HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-02-26; Encina Joint Advisory Committee Ad Hoc; Minutesc 0<L 9 .?•',J *""""->'" i
JOINT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
February 26, 1976
Chairman, Ed Stiles Vice-chairman, Stanley Mahr
Present:Buena:
Carlsbad:
Encinitas:
Leucadia:
San Diego Co:
San Marcos:
Vista:
Blade-Tribune:
Brown & Caldwell:
Carlsbad Council;
LOWV:
Ed Stiles, Bill Dorainguez
Lew Chase, Dave Dunne, Ron Beckman,
Diane Hubbard
C.D. Bricks, Mark Schneider, Jack Kubota
Dick Hanson, Caroline Lash
Chuck Oldsen, G.M. Bowman, Gary Decker
Stanley Mahr, Jim McKay
Bob Foo, Joe Zapotocky, Paul Pressman
Liz Harris
Lynn Hartford
A.J. Skotnicki
Ruth Honnold, Jane Skotnicki
Minutes of 28 January Meeting
The minutes of the January 28 meeting were approved as submitted.
Operations and Maintenance Report
The. digester cleaning has been completed, with the contractor doing a
fine job. Weardco.started reconstruction of the supernatant box that
was corroded immediately upon the completion of the digester cleaning.
The interior will be fiberglass to prevent future corrosion. There
are a few items in the digester that need to be taken care of by staff.
No odor complaints were phoned in .this past month.
Weardco has commenced clean up -work on Phase IIA and is moving along
with the punch list.
The flow was just about the same as December, with Encinitas1 flow still
down and Oceanside's flow a little high. Encinitas reported that their
recorder will be adjusted this week.
Cost accounting chart had an error; where Agua Hedionda .shows $29,956,
it should be $20,956.
Existing and Projected Flows
116 new connections.
Action Report on Hydrogen Sulfide Problem
Leucadia's Board of Directors authorized an agreement with Lathrop
Labs for a demonstration testing program of 90 days of a new process
for controlling sulfide odors. They are hopeful that it will be a
solution to the problem. However, during the test period, they will
terminate chlorine and air injection.
Joint Advisory Committee
February 25, 1976
Page Two
4. Action Report, cont'd.
San Marcos is continuing to chlorinate and is getting zero readings.
They feel that their problem is in the junction with Buena and not
with sulfides.
Encinitas has their engineers working on the problem; Jack Kubota
advised that he had just received the draft of the reoort from the
consultant. They will be going to a flushing system and will also
experiment with air injection.
5. Phase II and IIA Progress Report
This item was covered under the 0 & M report.
6. Phase III Progress Report
The appeal of the coastal permit was covered by Paul Pressman. He
related that a meeting with staff and other agencies involved would
be held the following week, along with the opponents to look at the
situation and discuss it. Staff will make a recommendation to the
Commission and then a decision will be made. He did not feel that
there was a possibility that the permit would be denied, but rather
that more stringent conditions would be placed on it. The primary
issue seemed to be growth and our staff is trying to show that the
San Diego area is far ahead of others in the State on air quality
and associated problems of growth.
Chuck talked about the design contract; revisions have been made to
the contract to make it agree with new regulations imposed by EPA.
A meeting was held with the negotiating committee and they reviewed
the approach, finding it reasonable and understandable. The final
draft will be available for review by Counsel and then EPA and then
Vista will make the award of contract.
• San Marcos brought up the fact that they were having a problem in
adopting the resolution regarding the financial plan, project report
and EIR. The revenue program and financial plan was where their
hang-up was; they could not follow the plan completely and were
having a problem with the numbers and the approach. Their board
wanted the assurance that they would not be stuck with the methods
outlined in the plan. Jim McKay will be meeting with Paul Pressman
to discuss the resolution and variations of it that can be made to
suit their situation.
Vista, Encinitas, Carlsbad and Buena have all adopted the resolution;
Leucadia will also meet with the Counsel on the problems involved
with the resolution.
Joint Advisory Committee
February 25, 1976
Page Three
7. Direction from JAC on Allocations
After discussion, it was agreed that the agreements spell out that
all O & M costs are to be allocated on the basis of flow, while
capital items are based on ownership. Ed Stiles will obtain a
breakdown on the capital items for insurance purposes.
8. Independent Management Study Subcommittee
Only Buena has not approved the management study, and Bill Dominguez
advised that this was the first time he had seen the resolution. Ron
Beckman asked that each agency forward copies of their respective
resolutions to Carlsbad. He further continued that a draft had been
prepared, to be sent later to each agency, on qualifications and job
description for the manager to be hired. He asked for comments and
discussion at the next meeting on the draft. However, the actual
job description will be prepared by Carlsbad, taking into considera-
tion the advice of JAC. He felt that it would be appropriate if JAC
affirmed that the personnel at the plant would be invited to stay on
after the take-over by the joint agencies. Lew Chase suggested that
Chuck Oldsen inform the personnel of their having the option to stay
if they wanted. After considerable discussion and a motion by Bill
Dominguez that was.withdrawn, it was finally decided by. motion (Dunne-
McKay) that staff was to prepare a statement on this matter to be
given to plant personnel, that would be presented at the next meeting.
9. Other Business
Chuck advised that he is working on the budget and that, prior to the
next meeting, he will have a preliminary copy of it. If there is
sufficient lead time, he will send a copy of this draft to each agency
for their review prior to the meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ASSISTANT CAO--
COMMUNITY SERVICES
CSA
ADVISORY BOARD
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
REGIONAL SOLID
WASTE ORGANIZATION
1. PURELY ADVISORY IN NATURE.
2. SINCE AGENCY ADVISORY BOARD COMMENT IS REQUIRED ONLY ON "MAJOR PROJECTS
OR PROGRAMS DIRECTLY AFFECTING PUBLIC SERVICES," IT IS ASSUMED THE
ADVISORY COMMITTEE WOULD BE SIMILARLY RESTRICTED.
3. POLICY A-40 GOVERNS PROCEDURE FOR CREATION.
SOLID WASTE COMMISSION
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ASSISTANT CAO—
COMMUNITY SERVICES
REGIONAL SOLID
WASTE ORGANIZATION
SOLID WASTE
COMMISSION
MATTERS PERTAINING
TO: BUDGET, PROJECTS,
PRIORITIES, MANAGEMENT
POLICY
3.
4.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DEFINES POWERS AND DUTIES, REQUIRES COMMISSION TO
REVIEW AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS ON MATTERS WITHIN THEIR SCOPE OF
RESPONSIBILITY.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MAY OVERRULE COMMISSION BY:
A. MAJORITY VOTE OR
B. 4/5 VOTE -- COULD ALSO REQUIRE THE SUPERVISOR WHOSE DISTRICT A
PROJECT IS IN TO VOTE WITH MAJORITY
COMMISSION CREATED BY COUNTY ORDINANCE.
COMPOSED OF ELECTED CITY OFFICIALS ONLY-