Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-12-15; Parks & Recreation Commission; MinutesMeeting of: Time of Meeting: Date of Meeting: Place of Meeting: MINUTES -PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION 5:30 p.m. December 15, 1986 Harding Street Community Center COMMISSIONERS CALL TO ORDER: Vice-Chairperson Donovan called the meeting to order at 5:37 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present - Vice-Chairperson Donovan, Commissioners Conti, Dahlqulst, Morrison, Popovich and Regan. Absent - Chairman Wright. Staff Present: Dave Bradstreet, Director of Parks and Recreation Keith Beverly, Management Analyst Lynn Chase, Recreation Superintendant Ray Patchett, Assistant City Manager PUBLIC OPEN FORUM: •There was no one present wishing to address the Commission during the public open forum. APPROVAL OF MINUTES; The Minutes of the Meeting held November 17, 1986, were approved as presented. APPOINT SCRIBE; Commissioner Popovich was appointed Scribe for this meeting. UNFINISHED BUSINESS; A. Scribe Report Vice-Chairperson Donovan called attention to the Scribe Report as contained in the packet. B. Ballfleld Analysts Attention was called to the new, updated report on ballfields included In the packet. Commissioner Dahlquist requested this item be placed on the agenda. She expressed concern these were the numbers to be used for the Growth Management Plan. Commissioner Dahlqulst said she thought these were the numbers to be used as a starting point. If these were to be used for the Growth Management Plan, the ballfields should not be counted three or four times. The playing schedules cannot be changed to accommodate all the teams at the same time. Commissioner Dahlquist felt If the standards should be higher, now is the time to make that adjustment. Donovan Dahlquist Lawson Morrison Popovich Regan MINUTES PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION December 15, 1986 Page 2 COMMISSIONERS Dave Bradstreet stated his impression of the last Commission meeting was the Commission adopted the standards and those standards should be reviewed on an annual basis. If the Commission wants to revise the standards next year, that would be their decision. At that time, it would be determined how Parks and Recreation was proceeding with catching up with the number of ballfields required. The standards as adopted by the Commission would serve as guidelines by staff for the development of additional fields. Commissioner Regan stated it was not her intent to have these standards used as criteria by the City as it works with the Growth Management Plan. If this is true, then more work needs to be done to get exact numbers as far as the number of fields needed. Commissioner Lawson said these are only base standards and staff and Council will look to something better than that. He felt the Commission was reacting emotionally because there is a shortage of fields, and if they could use the formula and see if it does provide the appropriate amount of fields, that would be the only way to solve the problem. There are fields in the pipeline, and Commissioner Lawson recommended the Commission look at'exactly what the City is supposed to have in each area. Some areas are short of fields, but there are some In the pipeline. He concluded, stating he had no problem with the numbers as presented by staff. Commissioner Popovlch reminded the Commission of the survey he mentioned at the last meeting. This survey included 5,152 households In La Costa, south of Palomar Airport Road. They were called to find out what they wanted as far as recreational facilities in La Costa. Fifty-eight percent of the people wanted open space. Only 7.3 percent of those surveyed wanted more ballfields. Everything else was a higher priority, which meant the people in that area In the silent majority do not want ballfields as a top priority. Commissioner Popovich said this Commission had been inundated with the statements that more ballfields were needed, but he felt the people were not saying that. Commissioner Morrison stated she was comfortable with the action taken by the Commission at the last meeting. There is a need, but she felt the City was on track and beginning to put In the ballfields. She believed an annual review would be sufficient, and a year from now would be a good time to reconsider the ballfield needs. Commissioner Lawson stated the Growth Management Plan requires that before any development takes place within any of the quadrants and/or zones, the deficiencies must be eliminated. There will be 18 more fields, and he felt the Commission should keep in mind how that is calculated. It will be six months before any projects will be approved to go forward. There will be six months of dead time, and another six months where nothing will be done; therefore, a year is quite sufficient for reviewing these numbers. MINUTES PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION December 15, 1986 Page 3 COMMISSIONERS Commissioner Regan stated she would like to have the Growth Management Plan explained to this Commission insofar as it relates to the Parks and Recreation standards and the 25 zones. This Commission should make certain the fields are being placed where they are needed and should ascertain the types of fields. Dave Bradstreet stated Mike Holzmiller will be at the January meeting to