for aviation safety. Recommendations on lighting structures can vary depending on terrain features, weather patterns, geographic location, and in the case of wind turbines, number of structures and overall layout of design. 41. STANDARDS The standards outlined in this AC are based on the use of light units that meet specified intensities, beam patterns, color, and flash rates as specified in AC 150/5345-43. These standards may be obtained from: Department of Transportation OTS Subsequent Distribution Office, M-30 Ardmore East Business Center 3341 Q 75th Avenue Landover, MD 20785 42. LIGHTING SYSTEMS Obstruction lighting may be displayed on structures as follows: a. Aviation Red Obstruction Lights. Use flashing beacons and/or steady burning lights during nighttime. b. Medium Intensity Flashing White Obstruction Lights. Medium intensity flashing white obstruction lights may be used during daytime and twilight with automatically selected reduced intensity for nighttime operation. When this system is used on structures . 500 feet (153m) AGL or less in height, other methods of marking and lighting the structure may be omitted. Aviation orange and white paint is always required for daytime marking on structures exceeding 500 feet (153m) AGL. This system is not normally recommended on structures 200 feet (61m) AGL or less. •j c. High Intensity Flashing White Obstruction Lights. Use high intensity flashing white obstruction lights during daytime with automatically selected reduced intensities for twilight and nighttime operations. When this system is used, other methods of marking and lighting the structure may be omitted. This system should not be recommended on structures 500 feet (153m) AGL or less, unless an FAA aeronautical study shows otherwise. Note- All flashing lights on a structure should flash simultaneously except for catenary support structures, which have a distinct sequence flashing between levels. d. Dual Lighting. This system consists of red lights for nighttime and high or medium intensity flashing white lights for daytime and twilight. When a dual lighting system incorporates medium flashing intensity lights on structures 500 feet (153m) or less, or high intensity flashing white lights on structures of any height, other methods of marking the structure may be omitted. e. Obstruction Lights During Construction. As the height of the structure exceeds each level at which permanent obstruction lights would be recommended, two or more lights of the type specified in the determination should be installed at that level. Temporary high or medium intensity flashing white lights, as recommended in the determination, should be operated 24 hours a day until all permanent lights are in operation. In either case, two or more lights should be installed on the uppermost part of the structure any time it exceeds the height of the temporary construction equipment. They.may be turned off for periods when they would interfere with construction personnel. If practical, permanent obstruction lights should be installed and operated at each level as construction progresses. The lights should be positioned to ensure that a pilot has an unobstructed view of at least one light at each level. f. Obstruction Lights in Urban Areas. When a structure is located in an urban area where there are numerous other white lights (e.g., streetlights, etc.) red obstruction lights with painting or a medium intensity dual system is recommended. Medium intensity lighting is not normally recommended on structures less than 200 feet (61m). g. Temporary Construction Equipment Lighting. Since there is such a variance in construction cranes, derricks, oil and other drilling rigs, each case should be considered individually. Lights .should be installed according to the standards given in Chapters 5, 6, 7, or 8, as they would apply to permanent structures. Chap 4 AC 70/7460-1K 3/1/00 43. CATENARY LIGHTING Lighted markers are available for increased night conspicuity of high-voltage (69KV or greater) transmission line catenary wires. These markers should be used on transmission line catenary wires near airports, heliports, across rivers, canyons, lakes, etc. The lighted markers should be manufacturer certified as recognizable from a minimum distance of 4,000 feet (1219m) under nighttime conditions, minimum visual flight rules (VFR) conditions or having a minimum intensity of at least 32.5 candela. The lighting unit should emit a steady burning red light. They should be used on the highest energized line. If the lighted markers are installed on a line other than the highest catenary, then markers specified in paragraph 34 should be used in addition to the lighted markers. (The maximum distance between the line energizing the lighted markers and the highest catenary above the lighted marker should be no more than 20 feet (6m).) Markers should be distinctively shaped, i.e., spherical, cylindrical, so they are not mistaken for items that are used to convey other information. They should be visible in all directions from which aircraft are likely to approach. The area in the immediate vicinity of the supporting structure's base should be clear of all items and/or objects, of natural growth that could interfere with the line-of-sight between a pilot and the structure's lights. Where a catenary wire crossing requires three or more supporting structures, the inner structures should be equipped with enough light units per level to provide a full coverage. 44. INSPECTION, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE To ensure the proper candela output for fixtures with incandescent lamps, the voltage provided to the lamp filament should not vary more than plus or minus 3 percent of the rated voltage of the lamp. The input voltage should be measured at the lamp socket with the lamp operating during the hours of normal operation. (For strobes, the input voltage of the power supplies should be within 10 percent of rated voltage.) Lamps should be replaced after being operated for not more than 75 percent of their rated life or immediately upon failure. Flashtubes in a light unit should be replaced immediately upon failure, when the peak effective intensity falls below specification limits or when the fixture begins skipping flashes, or at the manufacturer's recommended intervals. Due to the effects of harsh environments, beacon lenses should be visually inspected for ultraviolet damage, cracks, crazing, dirt build up, etc., to insure that the certified light output has not deteriorated. (See paragraph 23, for reporting requirements in case of failure.) 45. NONSTANDARD LIGHTS Moored balloons, chimneys, church steeples, and similar obstructions may be floodlighted by fixed search light projectors installed at three or more equidistant points around the base of each obstruction. The searchlight projectors should provide an average illumination of at least 15 foot- candles over the top one-third of the obstruction. 46. PLACEMENT FACTORS The height of the structure AGL determines the number of light levels. The light levels may be adjusted slightly, but not to exceed 10 feet (3m), when necessary to accommodate guy wires and personnel who replace or repair light fixtures. Except for catenary support structures, the following factors should be considered when determining the placement of obstruction lights on a structure. a. Red Obstruction Lighting Systems. The overall height of the structure including all appurtenances such as rods, antennas, obstruction lights, etc., determines the number of light levels. b. Medium Intensity Flashing White Obstruction Lighting Systems. The overall height of the structure including all appurtenances such, as rods, antennas, obstruction lights, etc., determines the number of light levels. . - c. High Intensity Flashing Wliite Obstruction Lighting Systems. The overall height of the main structure including all appurtenances such as rods, antennas, obstruction lights, etc., determines the number of light levels. d. Dual Obstruction Lighting Systems. The overall height of the structure including all appurtenances such as rods, antennas, obstruction lights, etc., is used to determine the number of light levels for a medium intensity white obstruction light/red obstruction dual lighting system. The overall height of the structure including all appurtenances is used to determine the number of light levels for a high intensity white obstruction light/red obstruction dual lighting system. e. Adjacent Structures.' The elevation of the tops of adjacent buildings in congested, areas may be used as the equivalent of ground level to determine the proper number of light levels required. 10 Chap 4 8/1/00 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 1 f. Shielded Lights. If an adjacent object shields any light, horizontal placement of the lights should be adjusted or additional lights should be mounted on that object to retain or contribute to the definition of the obstruction. 47. MONITORING OBSTRUCTION LIGHTS Obstruction lighting systems should be closely monitored by visual or automatic means. It is extremely important to visually inspect obstruction lighting in all operating intensities at least once every 24 hours on systems without automatic monitoring. In the event a structure is not readily accessible for visual observation, a properly maintained automatic monitor should be used. This monitor should be designed to register the malfunction of any light on the obstruction regardless of its position or color. When using remote monitoring devices, the communication status and operational status of the system should be confirmed at least once every 24 hours. 'The monitor (aural or visual) should be located in an area generally occupied by responsible personnel. In some cases, this may require a remote monitor in an attended location. For each structure, a log should be maintained in which daily operations status of the lighting system is recorded. Beacon lenses should be replaced if serious cracks, crazing, dirt build up, etc., has occurred. 48. ICE SHIELDS Where icing is likely to occur, metal grates or similar protective ice shields should be installed directly over each light unit to prevent falling ice or accumulations from damaging the light units. 49. DISTRACTION a. Where obstruction lights may distract operators of vessels in the proximity of a navigable waterway, the sponsor must coordinate with the Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, to avoid interference with marine navigation. b. The address coordination is: for marine information and Chief, Aids to Navigation Division (OPN) U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters 2100 2nd Street, SW., Rm. 3610 Washington, DC 20593-0001 Telephone: (202) 267-0980 Chap 4 11 03/1/00 AC 70/7460-1K CHAPTER 5. RED OBSTRUCTION LIGHT SYSTEM 50. PURPOSE Red Obstruction lights are used to increase conspicuity during nighttime. Daytime and twilight marking is required. Recommendations on lighting structures can vary depending on terrain features, weather patterns, geographic location, and in the case of wind turbines, number of strucrutes and overall layout of design. 51. STANDARDS The red obstruction lighting system is composed of flashing omnidirectional beacons (L-864) and/or steady burning (L-810) lights. When one or more levels is comprised of flashing beacon lighting, the lights should flash simultaneously. a. Single Obstruction Light. A single (L-810) light may be used when more than one obstruction light is required either vertically or horizontally or where maintenance can be accomplished within a reasonable time. 1. Top Level. A single light may be used-to identify low structures such as airport ILS buildings and long horizontal structures such as perimeter fences and building roof outlines. 2. Intermediate Level. Single lights may be used on skeletal and solid. structures when more than one level of lights is installed and there are two or more single lights per level. b. Double Obstruction Light. A double (L-810) light should be installed when used as a top light, at each end of a row of single obstruction lights, and in areas or locations where the failure of a single unit could cause an obstruction to be totally unlighted. 1. Top Level. Structures 150 feet (46m) AGL or less should have one or more double lights installed at the highest point and operating simultaneously. 2. Intermediate Level. Double lights should be installed at intermediate levels when a malfunction of a single light could create an unsafe condition and in remote areas where maintenance cannot be performed within a reasonable time. Both units may operate simultaneously, or a transfer relay may be used to switch to a spare unit should the active system fail. 3. Lowest Level. The lowest level of light units may be installed at a higher elevation than normal on a structure if the surrounding terrain, trees, or adjacent building(s) would obscure the lights. In certain instances, as determined by an FAA aeronautical study,, the lowest level of lights may be eliminated. 52. CONTROL DEVICE Red obstruction lights should be operated by a satisfactory control device (e.g., photo cell, timer, etc.) adjusted so the lights will be turned on when the northern sky illuminance reaching a vertical surface falls below a level of 60 foot-candles (645.8 lux) but before reaching a level of 35 foot-candles (367.7 lux). The control device should turn the lights off when the northern sky illuminance rises to a level of not more than 60 foot-candles (645.8 lux). The lights may also remain on continuously. The sensing device should, if practical, face the northern sky in the Northern Hemisphere. (See AC 150/5345-43.) 53. POLES, TOWERS, AND SIMILAR SKELETAL STRUCTURES The following standards apply to radio and television towers, 'supporting structures for overhead transmission lines, and similar structures. a. Top Mounted Obstruction Light. 1. Structures 150 Feet (46m) AGL or Less. Two or more steady burning (L-810) lights should be installed in a manner to ensure an unobstructed view of one or more lights by a pilot. 2. Structures Exceeding 150 Feet (46m) AGL. At least one red flashing (L-864) beacon should be installed in a manner to ensure an unobstructed view of one or more lights by a pilot. 3. Appurtenances 40 Feet (12m) or Less. If a rod, antenna, or other appurtenance 40 feet (12m) or less in height is incapable of supporting a red flashing beacon, then it may be placed at the base of the appurtenance. If the mounting location does not allow unobstructed viewing ,of the beacon by a pilot, then additional beacons should be added. 4. Appurtenances Exceeding 40 Feet (12m). If a rod, antenna, or other appurtenance exceeding 40 feet (12m) in heighfis incapable of supporting a red flashing beacon, a supporting mast with one or more beacons should be installed adjacent to the appurtenance. Adjacent installations should not exceed the height of the appurtenance and be within 40 feet (12m) of the.tip to allow the pilot an unobstructed view of at least one beacon. b. Mounting Intermediate Levels. The number of light levels is determined by the height of the structure, including all appurtenances, and is detailed in Appendix 1. The number of lights on each level is Chap 5 13 AC70/7460-1KCHG2 2/1/07 determined by the shape and height of the structure. These lights should be mounted so as to ensure an unobstructed view of at least one light by a pilot. 1. Steady Burning Lights (L-810). (a) Structures 350 Feet (107m) AGL or Less. Two or more steady burning (L-810) lights should be installed on diagonally or diametrically opposite positions. (b) Structures Exceeding 350 Feet (107m) AGL. Install steady burning (L-810) lights on each outside corner of each level. 2. Flashing Beacons (L-864). (a) Structures 350 Feet (107m) AGL or Less. These structures do not require flashing (L-864) beacons at intermediate levels. (b) Structure Exceeding 350 Feet (107m) AGL. At intermediate levels, two beacons (L-864) should be mounted outside at diagonally opposite positions of intermediate levels. 54. CHIMNEYS, FLARE STACKS, AND SIMILAR SOLID STRUCTURES a. Number of Light Units. 1. The number of units recommended depends on the diameter of the structure at the top. The number of lights recommended below are the minimum. 2. When the structure diameter is: (a) 20 Feet (6m) or Less. Three light units per level. (b) Exceeding 20 Feet (6m) But Not More Than 100 Feet (31m). Four light units per level. (c) Exceeding 100 Feet (31m) But Not More Than 200 Feet (61m). Six light units per level. (d) Exceeding 200 Feet (61m). Eight light units per level. b. Top Mounted Obstruction Lights. 1. Structures 150 Feet (46m) AGL or Less. L-810 lights should be installed horizontally at regular intervals at or near the top. 2. Structures Exceeding 150 Feet (46m) AGL. At least three L-864 beacons should be installed. 3. Chimneys, Cooling Towers-; and Flare Stacks. Lights may be displayed as low as 20 feet (6m) below the top to avoid the obscuring effect of deposits and heat generally emitted by this type of structure. It is important that these lights be readily accessible for cleaning and lamp replacement. It is understood that with flare stacks, as well as any other structures associated with the petrol-chemical industry, normal lighting requirements may not be necessary. This could be due to the location of the flare stack/structure within a large well-lighted petrol-chemical plant or the fact that the flare, or working lights surrounding the flare stack/structure, is as conspicuous as obstruction lights. c. Mounting Intermediate Levels. The number of light levels is determined by the height of the structure including all appurtenances.' For cooling towers 600 feet (183m) or less, intermediate light levels are not necessary. Structures exceeding 600 feet (183m) AGL should have a second level of light units installed approximately at the midpoint of the structure and in a vertical line with the top level of lights. 1. Steady Burning (L-810) Lights. The recommended number of light levels may be obtained from Appendix 1. At least three lights should .be installed on each level. 2. Flashing (L-864) Beacons. The recommended number of beacon levels may be obtained from Appendix 1. At least three lights should be installed on each level. (a) Structures 350 Feet (107m) AGL or Less. These structures do not need intermediate levels of flashing beacons. <••''. (b) Structures Exceeding.350 Feet (107m) AGL. At least three flashing (L-864) beacons should be installed on each level in a manner to allow an unobstructed view of at least one beacon. 55. GROUP OF OBSTRUCTIONS When individual objects, except wind turbines, within a group of obstructions are not the same height and are spaced a maximum of 150 feet (46m) apart, the prominent objects within the group should be lighted in accordance with the standards for individual obstructions of a corresponding height. If the outer structure is shorter than the prominent, the outer structure should be lighted in accordance with the standards for individual obstructions of a corresponding height. Light units should be placed to ensure that the light is visible to a pilot approaching from any direction. In addition, at least one flashing beacon should be installed at the top of a prominent center obstruction or on a special tower located near the center of the group. . 14 Chap 5 03/1/00 AC 70/7460-1K 56. ALTERNATE METHOD OF DISPLAYING OBSTRUCTION LIGHTS When recommended in an FAA aeronautical study, lights may be placed on poles equal to the height of the obstruction and installed on or adjacent to the structure instead of installing lights on the obstruction. 57. PROMINENT BUILDINGS, BRIDGES, AND SIMILAR EXTENSIVE OBSTRUCTIONS When objects within a group of obstructions are approximately the same overall height above the surface and are located a maximum of 150 feet (46m) apart, the group of obstructions may be considered an extensive obstruction. Install light units on the same horizontal plane at the highest portion or edge of prominent obstructions. Light units should be placed to ensure that the light is visible to a pilot approaching from any direction. If the structure is a bridge and is over navigable water, the sponsor must obtain prior approval of the lighting installation from the Commander of the District Office of the United States Coast Guard to avoid interference with marine navigation. Steady burning lights should be displayed to indicate the extent of the obstruction as follows: a. Structures 150 Feet (46m) or Less in Any Horizontal Direction. If the structure/bridge/extensive obstruction is 150 feet (46m) or less horizontally, at least one steady burning light (L-810) should be displayed on the highest point at each end of the major axis of the obstruction. If this is impractical because of the overall shape, display a double obstruction light in the center of the highest point. b. Structures Exceeding 150 Feet (46m) in at Least One Horizontal Direction. If the structure/bridge/ extensive obstruction exceeds 150 feet (46m) horizontally, display at least one steady burning light for each 150 feet (46m), or fraction thereof, of the overall length of the major axis. At least one of these lights should be displayed on the highest point at each end of the obstruction. Additional lights should be displayed at approximately equal intervals not to exceed 150 feet (46m) on the highest points along the edge between the end lights. If an obstruction is located near a landing area and two or more edges are the same height, the edge nearest the landing area should be lighted. c. Structures Exceeding 150 Feet (46m) AGL. Steady burning red obstruction lights should be installed on the highest point at each end. At intermediate levels, steady burning red lights should be displayed for each 150 feet (46m) or fraction thereof. The vertical position of these lights should be equidistant between the top lights and the ground level as the shape and type of obstruction will permit. One such light should be displayed at each outside corner on each level with the remaining lights evenly spaced between the corner lights. d. Exceptions. Flashing red beacons (L-864) may be used instead of steady burning obstruction lights if early or special warning is necessary. These beacons should be displayed on the highest points of an extensive obstruction at intervals not exceeding 3,000 feet (915m). At least three beacons should be displayed on one side of the extensive obstruction to indicate a line of lights. e. Ice Shields. Where icing is likely to occur, metal grates or similar protective ice shields should be installed directly over each light unit to prevent falling ice or accumulations from damaging the light units. The light should be mounted in a manner to ensure an unobstructed view of at least one light by a pilot approaching from any direction. ChapS 15 03/1/00 AC 70/7460-1K CHAPTER 6. MEDIUM INTENSITY FLASHING 60. PURPOSE Medium intensity flashing white (L-865) obstruction lights may provide conspicuity both day and night. Recommendations on lighting structures can vary depending on terrain features, weather patterns, geographic location, and in the case of wind turbines, number of structures and overall layout of design. 61. STANDARDS The 'medium intensity flashing white light system is normally composed of flashing omnidirectional lights. Medium intensity flashing white obstruction. lights may be used during daytime and twilight with automatically selected reduced intensity for nighttime operation. When this system is used on structures 500 feet (153m) AGL or less in-height, other methods of marking and lighting the structure may be omitted. Aviation orange and white paint is always required for daytime marking on structures exceeding 500 feet (153m) AGL. This system is not normally recommended on structures 200 feet (61m) AGL "or less. The use of a 24-hour medium intensity flashing white light system in urban/populated areas in not normally recommended due to ./their tendency to merge with background lighting in these areas at night. This makes it extremely difficult for some types of aviation operations, i.e., med-evac, and police helicopters to see these structures. The use of this type of system in urban and rural areas often results in complaints. In addition, this system is not recommended on structures within 3 nautical miles of an airport. 62. RADIO AND TELEVISION TOWERS AND SIMILAR SKELETAL STRUCTURES a. Mounting Lights. The number of levels recommended depends on the height of the structure, including antennas and similar appurtenances. 1. Top Levels. One or more lights should be installed at the highest point to provide 360-degree coverage ensuring an unobstructed view. 2. Appurtenances 40 feet (12m) or less. If a rod, antenna, or other appurtenance 40 feet (12m) or less in height is incapable of supporting the medium intensity flashing white light, then it may-be placed at the base of the appurtenance. If the mounting location does not allow unobstructed viewing of the medium intensity flashing white light by a pilot, then additional lights should be added. WHITE OBSTRUCTION LIGHT SYSTEMS 3. Appurtenances Exceeding 40 feet (12m). If a rod, antenna, or other appurtenance exceeds 40 feet (12m) above the tip of the main structure, a medium intensity flashing white light should be placed within 40 feet (12m) from the top of the appurtenance. If the appurtenance (such as a whip antenna) is incapable of supporting the light, one or more lights should be mounted on a pole adjacent to the appurtenance. Adjacent installations should not exceed the height of the appurtenance and be within 40 feet (12m) of the tip to allow the pilot an unobstructed view of at least one light. b. Intermediate Levels. At intermediate levels, two beacons (L-865) should be mounted outside at diagonally or diametrically opposite positions of intermediate levels. The lowest light level should not be less than 200 feet (61m) AGL. c. Lowest Levels. The lowest level of light units may be installed at a higher elevation than normal on a structure if the surrounding terrain, trees, or adjacent building(s) would obscure the lights. In certain instances, as determined by an FAA aeronautical study, the lowest level of lights may be eliminated. d. Structures 500 Feet (153m) AGL or Less. When white lights are used during nighttime and twilight only, marking is required for daytime. When operated 24 hours a day, other methods of marking and lighting are not required. e. Structures Exceeding 500 Feet (153m) AGL. The lights should be used during nighttime and twilight and may be used 24 hours a day. Marking is always required for daytime. f. Ice Shields. Where icing is likely to occur, metal grates or similar protective ice shields should be installed directly over each light unit to prevent falling ice or accumulations from damaging the light units. The light should be_ mounted in a manner to ensure an- unobstructed view of at least one light by a pilot approaching from any direction. 63. CONTROL DEVICE The light intensity is controlled by a device that changes the intensity when the ambient light changes. The system should automatically change intensity steps when the northern sky illumination • in the Northern Hemisphere on a vertical surface is as follows: a. Twilight-to-Night. This should not occur before the illumination drops below five foot-candles (53.8 Chap 6 17 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 2 2/1/07 lux) but .should occur, before it drops below two foot- candles (21.5 lux). b. Night-to-Day. The intensity changes listed in subparagraph 63a above should be reversed when changing from the night to day mode. 64. CHIMNEYS, FLARE STACKS, AND SIMILAR SOLID STRUCTURES a. Number of Light Units. The number of units recommended depends on the diameter of the structure at the top. Normally, the top level is on the highest point of a structure. However, the top level of chimney lights may be installed as low as 20 feet (6m) below the top to minimize deposit build-up due to emissions. The number of lights recommended are the minimum. When the structure diameter is: 1. 20 Feet (6m) or Less. Three light units per level. 2. Exceeding 20 Feet (6m) But Not More Than 100 Feet (31m). Four light units per level. 3. Exceeding 100 Feet (31m) But Not More Than 200 Feet (61m). Six light units per level. 4.'Exceeding 200 Feet (61m). Eight light units per level. 65. GROUP OF OBSTRUCTIONS When individual objects within a group of obstructions are not the same height and are spaced a maximum of 150 feet (46m) apart, the prominent objects within the group should be lighted in accordance with the standards for individual obstructions of a corresponding height. If the outer structure is shorter than the prominent, the outer structure should be lighted in accordance with the standards for individual obstructions of a corresponding height. Light units should be placed to ensure that the light is visible to a pilot approaching from any direction. In addition, at least one medium intensity flashing white light should be installed at the top of a prominent center obstruction or on a special tower located near the center of the group. 66. SPECIAL CASES Where lighting systems are installed on structures located near highways, waterways, airport approach areas, etc., caution should be exercised to ensure that the lights do not distract or otherwise cause a hazard to motorists, vessel operators, or pilots on an approach to an airport. In these cases, shielding may be necessary. This shielding should not derogate the intended purpose of the lighting system. 67. PROMINENT BUILDINGS AND SIMILAR EXTENSIVE OBSTRUCTIONS When objects within a group of obstructions are approximately the same overall height above the surface and are located a maximum of 150 feet (46m) apart, the group of obstructions may be considered an extensive obstruction. Install light units on the same horizontal plane at the highest portion or edge of prominent obstructions. Light units should be placed to ensure that the light is visible to a pilot approaching from any direction. Lights should be displayed to indicate the extent of the obstruction as follows: a. Structures 150 Feet (46m) or Less in Any Horizontal Direction. If the structure/extensive obstruction is 150 feet (46m) or less horizontally, at least one light should be displayed on the highest point at each end of the major axis of the obstruction. If this is impractical because of the overall shape, display a double obstruction light in the center of the highest point. b. Structures Exceeding 150 Feet (46m) in at Least One Horizontal Direction. If the structure/extensive obstruction exceeds 150 feet (46m) horizontally, display at least one light, for each 150 feet (46m) or fraction thereof, of the overall length of the major axis. At least one of these lights should, be displayed on the highest point at each end of the obstruction. Additional lights should be displayed at approximately equal intervals not to exceed 150 feet (46m) on the highest points along the edge between the end lights. If an obstruction is located near a landing area and two or more edges are the same height, the edge nearest the landing area should be lighted. c. Structures Exceeding 150 Feet (46m) AGL. Lights should be installed on the highest point at each end. At intermediate levels, lights should be displayed .for each 150 feet (46m), or fraction thereof. The vertical position of these lights should be equidistant between the top.-lights and the ground level as the shape and type of obstruction will permit. One such light should be displayed at each outside corner on each level with the remaining lights, evenly spaced between the comer lights. 18 Chap 6 2/1/07 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 2 CHAPTER 7. HIGH INTENSITY FLASHING WHITE OBSTRUCTION LIGHT SYSTEMS 70. PURPOSE Lighting with high intensity (L-856) flashing white obstruction lights provides the highest degree of conspicuity both day and night. Recommendations on .lighting structures can • vary depending on terrain features, weather patterns, geographic location, and in the case of wind turbines, number of structutes and overall layout of design. 71. STANDARDS Use high intensity flashing white obstruction lights during daytime with automatically selected reduced intensities for twilight and nighttime operations. When high intensity white lights are operated 24 hours a day, other methods of marking and lighting may be omitted. This system should not be recommended on structures 500 feet (153m) AGL or less unless an FAA aeronautical study shows otherwise. 72. CONTROL DEVICE Light intensity is controlled by a device that changes the intensity when the ambient light changes. The use of a 24-hour high intensity flashing white light system in urban/populated areas is not normally recommended due to their tendency to merge with background lighting in these areas at night. This makes it extremely difficult for some types of aviation operations, i.e., med-evac, and police helicopters to see these structures. The use of this type of system in urban and rural areas often results in complaints. The system should automatically change intensity steps when the northern sky illumination in the Northern Hemisphere on a vertical surface is as follows: a. Day-to-Twilight. This should not occur before the illumination drops'to 60 foot-candles (645.8 lux), but should occur before it drops below 35 foot-candles (376.7 lux). The illuminance-sensing device should, if practical, face the northern sky in the Northern Hemisphere, b. Twilight-to-Night. This should not occur before the illumination drops below five foot-candles (53.8 lux), but should occur before it drops below two foot- candles (21.5 lux). '•t c. Night-to-Day. The intensity changes listed in subparagraph 72 a and b above should be reversed when changing from the night to day mode. 73. UNITS PER LEVEL One or more light units is needed to obtain the desired horizontal coverage. The number of light units recommended per level (except for the supporting structures of catenary wires and buildings) depends upon the average outside diameter of the specific structure, and the horizontal beam width of the light fixture. The light units should be installed in a manner to ensure an unobstructed view of the system by a pilot approaching from any direction. The number of lights recommended are the minimum. When the structure diameter is: ' a. 20 Feet (6m) or Less. Three light units per level. b. Exceeding 20 Feet (6m) But Not More Than 100 Feet (31m). Four light units per level. c. Exceeding 100 Feet (31m). Six light units per level. 74. INSTALLATION GUIDANCE Manufacturing specifications provide for the effective peak intensity of the light beam to be adjustable from zero , to 8 degrees above the horizon. Normal installation should place the top light at zero degrees to the horizontal and all other light Units installed in accordance with Table 2: Llsht Unit Elevation Above the Horizontal Height of Light Unit Above Terrain Exceeding 500 feet AGL 401 feet to 500 feet AGL 301 feet to 400 feet AGL 300 feet AGL or less Degrees of Elevation Above the Horizontal 0 1 2" 3 TBL2 a. Vertical Aiming. Where terrain, nearby residential areas, or other situations dictate, the light beam may be further elevated above the horizontal. The main beam of light at the lowest level should not strike the ground closer than 3 statute miles (5km) from the structure. If additional adjustments are necessary, the lights may be individually adjusted upward, in 1-degree increments, starting at the bottom. Excessive elevation may reduce its conspicuity by raising the beam above a collision course flight path. b. Special Cases. Where lighting systems are installed on structures located near highways, waterways, airport approach areas, etc., caution should be exercised to ensure that the lights do not distract or otherwise cause a hazard to motorists, vessel operators, or pilots on an approach to an airport. In these cases, Chap 7 19 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 2 2/1/07 shielding or an adjustment to the vertical or horizontal light aiming may be necessary. This adjustment should not derogate the intended purpose of the lighting system. Such adjustments may require review action as described in Chapter 1, paragraph 5. c. Relocation or Omission of Light Units. Light units should not be installed in such a manner that the light pattern/output is disrupted by the structure. 1. Lowest Level. The lowest level of light units may be installed at a higher elevation than normal on a structure if the surrounding terrain, trees, or adjacent building(s) would obscure the lights. In certain instances, as determined by an FAA aeronautical study, the lowest level of lights may be eliminated. 2. Two Adjacent Structures. Where two structures are situated within 500 feet (153m) of each other and the light units are installed at the same levels,, the sides of the structures facing each other need not be lighted. However, all lights on both structures must flash simultaneously, except for adjacent catenary support structures. .Adjust vertical .placement of the lights to either or both structures' intermediate levels to place the lights on the same horizontal plane. Where one structure is higher than the other, complete level(s) of lights should be installed on that part of the higher structure that extends above the top of the lower structure. If the structures are of such heights that the levels of lights cannot be placed in identical horizontal planes, then the light units should be placed such that the center of the horizontal beam patterns do not face toward the adjacent structure. For example, structures situated north and south of each other should have the light units on both structures installed on a northwest/southeast and northeast/southwest orientation. 3. Three or More Adjacent Structures. The treatment of a cluster of structures as an individual or a complex of structures will be determined by the FAA as the result of an aeronautical study, taking into consideration the location, heights, and spacing with other structures. 75. ANTENNA OR SIMILAR APPURTENANCE LIGHT When a structure lighted by a high intensity flashing light system is topped with an antenna or similar appurtenance exceeding 40 feet (12m) in height, a medium intensity flashing white light (L-865) should be placed within 40 feet (12m) from the tip of the appurtenance. This light should operate 24 hours a day and flash simultaneously with the rest of the lighting system. 76. CHIMNEYS, FLARE STACKS, AND SIMILAR SOLID STRUCTURES The number of light levels depends on the height of the structure excluding appurtenances. Three or more lights should be installed on each level in such a manner to ensure an unobstructed view by the pilot. Normally, the top level is on the highest point of a structure. However, the top level of chimney lights may be installed as low as 20 feet (6m) below the top to minimize deposit build-up due to emissions. 77. RADIO AND TELEVISION TOWERS AND SIMILAR SKELETAL STRUCTURES a. Mounting Lights. The number of levels recommended depends on the height of the structure, including antennas and similar appurtenances. At least | three lights should be installed on each level and mounted to ensure that the effective intensity of the full horizontal beam coverage is not impaired by the structural members. b. Top Level. One levelof lights should be installed at the highest point of the structure.' "If the highest point is a rod or antenna incapable of supporting a lighting system, then the top level of lights should be installed at the highest portion of the main skeletal structure. When guy wires come .together at the top, it may be necessary to install this level of lights as low as 10 feet (3m) below the top. Tf the rod or antenna exceeds 40 feet (12m) above the main structure, a medium intensity flashing white light (L-865) should be mounted on the highest point. If the appurtenance (such as a whip antenna) is incapable of supporting a medium intensity light, one or more lights should be installed on a pole adjacent to the appurtenance. Adjacent installation should not exceed the height of the appurtenance and be within 40 feet (12m) of the top to allow an unobstructed view of at least one light. c. Ice Shields. Where icing is likely to occur, metal grates or similar protective ice shields should be installed directly over each light unit to prevent falling ice or accumulations from damaging the light units. 78. HYPERBOLIC COOLING TOWERS Light units should be installed in a manner to ensure an unobstructed view of at least two lights by a pilot approaching from any direction. a. Number of Light Units. The number of units recommended depends on the diameter of the structure 20 Chap? 2/1/07 AC 70/7460-1K CHG2 at the top. The number of lights recommended in the following table are the minimum. When the structure diameter is: 1. 20 Feet (6m) or Less. Three light units per leveJ. 2. Exceeding 20 Feet (6m) But Not More Than 100 Feet (31m). Four light units per level. 3. Exceeding 100 Feet (31m) But Not More Than 200 Feet (61m). Six light units per level. 4. Exceeding 200 Feet (61m). Eight light units per level. b. Structures Exceeding 600 Feet (183m) AGL. Structures exceeding 600 feet (183m) AGL should have a second level of light units installed approximately at the midpoint of the structure and in a vertical line with the top level of lights. 