HomeMy WebLinkAbout1964-01-21; City Council; Minutesf Y" i CITY OF CARLSBAD : -8 , '8 -' \ ' '\ * ', i Minutes of: CITY COUNCIL (Regular meeting): i Date of Meeting: January 21, 1964 1 \ '., '8 I ', 8 '% i Time of Meeting: 7:OO P.M, i Name \\ '89 \pL :"-""-""""-""-""""""""""~""""""""""~"""""~""~""""", : Member q
', '\ 'x 8 ', '8 ' '\
i ftosc sf Meetinlgi Goun~il Ghanibers ; of '<,+'<
a
I I
I I I I I I I I I * 4 t I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8 I f
I ROLL CALL was .answered by Councilmen McPherson, :
Bierce, Guevara and Neiswender * Councilman Hughe;
was absent. Also present were City Manager I I
Slater, City AttWney Wilson and City Clerk Adarnd.
I
I
ALLEGIANCE to thit Flag was .given.
XWVOCATION was ofgered by Councilman McPhkrson, .I
APPROVAL OF MIBJU,%ES :
I I * I I I I
I I t I I i i'
I (a) Minutes of the regular meeting of January iMcPherson 21, 1964, were approved as submitted, {Bierce jGubvara
! lNeiswendel
i CORRESPONDENCE : I I
i (a} , Notice. from P.u'blic Utilities Commission-re: i i Notice of hearinq on Pacific Telephone and Tele-j i qraph. Notice dated January 15, 1964 from the i : Public Utilities Commission was presented, sta- i : ting a hearing on the application of the Pacific! : Telephone and Telegraph Company for authority to: I establish extended service between certain of it$ i exchanges in the northern area of San Diego County i and to withdraw message toll telephone service i i rates now in effect between exchanges, will be i I heard Thursday, March 5, 1964, at 1O:OO A.M. in i : the Community Recreation Center, Room 2, Vista, i
i ! California, at which time and place all inter- i
I i I I I *
i ested parties may appear and be heard,
I
I !
I I i Councilmen Bierce and Meiswender st;a*..ed they werk i in favor of the extended service as it W~nrf.4 meah : direct dialing to the neighboring cities. I
I I 1
1,
1 I I : After further discussion, it was agreed that the! : City would not oppose the application.
i (3) L. wo Israel - re: Letter of Appreciation. i i Letter dated January 14, 1964, from Lester W. i Israel, MSGT. USMC, 1073 Buena Vista Way, expresb- i ing his appreciation and thanks to the City of i
! Carlsbadl for the efficient service offered by i
; I the Police Department and the Fire Department I : when his father was stricken a few weeks ago- ! A special. thanks went to the patrolman who res- i : ponded to the call, ! !
: The Mayor asked that this letter be referred to i
I the Police and Fire Department.
\ (c). Carlsbad Landins, Inc. - re: Request for' t : Council sanction of boat _r-ace. March 29, ~964, I.
: Letter dated January 5, 1964, from Clif€ord W., I : Talbot, President of Carlsbad-Landing, Ind., re-: i questing. the Council to sanction a regatta to bel i held on March 29, 1964, to be sponsored .by the i i Southern California Outboard Association. The : i event would be held at Carlsbad Landing (former-I i ly Whitey's landing) o By motion of the Council I McPhersl : it was agreed that the event be allowed as re- i Bierce i quested, providing proper insurance and parking i Guevara
! kn nrovided for. i Neiswen
* I I I t 1 I
f I
$ I
* t
I
I I I 1 1 I I *'
I *
I
. I
:
t # I
-2-
t I -\, '\ 8, '\, I '. '.. '.\ t
I '. ', ' I \, \, 'I I Name '\\ 8$
I of '3
I
I I :"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""-"""*~*""""""" i Member i (d) F. J, Kqz e- re; Request for beer sales,
:Letter dated January 17, 1964, frcm Francis J, Foi
!of FOX'S Snug Harbor, reqxsting the Council to ::
!take whatever &kegs ape necessaly to allow him to 1 jseljl beer on his property,
:Mayor Guevara stated he did not feel that Mr, Fox:
:should be allowed to have a beer license at his i
!place of business on the lagoon as the City leaset
ithe lagoon from the San Diego Gas & Electric Corn-! :pany I and ,~&s responsible for what happens on the t
:lagoon. He realizes that people buy beer else- ;
jwhere and take it down there, but if it is not i
:sold there it might help curtail minors €rom havi$g I it., !
t I
I I I I I I I
I
I I t I i I !Councilman McPherson stated he did not feel that :
!minors would be allowed to buy beer at this place!
io€ business than any other place of business in i
itown; howeuelr, he did know that people do take i I
:beer down to the lagoon,
i
I I I I I I t
:The City Attorney pointed out the part of the ordt- i nance €or R-T Zoning whereby liquor is allowed kn!
!this zone only in a motel or hotel for the convenf jience of the guests and it would have to be enc- !
