The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2017-02-15; Planning Commission; ; CT 14-11/PUD 16-02/CUP 14-10 – CARLSBAD BOAT CLUB & RESORT The City of Carlsbad Planning Division A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. Application complete date: June 24, 2016 P.C. AGENDA OF: February 15, 2017 Project Planner: Teri Delcamp/Greg Fisher Project Engineer: Kyrenne Chua SUBJECT: CT 14-11/PUD 16-02/CUP 14-10 – CARLSBAD BOAT CLUB & RESORT – Request for a Tentative Tract Map, Nonresidential Planned Unit Development Permit and Conditional Use Permit for the demolition of a restaurant and single family residence and to allow the construction of a twenty (20) unit timeshare condominium project with underground parking on approximately one acre of land located at 4509 Adams Street, on the south side of Adams Street between Highland Drive and Park Drive, within the Agua Hedionda Segment of the Local Coastal Program (LCP) and in Local Facilities Management Zone 1. The City Planner has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to state CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In-fill Development Projects. The Agua Hedionda LCP Segment is in an area of deferred certification where the City of Carlsbad does not have permit authority to issue Coastal Development permits and thus, the project will need to obtain a Coastal Development Permit issued by the California Coastal Commission. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 7200 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Tentative Tract Map CT 14-11, Non-Residential Planned Unit Development Permit PUD 16- 02 and Conditional Use Permit CUP 14-10, based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. BACKGROUND At the September 21, 2016, Planning Commission hearing, the applicant requested and was granted a continuance of the Carlsbad Boat Club project to a date uncertain. The stated intent of the request was to allow time for the applicant to conduct further outreach with the neighboring community and to prepare a traffic study. Because the project was not continued to a date certain, a new public hearing notice was provided in advance of this meeting. Since the previous hearing, the applicant has continued to meet with the neighboring community, including a community meeting at the Faraday Center on January 11, 2017. The applicant decided not to prepare a traffic study. The applicant stated that, even though a traffic study is not required for the project, they did consider having one prepared because they thought it might deflect some of the concerns of the neighbors about increased traffic. The applicant found the estimates to be cost prohibitive, and decided to instead focus efforts on outreach and the Planning Commission presentation to convey that the project will reduce traffic compared to the historical use of the site as a restaurant. 1 CT 14-11/PUD 16-02/CUP 14-10 – CARLSBAD BOAT CLUB & RESORT February 15, 2017 Page 2 The original staff report for the September 21, 2016, meeting is attached. Staff has continued to receive correspondence regarding the project, both before and after the community meeting. The recent correspondence that was not previously transmitted to the Planning Commission is attached to this staff report. A member of the public brought a typographical error in the previous staff report to staff’s attention. On page 8, the paragraph under item 2 erroneously characterizes the reduction from the previous project’s 25 timeshare units to 20 current units as a 25 percent reduction, whereas it is of course a 20 percent reduction. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 7200 2. Planning Commission Staff Report dated September 21, 2016 3. Correspondence from the Public Received after September 21, 2016 The City of Carlsbad Planning Division A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. Application complete date: June 24, 2016 P.C. AGENDA OF: September 21, 2016 Project Planner: Greg Fisher/Teri Delcamp Project Engineer: Kyrenne Chua SUBJECT: CT 14-11/PUD 16-02/CUP 14-10 – CARLSBAD BOAT CLUB & RESORT – Request for a Tentative Tract Map, Nonresidential Planned Unit Development Permit and Conditional Use Permit for the demolition of a restaurant and single family residence and to allow the construction of a twenty (20) unit timeshare condominium project with underground parking on approximately one acre of land located at 4509 Adams Street, on the south side of Adams Street between Highland Drive and Park Drive, within the Agua Hedionda Segment of the Local Coastal Program (LCP) and in Local Facilities Management Zone 1. The City Planner has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to state CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In-fill Development Projects. The Agua Hedionda LCP Segment is in an area of deferred certification where the City of Carlsbad does not have permit authority to issue Coastal Development permits and thus, the project will need to obtain a Coastal Development Permit issued by the California Coastal Commission. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 7200 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Tentative Tract Map (CT) 14-11, Non-Residential Planned Unit Development Permit (PUD) 16-02 and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 14-10, based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The project consists of demolishing the existing restaurant and single family residence at the "Boat Club" facility and constructing a new 20-unit timeshare condominium project along the north shore of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. A prior request for a 25-unit timeshare condominium project with remodels of the boat launch and recreation building was denied in 2008 (CT 06-16/CUP 06-16/SUP 07-05/V 07-04). That project initially included 26 timeshare units and significantly greater square footage than the current project. The Planning Commission had continued the prior project’s public hearing to allow the applicant to address concerns raised by the Commission and several neighbors relating to compatibility with the adjacent single family uses based on the massing, scale, and intensity of the project, suggesting that the number of units should be reduced to about 19 with some associated reduction in building square footage and coverage. The prior project was revised to provide minor design modifications and was reduced to 25 units, but the Planning Commission was still unable to make the necessary findings for approval. The Planning Commission recommended denial of the CUP, and denied the other entitlements. The City 4 CT 14-11/PUD 16-02/CUP 14-10 – CARLSBAD BOAT CLUB & RESORT September 21, 2016 Page 2 Council concurred and denied the CUP, along with the other entitlements on appeal. The purpose of this staff report is not to compare the current project with the prior project, although some comparisons are noted where appropriate, but to address the current project’s consistency with the development regulations for the site and the proposed use. Staff’s position is that the current proposed project meets the necessary findings, and is recommending approval. A public notice was mailed to property owners within 600 feet of the project site on September 6, 2016. Prior to and after the notice date, staff received several letters and emails in opposition to the project. The correspondence is an attachment to the staff report. The new timeshare building is three stories over an underground parking garage. Access is via a concrete driveway off Adams Street, which will circulate down on the westerly side of the property to the garage level. The garage level is at the eight foot elevation, or eight feet above mean sea level. The parking garage provides 30 parking spaces plus two boat storage spaces. Two visitor parking spaces are provided outside the parking garage, adjacent to the existing boat ramp. Above the garage is the first floor with an office, seven timeshare units and most of the required storage areas for the timeshare units. In the center of the first floor is a courtyard, roughly 30 feet by 45 feet, which is open to the sky above. The second floor provides seven timeshare units and the remaining required storage areas. The third floor contains six timeshare units and a balcony between two of the units that is roughly 25 feet by 35 feet. The project provides a balanced mix of studio, one, two and three bedroom units. The roof plan is primarily flat, with a compact mechanical equipment area in roof screens to obscure views and noise of the equipment. No roof deck amenities are provided or proposed. The building has sloped 4:12 barrel tile roof parapet elements which wrap around most of the building. The project does not propose any changes to the existing recreation building or the existing boat launch ramp, other than addressing stormwater quality treatment requirements. Trash enclosures will be located at the garage level. Two stairwells and an elevator provide vertical access from the parking garage to the third floor, and do not extend to the roof. An at-grade exterior stairway is located on the east side of the property from Adams Street to the bottom of the property. As part of the citywide trail plan, a pedestrian trail parallel to the lagoon is proposed above the high tide line, traversing the site across the lower portion of the property. The existing private boat club’s launch/ramp facility and boathouse building were originally approved by the City Council in 1955 (Ordinance 9043). The restaurant that is to be demolished has operated as part of the boat club sporadically under a variety of different restaurant names over the years, including Peanuts, The Restaurant, La Mason Du Lac, Chez Milene, and Jose’s Baja Grill. The Boat Club, which provides the boat launch facility for members, has been in continuous operation. As early as 1956, the subject site and four other surrounding properties were General Plan Land Use designated as Recreational Commercial (RC, later redefined as Travel Recreation/Commercial (TR) and recently redefined as Visitor Commercial (VC)), and were zoned as Residential Tourist (R-T). The other four sites (one to the east, and three on the north side of Adams Street) have since had their General Plan Land Use and Zoning designations changed to Residential (R-4 and R-1-15,000, respectively). The private boat club facility operated from the 1950s until the early 1990s without neighbors. Residential construction began to fill in around the site from about 1991 through the 2000s. The Carlsbad Boat Club site is the last remaining parcel with a VC Land Use designation and R-T Zoning in the immediate area. Table 1 below includes the General Plan designations, zoning and current land uses of the project site and surrounding properties. CT 14-11/PUD 16-02/CUP 14-10 – CARLSBAD BOAT CLUB & RESORT September 21, 2016 Page 3 TABLE 1 Location General Plan Designation Zoning Current Land Use Site Visitor Commercial (VC) Residential Tourist (R-T) Boat dock/launch and recreation building, single family home, former restaurant North Residential (R-4) Single Family Residential (R-1-15,000) Single family homes South Open Space (OS) OS Agua Hedionda Lagoon East R-4 R-1-15,000 Single family home West R-4 R-1-15,000 Single family home The CUP for a timeshare development requires City Council approval. Per Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC) Section 21.54.040(C)(3), because the CUP requires City Council action, the CT and PUD also require a recommendation from the Planning Commission to the City Council as the final decision-maker. III. ANALYSIS The proposed project is subject to the following regulations: A. Visitor Commercial (VC) General Plan Land Use designation; B. Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20 of the CMC); C. Residential Tourist Zone (R-T) (Chapter 21.20 of the CMC); D. Nonresidential Planned Development Ordinance (Chapter 21.47 of the CMC); E. Conditional Use Permit (Section 21.42.140(B)(155) of the CMC); F. Local Coastal Program Agua Hedionda Segment; G. Hillside Development Ordinance (Chapter 21.95 of the CMC); and H. Growth Management – Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) Zone 1. The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable regulations and policies. The project's compliance with each of the above regulations is discussed in detail in the sections below. A. General Plan – Visitor Commercial (VC) The project is consistent with the applicable policies and programs of the General Plan. The VC land use designates areas for commercial uses that serve the travel, retail, shopping, entertainment, and recreation needs of visitors, tourists, and residents. Particularly relevant to the timeshare project are the Land Use, Mobility, Noise, and Public Safety elements of the General Plan. Table 2 below indicates how the development of the site under a VC land use designation complies with the elements of the General Plan. CT 14-11/PUD 16-02/CUP 14-10 – CARLSBAD BOAT CLUB & RESORT September 21, 2016 Page 4 TABLE 2: GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE ELEMENT USE CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE, OR PROGRAM PROPOSED USES AND IMPROVEMENTS COMPLY Land Use 2-G.3 Promote infill development that makes efficient use of limited land supply, while ensuring compatibility and integration with existing uses. Ensure that infill properties develop with uses and development intensities supporting a cohesive development pattern. The proposed 20-unit timeshare is on the only remaining VC designated site in the immediate vicinity. The floor levels step back from the lagoon, with underground parking and portions of floor levels below grade. The height of the building will not exceed the height of the centerline of Adams Street. No variances to development standards are proposed. Yes Land Use 2-G.5 Protect the neighborhood atmosphere and identity of existing residential areas. The site is not residentially zoned, but is surrounded by residentially zoned properties on the east, west and north. The site has been an existing commercial/boat club use since the 1950s, and the proposed timeshare use is less intensive in terms of average daily traffic (ADT) than the historical use of the site. The size, scale and height of the proposed timeshare is designed to be below Adams Street so as not to negatively affect the neighborhood atmosphere of the surrounding residential area. Yes 2-G.10 Promote continued growth of visitor- oriented land uses, and provide enhanced opportunities for new hotels and visitor services in desirable locations. The proposed 20-unit timeshare development at the existing boat launching facility will serve visitor travel and recreational needs adjacent to Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Yes 2-P.23 Sites designated for “Visitor Commercial” uses should generally be located near major transportation corridors and proximate to key tourist/visitor draws such as lagoons and recreation venues. The project site is on the north shore of Agua Hedionda Lagoon, on the site of an existing private boat club with a boat ramp facility. The project is in close proximity to water activity rental facilities at Snug Harbor located on the lagoon west of the timeshare. Yes CT 14-11/PUD 16-02/CUP 14-10 – CARLSBAD BOAT CLUB & RESORT September 21, 2016 Page 5 TABLE 2: GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE CONTINUED ELEMENT USE CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE, OR PROGRAM PROPOSED USES AND IMPROVEMENTS COMPLY Land Use 2-P.24(d) and 2-P.41 Build and operate commercial uses in such a way as to complement but not conflict with adjoining residential areas. Ensure building mass does not adversely impact surrounding residences. Ensure that the review of future projects places a high priority on the compatibility of adjacent land uses along the interface of different residential density and non- residential intensity categories. The height of the proposed timeshare project does not exceed the centerline height of Adams Street and the structure is partially below grade and stepped down toward the lagoon so the mass will not adversely impact surrounding residences. Yes Mobility 3-P.5 Require developers to construct or pay their fair share toward improvements for all travel modes consistent with the Mobility Element, the Growth Management Plan, and specific impacts associated with their development. The project would be conditioned to provide street improvements to Adams Street. Adams Street is adequate for the traffic generated by the use. The proposed timeshare use is roughly half the traffic generation of the historical restaurant/boat club uses. Yes Noise 5-P.5 As part of development project approval, require that noise generated by a project does not exceed standards established in Table 5-3 of the General Plan. The project site is not impacted by noise, but as a VC designated site, it has the potential to generate noise. The site has been historically used as a private boat club facility and restaurant; traffic generation was higher with the historical uses than currently proposed. The conditions requiring compliance with the standards of Table 5-3 and annual monitoring of CUP compliance will ensure the project does not exceed Allowable Noise Exposure levels for adjacent residences and that noise impacts are adequately addressed. Yes Public Safety 6-P.15 In accordance with the California Subdivision Map Act, deny subdivision maps if a project site is not physically suitable for either the type or density of a proposed development because of geologic, seismic, or other hazards. The geotechnical report prepared for the project, as conditioned, indicates that the site is suitable for the type and density of development and will not result in geologic, seismic or other hazards. The proposed building is well outside the 100-year flood buffer. Yes CT 14-11/PUD 16-02/CUP 14-10 – CARLSBAD BOAT CLUB & RESORT September 21, 2016 Page 6 B. Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20 of the CMC) The project proposes an airspace subdivision of 20 timeshare units. Chapter 20.16, Subdivision Ordinance, of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC) addresses the requirements of a major subdivision (or tentative tract map for a subdivision creating more than four parcels). These requirements deal mostly with providing the drainage, sewerage, and circulation dedications and improvements needed to serve the subdivision. The proposed timeshare subdivision will provide all necessary facilities prior to, or concurrent with, construction. The preliminary hydrology report submitted by the applicant indicates that all runoff can be controlled on-site with no overall increase. The on-site sewer system would be connected to the existing system which traverses the site. The water system would involve provision of looped service from the existing lines in Adams Street. Street improvements consisting of curb, gutter and sidewalk will be made along the frontage on Adams Street. No variances are needed to approve the project. Based on the analysis in this staff report, the proposed subdivision of airspace for 20 timeshare units meets the required findings of the Subdivision Map Act and CMC Section 20.12.19. C. Zoning – Residential Tourist (R-T) (Chapter 21.20 of the CMC) The Residential Tourist (R-T) Zone (CMC Chapter 21.20) implements the Visitor Commercial (VC) General Plan Land Use designation. The R-T Zone only permits dwellings and large and small family day care homes by right. A variety of conditional uses, which are commercial and recreational in nature including timeshares, are allowed by approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The project complies with the development standards of the R-T Zone as shown in Table 3 below. TABLE 3: RESIDENTIAL TOURIST COMPLIANCE Standard Required/Allowed Proposed/Provided Comply Building Height Not to exceed 35 feet 35 feet Yes Setbacks – Buildings Front: 20 feet Street side: N/A Interior side: 5 foot minimum one side 10 foot minimum on other side Rear: 20 feet Front: 43’-6” Street side: N/A Interior side: 10’-6” to building, 6 feet to balconies on east side 25’-4” on west side Rear: 80 feet minimum Yes Setbacks – Driveways and Parking Front: 20 feet Street side: N/A Interior side: 5 feet Rear: 20 feet Front: 26 feet Street side: N/A Interior side: 5’-4” Rear: 57 feet minimum Yes Lot Area 7,500 square feet minimum 1.02 Ac (44,431 sq. ft.) existing Yes Lot Width 60 foot minimum 133 feet existing Yes Lot Coverage 75% maximum 43%* Yes Parking 1.2 parking spaces per unit required, or 24 30 spaces, plus 2 boat parking spaces in underground garage, and 2 visitor spaces in parking lot Yes *19,066 square feet (includes subterranean parking level, covered trash enclosure, existing recreation building, and three above grade deck areas. CT 14-11/PUD 16-02/CUP 14-10 – CARLSBAD BOAT CLUB & RESORT September 21, 2016 Page 7 D. Nonresidential Planned Development Ordinance (Chapter 21.47 of the CMC) The project is subject to the Nonresidential Planned Development (PUD) Ordinance (Chapter 21.47 of the CMC). The intent of Chapter 21.47 is in part to provide a method for approval of separate ownership of units within multiple-unit buildings. In this case, a Nonresidential PUD is required for the airspace subdivision of 20 timeshare units identified on the proposed subdivision map. The allowable uses and required development standards for a Nonresidential PUD are those of the underlying zone as well as the Subdivision Ordinance. As indicated in the previous two sections, the project meets all requirements of the R-T Zone and the Subdivision Ordinance. E. Conditional Use Permit (Section 21.42.140(B)(155) of the CMC); The purpose of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is to allow special consideration for certain uses to be located in zones because of their particular characteristics. Such uses may only be suitable in specific locations or if designed in a particular manner on a site, or may require specific conditions to ensure compatibility within the zone and with their surroundings. Timeshare developments are conditionally allowed uses within the Residential Tourist (R-T) Zone per Section 21.20.010 of the CMC. The project is subject to the findings in CMC Section 21.42.030 for timeshare projects as a conditional use per CMC Section 21.42.140(B)(155). In accordance with Section 21.42.140(B)(155)(d), because the timeshare project is located within a nonresidential zone, a condition requires it to be converted to a hotel use if the project cannot be successfully marketed as a timeshare project. Another conditions addresses Section 21.42.140(B)(155)(e), which requires timeshare project applications to include a management and maintenance plan that describes proposed methods to guarantee the future adequacy, stability and continuity of a satisfactory level of management and maintenance for the project. The proposed conditions of approval also note the requirement of Section 21.42.140(B)(155)(f) that the maximum time increment for recurrent exclusive use of occupancy of a timeshare unit is four months. Timeshare projects are considered by the Planning Commission, with a recommendation being forwarded to the City Council which is the final decision-making body. The proposed timeshare use is on a Visitor Commercial, Residential Tourist designated site surrounded by single family zoned properties developed with homes. The proposed design, scale, massing and intensity of the timeshare is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood based on the following findings: 1. That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community, and is in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the general plan, including, if applicable, the certified local coastal program, specific plan or master plan. The use is consistent with the General Plan vision for the Visitor Commercial (VC) Land Use designation of the site. As such, the use is considered desirable for the development of the community as it will provide tourist serving units and support the economic viability of the city through visitors patronizing local establishments. The visitor serving use and preservation of the private boat club and boat launching facility furthers the goals of the city’s Local Coastal Plan as discussed below. Lateral coastal access is required to be provided by projects along the Agua Hedionda Lagoon and is proposed by this project. A condition requires dedication of vertical public access (street to shore) if and where required by the Coastal Commission (stairs on the east or via the driveway on the west side of the project). The project site is not within the boundary of a Specific or Master Plan. CT 14-11/PUD 16-02/CUP 14-10 – CARLSBAD BOAT CLUB & RESORT September 21, 2016 Page 8 The General Plan Land Use and Community Design Element requires projects to be found compatible with adjacent land uses. The design of the proposed timeshare project is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood at the scale and intensity proposed. The previously denied project consisted of 26 timeshare units within a 40,500 square foot building on a 12,000 square foot above- grade building footprint. The timeshare project now proposes 20 timeshare units within a 26,288 square foot building on an 11,360 square foot above-grade building footprint. The surrounding area has been developed with single family homes. However, the zoning for this one acre project site is Residential Tourist (R-T), and could allow from 15 up to a maximum of 30 dwelling units per acre as a secondary use in the VC Land Use designation per Table 2-3, Density and Intensity Standards, of the General Plan Land Use Element. The project meets the required development standards for the zone without any variances, includes underground parking and has been designed to step down toward the lagoon so as to reduce its scale and massing. The timeshare use will generate 200 Average Daily Trips (ADT). The restaurant has been closed during the time that the applicant has been processing applications to try to obtain approval of a timeshare project, so 200 ADT is higher than the ADT generated from the site in recent years. However, the 200 ADT is roughly half the ADT that was generated by the historical use of the site as a restaurant and boat launching facility. The proposed conditions to be applied to the project help ensure compatibility of the use with the neighborhood, and annual monitoring of the CUP allows for any issues regarding compliance to be addressed. 