HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-06-13; Public Financing Authority; 2; Approve Request for Proposal, Plans, Specifications, Contractors List and Authorize Solicitation Proposals for Carlsbad City Golf Course ProjectCARLSBAD PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY I
AB# DEPT. HD. 'w m: APPROVE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL, PLANS,
MTG. b- 13-00 ClTYAmY AUTHORIZE THE SOLICITATION OF PROPOSALS FOR
SPECIFICATIONS, CONTRACTORS LIST, AND
THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CARLSBAD CITY GOLF
DEPT. CD CITY MGRa COURSE PROJECT
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends the Authority ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 9. approving a
Request for Proposal, plans, specifications, contractors list, and authorize the solicitation
of proposals for the construction of the Carlsbad City Golf Course Project.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
At its meeting of April 18, 2000, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, acting in concert
with the Board of the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, approved the Joint Exercise of
Powers Agreement creating the Carlsbad Public Financing Authority. On May 16, 2000,
the Authority adopted rules and regulations, a conflict of interest code, and contractor
selection procedures for the proposed Carlsbad City Golf Course Project. The Authority
has become the controlling entity which will finance, construct, manage, operate, and
maintain the Golf Course Project on behalf of the City of Carlsbad as the owner of the
property upon which the project will be developed.
Recent Project Backwound: The Golf Course Project has undergone several design
changes over the last 3 years necessitated by the Federal and State Resource Agencies
negotiating the project's "hard-line" design with the City within the Carlsbad Habitat
Management Plan ("HMP). City staff, working closely with the members of the City
Council appointed Golf Course Steering Committee, has overseen the incorporation of
these many changes into the design with the assistance of numerous consultants which
comprise the design team. As the lengthy, complex, and arduous negotiations on the
HMP and the Golf Course Project near conclusion, the City's original goals for this project
dating back over 10 years remain in place today:
"A championship length, high quality public golf facility that is accessible
and affordable to Carlsbad residents; a project that is responsibly financed
and efficiently operated and maintained"
Staff will review the project's components and describe the numerous features of the
project during the Authority's consideration of this item.
Status of Project Permits and Entitlements: The Golf Course Project's numerous
permits and entitlements can best be described by jurisdiction: Federal, State, and local.
Federal Agencies: Final approval of the Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan is
scheduled during the June I July time period. The Golf Course Project is a "hard-line"
design project within the HMP; that is to say, the Golf Course Project design is effectively
"approved" by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service consistent with the final approval
of the HMP. The City of Carlsbad will, thereafter, have the authority to issue a "take
authorization permit" to the Golf Course Project. Staff anticipates this action to occur in
August at the time of a recommendation of award of the construction contracts.
I
(4 6. - -4
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 2
The Golf Course Project also requires a 404 Permit from the United States Army Corps of
Engineers. This permit, with various conditions of approval, is anticipated to be issued to
the City by the Corps sometime during the month of June, 2000. This permit incorporates
all conditions and requirements of the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
State AQencies: The California Department of Fish and Game was a participant,
along with the USFWS, in the HMP negotiations with the City. Their modifications to the
project have already been incorporated. The project does require, however, a "1601 /
1603 Streambed Alteration Agreement" from CDFG. The City has previously filed its
application, including all exhibits, supporting data, and fees with CDFG. Issuance of their
permit is anticipated within the July I August time period.
The City has already secured approval from the State Water Quality Control Board, San
Diego Region, in the form of a permit waiver for the Golf Course Project.
The remaining State Agency hurdle lies with the California Coastal Commission. Although
the City of Carlsbad has "Local Coastal Plan" ("LCP) authority to issue coastal
development permits to projects within its LCP boundaries, such as the Golf Course
Project, the California Coastal Commission retains "appeal" authority over all permits. City
staff met with Coastal staff on May 26, 2000 in an effort to gauge the potential for the
Commission to exercise its appeal authority over this City issued coastal development
permit of approval. Although the initial meeting with the Coastal staff was a positive one,
City staff cannot at this time predict the outcome of this potential action by the California
Coastal Commission. Staff will continue to meet with Coastal staff, monitor the issues,
and report any actions affecting the project.
Local Aqency: On June 7, 2000, the Planning Commission adopted
Resolutions 4772, 4773, 4774, 4775, and 4776 certifying the Environmental Impact
Report, approving the Conditional Use Permit, Coastal Development Permit, Hillside
Development Permit, and Special Use Permit for the project. The actions of the Planning
Commission are final and do not require City Council action.
The Golf Course Project also requires an encroachment permit from the San Diego Gas
and Electric Company due to the existence of numerous SDGE utility easements
containing both underground and overhead facilities crisscrossing the property. City staff
has worked out the myriad of design details affecting the project with SDGE. SDGE
representatives have indicated their encroachment permit, including a letter of permission
to grade within their easements, is to be finalized within the next 30 days.
Project Construction Strategy: The Project is divided into 3 separate construction
contracts: (1) golf course construction, (2) all buildings, and (3) bridge structure over
College Boulevard. This division is designed to seek the best qualified contractors to
construct 3 distinctly different construction products. This approach also carries with it the
economic advantage to the project of encouraging pricing competition among equally
qualified contractors with similar building expertise.
$8 L’ - -
PAGE 3 OF AGENDA BILL NO. a
All 3 construction packages have incorporated the latest, and hopefully final, round of
changes from the Resource Agencies. These 3 construction packages have also secured
the required development processing approvals from the City’s Building, Planning,
Engineering, Water District, and Fire Departments. From a construction document
standpoint, the 3 construction packages are now ready for solicitation of construction
proposals.
The Authority adopted specific contractor selection procedures for the Golf Course Project
at its meeting of May 16, 2000, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 2. These selection
procedures identify a 7-member Selection Committee who will review, evaluate, and
recommend for award by the Authority the 3 construction contracts. The form of the
contractors’ proposals to the Authority for the work is a Request for Proposal. As required
by Section 2.2 of the adopted contractor selection procedures, Staff has assembled the
attached Exhibit 3 list of contractors to receive the Request for Proposal for the 3
construction contracts. Approval of the contractor’s list by the Authority is an action item in
the accompanying resolution.