: or lobby,
i lor;ed and entrance would have to be from a patio i .I
D I I I * I I
!Councilman Bierce stated there were two ways to i
:handle this matter - either ME, Fox builds a hotel
!or motel, or applies to the Planning Commission : i for a C-2 zone, l e l I I
t
e
I :&Ira Fox was present and stated he was in the pro-: I cess of remodeling his place of business. He was! ! issued a beer license by the State; however, he I
!was notified by the City he would not be allowed i
:to sell it due to the zoning. He would like to i i sell beer for the convenience of his patrons,
f
I I t I I I I I i ORAL COiWiUHICATIONS :
1
I I : ! ;REV. P.A. Zx"ERi!i! stated the CaKlSbad Gospel Taf
ibernacle is contemplating an educational addition:
!to the Church, Mr, Osburn, Building Inspector, i i informed him the Church would probably have to :
{apply for a conditional use permit before they i i could proceed with their building. This building!
jwas built prior to the incorporation of the City. i
:They would not be changing the use of the propertt.
!A$ their annual. Church business meeting will be i
\,%eJdtomnrrow evening, he requested help from the i
!Council in order that they would not have to i appear before the PZacning Commission.
[The City Attorney informed the Council they cannot : guarantee what the Planning Commission will do; i
:however, he felt the Council could aukhorize the ! i issuance of a building permit on the condition i i that a conditional use permit will be grarzted by : i the Planning Commission,
I
I I * b t I I I I *
4 I
8 t I I I
t I 1
I I I I I !
I I I I I * b
B 4 !
-3-
s ;"""""""""""""""""""-"""""""""*
i '. ' '\ '\ '\ ' , \ '?
*, . '* \
', \ '\ I Na me '8,,'2 : of ':$
1 Mec%Gr *
I b I & ', 'x., ',
.""""""".."4""""-"""-
I I i~y motion of ,the Council ;?.,cthorization was given jMFpherson
IZor -&e Building ihspeckor to ,issue a building
!permit on the condieion khait a conditional use !Guevara 0 lsierce
~ :permit is granted. 1
1
:Meiswendex
I ! Aov Scout Week - February 5th to 13th 1964, Lett& jdated January 21, 1964, from M.3.. Vickery, Assis-:
:tant District Commissioner, stating he had been i
:selected to arrange B6y Scout Week from February i
i5th to i3th, i964.j herein Carlsbad, Ee suggested i
! :'chat at the Coulleil meeting of February 4, 1964, i
;four Boy Scouts have the opening ceremony by pre- I
isenting cohaks. A+*Wne &e Mayor would present :
!a proclamation designating'Boy Scout Week offi- i
icially. Also Mr. Vickery requested the following!
:positions be filled by Boy Scouts from one to
!three o'clock on February 7, 1964: Mayor, Vice i
!Mayor, Council Members, City Manages, Chief of i
!Police, Fire Chief, Building Inspectors and City :
jhlttorney. I !
i .-
* I 9
I t I
* I I !By common consenk of the Council it was agreed ;
:that the Boy Scouts be allowed to participate as i I requested ,,
:Proclamation - National Brotherhood Week - Feb- :
jruary 16th to 23rd, b959., With the consent of thi
!Council the Mayor proclaimed the week of February:
I I 4 I I I
* I
:l6-kh to 23rd, 1964, as Brotherhood Week. * 8
1 t I
!Proclamation - American Field Service Week -- 3anuj
iary 27th to February 2nd, 1964. With the consent i
!of the Council the Mayor proclaimed the week of i
!January 27th to February 2nd, 1964, as American I
:Field Service Week. I I I I I
8 I
~FNGINEERING t !
I I t ! t t I (a) 1911 AC~ Proceedinqs for sewer improvements 1
iii2 Buena Vista Way, Valley Street, Oak Avenue and i
!easements. Assessment District 3-1964,
!The Council was informed a petition had been re- i
iceived requesting sewer improvements in ~uena Vis$a
:Way, Valley Street, Oak Avenue and easements.
!39,70/t of the property owners have signed the pti;
ition. Due to the fact that less than 50% of the i
!property owners signed the petition, it will be :
!necessary to request a report from the Health
I I t I I
I 1 8
1 I
I ! ~ :Officer of the City 'of Carlsbad.
I
t I I ! I b
:A map of the proposed district was presented for f t !the Council1= review.
1 I
I !
I I :After further discussion by the Council, the :McPher sor
jfollowing resolutions were adopted by title only iBierce
I
0 jand further reading waived:
I 1
:Guevara
keiswendt - I :Resolution No, 972 o A RZSOTJJTION 03 THE CITY '.. 0
ICOWCIL OF TEE CPW OF CARLSBAD APPROVIKG PETITIO^ i for proposed Assessment District No- 3-1964.
I
s a I 0 6 I I I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I
1
I .\ . . '\ -, t \' I I I '\\ y\8 '\, ! ~~,.".,"\. ! - 4-
I
I *
I
1 i Name \x, 4
t : of '3
-.