2. That the requested use is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. The 20-unit timeshare project will not be detrimental to the existing boat club and boat launching facility, which is the only existing use on the same site and zone in which the timeshare use is proposed. In past years, four other parcels adjacent to the project site were also zoned for Residential Tourist uses. Over time as the surrounding area began to be developed, those other similarly zoned sites were developed with homes and their Land Use and Zoning designations were changed to residential. The project site is now the only remaining Residential Tourist (R-T) site in the immediate vicinity. The timeshare project is designed in such a way, and is conditioned, so as not to be detrimental to the surrounding residential neighborhood. The design and intensity of the project, given the level of intensity that could be developed on this site in the Residential Tourist (R-T) zone, is compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood. The architecture of the building is well- designed, and steps down toward the lagoon. The number of timeshare units is 20, which is a 25 percent reduction compared to the previously denied timeshare project on the site. The parking garage, and portions of the floors above, are below grade, which helps to further reduce the massing of the project. The height of the building will not exceed the centerline height of Adams Street, so the timeshare will not impose massing on the streetscape character of the neighborhood. Conditions of approval are proposed to address potential impacts that could otherwise occur related to noise and operations, which will further ensure the use is not detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood. 3. That the site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, parking, loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this code and required by the city planner, planning commission or city council, in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. CT 14-11/PUD 16-02/CUP 14-10 – CARLSBAD BOAT CLUB & RESORT September 21, 2016 Page 9 The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed 20-unit timeshare use as the project meets all required development standards. While the restaurant building has been vacant for several years, a number of restaurants previously occupied the site over the years along with the boat club facility. The primary use of the site has not been residential, and the site has accommodated the commercial and recreational uses. The timeshare building footprint is outside the required 100-foot wetland buffer, and provides the necessary stormwater treatment improvements to protect the lagoon. The boat club recreation building and launching ramp are within the wetland buffer, but they have existed at the site for decades and are a use that is protected under Local Coastal Plan policies and requirements. 4. That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use. Access to the site is by way of Adams Street. Adams Street is adequate in size to handle the proposed 200 ADT in traffic that will be generated by the proposed timeshare use. 5. That the time-share project is located in reasonable proximity to an existing resort or public recreational area and, therefore, can financially and geographically function as a successful time- share project and that the project will not be disruptive to existing or future uses in the surrounding neighborhood. The project is located adjacent to the Agua Hedionda Lagoon which provides recreational activities for water sports such as boating, sailing, fishing and kayaking. Water access from the site would allow the aquatic activities which will help ensure that the project can financially and geographically function as a successful timeshare use. The Residential Tourist (R-T) zoning implements the Visitor Commercial (VC) Land Use designation, which is a nonresidential designation of the General Plan, so it is a nonresidential zone. Timeshares in nonresidential zones are conditioned to be converted to a hotel use if they cannot be successfully marketed as a timeshare project. The project has been designed to accommodate conversion and a hotel would need to meet all of the same requirements and conditions of the CUP and Section 21.42.140(B)(155) of the CMC. The project has submitted the required management and maintenance plan. F. Agua Hedionda Segment of the Local Coastal Program The project site is within the Agua Hedionda Segment of the Local Coastal Program (LCP), an area of Deferred Certification, and will require Coastal Development Permit approval from the Coastal Commission. The LCP recognizes that there are a wide variety of land uses and that a balance must be maintained which provides for continuance and expansion of recreational opportunities. Policy 1.1 of the Agua Hedionda LCP Land Use Plan states that "Land uses in the Agua Hedionda Plan area shall be consistent with those indicated on the Land Use Plan." The project site is designated as Visitor Commercial (VC) on the Land Use Plan. Environment: The project does not propose any improvements near the water’s edge. There are existing improvements within the 100 foot wetland buffer (recreation building and boat ramp) which will remain. The project will provide required stormwater treatment facilities adjacent to the existing recreation building. CT 14-11/PUD 16-02/CUP 14-10 – CARLSBAD BOAT CLUB & RESORT September 21, 2016 Page 10 Recreation and visitor serving facilities: There are a variety of Coastal Act Policies which encourage, where appropriate and feasible, public facilities for recreational use and visitor commercial serving recreational facilities. The plan recognizes Sung Harbor and Whitey's Landing (subject property) as major boating facilities. As such, the plan states that Snug Harbor and Whitey's Landing shall be designated for continued recreational-commercial use and expansion of existing facilities at these locations shall be encouraged. The timeshare would provide some additional recreational access for visitors staying at the timeshare. The required public access across the property is bring provided, and a condition of approval requires vertical access from Adams Street to the shore in a location as required by the Coastal Commission. Shoreline access: The project will provide lateral access across the property. A pedestrian walkway and steps, or alternatively the vehicular driveway, could provide vertical access to the shoreline. A condition of approval requires dedication of a vertical access to the shore in a location as required by the Coastal Commission. Visual Resources and Historic Preservation: Adams Street is designated as a scenic roadway in the LCP. Policy 8.3 of the Agua Hedionda LCP states that no portion of a structure shall be permitted to exceed the elevation of the adjacent roadway (Adams Street). The centerline elevation of Adams Street is shown to be 53 feet Above Sea Level (ASL). The project has been designed at a height of 53 feet ASL and there are no proposed protrusions above that height. Therefore, the project complies with the LCP building height requirement. In addition, shoreline development shall "step down" in height to avoid casting shadows and to produce a perceived transition from open space (lagoon) areas to developed areas. The proposed building does step down in height toward the lagoon. The previously denied project stepped back from the lagoon approximately five feet from the first to the second levels, and five feet from the second to the third levels and the rooftop observation deck above. Thus, the stepbacks occurred within a 10 foot depth. The currently proposed project steps back from the lagoon approximately seven feet from the first to the second levels, and 14 feet from the second to the third levels and there is no rooftop observation deck above. These proposed stepbacks occur within a 21 foot depth which creates a more pronounced stepping effect that helps reduce the visual and physical mass of the building and creates more of a transition from the lagoon to developed areas than the prior project. No agricultural uses currently exist on the site, nor are there any sensitive resources located on the property. The proposed project is not located on an area of known geologic instability or flood hazard. To reduce the potential for soil erodibility and sedimentation, driveway and parking areas shall be limited in size and shall be restricted to an area adjacent to the local street. The project design provides a long driveway which circulates down to the bottom, or garage, level, similar to the existing driveway pattern on the site. The underground parking is covered and helps to prevent contaminants from leaving the site and entering the lagoon. Based on estimated grading quantities, the project will require a grading permit. Construction of the project will adhere to the City's Master Drainage and Storm Water Quality Management Plan and Grading Ordinance to avoid increased runoff and soil erosion. Best Management Practices (BMP) treatment facilities are proposed to capture and treat stormwater so that there is no increase in runoff from the site. The subject site is located in the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (CMC Chapter 21.203 of the Zoning Ordinance). The project is consistent with the provisions of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone in that the project will adhere to the City’s Master Drainage Plan, Grading Ordinance, Storm Water Ordinance, BMP Design Manual and Jurisdictional Runoff Management Program (JRMP) to avoid CT 14-11/PUD 16-02/CUP 14-10 – CARLSBAD BOAT CLUB & RESORT September 21, 2016 Page 11 increased urban run-off, pollutants and soil erosion. The subject property does not include steep slopes (equal to or greater than 25% gradient) or native vegetation. In addition, the site is not located in an area prone to landslides, or susceptible to accelerated erosion, floods or liquefaction. G. Hillside Development Ordinance Because the site contains slopes that are over 15 percent, and over 15 feet in height, the project is subject to the Hillside Development Ordinance. Since the site was previously graded, a Hillside Development Permit is not required, but the project must follow the Hillside Development and Design Guidelines. The project site does not have any slopes over 25 percent or prominent landform features. The proposed grading is approximately 6,000 cubic yards per acre (or 7,300 cubic yards per acre excluding the shoreline area of the site) and is within the "acceptable" limits of hillside grading. No slopes or contour grading is required or proposed for the project. The development of the site is primarily cutting into the upper portion of the existing site for the development of the parking garage and portions of building levels that are underground. The building is subject to the Hillside Development and Design Guidelines for the development of hillsides. Hillside architecture is encouraged to step away from the dominant slope face and have roof structures oriented in the same direction as the slope. As discussed above, the building provides adequate stepping of the structure and the roofed parapets follow the orientation of the slope. The depth of the 4:12 roofed parapets, in combination with the increased stepbacks, are adequate to soften the building edges. Overall, the project complies with the Hillside Development Ordinance and the Hillside Development Guidelines. H. Growth Management (Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code) and Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1 The project is subject to the provisions of the Growth Management Program, as contained in Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance. Table 4 below details the project's conformance with the requirements of the Growth Management Program. TABLE 4 – GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE STANDARD IMPACTS COMPLIANCE City Administration N/A N/A Library N/A N/A Waste Water Treatment 20 EDU Yes Parks N/A N/A Drainage Drainage Basin “B” Yes Circulation 200 ADT Yes Fire District No. 1 Yes Open Space N/A N/A Schools N/A N/A Sewer Collection System 20 EDU (Equivalent Dwelling Unit) Yes Water 5,000 gallons per day (gpd) (250 gpd/EDU x 20 EDUs) Yes CT 14-11/PUD 16-02/CUP 14-10 – CARLSBAD BOAT CLUB & RESORT September 21, 2016 Page 12 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW While no significant cultural resources have been or are anticipated to be encountered on the site, conditions of approval require archaeological, paleontological and Native American monitoring to ensure no impacts in the case of inadvertent discoveries. The City Planner has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to state CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In-fill Development Projects. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 7200 2. Location Map 3. Disclosure Statement 4. Correspondence from the Public 5. Reduced Exhibits 6. Full Size Exhibits “A” – “Q” dated September 21, 2016 7. Prior Project City Council Staff Report, Resolution and Minutes* *Denotes separately distributed documents; copy on file with the Planning Division. MARINA DRPA R K D R S U NNYHI LL D R ADAM SSTBEACHWO ODCTCO V E D RHIGH L ANDDR CT 14-11 / PUD 16-02 / CUP 14-10Carlsbad Boat Club and Resort SITE MAP JPALOMARAIRPORTRD L A COS T A AVCARLS B A D B L MEL RO S E DR RAN CHO SANTAFERDCO L LEG EBLE L CAMINOREAL AGUA HEDIONDALAGOON SITE City of Carlsbad DISCLOSURE STATEMENT P-1(A) Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (760} 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information .MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittaL Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, finn, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit" Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of aU individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation. include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person JAMES COURTNEY Corp/Part VIP PARTNERS Title CO-OWNER/GENERAL PARTNER Address 1861 S. VIEW DR. CARLSBAD. CA Title CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP Address 1250 MAGNOLIA. CARLSBAD, CA 92008 2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent) P-1(A) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e., partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation. include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person JAMES COURTNEY Corp/Part MICHAEL PFANKUCH Title CO-OWNER-GENERAL PARTNER Title ___ c_o_-O_W_N_E_R_-_G_E_N_E_RA_L_P_A_R_TN_ER_ Address 1861 S. VIEW DR. Address 1250 MAGNOLIA AVE. CARLSBAD, CA 92008 CARLSBAOf CA 92008 Page 1 of2 Revised 07110 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofrt organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non- profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non ProfitfTrust Non ProfitfTrust. _________ _ Title. ___________ _ Title. _____________ _ Address. _________ _ Address~---------------- 4. Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? DYes I/'INo If yes, please indicate person(s): __________ _ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I:J.-( .s--.)_l)f 'I JAMES COURTNEY CO-OWNER JAMES COURTNEY Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicanfs agent P-1{A) Page2 of2 Revised 07110 Greg Fisher From: Sent: To: Subject: Dear Mr Fisher, John Sodano <jc Tuesday, March 10, 2015 8:08PM Greg Fisher CT 14-11/CUP14-10 I write to express my opposition to the proposed Carlsbad Boat Club and Resort, currently under preliminary review. I have lived in Bristol Cove since 1983 and given that experience, the proposed timeshare condo project is wholly incompatible with the area. The traffic on Adams is already precarious and the additional traffic that such a development would produce will make it even more so. My family is a supporter of the AHLF, my wife serves on the board of that' organization. I am particularly sensitive to the health and maintenance of Agua Hedionda Lagoon. It is a rare asset that is one of Carlsbad's characteristic elements. The impact on lagoon usage by additional vacationers, particularly if they have minimal familiarity with tradition usage guidelines, will create additional stress on this unique body of water. Will vacationers get temporary boat permits? Will they have access to the water? What about additional transients in the neighborhood? Will the city permit vendors to provide services to the visitors? Will the CPO or the City of Carlsbad have to increase its on water presence to maintain order? The adjacent properties are single family residences. I doubt that those property owners will want a steady stream of hundreds of new people coming and going week in, week out. I'm all about free enterprise and property rights. But as a long time resident I expect to receive due consideration for what I believe is an intrusion in the neighborhood and and an incompatible project for the lagoon. I would recommend that the proposed project be rejected in favor of a project that is somewhat more benign and compatible with the area. Thank you. John C Sodano 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Teri, Jim strickland < Tuesday, August 16, 2016 10:03 AM Teri Delc<~mp Greg Fisher 20 Unit TIMESHARE Thanks very much for your time on our phone call. Thanks for letting me know that the project will go to the Planning Commission on September 21st. We neighbors will be looking forward to the meeting notice in the mail. I live at 92008 here on Bristol Cove on the lagoon. I am very strongly opposed to this project at 4509 Adams Street, CT14-ll/CUP 14-10. It was judged to be too intense and incompatible last time and I strongly believe that is still the case. My HOA Board had th.is project on our Agenda for our meeting last night and everyone in the meeting was against the project. We will be sending a letter to you opposing the project. This subject is on our Bristol Cove Property Owner's Association meeting agenda also. I respect that the property owners should be able to build on their property but this 20 Unit Timeshare is far too intense and incompatible with the area. I would not be opposed to a more reasonably sized project that was not a timeshare. I appreciate that you agreed to save and accumulate the mail and emails you receive regarding the project Thanks, Jim 1 T eri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Hi Teri, Jan Bandich <jb Friday, August 19, 2016 3:40 PM Teri Delcamp 20 Unit TIMESHARE I appreciate all your help in answering questions and I am sending you a copy of my statement to the Planning Commission at the August 17 Meeting to add to your letters and e-mails regarding the permit pending 20 Unit TIMESHARE at 4509 Adams St in Carlsbad along the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. 1 I've included the photo I shared of the dead sea turtle I found and reported on August 9, 2016 on the beach right next to the 4509 property, which I believe is due to increased amount of traffic on the Lagoon. 2 My name is Janis Bandich and I live at in Carlsbad, 92008 and I am hear to share my concerns about the pending permit for a 20-unit TIMESHARE at 4509 Adams St on the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. I have walked and paddleboarded on the Agua Hedionda Lagoon almost daily for the last 4 years and have watched the passive and active craft use of the Lagoon increase at Bayshore Public Access and the use of rental equipment more and more each year, with no supervision or concerns for safety. Adding the density of a 19,884 sq ft bldg, with 34 bedrooms with itinerant guest on one Lagoon site will exacerbate: the noise level on the lagoon pollution and threat to wildlife -State Water Quality Board has proposed that the Agua Hedionda Lagoon be put on the list of polluted water bodies for high level of toxicity safety issues on the beach and lagoon traffic safety on Adams-increased number of cars is threat to pedestrians and bicyclists parking issues adequate water and sewage The owner has the right to build something on his property, but it should be appropriate to the setting Changing the land use designation and zoning designation from Commercial to something appropriate to a residential neighborhood would be greatly appreciated. Jan May you always have: Love to share, Friends who care, and Health to spare. 3 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: Jim strickland <j t> Tuesday, August 23, 2016 11:00 AM To: Subject: Teri Delcamp; Greg Fisher; Planning; Van Lynch Fw: 20 Unit TIMESHARE Teri, Please add this to the record. Thanks, Jim -----Forwarded Message ----- From: Ann Tanner m> To: Jim strickland <> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 8:29 PM Subject: Re: 20 Unit TIMESHARE Jim, Thank you for reaching out to me. The development sounds like a disaster to the surrounding community. I believe in smart, balanced, thoughtful development and am surprised that a similar plan opposed years ago is back on the table. Developers should not be making the decisions in our community. The City Council must represent the best interests of their residents/taxpayers and request citizen input. I'm against this project. We can do better. In the next 4-6 years major decisions about our Carlsbad coast will be decided that will affect generations to come. We need to get this right. I believe we need fiscal responsibility and transparency in our development decisions that preserves the character of our community. Please contact me if you need further information. Thank You. Ann Tanner On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Jim strickland et> wrote: Dear Ann, 1 Bristol Cove Property Owners Association c/o CHAMPS/ A Division of AAM, LLC August 24, 2016 City of Carlsbad Planning Division 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 5731 Palmer Way -Suite B Carlsbad, CA 92010-7247 760/603-0501· FAX 760/603-0505 RE: OPPOSITION TO Carlsbad Boat Club & Resort Project, a 20-Unit Timeshare 4509 Adams Street Carlsbad CA 92008 CT 14-11 CUP 14-10 Dear Carlsbad Planning Staff, The Board of the Bristol Cove Property Owners Association unanimously resolved to oppose this project. The Board represents 268 living units which is approximately 800 people and 500 voters. Our community is located very close to the project and our homes are on the water at Agua Hedionda Lagoon as is the Boat Club property. Most of us love our community and chose to live here because of our beautiful lagoon and the recreational opportunities it provides. Last time around we opposed this project and supported Carlsbad Planning Staff and Commissioners who declared the project "too intense and incompatible for the surrounding neighborhood." We supported and applauded the City Council who also denied the project. Many people hoped this bad idea was done and gone for good but it is not, it is back. The old failed project was a massive bulky 25 units with 37 bedrooms and 40,500 square feet. This new project appears on the surface to be less massive since it is 20 units. This is misleading since the drawings don't disclose the total square feet but instead it indicates "habitable square footage." When the "habitable square footage" of each of the old and new projects is added up, they are essentially the same. It is essentially the same building with a different interior. It has 34 bedrooms and the number of studios went from 9 to only 1, so it will house essentially the same amount of people. This many additional people, cars and lagoon usage will be disruptive to the surrounding neighborhood. This project is not compliant with some of our Carlsbad zoning principles, for example: 21.47.010 Intent and purpose. The intent and purpose of the nonresidential planned development regulations are to: (2) Provide for nonresidential projects which are compatible with surrounding developments; 21.47.080 Development standards. All nonresidential planned developments ... but they shall be reasonable as to intended use and relation to the project and the surrounding area and shall meet the intent and purpose of this chapter as stated herein. (Ord . 