explain the Growth Management Plan. Also, the fitting of the different categories into the Growth Management Plan will be analyzed. The Planning Department does not design parks, but If we know where the parks will be, it can be determined where the ballflelds are needed. There may not be a demand for additional ballflelds in some areas, and that must be determined. Mr. Bradstreet said he has discussed the counting of fields with other cities, and they all use the same method of counting as Carlsbad. The Unified School District also uses the same method of counting. However, if the Commission wants to change the method of counting, the Parks and Recreation Department will follow their recommendations. Carlsbad meets and exceeds the national standards in a number of categories. This is a better place to live and more fields are needed. Mr. Bradstreet felt this need was indicated in the standards. Vice-Chairperson Donovan commented since there is no Council liaison, the Scribe Report should contain more information, particularly where an item Is discussed thoroughly by the Commission. Commissioner Morrison said the ballfields could be discussed in January, if the Commission desired. It could certainly be brought up any time .during the year the Commission felt it was necessary. Commissioner Popovlch suggested deleting the word "annual" and changing the wording to: "subject to review by the Commission", which would leave it open to review constantly. 31m Courtney, 49H Avila, representing CARA, addressed the Commission, distributing a set of reports on facility standards, showing his numbers as compared with Parks and Recreation. He stated he only wanted enough fields for the kids to have a place to play. Mr. Courtney stated he had no problem with the standards per se--his problem was the way the standards were interpreted. Mr. Courtney's reports are attached to the original minutes to show his counting of fields as compared with the City. Commissioner Popovlch made a motion to accept the ballfield standards and analysis as written. There was no second to the motion. Commissioner Dahlquist made a motion to re-examine the balifield standards for the Growth Management Plan. Commissioner Regan seconded the motion. Commissioner Dahlguist stated she wanted staff to re- exa^lne these numbers and come up with more legitimate figures for the available fields. MINUTES PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION December 15, 1986 Page 4 COMMISSIONERS Commissioner Lawson said it was a matter of semantics. If we count a field as a youth Softball and adult Softball field, then we should separate the population and not count the entire population. He stated he felt strongly these standards could work and were a good starting point. What this Commission did last month set the wheels In motion to move on having good facilities in the City. Commissioner Lawson said he could not support going through this again. Commissioner Morrison felt this was asking staff to take a lot of time doing something that has already been done. Commissioner Regan said Mr. Courtney has some good points and he is representative of the people using the fields. If the deficiencies are true, he should be heard and it should be worked out with staff to agree with the numbers. She wants this Commission to tie in with the Growth Management Plan. Parks and Recreation Commission voted to re-examine the ballfield standards as they relate to the Growth .Management Plann. Staff, Mr. Courtney and a Committee are to meet to discuss these standards. Commissioner Lawson voted against the motion as he felt this was taken care of last month. Commissioner Morrison concurred. Park Site and Facility Planning, staff and Mr. Courtney will meet to discuss the ballfield analysis as it relates to the growth management plan. NEW BUSINESS: A. This item was taken up later in the agenda. 8. Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting Time for 1987 Vice-Chairperson Donovan requested this Item be placed on the agenda, explaining she felt the meetings should start at 6:00 p.m. This would be more convenient for members of the Commission, the public and staff. The consensus of the Commission was to leave the meeting time at 5:00 p.m. C. Status of Council Liaison Vice-Chairperson Donovan read the statement there will be no liaisons to the Commissions and Boards. A. Joint Meeting between City Council and Parks and Recreation Commission Dave Bradstreet said he submitted a report to the Manager's office, and they will set up a meeting. Assistant City Manager Ray Patchett said if the Commissioners have items they want discussed, staff will get the background on those items. Donovan Dahlgulst Lawson Morrison Popovich Regan MINUTES PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION December 15, 1986 Page 5 COMMISSIONERS One item suggested for the joint meeting was: How the Parks and Recreation Commission's role fits into the Growth Management Plan. Vice-Chairperson Donovan asked the Commissioners to think of topics for discussion and a framework to present the topics to Council. The Commission would like to have staff give them guidelines for the topics. Another item suggested for discussion was the problem of communication and lack of direction from Council. (The example given was the tennis courts and indoor soccer.) Commissioner Morrison