; Member ~"-""""""""""""""""""""""~"""""""*""""""""""""~""
;Resolution Noo 973 , A RESOLUTLGN OF m-~ CITY
jCOuNCfL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD &QUESTIN(J OPTllTO&
!OF HEALTH OFFICER, ~PJD DECLARING PHE NECESSXTY OF i I X:NS'TALLAT$ON OP SANXk'ARY SE;FJ'ERS& for prop6sec-l I I
jilssessment District No, 3-1964,
Iltesofution EO. 974, A RESOLUTIO& QF ~m CITY COUN~IL
:OF ~rn CITY OF C~SBAD APPOINT~HG ~ERSON m PRE- i
jtrict No, 3-1964, i
ipcsolution NO. 975, A RESOL~ION OF THE CITY CO~CIL
\
I I
1
0
I I I f t b I
I-
IPARE? ALL PROCEEDTBCS, $& pabposed #&sessmez.-k Disk
I I t I I
:OF THE CITY OF CAlRLSBAD APPOINTING PERSON TO ACT i
!AS ENGINEER OF WORK, DESLGNATING ENGINEER OF WORK!
:AS THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR PX3PAFtATION OF THE i
I EXCTNEERINC DOCU"l"TS, ASSESS:M%rST DIAGWS ,ASSESS+ I
!PIEKE ROLL AND ~mm: DESIGNATING THE ENGINEER :
:OF WORK TO SUPERVISE ALL WORK; APPOINTING EMGINEE~
!OF WORK AS WE SUTPERTNTEMDENT OF ST~EETS AND FIX-!
II~G COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES, for proposed ASS~S~-
jrnent District No, 3-1964, I I
i ResolutioP? No, 976, A RESOLUTION OF TKE CITY CO&-
I I I
i CXL OF THE CIW OF C~LSB~ DIRECTING PREP-WTION;
iNEER TO PREPARE PLXSS, for proposed Assessment i 1, District No. 3-1964- I I
!The City Manager presented a letter dated January!
!l3, 1964, from J. 8, Askew, M. D. Health Officer i
!OF PLANS AND SPEZIFHCATIONS AND DESIGNATING ENGI-:
I 6 l a 4
iof the City of Car?.sbad, which stated as follows; i
1 0
I I f "Carlsbad City Council i P. 0, Box 265 : Carlsbad, California
; Attention: Lowell A, Rathbun, City Engineer
i Gentlemen :
i My attention has been directed to the proposed : i construction of certain sanitary sewers in the i i city of Carlsbad, county of San Diego, Califosni+,
i under the Improvenent Act of 1911, Division 7 of\ i the Streets and Highways Code. The territory to! i be served by said sewerage facilities and to be I
i ding parts of the following streets: Valley * I i Street, Highland Drive, Canon Street, Wilson i Street, Arlen Road and Forest Street in the City: : of Carlsbad.
I !
I I 1 I I I I * 1 I I I I 1 I I
1 I I I I I I
1 ..+:
I
I I I
I I I
i benefited by such work is shown on a map inelu- 1
I I *
I 4 I I I
I I I I I I I I I I t I I . 0 I 4
# I I * I I I I I I I
t I
i I I 1
I have examined generally the above area and map:
of the assessment district. 1 have also made, ol:
caused to be made, an investigation of said terri-
tory and the existing sewage facili'cies served ib
said territory, This investigation reveals that:
the existing sewage facilities are generally in-j
adequate and there is a need for, and the publici
health requires, the construction of sewerage i
facilities to serve this territory, i I I I I I I 8 I I !
I * . ,. ..
I ! '\. '\ '8, '8 I I
I
I
I I
L '., ', '\, '1
a -5- I '. \ '<
\" 8 '8 \ i i Na me "\,"$
1 Member t : of "9 \< :""""~""""""~"""""""""""""""""""-""""~""~"""~"""" : Puksuant to your request and as Health officer OF
I
! e i the City of Carlsbad, I find and recommend as ! i follows: I
I
I I l a i 1. That the construction of the sewerage facilii
ties shown on the above mentioned map is ne& I I i t ! kssary as a health measure, I i
i t : 2.
i I !
8
I i : 3,
I I I t I I I I i 4*
I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I lU
I
That proceedings for the construction of saik
measure o
That. proceedings for the construction of saib
sanitzry sevjers under the 1911 Improvement i
Act are necessary a.s a health measure.
That 1, 2 and 3 above are all necessary as ai
h'eslth measure o I *
Very truly yours, I I
J. 3. Askew, MOD,
Health Officer of the !
City of Carlsbad" I I
sanitary sewers are necessary as a health ! I
I I I I I
I I I I i I
I ;
b a
1 8 I I I I
I
I :. . 1. .. ., .. - . e' I .. . I I 1 ~he folrowing resolution was presented 2
iResolution No, 977. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY i CQUEJCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, RPPROVIEaG OPIMIOh :&ID FINDING OF HEALTH OFFICER, AND ORDERIHG OPIN-IMcPherson i ION OF HEALTH OFFICER SPREAD UPON THE MINUTES, i Bierce
:proposed Assessment District No, 3-1964, was : Guevara i adopted by title only and further reading waived. iNeiswende
i (b) Grant Deed releasing City dsainaqe riqhts in i i a portion of Carlsbad Lands, Tract 119 to Ralph i
:H. Shick and Marjorie A. Shick. The City Attornei
!advised the Council this matter was discussed at I ! the meeting of December 17, 1963, Thy property i
:is located between Oak Avenue and Elm Avenue adjaf
!cent to Pi0 Pic0 Drive, and is triangular shape. :
I The Council .authorized transfer of title and i ordered preparation 05 the documents, The follow$ : ing resolution was presented for the Council's i : consideration:
1
t I
I I I I I I
I I I
I *
I I I
I I * I 1 I I Resolution NO. 978. A RESOLUTION OF T-FIE CITY I COWNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AUTHORIZING AND i McPherson i DIRECTING CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY KCTHIN i Bierce i TEE CjcflY OF CARLSBAB, was adopted by title only IGuevara
i and Surther reading waived. I Neiswende
: (c) Acceptance of street dedicakion €or public i
!use - portion or' Lot 42, Seaside Lands. This prof i perty is located between Beech Street and Laguna i
!Drive where Mr, Apodaca is building apartments. :
iP4r. Apdaca is of€ering 8' for street purposes, i
! By motion of the Council, the deed was accepted i McPherson
ion behalf of the City of Carlsbad for street i Bierce : purposes. I Guevara
I : Neiswende
I # a
I I I
I I I
e ! !