9685 § 1, 1983) This incompatible project is not orderly growth and development of our community. We hope that you, our Carlsbad Planners, will faithfully protect the public interest and not just that of a single property owner. You are the guardians of our common future and are trusted to plan for the needs of present and future generations. We are not against development on this lot and we would probably support a smaller project that is not a Timeshare. We ask that you help our neighborhood preserve its special Carlsbad small town beach character and deny the application for this massive, incompatible project. Sincerely, Board of Directors Bristol Cove Property Owners Association CC: Bristol Cove Property Owners council@carlsbadca.gov planning@carlsbadca.gov Teri Delcamp From: Sent: Jim strickland < Thursday, August 25, 2016 9:40 AM To: Subject: Teri Delcamp; Greg Fisher; Van Lynch; Council Internet Email; Planning Fw: 20 Unit TIMESHARE FYI --Forwarded Message -- From: Geri Peterson <p t> To: Jim strickland <> Sent: Monday, August22, 2016 8:12AM Subject: Re: 20 Unit TIMESHARE Jim, Thank God we have you as our neighbor and lagoon watch. I had no idea this was going before the planning commission AGAIN. I still can't believe they considered it in the first place. Thanks for staying on it. Geri Peterson On Sunday, August 21, 2016 3:39 PM, Jim strickland < wrote: Dear Lagoon Friends and Neighbors, This 20 Unit Timeshare is a project proposal to be built on the lagoon at 4509 Adams Street. I attached the drawings for it It was soundly rejected about 5 years ago and now it is back. Although it is described as 20 units its basically the same proposal in size and square footage as last time. It is tentatively scheduled to go before the Planning Commission meeting on September 21st [hope you will attend. The BCPOA Board re-scheduled our meeting so we can attend. Our voices and opinions are important and 1 believe the City will consider what we say. All tbe emails and letters will be accumulated and presented to the Commission. If you want to give your input you can email the planning staff and City Council. Van.Lynch@carlsbadca.gov Teri.Delcamp@carlsbadca.gov Greg.Fischer@Carl sbadca. gov • plnnning@carlsbadca.gov 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: areysbergen Thursday, August 25, 2016 10:57 AM T eri Delcamp 20 Timeshares on Adams Street?!? to City Senior Planner Teri Delcamp .. as a local property owner/resident, I'm concerned why the Boat CLub property remains as a VC zoning designation --with residential homes surrounding it ?? the VC property needs to be rezoned to £it in with the ambiance of the local community. a single family home would co-exist naturally with the sunounding homes on Adams St as well as the larger community. PLEASE --do the right thing -request a zoning change -- the lagoon has been spared commercialization via an election by which the registered voters of Carlsbad spoke - -and said --NO --to the 85/15 plan. we, Carlsbad residents, are speaking again--just say NO to timeshares which are a commercialization of and on.. the lagoon . we want to SA VB the lagoon for future generations -not trample it with timeshares. thank you, alice and terry reysbergen 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: To whom it may concern, Upinder Singh < u Saturday, August 27, 2016 10:59 AM Teri Delcamp 20 TIMESHARE UNITS IN CARLSBAD LAGOON "NO" Living in Carlsbad can stays nice if we do not keep building more housing. We do not like another time share in Carlsbad. This is a letter of protest to the City Council not to approve this project to raise money. Keep it small and beautiful. Enough is Enough. Thanks Upinder Singh A-HARPMAN INC. Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Planning Monday, August 29, 2016 9:11 AM Teri Delcamp FW: 20 Timeshare Units From: att ray heller [mailto:ra Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 6:37 PM To: Planning Subject: 20 Timeshare Units To the Planning Commission, I am a homeowner and voter living on Calavo Ct. It has come to my attention that 20 units of time share are being planned on Adams. Being retired, I walk my dog 4 or 5 times a day In my neighborhood (that includes Adams). Adams is already a very dangerous road -the sidewalks stop right in the middle of a blind curve, making it very dangerous for pedestrians and vehicles alike. Since the infrastructure is not even currently safe, adding additional pedestrians and vehicles from building 20 additional units is askihg for disaster (accidents and deaths). Please note when voting on this issue that I am totally against it. Thank you. Sincerely, Ray Heller Carlsbad 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: GERRIE BOONE Monday, August 29, 2016 5:14 PM Van Lynch; Teri Delcamp; Greg.Fischer@Carlsbadca.gov; Planning; Councillnternet Email BOAT CLUB PROJECT-20 UNITS Boat Club project Square feet.pdf DEAR CARLSBAD PLANNERS, THE CARLSBAD BOAT CLUB & RESORT PROJECT IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH OUR NORTH SHORE LAGOON NEIGHBORHOOD. THANK YOU FOR DENYING THE PROJECT LAST TIME. THE APPLICANT HAS COME BACK WITH ALMOST THE SAME PROJECT. WHEN YOU COMPARE THE PLANS OF THE OLD DENIED PROJECT WITH THE NEW PROJECT YOU CANNOT SEE WHAT THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IS. I HAD TO ADD UP ALL THE UNITS' SQUARE FOOTAGE TO DISCOVER THAT THE NEW BUILDING IS VERY CLOSE IN SIZE TO THE DENIED ONE. DENIED 19,978 SQFT-NEW 19,902 SQFT = A MERE 76 SQUARE FEET OF HABITABLE SPACE DIFFERENCE. PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED PROJECT COMPARISON ~ PLEASE TELL ME YOU WON'T DENY A PROJECT BASED ON BULK AND SCALE AND INCOMPATIBILITY ONE TIME AND APPROVE THE SAME PROJECT 8 YEARS LATER. THANK YOU, GERRIE KAY BOONE Carlsbad Boat Club & Resort 20 unit Timeshare "Habitible Square Footage" Comparison Denied Project Proposed Project Unit Square Feet Unit Square Feet 1 1116 1 945 2 1116 2 945 3 833 3 833 4 735 4 1190 5 442 5 1161 6 465 6 918 7 533 7 944 8 918 8 922- 9 944 9 944 10 922 10 597 11 944-11 1190 12 597 12 1343 13 725 13 867 --14 457 14 795 15 695 15 618 16 618 16 618 1st floor 17 867-17 795 bottom 18 795 18 1202 19 637 19 842 20 637 20 1803 6673 19472 -52 21 795 1st floor office 430 7103-TOTAL 22 1202 bottom 23 842 24 1363 25 350 6621 19548 Proposed is "smaller" by office 430 7051-TOTAL -SqFeet Beds Un it bdrm type Bd rm Types Un it bdrm type Beds 9 3 3 3 9 12 6 2 10 20 7 7 1 4 4 9 9 Studio 1 1 - - Proposed is "smaller" by -Bdrms The INTENSITY of both projects is essentially the same. The proposed project plans do not disclose total square Footage just "Habitable". The denied project does not disclose "Habitable Sq Footage" just 40,500 Total Sqft The proposed project is just as out of place in "BULK AND SCALE" as before. Teri Delcamp Subject: FW: 26 unit time-share condominium project ----Original Message----- From: Julie Nygaard [mailto:N Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 10:28 AM To: Van Lynch <Van.Lynch@carlsbadca.gov>; ji Subject: 26 unit time-share condominium project Dear Van, It has come to my attention that the time-share condo on Adams street is once again on the agenda. I think mixing time-shares in a basically residential neighborhood is not a very good idea. The two venues are not compatible. I voted against this project when it came before for us before and I would vote against it again. We pride ourselves in creating neighborhoods that are pleasant, peaceful places to live. We need to protect them. Warm regards, Julie Nygaard Sent from my iPad CONFID ENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from the Tri-City Healthcare District and are intended only for the addressee. The information contained in this message is confidential and may constitute non-public information under international, federal, or state securities laws and is intended only for the use of the addressee. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distributing, or using such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail. 1 Teri Delcamp' Subject: FW: 20 Timeshares From: Steve [mailto:s ] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 5:36 PM To: Teri Delcamp <Teri.Delcamp@carlsbadca.gov> Subject: 20 Timeshares My name is Steve Bandich. I live at . in Bristol Cove in Carlsbad. I am the past Presidential and current Secretary ofthe Villas at the Cove HOA. I speak for all of our members and many of our neighbors in Bristol Cove. We are opposed to the approval of a 20 unit timeshare on Hedionda Lagoon for 3 primary reasons: Safety-Security-and Sustainability. First, the Lagoon is now very busy with many boats, jet-skiers, and passive water sports vehicles, such as kayaks, paddle boards and water bikes. While there are designate areas for each, may people choose to disregard these rules and utilize unauthorized areas. Carlsbad police and Parks & Rec. do not have the capacity or will to supervise the lagoon except on the 2 or 3 major holidays. The addition of several dozens more people will only exacerbate this dangerous situation. It is only a matter oftime before there is a serious accident. Secondly, the approval of a timeshare on our lagoon will add many-out ofthe area-people to the congestion and impact to our cove, which is almost adjacent to the proposed timeshare site. Temporary timeshare guest at our lagoon will not know or heed the no trespassing rules of our private cove. Currently many lagoon day users traverse our cove with boats and passive water vehicles and, at times avail themselves of the use of our private docks. Our Bristol Cove residents enjoy the narrow waters of our cove with their power boats, small watercraft and flotation devises, and this additional use buy nonresidents, at times, presents dangerous confrontations. I am told that the police cannot enforce the privacy of our cove because it it private property. Finally, the fragile ecosystem of our lagoon will be further threatened by the additional of human damage caused by people not necessarily concerned with its preservation. The lagoon and our cove are constantly littered with paper waste, bottles and cans, and all sorts of plastic products. The Hedionda Lagoon Association, and volunteer organization such as H20 Patrol are encountering more and more debris in the clean up efforts. More sightings of dead sea creatures, fish and birds are seen along our shores. Many day users trespass into the restricted area of the Fish and Game Preserve. This damage will only increase with the addition of out of the area visitors. Sincerely, Steven Bandich 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Linda A Shafer <l Saturday, September 03, 2016 8:48AM Van Lynch; Teri Delcamp; Greg.Fischer@Carlsbadca.gov; Planning; Council Internet Email 20 Unit Time Share on Aqua Hedionda Lagon to go before planning commission I have lived in Carlsbad within Bristol Cove on Aqua Hedionda Lagoon since 1980 and I love Carlsbad as much today as when I moved first moved here. Of course it has grown tremendously, but mostly well planned. I realize the City and Planning Commission has a tough job to forward think about the implications of each project that comes before them and weigh the rights of property owners against the impact to the community: integrity, safety and quality of life. In the instance of the 20 unit time share being proposed on Aqua Hedionda Lagoon, I am hoping the foreseeable negative impact to our community will guide your decision. This is a relatively small area that is being pushed today to absorb a huge growth in recreational use. I see thousands of Groupons sold for paddle boarding on the lagoon and any given weekend over summer we see the eastern shore (passive access beach area) completely covered with people settled in to enjoy the day. This is a lot to handle today. On any sunny day, there is little to no parking on any of the residential streets near the lagoon because of visitor traffic. Walking, jogging, rolling strollers and bike riding on Adams (near the site of the proposed time share) is extremely dangerous due to blind intersections, lack of sidewalks and distracted drivers looking down at the action on the lagoon. I believe it is easy to foresee the danger involved if the City and Planning Commission were to move forward to approve adding a 20 unit time share to the mix, with every week a new set of folks that are unfamiliar with the neighborhood rushing in and out for their week of fun. Again, I urge you to turn down the proposal for a 20 Unit time share on Adams at this time. Respectfully, Linda Shafer d, CA 92008 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Hi, Donna Kilpatrick Tuesday, September 06, 2016 10:02 AM Teri Delcamp 20 timeshares I recendly bought a home in Bristol Cove and do not wish to have 20 timeshares close by. Thank you, Donna Kilpatrick Carlsbad, CA 92008 1 SEP 8 2016 September 5, 2016 Planning Division Dear Carlsbad Planners Mr. Fisher and Ms. Delcamp and Mr. Neu, I am very disappointed to see that the Carlsbad Boat Club and Resort project is haunting us a gam. I have been a homeowner on the lagoon since 1979 and have enjoyed the lagoon the neighborhood's charm. This project will certainly erode the charm and ambiance of the area. It is much too large and will adversely affect the recreation on the lagoon. The other for profit recreational business on the lagoon has already overburdened this small lagoon with its thousands of tourists. The City Planners got it right last time when they denied the project. The City Council also got it right. Now the property owners have returned with the same oversized building as the last time. A huge timeshare business didn't belong here in 2008 and it doesn't belong here in 2016 or in the future. I would support a smaller scale project but not this giant timeshare business. Please protect our neighborhood from this bad idea. Thank you for your service to Carlsbad. Regards, Clint Cowie CA 92008 CC: Carlsbad City Council Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: FYI From: Council Internet Email Don Neu Wednesday, September 07, 2016 4:05 PM Teri Delcamp FW; Carlsbad Boat Club & Resort Project a 20 Unit Timeshare at 4509 Adams Street Carlsbad CA 92008 CT 14-11 CUP 14-10 Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 12:58 PM Subject: FW: Carlsbad Boat Club & Resort Project a 20 Unit Timeshare at 4509 Adams Street Carlsbad CA 92008 CT 14-11 CUP 14-10 From: Bob Ross [mailto: Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 12:34 PM To: Council Internet Email <CityCouncil@carlsbadca.gov> Subject: Carlsbad Boat Club & Resort Project a 20 Unit Timeshare at 4509 Adams Street Carlsbad CA 92008 CT 14-11 CUP 14-10 Dear Carlsbad Planning Staff, I live and own my home at Carlsbad. I am very much against the subject project. Parking on Adams, Cove Dr. and Park Dr. are already a problem and we certainly don't need any overflow from Adams. Also the project seems much too massive for the lagoon and if the project has a boat ramp to use the lagoon it will become too crowded and unmanageable. This project has already been turned down once, please don't approve it this time around. Thank you, Myra Finch Robert Ross 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Gail Huntington < Thursday, September 08, 2016 6:49 PM Teri Delcamp No to timeshares Please do not allow the 20 unit timeshare to be built at the lagoon. Thank you Jerry and Gail Huntington Sent from my iPhone 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Dear Carlsbad Planning Staff, Kathy Perry < Friday, September 09, 2016 4:00 PM Teri Delcamp 20 Unit timeshare project CT 14-11 CUP 14-10 I am writing to strongly oppose this proposed project. It is incompatible with the existing neighborhood and would negatively impact the lagoon. Adams Street itself is already busy and lacks parking so adding twenty units on one lot on this street seems to defy reason. This is not orderly growth, merely greed on the part of the owner to maximize profits at the expe nse of the entire neighborhood. We hope you will deny this project until it is considerably reduced in size and scope. Sincerely, Katharine Perry Carlsbad, CA 92008 Sent from my iPad 1 4509 ADAMS STREET CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA VICINITY MA AGUA .rEDIONDA LAGOC1'I f'l"lFF8eJ) -t-w FIOOF<l6EP FeR HI w -PPCVA -eEE CMI. 0< Ill I t-d) d) f'l"lFF8eJ) I:: COle.~ <.( I 0 <.( PRO EC D LEGAl. JURI5DICTION, CITY Of' CAAL56AD 6UILDINCi CODE, 1635 FARADAT AVENUE, SUITE 11210 CAI<L56AD, CA. 9212108 2013 CALifOR.IIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE IPART I, TITLE 24, CCRi 3013 CALifOR.IIA 6UILDING! CODE IPART 2, VOLUMES 112! 2013 CALifOR.IIA ELECTRIC CODE IPART 3, TITLE 24, CCRJ 2013 CALifOR.IIA ME~ICAL CODE IPART 4, TITLE 24, CCRI 2013 CALifOR.IIA FLUM61Nei CODE IPART S, TITLE 24, CCRi 2013 CALifOR.IIA ENER:IY CODE IPART &, TITLE 24, CCR) 2013 CALifOR.IIA FIRE CODE IPART ~. TITLE 24, CCRi 2013 CALIFOilNIA REFERENCED STANDAF<DS CODE IPART 12, TITLE 24, CCRi CONSTRUCTION TYPE, TYPE 11-IIR OCCUPANCY• fie ZONE, RT GENERAL PLAN, SITE AfeEA, vc 1.02 /JC. I 44,431 S.FJ SITE COVERAGE, AaOVE GRADE FOOTPRINT 1,13&0 SF + ~ 165 SF + REC. CENTER 105& SF • 12,5al SF • 28.37/o II-IDEVELOPA6LE• 4,11210 S.F I APPROX.i AREA 6ELOH .r1~ TIDE SPECIAL NOTE, ALL 11-!ITS INA TIME-~ PROJECT ~ 6E TIME ~ 11-!ITS EXCEPT A ~ANENT ON-SITE MANAGEMENT RESIDENCE II-IlT MAY 6E ~ITTED. T.rE MAXIMUM TIME INCREMENT FOR RECURRINCi EXCLUSIVE USE Of' OCCUPANCY Of' A TIME-~ II-IlT ~ llE FOUFi! MONT.r&. A PEfiiMANENT C1'1-SITE MANAGER RESIDENCE loiiLL FE PROVIDED. 12&'4' ~ TO SECGW F\.OOR c6oE~----f'l"lFF8eJ) 101%1' PIOAN I l.t£ TO PATI.IGIIT ----~ " • FROFOSED 20 UNIT TIMESI-1ARE CONDOMINIUM 3 STORIES W/ UNDERGROUND PARKING SITE PLAN 6UILDING! AREA• IIA61TA6LE• FIRST fLOOfi!, SECOND flc:x;)R, T.rlfiiiD FLOOfi!, TOTAL IIA61TA6LE• UNDE~ PARKING!, lot 12nd FLOOFi! STORAGE, COVERED~' EXIST'G. REC. CENTER• EXIST'G. COVERED PATIO, 1)1!'3 &.F. &,189 S.F. S,~ S.F. I~&.F. n.E>-48 S.F. &,4lJ4 S.F. I&SS.F. &1& S.F. 4&5 &.F. CT 14-11 CUP 14-10 SH TIN X AS-I TITLE MET I SITE FLAN AS-2 6UILDING! SECTIONS I flOAT LALNC~INCi FLAN A-0 UNO~ PARKING A-I FIRST FLOOFi! PLAN A-2 SECOND FLOOFi! PLAN A-3 T~lfiiiD FLOOFi! PLAN A-4 F10CF PLAN A-S EXTERIOR ELEVATION& A-& 6UILDING! 1-W.L FLANE STUDY C-1 TENTATIVE MAP IFIOOPOSEDJ C-1 TENTATIVE MAP !EXISTING! TOPOl II-IlT I3REAKDOl+l, STUDIO 3 SH'1P STQI;M HATER MANAGEMENT FLAN ONE BEDROCM 4 T1o10 BEDROCM 10 LC-1 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT FLAN T~E llEDROOM 3 LC-2 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT FLAN PARKINCi REQJIRED• 24120 11-!ITS • 1.2 SPACES/II-IlT! PARKING! PROVIDED• 32 LC-3 loiATER CON&ERVATIC1'1 FLAN ION AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC I ADT! 21210 LEGAL DESCRIPTION, loiESTEi<L Y In Of' LOT 1 6LOCK D Of' TR/JCT 2152 NOTE: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL i'&JM6Efe, 20&-21210-0& SITE ADDRESS, ~ ADAMS STREET CAi<LSSAD, CALIFOilNIA 9212108 ALL WORK SI-10WN IS FROFOSED UNLESS OTI-1ERWISE NOTED. EXI&Ttl!o !!OAT M"IP F f'l"lFF8eD f'IWATE BMP FACI.ITT • TTF. . i!.IND .· · ..... ,. :··-... , . . · .. . . ' . . . .. •·,' ·-. :_ ' . .. . . .. ..... _ ... ... ,·: ; .-. . . . . . . /10-<J-0-/r':~ ~'R!JAINIIiiG._IoW.I. ' ... ,._ .. . ·. . · ... , ..... ·· .. .· .. .· ... ~-. . .. . . : . . . · .. - EXISTINCi PATIO .. '•' ·-: . . ·. · .. ·,· ... .-.· "~ ... ' ..... • ..... • •. ·> '·· ••• ....... : . -. ·:·.·· ·. . . .·. · ..... : .. ' .... :· · ... · . • • '· .• ! ·. .. _ .... · .. :· ·: .. .. · .. ·: ···~···.·. ..... . :-.. . ·-···. · .... · ·. · ... ·. ··.-,. •. ·.· ._.... .· .. ... .. ·· .... - &Aib·· ' 1A&-allll&' DA'ti:D oc:t.l!6& ':. -. ··. AGUA 1-1EDIONDA LAGOON f'l"lFF8eD PRIVATE et1P FACI.ITT -TTF. ~~ /4-+-M-----FIOOF<l6EP 2.5' HIPE 6&ER EA&lHNT eolll EXIEITtl!o 24' ..a' SEIER PIFE PER PRAWtl!o 13.3-9 :.. ~ &IPE& OF EXIEITtl!o EA&lHNT GRANTED TO THE CITT OF c:AAl.&BAP 1->--t-<>t-t----EXI6TNG 10' HIPE 6&ER EASa1EMT GRANTED TO 11-IE CI1T Gf CAQ 5640 ~ ttAAD-15,154 A& INSNI"IENT NO. 41123 OF OFFICIAl. r;E~. AN EA&lHNT Alf£C1ING THE f'ClRIIa.l OF &AlP l.AI() ANP FOR TIE RR'06E& &TATEP ION ANP INCIDENTAl. RR'OeE&. N FAYOIO OFo THE CITY OF CAFL&eAP 1'01<• R.Ac:m, CGIII&1JIJCTtl!o, r;EPAI-M4MAIHtl!o, ANP U&IG A -PIFELt£ AI() AU. ~ ANP FIOOf'ER ~ FI><TUI<E& ANP 1'01< 11!E N c::aNEt:TklH TIEF&IITII, lml, ALCIIIi ANP IWERTIE IEI<Etw!ER PE&CI<II3EP EASEHEMT, TOGETIER Hit!! THE IOI<iiiT OF-Tle!ETO ANP E6IOE&& llG S IU 113T A f'RACTicAL IOCU1E OF IOCUTE&. IE<li<PED• I1ARCII &. 1964 A& Fll.E NO. 41123 OF OFFICIAl. I<ECOI'!P&. MfEc:r&, A &ll<IP OF &a> FEET lol HIDTI\ eEIG 1.5 FEET t1EA6IRP AT IOI<iiiT ANC:l.E&, ~ EACil61PE OF THE FOUOHtl!o ~- c:!NTEII!l.IE. ealNIG AT THE eam+IE&TEIOL T CQ;NER OF THE Ae0\1! PEliCIWEP FNOFERIIt THENCE FR<lM &AlP FOM OF eeGINtl!o NOR1H!R. T ALCIIIi TIE HE&TEIOL T l.I>E CF &AlP PI<UI I>< I 1 A PI&TAIICC CF IIJ2.4l FEET TO THE 1RJE FONT CF ealltltl!o CF THE CCN1EI'< U>E To ee PE~I THENCE FR<lM &AID T1<1E FONT OF ealNtl!o EA&TEI<L Y N A &TRAIC!IIT l.t£ A PI&TANCE OF 216.2S FEET, I10I<E OR I.E&&, TO A FONT~ THE EA&TEIOL T Lt£ OF &AlP PI<UI 0<1 1 ,&AlP FONT lll!tl!o NORIIaOl. Y ALCIIIi &AlP EA&TEIOLT l.I>E A PI&TAIICC CF ~1.6& FEET FR<lMTIE ~TEIOLT CQ;NER OF &AID NWI EKI f. SCALE• 1'•20'-0' :c £·J·i-762--sg:s r1cb-Jic1·C· ··,-c.~m ::e:· :44/0 tl·Jutiob ~·JJJ, .~rcc, ~alif,ni·J ~;::;~,g REVISIONS 0 PRE-SID SET ISSUE DATE 1\ POST SID SET L.::. ISSUE DATE DATE DESCRIPTION 16-•1-15 Reaponae to city to city Reaponae to city t- OL a d) w OL ~ z ru <[ d) =:Ji Ill _J w o_ _J z t-u Ill <.( w o_ t-t-£L <[ . -- d) a > ru .. ............. Ill 0 t-1L w Q w <[ -=r ru d) d) w _J OL _J t-<[ t-u DATE 11-05-14 SCALE AS NOTED M.eoLEN Joe NO. 01-0& AS-1 Of' ADAMS 5TI<EET ---1-=·· +4tt-e• !lilT 14 !lilT 11 BUILDING SECTION ,---LINE Cl' CENTE;i LINE Cl' ffiOF05ED DI'IYEHA'r DI'!IYE BUILDING SECTION ,---LINE Cl' CENTE;i LINE Cl' ~D D;iiYEWA'r LINE Cl' EXISTII\G ~E BUILDING SECTION F.F.• <29'-0' !lilT 15 F.F.= +18'-0• UNIT 20 A.C. CONDCN5E;! EGIIJIFHENT SC;iEEN BUILDING SECTION !!OAT PROPOSED 20 UNIT TIMES~ARE CONDOMINIUM 3 STORIES WI UNDERGROUND PARKING ~l-e•rerm er• &f. roec. CEN~E~< e.rerm -465 &f. CO\IEliE) PATTo ... -' · .. . :· ' . ' ~ .. 'EXIST~-.~--- . . . · .... . · ... '.. ·I CT 14-11 CUP 14-10 SCALE, 1'•20'-0' :c £·J·I-762.-sg:s rlcb-Jici-C· \·c.~m ::e:· :44/0 tl·Jutiob ~·JJJ, .~rcc, ~alif,ni·J ~;::;~,g REVISIONS 0 f'RE-61D SET ISSUE DATE 1\ FO&T 61D SET L..::. ISSUE DATE DATE DE&ciO!IFTION Reaponae to city to city Reaponae to city z -<![ _J Q_ ~ z =r l) z =::J -<![ _J t-- -<1[ () 00 • l) w <§) • ~ Q _J 00 DATE SCALE DI'AI+.I J06NO. t-- OL () <§) w OL 00~ =::Jlll _J~ l)~ t-o_: -<![· a> 00~ Q -<![ 00 <§) _J OL -<![ l) 1L 11-!1'-;-14 A& NOTED H.60LCN 01-1116 ~----------------~------------~----~~~----------~AS=2 BOAT LAUNC~ING PLAN SCALE' 1'•20'-0' Cl' SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS ( \ 25'-o" 155' o" I I ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CT 14-11 CUP 14-10 1 -----~r---~ ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -----+-- ---FROFI:RTY LINE ./'/ cet.ICI'ETE I-IALK AND 5TEF5"" Gm>E I I I I .