felt the public was put through the wringer on that item, and she did not want that to happen again. Parks and Recreation Commission directed staff to prepare an outline of generalized topics that Commission members and staff have suggested. Vice-Chairperson Donovan announced the new Brown Act Amendments take effect Danuary 1, 1987, and no item can be discussed unless It is on the agenda. She urged the Commissioners to make certain any item they wish to discuss Is turned in to staff to be placed on the agenda. COMMITTEE REPORTS: Commissioner Popovlch reported the 52 acres Koll Company had offered sometime in the past were still available according to Hank Litton. He said he intended to call Koll Company to check on the status of this offer. Commissioner Lawson stated the acreage should be identified as to its exact location, and felt staff should pursue that, as well as whether or not there were any restrictions attached to the property. This item could be brought back before the Commission as an information item after staff checked into donation of this parcel of land. Keith Beverly stated staff had talked with ERA with regard to that acreage as it tied in with the golf course feasibility study. The decision was that acreage did not fit in with a golf course design in that area. Different alternatives were studied to try to tie that acreage into the golf course design for Macario Canyon, but the final decision was not to incorporate the 52 acres into the golf course. Mr. Beverly stated he would inquire whether the acreage was still available to the City. The suggestion was made to look at that acreage with the thought of using It in some manner; such as picnic areas, etc. Commissioner Regan stated the Park Site and Facility Planning Committee would look Into that. The four Commissioners to pursue this item would be Commissioners Regan, Lawson, Popovich and Dahlquist, with staff and Mr. Courtney also included. Donovan Dahlquist Lawson Morrison Popovich Regan MINUTES PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION December 15, 1996 Page 6 COMMISSIONERS Commissioner Dahlquist requested an agenda item on the land at Highway 101 and Cannon Road. SDG4E was going to take that park land back and give the City $100,000 to put in Cannon Lake. Dave Bradstreet stated this item is on hold at the present time. Dave Bradstreet was congratulated on his recent marriage. AD30URNMENT: By proper motion, the Meeting of December 15, 1986, was adjourned at 6:^2 p.m., to a Christmas dinner and party hosted by Parks and Recreation Department. Respectfully submitted, ln/Mttf^d&* Jnarriett Baobitt Minutes Clerk City of Carlsbad Growth Management Program Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan \ September 16, 1986 ATTACHMENT B CITYWIDE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS PLAN Adopted by City Council Resolution No. 8797 Septembter 16, 1986 MARY 8. CASLER, MAYOR Claude A. Lewis, Vice Mayor Richard Chick, Councilmember Ann J. Kulchin, Councilmember Mark V. Pettine, Councilmember Frank D. Aleshire, City Manager Vincent F. Biondo, City Attorney Marty Orenyak, Community Development Director Michael J. Holzmiller, Planning Director PLAN PREPARATION Philip 0. Carter, Administrative Assistant II Grace Manues, Administrative Assistant I Anita Ramos-Bonas Secretary II Barbara Nedros, Word Processing Operator Michael J. Holzmiller, Planning Director James C. Hagaraan, Research/Analysis Manager Gordon Peterson, Systems Analyst Bobbie Hoder, Administrative Assistant II Vicki Bowen, Graphics Consultants: Fay Round, Automated Systems Paul Zucker, Planning SANDAG - Automated Systems and Graphics Special Assistance Prom; Costa Real Municipal Water District Leucadia County Hater District San Marcos County Water District Olivenhain Municipal Water District Carlsbad Unified School District Encinitas Union Elementary School District San Dieguito Union High School District San Marcos Unified School District Lee Rautenkranz, Information Systems Director Charlie Grimm, Assistant Planning Director Jim Elliott, Finance Director Cliff Lange, Library Director Dave Bradstreet, Parks & Recreation Director Jim Thompson, Fire Chief Roger Greer, Utilities & Maintenance Director TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I SECTION II SECTION III SECTION IV SECTION V Overview Page 1 Contents of Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan Page 1 Requirement for Local Facility Management Plan and Relationship to Citywide Plan Page 3 Buildout Projections and Assumptions Page 5 Citywide Requirements for Public Facilities and Services - Existing to Buildout Page 12 SECTION VI SECTION VII SECTION VIII SECTION IX Guidelines for Preparation of Local Facility Management Plans Page 56 Financing Options and Policies Page 70 Growth Management Information System Page 78 Applicability to Growth Management Ordinance (Section 2190 of the Page 90 Carlsbad Municipal Code) FIGURES Page(a) 1. Local Facility Management Zones 3 2. Comparison of Citywide and Local Plans 4 3. Density Control Map 8 4. Citywide Acreage Information 9 5. Projected Dwelling Units and Population at Buildout 10 6. Dwelling Unit Summary 11 7. Determination of Compliance with Performance Standards 13 8(A) Public Buildings - City Administrative Facilities 15 8(B) Public Buildings - Libraries 22 8(C) Public Buildings - Fire Stations 42 9. Sewer