I I
1 * I I I I
I I I I I
I I t
I I
I
1
I
,..-. I I
I I
'\ '\ '\ '\
8, '\ ', '.
8' '\ ' I I
I -6- I '\ '\ 'b?
I I Name '*,'4
I ; of '3
I l Member ;"""""""""~""~""""-~"""""~.."""""~"""""""""~"""""""~ i (a) Award of contract for storm drain project i
i3-45, Basswood and Canyon Street, The Engineer's! i estimated cost €or construction of this project ;
:was $12,030.04, There were nine bids received i i which were as to~ows; I I I
0
I
I :
I A. A, Sohnson $ L1,933,06 !
I W, H, Barber Company
I Castillo $'. 13,366;85 I
I Eiher Brothers $. 2b+ 346.20 I
I I Kelly (Blacktop Man) $ 14,805 , 24 I I
I Don Hubbard I
1 $ 13,035.88 I
I Cavar I I $ 15,085.91 I
I S, K, Company $ 15,422,86 I
I
I i 8 I $ 18,265.23 I I I I Orendain $ is,osi.o2 I t
I
I 1 I I * I
I I
I I
* I
I I t I 4 t
!Ao A, Johnson was the low bidder. The City Engi-! i neer infamed the Council that the low bid was in!
!order and Mr. Johnson is a responsible person, I I
!They recommended that Mr. Johnson be awarded the i 1 hi8 far'the pro jeck
I
I t
I .
I I I i By motion of the Council, A.A, Johnson was award-iMcPherson i ed the contract in the amount of $11,933.00 for i Bierce i the construction of the storm drain project 3-45. i Guevara
+ ; Neiswende i The City Engineer pointed out that the bid for I I pipe submitted was below the City's estimate. At i
i one time the City discussed extending this drain-: I age up Monroe, According to the bid submitted ani i additional 750 feet could be installed at approx-i i imately $6,870,00. The cost of just the pipe i i alone is $4,450.00. * I
i Discussion was given as to having sufficient fundi
; available to do the additional work. The City i
i report back to the Council at the next meeting, i
I (e) Request for waiver of street improvements: i
:le Letter dated January 15, 1964, from Donald H.:
:Holly, licensed land surveyor, stating he was
:acting as agent for Mrs. Jessie R, Griffith with i ! reference to a lot split of her property located: i at 2530 Davis Street, Carlsbad, Subject property:
!was partially sold prior to the revised ordinance: i change oE September 18, 1963, which required all i I improvements to be installed before a lot split i
i would be granted, Mrs. Griffith and the party i
:who purchased the parcel from Mrs. Griffith would: 1 like to sign an Xmprovement Ayreement guaranteein9 i their participation for their share of the improv$- i ments at such time as it is improved, 8 #
i Tke City Engineer advised the Council there is a i i petition being circulated for an improvement dis-i : trict in this area. It was his feeling it would. I
!be in order to grant the waiver of the improve- i
I I
I I I I I
:Manager stated he would check this matter out and: I
I 1 I I
I I I I I
I I I
I I .' I
1 * I
0
irnents at this time,
8 I I I I I I I I I *
4 I I I * I * * I I I I I
! I I
I I ; 8, \- I
I '. \ '. I I I I \, \."'. '.,
a I '. ', > I 6 4
* .\ . '.
I -7- i Name ",'4
I I I of <$
I : Member ' I"" ....................... """"""""-.""."-~" "-"I".. "I. I
!By motion of the Council it was agreed ghat the i
!request for waiver of street improvements be grand- 0 ;teQ, with the provision that MIS, Grlffth and the i fpurchaser of a portion of Mrs. Grzffith's propest$ McPhersoI
jexecute an improvement agreement for participatiod Bierce
:in street improvements at such time as there are ! Guevara
:street improvements constructed, i Neiswendt
i2, Letter dated January 15, 1964, from James E. i
:Cairns Company, Realtors, stating the Planning i
!Commission unanimously approved a variance to alloy
:a lot split Zequested by Lois H. Fry. As agents :
ifor Mrs.= Fry, they requested a waiver of street :
!improvement requirements for this Lot split under!
:the existing ordinance. It is their understandin4
inue has ndt been determined as of this date.