Responses to the Request for Proposal shall be judged on merit and are not limited solely
to the “low-bid’‘ received for the construction of the work. Section 4.2 of the contractor
selection procedures contains specific evaluation criteria including:
- Construction bid - Prior experience - Special skills - Project management expertise - References
The Selection Committee will apply weighted multipliers to the evaluation criteria to
determine the best response to the Request for Proposal for each of the 3 construction
contracts. Staff wishes to emphasize that the Selection Committee’s recommendation to
the Authority for award of the 3 contracts may not be to the “low-bidder” but, rather, to the
best contractor for each of the 3 construction products based upon the response to the
Request for Proposal.
Staff anticipates the Selection Committee will conclude its evaluation of the proposals in
early August. If the remaining project permits and entitlements are granted to the City by
the respective Federal and State Resource Agencies in a timely way, award of the 3
construction contracts may occur sometime during the month of August at the earliest.
Year 2000 Project Schedule: The year 2000 project schedule is entirely dependent
upon the issuance of the previously discussed Federal and State Agency permits and
approvals. If these entitlements are issued to the City within the June through August time
period as previously pledged by the respective agencies representatives, then the Golf
Course Project is capable of beginning construction in September, 2000 as planned. Staff
wishes to emphasize that without all Federal and State Agency permits in hand prior to the
end of August, 2000, the Authority would be precluded from awarding the 3 construction
contracts. Therefore, no construction activity on the Golf Course Project would commence
in 2000.
3
It 4% h
PAGE 4 OF AGENDA BILL NO.
h
The remaining project schedule for year 2000 is also influenced by the activities of the
California Coastal Commission. As previously discussed, staff will keep the Authority
informed regarding any development in this venue.
Central to the Golf Course Project schedule for year 2000 is the question, “Why solicit
construction proposals at this time without the certainty of receiving the project permits
from the Federal and State agencies?” The answer is there remains the chance the
Federal and State Agencies will perform as represented; if so, the Authority should be
similarly prepared in advance to begin construction. Solicitation of construction proposals
during the June through July time period will ensure the Authority’s ability to begin the
project in September, 2000 if all entitlements are secured. Staff wishes to emphasize that
the Authority acquires no risk, cost exposure, or liability whatsoever by soliciting proposals
at this time. Cost exposure would potentially attach to the Authority only if contracts were
awarded and then later terminated or excessively delayed.
Therefore, following the year 2000 project schedule discussed above, staff recommends
the Authority:
- Authorize the solicitation of construction proposals at this time;
- Authorize the Selection Committee to evaluate the proposals and be
ready to recommend award of the 3 contracts.
Given the status of the remaining Federal and State Resource Agency permits and
approvals, staff will not recommend the Authority award the 3 contracts unless these
entitlements are secured prior to September 1, 2000. If the approvals are not secured by
this date, staff will recommend the Authority reject all proposals.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
On June 7, 2000, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 4772 certifying the
Environmental Impact Report finding the project consistent with the California
Environmental Quality Act and applicable City ordinances and environmental policies.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Preliminary cost estimates have been prepared and range between $22 million and $25
million for all project components including:
Golf Course construction;
Construction of all buildings;
Fixtures, furnishings, and equipment for all buildings;
College Boulevard bridge construction;
Grow-in maintenance for golf course;
Pre-opening expenses;
Construction of 3 industrial pads;
Completion of street and median improvements to Palomar Airport
Road including undergrounding of existing overhead utilities;
Street improvements to Hidden Valley Road and Palomar Oaks Way;
4
P
PAGE 5 OF AGENDA BILL NO. &
- All signage and lighting;
- Substantial utility work including several relocations; - All onsite and offsite environmental mitigation;
- Acquisition of offsite mitigation property; - Supplemental architectural, engineering, and environmental
- Construction management; - Inspection and testing;
- Construction contingencies.
design work resulting from Resource Agency processing;
The funding for the construction of the golf course is expected to come, first, from the
issuance of bonds, and then from other funding sources if needed. The bonds will be
repaid from golf course revenues. Thus, in order to determine the amount of bonds that
can be issued, an estimate of the annual net income from the golf course operations is
needed.
Earlier this year, the City retained Economic Research Associates ("ERA) to provide an
overview of the golf market in San Diego and to prepare pro-forma financial projections for
the City's proposed golf course project. This report is attached as Exhibit 4.
The preliminary estimates show potential net income before debt service ranging from
$1 .I million to $2 million per year for the first 5 years after opening the facility. Stable year
net income in today's dollars is estimated at $1.5 million per year. Although we are still
developing the financing plan for the golf course, it is clear that the revenue to be
generated from the course alone will not be sufficient to repay bonds if they were issued
for the entire amount of the project costs (estimated between $22 million and $25 million).
Fieldman / Rolapp & Associates, the City's financial advisors on the project, have
estimated the revenues from the course will support a bond issue of approximately $17
million which will provide $13.7 million towards the project costs after deducting capitalized
interest, the reserve fund, and other issuance costs. Therefore, an additional $8.3 million
to $1 1.3 million is needed to construct the course as currently planned.
The additional funding could be raised in several ways. One option would be to obtain an
advance from the City's General Fund to be repaid over time as the revenues from the golf
course allow. With the current estimates, the repayment will take over 40 years. Another
option would be to obtain an advance from the General Fund but repay it from the sale of
the 3 industrial pads that will be developed along with the golf course.
The golf course site pian depicts 3 industrial parcels totaling 16.9 acres that are not
intended to be used in the golf course operation. Staff has had these 3 parcels
independently appraised under the conditions of the parcels being fully developed and
entitled through the development of the golf course project. The value of these 3 parcels
is approximately $11.5 million. The sale of the parcels may provide sufficient funds to
repay the advance from the General Fund. In the event the City Council elects to advance
funds from the General Fund, staff would recommend this advance be approved as an
interest-bearing advance so that the General Fund may eventually recover all lost
earnings on the advance as well.
5
P
PAGE 6 OF AGENDA BILL NO. d-
Another option, but one not recommended by staff at this time, would be to issue bonds for
the entire project ($22 - $25 million) and pay the additional debt service from the General
Fund as needed. This would create an ongoing debt service burden for the General Fund
that may be difficult in later years.