Service 27, 50 10. Sewer District Boundaries 28, 51 11. Parks 32 12. Drainage 37 13. Circulation 39 14. Fire 43 15. Open Space 45 16. Schools 47 17. School District Boundaries 48 18. Water System 53 19. Water District Boundaries 54 20. Growth Management Information System 82 * 21. Entity Levels 83 22. Data Availability 84 23. Data Availability (Matrix Format) 85-87 24. Relationship to Parcel-Level Geobase 88 25. Informational Relationship Overview 89 SECTION I. OVERVIEW The Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan will implement the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance by ensuring that development does not occur unless adequate public facilities and services exist or will be provided concurrent with new development. The preparation of the Citywide Plan is the first phase in the implementation process of the City's Growth Management Ordinance which was adopted by Ordinance No. 9810 on July 1, 1986 by the Carlsbad City Council. Once the Citywide Plan is adopted, a Local Facility Management Plan will be required for each of the 25 local zones into which the City has been divided. This must be done before any additional development is allowed in any one of the zones. Then, when individual development projects are considered, a public facilities adequacy analysis will be provided as part of the report on the project to ensure that it is consistent with both the Citywide and Local Zone Plan. SECTION II. CONTENTS OF THE C I T Y W I D E F A C IL IT IE S AND IMPROVEMENTS PLAN The Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan consists of the following: 1. Identification of the existing level of development in the City and a projection of the ultimate future buildout based upon recent controls placed upon development as specified in the General Plan and by the zoning. 2. Identification of all current and future public facilities and improvements necessary to accommodate existing and buildout demands for the land uses specified in the General Plan and by the zoning. 3. Establishment of ongoing service level requirements for public facilities through the adoption of specific performance standards for each of the following public facilities and improvements: a) City Administrative Facilities b) Library c) Wastewater Treatment Capacity d) Parks e) Drainage f) Circulation g) Fire -1- h) Opufttt Space i) Schools j) Sewer Collection System fc) Water Distribution System 4. Establishment of specific boundaries for each of the 25 Local Facility Management Zones and adoption of guidelines for the preparation of plans for the local zones. The local plans will specifically address the timing and financing of public facilities. 5. Identification of the potential financing method, or methods, for each public facility and improvement. 6. Establishment of an informational data based system to: A) project demand for public facilities and improvements, B) aid in the preparation of Local Facility Management Plans, and C) provide a mechanism to monitor the adequacy of public facilities on an ongoing basis. The purpose of the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan is to assure the elimination of the shortages of public facilities identified by the City Council to be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Carlsbad. Through the accomplishment of those tasks outlined above, the City will be able to ensure adequate public facilities and improvements or it will halt development until provisions have been made to correct these inadequacies. Again, the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan is the first phase in the implementation of the City's overall Growth Management Ordinance and it is intended to provide the framework necessary to allow more detailed phasing and financing plans to be accepted in the form of Local Facility Management Zone Plans. -2- SECTION III. REQUIREMENTS FOR LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT PLANS - RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITYWIDE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS PLAN As part of the overall Growth Management Program the City was broken down into 25 Local Facility Management Zones (See Figure 1). The boundaries for each of the 25 Local Facility Management Zones were established based upon logical facilities and improvements planning, construction and service relationships to ensure the economically efficient and timely installation of required public facilities and improvements. After the adoption of the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan and prior to any development occurring in any of these zones, a Local Facility Management Plan must be submitted and approved. The plan must be consistent with all aspects of the Citywide Facilities Improvements Plan and shall implement the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan within the Zone. It must ensure that each public facility and improvement meets the adopted performance standard prior to allowing any development. FIGURE 1 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONES -3- The preparation and subraittal of the Local Facility Management Plan ia the second phase in the implementation process of the City's Growth Management Ordinance. The local plan takes the Citywide plan and provides a more detailed description and analysis of how the City will develop from