IBy motion of the Council it was agreed that stree4
:improvements be waived, and that Lois Bo Fry exec4 McPhersol
jute an improvement agreement with the City for i Bierce
:participation of street improvements at a later i Guevara
:date o i Neiswendc
i3. Letter dated January 6, 1964, from G. F. Yar- i
$erry, stating he recently made a lot split of Lo{
jl0, Wilsonia Tract, and he was informed that in :
jaccordance with the ordinance. he is required to id-
:stall curb, gutter and sidewalk in front of the !
:property, Mr. Yarberry requested a waiver of: the i
:street improvements, as there are no other im- i
:provements on Wilson Street, the existing ded'ica- 1.
!ked street is only 40 feet, and the street has
!several vertical grade changes which would requid
!extensive engineering. I I I
:The City Engineer stated there are no improvementi
ion the street and the City has no plans for the i
:street, as this is only a 40' street at the pre- i
jsent time.
;By motion of the Council the request for waiver of! McPherso
!street improvements was granted, with the provi- ! Bierce
lsion that an improvement agreement be entered intd Guevara
by Mr, Yarberry for improvements at a future date,! Neiswend
:(E) A,T. & S.F, Railway - License to locate pipe l
;line an railroad riqht of way. Letter dated Janu- 1
Iary 3, 1964, from the A.T. & S.F. Railway Company,!
:in which they enclosed duplicate originals of li- ;
kense for the construction of an 8" sewer line on i
kheir right of way and an 18" sewer line under th4
itrackso Included in the letter were instructions i
Ifor the execution of the document and the contracj
Itor ,,
I :
a t
t
[that the street width and design of Tamarack Ave- i
8 1 I a I
s l
* P
* 1 I
I
1 4
I I I I
I 1 i 1 I I
I 4
I I
t
s I
0
I 1 I ?he Council was informed this was in connection i
bith the Joint Sewer Project for th~ Mtain trans- i
bission line to the south,
by motion of the Council Mayor Guevara was author4 McPhersc
{ized to execute the do-cumentson behalf of the : Bierce
pity of Carlsbad, : Guevara
!
I 8 1 I I I I
t ! Nehwenc
I ! ; '\ -\ ', \ '
I *, '., 8. '\\
I -8- b \\ '\ 8,
I i Name '*,'4
I I : of '$
1 I
I
I
I 1 \\ \ '\
\"
;""""""""""""""""""-"""""""""-""-~"""""-"~"""""""- I Member
:A short recess Was called at 7:55 P,M, The meet-: i ing reconveried at 8:lO P.M,
!NEW BUSINESS: ;
1 (.a) Discussion b€ chancres to. OrdiEance .Nop,; 9650 -i
; subdivision ordinance,. The City Mahager infbmned i
ithe Council a report has .been stibmitted by the 1 I Chairman of the Subdivisioli , Standards ' Sub-Commitk&. I to the 'Chairman bf ' the Subdivision StaridaPd$ bmti b
iCouncii membersb setting forth their x'edommenda- \ i tions o
!As ta street lighting in siibdivisions, the follow; ! ing recommendations were submikted for the Counci$'s
Itcdnsidkration: (1) That street lighting be re- 'r
:qdred iri tili new subdivisions; location of the I
!lights shall be determined by the San Diego Gas i i& Electric Company, and the subdivider shall pay : : an 18 month service charge for the lights* (2) !
!That if the subdivider installs electro-lires, the
:18 month charge be waived, The committee recomm-i
:ended that the Council consider the possibility i
:of City part9cipation if electro-lires are ins- i
jtalled; and (3) The committee also recommends I
!that minimum requirements for street lighting in i
!subdivisions for standard street lighting be de- ;
:termined, I I
:It was pointed out that if electro-lires are ins3i
jtalled it would entail underground wiring, and I
Ithe fixtures would become the property of tie tit$.
IThe estimated cost for each lamp is $400.00, how- :
!ever, the energy would be less. t
:Councilman Bierce stated he did not feelthat Item!
:#2 should be written into the ordinance as a firmi
!requirement. If the subdivider wishes to put in i
ielectro-lires, then each project should be consi- i
idred on its own merit as to city participation. i
! :Councilman Neiswender stated he could see no just3- !
ification for city participation on lights as this:
:does not concern the health and welfare of the I
!citizenry,, and ornamental lights would only be i
ifor the improvement of the subdivision.
!After further discussion it was agreed that Item :
!#2 be deleted as a requirement and that Item #1 :
:ties in with ftem #3 as to minimum requirements, i
!The City Manager pointed out that Section No. 415;
!of Ordinance No. 9050, sets forth that the fees i
ishall be paid to the City Clerk, At the present i
:time the fees are paid to the City Treasurer and I
I
4 I I 1 0 I: t 1
I I .. * I
! ttee, a copy of which was sent to each of the . 4 !
1 i 6
'<
t I
I I I
8 t
I * I
I I
l
I I
a
I I I I
I
I I
I t
a !the accounting is done by the Finance Department,;
! :It was agreed that the items recommended by the i
I I
: committee for subdivision standards be incorpora- i i ted into the subdivision ordinaree, and that the i
!City Attorney be instructed to prepare an amend- !
jment to the ordinance, t 4 * I I
I 8 I
I : \, '\ ', -8 q
I \, ', ' '. I , \, " '
I '\ '\ ' I , ' '.