= ~-~·glll~l=l111rll= ~c=l111'1u==~1=1rlt¥11~1~=jlll11~=rii~I111A~1~-~~=r=~~~===~~~~~~~~===~~~~~~=]~'~~~-~[l~~-~-~~r~~~-~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~g~~~~~~==~+-~~==~~==~~====~ "' ·.. I I 1-1 1-1 1 ~1 I 1-1 I I I=== I I 1: =111:,_,_::111= =I I 1===1 r 1:,..::::=111===111==1 I I - - -- - - - -~ I 14+--++-~f UF ~1-++-+-H UP I DN +-+---!+-+~ DN -~ I I I fillffi 1~1 I w[ll-'-' ~ill=rll=TTT:::=rTEfn=l==rTf==hOtJO~TJ=bbWt:-__::=::::::~_ cet.ICRETE I-IALK AND e+e ""Gm>E ' 0 I CXl -- I / \ II ~-~.: =al /17 1--' ~==-"~• I, ·· .. ~~! c := Ml ---h:_} 0 0 Jll " t-t_t--l !:lATH KITCHEN ~ DININI> ~------J.. EXIT // ~ENTRY ! ~ / .-EXTE~Ofll / > DECK II II J.....-...,,J .... : UNIT 11ltj 842 S.F. Si\JDIO OFFICE 430 &.F. DIN IN!> J !:lATH F====1\ · ... _ I : . . ) F==== = ~ = lffilllffiJ 110 ~~ --------EXI~TI~G BOAT RAMPr L EXTEI<IORDECK /> EXIT I Rl DININI> .•.•• ITI~II ' I I Fi2=zz<~3'.j !. lr-= = -= I KITCI-IEN u u I I ~'T H:-: LIYINI> . I IN I I DIN IN!> UNIT 1118 1.202 S.F. FIRST FLOOR COURTYARD LIVING 1ST~ IR~II2 DN~I\. 1 i u~~~~~11 6E~L~~ 1 1 I I ~ ~ w wlUwillr T ~Wmillm:lllmlll Rl I < =II h/ 6ATH. l L . BEDROOM I I I ~ ITI Ill!-:-) CL05ET :_ !..=.. LINE Cf I<W-L AeOVE I I I I 0 ~I T . r-- --l -42' GIJA~IL ::0 !I. :1_// I·· __ .12_,: .. C) ILL,: ~ ~ ~ ~ < 11 1 I~") lr-+-1-CLAY MI551CN 6AFil'iEL TILE -ITYP. I I r-'-1 ~ I o~ ~~~ ,...---J!I ~ 1-II LINE Cf I<W-L AeOVE I I I I I UNIT il6 '· -~ ~ 42' GUA~IL ::0 ] 1 : 618 S.F. {__ ~ ~rn4J _ FLA>lTER 1 1 1 1 ~~ IL-'----r~-: DININI> l~ill I I __ ~--+------------~F,-=t=:========J!Um~= ~,_~.~~~"·~!1l!ii· !1l!il~~~~~~!'fll:i]H~jjj ~ : : ~ ............. --~~ rr=IIR=I~grr ........... ~-.....:........:.....:........:·· _;___. ·......:,;.· .:,.· -~---~- t: KITCI-IEN : DININI> ~ l~ill ill\) I I I I-~II e-.~~ : UNIT i!S C ~ ,~:Jr=-li -1 1 1 , 1 1 ~ 1= EXISTING REC r_..~r 11:1"< .. · 61es.F. (-~ :I I:~ Jn 'T ~~~1:11 ~ COVERED PA '"10 HALL w ,_ 1-1 oo =- 1 fT STUDIO 1~1 w 1 1-1 1 :::: 1 I:;: 1 f=l ' Jl, I I=-1=1 I I """ I ~Ui ~zzz:zl \ • ~,0 : •lnmlD/ .L1:J A. . .. I......__ til jTII ~ I I Iilli li~)6ATH CL05ET .1 BEDROOM Iill-I ~~ ~~ r~T ENTRY C) -· > 'Ill ~T; ' ( v -J,~ "=== EXTERIORDECKTIJ -1 I I II~~ l/ ~ I ,Jl I I r-II LIY~ UNIT •14 , ~IT 1 1 rr, \!r~~r:~_ml/'i'!=l_!:!'inll-=~rrll;=r l~lli"l"l==:=rJ-_ ... ~--· r / r ' / ri1! I 1'5 Sl'. LIYINI> ,....., I I =:..... I fi~ll_l ~~-== I== I ~~Ill . . 1 ~~~~~ ~ ~--~ I KITCI-IEN b,..: ..,., l'l_l_m ~m · -\ • 1:>1 EXIT I I """" I I "· I ~~T[l;;;" I -_I ..... T ! I I I I I CONCI'ETE WALK AT r I I I ~ : : ~ I '~~ ' cet.ICI'ETE I'ETAIN~ I<W-LS TYP. I I J__-v--I 0 : " 1 "( /"""""""" : I I I FROFI:RTY_L_INE ___ r-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~~~~~~~=lU~~~~~~~lU~~illlli~~U£~J+~~lll~~rrt~n~~~~ 25' -o" I LI) ss· o" I \ /4 ~ ~* 74' o" 7' o· EXISTING 15' -0" SEWER EASEMENT PROPOSED 20' -0" I SEWER EASEMENT I I I I I I I DATE DESCIO!IFTION 4-15 Reaponae to city commlllls 20-15R•pouse to city commlllls I-:-:DA~TE=--_~11-_=:0S_.-_-14---I ~ I SCALE AS NOTED ~ DFW+I MSOLEN 1 Joe No. 01-1116 ~ I I I I ~----------------------------~FI~RS~T~F~LO~O~R~F~LA~N~--------------------,====~SCALE;.~··~·~-~~~·~~~~1j9 26' -o" ~----'io~-~------------ 1 0 ~ ELECT. 5El<VICE CIIA5E -+---+-- I I F.S.Fi!. CllASC ---+----+-- 26'-o" 0 I co ~ ~ = 0 I -~ co = <0 I 0 ~ • <0 I ' ' . --...• 41'-0" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 156' -o" I I I I I I I I I I I I CT 14-11 CUP 14-10 PF!OFERIY LINE I I I -----------+-------------------+---------+-------t-; ,F.-=-:~=~~~~-==-~~=~:..-=-= ....rr--Cc:t>ICI<ETE loiAI..I< AND 6TEF6 Ctl ClRADE -------~ ........ ~ / I DINING UNIT ~12 1,343 &.F. LIVING EXTERIOR DECK AT GRADE UNIT ~11 I-IALL 6ED~"2 I , .. LIVING UNIT ~10 r 1;91 6.F. I \t:::=~:j==~ 1-iAL ~ _rnj I-IALL / / LTU . - ~ KITCI-IEN DINING ( \ (i L-i=-JI wz=. SECOND FLOOR BALCONY F.r .• +291·£1· ENTRY , 42'1-iiGf..l I GI.IAI'DRAIL ---z UNIT *'13 1!61 S.F. LIVING OFENA60YE AND BEL.aol BE~"2 ~ S lt\ II 112 ·· ... ,Y 1 o1' -o· ON t--+--++++~ ON+++-~ ---k I I ~~ EXI~TI~C. ElOAT !SAME r I 1\·· .. I C>AIH .~c rc-:) \~ , Jv ~"· ... \l > DINING :::::JI r----EXTERIOR DECK \. ··~ ~&.F. UNIT~ H I "' KITCilEN I • b : ENTRY II-' "--" .m.-I 1---~ It ~ I I __...--· I I ; ~~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ......__-+-CLAY MI551Cti6ARREL TILE'-J. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I <: (/) Jl t: ~ KITCilEN I-IALL I I ' ' BE~"2 \\ _ EXTERIOR DECI LIVING ~ r-_ ---+~---""',..........,_ UNIT 118 /> ~ \!22 &.F. i/~ DINING LIVING UNIT r] ~>- ~s.F. ( .~ EXTERIOR DECK /- BED~ 7' -0" 7'-o· I I I I I I I I c, I I~ I I I I = 0 I I I I : I I I I I I I I I I I I ~~ I I ,;1'\. '---~~;-~~~ II ~ I I I I I I I I I I L._----J...-- II~ ~--~ I~ I __ / I I ~==Ljl_ ;\ - I I l // ·.. _ I I I I I I I I -------- SECOND FLOOR PLAN :c £·J·I-762.-sg:s rlcb-Jici-C· \·c.~m ::e:· :44/0 tl·Jutiob ~·JJJ, .~rcc, ~alif,ni·J ~;::;~,g REVISIONS 0 f'RE-610 &ET ISSUE DATE 1\ FO&T 610 &ET L..::. 156UE DATE DATE DESCRIFTICtl 4-15 Reaponae to city commlllls 20-15R•pouse to city commlllls DATE 11-!1'-;-14 SCALE A& NOTED DRAi+1 M.60LEN JOB NO. 01-1116 A=2 OF w 0 _J t- ill w OL t- (j) (j) r q Q q i i i QT 14-11 I I CUP 14-10 I I I I I I I I 47'-o" 121 • -o" 7' o" t o" I I I I I I I I ~ CalCRETE loll LK ..w STEP5 C!<l c:.RADE I I I I 2'-o" 7'-o· ----~ F'FiOF'ERII LINE I I I I ' _ _1-,-- ----T----/ I - -- ---- ---- ----+-- ---- ---- --+-- - - ---- ---- ---- -r--+--- ---1----+-- ---- -lr---rf=--=--"'"--==~1=-~=--=--""'--== ----------.w $' ...... ' f DN H+++++--+---e-1 ""'' DN H+-1-+--+-e.l DN H+++++--+-e-1 ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I -s-.....____., ' ' DN ~4>-1 I I J I 1--.r= 1 ==:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::_-1 I 1 1 ~ ~. EX I'( TI1G BOAT RAMF \,~i, -.. ""'"_, ~~:::-::-....::::~~~~.,...:p111 ~~~~~-_,..__,-4---+~0> ~X-IT.~~ ~~=====~wlJr: =-" /:;;: P, : lit -" / : : \ -:i ': ~::::::=:===:::J~~~=~~~· =r=l_:::===7=:j BE~ \-·-I ~'T 1-V""'-'1 (/ /I 1_) .. _ I __ /\ BEDROOM L LLJ BEDROOM'l'_ : I ~~ I I ld::===~~~C· -/ LIVNC> // : I I I I ~,: UP DN \ -/ EXTmOR DECK \_ ------lll f-- - - ---l D UNIT #3 DINING ====j~/51 HALL c=-::::::::: '·===m : I I I I I I F.S.R. CHASE I L~=z.F1~5 T~~~IR.---'#1 ,m\/ =,=-:l., / I ;\ 833 S.F. ~--() lv vi I I I I I ' ', ' 1 ', ~ , , ,' ', ',, ,jl /, \ c-----r f; "~ \ UNIT '2 \ • i---1-----I I I I // I •••--·• BATII Cl ~L l~A=;;l• /~--?--" _ ~-;;;;No.,_~, BEDROOM 'l BEDROOM iAIH \ I \L KITCilEN I] ' I-; j' ~ S.!'. '>-Ex1E~IOR oea I -----._r--. ___ Jl=~LINE:CG1' HALL ABOVE I I I I -\ rr-_ __ eArH 'l r :-.. /g_ • ,""""L~1 r:-~--m-.J -: l / 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 ! ,.1 -~~ lf' ___j ·-. >----~----< =,.;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;~~~~~ENlRT I KITCHEN 'Tll 1__ LIVING/DINING /-& :I ,.~,-~ ~ 'I I w / 42'~1L I I I I '\ =~ IC;;~.I DINNC> UNIT #4 L_ CD ,J • "" ~-__j / v ! I I HAL.L B KITCHEN l,f.!0 S.F. LMNG I ENTR1' / v...-+--CLAY MISSIC!<l BAmL TILEII-T'l' . I I I I "T 1 L__---r-,-I \-~ '~r:~IL ---1.. II Ill -..... f-----{--~. '-.._ Tl-tiRD FLOOR / I ro ==~~=~ENTR1' '\, / : HAL.L OPEN BEL~ 64j;.~~-~: I ~ b I J ' C) EXIT T UP I ~ I~~ I I I -,0(::::) " - ----+~'\',-----..... I I I I I ~~"' EI~-EV. I I I I < Ul I ro -- BEDF!001"2 {_: ,_jJf i : BEDROOM"3 " ./ ···.. =~3!i'2=:!'22l11.. ?2f?M /,......+-IROG1':: • "~ ~ : : ·' .· HALL ~=r"~::c==="'~~ I C0 I I !l ~ I / / ~~ ~~ "'~'----...!..f+--JL-..4--..(~A--::'-_,.. -----t-3 f--~~L, .... ENlRT ~ I'-_ I I ~\.. r-;" · _ / '-' KITCHEN,, . , 1 ' -lb ="""""~~ _. ~>-~s I I 1-) .· ·, T _=.]---.}-· . li UNIT#[ ·./ I / I I \_ DINING UNIT i5 BEDROOM"3 U UAI;, KITCHEN 1. 1 ,eATII 'I~ I ~s.!'. --ExrE~IORDECK 1 1 1 1 I I II I I --------1.161 S.F. l:=::r """"" ITJ I rn ; t) BATII v--l" ~/ I I I I LIVNC> ,......__----<;1] /. ---HALL !Fif'cl I C; I I I I 1.\, --\( -.· DINING ~L05ET ===::::!~=.J -- I ,ID'k---1--'~', \\-------------'"'-BEDROOM 'l LIVING I ~==~"/, I I ~ I ~ i ~ ~~.._~1 \J v--1~ ~~~wffi : ~ ~=-Jf--_J--,4//.L--+---:=._-=._-=._-=_-=_==::=:~=~: I I ~=d..l--=--' 1,\ ~ DECK ~ lie, II ~-~:::::::::-OFEN TO DECK BEW. I ~ I I ~ I I r--~~,--~------------------~~==========================================T~====d===~~ I I I I ' 00 I C) - I I I I I I I I I I I I 'k----~~ ==:::::;;'] I I I I I I I I ' 00 I I I I I I I I I I I I : I /caQETE Me L ! \_ va-!TTO GRADE ABOVE------; ; --- ------>1..--------i-----------------+-----_, __ ----------+-------------------+----------+--------.--~ r----- f'ROFERITLINE 26' -0" 41'-Q" 9 '-0" 7' o· T~IRD FLOOR PLAN 7' 0" 7' 0" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ------ 1 I i i(~~ :c £·J·I-762.-sg:s rlcb-Jici-C· \·c.~m ::e:· :44/0 tl·Jutiob ~·JJJ, .~rcc, ~alif,ni·J ~;::;~,g REVI510N5 0 f'RE-BID SET ISSUE DATE 1\ POST 61D SET L..::. ISSUE DATE DATE DE~IFTIC!<l 4-15 Reaponae to city commlllls 20-15R•pouse to city commlllls DATE 11-!1'-;-14 ~ SCALE AS NOTED ~ DFW+1 M.BOLEN JOB NO. 01-1116 ~ A=3 w 0 _J t--w w 0[ t- O) 0) r <[ 0 <[ I I ) \ ' I I I I ROOF PLAN :1: £·J·I-76~.-jg3J ncb-Jici-C· \·c.~m ::e:· -:44/0 tl·Jutiob ~·JJJ, .~rcc, ~alif,ni·J ~;::;~,g REVI510N5 0 f'RE-61D 5ET ISSUE DATE 1\ FO&T 61D 5ET L.::. ISSUE DATE __-:;:::.~-:::::-DATE ~ u-4-15 Reaponae to city commlllls DESCIO!IFTION ~ ( !>""20-15R•pouse to city commlllls < (/) SCALE· 118'•1'-IZl' ~ L t- O[ a 0) w 0[ DATE 11-!1'-;-14 ~ 1-&CAL=E------:-:-A&-:c-:NOTE=::--D -I ~ DFW+1 HSOLEN J.:J:::06:.:.:N::..O. __ 0;;_1--06--1 ~ A=4 OF w 0 _J ~'Clef DECK <50'-0' 41 1 !'II<STI'LOO!< !' .F ~e· -0' - ...----ACCI:SS TO STEPS ON GRADE TOP Cf PARAPET 63'-0' ~ oe&ERVATION DECK ~?~~-~':__it::::jll_ _ _j_UlJilllilllllL / ~-r-- 1 r----CLAY MISSION BAI<I<EU. ILE -TYP. : / ~r----STUCCO PARAFET I STUCCO -TYP. I I " 1./ 1·. / 1\\ 1./ •• -- CT 14-11 CUP 14-10 --------~- :c £·J·I-76~.-sg:s rlcb-Jici-C· \·c.~m ::e:· :44/0 tl·Jutiob ~·JJJ, .~rcc, ~alif,ni·J ~;::;~,g REVI510N5 0 f'RE-61D SET ISSUE DATE 1\ FO&T 61D SET L..::. reeuE DATE DATE DESCIO!IFTION • • • Reaponae to city to city EAST ELEVATION / ' SCALE, 1/e'•l'-0' "-1 _./------------1 / r----CLAY MIS510N BAI<I<ELL TILE -TYP. vr----ELEVATOR FENTilOJSE 6EYOND '9~~12~;~~~~~~;~j~;;;;=r=::::;;illll'~-~~~i~ ~~~'""TOPCf PARAPET 63'-0' ___ _ 41 / ~ -:::,. 14 ~'Clef DECK 60'-0_' __ --r-Ah7 c..--" " ' ~rr = --....J c..--" " " " ' ~ I./ 1 \ I./ / \ I \. I / // \ •• I./ I \ TOP Cf PARAFET 63'-0' !OOF DECK 60' -0' SECOND I'LOO!< F.!'. +29'-0' ___________________________________ \~\--\-EXITI'RCM Ti-111<0~ ~~~~~~~. TH~IRD._•~·~rrn..bi!'.F. <4121'-0' '----LINE Cf DRIVEWAY SUI<FACE I/. • ..• // \\ I/. I./ 1\\ \\ / \\ I I I I STONE YENS-TYP I I FIRST !'LOO!< F.F ~'-0' ~ OL () <.§) NORTH ELEVATION I -------,_ TO ------~ '•• PAF!KII'(; F .F <8'-0' w OL (~ ~ 4'" souTH ELEvATION '-? SCALE, 1/e'•l'-0' ( 2 '\ <1( ~ ~ :.,/ ,~_/ > Ul ~--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_-_-_-_--~-L--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~~w __J ~ -------__J u ft_ EXIT I'RCt1 THIRD I'LOO!< ----111-1--- DRIVEWAY r----STUCCO PARAFET r----STONE VENEER -TYP. I./ I \ •. I./ II/ \\ I \\ r --------------------------- Ill Ill / \. 1./ 1\ ./ \\ ----r-=::-:---CLAY MISSION 13A """' L TILE -TYF. w ~ / ------OL <1( _o_; I 12 -----() > I 14 ~'Clef DECK 60'-0' -----() .. .I ----------------+ --00 ~ '--7 OL Q 1L Ti-111<0 I'LOO!< F.!'. <4121'-0' .il. ~ ----STUCCO -TYP. ~~~~~F~LOO!<=F~.F +le'-0_' _ r--J EXISTII'(; REC. CENTER EXI5Tn-lel COVERED PATIO I ~<1( XU) w <.§) __J OL <1( u ~~-TE ____ II-_~_-14_~~ SCALE AS NOTED ~ DRAi+1 M.60LEN J06 NO. 01-1116 l) ~~--------~~ ~EST ELEVATION Cf Ul 0 __J --------------- /---- ___ / ----td=~prr-~~--~ HATCHING INDICATES SUILDINC:! PI.ANE AND ASSOCIATED FiiCCf5 GI'!EATEFii THAN 1'-6' IN FFiiONT Cl' MAIN SUILDINCS PI.ANE. NORTH ELEVATION - ....-1------------- I I I HATC~INC:! INDICATES SUILDINCS PI.ANE AND ASSOCIATED I<OOFS GI'!EATEFii T~ 1'-6' IN FFiiONT Cl' MAIN 6UI1DINCS PI.ANE. EAST ELEVATION NO HATCHIN& INDICATES MAIN 6UI1DING PI.ANE AND ASSOCIATED I<OOFS. 411 HINDOH& AND DOOI'ii& IN THIS PI.ANE AFiiE FiiECESSED 6'. CFi!OSS HATCHIN& INDICATES SUILDIN& P1ANE AND ASSOCIATED FiiCCfS GI<EATEFii THAN 1'-6' BE~IND MAIN 6UI101Nt:S I"'LA~---_/ CFi!06S HATCHIN& INDICATES 6UI1DIN& P1ANE AND ASSOCIATED FiiCCfS GI'!EATEFii THAN 1'-r!l' eEl-liND MAIN SUILDINC:! PI.ANE. I-IATCHINC:! INDICATES SUILDINC:! PI.ANE AND ASSOCIATED FiiCCf5 GI'!EATER T~ 1'-0' IN FI<ONT Cl' MAIN SUILDINCS PI.ANE. _____ __J CFiOSS HATCHINC:! NDICATES SUILDIN& PI.ANE AND ASSOCIATED I<OOFS GI<EATER THAN 1'-6' BE~IND MAIN SUILDINCS PI.ANE. SOUTH ELEVATION CFi!OSS ~ATCHINC:! INDICATES 6UI1DIN& PI.ANE AND ASSOCIATED I<OOFS GI'!EATER TI-IAN 1'-6' eEl-liND MAIN SUILDINCS PI.ANE. -- ------------------ -- ~EST ELEVATION NO HATCHINCS NDICATES MAIN SUILDIN& P1ANE AND ASSOCIATED I<OOFS. 411 HIN0a-16 AND DOORS IN n-116 PI.ANE Af<E lllECESSED 6'. -- 6UI1DINC:! P1.ANE AND ASSOCIATED FiiCCf5 GFiiEATEFii T~ 1S' BEl-liND MAIN 6UI1DING PI.ANE EXISTING FiiEC. CENTER I CO\IEFiiEO PATIO TO FiiEMAIN ------., CT 14-11 CUP 14-10 NO HATCHING INDICATES MAIN SUILDINCS PI.ANE AND ASSOCIATED FiiCCfS. CFiiOSS HATCHINC:! INDICATES SUILDIN& P1ANE AND ASSOCIATED I<OOFS GI<EATEFii 6UI1DIN& P1ANE. 5C41E, 1/8'•1'-0' SC41E' 1/8'•1'-0' :c £·J·I-762.-sg:s rlcb-Jici-C· \·c.~m ::e:· :44/0 tl·Jutiob ~·JJJ, .~rcc, ~alif,ni·J ~;::;~,g REVI510N5 0 PlllE-61D SET ISSUE DATE 6 POST 61D SET ISSUE DATE DATE DESCFiiiPTION Reaponae to city to city t- >--OL a Q d) =::3 t-w d) OL w ~ z ru <[ <J) =::3 oc _J Ul _J z Q_ t-u oc ""l _J o_ t-0..: _J <[ . <[ > a ~ ru .. oc 0 ~ 1L Q z <[ Q ru _J d) =::3 _J ru OL <[ u DATE 11-IZIS-14 ~ SCA1E AS NOTED 0 o_ DFiiAHN M.601EN J06NO. 01-06 0 ":!.1. A 0 Ul 0 -_J Cl' ENGINEERING EXCEL ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD TENTATIVE MAP~ ~ CARLSBAD BOAT CLUB & RESORT~ TENTATIVE MAP & SITE PLAN VICINITY MAP NOT 1lJ SCALE SHEET /NO£)(: -n1lE SHEET tk SllE PLAN SHEET 1 SHEET 2 SHEET J SHEET-I -E)(!SnNG CONO/nONS AND EASEMENTS EXHIBIT -PROPOSE!) GRAOING -SllE CROSS SECnONS LEGEND PROPERTY liNE RIGHT OF WAY E)(!SnNG CONTotiRS E)(!S11NG WA 1ER AlAIN EX/SnNG SEllER AlAIN PROPOSE!) fiRE H'tVRANT CONCRElE BI_OCK RETAINING WALL (SPLIT FACE TYP.) PROPOSED TOP OF ct/RB PROPOSE!) SPOT ELEVA nON INI-V?T ElEVA nON ROOF DOHNSPotiT RIP RAP CONCRElE AREAS LANI)SCAPE AREAS 810-RENnON AREAS S/I)£WALK AREAS AGi/A HEf)IONI)A LAGOON -------t?l7 417 l.ANl PlANNING CML ENGINEERING SUMYINC 440 SIAl£ PlACE ESCONDIDO, CA 92029 TEL 745-8118 FAX 745-1800 617 817 ---PL--- ---H/11'--- ---400--- --\J \J-- --s s-- I • s7..J rc_ 57.3 fS • 1£=195.50 t::IJ ~ lo' ','1 ( I ". " .... " " ..... . . . . . ' .. "' .... . "' " .... " " ..... . . . . . ' .. "' .... . "' " .... " " ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . mom I~ . : . • . , I • • • •d • r-t..:.__-!.......R,Ar RETAINING -D NOlE: TOPOGRAPHY PARCEL IS SHOHN CARLSBAD ORA HfNG LIMITS OF UNDERGROUND PARKING ---- s~Ut4f:lii''--~~EXISTING STRUCTURES - -_....-PROPOSED UA<:nNR'LJ --__"ET._'AINI~ ~::!lf§;S5fj(~~ TO BE REMOVED I GARAGE FLOOR= 8.00 1ST. FLOOR = 18.00 2ND. FLOOR = 29.00 JRD. FLOOR = 40.00 ROOF= 50.00 EXIS77NG CLUB HOUSE FF=!O.JJ - Q.. ~ ( \ \... -"---- ------------- SHEET 1 OF 4 CT 14-11 CUP 14-10 OWNER: J4P PARlNERS 4509 ADAAIS SlREET CARLSBAD, CA 92008 THIS IS A CONf}{}AIIN/l/AI (nilE SHARE) PRO.IECT AS lJEflNEf} IN SIJBIJIJ4SION (F) OF SECnON 1.151 OF THE CIJ4L COO£ THE PRO.IECT CONTAINS 20 llAIE SHARE UNITS. OWNER'S CERTIFICATE: 1£ HEREBY CER11FY THAT 1£ ARE THE RECOR!) OHNERS OF THE PROPERTY SHOHIV ON THE llNTA nl£ AIAP, ANIJ THAT SAIIJ AIAP SHOWS 01/R EN11RE CONRG/Jot/S 0/#NERSH/P (E)(C/.1/1)/N() SIJBIJIJ4SION LOTS} 1£ tJNIJERSTANf} THAT PROPERTY IS CONS/lJEREI) AS CONllCO(JS EYFN IF IT IS SEPARAlllJ BY ROADS, SlREETS tJnLITY EASEAIENT OR RAILROAIJ RIG/IT-OF-WAY. NAAIE MAP PREPARED BY: EXCEL ENGINEERING 440 STA 1E PLACE ES'CON.?UJa CA 92029 (760} 745-8118 LEGAL O£SCRIP TION: OA!l WESlERLY 1/2 OF LOT 7 BI_OCK 0 OF 1RACT 2152. SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY.· THE TOPOGRAPHY HEREON IS BASE!) ON THE FOLLOWING: BotiNDARY StJRI£Y BY E)(CEL ENG/NHRING DA lED .!ANtJARY 2004 LAND AREA: 1.02 ACRES BENCHMARK: J" 80 IN SllJ HElL liON "V 1J07 1978" tJTAAIARACK tk AT&: SF INlERSECnON ELEVAnON 46.fa ASSESSOR'S PARCEl NUMBER· 2/)/j-20!)-/)/j ZONING/GENERAL PLAN: ZONING.· 14:' CENERAL PLAN: lR. LEGAL ACCESS.· ACCESS TO SllE IS FROAI ADAAIS S1REET. A Pl/8/_/C S1REET UTILITIES fiRE CITY OF CARLSBAIJ fiRE lJEPARMNT SCHOOl. CARLSBAD UN/RED SCHOOL OIS1RICT SEHER CARLSBAIJ AltJNIC/PAL WAfER IJIS1R/CT WAfER CARLSBAO AIUNIC/PAL WAfER IJ/SlRICT EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ctiT=5!52.80 ct/BIC YAROS fiLL=1592.84 CtJBIC YARf)S E)(f'()RT=-1559. !15 ctJB/C YAROS REAIEDIAL=JB.f.S. 00 CIJBIC YAROS IAIPIJRT=O ct/BIC YAROS BUILDING ElEVATIONS ROOF/PAR0=5aOO lHIRO ROOR/f.OIJGINC=4aoo SECONO ROOR/f.OOGING=29.00 fiRST ROOR/RECEPnON/f_OOGINO=!B.OO BASEAIENT/PARKING=B. 00 PROPOSED LOT AREA ! COAIAIERC/AL LOl (1.02 AC.} 44,431 S.F. EXISTING /PROPOSED EASEMENTS E)(fSnNG 15' WllJE SEMR EASEAIENT GRAN!Ef} TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAIJ RECOIJEIJ AIARGH .5; !!154 AS INSTRt/AIENT NQ 41722 OF 0/HC/AL RECORIJS PROPOSE!) 2. 5' WIIJE SEHER EASEMENT BOTH SlOES OF E)(!SRNG EASEMENT GRANlllJ 1lJ niE CITY OF CARLSBAO PROPOSED 5' R/W lJEIJICA nON SHEET C1 ENGINEERING EXCEL CITY OF CARLSBAD TENTATIVE MAP CARLSBAD BOAT CLUB & RESORT EXISTING CONDITIONS EXHIBIT ---- l.ANl PlANNING CML ENGINEERING SUMYINC 440 SIAl£ PLACE ESCONDIDO, CA 92029 TEL 745-8118 FAX 745-1800 -- l---lff--(30) ----- I I ------, FF = 28.5' --- ----- EXISTING CLUB -- HOUSE TO REMAIN EXISTING COVERED PATIO TO REMAIN I I I --- - ----() 2() 4() 6() 8() s s s s- 'vi- 0 \__EXISTING R/W EXISTING SINGLE ) ,------FAMILY RESIDENCE F.F. 18.00' -------- r:~ISI7S.71NC 15' llfiJE S£H£H EASEMENT CRAN!EO TO lH£ CITY OF CARLSBAO REC00£0 A/ARCH ~ 1904 AS INS1Rliii£NT Na 4172J ---- OF OFfiCIAL R£ClWOS - "' I~ LU I I I I I ' j:: ~I LU I I ADAMS STREET I I I' £)(1ST. SIIOlllOER 12'-17' £)(1S11NC PA 1£1/ENT HfOlH VARIES £)(1S11NC AC PAI£4/ENT £)(1S11NC RETAININC WALl i 12' mAmc LAN£ HfOlH VARI£.5 FR04I 5' TO 12' ct/RB ANO Gl/TlER TYPICAL SECTION ADAMS STREET (EXISTING) NOT TO SCALE 50.00 ,---EX. RETAINING WALL 7 - - - - - -~ - - - - - - - JO.OO -Ex. SLAB - - -/ - - 20.00 - - --L 10.00 L - - - - - - - 00.00 - - - - - - - SECTION A -A NOT TO SCALE £)(1ST. £)(1S11NC RETAININC WAll EXISTING BOAT HOUSE } I FF=!O.JO • ' II SHEET 2 OF 4 CT 14-11 CUP 14-10 D(IST/NC /PROPOSED EASEMENTS £)(1S11NC 15' lifO£ S£11£"R EASEMENT CRAN!EO TO lH£ CITY OF CARLSBAO R£C00£0 A/ARCH ~ 1954 AS INS1Rliii£NT Na 41722 OF OFfiCIAL RECOii'OS PROPOS£0 2. 5' lifO£ S£11£"R EASEMENT 801H SlOES OF £)(/S11NC EASEAIENT CRAN!EO TO 1H£ CITY OF CARlSBAO NO!E: TOPOCRAPHY FOR APN 200-200-06 IS SIIOIHV PER CITY OF CARLSBAO ORAIIfNG Na 4J.J-!. -- I I ~ I ~ l el Q ~ Q ' SHEET C2 ENGINEERING EXCEL TYPICAL BASIN SECTION 1&2 BASIN 3 SECTION DRIVEWAY ENTRY PROFILE SECTION C - C TYPICAL SECTION ADAMS STREET CITY OF CARLSBAD TENTATIVE MAP CARLSBAD BOAT CLUB & RESORT PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN ENGINEERING EXCEL CITY OF CARLSBAD TENTATIVE MAP CARLSBAD BOAT CLUB & RESORT CROSS-SECTIONS & DETAILS CONCRETE DRIVEWAY AT ADAMS STREET SECTION B - B SECTION A - A SECTION D - D SECTION E-E LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT VIP PARTNERS 4509 ADAMS STREET CARLSBAD, CA 92008 CONCEPT WATER USE CALCULATIONS I ~ ~ § t ""' WATER USE DIAGRAM & LANDSCAPE WATER BUDGET MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE (MAWA) MAWA = (ETc) (0.62) [ .55 x LA+ 0.3 x SLA] MAWA = (46.5) (0.62) [ .55 x 6,398 + 0.3 x 0] MAWA = 101,450 gal/ yr HYDROZONE LEGEND t .......................... ! ........................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •••••• 0 ••• 0 ••• 0 0 •••••• 0 0 •• 0 .......................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • 0 ••• 0 ••• 0 0 •••••• 0 0 •• 0 .......................... 6,398 SQ. rr . § ~.,§! ~lli ~~~ ~ "<:'i " !!>~~ ~~~r:: ;::s .,ts ~~ "' ~~ I r::~~ t;~~ ..... ~~ !l::~~<::S ~~~~"' §§~~ ~""'~;s~ ~~<;:,~ .., ~~"""' ........... ......::~ ~~"'§ ~"'"' <.l ... ;::s~~~ • I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~~~<~}7F:~~1~:!bd~~/l • IRRIGATION NOTE= ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED ACCORDING TO PLANT TYPE AND ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE. ALL IRRIGATED AREAS SHALL RECEIVE UNIFORM COVERAGE BY MEANS OF AN AUTOMATICALLY CONTROLLED, ELECTRICALLY ACTIVATED UNDERGROUND PIPED IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR WATER CONSERVATION AND TO MINIMIZE EROSION. STATE OF THE ART AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER WITH MASTER VALVE AND RAIN SHUTOFF CAPABILITIES. A REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER WILL BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL AND REGIONAL STANDARDS. REMOTE CONTROL VALVES SHALL BE UTILIZED WITH LOW PRECIPITATION HEADS FOR REDUCED WATER CONSUMPTION. PRESSURE COMPENSATING DRIP AND LOW PRECIPITATION RATE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE USED WHERE APPLICABLE. ALL PRESSURIZED MAINLINE AND LATERAL LINES WILL BE PVC INSTALLED BELOW GRADE PER LOCAL AND REGIONAL STANDARDS. AN AUTOMATIC, WATER EFFICIENT IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN LANDSCAPING. IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL INITIALLY USE POTABLE WATER BUT WILL BE DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE RECYCLED WATER INCASE RECYCLED WATER BECOMES AVAILABLE IN THE FUTURE. I I I I I I I I I ---------0 ~l'la 40 60 80 1-~ 'll"ll !\JN~ 1-wac UJ t:Nm 0 :::lOl"' !f) <t UJ -<( ... . 0 z w (I) ~Or-. UJ ~ -~ CD w(J)lL . lii<(<t a.. Wf-<t (f) I_(l) uzo UJ Z I <(-Ol ~ ~o~ <( 8Zo "'"UJ(l) ...., '<!" "' 1:20 2611 LC-1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT VIP PARTNERS 4509 ADAMS STREET CARLSBAD, CA 92008 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN I SLOPE STANDARDS• SLOPES 611 OR STEEPER REQUIRING EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS SPECIFIED HEREIN SHALL BE TREATED ~ITH ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLO~ING PLANTING STANDARDS A. STANDARD 1 -COVER CROP/REINFOCED STRA~ MATTING' COVER CROP SHALL BE A SEED MIX TYPICALLY MADE UP OF QUICK GERMINATING AND FAST COVERING GRASSES, CLOVERS, AND/OR ~ILD FLO~ERS. SUBMIT THE SPECIFIC SEED MIX FOR CITY APPROVAL PRIOR TO APPLICATION. THE COVER CROP SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE AND MANNER SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE 90Y. COVERAGE ~!THIN THIRTY (30) DAYS. TYPE OF REINFORCED STRA~ MATTING SHALL BE AS PROVIDED BY THE CITY AND STAKED TO THE SLOPE AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. REINFORCED STRA~ MATTING SHALL BE REQUIRED ~HEN PLANTING OCCURS BET~EEN AUGUST 15 AND APRIL 15. THE COVER CROP AND/OR REINFORCED STRA~ MAT SHALL BE USED THE REMINDER OF THE YEAR. B. STANDARD #2 -GROUND COVER ONE HUNDRED <100/.) PERCENT OF THE AREA SHALL BE PLANTED ~ITH A GROUND COVER KNO~N TO HAVE EXCELLENT SOIL BINDING CHARACTERISTICS <PLANTED FROM A MINIMUM SIZE OF FLATTED MATERIAL AND SPACED TO PROVIDE FULL COVERAGE ~!THIN ONE YEAR>. C. STANDARD #3 -LO~ SHRUBS LO~ SPREADING ~OODY SHRUBS <PLANTED FROM A MINIMUM OF 2-3/4 INCH LINERS) SHALL COVER A MINIMUM OF SEVENTY <70/.) PERCENT OF SLOPE FACE <AT MATURE SIZD. n STANDARD #4 -TREES AND/OR LARGE SHRUBS TREES AND/OR LARGE SHRUBS SHALL BE <PLANTED FROM A MINIMUM OF I GALLON CONTAINERS) AT A MINIMUM RATE OF ONE m PER T~D HUNDRED <200) SQUARE FEET. SLOPES 6:1 OR STEEPER AND: A. 3' OR LESS IN VERTICAL HEIGHT AND ARE ADJACENT TO PUBLIC ~ALKS DR STREETS REQUIRE AT MINIMUM STANDARD #!. B. 3' TO 8' IN VERTICAL HEIGHT REQUIRE STANDARDS #I <EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN LIEU OF A COVER CROP), #2, AND #3. C. IN EXCESS OF 8' IN VERTICAL HEIGHT REQUIRE STANDARD #1 <EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN LIEU OF A COVER CROP>, #2, #3, AND #4. AREAS GRADED FLATTER THAN 611 REQUIRE STANDARD #1 <COVER CROP) ~ITH TEMPORARY IRRIGATION ~HEN THEY HAVE ONE DR MORE OF THE FDLLD~ING CONDITIONS' A. SHEET GRADED PADS NOT SCHEDULED FOR IMPROVEMENTS ~!THIN 6 MONTHS OF COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING. B. A POTENTIAL EROSION PROBLEM AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY. C. IDENTIFIED BY THE CITY AS HIGHLY VISIBLE AREAS TO THE PUBLIC OR HAVE SPECIAL CONDITIONS THAT ~ARRANT IMMEDIATE TREATMENT. ~ ~ l;.'l \ "' ~ ' SEE PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND ON SHEET LC-3 MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY NOTE: THE PROPERTY O~NERS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTINUAL MAINTENANCE OF ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS ON SITE. THE EXISTING PLANTING AREAS ~!THIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-~AY ARE TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE PROPERTY O~NERS. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF ~EEDS AND DEBRIS. PLANTINGS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A HEAL THY, VIGOROUSLY GRO~ING CONDITION, AND SHALL RECEIVE REGULAR PRUNING, FERTILIZING, MO~ING AND TRIMMING. IRRIGATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE REGULARLY INSPECTED AND KEPT IN FULLY OPERATIONAL CONDITION ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS' DESIGN STANDARDS AT ALL TIMES. LANDSCAPE NOTE• I. ALL LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD'S LANDSCAPE MANUAL AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE STANDARDS AS OF THE APPROVED DATE OF THESE PLANS. 2. TREES PLANTED ~!THIN 5 FEET OF ~ALKS, CURBS DR PAVING SHALL BE PLANTED ~ITH A ROOT BARRIER <BID-BARRIER). 3. IF ANY EXISTING HARDSCAPE DR LANDSCAPE INDICATED ON THE APPROVED PLANS ARE DAMAGED OR REMOVED DURING DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION, IT SHALL BE REPAIRED AND/OR REPLACED IN KIND AND EQUIVALENT SIZE PER THE APPROVED PLANS BY THE O~NER/PERMITTEE. 4. ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SHALL BE PERMANENTLY MAINTAINED IN A GRD~ING AND HEAL THY CONDITION AT ALL TIMES, INCLUDING TRIMMING AS APPROPRIATE TO MAINTAIN APPROVED LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. 5. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE FINISHED ~ITH A 3 INCH LAYER OF SHREDDED BARK MULCH <ECOBARK> AVAILABLE THROUGH BUTLER'S MILL INC., (619) 263-3659 6. NO ENHANCED HARDSCAPE PAVING SHALL BE COUNTED TO~ARD LANDSCAPE AREA CALCULATIONS. 6. NO BRUSH MANAGEMENT SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT. I ~~§ ~:"": ... ~ ~1:1 bj~~::~ ~ ~~ ~~~~13 ~:"": ~ .,~~~ ... ----.~ ~il:!"' ~:<("' ""' ;:s~~~ ' PLANTING ZONES• ZONE I' ZONE 2' ZONE 3, ZONE 4, LUSH REFINED NATURALIZING/TRANSITIONAL NATIVE PERCENTAGES= TOTAL SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE• 43,668 SQFT /. OF TOTAL SITE USED FOR LANDSCAPING• 30.6 /. <13360 SQFn /. OF LANDSCAPE AREA OF EACH PLANTING ZONE1 ZONE I• 12.8/. ZONE 2' OY. ZONE 3, 0/. ZONE 4, 17.8/. • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --I I -------() ~l'lO ,?() 4() 6() 8() I-I-UJ 0 UJ z UJ CD . a.. (f) UJ ~ <( ...., 1:20 2611 LC-2 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT VIP PARTNERS 4509 ADAMS STREET CARLSBAD, CA 92008 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN I I I I I I I I I / ' I \ I (B ,I \ ~ / ' / INNER COURTYARD AREA SCALE 1:30 PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND BOfANICA~ NAMf ----// "'" I \ ' ' I ,-\ I I Q I \ I \ / '---/-------------EXISTING TREE -o BE REMOVED ARCHDNTDP~ DE NIX ::U\ININGHAHI A~ A I -0HDENIX Dr'CTYLIFC:RI\ DENIX RDC:3C:L::Im SHRUBS 0 (\SPLE~IU'I BUL3IFERUH G ASP _E'JIUH NIDUS 0 PHDRM:LH TENr',X 0 PHCRnU'1 'BRDfiZE BABY' (i(1 f'HLUDl \I~UI'I 'XMI~DL' ~ ""' '"" """ " G) :-;IRlLllllA PlGJNAl 'YE_LJ',;' ///// //// /i// //// //// //// l'.'"·0".'"·0"" uu~ i/// //// ////// D:::)HIDPDGD~\ ~r'\PD~\ICJS f>.----<.-------·->.-----·-~·-:-----.------>.---_~1 t -_::-:::--::--::--::--::-~:..::! C_=v=A MINIA-A TRACHELDSPERMUM JASMINDIDES ~~~;/:f'-::/;;("(;J~ RmMART~II~ WFTI:Tfl~l T~ 'Hin"'ITfJGTnfJ Bl IIF' ~;,;~~1~'&\~~l,~~~ CAklX Ul \ILL~ A WfMJN NAMe REHCVE AI,ID GRIND STUf1P 24' BCX D~TE PALH 24' BCX 10 GAL. HDTIICRS ITRN ~ GAL, '--._ lAL, c::; CAL, 3_UJJ-~~J I~UM~ll V1Nl eo GAL. T~E::: '1r',_LJ\J 5 GAL. 5 GtL NEw ZE~L~ND FLAX 10 :::J(',_, ~Ew ZEALANL FL~X 5 GAL. WINTERBDURN P~ILJJC:NDRJN 5 GAL. G:l'm BIRD JF PARADISE 24' BCX 31RD OF PI\RI1DISE 5 GAL. 1 GAL. YELLD'il DAYLL Y 1 G~l L:L Y TLRF 1 G~L HONDO GRASS 1 GAL. KAFFTR I Tl Y 1 G~L 1 G~L ROSEMARY _ GAL. BERKELEY SE[GE _ GI\L. Hf. 6• 7' -I 6. 7' -I ~~ J' 12''-1~'' 1C''-1:0" 12'-15' 4'-6' 12"-15' 12'-1:0' 12'-15' 12" ~s· 12"-15' 12''-1~'' 6"-8" 6''-8'' G'' 0-'' G'' 0" G'' 0-'' G'' 0-'' G'' 0" 6''-8" SPO. QfY. 2'-3' 6 2'-3' 3 ~~ J' 4 1?"-ICS' 4 12'-15' 3 12'-15' 12 12'-1:0' 12U '2'-15' •o 12'-15' li 12"-15" " "2'-15" •s STR~IG~T T~U\IK, FLLL ~E~D STRI'IG~T nU\IK. FULL HEI\D SnAIGHT TRU~~K. FULL HEAD ~11 I A\ID B.I~~Y. Gnnn r.n1 nR FULL 1\ND BUSHv, GOOD COLOR FULL AND BUSHv, GOOD COLOR f LLL ~I'll: BU:-;HY, GJUD ::U_U" FIJI I MID BII~HY, mnn r.n1 nR ~u_L A\ID BJS~Y. GOOD COLOR f JL_ L\I,JD BU::;HY. lULD CLLLR FJL_ L\ND BUSHY, [0[D CCLCR FJL_ ~ND BUSHY, GOOD COLOR FUL_ L\ND BUSHY. [0[D CCLCR FUL_ ~ND BUSHY. [0[D CCLCR @ 18" D.C @ '8" D.C. @ •8" D.C. @ 18" D.C. @ •B" D.C. @ 18" J.C. @ 18' ][ I~ I BLOW-UP OF COURTYARD AREA P~I\NfiNG Z:ONf'S ZCfiE 1 LUS~ ZCfiE 2, LUSH I I J:C:H ZONE _ LUSH ZONE 1, LUS~ 7nNF ?' I .ISH ZJNC: ~' LUSH ZD\IE 2 LUS~ ZCfiE 1 LUS~ ZONE _, LUSH ZD\IE 1' LJSH Z[l'i[ 1 LUSII ZONE 1' LUS~ ZONE _ LUSH ZONE 2' LJSH ZJNC: ~' LUSH ZJIE 2• LUSH IRRIGATION NOTE: AI I PI A~, Tl'JG A~F~~ ~~A I B~ TRRTATFD Ar:r:nRnTNG Tn PI ANT TYPF ANl [~,VJR[~W[~, T~L [)<f'[SLR[. ALL :RRI~ATCD ARCAS SIIALL R[C[J\1[ UNIIDRM CDVCRAG[ BY ~EI'NS CF A~ I'UTD~ATIC~L_Y CONTROLLED. ELECTRI::A_LY ~CTIVATED JNDE~G~DJND Pl~lU l~P_lA I lU'J ~y~ I ~M f J~ ''/A llR CUN::;lR\!A I !UN AND I U ~~JNll'llLl lRU::;JUN. ::; I All OF THE I'RT I'UTD~ATIC CJNTRDL_E~ WITH HASTER VALVE AND RAIN SHUTOFF Ci1P11BLI-:ES. 1\ REDUCED PRESSURE BI\CKFLDw PRE\IEIHER IVILL BE USED m ACTIRfA~,r:F \[TH I 11:~1 A~,n RFCilll,~l qANlARD~. RFflnTF r:nNTRnl \!AI VF~ ~HAl I IJ[ L TLIZCD wl-11 LD\i rc;c=Ir:TATID'J IICAJS lOR RCDUCCD WATCR CDNSU~~I'TIDN. PRESSLRE CD~PENSATIN~ DRIP ANJ LOW PREC:PITATIDN RATE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE USED \JHlPl APPL_CABLl. ALL PPl:-;~U~lllD f1AJNL_Nl ANU LA llkAL L!Nl::; \v JLL Bl PVC INST~L_ED BE_D\V GRALE PER LCCI'L AND REGIONAL STANJARDS. AN AUTDf1ATIC. 1,/A-ER EFFI=IEN-IRRIG1\TIDN SYSTEM SHt,LL BE PROVIDED TO ESTI\BLISH (\I'D flr'.I~ITr'.II'i I ~l,lf:C:I:APTI,~. MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY NOTE: T~E P~D~E~TY JWNERS PRE RESPCNSI3LE FOR THE CDN-I~U~L H~INTE~A~C::: JF A_L LL\I,DS::A~ED L\RC:AS Jl' SITE. THC: C:XISTIN~ ~L~NTING AREAS 'wiTH!~ THE FUEL!:: ~luH 1-Uf -WAY L\~~ I U 3~ '1AJN AJNlU BY I ~l P"U~l" I Y J',/fllk~. ALL LAI'W:-:CAPlD A~EL\S S~A_L 3::: <E~T F~E::: JF ',;EEDS A\ID DC:E~IS. P _A\ITINGS SHALL BE MAINTAI\IED :~~ 1\ HEI\L -w, VIGJRJUSL Y ~RJ',/11'~ =DNJITIDN, (,ND SHt,LL RECEIVE REGULI\R PRUNI~G. F~Rn T7TN~. ~1n\ri\Ci AI\D TRTI~'ITNG. TRRTCiATTnl'l SYSTFMS SHAI I CJF RFCilll ARI Y :NSPECTED AND KEP-IN FLLLY OPERATIONAL CDNDITIJN A=CJRDING TO MANUFACTURERS' JC:SIGN STANDARDS AT ALL TIMES. LANDSCAPE NOTE: l. ALL LAI'~DSCAPE A I'D IRRIG~ TIDN SHALL cm~FDRM TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD'S LANDSCAPE MANUAL ANJ ALL D-HER APPLICABLE STANDARDS AS OF THE APPROVED Dt,-E OF -HESE PLI\I,IS. 2. -REES PLAN-ED wi-HIN 5 FEET CF WALKS, =u~BS JR P~VIN~ SH~L-BE P_A\ITC:D wl-11 A ROD-DARRICR CDID DARRJCR) J. lf A~Y lXJ~IJNG HA~D~CAPl UP LANU~CAPl JNDJCAilJ UN IHl AP~~UVlD PLAN~ ARl DAMAGED DR REI"IDVC:D DJRII,IG DEMOLITION DR CONSTRUCTION, 1-SHALL BE REPAIREr ~ND/DR REPLACED IN Kl\ID ~\ID EJUIVI\LENT s:zE PER THE APPROVED PLI\NS BY THE n\...1\IF~PF~MTT-FF. 4. ALL LANDSCAPE MA-ER:~LS SH~LL BE PERMANENTLY MAINTAINED IN A GROWING AND II[AL -11v CDNDITIJN AT ~L-TIMCS. INCLUDJ~,G TRIM~ING AS Al'rRDI'RI~T[ TO MAINTAI~ ~P~RJ\IEL LA~DSCI'PE ~ATERIALS. ALL PLA~ I 1\lu A~l~~ ~~A_L B~ -l~l~~lU lvl I H A 2 n'LH LAvl~ Uf :;H~lJDUJ BA~K 'IU_C~ ~ECDBARK; ~VAILAELE THRDU~H EJT _E~'S HILL 1\IC, (619) 263-36~9 6. NO ENHANCED HARDSCAPE PAVING SHALL BE COUNTED TDwARJ LANDSCAPE AREA CALCULA Tl m, S 7. NJ BRJS~ ~A\IA~E~E\IT S~A_L 3::: BE REQUIREI FOR THIS ~RJJC:CT. SCALE 1:4 PLANTING ZONES: ZD\IE 1' ZONE 2' ZCfiE ~' 7nNF 4, _U~H PERCENTAGES: I ~~ .. I TnTAI ~TT~ :C:Cl.IA~F FlnTAT IJ,S63 so~T % U-I U I A_ ::;1 l u:-;LD f UP LMU:-;CAP ll'll ~n f, % Clllf,n SClFL % Uf LAI'W~CA~l APlA Uf lACH P _A 'J lli"G LU~~l' ZJNC: 1' 12.3% lJN~ ~, U% ZJNC: 3, 0% I-I-UJ 0 UJ z UJ CD . a.. (f) UJ ~ <( ...., 7 /.1,"" /_1 "' ·I ~I ·~ 1 • 20 261' LC-3 I ZONE 1-LUSH LANDSCAPE 1. Criteria: a. Zone One should be utilized only in areas of a development which require a lush green landscape such as areas of high use or visual importance. b. The plantings require an intensive maintenance operation to produce the desired appearance c. This Zone's anticipated appearance relies on large amounts of irrigation. Annual amounts for a healthy, mature landscape are estimated at over thirty (30") inches of supplemental water annually. 2. Description: Zone One may be thought as a tradtional landscape, green, lush, and flowering. Most plants used to produce this effect do not come form a semi-arid type climate found in Southern California. These exotic plants require large amounts of water and intensive maintenance. Although Carlsbad has a mild temperate climate, it remains a semi-arid region, characterized by poor, infertile soil. Natural lush landscapes are found within our area, but only in very limited micro-climates whose special enviroment can produce the requirements to support this types of landscapes. This natural pattern of limited lush landscapes should act as a guide for Zone One's use. These lush landscapes should be utilized for areas of intensive use is as a sensory rich setting in areas visible and important to the majority of users, such as entries, courtyards, pedestrian ways, and recreational areas. 0 s. '< ZONE 4-NATIVE LANDSCAPE 1. Criteria: a. Zone Four is an area of existing vegetation whose native character shall remain with very little modification. b. It is planned for low-level active use, which is compatible with the area's natural character. c. In this zone, no water is required. The use of irrigation can adversely affect many plants found in this zone. Introduced plants should be watered individually 2. Description: Zone four consists of natural vegetation, native or naturalized, in which there is no or very little disturbance from site improvements. An area may be planned as a Zone Four landscape to preserve it physical features, its qualities as a natural ecosystem, wildlife habitat, or as open space. These qualities may be used to provide passive recreational opportunities, possibly linked to hiking trials. Zone Four will require a minimal level of upkeep. Its maintenance program will consist of periodic control of debris and minor clearing and/or pruning for fire protection and removal of nonnative species. Retained in their natural non-irrigated condition, these areas will remain relatively dry. Due to this characteristic, a "Fire Protection Program" may be required. ~ ~- PLANTING ZONES: PERCENTAGES= rom. s1r~ sam f'OOfli:t' 4J .600 Si)'f % ()' fOfAL. Slf~ iJ'.:W fCI\ ~NIJSCIJ'Itl':> J0.6 % (1)360 Sl)'1] m llt.a% me' 01. tal:} 0% tal:+ 17.8% V)V)Qj I 0\§l~~~ l;j 0:! ~~h._~ ~""~~§ ~V\~'-5 ;,.,~~\:, ~~c:;,~'< :;:;v;,._ <,.,<5"'~~ i::S>-: "~31~~ "' t; ~0:!~~ ~ '<> "" ~~ ~G~<:S & "' ;::sl':,~\:5 ft ~~ I ___ I \~ \~ -~ ~ ~~ I &~ I lS:~ I I . . . \\\iil\\\\\\11 ' ' ' ' . ....: : : " \ IJI \ \ I I NOT TO SCALE 0 li!'Vl~ON5: HORIZoN oR 'i : 1:20 > ( < I 2611 :tJn:r t?O 40 60 80 LC-4 Of 4 *l'f5 / ' •'"' '. Protect Our Lagoon and Neighborhood Carlsbad Lagoon Protection Council () RECEIVED SEP 21 .2016 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION .Gpal:J ... QQP .. Show support for the Agua Hedionda Lagoon and neighborhood. Object to the development of a 20-unit timeshare on Adams St. for the followi ng re.~(:~P~~·:·.. . http://www.rpetitions.com/petltfon/keep-carfsbad-lagoon-local 9/21/16, 9:06AM Page 1 of 68 1. The proposed structure size and design do not conform to the neig.~~O'rhood. 2. This proposed development could bring in 3,000 to 4,000 new users to the lagoon each year. The water quality of Aqua Hedionda is already in jeopardy of pollution according to the State Water Control Agency. More users will accelerate contamination. 3. Adams Street has 7 blind turns and has only 5% paved sidewalks. By adding hundreds of unfamiliar drivers in a vacation mode to a street that is highly used by pedestrians, joggers, and cyclists; accidents are certain. 2 HIGHliGHTS We are now live! 96 COMMENTS Filter .• . • • ;· :·· ;, lj~'\: ... ~~ ... , :· .. .... . Susan Sauter United States, Fallbrook Sep 21.2016 upvote reply show This is a horrible project. The lagoon is taxed to the max as it is, as are our residential streets. NO .. NO .. NO good to our community will come of this project Alex Tarreblanca United States, Carlsbad Sep 21,2016 upvote reply show . "\" ..... http ://www.l pa tltio n s. co mjpetiti on/keep-carl s bad-1 ag oo n-local 9/21/16, 9:06AM Page 2 of 68 •. .. ··~ •.· •. · ... NO to the project Shirley Forsch United States, Carlsbad Sep 21,2016 ~ ") 21.2016 upvote reply show This should not be in an area of single family homes! janis Bandich United States, Carlsbad Sep 21.2016 l ~ -~p 21' 2016 upvote reply show This 20=unit Timeshare proposal is completely inappropriate for a residential neighbor, for the impact on the Lagoon, and for the traffic issues on Adams. Debra Mullin United States, Carlsbad Sep 20.2016 +--Seo 20 2016 upvote reply show I am against the proposed 20 unit timeshare on Adams Street Thomas Shearer United States, Carlsbad Sep20. 2016 Sep20. 201. ... http://www.lpetltions.com/petltlon/keep-carlsbad-lagoon-local 9/21/16, 9:06AM Page 3 of 68 ....... ~. ;: . . .. \ ~ ~ · .. ' ... ~ upvote reply show I live near Park and Bayshore and I am also a bicyclist. The safest route to get to Coast Hwy is along Adams Street If the development is approved El Camino Real would be my only option. Kristine Wright United States. Carlsbad Se:p 20. 2016 ~ ) 20.2016 upvote reply show l object to the developr:nent of 20 unit time share at the Carlsbad Boat club on Adams St. This project is to large for such a small area of land and has been successfully used in the past as having restaurants. Robert johnson United States, Carlsbad Sep 20,2016 ~ )20 2016 upvote reply show the north side of the lagoon is a residential area it does not need a timeshare. Deborah Cowden United States, Carlsbad Sep 20. 2016 .... _, ~ ,) 20 '2016 upvote reply show We live near the south end of Highland, just above Adams and the lagoon, and the neighborhood cannot support extra traffic. Neither can the lagoon support any extra pollution. I've seen first hand how vacation rentals effect our quiet neighborhood, as the house across the street from us was sold to investors and is now a vacation rental. Non residents are rude, noisy at night. perhaps not real.izing we enjoy, and deseNe, our privacy and quiet. Anonymous Sep 20 .2016 er-... C 20 ... http:/jwww.!petltions.com/petltiollfkeep-carlsbad-lagoon-loca! 9/21/16, 9:06AM Page 4 of 68 I ' ' ... ' ·. \' :..-:;· ~ ~ upvote reply show We live on Highland Dr and are 100% against this! Syndi poling United States, Carlsbad Sep 20. iOl6 ~ upvote reply show p '' I live on the lagoon James Courtney United States, Carlsbad Sep 20,2016 • I .... ~e: , 20. 2016 upvote reply show Before signing this petition, please be advised that it contains misleading and false statements in all3 stated reasons. Statement# 1 is FALSE! Please read the Staff report to the Plq.nning Commission to learn the truth. Statement# 2 is FALSE! Common sense will tell you, that it's simply an outrageous statement! Statement# 3 is FALSE! He says, "Adams has 7 blind curves and is only 5% paved". That's ridiculous! It's a standard city street, and is paved. Drive down Adams St. and see for yourself. A commercial restaurant and Boat dub have been operating at this site,since the 1950s, charged with approximately 570 trips per day. The timeshare project will generate 200 trips per day, which is about 60% LESS! That is correct: It t·educes the traffic far below the previous allowed coomercial uses and makes the street safer. Check with the City for the actual facts. If you have already signed this petition, because you took the word of one person who has an ulterior motive, I recommend you have your name deleted before it is soiled when the truth is revealed. http://WWW.ipetltions.coll)fpe,ltlontkeep-oarlsbad-lagoon-local 9/21/16, 9:06 AM Page 5 of 68 "-' =: . ~ .. ~ o-• -.' Elizabeth Ward United States. Carlsbad Sep19. 2016 -~ J 19.2016 upvote reply show Adams street absolutely CANNOT accommodate a timeshare! Way too many people in one place. I can't imagine all the cars going in and out through that small street, speeding around those dangerous curves. My parked car got hit last week! It could have been a person! Carol'[n Rodosta United States. Carlsbad Sep19,2016 ~ J~ J \9, 2016 upvote reply show A timeshare property has no business on Adams street, no matter how large or small it is. One goes to a timeshare to see an area, in this case San Diego. People will be making numerous trips back and forth on Adams, a street not set up for traffic and unsafe for the timeshare occupants as well as for people who Uve in Carlsbad. Shirley Anderson United States, Carlsbad Sep 19,2016 ... ~ 19 upvote reply show 6 Please no more timeshares. Gail Huntington Un ited States, Carlsbad Sep18, 2016 ~ ) 18 2016 upvote reply show Please do not allow this time share unit to be built. It will ruin our lagoon and add more traffic and congestion. Anonymous Sep 17.2016 ~ upvote reply show ::;,ep 01 : http://www.lpetltions.com/petition/keep-carlsbad-lagoon-local 9/21/16, 9:0G AM Page 6 of 68 -~ '-- ; '· Dumb idea. Michael Maras United States, Carlsbad Sep 17,2016 ~ :·: upvote reply show . ·. ·-• 7 '0 , l * ,_ I Save the lagon! Anonymous Sep 17. ~016 ..... upvote reply show 17 2016 I own and live on Cove Dr. And do not want this development. Anonymous Sep 17.2016 ~ , 17 2016 upvote reply show The Adams Street Area is not sufficiently prepared to safely support the proposed timeshare development. The development should not be completed. Jean Isbell United States, Carlsbad Sep 17,2016 ~ -el17 2016 upvote reply show This development should be denied. http:/fwww.lpetitlons.com/petitlon/keep-carlsbad-lagoon-local 9/21{16, 9:013 AM Page 7 of 68 .. ._·.: -,. •'.• . ' .. ·. ·' ..... Laura Drelleshak United States, Carlsbad Sep 17.2016 ~ s~ ) 17. 20lo upvote reply show The location is not appropriate for any development of t his size, and especially not timeshares. sandra meador United States, Carlsbad Sep 17. 2016 · .. · ~ -" 17 2016 upvote reply sliow · Sandra Meador Smart Growth, not growth for the sake of growth and developer profits. josh Leupold United States, Carlsbad Sep 17. 2016 ~ . ,)eo17 2016 upvote reply show I run Adams St regularly, often with my daughter, and the additional traffic from short-term tenants unfamiliar with the area and without any real investment in the community and keeping it safe is dangerous. Doris Schiller United States, Carlsbad - Sep 17, 2016 · ~ Se 17.2016 upvote reply show Not the right place for time-shares http:/ /www.l petitions .com{ petlti on/keep-carlsbad -1 a goon -loca I 9{21/16, 9:06AM Page 8 of 68 ' J •• Anonymous Sep17, L016 ~ upvote , reply show r> 1/ 2 16 I've lived in north county my entire life and never thought that it would look the way that it does now, we are one step away from being Los Angeles. Gone is the quiet little beach town, and in its place a congested, polluted city with every spare inch of free land being built upon. It's time to say ho more. Penny Johnson United States, Carlsbad Sep 17. '2016 ..._ -f7 2016 upvote reply show Time shares in that area are not a good fit ! l(eep it a residential area. Emily Schroder United States, Carlsbad Sep 11.2016 ~ ~) 17.2016 upvote reply show Please, No timeshares on Adams for all the reasons indicated in comments already posted. Miriam brunhaver United States, Carlsbad Sep17. 2016 http://www.ipetltions.com/pRtitlon/keep-carlsbad-lagoon-Joc:al 9/21/16, 9:06AM Page 9 of 68 . ~ •, J' ••• . •- .-. ~ upvote reply show No on timeshare Don Burton United States, Carlsbad Sep 16.2016 .._ .:<; ) 16 2016 upvote reply show These people have no shame. It's the same group every time, all the so- called do-gooders who are in tight with the local establishment._ so sick of it. Time for some serious change come November 8. Dan Kalin United States, Carlsbad Sep 16.2016 ~ ~ 116.2016 upvote reply show We don't need it and we don't want it. Anonymous Sep 16.2016 (.>.. upvote reply show ~ Huge safety concern sharon johnson United States, Carlsbad Sep 14,2016 http://WVlW.ipetitiQns.~com/petitlon/keep-carlsbad-lagoon-local 9/21/16, 9:06AM Page 10 of 68 -. - I ..... -:.? .. • ::.. 0 .. .... ../'; ~ upvote reply show My concern is that the soil that this large development will be built on is basically sand ..... not smart. Elizabeth banks United States, Carlsbad Sep 02.2016 ~ )Ot 2016 upvote reply show Developers use timeshares so they won't have to contribute to schools. Also timeshares don't count toward the city build out requirements. Good for .all except the citizens that live here. · No timeshares by the lagoon steve commins United States, Carlsbad Aug28,2016 ~ 28.2016 upvote reply show a time share complex is not an appropriate addition to this neighborhood and would not fit the current character of the area Anonymous Aug 28, 2016 *' upvote reply show ,28.1016 No time shares! There are enough places for visitors to stay. The lagoon is already too crowded. Anonxmous Aug 28. 2016 •0 .8, .C .., http://WWW.ipatltions.com/petltionJkeep-carlsbad-lagoon-local 9/21/16, 9:06 AM Page 11 of 68 . . . • • ~ r •""" • •• ~ upvote reply show No more building . Penny johnson United States, Carlsbad Aug28. 2016 ~ "'' "' 28. 2016 upvote reply show - Stop the madness that this city council and planning commission keep trying to shove on us!! Anonymous Aug28. 2016 <--- upvote reply show ~ just say NO! T Brown United States, Carlsbad Aug_28, 2016 ~ , upvote reply show r 28.2016 To ensure the preservation of the lagoon, we do not support further building and development on and surrounding tghe Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Anonymous Aug28. 2016 L;, J 2.J.s h~tp://www.lpetitlons.com/petltion/keep-carlsbad-lagoon-local 9/21/16, 9:06AM Page 12 of 68 '- '· . · .. ·.:···<. _:;-~: · .. ' .· .. ~: ; .... : ~ upvote reply show Let's work together to keep Carlsbad clean and preserved. Anonx:mous Aug28. 2016 ... upvote reply show g 28. ~ 16 No condos on the lagoon Linda seymour United States, Sacramento Aug27. 2016 ~ upvote reply show { 27 16 No timeshares on this lagoon Linda Farnsworth United States. Carlsbad Aug27. 2016 ~ J27 2016 upvote reply show Unlike a single homeowner, time share developments bring in de-facto "renters" with no sense of ownership and stewardship of Carlsbad's natural resources. Out of town tourists already leave too much impact in · the form of trash left on these lagoon beaches and crowding street parking. This is a sensitive environment that needs to be protected. jaime Kessinger United States, Carlsbad Aug 27, 2016 http://www.lpetitlons.com/petition/keep-carlsbad-lagoon-local 9/21/16, 9:0G AM Page 13 of 68 ; ' . .. *' upvote reply show The lagoon is already over crowded during peak season as it is. Kristine Wright United States. Carlsbad Aug 27,2016 +-. , 27 2016 upvote reply show I agree that we do not need time share units on our lagoon. Anonymous Aug 27. '2016 ~ upvote reply show I agree Tamara De Santi United States, Carlsbad Aug 26.2016 ... A upvote reply show £U IO Keep our water is dean! Anonymous Aug 14. L016 -c. 1 2J16 http:l/www.lpetltlons.com/petition/keep-carlsbad-lagoon-local 9/21/16, 9:06AM Page 14 of 68 ·. . ·~ ... ·~ j " II .... upvote reply show As a long time employee of the carlsbad lagoon I've spent much time on Adams st. driving to and from work. lve already had many close calls on this road as there are many blind turns and no sidewalks for pedestrians or cyclist. I feel safer driving on the 5 fwy then i do driving on Adams st These timeshares will bring unfamiliar drivers in to a an already precarious situation. "Adams st. belongs to the joggers and cyclist of carlsbad". keep our streets safe and traffic low. All i see is bad news when i think of these time shares. Anonymous jul16, 2016 ~ 16 2016 upvote reply show North Coastal San Diego has seen an a much higher percentage rate of high density housing than any other southern calif. area. Enough! We need to vote out any council members who continue to vote for this kind of growth . Anonymous Oct 19, L015 ~ upvote reply show 119 1015 This would be detrimental to the family neighborhood. Steven Bandich United States, Carlsbad Sep 12.2015 ~ _;:;) tl 2015 upvote reply show The addition of 20 timeshare units with associated docks and water access, in a very confined and con jested area of the Lagoon, will certainly add to the potential for safety and loss of enjoyment issues. Jan is Bandich United States, Carlsbad Sep 11,2015 http://www.ipetitlons.com/petltlon/keap-carlsbad-lagoon-local 9/21/16, 9:06 AM Page15 of 68 ;, .:· . ~. .. :· .... . . . ... :··' ........ ~ jt; ) 11, 2015 upvote reply show · I agree that a timeshare on the Lagoon would add severe impact to the ecology of the environment and add many more to an overcrowded use of limited resources and supervision, which will lead to escalating many safety issues that already exist and are not being dealt with currently. Gitiand l(iumars samadani United States Sep 05.2015 ~ .,) 05.2015 upvote reply show This is a small community safe and secure do not ruin it Kirk Gruenwald United States, Carlsbad Sep 03. 2015 · .._ 03 upvote reply show~ IS Traffic would be a problem. spencer gonzalez United States, Newport Beach Aug28, 2015 ~ I' 'i 28. 2015 upvote reply show we just moved to Bayshore and prefer the traffic to remain as is. Roberta J Ash United States, Carlsbad Aug25, 2015 c."" ..,.~ http://www.ipetitions.comfpetition/keep-carlsbad-Jagoon-local 9/21/16, 9:06AM Page 16 of 68 / ~ upvote reply show NO TO LAGOON DEVELOPMENT!!! Roberta Aah Doherty United States, La Puente Aug25, 2015 . ~ g 25.2015 upvote reply show NO TIMESHARES ON LAGOON Christine Griffin United States, Carlsbad Aug 24.2015 ~ upvote reply show Thank you Anonymous Aug24. 2015 ~ upvote reply show 1'$24. 2015 No! I do not want more traffic on Adams; the blind curves are so dangerous at this point you can barely cross the street for fear of being hit! AnOn'lf!lOUS Aug24, 2015 http://W~w.ipetitions.com/petition/keep-carlsbad-lagoon-local 9/21/16, 9:06AM Page 17 of 68 •• ·:: ..__ ·::';-! ·, .. • ••• ... . . . . ~. ·:.' .. . .. ~ ··~ .... '. '"'• ~ upvote reply show We are against these timeshares and want to keep the lagoon natural!!! Anonymous Aug 23, 2015 ~ '~23. 2015 upvote reply show Any project that establishes a transient population has no business in an established residential neighborhood Bruce Roelofs United States, Carlsbad Aug21. 2015 ..._ J 21. 2015 upvote reply show lam vehemently opposed. How can this be forwarded like an e-mail? Stephen cramer United States, Carlsbad Aug20. 2015 ~ upvote reply show ~20. 2015 I am against any proposed time share or other residential development on the lagoon mar:Ydawn gonzalez United States, Carlsbad Aug20, 2015 1 Ul;10.~l..,:~ http://www.lpetitions.com/petltion/keep-carlsbad-lagoon-local 9/21/16, 9:06AM Page 18 of 68 r ·'. ~ !: • .~' -~. .. . -·· .. •' r. • ... • ,., ...... . • ... ... :- .... ,; ... -· .... .... upvote reply show Thank you for the heads up. ji United States, Carlsbad Aug20, 2015 ~ r20,2015 upvote reply show Is this a legitimate petition? Where can we sign something that has legal standing? Anonymous Aug20. 2015 (=... upvote reply show 20 2(~}5 This project is inconsistent with the surrounding residential uses and fails to meet the compatibility requirement for issuance of a conditional use permit. It wiU create traffic, safety, and noise issues that will adversely affect the values of the surrounding single-family homes. It's a poorly- conceived, poorly-designed project that should be rejected by the City. Anonymous Aug19,2015 ~ 19 upvote reply show IS Don't ruin my peaceful home. Sandra Blake United States. Carlsbad Aug19, 2015 http://www.lpetltions.com/petition/keep-c<trlsbad-lagoon-local 9/21/16, 9:06AM Page 19 of 68 ....... ;;:: t"··: . •, ' ' . "'"' upvote reply show This is not an environmentally sound proposition. Adams Street cannot handle this type of traffic. Brian United States, Carlsbad Aug 19,2015 .._ I 19,2015 upvote reply show A timeshare whether on the lagoon or upslope is an inappropriate use of a sensitive environment. Russ Shafer United States, Carlsbad Aug19. 2015 ~ 19, ~015 upvote reply show I support this petition and it's effort to protect Aqua Hedionda Lagoon . Linda Shafer United States, Carlsbad Aug 19,2015 q.., I 19 2015 upvote reply show I am against the proposed development. To me, Carlsbad's charm has been it's open space and dedication to nature and recreation. This development in particular will negatively impact the City, and the lagoon in particular, by adding density and heavy tourism with potential disrespect for our natural habitat. Alex Ning United States, Carlsbad Aug 19, 201'5 · http://www.ip!>'tltlons.com/petltlon/keep-carlsbad-lagoon-local 9/21/16, 9:06 AM Page 20 of 68 I' '· . . : '.: . ..... ·.-~ ·=..; ~: .... . . . . . . . ~· .. .... "': ..... +-. upvote reply show I support this petition. Erik Geraldon United States, Carlsbad Aug 19,2015 .._ upvote reply show ~ 19.2015 No way ... the lagoon is too small for such a big development. l<eep it the way it is!!! Larry Geraldson United States, Carlsbad Aug 19. 2015 . ... , 19 2015 upvote reply show I support the petition ... this area doesn't need more traffic . ute geraldson United States, Carlsbad Aug 17j, 2015 ~ 19.2015 upvote reply show I am against more development on the lagoon. Fred Jansson United States, Carlsbad Aug 18.2015 http://WVffl.ipetltions.com/petltionJkeep-carlsbad-lagoon-local 9/21/16, 9:06AM Page 21 of 68 I • • ._ t" .: 4 • .......... ~ . ; ,. :-.. . ·, ........ . =-.· ~ upvote reply show It is going to threaten the lagoons eco system Anonymous Aug 18. '2015 .._ upvote reply show 18 7.015 I am against the proposed development for the reasons of increased traffic as well as potential impact in other regards to this deUcate area. Bruce Roe lofs United States, Carlsbad Aug18, 2015 ~ 18,2015 upvote reply show I am vehemently opposed for all the same reasons -traffic, parking, pollution, disrespect for the lagoon and our COfT1munity, decreasing property values, etc. How can we best spread this information? Sharon Johnson United States, Carlsbad Aug18, 2015 ~ , 18,2015 upvote reply show Years ago a destination hotel was proposed on the lagoon. Residents in the neighborhood fought the project and the proposal was denied. Adams Street is a designated scenic route and no structures can exceed the height of Adams. Dian Sodano United States, San Diego jun 02,2015 http://www.ipetltions.com/petltion/keep-carlsbad-lagoon-tocal 9/21/16, 9:06AM Page 22 of 68 \ f-· ' .. ·.: ~ .. : ::· .. = . .. . ,. ... -..:·.·.: +-. upvote reply show I wholeheartedly agree with this petition, this resource is fragile and 20 (really 20) more units of unfamiliar visitors is not responsible. All of us property owners have had to downgrade our developments over the years as density has gone up. Travis Washburn United States, Atlanta May21. 2015 +-. upvote reply show Locals only Amber depace United States, Carlsbad May 19. 2015 +-. r I y19 2Q1S upvote reply show There is not enough Space and the lagoon is small it is already over crowded in the summer time . Parking would be an issue too . And these are peoples homes . Martin Pohlmann United States. Carlsbad May18. 2015 .... f upvote reply show. a lOt:> I support this petition. Michael Moot United States, Corona May14. 2015 May .4. i.~ J http://www. ipetition s.co m I petition/keep-carlsbad -Ia goon-local 9/21/16, 9:06 AM Page 23 of 68 ' .. :: .• .. · .. .... upvote reply show As a professional real estate agent , a time share is not conducive to a single family neighborhood · .. ; :.·: ~ -~: ..... .. : ·.: ... . ,_: ·.:. jeanette Werner United States, Vista May14, 2015 ... upvote reply show v 14 1015 The lagoon is a special place in Carlsbad that should not be allowed to be deteriorated by people coming and going with no regard for the natural beauty. Tiffani Baumgart United States May14. 2015 .._ I J4. 2015 upvote reply ·show Please help perserve the lagoon! It now has the perfect balance of fun and serenity. With a time share comes chaos! AnonY.:mous Mayl3, 2015 ~ upvote reply show ~ 13 1015 Bad place for timeshare environment RandY. United States, Carlsbad May13. 2015 ~ 'f t3. 2015 upvote reply show Commercializing a local Laguna for a tourist spot will PROVE to pay off ... just ask the city of New Braunfels Texas. The new "state of the art condos'' t' have brought unwelcoming guest whom have littered the local rivers & ' streams with unwanted beer cans, cigarette butts & loud noise complaints at random hours of the night so I will contest to this unlawful action of http:f/www.ipetitlons.com/petition/!<eap-carlsbad-lagoon-local 9/21/16, 9:06 AM Page 24 of 68 8/1~016 Petition Keep Carlsbad Lagoon Local and only 5% paved side-walks. I am also concerned about a lack of respect for the lago'on visitors may have to our lagoon. 2 HIGHLIGHTS September S Petition has reached 100 signatures! Ma:; 5 We are now live! -48 COMMENTS _ Anonymous Aug 14,2016 ~ Aug14,2016 upvote reply show Filter As a long time employee of the carlsbad lagoon I've spent much time on Adams st driving to and from work lve already had many close calls on this road as there are many blind turns and no sidewalks for pedestrians or cyclist. I feel safer driving on the 5 fwy then i do driving on Adams st. These times hares will bring unfamiliar drivers in to a an already precarious situation. "Adams st. belongs to the joggers and cyclist of carlsbad". keep our streets safe and traffic low. All i see is bad news when i think of these time shares. Anonymous Jul16, 2016 +--jul16, 2016 upvote reply show North Coastal San Diego has seen an a much higher percentage rate of high density housing than any other southern calif. area. Enough! We need to vote out any council members who continue to vote for this kind of growth. Anonymous Oct19, 2015 .._ Oct 19, 2015 upvote reply show This would be detrimental to the family neighborhood. S!I'3N PETffiON http://www.ipetitions.comlpetitionlk:eep-carlsbad-lagoon-local 2117 8/1412016 Petition Keep Carlsbad Lagoon Local Steven Bandich United States. Carlsbad Sep 12,2015 +--Sep 12, 2015 upvote reply show The addition of 20 timeshare units with associated docks and water access, in a very confined and con jested area of the Lagoon, will certainly add to the potential for safety and loss of enjoyment issues. janis Bandich United States, Carlsbad Sep 11.2015 +--Sep 11, 2015 upvote reply show / I agree that a timeshare on the Lagoon would add severe impact to the ecology of the 1.. environment and add many m'ore to an overcrowded use of limited resources and supeNision, ~hich will lead to escalating many safety issues that already exist and are not being dealt with currently. Gitiand l<iumars samadani United States Sep 05,2015 +--Sep 05, 2015 upvote reply show This is a srriall community safe and secure do not ruin it l<irk Gruenwald United States, Carlsbad Sep 03,2015 +--Sep 03, upvote reply show2015 Traffic would be a problem. hnp://www.ipetitions.com/petition/keep-carlsbad-lagoon-local 3/17 ( 8/14/Z016 Petition Keep Carlsbad Lagoon Local spencer gonzalez United States, Newport Beach Aug28, 2015 ~ Aug 28, 2015 upvote reply show we just moved to Bayshore and prefer the traffic to remain as is. Roberta J Ash United States, Carlsbad Aug 25,2015 ~ Aug25, 2015 upvote reply show NO TO LAGOON DEVELOPMENT!!! Roberta Aah Doherty United States, La Puente Aug25. 2015 ~ Aug 25, 2015 upvote reply show NO TIMESHARES ON LAGOON Christine Griffin United States, Carlsbad Aug24, 2015 ~ upvote reply show Aug 24.2015 Thank you http://www.ipetitions.com/petition!keep-carlsbad-lagoon-local 4/17 811412016 Anonymous Aug24.2015 Petition Keep Carlsbad Lagoon Local .._ Aug 24. 2015 upvote reply show No! I do not want more traffic on Adams; the blind curves are so dangerous at this point you can barely cross the street for fear of being hit! Anonymous Aug24. 2015 .._ Aug 24, 2015 upvote reply show We are against these timeshares and want to keep the lagoon natural!!! Anonymous Aug23, 2015 .._ Aug 23, 2015 upvote reply show Any project that establishes a transient population has no business in an established residential neighborhood Bruce Roelofs United States, Carlsbad Aug21, 2015 .._ Aug 21, 2015 upvote reply show I am vehemently opposed. How can this be forwarded like an e-mail? http:J/wwwjpetitions.com/petitionlkeep-carlsbad-lagoon-local \_ 5117 ( 81144016 .. ,. Petition Keep Ou:Jsbad Lagoon ~cal Stephen cramer United States, Carlsbad Aug ~o. 201.s +.. Aug 20, 2015 upvote reply show I am against any proposed time share or other residential development on the lagoon marydawn gonzalez United States, Carlsbad Aug 20, 2015· +.. Aug20, upvote reply show2015 Thank you for the heads up. jj United States, Carlsbad Aug20, 2015 +.. Aug 20, 2015 upvote reply show Is this a legitimate petition? Where can we sign something that has legal standing? Anonymous Aug20, 2015 +.. Aug 20, 2015 upvote reply show This project is inconsistent with the surrounding residential uses and fails to meet the compatibility requirement for issuance of a conditional use permit. It will create traffic, safety, and noise issues that will adversely affect the values of the surrounding bttp:l/wwwjpetitions.com/petitionlkcep-carlsbad-Jagoon-local 6117 8/1412016 Petition Keep Carlsbad Lagoon Local single-family homes. It's a poorly-conceived, poorly-designed project that should be rejected by the City. Anonymous Aug 19.2015 ~ Aug19, upvote reply show2015 Don't ruin my peaceful home. Sandra Blake United States, Carlsbad Aug19, 2015 +.. Aug 19, 2015 upvote reply show This is not an envi ronmentally sound proposition. Adams Street cannot handle this type of traffic. Brian United States, Carlsbad Aug 19,2015 ~ Aug 19, 2015 upvote reply show A timeshare whether on the lagoon or upslope is an inappropriate use of a sensitive environment. Russ Shafer United States, Carlsbad Aug19, 2015 +.. Aug 19, 2015 upvote reply show I support this petition and it's effort to protect Aqua Hedionda Lagoon. http://www.ipetitions.com/petitionlkeep-car!sbad-lagoon-local 7/17 8/14/7016 ... . ~. ·~ :-.. ',· .. ' .. Petition Keep Carlsbad Lagoon Local Linda Shafer United States, Carlsbad Aug19. 2015 ~ Aug 19, 2015 upvote reply show I am against the proposed development. To me, Carlsbad's charm has been it's open space and dedication to nature and recreation. This development in particular will negatively impact the City, and the lagoon in particular, by adding density and heavy tourism with potential disrespect for our natural habitat. Alex Ning United States, Carlsbad Aug19, 2015 ~ Aug upvote reply show19. 2015 I support this petition. Erik Geraldon United States, Carlsbad Aug19, 2015 ~ Aug 19, 2015 upvote reply show No way ... the lagoon is too small for such a big deve!opment.l<eep it the way it is!!! Larry Geraldson United States, Carlsbad Aug19, 2015 ~ Aug 19, 2015 upvote reply show I support the petition ... this area doesn't need more traffic. http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/keep-carlsbad-lagoon-local 8/17 8/14/2016 · .. Petition Keep Carlsbad Lagoon Local ute geraldson United States, Carlsbad Aug 19.2015 ~ Aug19,2015 upvote reply show I am against more development on the lagoon. Fred Jansson United States, Carlsbad Aug18. 2015 ~ Aug 18, 201~ upvote reply show It is going to threaten the lagoons eco system Anonymous Aug18. 2015 ~ Aug 18, 2015 upvote reply show I am against the proposed development for the reasons of increased traffic as well as potential impact in other regards to this delicate area. Bruce Roelofs United States, Carlsbad Aug 18,2015 ~ Aug 18, 2015 upvote reply show I am vehemently opposed for all the same reasons -trafffc, parking, pollution. disrespect for the lagoon and our community, decreasing property values, etc. How can we best spread this information? http://www.ipetitions.com/petition!keep-carlsbad-lagoon-local \.. 9/17 8/141~016 Petition Keep Carlsbad Lagoon Local Sharon johnson United States, Cal'lsbad Aug18, 2015 +-Aug 18, 2015 upvote reply show Years ago a destination hotel was proposed on the lagoon. Residents in the neighborhood fought the project and the proposal was denied. Adams Street is a designated scenic route and no structures can exceed the height of Adams. Dian Sodano United States, San Diego Jun 02,2015 +-jun 02, 2015 upvote reply show I wholeheartedly agree with this petition, this resource is fragile and 20 (really 20) more units of unfamiliar visitors is not responsible. All of us property owners have had to downgrade our developments over the years as density has gone up. Travis Washburn United States, Atlanta May21, 2015 ~ upvote reply show May21. 2015 Locals only Amber depace United States, Carlsbad May19, 2015 +-May 19, 2015 upvote reply show There is not enough Space and the lagoon is small it is already over crowded in the summer time . Parking would be an issue too . And these are peoples homes . h11p:/lwwW.ipetitions.com/petilion/keep-carlsbad-lagoon-local 10117 8/1412016 .. Petition Keep Carlsbad Lagoon Local Martin Pohlmann United States, Carlsbad May18,2015 ...._ upvote reply show May18, 2015 I support this petition. Michael Moot United States, Corona May14, 2015 ~ May 14. 2015 upvote reply show As a professional real estate agent , a time share is not conducive to a single family neighborhood . . , ... Jeanette Werner United States, Vista May14, 2015 .. :. •'~ • I ' +-May 14, 2015 ) . ,. upvote reply show The lagoon is a special place in Carlsbad that should not be allowed to be deteriorated by people coming and going with no regard for the natural beauty. Tiffani Baumgart United States May14, 2015 +-May 14, 2015 upvote reply show Please help perseNe the lagoon! It now has the perfect balance of fun and serenity. With a time share comes chaos! Anonymous http://www.ipetitions.com/petitionlk:eep-carlsbad·lagoon·local 11/17 8/14/?016 :.··: ': .. . ,. Petition Keep Carlsbad Lagoon Local May 13, 2015 +--May 13, 2015 upvote reply show Bad place for timeshare environment Randy United States, Carlsba9 May 13.2015 +--May 13, 2015 upvote reply show Commercializing a local Laguna for a tourist spot will PROVE to pay off ... just ask the city of New Braunfels Texas. The new "state of the art condos" have brought unwelcoming guest whom have littered the local rivers & streams with unwanted beer cans, cigarette butts & loud noise complaints at random hours of the night so I will contest to this unlawful action of building condos on a quite relaxing Laguna. Keep the peace & leave the condos for a urbanized area! james Arnold United States, Carlsbad May. 13, 2015 ..._ upvote reply show May13, 2015 I support this petition Tammy Stevens United States, Carlsbad May 13, 2015 ..._ upvote reply show May13, 2015 No Timeshares . jan Smith United States, Columbus MayO?, 2015 ..._ upvote reply show May 07,2015 No timeshares http://wwwjpetitions.com/petitionlkeep-carlsbad-lagoon-local 12/17 811412016 '• :-_ . ' . Sign in to comment Petition Keep Carlsbad Lagoon Local Darren D United States May 06,2015 +--May 06, 2015 upvote reply show stop this ''fertelli" esque slippery slope. A development like this could easily attract more of the same. The resulting "drainage" from any more developing around the lagoon will lead to further pollutants entering the lagoon ecosystem. Eldein fathi United States May 06,2015 ..._ upvote reply show May06, 2015 No condos. Anonymous May 06,2015 +--May06, upvote reply show2015 No timeshares on the lagoon Tommy dean United States, Carlsbad May 06,2015 +--May 06, 2015 upvote reply show This time share must be stopped. Once this is approved, the lagoon will never be the same. Also the safety of Adams.St. pedestrians will be even more dangerous than ever. Sign in to comment 108 .SIGNATURES 10 months ago Zoltan lles United States 1 0 months ago http://wwwjpetitions.com/petitionlkeep-carlsbad-lagoon-local I \. / ' ' 13/17 . C-=:- Tu Casa Homeowners Association August 29, 2016 City of Carlsbad Planning Division 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 C/o Lindsay Management Services 6126 1nnovation Way Carlsbad, CA 92009 760/436-1144 ·FAX 760/436-2566 ITEM #4 Subject: Incompatibility of the proposed Carlsbad Boat Club & Resort Project a 20 Unit Timeshare at 4509 Adams Street Carlsbad CA 92008 CT 14-11 CUP 14-10 Dear Carlsbad Planning Staff and Commissioners, The Board of Directors for the Tu Casa Homeowners Association, which is a sub Association in Bristol Cove, unanimously resolved to oppose this project. Thankfully, the project that was denied in 2008 was determined to be too massive in bulk and scale of the surrounding residential area. The "new" proposed project is basically the same as the denied project. Last time around we opposed this project and supported Carlsbad Planning Staff and Commissioners who declared the project "too intense and incompatible for the surrounding neighborhood». We supported and applauded the City Council who also denied the project. Our HOA has been harmonious and compatible with the surrounding area for 40 years. One of the ways we have achieved this is to not allow vacation rentals. Our CC&Rs do not allow leases for less than nine months. This project will have about 100 vacationers cycling through 52 times per year! This incompatible project is not orderly growth and development of our community. We hope that you, our Carlsbad Planners, will faithfully protect the public interest and not just that of a single property owner. You are the guardians of our common future and are trusted to plan for the needs of present and future generations. We are not against development on this lot and we would probably support a smaller project that is not a Timeshare. We ask that you help our neighborhood preserve its special Carlsbad small town beach character and deny the application for this massive "in bulk and scale", incompatible project. Sincerely, Board of Directors Tu Casa Homeowners Association CC: Van.Lynch@carlsbadca.gov Teri.Delcamp@carlsbadca.gov Greg.Fisher@Carlsbadca.gov plan ning@carlsbadca.gov Council@carlsbadca.gov Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Teri, KUNTMIKE <> Tuesday, September 13, 2016 10:30 AM Teri Delcamp "20" TIMEHASHRES The number one concern in Carlsbad is the continued building. This has to stop1 and this project is a good one to fmally . let the residents (voters) of Carlsbad, that the Mayor and City Council are finally listening. Mike Klint Carlsbad, Ca. 92010 1 Teri Delcamp Subject: FW: CT 14-11/PUD 16-02/CUP 14-10-Carlsbad Boat Club & Resort From: Kirk Cowles [mailto:l Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 2:24 PM To: Don Neu <Don.Neu@carlsbadca.gov> Subject: CT 14-11/PUD 16-Q2/CUP 14-10-Carlsbad Boat Club & Resort City of Carlsbad Planning Commission, ,- \ My name is Kirk Cowles and I am a long time resident of Carlsbad residing at Carlsbad CA. 92010. A few yea rs back I was appointed by the City Council as one of the eight original citizens of Carlsbad to the Envision Committee and I served the entire term. I am writing today to voice my negative opinion of this Boat Club and Resort project. Please do not approve this project. The area this project being proposed in a unique rural part of Carlsbad with no sidewalks and beautiful homes. Building a huge resort on a small piece of land is not at all compatible with this beautiful rural residential area of Carlsbad. Please do not approve this project as it is exactly what citizens of Carlsbad' are against. Best Regards, . Kirk Cowles CMI San Diego \ Teri Delcamp From: .Sent: To: Subject: Dear City Planners, David Turner < Friday, September 16, 2016 5:40 PM Teri Delcamp 20 Timeshares Thank you for requesting input from the community. I am a condo owner in Bristol Cove. I h;;lve lived and/or owned a home there since 1994. The timeshare is too dense for the location in my opinion. I ag ree with the Bristol Cove Property Owners Association in opposing this developement as described. Thank'you for your thoughtful consideration on this project. Sincerely, David H. Turner Carlsbad, CA 92008 1 Teri Delcamp From: Planning Sent: Monday,-September 19, 2016 7:40AM To: Teri Delcamp _ Subject: FW: Time shares on lagoon -Original Message- From: Penny Johnson [mailto: Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 6:20 PM To:_ Planning Subject: Time shares on lagoon Sent from my iPad It would be shameful for you to OK the proposed time shares on the lagoon. The precedence on Adams street is single family residence . Why would you do that to them and cause a decline in their home values. I would like to think we can depend on you to show your integritY and not f• stick it" to the citizens of that area ! Time shares are not a good fit for that area (and many other areas in Carlsbad). Penny Johnson 1 r / \. Teri Delcamp From: Planning \ Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 7:40 AM Teri Delcamp ' To: Subject: FW: a proposal for a 20-unit timeshare complex at 4509 Adams Street From: Doris Schiller [mailto:d Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2016 1:15PM To: Planning Subject: a proposal for a 20-unit timeshare complex at 4509 Adams Street I would like to express my opposition to the proposal for a 20 unit timeshare at 4509 Adams St. I do not think that this neighborhood should have this type of project built. The density of the proposed project and the number of tourists using the area is way too high for the the exiting surrounding use. Doris Schilller Carlsbad, CA 92011 1 .. - Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: For your information. Frort:1: Council Internet Email Don Neu Monday, September 19, 2'016 5:50 PM Teri Delcamp Van Lynch FW: 20 unit timeshare on the lagoon Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 9:01AM Subject: FW: 20 unit timeshare on the lagoon -4 •• • • • • -• • -• -·. •• • • --· , From: Candy Chesnut [mailto:c Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2016 8:21AM To: Council Internet Email <CityCouncil@carlsbadca.goV> Subject: 20 unit timeshare on the lagoon This type of building really doesnt belong on the lagoon. The planning council denied it in 2008 and essentially the building size has not changed. (76 sq feet of habitable space less). And a ·17,000 sq foot parking garage? I This plan is incompatible with the neighborhood. Lets work on :finding a solution for this space that does not r upset everyone in Carlsbad (again!) Candy Chesnut l Teri Delcamp r· From: Sent: To: Subject: Dear Ms. Delcan1:p Bill Kilpatrick <t Sunday, September 18, 2016 11:51 AM Teri Delcamp 20 Time'Shares I am writing to express my strong opposition to the planned "20 Time Shares" development on Adams Avenue overlooking the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Plopping what is essentially a hotel down in this clearly residential neighborhood makes no sense whatsoever. It would appear that the rampant overdevelopment of Carlsbad's iconic Village area is beginning to spill over into other areas of our beach to~ threatening to turn this once unique coastal haven into yet another overcrowded, overburdened and faceless California city. I ask you please not to approve this project, and would urge yol.ll' fell~w City Planning staff to follow suit. Sincerely, Bill Kilpatrick 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Su bject: JAMES BUSCHER Sunday, September 18, 2016 8:37 PM Teri Delcamp LAGOON PROJECT HI I HAVE LIVED IN CARLSBAD ALL OF MY U.FE AND WANTED YOU TO KNOW THAT I OPPOSE THE TIMESHARE PROJECT ON ADAMS ST. IT IS ALREADY CROWDED ENOUGH AROUND HERE AND I REALLY DON'T WANT A LOT MORE TRAFFIC AND PARKING IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD. WE SEEM TO HAVE MORE THAN ENOUGH TOURIST GROWTH DOWN ON THE BEACH. LET'S BE SMART LIKE DEL MAR AND MINIMIZE ADDITIONAL LOGJAMS AND SLOW DOWN SOME MORE. THANKS FOR YOUR ATIENTION-JIM BUSCHER 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Planning Monday, September 19, 2016 7:41AM Teri Delcamp FW: Adams Street timeshare From: Carolyn Rodosta [mailto:r Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2016 8:38 PM To: Planning Subject: Adams Street timeshare Adams Street is not conducive to timeshares. Timeshare ~:~sers exchange into an area to utilize it as a launching pad for the county. We are fort;unate to have lots to offer between Orange and San Diego Counties. These exchangers would not go to Adams Street to stay put; they would be on the move con·stantly. Timeshares would endange·r the traders, the residents who use Adams Street to get around their local neighborhood, and the entire ambiance of the area. Neon sign age would be necessary to alert timeshare users of their destination. Please seriously cohsidering the r.ejection of this or any timeshare project for Adams Street. Carolyn Rodosta . .:::..