Fieldman I Rolapp has also been working with staff on determining what types of bonds
should be issued and what type credit enhancement may be needed to sell the bonds at a
reasonable interest rate. At this time, it appears that any bonds issued will require the
backing of the General Fund of the City. This means that if the golf course does not
generate sufficient money to pay the debt service on the bonds, the City would need to
advance the funds to make those payments. Fieldman I Rolapp, together with staff, are
still investigating methods by which the General Fund’s financial commitment to the golf
course debt could be limited. However, it is unlikely that any structure will be able to
reduce the financial risk to the City’s General Fund without significantly increasing the cost
of the debt to the golf course.
More details on the total financing package will be presented to the Authority prior to the
award of the construction contracts. It is anticipated the bonds will not be issued until just
prior to the beginning of construction.
EXHIBITS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Resolution No. d- approving the Request for Proposal, plans,
specifications, contractors list, and authorizing the solicitation of proposals for the
construction of the Carlsbad City Golf Course Project.
Authority’s selection procedures for construction contractors adopted by the
Authority May 16, 2000.
Recommended contractor’s list for receipt of Request for Proposals.
Report from Economic Research Associates.
Request for Proposal on file in the Community Development Department.
Plans, specifications, and contract documents related to the Carlsbad City Golf
Course Project including golf course construction, construction of all buildings, and
construction of the bridge over College Boulevard, on file in the Purchasing
Department.
6
, , I’
1
2
3
4
5
6
I
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2;
2f
RESOLUTION NO. 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CARLSBAD PUBLIC
FINANCING AUTHORITY APPROVING A REQUEST FOR
PROPOSAL, PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, CONTRACTORS
LIST, AND AUTHORIZING THE SOLICITATION OF
PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE
CARLSBAD CITY GOLF COURSE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Carlsbad Public Financing Authority, hereafter referred to as the
”Authority,” was formed on April 18, 2000 by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad
and the Board of the Carlsbad Municipal Water District; and
WHEREAS, the Authority adopted on May 16, 2000 a resolution approving rules
and regulations, a conflict of interest code, and contractor selection procedures for the
Carlsbad City Golf Course Project; hereafter referred to as the “Project;” and
WHEREAS, a Request for Proposal, plans, specifications, and contractor’s list
have been prepared on behalf of the Authority; and
WHEREAS, the Authority hereby finds it necessary, desirable, and in the public
interest to proceed with the solicitation of development proposals for the Project at this
time pending anticipated requisite permit approvals from Federal and State Agencies.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the
Carlsbad Public Financing Authority as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That in accordance with Section 2.2 of the aforementioned contractor
selection procedures adopted by the Authority on May 16, 2000, the contractor‘s list is
hereby approved.
3. That in accordance with Section 2.1 of the aforementioned contractor
selection procedures adopted by the Authority on May 16, 2000, three (3) Requests for
c .I
1
2
3
4
5
6
I
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
25
28
Proposal for the construction of the Carlsbad City Golf Course Project are hereby
approved and staff is directed to solicit proposals in accordance with said procedures.
4. That plans and specifications for the construction of the Carlsbad City Golf
Course Project including the golf course, all buildings, and bridge over College
Boulevard are hereby approved and staff is directed to solicit proposals in accordance
with the aforementioned procedures.
5. That in accordance with Section 4.1 of the aforementioned contractor
selection procedures adopted by the Authority on May 16, 2000, the Authority
authorizes out of state business travel for those members of the Selection Committee
approved by the Authority’s Executive Director as may be necessary to assist with the
evaluation of the proposals received for the Project.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the Carlsbad
Public Financing Authority on the 13th day of June , 2000, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Board Members Lewis, 211, Finnila,nd Nygaard.
NOES: None
ABSENT: Board Membe
- CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Chairman
1 /
LORRAINE M. WOOD, Secretary
(SEAL)
-2-
,- 1.
EXHIBIT 2
CARLSBAD PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
SELECTION PROCEDURES FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACTORS FOR THE CARLSBAD GOLF
COURSE PROJECT
I .O BACKGROUND
The City of Carlsbad ("City") acting with the Carlsbad Municipal Water District
("CMWD") has formed a separate legal entity, a joint powers authority, entiled
the "Carlsbad Public Financing Authority," hereafter referred to as the "Authority."
Generally, the roles and responsibilities of the Authority include:
Obtain a lease interest in the property on which the golf course will be
constructed under a lease agreement with the City as fee owner;
Assume complete management and control of the property pending
completion of the proposed improvements;
Indemnify and hold harmless the City and CMWD from all liabilities,
damages, losses, etc., arising from the Authority's management of the
property and operation of all facilities and activities thereon;
Provide all financing for the development of a championship length, daily
fee municipal Golf Course Project, hereafter referred to as the "Project;"
Enter into management, maintenance, operations, construction, service,
consulting, and other contracts as may be required;
Develop and adopt policies and procedures for the solicitation of
construction related contracts;
Solicit, evaluate, award, and administer all construction related contracts;
Manage the construction of the Project through to completion following
which the golf course and all facilities thereon may be managed by a third-
party contract operator on behalf of the Authority;
Lease the completed Project back to the City and, thereafter, assume
responsibility for its management and operation on behalf of the City;
The Authority Board of Directors shall prepare and deliver on or before
June 30 of each calendar year an annual report to the City summarizing
all activities related to the management, operation, and fiscal condition of
the Project;
Conduct other business incidental to, and as may be required by, the
Board to facilitate its management, operation, and financing of the Project,
2.1 Introduction
The Authority will issue 3 different Requests for Proposal (hereafter referreti to
as "RFP) for the development of various components of the project includinp.
1
.?
(1) golf course construction; (2) building constnrction; and (3) College Boulevard
bridge construction. The Authorii will develop and adopt standard selection
criteria to be applied to all 3 Requests for Proposal. All submittals to the 3 RFPs
will be evaluated solely by the Authority.
2.2 Identification of Contractors to Receive Prooosals
The Authority, through its authorized representatives, shall prepare a list of no
fewer that 5 potential contractors who specialize in the type of work required for
each of the 3 RFPs for the work. The identification and inclusion of potential
contractors on these 3 lists shall be made at the sole discretion of the Authority.
Said lists of potential contractors shall be considered final at the time of adoption
of the rules and regulations by the Authority.