79. PROMINENT BUILDINGS AND SIMILAR EXTENSIVE OBSTRUCTIONS When objects within a group of obstructions are approximately the same overall height above the surface and are located not more than 150 feet (46m) apart, the group of obstructions may be considered an extensive obstruction. Install light units on the same horizontal plane at the highest portion or edge of prominent obstructions. Light units should be placed to ensure that the light is visible to a pilot approaching from any direction. These lights may require shielding, such as louvers, to ensure minimum adverse impact on local communities. Extreme caution in the use of high intensity flashing white lights should be exercised. a. If the Obstruction is 200 feet (61m) or Less in Either Horizontal Dimension, install three or more light units at the highest portion of the structure in a manner to ensure that at least one light is visible to a pilot approaching from any direction. Units may be mounted on a single pedestal at or near the center of the obstruction. If light units are placed more than 10 feet (3m) from the center point of the structure, use a minimum of four units. b. If the Obstruction Exceeds 200 Feet (61m) in One Horizontal Dimension, but is 200 feet (61m) or less in the other, two light units should be placed on each of the shorter sides. These light units may either be installed adjacent to each other at the midpoint of the edge of the obstruction or at (near) each corner with the light unit aimed to provide 180 degrees of coverage at each edge. One or more light units should be installed along the overall length of the major axis. These lights should be installed at approximately equal intervals not to exceed a distance of 100 feet (31m) from the corners or from each other. c. If the Obstruction Exceeds 200 Feet (61m) in Both Horizontal Dimensions, light units should be equally spaced along the overall perimeter of the obstruction at intervals of 100 feet (31m) or fraction thereof. Chap 7 21 2/1/07 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 2 CHAPTER 8. DUAL LIGHTING WITH RED/MEDIUM INTENSITY FLASHING WHITE SYSTEMS 80. PURPOSE This dual lighting system includes red lights (L-864) for nighttime and medium intensity flashing white lights (L-865) for daytime and twilight use. This lighting system may be used in lieu of operating a medium intensity flashing white lighting system at night. There may be some populated areas where the use of medium intensity at night may cause significant environmental concerns. The use of the dual lighting system should reduce/mitigate those concerns. Recommendations on lighting structures can vary depending on terrain features, weather patterns, geographic location, and in the case of wind turbines, number of structutes and overall layout of design. 81. INSTALLATION The light units should be installed as specified in the appropriate portions of Chapters 4, 5, and 6. The number of light levels needed may be obtained from Appendix 1. 82. OPERATION Lighting systems should be operated as specified in Chapter 3. Both systems should not be operated at the same time; however, there should be no more than a 2- second delay when changing from one system to the other. Outage of one of two lamps in the uppermost red beacon (L-864 incandescent unit) or outage of any uppermost red light shall cause the white obstruction light system to operate in its specified "night" step intensity. 83. CONTROL DEVICE The light system is controlled by a device that changes the system when the ambient light changes. The system should automatically change steps when the northern sky illumination in the Northern Hemisphere on a vertical surface is as follows: a. Twilight-to-Night. This should not occur before the illumination drops below 5 foot-candles (53.8 lux) but should occur before it drops below 2 foot-candles (21.5 lux). b. Night-to-Day. The intensity changes listed in subparagraph 83 a above should be reversed when changing from the night to day mode. 84. ANTENNA OR SIMILAR APPURTENANCE LIGHT When a structure utilizing this dual lighting system is topped with an antenna or similar appurtenance exceeding 40 feet (12m) in height, a medium intensity flashing white (L-865) and a red flashing beacon (L- 864), should be placed within 40 feet (12m) from the tip of the appurtenance. The white light should operate during daytime and twilight and the red light during nighttime. These lights should flash simultaneously with the rest of the lighting system. 85. OMISSION OF MARKING When medium intensity white lights are operated on structures 500 feet (153m) AGL or less during daytime and twilight, other methods of marking may be omitted. Chap 8 23 2/1/07 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 2 CHAPTER 9. DUAL LIGHTING WITH RED/HIGH INTENSITY FLASHING WHITE SYSTEMS 90. PURPOSE This dual lighting system includes red lights (L-864) for nighttime and high intensity flashing white lights (L-856) for daytime and twilight use. This lighting system may be used in lieu of operating a flashing white lighting system at night. There may be some populated areas where the use of high intensity lights at night may cause significant environmental concerns and complaints. The use of the dual lighting system should reduce/mitigate those concerns. Recommendations on lighting structures can vary depending on terrain features, weather patterns, geographic location, and in the case of wind turbines, number of strucrutes and overall layout of design. 91. INSTALLATION The light units should be installed as specified in the appropriate portions of Chapters 4, 5, and 7. The number of light levels needed .may be obtained from Appendix 1. 92. OPERATION Lighting systems should be operated as specified in Chapters 4, 5, and 7. Both systems should not be operated at the same time; however, there should be no more than a 2-second delay when changing from one system to the other. Outage of one of two lamps in the uppermost red beacon (L-864 incandescent unit) or outage of any uppermost red light shall cause the white obstruction light system to operate in its specified "night" step intensity. 93. CONTROL DEVICE The light intensity is controlled by a device that changes the intensity when the ambient light changes. The system should automatically change intensity steps when the northern sky illumination in the Northern Hemisphere on a vertical surface is as follows: a. Day-to-Twilight. This should not occur before the illumination drops to 60 foot-candles (645.8 lux) but should occur before it drops below 35 foot-candles (376.7 lux). The illuminance-sensing device should, if practical, face the northern sky in the Northern Hemisphere. b. Twilight-to-Night. This should not occur before the illumination drops below 5 foot-candles (53.8 lux) but should occur before it drops below 2 foot-candles (21.5 lux). c. Night-to-Day. The intensity changes listed in subparagraph 93 a and b above should be reversed when changing from the night to day mode. 94. ANTENNA OR SIMILAR APPURTENANCE LIGHT When a structure utilizing this dual lighting system is topped with an antenna or- similar appurtenance exceeding 40 feet (12m) in height, a medium intensity flashing white light (L-865) and a red flashing beacon (L-864) should be placed within 40 feet (12m) from the tip of the appurtenance. The white light should operate during daytime and twilight and the red light during nighttime. 95. OMISSION OF MARKING When high intensity white lights are operated during daytime and twilight, other methods of marking may be omitted. Chap 9 2/1/07 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 2 CHAPTER 10. MARKING AND LIGHTING OF CATENARY AND CATENARY SUPPORT STRUCTURES 100. PURPOSE This chapter provides guidelines for marking and lighting catenary and catenary support structures. The recommended marking and lighting of these structures is intended to provide day and night conspicuity and to assist pilots in identifying and avoiding catenary wires and associated support structures. 101. CATENARY MARKING STANDARDS Lighted markers are available for increased night conspicuity of high-voltage (69KV or greater) transmission line catenary wires. These markers should be used on transmission line catenary wires near airports, heliports, across rivers, canyons, lakes, etc. The lighted markers should be manufacturer certified as recognizable from a minimum distance of 4,000 feet (1219m) under nighttime conditions, minimum VFR conditions or having a minimum intensity of at least 32.5 candela. The lighting unit should emit a steady burning red light. They should be used on the highest energized line. If the lighted markers are installed on a line other than the highest catenary, then markers specified in paragraph .34 should be used in addition to the lighted markers. (The maximum distance between the line energizing the lighted markers and the highest catenary above the lighted marker should be no more than 20 feet (6m).) Markers should be distinctively shaped, i.e., spherical, cylindrical, so they are not mistaken for items that are used to convey other information. They should be visible in all directions from which aircraft are likely to approach. The area in the immediate vicinity of the supporting structure's base should be clear of all items and/or objects. of natural growth that could interfere with the line-of-sight between a pilot and' the structure's lights. Where a catenary wire crossing requires three or more supporting structures, the inner structures should be equipped with enough light units per level to provide a full coverage. a. Size and Color. The diameter of the markers used on extensive catenary wires across canyons, lakes, rivers, etc., should be not less than 36 inches (91cm). Smaller 20-inch (51cm) markers are permitted on less extensive power lines or on power lines below 50 feet (15m) above the ground and within 1,500 feet (458m) of an airport runway end. Each marker should be a solid color such as aviation orange, white, or yellow. b. Installation. 1. Spacing. Lighted markers should be spaced equally along the wire at intervals of approximately 200 feet (61m) or a fraction thereof. Intervals between markers should be less in critical areas near runway ends, i.e., 30 to 50 feet (10m to 15m). If the markers are installed on a line other than the highest catenary, then markers specified in paragraph 34 should be used in addition to the lighted markers. The maximum distance between the line energizing the lighted markers and the highest catenary above the markers can be no more than 20 feet (6m). The lighted markers may be installed alternately along each wire if the distance between adjacent markers meets the spacing standard. This method allows the weight and wind loading factors to be distributed. 2. Pattern. An alternating color scheme provides the most conspicuity against all backgrounds. Mark overhead wires by alternating solid colored markers of aviation orange, white, and yellow. Normally, an orange marker is placed at each end of a line and the spacing is adjusted (not to exceed 200 feet .(61m)) to accommodate the rest of the markers. When less than four markers are used, they should all be aviation orange. 102. CATENARY LIGHTING STANDARDS When using medium intensity flashing-white (L-866), high intensity flashing white (L-857), dual medium intensity (L-866/L-885) ;or dual high intensity '(L- 857/885) lighting systems, operated 24 hours a day, other marking of the support structure is not necessary. a. Levels. A system of three levels of sequentially flashing light units should be installed on each supporting structure or adjacent terrain. Install one level at the top of the structure, one at the height of the lowest point in the catenary and one level approximately midway between the other two light levels. The middle level should normally be at least 50 feet (15m) from the other two levels. The middle light unit may be deleted when the distance between the top and the bottom light levels is less than 100 feet (30m). 1. Top Levels.: One or more lights should be installed at the top of the structure to provide 360- degree coverage ensuring an unobstructed view. If-the installation presents a potential danger to maintenance personnel, or when necessary for lightning .protection, the top level of lights may be mounted as low as 20 feet (6m) below the highest point of the structure. 2. Horizontal Coverage. The light units at the middle level and bottom level should be installed so as to provide a minimum of ISO-degree coverage centered perpendicular to the flyway. Where a catenary crossing is situated near a bend in a river, canyon, etc., or is not perpendicular to the flyway, the Chap 10 27 AC70/7460-1KCHG2 2/1/07 horizontal beam should be directed to provide the most effective light coverage to warn pilots approaching from either direction of the catenary wires. 3. Variation. The vertical and horizontal arrangements of the lights may be subject to the structural limits of the towers and/or adjacent terrain. A tolerance of 20 percent from uniform spacing of the bottom and middle light is allowed. If the base of the supporting structure(s) is higher than the lowest point in the catenary, such as a canyon crossing,' one or more lights should be installed on the adjacent terrain at the level of the lowest point in the span. These lights should be installed on the structure or terrain at the height of the lowest point in the catenary. b. Flash Sequence. The flash sequence should be middle, top, and bottom with all lights on the same level flashing simultaneously. The time delay between flashes of levels is designed to present a unique system display. The time delay between the start of each level of flash duration is outlined in FAA AC 150/5345-43, Specification for Obstruction Lighting Equipment. c. Synchronization. Although desirable, the corresponding light levels on associated supporting towers of a catenary crossing need not flash simultaneously. d. Structures 500 feet (153m) AGL or Less. When medium intensity white lights (L-866) are operated 24 hours a day, or when a dual red/medium intensity system (L-866 daytime & twilight/L-885 nighttime) is used, marking can be omitted. When using a medium intensity while light (L-866) or a flashing red light (L- 885) during twilight or nighttime only, painting should be used for daytime marking. e. Structures Exceeding 500 Feet (153m) AGL. When high intensity white lights (L-857) are operated 24 hours a day, or when a dual red/high intensity system (L-857 daytime and twilight/L-885 nighttime) is used, marking can be omitted. This system should not be recommended on structures 500 feet (153m) or less unless an FAA aeronautical study shows otherwise. When a flashing -red obstruction light (L- 885), a medium intensity (L-866) flashing white lighting system or a high intensity white lighting system (L-857) is used for nighttime and twilight only, painting should be used for daytime marking. 103. CONTROL DEVICE The light intensity is controlled by a device (photocell) that changes the intensity when the ambient light changes. The lighting system should automatically change intensity steps when the northern sky illumination in the Northern Hemisphere on a vertical surface is as follows: a. Day-to-Twillght (L-857 System). This should not occur before the illumination drops to 60 foot-candles (645.8 lux), but should occur before it drops below 35 foot-candles (376.7 lux). The illuminant-sensing device should, if practical, face the northern .sky in the Northern Hemisphere. b. Twilight-to-Night (L-857 System). This should not occur before the illumination drops below 5 foot- candles (53.8 lux), but should occur before it drops below 2 foot-candles (21.5 lux). c. Night-to-Day. The intensity changes listed in subparagraph 103 a. and b. above should be reversed when changing from the night to day mode. d. Day-to-Night (L-866 or L-885/L-866). This should not occur before the illumination drops below 5 foot-candles (563.8 lux) but should occur before it drops below 2 foot-candles (21.5 lux). e. Night-to-Day. The intensity .changes listed in subparagraph d. above should be^ reversed when, changing from the night to day mode. f. Red Obstruction (L-885). The red lights should not turn on until the illumination drops below 60 foot- candles (645.8 lux) but should occur before reaching a level of 35 foot-candles (367.7 lux). Lights should not turn off before the illuminance rises above 35 foot- candles (367.7 lux), but should occur before reaching 60 foot-candles,(645.8 lux). - 104. AREA SURROUNDING CATENARY SUPPORT STRUCTURES . The area in the immediate vicinity of the supporting structure's base should be clear of all items and/or objects, of natural growth that could interfere with the line-of-sight between a pilot and the structure's lights. 105. THREE OR MORE CATENARY SUPPORT STRUCTURES Where a catenary wire crossing requires three or more supporting structures, the inner structures should be equipped with enough light units per level to provide a full 360-de°ree coverage. 28 Chap 10 2/1/07 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 2 CHAPTER 11. MARKING AND LIGHTING MOORED BALLOONS AND KITES 110. PURPOSE The purpose of marking and lighting moored balloons, kites, and their cables or mooring lines is to indicate the presence and general definition of these objects to pilots when converging from any normal angle of approach. 111. STANDARDS These marking and lighting standards pertain to all moored balloons and kites that require marking and lighting under 14 CFR, part 101. 112. MARKING Flag markers should be used on mooring lines to warn pilots of their presence during daylight hours. a. Display. Markers should be displayed at no more than 50-foot (15m) intervals and should be visible for at least 1 statute mile. b. Shape. Markers should be rectangular in shape and not less than 2 feet (0.6m) on a side. Stiffeners should be used in the borders so as to expose a large area, prevent drooping in calm wind, or wrapping around the cable. c. Color Patterns. One of the following color patterns should be used: 1. Solid Color. Aviation orange. 2. Orange and White. Two triangular sections, one of aviation orange and the other white, combined to form a rectangle. 113. PURPOSE Flashing obstruction lights should be used on moored balloons or kites and their mooring lines to warn pilots of their presence during the hours between sunset and sunrise and during periods of reduced visibility. These lights may be operated 24 hours a day. a. Systems. Flashing red (L-864) or white beacons (L-865) may be used to light moored balloons or kites. High intensity lights (L-856) are not recommended. b. Display. Flashing lights should be displayed on the top, nose section, tail section, and on the tether cable approximately 15 feet (4.6m) below the craft so as to define the extremes of size and shape. Additional lights should be equally spaced along the cable's overall length for each 350 feet (107m) or fraction thereof. c. Exceptions. When the requirements of this paragraph cannot be met, floodlighting may be used. 114. OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS The light intensity is controlled by a device that changes the intensity when the ambient light changes. The system should automatically turn the lights on and change intensities as ambient light condition change. The reverse order should apply in changing from nighttime to daytime operation. The lights should flash simultaneously. Chap 11 29 2/1/07 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 2 CHAPTER 12. MARKING AND LIGHTING EQUIPMENT AND INFORMATION 120. PURPOSE This chapter lists documents relating to obstruction marking and lighting systems and where they may be obtained. 121. PAINT STANDARD Paint and aviation colors/gloss, referred to in this publication should conform to Federal Standard FED-STD-595. Approved colors shall be formulated without the use of Lead, Zinc Chromate or other heavy metals to match International Orange, White and Yellow. All coatings shall be manufactured and labeled to meet Federal Environmental Protection Act Volatile Organic Compound(s) guidelines, including the National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for architectural coatings. a. Exterior Acrylic Waterborne Paint. Coating should be a ready mixed, 100% acrylic, exterior latex formulated for application directly to galvanized surfaces. Ferrous iron and steel or non-galvanized surfaces shall be primed with a manufacturer recommended primer compatible with the finish coat. b. Exterior Solventborne Alkyd Based Paint. Coating should be ready mixed, alkyd-based, exterior enamel for application directly to non-galvanized surfaces such as ferrous iron and steel. Galvanized surfaces shall be primed with a manufacturer primer compatible with the finish coat. Paint Standards Color Table COLOR Orange White Yellow NUMBER 12197 • 17875 13538 . TSL3 Note- 1. Federal specification Tl-P-59, aviation surface paint, ready mixed international orange. 2. Federal specification Tl-102, aviation surface paint, oil titanium zinc. 3. Federal specification Tl~102, aviation surface paint, oil, exterior, ready mixed, white and light tints. 122. AVAILABILITY OF SPECIFICATIONS Federal specifications describing the technical characteristics of various paints and their application techniques may be obtained from: GSA- Specification Branch 470 L'Enfant Plaza Suite 8214 Washington, DC 20407 Telephone: (202) 619-8925 123. LIGHTS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT The lighting equipment referred to in this publication should conform to the latest edition of one of the following specifications, as applicable: a. Obstruction Lighting Equipment. 1. AC 150/5345-43, FAA Specification for Obstruction Lighting Equipment. 2. Military Specifications MIL-L-6273, Light, Navigational, Beacon, Obstacle or Code, Type G-l. 3. Military Specifications MIL-L-7830, Light Assembly, Markers, Aircraft Obstruction. b. Certified Equipment. 1. AC 150/5345-53, Airport Lighting Certification Program, lists the manufacturers that have demonstrated compliance with the specification requirements of AC 150/5345-43. 2. Other manufacturers' equipment may be used . provided that equipment meets the specification requirements of AC 150/5345-43. c. Airport Lighting Installation and Maintenance. 1. AC 150/5340-21, Airport Miscellaneous Lighting Visual Aids, provides guidance for the installation, maintenance, testing, and inspection of obstruction lighting for airport visual aids such as airport beacons, wind cones, etc. 2, AC 150/5340-26, Maintenance of Airport Visual Aid Facilities, .provides guidance on the maintenance of airport visual aid facilities. d. Vehicles. 1. AC 150/5210-5, Painting, Marking, and Lighting of Vehicles Used on an Airport, contains provisions for marking vehicles principally used on airports. 2. FAA Facilities. Obstruction marking for FAA facilities shall conform to FAA Drawing Number D- 5480, referenced in FAA Standard FAA-STD-003, Paint Systems for Structures. Chap 12 31 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 2 2/1/07 124. AVAILABILITY The standards and specifications listed above may be obtained free of charge from the below-indicated office: a. Military Specifications: c. FAA Advisory Circulars: Standardization Document Order Desk 700 Robbins Avenue Building #4, Section D Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094 Department of Transportation TASC Subsequent Distribution Office, SVC-121.23 Ardmore East Business Center 3341 Q 75th Avenue Handover, MD 20785 Telephone: (301)322-4961 b, FAA Specifications: Manager, ASD-110 Department of Transportation Document Control Center Martin Marietta/Air Traffic Systems 475 School St., SW. Washington, DC 20024 Telephone: (202) 646-2047 FAA Contractors Only Chap 12 2/1/07 AC 7Q/7460-1K CHG 2 CHAPTER 13. MARKING AND LIGHTING WIND TURBINE FARMS 130. PURPOSE This chapter provides guidelines for the marking and lighting of wind turbine farms. For the purposes of this advisory circular, wind turbine farms are defined as a wind turbine development that contains more than three (3) turbines of heights over 200 feet above ground level. The recommended marking and lighting of these structures is intended to provide day and night conspicuity and to assist pilots in identifying and avoiding these obstacles. 131. GENERAL STANDARDS The development of wind turbine farms is a very dynamic process, which constantly changes based on the differing terrain they are built on. Each wind turbine farm is unique; therefore it is important to work closely with the sponsor to determine a lighting scheme that provides for the safety of air traffic. The following are guidelines that are recommended for wind turbine farms. Consider the proximity to airports and VFR routes, extreme terrain where heights may widely vary, and local flight activity when making the recommendation. a. Not all wind turbine units within an installation or farm need to be lighted. Definition . of the periphery of the installation is essential; however, lighting of interior wind turbines is of lesser importance unless they are taller than the peripheral units. b. Obstruction lights within a group of wind turbines should have unlighted separations or gaps of no more than 1/2 statute mile if the integrity of the group appearance is to be maintained. This is especially critical if the arrangement of objects, is essentially linear. c. Any array of flashing or pulsed obstruction lighting, should be synchronized or flash simultaneously. d. Nighttime wind turbine obstruction lighting should consist of the preferred FAA L-864 aviation red-colored flashing lights. e. White strobe fixtures (FAA L-865) may be used in lieu of the preferred L-864 red flashing lights, but must be used alone without any red lights, and must be positioned in the same manner as the red flashing lights. f. The white paint most often found on wind turbine units is the most effective daytime early warning device. Other colors, such as light gray or blue, appear to be significantly less effective in providing daytime warning. Daytime lighting of wind turbine farms is not required, as long as the turbine structures are painted in a bright white color or light off-white color most often found on wind turbines. 132. WIND TURBINE CONFIGURATIONS - Prior to recommending marking and lighting, determine the configuration and the terrain of the wind turbine farm. The following is a description of the most common configurations. a. Linear - wind turbine farms in a line-like arrangement, often located along a ridge line, the face of a mountain or along borders of a mesa or field. The line may be ragged in shape 'or be periodically broke, and may vary in size from just a few turbines up to 20 miles long. b. Cluster - turbine farms where the turbines are placed in circles like groups on top of a mesa, or within a large field. A cluster is typically characterized by having a pronounced perimeter, with various turbines placed inside the circle at various, erratic distances throughout the center of the circle. c. Grid - turbine farms arranged in'a geographical shape such as a square or a rectangle, where each turbine is set a consistent distance from each other in rows, giving the appearance that they are part of a' square like pattern. -• .•••' 133. MARKING STANDARDS The bright white or light off-white paint most often found on wind turbines has been shown to be most •effective, and if used, no lights are required during the daytime. However, if darker paint is used, wind turbine marking should be supplemented with daytime lighting, as required. 134. LIGHTING STANDARDS a. Flashing red (L864),. or white (L-865) lights . may be used to light wind turbines. Studies have shown that red lights are most effective, and should be the first consideration for lighting recommendations of wind turbines. b. Obstruction lights should have unlighted separations or gaps of no more than 1A mile.: Lights should flash simultaneously. Should the synchronization of the lighting system fail, a lighting outage report should be made in accordance with paragraph 23 of this advisory circular. Light fixtures should be placed as high as possible on the turbine nacelle, so as to be visible from 360 degrees. Chap 13 33 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 2 2/1/07 c. Linear Turbine^ Configuration. Place a light on each turbine positioned at each end of the line or string of turbines. Lights should be no more than Vi statute mile, or 2640 feet from the last lit turbine. In the event the last segment is significantly short, push the lit turbines back towards the starting point to present a well balanced string of lights. High concentrations of lights should be avoided. d. Cluster Turbine Configuration. Select a starting point among the outer perimeter of the cluster. This turbine should be lit, and a light should be placed on the next turbine so that no more than a Vi statute mile gap exists. Continue this pattern around the perimeter. If the distance across the cluster is greater than 1 mile, and/or the terrain varies by more than 100 feet, place one or more lit turbines at locations"' throughout the center of the cluster. e. Grid Turbine Configuration. Select each of the defined corners of the layout to be lit, and then utilize the same concept of the cluster configuration as outlined in paragraph d. f. Special Considerations. On occasion, one or two turbines may be located apart from the main grouping of turbines. If one or two turbines protrude from the general limits of the turbine farm, these turbines should be lit. 34 Chap 13 8/1/00 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 1 APPENDIX 1: Specifications for Obstruction Lighting Equipment Classification APPENDIX Type L-810 L-856 L-857 L-864 L-865 L-866 L-864/L-865 L-885 Description Steady-burning Red Obstruction Light High Intensity Flashing White Obstruction Light (40 FPM) High Intensity Flashing White Obstruction Light (60 FPM) Flashing Red Obstruction Light (20-40 FPM) Medium Intensity Flashing White Obstruction Light (40-FPM) Medium Intensity Flashing White Obstruction Light (60-FPM) Dual: Flashing Red Obstruction Light (20-40 FPM) and Medium Intensity Flashing White Obstruction Light (40 FPM) Red Catenary 60 FPM FPM = Flashes Per Minute TBL4 Appendix 1 Al-1 AC70/7460-1KCHG1 8/1/00 PAINTING AND/OR DUAL LIGHTING OF CHIMNEYS, POLES, TOWERS, AND SIMILAR STRUCTURES |Oj=L-856 fH = L-864or (L-864/L-865) Appurtenance over 40'(12m) More than 500ft (1 but not more than 700ft. (213m) As low as 20 fee! (6m) issr Mora than 250ft. (77m) but not more than 7QOfU213m) FIG I Al-2 Appendix 1 2/1/07.AC 70/7460-1K CHG 2 L-8640RL-865 Overall AGL height wien determining light levels. Top of Structure --L-8S40RL-865 ^ v ORM64A.-865)Communications Antenna Top of Antenna Support Structure 10' Max. Overall AGL height vthen determining light levels. Obstruction lights can be mounted wthin 10' (3m) from the overall height. Intermediate lighting not showi. Overall AGL height if more than 200' '(61m), but hot more than 500' (153rh). FIG 2 Appendix 1 Al-3 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 1 8/1/00 PAINTING AND LIGHTING OF WATER TOWERS, STORAGE TANKS, AND SIMILAR STRUCTURES The number of light units recommended depends on the diameter of the structure More than 150ft. (45m) but not more than 250ft. (77m) More than 150ft. (45m) but not more than 250ft. (77m) FIG 3 Al-4 Appendix 1 8/1/00 AC 70/7460-1K CHG1 PAINTING AND LIGHTING OF WATERTOWERS ANDE SIMILAR STRUCTURES The number of light units recommended depends on the diameter of the structure More than 150 ft. (45m) but not more than 250ft. (77m) FIG 4 Appendix 1 Al-5 AC 70/7460-1K CHG1 8/1/00 PAINTING OF SINGLE PEDESTAL WATER TOWER BY TEARDROP PATTERN FIG S Al-6 Appendix 1 8/1/00 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 1 LIGHTING ADJACENT STRUCTURES Inboard lights recommended on all tevete above height of shorter structure o Inboard lights ! 7S5' may "De omitted ' (242m) Minor adiustrrisnts in vertical placement may be made to place figrrts on same horizontal plane. Lights ors both structures be synchronized FIG 6 Appendix 1 Al-7 AC70/7460-1KCHG1 8/1/00 Lighting Adjacent Structure 750' AGL(225m) Lowest level gliould ha above adjacent structurs yStructuresaf aqijalhaJiirtL Number ot !ev$is depends upon tisightot structure. Lights on both s to ba svnctironizod. J 3f;'/ £ t & 3§i ~?h\ -3 -u^ -*L~ *v _-- r xS 1 Lower tevsSs may bo omitted Cric atf uclui* hi'-jiwr tl*.;in i «nd iighl tev--i!s aca w> S^FIXI lioriDMiial ptarw. Li'jnts en bo8i siructuKu; Saba syndwonizo'i Ona sErycTtifB ft land SiGislfo^S Al-8 Appendix 1 8/1/00 AC70/7460-1KCHG Lighting Adjacent Structure AK-a^j a-20' (6m) or less 250'AGL (77m) fa-Exceeding 20' (6m) but not more than 100' (31m) i 800' AGL (244m) Appendix 1 FIGS Al-9 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 1 8/1/00 HYPERBOLIC COOLING TOWER The number of light units recommended depends on th© diameter of the structure a-Exceeding 100" (31m) FIG 9 Al-10 Appendix 1 8/1/00 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 1 BRIDGE LIGHTING -L-364'ORL-3S5OR (L-864/L-3SJ) , •• FIG 10 Appendix 1 Al-11 AC70/7460-1KCHG1 8/1/00 TYPICAL LIGHTING OF A STAND ALONE WIND TURBINE Front View Side View FIG u Al-12 Appendix 1 8/1/00 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 1 WIND TURBINE GENERATOR FK12 Appendix 1 Al-13 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 1 8/1/00 RED OBSTRUCTION LIGHTING STANDARDS (FA A style A) Day Protection = Aviation Qrcmse/A'W-e PaintNight Protection » 2,000cd Red Beacon and ,=!• - L-8G4 - L-S10 Ocstrocricn FIG 13 Al-14 Appendix 1 8/1/00 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 1 MEDIUM INTENSITY WHITE OBSTRUCTION LIGHTING STANDARDS (FAA Style P) Ocy/Twiiight Protection = ZD.OOOcd White .Strobe Night Protection « 2,OGQcd White Stress Psnllng .af tfr*Bf ia ij?!coHy .act rec^r^d. 1 351'-500' <l05rn-i52m) 220'-350 (61m—1C 1/2 but rsci lower. than 2CC fsct (51m) 0-2 FIG 14 Appendix 1 Al-15 AC 70/7460-1K CHG1 8/1/00 If: ^ HIGH INTENSITY OBSTRUCTION LIGHTING STANDARDS (FAA Style B) Day Protection « 2CO,OOOcd White Strobe Twilight Prctectios •» 2Q,OOOcd White Strcbo N'ight Proteci'ion - 2.000:4 WhfU Strobe • I-ess H'jh I.MsnjB/ Svoi: HG 15 Al-16 Appendix 1 8/1/00 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 1 1751-'-22CC' 1401.'-5750' (427m-533m) 701'-;! 050' 501'-700* HIGH INTENSITY OBSTRUCTION LIGHTING STANDARDS (FAA Style C) Day Protection = 200.000cd White Strobe Twilight Pr<risct!=r5 = 20.000cd Whita Stroba Niight Protect'ioo — 2.000ci White Strobe fe13j3| gi *•> r^sk = J 5 S B) |3j|=1 S S > s.' =|g]r 3& -& » ^ C-2 C-,3 C-4 -C-5 C-5 I - t-S" High lrt»raS FIG 16 Appendix 1 Al-17 AC70/7460-1KCHG1 8/1/00 ;K ^ MEDIUM INTENSITY DUAL OBSTRUCTION LIGHTING STANDARDS (FAA Style E) 2Q.OOOcs Whit«Prctocticn « 2«CCOcd Sod Strobo and si !£&^^^:^'*^™*K^B^*!3^^ II 35i '-500'; (107m-152m) 200'-350' (6im-107rn.) . - L-3&-VL-S65 Floshing 1/2 but riDt \cvsr ihcr, 220 feei.<5-i,-nj E-2 FIG 17 Al-18 Appendix 1 8/1/00 AC 70/7460-1K CHG 1 I I! DUAL HIGH INTENSITY OBSTRUCTION LIGHTING STANDARDS (FAA Style F) Say Fratectfon = 2DO,OOCcd White Strobs !"*•;light Protection = 20.003cd White Strobs ftfght Protecllon «=> 2,000cd Rsd Beacon and sidelights "751'-2200* ($33tn-S71m) 3 401'-1750' (427m-533m) 1051'-1400' (320m -427m) 701'-1050' (213m -320m) 501'-700' 052m-213m) • a•» "f ilBlHl 6 a ka, f. kii. & el |B| F-2 F-3 F-4 F-5 F-5 - L— B54 RnahTng Bcoc;n - L-ft*-&b'ghl — L—S-5S Hfgh Ir-wi-iffy Stmb« (3 Fla=hh9acte r^qulrsd" par * FIG 18 Appendix 1 Al-19 3/1/00 AC 70/7460-1K APPENDIX 2. Miscellaneous 1. RATIONALE FOR OBSTRUCTION LIGHT INTENSITIES. Sections 91.117, 91.119 and 91.155 of the FAR Part 91, General Operating and Flight Rules, prescribe aircraft speed restrictions, minimum safe altitudes, and basic visual flight rules (VFR) weather minimums for governing the operation of aircraft, including helicopters, within the United States. 2. DISTANCE VERSUS INTENSITIES. TBL 5 depicts the distance the various intensities can be seen under 1 and 3 statute miles meteorological visibilities: Distance/Intensity Table Time Period Night Day Day Twilight Twilight Meteorological Visibility Statute Miles 3 (4.8km) 1 (1.6km) 3 (4.8km) - 1 (1.6km) 3 (4.8km) Distance Statute Miles 2.9 (4.7km) 3.1 (4.9km) 1.4 (2.2km) 1.5 (2.4km) 1.4 (2.2km) 1.0 (1.6km) 3.0 (4.8km) 2.7 (4.3km) 1.8 (2.9km) 1.0 (1.6km) to 1.5 (2.4km) 1.8 (2.9km) to 4.2 (6.7km) Intensity Candelas 1,500(-H/-25%) 2,000 (+/- 25%) 32 200,000 100,000 20,000 (+1- 25%) 200,000 100,000 20,000 (+/- 25%) 20,000 (+/- 25%)? 20,000 (+/- 25%)? Note- 1. DISTANCE CALCULATED FOR NORTH SKY ILLUMINANCE. 3. CONCLUSION. Pilots of aircraft travelling at 165 knots (190 mph/306kph) or less should be able to see obstruction lights in sufficient time to avoid the structure by at least 2,000 feet (610m) horizontally under all conditions of operation, provided the pilot is operating in accordance with FAR Part 91. Pilots operating between 165 knots (190 mph/303 km/h) and 250 knots (288 mph/463 kph) should be able to see the obstruction lights unless the weather deteriorates to 3 statute miles (4.8 kilometers) visibility at night, during which time period 2,000 candelas would be required to see the lights at 1.2 statute miles (1.9km). A higher intensity, with 3 statute miles (4.8 kilometers) visibility at night, . could generate a residential annoyance factor. In addition, aircraft in these speed ranges can normally be expected to operate under instrument flight rules (IFR) at night when the visibility is 1 statute mile (1.6 kilometers). TBL 5 4. DEFINITIONS. a. Flight Visibility. The average forward horizontal distance, from the cockpit of an aircraft in flight, at which prominent unlighted objects may be seen and identified by day and prominent lighted objects may be seen and identified by night. Reference- AIRMAN'S INFORM A TION MANUAL 'PILOT/CONTROLLER GLOSSARY. b. Meteorological Visibility. A term that denotes the greatest distance, expressed in statute miles, that selected objects (visibility markers) or lights of moderate intensity (25 candelas) can be seen and identified under specified conditions of observation. Appendix 2 A2-1 AC 70/7460-1K 3/1/00 5. LIGHTING SYSTEM CONFIGURATION. d. Configuration D. Medium Intensity White Lights a. Configuration A. Red lighting system. (including appurtenance lighting). b. Configuration B. High Intensity White e. Configuration E. Dual Lighting Systems - Obstruction Lights (including appurtenance lighting). Medium Intensity White & Red (including c. Configuration C. Dual Lighting System - High appurtenance lighting). Intensity White & Red (including appurtenance Exampie-,. , • \ "CONFIGURATION B 3" DENOTES A HLGH INTENSITY LIGHTING llgntingj. SYSTEM WITH THREE LEVELS OF LIGHT. Appendix 2 EXHIBIT C SQUIRES DAM NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS p.. IT D D D D- * D D n ANALYSIS 17, 2009 Prepared by. , INC. 7578 Bl Caftfn tfoulevar^ Suite 200 (619)^2-1515 i. a ' *• f' f -' Prefaredifor: . ** ,_ "S , f" ^ ' VERIZON WIRELESS t ,. lj§'505 Ssand Canyon Avenue- N " ,4 e, -* , * *•>; t ». -» ? ^Senior rAcousticaP Analyst, * V f f u , { rv » i <, • / <S i, * 1 <. "1 "/ , NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Telecommunications Site 5220 Sunny Creek Road Carlsbad, CA 92010 Prepared For: Cathy Bardenstein Verizon Wireless 15505 Sand Canyon Avenue Irvine, CA 92618 Preparer: Charles Terry HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 El Cajon Boulevard, Suite 200 La Mesa, CA 91942 (619) 462-1515 September 17, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION..... 1 1.1 Project Location and Description 1 1.1.1 Project Location 1 1.1.2 Project Description 1 1.2 Applicable Noise Regulations and Standards 1 1.2.1 Sound Descriptors 1 1.2.2 City of Carlsbad Noise Regulations 2 1.3 Environmental Setting and Existing Conditions 2 1.3.1 Environmental Setting 2 1.3.2 Existing Noise Conditions 2 1.3.3 Future Noise Environment 3 1.4 Methodology and Equipment : 3 1.4.1 Noise Measuring Methodology and Procedures 3 1.4.2 Noise Modeling Software 3 2.0 OPERATION ACTIVITIES '!•: 3 2.1 Guidelines for the Determination of Significance :... 3 2.2 Project-related Noise Sources 4 2.2.1 Generator 4 2.2.2 Air Conditioning Units 4 2.3 Summary of Site-specific Features Used in CADNA Noise Model 5 2.4 Noise Impacts 5 3.0 MITIGATION '. 5 4.0 CONCLUSION 5 5.0 CERTIFICATION-' 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.)r LIST OF FIGURES Follows | No. Name Page 1 Regional Location Map 2 *••'• 2 Project Location Map 2 p 3 Aerial Photograph, 2 [.; 4 Existing Conditions Noise Contours : 6 LIST OF TABLES No. Name Page j 1 On-site Equipment Noise Measurements of Kohler 80REOZJ Generator 4 2 On-site Equipment Noise Measurements of Sun AVP Packaged Terminal Air Conditioning Unit 4 3 Summary of Site Feature Included in CADNA Model .'... 5 f ' LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix Name A Existing Site Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This noise impact analysis was completed to assess noise impacts from on-site project related noise sources to surrounding sensitive uses. The triangle-shaped 50-acre site is generally located along Sunny Creek Road within City of Carlsbad (City), California on a parcel adjacent to both the City of Oceanside and the City of Vista. The 75- by 75-foot project lease area is located in the southeastern area of the parcel, approximately 25-feet to the west of residences along Sequoia Crest and 325 feet northeast of Squires Dam. The project vicinity is comprised of open space and single-family residences. The lease area is located on a hillside at a similar elevation as the nearest residences (sensitive noise receptor) directly to the east. The existing day-time noise level measured on site at an area not impacted by the existing telecommunications facility noise was 48.7 dBA LEQ. No new development is proposed as a part of the project. The project consists of obtaining a Conditional Use Permit renewal for the existing telecommunications facility. The existing lease area includes a Verizon Wireless equipment shelter with two air conditioning exterior-mounted air conditioning units in the southeastern area, a three-foot high retaining wall to the west of the equipment shelter, a back-up generator with tank enclosure to the east of the shelter, a three-legged lattice tower to the east of the generator, and a coax cable bridge between the tower and the shelter. The lease area is enclosed by a chain link fence with two access gates. The site is governed by the City of Carlsbad noise regulations presented in the Municipal Code and the General Plan Noise Element. The General Plan Noise Element do not apply in this situation since no new land uses or development is proposed. The City of Carlsbad Municipal Code only has noise regulations for construction activities and other activities that are not relevant to the project. The operation of the existing telecommunications facility was calculated raise noise levels to 50.4 dBA LEQ along the residential property line to the east of the lease area. This 50.4 dBA LEQ equates to 57.1 CNEL assuming the noise is constant over a 24-hour period. This calculation included the noise generated on site by the air conditioning units (91.8 dBA) and the back-up generator (93.5 dBA). As mentioned above, the City of Carlsbad noise regulations do not apply to existing uses. Thus, the project noise generation would not violate the City of Carlsbad noise regulations. Considering this, no mitigation is required or identified in this report. HELIX Noise Impact Analysis for Squires Dam / VER-01 / September 17, 2009 ES-1 G C C THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK HELIX Noise Impact Analysis for Squires Dam / VER-01 / September 17, 2009 ES-2 1.0 INTRODUCTION This noise impact analysis was completed to assess noise impacts from on-site project related noise sources to surrounding sensitive uses. 