Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1957-10-08; Planning Commission; MinutesI .- I. , ." _" MINUTES OF REGULAF: MP'ETINC OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COIVIMISSION " - - October 8, I957 1- 2- 3- 4 e. The meeting was called to order at 7:35 P.M. By Chairman Baumgartner, Present besides the Chairman were Commissioners Jarvie, Swirsky, Yourell, Stringer and EngeLnann; City Engineer Kubota, Secretary Ewald an3 Flanning Consultant Gordon VJhitnall. Absent Commissioner Fennel The Commirision asked that the Minutes of September .24. 1957 be corrected tc show that on Page 2, under Section 5, that the duplication of statemenf he deleted. Comm, Stringer requested that his statement on Page 3 rc!garding the pl'eliminary survey on animal and fowl problems be stricken from the record:.. Comm. Jarvie moved that the Minutes of Septerrber 24, 1957 be approved as corrected. Seconded by Comm. Engelmacn. .%i1 ayes, matinn carried, CONTINUE11 HEARING Reclassification from R-1 to R-3 Sawyers, motice ofs3rin.e was rea-TLetter from Ifrank B.-Smith was read ~~ " wherein he titated his reason for protesting this reclassification. There were no oral protests. Comm. Stringer asked Mr. Whitnall if people in the Holiday Park area asked to bui?d OT put theirproperty to some use would they be allowed to do so. Mi.o Whitnall stated that the Master Park Plan it; only a guide, and that if the owners in that area wished to build OF make use of their pyoperty that they would have to be given a permit. He further stated that. a master plan is only a declaration, but a precise plan may be controlling. After considerable discussion Resolution Eio, 33 was presented to the Commission. Comm, Swirsky moved that Ilesolution No. 33 be adopted, recommending to the City Council chat the property as advertised be rezoned from R-1 to R-3, Seconded by Cornm. Jarvie. Six ayes, Comm. Fennel absent. Resolution Fro. 33 adopted, HEARING - Precise PLan -.- Pi0 Pic0 Drive. Notice of hearing was read. A map of the Precise Plan was presented, which included all of the property lying on ths East side of Pi0 Pic0 Drive from the North line ob Chknquapin to the south property line of Elm Avenue, MR. BOMDY, 1150 Pine Avenue, asked to see the precise plan. After reviewing the map he statedSt it was his understanding that there would be no alley through his property. The City Engineer stated that if he wished his property to be rezoned R-3 along with the other proper- ties on Pi0 Pic0 Drive, that it would necessitate an alley in order to take care of tb.e extra traffic that is centemplated in the future as result of tbt; rezoning. After considerable discussinn, Resolution No, 32 was presented to the adopted, recommending to the City Council the adoption of the Precise Commission. Comm. Engehann moved that Resoluticn No. 32 be " I 5- 6- Plan for Pio Pic0 Drive. Secmded by C.omm. Yourell. All ayes, Comm. Fennel absent, Resolution No. 32 adopted. Mr. Whitnall stated that at such time as the City Council adopted this Precise Plan and the change of zone in this area had been approved, that the R-3 zone use becomes effective only when the individual has coinplied with the conditions imposed by the Precise Plan. HEARING - Reclassification of portion ot Ingraham property from R-3 to 17-1, mice ot hearing was read. 'i'here were no written protests. the owner to build two houses on the property. The Commission informed EGTreighion asked if this zone change on the property would allow because of i.he size of the lot the lot had been zoned R-3 on the rear Mr. Creighkon that the reason for their requesting this zone change was portion and R..! on the front portion and that they wished the property to have a urifsrm zoning; that this zone change would not have any bearing on lhe variance which had previously been approved. After discussion by the Commission. Resolution No, 34 was presented to the Comrnir sion. Comm. Swirsky stated that he had voted no on the granting of the variance, but that due to the size and inconsistent he moved tkat the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 34. lot distaace, and because of the fact that this lot was in two zones, rezoned from R-3 to R-1 to conform with the front portion of the lot. recommending to the City Council that the rear portion of this lot be No, Comm. Fennel absent. Resolution No. 34 adopted. Seconded b>. Comm. Engelmann. Five ayes, Comm. Stringer voting HEARING - Reclassification of Lots 25 thru 32, Block 48, and Lots l thru 8, Block 57 hearing wazf* Tolles Carlsbad Townsite, From 3-2 to H-P. Notice of st&in<that she was in favor of this proposed rezoning. 'Letter dated 9-22-57 from Mrs. E. M. C.reswel1 and Mrs. Bertha Ciles was re- ceived skating their approval of this proposed rezoning. There were no oral proksts. Resolution No. 35 was presentea to the Commission for their app;.ovat. Comm, Swirsky moved that Resolution No. 35 be appravec., recommending to the City Council that the area described in the Ncticc of Hearing be rezoned from C.->2 to R-3 due to the follow- ing reasons: viously +ecl.assified other property in the immediate vicinity; use with the, surrounding area; and area into a C-2 Zone it has not been developed into a C-2 use. Seconded lq. Comm. Stringer,, All ayes, Comm. Fennel absent. Resolution IUo. 35 adopted. HEARING - Coaditional Use Permit - William H. Fair. Notice of baring .