its current status on to ultimate buildout. The local plan will show how and when each facility and improvement will be constructed in order to accommodate development within the zone (phasing). It will also provide a complete description of how each facility and improvement will be financed. Figure 2 shows conceptually the relationship between the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan and the Local Facility Management Plan. FIGURE 2 Comparison of Citywide and Local Plan Standards Provision For Public Facilities Funding of Facilities Citywide Plan Sets Standards Inventory of Existing and Future Buildout Needs Funding Options Local Plan Shows How Standards Complied With Phasing from Existing to Future Detailed Financing Plan The specific guidelines for the development and subraittal of the LocaL Facility Management Plans which will be provided to the preparers of these plans is contained in Section VI of this document. -4- In order to adequately assess and plan for Citywide public facilities and services, it was necessary to project the level of development that can be anticipated to the ultimate buildout of the City. These projections take into consideration recent ordinances adopted by the City which reduce residential density and restrict the overall future intensity of development throughout the City. The process used to estimate the total number of dwelling units in the City at ultimate buildout is relatively straightforward. Using the City's General Plan map as a basis, all of the land uses shown were entered into a computer by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) using a process known as "digitizing." The computer converted this digitized information into gross acres for each land use designation. Environmentally constrained areas, beaches, wetlands, floodways, other water bodies, riparian and woodland habitats, were also digitized and converted into acreage figures in the same way. Other constrained areas included slopes greater than 25 percent, beaohea, wotlando, floodwaya, other water bodies, major roadways, railroad tracks, and major power line easements* a*d—riparian—artd- woadland habitats. The primary sources used in identifying these areas included previous environmental impact reports prepared for projects throughout the City and a Citywide slope analysis map. To obtain net developable acres, all of the 100 percent constrained acres and one-half of the areas shown as 25-40 percent slopes were subtracted from the gross acreage figure for each land use category. In this way, a net developable acreage figure could be established for the overall City, for each quadrant of the City, and for each of the 25 Local Facility Management Zones. The net developable acreage figure was then multiplied by the number of dwelling units allowed per acre using the City's "Control Yield" density ranges, which are listed below: Residential Land Use Control Yield RL 1.0 RLM 3.2 RM 6.0 RMH 11.5 RH 19.0 The Control Yield densities represent either the midpoint of the City's adopted density ranges or actual experience using existing developments within each land use category. By applying the Control Yield densities to the net developable acreage figures, an estimate of the total number of dwelling units at full buildout can be derived. To carry the process one step further, the per capita household size data provided by the -5- State Department of Finance can be used to estimate buildout population. The data indicate that the City of Carlsbad had an average household size of 2.471 persons on January 1, 1986. The same type of calculations were used to estimate the total number of square feet of industrial and commercial land uses at buildout. However, instead of residential density ranges, a set of assumptions regarding site coverage for industrial and commercial development was applied to the net developable acreage figures. It was assumed that every net developable acre of industrial/commercial, would result in a maximum square footage yield of 40%. The methodology described in the previous paragraphs was used to provide a basis for determining the amount and types of public facilities that will be needed to adequately serve the City at buildout. However, it has a number of acknowledged short- comings. For example, the digitizing process itself is not 100 percent accurate, and when applied to small geographical areas, such as Local Facility Management Zones, some inaccuracies can occur. A much more accurate means of providing the same information would be via a parcel-level Geobase system, however, such systems are very complex and require a substantially longer time frame to implement. Therefore, concurrent with the development of the overall Growth Management Program, the City has begun work on developing such a Geobase system, which, at some point in time will supplant the methodology described in the previous paragraphs. Likewise, the dwelling unit estimates at buildout represent a straight conversion of acres to units, with no regard to the number of units already existing or approved throughout the City. This may result in inequities within certain zones where development has previously occurred under less constraining conditions or using higher density ranges than those represented by the Control Yield. In those cases, remaining development will have to occur at