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 1.1.1 Project Location The triangle-shaped 50-acre site is generally located within City of Carlsbad (City), California (Figure 1) on a parcel (Assessors Parcel Number [APN] 169-500-0500) that is adjacent to both the City of Oceanside and the City of Vista (Figure 2). The site is regionally located west of South Melrose Drive, north of Palomar Airport Road, south of Shadowridge Drive, and east of the College Boulevard/Cannon Road intersection. More specifically, the 75- by 75-foot project lease area is located in the southeastern area of the parcel approximately 25 feet to the west of residences along Sequoia Crest and 325 feet northeast of Squires Dam (Figure 3). The site is accessible from a dirt road that extends off of Sunny Creek Road. 1.1.2 Project Description No new development is proposed as a part of the project. The project consists of obtaining a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) renewal for the existing telecommunications facility. The existing lease area includes a Verizon Wireless equipment shelter with two exterior-mounted air conditioning units in the southeastern area, three-foot high retaining wall to the west of the equipment shelter, a generator with tank enclosure to the east of the shelter, a three-legged lattice tower to the east of the generator, and a coax cable bridge between the tower and the shelter. The lease area is enclosed by a chain link fence with two access gates. For additional project details, refer to the rough site plan provided in Appendix A. -,• ," 1.2 APPLICABLE NOISE REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS 1.2.1 Sound Descriptors All noise level or sound level values presented herein are expressed in terms of decibels (dB), with A-weighting, abbreviated "dBA," to approximate the hearing sensitivity of humans. Time-averaged noise levels of one hour are expressed by the symbol "LEQ" unless a different time period is specified. Some of the data may also be presented as octave-band-filtered and/or A-octave-band-filtered data, which are a series of sound spectra centered about each stated frequency, with half of the bandwidth above and half of the bandwidth below each stated frequency. This data is typically used for machinery noise analysis and barrier-effectiveness calculations. The Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) is a 24-hour average, where sound levels during the evening hours of 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. have an added 5 dB weighting, and sound levels during the nighttime hours of 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. have an added 10 dB weighting. This is similar to the Day-Night Sound Level (LDN), which is a 24-hour average with 10 dB added weighting on the same nighttime hours, but no added weighting on the evening hours. Sound levels expressed in CNEL are always based on A-weighted decibels. These data unit metrics are used to express Noise Impact Analysis for Squires Dam / VER-01 /September 1 7, 2009 noise levels for measurement and municipal noise ordinances and regulations, land use r_, guidelines, and enforcement of noise ordinances. ]i ~ Noise emission data is often supplied per the industry standard format of Sound Power, which is ^, the total acoustic power radiated from a given sound source as related to a reference power level. i Sound Power differs from Sound Pressure, which measures the fluctuations in air pressure caused by the presence of sound waves, and is generally the format that describes noise levels as heard by the receiver. Sound Pressure is the actual noise experienced by a human or registered by a sound level instrument. When Sound Pressure is used to describe a noise source, it must specify the distance from the noise source to provide complete information. Sound Power is a specialized analytical method to provide information without the distance requirement, but it ( may be used to calculate the sound pressure at any desired distance. 1.2.2 Citv of Carlsbad Noise Regulations j The site is governed by the City of Carlsbad noise regulations presented in the Municipal Code and the General Plan Noise Element. The General Plan Noise Element regulates the placement P~ of new uses and development within the City. Thus, the General Plan Noise Element does not (• apply in this situation since the project does not propose any new land uses or development. The City of Carlsbad does not have noise ordinance regulations that pertain to the operation of the existing uses; however, the City does include a construction noise ordinance that limits the hours of construction activities. The project does not propose any construction. Thus, no City noise regulations are relevant to the project. . . . j ' 1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND EXISTING CONDITIONS 1.3.1 Environmental Setting 1: The project site is located in the immediate area of a single-family residential development in the r" City of Vista and open space in the City of Carlsbad (Figure 2). A satellite station with six [ , satellites exists to the south within the open space area. The open space area also contains Squires Dam and associated structures to the southwest. ; The project lease area consists of an existing telecommunications facility, including an equipment shelter, generator, and lattice tower (Figure 3). The site is located on a hillside that is r • a part of a series of low rolling hills. The elevation on site is approximately 557 feet above mean I sea level. The hillside increases in elevation and peaks just to the south of the project area, and decreases in elevation to the north. Areas to the east and west, including the nearby residences, j are generally on the same elevation plane as the project (Figure 2). ) The project APN is- designated as Open Space (OS) by the City of Carlsbad, while the residences i • to the east are designated as Single-family Residential (R-1B) by the City of Vista. The area to [_ the south of the site, which contains Squires Dam and the satellite station, is designated as OS by the City of Carlsbad. , - •~L1.3.2 Existing Noise Conditions An on-site inspection was conducted at 1:30 p.m. on Wednesday, July 26th, 2009. The weather [_ conditions were as follows: no wind, medium humidity, and temperatures in the low 80s. A Noise Impact Analysis for Squires Dam / VER-01 /September 1 7, 2009 ; RIVERSIDE COUNTY nRdwrF ! SAN DIEGO •UKANCjfc ; «_. ,.,-rw •••_COUNTY J COUNTY Pacific Ocean N ! Miles r ^MH X UHrre0STATK _.J^S \ MEXICO Tijuana I:\ArcOtS\V\VER-OI SquiresDam\Map\E.W\Noi3e\Fig[_Regional.mxd -KF mix Regional Location Map SQUIRES DAM Figure 1 M •*• ' ?uena VistaI /T I T Park**-—— • t |__' dl™ 2,000 1,000 JobNo:VER-01 Date: 09/02/09 Source: USGS 7.5' Quads; San Luis Key and San Marcos l:\ArcGIS\V\VER-01 SquiresDam\Map\ENV\Noise\Fig2_Loca!ion.mxd -Kf mix Project Location Map SQUIRES DAM Figure 2 Job No: VER-01 Date: 09/02/09 I:\ArcGlS\V\VER-Ol SquiresDam\Map\ENV\NoUc\Fig3_Aerial.nwd -KF HELIX Aerial Photograph SQUIRES DAM Figure 3 fifteen-minute ambient noise measurement of 48.7 dBA LEQ was taken near the existing equipment location (Figure 2). The microphone was positioned approximately five feet above the existing grade. The measurement location was chosen to provide a measurement similar to the site without any site contribution to the measurement. Ambient noise at the site is mainly due to vehicular traffic on nearby residential streets. 1.3.3 Future Noise Environment Since the surrounding area is fully developed or designated as open space, no significant increase in development is expected to occur in the future. Thus, future noise levels are not expected to change relative to the existing conditions. 1.4 METHODOLOGY AND EQUIPiMENT 1.4.1 Noise Measuring Methodology and Procedures The sound level meter was field-calibrated immediately prior to the noise measurement to ensure accuracy. All sound level measurements conducted and presented in this report, in accordance with the regulations, were made with a sound level meter that conforms to the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) specifications for sound level meters ANSI SI.4-1983 (R2001). All instruments are maintained with National Bureau of Standards traceable calibration, per the manufacturers' standards. The equipment noise emission levels were measured with a Larson Davis Model 831, Type 1 Sound Level Meter, Serial (with windscreen), and Larson Davis Model CA250, Type 1 Calibrator. The sound level meter was field-calibrated immediately prior to the noise measurements and checked afterwards to ensure accuracy. 1.4.2 Noise Modeling Software Modeling of the non-traffic outdoor noise environment is accomplished using Computer Aided Noise Abatement (CADNA) Version 3.5, which is a model-based computer program, developed by DataKustik for predicting noise impacts in a wide variety of conditions. CADNA assists in the calculation, presentation, assessment, and mitigation of noise exposure. It allows for the input of project information, such as noise source data, barriers, structures, and topography to create a detailed CAD model, and uses the. most up-to-date calculation standards to predict outdoor noise impacts. 2.0 OPERATION ACTIVITIES 2.1 GUIDELINES FOR THE DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE The City of Carlsbad does., not have any noise regulations that apply to the project. Refer to Section 1.2.1, City of Carlsbad Noise Regulations, for more information. HELIX Noise Impact Analysis for Squires Dam / VER-01 /September 17, 2009 2.2 PROJECT-RELATED NOISE SOURCES All noise source data presented in this section is in Sound Power SWL (see Descriptors). 2.2.1 Generator The project lease area contains an existing back-up generator with tank enclosure to the west of the Verizon equipment shelter (Appendix A). The noise levels associated with the existing backup generator was determined through on-site noise measurements taken at the site while the generator was operating under the load associated with a power outage. Table 1 presents the worst-case composite noise level derived from three measurements taken around the periphery of the generator. As shown, the noise level of the generator was determined to be 93.5 dBA. Table 1 ON-SITE EQUIPMENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS OF KOHLER 80REOZJ GENERATOR Noise Levels in Decibels (dB) Measured at Octave Frequencies in Hertz (hz 31.5 89.8 63 94.3 125 96.2 250 96.9 500 89.4 IK 88.9 2K 81.4 4K 76.8 , 8K 72.0 Overall Noise Level in A-weighted Scale (dBA) 93.5 c 2.2.2 Air Conditioning Units The site contains two existing air conditioning units mounted on the west side,,of the existing telecommunications facility (Appendix A). The air conditioning units are SUN AVP Packaged Terminal Air Conditioning (PTAC) units. Table 2 illustrates the measurements taken at one of the existing PTAC units on site. As shown, the PTAC unit noise level was determined to be 91.8 dBA. 1 Table 2 ON-SITE EQUIPMENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS OF SUN AVP PACKAGED TERMINAL AIR CONDITIONING UNIT Noise Levels in Decibels (dB) Measured at Octave Frequencies in Hertz (hz) 31.5 63 125 102 98.1 92.5 250 92.3 500 90.2 IK 86.6 2K 81.9 4K 76.1 8K 69.4 Overall Noise Level in A-weighted Scale (dBA) 91.8 HELIX Noise Impact Analysis for Squires Dam / VER-Q1 /September 17, 2009 2.3 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC FEATURES USED IN CADNA NOISE MODEL The existing site feature that was included in the CADNA noise prediction model is listed in Table 3. The existing 12-foot tall equipment shelter was considered the only on-site permanent features that would affect the noise propagation of the existing noise sources to the closest residential property line. Table 3 SUMMARY OF SITE FEATURE INCLUDED IN CADNA MODEL Description Verizon Wireless Equipment Shelter Height (in feet) 12 2.4 NOISE IMPACTS As mentioned above, the existing telecommunications facility includes a back-up generator and two air conditioning units that generate noise and the noise is partially blocked by an existing equipment shelter. Based on the existing site conditions, the existing project noise impact was calculated to be 50.4 dBA LEQ along the residential property line to the east of the lease area (Figure 4). If this noise level is constant through a 24-hour period, it would equate to 57.1 CNEL. Residences are typically considered sensitive noise receptors. The City of Carlsbad does not have any noise regulations that apply to the operational noise of the project. Thus, the project would not generate noise in exceedance of any City of Carlsbad noise regulations. 3.0 MITIGATION Considering no significant noise impacts would result from the implementation of the project, no mitigation is required or identified herein. 4.0 CONCLUSION With the operation of the existing telecommunication facility, the noise level at the adjacent residential property line is 50.4 dBA LEQ, which is equivalent to 57.1 CNEL. The project would not generate noise in exceedance of any City of Carlsbad noise regulations, as the City does not restrict the existing operational noise generation. Considering no significant noise impact would result from the implementation of the project, no mitigation is required or identified herein. These conclusions and recommendations are based on the most up-to-date, project-related information available. Verification of compliance with City noise regulations can be provided, if desired, by conducting a noise survey consisting of sound level measurements at or close to the nearest impacted locations in each direction after the noise wall mitigation is built. This is best accomplished in the late night or very early morning hours while the equipment is in full operation and other ambient noise sources are minimized. If any additional sound attenuation is found to be necessary, it can be specified at that time. It is not expected that any additional sound attenuation would be necessary within the scope of this project. HELIX Noise Impact Analysis for Squires Dam / VER-01 / September 17, 2009 5.0 CERTIFICATION This analysis is based on the related project information received and measured noise levels, and represents a true and factual analysis of the acoustical impact issues associated with the Verizon Wireless Squires Dam telecommunications site at 5220 Sunny Creek Road, Carlsbad, California. This report was prepared by Charles Terry. r r / 1 y & 9 n Charles ferry Date ' j ; HELIX Noise Impact Analysis for Squires Dam IVER-01 / September 17, 2009 0.. Ji Project Boundary Contour (in decibels) Job No: VER-01 Date: 09/17/09 l:\ArcGIS\V\VER-01 SquiresDam\Map\ENVVNoise\Fig4_Mitigated_Noise_Conlourc.mxd -KF HELIX Existing Conditions Noise Contours SQUIRES DAM Figure 4 APPENDIX A Existing Site Plan EXHIBIT D SQUIRES DAM RF / EME COMPLIANCE REPORT stescfe 200 North Glebe Road, Suite 1000. Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • 703.276.1169 fax info@sitesafe.com • www.sitesafe.i rr compliance Verizon Wireless Site ID - Squires Dam Site Name-Squires Dam Site Compliance Report 5220 Sunnycreek Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 San Diego County Site visit date: September 15, 2009 Site survey by: Mohamed Frej Report generated date: September 25, 2009 Report, by: Jerry Audi . Verizon Wireless is Compliant with FCC Rules on RF Health and Safety. © 2009 Sitesafe,: Inc. Arlington; VA Matthew J Butcher Registered Professional Engineer State of California License E 18612 Registration Expires December 31,2010. rf compliance experts Verizon Wireless Squires Dam - Squires Dam Radio Frequency (RF) Site Compliance Report 5220 Sunnycreek Road, Carlsbad, CA 92008 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 . info@sitesafe.com r i c o m ;p ! i cs n c e experts Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF REPORT l 1.2 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE 2 2 SITE COMPLIANCE 3 2.1 ACTIONS FOR SITE COMPLIANCE 3 2.2 SITE SAFETY PROCEDURES.... 4 3 SITE ACCESS PROCEDURES 5 4 NIR ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6 4.1 NIR ANALYSIS RESULTS 6 4.2 SITE MEASUREMENTS COLLECTED 6 4.3 RF EMISSION DIAGRAM 12 5 PREDICTED RF ENERGY DENSITY CALCULATIONS 14 6 FIELD TECHNICIAN CERTIFICATION 64 7 ENGINEER CERTIFICATION 65 APPENDIX A - STATEMENT OF LIMITING CONDITIONS 67 APPENDIX B - ASSUMPTIONS AND DEFINITIONS 68 GENERAL MODEL ASSUMPTIONS , 68 USE OF GENERIC ANTENNAS : 68 DEFINITIONS 69 APPENDIX C - RULES & REGULATIONS 71 EXPLANATION OF APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS 71 OCCUPATIONAL ENVIRONMENT EXPLAINED 71 APPENDIX D-GENERAL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS 72 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION .„.., : 73 200 N. Glebe Road « Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.275.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Executive Summary 1.1 Purpose of Report Verizon Wireless has contracted with Sitesafe, Inc. (Sitesafe), an independent Radio Frequency (RF) regulatory and engineering consulting firm, to determine whether the communications site, Squires Dam - Squires Dam, located at 5220 Sunnycreek Road, Carlsbad, CA, is in compliance with Federal Communication Commission (FCC) Rules and Regulations for RF emissions. Sitesafe's field personnel visited Squires Dam - Squires Dam on September 15, 2009. This report contains a detailed summary of the RF environment at the site including: • photographs of the site; • diagram of the site; • a presentation of Verizon Wireless's predicted contributions to the ground- based RF energy density; and • tabulation of cumulative Maximum Permissible Exposure. ("MPE") measurements taken on the site, as applicable; This report addresses exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields in accordance with the FCC Rules and Regulations for all individuals, classified in two groups, "Occupational or Controlled" and "General Public or Uncontrolled." The FCC defines an Occupational or Controlled environment as one where persons are exposed to RF fields as a consequence of their employment and where those persons exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Typical criteria for an Occupational or Controlled environment is restricted access (i.e. locked doors, gates, etc.) to areas where antennas are located coupled with proper RF warning signage, The FCC defines a site as a General Public or Uncontrolled environment when human exposure to RF fields occurs to the general public or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be fully aware of the potential for exposure or can not exercise control over the exposure. Typical criteria for a General Public or Uncontrolled environment are unrestricted access (i.e. unlocked or no restrictions) to areas where antennas are located without proper RF warning signage being posted. The theoretical modeling of the RF energy being transmitted at a given site have been performed in accordance with the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65"), Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Edition 97-01, published August 1997. This document specifically addresses compliance of Verizon Wireless's transmitting facilities. •j - If you have any questions regarding RF safety and regulatory compliance, please do not hesitate to contact Sitesafe's Customer Support Department at (703) 276- 1100. Pagel 1.2 Statement of Compliance Upon evaluation of the RF emission levels at this site, and a thorough review of site access procedures, hazard signage and visible antenna locations, Sitesafe has determined that: This site is compliant with the FCC rules and regulations, as described in OET Bulletin 65. The compliance determination is based on General Public MPE levels due to theoretical levels, RF signage placement, and the level of restricted access to the antennas at the site. Measurements have also been performed to validate the assumptions used in out theoretical modeling of this site. Measurements provide a view of MPE percentage levels at the site at the time of Sitesafe's visit and are used to validate modeling results. Theoretical modeling is used for determining compliance and the percentage of MPE contribution. Page 2 Site Compliance 2.1 Actions for Site Compliance Based on common industry practice and our understanding of FCC and OSHA requirements, this section provides a statement of recommendations for site compliance. RF alert signage recommendations have been proposed based on existing measurements and theoretical analysis of MPE levels. Sitesafe has documented the locations of any RF signs and barriers that are required for compliance. Barriers can consist of locked doors, fencing, railing, rope, chain, paint striping or tape, combined with RF alert signage. Sitesafe found one issues that that will improve the site relative to RF Safety: • Posting RF signs such that a person could read and understand the signs prior to accessing the tower If access.to the tower is required Sitesafe recommends completion of the proper RF safety training. If personnel need to work on or near the Verizon Wireless antennas or other carrier antennas, and transmitters cannot be powered down, we recommend passing through and not stopping in the areas in front of or immediately adjacent to any antennas and utilizing an RF Exposure personal monitor at all times (e.g. Nardalert XT). PageS 2.2 Site Safety Procedures The following items are general safety recommendations that should be administered on a site by site basis as needed by the carrier. General Maintenance Work: Any maintenance personnel required to work immediately in front of antennas and / or in areas indicated as above 100% of the MPE limits should coordinate with the wireless operators to disable transmitters during their work activities. Training and Qualification Verification: All personnel accessing this site should have a basic understanding of EME awareness and RF Safety procedures when working around transmitting antennas. Awareness training increases a workers understanding to potential RF exposure scenarios. Awareness can be achieved in a number of ways (e.g. videos, formal classroom lecture or internet based courses). Physical Access Control: Access restrictions to transmitting antennas locations is the primary element in a site safety plan. Examples of access restrictions are as follows: • Locked door or gate • Alarmed door • . Locked ladder access • Restrictive Barrier at antenna locations (e.g. Chain link with posted RF Sign) . RF Signage: Everyone should obey all posted signs at all times. RF signs play an important role in" properly warning a worker prior to entering into a potential RF Exposure area. Assume all antennas are active: Due to the nature of telecommunications transmissions, an antenna transmits intermittently. Always assume an antenna is transmitting. Never stop in front of an antenna. If you have to pass by an antenna, move through as quickly and safely as possible thereby reducing any exposure to a minimum. Maintain a 3 foot clearance from all antennas: There is a direct correlation between the strength of an EME field and the distance from the transmitting antenna. The further away from an antenna, the lower the corresponding EME field is. Page 4 3 Site Access Procedures A site visit was conducted on September 15, 2009 at approximately 9:15 AM. At that time, a diagram of the site was verified, obtained or produced containing the locations of all visible antennas, RF signs and access points on site. These antennas were recorded and photographed. The antenna make(s)/model(s) and centerlines were verified where possible. The following information was gathered regarding site access at the facility. Site access were locked or restricted at the time of the site visit. RF Advisory signage was posted at some but not all site access points. Figure 1: Site Access PageS NIR Analysis and Recommendations 4.1 NIR Analysis Results When applying the General Public environment standards, the predicted energy density from the Verizon Wireless operation is no more than 1.256 % of the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limiting any accessible location on the ground. A presentation of this predicted analysis is attached in Section 4. Additionally, measurements were taken on the ground in the vicinity of the site. Measurements show the cumulative RF energy density from all sources. Given that Verizon Wireless's predicted contribution is below 5%, Verizon Wireless meets the 5% exclusion from corrective action should it be necessary in the future. Based on actual measurement taken and an inspection of the site, Verizon Wireless is compliant with the FCC rules and regulations for human exposure to non-ionizing radiation to the general public. 4.2 Site Measurements Collected This section provides a summary of the measurements collected at the site. Actual measurements locations at which these data points were collected are included in the RF Emission Diagram provided in Section 4.3 of this report. Measurements collected include both maximum and spatial average values. The spatial average measurement consists of a collection of atleast ten (10) measurements within a ten (10) second time interval taken from zero (0) to six (6) feet. The purpose of this measurement technique is to identify the average power density over the dimensions of a typical human body. The measurements below were obtained from accessible areas located at the site at the time of Sitesafe's visit. Because of the antenna configuration at this site, specific emissions could not be discerned from nearby facilities, and no attempt was made to determine power density levels from a specific transmitting antenna. Highest Measurement of Occupational MPE Limit: <1 %. Highest Measurement of General Public MPE Limit: <5 %. ' ; •;, Table 2: Spatial Average and Maximum Measurements Measurements •-:.•• Points. •"•%-' Ml M2 M3 M4 M5 : -Spatial Average <} % <i % f-l 97<• 1 /o <"1 ®7<- 1 /o «*1 °?^ 1 /o Maximum <l % <l % <l % <] % <l % Measurements Points M6 M7 M8 M9 Spatial Average <i % <i % <i % <i % _j Maximum <l % <l % <i % <l % RF meters and probes have been calibrated and used according to the manufacturer's specifications. Measurements provide a view of MPE percentage levels at the sfte at the time of Sitesafe's visit and are used to validate modeling results. Theoretical modeling is used for determining compliance and the percentage of MPE contribution. A separate diagram has been included in section 4.3 of this document. Spatial average measurements are displayed in this diagram. Page6 Figure 2: Verizon Wireless Alpha Sector Antennas #1 through #4 Figure 3: Verizon Wireless Beta Sector Antennas #5 through #8 Page? ' Figure 4: Verizon Wireless Gamma Sector Antennas #9 through #12 Figure 5: Verizon Wireless Alpha Sector Antennas #13 through #17 PageS Figure 6: Verizon Wireless Beta Sector. Antennas #18 through #22 Figure 7: Verizon Wireless Gamma Sector Antennas #23 through #27 Page 9 Figure 8: Verizon Wireless Microwaves #28 through #35 ~f -^ -,- - ,Jf, -- * " ,~. ""'c-^iB-jV ' -S. ' ,"->,'' '^-^Tsi (V:"-,-.*- ^t^li^^' "4~ Figure 9: Verizon Wireless Antennas #36 through #37 Page 10 Figure 10: Ladder Overview Figure 11: Base Overview Page 11 4.3 RF Emission Diagram The diagram below displays RF spatial average measurement locations. Measurement values are referenced from the table above. Predicted Maximum Permissible Exposure levels calculations provided in tabular form in Section 4 below. See the engineering statement for more information on these calculations. I _ _J3ROUND.._ _ L Figure 12: Site Layout with Measurement Points Page 12 Abbreviations used in the RF Emissions Diagrams | Measurement ## taken during a site visit As discussed in Section 4.2, site measurement locations for spatial average measurements collected at the time of Sitesafe's visit have been added to the RF emissions diagram. While the software modeling represents theoretical MPE levels based on the assumption (s) detailed above, the site measurement data is a snapshot of MPE levels, and dependent on transmitter duty cycle, system implementation and emissions from other RF sources at nearby antenna sites. Additional Information in the RF Emissions Diagrams Key The RF Emission Diagram provides indications of RF signage and locked doors. The table below lists the abbreviations used to indicate locked doors, signs and barriers: Table 3: RF Signage and Barrier Key RF Signage - Type Notice Caution Warning Existing Location NE CE WE Recommended Location MR CR WR Barriers Type Locked Door Fencing Rope Chain Paint Stripes Existing Location LE RE Recommended Location LR BE Page 13 5 Predicted RF Energy Density Calculations Verizon Wireless Squires Dam Site Summary Carrier Verizon Wireless Verizon Wireless Verizon Wireless Verizon Wireless Verizon Wireless Verizon Wireless Verizon Wireless Verizon Wireless Verizon Wireless Verizon' Wireless Area Maximum Percentage MPE 0% 0.375 % 0.055 % 0% 0.248 % 0.188 % 0.024% 0 % 0.056 % 0.309 % Composite Site MPE:1.256 % Page 14 Verizon Wireless Squires Dam Carrier Summary Frequency: 6000 MHz Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 pW/cmA2 Maximum power density at ground level: 0 (jW/cmA2 Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 0 % Antenna Make Model ANDREW PL6-65 Height (feet) 120 Orientation (degrees true) ERP (Watts) 12 0 On Max Power Density (uW/cmA2) 0 Axis Percent of MPE 0 Area Max Power Density Percent of (uW/cmA2) MPE 0 0 Page 15 Verizon Wireless Squires Dam Carrier Summary Frequency: 6256 MHz Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 jjW/cmA2 Maximum power density at ground level: 3.75371 pW/cmA2 Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 0.37537 % Antenna Make Model ANDREW PL6-65 Height (feet) ' 60 Orientation (degrees true) 295 ERP (Watts) 4635 On Max Power Density (uW/cmA2) 3.753711 Axis Percent of MPE 0.375371 Area Max Power Density (uW/cmA2) 3.753711 Percent of MPE 0.375371 Page 16 Verizon Wireless Squires Dam Carrier Summary Frequency: 6286 MHz Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 Mw/cmA2 Maximum power density at ground level: 0.54821 pW/cmA2 Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 0.05482 % Antenna Make Model ANDREW PL6-65 Height (feet) 120 Orientation (degrees true) ERP (Watts) 145 2793 On Axis Max Power Density Percent of (uW/cmA2) MPE 0.441749 0.044175 Area Max Power Density Percent of (uW/cmA2) MPE 0.548209 0.054821 Page 17 Verizon Wireless Squires Dam Carrier Summary Frequency: Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Maximum power density at ground level: Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 11000 MHz 1000 MW/cmA2 0 (jW/cmA2 0 % On Axis Area Antenna Make Model ANDREW VHLP4-1 1 Height (feet) 79 Orientation (degrees true) 73 ERP (Watts) 0 Max Power Density (uW/cm»2) 0 Percent of MPE 0 Max Power Density (MW/cm*2) 0 Percent of MPE 0 Page 18 Verizon Wireless Squires Dam Carrier Summary Frequency: Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): .Maximum power density at ground level: Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 11225 MHz 1000 MW/cm*2 2.48005 |jW/cmA2 0.248 % Antenna Make Model ANDREW VHLP4-11 Height (feet) 60 Orientation (degrees true) ERP (Watts) 73 3062 On Axis Max Power Density (MW/cm»2) 2.371328 Percent of MPE 0.237133 Area Max Power Density Percent of (uW/cmA2) . MPE 2.480047 0.248005 Page 19 Verizon Wireless Squires Dam Carrier Summary Frequency: Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Maximum power density at ground level: Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 6197 MHz 1000 uW/cmA2 1.88042 MW/cmA2 0.18804 % Antenna Make RFS ANDREW Model PA4-57 PL6-65 . Height (feet) 80 62 Orientation (degrees true) 145 12 ERP (Watts) 1762 2323 On Max Power Density (MW/cmA2) 0.925382 1.452862 Axis Percent of MPE 0.092538 0.145286 Area Max Power Density (uVWcm»2) 0.925382 1.880386 Percent of MPE 0.092538 0.188039 Page 20 Verizon Wireless Squires Dam Carrier Summary Frequency: Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Maximum power density at ground level: Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 11365 MHz 1000 pW/cmA2 0.24236 MW/cmA2 0.02424 % Antenna Make Model Gabriel HE3-107 Height (feet) 60 Orientation (degrees true) ERP (Watts) 159 299 On Axis Max Power Density Percent of (uW/cmA2) MPE 0.24236 0.024236 Area Max Power Density Percent of (pW/cmA2) MPE 0.24236 0.024236 Page 21 Verizon Wireless Squires Dam Carrier Summary Frequency: Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 5250 1000 MHz Maximum power density at ground level: 0.00076 (;W/cmA2 Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 0.00008 % On Axis Max Power Height Orientation Density Percent of Antenna Make Model (feet) (degrees true) ERP (Watts) (uW/cmA2) MPE Gabriel DFPD2-52 154 50 4 0.000757 0.000076 Area Max Power Density (uW/cmA2) 0.000757 Percent of MPE 0.000076 Page 22 Verizon Wireless Squires Dam Carrier Summary Frequency: Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Maximum power density at ground level: Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 1900 MHz 1000 pW/cmA2 0.56431 uW/cmA2 0.05643 % Antenna Make .EMS • EMS . EMS Model RR65-18-OODPL2 '. RR65-18-OODPL2 RR65-18-OODPL2 Height (feet) 154 154 154 Orientation (degrees true) 60 21.0 330 ERP (Watts) 1050 1050 1050 On Axis Max Power Density Percent of (uW/cmA2) MPE 0.207324 0.020732 0.207324 • 0.020732 0.207324 0.020732 Area Max Power Density Percent of (uW/cmA2) MPE 0.3272 0.03272 0.3272 0.03272 0.3272 0.03272 Page 23 Verizon Wireless Squires Dam Carrier Summary Frequency: Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Maximum power density at ground level: Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: Antenna Make S.WEDCOM SWEDCOM SWEDCOM SWEDCOM SWEDCOM SWEDCOM. SWEDCOM SWEDCOM ANDREW ANDREW ANDREW ANDREW ANDREW ANDREW ANDREW ANDREW ANDREW ANDREW ANDREW ANDREW ANDREW ANDREW ANDREW Antel Antel Antel Antel Model ALP 9212 ALP 9212 ALP 9212 ALP 921 2 ALP 9212 ALP 92 12 ALP 9212 ALP 9212 844H90T8E-XY 844H90T8E-XY 844H90T8E-XY 844H90T8E-XY 844H90T8E-XY 844H90T8E-XY 844H90T8E-XY 844H90T8E-XY 844H90T8E-XY 844H90T8E-XY 844H90T8E-XY 844H90T8E-XY 844H90T8E-XY 844H90T8E-XY 844H90T8E-XY BCD-80010 BCD-80010 BCD-80010 BCD-80010 Height (feet) 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 157 157 157 157 157 . 157 157 157 157 157 157 157 157 157 157 172 172 172 170 Orientation (degrees true) 60 60 210 210 210 330 330 330 20 20 20 20 20 120 120 120 120 120 270 270 270 270 270 0 0 0 0 850 566.67 1.74845 0.30855 ERP (Watts) 375 375 250 250 250 250 250 250 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 250 250 250 . 250 MHz uW/cm*2 MW/cmA2 % On Axis Max Power Density (MW/cmA2) 0.194736 0.194736 0.12999 0.12999 0.12999 0.129824 0.129824 0.129824 0.17505 0.17505 0.17505 0.17505 0.17505 0.174828 0.174823 0.174828 0.174828 0.174828 0.174828 0.174828 0.174828 0.174828 .0.174828 0.122659 0.129027 0.122659 0.124915 Percent of MPE 0.034365 0.034365 0.022939 0.022939 0.022939 0.02291 0.02291 0.02291 0.030891 0.030891 0.030891 0.030891 0.030891 0.030852 0.030852 0.030852 0.030852 0.030852 ' 0.030852 0.030852 0.030852 0.030852 0.030852 0.021646 0.022769 0.021646 0.022044 Area ' Max Power Density (uW/cmA2) 0.203355 0.203355 0.13557 0.13557 0.13557 0.13557 0.13557 0.13557 0.178811 0.178811 0.178811 0.178811 0.178811 0.178811 0.178811 .0.178811 ; 0.178811 0.178811 0.178811 0.178811 0.178811 0.178811 0.178811 0.125342 0.134048 0.125342 0.127651 Percent of MPE 0.035886 0.035886 0.023924 0.023924 0.023924 0.023924 0.023924 0.023924 0.031555 0.031555 0.031555 0.031555 0.031555 0.031555 0.031555 0.031555 0.031555 0.031555 0.031555 0.031555 0.031555 0.031555 0.031555 0.022119 0.023656 0.022119 0.022527 Page 24 ANDREW:PL6-65 Antenna Worksheet (12 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 0 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dS Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0' 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 . 12.0 14.0 - 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 -0.50 -5.00 -20.00 -20.00 -20.00 -23.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -40.00 -40.00 -40.00 -40.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 0.8913 0.3162 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0050 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 ' 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001• s 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 120 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.79 2889.09 1444.42 .962.80 721.95 577.40 481.01 412.14 360.46 320.25 288.06 239.74 205.18 179.22 159.00 142.79 129/51 118.42 109.02 100:94 93.93 87.79 82.37 77.54 73.22 69.33 65.82 62.63 59.72 57.07 54.64 52.42 50.38 48.50 46.78 45.20 43.75 42.43 41.23 40.13 39.15 38.26 37.48 36.79 36.20 35.70 35.29 34.98 34.76 34.62 34.53 1000 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 • 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 • 0.00 6000 Power Density (uW/cmA2) 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 "0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 . 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 . 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0:000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 •0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000000 . 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 o.oooooo 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 . ' 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 - o.oooooo 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 .•o.oooooo 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.0 Times Below MPE 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 11 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 11 11 1 1 11 1 111 1 1 1 11 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 11 Page 25 ANDREW:PL6-65 Antenna Worksheet (295 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 4635 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32,0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 • 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 -0.50 -5.00 -20.00 -20.00 -20.00 -23.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -40.00 -40.00 -40.00 -40.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 . -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 0.8913 0.3162 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0050 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 . 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 -- 0.0001 • 0.0001 v" 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 60 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.78 2888.93 1444.10 962.32 721.31 576.60 480.04 411.01 359.17 318.79 286.44 237.79 202.90 176.61 156.05 139.50 125.87 114.42 104.66 . 96.23 88.85 82.33 76.51 71.29 66.57 62.26 58.32 54.70 51.35 48.24 45.34 42.63 40.09 37.71 35.47 33.36 . 31.37 29.50 27.74 26.08 24.54 23.10 21.78 20.58 19.50 18.56 17.76 17.13 . 16.67 16.38 16.29 1000 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103'.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 . 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 . 24.59 22.45 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 6256 Power Density (uW/cmA2) 0.000185 0.018516 0.074104 0.166876 0.297025 0.464818 0.670605 0.914811 1.197947 1.520605 1.883465 2.732959 3.753711 3.545602 2.035578 0.222764 0.099244 0.119238 0.143509 0.098765 0.077250 0.073642 . 0.085245 0.098178 0.112593 0.128667 0.146606 0.166647 0.189063 0.016223 0.007753 0.008764 0.009902 0.011185 0.012579 0.011342 0.012812 0.014473 0.016347 0.018457 0.020819 0.023442 0.026320 0.029424 0.032687 0.035999 0.039194 0.042060 0.044354 0.045844 0.046286 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000019 • 0.001852 0.007410 0.016688 0.029702 0.046482 0.067060 0.091481 0.119795 0.152060 0.188346 0.273296 0.375371 0.354560 0.203558 0.022276 0.009924 -0.011924 0.014351 0.009876 0.007725 0.007364 0.008524 0.009818 0.011259 0.012867 O'.0 14661 0.016665 0.018906 0.001622 0.000775 0.000876 0.000990 0.001118 0.001258 0.001134 0.001281 0.001447 0.001635 0.001846 0.002082 0.002344 0.002632 0.002942 0.003269 0.003600 0.003919 0.004206 0.004435 0.004584 0.004629 0.0 Times Below MPE 5401545 54006 - 13494 5992 3366 .,. 2151 " 1491 1093 834 657 530 365 266 282 491 4489 10076 8386 6968 10125 12944 13579 11730 10185 8881 7771 6820 6000 '5289 61641 128984 114101 100987 89405 79497 88168 78054 69095 61171 54180 48033 42658 37993 33986 30593 27778 25513 23775 22545 21813 21604 Paga 26 ANDREW:PL6-65 Antenna Worksheet (145 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 2793 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 .68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 -0.50 -5.00 -20.00 -20.00 -20.00 -23.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -40.00 -40.00 -40.00 -40.