Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-07-16; Parks & Recreation Commission; MinutesMINUTES MEETING OF: DATE OF MEETING: TIME OF MEETING: PLACE OF MEETING: PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION July 16, 1984 5:00 p.m. City Council Chambers CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Chairman Wright at 5:05 p.m. ROLL CALL; Present - Chairman Wright, Commissioners Donovan, Dahlquist, 0 and Regan. Commissio: at 5:10 p.m. Absent - None Also Present - Council Liaison Lewis Dave Bradstreet, Parks & Recreation Director PUBLIC OPEN FORLM; There was no one present for the open forum. APPROVAL OF MINUTES; The Minutes of the June 18, 1984, meeting were approved as presented. APPROVAL OF AGENDA; Chairman Wright announced Item C under New Business had been withdrawn from the Agenda Chairman Wright announced Item D under New Business would be an Action Item. under Additional Business (11A) to elect a Vice- chairman. Commissioner Dahlquist volunteered to be the scribe for tonight's meeting. Commission regarding the scribe. UNFINISHED BUSINESS; A. Levante Tot Lot Citizen Complaint Mr. George Gill appeared before the Commission again on this item, stating he had talke Lindstrom, but was not aware of what had transpired since then. Dave Bradstreet, Parks & Recreation Director, reported that Mr. Lindstrom felt the landscaping was sufficient as far as the school district was concerned. COMMISSIONERS hairman ioners ran, Popovich Conti arrived is rks & n forum. eting were er New Agenda. er New item be added lect a Vice- D be the Commissioner, 3opted by the t Commission alked with Mr. had )irector, landscaping district was Wright Donovan Dahlquist Cochran Popovich Regan X X X X X X X MINUTES Page 2 July 16, 1984 COMMISSIONERS UNFINISHED BUSINESS; (Continued) Mr. Gill stated the biggest problem was the loss of privacy, not only during the daytime, but to all hours of the night. The suggestion was made that perhaps Mr. Gilll should contact the Boys and Girls Club about the noise and loitering after hours. The Commissioners suggested the hours for use of the park area be posted and then some type of reminder to those not obeying the time limit. The Commission voted to take no action at the present time, but to leave the situation at the tot lot as it is; However, a sign is to be posted giving the hours for use and Mr. Gill to proceed with his negotiations with the Boys and Girls club or any other interested party. B. Carlsbad Unified School District Pool Use Request Chairman Wright gave the background on this item and Dave Bradstreet continued, stating he felt there was no action required by the Commission on this item. The pool agreement with the Carlsbad Unified School District has a condition in it that reduces the hourly rate for school activity to $14/hr. It also provides for free time from 6:00 to 11:15 a.m. and from 1:00 to 2:00 p.m. during the week. NEW BUSINESS; Walco Inc. Trash Receptacle Grant Dave Bradstreet reported Walco Inc. had offered the trash cans to the City free of charge with the logo "I love a clean San Diego". He stated Parks & Recreation would request between 30 to 50 cans. Parks & Recreation Commission accepted the offer of Walco Inc. to give trash cans to the City free of charge. Commissioner Dahlquist reported a trash can missing at Beach Terrace. B. Board-Sail Request Chairman Wright stated this was a request for a change in hours for board sailors, and asked whether anyone was present to give testimony. Dave Bradstreet stated the interested parties had been notified, but had not responded. This item was dropped from the Agenda, to be re- instated if and when a request is made. Wright Donovan Dahlquist Cochran Popovich Regan Conti Wright Donovan Dahlquist Cochran Popovich Regan Conti Wright Donovan Dahlquist Cochran Popovich Regan Conti X MINUTES Page 3 July 16, 1984 COMMISSIONERS C. Request to Waive Fees for Use of Harding by Las Madras 83 This item was withdrawn from the Agenda. D. Update on 84-85 CIP Projects Dave Bradstreet reported this is an action item and the Commission agreed by consensus to act on each item separately. 1. Community Center Plans Dave Bradstreet reported he was directed to lookat various sites for the proposed community center and to come up with a recommendation for a site and design. He listed the sites investigated as possible community center sites, and their drawbacks, stating the best site available was Cannon Lake Park. There is four acres of land available and two acres of water, and it is in a central location. Mr. Bradstreet stated there was a subterranean water problem, which was being analyzed prior to the August 7 presentation to Council. Mr. Bradstreet stated the park would be developed in three phases, with a large rectangular building constructed first. He indicated the plans would include socker fields and a green belt. The cost was estimated between $850,000 to $900,000, with District One and Two funds and park-in-lieu funds available for part of the funding. Commissioner Conti asked what effect the bullet train might possibly have on that location. Mr. Bradstreet replied that would be something that should be considered. He also stated that part of that land is State-owned and Parks & Recreation would make a proposal to the State to develop their land. Parks & Recreation Commission approved of the concept for future development of the Cannon Lake Park area for a community center. 2. Calavera Hills Community Park Dave Bradstreet used a wall map to show the Calavera Hills Community Park. He stated the City has eight acres now and the development is in the CIP. In phase one there would be three lighted youth softball fields, but there would have to be considerable grading done first. The community center would be the third phase of that development. Mr. Bradstreet stated the neighbors were concerned about the traffic, but a traffic study had indicated there would not be an adverse impact on traffic, but would actually reduce traffic from what it would be if that area were left commercial. Wright Donovan Dahlquist Cochran Popovich Regan Conti MINUTES Page 4 July 16, 1984 COMMISSIONERS Mr. Bradstreet stated there would be a charge for the use of the facilities. Mr. Jim Courtney, CARA, explained the open lawn area in the proposed park and that there would be no noise pollution on that side of the park. Chairman Wright stated that CARA would have to pay for the use of those fields. Mr. Courtney stated CARA helps at each level to develop the parks and they feel their children should be