2.3 Pre-Prooosal Conference and Site Visit
A pre-proposal conference and site visit shall be conducted by the Authority on
(to be determined) , 2000 at (to be determined) am / pm in
Conference Room 173 - B of the City of Carlsbad's Faraday Center facility, 1635
Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. Invited Proposers shall be
requested to attend or send representatives to this pre-proposal conference to
familiarize themselves with the site and the conditions set forth in the RFP. The
Authority reserves the right to schedule an additional pre-proposal conference
and site visit should the Authority determine the necessity to do so. In such
case, all interested parties shall be given advance written notice. Attendance at
the pre-proposal conference(s) by prospective Proposers is recommended but
not mandatory.
Before submitting a proposal, each Proposer shall examine the 'RFP and shall
visit the site of the proposed work and observe its conditions in' order that the
Proposer may be fully informed for purposes of preparing a response to the RFP.
Proposers may, at their own risk and expense, conduct subsurface investigations
of the project site, provided they request in writing and receive permission in
writing from the Authority at least five (5) working days in advance of initiating
their own site investigation. Before undertaking any subsurface investigations of
the project site, Proposers shall acquaint themselves with the environmental
resources on the site and shall take all reasonable steps to avoid adverse
impacts to said resources. Written requests from Proposers to u.ndertake their
own subsurface site investigation shall be directed via FAX to:
CARLSBAD PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY CARLSBAD CITY GOLF COURSE PROJECT attention: John J. Cahill., Municipal Projects Manager
1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008 FAX: 760-602-8560 PHONE: 760-602-2726
2
2.4 Copies of Reauest for Proposal
At the time of the pre-proposal conference and site visit, the Authority shall
furnish at its own expense one (I) complete copy of the RFP, including all
drawings, specifications, contract documents, attachments, and existing
addenda to each Proposer in attendance. Additional copies of the RFP may be
secured by Proposers from the Purchasing Department. City of Carlsbad, 1635
Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California, 92008 at a cost of (to be determined 1
per set.
2.5 Reauest for ProDosal Submission Date
All responses from contractors submitting proposals for the RFP shall be
received no later than 4:OO p.m. (to be determined] 2000 in the office of the
Purchasing Department, City of Carlsbad, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad,
California, 92008. No time extensions shall be granted by the Authority to any
Proposer beyond the aforementioned submission date and time. The Authority
shall reject all submissions received after the aforementioned submission date
and time.
2.6 . Clarifications Reaardina the Reauest for ProDosal
Requests for information, clarification, or other questions regarding intent or
content of the design details contained within the RFP shall be in writina and
forwarded bv FAX to the Authority, attention John J. Cahill, Municipal Projects
Manager at 760-602-8560 no later than 4:OO p.m., (to be determined) 2000.
The Authority will not accept written requests for information, clarification, or
other questions beyond this date. The Authority will not accept oral questions,
clarifications, or requests for information of any kind in any manner other by
written FAX.
The Authority shall prepare, or cause to be prepared by others, a written
response to the initiating Proposer's questions. Said responses shall be sent via
FAX to all those contractors submitting proposals for all written requests received
in the specified manner and prior to the closure date specified above within ten (Io) calendar days of receipt. All requests for information, clarification, or other
questions received from all Proposers, and the written responses prepared by
the Authority, shall be included in an addenda document to be prepared by the
Authority and mailed to all Proposers by certified mail, return receipt requested,
no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the date fixed for submission of
proposals. Receipt of addenda shall be acknowledged on the proposal forms
where required and each contractor shall be responsible for ensuring that it has
received all addenda. Failure of a Proposer to receive any addenda shall not
relieve the Proposer from any requirements or obligations therein.
No one is authorized to amend or modify the RFP orally, or to make
representations or interpretations in conflict with the RFP. .If necessary,
supplemental information to the RFP may be prepared by the Authority. This
3
supplemental information shall be prepared and distributed in the same manner
and time frame established above for responses to Proposer initiated questions
and clarifications. All supplemental information prepared and distributed by the
Authority prior to the date specified in Section 2.5 above for receipt of RFP's
shall be considered to be included in all Proposer's RFP submittals.
2.7 No Substitutions
The Authority will not receive, evaluate, consider, or approve substitutions of any
kind of equipment, materials, supplies, furnishings, fixtures, utilities, structures,
systems, hardware, or any other articles specified within the project plans,
specifications, drawings, or exhibits, comprising the RFP during the proposal
period other than those specified and transmitted via addenda from the Authority
as described above.
3.0 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
3.1 Submittal Requirements: General
In order to insure being considered qualified by the Authority, each Proposer
must submit as a part of their response to the RFP the information requested in
the RFP. Proposals must be indexed and bound or assembled in loose-leaf
binder(s) with each response clearly identified for each information category.
General information, photographic exhibits of prior work, brochures, pictures,
awards, etc., may be included, but, are not required. Proposals will not be
available for public inspection until after the Authority has taken formal action
either awarding a contract@) or rejecting all proposals.
3.2 Public Records Act
All proposals, and all parts thereof, shall be considered subject to the Public
Records Act with the exception .of the financial disclosure requirements. The
Authority shall exercise its best efforts to protect from publication or
dissemination all information contained within the financial disclosure statement
section of the proposal.
3.3 Repuest for ProDosal Reauirements
All proposals shall include the following:
(1) Bid for the work
(2) Supplemental Information containing:
(a) Business entity
(b) Licensing and insurance
(c) Financial disclosure
4
(d) Prior related construction experience
(e) Special construction skills
(9 Project management and scheduling
(9) References
(h) Prior and current construction claims
3.4 Reservation of Riahts
The Authority reserves the right to reject any or all proposals and to waive any
informality or minor irregularity in any proposal.
3.5 Lump Sum Bid
Proposals shall include all costs on a "Lump Sum Bid" basis. All proposals shall
be made with the express understanding that the price quotation shall remain in
effect for a period of one hundred eighty (180) days from the proposal due date
as described in Section 2.5 above. The term "Lump Sum Price" where and as
used in the RFP and contract documents is defined as the following:
"A contract which provides for a price which is not subject to any
adjustment by reason of the cost experience of the Contractor in the
performance of the contract, unless the adjustment is required by the
operation of any contract clause or provision which provides for an
adjustment, escalation, or other revision of the contract price through the
occurrence of an event or contingency.
Proposers are advised that the proposed price shall be the firm, maximum
price allowed, not subject to increase except and unless additional
components of the project are required at the discretion of the Authority."