I -9- i Name '%,x's
I ; of %$ 4 I I Member \
l a I 1 I
l
I .\ I
a
t 4
:""""""""""""""-.""""""""""""""""-""""""-!"""""""-
4 I i (b) Municipal Election: The following resolutio4s
:were submitted for the Council's consideration, f$r
m64: I t
t .f SResoIution NO. 499, ' A RESOLUTION d~' THE: CITY cod+ ;- :CIL OF "HE. CITY OF CARLSBAD REQUESTING T& WARD i
ITHE RE!GISTRAR. OF VOTERS OF SAID COUElT'Y 'f0 RENDER :
hNG TO THE CONDUCT OF A GENZRAL MUNICIPAL ELEC- bcPherson
!TIdPs TO BE hLD %N SAID CITY ON APRIL 14, 1964, bierce
bas adopted by title only and further reading 'puevara baived o Peimender
iResoiution NO, 980. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY co~-
0 jthe General Municipal. Election to be heid April 14,
i 1'
I 1
!OF SUPI~RVISORS OF THE C~UNTY OF SAN DIEGO TO PERM;T
:SPEC.IFIED S~ERVICES TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, RELA- i
t I I 'a
:CIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, CALLING t
$ND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUN;
!THE 14TH DAY OF APRIL, 1964, FOR THE ELECTION OF I :ICIPAL ELECTION 'TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDA$,
;CERTAIN OFFICERS OF SAID CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE ! 8
I PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA I
;RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES AND FOR THE SUBMI&-
!ION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTOBS OF SAID CITY OF CER-i
FAIN QUESTIONS, PROPOSITIONS OR MEASURES RELATING i
:TO THE ELECTION OF MAYOR AND FOUR COUNCILMEN AND hcPherson
:COMBINATION OF THE OFFICES OF CITY CLERK AND CITY bierce
TREASURER, was adopted by title only and further guevara
ireadling waived D peiswender
:Employment of Martin and Chapman, Inc. The City ;
Fanager requested authorization for the employment!
bf Martin and Chapman, Inc., to handle all electih
:supplies for the General Municipal Election in i
hpril 14, 1964,
I I I
1 I I
I I I I I I
I I I
$y motion of the Council authorization was given VcPherson !for the employment of Martin and Chapman, Inc, to 8ierce
pandle all the election supplies for the General buevara
Nunicipal Election, in April 14, 1964--, beiswender
:Sale of 1962 Sewer Bonds, Series €3, The City Att-I
brney informed t'ne Council it will be necessary I
ifor the Council to approve the Official Statement i
:in connection with the sale of the bonds. O'Mel- :
;veny and Myers 'nave prepared the following resolu-:
kion for the Council * s consideration:
kesolution No, 981. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COdr McPhersol
LIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING! Bierce
kHE OFFICIAL STATEMENT, was adopted by title only i Guevara
!andl further reading waived, I Meiswende:
I I
I I I
I I I I I I I
a I
I I
!Dedication of Cannon Park. Councilman Meiswender I
:suggested that the Chairman of the Parks and Rec- i
:reation Commission be instructed to set up the t 8 I
0 becessary procedure for the dedication of Cannon i
$ark, I I
I ! I I
bommittees for development of Master Plan, Councik-
ban Bierce stated the City of Costa Mesa is having:
!a master plan developed and they have had comi- i
!tees to assist them, He would like to suggest thak
t 1 I
I I I
I I I * 6 *
I ',I. 8* I \\ I I '', '+, '\
I \' '- 8, '\. ' '
I I
I
I '\ '
I -10- \ '\ '- i Name '\ *$?
I f of '+ i I '9 !"""""""""""""""""""""""~""""~""""-"""-~"-""""""". : Member '* ;various coirunittees be appointed to assist I .I Daniel,; I
0 1Mann; Johnson and MehdenhaL1 in the city's master: ! plan, i. e ., , industkid, commercial residential, i
:harbor, Pakks and Recreation and agriculturai. i
:Mayor Gdevara requested that the Council members '!
jsubmit names for these committees at the next i
Iregular meetirig, I
I
f i (a) Aqreement between City of Carlsbad and Carroil i Kelly, concerninq water, The City Attorney informid
:the Council this item was in connection with the i
! !Hall Wells. An agreemenk was submitted to Mr. I
!Kelly €or his approval and as of this date we hav+ i not heard from Mr a Kelly,
I i * t
I
I I I I
I I I t
; OLD BUSINESS: 1
I I
I I I I I
[It was agreed that this item be deferred until thh
:next meeting.
!
t I #
I i i (33) Second readinq of Ordinance No, 5035, relat. f
! to food handlers, The following ordinance was su$-
Irnitted for a second reading by the Council:
!Ordinance No, 5035. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF -i
ICARLSBAD ADOPTING BY REFEREWCE CHAPTERS 1 and 2 Ok
i DIVISION 1 OF TITLE VI OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY i I CODE RELATING TO FOOD HANDLERS AND THE PREPARATIO$ i AND DISTRIBUTION OF BOOD, REPEALING CONFLICTING iMcPherson 1 I ORDINANCES, AND PROVIDING REMEDIES AND PENALTIES i Bierce
:title only and adopted, : Neiswenderi
I I I
I I I I *
I i FOR VIOLATION, was given a second reading by i Guevara i I
I t 1 !