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41 .00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 . -41.00 -41.00 -41 .00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41 .00 -41.00 -41.00 0.8913 0.3162 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0050 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 •V0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 •0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 = ° 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 120 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.79 2889.09 1444.42 962.80 721.95 577.40 481.01 412.14 360.46 320.25 288.06 239.74 205.18 179.22 159.00 142.79 129.51 118.42 109.02 100.94 93.93 87.79 82.37 77.54 73.22 69.33 65.82 62.63 59.72 57.07 54.64 52.42 50.38 48.50 46.78 45.20 43.75 42.43 41.23 40.13 39.15 38.26 37.48 36.79 36.20 35.70 35.29 34.98 34.76 34.62 34.58 1000 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 . 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103:39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 • 5.30 3.53 1.76 ' 0.00 6286 Power Density (uW/cmA2) 0.000112 0.011156 0.044632 0.100452 0.178655 0.169650 0.402454 0.441749 0.401854 0.145840 0.016451 0.016482 0.013883 0.009363 0.011894 0.014744 0.017919 0.021426 0.025273 0.000943 0.001088 0.001245 : 0.001413 0.001593 0.001696 0.001582 0.001753 0.001935 0.002125 0.002325 0.002533 0.002750 0.002973 0.003204 0.003439 0.003679 0.003921 0.004164 0.004405 0.004642 0.004873 0.005094 0.005303 0.005497 0.005673 0.005827 0.005958 0.006062 0.006138 0.006184 0.006195 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.00001 1 •0.001116 0.004463 0.010045 0.017866 0.016965 0.040245 0.044175 0.040185 0.014584 0.001645 0.001648 0.001388 0.000936 0.001189 0.001474 0.001792 -0.002143 0.002527 , 0.000094 0.000109 •0.000124 0.000141 0.000159 0.000170 0.000158 0.000175 0.000193 0.000213 0.000233 0.000253 •0.000275 0.000297 0.000320 0.000344 0.000368 0.000392 0.000416 0.000441 0.000464 0.000487 0.000509 0.000530 0.000550 0.000567 0.000583 0.000596 0.000606 0.000614 0.000618 0.000620 0.0 Times Below MPE 8964357 89638 ... 22405 9955 5597 5894 2484 2263 2488 6856 60787 60672 72028 106800 84075 67825 55807 46671 39567 1060675 919053 803324 707594 627557 589593 632242 570289 516852 470503 430103 394741 363676 336306 312133 290746 271805 255022 240158 227012 215412 205214 196297 188558 . 181909 176280 171611 167853 164968 162927 161711 161413 Page 27 ANDREW:VHLP4-11 Antenna Worksheet (73 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 0 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68,0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 - -0.58 -5.82 -10.82 -16.00 -20.00 -28.00 -28.33 -28.67 -29.00 -31.50 -34.00 -36.80 -39.60 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.60 -42.80 -44.00 -44.00 ' " -44.00 -44.00 -44.00 . -44.00 -44.00 -44.00 -44.00 -44.00 -44.00 -44.00 -44.28 -44.84 ^45.40 -46.00 -46.00 -46.00 -46.00 -46.00 -46.72 -48.16 -49.60 -51.04 -52.48 -53.92 -55.36 -56.80 -58.24 -59.68 -61.12 0.8746 0.2618 0.0828 0.0251 0.0100 0.0016 0.0015 0.0014 0.0013 0.0007 0.0004 0.0002 • 0:0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -- 0.0000 0.0000 = 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 79 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.78 2888.97 1444.17 .962.43 721.46 576.79 480.28 411.28 359.48 319.14 286.83 238.26 203.45 177.24 156.76 140.29 126.75 115.39 105.72 97.37 90.09 83.66 77.95 72.83 68.21 64.02 >• 60.20 56.69 53.47 50.49 47.73 45.16 42.78 40.55 38.48 36.54 34.73 33.05 31.49 30.04 28.71 27.49 26.39 25.41 24.54 23.80 23.19 22.71 22.36 22.15 22.08 1000 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 . 24.59 22.45 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 . 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 11000 Power Density (uW/cmA2) 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 . 0.000000o.oooooo 0.000000 ' 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 . 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 . 0.000000 0.000000 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000000 . o.oooooo 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000- o.oooooo 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000.•o.oooooo 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 o.oooooo . 0.000000 ' 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.0 Times Below MPE 1 1 - 1 1 11 1 1 111 1 1 1 11 1 • 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Page 28 ANDREW:VHLP4-11 Antenna Worksheet (73 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 3062 (feet): Depression Angle . Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 ' 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 . 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 . 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 ' 88.0 90.0 -0.58 -5.82 -10.82 -16.00 -20.00 -28.00 -28.33 -28.67 -29.00 -31.50 -34.00 -36.80 -39.60 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41 .00 -41.60 -42.80 -44.00 -44.00 -44.00 -44.00 -44.00 -44.00 -44.00 -44.00 -44.00 -44.00 -44.00 -44.00 -44.28 -44.84 -45.40 -46.00 -46.00 -46.00 -46.00 -46.00 -46.72 -48.16 -49.60 -51.04 -52.48 -53.92 -55.36 -56.80 -58.24 -59.68 -61.12 0.8746 0.2618 0.0828 0.0251 0.0100 0.0016 0.0015 0.0014 0.0013 0.0007 0.0004 0.0002 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 . 0.0000 0.0000 *' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 60 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.78 2888.93 1444.10 962.32 721.31 576.60 480.04 411:01 359.17 318.79 286.44 237.79 202.90 176.61 156.05 139.50 125.87 114.42 104.66 96.23 88.85 82.33 76.51 71.29 66.57 62.26 58.32 54.70 51.35 48.24 45.34 42.63 40.09 37.71 35.47 33.36 . .31.37 29.50 27.74 26.08 24.54 23.10 21.78 20.58 19.50 18.56 17.76 17.13 16.67 16.33 16.29 1000 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103-.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 • 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 • ' 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 11225 Power Density (uW/cmA2) 0.000122 0.012234 0.048960 0.110254 0.196242 0.307102 0.443063 0.604408 0.791474 1.004651 1.244390 1.805644 2.371328 2.065230 1.047077 0.575948 0.302516 0.157940 0.089610 0.027739 0.020027 0.021852 ', 0.023444 0.022280 0.014796 0.010041 0.008161 0.006498 0.005061 0.003899 0.004070 0.004601 0.005198 0.005871 0.006631 0.007477 0.007040 0.005843 0.005419 0.006118 0.006900 0.007768 0.008721 0.009748 0.010827 0.009562 0.008192 0.008790 0.004905 0.001861 0.000677 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000012 .0.001223 0.004896 0.011025 0.019624 0.030710 0.044306 0.060441 0.079147 .0.100465 0.124439 0.180564 • 0.237133 0.206523 0.104708 0.057595 0.030252 - 0.015794 0.008961 0.002774 0.002003 0.002185 0.002344 0.002228 0.001480 0.001004 0.000816 0.000650 0.000506 0.000390 0.000407 0.000460 0.000520 0.000587 0.000663 0.000748 0.000704 0.000584 0.000542 0.000612 0.000690 0.000777 0.000872 0.000975 0.001083 0.000956 0.000819 0.000879 0.000490 0.000186 0.000068 0.0 Times Below MPE 8175587 81742 ... 20425 9070 5095 3256 2257 1654 1263 995 803 553 421 484 955 1736 3305 6331 11159 36050 49932 45763 42654 44882 67585 99587 122535 153884 197571 256465 245685 217343 192371 170315 150801 133747 142049 171146 184520 163451 144927 128728 114667 102588 92360 104583 122065 113757 203890 537279 1477302 Page 29 RFS:PA4-57 Antenna Worksheet (145 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 1762 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 . 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 • 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 -0.10 -1.00 -3.90 -8.70 -15.40 -21.30 -22.00 -22.75 -23.50 -24.25 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 . -25.00 -25.00 -26.00 -27.00 . -28.00 -29.00 -30.00 -30.00 -30.00 -30.00 -30.00 -30.00 -30.00 .-30.00 -30.00 -30.00 -30.00 -30.00 -30.00 -30.00 -30.00 -30.00 -30.80 -31.60 -32.40 -33.20 -34.00 -34.80 -35.60 -36.00 -36.00 -36.00 -36.00 -36.00 -36.00 -36.00 -36.00 0.9772 0.7943 0.4074 0.1349 0.0288 0.0074 0.0063 0.0053 0.0045 0.0038 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0025 0.0020 0.0016 0.0013 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0008 0.0007 0.0006 0.0005 0.0004 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 . 0.0003 0.0003 3 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 80 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.78 2888.97 1444.18 962.44 721.47 576.80 480.29 411.29 359.50 319.16 286.85 238.29 203.48 177.27 156.80 140.34 126.80 115.45 105.78 97.44 90.16 83.74 78.04 72.93 68.31 64.13 60.31 56.81 53.59 50.62 47.87 45.31 42.93 40.72 38.65 36.72 34.93 33.26 31.70 30.27 28.95 27.74 26.65 25.67 24.82 24.09 23.48 23.00 22.66 22.45 22.38 1000 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 . 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 •26.81 . 24.59 22.45 • 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 6197 Power Density (uW/cm*2) 0.000070 0.007040 0.028170 0.063428 0.112874 0.176593 0.254696 0.347316 0.454614 0.576778 0.714020 0.925382 0.874575 0.540132 0.217283 0.064314 0.026607 0.027208 0.027109 0.026599 0.025822 0.027034 -.. 0.031125 0.035633 0.040595 0.046052 0.052048 0.058634 0.065574 0.063570 0.058889 0.053889 0.048675 0.043352 0.040026 0.044297 0.048923 0.053909 0.059250 0.064927 0.070899 0.077100 0.083435 0.089772 0.095740 0.074463 0.053683 . 0.037791 0.028808 0.029328 0.029506 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000007 • 0.000704 0.002817 0.006343 0.011287 0.017659 0.025470 0.034732 0.045461 0.057678 0.071402 0.092538 0.087458 0.054013 0.021728 0.006431 0.002661 0.002721 0.00271 1 - 0.002660 0.002582 0.002703 0.003112 0.003563 0.004060 0.004605 0.005205 0.005863 0.006557 0.006357 0.005889 0.005389 0.004867 0.004335 0.004003 0.004430 0.004892 0.005391 0.005925 0.006493 0.007090 0.007710 0.008344 0.008977 0.009574 '0.007446 0.005368 0.003779 0.002881 0.002933 0.002951 0.0 Times Below MPE 14207559 142055 - .• 35498 15765 8859 5662 3926 2879 2199 1733 1400 1080 1143 1851 4602 15548 37584 36754 36888 37595 38726 36990 32128 28064 24633 21714 19212 17055 15249 15730 16981 18556 20544 23066 24983 22574 20440 18549 16877 15401 14104 12970 11985 11139 10444 13429 18627 26461 34712 34097 33890 Page 30 ANDREW:PL6-65 Antenna Worksheet (12 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 2323 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 8S.O 88.0 , 90.0 -0.50 -5.00 -20.00 -20.00 -20.00 -23.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -40.00 -40.00 -40.00 -40.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 . -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 -41.00 0.8913 0.3162 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0050 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 . 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 '= 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 62 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.78 2888.94 1444.10 962.33 721.32 576.62 480.07 411.03 359.20 318.82 286.48 237.84 202.95 176.67 156.11 139.57 125.95 114.51 104.76 96.33 88.96 82.45 76.65 71.43 66.72 62.43 58.50 54.88 51.54 48.45 45.56 42.87 40.35 37.98 35.75 33.66 31.69 29.84 28.10 26.47 24.95 23.54 22.24 21.06 20.01 19.09 18.32 17.71 . 17.26 16.99 16.90 1000 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 ' 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 6197 Power Density (uW/cmA2) 0.000093 0.009280 0.037139 0.083634 0.148859 0.232947 0.336069 0.458436 0.600301 0.729256 0.608267 .0.471584 1.452862 1.416926 0.483479 0.047422 0.049675 0.058982 0.057102 0.040695 0.032348 0.036796 0.042574 0.049006 0.056169 0.064145 0.073035 0.082950 0.049737 0.003404 0.003847 0.004343 0.004899 0.005525 0.005945 0.005580 0.006289 0.007085 0.007979 0.008978 0.010089 0.011313 0.012644 0.014066 0.015547 0:017034 0.018454 0.019716 0.020718 0.021365 0.021588 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000009 • 0.000928 0.003714 0.008363 0.014886 0.023295 0.033607 0.045844 0.060030 0.072926 0.060827 0.047158 0.145286 0.141693 0.048348 0.004742 0.004968 0.005898 0.005710 - 0.004069 0.003235 0.003680 0.004257 0.004901 0.005617 0.006415 0.007303 0.008295 0.004974 0.000340 0.000385 0.000434 0.000490 0.000553 . 0.000594 0.000558 0.000629 0.000708 0.000798 0.000898 0.001009 0.001131 ' 0.001264 0.001407 0.001555 0.001703 0.001845 0.001972 0.002072 0.002137 0.002159 0.0 Times Below MPE 10777509 107757 - 26925 11956 6717 4292 2975 2181 1665 1371 1644 2120 688 705 2068 21087 20130 ' 16954 17512 24573 30913 27176 23488 20405 17803 15589 13692 12055 20105 293767 259963 230267 204102 180993 168222 179200 159018 141144 125334 111384 99120 88395 79087 71092 64322 58707 54188 50720 48266 46804 46322 Page 31 Gabriel:HE3-107 Antenna Worksheet (159 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 299 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 ' 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 -0.35 -3.50 -17.10 -22.50 -25.50 -28.50 -31.50 -32.67 -33.84 -35.01 -36.20 -37.10 -38.00 -38.90 -39.80 -40.60 -41.40 -42.20 -43.00 -43.80 - -44.60 -45.40 -46.20 -47.00 -47.80 -48.80 -48.80 -48.80 -48.80 -48.80 -48.80 -48.80 -48.80 -48.80 -48.80 -48.80 -49.40 -50.00 -50.60 -51.20 -51.80 -52.40 -53.00 -53.60 -54.20 -54.90 -54.90 -54.91 -54.92 -54.92 -54.92 0.9226 0.4467 0.0195 0.0056 0.0028 0.0014 0.0007 0.0005 ' 0.0004 0.0003 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -- 0.0000 0.0000J o.oooo 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 60 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.78 2888.93 1444.10 962.32 721.31 576.60 480.04 411.01 359.17 318.79 286.44 237.79 202.90 176.61 156.05 . 139.50 125.87 114.42 104.66 96.23 88.85 82.33 76.51 • 71.29 66.57 62.26 58.32 54.70 51.35 48.24 45.34 42.63 40.09 37.71 35.47 33.36 31.37 29.50 27.74 26.08 24.54 23.10 21.78 20.58 19.50 18.56 17.76 17.13 16.67 16.38 16.29 1000 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 . 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.'39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 • 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 11365 Power Density (uVWcmA2) 0.000012 0.001196 0.004785 0.010774 0.019178 0.030011 0.043298 0.059065 0.077346 0.098179 0.121607 0.176455 0.242360 0.240617 0.155613 0.023034 0,006875 0.003705 0.002608 0.001788 0.001210 0.000944 . 0.000863 0,000777 0.000690 0.000622 0.000635 0.000644 0.000647 0.000645 0.000637 0.000623 0.000609 0.000593 0.000570 0.000541 0.000507 0.000466 0.000420 0.000371 0.000319 0.000253 0.000283 0.000316 0.000351 0.000386 0.000378 0.000278 0.000196. 0.000133 0.000122 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000001 • 0.000120 0.000478 0.001077 0.001918 0.003001 0.004330 0.005907 0.007735 0.009818 0.012161 0.017645 0.024236 0.024062 0.015561 0.002303 0.000687 U000371 0.000261 0.000179 0.000121 . 0.000094 0.000086 0.000078 0.000069 0.000062 0.000064 0.000064 0.000065 0.000065 0.000064 0.000062 0.000061 0.000059 0.000057 0.000054 0.000051 0.000047 0.000042 0.000037 0.000032 0.000026 0.000023 0.000032 0.000035 0.000039 0.000038 0.000028 0.000020 0.000013 0.000012 0.0 Times Below MPE 83659955 836457 - 209006 92812 52144 33320 23095 16930 12928 10185 8223 5667 •4126 4155 6426 43414 '145454 269884 383412 559172 826431 1059215 1158885 1286893 1449837 1608975 1574219 1552900 1544815 1550308 1570329 1606056 1642027 1686847 1753397 1846736 1974187 2146424 2379228 2696385 3134580 3883142 -3536762 3165044 2850283 2589153 . 2546075 3603231 5104709 7506764 8218702 Page 32 Gabriel:DFPD2-52 Antenna Worksheet (50 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 4 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 0.00 0.00 -0.86 -3.02 -7.55 -10.12 -13.70 -15.89 -16.73. -17.56 -18.40 -20.14 -20.14 -20.14 -20.14 -20.14 -24.42 -26.55 -26.55 -26.55 -26.55 -26.55 -26.55 -27.31 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 -28.85 1.0000 1.0000 0.8204 0.4989 0.1758 0.0973 0.0427 0.0258 0.0212 0.0175 0.0145 0.0097 0.0097 0.0097 0.0097 0.0097 0.0036 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0019 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 ^0.0013 . = ~ 0.001 3 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 154 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.24 1444.70 963.23 722.52 578.12 481.87 413.14 361.60 321.53 289.49 241.45 207.18 181.51 161.57 145.65 132.65 121.85 112.73 104.95 98.22 92.37 87.23 . 82.68 78.65 . 75.04 . 71.80 . 68.89 66.26 63.88 61.72 59.76 . 57.98 56.36 54.89 53.55 . 52.33 51.23 50.24 49.34 48.54 47.83 47.21 46.66 46.20 45.81 45.49 45.25 45.08 44.97 '44.94 1000 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87,34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 . 26.81 24.59 22.45 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 5250 Power Density (uW/cmA2) 0.000000 0.000016 0.000064 0.000144 0.000255 0.000399 0.000572 0.000734 0.000757 0.000588 0.000292 0.000120 0.000073 0.000067 0.000050 0.000062 0.000075 0.000088 0.000103 0.000097 0.000045 0.000035 0.000039 0.000044 0.000048 0.000053 0.000058 0.000055 0.000042 0.000043 0.000046 0.000049 0.000052 • 0.000055 0.000058 0.000061 0.000064 0.000067 0.000069 0.000072 0.000074 0.000076 0.000078 0.000080 0.000082 0.000083 0.000084 0.000085 0.000086 0.000086 0.000086 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000000 0.000002 0.000006 0.000014 0.000026 0.000040 0.000057- 0.000073 0.000076 0.000059 0.000029 0.000012 0.0000070.000667 0.000005 0.000006 0.000007 0.000009 0.000010 0.000010 0.000004 ' 0.000004 0.000004 0.000004 0.000005 0.000005 0.000006 0.000006 0.000004 0.000004 0.000005 - 0.000005 0.000005 0.000006 0.000006 0.000006 0.000006 0.000007 0.000007 0.000007 0.000007 0.000008 0.000008 0.000008 0.000008 0.000008 0.000008 0.000009 0.000009 0.000009 - 0.000009 0.0 Times Below MPE 6258405445 62586462 - 15648440 6956216 3913939 2505802 1747604 1363300 1320581 1699930 3419933 8360243 13792744 15024872 19888278 16167041 13414886 11322805 9695875 10280965 22458962 28394782 25338386 22783017 20626508 18791554 . 17218883 18149533 23689780 23174034 21652445 20315738 19137932 18097663 17177269 16362045 15639697 14999899 14433956 13934538 13495435 13111417 12778050 12491635 12249065 12047781 11885712 11761210 11673037 11620327 11602558 Paga 33 EMS:RR65-18-OODPL2 Antenna Worksheet (60 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 1050 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 ' 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 ».-.- -68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 -0.02 -0.20 -1.00 -2.30 -4.50 -7.50 -12.60 -21.90 -26.70. -18.90 -17.80 -22.00 -32.40 -19.60 -19.00 -24.40 -29.90 -23.90 -25.80 -36.50 -25.40 -22.30 -24.90 -32.70 -25.40 -20.90 -20.00 -22.00 -26.50 -27.50 -23.50 -22.30 -23.00 -26.00 -30.20 -35.30 -29.70 -26.40 -25.50 -25.70 -26.70 -29.00 -29.00 -29.20 -29.40 -29.80 -29.30 -29.20 -28.60 -29.50 -31.60 0.9954 0.9550 0.7943 0.5888 0.3548 0.1778 0.0550 0.0065 0.0021 0.0129 0.0166 ' 0.0063 : ' 0.0006 0.0110 0.0126 0.0036 0.0010 0.0041 0.0026 0.0002 0.0029 0.0059 0.0032 0.0005 0.0029 0.0081 0.0100 0.0063 0.0022 0.0018 0.0045 0.0059 0.0050 0.0025 . 0.0010 0.0003 0.0011 0.0023 0.0028 0.0027 0.0021 0.0013 0.0013 0.0012 0.0011 -- 0.0010 0.0012 J 0.0012 0.0014 0.0011 0.0007 154 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.24 1444.70 963.23 722.52 578.12 481.87 413.14 361.60 321.53 289.49 241.45 207.18 181.51 161.57 145.65 132.65 121.85 112.73 104.95 98.22 92.37 87.23 82.68 78.65 75.04 71.80 68.89 66.26 63.88 61.72 59.76 57.98 56.36 54.89 53.55 52.33 51.23 50.24 49.34 48.54 47.83 47.21 46.66 48.20 45.81 45.49 45.25 45.03 44.97 44.94 1000 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 . 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.6.8 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24,59 22.45 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 1900 Power Density (uW/cmA2) 0.000042 0.004194 0.016775 0.037736 0.067068 0.104757 0.148508 0.188273 0.207324 0.202418 0.162702 0.052923 0.017205 0.022389 0.025461 0.028498 0.034310 0.040555 0.036528 0.017612 0.025189 0.031936 0.035659 0.039521 0.043500 0.072578 0.085028 0.091857 0.098699 0.105494 0.112211 0.082895 0.076553 0.080440 0.084316 0.087827 0.074364 0.046926 0.049842 0.050788 0.051995 0.053498 0.053720 0.044045 0.028409 0.025710 0.026542 0.027582 . 0.028041 0.027848 0.027583 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000004 •0.000419 0.001677 0.003774 0.006707 0.010476 0.014851 0.018827 0.020732 0.020242 0.016270 0,005292 0.001721 0.002239 0.002546 . 0.002850 0.003431 0.004056 0.003653 0.001761 0.002519 0.003194 0.003566 0.003952 0.004350 0.007258 0.008503 0.009186 0.009870 0.010549 0.011221 0.008289 0.007655 0.008044 0.008432 0.008783 0.007436 0.004693 0.004934 0.005079 0.005200 0.005350 0.005372 0.004405 0.002841 0.002571 0.002654 0.002758 0.002804 0.002785 0.002759 0.0 Times Below MPE 23841542 238424 - 59613 26499 14910 9545 6733 5311 4823 4940 6146 18895 58121 44664 39275 35089 29146 24657 27375 56780 39699 31312 28043 25302 22988 13778 11760 10886 10131 9479 8911 12063 13062 12431 11860 11386 13447 21310 20063 19689 19232 18692 18615 . 22703 35200 38895 37676 36255 35662 35911 36247 Page 34 EMS:RR65-18-OODPL2 Antenna Worksheet (210 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 1050 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 '88.0 90.0 -0.02 -0.20 -1.00 -2.30 -4.50 -7.50 -12.60 -21.90 -26.70 -18.90 -17.80 -22.00 -32.40 -19.60 -19.00 -24.40 -29.90 -23.90 -25.80 -36.50 -25.40 -22.30 "-24.90 -32.70 -25.40 -20.90 -20.00 -22.00 -26.50 -27.50 -23.50 . -22.30 -23.00 -26.00 -30.20 -35.30 -29.70 -26.40 -25.50 -25.70 -26.70 • -29.00 -29.00 -29.20 -29.40 -29.80 -29.30 -29.20 -28.60 -29.50 -31.60 0.9954 0.9550 0.7943 0.5888 0.3548 0.1778 0.0550 0.0065 • 0.0021 0.0129 0.0166 0.0063 0.0006 0.0110 0.0126 0.0036 0.0010 0.0041 0.0026 0.0002 0.0029 0.0059 0.0032 0.0005 0.0029 0.0081 0.0100 0.0063 0.0022 0.0018 0.0045 0.0059 0.0050 0.0025 0.0010 0.0003 0.0011 0.0023 0.0028 0.0027 0.0021 0.0013 0.0013 0.0012 0.0011 0.0010 _ 0.0012 '" 0.0012 0.0014 0.0011 0.0007 154 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.24 1444.70 '963.23 • 722.52 578.12 481.87 413.14 361.60 321.53 289.49 241.45 207.18 181.51 161.57 145.65 132.65 121.85 112.73 104.95 98.22 92.37 87.23 82.68 78.65 75.04 71.80 68.89 66.26 63.88 61.72 59.76 57.98 56.36 54.89 53.55 52.33 51.23 50.24 49.34 48.54 47.83 47.21 46.66 46.20 45.81 45.49 45.25 45.08 44.97 44.94 1000 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 ' 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 . 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 • 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 1900 Power Density (MW/cmA2) 0.000042 0.004194 0.016775 0.037736 0.067068 0.104757 0.148508 0.188273 0.207324 0.202410 0.162895 0:052923 0.017205 0.022389 0.025461 0.028533 0.034310 0.040555 0.036528 0.017612 0.025222 0.031931 0.035660 0.039471 0.043445 0.072652 0.085000 0.091941 0.098825 0.105724 0.112602 0.083212 0.076164 0.080031 0.083785 0.087373 0.073891 0.047286 0.049434 0.051203 0.052423 0.053025 0.053367 0.044404 0.028663 0.025423 0.026918 0.028078 0.027457 0.027310 0.027600 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000004 •0.000419 0.001677 0.003774 0.006707 0.010476 0.014851 0.018827 0.020732 0.020241 0.016290 0.005292 0.001721 0.002239 0.002546 0.002853 0.003431 0.004056 0.003653 . 0.001761 0.002522 0.003193 0.003566 0.003947 0.004344 0.007265 0.008500 0.009194 0.009882 0.010572 0.011260 0.008321 0.007616 0.008003 0.008378 0.008737 0.007389 0.004729 0.004943 0.005120 0.005242 0.005302 0.005337 0.004440 0.002866 0.002542 0.002692 0.002808 0.002746 0.002731 0.002760 0.0 Times Below MPE 23841542 238424 - 59613 26499 14910 9545 6733 5311 4823 4940 6138 18895 58121 44664 39275 35046 29146 24657 27375 56780 39648 31317 28042 25335 23017 13764 1 1 764 10876 10118 9458 8880 12017 13129 12495 11935 11445 13533 21147 20229 19530 19075 18859 18738 22520 34887 . 39334 37149 35614 35420 36616 36232 Page 35 EMS:RR65-18-OODPL2 Antenna Worksheet (330 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 1050 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 ' 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 ' 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 . 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 -0.02 - -0.20 -1.00 -2.30 -4.50 -7.50 -12.60 -21.90 -26.70 -18.90 -17.80 -22.00 -32.40 -19.60 -19.00 -24.40 -29.90 -23.90 -25.80 -36.50 -25.40 -22.30 -24.90 -32.70 -25.40 -20.90 -20.00 -22.00 -26.50 ' -27.50 -23.50 -22.30 -23.00 -26.00 -30.20 -35.30 -29.70 -26.40 -25.50 -25.70 -26.70 -29.00 -29.00 -29.20 -29.40 -29.80 -29.30 -29.20 -28.60 -29.50 -31.60 0.9954 0.9550 0.7943 0.5888 -'•0.3548 0.1778 0.0550 0.0065 0.0021 0.0129 0.0166 0.0063 0.0006 0.0110 0.0126 0.0036 0.0010 0.0041 0.0026 0.0002 0.0029 ' 0.0059 0.0032 0.0005 0.0029 0.0081 0.0100 0.0063 0.0022 0.0018 0.0045 0.0059 0.0050 0.0025 0.0010 0.0003 0.0011 0.0023 0.0028 0.0027 0.0021 0.0013 0.0013 0.0012 0.0011 -- 0.0010 0.0012 " 0.0012 0.0014 0.0011 0.0007 154 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.24 1444.70 963.23 722.52 578.12 481.87 413.14 361.60 321.53 . 289.49 241.45 207.18 181.51 161.57 145.65 132.65 121.85 112.73 104.95 98.22 92.37 87.23 82.68 78.65 75.04 71.80 68.89 66.26 63.88 61.72 59.76 57.98 56.36 54.89 53.55 . 52.33 51.23 50.24 49.34 48.54 47.83 47.21 46.66 46.20 45.81 45.49 45.25 45.08 44.97 44.94 1000 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891,77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84' 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 . 24.59 22.45 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 1900 Power Density (uW/cmA2) 0.000042 0.004194 0.016775 0.037736 0.067068 0.104757 0.148508 0.188273 0.207324 0.202418 0.162702 0.052923 0.017205 0.022389 0.025461 0.028498 0.034310 0.040555 0.036528 0.017612 0.025189 0.031936 0.035659 0.039521 0.043500 0.072578 0.085028 0.091857 0.098699 0.105494 0.112211 0.082895 0.076553 0.080440 0.084316 0.087827 0.074364 0.046926 0.049842 0.050788 0.051995 0.053498 0.053720 0.044045 0.028409 0.025710 ' 0.026542 0.027582 0.028041 0.027846 0.027077 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000004 •0.000419 0.001677 0.003774 0.006707 0.010476 0.014851 0.018827 0.020732 0.020242 0.016270 0.005292 0.001721 0.002239 0.002546 0.002850 0.003431 0.004056 0.003653 0.001761 0.002519 0.003194 0.003566 0.003952 0.004350 0.007258 0.008503 0.009186 0.009870 0.010549 0.011221 0.008289 0.007655 0.008044 0.008432 0.008783 0.007436 0.004693 0.004984 0.005079 0.005200 - 0.005350 0.005372 0.004405 0.002841 0.002571 0.002654 0.002758 0.002804 0.002785 0.002708 0.0 Times Below MPE 23841542 238424 - 59613 26499 14910 9545 6733 5311 4823 4940 6146 18895 58121 44664 39275 35089 29146 24657 27375 56780 39699 . 31312 28043 25302 22988 13778 11760 10886 10131 9479 8911 12063 13062 12431 11860 11386 13447 21310 20063 19689 19232 18692 13615 22703 35200 38895 37676 36255 35662 35911 36931 SWEDCOM:ALP 9212 Antenna Worksheet (60 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 375 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.20 -0.40 -0.70 -1.10 -1.60 -2.20. -2.80 -3.60 -5.60 -8.20 -11.60 -16.40 -24.30 -30.10 -22.70 -20.00 -19.20 -19.50 . -20.90 -23.20 -27.00 -34.20 -53.10 -34.20 -29.90 -28.10 -27.60 -28.00 -29.20 -3120 -34.20 -39.00 -48.60 -47.30 -40.00 -36.80 -35.40 -34.60 -34.60 -34.70 -35.00 -35.90 -37.30 -39.40 -41.70 -46.60 -49.20 -45.20 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9550 0.9120 0.8511 0.7762 0.6918 0.6026 0.5248 0.4365 0.2754 0.1514 0.0692 0.0229 0.0037 0.0010 0.0054 0.0100 0.0120 0.0112 0.0081 0.0048 0.0020 0.0004 0.0000 0.0004 0.0010 0.0015 0.0017 0.0016 0.0012 0.0008 0.0004 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0002 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 • 0.0002 0.0001 • * 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 154 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.24 1444.70 963.23 722.52 578.12 481.87 413.14 361.60 321.53 289.49 241.45 207.18 181.51 161.57 145.65 132.65 121.85 112.73 104.95 98.22 92.37 87.23 82.68 78.65 75.04 71.80 68.89 66.26 63.88 61.72 59.76 57.98 56.36 54.89 53.55 52.33 51.23 50.24 49.34 48.54 47.83 47.21 46.66 46.20 45.81 45.49 45.25 45.03 44.97 44.94 566.67 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 ' 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 850 Power Density (uW/cm»2) 0.000015 0.001498 0.005991 0.013477 0.023953 0.037413 0.053852 0.073261 0.095056 0.115650 0.137073 0.172833 0.192069 0.1.94736 0.170710 0.135348 0.090637 0.050610 0.020717 0.017536 0.019987 0.022481 0.025233 0.027893 0.028993 0.024241 0.016538 0.008348 0.006607 0.007430 0.007922 0.008413 0.008851 0.009321 0.008989 0.007127 0.004624 0.002313 0.001928 0.002540 0.002711 0.002753 0.002805 0.002874 0.002872 0.002801 0.002645 0.002087 0.001430 0.000871 0.001338 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000003 . 0.000264 0.001057 0.002378 0.004227 0.006602. 0.009503 0.012928 0.016775 0.020409 0.024189 0.030500 0.033895 0.034365 0.030125 0.023885 0.015995 0.008931 0.003656 . 0.003095 0.003527 0.003967 0.004453 . 0.004922 0.005116 0.004278 0.002919 0.001473 0.001166 0.001311 0.001398 0.001485 0.001562 0.001645 0.001586 0.001258 0.000816 0.000408 0.000340 0.000448 0.000478 0.000486 0.000495 0.000507 0.000507 0.000494 0.000467. 0.000368 0.000252 0.000154 0.000245 0.0 Times Below MPE 37828584 378300 - 94586 42046 23657 15146 10522 7734 5961 4899 4134 3278 2950 2909 3319 4186 6252 11196 27353 32315 28351 25206 ' 22457 20315 19545 23376 34263 67877 85764 76270 71534 67355 64025 60795 63037 79505 122540 245013 293963 223067 209050 205833 202010 197200 197284 202279 214276 271540 396221 650956 408227 Page 37 SWEDCOM:ALP 9212 Antenna Worksheet (60 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 375 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 . 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14^0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.20 -0.40 -0.70 -1.10 -1.60 -2.20.. -2.80 -3.60 -5.60 -8.20 -11.60 -16.40 -24.30 -30.10 -22.70 -20.00 -19.20 -19.50 -20.90 -23.20 -27.00 -34.20 -53.10 -34.20 -29.90 -28.10 -27.60 -28.00 -29.20 -31.20 -34.20 -39.00 -48.60 -47.30 -40.00 -36.80 -35.40 -34.60 -34.60 -34.70 -35.00 -35.90 -37.30 -39.40 -41.70 -46.60 -49.20 -45.20 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9550 0.9120 0.8511 0.7762 0.6918 0.6026 0.5248 0.4365 0.2754 0.1514 0.0692 0.0229 0.0037 0.0010 0.0054 0.0100 0.0120 0.0112 0.0081 0.0048 0.0020 0.0004 0.0000 0.0004 0.0010 0.0015 0.0017 0.0016 0.0012 0.0008 0.0004 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0002 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 * 0.0002 0.0001 ° 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 154 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.24 1444.70 963.23 722.52 578.12 481.87 413.14 361.60 321.53 289.49 241.45 207.18 181.51 161.57 145.65 132.65 121.85 112.73 104.95 98.22 92.37 87.23 82.68 78.65 75.04 71.80 68.89 66.26 63.88 61.72 59.76 57.98 56.36 54.89 53.55 52.33 51.23 50.24 49.34 48.54 47.83 47.21 46.66 46.20 45.81 45.49 45.25 45.08 44.97 44.94 566.67 Frequency (MHz): 850 Dist From Structure Power Density (meters) (uW/cm*2) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 '410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 .124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 . 24.59 22.45 • 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 0.000015 0.001498 0.005991 0.013477 0.023953 0.037413 0.053852 0.073261 0.095056 0.115650 0.137073 0.172833 0.192069 0.194736 0.170710 0.135348 0.090637 0.050610 0.020717 0.017536 0.019987 0.022481 . 0.025233 0.027893 0.028993 0.024241 0.016538 0.008348 0.006607 0.007430 0.007922 0.008413 0.008851 0.009321 0.008989 0.007127 0.004624 0.002313 0.001928 0.002540 0.002711 0.002753 0.002805 0.002874 0.002872 0.002801 0.002645 0.002087 0.001430 0.000871 0.001388 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000003 • 0.000264 0.001057 0.002378 0.004227 0.006602 0.009503 0.012928 0.016775 0.020409 0.024189 0.030500 '0.033895 0.034365 0.030125 0.023885 0.015995 0.008931 0.003656 - 0.003095 0.003527 0.003967 0.004453 0.004922 0.005116 0.004278 0.002919 0.001473 0.001166 0.001311 0.001398 0.001485 0.001562 0.001645 0.001586 0.001258 0.000816 0.000408 0.000340 0.000448 0.000478 0.000486 0.000495 0.000507 0.000507 0.000494 0.000467 0.000368 0.000252 0.000154 0.000245 0.0 Times Below MPE 37828584 378300 - 94586 42046 23657 15146 10522 7734 5961 4899 4134 3278 2950 2909 3319 4186 6252 11196 27353 32315 28351 25206 22457 20315 19545 23376 34263 67877 85764 76270 71534 67355 64025 60795 63037 79505 122540 245013 293963 223067 209050 205833 202010 197200 197284 , 202279 214276 271540 . 396221 650956 408227 Page 38 SWEDCOM:ALP 9212 Antenna Worksheet (210 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 250 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative OB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 . H.O 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 7.8.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 83.0 88.0 90.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.20 -0.40 -0.70 -1.10 -1.60 -2.20 -2.80 -3.60 -5.60 -8.20 -11.60 -16.40 -24.30-30:10 , -22.70 -20.00 -19.20 -19.50 -20.90 -23.20 -27.00 -34.20 -53.10 -34.20 -29.90 -28.10 -27.60 -28.00 -29.20 -31.20 -34.20 -39.00 -48.60 -47.30 -40.00 -36.80 -35.40 -34.60 -34.60 -34.70 . -35.00 -35.90 -37.30 -39.40 -41.70 -46.60 -49.20 -45.20 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9550 0.9120 0.8511 0.7762 0.6918 0.6026 0.5248 0.4365 0.2754 0.1514 0.0692 0.0229 0.0037 0.0010 0.0054 0.0100 0.0120 0.0112 0.0081 0.0048 0.0020 0.0004 0.0000 0.0004 0.0010 0.0015 0.0017 0.0016 0.0012 0.0008 0.0004 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0002 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0002 0.0001 - ' 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 '154 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.24 1444.70 963.23 722.52 578.12 481.87 413.14 361.60 321.53 289.49 241.45 207.18 181.51 161.57 145.65 132.65 121.85 112.73 104.95 98.22 92.37 87.23 82.68 78.65 75.04 71.80 68.89 66.26 63.88 61.72 59.76 57.98 56.36 54.89 53.55 . 52.33 51.23 50.24 49.34 48.54 47.83 47.21 46.66 46.20 45.81 45.49 45.25 45.08 44.97 44.94 566.67 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 , 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 • 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 " 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 850 Power Density (uW/cm»2) 0.000010 0.000999 0.003994 0.008985 0.015969 0.024942 0.035901 0.048840 0.063371 0.077097 0.091490 0.115262 0.128046 0.129990 0.113662 0.090459 0.060286 0.033670 0.013785 0.011661 0.013291 0.015025 0.016758 0.018667 0.019403 0.016099 0.011068 0.005539 0.004388 0.004928 0.005256 0.005580 0.005931 0.006247 0.006024 0.004776 0.003102 0.001533 0.001293 0.001683 0.001793 0.001847 0.001884 0.001901 0.001900 0.001884 0.001747 0.001379 0.000963 0.000586 0.000926 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000002 .0.000176 0.000705 0.001586 0.002818 0.004402 0.006335 0.008619 0.011183 0.013605 0.016145 0.020340 0.022596 0.022939 0.020058 0.015963 0.010639 0.005942 0.002433 . 0.002058 0.002345 0.002652 0.002957 0.003294 0.003424 0.002841 0.001953 0.000978 0.000774 0.000870 0.000928 0.000985 0.001047 0.001102 0.001063 0.000843 0.000547 0.000271 0.000228 0.000297 0.000316 0.000326 0.000333 0.000335 • 0.000335 0.000332 0.000308 0.000243 0.000170 0.000103 0.000163 0.0 Times Below MPE 56742869 567450 ... 141879 63069 35486 22719 15784 11602 8942 7350 6193 4916 4425 4359 4985 6264 9399 16830 41107 48596 42635 37713 33815 30357 29205 35198 51199 102299 129138 114989 107812 101549 95550 90715 94074 118642 182684 369544 438145 336739 315982 306788 300707 298071 298197 300798 324295 410960 588689 966331 612154 Pags 39 SWEDCOMrALP 9212 Antenna Worksheet (210 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE):566.67 ERP (Watts): Depression Angle (degrees) 0.1- 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 • 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 250 Relative dB 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.20 -0.40 -0.70 -1.10 -1.6.0 -2.20. -2.80 -3.60 -5.60 -8.20 -11.60 - -16.40 -24.30 -30.10 -22.70 -20.00 -19.20 -19.50 -20.90 -23.20 -27.00 -34.20 -53.10 -34.20 -29.90 -28.10 -27.60 -28.00 -29.20 -31.20 -34.20 -39.00 -48.60 -47.30 -40.00 -36.80 -35.40 -34.60 -34.60 -34.70 -35.00 -35.90 -37.30 -39.40 '-41.70 -48.60 -49.20 -45.20 Height (feet): Relative Gain 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9550 0.9120 0.8511 0.7762 0.6918 0.6026 0.5248 0.4365 0.2754 0.1514 - 0.0692 0.0229 0.0037 0.0010 0.0054 0.0100 0.0120 0.0112 0.0081 0.0048 0.0020 0.0004 0.0000 0.0004 0.0010 0.0015 0.0017 0.0016 0.0012 0:0008 0.0004 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0002 .0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0,0003 , 0.0002 0.0001 * 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000•• o.oooo 154 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.24 1444.70 963.23 722.52 578.12 481.87 413.14 361.60 321.53 289.49 241.45 207.18 ' 181.51 161.57 145.65 132.65 121.85 112.73 104.95 98.22 92.37 87.23 82.68 78.65 75.04 71.80 68.89 66.26 63.88 61.72 59.76 57.98 56.36 54.89 53.55 52.33 51.23 50.24 49.34 48.54 47.83 47.21 46.66 46.20 45.81 45.49 45.25 45.08 44.97 44.94 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 850 Power Density (uW7cmA2) 0.000010 0.000999 0.003994 0.008985 0.015969 0.024942 0.035901 0.048840 0.063371 0.077097 0.091490 0.115262 0.128046 0.129990 0.113662 0.090459 0.060286 0.033670 0.013785 0.011661 0.013291 0.015025 . 0.016758 0.018667 0.019403 0.016099 • 0.011068 0.005539 . 0.004388 0.004928 0.005256 0.005580 0.005931 0.006247 0.006024 0.004776 0.003102 0.001533 0.001293 0.001683 0.001793 0.001847 0.001884 0.001901 0.001900 0.001884 0.001747 0.001379 • 0.000963 0.000586 0.000926 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000002 0.000176 0.000705 0.001586 0.002818 0.004402 ' 0.006335 0.008619 0.011183 . 0.013605 0.016145 0.020340 0.022596 0:022939 0.020058 0.015963 0.010639 0.005942 0.002433 . 0.002058 0.002345 0.002652 0.002957 0.003294 0.003424 0.002841 0.001953 0.000978 0.000774 0.000870 0.000928 0.000985 0.001047 0.001102 0.001063 0.000843 0.000547 0.000271 0.000228 0.000297 0.000316 0.000326 0.000333 0.000335 0.000335 0.000332 0.000308 0.000243 0.000170 0.000103 0.000163 0.0 Times Below MPE 56742869 567450 - 141879 63069 35486 22719 15784 11602 8942 7350 6193 4916 4425 4359 4985 6264 9399 16830 41107 48596 42635 37713 ' 33815 30357 29205 35198 51199 102299 129138 114989 107812 101549 95550 90715 94074 118642 182684 369544 438145 336739 315982 306788 300707 298071 298197 300798 324295 410960 538689 966831 612154 Page 40 SWEDCOM:ALP 9212 Antenna Worksheet (210 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 250 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 ' 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 . 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.20 -0.40 -0.70 -1.10 -1.60 -2.20. -2.80 -3.60 -5.60 -8.20 -11.60 -16.40 -24.30 -30.10 -22.70 -20.00 -19.20. -19.50 -20.90 -23.20 -27.00 -34.20 -53.10 -34.20 -29.90 -28.10 . -27.60 -28.00 -29.20 -31.20 -34.20 -39.00 -48.60 -47.30 -40.00 -36.80 -35.40 -34.60 -34.60 -34.70 -35.00 -35.90 -37.30 -39.40 -41.70 -46.60 -49.20 -45.20 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9550 0.9120 0.8511 0.7762 0.6918 0.6026 0.5248 0.4365 0.2754 0.1514 0.0692 0.0229 0.0037 0.0010 0.0054 0.0100 0.0120 0.0112 0.0081 0.0048 0.0020 0.0004 0.0000 0.0004 0.0010 0.0015 0.0017 0.0016 0.0012 0.0008 0.0004 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0002 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0002 0.0001 * = 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 154 Slant Distance . (meters) 28891.81 2889.24 1444.70 963.23 722.52 578.12 481.87 413.14 361.60 321.53 289.49 241.45 207.18 181.51 161.57 145.65 132.65 121.85 112.73 • 104.95 . 98.22 92.37 87.23 82.68 78.65 75.04 71.80 68.89 66.26 63.88 61.72 59.76 57.98 56.36 54.89 53.55 52.33 51.23 50.24 49.34 48.54 47.83 47.21 46.66 46.20 45.81 45.49 45.25 45.08 44.97 44.94 566.67 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19. 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 • ' 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 -1.76 0.00 850 Power Density (uW/cmA2) 0.000010 0.000999 0.003994 0.008985 0.015969 0.024942 0.035901 0.048840 0.063371 0.077097 0.091490 0.115262 0.128046 0.129990 0:113662 0.090459 0.060286 " 0.033670 0.013785 0.011661 0.013291 0.015025 0.016758 0.018667 0.019403 0.016099 0.011068 0.005539 0.004388 0.004928 0.005256 0.005580 0.005931 0.006247 0.006024 0.004776 0.003102 0.001533 0.001293 0.001683 0.001793 0.001847 0.001884 0.001901 0.001900 0.001884 0.001747 0.001379 0.000963 0.000586 0.000926 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of ' MPE 0.000002 • 0.000176 0.000705 0.001586 0.002818 0.004402 0.006335 0.008619 0.011183 0.013605 0.016145 0.020340 0.022596 0.022939 0.020058 0.015963 0.010639 0.005942 • 0.002433 . 0.002058 0.002345 0.002652 0.002957 0.003294 0.003424 0.002841 0.001953 0.000978 0.000774 0.000870 0.000928 0.000985 0.001047 0.001102 0.001063 0.000843 0.000547 0.000271 0.000228 0.000297 0.000316 0.000326 0.000333 0.000335 0.000335 0.000332 0.000308 0.000243 0.000170 0.000103 0.000183 0.0 Times Below MPE 56742869 567450 - 141879 63069 35486 22719 15784 11602 8942 7350 6193 4916 4425 4359 4985 6264 9399 16830 41107 - 48596 42635 37713 33815 30357 29205 35198 51199 102299 129138 114989 . 107812 101549 95550 90715 94074 118642 182684 369544 438145 336739 315982 306788 300707 298071 298197 300798 324295 410960 588689 966831 612154 Page 41 SWEDCOM:ALP 9212 Antenna Worksheet (330 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 250 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 -16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 . 76.0 78.0 80.0 • 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.20 -0.40 -0.70 -1.10 -1.60 -2.20 . -2.80 -3.60 -5.60 -8.20 •-11.60 ' -16.40 -24!30 -30.10 -22.70 -20.00 -19.20 -19.50 -20.90 -23.20 -27.00 -34.20 -53.10 -34.20 -29.90 -28.10 -27.60 -28.00 -29.20 -31.20 -34.20 -39.00 -48.60 -47.30 -40.00 -36.80 -35.40 -34.60 -34.60 -34.70 -35.00 -35.90 -37.30 -39.40 -41.70 . -46.60 -49.20 -45.20 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9550 0.9120 0.8511 0.7762 0.6918 0.6026 • 0.5248 0.4365 0.2754 0.1514 0.0692 . 0.0229 0.0037 0.0010 0.0054 0.0100 0.0120 0.0112 0.0081 0.0048 0.0020 . 0.0004 0.0000 0.0004 0.0010 0.0015 0.0017 0.0016 0.0012 0.0008 0.0004 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0002 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 ,- 0.0002 0.0001 * 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 154 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.24 1444.70 963.23 722.52 578.12 481.87 413.14 361.60 321.53 289.49 241.45 207.18 181.51 161.57 '•'<. 