3.6 Use of ProDosals
The Authority may use any or all ideas or concepts presented in any proposal.
Selection or rejection of the proposal does not affect this right. All materials
submitted in response to this RFP shall become the property of the Authority.
3.7 Prevailina Waae Rates
Pursuant to California law, the rates established by the Department of Industrial
Relations are applicable to this project. Current classifications and wage scales, bo (2) categories of "Basic Trades" and "Sub Trades" applicable to San Diego
County, California can be located on the Internet I World Wide Web at the
following address:
httD://www.dir.ca.aov/DIRdatabases.html
5
It is the express responsibility of the Proposer to obtain and utilize current
classifications and wage scales throughout the Project.
4.0 EVALUATION CRITERIA
4.1 General Information
The Authority shall conduct the issuance, receipt, and evaluation of proposals for
the work in a professional and confidential manner. Evaluation of the proposals
shall be made solely on merit. Ultimate selection of the best proposal for the
work shall be made based upon a combination of lowest price and highest
quality of response to the RFP. The Authority intends to contact references of
the proposers prior to the conclusion of the evaluation process. The Authority
may, at its discretion and at its own expense, conduct site visits to selected
projects, which may assist the Authority with its evaluation of the proposals.
4.2 Evaluation Criteria
The criteria to be used to evaluate proposals are listed below. Each criterion will
be scored based upon a ten (IO) point scale (IO being the best score) and
weighted relative to the multipliers indicated for each criterion.
CRITERION MAXIMUM POINTS MULTIPLIER TOTAL POINTS
1. Bid 10 5 50
2. Prior experience 10 2 20
3. Special skills IO I IO
4. Project management 10 1 10
5. References 10 I IO
Grand Total Points I00
4.3 Evaluation Process
The Authority shall appoint an Evaluation Committee, which may consist of the
following representatives:
- 1 representative of the City of Carlsbad Golf Course Steering Committee;
- 1 representative of the Authority's proposed Golf Course Management Company;
- 1 representative of the Architect designing the golf course;
- 1 representative of the Authority's General Counsel;
6
- 3 representatives of Carlsbad. City staff designated by the Authority’s Executive
Director.
Each proposal will undergo a detailed review by the Evaluation Committee ,
which will assign the point value to each criterion listed in Section 4.2 above.
In the course of its review, the Evaluation Committee may find that some
clarification of a proposal is necessary and required for a fair and objective
evaluation. In such an event, such clarification may be requested in writing and
the proposer given a reasonable opportunity to respond in writing. Changes will
neither be requested nor accepted during the evaluation process. Clarifications,
when requested, shall not change the bid price. Proposers should not assume
they will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss, or revise a
proposal.
The proposals will be ranked based upon the total number of points received
from the Evaluation committee. The assignment of evaluation points and the
ranking of the proposals by the Evaluation Committee shall be final and no
appeal of its decision will be considered.
4.4 Non-ResDonsive ProDosals
During the evaluation process it may become apparent that one or more of !he
proposals do not qualify for consideration on the basis of lack of thoroughness,
clarity, completeness of required information, or other similar deficiencies. If so
determined by the Evaluation Committee, these proposals will be returned to the
proposer with the deficiencies noted.
- 6 EXHIBIT 3
CARLSBAD PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
RFP LIST FOR GOLF COURSE PROJECT
GOLF COURSE CONSTRUCTION
WADSWORTH GOLF CONSTRUCTION
Attention: Steve Harrell, President
600 N. 195Ih Avenue
Buckeye, Arizona 85326
Phone: 623-853-9100
Fax: 623-853-0217
NIEBUR GOLF
Attention: Joe Niebur, President
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80906
675 South Pointe Court. Suite 100
Phone: 719-527-0313
FAX: 719-527-0337
LANDSCAPE UNLIMITED
Attention: Bill Kubly, CEO
1601 Old Cheney Road
Lincoln, Nebraska 68512
FAX: 402-423-4487
Phone: 402-234-6653
ENVIRONMENTAL GOLF
Attention : Michael Dingman, Vice President
Calabasas. California 91302
24121 Ventura Boulevard
Phone: 818-223-8500
FAX: 818-737-2694
HAZARD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Attention: W. S. Rogers, Vice President of Estimating
San Diego, California 92121
6465 Marindustry Place
Phone: 858-587-3600
FAX: 858-453-6034
WElTZ GOLF
Attention: Michael Harstad. Manager of Construction
North Palm Beach, Florida 33408
11 780 US Highway One
Phone: 561-227-0468
FAX: 561-227-0352
RANGER GOLF
Attention: Jade Work
Chandler, Arizona 85249
500 East Springs Road
Phone: 480-883-8200
FAX: 480-802-2476
I
CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION
ROEL CONSTRUCTION
Attention: Bill Shaw. Chief Estimator
3366 Kurtz Street
San Diego. California 921 10
Phone: 619-297-4156
FAX: 619-2971522
NINTEMAN CONSTRUCTION
Attention: Joe Grosshart, Vice President
4375 Jutland Drive
Suite 200
San Diego, California 921 17
Phone: 858-490-6800
FAX: 858-490-6818
LUSARDI CONSTRUCTION
Attention: Scott Free, President
1570 Linda Vista Drive
San Marcos, Califorrnia 92069
Phone: 760-744-3133
FAX : 760-744-9064
DPR CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Attention: Jay Leopold, Project Development
6333 Greenwich Drive, Suite 170
San Diego. California 92122
Phone: 858-597-7070
Fax: 858-597-7001
RENO CONSTRUCTION
Attention: Dave Armstrong. Director of Pre-Construction
1650 Hotel Circle North