able to use the fields in the City without paying a fee. Chairman Wright answered that organizations such as Little League, etc., usually have their own facilities and purchase those facilities. The City is trying to provide facilities for all the citizens, but the national organizations do have the ability to raise money for their own use and have the ability to fund their programs. He concluded that this would have to be considered and worked out together. Parks & Recreation Commission approved the concept of Calavera Hills Park. 3. Fuerte Park Development Dave Bradstreet reported this park was ready to go and he showed a wall park with the rendering. The grading is going on now and this will be part school and part park use, with the City maintaining the school land and being paid for that. Parks & Recreation Commission accepted the Fuerte Park Development. Commissioner Cochran left the meeting at 6:30 p.m. 5. Stagecoach Park with temporary Play Field Dave Bradstreet stated his recommendation would be to do nothing—since this is the wrong portion for a play field. He stated he recommended "no" on Stagecoach Park, as they are looking at other areas. There is some land between La Costa and Olivenhain that Daon owns that may be available for a ballfield. Mr. Bradstreet recommended a tour of Buena Vista Elementary School with the thought of having portable backstops for ball practice. Wright Donovan Dahlquist Cochran Popovich Regan Conti Wright Donovan Dahlquist Cochran Popovich Regan Conti MINUTES Page 5 July 16, 1984 COMMISSIONERS Mr. Bradstreet stated Valley Jr. High School ballfields need to be renovated—they could be legal if improved. He requested City Council fund renovation of Valley Junior High fields—or contract for this. Mr. Bradstreet asked for endorsement to go forward with "no" on Stagecoach and "yes" on the other sites. Parks & Recreation Conmission approved the concept of touring the Buena Vista fields and continuing to search for acceptable ballfields in any area possible. Stagecoach Park Further discussion on Stagecoach Park by Mr. Bradstreet revealed it nay take up to eight years to get the rest of the park, but want to go forward with the design next year. Macario Canyon and Stagecoach Park lack access at the present time and Mr. Bradstreet recomnended an update to determine legal accesses the City has to the areas they own. By consensus, the Conmission agreed an update on legal access to City land would be valuable. COUNCIL REPORT; Council Member Lewis reported that both dates for the workshop had been cancelled. CCMMITTEE REPORTS; Tree Committee Commissioner Donovan reported the Tree Committee had met and they do need more members. She asked Dave Bradstreet to bring copies of the news articles she presented last meeting. Mrs. Donovan reported on a plan whereby developers would give new buyers a tree certificate which they could use or donate to the City. She stated a tree removal and replacement policy will become a written policy. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS; Election of Officers By acclamation, Scott Wright was elected Chairman and Barbara Donovan, Vice-chairman for the coming year. Wright Donovan Dahlquist Popovich Regan Conti Wright Donovan Dahlquist Popovich Regan Conti MINUTES Page 6 July 16, 1984 COMMISSIONERS Commissioner Dahlquist read her notes as scribe for this meeting. ADJOURtMENT; By proper motion, the meeting was adjourned at 6:57 p.m. Respectfully/isubmitted, Harriett Babbitt Minutes Clerk RECEIVED AUG " 2 1984 CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989 VINCENT F. BIONDO, JR. (619) 438-5531 CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL S. HENTSCHKE ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY August 2, 1984 Barry C. Bender Rick Engineering Company Suite 100 365 South Rancho Santa Fe Road San Marcos, California 92069 RE: CONDOMINIUM PERMIT 36(A) Dear Barry: Thank you for your letter of July 31, 1984. After my discussion with Mr. Guttman, regarding Lot 290, I understood that he would get back to us when he had acquired or made legally binding arrangements to acquire the residual fee interest in the property. Assuming that has been done the next step is for Dave Bradstreet to take the natter to the Parks and Recreation Commission. After securing their recommendation and assuming the Commission and Mr. Bradstreet agree that we should dispose of the property, the next step is to present it to the City Council for their approval. In this case I would suggest that the appropriate staff recommendation would be to ask the Council's concurrence to dispose of the property by negotiation rather than by following our normal bid procedure. The law allows that when it appears the City can make a better deal by negotiation. I think that is probably so in this situation where your client owns the underlying fee. Although the City's interest in the property is the substantial equivalent of fee title the fact that our interest is of record as an easement would complicate the sale on an open market basis. For that reason and because it appears logical that the property be developed in connection with the project which surrounds it I think staff would be justified in recommending the negotiated sale to the Council. If the City Council concurs their action would be to authorize staff to obtain an appraisal, negotiate with Mr. Guttman, and return to the City Council with the proposed terms for the sale. As previously indicated, it is the opinion of our office that Attachment A Barry Bender RE: Condominium Permit 36(A) August 2, 1984 Page 2 the proceeds of the sale are park funds, and would have to be used for the development or acquisition of park and recreation facilities in that area of Carlsbad. If you have any questions please feel free to give me a call. Very truly yours, VINCENT F. BIONDO, JR. City Attorney rmh c: Dave Bradstreet PLANNING CONSULTANTS AND CIVIL ENGINEERSRICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 365 SO. RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD • SUITE 100 SAN MARCOS, CALIFORNIA 92069 • 619/744-4800 (' RECEIVED AUG " 11984 July 31, 1984 Mr. Vincent Biondo, Jr. CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 RE: CONDOMINIUM PERMIT 36(A) (JOB NO. 8422-G, 8422-H) Dear Vince: Mr. Jack Guttman of Con Am Properties has advised me that he has been in contact with you regarding the inclusion of Lot 290, Vale Unit No. 3, Map No. 7779, into CP-36(A). Lot 290 is currently owned by the Daon Corporation and has a City open space easement over it. Con Am would like to purchase the fee title to the lot, remove the open space designation on it, and include it in the presently approved CP 36(A). Included for your review is a memorandum, dated February 16, 1984, of a meeting I had with Dan Hentschke regarding the processing and approvals necessary to accomplish Con Am's goals. Con Am would like to proceed on this matter at everyone's earliest convenience. Preliminary discussions have taken place with City Planning, Parks & Recreation, and the Police Department regarding Lot 290 and there appears to be agreement that the inclusion of the lot in CP 36(A) would be in the best interests of both the City and the project. 