HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-03-22; Chapter 1.24 Committee Ad Hoc; MinutesFINAL SET OF MINUTES -- NOT APPROVED BY COMMITTEi:
MINUTES
Meeting of: CHAPTER 1.24 COMMMITTEE Time of Meeting: 8:30 A.M. Date of Meeting: March 22, 1983 Place of Meeting: City Council Chambers
The following Committee Members were present:
Mary Casler, Chairman Ann Kulchin, Council Member Michael Straub
Patrick O'Day (arrived late) Margie Cool Alan Feld
11. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Council Member Kulchin suggested, and the Committee members
agreed that the words "at this time" should be deleted on page
2, under section 1V.B.
.The March 22, 1983, minutes were approved as corrected.
AYES : Casler, Kulchin, Straub, Cool and Feld.
NOES : None
ABSENT: O'Day
111. DRAFT GUIDELINES:
Chairman Casler suggested that the "quote" be deleted on line 12 of Guideline 4, and the Committee members agreed. It was agreed that before action was taken, the committee would await the
arrival of Mr. O'Day.
IV. GUIDELINES COMPLETE?
The members of the committee agreed there were no further guidelines to be prepared.
V. COMMITTEE REPORT TO COUNCIL
The City Attorney referenced the copy of the agenda bill, and suggested that the word "unanimously" be deleted in the section of recommended action. The Committee agreed with the suggested
deletion.
CHAPTER 1.24 COMMITTEE MINUTES Page 2 March 22, 1983
111. DRAFT GUIDELINES
Mr. O'Day indicated his agreement with the wording of Guideline 4.
The Committee approved the wording of Guideline 4 and 5, with the deletion of the word "quote" on line 12 of #4.
AYES : Casler, Kulchin, Straub, O'Day, Cool and Feld. NOES : None
VI. CONCLUDING STATEMENTS
Mr. O'Day commented on the possibility of the City phasing the cost of a project over several years in order to avoid the effects of the ordinance, and questioned whether the guidelines addressed the
matter of fiscal phasing.
In response, the City Attorney indicated the phasing guidelines approved by the committee would address fiscal as well as physical phasing.
Committee members commented on the educational process involved in preparing guidelines, and noted the need for those educational activities to extend to the rest of the citizens. Also noted was the committee's desire for their reasoning when preparing the guidelines to be known, and in that regard, they agreed with referencing the appropriate portions of the Discussion Paper.
VII. NEXT TASKS
The Committee that they should not be disolved, but should be available to meet and consider any concerns about the guidelines which may result from the public hearing on the matter.
Chairman Casler noted the matter would be scheduled for a public hearing before Council at their meeting of April1 5, 1983, and she
encouraged the committee members to attend that meeting.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT.
The Committee adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
LEE RAUTENKRANZ City Clerk