__ Resident in the Laguna Riviera area of Carlsbad for 30+ years . ..... 1 ·"'·•I ... Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Tom Suess <t Monday, September 19, 2016 6:58 PM Greg Fisher; Teri Delcamp Pe.nding Approval of Case Name CT 14-11/PUD 16-02/CUP 14-10-Carlsbad Boat Club & Resort Dear Greg Fisher and Teri Delcamp: We, Thomas and Pamela Suess, have ju~t been made aware of a Pending Planni_ng Commission/Staff Approval for the Subject Development, the Carlsbad Boat Club & Resort (Project). We are owners of a Condominium on the Aqua Hedionda Lagoon (Lagoon). Our property is located at Carlsbad, CA 92008. We find this Pending Approval disconcerting and premature, primarily since we are not cognizant of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) being competed Per California Environmental Impact Act (CEQA). Due to the Location ofthe Project, Size of the Construction (approximately 40,000 sq. ft.), Number of Potential Users (20 Units X 4 People on Average = 80 Potential Users per Week X 52 Weeks= 4,160 People per year), there simply are too many Significant Negative Impacts that have not been properly addressed per CEQA. If this has been completed, being a Homeowner on the same Lagoon, we were never made aware of same. While we understand we may not have been in the Required Distance from the Project to be Legally Notified, certainly we are neighbors and share the same Lagoon and would have common concerns; .and we believe the Owner(s) of the Project, and future Users would want this too. We believe the Project will ca use Significant Negative Impacts that most likely will not be able to be Mitigated, and we believe have not been properly studied Per CEQA. The first Significant Negative Impact is to the very Lagoon itself. Certainly with 4,160 potentially new and different Users per year this will create various Significant Negative Impacts that have not been properly addressed. One such issue is the Significant Negative Impact to the Native Eelgrass (Zostera) along the shoreline of the Project. Since there are no docks, the Resorts boats would have to pull up to the beach to bring passengers aboard and for them to disembark. This would result in the boats crossing through the Eelgrass habitat time, and time again. Due to the intense nature of the Resort this would occur throughout every day, and every day of the year. At low tide the boats' props would mow the eelgrass and uproot it. Additionally} hundreds of kayaks and stand up boards and people wading, that are not currently there now, would be traversing the eelgrass habitat and damaging same. How shall the Carlsbad Boat Club & Resort mitigate for this eelgrass habitat destruction? We believe the added Users of the Project will have a Significant Negative Impact to Fire Services, Police Services, and City Staff, and again we believe it has not been properly studied per CEQA. We believe the Project has a Significant Negative Impact to the Surrounding Neighborhood not. only due to the size, but because of the multiple unitS being rented on a weekly basis in a community/neighborhood that is considered a Long-term Single Family Environment. We believe there is a Significant Negative Impact to Traffic Safety due to the potential ofthe many new vehicles. Traffic Safety not only to all Drivers but to the vehicles' Passengers. We believe there will be a Significant Negative Impact to Pedestrians (Walking, Running, Skating, Babies in ~arriages) and Bicyclists using the same street as the additional vehicles; especially due to no sidewalks, the street's curves, and changing grade of the road. · The above is just a quick response to our just finding out of the Pending Planning Commission Approval of t~e Project. Again, the most disconcerting issue is that we believe a proper study of the Significant Negative Impacts were not properly addressed per CEQA. We ask for City Staff's response before this Project moves to the final Planning Commission Approval. We also ask that all neighbors that live on the Lagoon be notified as well. PS: Eelgrass Background and lnformaUon Eelgrass species (Zostera marina L. ·and z. pacifica) are seagrasses that occur in the temperate unconsolidated substrate of shal/ow coastal environments, enclosed bays, and estuaries. Eelgrass is a 1 highly productive species af}d is_ considered to be a '1oundation" or habitat forming species. Eelgrass contributes to ecosystem functions at multiple levels as a primary and secondary producer, as a habitat structuring elem~nt, as a substrate for epiphytes and epifauna, and as sediment stabilizer and nutrient cycling fae~1itator. Eelgrass provides importf;mt foraging areas and shelter to young fish and invertebrates, food for migratory waterfowl and sea turtles, and spawning surfaces for invertebrates and fish such as the Pacific herring. Eelgrass also provides a significant source of carbon to the detrital pool which provides important organic matter in sometimes food-limited environments (e.g., submarine canyons): In addition, eelgrass has the capacity to sequester carbon in the underlying sediments and may help offset carbon emissions. Given the significance and diversity of the functions and services provided by sea grass, Costanza eta/. {2007} determined seagrass ecosystems to be one of Earth's most valuable. http:Uwww.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/publications/habitat/california eelgrass mitigation/Finai%20CEMP%200ctob er%202014/cemp oct 2014 final.pdf PS: I just talked to Greg Fisher, he advised that an EIR was not completed. He also advised that the Planning Commission Meeting Scheduled for September 22, 2016 will not be addressing the Project. Sincerely, Thomas A. Suess license No. 00555453 c. R. Stelling Insurance Agency 631 East Foothill Boulevard Monrovia, CA 9l016-2095 O.ffice 626.359.6626 Cell 626.437.9484 Office 800.350.6626 Fax 626.359.6444 Certificate of Insurance Request: Elsa Flores Commercial lines Account Executive: Robyn Mee Accounting Payment Processing: Angela Taylor We appreciate referrals! When yaur referral becomes a cfient, we will send you a $10.00 Starbucks Gift Card! 2 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Therese Dolkas <> Tuesday, September 20, 2016 1:33 PM Teri Delcamp 20 timeshares I am very against having 20 timeshares on the Carlsbad boat club property. This project does n.ot fit into the neighborhood around the property at all. The traffic alone, on that quaint road would be a disaster. This is not at all what I would like to see on this site. Thanks for your consideration. ~herese Dolkas1 Carlsbad home _owner and resident 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Hi, Sarah Osborne Tuesday, September 20, 2016 8:24 PM T eri Delcamp 20 timeshares I am very opposed to having 20, let alone any, timeshares on the Carlsbad boat club property. That is such a special and private Street in our City. It does not make any sense to bring tourists there. The traffic increase on such a windy and scenic road· increases the danger factor, as well as lowers the value for the special properties in that area that deserve the privacy and high property values for the unique and unlike any other view in Carlsbad. Please take this into consideration. Our City, and it's treasures, should be for the Citizens and not visitors. I am a home owner, and Carlsbad resident since 1975. Please respect the Citizen's wishes. Thank you, Sarah Osborne 1 <' Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Planning Wednesday, September 21, 2016 2:39 PM Teri Delcamp FW: against proposed 20-unit timeshare on Adams St. From: Kevin Bender [mailto:k Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 12:36 PM To: Planning Subject: against proposed 20-unit timeshare on Adams St._ I'm joining my neighbors here on Adams St to let you know we oppose the proposed 20-unit timeshare on Adams Stand the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Have lived in this house on Adams and Harborview since 1970. We don't want the timeshare. It's inappropriate, will cause danger and more pollution and congestion in the lagoon. Please listen to our opinions. Kevin Bender Carlsbad, CA Teri Delcamp From: Planning Sent: To: Thursday, September 22, 2016 11:11 AM Teri Delcamp Subject: FW: Adams St. Timeshare application -----Original Message--- From: Bonnie Dominguez [mailto: Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 4:55 PM To: Planning Subject: Adams St. Timeshare application Dear Planning Commission Members: As residents in close proximity to this application, we know the history and the applicant, and therefore support the re- application of the project wholeheartedly. You r support would be appreciated as well. Edmond "Bill" Dominguez. Carlsbad, CA 92008 1 Teri Delcamp From: Planning Sent: To: Thursday, September 22, 2016 11:11 AM Teri Delcamp Subject: FW: Against time share on Adam's Street From: John Obrien [mailto:j Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 4:24 PM To: Planning Subject: Against time share on Adam's Street To the City of Carlsbad planning division, As a resident just above the Hedionda Lagoon for 20 years, I've been witness to many constTuction sites around this area. Many of the changes have proven to be environmentally responsible, however, this time share proposal would open the door to transient population. This isn't an acceptable way to maintain the beauty of the lagoon area. Over the past few years the" dog beach11 has become ovenun with trash and waste. Here is your chance to stand WITH the residents. Vote no tonight. Sincerely, John OBrien 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Planning Thursday, September 22, 2016 1:13 PM Teri Delcamp FW: Timeshares on Adams Ave. From: Kasey McCarthy [mailto:k Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 1:10PM To: Planning Subject: Timeshares on Adams Ave. Dear Carlsbad Planning, As a ten year resident of Carlsbad living on Agua Hedionda Lagoon and as a lifetime resident of North County, I am concerned about the request to develop timeshares along Adams Street and the Agua Hedioda Lagoon. This is reference to Dr. Sarkaria Property; PRE 08-15; Project File; 12061720300120617204001206172050012061720600120617207001. I cannot locate the current permit. Dr. Sarkaria has bought multiple homes and vacant property a[ong the Agua Hedionda Lagoon to serve his desire to chage the makeup of Agua Hedionda Lagoon and the quiet RESIDENTIAL Adams Street, Approving this development is not the right thing for the city of Carlsbad to do. This is not the appropriate location for timeshares nor similar developments. Adams Street is a dangerous street with multiple curves and blind corners. Everyday bikers, walkers and runners use this street that has a short or no sidewalks to get to and from their homes or for recreation. Already there are more and more people using this road to access the Agua Hedionda Lagoon on Cove Drive and Bay Shore Driv, but this another issue. In addition to the extra number of cars and crowding along Adams Street, this development will impact the Agua Hedionda Lagoon health of the water and wildlife. With the addition of the timeshares, it will bring more pollution to the lagoon with runoff from the landscaping and waste left by the residents. The wildlife have been forced to move their habitat to the Eastern portion of the lagoon from the overuse of the lagoon. The city of Carlsbad already knows the feelings of the majority of their residents regarding development along the Agua Hedionda Lagoon and I hope you consider the opinions of your residents in regards to this development. Best regards, Kasey McCarthy , Carlbad 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: -----0 rigi na I Message----- Planning Monday, September 26, 2016 9:05 AM Teri Delcamp FW: ADAMSST TIMESHARE From: Pauline Morisoli [mailto:p Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 12:15 PM To: Planning Subject: ADAMS ST TIMESHARE I VOTE NO ON THIS DEVELOPMENT. I LIVE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THIS PARTICULAR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. The way in, out and around this area is a dangerous problem. It will add to the pollution of the air, water and detract from the quality of life for this community. Already the East side of EICamino is being covered by developments. Our planning department folks are responsible for the proper care and maintenance of our city. Builders will come in, grab up our premium land, build the houses, take their high profits and move on to the next beautiful site. Please don't allow this to happen. Thank you for reading my message. PAULINE HENDREN MORISOLI, resident of Carlsbad since 1972. Sent from my iPad 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Cc: Alan Katof < Tuesday, October 25, 2016 8:29 PM Teri Delcamp; Mick Calarco Subject: Jim Strickland; Stu Scheidler; Craig Elliot; Dave Duet Boat Club Time Share Project -4509 Adams Gentlemen: My wife and I have lived at on the Agua Hedionda Lagoon for more than 12 years and want to express our strong opposition to the proposed Boat Club Time Share project proposed at 4509 Adams {CT14-ll/CUP 14-1 0). A 20 Unit time share does not belong in a residential neighborhood on a very nrurow street that will no doubt effect traffic :flow and safety, It has already been deemed incompatible in an earlier cycle of review, and that continues to be the case. As homeowners in this neighborhood~ we appreciate that the property owners want to build on the lot, but this is not a reasonable project. In addition, this timeshare would significantly increase the amount of people on Adams tbJ:oughout the year, and create a negative impact on the lagoon itself. We believe that this combination of conditions makes the project incompatible with our neighborhood. I hope you will take these concems into consideration. Thank you. Alan and Barbro Katof Carlsbad, CA 92008 1 Gentlemen: I have been a resident on the Agua Hedionda Lagoon at for more than 16 years. During that time I have witnessed the buildup of traffic and congestion in the area due to use of the lagoon area by dog owners and paddle boaters to a disagreeable level. Now I have learned of the Boat Club Time Share project proposed for 4509 Adams (CT14-11/CUP 14-10). A 20-unit timeshare in this confined area is far too intense a development. I understand that this project has already been deemed incompatible in an earlier review, and nothing has changed to alter that conclusion now. As a homeowner in the area, I appreciate that the owners of this property may want to build on the lot but this is not a reasonable-sized project. Furthermore, a timeshare property will significantly increase the incipient congestion in the area, bringing in volumes of people throughout the year, as well as contributing a potential negative impact on the lagoon itself. This combination makes the project incompatible with our area. I trust you will take these concerns into consideration. Thank you. Stuart Scheidler Carlsbad, CA 92008 City of Carlsbad Planning Division 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 City of Carlsbad NOV 0 3 2016 Planning Division RE: Opposition to the proposed Carlsbad Boat Club & Resort Project Dear Carls:bad Planning Commissioners and Staff, I have lived at for five years and I have been part of a timeshare sales staff in Carlsbad for over 20 years. I love my home on the lagoon and I get out on the water often. I am really surprised that anyone would think a timeshare business in the middle of a peaceful residential neighborhood is a good idea. It is a bad mix-totally incompatible. I work at a timeshare 5 days a week and I see how the guests enjoy their vacations. They pack as many people as possible into each unit. A one bedroom designed for four will have eight to ten people staying there. So a 20 unit timeshare will have well over a hundred people every day! That is far too many people for that property = too intense! Additionally, timeshare vacationers don't have to go to work tomorrow and they party all night long as a result. You wouldn't want this in your neighborhood would you? The parking lots at our timeshare are huge but they are always completely full. Each unit has at least two cars and another car for their guests. Plus, there are housekeepers, gardeners, maintenance workers, sales people, the front desk crew and this one will also have boat 'drivers -where do they all park? 32 parking spots is a bad joke. How can this property possibly handle the parking necessary? Cars parked on Adams Street make driving very hazardous. Just pulling in and out of that property on the hill with the blind curve will be dangerous. This proposed project is immense and out of place for the lot it would be built on. It would be a massive 53 feet tall, four story, monstrosity far bigger than the big houses around it. .In a word-INCOMPATIBLE. I hope tha(you, our City Planners, will protect us and our special neighborhood from this ill-conceived business on our precious lagoon. Please deny the application. 7:crkt ;)!;__ Kathy Hutchinson I I Joe and Dee Dee Polzin 39408 Cardiff Ave. Murrieta, CA 92563 Owners of 4382 Adams St., Carlsbad, CA 92008 951-757-1297 951-757-2211 joepolzin@me.com dpolzin@me.com November 21, 2016 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: Opposition to Carlsbad Boat Club and Resort Project A 20 Unit Timeshare 4509 Adams Street, Carlsbad, CA 92008 CT 14-11 CUP 14-10 Dear Carlsbad Planning Staff, We are the owners of APN 206-180-40-00, aka , Carlsbad, CA. 92008. We are in the process of working on plans to submit an application to the City for a single-family home on our lot We are gravely concerned about the possibility that the above mentioned high-density (by compalison to the surrounding area) condo project being developed so close to our future home. Adams Street is just a quiet, narrow, winding lane by the peaceful and spectacular lagoon. This high-density project and the traffic it would bring to our little Jane is totally out of character to our low-density community. The impact of traffic, the noise and the danger it creates to the many pedest1ians, joggers and bicyclists would be far too great It is completely out of character to our quiet area. Furthermore, the fact that timeshare is being considered is simply astonishing! How could there be any development more foreign or out of character to this low-density portion of the lagoon? · Despite what developers/speculators may claim, all of us who live in coastal areas know how people will crowd into each bedroom to enjoy the proximity of the water. This will invite intense partying, loud noise and music, barbequing on the beach, ignoring the peace of neighbors, fast and careless driving, loose dogs, overcrowding, and a general disregard of the peaceful ambience of our neighborhood. The transient nature of the thousands of short-term occupants will insure a complete change to the character of the neighborhood. What a shame it would be! Surely it is not the intent of Staff to allow something that would be so at odds to the essence of our area. Clearly, such intense high-density as (compared to the surrounding area), especially whe n compounded by timeshare use, is astoundingly incompa tible with this long established, quiet residential area. Just the marketing alone and the intense h·affic it would bring to the narrow and winding Adams Street, would create a nuisance as well as a danger to residents. The transients it would attract are typically careless of the peace ancl safety of others around them. ln fact, we would argue that such a use would constitute spot zoning and an incompatible blight on this neighborhood. We ask that you deny this project application and protect the lagoon neighborhood, its residents and values. We would further ask that when .next updating the General Plan, you revise and eliminate all but single-family use for the lagoon area to maintain the character of the lagoon for which Carlsbad is famous. We are certainly not against orderly and rational development, but it must be compatible and not create marked negative impact to the surrounding area. The subject portion of the neighborhood is attractive, low density residential that should be maintained. The ambience of the famed lagoon, its reputation and residents should be rigorously protected. Thank you for your careful and considerate attention to this impactful and sensitive matter. Respectfullyp~ ~.