0 Police would like to see the access via Lot 290 to San Marcos Creek Canyon removed. 0 Parks & Recreation would like to not have the responsibility of maintaining the lot. 0 Planning will consider the inclusion of Lot 290 in a revised plan. 0 Daon is willing to sell the property. Mr. Vincent Biondo, Jr. RE: CONDOMINIUM PERMIT 36(A) July 31, 1984 Page two I have enclosed for your review the memorandum mentioned above and related backup information, a copy of the Tentative Condominium Permit Map and the Resolution of Approval (PC 1882). Could you please advise us as to what needs to be done to initiate proceedings on this matter? Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Barry C. BCB:omh enclosures cc: Mr. Dave Bradstreet, CARLSBAD PARKS & RECREATION Mr. Dan Hentschke, CARLSBAD CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Mr. Bill Hofman, CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mr. Jack Guttman, CON AM PROPERTIES Mr. Jim Goff, DAON CORPORATION all with enclosures PLANNING CONSULTANTS AND CIVIL ENGINEERSRICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 365 SO. RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD • SUITE 100 SAN MARCOS. CALIFORNIA 92069 • 619/744-4800 | | Conference Report I X | Telephone Conversation Job: 8422H Date: February 16, 1984 Regarding: LOT 290. VALE UNIT NO. 2 Prepared by: Barry Bender Jack Guttraan/ (w/encl.) Copies to: CON AM Joan Cooper/ (w/encl.) CON AM Bob Stockton/(w/encl.) PICK ENGINEERING CO. John Brand/ (w/encl.) RICK ENGINEERING CO. Present: Dan Hentschke - CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Bob Ladwig/ RICK ENGINEERING CO. Ernie Harrington/ RICK ENGINEERING CO. Barry Bender - RICK ENGINEERING Doug Helming/ RICK ENGINEERING CO. File (w/encl.) After reviewing the attached information, I attempted to set a meeting up with the City Attorney's Office to discuss the City vacating the existing open space easement. Dan Hentschke replied to me by phone after reviewing same data. 0 The lot, although not owned in fee by the City, is considered, in the opinion of the Attorney's Office, to be Park property. 0 As park property, it is an asset to the City, and has value as other park lands. 0 In order to dispose of the "asset," the following would need to be accomplished, not necessarily in this order: - Concurrence with the Parks & Recreation Director that the site is no longer needed. - Concurrence with the Parks Commission of the same. - Action by the City Council. - Appraisal of property to establish value. - Payment to the City of acceptable value of property. DAWCO PRESS 283 » Telephone Conversation LOT 290, VALE UNIT NO. 2 Page two Attachments: Planning Department request for legal adivce, 1-18-84 Reply to Planning from Attorney's Office, 1-31-84 Letter from John Brand to Jack Guttman, 2-8-84 Title report on Lot 290 with cover letter (1-3-88), 10-24-83. BCB/omh "O : FROM: ty$ 84 ^ CITY OF CARLSBAD '^QUEST FOR LEGAL ADVICE DATE DEPT SUBJECT: ADVICE REQUESTED fiACKGROUND INFORMATION; .-epare synopsis of facts, giving as many as possible. Add additional) sheets -if necessary or attach supporting documents.) Prepared/Syr ^^ — Approved by: Request Noted: City Manager January 31, 1984 TO: Land Use Planning Manager FROM: City Attorney STATUS OF LOT 290 You have asked for our advice regarding the status of lot 290 (CT 72-20). The lot is not a condominium lot. Any development of the property would require a condominium subdivision map processed per usual under Title 20 ;and a planned development permit under Chapter 21 .45. The lot was, in effect, dedicated for park and recreational purposes in accordance with the old La Costa Master Plan and the City's then current Park and Recreation Element of the General Plan. It was to be park land to afford pedestrian and vehicular access to the San Marcos Canyon Park, an open space area. In our view the lot is part of the City's inventory of park and recreational lands. It is an asset of the system and could only be disposed of accordingly. In order to make the lot available for development we think it would be necessary to secure the concurrence of the Park and Recreation Commission. Assuming it is no longer desired for park purposes it could be disposed of in a similar fashion to .other surplus park properties. That is appraisal and sale at fair market value with the proceeds being placed in the park fund for that portion of the City. VINCENT F. BIONDO, JR. City Attorney rme 12. OJ 1984FEB EC IANDUSE RECEIVED S| ^ PIAHMING OFFICE PLANNING CONSULTANTS AND CIVIL ENGINEERSRICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 3088 PIO PICO DR. . SUITE 202 . CARLSBAD, CA 92008 P.O. BOX 1129 . PHONE . AREA CODE 619 • 729-4987 February 8, 1984 Mr. Jack Guttman CON-AM 1764 San Diego Avenue San Diego, California 92110 s RE: LOT #290 - SEA POINTE VILLAGE (J#8422) Dear Jack: On Monday I met with Catherine Nicholas, the staff planner on Sea Pointe Village, to discuss the development of Lot #290. I re- ceived from her a request for legal advice prepared by her along with the City Attorney's response. I believe the City Attorney is incorrect in saying the lot was dedicated for park and recreational uses and therefore can be sold at fair market value. The preliminary title report shows the City as having only an easement on the property. Barry Bender will be contacting the City Attorney to hopefully rectify this problem so we can proceed with Lot 290's development. If you have any questions on this matter, please call. Sincerely, JB:cg Enclosures (2) Request for Legal Advice City Attorney Response LA COSTA VALE, LTD. 176** San Diego Avenue San Diego, California 92110 Janjuaxy Stockton INEERING COMP Carlsbad, California 92008 RE: SEA POINTE VILLAGE LA COSTA, CALIFORNIA LOT #290 Dear Bob: Enclosed please find the preliminary title report for the above-referenced Lot. Please review same to make certain that