densities lower than the Control Yield figure. Despite these recognized shortcomings, the approach and methodology used within the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan has been found to be quite adequate for the purpose to which it was intended, namely long-range facility planning. Therefore, until the parcel-level Geobase system described earlier is implemented, this approach will be used to provide the baseline estimates needed for both mid-term and long-term facilities planning. Other planning assumptions used in preparing the Citywide projections included: 1. Dwelling unit projections do not include any density increases for special housing projects such as senior or low income projects. -6- 2. H<*£«!, motel, time-share, board and care, and housing units without individual kitchen facilities which do not qualify as dwelling units in the building code were not considered as units for the purpose of dwelling unit calculations. 3. Likely changes to the City's Land Use Plan from a residential to non-residential use. The projection made for the total number of dwelling units in the City at ultimate buildout has been translated into a Density Control Map (see Figure 3). The map shows existing, future and remaining dwelling units for each quadrant of the City. Figure 4 (Citywide Acreage Information) shows the number of acres in each land use category which was used to make the Citywide projections for ultimate buildout. Figure 5 (Projected Dwelling Units and Population at Buildout) shows how the acreage was converted into projected dwelling unit and population totals. Figure 6 (Dwelling Unit Summary) provides a summary of existing, approved and remaining dwelling units in the City. The information regarding buildout projections and assumptions is needed to determine the required demand for public facilities and services as growth occurs. The methodogy for projecting dwelling units at buildout, a 'control yield", follows the procedure which has always been used by the City in implementing the density ranges of the Land Use Plan. It is important to formalize this procedure as part of the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan since the projection has been translated into ultimate demand for public facilities and services. If the "control yield" is not closely adhered to, then the planned facilities and improvements may not be adequate. -7- FIGURE 3 DENSITY CONTROL SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 CANNON NO ft THE AST QUADRANT DWELL)NO UNITS EXISTING FUTURE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OWELLINQ UNITS EXISTING FUTURE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT DWELLING UNITS SOUTHWEST QUADRANT DWELLING UNITS EXISTING FUTUREPOIN8CTTIA IN -8-City of Carlsb SEPTEMBER 16. 198 FIGURE 4 CITYWIDE ACREAGE INFORMATION GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION GROSS 100% CONSTRAINED 25%-40% SLOPE NET RESIDENTIAL: RL RLM RH RMH RH LOW (0-1.5) Low-Med (0-4) Medium (4-8) Med-Hi (8-15) High (15-23) 1,824 7,935 2,638 1,231 243 270 710 184 110 8 379 1,364 660 6,895 156 2,375 79 1,081 5 233 COMMERCIAL: CBD C N RC TS 0 RRE RRI RS Central Bus Dist Community Neighborhood Recreation Travel Services Prof'l t Related Extensive Retail Intensive Retail Regional Service 70 321 49 108 191 333 32 119 39 0 41 11 30 31 80 0 5 0 70 280 38 78 160 253 32 114 39 INDUSTRIAL: PI OTHER: E J H HC P G U NRR OS RR PW MAJ MIN COL Planned Ind Elementary School Jr. High School High School Continuation School Private School Government Facility Public Utilities Non-Res Reserve Open Space Railroad Freeway Major Arterial Minor Arterial Collector St 2,175 200 79 202 4 17 268 158 382 4,398 117 213 525 510 541 148 9 0 10 0 0 0 19 2 2,078 117 213 525 510 541 2,027 191 79 192 4 17 268 139 380 2,320 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 24,920 5,652 1,279 18,629 -9-City of Carlsbad FIGURE 5 SEPTEMBER 16. 1986 CITY OF CARLSBAD Projected Dwelling Unit and Population at Buildout LAND USE RL RLM RM RMH RH (& RVH) NON-RES NET ACRES 1,364 6,895 2,376 1,081 233 6,680 18,629 CONTROLYIELD 1 3.2 6 11.5 19 D.U.s at BUILDOUT 1,364 22,065 14,252 12,430 4,488 54,599 POPULATION at BUILDOUT 3,371 54,522 35,218 30,713 1 1,090 134,914 ASSUMPTIONS 1) PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT 2.471 AS PER THE STATE DEPT. OF FINANCE -10-Gity of Carlsbad FIGURE 6 SEPTEMBER 16. 1986 CITY OF CARLSBAD DWELLING UNIT SUMMARY EXISTING 39% REMAINING 42%APPROVED 19% EXISTING APPROVED REMAINING BUILDOUT 21,121 10,298 23,180 54,599 -11-City of SECTION V. CITYWIDE REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES - EXISTING " ^ TO B U I L D O U T The Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan addresses eleven separate facilities: 1) City Administrative Facilities 2) Library 3) Wastewater Treatment Capacity 4) Parks 5) Drainage 6) Circulation 7) Fire 8 } Open Space 9 ) Schools 10) Sewer Collection System 11) Water Distribution System For each one of these facilities and services the following is provided: 1) An illustrative map showing what is existing and what is needed Citywide at buildout (Figures 8 through 18). City Administrative Facilities, Library and Fire have been combined into one map - Figure 8 (A, B, C) and Wastewater Treatment and Sewer Collection have been combined into one map - Figure 9; 2) District boundary maps