145.65 . 132.65 121.85 • 112.73 104.95 98.22 92.37 87.23 82.68 78.65 75.04 71.80 68.89 66.26 63.88 61.72 59.76 57.98 56.36 54.89 53.55 52.33 51.23 50.24 49.34 48.54 47.83 47.21 45.66 46.20 45.81 45.49 45.25 45.08 44.97 ' 44.94 566.67 Frequency (MHz): DistFrom Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 .175.86 155.19 138.54 ' 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 • 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 ' 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 . 0.00 850 Power Density (MW/cmA2) 0.000010 0.000999 0.003994 0.008985 0.015969 0.024942 0.035901 0.048840 0.063371 0.077100 0.091382 0.115222 0.128046 0.129824 0.113807 0.090232 0.060425 0.033740 6.013811 0.011690 0.013325 0.014987 0.016822 0.018595 0.019329 0.016161 0.011026 0.005566 0.004405 0.004953 0.005281 0.005609 0.005900 0.006214 0.005993 0.004752 0.003083 0.001542 0.001285 0.001694 0.001807 0.001835 0.001870 0.001916 0.001915 0.001868 0.001763 0.001391 0.000953 0.000580 0.000935 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 6.000002 -0.000176 0.000705 - 0.001586 0.002818 0.004402 0.006335 0.008619 0.011183 0.013606 0.016126 0.020333 0.022596 0.022910 0.020084 0.015923 0.010663 . 0.005954 0.002437 0.002063 0.002351' 0.002645 0.002969 0.003282 0.003411 0.002852 0.001946 0.000982 0.000777 0.000874 0.000932 0.000990 0.001041 0.001097 0.001058 0.000839 0.000544 0.000272 0.000227 0.000299 0.000319 0.000324 • 0.000330 0.000338 0.000338 0.000330 0.000311 0.000246 0.000168 0.000102 0.000165 0.0 Times Below MPE 56742869 567450 - 141879 63069 35486 22719 15784 11602 8942 7349 6201 4918 4425 4364 - 4979 ' 6280 9378 '16794 41029 48473 42526 37810 33686 30473 29317. 35064 51395 101816 128646 114405 107301 101033 96038 91193 94555 119258 183810 367520 440945 334600 313576 308749 303015 295301 295926 303419 321415 407310 594332 976434 605939 Page 42 SWEDCOM:ALP 9212 Antenna Worksheet (330 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 250 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.20 -0.40 -0.70 -1.10 -1.60 -2.20. -2.80 -3.60 -5.60 -8.20 -11.60 -16.40 -24.30 -30.10 -22.70 -20.00 -19.20 -19.50 -20.90 -23.20 -27.00 -34.20 -53.10 -34.20 -29.90 -28.10 -27.60 -28.00 -29.20 -31.20 -34.20 -39.00 -48.60 -47.30 -40.00 -36.80 -35.40 -34.60 . -34.60 -34.70 -35.00 -35.90 -37.30 -39.40 -41.70 -46.60 -49.20 -45.20 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9550 0.9120 0.8511 0.7762 0.6918 0.6026 0.5248 0.4365 0.2754 0.1514 0.0692 0.0229 0.0037 0.0010 0.0054 0.0100 0.0120 0.01 12 0.0081 . 0.0048 0.0020 0.0004 0.0000 0.0004 0.0010 0.0015 0.0017 0.0016 0.0012 0.0008 0.0004 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0002 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0002 0.0001 J = 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 154 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.24 1444.70 963.23 722.52 578.12 481.87 413.14 361.60 321.53 289.49 241.45 207.18 181.51 161.57 145.65 132.65 121.85 112.73 104.95 98.22 92.37 . 87.23 82.68 78.65 75.04 71.80 68.89 66.26 63.88 61.72 59.76 57.98 56.36 54.89 53.55 52.33 51.23 50.24 49.34 48.54 47.83 47.21 46.66 46.20 45.81 45.49 45.25 45.08 44.97 44.94 566.67 Frequency (MHz): Disi From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.'39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 - 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 . 3.53 1.76 0.00 850 Power Density (MW/cmA2) 0.000010 0.000999 0.003994 0.008985 0.015969 0.024942 0.035901 0.048840 0.063371 0.077100 0.091382 0.115222 0.128046 0.129824 0.113807 0.090232 0.060425 0.033740 0.013811 0.011690 0.013325 0.014987 , 0.016822 0.018595 0.019329 0.016161 0.011026 0.005566 0.004405 0.004953 0.005281 0.005609 0.005900 0^006214 0.005993 0.004752 0.003083 0.001542 0.001285 0.001694 0.001807 0.001835 0.001870 0.001916 0.001915 0.001868 0.001763 0.001391 0.000953 0.000580 0.000935 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000002 . 0.000176 0.000705 0.001536 0.002818 0.004402 0.006335 0.008619 0.011183 0.013606 0.016126 0.020333 0.022596 0.022910 0.020084 0.015923 0.010663 •0.005954 0.002437 . 0.002063 0.002351 6.002645 0.002969 0.003282 0.003411 0.002852 0-001946 0.000982 0.000777 0.000874 0.000932 0.000990 • 0.001041 0.001097 0.001058 0.000839 0.000544 0.000272 0.000227 0.000299 0.000319 0.000324 0.000330 0.000338 0.000338 0.000330 0.000311 0.000246 0.000168 0.000102 0.000165 0.0 Times Below MPE 56742869 567450 - 141879 63069 35486 22719 15784 11602 8942 7349 6201 4918 4425 436.4 4979 6280 9378 16794 41029 48473 42526 37810 33686 30473 29317 35064 51395 101816 128646 114405 107301 101033 96038 91193 94555 119258 183810 367520 440945 334600 313576 308749 303015 295801 295926 303419 321415 407310' 594332 976434 605939 Page 43 (£}; ACCESS GATE (E) CHAIJtUNR'FENCE AROUNQ-COMPOUND E 'CONCRETE:SVOOP 3-tEGGEO LATTICE: TQWER '(£} COAX:;CA05.E BRIDGE (E) kWJM GATE (q VERIZONEQUIPMENT ---SHEL'TER {£).. 3VO' HIGH RETWNING WALL (0':GENEE?ATOR SWEDCOM:ALP 9212 Antenna Worksheet (330 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 250 (feet): . Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain -K1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 . 12.0 14.0 • 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 . 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 65.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 85.0 88.0 90.0 • 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.20 -0.40 -0.70 -1.10 -1.60 -2.20. -2.80 -3.60 . -5.60 -8.20 -11.60 -16.40 -24.30 -30.10 -22.70 -20.00 -19.20 . -19.50 -20.90 ' -23.20 -27.00 -34.20 -53.10 -34.20 -29.90 -28.10 -27.60 -28.00 -29.20 -31.20 .-34.20 -39.00 -48.60 -47.30 -40.00 -38.80 -35.40 -34.80 -34.50 -34.70 -35.00 -35.90 -37.30 -39.40 -41.70 -43.60 -49.20 -45.20 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9550 0.9120 0.8511 0.7762 ' 0.6918 0.6026 0.5248 0.4365 0.2754 0.1514 0.0692 0.0229 0.0037 0.0010 0.0054 0.0100 0.0120 0.0112 0.0081 0.0043 • 0.0020 0.0004 • 0.0000 0.0004 .0.0010 0.0015 0.0017 0.0015 0.0012 0.0008 0.0004 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0002 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 -" 0.0003 ,, 0.0002 0.0001 J 0.0001 O.QOOO 0.0000 0.0000 154 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.24 1444.70 963.23 722.52 578.12 431.87 413.14 361.60 321.53 289.49 241.45 207.18 . 181.51 161.57 145.65 132.65 121.85 112.73 104.95 98.22 92.37 87.23 82.68 78.65 75.04 71.80 68.89 66.26 63.88 61.72 59.76 ' 57.98 55.36 54.89 53.55 52.33 51.23 50.24 .49.34 48.54 47.83 47.21 46.66 43.20 45.81 45.49 45.25 45.08 • 44.97 44.94 566.67 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 23891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103/39 - 94.84 87.34 80.70 ^74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 ' 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 • 20.37 18.35 15.38 14.45 12.57. 10.72 8.89. 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.75 0.00 850 • Power Density (pW/cmA2) 0.000010 0.000999 0.003994 0.008985 0.015969 0.024942 0.035901 0.048840 0.063371 0.077100 0.09.1382 0.115222 0.123046 0.129824 0.113807 0.090232 0.060425 0.033740 0.013811 0.011690 0.013325 0.014937 . 0:016822 0.018595 0.019329 ' 0.016161 0.011026 0.005566 0.004405 0.004953 0.005281 0.005609 0.005900 0.005214 0.005993 0.004752 0.003083 0.001542 0.001285 0.001694 0.001807 0.001835 0.001870 0.001915 '0.001915 0.001868 0.001763 0.001391 0.000953 0,000580 0.000935 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000002 • 0.000176 0.000705 0.001536 0.002813 0.004402 0.006335 0.008619 0.011183 0.013606 0.013125 0.020333 0.022596 0.022910 0.020084 0.015923 0.010663 . U005954 0.002437 . 0.002063 0.002351 0.002645 0.002969 ' 0.003282 0.003411 0.002852 0,001946 0.000982 0.000777 0.000874 0.000932 0.000990 0.001041 0.001097 0.001053 0.000839 0.000544 0.000272 0.000227 0.000299 0.000319 0.000324 0.000330 0.000338 0.000333 0.000330 0.000311 0.000243 0.000168 0.000102 0.000155 0.0 Times Below MPE 56742869 567450 - 141879 63069 35486 22719 15784 11602 8942 7349 820 1 4918 4425 4364 4979 6280 9373 16794 41029 48473 42525 37810' 33686 30473 29317 35064 51395 101816 123646 114405 107301 101033 96038 91193 94555 119258 183310 367520 440945 334600 313575 308749 303015 295301 295926 303419 321415 407310 594332 976434 605939 Paga 44 ANDREW:844H90T8E-XY Antenna Worksheet (20 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 150 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 .„ 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0' 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 -3.12 -2.40 -1.70 -1.20 -0.70 -0.40 -0.20 0.00 0.00. 0.00 -0.20 -0.70 -1.70 -3.00 -4.90 -7.40 -10.60 -14.40 -17.50 -16.40 -14.00 -12.50 -11.80 -11.70 -12.00 -12.90 -14.30 -16.10 -18.50 -21.50 -24.90 -27.40 -28.80 -28.10 -27.40 -26.90 -26.80 -27.10 -27.50 -28.80 -29.90 -31.10 -33.30 -34.80 -36.10 -37.10 -38.30 -38.20 -37.00 -36.60 . -34.30 0.4875 0.5754 0.6761 0.7586 0.8511 0.9120 0.9550 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9550 0.8511 0.6761 0.5012 0.3236 0.1820 0.0871 0.0363 0.0178 0.0229 0.0398 0.0562 0.0661 .0.0676 0.0631 0.0513 0.0372 0.0245 0.0141 0.0071 0.0032 0.0018 0.0013 - 0.0015 0.0018 0.0020 • 0.0021 0.0019 0.0018 0.0013 0.0010 0.0008 0.0005 0.0003 0.0002 0.0002 0.0001 5 * 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0004 157 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.25 1444.73 963.27 722.58 578.19 481.95 413.24 361.72 321.66 289.63 241.63 207.38 181.74 161.83 145.93 ~' 132.96 122.19 113.10 105.34 98.64 ' 92.82 87.70 83.18 79.17 75.59. 72.38 69.49 66.89 64.53 62.39 60.45 58.69 57.09 55.64 54.32 53.12 52.03 51.05 50.18 49.39 48.69 48.08 47.55 47.09 46.71 46.40 46.16 45.99 45.89 45.85 566.67 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 • ' 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 850 Power Density (MW/cm*2) 0.000003 0.000300 0.001198 0.002695 0.004229 0.014962 0:021533 0.029290 0.038228 0.048342 0.059625 0.085671 0.116302 0.147462 0.169976 0.175050 0.167425 0.142434 0.108527 0.069735 0.038607 0.043688 0.051290 0.056853 0.062634 0.068726 0.07481 1 0.080530 0.079805 0.069248 0.053331 0.037549 0.023260 0.012228 0.005900 0.004822 0.005089 0.005280 0.005436 0.005601 0.005584 0.005206 0.004260 0.003300 0.002481 0.001515 0.001070 0.000804 0.001065 0.001241 0.001236 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000001 0.000053 0.000211 0.000475 0.000746 0.002640 0.003800 0.005169 0.006746 0.008531 0.010522 0.015118 0.020524 0.026023 0.029996 0.030891 0.029546 0.025135 0.019152 0.012306 0.006813' 0:007710 ' 0.009051 0.010033 0.011053 0.012128 0.013202 0.014211 0.014083 0.012220 0.009411 0.006626 0.004105 0.002158 0.001041 0.000851 0.000898 0.000932 0.000959 0.000988 0.000985 0.000919 0.000752 0.000582 0.000438 0.000267 0.000189 0.000142 0.000188 0.000219 0.000218 0.0 Times Below MPE 189173257 1891803 - 473014 210278 134003 37874 26316 19346 14823 11722 9503 6614 4872 3842 3333 3237 3384 3978 5221 8125 14677 12970 11048 9967 9047 8245 7574 7036 7100 8183 10625 15091 24362 46342 96051 117514 111347 107329 104250 101177 101474 108856 133013 171739 228423 374021 529649 704627 531856 456471 458650 Page 45 ANDREW:844H90T8E-XY Antenna Worksheet (20 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 150 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86,0 88.0 90.0 -3.12 -2.40 -1.70 -1.20 -0.70 -0.40 -0.20 0.00 0.00. 0.00 -0.20 -0.70 -1.70 -3.00 -4.90 -7.40 -10.60 -14.40 -17.50 -16.40 -14.00 -12.50 * -11.80 -11.70 -12.00 -12.90 -14.30 -16.10 -18.50 -21.50 -24.90 -27.40 -28.80 -28.10 -27.40 -26.90 -26.80 -27.10 -27.50 -28.80 -29.90 -31.10 -33.30 -34.80 -36.10 -37.10 -38.30 -38.20 -37.00 -38.60 -34.30 0.4875 0.5754 0.6761 0.7586 0.8511 0.9120 0.9550 1.0000 1.0000 1 ,0000 0.9550 0.8511 0.6761 0.5012 0.3236 0.1820 0.0871 0.0363 0.0178 0.0229 0.0398 0.0562 0.0661 0.0676 0.0631 0.0513 0.0372 0.0245 0.0141 0.0071 0.0032 0.0018 0.0013 0.0015 0.0018 0.0020 0.0021 0.0019 0.0018 0.0013 0.0010 0.0008 0.0005 0.0003 0.0002 j 0.0002 0.0001 ' 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0004 157 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.25 1444.73 963.27 722.58 578.19 481.95 413.24 361.72 321.66 289.63 241.63 207.38 181.7.4 161.83 145.93 132.96 122.19 113.10 105.34 98.64 92.82 87.70 83.18 79.17 75.59 72.38 69.49 66.89 64.53 62.39 60.45 58.69 57.09 55.64 54.32 • 53.12 52.03 51.05 50.18 49.39 48,69 48.08 47.55 47.09 46.71 46.40 46.16 45.99 45.89 45.85 566.67 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 • 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 850 Power Density (uW/cm-'Z) 0.000003 0.000300 0.001198 0.002695 0.004229 0.014962 0.021533 0.029290 0.038228 0.048342 0.059625 0.085671 0.116302 0.147462 0.169976 0.175050 0.167425 0:142434 0.108527 0.069735 0.038607 0.043688 0.051290 0.056853 0.062634 0.068726 0.07481 1 0.080530 0.079805 0.069248 0.053331 0.037549 0.023260 0.012228 0.005900 0.004822 0.005089 0.005280 0.005436 0.005601 0.005584 0.005206 0.004260 0.003300 0.002481 0.001515 0.001070 0.000804 0.001065 0.001241 0.001236 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000001 .0.000053 0.000211 0.000476 0.000746 0.002640 0.003800 0.005169 0.006746 0.008531 0.010522 0.015118 0.020524 0.026023 0.029996 0.030891 0.029546 0.025135 0.019152 . 0.012306 0.006813' 0.007710 0.009051 0.010033 0.011053 0.012128 0.013202 0.014211 0.014083 0.012220 0.009411 0.006626 0.004105 0.002158 0.001041 0.000851 0.000898 0.000932 0.000959 0.000938 0.000985 0.000919 0.000752 0.000582 0.000438 0.000267 0.000189 0.000142 0.000188 0.000219 0.000218 0.0 Times Below MPE 189173257 1891803- 473014 210278 134003 37874 26316 19346 14823 11722 9503 6614 4872 3842 3333 3237 3384 3978 5221 8125 14677 12970 11048 9967 9047 8245 7574 7036 7100 8183 10625 15091 24362 46342 96051 117514 111347 107329 104250 101177 101474 108856 133013 171739 228423 374021 529649 704527 531856 456471 458650 Page 46 ANDREW:844H90T8E-XY Antenna Worksheet (20 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 150 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0. 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 ' 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 8S.O 88.0 90.0 -3.12 -2.40 -1.70 -1.20 -0.70 -0.40 -0.20 0.00 0.00 . 0.00 -0.20 -0.70 -1.70 -3.00 -4.90 -7.40 -10.60 -14.40 -17.50 -16.40 -14.00 -12.50 --11.80 -11.70 -12.00 :-:-12:90: - -14.30 -16.10 -18.50 -21.50 -24.90 -27.40 -28.80 -28.10 -27.40 -26.90 -26.80 -27.10 -27.50 -28.80 -29.90 -31.10 -33.30 -34.80 -36.10 -37.10 -38.30 -38.20 -37.00 -36.60 -34.30 0.4875 0.5754 0.6761 0.7586 0.8511 0.9120 0.9550 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9550 0.8511 0.6761 0.5012 0.3236 0.1820 0.0871 0.0363 . 0.0178 0.0229 0.0398 0.0562 0.0661 0.0676 0.0631 0.0513 0.0372 0.0245 0.0141 0.0071 0.0032 0.0018 0.0013 0.0015 0.0018 0.0020 0.0021 0.0019 0.0013 0.0013 0.0010 0.0008 0.0005 0.0003 0.0002 0.0002 0.0001 * s 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0004 157 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.25 1444.73 963.27 722.58 578.19 481.95 413.24 361.72 321.66 289.63 241.63 207.38 181.74 161.83 145.93 132.96 122.19 113.10 105.34 98.64 92.82 87.70 83.18 79.17 75.59 72.38 69.49 66.89 64.53 62.39 60.45 58.69 57.09 55.64 54.32 53.12 52.03 51.05 50.18 49.39 48.69 48.08 47.55 47.09 46.71 46.40 46.16 45.99 45.89 . 45.85 566.67 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 . 124.81 113.26 103.39 • 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 • 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 • 20.37 - 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 ' 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 850 Power Density (uVWcmA2) 0.000003 0.000300 0^001198 0.002695 0.004229 0.014962 0.021533 0.029290 0.038228 0.048342 0.059625 0.085671 0.116302 0.147462 0.169976 0.175050 0.167425 0.142434 0.108527 0.069735 0.038607 0.043688 0.051290 0.056853 0.062634 0.068726 ' 0:074811 0.080530 0.079805 0.069248 0.053331 0.037549 0.023260 0.012228 0.005900 0.004822 0.005089 0.005280 - 0.005436 0.005601 . 0.005584 0.005206 0.004260 0.003300 0.002481 0.001515 0.001070 0.000804 0.001065 0.001241 0.001236 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000001 0.000053 0.000211 0.000476 0.000746 0.002640 0.003800 0.005169 0.006746 0.008531 0.010522 0.015118 0.020524 0.026023 0.029996 0.030891 0.029546 0.025135 0.019152 0.012306 0.006813' 0.007710 0.009051 0.010033 0.011053 0.012128 0.013202 0.014211 0.014083 0.012220 0.009411 0.006626 0.004105 0.002158 0.001041 0.000851 0.000898 0.000932 0.000959 0.000988 0.000985 0.000919 0.000752 0.000582 0.000438 0.000267 0.000189 0.000142 0.000188 0.000219 0.000218 0.0 Times Below MPE 189173257 1891803 - 473014 210278 134003 37874 26316 19346 14823 11722 9503 6614 4872 3842 3333 •3237 3384 3978 5221 8125 14677 12970 11048 9967 9047 . 8245 7574 7036 7100 8183 10625 15091 24362 46342 96051 117514 111347 107329 104250 101177 101474 108856 133013 171739 228423 374021 529649 704627 531856 456471 458650 Page 47 ANDREW:844H90T8E-XY Antenna Worksheet (20 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 150 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 65.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 -3.12 -2.40 -1.70 -1.20 -0.70 -0.40 -0.20 0.00 ''• 0.00. 0.00 -0.20 -0.70 -1.70 -3.00 -4.90 -7.40 -10.60 -14.40 . -17.50 -16.40 -14.00 -12.50 • -11.80 -11.70 -12.00 -12.90 -14.30 -16.10 -18.50 -21.50 -24.90 -27.40 -28.80 -28.10 -27.40 -26.90 -26.80 -27.10 -27.50 -28.80 .;. -29.90 ' -31.10 -33.30 -34.80 -36.10 -37.10 -38.30 -38.20 -37.00 -36.60 -34.30 0.4875 0.5754 0.6761 0.7586 0.8511 0.9120 0.9550 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9550 0.8511 0.6761 0.5012 0.3236 0.1820 0.0871 0:0363 •<:, , 0.0178 0.0229 0.0398 0.0562 0.0661 0.0676 0.0631 0.0513 0.0372 0.0245 0.0141 0.0071 0.0032 0.0018 0.0013 0.0015 0.0018 0.0020 0.0021 0.0019 0.0018 0.0013 0.0010 0.0008 0.0005 0.0003 0.0002 = 0.0002 0.0001 5 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0004 157 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.25 1444.73 963.27 722.58 578.19 481.95 413.24 361.72 321.66 289.63 241.63 207.38 181.74 161.83 145.93 132.96 ,.. 122.19 113.10 105.34 98.64 92.82 87.70 83.18 79.17 75.59 72.38 69.49 66.89 64.53 62.39 60.45 58.69 57.09 55.64 54.32 53.12 52.03 51.05 50.18 49.39 48.69 48.08 47.55 47.09 46.71 46.40 46.16 45.99 45.89 45.85 566.67 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 • 20.37 18.35 . 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 850 Power Density (MW/cmA2) 0.000003 0.000300 0.001198 0.002695 0.004229 0.014962 0.021533 0.029290 0.038228 0.048342 0.059625 0.085671 0.116302 0.147462 0.169976 0.175050 0.167425 ' 0.142434 0.108527 0.069735 0.038607 0.043688 0.051290 0.056853 0.062634 0.068726 0.074811 0.080530 0.079805 0.069248 0.053331 0.037549 0.023260 • 0.012228 0.005900 0.004822 0.005089 0.005280 0.005436 0.005601 0.005584 0.005206 0.004260 0.003300 0.002481 0.001515 0.001070 0.000804 0.001065 0.001241 0.001236 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000001 0.000053 0.000211 0.000476 0.000746 0.002640 0.003800 0.005169 0.006746 0.008531 0.010522 0.015118 0.020524 0.026023 0.029996 0.030891 0.029546 0.025135 0.019152 . 0.012306 0.006813' 0:007710 0.009051 0.010033 0.011053 0.012128 0.013202 0.014211 0.014083 0.012220 0.009411 0.006626 0.004105 0.002158 0.001041 0.000851 0.000898 0.000932 0.000959 0.000988 0.000985 0.000919 0.000752 0.000582 0.000438 0.000267 0.000189 0.000142 0.000188 0.000219 0.000218 0.0 Times Below MPE 189173257 1891803 - 473014 210278 134003 37874 26316 19346 14823 11722 9503 6614 4872 3342 3333 3237 3384 3978 5221 8125 14677 12970 11048 9967 9047 8245 7574 7036 7100 8183 10625 15091 24362 46342 96051 117514 111347 107329 104250 101177 101474 108856 133013 171739 228423 374021 529649 704627 531856 456471 458650 Page 48 ANDREW:844H90T8E-XY Antenna Worksheet (20 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 150 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 "40.0 • 42.0 . 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52:0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 •80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 -3.12 -2.40 -1.70 -1.20 -0.70 -0.40 -0.20 0.00 0.00. 0.00 -0.20 -0.70 -1.70 -3.00 -4.90 -7.40 -10.60 -14.40 -17.50 -16.40 -14.00 -12.50 -11.80 -11.70 -12.00 . -12.90 -14.30 -16.10 -18.50 -21.50 -24.90 -27.40 -28.80 -28.10 -27.40 -26.90 -26.80 -27.10 -27.50 -28.80 -29.90 -31.10. -33.30 -34.80 -36.10 -37.10 -38.30 -38.20 -37.00 -36.60 -34.30 . 0.4875 0.5754 0.6761 0.7586 0.8511 0.9120 0.9550 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9550 0.8511 0.6761 0.5012 0.3236 0.1820 0.0871 0.0363 0.0178 0.0229 0.0398 0.0562 0.0661 0.0676 ' 0.0631 0.0513 0.0372 0.0245 0.0141 0.0071 0.0032 0.0018 0.0013 0.0015 0.0018 0.0020 0.0021 0.0019 • 0.0018 0.0013 0.0010 0.0008 0.0005 0.0003 0.0002 0.0002 0.0001 J-~ 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0004 157 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.25 1444.73 963.27 722.58 578.19 481.95 413.24 361.72 321.66 289.63 241.63 207.38 181.74 161.83 145.93 132.96 122.19 113.10 105.34 98.64 92.82 87.70 83.18 79.17. 75.59 72.38 69.49 66.89 64.53 62.39 60.45 58.69 57.09 55.64 54.32 53.12 52.03 51.05 50.18 49.39 48.69 48.03 47.55 47.09 46.71 46.40 46.16 45.99 45.89 45.85 566.67 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 • 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 60.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 ' 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 •• 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 850 Power Density (MW/cmA2) 0.000003 0.000300 0.001198 0.002695 0.004229 0.014962 0.021533 0.029290 0.038228 0.048342 0.059625 0.085671 0.116302 0.147462 0.169976 0.175050 0.167425 0.142434 0.108527 0.069735 0.038607 0.043688 0.051290 0.056853 0.062634 .•0.068726 . • 0.074811 0.080530 0.079805 0.069248 0.053331 0.037549 0.023260 0.012228 0.005900 0.004822 0.005089 0.005280 0.005436 0.005601 0.005584 0.005206 0.004260 0.003300 0.002481 0.001515 0.001070 0.000804 0.001065 0.001241 0.001236 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000001 0.000053 0.000211 0.000476 0.000746 0.002640 0.003800 0.005169 0.006746 0.008531 0.010522 0.015118 0.020524 0.026023 0.029996 0.030891 0.029546 0.025135 0.019152 . . 0.012306 0.006813 0.007710 0.009051 0.010033 0.011053 0.012128 0:01 3202 0.014211 0.014083 0.012220. 0.009411 0.006626 0.004105 0.002158 0.001041 0.000851 0.000898 0.000932 0.000959 0.000988 0.000985 0.000919 0.000752 0.000582 0.000438 0.000267 0.0001 89 : 0.000142 0.000188 0.000219 0.000218 0.0 Times Below MPE 189173257 1891803- 473014 210278 134003 37874 26316 19346 14823 11722 9503 6614 4872 3842 3333 3237 3384 3978 5221 8125 14677 12970 ' 11048 9967 9047 8245 7574 7036 7100 8183 10625 15091 24362 46342 96051 117514 111347 107329 104250 101177 101474 108856 133013 171739 228423 374021 529649 704627 531856 ' 456471 458650 Page 49 ANDREW:844H90T8E-XY Antenna Worksheet (120 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 150 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 '40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 -3.12 -2.40 -1.70 -1.20 -0.70 -0.40 -0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.20 -0.70 -1.70 -3.00 -4.90 -7.40 -10.60 -14.40 -17.50 -16.40 . -14.00 -12.50 " -11.80 -11.70 -12.00 -12.90 -14.30 -16.10 -18.50 -21.50 -24.90 -27.40 -28.80 -28.10 -27.40 -26.90 -26.80 -27.10 -27.50 -28.80 -29.90 -31.10 -33.30 -34.80 -36.10 -37.10 -38.30 -38.20 -37.00 -36.60 -34.30 0.4875 0.5754 0.6761 0.7586 • 0.8511 0.9120 0.9550 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9550 0.8511 0.6761 0.5012 0.3236 0.1820 0.0871 0.0363 0.0178 0.0229 0.0398 '0.0562 0.0661 0.0676 0.0631 0.0513 0.0372 0.0245 0.0141 0.0071 0.0032 0.0018 0.0013 0.0015 0.0018 0.0020 0.0021 0.0019 0.0018 0.0013 0.0010 0.0008 0.0005 0.0003 0.0002 , 0.0002 0.0001 '* 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0004 157 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.25 1444.73 963.27 722.58 578.19 481.95 413.24 361.72 321.66 289.63 241.63 207.38 181.74 161.83 145.93 132.96 122.19 113.10 105.34 98.64 92.82 87.70 83.18 79.17 75.59 72.38 69.49 66.89 •" 64.53 62.39 60.45 58.69 57.09 55.64 54.32 53.12 52.03 51.05 50.18 49.39 48.69 48.08 47.55 47.09 45.71 46.40 46.16 45.99 45.89 45.85 566.67 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 • 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 850 Power Density (uW/cmA2) 0.000003 0.000300 0.001198 0.002695 0.004229 0.014962 0.021533 0.029290 0.038228 0.048342 0.059625 0.085671 0.116302 0.147462 0.169976 0.174828 0.167425 0.142623 0.108527 0.069735 0.038691 0.043688 0.051290 0.056853 0.062634 0.068726 0.074621 0.080530 0.079805 0.069513 0.053535 0.037693 0.023153 0.012181 0.005900 0.004822 0.005065 0.005280 0.005436 0.005622 0.005606 0.005206 0.004244 0.003312 0.002490 0.001515 0.001070 ' -0.000804 0.001061 0.001237 0.001231 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000001 0.000053 0.00021 1" 0.000476 0.000746 0.002640 0.003800 0.005169 0.006746 0.008531 0.010522 0.015118 0.020524 0.026023 0.029996 0.030852 0.029546 0:025169 0.019152 . 0.012306 0.006828 ' 0.007710 0.009051 0.010033 0.011053 0.012128 0.0.13168 0.014211 d.0'14083 0.012267 0.009447 0.006652 0.004086 0.002150 0.001041 0.000851 0.000894 0.000932 0.000959 0.000992 0.000989 0.000919 0.000749 0.000585 0.000439 0.000267 0.000189 0.000142 0.000187 0.000218 0.000217 0.0 Times Below MPE 189392516 1891803 - 473014 210278 134003 37874 26316 19346 14823 11722 9503 6614 4872 3842 3333 3241 3384 3973 5221 8125 . 14645 12970 11048 9967 9047 8245 7593 7036 7100 8151 10534 15033 24474 46520 96051 117514 111871 107329 104250 100786 101086 108856 133523 171083 227551 374021 529649 704627 533893 458220 480407 Paae 50 ANDREW:844H90T8E-XY Antenna Worksheet (120 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 150 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 ' 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 . 40.0 42.0 ' 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 -3.12 -2.40 -1.70 -1.20 -0.70 -0.40 -0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.20 -0.70 -1.70 -3.00 -4.90 -7.40 -10.60 -14.40 -17.50 . -16.40 -14.00 -12.50 '-11.80 -11.70 -12.00 -12.90 -14.30 -16.10 -18.50 -21.50 -24.90 -27.40 -28.80 -28.10 -27.40 -26.90 -26.80 -27.10 -27.50 -28.80 -29.90 -31.10 -33.30 -34.80 -36.10 -37.10 -38.30 -38.20 -37.00. -36.60 -34.30 0.4875 0:5754 0.6761 0.7586 0.8511 0.9120 0.9550 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9550 0.8511 0.6761 0.5012 0.3236 0.1820 0.0871 0.0363 0.0178 0.0229 0.0398 0.0562 0.0661 0.0676 0.0631 0.0513 . 0.0372 0.0245 0.0141 0.0071 0.0032 0.0018 0.0013 0.0015 0.0018 0.0020 0.0021 0.0019 0.0018 0.0013 0.0010 0.0008 0.0005 0.0003 0.0002 0.0002 0.0001 J ' 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0004 157 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.25 1444.73 963.27 722.58 578.19 481.95 413.24 361.72 321.66 289.63 241.63 207.38 181.74 161.83 145.93 132.96 122.19 113.10 105.34 98.64 92.82 87.70 83.18 79.17 75.59 72.38 69.49 66.89 64.53 62.39 60.45 58.69 57.09 55.64 54.32 53.12 • 52.03 51.05 50.18 49.39 48.69 48.08 47.55 47.09 46.71 46.40 46.16 45.99 45.89 45.85 566.67 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 • 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 '39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 • 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 850 Power Density (MW/cmA2) 0.000003 0.000300 0.001198 0.002695 0.004229 0.014962 0.021533 0.029290 0.038228 1 0.048342 0.059625 0.085671 0.116302 0.147462 0.169976 0.174828 0.167425 0.142623 0.108527 0.069735 0.038691 0.043688 0.051290 0.056853 0.062634 0.068726 0.074621 0.080530 0.079805 0.069513 0.053535 0.037693 0.023153 0.012181 0.005900 0.004822 0.005065 0.005280 0.005436 0.005622 0.005606 0.005206 0.004244 0.003312 0.002490 0.001515 0.001070 0.000804 0.001061 0.001237 0.001231 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000001 0.000053 0.000211 0.000476 0.000746 0.002640 0.003800 0.005169 0.006746 0.008531 0.010522 0.015118 0.020524 0.026023 0.029996 0.030852 0.029546 0.025169 0.019152 . 0.012306 0.006828 ' 0:007710 0.009051 0.010033 0.011053 0.012128 0.013168 0.014211 0.014083 0.012267 0.009447 0.006652 0.004086 0.002150 0.001041 0.000851 0.000894 0.000932 0.000959 0.000992 0.000989 0.000919 0.000749 0.000585 0.000439 0.000267 0.000189 0.000142 0.000187 0.000218 0.000217 0.0 Times Below MPE 189392516 1891803 - 473014 210278 134003 37874 26316 19346 14823 11722 9503 6614 4872 3842 3333 3241 3384 3973 5221 8125 14645 12970 11048 9967 9047 8245 7593 7036 7100 8151 10584 15033 24474 46520 96051 117514 111871 107329 104250 100786 101086 108856 133523 171083 227551 374021 529649 704627 533393 458220 460407 Page 51 ANDREW:844H90T8E-XY Antenna Worksheet (120 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 150 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 . 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 -3.12 -2.40 ' -1.70 -1.20 -0.70 -0.40 -0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.20 -0.70 -1.70 -3.00 -4.90 -7.40 -10.60 -14.40. -17.50 -16.40 '-14.00 -12.50 -11.80 -11.70 -12.00 -12.90 -14.30 -16.10 -18.50 -21.50 -24.90 -27.40 -28.80 -28.10 -27.40 -28.90 -26.80 -27.10 -27.50 -28.80 -29.90 -31.10 -33.30 -34.80 -36.10 -37.10 -33.30 -38.20 -37.00 -36.60 -34.30 0.4875 0.5754 0.6761 0.7586 0.8511 0.9120 0.9550 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9550 0.8511 0.6761 0.5012 0.3236 0.1820 0.0871 0.0363 0.0178 0.0229 0.0398 0.0562 0.0661 0.0676 0.0631 0.0513 0.0372 0.0245 0.0141 0.0071 0.0032 0.0018 0.0013 . 0.0015 0.0018 0.0020 0.0021 0.0019 0.0018 0.0013 0.0010 0.0008 0.0005 0.0003 0.0002 , 0.0002 0.0001 * 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0004 157 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.25 1444.73 963.27 722.58 578.19 481.95 413.24 361 .72 321.66 289.63 241.63 207.38 181.74 161.83 145.93 132.96 122.19 113.10 105.34 98.64 92.82 87.70 83.18 79.17 75.59 72.38 69.49 66.89 64.53 62.39 60.45 58.69 57.09 55.64 54.32 53.12 52.03 51.05 50.18 49.39 43.69 48.08 47.55 47.09 46.71 46.40 46.16 45.99 45.89 45.85 566.67 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 • 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 850 Power Density (uW/cmA2) 0.000003 0.000300 0.001198 0.002695 0.004229 0.014962 0.021533 0.029290 0.038228 0.048342 0.059625 0.085671 0.116302 0.147462 0.169976 0.174828 0.167425 0.142623 0.108527 0.069735 0.038691 0.043688 0.051290 0.056853 0.062634 0.068726 0.074621 0.080530 0.079805 0.069513 0.053535 0.037693 0.023153 0.012181 0.005900 0.004822 0.005065 0.005280 0.005436 0.005622 0.005606 0.005206 0.004244 0.003312 0.002490 0.001515 0.001070 0.000804 0.001061 0.001237 0.001231 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000001 0.000053 0.000211 0.000475 0.000746 0.002640 0.003800 0.005169 0.006746 0.008531 0.010522 0.015118 0.020524 0.026023 0.029996 0.030852 0.029546 - 0.025169 0.019152 . 0.012306 0.006828 0:007710 0.009051 0.010033 - 0.01 1053 0.012128 0.013168 0.014211 0.014083 0.012267 0.009447 0.006652 0.004086 0.002150 0.001041 0.000851 0.000894 0.000932 0.000959 0.000992 0.000989 0.000919 0.000749 0.000585 0.000439 0.000267 0.000189 0.000142 0.000187 0.000218 0.000217 0.0 Times Below MPE 189392516 1891803 - 473014 210278 134003 37874 26316 19346 14823 11722 9503 6614 4872 3842 3333 3241 3384 3973 5221 8125 14645 12970 ' 11048 9967 9047 8245 ' 7593 7036 7100 8151 10584 15033- 24474 46520 96051 117514 111871 107329 104250 100786 101086 108856 133523 171083 227551 374021 529649 704627 533893 458220 460407 Page 52 ANDREW:844H90T8E-XY Antenna Worksheet (120 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 150 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 ' ' 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 -3.12 -2.40 -1.70 -1.20 -0.70 -0.40 -0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.20 -0.70 -1.70 -3.00 -4.90 -7.40 -10.60 -14.40 -17.50 -16.40 -14.00 -12.50 -11.80 -11.70 -12.00 •-12.90 -14.30 -16.10 -18.50 -21.50 -24.90 -27.40 -28.80 -28.10 -27.40 -26/90 -26.80 -27.10 -27.50 -28.80 -29.90 -31.10 -33.30 -34.80 -36.10 -37.10 -38.30 -38.20 -37.00 -36.60 -34.30 0.4875 0.5754 0.6761 0.7586 . 0.8511 0.9120 0.9550 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9550 0.8511 0.6761 0.5012 0.3236 0.1820 0.0871 0.0363 0.0178 0.0229 0.0398 0.0562 0.0661 0.0676 0.0631 0.0513 0.0372 0.0245 0.0141 0.0071 0.0032 0.0018 0.0013 0.0015 0.0018 0.0020 0.0021 0.0019 0.0018 0.0013 0.0010 0.0008 0.0005 0.0003 0.0002 0.0002 0.0001 3 -"0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0004 157 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.25 1444.73 963.27 722.58 578.19 481.95 413.24 361.72 321.66 289.63 241.63 207.38 181.74 161.83 145.93 132.96 122.19 113.10 105.34 98.64 92.82 87.70 83.18 79.17 75.59 72.38 69.49 66.89 64.53 62.39 60.45 58.69 57.09 55.64 54.32 53.12 52.03 51.05 50.18 49.39 48.69 48.08 47.55 47.09 46.71 46.40 46.16 45.99 45.89 45.85 566.67 Frequency (MHz): DHst From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 ' 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 • '20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 .850 Power Density (uW/cmA2) 0.000003 0.000300 0.001198 0.002695 0.004229 0.014962 0.021533 0.029290 0.038228 0.048342 0.059625 0.085671 0.116302 0.147462 0.169976 0.174828 0.167425 0.142623 0.108527 0.069735 0.038691 0.043688 0.051290 0.056853 0.062634 0.068726 0^074621 0.080530 0.079805 0.069513 0.053535 0.037693 0.023153 0.012181 0.005900 • 0.004822 0.005065 0.005280 0.005436 0.005622 0.005606 0.005206 0.004244 0.003312 0.002490 0.001515 0.001070 0.000804 0.001061 O'.OOI 237 0.001231 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000001 0.000053 0.000211 0.000476 0.000746 0.002640 0.003800 0.005169 0.006746 0.008531 0.010522 0.015118 0.020524 0.026023 0.029996 0.030852 0.029546 0-.025169 0.019152 . 0.012306 0.006828 ' 0.007710 0.009051 0.010033 0.011053 0:01 21 28 0.0.13168 0.014211 0.014083 0.012267 0.009447 0.006652 0.004086 0.002150 0.001041 0.000851 0.000894 0.000932 0.000959 0.000992 0.000989 0.000919 • 0.000749 0.000585 0.000439 0.000267 0.000189 0.000142 0.000187 0.000218 0.000217 0.0 Times Below MPE 189392516 1891803 - 473014 210278 134003 37874 26316 19346 14823 1 1 722 , 9503 '""6614 4872 3842 3333 3241 3384 3973 5221 8125 14645 12970 11048 9967 9047 8245 7593 7036 7100 8151 10584 15033 24474 46520 96051 117514 111871 107329 104250 100786 101086 108856 133523 171083 227551 374021 529649 704627 533893 458220 460407 Page 53 ANDREW:844H90T8E-XY Antenna Worksheet (120 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 150 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) -Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 • 86.0 88.0 90.0 -3.12 -2.40 -1.70 -1.20 -0.70 -0.40 -0.20 0.00 0.00 . 0.00 -0.20 -0.70 -1.70 -3.00 -4:90 -7.40 -10.60 -14.40 -17.50 -16.40 - -14.00 -12.50 " -11.80 -11.70 -12.00 -12.90 -14.30' -16.10 -18.50' -21.50 -24.90 -27.40 -28.80 -28.10 -27.40 -26.90. -26.80 -27.10 -27.50 -28.80 -29.90 -31.10 -33.30 -34.80 -36.10 -37.10 -38.30 -38.20 -37.00 -36.60 -34.30 0.4875 0.5754 0.6761 0.7586 0.8511 0.9120 0.9550 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9550 0.8511 0.6761 0.5012 0.3236 0.1820 0.0871 0.0363 0.0178 0.0229 0.0398 0.0562 0.0661 0.0676 0.0631 0.0513 0.0372 0.0245 0.0141 0.0071 0.0032 0.0018 0.0013 0.0015 0.0018 0.0020 0.0021 0.0019 0.0018 0.0013 0.0010 0.0008 0.0005 0.0003 0.0002 ; 0.0002 0.0001 J 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0004 157 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.25 1444.73 963.27 722.58 578.19 481.95 413.24 361.72 321.66 289.63 241.63 207.38 181.74 161.83 145.93 132.96 122.19 113.10 105.34 98.64 92.82 87.70 83.18 79.17 75.59 72.38 69.49 66.89 . 64.53- 62.39 60.45 . 58.69 • 57.09 55.64 54.32 53.12 52.03 51.05. 50.18 49.39 48.69 48.08 47.55 47.09 46.71 46.40 46.16 45.99 45.89 45.85 566.67 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 , 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 : 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 20.37 18.35 15.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 850 Power Density (uW/cmA2) 0.000003 0.000300 0.001198 0.002695 0.004229 0.014962 0.021533 0.029290 0.038228 0.048342 0.059625 0.085671 0.116302 0.147462 0.169976 0.174828 0.167425 0.142623 0.108527 0.069735 0.038691 0.043688 0.051290 0.056853 0.062634 0.068726 0.074621 0.080530 0.079805 0.069513 0.053535 0.037693 0.023153 0.012181 0.005900 0.004822 0.005065 0.005280 0.005436 0.005622 0.005606 0.005206 0.004244 0.003312 0.002490 0.001515 0.001070 0.000804 0.001061 0.001237 0.001231 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000001 0.000053 0.00021 1 0.000476 0.000746 0.002640 0.003800 0.005169 0.006746 0.008531 0.010522 0.015118 0.020524 0.026023 0.029996 0.030852 '0.029546 0.025169 0.019152 - 0.012306 0.006828 ' 0.007710 0.009051 0.010033 0.011053 0.012128 0.013168 0.014211 0.014083 0.012267 0.009447 0.006652 0.004086 0.002150 0.001041 0.000851 0.000894 0.000932 0.000959 0.000992 0.000989 0.000919 0.000749 0.000585 0.000439 0.000267 0.000189 0.000142 0.000187 0.000218 0.000217 0.0 Times Below MPE 189392516 1891803 - 473014 210278 134003 37874 26316 19346 14823 11722 9503 6614 4872 3842 3333 3241 3384 3973 5221 8125 14645 12970 11048 9967 9047 8245 7593 7036 7100 8151 10584 15033 24474 46520 96051 117514 111871 107329 104250 100786 101086 108856 133523 171083 227551 374021 529649 704627 533893 458220 460407 Page 54 ANDREW:844H90T8E-XY Antenna Worksheet (270 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 150 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 ' 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 73.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 -3.12 -2.40 -1.70 -1.20 -0.70 -0.40 -0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.20 -0.70 -1.70 -3.00 -4.90 -7.40 -10.60 -14.40 -17.50 -16.40 -14.00 -12.50 -11.80 -11.70 -12.00 -12.90 -14.30 -16.10 -18.50 -21.50 -24.90 -27.40 -28.80 -28.10 -27.40 -26.90 -26.80 -27.10 -27.50 -28.80 -29.90 -31.10 -33.30 -34.80 -36.10 -37.10 -38.30 -38.20 -37.00 -36.60 -34.30 . 0.4875 0.5754 0.6761 0.7586 0.8511 0.9120 0.9550 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9550 0.8511 0.6761 0.5012 0.3236 0.1820 0.0871 0.0363 0.0178 . 0.0229 0.0398 0.0562 0.0661 0.0676 0.0631 0.0513 0.0372 0.0245 0.0141 0.0071 0.0032 0.0018 0.0013 0.0015 0.0018 0.0020 0.0021 0.0019 0.0018 0.0013 0.0010 0.0008 0.0005 0.0003 0.0002 0.0002 0.0001 ' '0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0004 157 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.25 1444.73 963.27 722.58 578.19 481.95 413.24 361.72 321.66 289.63 241.63 207.38 181.74 161.83 145.93 132.96 122.19 113.10 105.34 98.64 92.82 87.70 83.18 79.17 75.59 72.38 69.49 66.89 64.53 62.39 60.45 58.69 57.09 55.64 54.32 53.12 52.03 51.05 50.18 49.39 48.69 48.08 47.55 47.09 46.71 46.40 46.16 45.99 45.89 45.85 566.67 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 3151 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 • ' 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 850 Power Density (uW7cmA2) 0.000003 0.000300 0.001198 0.002695 0.004229 0.014962 0.021533 0.029290 0.038228 0.048342 0.059625 0.085671 0.116302 0.147462 0.169976 0.174828 0.167212 0.142434 0.108378 0.069646 0.038607 0.043688 0.051225 0.056853 0.062634 0.068608 0.074621 0.080252 0.079574 • 0.069248 0.053331 0.037549 0.023153 0.012181 0.005900 0.004822 0.005065 0.005253 0.005436 0.005601 . 0.005584 0.005206 0.004244 0.003300 0.002481 0.001515 0.001066 0.000801 0.001061 0.001237 0.001236 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000001 0;000053 0.00021 1 0.000475 0.000746 0.002640 0.003800 0.005169 0.006746 0.008531 0.010522 0.015118 0.020524 0.026023 0.029996 0.030852 0.029508 0-.025135 0.019126 .-. 0.012291 0.006813 ' 0.007710 0.009040 0.010033 0.011053 0.012107 0.013168 0.014162 0.014042 0.012220 0.009411 0.006626 0.004086 0.002150 0.001041 0.000851 0.000894 0.000927 0.000959 0.000988 0.000985 0.000919 0.000749 0.000582 0.000438 0.000267 0.000188 0.000141 0.000187 0.000218 0.000218 0.0 Times Below MPE 189392537 1892021 - 473014 210278 134003 37874 26316 19346 14823 11722 9503 6614 4872 3842 3333 3241 3388 3978 5228 8136 14677 12970 11062 9967 9047 8259 7593 7061 7121 8183 10625 15091 24474 46520 96051 117514 .111871 107878 104250 101177 101474 108856 133523 171739 228423 374021 531678 707325 533893 458220 458650 Page 55 ANDREW:844H90T8E-XY Antenna Worksheet (270 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 150 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 . 56.0 . 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0' 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 -3.12 -2.40 -1.70 -1.20 -0.70 -0.40 -0.20 0.00 0.00 . 0.00 -0.20 -0.70 -1.70 -3.00 -4.90 -7.40 -10.60 -14.40 -17.50 -16.40 - -14.00 -12.50 -11.80 -11.70 -12.00 -12.90 -14.30 -16.10 -18.50 -21.50 -24.90 -27.40 -28.80 -28.10 -27.40 -26.90 -26.80 -27.10 -27.50 -28.80 -29.90 -31.10 -33.30 -34.80 -36.10 -37.10 -38.30 -38.20 -37.00 -35.60 -34.30 0.4875 0.5754 0.6761 0.7586 0.8511 0.9120 0.9550 1.0000 1.0000 . 1.0000 0.9550 0.8511 0.6761 0.5012 0.3236 0.1820 0.0871 0.0363 0.0178 0.0229 0.0398 0.0562 0.0661 0.0676 0.0631 • 0.0513 0.0372 0.0245 0.0141 0.0071 0.0032 0.0018 0.0013 0.0015 0.0018 0.0020 0.0021 0.0019 0.0018 0.0013 0.0010 0.0008 0.0005 0.0003 0.0002 = 0.0002 0.0001 ' 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0004 157 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.25 1444.73 963.27 722.58 578.19 481.95 413.24 361.72 321.66 289.63 241.63 207.38 181.74 161.83 145.93 132.96 122.19 113.10 105.34 98.64 92.82 87.70 83.18 79.17 75.59 72.38 69.49 ' 66.89 64.53 62.39 60.45 58.69 57.09 55.64 54.32 . 53.12 52.03 51.05 50.18 49.39 48.69 48.08 47.55 47.09 ' 46.71 46.40 46.16 . 45.99 45.89 45.85 566.67 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 , 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 . 24.59 22.45 • 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 850 Power Density (uW/cm*2) 0.000003 0.000300 0.001198 0.002695 0.004229 0.014962 0.021533 0.029290 0.038228 0.048342 0.059625 0.085671 0.116302 0.147462 0.169976 0.174828 0.167212 0.142434 0.108378 0.069646 0.038607 0.043688 0.051225 0.056853 0.062634 0.068608 0.074621 0.080252 0.079574 0.069248 0.053331 0.037549 0.023153 0.012181 0.005900 . 