we are not encroaching on any of the easements, property lines, etc. Very truly yours, LA COSTA VALE, LTD. By: Continental La Costa Properties, Inc. General Partner JOHN M. COOPER Construction Manager JMC:fw cc: Jack Guttman/ConAm Barry Bender/Rick Engineering (w/attachment) H TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 220 "A" STREET P.O. BOX 1150 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92112 619-239-6081 OCTOBER 24, 1983 DORMAN ESCROW YOUR REFERENCE: DAON/LA COSTA OUR ORDER NO. : 1115543 IN RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE REFERENCED APPLICATION FOR A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY HEREBY REPORTS THAT IT IS PREPARED TO ISSUE, OR CAUSE TO BE ISSUED, AS OF THE DATE HEREOF, A CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE FORM POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE DESCRIBING THE LAND AND THE ESTATE OR INTEREST THEREIN HEREINAFTER SET FORTH, INSURING AGAINST LOSS WHICH MAY BE SUSTAINED BY REASON OF ANY DEFECT, LIEN OR ENCUMBRANCE NOT SHOWN OR REFERRED TO AS AN EXCEPTION BELOW OR NOT EXCLUDED FROM COVERAGE PURSUANT TO THE PRINTED SCHEDULES, .CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS OF SAID POLICY FORM. NOTICE: IF THE REAL PROPERTY COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS A RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNIT, A RESIDENTIAL LOT, OR A RESIDENTIAL LOT IMPROVED WITH A STRUCTURE CONTAINING ONE TO FOUR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS, THEN THE POLICY ISSUED TO AN OWNER IN CONNECTION HEREWITH, WILL NOT BE THE POLICY REFERRED TO ABOVE, BUT WILL BE THE AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL POLICY - 1979 FORM. THIS REPORT -AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS OR AMENDMENTS THERETO- IS ISSUED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREBY. IF IT IS DESIRED THAT LIABILITY BE ASSUMED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER OR COMMITMENT SHOULD BE REQUESTED. DATED AT 7:30 A.M. AS OF OCTOBER 19, 1983 TITLE OFFICER: BECKY DAILEY SIGNED: 1115543 PAGE TICOR TITLG THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: A FEE TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: DAON CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LA COSTA COMPANY, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION t AT THE DATE HEREOF EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS CONTAINED IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: 1. GENERAL AND SPECIAL COUNTY AND CITY TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR : 1983-84 INCLUDING PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX, IF ANY, FIRST INSTALLMENT : A LIEN NOW PAYABLE, BUT NOT YET DUE. >ECOND INSTALLMENT : A LIEN NOW PAYABLE, BUT NOT YET DUE. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES, IF ANY, ASSESSED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SENATE BILL 813 OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 1982-83 TAXES - NOT ON ROLLS. 2. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID LAND AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, SHOWN OR DEDICATED ON MAP FOR AFFECTS 7779 PARKING AND PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT FOR ACCESS TO SAN MARCOS CREEK LOT 290 3. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID LAND AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, SHOWN OR DEDICATED ON MAP FOR AFFECTS 7779 PUBLIC UTILITY AND TREE PLANTING PURPOSES LOTS 273 AND 290 4. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS IN THE DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS EXECUTED BY : LA COSTA LAND COMPANY, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION _RECORDED : NOVEMBER 2, 1973, RECORDER'S FILE NO. 73-307983 RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION OR NATIONAL ORIGIN ARE DELETED. WHICH PROVIDE THAT A VIOLATION THEREOF SHALL NOT DEFEAT OR RENDER INVALID THE LIEN OF ANY MORTGAGE OR DEED OF TRUST MADE IN GOOD 1115543 PAGE 2 TICOR TITLE INSURANCE FAITH AND FOR VALUE. SAID COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS HAVE BEEN PURPORTEDLY MODIFIED BY AN INSTRUMENT EXECUTED BY : LA COSTA LAND COMPANY, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION RECORDED : NOVEMBER 16, 1973, RECORDER'S FILE NO. 73-321220 SAID COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS HAVE BEEN PURPORTEDLY MODIFIED BY AN INSTRUMENT EXECUTED BY : LA COSTA LAND COMPANY, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION RECORDED : DECEMBER,19, 1973, RECORDER'S FILE NO. 73-349970 SAID COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS HAVE BEEN PURPORTEDLY MODIFIED BY AN INSTRUMENT EXECUTED BY : LA COSTA LAND COMPANY RECORDED : MAY 15, 1974, RECORDER'S FILE NO. 74-126131 5. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE OF EACH AND ALL OF THE OBLIGATIONS OF THE TRUSTOR UNDER THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT, AND ANY OTHER OBLIGATIONS THEREIN CONTAINED. DEED OF TRUST DATED : MARCH 10, 1981 "RUSTOR : LA COSTA LAND COMPANY .RUSTEE : TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY BENEFICIARY : THE TRUSTEES OF CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND RECORDED : MARCH 10, 1981, RECORDER'S FILE NO. 81-72862 SAID MATTER AFFECTS THIS AND OTHER PROPERTY. A MODIFICATION TO THE CONSOLIDATED TRUST DEED WAS DATED FEBRUARY 28, 1983 AND EXECUTED BY DAON CORPORATION, ET AL AND WAS RECORDED FEBRUARY 28, 1983, RECORDER'S FILE NO. 83-063017. 6. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN ORIGINAL INDEBTEDNESS OF THE AMOUNT STATED HEREIN DATED AMOUNT TRUSTOR TRUSTEE BENEFICIARY RECORDED MARCH 10, 1981 $40,378,689.71 LA COSTA LAND COMPANY TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY RANCHO LA COSTA, INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION MARCH 10, 1981, RECORDER'S FILE NO. 81-072863 SAID MATTER" AFFECTS THIS AND OTHER PROPERTY. THE BENEFICIAL INTEREST UNDER SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS ASSIGNED TO : ALLARD ROEN AND IRWIN A. MOLASKY, TRUSTEES UTA DATED JULY 6, 1981 if ASSIGNMENT DATED : JULY 6, 1981 RECORDED : JULY 14, 1981, RECORDER'S FILE NO. 81-220822 THE BENEFICIAL INTEREST UNDER SAID DEED OF TRUST 1115543 PAGE 3 TICOR TITLE INSURANCE WAS ASSIGNED AS COLLATERAL TO : THE TRUSTEES OF CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND BY ASSIGNMENT DATED : FEBRUARY 25, 1982 RECORDED : FEBRUARY 26, 1982, RECORDER'S FILE NO. 82-053120 SAID DEED OF TRUST HAS BEEN SUBORDINATED TO THE SUBJECT MATTER REFERRED TO IN THIS PARAGRAPH, BY THE PROVISIONS OF AN INSTRUMENT DATED : FEBRUARY 25, 1983 EXECUTED BY : ALLARD ROEN AND IRWIN MOLASKY, AS TRUSTEES RECORDED : FEBRUARY 28, 1983, RECORDER'S FILE NO. 83-063016 SUBORDINATED TO : MODIFICATION OF TRUST DEED RECORDED MARCH 10, 1981, RECORDER'S FILE NO. 81-072862 RECORDED : FEBRUARY 28, 1983, RECORDER'S FILE NO. 83-063017 7. MATTERS RELATING TO THE CORPORATE STANDING OF: CONTINENTAL LA COSTA PROPERTIES, INC., DARTMOOR DEVELOPMENT CO., CONTINENTAL LA COSTA EQUITIES, INC., CONTINENTAL LA COSTA INVESTMENTS, INC. REPORT TO FOLLOW. TAX FIGURES FOR CODE AREA PARCEL NO. FIRST INSTALLMENT SECOND INSTALLMENT 1982-83 9045 223-190-01 NOT ON ROLL NOT ON ROLL 1115543 PAGE TICOR TITLE INSURANCE THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 290 OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 72-20 UNIT NO. 2, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 7779, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. 