I
I i (C) Second readinq of Ordinance No, 1086, provi-i i diw for the issuance of sewer bonds. The followj i ing ordinance was submitted €or a second reading I
:by the Council: 8 ! I t
I I
I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I
i Ordinance No. 1086. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ! i CARLSBAD, CALIFOFWIA, PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE i McPherson ; I OF SEWER BONDS DESIGNATED 1952 SEWER BONDS, SERIEb Bierce I
iB OF SAID CITY IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,000,000, was IGuevara ! : given a second reading by title only and adopted. i Neiswender:
I 1 I
I I
* 1 I
I I I i (a) Joint Powers Aqreement for Transportation 1 i
!Coordination. The City Manager stated last week ; ! t i he sent a memorandum to the members of the Councik I I
!concerning this item, and today he received fur- i I I i tker information that he would like to study, and: I I
:requested this matter deferred until the next i I I : meeting, 4 *
I
I
I
I * 8
I
I !
1 I i (e) Carlsbad City Schools - re: Las Flores Ave-i 1
inue extension, The City Manager advised the Coun-: i cil this matter has been pending for some time. In: : the beginning the school indicated they did not i
!need the additional property being offered for th$ i additional street width; however, they requested i i that an overpass or underpass be constructed to i
!provide access to the school, A cost estimate i
0
I * I * 4 * 8 I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I * I : I for the construction of an overpass or underpass I i was made by the City Engineer and a letter forwarb- I
! !
: ed to the school board setting forth these costs.! I
I I I
I
!
* , . ,. ..
I 1
I I 8 I I I
I I ', 8, '\ ' '
I 1 '\ 8, '\, ",
I -11- '\x, y,,
8 I Na me "\,'\$
I I : of '*
8 i Member ': ;"""""""""""""""""""""""-~""""""--"-"-"-""~*""""""--
:After a meeting of the school board a letter was i
!sent to the city wherein they indicated that some!
!provision wsuld hive to be provided for additionaf
:safety for $hose bkudents who wotlld be crossing ;
jLas Flores Drive. It was their feeling that it i$
jthe city's responsibility to insure reasonable i
jsafety in its strekt prograta, The onlv fceasdnablh :alternative to an. hndergass wmLd be the employ- 1
jrnent af an adQlt emssing gw!d Ear this dr~shing!
!Mayor Guevara stated the school. districk rriakes it$
!decision as $0 where they wish to ldeake d school;
!This school .wad placed in an area where the stree$s
!were a1read.y in poor condition. Wen khky contern4
!plate a new school they should work with the city!,
!planning. de did not feel the school should creare
:problems. dk did not feel the city should have t4
!put in an overpass or underpass,
;Councilman McBherson stated he did not see why on<
jschool is more of a hazard than any of the others;
!Councilman Bierce stated he concurred with Councii-
!man ~c~herson, I
:The Mayor stated if we have to go through condemn4
jation, he would just as soon forget the extension i
;of Las Flores.
:Councilman Bierce pointed out that the city has :
:made negotiations with other parties in the area, i
!and felt the Council had a moral obligation to I
!make a dtecision,
iCouncilrnan Meiswender requested the plan for the i
jextension of Las Flores presented for the Council'js
jreview, and that some definite action be taken at:
:this time e
\Agter Surther discussion it was agreed that a
I
I
0 '&
1 I
1 I I t I I i
I I I 4
I 1
8 I
I b 4
I I I I I I I I I
I t I I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I I
:committee be appointed by the Mayor to meet with ;
!members of the school board.
:The Mayor appointed Councilman Bierce, City Mana- I
iger, City Attorney, City Engineer and himself to i
keet with members of the school board, The City \
ifimager was instructed to arrange a meeting at an i
!early date,
9ITY ATTORNEY ' S REPORT :
kcke Lease for beach property, A rough draft of a I
!lease was presented to Mr, Ecke for his considera-;
ition. Mr, Ecke still wishes to have the right to i
kake rock from the area. He has been allowing one! . !
!
I I I I I f 4 1 8
I I I $ I 9 I I t I I I 8 1 I I
jfirm to remove rock from the area, I I
0 l 1 I I ?layor Guevara stated this could create a Police :
$roblem, Perhaps he would be willing to submit :
%he name of the concern that would be taking the i
hock. Also this could eventually cause erosion, I
I I I I I I I I I I 4 I 1 I !
r.
I I,
I I I I
i 8, -\, ', .8, T
I
I I I '\\ '\ =, ',
I ', 'I ' ' I '\ ,' \ '\
I "12" ! Name *\,'\$
I I I ; of '*$ :"""""""""~"""-"""""""-""-~""""-*"""-"""""""""""""- : Member ':
r. I, I I I I I I I
I I I
"12"
i I 8, -\, ', .8, T
I I '\\ '\ =, ',
I ', 'I ' ' I ,' ! Name *\,'\$ '\ \ '\
; of '*$ : klArnCl*l. 8:
"" I icouncilman Bierce stated. if this erosion gets bad: i maybe the San Diecgo Gas st Electric .Company would i
:pump some of the sand back. This is Mr. Ecke's i
jwater that 3s his problem,
i It was agreed that the City continue negotiations!