0.004822 0.005065 0.005253 0.005436 0.005601 0.005584 0.005206 0.004244 0.003300 0.002481 0.001515 0.001066 0.000801 0.001061 0.001237 0.001236 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000001 0.000053. 0.000211 0.000476 0.000746 0.002640 0.003800 0.005169 0.006746 0.008531 0.010522 0.015118 0.020524 0.026023 0.029996 0.030852 0.029508 0:025135 0.019126 0.012291 0.006813 ' . 0.007710 0.009040 0.010033 0.011053 0.012107 0.013168 0.014162 0.014042 0.012220 0.009411 0.006626 0.004086 0.002150 0.001041 0.000851 0.000894 0.000927 0.000959 0.000988 0.000985 0.000919 0.000749 0.000582 0.000438 0.000267 0.000188 0.000141 0.000187 0.000218 0.000218 0.0 Times Below MPE 189392537 1892021 - 473014 210278 134003 37874 26316 19346 14823 11722 9503 6614 4872 3842 3333 3241 3388 3978 5228 8136 14677 12970 11062 9967 9047 8259 7593 7061 7121 8183 10625 15091 24474 46520 96051 117514 111871 107873 104250 • 101177 101474 108856 133523 171739 228423 374021 531878 707325 533893 458220 458650 Page 56 ANDREW:844H90T8E-XY Antenna Worksheet (270 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 150 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 ' 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 . 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 -3.12 -2.40 -1.70 -1.20 -0.70 -0.40 -0.20 0.00 0.00. 0.00 -0.20 -0.70 -1.70 -3.00 -4.90 -7.40 -10.60 -14.40 -17.50 -16.40 -14.00 -12.50 -11.80 -11.70 -12.00 -12.90 -14.30 -16.10 -18.50 -21.50 -24.90 -27.40 -28.80 -28.10 -27.40 -26.90 -26.80 -27.10 -27.50 -28.80 -29.90 -31.10 -33.30 -34.80 -36.10 -37.10 -38.30 -38.20 -37.00 -36.60 -34.30 0.4875 0.5754 0.6761 0.7586 0.8511 0.9120 0.9550 1.0000 - 1.0000 1.0000 0.9550 0.8511 0.6761 0.5012 0.3236 0.1820 0.0871 0.0363 0.0178 0.0229 0.0398 0.0562 0.0661 0.0676 0.0631 0.0513 0.0372 0.0245 0.0141 0.0071 0.0032 0.0018 0.0013 0.0015 0.0018 0.0020 . 0.0021 0.0019 0.0018 0.0013 . 0.0010 0.0008 0.0005 0.0003 0.0002 0.0002 0.0001 ' " 0.0002 0.0002 . 0.0002 0.0004 157 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.25 1444.73 963.27 722.58 578.19 481.95 413.24 361.72 321.66 289.63 241.63 207.38 181.74 161.83 145.93 132.96 122.19 113.10 105.34 98.64 92.82 87.70 83.18 79.17 75.59 72.38 69.49 66.89 64.53 62.39 60.45 58.69 57.09 55.64 54.32 . 53.12 52.03 51.05 50.18 49.39 48.69 48.08 47.55 47.09 46.71 46.40 46.16 45.99 45.89 • 45.85 566.67 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 72.1.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 • 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 . 850 Power Density (MW/cm»2) 0.000003 0.000300 0.001198 0.002695 0.004229 0.014962 0.021533 0.029290 0.038228 0.048342 0.059625 0.085671 0.116302 0.147462 , 0.169976 0.174828 0.167212 0.142434 0.108378 0.069646 0.038607 0.043688 0.051225 0.056853 0.062634 0.068608 0.074621 0.080252 0.079574 0.069248 0.053331 0.037549 0.023153 0.012181 0.005900 0.004822 0.005065 0.005253 0.005436 0.005601 - 0.005584 0.005206 0.004244 0.003300 0.002481 0.001515 0.001066 0.000801 0.001061 . 0.001237 0.001236 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000001 0.000053 0.000211 0.000476 0.000746 0.002640 0.003800 0.005169 0.006746 0.008531 0.010522 0.015118 0.020524 0.026023 0.029996 0.030852 0.029508 0.025135 0.019126 . 0.012291 0.006813 0:007710 0.009040 0.010033 0.011053 0.012107 0.013168 0.014162 0.014042 0.012220 0.009411 0.006626 0.004086 0.002150 0.001041 0.000851 0.000894 0.000927 0.000959 0.000988 0.000985 0.000919 0.000749 0.000582 0.000438 0.000267 0.000188 0.000141 0.000187 0.000218 0.000218 0.0 Times Below MPE 189392537 1892021 - 473014 210278 134003 37874 26316 19346 14823 11722 9503 6614 4872 3842 3333 3241 3388 3978 5228 8136 14677 12970 11062 9967 9047 8259 7593 7061 7121 8183 10625 15091 24474 46520 96051 117514 111871 107878 ' 104250 101177 101474 108856 133523 171739 228423 374021 531678 707325 533893 458220 458650 Page 57 ANDREW:844H90T8E-XY Antenna Worksheet (270 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 150 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0. 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 . 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 -3.12 -2.40 -1.70 -1.20 -0.70 -0.40 -0.20 0.00 0.00 . 0.00 -0.20 -0.70 -1.70 -3.00 -4.90 -7.40 -10.60 -14.40 -17.50 -16.40 -14.00 -12.50 " -11.80 -11.70 -12.00 -12.90 -14.30 -16.10 -18.50 -21.50 -24.90 -27.40 -28.80 -28.10 -27.40 -25.90 -26.80 -27.10 -27.50 -28.80 -29.90 -31.10 -33.30 ' -34.80 -36.10' -37.10 -38.30 -38.20 -37.00 -36.60 -34.30 0.4875 0.5754 0.6761 0.7586 0.8511 0.9120 0.9550 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9550 0.8511 0.6761 0.5012 0.3236 0.1820 0.0871 0.0363 0.0178 0.0229 0.0398 0.0562 0.0661 0.0676 0.0631 0.0513 0.0372 0.0245 0.0141 0.0071 0.0032 0.0018 0.0013 0.0015 0.0018 0.0020 0.0021 0.0019 0.0018 0.0013 0.0010 0.0008 0.0005 0.0003 0.0002 , 0.0002 0.0001 J 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0004 157 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.25 1444.73 963.27 722.58 578.19 481.95 413.24 361.72 321.66 289.63 241.63 ; 207.38 181.74 • 161.83 145.93 132.98 122.19 113.10 105.34 98.64 92.82 87.70 83.18 79.17 75.59 72.38 69.49 65.89 64.53 . 62.39 60.45 58.69 57.09 55.64 54.32 53.12 52.03 51.05 50.18 49.39 48.69 48.08 47.55 47.09 46.71 46.40 46.. 16 45.99 45.89 45.85 566.67 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 •175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.3"9 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 ' 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 850 Power.Density (uW/cmA2) 0.000003 0.000300 0.001198 0.002695 0.004229 0.014962 0.021533 0.029290 0.038228 0.048342 0.059625 0.085671 0.116302 0.147462 0.169976 0.174828 0.167212 0.142434 0.108378 0.069646 0.038607 0.043688 0.051225 0.056853 0.062634 0.068608 0.074621 0.080252 0.079574 0.069248 0.053331 0.037549 0.023153 0.012181 0.005900 0.004822 0.005065 0.005253 0.005436 0.005601 0.005584 0.005206 0.004244 0.003300 0.002481 0.001515 0.001066 0.000801 0.001061 0.001237 0.001236 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000001 0.000053 0.000211 0.000476 0.000746 0.002640 0.003800 0.005169 0.006746 0.008531 0.010522 0.015118 0.020524 0.026023 0.029996 0.030852 0.029508 0: 0251 35 0.019126 0.012291 0.006813 0.007710 0.009040 0.010033 0.011053 0.012107 0.0-13168 0.014162 0.014042 0.012220 0.009411 0.006626 0.004086 0.002150 0.001041 0.000851 0.000894 0.000927 0.000959 0.000988 0.000985 0.000919 0.000749 0.000582 0.000438 0.000267 0.000188 0.000141 0.000187 0.000218 0.000218 0.0 Times Below MPE 189392537 1892021 - 473014 210278 134003 37874 26316 19346 14823 11722 9503 6614 4872 3842 3333 3241 3388 3978 5228 8136 14677 12970 11062 9967 9047 8259 7593 7061 7121 8183 10625 15091 24474 46520 96051 117514 111871 107878 104250 101177 101474 108856 133523 171739 228423 374021 531678 707325 533893 458220 458650 Page 58 ANDREW:844H90T8E-XY Antenna Worksheet (270 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 150 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62,0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 -3.12 -2.40 -1.70 -1.20 -0.70 -0.40 -0.20 0.00 0.00 . 0.00 -0.20 -0.70 -1.70 -3.00 -4.90 -7.40 -10.60 -14.40 -17.50 -16.40 -14.00 -12.50 -11.80 -11.70 -12.00 -12.90 -14.30 -13.10 -18.50 -21.50 -24.90 -27.40 -28.80 -28.10 -27.40 -26.90 -26.80 -27.10 -27.50 -28.80 -29.90 -31.10 -33.30 -34.80 -36.10 -37.10 -38.30 -38.20 -37.00 -36.60 -34.30 0.4875 0.5754 0.6761 0.7586 0.8511 0.9120 0.9550 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9550 0.8511 0.6761 0.5012 0.3236 0.1820 0.0871 0.0363 0.0178 0.0229 0.0398 0.0562 0.0661 0.0676 0.0631 0.0513' 0.0372 0.0245 0.0141 0.0071 0.0032 0.0018 0.0013 0.0015 0.0018 0.0020 0.0021 0.0019 0.0018 0.0013 0.0010 0.0008 . 0.0005 0.0003 0.0002 0.0002 0.0001 " ' 0.0002 . 0.0002 0.0002 0.0004 157 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.25 1444.73 963.27 722.58 578.19 481.95 . 413.24 361.72 321.66 289.63 241.63 207.38 181.74 161.83 145.93 132.96 122.19 113.10 105.34 98.64 92.82 87.70 • 83.18 79.17 75.59 72.38 69.49 66.89 64.53 62.39 60.45 58.69 57.09 55.64 54.32 . . 53.12 52.03 51.05 50.18 49.39 48'.69 48.08 47.55 47.09 46.71 48.40 46.16 45.99 45.89 45.85 566.67 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 . 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 - 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 ' 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 • ' 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 .10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 850 Power Density (uW/cm"2) 0.000003 0.000300 0.001198 0.002695 0.004229 0.014962 0.021533 0.029290 0.038228 0.048342 0.059625 0.085671 0.116302 0.147462 0.169976 0.174828 0.167212 0.142434 0.103378 . 0.069646 0.038607 0.043688 0.051225 O.OSBSSS 0.062634 0.068608 0.074621 0.080252 0.079574 0.069248 0.053331 0.037549 0.023153 0.012181 0.005900 0.004822 0.005065 0.005253 '0.005436 0.005601 0.005584 0.005206 0.004244 0.003300 0.002481 0.001515 0.001066 0.000801 0.001061 0.001237 0.001236 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000001 0:000053 0.000211 0.000476 0.000746 0.002640 0.003800 0.005169 0.006746 0.008531 0.010522 0.015118 0.020524 0.026023 0.029996 0.030852 0.029508 0-.025135 • 0.019126 . 0.012291 0.006813 ' 0.007710 0.009040 0.010033 0.011053 0.012107 0.0-13168 0.014162 , 0.014042 ' 0.012220 0.009411 0.006626 0.004086 0.002150 0.001041 0.000851 0.000894 0.000927 0.000959 0.000988 0.000985 0.000919 0.000749 0.000582 0.000438 0.000267 0.000188 0.000141 0.000187 0.000218 0.000218 0.0 Times Below MPE 189392537 1892021 - 473014 210278 134003 37874 26316 19346 14823 11722 9503 6614 4872 3842 3333 3241 3388 3978 5228 8136 14677 12970 11062 9967 9047 8259 7593 7061 7121 8183 10625 15091 24474 46520 96051 1.17514 111871 107878 104250 101177 101474 .108856 133523 171739 228423 374021 531678 707325 533893 " 458220 458650 Page 59 Antel:BCD-80010 Antenna Worksheet (0 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 250 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dS Gain 0.1 . 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0: 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 •70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 88.0 88.0 90.0 -0.28 -0.10 -0.40 -0.90 -2.20 -3.90 -6.20 -9.10 -11.40 -14.90 -17.10 -15.40 -14.00 -15.40 -20.00 -26.50 -24.60 -23.50 -25.50 -41.80 -34.20 -32.40 -33.60 -43.50 -29.50 -26.40 -26.20 -27.30 -29.40 -32.80 -37.40 -37.10 -31.10 -27.20 -24.40 -22.70 -22.30 -22.70 -23.50 -24.70 -25.00 -26.80 -27.10 -27.30 -28.10 -28.90 -29.90 -30.90 -32.60 -35.20 -33.30 0.9376 0.9772 0.9120 0.8128 0.6026 0.4074 0.2399 0.1230 0.0724 0.0324 0.0195 0.0288 0.0398 0.0288 0.0100 0.0022 0.0035 0.0045 0.0028 0.0001 0.0004 0.0006 0.0004 0.0000 0.0011 0.0023 0.0024 0.0019 0.0011 0.0005 0.0002 0.0002 0.0008 0.0019 0.0036 0.0054 0.0059 0.0054 0.0045 0.0034 0.0025 0.0021 0.0019 0.0019 0,0015 -- 0.0013 0.0010 3 0.0008 0.0005 0.0003 0.0001 172 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.82 2889.33 1444.88 963.50 722.88 578.57 482.41 413.77 362.32 322.34 290.39 242.53 208.44 182.94 163.18 147.43 134.61 123.98 115.03 107.41 100.85 95.16 90.18 85.79 81.90 78.45 75.36 72.59 70.10 67.85 65.83 63.99 62.33. 60.82 59.45 58.23 57.11 ' 56.10 55.20 54.39 53.66 53.02 52.46 51.97 51.55 51.20 50.92 50.70 50.55 50.46 50.43 566.67 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 - 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 • 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 850 Power Density (MW/cmA2) 0.000010 0.000975 0.003893 0.008744 0.015441 0.024290 0.034925 0.047060 0.060304 0.072449 0.082686 0.089627 0.086024 0.100192 0.113108 0.122659 0.096993 0.058792 •, 0.057569 0.055820 0.048971 0.023793 . 0.022536 0.031207 0:030602 0.028372 • 0.026273 0.024316 0.022506 0.018808 0.013340 0.014427 0.022475 0.029195 0.029927 0.028476 0.027156 0.025959 0.024880 0.022913 0.019812 0.014385 0.011382 0.008613 0.007298 0.006488 0.005533 0.004737 0.004364 0.003211 0.002216 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000002 • 0.000172 0.000687 0.001543 0.002725 0.004286 0.006163 0.008305 0.010642 0.012785 0.014592 0.015817 0.015181 0.017681 0.019960 0.021646 0.017116 0.010375 0.010159 0.009851 0.008642 0.004199 0.003977 0.005507 0.005400 0.005007 0.004636 0.004291 0.003972 0.003319 0.002354 0.002546 0.003966 0.005152 0.005281 0.005025 0.004792 0.004581 0.004391 0.004043 0.003496 0.002539 0.002009 0.001520 0.001288 0.001145 0.000976 0.000836 0.000770 0.000567 0.000391 0.0 Times Below MPE 58071622 581403 - 145568 64807 36699 23329 16225 12041 9396 7821 6853 6322 6587 5655 5009 4619 5842 9638 ' 9843 10151 11571 23816 - 25145 18158 18517 19972 21568 23303 25178 30128 42478 39277 25213 19409 18935 19899 20867 21829 22776 24731 28602 39392 49787 65789 77652 87342 102423 119638 129857 176486 255551 Pagg 60 AntelrBCD-80010 Antenna Worksheet (0 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 250 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 '26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 85.0 88.0 90.0 -0.33 -0.60 -1.60 -3.00 -4.40 -7.20 -9.90 -15.80 . -24.40 -19.80 -15.40 -13.70 -15.60 -24.40 -20.60 -17.80 -18.50 -22.80 -35.60 -24.90 -21.00 . -20.10 -21.40 -23.60 -29.40 -39.20 -31.90 -29.90 -32.20 -32.70 -27.20 -23.90 -22.10 -21.80 -22:10. -22.20 -22.20 -22.00 -21.90 -21.90 -22.50 ' -23.40 -24.60 -25.80 -26.80 -28.30 -29.20 -30.60 -32.70 -35.10 -36.60 0.9268 0.8710 0.6918 0.5012 0.3631 0.1905 0.1023 0.0263 0.0036 0.0105 0.0288 0.0427 0.0275 0.0036 0.0087 0.0166 . 0.0141 0.0052 0.0003 0.0032 0.0079 0.0098 0.0072 0.0044 0.0011 0.0001 0.0006 0.0010 0.0006 0.0005 0.0019 0.0041 0.0062 0.0066 0.0062 . 0.0060 0.0060 0.0063 0.0065 0.0065 0.0056 0.0046 0.0035 0.0026 0.0021 0.0015 , 0.0012 * 0.0009 0.0005 0.0003 0.0002 172 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.82 2889.33 1444.88 • 963.50 722.88 578.57 482.41 413.77 362.32 322.34 290.39 242.53 208.44 182.94 163.18 147.43 134.61 123.98 . 115.03 107.41 100.85 95.16 90.18 85.79 81.90 78.45 75.36 72.59 70,10 67.85 65.83 63.99 62.33 60.82 59.46 58.23 - 57.11 56.10 55.20 54.39 53.66 53.02 .52.46 51.97 51.55 51.20 50.92 50.70 50.55 50.46 50.43 566.67 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 '74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 ' ' 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 ' 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 850 Power Density (uW/cmA2) 0.000010 0.000952 0.003804 0.008545 0.015163 0.023644 0.033726 0.042760 0.052354 0.058512 0.062083 0.063282 0.075675 0.086866 ' 0.085044 0.091116 0.095767 0.099105 0.121439 0.125735 0.127727 0.128780 0.129027 0.128593 0.103155 0.045431 0.019572 0.017934 0.016439 0.018521 0.022709 0.024074 0.023888 0.022487 0.022057 0.022160 0.021922 .0.021331 0.020397 .0.0.19563 0.018824 0.018174 0.016845. 0.013694 0.009516 0.004812 0.002165 0.000774- 0.000893 0.001609 0.002216 . Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000002 • 0.000168 0.000671 0.001508 0.002676 0.004172 0.005952 0.007546 0.009239 0.010326 0.010956 0.011167 0.013354 0.015329 0.015008 0.016079 0.016900 0.017489 0.021430 0.022189 0.022540 0.022726 0.022769 0.022693 0.018204 0.008017 0.003454 0.003165 0.002901 0.003268 0.004008 0.004248 0.004216 0.003968 0.003892 0.003911 0.003869 0.003764 •'0.003599 .. 0.003452 0.003322 0.003207 0.002973 0.002417 0.001679 0.000849 0.000382 0.000137 0.000158 0.000284 0.000391 180.0 Times Below MPE 59424275 594943 - 148957 66314 37371 23966 16801 • 13252 10823 9684 9127 8954 7488 6523 6663 6219 5917 5717 4666 4506 4436 . 4400 . 4391 4406 5493 12473 28952 31598 34471 30596 . 24953 23538 23721 25199 25690 25571 , 25849^ 26565 . 27782 28966 30103 31180 33639 41382 59546 117756 251698 732128 634575 352270 255710 Paga 61 Ante!:BCD-80010 Antenna Worksheet (0 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 250 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 ' 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 • 60.0 62.0 . 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 85.0 88.0 90.0 -0.28 -0.10 -0.40 -0.90 -2.20 -3.90 -6.20 -9.10 -11.40. -14.90 -17.10 -15.40 -14.00 -15.40 -20.00 -26.50 -24.60 -23.50 -25.50 -41.80 -34.20 -32.40 -33.60 -43.50 -29.50 -26.40 " -26.20 -27.30 -29.40 ' -32.80 -37.40 -37.10 -31.10 -27.20 -24.40 -22.70 -22.30 -22.70 -23.50 -24.70 -26.00 -26.80 -27.10 -27.30 -28.10 -28.90 -29.90 -30.90 -32.60 -35.20 -38.30 0.9376 0.9772 0.9120 0.8128 0.6026 0.4074 .0.2399 0.1230 0.0724 0.0324 0.0195 0.0288 0.0398 0.0288 0.0100 0.0022 0.0035 0.0045 0.0028 0.0001 0.0004 0.0006 0.0004 0.0000 0.0011 0.0023 0.0024 0.0019 0.0011 0.0005 0.0002 0.0002 0.0008 0.0019 0.0036 0..00540:0059 0.0054 • 0.0045 0.0034 0.0025 0.0021 0.0019 0.0019 0.0015 .- 0.0013 0.0010 ' 0.0008 0.0005 0.0003 0.0001 172 Slant Distance . (meters) 28891.82 2889.33 ' 1444.88 963.50 722.88 578.57 482.41 413.77 362.32 322.34 290.39 242.53 208.44 182.94 163.18 147.43 134.61 123.98 115.03 107.41 100.85 95.16 90.18 85.79 81.90 78.45 75.36 72.59 70.10 67.85 65.83 63.99 62.33 60.82 59.46 58.23 - 5.7.11 56.10 . .55.20 54.39 53.66 53.02 52.46 51.97 51.55 51.20 50.92 50.70 50.55 50.45 50.43 566.67 Frequency (MHz): 850 Dist From Structure Power Density (meters) (uW7cmA2) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 • 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103.39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 . 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 . 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 • 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 0.000010 0.000975 0.003893 0.008744 0.015441 0.024290 0.034925 0.047060 0.060304 0.072449 0.082686 0.089627 0.086024 0.100192 0.113108 0.122659 0.096993 '"OT658792 0.057569 0.055820 0.048971 0.023793 , 0.022536 0.031207 0.030602 0.028372 0.026273 0.024316 0.022506 0.018308 0.013340 0.014427 0.022475 0.029195 . 0.029927 0.028476 0.027156 0,025959 0.024880 0.022913 0.019812 0.014385 0.011382 0.008613 0.007298 0.006488 0.005533 0.004737 0.004364 0.003211 0.002216 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 6.000002 •0.000172 0.000687 0.001543 0.002725 0.004286 0.006163 0.008305 0.010642 0.012785 0.014592 0.015817 0.015181 0.017681 0.019960 0.021646 0.017116 0.010375 0.010159 - 0.009851 0.008642' . 0.004199 0.003977 0.005507 0.005400 0.005007 0.004636 0.004291 0.003972 0.003319 0.002354 0.002546 0.003966 0.005152 ' 0.005281 0.005025 . 0.004792 0.004581 0.004391 ' 0.004043 0.003496 0.002539 0.002009 0.001520 0,001288 0.001145 0.000976 0.000836 0.000770 • 0.000567 0.000391 . 0.0 Times Below MPE 58071622 581403 - 145568 64807 36699 23329 16225 12041 9396 7821 6853 6322 6587 5655 5009 4619 5842 9638 9843 • 10151 .11571 23816 25145 18158 18517 19972 21568 23303 25178 30128 42478 39277 25213 19409 18935 • 19899 20867 21829 22776 24731 28602 39392 49787 65789 77652 87342 102423 119638 129857 176486 255661 Page 62 Antel:BCD-80010 Antenna Worksheet (0 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): Height ERP (Watts): 250 (feet): Depression Angle Relative (degrees) Relative dB Gain 0.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 46.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 54.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 72.0 74.0 76.0 78.0 80.0 82.0 84.0 86.0 88.0 90.0 -0.28 -0.10 -0.40 -0.90 -2.20 -3.90 -6.20 -9.10 -11.40 -14.90 -17.10 -15.40 -14.00 -15.40 -20.00 -26.50 -24.60 -23.50 -25.50 -41.80 -34.20 -32.40 -33.60 -43.50 -29.50 -26.40 -26.20 -27.30 -29.40 -32.80 -37.40 -37.10 -31.10 -27,20 -24.40 • -22.70 -22.30 -22.70 -23.50 -24.70 -26.00 -26.80 -27.10 -27.30 -23.10 -28.90 -29.90 -30.90 -32.60 -35.20 -38.30 0.9376 0.9772 0.9120 0.8128 0.6026 0.4074 0.2399 0.1230 0.0724 0.0324 0.0195 0.0288 0.0398 0.0288 0.0100 0.0022 0.0035 0.0045 0.0028 0.0001 0.0004 0.0006 0.0004 0.0000 0.0011 0.0023 0.0024 0.0019 0.0011 0.0005 0.0002 0.0002 0.0008 0.0019 0.0036 0.0054 0.0059 0.0054 0.0045 .0.0034 0.0025 0.0021 0.0019 0.0019 0.0015 0.0013 0.0010 jj 0.0008 • 0.0005 0.0003 0.0001 170 Slant Distance (meters) 28891.81 2889.32 1444.86 963.47 722.84 578.52 482.35 413.69 362.24 322.25 290.28 242.41 208.29 182.78 162.99 147.23 134.38 123.73 114.76 107.12 100.55 94.84 89.84 85.43 81.53 78.06 74.95 72.17 69.66 67.40 65.36 63.51 61. '84 60.32 58.94 57.70 56.57 55.56 54.64 53.82 53.09 52.44 51.87 51.38 50.96 50.60 50.32 50.10 49.94 49.85 49.82 566.67 Frequency (MHz): Dist From Structure (meters) 28891.77 2888.89 1444.00 962.18 721.12 576.37 479.77 410.68 358.80 318.38 285.98 237.23 202.25 175.86 155.19 138.54 124.81 113.26 103/39 94.84 87.34 80.70 74.76 69.41 64.54 60.10 56.00 52.22 48.70 45.40 42.31 39.40 36.64 34.01 31.51 29.11 26.81 24.59 22.45 • ' 20.37 18.35 16.38 14.46 12.57 10.72 8.89 7.09 5.30 3.53 1.76 0.00 850 Power Density (uW/cmA2) 0.000010 0.000975 0.003893 0.008745 0.015448 0.024280 0.034935 0.047116 0.060443 0.072920 0.083559 0.091934 0.088961 0.101376 0.114609 0.124915 0.103892 0.065622 0.059193 0.057480 0.051942 0.029087 0.020886 0.030831 0.031753 0.029453 0.027282 0:025253 • 0.023372 0.020006 0.014558 0.013670 0.022292 0.028905 0.030348 0.029394 0.028013 0.026760 0.025630 0.023834 0.020684 0.015338 0.011943 0.008948 0.007517 0.006694 0.005750 0.004888 0.004472 0.003294 0.002271 Downtilt (Degrees): Percent of MPE 0.000002 0.000172 0.000687 0.001543 0.002726 0.004285 0.006165 0.008315 0.010666 0.012868 0.014746 0.016224 0.015699 0.017890 0.020225 0.022044 A,018334 -0.011580 0.010446. . 0.010143 0.009166 0.005133 0.003686 0.005441 0.005603 0.005198 .0.004815 0.004456 0.004125 0.003531 0.002569 0.002.412 0.003934 0.005101 0.005355 0.005187 0.004943 0.004722 0.004523 0.004206 0.003650 0.002707 0.002108 0.001579 0.001327 0.001181 0.001015 0.000863 0.000789 0.000581 0.000401 0.0 Times Below MPE 58071534 581390- 145560 64799 36682 23338 16220 12027 9375 7771 6781 6163 6369 5589 4944 4536 5454 8635 9573 9858 10909 19481' 27131 18379 17846 19239 20770 22439 24245 28324 38925 41453 ' 25419 19604 18672 19278 20228 21175 22109 23775 27396 36944 47448 63331 75384 84653 98551 115919 126703 172040 249517 Page63 6 Field Technician Certification Upon Penalty of Perjury, I, Mohamed Frej, state: I am an employee of Sitesafe, Inc., in Arlington, Virginia, which provides RF compliance services to clients in the wireless communications industry; and That I have successfully completed RF Safety Awareness training, am aware of the hazards and, therefore, can be exposed to RF fields classified for "Occupational" exposure; That I am familiar with the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as well as the regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), both in general and specifically as they apply to the FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio-frequency Radiation; and That I have been trained in the proper use of measurement equipment, and have ^successfully completed Sitesafe training in policy, procedure and proper site measurement and modeling; and That 1 performed survey measurements of the RF environment at the site identified as Squires Dam - Squires Dam on September 15, 2009 at 9:15 AM in order to .determine where there mighf be electromagnetic energy that is in excess of both the. Controlled Environment and Uncontrolled Environment levels; and . '• That the survey measurements were performed with a Narda Microwave, model 87188-10 field intensity meter (serial number 01536) and a Narda Microwave, model A8742D field intensity probe, (serial number 01070) calibrated on 11/8/2008; and • That I have prepared this Site Compliance.Report and believe it to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and based on data gathered. By: Mohamed Frej Page 64 7 Engineer Certification The engineering indicated on the cover of this report hereby certifies and affirm that: That I am registered as a Professional Engineer in the jurisdiction indicated; and That I have extensive professional experience in the wireless communications engineering industry; and That I am an employee of Sitesafe, Inc. in Arlington, Virginia; and That I am thoroughly familiar with the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission ("the FCC" and "the FCC Rules") both in general and specifically as they apply to the FCCs Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields; and That the technical information serving as the basis for this report was supplied by Verizon Wireless (See attached Site Summary and Carrier documents), and that Verizon Wireless's installations involve communications equipment, antennas and associated technical equipment at a location referred to as the "Squires Dam - Squires Dam" ("the site"); and That Verizon Wireless proposes to operate at the site with transmit antennas listed in the carrier summary and with a maximum effective radiated power as specified by Verizon Wireless and shown on the worksheet, and that worst-case 100% duty cycle have been assumed; and. That.in addition to the emitters specified in the worksheet, there are additional collocated point-to-point microwave facilities on this,structure and,-the antennas used are highly directional oriented at angles at or just below the horizontal and, that the energy present at ground level is typically so low as to be considered insignificant and have not been included in this analysis; and That this analysis has been performed with the assumption that the ground immediately surrounding the tower is primarily flat or falling; and •<S.' '.'•', That at this time, the FCC requires that certain licensees address specific levels of radio-frequency energy to which workers or members of the public might possibly be" exposed (at §1.1307(b) of the FCC Rules); and That such consideration of possible exposure of humans to radio-frequency radiation must utilize the standards set by the FCC, which is the Federal Agency having jurisdiction over communications facilities;, and That the FCC rules define two tiers of permissible exposure guidelines: 1) "uncontrolled environments," defined as situations in which persons may not be aware of (the "general public"), or may not be able to control their exposure to a transmission facility; and (2) "controlled environments," which defines situations in which persons are aware of their potential for exposure (industry personnel); and That this statement specifically addresses the uncontrolled environment (which is more conservative than the controlled environment) and the limit set forth in the FCC rules Page 65 for licensees of Verizon Wireless's operating frequency as shown on the attached antenna worksheet; and That when applying the uncontrolled environment standards, the-predicted Maximum Power Density at two meters above ground level from the Verizon Wireless operation is no more than 1.256 % of the maximum in any accessible area on the ground and That it is understood per FCC Guidelines and OET Bulletin 65 Appendix A, that regardless of the existent radio-frequency environment, only those licenses whose contributions exceed five percent of the exposure limit pertinent,to their operation(s) bear any responsibility for bringing.any non-compliant area(s) into compliance; and That when applying the uncontrolled environment standards, the cumulative predicted energy density from the operation is no more than 1.256% of the maximum in any accessible area up to two meters above the ground per OET Bulletin 65; and That the calculations provided in this report are based on data provided by the client and antenna pattern data supplied by the antenna manufacturer, in accordance with FCC guidelines listed in OET Bulletin 65. Horizontal and vertical antenna patterns are combined for modeling purposes to accurately reflect the energy two meters above ground level where on-axis energy refers to maximum energy two meters above the ground along the azimuth of the antenna and where area energy refers to the maximum energy anywhere two meters above the ground regardless of. the antenna azimuth, accounting for cumulative energy from multiple antennas for the carrier and frequency range indicated; and That the Occupational Safety and Health Administration has policies in place which address worker safety in and around communications sites, thus individual companies will be responsible for their employees' training regarding Radio Frequency Safety. In summary, it is stated here that the operation at the site would not result in exposure of the Public to excessive levels of radio-frequency energy as defined in the FCC Rules and Regulations, specifically 47 CFR 1.1307 and that Verizon Wireless's operation is completely compliant. • Finally,.it is stated that access to the tower should be restricted to communication industry professionals,, and approved contractor personnel trained in radio-frequency safety; and that the instant analysis addresses exposure levels at two meters above ground level ' and does not address exposure levels on the tower, or in the immediate proximity of the antennas. ' • . • September 25, 2009 Page 66 Appendix A - Statement of Limiting Conditions Sitesafe field personnel visited the site and collected data with regard to the RF environment. Sitesafe will not be responsible for matters of a legal nature that affect the site or property. The property was visited under the premise that it is under responsible ownership and management and our client has the legal right to conduct business at this facility. Due to the complexity of some wireless sites, Sitesafe performed this visit and created this report utilizing best industry practices and due diligence. Sitesafe cannot be held accountable or responsible for anomalies or discrepancies due to actual site conditions (i.e., mislabeling of antennas or equipment'inaccessible cable runs, inaccessible antennas or equipment, etc.) or information or data supplied by Verizon Wireless, the site manager, or their affiliates, subcontractors or assigns. Sitesafe has provided computer generated model(s) in this Site Compliance Report to show approximate dimensions of the site, and the model is included to assist the reader of the compliance report to visualize the site area, and to provide supporting documentation forSitesafe's recommendations. Sitesafe may note in the Site Compliance Report any adverse physical conditions, such as needed repairs, observed during the survey of the subject property or that Sitesafe became aware of during the normal research involved in performing this survey. Sitesafe will not be responsible for any such conditions that do exist or for any engineering, or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. Because Sitesafe is not an expert in the field of mechanical engineering or building maintenance, the Site Compliance Report must not be considered a structural or physical engineering report. Sitesafe obtained information used in this Site Compliance Report from sources that Sitesafe considers reliable and believes them to be true and correct. Sitesafe does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy of such items that were furnished by other parties. When conflicts in information occur between data provided by a second party and physical data collected by Sitesafe, the physical data will be used. Page 67 Appendix B - Assumptions and Definitions General Model Assumptions In this site compliance report, it is assumed that all antennas are operating at full power at all times. Software modeling was performed for all transmitting antennas located on the site. Sitesafe has further assumed a 100% duty cycle and maximum radiated power. The site has been modeled with these assumptions to show the maximum RF energy density. Sitesafe believes this to be a worst-case analysis, based on best available data. Areas modeled to predict emissions greater than 100% of the applicable MPE level may not actually occur, but are shown as a worst-case prediction that could be realized real time. Sitesafe believes these areas to be safe for entry by occupationally trained personnel utilizing appropriate personal protective equipment (in most cases, a personal monitor). Thus, at any time; if power density measurements were made, we believe the real- time measurements would indicate levels below those depicted in the RF emission diagram(s) in this report. By modeling in this way, Sitesafe has conservatively shown exclusion areas - areas that should not be entered without the use of a personal monitor, carriers reducing power, or performing real-time measurements to indicate real-time exposure levels. Use of Generic Antennas For the purposes of this report, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model, or "Unknown" for an operator means the information about a carrier, their FCC license and/or antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use our industry specific knowledge of equipment, antenna models, and transmit power to model the site. If more specific information can be obtained for the unknpwn measurement criteria, Sitesafe recommends remodeling of the site'utilizing the more complete and accurate data. Information about similar facilities is used • when the service is identified, and associated with a particular antenna. If no -information is available regarding the transmitting service associated with an unidentified antenna, using the antenna manufacturer's published data regarding the antenna's physical characteristics makes more conservative assumptions. Where the frequency is unknown, Sitesafe uses the closest frequency in the antenna's range that corresponds to the highest Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE), resulting in a conservative analysis. Page 68 Definitions 5% Rule- The rules adopted by the FCC specify that, in general, at multiple transmitter sites actions necessary to bring the area into compliance with the guidelines are the shared responsibility of all licensees whose transmitters produce field strengths or power density levels at the area in question in excess of 5% of the exposure limits. In other words, any wireless operator that contributes 5% or greater of the MPE limit in an area that is identified to be greater than 100% of the MPE limit is responsible taking corrective actions to bring the site into compliance. Compliance - The determination of whether a site is safe or not with regards to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation from transmitting antennas. Decibel (dB) - A unit for measuring power or strength of a signal. Duty Cyc/e-The percent of pulse duration to the pulse period of a periodic pulse train. Also, may be a measure of the temporal transmission characteristic of an intermittently transmitting RF source such as a paging antenna by dividing average transmission duration by the average period for transmission. A duty cycle of 100% corresponds to continuous operation. Effective (or Equivalent) Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) - The product of the power supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain in a given direction relative to an isotropic antenna. . Effective Radiated Power (ERP)- In a given direction, the relative gain of a transmitting antenna with respect to the maximum directivity of a half wave dipo.le multiplied by the net power accepted by the antenna from the connecting transmitter. Gain (of an antenna) - The ratio of the maximum intensity in a given direction to the maximum radiation in the same direction from an isotropic radiator. Gain is a measure of the relative efficiency of a directional antennas as compared to an omni directional antenna. General Population/Uncontrolled Environment - Defined by the FCC, as an area where RFR exposure may occur to persons who are unaware of the potential for exposure and who have no control of their exposure. General Population is also referenced as General Public. Generic Antenna - For the purposes of this report, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model means the antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the.event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use our industry specific knowledge of antenna models to select a worst case scenario antenna to model the site. Isotropic Antenna - An antenna that is completely non-directional. In other words, an antenna that radiates energy equally in all directions. Maximum Measurement- This measurement represents the single largest measurement recorded when performing a spatial average measurement. Page 69 Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE)-lhs rms and peak electric and magnetic field strength, their squares, or the plane-wave equivalent power densities associated with these fields to which a person may be exposed without harmful effect and with acceptable safety factor. Occupational/Controlled Environment- Defined by the FCC, as an area where Radio Frequency Radiation (RFR) exposure may occur to persons who are aware of the potential for exposure as a condition of employment or specific activity and can exercise control over their exposure. OETBulletin 65- Technical guideline developed by the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology to determine the impact of Radio Frequency radiation on Humans. The guideline was published in August 1997. OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) - Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing a safe and healthy workplace for their employees. OSHA's role is to promote the safety and health of America's working men and women by setting and enforcing standards; providing training, outreach and education; establishing partnerships; and encouraging continual process improvement in workplace safety and health. For more information, visit www.osha.gov. Radio Frequency Radiation - Electromagnetic waves that are propagated from antennas through space. Spatial Average Measurement- A technique used to average a minimum of ten (10) measurements taken in a ten (10) .second interval from zero (0) to six (6) feet. This measurement is intended to model the average energy an average sized human body will absorb while present in an electromagnetic field of energy. Transmitter Power Output (TPO)-The radio frequency output power of a transmitter's final radio frequency stage as measured at the output terminal while connected to a load. Page 70 Appendix C - Rules & Regulations Explanation of Applicable Rules and Regulations The FCC has set forth guidelines in OET Bulletin 65 for human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields. Specific regulations regarding this topic are listed in Part 1, Subpart I, of Title 47 in the Code of Federal Regulations. Currently, there are two different levels of MPE - General Public MPE and Occupational MPE. An individual classified as Occupational can be defined as an individual who has received appropriate RF training and meets the conditions outlined below. General Public is defined as anyone who does not meet the conditions of being Occupational. FCC and OSHA Rules and Regulations define compliance in terms of total exposure to total RF energy, regardless of location of or proximity to the sources of energy. It is the responsibility of all licensees to ensure these guidelines are maintained at all . times. It is the ongoing responsibility of all licensees composing the site to maintain ongoing compliance with FCC rules and regulations. Individual licensees that contribute less than 5% MPE to any total area out of compliance are not responsible for corrective actions. OSHA has adopted and enforces the FCC's exposure guidelines. A building owner or site manager can use this report as part of an overall RF Health and Safety Policy. It is important for building owners/site managers to identify areas in excess of the General Population MPE and ensure that only persons qualified as Occupational are granted access to those areas. Occupational Environment Explained The FCC definition of Occupational exposure limits apply to persons who: • are exposed to RF energy as a consequence of their employment; • have been made aware of the possibility of exposure; and • -can exercise control over their exposure. OSHA guidelines go further to state that persons must complete RF Safety Awareness training and must be trained in the use of appropriate personal protective equipment. In order to consider, this site an Occupational Environment, the site must be • controlled to prevent access by any individuals classified as the General Public. Compliance is also maintained when any non-occupational individuals (the General Public) are prevented from accessing areas indicated as Red or Yellow in the attached RF Emissions diagram. In addition, a person must be aware of the RF environment into which they are entering. This can be accomplished by an RF Safety Awareness class, and by appropriate written documentation such as this Site Compliance Report. All Verizon Wireless employees who require access to this site must complete RF Safety Awareness training and must be trained in the use of appropriate personal protective equipment. Page 71 Appendix D - General Safety Recommendations The following are general recommendations appropriate for any site with accessible areas in excess of 100% General Public MPE. These recommendations are not specific to this site. These are safety recommendations appropriate for typical site management, building management, and other tenant operations. 1. All individuals needing access to the main site (or the area indicated to be in excess of General Public MPE) should wear a personal RF Exposure monitor, successfully complete proper RF Safety Awareness training, and have and be trained in the use of appropriate personal protective equipment. 2. All individuals needing access to the main site should be instructed to read and obey all posted placards and signs. 3. The site should be routinely inspected and this or similar report updated with the addition of any antennas or upon any changes to the RF environment including: • adding new antennas that may have been located on the site • removing of any existing antennas • changes in the radiating power or number of RF emitters 4. Post the appropriate NOTICE, CAUTION, or WARNING sign at the main site access point(s) and other locations as required. Note: Please refer to RF Exposure Diagrams in Appendix B, to inform everyone who has access to this site that beyond posted signs there may be levels in excess of the limits prescribed by the • FCC. The signs below are examples of signs meeting FCC guidelines. CAUTION 5. Ensure that the site door remains locked (or appropriately controlled) to deny access to the general public if deemed as policy by the building/site owner. 