1115543 PAGE MAP NO. 7779 CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 72-20 3 W 5 S This is not a survey of the land, but is compiled for information only, nor is it « part of the report or policy to which it nay be attached. TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST ::0 "A" Street 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1882 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF 3 A 336 UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON PIRAQUA AND VENA»» STREETS, 4 I LA COSTA APPLICANT: LA COSTA VALE, LTD. 5 CASE NO; CP-36 (A) 6 WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, t« 7 wit: 8 Lots 274 through 289 and 291 through 295 of Carlsbad Tract 72-20 (La Costa Vale Unit No. 2) according to Map No. 7779 9 filed in the office of the San Diego County Recorder on October 26, 1973 10 has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the 11 Planning Commission; and 12 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as 13 provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 14 • . WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 20th day of 15 October, 1981, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed 16 by law, to consider said request; and 17 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering 18 all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to 19 I be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the 20 Condominium Permit; and 21 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commis- 22 siori as follows:23 (A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 24 (B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, 25 the Commission recommends APPROVAL of CP-36(A), based on the following findings cind subject to the following conditions: 26 Findings; 27 1) The proponed project is consistent with the City's currei General Plan and with the Specific Plan which has been, ., 1 applied to this property, since the proposed density of 8.22 du's/ac does not exceed the density limit of 10-20 du's/ac 2 established for this site and previous grading activities and the topography of the site precludes a higher density. Also, 3 as conditioned, the project conforms to the requirements of all other applicable General Plan Elements. 4 2) A Subdivision Map for the site (CT 72-20), designating all 5 lots as "Condominium Lots", has been finaled and approved by the City Council and a condition has been included which re- 6 quires the applicant to file for an adjustment plat in order to remove all lot lines which would intersect a proposed 7 dwelling unit. 8 3) The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the site is adequate in size and shape 9 to accommodate residential development at the proposed den- sity and still meet all the requirements of the City's Condo- 10 minium Ordinance. 11 4) The project is consistent with all City public facility poli- cies and ordinances since: 12 a) One hundred fifty sewer connections have been reserved 13 for the first two phases of development by the Leucadia County Water District. 14 b) A condition has been added that building permits cannot 15 be issued unless sewer service is available and building cannot occur within the project unless sewer service re- 16 mains available. Therefore, the Planning Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities 17 Element of the General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project. 18 c) An agreement exists between the La Costa Land Company and 19 the Encinitas School District whereby a school site has been made available to this district covering the subject 20 project. 21 Also, a condition of approval requires that certain school fees must be paid to the San Dieguito Union School 22 District prior to the issuance on building permits. 23 (j) Adequiite water and gas and electric service will be available to serve the development. 24 e) All necessary public improvements have been either pro- 25 vided or will be required as conditions of approval. 26 f) TVie applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities 27 fee. Performance of that contract and payment of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will 2" be available concurrent with need as required by the General Plan. PC RKJiO LR02 -2- 1 5) Based on an initial study of the project, including a field investigation of the site, the Planning Director has deter- 2 mined that the project will not result in any adverse envi- ronmental impacts and has issued a Negative Declaration on 3 December 19, 1979 (log No. 626) and a Notice of Prior Envi- ronmental Compliance on October 5, 1981 which was approved by 4 the Planning Commission on October 28, 1981. 5 6) The proposed condominium project meets the criteria of Chap- ter 21.47 (condominiums) since: 6 a) The condominium meets the design criteria of Chapter 21.47.110 since the overall plan is comprehensive, em- bracing land, buildings, landscaping and their relation- ships, the driveways are not dominant features and suffi- cient circulation and on-site amenities are provided. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 b) Storage space, laundry facilities, open recreation areas, parking facilities, refuse areas, separate utilities and all other requirements of Section 21.47.130 have been met or will be made conditions of approval. Conditions General Conditions: 1) Approval is granted for CP 36(A), as shown on Exhibit(s) "A" -"F", dated September 17, 1981, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these condi- tions. 2) The conditions contained herein shall supercedc all condi- tions of CP 36 (Resolution No. 1629). 