~aft Page 2 Farah Nisan From: Sent: To: Subject: -----Original Message----- Planning Monday, September 26, 2016 9:05 AM Teri Delcamp FW: ADAMS ST TIMESHARE From: Pauline Morisoli'(mailto:) Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 12:15 PM To: Planning Subject: ADAMS ST TIMESHARE I VOTE NO ON THIS DEVELOPMENT. I LIVE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THIS PARTICULAR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. The way in, out and around this area is a dangerous problem. It will add to the pollution of the air, water and detract from the quality of life for this community. Already the East side of EICamino is being covered by developments. Our planning department folks are responsible for the proper care and maintenance of our city. Builders will come in, grab up our premium land, build the houses, take their high profits and move on to the next beautiful site. Please don't allow this to happen. Thank you for reading my message. PAULINE HENDREN MORISOLI, resident of Carlsbad since 1972. Sent from my iPad 1 Farah Nisan From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Ellen Wolfe < Sunday, October 23, 2016 2:29 PM Teri Delcamp; Mick Calarco Alan & Barbre Katof Boat Club Time Share Project -4509 Adams Gentlemen-I have lived at on the Agua Hedionda Lagoon for more than 15 years and want to express my strong opposition to the proposed Boat Club Time Share project proposed at 4509 Adams (CT14- ll/CUP 14-1 0). A 20-Unit Timeshare on this nan·ow road in this location is far too intense a development-It has already been deemed incompatible in an earlier cycle of review, and that continues to be the case. As a homeowner in this area, i appreciate that the property owners will want to build on the lot, but this is not a reasonably sized project. In addition, a timeshare property significantly increases the impact, bringing in volumes of people throughout the year, not to speak of the impact on the lagoon itself. This combination makes the project incompatible to the location. I hope you will take these concerns into consideration. Thank you. Ellen Wolfe Carlsbad, CA 92008 Ellen K. Wolfe The information transmitted is intended only for the person(s) or entity(ies) to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. 1 January 10, 2017 City of Carlsbad Planning Division 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Carlsbad Planning Staff and Commissioners, City of Carlsbad JAN 1 7 Z017 Planning Division I am Roberto Vigilucci and my beautiful wife Jadine and I live at . We bought our piece of paradise in 2004 and we love our home, Carlsbad and our view of the lagoon. Now that piece of paradise could be taken away from us. The Carlsbad Boat Club and Resort 20 unit timeshare project would ruin our neighborhood, property values and quality of life. In 2008 the City of Carlsbad rejected this project in part because: "the requested use is not necessary or desirable for the development of the community in that the timeshare use does not provide any services to other uses within the community, is not in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan in that the use would be detrimental to the existing surrounding residential uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is located, in that the proposed timeshare project at the intensity, bulk and scale of development proposed is not compatible with the existing surrounding single family residential uses in addition to generating increased traffic on residential streets and noise associated with the timeshare operation .... " This is the same incompatible, out of place projectthat was, fortunately, soundly rejected the last time. How could the same thing be proposed again or approved? Our home is right across the street on the hill above the property. There is a long list of things wrong with this project but one that will greatly affect us -also affects all the walkers, joggers, bicyclists, dog walkers and stroller pushers -is the rooftop. Since Adams Street is a designated scenic roadway the roof top cannot rise above the street level. So, the enormous 8,300 plus square foot industrial style rooftop will be very much visible from our home and the street. It is larger than a baseball infield! The problems start with a bank of 20 air conditioning units on the roof! Ugly and noisy and the screening won't help. Not shown on the included drawing is all the other sidewalk level rooftop annoyances. There will need to be vents for 20 stoves which will vent unwelcomed cooking aromas. Even more unwelcomed aromas will come from the numerous bathroom sewer stack vents, which are sometimes called stink pipes, which will emit sewer gasses. But wait there's more -add another 20 to 30 bathroom fan vents! The building will be occupied by approximately 100 people. Also, not shown is the possible array of TV satellite dishes, solar panels and skylights. Since that's still not enough noxious smells there is a garage exhaust fan vent at the front Northwest corner of the lot at sidewalk level spewing the exhaust from 34 cars. These are just some of the examples of what makes this business incompatible with the existing surrounding family homes. The project stinks figuratively and literally. This project caters only to tourists and although the Carlsbad tourism industry is important to the City it should not come at the expense of the residents. My restaurants cater to tourists as well as locals and they smell beautiful. I would gladly forgo the possible added business the project might bring. We are not opposed to development in general or even something reasonable on this particular lot. We ask that you help our neighborhood preserve its special Carlsbad small town beach character and deny the application for this massive, incompatible project. cc Mayor and City Council members . 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan .• :<fesj~-of-th~----~-~-==>: subdivis · : provid~~;~!-~Jhe--! J . ---I ---. . I ::~~v~f~f~{~~~~~~~~~j~.:··o.~IA ~m:iffi'i:i'ffil . ~, ~~ . cooling .d~portunitfe$ in the subdivi~idn, in that st?~c~ures are oriejn~ed·-such that ·~~e timeshare uni will be 'able to I I -' 'I -- take ad~~nta -so pr~v~1 1~g breeze~ ard ~-~ulate! he~tmg and codll~g t)W4ctua~in~ fully fu_n~ior.i~g d~ors an~ 1in~w~....,., w1thm ,hf umts. I :! 1 I I -~ 'I l f, Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Greg Nelson Tuesday, January 10, 2017 11:13 AM Teri Delcamp Carlsbad Boat Club My family and I have enjoyed our fine city since moving here in 1959 .... I am a graduate of Carlsbad High Schoo l as are my 4 children. We love this city, the people in it and our city government ! ! ! Buddy Lewis was my football coach and history teacher ! ! ! ! I write this note to you to encourage you and your staff to recommend for approval Mike Pfankuch's Time Share project. It will be an added "flower" to our beautiful coastal city and built by one of our own long time local businessman who has contributed much that helps make Carlsbad special!!!! Yes our Lagoon is special but this project will allow more people to enjoy it I!! If I can be of any se'rvice feel free to call me at Thank you!!! Sincerely Greg Nelson Carlsbad , Ca 92008 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Leo Brodeur Saturday, January 14, 2017 8:11PM Teri Delcamp New Project We need to have new projects to keep the city active with new ideas. The lagoon project would give a new look for the area and bring activity to a stagnant Lagoon. Sent from my iPhohe -1 Teri Delcamp Subject: FW: Carlsbad Boat Club From: Jack Brey (mailto: Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2017 2:39 PM To: Greg Fisher Subject: Carlsbad Boat Club Dear Mr. Fisher - Tlus is to inform you of my support for the project proposed by Mr. Jim Cow·tney. As someone who has been in the civil engineering and land development business for over forty years, I am a strong believer in responsible development relative to both the conununity and developer needs. As with any development project, there will always be opposition however; it is my understanding the Mr. Courtney has endured a long and arduous process of work-ing with both the city and local residents concerns; and has made substantial concessions to both. I also believe strongly in owners and property rights. After a decade and a bat f of his numerous compromise and concessions, I truly believe it is time to allow this project to move forward. I hope the city will at last find closure with the project approval. Thank You! Jack Brey President JB Consulting Services, LLC Land Development Consulting/ADS Affiliate Bakersfield, CA 93312 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Marcy Agatep Monday, January 16, 2017 11:09 AM Teri Delcamp Jim Courtney Carlsbad Boat Club Project I am in favor of the development known as The Carlsbad Boat Club. I think it w ill be an asset to our wonderful Carlsbad community. Thank you Marcy Agatep Sent from my iPad 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Arnie Cohen < Monday, January 16, 2017 1:07 PM Don Neu; Teri Delcamp; Greg Fisher Carlsbad Boat Club project We are wrrting to express our full support of the proposed Carlsbad Boat Club project. We recently attended Jim Courtney's public meeting and once again heard that this plan is in line with what the Coastal Commission has repeatedly said is the only use they would approve, which is Visitor Commercial. It is clear that Jim and his team have worked long and hard to create a plan that meets the zoning requirements, is sensitive to the look and feel of the neighborhood and has features to help protect the lagoon. It is a good compromise for th~t property while allowing a land owner to effectively use their property. As strong proponents of private property rights we do not see any justifiable reason to deny this project and we encourage Planning Commission approval when it hears this matter. Sincerely, Arnie & Teri Cohen 1 Teri Delca mp From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Teri, et at James Brubaker < Monday, January 16, 2017 1:31PM Teri Delcamp Don Neu; Greg Fisher Carlsbad Boat Club Project CT 14-11 I CUP 14-10 As an actively involved resident and avid proponent of the continued quality stewardship of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon, I highly recommend this project be approved. The fact that the land is zoned for commercial and cannot be built residential, and will meet all codes, regulations and requirements, makes it imperative to allow it to go forward just based on a private property rights issue -the owners have been working for a project approval for 15 years. The additional facts that: it will not bring in more, (possibly less), traffic than the prior restaurant (there were always a lot more than 20 diners there when I went, timeshares are rarely 100% occupied and vehicle time of use varies greatly, and not all tenants will have cars.); the owners have reduced the project size by 25% to cooperate with the neighbors; it will fit in with the neighboring properties and environment; and it will benefit Carlsbad by bringing in additional visitors to spend their money. It is a great example of the "smart growth" that we need at this stage of buildout. This project needs to be approved for the good of the city and of all residents of Carlsbad, with the exception of those that oppose all development/improvements. Please approve this project. Thank you. James L Brubaker Carlsbad, CA 92008 This E-mail is covered by the Electron1c Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and ts legally privileged. This information is confidential information and is intended only for the use of the individual or enhty named above. If the reader of thrs message ls not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communtcation ts strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in e1rnr, please notify us cmmediately by replytng to this message and deleting the material from any computer. 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Tracy Carmichael < Monday, January 16, 2017 2:29 PM Teri Delcamp Fw: CT 14-11/CUP 13-10 On Monday, January 16, 2017 2:24PM. Tracy Carmichael <whatzuptlc@yahoo.com> wrote: To whom this may concern, MY husband and I have been carlsbad residents since 1988 and property and business owners since 1989. we love the city of carlsbad. we have seen the city grow and change over the years which has allowed everyone to enjoy a beautiful pl ace to live. we support property owners' rights to develop within the guidelines of the city of carlsbad, the california coastal commission and the State of california. Today we are writing to you in support of the CT 14-11/CUP 14-10, a proposed project by Jim courtney and Mike Pfankuch. we have known Mr. courtney and Mr. Pfankuch; both carlsbad resi dents for many years. we have read and understand t heir proposed project . It is our understanding and belief that it is zoned for commercial use and is a compatible good fit for the neighborhood while benefiting the city of carlsbad and it 's residents . we are hoping everyone can see the val ue of good planning~ compromise, and will recommend approval of this project CT 14 -11/CUP 14 -10. If you should have any further questions for us please see the contact information listed below. Best Regards, & michael carlsbad, CA 92008 Teri Del Camp Planning Dept. City of Carlsbad Philip J. Urbina Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Carlsbad Boat Club Timeshares Project -Support Dear Ms. Del Camp: I am writing in support of the Carlsbad Boat Club Timeshare Project that will be going before the Planning Commission at its February meeting. The property has been used for a boat launch on Agua Hedionda Lagoon for decades and the proposed project is an ideal fit for the area. It is zoned for commercial use and the 20-unit timeshare project meets all zoning requirements without generating undue traffic to the area. The project will bring visitors to our city and those visitors will contribute to the City's tax base. In today's days of renting via Airbnb or VRBO, which is certainly going on in the area, this project is compatible with the Agua Hedionda Lagoon neighborhood. After exhaustive reviews, City staff is recommending approval and the Planning Commission should follow the staff recommendation. Respectfully, Philip Urbina Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Mail Center < Tuesday, January 17, 2017 10:25 AM T eri Delcamp Carlsbad Boat Club Timeshares This correspondence is to support the project of Mr. Pfankuch for the Carlsbad Boat Club Timeshares. We feel that the project meets the zoning criteria and is compatible with all the Air b&b use in the area. It would also be a financial asset to the City of Carlsbad. Thank you, Richard and Pauline Dimond Carlsbad, CA 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: tricia benton > Thursday, January 19, 2017 9:08AM Teri Delcamp Carlsbad Boat Club Timeshares Hi Teri-I know there is a Time Share project currently under review by the City on the Lagoon . While I know there are many outspoken people against this project, there are also many of us, a little bit more silent perhaps, that are actually in favor of this project. My family and I fully support this project and think it would be a great addition for Carlsbad . It appears that it is currently zoned for this type of project and I think it sounds awesome. Thank you for your consideration. I am sure you've been inundated with opposition, so I wanted to be su re to voice my positive opinion on t he subject. Many thanks! Tricia Benton 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Daniel Meritt < Thursday, January 19, 2017 9:29 PM Teri Delcamp Support for the Carlsbad Boat Club Timeshare I'm a retired firefighter and 40 year resident of Carlsbad. I'm a proud Carlsbad citizen having raised my family here all of whom also reside here in Carlsbad. I own and reside on property overlooking the beautiful Agua Hedionda and believe the Carlsbad Boat Club development is long overdue and will be an excellent example of proper land use planning. It would serve all the citizens Carlsbad by creating tax revenue for our city and by providing accommodations for visiting tourists eager to enjoy the rest of our fine city and all its amenities. Please suppatt this win-win project. Daniel Meritt, , Ca Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Teri, Laura Simons < Friday, January 20, 2017 8:14AM Teri Delcamp Carlsbad Boat Club Timeshares I know there is a Time Share project currently under review by the City on the Lagoon. While I know there are many outspoken people against th is project, there are also many of us that are actually in favor of this project. My family and I fully support this project and think it would be a great addition for Carlsbad. It appears that it is currently zoned for this type of project and I think it sounds awesome. I live on the north shore of the lagoon and think this would make my neighborhood even more special! Thank you for your consideration. I am sure you've been inundated with opposition, so I wanted to be sure to voice my positive opinion on the subject. Many thanks! Laura Simons Ross Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: January 18, 2017 Laurie Pfan Friday, January 20, 2017 5:25 PM Teri Delcamp Carlsbad Boat Club Timeshare Project City of Carlsbad Planning Commission RE: CARLSBAD BOAT CLUB TIMESHARE PROJECT Dear Members of the Planning Commission, My name is Laurie Pfankuch and I am a lifetime resident of Carlsbad and a Community Service Officer at the Carlsbad Police Department. I currently live at , which is just up the street from the proposed timeshare project at 4509 Adams Street. I grew up in my current home and returned there in 2015 with my husband and two small children. While growing up on Adams Street in the 1980's and 1990's, using the lagoon was part of our lives. During that time, 4509 Adams Street operated as Carlsbad Boat Club, where the public could pay to launch boats and use the beach. For a short time, there was also a popular Mexican restaurant called Jose's on the site. Neither of these businesses affected the neighborhood or the lagoon in a negative way and it was nice to have a place that made the lagoon accessible to the public. Even with the boat club, restaurant and the rental/launch site that is now Carlsbad Lagoon, the area still had a very residential feel. We did not have heavy traffic or parking issues, especially because there was always onsite parking at the Boat Club and Jose's . .Since returning to the neighborhood in 2015, we have purchased a boat and use it on the Agua Hedionda Lagoon frequently. The lagoon is very safe and regulated by the buoys that mark the jet ski, boating and no wake zones. Unfortunately, there seems to be a presumption by the Bristol Cove residents that the lagoon is for their private use. We have many friends in Bristol Cove who often say, "This is our lagoon," and talk about how the City needs to shut down the Carlsbad Lagoon rental business. To be honest, it appears that the Agua Hedionda Lagoon has become private, for the sole use of the residents of Bristol Cove and the few large single family homes on the water. Asking the owners of 4509 Adams Street to build another multi-million dollar residence on the lagoon will only make this problem worse. By approving a timeshare project, the City could maintain tourism use of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon without marring the surrounding neighborhood. I truly hope the Planning Commission does not allow residents with immediate access to the lagoon to dictate the development of 4509 Adams Street, which is zoned for tourism use. I have worked for the Carlsbad Police Department for nine years as a Community Service Officer. During six of those years, I worked for the Traffic Division, doing parking enforcement and assisting with collision investigations. In my experience, there have been no parking issues or major collisions on Adams Street near the proposed timeshare site. The only traffic related issue on Adams Street is speeding, which needs to be 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Jim Boone < Friday, January 20, 2017 12:27 PM Teri Delcamp Carlsbad Boat Club Time Shares I sincerely hope you will recommend approval of the project called Carlsbad Boat Club Time Shares. A small boutique time share on the lagoon shore would be a much better venue than a hotel or restaurant. The long time Carlsbad residents proposing this project wa nt the best for Carlsbad and so do I. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of this proposed project Jim Boone ...... Carlsbad resident since 1971 Sent from my iPhone 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: To Whom it May Concern: Talin Haritunians > Friday, January 20, 2017 2:39 PM Don Neu; Greg Fisher; Teri Delcamp Carlsbad Boat Club Project (CT 14-11 I CUP 14-10) I am writing to you in SUPPORT of the project proposed at the Carlsbad Boat Club. Mr. Courtney and Mr. Pfankuch have spent considerable time and thought in carefully planning this project. As long tenn Carlsbad citizens, they have made every effort to listen to their neighbors and have modified their project accordingly to address any concerns. This project will be beneficial to botb tbe city and its residents and 1 strongly mge you to approve this project. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Regards, Tali.I1 Haritunians, Ph.D. 1 Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Kevin Bender < Sunday, January 22, 2017 4:18 PM Kevin Bender CT 14-11/PUD 16-02/CUP 14-10 Carlsbad Boat Club & Resort I'm writing Carlsbad Planning Division staff and the Carlsbad City CO\mcil, Carlsbad Planning Commission and California Coastal Commission to register my opposition to this proposed 20 unit timeshare condominium project. My opposition centers on: • increased traffic on already over-burdened Adams St. • time share condos are inappropriate use of the site~ sunounded as it is by single family homes • potential for abuse of the lagoon waters and shore by scores of visitors who don't share the regard 'locals' have for this precious lagoon resource NIMBY Note: Having first moved into 4070 Adams St h1 1970, I've seen the south end of Adams St. tum from a sleepy dead-end into a thoroughfare of traffic. Can we begin to consider the quality of life for long-time area residents as being more important than short-term enjoyment by out-of-towners? I attended a community meeting with project applicant Jim Courtney and even he admitted this is not the idea use of this site. I'd like to emphasize that what is allowed is not always appropiiate. I encourage denial of these permit requests. I also heartily encourage all council, commission and staff concerned as well as our community at large to regard and treat the Agua Hedionda Lagoon area as the important historic site and cultural landmark it is. We must zealously protect it and prevent its mis-development and mis-use. Thank you for your time and attention. Kevin Bender Carlsbad, CA Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Hello Teri, Sam Ross Monday. January 23, 2017 11:31 AM Teri Delcamp Carlsbad Boat Club I have heard there is a time share project currently under review by the City on the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. While there are many outspoken people against this project, I'd like to let you know my family and I are in favor of the Carlsbad Boat Club and hope the City will approve the development. I live in the community called The Bluffs and think it will be a great addition for Carlsbad. With only 20 units. I do not feel the local roads will be greatly impacted by increased traffic from people staying at the club. The land is zoned for this type of project and I think it sounds awesome. Thank you for your consideration. I am sure you've been inundated with opposition, so I wanted to be sure to voice my positive opinion on the subject. Many thanks! Kindest Regards, Sam Ross Carlsbad, CA 92008 1 \>~ 0L~t-t\iv~t~ C:ott\'<f1~l1o«~ l: ~l ~G.At:\\--t(.. ~~ t...c-~\ -r~ .l-.J!:::>T '{t::>u l{.'~-(c\u ~<:..:>Q. ~'Cij-L~~~ ~11. '-{~ f..:. c, ~f"l ~A.. \"\:, ~L-.i.c>"-..1 l ~ ~ e..WJ ~ ~f'e-R.-:q. C:::>"tt ~<\,~~~"-~C. ( Th~ O''J.4t{ ·~0~ ~~ ~t--( f"Lt=-X_ \ rl~ ~\~~ ~~ Y: ~a:-\ttr~ o\?~a~~ ~\~ (.)~~ RF.t'-~~~<;" ~s ~~A...~ 0RP~t-~ ~ ~e"~LG \~ ~ \j~'i. ~xc.;..~~t\_'-~ ~~~\t~~-irt~ _ ~'C,. ~~ ~~~\.\(:)~ ~~n~~ k.\.V\-t-\~ N.~ TMc s;..t~- \L>\:: ~ult.-\ t::>~ ~MZ: ~ 't~l-~ ~~~ '~!:' I ~7 'i~~~ ~ , . " n -~ .~. t~, r--..~ ~~ 0~'\fie w c.-H<=>~C '···e=--~ ~ l-LL '-L")l)o, _, , ~ '" \~\~ ~U\.\.-~ \-MC.._ -s \t-(~~\ Q~~"~ .ity of Carlsbad :>Ianning Divrslcn Teri Delcamp From: Sent: To: Subject: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 9:16AM Teri Delcamp Carlsbad Boat Club Project I have been a Carlsbad resident for nearly 60 years. Our city has done a wonderful job of planning its growth. We presently have a group that want to stop afl growth. That is insane. A person has a right develop his land and profit from his investments. The Carlsbad Boat Club P:reject is a reasonable request and deserves your approval. Thank you for your service to Carlsbad, and I am confident you will do the what is best for the entire city and not just what the no growth people want Joe DeDiminicantanio While every attempt has been made to remove all malware and computer viruses sender assumes no liability 1