Suite 201
San Diego, California 92108
Phone: 619-220-0224
FAX: 619-220-0229
WESPAC CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Attention John Largay, President
9440 North 26" Street
Suite 100
Phoenix, Arizona 85028
Phone: 602-956-1323
FAX: 602-992-81 1 I
R. D. OLSON COMPANY
attention: Dennis Reyling. President
295 Main Street, 3'' Floor
Irvine. California 92614
Phone: 949-474-2001
FAX: 949-474-1 534
L
I7
COLLEGE BOULEVARD BRIDGE
FCI CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
Attention: Susan Robison. Chief Estimator
12777 High Bluff Drive, Suite 200
San Diego, California 92130
Phone: 858-481-6900
FAX: 858-793-861 1
HERZOG CONTRACTING COMPANY
Attention: Bruce Marinchek. Chief Estimator
Oceanside, California 92051
P. 0. Box 2510
Phone: 760-966-0600
FAX: 760-966-0900
E. L. YEAGER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Attention: Doug Aadland, Chief Estimator
Riverside, California 92509
1995 Agua Mansa Road
Phone: 909-684-5360
FAX: 909-788-2449
R. E. HAZARD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Attention: W. S. Rogers, Vice President of Estimating
6465 Marindustry Place
San Diego, California 92121
Phone: 858-587-3600
FAX: 858-453-6034
ERRECAS INCORPORATED
Attention: Max Frazier, Chief Estimator
P. 0. Box 640
Lakeside; California 92040
Phone: 619-390-6400
FAX: 619-443-3002
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Attention: Dennis Iverson, Estimator
14080 B San Pasqual Valley Road
Escondido. California 92027
Phone: 760-735-2880
FAX: 760-735-2879
WR CONNELLY, INCORPORATED
Attention: Jeff Turner, Project Manager
Spring Valley, California 91977
9210 Olive Drive
FAX: 619-465-4688
Phone: 619-4654697
3
EXHIBIT 4
Memorandum
bate: FabroEuy 18,2MxI
To: John CahlWUsa Nildebrnnd
From: 0. Krakorian
Re : Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course Revised Pro Fma ormating P@@AiWIS ERA No. t3488
€=-nomic+ Research Pssoclatcs
Revised Pro Forma Opemthg Projections ERA No. 13468
February 18,2000
Page 5
23
Revisal Prc Forma opaatins Projections ERA No. 13468 Februay 18,2000 Page 6
24
Revised Pro F- OpetlrtiSK Rojations ERA No. 13468 February 18,ZOW Page 7
2002 14,000 31,000 45,000
2004 16,000 36,000 52,000
2003 15,000 34,000 49,000
The diratndion of play at stabilization is estimated as foUm
(moderate):
$ 30.00 35.00
40.00
s 85.00
95.00
115.00
S 50.00
7o.00 60.00
L.Am
J 74.48
S 78.40
9.8%
3.4% 8.0%
0.6% 1.7%
1.4%
31.0% 93%
21.%
5.5%
3 8% 1.7%
cz.mJ 100.0%
-
95.wo
Rpvised Pro Forma opaating Pm~tions
ERA No. 13468
February 1% 2000
Page 9
$ 550,000
350,OOo
300,000
125.000
$1,325,000
$ 275,000
195,ooa 75,000
75,000
50,0o0
$ 550,000
$ 150,000
s 110,000
29
5292 f3W 5310 $319 a28 91549
195 195 193 195 195 975
80 82 84 87 93 422
80 82 84 87 90 4!22
edit""'
M19 S51 Ut93 $916 S940 SubtCodGSA
1,497 275 291 305 310 316 -FCC'
444 77 - 85 92 95 98
$4359
394
439
351
M3
$619
394 m
S 1,476
125
$310
195
&
64
34
Table A-1
SURVEY OR ROUNDS ANI) RATES
Maderas
Meadow at Del Mar
A*
vineyard
Eaglecrest
Twin Oaks
Mt. Woodson
Carlton Oaks
Ste-ek Canyon (27 holes)
EdstMe
Camel Mountain RMch
Riverwalk (27 holes)
EncinitasRaUch
5 85
95
1551175'
491 42'
501 4@
40
55
49
55
65
5w 452
651 4d
78J 48*
$115
125
175/195'
60/ 53=
671 55'
60
72
80
75
85
651 55'
851 sd
98/ 68'
32
X
X
X
XX
X
XX
i
!
33
Vr" VIwl- e
NNN
yt
r).c.+
!!I
ii!
X
x
xxx
X
X
x
x x
v)
w
!
VI
49
.n
w3
!
. $'
1
35
.e s F
37
$1,846 S2,430 $3.866 589 573
286 200 350 253 320 405
398 30d 925 15 2 50
s3,397 $3,843 $5,496
-
-
72,000 71 ,OOO 52,000
39
pri’ )!. :’, .’/ - Aqe&a 54-G +n ALL RECEIVE *’ /
- .,
,’-T g 3 FOR THE Iff FORMATION OF
June 13,2000 THEClTVmIL
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECT
lo- \3- 00
SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF GOLF COURSE AGENDA
BILL ON TUESDAY EVENING, JUNE 13,2000
This memo is intended to report the latest status of issues and action steps
surrounding the City Council’s consideration of the Golf Course Project agenda
bill at the City Council meeting of Tuesday, June 13, 2000.
WHAT DOES TONIGHT’S ACTION MEAN TO THE CITY?
- Authorizes the solicitation of construction proposals m. - This process requires a generic time period of 60 days to complete start to finish. - Beginning this process now will ensure its timely completion during August. - Receiving and evaluating proposals gets the City ready to proceed with
construction in 2000 if all Federal and State Resource Aqencv Dermits are received Drior to September 1, 2000
WHAT ARE THE RISKS AND COSTS TO THE CITY?
City assumes no financial risk or contractual liability by soliciting proposals. Estimated cost to the City is $8,500 which is limited to printing costs for
the various plans and specification packages. - No other City costs to proceed with the proposals at this time.
WHAT IS LATEST STATUS OF HMP AND COASTAL COMMISSION APPEAL?
- HMP has not yet been “noticed” in the Federal Register by the USFWS.
- Planning Commission approved the Coastal Development Permit for the Golf
- Coastal Commission received ofticial “notice” from City of coastal permit
- This begins a 10 day ”appeal period” in which the Commission can review the
- Coastal staff have indicated the Commission will likely consider an “appeal” of
USFWS staff indicate that “noticing“ is imminent.
Federal process can still be completed during June to August, 2000 time frame.
Course Project on June 7, 2000.
issuance on June 13,2000.
entire City issued permit.
the permit perhaps at their July or August, 2000 meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
- Proceed with the solicitation of construction proposals now. - City Council, acting as the “Authority,” should take the position that the
City will not award anv contracts until all Federal and State Agency permits
and approvals are received by the City.