18 3) This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the City Engineer determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such sewer permits emd will continue to be available until time of occupancy. 4) This project is approved upon the express condition that the applicant shall pay a public facilities fee as required by City Council Policy No. 17, dated August 29, 1979, on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, and according to the agreement executed by the applicant for pay- ment of said fee a copy of that agreement dated October 5, 1981, is on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. If said fee is not paid as promised, this ap- plication will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project shall be void. PC RESO 1882 -3- 8 9-*•* 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5) The applicant shall provide school fees to San Dieguito Union District to mitigate conditions of overcrowding as part of building permit application. These fees shall be based on the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit application. 6) Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable ^ city ordinances in effect at time of building permit issu- ance. Planning Department: 7) The applicant shall prepare a reproducible mylar of the final site plan incorporating the conditions contained herein. --^,^Said site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. 8) The applicant shall establish a homeowner's association and one master set of corresponding covenants, conditions and ^restrictions for -the entire project. Said CC&R's shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of buildi-ng permits in any phase. 9) The followng provisions shall be included in the CC&R's pursuant to condition No. 8: a) No individual lots may be sold separately unless they are sold in groups of at least two lots and are contiguous . b) All lots shall be subject to the CC&R's in perpetuity. c) A common architectural theme shall be maintained for all lots. d) All lots shall share common recreation amenities. 10) All parking lot trees shall be a minimum of 15 gallons in o^si2e' 11) All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and o^-thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 12) Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with gates pursuant to city standards. Location ^i-of said receptacles shall be approved by the Planning Direc- tor prior to the issuance of building permits and shall be shown on the final site plans required pursuant to condition No. 7. 13) The recreation facility located on Lot 291 shall be installed to occupancy of any units in Phase 1. -4-PC RESO 1882 6 imparking spaces within this development. 7 17) The applicant has agreed to provide improvements on behalf of Commission and Planning Director. 10 18) Prior to the is'suance of any building permits within a speci- 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 14) The barbeque facility within lot 274 shall be relocated to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. The new location shall be shown on the final site plan required pursuant to condition No. 7. 15) An additional recreation facility, including a Jacuzzi and oj\ barbeque, shall be provided at a location subject to the ap- <'^ proval of the Planning Director. The location shall be shown j? on the final site plan required pursuant to condition No. 7. 16) A minimum of 24 feet of backup shall be provided for all .Ai,the city for lot 290. Said lot shall be improved by the ap- plicant concurrent with the construction of the units in Phase I, subject to the approval of the Parks and Recreation fie phase, the applicant shall submit an application for an ^Vadjustment plat and have a certificate of compliance record- ed, removing any lot line which intersects proposed dwelling units. A separate'adjustment plat is required for each lot line to be removed. 19) Unless otherwise approved herein, the subject property shall be subject to the RD-M zoning standards as they relate to ^'permitted and conditional uses, building height, setbacks and applicant shall submit a detailed landscape, lighting and irrigation plan for the entire project subject to the approv- al of the Planning Director. Said plan shall utilize drought and salt tolerant plant species to the maximum feasible and indicate methods of low intensity lighting of common recrea- tion areas and pedestrian walkways. Further, said plan shall include a 6' high decorative block wall separating and screening lot 290 from the adjacent parcel to the west. 21) The proposed pathway connecting the proposed development (lot 279) with the existing La Costa Canyon Park shall be improved ov^by the applicant and maintained by the homeowners' associa- tion. This requirement shall be noted in the CC&R's. 22) The specific location and design of the community identity Oi/signs shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Direc- tor prior to the issuance of building permits for Phase I. 23) All parking structures having individual garages shall be t,equipped with garage door openers. 27 28 PC RESO 1882 -5- Environmental Conditions; 2 24) The applicant shall grade in substantial conformance with <A the approved grading and drainage plan. 3 25) All grading and land clearance operations shall be subject to ^the review and approval of the City Engineer. The applicant f) shall obtain and strictly abide by an approved grading per- mit. 6 26) In order to reduce human and domestic animal impacts on the San Marcos Canyon, the applicant shall erect a minimum 42 7 clinch high, dark black chainlink fence for the length of the project along the San Marcos Canyon rim. This fence shall be 8 placed near the top of the Canyon, posted with "Danger/Keep Out" signs, and the fence shall not be visible from the 9 bottom of the Canyon. Access to the San Marcos Canyon shall be limited to lot 290. 10 Engineering Conditions: 27) No grading shall occur outside the limits of the subdivi- 12 o sion. 13 20) Concrete terrace drains shall be installed at the top of all ov-ihajor slopes where required by the City Engineer. 14 29) All concrete terrace drains shall be maintained by the home- 15 owners' association (if on commonly owned property) or the individual property owner (if on an individually owned lot) in perpetuity. An appropriately worded statement clearly identifying the responsibility shall be placed in the CC&R- 17 18 30) Additional drainage easements and drainage structures shall ^Jbe provided or installed as may be required by the County ** Department of Sanitation and Flood Control or the City Engi- neer. 20 31) All buildings shall conform to minimum slope setback stan- 21 o "dards as specified in city of Carlsbad standard GS-14. 