where applicable; 3) Adopted service level performance standard which must be complied with at all times as growth occurs in the City; and 4) A detailed facility planning and adequacy analysis for each of the three Citywide facilities. A general description of the facility planning information for the remaining eight facilities. Compliance with the adopted performance standard for each of these eight facilities will be analyzed when a Local Facility Management Plan is submitted. Compliance with the adopted Performance Standards will be reviewed and analyzed in the following manner: Citywide Basis 1) City Administrative Facilities, 2) Library, 3) Wastewater Treatment Capacity. These facilities will not need to be included in the Local Facility Management Plan, so long as the preparers of those plans feel these Citywide facilities will be constructed at a time and on an adequate basis to correspond with projected development within the zone. -12- Quadrant Biraia 4) Parks Compliance will be determined at the time a Local Facility Management Plan is submitted for the zone. Zone Basis 5) Circulation 6) Drainage 7) Fire 8) Open Space 9) Schools 10) Sewer Collection System 11) Hater Distribution System Compliance of each of these facilities will be determined at the time a Local Facility Management Plan is submitted for the zone. At that time, the responsible governing agency will determine the adequacy of schools, sewer and water. Figure 7 (Determination of Compliance with Performance Standard) summarizes how compliance will be determined. FIGURE 7 DETERMINATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH PERFORMANCE STANDARD City Administrative Facilities Library Hastewater Treatment Parks Circulation Drainage Fire Open Space Schools Sewer Collection Water Distribution CITY QUADRANT ZONE ZONE CITYWIDE DETERMINATION OF ADEQUACY X X X ZONE PLAN DETERMIN- ATION OF ADEQUACY X ZONE PLAN DETERMIN- ATION OF ADEQUACY X X X X SPECIAL DISTRICT DETERMIN- ATION OF ADEQUACY X X X -13- The type o£_ Adequacy and phasing analysis that is contained in the Citywide flan for City Administrative Facilities, Library and Wastewater Treatment Capacity is similar to what will be expected for all the remaining facilities addressed in the Local Facility Management Plans for each zone. It should be emphasized regarding the maps in this section, that because of their scale they are for illustrative purposes only. Larger descriptive maps have also been prepared, however, precise locations of facilities should be determined from Master Facility Plans available in the department or agency responsible for the facility. Also, because of the detail required, the maps for sewer, water and drainage only illustrate future planned facilities or improvements. -14- PARKS HOSP QROV6 MAQEE CANNON MO POIN8ITTIA LN FIGURE 1 1 PARKS SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 COMMUNITY PARKS • EXISTING A FUTURE SPECIAL USE AREA -32-City of Carls PARKS (Continued) Special Use Areas Buena Vista Cannon Park Car County Chase Field CHS Tennis Courts Harding Community Center Jefferson Elementary Kelly Elementary Magnolia Maxton Brown Maxton Brown Extension Oak Pine Elementary Pio Pico Rotary Swim Complex Valley Jr. High School Total Acres 2 1 1 2 3 1 2 2 4 1 2 0 2 0 1 3 7 .3 .7 .0 .3 .0 .0 .6 .8 .2 .4 .1 .4 .0 .8 .0 .0 .5 39.1 Northeast Quadrant Community Parks (Developed) Calavera Hills Phase I Larwin Total Developed Community Parks (Undeveloped) Macario Canyon - credit Calavera Hills Phase II Total Undeveloped Special Use Area Larwin Total Acres 8.0 18.3 Acres 25.0 10.0 Acres 4.0 26.3 35.0 4.0 Southwest Quadrant Community Parks (Developed) Altamira Total Developed Community Parks (Undeveloped) Macario Canyon - credit Total Undeveloped Acres 12.0 12.0 25.0 There are no Special Use Areas in the Southwest Quadrant. -34- PARKS (Continued) Alternatives There are several alternatives which could be considered to rectify this deficiency, however, after discussing these options staff believes one of the following should be considered: 1. Amend the current Five Year C.I.P. to include funding for new park facility in the Southwest Quadrant which would require deleting other projects. 2. Direct staff to attempt to resolve this deficiency based on the Local Facility Management Plans which will be received after the approval of the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. -36- Friday, January 30, 1987 Tom Ham's Restaurant, 2150 Harbor Island Dr., San Diego 6:30 to 7:30 p.m. - No Host Cocktails 7:30 p.m. - Buffet Dinner 8:45 p.m. • Program—Recognition, Awards, Scholarship, Raffle Buffet Dinner Menu*"^^""~ "*~ ^"™™" Enchiladas, Seafood, and Roast BeefSalads, Side Dishes, and Beverages Cost: $15.50 per person (1f prepaid reservation 1s received by January 26, 19871 We have room for only 160 reservations, which are on a first come, first serve basis. *If you have any questions, please call Willie HI 11 lams at 44-PARTY. •$» Detach and return to: NAME (*) AGENCY PARTYCO Attn: Willie WHHams 1717 E. Main Street El Cajon, CA 92021-5219 TELEPHONE NUMBER Please mike reservations for _ _ person (s) at $15.50 per person. Enclosed . 1s ^ _ Remember • Reservations and Payment must be received by January 26, 1987. Please mike checks payable to CPRS District XII. Reservation* are limited to 160. Please make your reservations Early. * * If making multiple reservations, please attach list of names of all those Individuals. 