!wi+h Mr. Ecke,
IBy motion of the Council the Magar was authorizediMcPherson i to exeGlute the lease on behalf of the City of i Bierce
!Carisbad, between the City and the Eckes, i Guevara
I : Neiswende~
:Lawsuit, - re: Easement. The City has been serve6
!with a complaint in which it is named as one of i i the deSendahtd. The suit concerns an easement th4t
ithe City inherited with the purchase of the Carls:
;bad Mutual Water Company, At one time, the Carlsi
!bad Mutual Water Company used this easement to f
!serve the St, Malo Beach area: however, the city I.
!has no further use €or it now, It is the recorn-!
;endation of the City Engineer and the City Attor-:
iney that the easement be abandoned and the city i
:execute a discfaimer as to this lawsuit. 1
!By motion of the Council authorization was given i
:for the Mayor to execute a Disclaimer on behalf ;
:of the City of Carlsbad as to the easement. I
!
@ :property 1 and zf he wants to place his land under 1
I I I
I
t I
I 8 I
I i
I
I
I I I 1 I
I
I I I
I * I I +
I I I
I :CITY MANAGER'S REPORT:
I I
I 4 * 1 t 8
!Tidelands. The City Manager informed the Council ::
:he had met with oflficiabs from the State concerni$g
:the required improvements for tidelands. We would
:lands, An improvement such as a lbreakvsater would:
:be an improvement, We would have to make these i
iimprovements within ten years, They will engineet i and monument these lands for a fee, which, in
:accordance with their letter, would not exceed i
hot have to improve the entire length (of the tide+ I
I * I
i $4,000, I
I I
I I I I :Civil Defense Sirens, On January 31, 1964, at 4:bO
!P,M,, the sirens will be tested. The City Mana-i
iger requested the newspapers to make note of this!
!in their papers, I
I I
1 I 1
I ! !Sale of City Property, The City Manager requeste8
:authorization to open escrow and execute the mec-i i essary documents to open the escrow.
:By motion of the Council authorization was given iMcPherson
!to the City Manager to open escrow and execute IBierce
ithe necessary papers to open the escrow, for the :Guevara
isale of the city property located on Elm Avenue INeiswende
:between Roosevelt and Madison streets,
!Boat Races - January 25th and 26th- Previously, t$e
:Council sanctioned a boat race to be s-ponsored byj
ithe Junior Chamber of Commerce., One of the mem3xts
jhas informed the City they would like to have sky:
!diving at this event, The City would be fully i
jcovered for this event, and there would be approxi
& I 1 I
* I t 1
I I I I I I
I I
I
-~, F I : -8, '1 ' *\ -1
I t '\ \ '\
I I I I I 8, '\,", '8
I '8, '.,". '
I I Name 8\ '\$
I -13- ; of '4 I 8.5
I .. 1
I
I
I
I
;""~"""""""""~"""""""""""~""~""-"""""""""~"""""""~ : Member '3
t I
:imately 7 sky divers. I I I I 0 * *I I 1 I I I I !It was the feeling of the Council that if the
:City I were fully covered they wduld have n~ ob- ;
! !
ICouncihan'Neiswender stated he would like to I I I
!have the Police Department's reaction on this
:matter o I
IMr, Frank IdeVors; Yepresentative of the Sari bisgoi
!Gas & Electric Company, stated usually these :.
I ~umps have to be approved by tl-k F.A,A. ad to i i Location, 4
!Monies &rod sale of city property- Councilman 1
:Meiswender stated he would like to suggest that i
ithe monies derived from the sale of the city pro-: i perty be applied towards retiring the water bonds{
:It was the general feeling of the majority of the:
jCouncil that nothing should be done at the present
:time with the monies, I
i RATIFICATION OF BILLS AMD PAYROLL:
:Ratification of the bills was given for the generi
!a1 expenses of the city in the amount of 1 I
:$248,417.76, and for the Water Department in the : ! amount of $7 I 379.57 I for the period January 7, i:McPherson
i1964, to January 21, 1964, as certified by the IBierce
!Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing fGuevara i Committee e iNeiswende~
!Ratification of the payroll was given for the :McPherson i first half of January, 1964, in the amount of :Bierce
i $17,786,41 as certified by the Director of Finan& Guevara
jand approved by the Auditing Committee, iNeiswende1
i ADJOURNMENT t
1 ; jections to the sky diving. !
I I 1 I I 4 I I ..
Id
1 1 I
I I I I
1
1 8
I I I I
1 I
I I I I I I I I 1 I I
I I 1
I
I I
I I
I I I I I I I I :By proper motion the meeting was i 9t30 P,Mo
I
I :Respectfully submitted,
I i I I 4 I I ! &. ;P &&./
I MARGAT E. ADAPIS,
I
:City Clerk
I I I I I
t I 4 I I I !
I I I adjourned at I I I 1 $
I I I 4 8 I I I I I I I !
I i I I I * 4 1 I .
I
I
I
I
I
I 0 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I t I I I 1
I I I I I 1 I I I 4 I I I I I I I * t I I !