32) The design of all private streets and drainage shall be ap- proved by the City Engineer. The structural section of all 23 o-x private streets and driveways shall conform to the city of Carlsbad street standards based on R-value tests. The mini- 24 mum width of the private streets shall be 24 feet and, where determined necessary by the City Engineer and Planning 25 j Director, each shall have a sidewalk along at least one side with a minimum width of four feet. All private streets, 26 driveways and draincige shall be inspected by the city and the standard improvement, plan check and inspection fees shall be 27 paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. 28 /// PC RESO 1882 -6- 1 2 8 9 10 11 12 1 5 17 18 20 21 22 24 26 2? 33) Lighting along the private streets shall be installed .prior3) L i/t occupancy of each phase and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 34) Sidewalks, street light heads and any other public street /improvements not presently existing shall be installed to *i city of Carlsbad standards by the developer along all public streets adjacent to the subdivision prior to occupancy of any units which abut said frontage. 35) A report of a soils investigation of the site and a grading ^v/plan shall be submitted by the applicant to the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 36) All cut and fill slopes shall be no steeper than two horizon- tal to one vertical unless otherwise approved by the City ^S Engineer. No fill slopes shall extend outside the subdivi- sion boundary adjacent to San Marcos Canyon. Care shall be taken in grading to ensure that no debris crosses the subdi- vision boundary and goes into the Canyon. 37) A^ll exposed slopes shall be hydroseeded or otherwise stabil- c^dzed immediately upon completion of grading activities. 38) All previously manufactured slopes which are to remain essen- .tially intact shall be smoothed, stabilized and hydroseeded cis may be required by the City Engineer. Fire Depar tme n t Cond i t i on s: 3(J) Street addresses for each cluster of buildings shall be ^/posted at the driveway entrance to each cluster subject to 40 the approval of the Fire Marshall. ) An all weather access road shall be maintained throughout construction. 19 41) All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances ^"shall be operational prior to combustible building materials being located on the project site. 42).Brush clearance shall be maintained within a minimum distance *j'^ of 30 feet to each residence. 43) All fire alarm systems, fire hydrant.s, extinguishing systems, /automatic sprinklers and other systems pertinent to the pro- ° ' ject shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to construction. 25 44) Buildings exceeding 10,000 square feet aggregate floor area ,/ shall be sprinklered or have four-hour fire walls with no0 openings therein which shall split the building into 10,000 square feet (or less.) areas. 45) Fire retardant roofs shall be required on all structures. PC RESO 1882 -7- 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Parks and Recreation Department Conditions: 46) The applicant shall provide a 30 foot landscape strip along perimeter of the project creating a transition from the project to the natural vegetation of San Marcos Canyon. Said planting shall include a minimum of 80% drought tolerant plant species and established by an appropriate temporary irrigation system subject to the approval of the Parks and Recreation Director. The developer shall be responsible for I the maintenance of this landscape area adjacent to each phase up until the time of the sale of the last unit in each phase, at which time the homeowners' association shall be respon- sible for this maintenance. 47) Any existing street trees presently missing or subsequently damaged or removed shall be replaced with a tree equal in 0 size subject to the approval of the Parks and Recreation Director. 48) Approval of this permit shall expire 18 months from the date ./of City Council approval unless building permits are issued. ^ An extension may be requested by the applicant. Said exten- sion shall be approved or denied at the discretion of the City Council. In 'approving an extension the City Council may impose new conditions and may revise existing conditions. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 28th day of October, 1981, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Marcus, Rombotis, Farrow, Jose, Friestedt, L'Heureux NOES: None ABSENT: Schlebuber ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: MARY/tyARCUS, Chairman D PLANNING COMMISSION C. HAGAMAN,7ecrot:ary 'CRLSBAD PLANNINJ3' COMmSSlON PC RESO 1882 -8- PLANNING CONSULTANTS AND CIVIL ENGINEERSRICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 365 SO. RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD • SUITE 100 SAN MARCOS, CALIFORNIA 92069 • 619/744-4800 August 7, 1984 Mr. Dave Bradstreet CITY OF CARLSBAD PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 RE: LOT 290, MAP NO. 7779, CP 36(A) (JOB NO. 8422-G, 8422-H) Dear Dave: Please find enclosed two copies of the above referenced map for your and the Parks & Recreation Commission's use. On behalf of Con Am Properties, I would like to request that you seek approval from your Commission to have the City Council negotiate the disposal of the open space designation on Lot 290. In review of my meetings to date with City staff, and most recently a letter from the City Attorney's Office, dated August 2, 1984, it appears the following needs to take place: 0 You prepare a staff report recommending the City vacate the public and City rights to Lot 290. 0 That the disposition be by negotiation. 0 Secure approval to do this by action of the Parks & Recreation Commission. 0 Have the matter put before the City Council as soon as possible. 