CARLSBAD PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
NOTICE INVITING PROPOSALS
Sealed proposals shall be deposited in the Bid Box located in the first floor lobby of the Fara-
day Center located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008-7314, until 4:OO P.M. on
the 3d day of August, 2000, at which time they will be opened and read, for performing the work as
follows: Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course Project.
CONTRACT NO. 30721
CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE PROJECT
This proposal and the terms of the Contract Documents and Supplemental Provisions constitute an
irrevocable offer that shall remain valid and in full force for a period of 180 days and such additional
time as may be mutually agreed upon by the Carlsbad Public Financing Authority, hereinafter
referred to as "CPFA", and the proposer.
The work shall be performed in strict conformity with the plans and specifications as approved by
the Carlsbad Public Financing Authority on file with the Community Development Department.
The specifications for the work include the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction,
1997 Edition, and the 1998 and 1999 supplements thereto, all hereinafter designated "SSPWC" as
issued by the Southern California Chapter of the American Public Works Association and as
amended by the supplemental provisions sections of this contract. Reference is hereby made to the
plans and specifications for full particulars and description of the work. Reference is made to the
to be used herein.
enclosed American Institute of Architects provisions, requirements, instructions, and forms
Contractor shall subcontract with a California Registered Land Surveyor to provide all construction
staking, surveying, and as-built surveying.
The CPFA encourages the participation of minority and women-owned businesses.
The CPFA encourages all bidders, suppliers, manufacturers, fabricators and contractors to utilize
recycled and recyclable materials when available, appropriate and approved by the Engineer.
The CPFA may disqualify a contractor or subcontractor from participating in bidding when a contrac-
tor or subcontractor has been debarred by the CPFA or another jurisdiction in the State of California
as an irresponsible bidder.
No bid will be received unless it is made on a proposal form furnished by the Purchasing
Department. Each bid must be accompanied by security in a form and amount required by law.
The bidder's security of the second and third next lowest responsive bidders may be withheld until
the Contract has been fully executed. The security submitted by all other unsuccessful bidders shall
be returned to them, or deemed void, within ten (10) days after the Contract is awarded. Pursuant
to the provisions of law (Public Contract Code section 10263), appropriate securities may be
substituted for any obligation required by this notice or for any monies withheld by the City to ensure
performance under this Contract. section 10263 of the Public Contract Code requires monies or
securities to be deposited with the City or a state or federally chartered bank in California as the
escrow agent. The escrow agent shall maintain insurance to cover negligent acts and omissions of
the agent in connection with the handling of retentions under this section in an amount not less than
$100,000 per contract.
'9 5/10/00 Contract No. 30721 Page 5
The documents which comprise the proposal and that must be completed and properly executed
including notarization where indicated are:
1. Contractor's Proposal 8. Acknowledgement of Addendum(a)
2. Bidder's Bond 9. Certificate of Insurance. The riders cover-
3. Non-Collusion Affidavit ing the City, its officials, employees and
4. Designation of Subcontractors volunteers may be omitted at the time of
and Amount of Subcontractor Bid bid submittal but shall be provided by the
5. Designation of Owner Operator/Lessors & Bidder prior to award of this contract.
Amount of Owner Operator/Lessor Work 10.Bidder's Statement Re Debarment
6. Bidder's Statement of Financial Responsi- 11 .Bidder's Disclosure Of Discipline Record
bility 12.Escrow Agreement for Security Deposits -
7. Bidder's Statement of Technical Ability and (optional, must be completed if the Bidder
Experience wishes to use the Escrow Agreement for
Security)
All bids will be compared on the basis of the Engineer's Estimate. The estimated quantities
are approximate and serve solely as a basis for the comparison of bids. The Engineer's
Estimate is $6,400,000.
Except as provided herein a proposal submitted to the CPFA by a Contractor who is not licensed as
a contractor pursuant to the Business and Professions Code shall be considered nonresponsive and
shall be rejected by the CPFA. In all contracts where federal funds are involved, no bid submitted
shall be invalidated by the failure of the bidder to be licensed in accordance with California law.
Where federal funds are involved the contractor shall be properly licensed at the time the contract is
awarded. In all other cases the contractor shall state their license number, expiration date and
classification in the proposal, under penalty of perjury. This invitation to propose does not involve
federal funds. The following classifications are acceptable for this contract:
Classification
A
AS0
B
c-2
c-4
c-5
C-6
c-7
C-8
c-9
c10
c11
c12
C13
C14
C15
5/10/00
Description IIClassification
General Engineering llc50
Asbestos CemovarCertification C5
General Building llc53
Insulation and Acoustical
Boiler, Hot Water Heating and
Steam Fitting
Carpentry
Cabinet and Mill Work
Low Voltage Communications
and Wiring Systems
Concrete
Drywall
General Electrical
Elevator Installation
Earthwork and Paving
Fencing
Metal Roofing Systems
Flooring and Floor Covering
c54
c55
c57
C60
C61
HAZ
DO3
DO4
DO6
DO9
Dl0
Dl2
Dl6
Contract No. 30721
Description
Reinforcing Steel
Structural Steel
Swimming Pool
Ceramic and Mosaic Tile
Water Conditioning
Water Well Drilling
Welding Limited Specialty
Hazardous Substance Removal
Certification
Awnings
Central Vacuum Systems
Concrete Related Services
Drilling, Blasting and Oil Field
Work Elevated Floors
Synthetic Products
Hardware, Locks and Safes
Page 6
C16
C17
c20
c2 1
C23
C26
C27
C28
C29
C32
c33
c34
c35
C36
c39
C42
c43
c45
C46
c47
c38
Fire Protection Contractor
Glazing
Warm-Air Heating, Ventilating
and Air-conditioning
Building Moving and Wrecking
Ornamental Metals
Lathing
Landscaping Lock and Security Equipment
Masonry
Parking and Highway Improve-
ment
Painting and Decorating
Pipeline
Plastering
Plumbing
Refrigeration
Roofing
Sanitation Systems
Sheet Metal
Electrical Signs
Solar
Manufactured Housing
D2 1
D24
D28
D29
D30
031
D34
D35
D38
D39
D4 1
D42
D49
D50
D52
D53
D56
D59
D62
D63
D64
Machinery and Pumps
Metal Products
Doors, Gates and Activating
Devices
Paperhanging
Pile Driving and Pressure Foun-
dation Jacking
Pole Installation and Mainte-
nance Prefabricated Equipment
Pool and Spa Maintenance
Sand and Water Blasting
Scaffolding
Siding and Decking
Sign Installation
Tree Service
Suspended Ceilings
Window Coverings
Wood Tanks
Trenching Only
Hydroseed Spraying
Air and Water Balancing
Construction Clean-up
Non-specialized
D65 Weatherization and Energy
Conservation
If the Contractor intends to utilize the escrow agreement included in the contract documents in lieu
of the usual 10% retention from each payment, these documents must be completed and submitted
with the signed contract. The escrow agreement may not be substituted at a later date.