9* ATTACHMENT D O VJD O vnoo oo \r. Ooo O - ~-J QJ 3 J> 3o o3 I — QJ 7Tro C3ro —, X OX O O 0o vno O O 0 1o1 U1 Z 00z s: 3 f O/l CQJ— • o_ 30 > on 3 ^— «• -a01— \ oro< , X OJ OO 0 0oo ro O ooo "ON\jnO 0OO -a -n -n ~— p> oo— m U ,0c Z QJ D O--t • -r T> O O•— 3 ^j -oJ> QJn -i 7T oro< . X p^j*~ ro O oo 0 -c- ro O O0O I O1 -n -n OJ OJn— QJ Q 0QJ 3 O ~O QJ-i;*- X — * _j*~ o 0o ooo — ooo ooo 1o1 -a -n ~n ro — o r! QJ '. -< -50 — J __ > 3 O> 3 33 r-l- QJ in 3 ~-~ Oo zrro<; .^ X row ooo ooo ro OOO 0OO 1O1 -o -n -n - ii m•^ S. !0— c 3 QJ^ a.•~> •iyi n O— 3ro • O ~u3> QJ O -I *—^ — ^3 •or* X ro o ooo ro o oo 0 o1 -n -n o 2 o U QJ/I -1 T> —-fl __* ^_ -a o 1) 33 3 QJ 3 0^~ X o o 0o vn 0oo ro oo 0 -n -n VO 31 O - - " f— Q. QJ -^ QJ — T X Oo ooo 0o ooo 1o1 -o — [— 1 > 00 - SI -f U /Oc2 QJ— a.-i • D ~D -^ Q) > 0n ro • < -—^ _. • X ax — o ro OOO ON O ro OOO i O -o -n -n - -i z <D m (— ( — (0 •D C 0 QJ T> O_ ^ • 1mi —O QJ 33 CL J> . — - nn jozc •oo*— ' X OJ w 0oo oo 0 ooo ooo 1o1 — r- i ax Z3 00 t> £i — T 3 33 O TJ O 3 3u -a_. — »-i ro X X ro Ulo ooo ro O 0 O 0 1o o 0 o - > oo • __ • *-r s: 1J • T ,<3 — C -1 QJ Q) Q.• — » I — O QJ 3 > Q.n ^>— • n _Q • X . ^ \_nOO OOO unOO OOO 1 O1 -o — r- * QJ•o n OJ— \ 33 — •D O <— O.n QJ 0 -<3 O 3 X 0o o 0o oo 0oo 1 01 -a — r— OJ — > ooD ro i 3 /I — • -T O-i nzn o— f — • — rr O • 3 O rt -I • X . w — JO 0 0oo OJ o~\ ^•Oo^ o 0o ^ ^ovD 0 Oo — ( — 03 ro -a ol> QJ"i —• *" ' •O Zu 1 — — —— —•in — C~)0 0 35s •n • — X ro v O O oo 0 ro VJ1 Oo oo 0 o -n -n — T3 O jj QJ ~\ — "D ZC 1 — • — — - —— . inOO > Oo 3•*-"' X X -fa*_ Vo OJoo 0o - CO o 0oo -tA oo — oo -o -n -n -o S3O -n~} — H OO 0^ CD CO 1 OOoo 00 -noo Z] 1 00 « 03> 03 "~ ^^ vo m o ^ o ^vD 1 ro > -o-a 33-o o o o-D OO• rn > 33 -o <=: 3! — O 00 a o -n~nrn 3>m orn oo -nO Ccr ~z. m -o 33 O Ooom <Z3 CO I ro o PROPOSED BUDGET 87-88 Sections Administration(4l 10) Personne 1 M/0 Capi tal Servi ces/Other Departments TOTAL P&R Commi ss ion (41 1 1 ) Personnel M/0 Capi tal TOTAL Parks (4121) Personnel M/0 Capi tal TOTAL (Includes Serv i ces) Total includes Serv i ces/Other Departments Trees (4122) Personne 1 M/0 Capi tal TOTAL Approved 86-87 $ 205,737 120,146 550 .. (3,323) $ 323,110 $ 0 800 0 $ 800 $ 551,564 506,630 55,370 $1,112,564 (527,941) $ 175,332 65,600 11,960 s 252,892 Proposed 87-88 $ 209,466 1 10,060 18,070 (3,323) $ 334,273 $ 0 800 0 $ 800 5 589,281 617,865 61 ,420 $1,268,566 ($27,941) $ 249,960 67,723 25,260 $ 342,943 1 ncrease $A $ 3,729/1.8% (-10,086/-9.1%) 17,520/99.97% (3,323) $ 11,163/3.4% $ 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 37,717/6.8% 1 12,235/22% 6,050/10.9% $156,002/14% ($27,941) $ 74,628/42.5% 2,123/3.2% 13,300/111% $ 90,051/35.6% Why Part time secretarial Golf Course Study compl eted Staff Vehicle Salary increases, part time salaries Full Year funding for Stagecoach (Heat, light water) ; Fuerte Maint. Contract, waste fees Dump truck 2 additional personnel Hosp Grove Hosp Grove Maint. suppl i es Flat bed truck PROPOSED BUDGET 87-88 Sect i ons Rec. Operations (4231) Personnel $ M/0 Capi ta 1 TOTAL $ Recreation Fee (4232) Personnel $ M/0 Cap i ta 1 TOTAL $ Aauatics (4233) Personnel S M/0 Capi tal TOTAL $ Aaua Hedionda Lagoon (AHL)(4234) Personnel 5 M/0 Capi ta 1 TOTAL 5 Approved 86-87 84,960 $ 54,267 46,210 185,437 $ 377,523 $ 306,205 700 684,428 $ 100,879 $ 68,458 8,524 177,861 S 7,500 $ 7,500 4,400 19,420 $ Proposed 87-88 127,000 59,850 20,000 206,805 459,271 365,700 0 824,971 126,412 66,600 10,000 203,012 13,400 7,800 0 21 ,200 1 ncrease $/% $ 42,040/49.4% 5,583/10.2% (-26,210/-57%) $ 21,368/11.5% $ 81,748/21.6% 59,495/19.4% (-700/-100%) $140,543/20.5% $ 25,533/25.3% H,858/-3%) 1,476/17.3% $ 25,151/14.1% $ 5,900/78.6% 300/4% (0/-100%) $ 1,780/9%" Why Part time salaries, sal; increases -full year funding for Stagecoach Vehicle majnt & replace-ment, pr i nt i ng , special supplies ( tab! es ,cha i rs] Anticipated 35,000 revenue for facility us« Graphics tech position, part time positions and full year staffing for Stagecoach+3/4 Calavera Hills 60% self-sustaining Salary i ncreases , i ncrea; part time positions Pool cover, carpeting 55% self-sustaining Increased part time staff 100% self-sustaining PROPOSED BUDGET . 87-88 Sect ions Bui Idinq Maint(5320) Personnel M/0 Capi tal Servi ces/Other Departments TOTAL Senior Citizens (4142) Personnel M/0 Capi ta 1 TOTAL Sen i or C i t i zen Commi ss ion (4141) Personne 1 M/0 Capi tal TOTAL TOTAL ALL DIVISIONS: PERSONNEL M/0 CAPTIAL GRAND TOTAL Approved 86-87 $ 294,091 256,222 14,700 (33,002) $ 532,061 $ 90,098 43,968 1 ,120 $ 135,186 $ o 500 0 $ 500 $1 ,887,684 $1,429,296 $ 183,134 53,500,114 Proposed 87-88 $ 458,758 268,000 29,700 (50,000) $ 706,458 $ 126,762 52,350 0 $ 179,112 $ 0 500 0 $ 500 $2,348,250 $1,617,248 $ 164,450 54,129,948 1 ncrease S/% $164,667/79% 11,778/4.5% 15,000/102% $174,397/32.7% $ 36,664/40.6% 8,382/19% $ 43,926/32.4% 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 $460,566/24.3% $187,952/13% Why Additional personnelBldg Maint super, two custodians, facilityworker for Safety Center P&R Dept relocation to to 405 Oak St. Bldg Maint equipment 405 Oak St. rehab. Additional personnel management analyst Assuming the responsi- bility of Sen i or C i t i zei Assoc i at ion Wi 1 1 receive $100,000 grant from area agency on aging. ($-l8,684/-10.3% 5629,834/17.9%