The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1963-12-10; Planning Commission; MinutesI I I 8,''' ". ' t' I t i CITY OF CARLSBAD ; Date of Meeting: December 10, 1963 i Name 8\,'8$$, 8'%:$h I I I ', '\ ', S8 " " I Minutes of: PLANNING COMMISSION Time of Meeting: 7:30 P. M. : of "+ '0'8 ' q$, I Place of Meeting: Council Chambers : Member f.q$.+.+ \%@..e+ 6 R. 1 ROLL CALL was answered by Commissioners Davis, I ', '- '. '\ '8",, I I '8,,"8,",, '\, ', '. 1 ;""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~"*"""~""""""~""""","" '(I 14 I I :;:::: ::;:;: ;:4;: :::; t i Davis ; ; :x; i ; I i Grant :x! ;x: i i I 1 Lamb I :x;xi ; : R,no.e ! Puc+,l&la7 Ceyr, No.' TRdC 7JdLh 'lltzlbJ Sonnemah ; I : ; !xi I i Ward, Grant Palmer, Jarvie, Lamb and Sonneman. Alsd : present were City Attorney Stuart C. Wilson, City Plannek i Uhland B, Melton and City Engineer Lowell A. Rathbun. : :!::bl ::Ill; I APPROVAL OF MINUTES: ; Ward : :xi ; I@ I (a) Minutes of the regular meeting of November 26, I Palmer I : ;x! : : : 1963, were approved as corrected. i Jarvie : :: i ; !xi I I 11 .. I {, Commissionef :!!a!; 11 c Sonneman requested that the following be inserted; I I I 1 I "At the meeting of November 12, 1963 , I requested 3 times to vote on the Resolution 321 , and a vote *as refused. (I insist that this be in the minutes of this meet: ing) for there was no vote where a poll vote is taken on i Resolution 321, As I see it it was irregular, out of I I order and said Resolbtion 321 has never been acted on." : WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: Letter from Carlsbad Investment Corporation, dated December 6, 1963, stating they are ready to grant the additional 10 feet of property for street right of way on i Laguna Drive. I I The City Planner pointed out their property and stated i that the Cantarinis had also expressed their willingness i to dedicate property for street right of way on Laguna : Drive. I I I 4 I I I , 8 I I I I I * I I ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: I (a) Audience - There were no oral coQ3tnunications i frQp the audience. I I (b) Report of City Planner on Council action on Plan- I I ning matters . The City Planner reported that at the last meeting of the : Council on December 3, 1963, the Council approved the i reclassification for Moye, Walton and Spencer from R -1 - i 7.5 to R-3 on Oak Avenue; the reclassification from R-1-; 7.5 to R-3L for Oakley G. Parker on Chestnut and Monro$; and granted the Planning Staff permission to go to DMJM : with the proposed Precise Plan Development Policy. He : reported meeting with Mr. Bachman and Mr. Cromwell, Vice-presidents of the Union Title and Trust Co. , in San i Diego, and Mr. Cerini, Vice-president of the Union Title; and Trust Go. of San Francisco I and they like the report i so well that they may use this as a pilot ordinance. The City Planner reported receiving a letter from the Sa6 Diego County Highway Department regarding the revised Master Plan of Major Streets and Highways in the City anti County and they are having a meeting in Escondido to reviiw the entire Master Plan before it is submitted to the Board: of Supervisors. I I The City Engineer stated that they are discussing technic41 points and are working up a select system as required under the new gas tax fund allocation. I I The City Planner stated that the City population has increksed to 11 500, and the 13.5% increase means about $9,000. : additional revenue from the State Gas Tax Fund. I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I t I I , * I I 8 I # I # (""""""""""""""" I i PUBLIC HEARING: . " # VARIANCE - Lot Split - To consider a reduction in i required frontage from 60' to 50' for parcel 2 of 4 lot ; ; splits, on a large through lot fronting on both Hemlock anq ; Juniper, between A.T. & S. F.R.R. and Garfield Street, ; being Lot 3, Block R # Palisades No. 2 Map 1803, in the i ; City of Carlsbad. Applicant: Maud C. Wahl. * I ; Notice of hearing was read. Secretary Grant certified to notice of hearing being sent to 34 property owners in the i i area and then re ad the application. # I Letter from Donald H. Hotly, Licensed Surveyor I 2499 i ; State Street, stating that they were acting as agents for i i Mrs. Wahl and mere submitting a lot split on Lot 3, and ; ; they were requesting a variance for reduction in lot width i i on one parcel because of the existing buildings on the reat; I of the property and reported that there are 6 fifty foot wid+ lots and five 46 foot wide lots already existing in this I # : Block R, and other substandard size lots in the area. i Chairman Palmer announced the Gommission would now htar i from the applicant and any other persons who wished to speak ; in favor of this reclassification. : DON HOLLY stated that he represented Mrs. Wahl and i had no further comments to make at this time but was : willing to answer any questions. ; The Chairman announced the Commission would now hear i from all persons desiring to speak in opposition. I 8 I I I I # I t 4 1 I t I I # # I I # b I # I I # 1 I # I 6 4 # I 4 I I I # # # I * i There were no persons present desiring to speak in i opposition . i The public hearing was declared closed at 7:58 P. M. i The City Planner explained the location and proposed splitk : of the property and stated that he felt the Commission : I shouLd consider this on its own merit because of the steep! : topography of the land. He felt that it would be much wisek I to grant two variances from 60' to 55', 56' or 57. The : existing house would have a 13' setback on a 55' lot, I I I I I I I I # 1 1 # I MR. HOLLY stated thqt Mrs. Wahl did not want the Lot ; i Line any closer to her house and if she cannot get this I # : variance, she wished to withdraw the application. Mrs, ; i Wahl's original purpose in splitting the property was to : give a portion of it to her sister and to sell a portion. : After due consideration, it was agreed that the request i i for said variance be granted for the following reasons: ; I I I e $ I I I I I I I I # # 1 # 1. That the granting of such variance will not be 0 ; materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious i to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone: I in which the property is located. I 1 ; 2. That the granting of such variance will not advers*y I affect the comprehensive general plan. I # # # # I I I # 1 I I # 3. That such variance is necessary for the preservatb : and enjoyment df a substantial property right possessed b$ i other property in the same vicinity and zone. I I I I I I I I # t I I I I 4. That there were no oral or written protests. I AND that the lot split be surveyed and monumented, and i : a street improvement agreement be entered into between i I the City of Carlsbad and the property owners on Juniper. ; I I n I I , 4 ! ! # I I I # # I 1 * # I # I I # # I I # * I t I # I I I t # I I # l I # t I I I I 8 I I I I # # 1 I I I # I I I I I I I I * I I ::i:,* I 1 :::;:; I I :::::; ::;I:, I::::: I* i The following resolution was presented: Resolution No. 329. A RESOLUTION OF THE CARLSBA4 : -MMISSION GRANTING A VARIANCE :::;:I *,,,I: i FOR REDUCTION IN FRONTAGE TO CREATE A LOT SPtIT I::':: : ON A PORTION OF LOT 3, B.WCK R, PALISADES NO. 2; Davis I :x;xi ; ; MAP 1803 OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, STATE OF : Ward :xi !x: i i I CALIFORNIA was adopted by title only and further read-! Grant : ing waived. i Palmer i !x: : I@ : : ; :xi ; : I : Jarvie i : :xi ; : I : Sonneman : : ;xi : : I i::;:: I * I;: 1:: I I I I i Lamb ; i !x: I i OLD BUSINESS: I I I **.!I* I I I : The City Engineer presented the final map and grading i i and improvement plans and explained the drainage would ; : now go to Magnolia Avenue with an underground system : i and will conform to the plans the City has for Harding and! : Magnolia proposed 191 1 Act Improvements. : The City Planner explained the changes that were made I I I I I 1 which improved the lot design for their proposed duplexes: The Secretary read a memorandum from the City Engineei I I I i certifying approval of the final map of said Magnolia : Village Subdivision. I I I I I I I I The Commission, City Engineer and City Attorney discusged I having a certificate accompanying the final map for inundq- : tion or flood hazard, and making a correction modifying : this requirement in the wording of the revised subdivisioni i ordinance. ; Davis : By motion of the Commission the final map of Magnolia : Grant I : Jar vie I i Ward I Village Subdivision was approved as presented. i Palmer I I I I i Lamb i : :xi i i I : Sonneman : i :xi ; I ;;;**I ,*I::; ;:;::I I I ;:@I1: I I 1::;; I:::,: I :::I:I 8 ,:I:;: ;;::;I *I:;: I i:::;; I ::::;; *;;;Il :::;I; I I :;;.;I I I i;;:;: I i The method and procedure for adopting resolutions was 1 :::;I; : discussed, and the City Attorney suggested that he work I I out a fCormat for the Commission to use as a guide on : : standard procedures. i Commissioner Sonneman stated that she liked the procedulfe ::I;;: I for adopting resolutions in the past. i The Chairman instructed the City Attorney to work with i i;;:;: : the City Planner in setting up a precise guide for present?$ i resolutions and the rules and regulations for the conduct ; I :::::i : of hearings. i (b) South Coast Asphalt Products Co. Conditiond Use i i Permit - Improvements. I t I I I I I I I 1 #.I! I Commissioner Jarvie stated that he had brought up the I : subject of improvements and landscaping at the meeting oe i November 12 1963, as it has been several years since this I permit was granted and they had promised to landscape i ; this property, and wanted to know what progress was : being made. : The City Planner stated that he had talked to Mr. Streute? / and he is going to bring the proposed plans in for the land+ scaping and they are prepared to put in about $3000. ; improvements after the first of the year. He explained : they had a flash flood at this location and had to put in I i money for repairs. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I P I I I I I I I ! : c I I 1 I I I I I I I I I * I I I a " 4 " I I I I I * I I I I I I I I I I I I NEW BUSINESS: 4 I I i (a) Discussinn of Planning Commission Meeting of : December 24, 1963. I i The City Planner stated that he had received a request for! i reclassification and the gentlemean had consented to have i : the hearing on January 14, 1964. I I i It was the unanimous decision of the Commission that the : meeting of December 24, 1963, be adjourned to January 18, i 1964. I I i (b) Reclassification of property fronting on Jefferson I : Street and a portion of Laguna Drive from R-1 to R-3. : The City Planner explained the location of the property I that was recently rezoned to R-3 and the property that the$ ; propose to zone to R-3, giving his opinions of the topograqhy i of the property and the property owners who he felt would : I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i It was also felt that both newspapers , Carlsbad Journal i and Blade-Tribune , should be notified of this proposed : I zoning. I : ADJOURNMENT: I I I I I I I t I I By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at 10:13 p. I I I I * * a I : Respectfully submitted, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I * I I I Sousa # I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I * I I 4 I I I I 8 I I I I I t I I I I 1 I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I