0 The City Attorney's Office can advise you on the need to request an appraisal of the property. Mr. Dave Bradstreet RE: LOT 290, MAP NO. 7779, CP 36(A) August 7, 1984 Page two It is my understanding that the Parks & Recreation Commission's next meeting is August 20, 1984. We would like to have this item on their agenda. If we can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to call. We would also be happy to attend the meeting, if you feel it is necessary. Sincerely, Barry C. Bender BCB:omh enclosure cc: Mr. Jack Guttman, CON AM PROPERTIES ECEIVED AUf? - S Continental American Properties Ltd. Gb\j»\/i 6 August 1984 Mr. Dave Bradstreet Parks and Recreation 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: Sea Pointe Tennis Club At La Costa Lot 290 Dear Dave: This will confirm our conversation today in which you indicated you would now write up the ordinance to be presented to the City Council at the next City Council hearing pertaining to the negotiated sale of Lot 290 to us and a relinquishment of this lot as a park lot. Very truly yours, CONTINENTAL AMERICAN PROPERTIES LTD. JG/dmd 1764 San Diego Ave. • San Diego, CA 92110 • (619) 297-6771 August 6, 1984 TO: PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: Parks & Recreation Director CARLSBAD'S PLAYING FIELD ANALYSIS Recommendati on 1. Accept staff's report on the ball field study. 2. Adopt the new standard, number of fields per population. Youth Softball/Baseball 1/4,000 1/2 lighted Adult Softball 1/3,000 1/2 lighted Youth Soccer 1/4,000 Adult Soccer 1/6,000 Youth Football 1/25,000 Adult Football 1/25,000 3. Fund and coordinate the development of: Valley Jr. High $10,000 Buena Vista Elementary 50,000 Kelly 1,000 Jefferson 1,000 Cadencia -.500 Koll Company Property N/A $677500" Background Staff made a report to the City Council on July 21, 1984 regarding playing fields. The Council directed staff to present the field analysis to the Parks & Recreation Commission and then forward the Commission's findings and recommendations to the City Council for further consideration. Discussion After completing the playing field needs study, the following data is submitted for your information and consideration regarding field inventory, observation and a recommended action plan. Existing Field Inventory Classification Youth Softball/Baseball Adult Softball Youth Soccer Adult Soccer Youth Football Adult Football # Game Fields 1 7 4 9 5 1 5 Lighted 4 1 0 0 0 0 # Practice Fields 11 13 13 17 21 17 Total 18 17 22 22 22 22 Recommended # of Game Units Per Population (42.000) Classification Youth Softball/Baseball Adult Softball Youth Soccer Adult Soccer Youth Football Adult Football Recommended Standard 1/4,000 1/3,000 1/4,000 1/6,000 1/25,000 1/25,000 Units Required 11 14 11 7 2 2 # Existing 7 4 9 5 1 5 # Deficiencies 4 10 2 2 1 0 In analyzing the playing field situation in Carlsbad the following is observed: - There is an increase in public demand for more league playing fields. - According to the recommended new standard, there is a game field deficiency in the City. - There is a lack of lighted fields. - There is a large amount of practice sites, but they are not designed for league games. - Some practice sites should be lighted. - All existing sites are overused, which creates unsafe playing conditions. - Inventory indicates City owns one facility, school and others own eleven. - Carlsbad Unified School District has concerns regarding the public using their fields. • Maintenance Impact • Will allow only practice games, no league games. • Feels that their fields meet the school system's needs. • Feels that the school's role is to provide education; the City's role is to provide recreation. • Feels that the City should provide more playing facilities. -2- - Under the existing agreement, the City maintains approximately one half (10 acres) of the school's playing areas at a cost of approximately $100,000 per year. - The Carlsbad Unified School District has requested that the City be responsible to schedule all their playing areas throughout the year (takes the burden off the schools). - There is a tremendous user demand for all facilities. - Womens1 Softball Leagues play on youth fields that are too small. - Some youth organizations have to limit participation due to lack of fields and facilities. - Public thinks community park development is not moving fast enough. - Other cities in County and State face the same problems as Carlsbad. - All cities surveyed have use agreements with school districts. - Some cities allow private youth organizations to utilize excess park land so that they can build their own playing fields. - All cities surveyed said they cannot meet the public demand for playing sites for the individual leagues. - Some cities charge user fees to youth and adult teams. - Carlsbad Athletic Recreation Association wants two special use areas for their use. - Private land owners have a problem in leasing land to user groups because it creates future expectation. - It would seem that it is impossible to meet all user demands. - Most cities surveyed stated they provide multi-use fields and facilities. - Fields in Carlsbad are used year-round. - 24 different groups use the fields between March and December. - The general public has little or no chance to utilize any of the fields for recreational activities. - It is apparent that the private youth and adult groups must adjust their playing seasons so that they are all not playing at the same time. -3- Recommendations to alleviate existing league playing field deficiency: Softball/ Funds Basebal1 Soccer Requi red 1. Rehabilitate Upper Valley Jr. High 2 1 $10,000 2. Turf Buena Vista Elementary 2 1 50,000 3. Skin Infield @ Kelly* 2 1 1,000 4. Skin Infield @ Jefferson 1 - 1,000 5. Skin Infield @ Cadencia 1 - 500 6. Koll Company** _2 1 N/A Total 10 4 $62.500 * Requires C.U.S.D. Permission ** Practice Field Only Future park development projects that will provide additional league playing fields: Softball/ Baseball Soccer Cost 1. Fuerte Special Use Area 4 2 $150,000 2. Calavera Hills Com. Park P-I 3 1 610,720 3. Calavera Hills Com. Park P-II 2 1 N/A 4. Stagecoach 3 1 N/A Total T2 T $760,720 Staff is also working with the Carlsbad Athletic Recreation Association to find other sites throughout the city that may provide additional playing fields. Summary Conclusion If it is the City's responsibility to provide playing facilities for all the recreation users, then there is a lack of league playing fields today. Youth Softball, baseball, soccer, and adult Softball are increasing in popu- larity every year. The current field inventory limits the number of participants and teams. It is staff's recommendation that a field standard per population be adopted and used as a guide for further City field development. By providing additional funds, ten more Softball/baseball and four more soccer playing fields can be added to the existing inventory that will alleviate the deficiency at our current pupulation. Exhibits 1. Agenda Bill #7829 - Community Center and Ball Field Development -4-