6. For a General Public environment the four color levels identified in this analysis can be interpreted in the following manner: • Areas indicated as Gray are at 5% of the General Public MPE limits or below. This level is safe for a worker to be in at any time. • Green represents areas predicted to be between 5% and 20% of the General Public MPE limits. This level is safe for a worker to be in at any time. Page 72 • Yellow represents areas predicted to be between 20% and 100% of the General Public MPE limits. This level is safe for a worker to be in at any time. • Red areas indicated predicted levels greater than 100% of the General Public MPE limits. This level is not safe for the General Public to be in. 7. For an Occupational environment the four color levels identified in this analysis can be interpreted in the following manner: • Areas indicated as Gray are at 5% of the Occupational MPE limits or below. This level is safe for a worker to be in at any time. • Green represents areas predicted to be between 5% and 20%. of the Occupational MPE limits. This level is safe for a worker to be in at any time. • Yellow represents areas predicted to be between 20% and 100% of the Occupational MPE limits. Only individuals that have been properly trained in RF Health and Safety should be allowed to work in this area, This is not an area that is suitable for the General Public to be in. • Red areas indicated predicted levels greater than 100% of the Occupational MPE limits. This level is not safe for the Occupational worker to be in for prolonged periods of time. Special procedures must be adhered to such as lock out tag out procedures to minimize the workers exposure to EME. 8. Use of a Personal Protective Monitor: When working around antennas, Sitesafe strong recommends the use of-a Personal Protective Monitor (PPM). Wearing a PPM will properly forewarn the individual prior to entering an RF exposure area. Keep a.copy of this report available for all persons who must access the .site. They should read this report and be aware of the potential hazards with regards to RF and MPE limits. Additional Information Additional RF information is available by visiting both www.Sitesafe.'com and • www.fcc.gov/oet/rfsafety. OSHA has additional information available at: http://www.osha-slc.gov/SLTC/radiofrequencyradiation. Page 73 EXHIBIT E SQUIRES DAM WIND LOAD ANALYSIS Project: 02-748 Date: Sep-Q9 U £ S I 6 N I « C Page TOC Table of Contents Discussion 1 Antenna Data 2 Tower Ana lysis 3 Anchor Bolt 4 Foundation Analysis 5 Summary 6 Reference Information A O t'S I G M INC NSD Job No. 02-748 Structural Calculations For: Existing Tower Analysis for: Verizon Wireless Site name: Squires Dam 5220 Sunny Creek Road Carlsbad, CA 26170 Enterprise Way Suite 400 Lake Forest, CA 92630 Tel: 949.215.3339 Fax: 949.457.9375 Project: 02-748 Date: Sep-09 Page 1 Discussion The following calculations analyze the ability of an existing lattice tower to support existing panel and dish antennas. The analysis is conducted for use for a land renewal project and is in conformance with the TIA/EIA-222-G National Standard. No new antennas or other appurtenances are poposed for this facility. Wind Speed = 85 MPH The following additional configuration is proposed: Existing Antennas ( 4 ) whip antennas at 172.00 ft ( 15 ) panel antennas at 150.00 ft ( 12 ) panel antennas at 147.00 ft ( 1 ) 2 ftdiadishat 150.00 ft ( 1 ) 6 ftdiadishat 110.00 ft ( 1 ) 4 ftdiadishat MO.OO ft ( 2 ) 6 'ftdiadishat 90.00 ft . ( 1 ) . 6 ft dia dish at 80.00 ft ( 1 ) 8 ftdiadishat 70.00 ft ( 2 ) 6 ftdiadishat 60.00 ft ° The information on the existing pole is based on the original design calculations by : .Firm Microflect Project # 38030 Dated 25-Aug-95 next Project: Date: Page 02-748 Sep-09 Antenna Data Panel Antennas height in width in depth in weight Ibs ea Qty ea sector Mount length tt (front) Mount length ft (side) Mount weight Ibs Mount O.D. in Total weight Ibs CA CA AA front sf CA AA side sf Sector weight Ibs Antenna 1 48 6 8.5 10 5 12 4 450 3 500 1.4 18.20 5.37 500 Antenna 2 52 11.4 11.4 27 4 12 4 450 3 558 1.4 27.25 7.16 558 Whip 120 3 3 15 1 15 1.4 3.50 3.50 15 Antenna 4 Antenna 5 Antenna 6 Antenna 7 Dish Antennas diameter ft depth ft Qty ea Weight Ibs Proj Area sf Dish 1 2 1 1 68 3.14 Dish 2 4 1.5 1 140 12.57 Dish 3 6 2 6 380 28.27 Dish 4 8 3 1 470 50.27 Dish 5 Dish 6 Dish 7 150.011 1 DESIGNED APPURTENANCE LOADING TYPE Antenna at 150M3" Antenna at 15CT-0" Antanna at 150'-0" 2'diadJJhat150l-0- Antenna at 147'-0" Antenna at 147'JT Antenna at 14r-C" 6' dia dish at 11 DMT 4'diadishat110'4)" 6' dia dish at 90'-0* ELEVATION 150 150 150 TYPE 6' dia dish at SDMI" 6' dia dish at 8<r-0* 8' dia duh at 70M>- 150 1 8' dia dish at BOM)" 147 147 147 110 110 90 6'diadjshatSCr-O- Whip at 160'-0" Whip at 160'-0" Whip at 16CT-0" Whipat160'-0" ELEVATION 90 80 70 60 60 0 0 0 0 MATERIAL STRENGTH GRADE A53-B-35 Fy 35ksi Fu 63ksi GRADE |Fy 1 Fu TOWER DESIGN NOTES 1. Tower is located in San Diego County, California. 2. Tower designed for Exposure C to the TIA-222-G Standard. 3. Tower designed for a 85 mph basic wind in accordance with the TIA-222-G Standard. 4. Deflections are based upon a 60 mph wind. 5. Weld together tower sections have flange connections. 6. Connections use galvanized A325 bolts, nuts and locking devices. Installation per TIA/EIA-222 and AISC Specifications. 7. Tower members are "hot dipped" galvanized in accordance with ASTM A123 and ASTMA153 Standards. 8. Welds are fabricated with ER-70S-6 electrodes. 9. TOWER RATING: 64.3% s As.Q MAX. CORNER REACTIONS AT BASE: DOWN: 150952 Ib UPLIFT: -115501 Ib SHEAR: 18453 Ib AXIAL MOMENT SHEAR 28896 K>_J__J \ TORQUE 8985 Ib-ft REACTIONS - 85 mph WIND sI Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Phone: FAX: lob' Existing Tower Analysis Project Squires Dam Client Verizon Wireless Code: T|A.222-G Drawn by: KCW Oale: 09/22/09 ' G:\Verizon\Scuires Dam\1-Calcs\Squires Dam.nri App'd: Seal.: NTg Dwg No. ^_^ RISATower Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam" Verizon Wireless Page 3.1 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW The main tower is a 3x free standing tower with an overall height of 150.00 ft above the ground line. The base of the tower is set at an elevation of 0.00 ft above the ground line. The face width of the tower is 9.00 ft at the top and 21.00 ft at the base. This tower is designed using the TIA-222-G standard. The following design criteria apply: Tower is located in San Diego County, California. Basic wind speed of 85 mph. Structure Class II. . Exposure Category C. Topographic Category 1. Crest Height 0.00 ft. Deflections calculated using a wind speed of 60 mph. Weld together tower sections have flange connections- Connections use galvanized A325 bolts, nuts and locking devices. Installation per TIA/EIA-222 and AISC Specifications.. Tower members are "hot dipped" galvanized in accordance with ASTM A123 and ASTM A153 Standards.. Welds are fabricated with ER-70S-6 electrodes.. A non-linear (P-delta) analysis was used. Pressures are calculated at each section. Stress ratio used in tower member design is 1. Local bending stresses due to climbing loads, feedline supports, and appurtenance mounts are not considered. Wind 180 Wind 90 LegC Lea A Face C Wind Normal Triangular Tower RISA Tower Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.2 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW liwyflsvvtffsi^'M^sweB.'wiv pisfe^&^'wesiKr-efi^aMJvS Tower Section Tl T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 Tower Elevation ft 150.00-140.00 140.00-130.00 130.00-120.00 120.00-110.00 110.00-100.00 100.00-80.00 80.00-60.00 60.00-40.00 40.00-0.00 Assembly Database Description Section Number Width of Sections ft 9.00 1 9.00 1 9.00 1 9.00 1 10.00 1 11.00 1 13.00 1 15.00 1 17.00 1 Section Length ft 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 40.00 ^S^K^^^^&^^S^SS^KI^^SXX^'^yAli^fS^^i^iS^^^iS^KSi^^^-s^iiS-itS^^Sf^fin - Tower Section Tl T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 Tower Elevation ft Tl 150.00-140.00 T2 140.00-130.00 T3 130.00-120.00 T4 120.00-1 10.00 T5 110.00-100.00 T6 100.00-80.00 T7 80.00-60.00 T8 60.00-40.00 T9 40.00-0.00 Tower Elevation ft 150.00-140.00 140.00-130.00 130.00-120.00 120.00-110.00 110.00-100.00 100.00-80.00 80.00-60.00 60.00-40.00 40.00-0.00 Diagonal Bracing Spacing Type ft 10.00 X Brace 10.00 X Brace 10.00 X Brace 10.00 X Brace 10.00 X Brace 20.00 X Brace 20.00 X Brace 20.00 X Brace 20.00 X Brace Has Has Top Girt K Brace Horizontals Offset End Panels No No No No No No No No No i?4 ~ S-.V7!?- £-? >j^ •.• vii3&*4£SSMfc:'v *i*t •&•&<- i'UJia ^f* -1 ito> *ftf£KJ 'rt-j r- J&^ML isri BJliSi? • ]£&£&&& f'-'XX'f K- £e# Type Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Leg Size P4.5ODx.188 P4.50Dx.188 P4.5ODx.188 ' P4x.237 P4x.237 .-PSx.258 P6x.432 PSx.322 PlOx.365 Leg Grade A53-B-35 (35 ksi) A53-B-35 (35 ksi) A53-B-35 (35 ksi) A53-B-35 (35 ksi) A53-B-35 (35 ksi) A53-B-35 (35 ksi) A53-B-35 (35 ksi) A53-B-35 (35 ksi) A53-B-35 (35 ksi) in Yes 0.0000 Yes 0.0000 Yes 0.0000 Yes 0.0000 Yes 0.0000 Yes 0.0000 Yes 0.0000 Yes 0.0000 Yes 0.0000 Diagonal Diagonal Type Size Pipe • Pl.90Dx.145 Pipe Pl.90Dx.1451 Pipe Pl.9ODx.145 Pipe Pl.9ODx.145 Pipe Pl.90Dx.145 Pipe P3x.216 Pipe P3x.216 Pipe P3x.216 Pipe P3x.216 Bottom Girt Offset in 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Diagonal Grade A53-B-35 (3 5 ksi) A53-B-35 (35 ksi) A53-B-35 (35 ksi) A53-B-35 (35 ksi) A53-B-35 (35 ksi) A53-B-35 (35 ksi) A53-B-35 (35 ksi) A53-B-35 (3 5 ksi) A53-B-35 (35 ksi) SISATower Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.3 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Tower No. Elevation of Mid ft Girts Tl 150.00-140.00 None T3 130.00-120.00 None T6 100.00-80.00 None T7 80.00-60.00 None Mid Girt Type Flat Bar Flat Bar Flat Bar Flat Bar Mid Girt Mid Girt Size Grade A36 (36 ksi) A36 (36 ksi) A36 (36 ksi) A36 (36 ksi) Horizontal Type Double Angle Double Angle Double Equal Angle Double Equal Angle Horizontal Size 212x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2x3/16 2L2x2x3/16 Horizontal Grade A36 (36 ksi) A36 (36 ksi) A36 (36 ksi) A36 (36 ksi) Tower Secondary Elevation Horizontal Type Secondary Horizontal Size Secondary Horizontal Grade Inner Bracing Type Inner Bracing Size Inner Bracing Grade Tl 150.00-140.00 T2 140.00-130.00 T3 130.00-120.00 T4 120.00-110.00 T5 110.00-100.00 T6 100.00-80.00 T7 80.00-60.00 T8 60.00-40.00 T9 40.00-0.00 Double Angle Double Angle Double Angle Double Angle Double Angle Double Equal Angle Double Equal Angle Double Equal Angle Double Equal Angle 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2x3/16 2L2x2x3/16 2L2x2x3/16 2L2 1/2x2 1/2x3/16 A36 (36 ksi) A36 (36 ksi) A36 (36 ksi) A36 (36 ksi) A36 (36 ksi) A36 (36 ksi) A36 (36 ksi) A36 (36 ksi) A36 (36 ksi) Double Angle Double Angle Double Angle Double Angle Double Angle Double Equal Angle Double Equal Angle Double Equal Angle Double Equal Angle 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2x3/16 2L2x2x3/16 2L2x2x3/16 2L2 1/2x2 1/2x3/16 A36 (36 ksi) A36 (36 ksi) A36 (36 ksi) A36 (36 ksi) A36 (36 ksi) A36 (36 ksi) A36 (36 ksi) A36 (36 ksi) A36 (36 ksi) Tower Elevation ft Tl 150.00-140.00 T2 140.00-130.00 T3 130.00-120.00 T4 120.00-110.00 T5 110.00-100.00 Gusset Area (perface) ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Gusset Thickness in 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Gusset Grade Adjust. Factor Af A36 1 (3 6 ksi) A36 1 (36 ksi) A36 1 (36 ksi) A36 1 (36 ksi) A36 1 (3 6 ksi) Adjust. Factor A, 1 ] 1 . 1 1 Weight Mult. Double Angle Stitch Boll Spacing Diagonals in 1 36.0000 1 36.0000 1 36.0000 1 36.0000 1 • 36.0000 Double Angle Stitch Bolt Spacing Horizontals in 36.0000 36.0000 36.0000 36.0000 36.0000 RISATower Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.4 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Tower Elevation ft T6 100.00-80.00 T7 80.00-60.00 T8 60.00^0.00 T9 40.00-0.00 Gusset Area (perface) ff 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Gusset Gusset Grade Adjust. Factor Thickness Af in 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 A36 1 (36 ksi) A36 1 (36 ksi) A36 1 (36 ksi) A36 , 1 (36 ksi) Adjust. Weight Mult: Double Angle Double Angle Factor Stitch Bolt Stitch Bolt A, Spacing Spacing Diagonals Horizontals in 1 1 36.0000 1 1 36.0000 1 1 36.0000 1 1 36.0000 in 36.0000 36.0000 36.0000 36.0000 KFactors' Tower Elevation ft Tl 150.00-140.00 T2 140.00-130.00 T3 130.00-120.00 T4 120.00-110.00 T5 110.00-100.00 T6 100.00-80.00 T7 80.00-60.00 T8 60.00-40.00 T9 40.00-0.00 Calc K Single Angles No No No No No No No No No Calc Legs X K Single Girts K Brace Brace Diags Solid Diags Diags Rounds X ' X X X Y Y Y Y No 1 No 1 No 1 No 1 No 1 No 1 No 1 ' No 1 1 1 No 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Horiz. X Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Sec. Inner Horiz. Brace X X Y Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'Note: K factors are applied to member segment lengths. K-braces without inner supporting members will have the K factor in the out-of-plane direction applied to the overall length. Tower Elevation ft Tl 150.00-140.00 T2 140.00-130.00 T3 130.00-120.00 Leg Net Width U Deduct in 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 Diagonal Net Width U Deduct , in 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 Top Girt Net Width U Deduct in 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 Bottom Girt Net U Width Deduct in 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 Mid Girt Net U Width Deduct in 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 Long Horizontal Net U Width Deduct in 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 Short Horizontal Net U Width Deduct in 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 RISATower Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.5 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Tower Elevation ft T4 120.00-110.00 T5 110.00-100.00 T6 100.00-80.00 T7 80.00-60.00 T8 60.00^0.00 19 40.00-0.00 Leg Net Width U Deduct in 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 Diagonal Net Width U Deduct in 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 Top Girt Net Width U Deduct in 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 Bottom Girt Net U Width Deduct in 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 Mid Girt Net U Width Deduct in 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 Long Horizontal Net U Width Deduct in 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 Short Horizontal Net U Width Deduct in 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 0.0000 0.75 Tower Leg Leg Elevation Connection ft Type Bolt Size -No. in Tl Flange 0.7500 0 150.00-140.00 A325N T2 Flange 0.7500 0 140.00-130.00 A325N T3 Flange 0.7500 0 130.00-120.00 A325N T4 Flange 0.7500 0 120.00-110.00 A325N T5 Flange 0.7500 0 110.00-100.00 A325N T6 Flange 0.7500 0 100.00-80.00 A325N T7 80.00-60.00 Flange 0.7500 0 A325N 1860.00^0.00 Flange 0.7500 0 ' ' A325N T9 40.00-0.00 Flange 0.7500 0 A325N Diagonal Bolt Size No. in- 0.6250 1 A325X 0.6250 1 A325X 0.6250 1 A325X 0.6250 1 A325X 0.6250 1 A325X 0.6250 1 A325X 0.6250 1 A325X 0.6250 1 A325X 0.6250 1 A325X Top Girt Bolt Size No. in 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N Bottom Girt Bolt Size No. in 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N Mid Girt Bolt Size No. in 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N 0.6250 0 A325N Long Horizontal Bolt Size No. in 0.6250 1 A325X 0.6250 1 A325X 0.6250 1 A325X 0.6250 1 A325X 0.6250 1 A325X 0.6250 1 A325X 0.6250 1 A325X 0.6250 1 A325X 016250 1 A325X Short Horizontal Bolt Size No. in 0.6250 1 A325X 0.6250 1 A325X 0.6250 1 A325X 0.6250 1 A325X 0.6250 1 A325X 0.6250 1 A325X 0.6250 1 A325X 0.6250 1 A325X , . 0.6250 1 A325X Description dish at 150' dish at 110' dish at 110' dish at 90' dish at 90' Face or Leg B A B A C Allow Shield No No No No No Component Type CaAa (Out Of3 Face) CaAa (Out Of Face) CaAa (Out Of Face) CaAa (Out Of Face) CaAa (Out Of Face) Placement ft 150.00-0.00 110.00-0.00 110.00-0.00 90.00 - 0.00 90.00 - 0.00 Total Number 1 1 1 1 1 No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice Cf*ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weight plf 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RISATower Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.6 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Description Face Allow or Shield Leg dish at 80' B dish at 70' C dish at 60' A dish at 60' C whip at 160' A whip at 160' B whip at 160' C Antenna at 150' A Antenna at 150' B Antenna at 1 50' C Antennatat 147' A Antennat at 147' B Antennatat 147' C No No No No No No No No No No No No No Component Type CaAa (Out Of Face) CaAa (Out Of Face) CaAa (Out Of Face) CaAa (Out Of Face) CaAa (Out Of Face) CaAa (Out Of Face) CaAa (Out Of Face) CaAa (Out Of Face) CaAa (Out Of Face) CaAa (Out Of Face) CaAa (Out Of Face) CaAa (Out Of Face) CaAa (Out Of Face) Placement Total Number ft 80.00-0.00 1 70.00-0.00 1 60.00-0.00 1 60.00-0.00 1 150.00-0.00 1 150.00-0.00 . 1 150.00-0.00 1 150.00-0.00 1 150.00-0.00 1 150.00-0.00 1 _, 147.00 -0.00 1 147.00-0.00 1 147.00 - 0.00 1 No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice CAAA ff/ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weight plf 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 Tower Tower Section Elevation ft Tl 150.00-140.00 T2 140.00-130.00 T3 130.00-120.00 T4 120.00-110.00 T5 110.00-100.00 T6 100.00-SO.OO T7 80.00-60.00 T8 60.00-40.00 T9 40.00-0.00 Face A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C Ax ff 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 tiilplSIKiffiBW AF CAAA In Face ff ff 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 • 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 CAAA Outpace ff 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 40.000 40.000 40.000 ifliiil Weight Ib 322.00 342.00 322.00 370.00 390.00 370.00 370.00 390.00 370.00 370.00 390.00 370.00 380.00 400.00 370.00 770.00 800.00 750.00 780.00 820.00 770.00 800.00 820.00 800.00 1600.00 1640.00 1600.00 RISATower Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.7 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Tower Section Feed Line Record No. Description Feed Line Segment Elev. K, No Ice Ka Ice Description Whip at 160'-0" Whip at 160'-0" Whip at 160'-0" Whip at 160'-0" Antenna at 150'-0" Antenna at 150'-0" Antenna at 150'-0" Antenna at 147'-0" Antenna at 147'-0" Antenna at,147'-0" Face or Leg A B C B A B C A B C Offset Type None None None None From Face From Face From Face From Leg From Leg From Leg Offsets: Horz Lateral Vert ft ft ft 4.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 Azimuth Adjustment o 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Placement ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 147.00 147.00 147.00 No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice CAAA Front ff 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 18.20 18.20 18.20 27.25 27.25 27.25 CAAASide ft 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 5.37 5.37 5.37 7.16 7.16 7.16 Weight Ib 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 558.00 558:00 558.00 Description 2'diadishatl50'-0" 6'diadishatllO'-0" 4'diadishat HO'-O" 6' dia dish at 90'-0" Face or Leg B A B A Dish Type Paraboloid w/Radome Paraboloid w/Radome Paraboloid w/Radome Paraboloid w/Radome Offset Type From Leg From Leg From Leg From Leg Offsets: Horz Lateral Vert ft 1.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 Azimuth 3 dB Adjustment Beam Width 0 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Elevation ft 150.00 110.00 - 110.00 90.00 Outside Diameter ft 2.00 No Ice 6.00 No Ice 4.00 No Ice 6.00 No Ice Aperture Area Jf 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weight Ib 68.00 380.00 140.00 380.00 RISATawer Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.8 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Description & dia dish at 90'-0" 6'diadishat80'-0" 8'diadishat70'-0" 6'diadishat60'-0" 6'diadishat60'-0" Face or Leg C B C A C Dish Type Paraboloid w/Radome Paraboloid w/Radome Paraboloid w/Radome Paraboloid w/Radome Paraboloid w/Radome Offset Type From Leg From Leg From Leg From Leg From Leg Offsets: Horz Lateral Vert ft 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 Azimuth Adjustment 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3 dB Elevation Beam Width ft 90.00 80.00 70.00 60.00 60.00 Outside Diameter ft 6.00 No Ice 6.00 No Ice 8.00 No Ice 6.00 No Ice 6.00 No Ice Aperture Area ff 0.00 0.00 0.00 --• o.oo 0.00 Weight Ib 380.00 380.00 470.00 380.00 380.00 •--:- ^£fe^m">^^*;-^!S50«w-^:>.;SSi|k !JaH|s|6SS = 0.850 Section Elevation ft Tl 150.00-140.00 T2 140.00-130.00 T3 130.00-120.00 T4 120.00-110.00 T5 110.00-100.00 T6 100.00-80.00 T7 80.00-60.00 T8 60.00-40.00 T9 40.00-0.00 z ft 145.00 135.00 125.00 115.00 105.00 90.00 70.00 50.00 20.00 Kz 1.369 1.348 1.326 1.303 1.279 1.238 1.174 1.094 0.902 fc psf 22 21 21 20 20 19 18 17 3 14 Ao ff 93.750 93.750 93.750 98.755 108.755 249.283 291.055 334.393 795.878 F a c e A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C Af if 2.875 2.875 2.875 1.438 1.438 1.438 2.875 2.875 2.875 1.516 1.516 1.516 1.684 1.684 1.684 3.680 3.680 3.680 4.319 4.319 4.319 2.536 2.536 2.536 7.521 7.521 7.521 AR ff 11.583 11.583 11.583 11.583 11.583 11.583 11.583 11.583 11.583 11.709 11.709 11.709 11.941 11.941 11.941 31.709 31.709 31.709 35.849 35.849 35.849 43.149 43.149 43.149 102.545 102.545 102.545 A,,g ff 7.500 7.500 7.500 7.512 7.512 18.574 22.120 28.798 71.786 Leg % 51.88 51.88 51.88 57.60 57.60 57.60 51.88 51.88 51.88 56.80 56.80 56.80 55.14 55.14 55.14 52.49 52.49 52.49 55.07 55.07 55.07 63.03 63.03 63.03 65.22 65.22 65.22 CAAA In Face ff 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 C,AA Out Faceff 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 . 10.000 10.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 40.000 40.000 40.000 RTSA Tawer Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.9 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW GH = 0.850 Section Elevation ft Tl 150.00-140.00 T2 140.00-130.00 T3 130.00-120.00 .T4 120.00-110.00 T5 110.00-100.00 f 6 100.00-80.00 T7 80.00-60.00 T8 60.0040.00 T9 40.00-0.00 z ft 145.00 135.00 125.00 115.00 105.00 90.00 70.00 50.00 20.00 Kz 1.369 1.348 1.326 1.303 1.279 1.238 1.174 1.094 0.902 It psf 11 11 10 10 10 10 9 9 7 As .ft2 93.750 93.750 93.750 98.755 108.755 249.283 291.055 334.393 795.878 F a c e A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C Af • ft3 2.875 2.875 2.875 1.438 1.438 1.438 2.875 2.875 2.875 1.516 1.516 1.516 1.684 "1.684 1.684 3.680 3.680 3.680 4.319 4.319 4.319 2.536 2.536 2.536 7.521 7.521 7.521 AR ft 11.583 11.583 11.583 11.583 11.583 1 1.583 11.583 11.583 11.583 11.709 11.709 11.709 11.941 11.941 11.941 31.709 31.709 31.709 35.849 35.849 35.849 43.149 43.149 43.149 102.545 102.545 102.545 Ak, ft 7.500 7.500 7.500 7.512 7.512 18.574 22.120 28.798 71.786 Leg % 51.88 51.88 51.88 57.60 57.60 57.60 51.88 51.88 51.88 56.80 56.80 56.80 55.14 55.14 55.14 52.49 52.49 52.49 55.07 55.07 55.07 63.03 63.03 63.03 65.22 65.22 65.22 C*AAIn Face ft 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000.•• o.ooo 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 CAAA Out Face- ft 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 40.000 40.000 40.000 Section Elevation .ft . .Tl 150.00-140.00 T2 140.00-130.00 T3 130.00-120.00 T4 120.00-110.00 T5 110.00-100.00 T6 100.00-80.00 Add Weight Ib 986.00 . 1130.00 1130.00 1130.00 1150.00 2320.00 Self Weight Ib 777.25 628.41 777.25 706.41 734.53 2275.41 F a c e A B C A B C A Ba A B C A B C A B e 0.154 0.154 0.154 0.139 0.139 0.139 0.154 0.154 0.154 0.134 0.134 0.134 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.142 0.142 CF 2.756 2.756 2.756 2.813 2.813 2.813 2.756 2.756 2.756 2.832 2.832 2.832 2.865 2.865 2.865 2.801 2.801 q* psf 22 21 21 20 20 19 DF • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 DK 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 AE ft 9.271 9.271 9.271 7.819 7.819 7.819 9.291 9.291 9.291 7.985 7.985 7.985 8.285 8.285 8.285 20.606 20.606 F Ib 1016.00 936.71 985.72 916.34 918.17 1947.36 w Plf 101.60 93.67 98.57 91.63 91.82 97.37 Ctrl. Face C C C c c c RISATower Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.10 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Section Elevation ft T7 80.00-60.00 T8 60.00-40.00 T9 40.00-0.00 Sum Weight: Add Weight Ib 2370.00 2420.00 4840.00 17476.00 Self Weight Ib 3223.04 3115.98 8078.64 20316.92 F a c e C A B C A B C A B C e 0.142 0.138 0.138 0.138 0.137 0.137 0.137 0.138 0.138 0.138 CF 2.801 2.816 2.816 2.816 2.821 2.821 2.821 2.815 2.815 2.815 9. psf 18 17 14 DF 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 DR 1 I 1 1 OTM AE ff 20.606 22.622 22.622 22.622 22.544 22.544 22.544 54.582 54.582 54.582 1066194.9 91b-ft F Ib 1940.87 1806.65 3298.07 13765.89 w plf 97.04 90.33 82.45 Ctrl. Face C C C Section Elevation ft Tl 150.00-140.00 T2 140.00-130.00 T3 130.00-120.00 T4 120.00-110.00 T5 110.00-100.00 T6 100.00-80.00 T7 80.00-60.00 T8 60.00-40.00 T9 40.00-0.00 Sum Weight: Add Weight Ib 986.00 1130.00 1130.00 1130.00 1150.00 2320.00 2370.00 2420.00 4840.00 17476.00 Self Weight Ib 777.25 628.41 777.25 706.41 734.53 2275.41 3223.04 3115.98 8078.64 20316.92 F a c e A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C e 0.154 0.154 0.154 0.139 0.139 0.139 0.154 0.154 0.154 0.134 0.134 0.134 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.142 0;142 0.142 0.138 0.138 0.138 0.137 0.137 0.137 0.138 0.138 0.138 Cr. 2.756 2.756 2.756 2.813 2.813 2.813 2.756 2.756 2.756 2.832 2.832 2.832 2.865 2.865 2.865 2.801 2.801 2.801 2.816 2.816 2.816 2.821 2.821 2.821 2.815 2.815 2.815 9^ psf 22 21 21 20 20 19 18 . 17 14 Dr 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 DR 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 OTM As .ff 8.696 8.696 8.696 7.532 7.532 7.532 8.716 8.716 8.716 7.681 7.681 7.681 7.948 7.948 7.948 19.870 19.870 19.870 21.758 21.758 21.758 22.037 22.037 22.037 ' 53.077 53.077 53.077 1045256.0 21b-ft F Ib 987.02 922.15 957.63 901.38 901.69 1913.26 1902.71 1785.73 3247.03 13518.59 VI Plf 98.70 92.21 95.76 90.14 90.17 95.66 95.14 89.29 81.18 Ctrl. Face C C C C C C C C C RISATower Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.11 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Section Elevation ft Tl 150.00-140.00 T2 140.00-130.00 T3 130.00-120.00 T4 120.00-110.00 T5 110.00-100.00 T6 100.00-80.00. T7 80.00-60.00 T8 60.00-40.00 T9 40.00-0.00 Sum Weight: Add Weight Ib 986.00 1130.00 1130.00 1130.00 1150.00 2320.00 2370.00 2420.00 4840.00 17476.QO Self Weight Ib 777.25 628.41 777.25 706.41 734.53 2275.41 3223.04 3115.98 8078.64 20316.92 F a c e A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C e 0.154 0.154 0.154 0.139 0.139 0.139 0.154 0.154 0.154 0.134 0.134 0.134 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.142 0.142 0.142 0.138 0.138 0.138 0.137 0.137 0.137 0.138 0.138 0.138 CF 2.756 2.756 2.756 2.813 2.813 2.813 2.756 2.756 2.756 2.832 2.832 2.832 2.865 2.865 2.865 2.801 2.801 2.801 2.816 2.816 2.816 2.821 2.821 2.821 2.815 2.815 2.815 1* Ptf 22 21 21 20 20 - 19 IS 17 14 DF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 DK 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 OTM AE ff 8.840 8.840 8.840 7.603 7.603 7.603 8.860 8.860 8.860 7.757 7.757 7.757 8.033 8.033 8.033 20.054 20.054 20.054 21.974 21.974 21.974 22.163 22.163 22.163 53.453 53.453 ^53.453 1050490.7 71b-ft F Ib 994.26 925.79 964.65 905.12 905.81 1921.79 1912.25 1790.96 3259.79 13580.41 w Plf 99.43 92.58 96.46 90.51 90.58 96.09 95.61 89.55 81.49 Ctrl. Face C C C c c c c c c ^S^MsiiM^*"^ Section Elevation ft Tl 150.00-140.00 T2 140.00-130.00 T3 130.00-120.00 T4 120.00-110.00 T5 110.00-100.00 T6 100.00-80.00 11 Add Weight Ib 986.00 . 1 130.00 1130.00 1130.00 1150.00 2320.00 2370.00 Self Weight Ib 777.25 .628.41 777.25 706.41 734.53 2275.41 3223.04 F a c e A B C A B C A B C A B* C A B C A B C A e 0.154 0.154 0.154 0.139 0.139 0.139 0.154 0.154 0.154 0.134 0.134 0.134 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.142 0.142 0.142 0.138 CF 2.756 2.756 2.756 2.813 2.813 2.813 2.756 2.756 2.756 2.832 2.832 2.832 2.865 2.865 2.865 2.801 2.801 2.801 2.816 1' Ptf 11 11 10 10 10 10 9 DF 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Dx 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 AE ff 9.271 9.271 9.271 7.819 7.819 7.819 9.291 9.291 9.291 7.985 7.985 7.985 8.285 8.285 8.285 20.606 20.606 20.606 22.622 F Ib 506.24 466.74 491.15 456.58 457.50 970.31 967.08 VI Plf 50.62 46.67 49.12 ' 45.66 45.75 48.52 48.35 Ctrl. Face C C C C C C C RISAT&wer Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.12 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Section Elevation ft 80.00-60.00 T8 60.00-40.00 T9 40.00-0.00 Sum Weight: Add Weight Ib 2420.00 4840.00 17476.00 Self Weight Ib 3115.98 8078.64 20316.92 F a c e B C A B C A B C e 0.138 0.138 0.137 0.137 0.137 0.138 0.138 0.138 CF 2.816 2.816 2.821 2.821 2.821 2.815 2.815 2.815 1: psf 9 1 DF 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 DR 1 1 1 OTM A£ ff 22.622 22.622 22.544 22.544 22.544 54.582 54.582 54.582 531252.87 Ib-ft F Ib 900.20 1643.33 6859.13 w plf 45.01 41.08 Ctrl. Face C C Section Elevation ft Tl 150.00-140.00 T2 140.00-130.00 T3 130.00-120.00 T4 120.00-110.00 T5 110.00-100.00 T6 100.00-80.00 T7 80.00-60.00 T8 60.00-40.00 T9 40.00-0.00 Sum Weight: Add Weight Ib 986.00 1130.00 1130.00 1130.00 1150.00 2320.00 2370.00 2420.00 4840.00 17476.00 Self Weight Ib 777.25 628.41 777.25 706.41 734.53 2275.41 3223.04 3115.98 8078.64 20316.92 F a c e A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C e 0.154 0.154 0.154 0.139 0.139 0.139 0.154 0.154 0.154 0.134 0.134 0.134 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.142 0.142 0.142 0.138 0.138 0.138 0.137 0.137 0.137 0.138 0.138 0.138 CF 2.756 2.756 2.756 2.813 2.813 2.813 2.756 2.756 2.756 2.832 2.832 2.832 2.865 2.865 2.865 2.801 2.801 2.801 2.816 2.816 2.816 2.821 2.821 2.821 2.815 2.815 2.815 fc Prf 11 11 10 10 10 10 9 9 7 Df 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 O.S 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 Dn 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 OTM Ae ft3 8.696 8.696 8.696 7.532 7.532 7.532 8.716 8.716 8.716 7.681 7.681 7.681 7.948 7.948 7.948 19.870 19.870 19.870 21.758 21.758 21.758 22.037 22.037 22.037 53.077 53.077 53.077 520819.61 Ib-ft F Ib 491.80 459.48 477.16 449.13 449.28 953.32 948.06 889.78 1617.90 6735.90 w plf 49.18 45.95 47.72 44.91 44.93 47.67 47.40 44.49 40.45 Ctrl. Face C C C C C C C C C Section Elevation ft Tl 150.00-140.00 Add Weight Ib 986.00 Self Weight Ib 777.25 F a c e A .B e 0.154 0.154 CF 2.756 2.756 ?» psf 11 DF 0.85 0.85 DR 1 1 AE ff 8.840 8.840 F Ib 495.41 w Plf 49.54 Ctrl Face C RISAT&wer Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.13 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Section Elevation ft T2 140.00-130.00 T3 130.00-120.00 .T4 120.00-110.00 T5 110.00-100.00 T6 100.00-80.00 T7 80.00-60.00 T8 60.00-40.00 T9 40.00-0.00 Sum Weight: Add Weight Ib 1130.00 1130.00 1130.00 1150.00 2320.00 2370.00 2420.00 4840.00 17476.00 Self Weight Ih 628.41 777.25 706.41 734.53 2275.41 3223.04 3115.98 8078.64 20316.92 F a c e C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C e 0.154 0.139 0.139 0.139 0.154 0.154 0.154 0.134 0.134 0.134 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.142 0.142 0.142 0.138 0.138 0.138 0.137 0.137 0.137 0.138 0.138 0.138 Cr .2.756 2.813 2.813 2.813 2.756 2.756 2.756 2.832 2.832 2.832 2.865 2.865 2.865 2.801 2.801 2.801 2.816 2.816 2.816 2.821 2.821 2.821 2.815 2.815 2.815 fc Prf 11 10 10 10 10 9 9 7 Df 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 DR 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 OTM AE ff 8.840 7.603 7.603 7.603 8.860 8.860 8.860 7.757 7.757 7.757 8.033 8.033 8.033 20.054 20.054 20.054 21.974 21.974 21.974 22.163 22.163 22.163 53.453 53.453 53.453 523427.93 Ib-ft F Ib 461.29 480.66 450.99 451.34 957.57 952.81 892.38 1624.26 6766.71 w Plf 46.13 48.07 45.10 45.13 47.88 47.64 44.62 40.61 Ctrl. Face C C C C C C C C Description Whip at 160'-0" Whipatl60'-0" Whip at 160'-0" Whip at 160'-0" Antenna at 150'-0" Antenna at 150'-0" Antenna at 150'-0" Antenna at 147-0" Antenna at 147-0" Antenna at 147'-0" Aiming Azimuth o 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000• o.oooo 300.0000 60.0000 180.0000 0.0000 120.0000 240.0000 Sum Weight: Weight Ib 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 558.00 558.00 558.00 3234.00 Offset, ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -5.71 5.71 0.00 0.00 7.96 -7.96 Offset, ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -3.30 -3.30 6.60 -9.20 4.60 4.60 z ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 i 47.00 147.00 147.00 K-. 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.378 1.378 1.378 1.373 1.373 1.373 ?z psf 16 16 16 16 22 22 22 22 22 22 CAAC Front ff 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 18.20 18.20 18.20 27.25 27.25 27.25 CAAC Side ff 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 5.37 5.37 5.37 7.16 7.16 7.16 JgASy^ptHs^lfr^^ Description Whip at 160'-0" Whip at 160'-0" Whip at 160'-0" Aiming Azimuth o 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Weight Ib 15.00 15.00 15.00 Offset, ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offset, ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 z ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 K, 1.000 1.000 1.000 9' psf 8 8 8 CAAC Front ff 3.50 3.50 3.50 CAAC Side ff 3.50 3.50 3.50 RISATower Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.14 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Description Whip at 160'-0" Antenna at 150'-0" Antenna at 150'-0" Antenna at 150'-0" Antenna at 147-0" Antenna at 147-0" Antenna at 147'-0" Aiming Azimuth o 0.0000 300.0000 60.0000 180.0000 0.0000 120.0000 240.0000 Sum Weight: Weight Ib 15.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 558.00 558.00 558.00 3234.00 Offset, ft 0.00 -5.71 5.71 0.00 0.00 7.96 -7.96 Offset, ft 0.00 -3.30 -3.30 6.60 -9.20 4.60 4.60 z ft 0.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 147.00 147.00 147.00 K-, 1.000 1.378 1:378 1.378 1.373 1.373 1.373 1: psf 8 11 11 11 11 11 11 CAACFront ff 3.50 18.20 18.20 18.20 27.25 27.25 27.25 CAAC Side ff 3.50 5.37 5.37 5.37 7.16 -7.16 7.16 Elevation ft 150.00 110.00 110.00 90.00 90.00 80.00 70.00 60.00 60.00 Dish Description 2'diadishatl50'-0" ffdiadishatllO'-O" 4'diadishalllO'-0" 6'diadishat90'-0" 6' dia dish at 90'-0" 6' dia dish at 80'-0" 81diadishat70'-0" 6'diadishat60'-0" 6' dia dish at 60'-0" Aiming Azimuth o 120.0000 0.0000 120.0000 0.0000 240.0000 120.0000 240.0000 0.0000 240.0000 Sum Weiaht Weight Ib 68.00 380.00 140.00 380.00 380.00 380.00 470.00 380.00 380.00 2958.00 Offset, ft 5.37 0.00 6.30 0.00 -7.73 8.23 -9.60 0.00 -9.23 Offset, ft 3.10 -7.77 3.64 -8.93 4.46 4.75 5.54 -10.66 5.33 K, 1.378 1.291 1.291 1.238 1.238 1.208 1.174 1.137 1.137 AA ff 3.14 28.27 12.57 28.27 28.27 28.27 50.27 28.27 28.27 9> Ptf 22 20 20 19 19 19 18 18 18 Elevation * 150.00 110.00 110.00 90.00 90.00 80.00 70.00 60.00 60.00 Dish Description 2'diadishatl50'-0" 6' dia dish at IIO'-O" 4'diadishatllO'-0" 6' dia dish at 90'-0" 6' dia dish at 90-0" 6' dia dish at 80'-0" 8' dia dish at 70'-0" 6' dia dish at 60'-0" 6' dia dish at 60'-0" Aiming Azimuth O 120.0000 0.0000 120.0000 0.0000 240.0000 120.0000 240.0000 0.0000 240.0000 Sum Weight: Weight Ib 68.00 380.00 140.00 380.00 380.00 380.00 470.00 380.00 380.00 29-58.00 Offset,: ft 5.37 0.00 6.30 0.00 -7.73 8.23 -9.60 0.00 -9.23 Offset, f 3.10 -7.77 3.64 -8.93 4.46 4.75 5.54 -10.66 5.33 ...K, 1.378 1.291 1.291 1.238 1.238 1.208 1.174 1.137 1.137 AA f2 , 3.14 28.27 12.57 28.27 28.27 28.27 50.27 28.27 28.27 1* Ptf 11 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 Load Case Leg Weight Bracing Weight Vertical Forces Ib Sum of Forces X Ib Sum of Forces Z Ib 10615.67 9701.25 Sum of Overturning Moments, Mf Ib-ft Sum of • Overturning Moments, M, Ib-ft Sum of Torques \ RISATower Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.15 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Load Case Total Member Self-Weight Total Weight Wind 0 deg-No Ice Wind 90 deg-No Ice Wind 180 deg-No Ice Total Weight Wind 0 deg - Service Wind 90 deg - Service Wind 180 deg-Service Sum of Overturning Moments, M, Ib-ft -1545.39 -1545.39 -1511946.08 13023.23 1459072.36 -1545.39 -754132.58 5713.72 726236.47 Sum of Overturning Moments, M, Ib-ft 6582.52 6582.52 532.48 -1477050,79 486723 6582.52 3567.97 -732667.29 5727.84 Comb. No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Dead Only 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 0 deg -No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 0 deg - No Ice 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 90 deg - No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 90 deg -No Ice 1 .2 Dead+1.6 Wind 1 80 deg - No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 180 deg -No Ice Dead+Wind 0 deg - Service Dead+Wind 90 deg - Service Dead+Wind 180 deg - Service Description mm Section Elevation Component No. ft Type Tl 150-140 Leg Diagonal Secondary Horizontal 3 Top Girt . -•- • -." Condition Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max. Vy Max. Vx Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max. Vy Max.Vx Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max. Vy . Max. Vx Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max. Vy Meml Cov. Load Comb. 7 2 4 6 4 2 4 4 4 6 4 2 2 2 6 2 6 2 3 6 6 2 6 Axial Ib 1406.34 -3454.70 -201.30 9.44 -748.19 760.94 1474.34 -1419.09 1458.09 -119.97 9.30 -0.10 59.84 -59.84 46.61 59.84 -29.77 -0.00 399.93 -454.52 -454.52 -251.86 -29.77 r^BsPiK Major Axis Moment Ib-ft -0.00 -1.72 1070.94 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -12.91 -12.08 -12.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.9S 0.00 0.00 Minor Axis Moment Ib-ft -0.00 438.39 -18.76 1072.33 0.00 -0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 -0.45 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RISATower Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.16 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Section Elevation Component No. ft Type T2 140 - 130 Leg Diagonal Secondary Horizontal T3 130-120 Leg Diagonal Horizontal Secondary Horizontal T4 120-110 Leg Diagonal Secondary Horizontal Condition Max. Vx Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max.Vy Max. Vx Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max. Vy Max.Vx Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max. Vy Max. Vx - Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max. Vy Max. Vx Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max. Vy Max.Vx Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max. Vy Max. Vx Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max. Vy Max.Vx Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max. Vy Max. Vx Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max. Vy Max.Vx Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Gov. Load Comb. 2 1 2 4 6 4 6 5 4 4 6 4 6 2 2 6 2 6 2 7 2 4 2 4 2 5 2 4 6 4 6 6 3 6 2 6 2 2 2 6 2 6 2 7 2 2 4 2 4 4 4 6 4 6 4 2 2 2 Axial Ib -0.00 4881.09 -8898.29 3530.25 4358.27 -125.80 - -126.44 2534.34 -2660.52 2511.79 -525.34 9.80 0.11 154.12 -154.12 97.63 154.12 -29.77 -0.00 11674.84 -16657.68 -2772.76 4124.73 116.81 - -113.79 3043.06 -3514.80 2975.26 -2664.19 10.02 -0.18 751.97 ^20.74 751.97 486.89 -29.77 0.00 288.52 -288.52 167.90 288.52 -29.77 -0.00 19015.05 -26147.66 -26147.66 -3724.94 142.64 145.56 3015.71 -3002.05 2708.45 -2984.80 -10.95 -0.63 453.46 -453.46 -131.00 Major Axis Moment lb-ft 0.00 -0.47 3.73 -554.43 -0.77 -554.43 -0.77 0.00 0.00 -16.28 -14.30 -16.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1.53 -13.06 -337.09 41.58 -337.09 41.58 0.00 0.00 -17.71 -8.13 -17.71 0.00 0.00 0;00 66.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.98 0.00 0,00 0.00 -165.62 -351.70 -351.70 -64.15 244.63 -64.15 0.00 0.00 -19.99 -7.66 -19.99 -7.27 0.00 0.00 74.18 Minor Axis Moment lb-ft 0.00 -541.74 -46.48 26.18 -558.81 26.18 -558.81 0.00 0.00 0.05 -0.51 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.39 63.37 -64.14 326.30 -64.14 326.30 0.00 0.00 0.10 -1.08 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -5.74 -49.56 -49.56 336.53 -20.84 336.53 0.00 0.00 -2.91 4.15 -2.91 4.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 RISATower Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.17 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Section Elevation Component No. ft Type T5 110-100 Leg Diagonal Secondary Horizontal T6 100 - 80 Leg Diagonal Horizontal Secondary Horizontal T7 80 - 60 Leg " Diagonal Horizontal Condition Max. My MaxVy Max. Vx Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max.Vy Max.Vx "Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max. Vy MaxVx Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My - Max. Vy Max. Vx Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max. Vy Max.Vx Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max. Vy Max. Vx Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max. Vy Max. Vx Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My MaxVy Max. Vx Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max. Vy Max.Vx Max Tension Max. Compression Max, MX • Max. My Max. Vy Max.Vx Max Tension Max. Compression Gov. Load Comb. 2 2 2 7 2 6 4 ' 6 3 7 2 2 6 6 6 2 2 2 4 2 4 7 2 6 2 6 2 5 4 4 6 4 6 6 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 ' 2 2 2 2 7 2 6 2 2 2 4 4 6 4 6 4 6 3 Axial Ib 453.46 -31.32 0.90 26250.75 -35057.49 24497.03 -4971.42 -225.80 -363.48 3224 .31 -3506.68 2796.96 -688.40 -12.05 0.56 607.97 -607.97 -148.41 86.22 -34.64 1.00 34545.02 -42937.28 32733.31 14615.32 311.25 -413.75 7272.86 -9767.35 4299.51 -7278.06 -41.96 4.20 3723.48 -2550.99 -2386.65 2222.94 -32.10 0.93 821.70 -821.70 -89.07 821.70 -34.78 -1.00 54050.78 -70380.95 52059.26 21373.47 428.76 -534.08 - 7085.24 -7442.78 6193.73 -7345.15 -46.06 -3.86 309S.01 -2118.22 Major Axis Moment Ib-fl 0.00 0.00 0.00 164.78 597.00 -695.88 -101.09 143.38 37.14 0.00 0.00 -23.86 -20.17 -23.16 -20.17 0.00 0.00 90.71 0.00 0:00 0.00 -680.46 1336.27 -1355.24 -931.57 -1355.24 -931.57 0.00 0.00 -154.51 -84.68 -154.51 -84:68 0.00 0.00 88.