=-is There were no written protests, and no oral protests., Fdr. Ewald stated that because the City does have a Trailer Ordinance, that the granting of the permit for the trailer pa k would have io be qproved by the City Council. Resolution No. 3 2 was presented to the Commission tor their approval. Comm. Stringer 1. That tbe Planning Commission and the City Council have pre- 2. The granting of this zone change will make a consistent land 3. Since the Planning Commission and the City Council zoned this 0- 9- 10- moved that Resolution No. 36 be adopted granting this conditional use permit on t'ae property as advertised due to the following reasons: 1. That the property is properly located for a trailer park; 2. That the property is situated in such a 'Nay tbat it has good 3. That it will not in any way impair the value of any adjoining access to the highway; and properties. Seconded by Comm. Engelmann. All ayes, Comm. Fennel absent, Resolution No. 36 adopted. HEARING - Amendment to Ordinance No. 9060 - Model Homes. mcxfmas read, There were no oral or written prOkStS. It was poinled out during the discussion that subdividers have found it desirable to erect model homes in certain subdivisions where ex- isting streets are involved, and that the matter had been taken UP sometime ago with the planning consultant. The planning consultant had submitted a proposed amendment to Ordinance No. 9060 for the Commission's approval. Resolution No. 37 was presented to the Commission which set forth the proposed amendment. Comm. Swirsky moved tbat Resolution No. 37 be adopted, recommending to the City Council the approval of the suggested amendment to Article 23 of Ordinance NoQ 9060. Seconded by Comm. Stringer. All ayes, Comm, Fennel abscnt. Resolution No. 37 adopted. KURNER - Request for Abatement. The Secretary informed the zembers of the Commission that he bad received the opinion from the the abatement of a non-conforming use of a conforming building and Ci.ty Attorney which they had requested regarding the procedure for the non-corforming use of the land. After considerable discussion Comm. Swirsky stated that there were two non-conforming uses involved, and in reference to the r,';n-conforming use of the land that the City Mannges be sent a copy of the opinion for the Council to take appropriate action. In reference to the non-conforming use of the conforming building that the Secreta.ry advise Mr. Chase and Mr. Ebright that ;st the first meeting in November, that the Planning Commission intends calling for the adopt~ion of a resolution for the abatement of the use of a non-conforming use of a conforming build- ing. Cornn~. Swirsky further requested that the Secretary have available &e records as to the final inspection and business licenses, Mr. Kurnejr was present and was asked if he had anything further to state and hr? stated that he would appreciate receiving a copy of the opinion from the City Attorney. EXTENTLON OF SPRUCE STREET. A plan was submitted to the The City Engineer requested that a precise plan be made of the Commissioners showing the proposed extention of Spruce Street. area as %e surrounding property owners have requested that it be done. Comm, Suirsky moved tb,at the City Engineer and Planning Consulta.nt prepare a precise plan for the extention of Spruce Street -3 .. _-. 1.1 - from Yourell Avenue to Forrest Avenue. Seconded by Comm. Engelmann, Six ayes. Comm. Fennel absent. Mr ~ Whitnall suggested that a parent ordinance be adopted to take care of these precise plans, He stated that this would help to expedite proceedings and would help cut the expenditures of adver- tising a MASTER FARK PLAN. Secretary Ewald reported on the meeting &at had be,sn held with the San Diego Gas & Electric Company, officials of the City, members of the Planning Commission and the Harbor Cornmission, and Mr- Patterson. Mr. Ewald stated that he felt the representatives from the Gas and Electric Company were satisfied that this plan of the harbor was merely a guide and that there that the Gas & Electric did not seem to object to the harbor plan un- would be many changes made before the actual plan would be adopted; less it interferred with their plant operations; and their main concern was how th,: plan was to be financed. .Mr. Vlrhitnall stated that the Gas and Elxtric had a large investment in this plant and that it was only natural that they were concerned, and that at such time as a precise plan was submitted that any objections would have to be qualified for financing this type of project under the new state laws considered, He further stated that he felt that the City would be €or financing. Resolution No. 38 was presented to the Commission, recommending to the C.ity Council that the Master Park Plan be adopted. Comm.. Swirsky pointed out that he had been absent when one of tie hearings on the Master Park Plan was held, but that he had read the minutes relating to said hearing and had reviewed all of the correspondence in the file, therefore, he moved that Resolution No. one of the hearings on the Master Park Plan was held, but that he had 38 be adopted. Comm. Stringer stated that he had been absent when read the M:.nutes relating to said hearing and had reviewed all of the correspondence in the file, and wished to second the motion. All ayes, Com:n. F~llsl absent. Resolution No. 38 adopted. Comm. Jarvie moved that the Meeting be adjourned. Seconded by Comm. Sw::rsky. The Meeting was declared adjourned at 10:40 P.M. Respectfully submitted, a LD. Secretary A