Sets of plans, supplemental provisions, and Contract documents may be obtained at the Cashier's
Counter of the Faraday Center located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008-7314,
for a non-refundable fee of $75.00 per set which includes all postage.
Any prospective proposer who is in doubt as to the intended meaning of any part of the drawings,
specifications or other contract documents, or finds discrepancies in or omissions from the drawings
and specifications may submit to the Engineer a written request for clarification or correction. Any
response will be made only by a written addendum duly issued by the Engineer a copy of which will
be mailed or delivered to each person receiving a set of the contract documents. No oral response
will be made to such inquiry. Prior to the award of the contract, no addition to, modification of
or interpretation of any provision in the contract documents will be given by any agent, em-
ployee or contractor of the CPFA except as hereinbefore specified. No bidder may rely on
directions given by any agent, employee or contractor of the CPFA except as hereinbefore
specified.
The CPFA reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive any minor irregularity or informal- ity in such bids.
G 5/10100 Contract No. 30721 Page 7
The general prevailing rate of wages for each craft or type of worker needed to execute the Contract
shall be those as determined by the Director of Industrial Relations pursuant to the sections 1770,
1773, and 1773.1 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to section 1773.2 of the Labor Code, a current copy
of applicable wage rates is on file in the Office of the City Engineer. The Contractor to whom the
Contract is awarded shall not pay less than the said specified prevailing rates of wages to all work-
ers employed by him or her in the execution of the Contract.
The Prime Contractor shall be responsible for insuring compliance with provisions of section 1777.5
of the Labor Code and section 4100 et seq. of the Public Contracts Code, "Subletting and Subcon-
tracting Fair Practices Act." The City Engineer is the City's "duly authorized officer" for the purposes
of section 4107 and 4107.5.
The provisions of Part 7, Chapter 1. of the Labor Code commencing with section 1720 shall apply to
the Contract for work.
A pre-bid meeting and tour of the project site will be held Thursday, July 13, 2000 at 1:30
p.m., in Room 1738, The Faraday Center Facility, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008.
All proposals are to be computed on the basis of the lump sum price given for the work. In case of a
discrepancy between words and figures, the words shall prevail.
All prices must be in ink or typewritten. Changes or corrections may be crossed out and typed or
written in with ink and must be initialed in ink by a person authorized to sign for the Contractor.
Proposers are advised to verify the issuance of all addenda and receipt thereof one day prior
to delivery of the proposals. Submission of proposals without acknowledgment of addenda may
be cause of rejection of bid.
The Contractor shall provide bonds to secure faithful performance and warranty of the work in an
amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the Contract price on this project. The Contractor
shall provide bonds to secure payment of laborers and materials suppliers, in an amount equal to:
1) One hundred percent (100%) of the total amount payable by the terms of the contract when the
total amount payable does not exceed five million dollars ($5,000,000).
2) Fifty percent (50%) of the total amount payable by the terms of the contract when the total amount payable is not less than five million dollars ($5,000,000) and does not exceed ten million
dollars ($1 0,000,000).
3) Twenty-five percent (25%) of the total amount payable by the terms of the contract if the con-
tract exceeds ten million dollars ($10,000,000).
These bonds shall be kept in full force and effect during the course of this project, and shall extend
in full force and effect and be retained by the CPFA until they are released as stated in the Supple-
mental Provisions section of this contract. All bonds are to be placed with a surety insurance carrier
admitted and authorized to transact the business of insurance in California and whose assets ex-
ceed their liabilities in an amount equal to or in excess of the amount of the bond. The bonds are to
be accompanied by the following documents:
1) An original, or a certified copy, of the unrevoked appointment, power of attorney, by laws, or
other instrument entitling or authorizing the person who executed the bond to do so.
2) A certified copy of the certificate of authority of the insurer issued by the insurance commis-
sioner.
G 5/10/00 Contract No. 30721 Page 0
If the proposal is accepted, the CPFA may require copies of the insurer's most recent annual state-
ment and quarterly statement filed with the Department of Insurance pursuant to Article 10 (com-
mencing with section 900) of Chapter 1 of Part 2 of Division 1 of the Insurance Code, within 10 cal-
endar days of the insurer's receipt of a request to submit the statements.
Insurance is to be placed with insurers that:
1) Have a rating in the most recent Best's Key Rating Guide of at least A-:V
2) Are admitted and authorized to transact the business of insurance in the State of California by
the Insurance Commissioner.
Auto policies offered to meet the specification of this contract must:
1) Meet the conditions stated above for all insurance companies.
2) Cover any vehicle used in the performance of the contract, used onsite or offsite. whether
owned, non-owned or hired, and whether scheduled or non-scheduled. The auto insurance cer-
tificate must state the coverage is for "any auto" and cannot be limited in any manner.
Workers' compensation insurance required under this contract must be offered by a company meet-
ing the above standards with the exception that the Best's rating condition is waived. The CPFA
does accept policies issued by the State Compensation Fund meeting the requirement for workers' compensation insurance.
The Contractor shall be required to maintain insurance as specified in the Contract. Any additional
cost of said insurance shall be included in the bid price.
The award of the contract by the CPFA is contingent upon the Contractor submitting the required
bonds and insurance, as described in the contract, within twenty days of bid opening. If the Contrac-
tor fails to comply with these requirements, the CPFA may award the contract to the second or third
lowest bidder and the bid security of the lowest bidder may be forfeited.
The prime contractor and all subcontractors are required to have and maintain a valid City of Carls-
bad Business License for the duration of the contract.
Approved by the Board of the Carlsbad Public Financing Authority, by Resolution No.
2 , adopted on the i3€6th day of June ,2000.
- /L, a000
Date ,
+3 5/10/00 Contract No. 30721 Page 9