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 103.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1330.87 -573.50 ' -1355.24 -568.51 555.85 -568.51 0.00 0.00 -154.72 -54.41 -154.72 -40.08 0.00 0.00 Minor Axis Moment Ib-ft -2.14 0.00 0.00 21.07 202.99 -85.71 966.49 21.13 -228.00 0.00 0.00 -3.56 -3.74 3.48 -3.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 -2.62 0:00 0.00 -88.07 803.07 -357.82 2109.49 -357.82 2109.49 0.00 0.00 -29.30 -43.66 -29.30 -43.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 -2.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -2.99 0.00 0.00 -363.63 619.95 -357.82 2804.27 -1012.14 2804.27 0.00 0.00 21.69 44.40 21.69 43.68 0.00 0.00 RISATower Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.18 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Section Elevation Component Condition No. ft Type Max. MX Max. My Max. Vy Max. Vx Secondary Max Tension Horizontal Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max.Vy Max.Vx T8 60-40 Leg Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max.Vy Max.Vx Diagonal Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX - Max. My Max. Vy Max.Vx Secondary Max Tension Horizontal Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max. Vy Max.Vx T9 40-0 Leg Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max. Vy Max.Vx Diagonal Max Tension Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max. Vy Max. Vx Secondary Max Tension Horizontal Max. Compression Max. MX Max. My Max. Vy Max. Vx , Gov. Axial Major Axis Load Moment Comb. Ib Ib-ft 2 -1979.89 123.30 2 1857.75 0.00 2 -37.94 0.00 2 1.10 0.00 2 1220.56 0.00 2 -1220.56 0.00 2 -330.02 141.54 2 1220.56 0.00 2 -40.65 0.00 2 1.17 0.00 7 72328.55 -63.57 2 -93838.12 -932.09 2 -93409.67 2293.60 2 30579.27 -568.55 2 375.72 2293.59 2 840.91 -568.55 4 8210.09 0.00 4 -8588.82 0.00 2 6753.28 -181.15 4 2464.85 -177.03 4 -51.75 -176.75 4 -3.09 -177.03 2 1627.35 0.00 2 -1627.35 0.00 2 -562.69 185.32 2 1627.35 0.00 2 -46.51 0.00 2 1.34 0.00 1 106709.18 293.27 2 -138831.84 0.00 2 -116921.56 4092.43 5 -9628.81 -806.94 2 683.68 4092.43 5 812.15 -806.96 5 8009.56 0.00 2 -8752.12 0.00 4 7781.46 -212.40 4 1926.03 -203.25 4 -62.10 -212.40 2 3.48 -96.74 2 2407.64 0.00 2 -2407.64 0.00 2 -732.66 365.51 2 2407.64 0.00 2 73.29 0.00 2 -2.12 0.00 Minor Axis Moment Ib-ft 0.00 -3.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -4.09 0.00 0.00 -324.54 -239.25 284.51 2804.26 284.51 2804.26 0.00 0.00 32.66 36.36 -31.99 36.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 -5.35 0.00 0.00 -37.11 -0.09 -106.70 5486.66 -106.70 5486.66 0.00 .0.00 -36.70 45.18 -36.70 -43.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 -10.55 0.00 0.00 Location Condition Go\. Vertical Load Ib Comb. LegC Max. Vert 6 82223.67 Max. H» ; 6 82223.67 Horizontal, X Horizontal, Z Ib Ib 7286.79 -6512.61 7286.79 . -6512.61 •- RTSATower Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.19 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Location LegB Leg A Condition Max.Hz Min. Vert Min. Hx Min.Hz Max. Vert Max. H, Max.Hz Min. Vert Min. H, Min.Hz Max. Vert Max.H» Max.Hz Min. Vert Min. H8 Min. H2 Gov. Load Comb. 5 5 5 6 4 3 3 3 4 4 2 7 2 7 4 7 Vertical Ib -99194.86 -99194.86 -99194.86 82223.67 131168.06 -53244.95 -53244.95 -53244.95 131168.06 131168.06 150952.10 -115501.24 150952.10 -115501.24 16411.33 -11550124 Horizontal, X Ib -12344.16 -12344.16 -12344.16 7286.79 -14476.66 5658.87 5658.87 5658.87 -14476.66 -14476.66 -264.64 167.27 -264.64 167.27 -1977.72 167.27 Horizontal, Z Ib 5690.93 5690.93 5690.93 -6512.61 -6965.30 5143.25 5143.25 5143.25 -6965.30 -6965.30 18451.44 -15494.68 18451.44 -15494.68 1194.89 -15494.68 Load Combination Dead Only 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 0 deg -No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 0 deg - No Ice 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 90 deg -No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 90 deg - No Ice 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 180 deg - No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 180 deg - No Ice Dead+Wind 0 deg - Service Dead+Wind 90 deg - Service Dead+Wind 180 deg - Service Vertical Ib 43984.92 52781.48 39586.43 52781.91 39586.43 52781.90 39586.43 43984.92 43984.92 43984.92 Shears Ib 0.00 170.43 171.08 28503.48 28503.13 48.50 48.51 53.27 8876.39 15.11 Shear, Ib 0.00 -28895.77 -28895.78 251.99 252.03 27880.23 27879.83 -8998.66 78.48 8682.29 Overturning Moment, Mf Ib-ft -1545.91 -2425324.69 -2423132.63 21508.04 21968.54 2341812.23 2340547.13 -755916.81 5722.85 727947.29 Overturning Moment, M, Ib-ft 6583.36 -1770.00 -3747.37 -2372638.33 -2372880.55 5177.76 3193.42 3579.02 -734387.49 5741.75 Torque Ib-ft -0.05 -8979.77 -8985.48 5745.21 5752.54 6425.45 6421.45 -2798.45 1790.90 2001.16 sS^pfffere ^JT^-^.-^.v.l/^i^'aSHfaE?^^IsS'-siwss&alaEHjrarasaAa^sVjVsis' Sum of Applied Forces Load Comb. 1 2 3 4 •5 6 7 8 9 10 PX Ib 0.00 171.06 171.06 28503.57 28503.57 48.50 48.50 53.27 8876.54 15.10 PY Ib -43984.92 -52781.9"! -39586.43 -52781.91 -39586.43 -52781.91 -39586.43 -43984.92 -43984.92 -43984,92 PZ Ib -0.00 -28896.19 -28896.19 251.98 251.98 27880.32 27880.32 -8998.81 78.47 8682.45 PX Ib -0.00 -170.43 -171.08 -28503.48 -28503.13 -48.50 -48.51 -53.27 -8876.39 -15.11 Sum of Reactions PY Ib 43984.92 52781.48 . 39586.43 52781.91 39586.43 52781.90 39586.43 43984.92 43984.92 43984.92 PZ Ib -0.00 28895.77 28895.78 -251.99 -252.03 -27880.23 -27879.83 8998.66 -78.48 -8682.29 % Error O'.000% 0.001% 0.001% 0.000% 0.001% 0.000% 0.001% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% SISATower Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.20 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW 'rr-.w M £¥•'•". LHCti.'WM'H'BFP'.a'^y iWP*5f!S««%i«|iri||$!E$^§sults^^£7V' ^ $p 3 Load Combination 1 ^3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Converged? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Number of Cycles 6 7 7 8 7 8 7 7 7 7 Displacement Tolerance 0.00000001 0.00000001 0.00000001 0.00000001 0.00000001 0.00000001 0.00000001 0.00000001 0.00000001 0.00000001 Force Tolerance 0.00000001 0.00013736 0.00010018 0.00003096 0.00011334 0.00003370 0.00012556 0.00011009 0.00011268 0.00011629 Section No. Tl T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 Elevation ft 150 - 140 140-130 130 - 120 120-110 110-100 100 - 80 80-60 60-40 40-0 Horz. Deflection in 1.508 1.323 1.139 0.962 0.800 0.656 0.427 0.245 0.120 Gov. - Load Comb. 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Tilt O 0.0863 0.0856 0.0825 0.0761 0.0687 0.0594 0.0437 0.0329 0.0204 Twist O 0.0019 0.0021 0.0022 0.0024 0.0025 0.0033 0.0034 0.0030 0.0016 P^*fS-li.'-7Srs^iKSES*>vw>Si-ai^Wr^ Elevation ft 150.00 147.00 110.00 90.00 80.00 70.00 60.00 0.00 Appurtenance 2'diadishatl50'-0" Antenna at 147'-0" 6'diadishatllO'-0" 6' dia dish at 90'-0" 6' dia dish at 80'-0" 8' dia dish at 70-0" 6' dia dish at 60'-0" Whip at 160'-0" Gov. Load Comb. 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 Deflection in 1.508 1.453 0.800. 0.533 0.427 0.330 0.245 0.000 Tilt O 0.0863 0.0862 0.0687 0.0507 0.0437 0.0382 0.0329 0.0000 Twist O 0.0019 0.0020 0.0025 , 0.0035 0.0034 0.0033 0.0030 0.0000 Radius of Curvature ft Inf Inf 67783 74959 137642 102279 78151 699154 iB&:S3S?SS*SS73tt'#;WISS®B5&^ Section No. Tl T2 T3 Elevation ft 150-140 140-130 130-120 Horz. Deflection in 4.826 4.235 3.646 Gov. Load Comb. 2 2 2 Tilt O 0.2761 0.2736 0.2638 Twist 0 0.0061 0.0067 0.0072 RISATower Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.21 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Section No. T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 Elevation ft 120-110110-100 100 - 80 80-60 60-40 40-0 Hon. Deflection in 3.079 2.562 2.102 1.369 0.786 0.384 Gov. Load Comb. 2 2 2 2 2 2 Tilt 0 0.2431 0.2192 0.1896 0.1402 0.1056 0.0655 Twist o 0.0078 0.0081 0.0105 0.0110 0.0097 0.0052 I't/SM'-MiriBitfjS I^>^:i^i^V^.^>.^K^'!^i|^^^-i&^S.:^^Critical Deflections^ and Radius c3fl--t,^*-£-->£r££SZ£«J';--i'^* l-'T'i'tf^i^li^l & C• ti il^P.jjSjvgfcpy -Cj. Elevation ft 150.00 147.00 110.00 90.00 80.00 70.00 60.00 0.00 Appurtenance 2' dia dish at 150'-0" Antenna at 147-0" 6' dia dish at 11 0'-O" . 6'diadishat90'-0" 6'diadishat80'-0" 8'diadishat70'-0" 6' dia dish at 60'-0" Whip at 160'-0" Gov. Load Comb. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 Deflection in 4.826 4.649 2.562 1.710 1.369 1.059 0.786 0.000 Tilt O 0.2761 0.2757 0.2192 0.1624 0.1402 0.1225 0.1056 0.0000 fwisf o 0.0061 0.0063 0.0081 0.0113 0.0110 0.0106 0.0097 0.0000 Radius of Curvature ft 529784 529784 21374 23638 43179 31963 24385 218070 Section No. Tl T2 13 T4 T5 T6 T7 Elevation ft 150 140 130 120 110 100 80 Component Type Diagonal Secondary Horizontal Diagonal Secondary Horizontal Diagonal Horizontal Secondary Horizontal Diagonal Secondary Horizontal Diagonal Secondary Horizontal Diagonal Horizontal Secondary Horizontal Diagonal Horizontal Bolt Grade A325X A325X A325X A325X A325X A325X A325X A325X A325X A325X A325X A325X A325X A325X A325X A325X Bolt Size in 0.6250 0.6250 0.6250 0.6250 0.6250 0.6250 0.6250 0.6250 0.6250 0.6250 0.6250 0.6250 0.6250 0.6250 0.6250 0.6250 Number Of Bolts 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Maximum Loadper Bolt Ib 1474.34 59.84 2660.52 154.12 3514.80 751.97 288.52 3015.71 453.46 3506.68 607.97 9767.35 3723.48 821.70 7442.78 3098.01 Allowable Load Ib 15186.40 19575.00 15186.40 19575.00 15186.40 19575.00 19575.00 15186.40 19575.00 15186.40 19575.00 15186.40 19575.00 19575.00 15186.40 19575.00 Ratio Load Allowable 0.097 V 0.003 I"*1' 0.175 V* 0.008 *^ 0.231 V 0.038 V* 0.015 V* 0.199 I/ 0.023 • 0.231 Y 0.031 • 0.643 ^ 0.190 *^ 0.042 Y* 0.490 "^ 0.158 ^ Allowable Ratio 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Criteria Bolt Shear Member Bearing Bolt Shear Member Bearing Bolt Shear Member Bearing Member Bearing Bolt Shear Member Bearing Bolt Shear Member Bearing Bolt Shear Member Bearing Member Bearing Bolt Shear Member Bearing RISAT&wer Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.22 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Section No. T8 T9 Elevation ft 60 40 Component Type Secondary Horizontal Diagonal Secondary Horizontal Diagonal Secondary Horizontal Bolt Grade A325X A325X A325X A325X A325X BoltSize in 0.6250 0.6250 0.6250 0.6250 0.6250 Number Of Bolts 1 1 1 1 1 Maximum Loadper Bolt Ib 1220.56 8588.82 1627.35 8752.12 2407.64 Allowable Load Ib 19575.00 15186.40 19575.00 15186.40 19575.00 Ratio Load Allowable 0.062 r 0.566 V' 0.083 Y 0.576 ^ 0.123 * Allowable Ratio 1 .1 1 1 . 1 Criteria Member Bearing Bolt Shear Member Bearing Bolt Shear Member Bearing Section No. Tl T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 • T7 T8 T9 Elevation ft 150- 140- 130- 120- 110- 100- 80- 60- 40- 140 130 120 110 100 -80 60 40 •0 Size P4.5ODx.188 P4.5ODx.188 P4.5ODx.188 P4x.237 P4X.237 P5x.258 P6x.432 P8x.322 PlOx.365 L ft 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.02 10.02 20.03 20.03 20.03 40.07 ,L" ft 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.27 5.25 10.85 10.73 10.64 10.57 Kl/r 39.3 K=1.00 39.3 K=1.00 39.3 K=1.00 41.9 K=1.00 41.7 K=1.00 69.3 K=1.00 58.7 K=1.00 43.5 K=1.00 34.5 . K=1.00 A in2 2.5468 2.5468 2.5468 3.1741 3.1741 4.2999 8.4049 . 8.3993 11.9083 P. Ib -3454.70 -8898.29 -16657.70 -26147.70 -35057.50 -42937.30 -70380.90 -93838.10 -138802.00 <(>/>„ Ratio P, Ib 74119.50 74119.50 74119.50 91386.70 91464.80 105896.00 221982.00 240183.00 352898.00 W* 0.047 0.120 0.225 0.286 0.383 0.405 0.317 0.391 0.393 i^ i i i i i i i i i 1 p „ /<)>/>„ controls Section No. Elevation ft Size L ft Lu ft Kl/r A in2 P. Ib Ratio Ib Tl T2 150-140 140-130 Pl.9ODx.145 Pl.90Dx.145 13.45 13.45 6.45 6.45 124.3 0.7995 K=1.00 124.3 0.7995 -1419.09 -2660.52 11427.30 0.124' I/ 11427.30 0.233l RISATower Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.23 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Section No. T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 Elevation ft 130-120 120-110 110-100 100-80 80-60 60-40 40-0 Size Pl""9ODx.l45 Pl.90Dx.145 Pl.90Dx.145 P3X.216 P3x.216 P3X.216 P3X.216 L ft 13.45 13.80 14.50 23.33 24.42 25.62 28.29 L. ft 6.45 6.99 7.34 12.19 12.60 13.04 14.22 Kl/r K=1.00 124.3 K=1.00 134.7 K=1.00 141.4 K=1.00 125.7 K=1.00 130.0 K=1.00 134.4 K=1.00 146.6 K=1.00 A in3 0.7995 0.7995 0.7995 2.2285 2.2285 2.2285 2.2285 P, Ib -3514.80 -3002.05 -3506.68 -9767.35 -7442.78 -8588.82 -8752.12 ifpa Ib 11427.30 9948.69 9029.26 31272.40 29575.00 27836.90 23411.90 Ratio P, $P, 0.308 ' I/ 0.302 ' y/ 0.388 'I/ 0.3 12' 4/ 0.252 ' tf 0.309 ' I/ 0.374 ' • 1 P » / $P, controls W&SKiJt:^lIBIHSiiil ill ppi tTSSs^^J ^ -. "*~" Section No. T3 T6 T7 '""'• Elevation ft 130-120 100-80 80-60 controls Size 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2x3/16 KL/R > 200 (C)- 70 2L2x2x3/16 KL/R > 200 (C)- 85 L /< 9.00 11.00 13.00 L. ft 8.63 10.63 12.54 Kl/r 172.5 K=1.00 206.6 K=l:00 243.8 K=1.00 A in1 1.6200 1.4300 1.4300 P, Ib -420.74 -2550.99 -2118.22 tfp. Ib 12299.20 7565.29 5434.22 ^^•'^£T^6^:"^Y^^^^G^n^^iM0i^©p|al|ite§^ailat^^iE Ratio Pu */>. 0.034 ' v* 0.337 ' I/ 0.390 ' y/ Section No. Tl T2 T3 T4 Elevation ft 150-140 140-130 130-120 120-110 Size 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 L ft 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.47 L. ft 8.63 8.63 8.63 9.10 Kl/r 172.5 K=1.00 172.5 K=1.00 172.5 K=1.00 182.0 K=1.00 A . iin' 1.6200 1.6200 1.6200 1.6200 P. Ib -59.84 -154.12 -288.52 -453.46 $P« Ib 12299.20 12299.20 12299.20 11051.90 Ratio P, $P" 0.005 ' ^/0.013 ' |X 0.023 ' iX 0.041 ' RISATower Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.24 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Section No. IS . T6 T7 T8 T9 -,.,„. Elevation ft 110-100 100 - 80 80-60 60-40 40-0 controls Section No. Tl Elevation ft 150-140 Size 212x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2x3/16 2L2x2x3/16 KL/R > 250 (Q- 95 2L2x2x3/16 KL/R>250(C)-107 2L2 1/2x2 1/2x3/16 KL/R>250(C)-119 Size 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 L ft 10.48 11.92 13.93 15.94 19.95 L ft 9.00 I, ft 10.10 11.45 13.38 15.22 19.05 Lu ft 8.63 KUr 202.0 K=1.00 222.8 K=1.00 260.2 K=1.00 296.0 K=1.00 293.9 K=1.00 Kl/r 172.5 K=1.00 A of 1.6200 1.4300 1.4300 1.4300 1.8000 "OrtYnr A in2 1.6200 P. Ib -607.97 -821.70 -1220.56 -1627.35 -2407.64 a"ccir\r P, Ib -454.52 <(,/>„ Ib 8967.05 6510.87 4773.09 . 3687.45 4707.92 ¥>, Ib 12299.20 Ratio P, <i>P, 0.068 ' $/ 0.126 ' ^0.256 ' yf 0.441 ' ¥lf 0.511 ' ^/* asas-asas Ratio P, *P, 0.037 ' */ 1 P „ / is/Pn controls vSfX&fSM,t^rt^itiv^':™*-,^ Section .No. Tl T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 Elevation ft 150-140 140 - 130 130 - 120 120-110 110-100 100-80 Size P4.5ODx.188 P4.50Dx.188 P4.5ODx.J88 P4x.237 P4x.237 P5x.258 ^^sl^^f^^^a^^ttn^irt^^fe^^S^^SJ^^P^^^i£9«M§5! I ft 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.02 10.02 20.03 Lu ft 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.27 5.25 10.85 Kl/r 39.3 39.3 39.3 41.9 41.7 69.3 A in2 2.5468 2.5468 2.5468 3.1741 3.1741 4.2999 P, Ib 1406.34 4881.09 11674.80 19015.10 26250.70 34545.00 i>Pa Ib 80222.70 80222.70 80222.70 99982.50 99982.50 135446.00 Ratio Pa <s>Pa 0.018 ' 0.061 ' 0.146 ' 0.190 ' 0.263 ' 0.255 ' ^sf&SspsSiiawf RISATower Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.25 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Section No. T7 T8 T9 Elevation ft 80-60 60-40 40-0 Size P6x.432 P8x.322 PlOx.365 L ft 20.03 20.03 40.07 L. ft 10.73 10.64 10.57 KVr 58.7 43.5 34.5 A irf 8.4049 8.3993 11.9083 P. Ib 54050.80 72328.60 106709.00 «*/". Ib 264756.00 264577.00 375111.00 Ratio P. *P. 0.204' */ 0.273 ' 0.284' 1 P . 1 $Pa controls ?ST=KS£-Vv;*S^- Tjhiag&iM •it-ltaS23t*»**ri?Sf<3r*ss--si;iiin DatiIftffip Section No. Tl T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 Elevation ft 150-140 140 - 130 130 - 120 120-110 110-100 100-80 80-60 60 - 40 40-0 Size Pl.90Dx.145 Pl.9ODx.145 Pl.9ODx.145 Pl.9ODx.145 Pl.90Dx.145 P3X.216 P3X.216 P3X.216 P3x.216 L .ft 13.45 13.45 13.45 13.80 14.50 23.33 24.42 25.62 28.29 L, ft 6.45 6.45 6.45 6.99 7.34 12.19 12.60 13.04 14.22 KVr 124.3 124.3 124.3 134.7 141.4 125.7 130.0 134.4 146.6 A in2 0.7995 6.7995 0.7995 0.7995 0.7995 2.2285 2.2285 2.2285 2.2285 P. Ib 1474.34 2534.34 3043.06 3015.71 3224.31 7272.86 7085.24 8210.09 8009.56 §Pn Ib 25182.90 25182.90 25182.90 25182.90 25182.90 70196.80 70196.80 70196.80 70196.80 Ratio P* <S>Pn 0.059 ' 0.101 ' 0.121 ' 0.120' 0.128 ' 0.104 ' 0.101 ' 0.117 ' 0.114' 1 P u 1 $P, controls 4^^^-ri'';:--;?*^5^*&^£~.-;?o'r~^^^alpsensiliplHfptfiSiSmsimmm^^5~*%&:J±.Z^2^\&y'-f££SZ5'iA Section No. T3 T6 Elevation ft ' 130 - 120 100-80 Size 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2x3/16 L ft 9.00 11.00 L. ft 8.63 10.63 KVr 172.5 206.6 A in1 1.0041 0.8616 P, Ib 751.97 3723.48 */>. Ib 43676.70 37478.00 Ratio P, $P* 0.017 ' 0.099 ' RISATower Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.26 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Section No. T7 1 P, 1 >/>„ Elevation ft 80-60 controls Section No. Tl T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 Elevation ft 150-140 140-130 130 - 120 120-110 110-100 100-80 80-60 60-40 Size 2L2x2x3/16 L ft 13.00 L. ft 12.54 ^;"i»i-^E^''-"-'^^r:"i^i'C^"'^3'":*=^^5"^^^"'*;^:-'"ir'i":;^i"J>''ari Size 212X2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2x3/16 2L2x2x3/16 2L2x2x3/16 40-0 2L2 1/2x2 1/2x3/16 controls Section No. Tl Elevation ft 150-140 Size 212x2 1/2x3/16 L ft 9.00 9:00 9.00 9.47 10.48 11.92 13.93 15.94 19.95 L ft 9.00 £» ft 8.63 8.63 8.63 9.10 10.10 11.45 13.38 15.22 19.05 ssicr L, ft 8.63 Kl/r A P, in2 Ib 243.8 0.8616 3098.01 Kl/r A P, in2 Ib 172.5 1.0041 59.84 172.5 1.0041 154.12 172.5 1.0041 288.52 182.0 1.0041 453.46 202.0 1.0041 607.97 222.8 0.8616 821.70 260.2 0.8616 1220.56 296.0 0.8616 1627.35 293.9 1.1391 2407.64 Kl/r A P, in2 Ib 172.5 1.6200 399.93 $Pr Ratio Pu Ib ^ 37478.00 ' 0.083 ' §Pn Ratio P, ft $Pa 43676.70 0.001 ' 43676.70 0.004 ' 43676.70 0.007 '• 43676.70 0.010 ' 43676.70 0.014 ' 37478.00 0.022 ' 37478.00 0.033 '*s 37478.00 0.043 ' 49549.20 0.049 ' ^i«iipsESgRsyfpqpii=lSf5;3!ii §P, Ratio P, Ib j,pa 52488.00 0.008 ' jftSiS^ controls RISATower Next Step Design Lake Forest CA Job Project Client Existing Tower Analysis Squires Dam Verizon Wireless Page 3.27 Date Sept-09 Designed by KCW Section Elevation Component No. ft Type Tl 150-140 Leg Diagonal Secondary Horizontal Top Girt T2 140 - 130 Leg Diagonal Secondary Horizontal T3 130 - 120 Leg Diagonal Horizontal Secondary Horizontal T4 120-110 Leg Diagonal Secondary Horizontal T5 110-100 Leg Diagonal Secondary Horizontal T6 . 100-80 Leg Diagonal Horizontal Secondary Horizontal T7 80 - 60 Leg Diagonal Horizontal Secondary Horizontal T8 60 - 40 Leg Diagonal Secondary Horizontal T9 40-0 Leg Diagonal Secondary Horizontal l^illoffi^F Size P4.5ODx.188 Pl.90Dx.145 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 P4.5ODx.188 Pl.9ODx.145 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 P4.5ODx.188 Pl.9ODx.145 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 P4X.237 Pl.9ODx.145 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 P4x.237 Pl.9ODx.145 2L2x2 1/2x3/16 P5x.258 P3x.216 2L2x2x3/16 2L2x2x3/16 P6x.432 P3X.216 2L2x2x3/16 2L2x2x3/16 P8x.322 P3x.216 2L2x2x3/16 PlOx.365 P3X.216 2L2 1/2x2 1/2x3/16 itiSilva Critical Element 3 8. 14 4 18 20 26 30 37 31 42 45 47 53 57 61 65 69 75 70 80 84 89 85 96 99 101 107 111 116 119 JlfBllill Ib -3454.70 -1419.09 -59.84 -454.52 -8898.29 -2660.52 -154.12 -16657.70 -3514.80 -420.74 -288.52 -26147.70 -3002.05 -453.46 -35057.50 -3506.68 -607.97 -42937.30 -9767.35 -2550.99 -821.70 -70380.90 -7442.78 -2118.22 -1220.56 -93838.10 -8588.82 -1627.35 -138802.00 -8752.12 -2407.64 Ib" 74119.50 11427.30 12299.20 12299.20 74119.50 1 1427.30 12299.20 74119.50 11427.30 12299.20 12299.20 91386.70 9948.69 11051.90 91464.80 9029.26 8967.05 105896.00 31272.40 7565.29 6510.87 221982.00 29575.00 5434.22 4773.09 240183.00 27836.90 3687.45 352898.00 23411.90 4707.92 Leg(T6) Diagonal (T6) Horizontal (T7) Secondary Horizontal (T9) Top Girt (Tl) Bolt Checks RATING = Capacity 4.7 . 12.4 0.5 3.7 - 12.0 23.3 1.3 22.5 30.8 3.4 3.8 (b) 2.3 28.6 30.2 4.1 38.3 38.8 6.8 40.5 31.2 64.3 (b) 33.7 12.6 31.7 25.2 49.0 (b) 39.0 25.6 39.1 30.9 56.6 (b) 44.1 39.3 37.4 57.6 (b) 51.1 Summary 40.5 64.3 39.0 51.1 3.7 64.3 64.3 Pass Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Program Version 5.3.1.0 -10/3/2008 File:G:/Verizon/Squircs Dam/1-Calcs/Squires Dam.eri next: Project: Date: Page 02-748 Sep-09 Anchor Bolt Check Check Existing Anchor Bolts: Anchor qty / leg 6 Anchor diameter Anchor grade Allowable shear Alowable tension 1/2 in A572 Gr. 50 Leg Reactions: Shear Uplift Bolt Loads: Shear Uplift 19.6 38.0 18.5 116 3.08 19.3 kips / bolt "kips/bolt kips / leg kips / leg kips / bolt kips / bolt 7 v) f - Interaction Equation: 3.08 19.6 19.3 38.0 0.666 < 1.33 OK Existing (6) 1-1/4 in dia anchor rods OK nevttib DESIGN INC Project: Date: Page 02-748 Sep-09 Anchor Bolt Check Check Existing Anchor Bolts: Anchor qty / leg 6 Anchor diameter Anchor grade Allowable shear Alowable tension 1 1/2 in A572 Gr. 50 Leg Reactions: Shear Uplift Bolt Loads: Shear Uplift 19.6 38.0 3.08 19.3 kips/bolt kips / bolt 18.5 kips / leg (From Risa output page 3.18-3.19) 116 kips/leg (From Risa output page3.18-3.19) kips / bolt kips / bolt Interaction Equation: 3.08 19.6 19.3 38.0 0.666 < 1.33 OK Existing (6) 1-1/4 in dia anchor rods OK Job No. Date: Page: 02-748 Sep-09 Spread Footing Analysis Axial load Shear O.M. (top of ftg) Allowable soil pressure Load duration factor Footing length Footing width Column length Column width Footing thickness Concrete density fc . Footing weight Total axial load O.M. (base of ftg) USE fU2 = [R/b * (H- 6 * (e/b))]/L e 0.161 . ft b/6 5.000 ft x 30.000 ft 44.0 kips (Including the weight of soil over ftg) i. •18.1 18.1 1,500 kips kip-ft psf 1.33 30.0 30.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 150 3,000 60,000 32.5 405,000 449 72.4 ft ft in in in pcf p.s.i P.S.L in Ibs kips kip-ft DIR OF LAT LOAD f2 WIDTH AXIAL fl= 979 psf < 1995 f2= 918 psf < 1995 STABILITY RATIO 93.02 > 1.50 psf OK psf OK OK 1 J Reinforcement: Cantilever length of footing Critical section for shear Soil pressure at edge of column Soil pressure at critical section maximum ultimate moment Maximum ultimate shear one way shear capacity (rebar neglected) Punching shear Two way shear capacity [rebar neglected) Reinforcing required ;.- 13.5 10.8 952 957 150 17.8 36.3 763 1,658 1.37 ft ft psf psf kip-ft kips kips OK ^ Reinforcing Alternatives: Use #3 @ Use #4 @ Use #5 © Use #6 @ Use #7 © Use #8 © Use #9 © kips kips OK in2 /ft 1 Existing 30 ft x 30 ft x 0 in o.c. 1 in o.c. 2 in o.c. 3 in o.c. 5 in o.c. 6 in o.c. 8 in o.c. 36" thick = #DIV/0! = (355) #4 = (178) #5 = (119) #6 = (71) #7 = (60) #8 = (45) #9 A footing OK Project: 02-748 Date: Sep-09 DESIGN INC Page Summary These calculations verify that the existing lattice tower is capable of supporting the existing panel and dish antennas. The analysis was conducted in conformance with TIA/EIA-222-G National Standard for an 85 mph wind speed. FOR REFERENCi ONLY A ALP 9212-N Log-Periodic Reflector Antenna 92 Degrees 12 dBd Features: Q Broadbanded. (800-900 MHz) Q Low backlobe radiation. Front-to-back ratio better than 28 dB Q Low Intermodulation Products. Q Low Wind-load. Q Low weight. Q Small size. Q Rugged design. Please see the following pages including radiation patterns/tables for ALP 9212-N. Electrical Specifications:Mechanical Specifications: Frequency range: Impedance: Connector: VSWR: Polarization: Gain: Front to back ratio: Side-lobe supression: Intermodulation: (2x25W): Power Rating: H-Plane: -3dB E-Plane: -3dB L ghtning Protection: 2.0 . • VSWR 1.5- •:•". . -'-A :•;.••:•;.:•?•;.• t;I 806-896 MHz 50 ohm N-female or 7/8' EIA Typ. 1.3:1 max 1.5:1 Vertical 12 dBd >28dB >18dB IM3>146dB IM5>153dB IM7& IM9>163dB 500 W 95° 15" DC Grounded ty.::f. .::.;; ,Q' , 1. . 7^~^^3?^T^^^^ Overall Height: Width: Depth: Weight including brackets: Rated wind velocity: Wind Area (CxA/Front): Lateral thrust at rated wind Worst case: Materials: Radiating elements: Element housing: Back-plate: ; Mounting hardware • clamps: - bolts: 52 in (1320mm) 11. 4 in (290mm) 11. 4 in (290mm) 26.7 Ibs (12 Kg) 113mph (180Km/h) 3.9 sq.it (0.36 sa.m) 570 N Aluminum Grey PVC Aluminum Hot dip galvanized steel Stainless steel ' Manufactured by: Allgon System AB 800 820 840 860 880 900 ' --i » y"S *? - >~ «. V _~, SA^s 3 —W FOR ONLY DB842H80N-XY. DB842H90N-XY dB DIRECTOR™ LOG PERIODIC ANTENNAS DB844H80N-XY, DB844H90N-XY 9-13 dBd GAIN, 40 dB F/B RATIO, 806-960 MHz "Mdeal for cellular and trunking/ESMR applications, these high quality log periodics are now Available from Decibel in four new models with 80 or 90 degree horizontal apertures. They're compact, lightweight, and provide an unmatched front-to-back ratio of 40 dB. • Less Wind Loading - They measure only 24 or 48 inches (610 or 1219 mm) tall, 8.5 inches deep (216 mm), and 6 inches wide (152 mm). They weigh only 5 or 10 pounds. • Downtilt - Electrical downtilt is available on all 4-foot models, 6°, 8°, 11 °, 13°, or for mechanical downtilt, order DB5083 bracket • Null-Fill - Four-foot models provide null-fill and upper lobe suppression. • Most Stringent IM Test - Each antenna is tested for the absence of IM with 16 carriers at 500 watts of composite power. • Sturdy Construction - Made in the U.S. of high-strength aluminum alloy backs, brass elements and UV resistant ABS plastic radomes. No rivets are used! • Lightning Resistant - All metal parts are grounded. • Terminations and Mounts - All models are available with N-Female or 7/16 DIN connectors, utuau pipe mount is included, prdering information - See table for models to fit your requirements.UPS Shippable Models Available Model- Gain - dBd/d8i F/B Ratio - dB Horizontal beamwidth** Vertical beamwidtti** Height -in. (mm) Weight -IDs. (kg) Shipping weight -Ibs. (kg) DB842H80N-XY 10/12.1 40 80° 30° 24(610) 5(2.3) 8(3.6) OB844H80N-XY 13/15.1 40 80° 15° 48(1219) 10(4.6) 15 (6.8) DB842H90N-XY 9/11.1 40 90° 30° 24 (610) 5(2.3) 8(3.6) OB844H90N-XY 12/14.1 40 90° 15" 48(1219) 10 (4.6) 15(6.8) For 7/16 DIN connectors substitute "E" for "N" in the model numbers. Example: DB842H80E-XY. ' 3 dB from maximum. Side offset mounting bracket is included. For electrical downtitt of 6°, 8°, 11° or 13° add T6, T8, T11 or T13 before the "N" or "E" in any 4-foot model number. Example: OB844H80T6N-XY. Note: Electrical downtilt causes a gain loss of .05 dB, or, at the horizon, a reduction of 3,6,9 or 12 dB on downtilts of 6", 8°,11 ° or 13° respectively. For mechanical downtilt order DB5083 bracket Mechanical Data Badome Backplate Radiators Mounting hardware I Width - in. (mm) Depth - in. (mm) 6(152) 8.5 (216) See table above Maximum wind speed - mph (km/h) 125 (200) Wind area -ft'(m') 24" (610 mm) antenna 1 (.093) 48" (1219 mm] antenna 2 (.186) Wind load (at 100 mph/161 km/h) - Ibf (N) kp 24" (610 mm) antenna 40 (178) 18 48" (1219 mm) antenna 80 (356) 36 Gray ABS Passivated aluminum Brass Galvanized steel See table above Electrical Data Frequency Range - MHz Gain - dBd Front-to-back ratio - dB Beamwidths VSWR 806-960 See table above >40 i See table above : <1.5:1 Null-fill and secondary lobe suppression On 48" (1219 mm) models only Maximum power input - watts Nominal impedance - ohms 500 50 Lightning protection Termination All metal parts grounded N-Female or 7/16 DIN Typical DB842H80-XY Vertical Pattern MOOEU DBWZHOVXY Gain: 10 dBd OdBd 4-Foot and 2-Foot OB DIRECTORS Typical DB842H90N-XY, DB844H90N-XY Horizontal Pattern Typical DB844H90N-XY Vertical Pattern MOOB.: DB&44H90N-XY OdBd Reference ALLEN TELECOM GROUP • DECIBEL PRODUCTS DIVISION « PHONE 1-800-676-5342 • (214) 631-0310 • FAX 1-BOO-229-4706 • (214) 631-4706 99 _e OptiRange™ Suppressor™ ****£*' RR65-18-XXDPL2' f*S& RF CONNECTORS 56 inch SPECIFICATIONS Electrical Azimuth Beamwidth (-3 dB) Elevation Beamwidth (-3 dB) Elevation Sidelobes (Upper) Gain Polarization Port-to-Port Isolation Front-to-Back Ratio Electrical Downtilt Options VSWR Connectors Power Handling Passive Intermodulation Lightning Protection ! 65° 6° >18dB 17.5dBi(15.4dBd) Slant, ±45 >30dB >25dB{>30dBTyp.) 0°,2°,4°,6° 1.35:1 Max 2; 7-16 DIN (female) 250 Watts CW <-147dBc (2x20W(+43dBm)] \ Chassis Ground Mechanical Dimensions (L x W x D) Rated Wind Velocity Equivalent Rat Plate Area Front Wind Load @ 100 mph (161 kph) Side Wind Load @ 100 mph (161 kph) Weight 56inxBinx2.75in (142 cm x 20.3 cm x 7.0 cm) 150 mph (241 km/hr) 3.1ft2 (.29 m1) 90 IDS (400 N) 31 IDS (139 N) 18 IDS (8.2 kg) Note: Patent Pending and US Patent number 5, 757, 246. Values and patterns are representative and variations may occur. Specifications may change without notice due to continuous product enhancements. Digitized pattern data is available from the factory or via the web site www.emswirsless.com and reflect all updates. ^'^^ Model Number MTG-POO-10 MTG-S02-10 MTG-DXX-20' MTG-CXX-10* MTG-C02-10 MTG-TXX-10* Description Comments Standard Mount (Sunolied with antenna) '• Mounts to Wall or 1 .5 inch to 5.0 inch Swivel Mount i Mounting kit providing azimuth adjustr O.D. Pole (3.8 cm to 12.7 cm) nent Mechanical Downtilt Kits 0° - 1 0° or 0° - 1 5° Mechanical Downtilt Cluster Mount Kits ' 3 antennas 1 20° apart or 2 antennas 1 80° apart U-Bolt Cluster Mount Kit j 3 antennas 120" apart. 4.5" O.D. pole. Steel Band Mount I Pole diameters 7.5" - 45' * Model number shown represents a series of products. See mounting options section for specific model number. Azimuth 120' Elevation 0° Downtilt 330* 210- Elevation 2° Downtilt Elevation 4° Downtilt wvwv.emswireless.com -H 770.582.0555 47 Fax +1 770.729.0036 DESIGN CRITERIA: ANTENNAS: MATERIALS & CODES: WIND: 70 moh (BWS) ,, „ .. n „„„ .,. „ ... „„ .,,. STRUCTURAL STEEL: ASTM A36 & A53GR.B ICE: None on Cpllulor Mounts B TOD of Tower ERECTION BOLTS: ASTM A325X & SAE GR.5 BAY DV10_ OV2S E F G H I J SOIL: Per Soils Report by Leighton S Assoc on August 18. 1987. Project No. 8870133- rowER ELEV. (PT.I 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 90 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 BAY DEAD LOAD IK IPS) 3.58 1.32 .420 .516 .587 .516 .410 .524 .425 .588 111 1.58 1.64 1.74 1.66 2.17 2.02 2.88 224 262 1.18 BAY WIND LOAD CKIPSI 298 1.49 .788 .854 .874 .835 .734 .825 .742 .839 1.22 1.66 1.66 1.68 157 1.74 1.56 1.73 1.53 1.70 .806 2) 5 - ASP 951's S Top ol Tower ANCHOR BOLTS: ASTM A572 or A588 GR.50 3) 4'» Std 8 110' C.L. Azi - 160° 6) &•» HP 0 70' C L Aji . 144« CONCRETE: ACI 318-89 7) 6'» HP 8 60' C.L. Azi - 73.6° INDUSTRY: EIA RS 222-E 8! 8'0 Grid 8 55' C.L.. Azi - 206° 9) 6'« HP S 40' C.L.. Azi . 144° (It A \ 1 PLAM CO5 Wind-1 — I 108' I — Wind-2 \P/>-DVG V/K B ttiFG S3 if M HG\t/ icX/ f/ \T NOTES: J\ /\ 1) Bay wind ,_\ / I lower meJG \/ ladd-r c / \ cellular \W \ 2) Worst co =3/ \l plied in ANT. DEAD LOAD (KIPS) .150 .250 .300 .300 .300 .230 .300 ANT. WIND LOAD IKPSI FOR' .222 1.53 .522 .472 .480 .470 .400 Antennas ONLY © © © © ® & dead bods include effects from mbers, access ladder, waveguide II ALP B013-N's. DB 833's. & ASP 95Ts. antenna mounts, -and all waveguide runs. se antenna wind shear has been ap- wo directions in order lo obtain U j maximum lower member stresses. 2r - o ' —I 31 '•" indicates internally braced level. 41 Maximum tower twist/sway 6 50 mph wind '••*' ELEVATION loading is 0.14* < 0.60° allowable lor on 8'9 antenna operating at 11 GHz. (OK) TOWER MODEL: 108-1830-150' O 1/1£ I Z -<p a> to Or STRESS ANALYSIS /^^"^X AIRTOUCH CELLULAR /^/^?55!^>\^ SITE: SQUIRES DAM CN^P O/J/1%' @»^9^ _ BY AM /^Wf; lUs&tt CK JG^4 / A 3575 25TH STREET S.E. QATE 25AUD95* t/ V<:AI FM no 07107 CjOWigio \. \ 'Si i (5031363-9267 TWX 510-599-0107 5 Q 38030 S^^ CALW£#£/g- ; I REVISIONS 1 The method used to analyze this tower structure is based upon a computerized direct element stiffness matrix technique (Ref. 1). This technique assumes elastic material properties and is based upon the following formulations: IP) - IK] tX) where IP) - applied nodal loads IK) > structural stiffness matrix (X) - nodal displacements This equation is solved for (X) by means of a modified Gauss-Jordan elimination technique. The nodal displacements are then utilized to calculate member end forces and moments. Microllect's implementation o! this technique allows for three-dimensional frames with nodal loads. Truss members may be input by specifying beam member end moment releases. Supports and/or support settlements may be input by specifying nodal displacements. The resulting computer output consists ol nodal displacements, member end forces ond moments, r AB QPFER and support reactions. rUr5 n Rel. 1: MATRIX METHODS OF STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS. 2nd Edition. Chu-Kia Wang. International' Textbook Co.. Scranton. Pennsylvania. 1970 LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR CRITICAL MEMBERS MEM. OVL EL FL GL HL IL JL DVD ED FD GO HD ID JD DVG EG FG GG HG IG JO SECTION TYPE LEGS: Pipe 4 1/2 OD x .186 Pipe 4 1/2 00 x .237 Pipe 5 9/16 OD x .258 Pipe 6 5/8 00 x .432 Pipe 8 5/8 OD x .322 Pipe 10 3/4 00 x .365 Pipe 10 3/4 00 x .365 DIAGONALS: Pipe 1.9 OD x .145 Pipe 1.9 OD x .145 Pipe 3 1/2 00 x .216 Pipe 3 1/2 00 x .216 Pipe 3 1/2 00 x .216 Pipe 3 1/2 OD x .216 Pipe 3 1/2 00 x .216 GIRTS: 2L's 2 V2 x 2 x 3/16--- 2L's 2 1/2 x 2 x 3/16--- 2L's 2 x 2 x 3/16 2L's 2 x 2 x 3/16 2L's 2 x 2 x 3/16 2L's 21/2x2 V2 x 3/16 T ZL's 21/2x2 1/2 x 3/16 T L (In) 60.0 57.1 130 129 128 127 126 74.0 83.0 140 144 152 158 167 49.5 56.4 65.9 78.0 178 100 112 r (In) 1.53 1.51 1.88 2.19 2.94 3.67 3.67 .623 .623 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.16 .600 .600 .617 .617 .617 .923 .923 KL/r 39.2 37.8 69.1 58.9 43.5 34.6 34.3 119 133 121 124 131 136 144 82.5 94.0 107 126 144 138 153 AREA 2.55 3.17 4.30 8.40 8.40 11.9 119 - .799 .799 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23 162 1.62 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.62 1.62 PC*"ALLOW. LOAD (Kips) 65.5 81.8 94.7 196 212 311 311 11.1 8.96 30.3 28.8 25.9 23.9 21.4 32.1 29.3 23.1 17.8 13.7 17.0 13.7 BOLTS "" OTY.-OIA. 1-5/88 1-5/88 ' 1-5/8* 1-5/88 1-5/89 1-5/88 1-5/88 1-5/88 1-5/88 1-5/8* 1-5/88 1-5/88 1-5/88 1-5/88 1 3/8 3/8 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 3/8 3/8 3/8 3/8 3/8 3/8 3/8 BEARINGALLOW. 15.3 16.3 21.7 217 21.7 21.7 21.7 16.3 16.3 16.3 16.3 16.3 16.3 16.3 «« Allowable loads have been increased by 1/3 per EIA/TIA 222 Revision E, Section 3.1.1.1. I ffiCl f7!mz -<p ? o\O Tl 00 STRESS ANALYSIS' AIRTOUCH CELLULAR SITE: SQUIRES DAM 3575 2STH STREET S£,SALEH.OR 97302(5031363-9267 TWX 510-599-0107 BY AM CK J(Jfc\ DATE 25Aug95 S.O. 3S030 SHEARALLOW. 17.2 17.2 24.5 24.5 24.5 24.5 24.5 24.5 24.5 24.5 24.5 24.5 24.5 24.5 MEMBER AXIAL LOAD IKips) 18.1 36.8 44.6 72.6 97.4 120 144 4.10 3.89 11.5 8.52 8.91 9.23 9.45 0.57 0.56 3.49 3.26 1.46 1.80 2,16 F.S. TO AISC ALLOW 3.62 2.22 2.12 2.70 2.18 2.59 2.16 2.71 2.30 1.89 2.55 2.44 2.35 2.26 28.6 29.1 4.67 5.00 9.38 9.06 6.34 3 m a 1 S O •NCE SLAB FOUNDATION DESIGN: - CAP SZE 1SOUARE) Microflecl assumes the foundation has been installed according to the original foundation design as per Microflecl drawing 0-66576 doted October 1987. - TOWER PACE MOTH -,-res 11 1 fi' » I ±1 15 2 jl ^- — TO" BARS HVERTHJ STBRUPS — " 1 *r — BOnon BARS I - SLAB MOTH (SQUARE! - DIMENSIONS: Slob width - 30.0 feel Slab thickness - 36.0 inches Cap height « 12.0 inches Cap size - 36.0 inches Tower face width • 21.0 feel Number of lower legs • 3 Depth of fill - 0.000 inches Depth from final grade - 0.000 feetto slab bollom TOWER BASE REACTIONS: Overturning moment • 2633 fl-kips Total tower shear • 31.6 kips Maximum leg shear - 16.3 kips Tower weight • 31.5 kips OUTPUT SUMMARY: Stability ratio - 2.23 OK Net soil bearing pressure - 1.12 ksl OK Volume of concrete • 100.7 cu. yds. Slob two-way shear: OK Slab beam shear: OK REINFORCEMENT REQUIREMENTS: IASTM A615 Gr. 60) Minimum reinforcement areas: Top bars: Area provided • 38.7 sq. inches > 11.79 sq. inches required (OK) •• Bollom bars-. Area provided • 34.8 sq. inches > 11.54 sq. inches required IOK) ONLY MATERIAL PARAMETERS: Allowable net soil bearing pressure - 3.00 ksf Soil factor of safely • 2.50 (q.ult/g.oll) Concrete compressive strength - 3000 psi Rebar yield strength • 60000 psi Density of concrete • 0.150 kef Density of soil - 0.100 kef Density of fill • 0.000 kef Allowable stress increase factor • 1.33 NOTES: 1. If 'depth of fill' or 'depth from final grade to slab bottom' are not known, they are conservatively assumed lo be zero. 2. This design methadolgy assumes a rigid slob (Ref. ACI 336.2 R-88). 3. The slab may be raised above the ground and Ihe caps eliminated unless noted otherwise (subject lo local minimum frost depth restrictions). •NCS SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS The lower located at Squires Dam (Microflecl Model 108-L830-150) has been analyzed using Ihe design criteria and antenna loading listed on sheet one of this analysis. The resulls of this analysis indicate thai Ihe tower, including all tower members, anchor bolls, and foundolion ore structurally adequate la support the proposed onlenno loading <jl the given bssign crilerio STRESS ANALYSIS AIRTOUCH CELLULAR SITE: SQUIRES DAM 3575 25TH STREET S.E. SALEM. OR 97302 15031363-9267 TWX 510-599-0107 BY AM CK DATE 25Aug95 S.O. 38030 BASE REACTIONS : TOWER OVERTURNING MOMENT - 2633 kip-fl TOTAL TOWER SHEAR • 31.6 kips TOWER WEIGHT . 31.5 kips MAX. SHEAR PER LEG • 18.3 kips TOWER BASE WIDTH • 21 feel TOWER HEIGHT • 150 (eel LEAST LEG FACTOR OF SAFETY NUMBER OF LEGS - 3 Uplift Download - Base moment x Leg F.S. Base width x 0.866 Base iriomenl x Leg F.S. Base width x 0.866 Tower Wl. Tower Wl. Shear • Leg Shear »Base moment x (Leg F.S.-D 2 x Tower HI. FACTORED OVERTURNING MOMENT • 2633 kip-ft FACTORED TOWER SHEAR • 31.6 kips MAXIMUM UPLIFT PER LEG - 134.3 kips MAXIMUM DOWNLOAD PER LEG - 155.3 kips MAXIMUM SHEAR PER LEG - 18.3 kips ANCHOR BOLTS ;Refj ENGINEERING JOURNAL/AISC. 2nd Qtr. 1983. p58 MATERIAL : ASTM A572 Gr.SO or ASTM A588 Gr 50 (Fy • 50 ksi min.) ALLOWABLE STRESS INCREASE FACTOR • 1.33 EXISTING: 6 - 1 1/2-e bolls/lea on o 16'9 boll circle 134.3 * 1.85 x 18.3fl • • 19.9 ksi6 x U1 ALLOWABLE ANCHOR BOLT TENSILE STRESS • 36.7 ksi >- 19.9 ksi—OK BASE PLATE Ret: 'Formulas for Stress ond Strain'. 5th Edition. ROARK & YOUNG AISC 9th Edition, minimum edge distance per table J3.5 MATERIAL: ASTM A36 (Fy • 36 ksi) ALLOWABLE STRESS INCREASE FACTOR - 1.33 DIAMETER OF BASE LEG - 10 3/i in CONCRETE BEARING PRESSURE - 2100 psi FOR DOWNLOAD CONDITION. MINIMUM THICKNESS (by Formula 21) 0.8< in. FOR UPLIFT CONDITION. MINIMUM THICKNESS (by Formula 10 0.9 in. EXISTING PLATE :w 3«-» x r IWCK. Fy. 36 ksi < 2' (OK) STRESS ANALYSIS AIRTOUCH CELLULAR SITE: SQUIRES DAM 3575 25TM STREET S.E.SALEM.OR 97302 1503)363-9267 TWX 510-599-0107 BY AM CK DATE 25Aug95 S.O. 38030 VICNTY MAP:N.T.a START FROM VERKQN WIRELESS QFHCE IN IRVINE- I. TURN LEFT ONTO SWO IMfiC tie. TAKERAMP MGHT MID roocw SIGHSR10HTfltCMTTURN LETT B I-S / SANTA A MID roocw SI TURN R10HT ONTO S MIF(03E DRTURN fltCMT ONTO CWNON ROTURN LETT ONTO SWXJWWOCE DRTURN raOHT ONTO SEQUOIA CREST TORN IBCHT ON APPLEWOOD Ltl ONTO THE OKI IWD TO THE SITE OR1VMQ DRECTKMS GRAVEL HANDICAPPerj KORIZOWW. CUBIC FOOT CAST-IN-PLACE CONC. CCNTRACT UM(T LINE CLOSURE CONC- MASONRY UHtT NOT IN CONTRACT &eao. REOURED HFH. ROOT HATCH RFC. ROOFING R.O.W. RIGHT-OF-WHY ELEWTMM ELECTRIC (ALJ ENO-OSURE ELECT. P)VIEU30*RD EQUIPMENT GROUND GfcH* OR C CAS VENT OTHERWISE UNLESS NOTED ABBREVIATIONS SQUIRES DAM ^?" EXSTWS ANTENNA g> GROUND BOO T—r CBOUNO BUS B«« * MECH. CflHD. COHN • C«*«LD j^] GROUND ACC. WELL LH ELECTRIC BOX ^J; LIGHT MLE O raUNMTTON A SE.POWT A REVISION (X) BRIO REF. SYMBOLS, UNETYPES AND HATCH PATTERNS pOFOmcF tc insruifo w XOXTOWCE MTH TNE ONRNTa Mnma BY THE LOX OMMNG MmnniK NOHIK N ID KRMT «*< MOT CWWJSUC TO THtS£ CCCQ . vurauvf. UMMSIMINE COTE. UUFORNK BULCOC CODES 2087, aUFt»W ELECIRCH. 03DE3 KTO, «UR»« UKHW04. CODES 1007 . B. LOCAL BUUjtffi CODES CODE COMPUANCE SW-79I-19 CITY OF GWLSBKO PLANNED C N 3T 08' 10' PROJECT DATA CWLSW! U' ZOHMBi ffi*l MCEPHW* (Ml MS-1033 USHE <ca: KEVU UOE ( COB-OUTE PARK, SilTE ISO PROJECT DRECTORY THS PROJECT CW3ST5 OF THE RELODTOM wC O7 N Of *HTEWK FOR THE VE PROJECT DESCHPTION U PUNS AM> DET1WS OltXSlOUS ft® CQNOTIMS GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES SHE RJN * ENLATCED SHE PLW EX^LY INTERNATIOf^T. VZW IMTCKONICCT: SQUIRES DAM TITLE SHEET DRAW B* R.D. CfCCKEDETf: J.R. WMWEOBV- T1 ' ------- PERR~UC N ••»'«• « 917-WmPERR~UC N ••»'«• « .SITE PLAN EMCMEER/CCWLLTWd; VBrlTOttwire/ess SQUIRES DAM I A1 .ELARGED SITE PLAN DBNETR/CWBULriWT; JNTERNA'DONAI, SQUIRES DAM ENLARGED SITE PUN loBrS A2 .WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION wiretess DLY j! If"""* SQUIRES DAM ELEVATIONS •»/ „..„. „.£5! A3 EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION wire/ess D^LY INTERNATIONAL SQUIRES DAM ELEVATIONS A4 Chris Sexton From: Hill, Steven C (US SSA) [steven.hill@baesystems.com] Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 3:04 PM To: Chris Sexton Subject: CUP 09-04 - Squires Dam Communication Site Dear Ms Sexton, Thank you for talking with me today about the CUP 09-04 - Squires Dam Communication Site. I have lived on Redwood Crest for 21 years and know the history of this tower from prior public hearings. This tower has been in it's current configuration for a number of years and I have seen no issues with it's use. It is well maintained and provides a vital link for all of north county's Communication needs. I would also be in favor of adding another carrier cell site (hopefully an AT&T) to this tower or a new tower to better serve my own communication needs. Do to topography issues from the current AT&T cell sites off Sycamore and Longhorn drives and Palomar airport rd / El Camino Real. My cell coverage is spotty and I must still rely on a landline telephone. So I would be grateful to have a site that would cover my home in Sea Vista as well as the Leisure Village folks from this location. Thank You Steven Hill BAE Systems, Inc (Office) (858) 592-5713