Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1965-10-26; Planning Commission; Minutes" I I i CITY OF CARLSBAD $i nutes of: PLAidNI D!G !Date of ivieeting: October :Time of Heeting: 7:30 P.M IP-~aCn,P,f-Jil~-~~-~~~;,,--T;Q.~!n_Cj,t-. !ROLL CALL was answered by C :Palmateer, iiccarthy, iicZoma isioner Frcistadt was prcsen Isioner Sutherlarid was absen :City Attorney ts'ilson, Plann !and Building Idspector Osbu I I I :APPROVAL OF 2INUTSS: I I I I I (a) Minutes of the regu :ber 28, 1965, were approved C 0i.ii.I I S S f 0 ?4 26, 1965 ommissioners Junn, s and Lamb. Commis- t at 7:35 P.Y. Commis- t. Also present were ing Director Schoell rn. lar meeting of Septem- as submitted. I I I I a I I I I (t) Minutes of the regular meeting of October i :13, 1965. k4o action waS taken since there was I !not a quorum present. !Commissioner Freistadt kfas present at 7:35 P.M. / I I I I I I I I I I I I (a) Parks and Recreatfon Commission memoran- i jdum dated October 15, 1965, recomwending that no : :variance be granted for reduction of the required i !landscaping of off-street parking areas, was read I :and acknowledged. I I !meeting Friday, ffovember 12, 1965, at Kona Kai i :Club-Shelter Island. "Elimination of Non-Conform-: :ing Uses and Obsolete Structures" will be the pro-j !gram for the meeting. 1 I !It was explained that the notice WBS received thaa :day. The Commission asked that copies of this ; :meeting be sent to them. I I 1 I I I * I (b) San Diego County Planning Congress - re: i I I 1 I I I I I I I (c) Engineering Department memorandum dated i :October 26, 1965 - re: Subdivision i4ap Act: Amend-: :ment to Provide for Parks for Recreational Pur- i :poses. I I I I I I I I I The question was brought up on whether this ! :park was just for the benefit of the subdivision, i jand the City Attorney explained that some cities : :get money from the subdividers for regional parks jreasonably accessable to the subdivisions but not ; :right in the subdivision. Uhen asked about the jcost or amount of money or land required from the : :subdividers, the City Attorney stated that he I !could check with other cities on the amount charg-! ied to the subdividers. i I !Vice-chairman PlcComas instructed the City Attorneh :to obtain this information and asked that copies !of the metnorandun from the Engineering Department : :be sent to them and that this matter be placed on i jthe agenda for the next regular meeting to figure : :the amount of land that should be set aside for i :parks before recommending this to the Cozncil . e b :The Planning Director stated that Planned Unit De-: Ivelopments could establish parks to serve the im- :mediate people in the area but that no method was :I !previously available for the City to establish : :neighborhood parks in standard subdivisions. I I :This amendment would assist the City in establish-! jing such parks. I I I I I I I I I I r I 1 ‘, ..’ ‘ 8. I I I I I I I I I I I I -2- I I I I 6 I (d) Letter from thd State Sivision of High- juays, ciated October 25, 1365, with a Freeway pro- ! :gress mag enclosed of uistrict XI to keep the I Conrni ssi ott i r?forz,>G of tf! - pro5russ hci 3:: ~2.d~ ! in the County. ITtiz Commission asked for copies of this memoran- I I I I I I 4 I I I I I i dun. I I I I I I I I (e) Yenorandurn from the Parks and Recreation! I Commission - re: Underground utility lines along i I the Freeway was read and acknowledged. i The Planning Director stated that the Engineering1 i Department was going to check into this as they ; ; did not knovr what the memorandum :;!as referring tc: i unless it was the utility lines near the freeway.: [There was discussion on having a cut-off date for! I receiving written communications. The Commission: i agreed that communications should be read al- : though it may be necessary to have them brought ! i up on the next agenda. Some Communications night! :pertain to matters that would bz- taking place :prior to the next regular meeting. i ORAL COWh1UNI CATIONS : I I I I 1 I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I * I 4 I I I I 1 I Commissioner Freistadt called attention to ai : booklet on the Focus on San Ciego, An Economic : i Study of the San Diego bletropolitan area, which I may be obtained from the Gank of America, as : having good information for the Commissioners. I I 1 1 I I I I I 0 I (b) 14R. OAKLEY PARKER inquired about a com- i jmunication sent to the Planning Director regard- : ing Harrison Street and was informed this matter : iwould be taken up under Old Business. I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I PUBLIC HEARING: I (a) VARIAflCE - To consider a reduction in i i the required car parking space from 200 sq. ft. ; : to 174 sq. ft., and to allow parking in a portion! i of the front and side yard setback areas where : : no covered garage structure may be built in the i future on property located at 2617 Ocean Street, : : on the llesterly side of Ocean Street between ! Cyprus and Beech Avenues. Applicants: Raymond S.: ; and Barbara is. Nul len. : Ilotice of hearing was read. Secretary i.lcCarthy ! certified that notice of the public hearing was : i given to property owners in the area and then ! : read the application. i The Planning Director read the report of his i findings and he and the Building Inspector ex- : p1alr;ed the locztirn of the existing structure I i and thc location of the buildings on the property! :on each siic. They also explained that when you ; ! alter a structure you have to cornp’fy with the i present off-street parking requirements in order ;to remodel thjs sipgle family residence. If the i property owners were to bc??d multiple dwellings ; ; they would have to ccnp ly with the parking re- iquirements or ask for another parking variance. i I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ; I I ,-- I I I i These buildings were built before this off-streeti t parking or"i nance was adopted. I 1 I I I ~1;;l~ i T!~C Ctlairman as':cd iP tho apF1icant or his repre-j ;I1 1:1:8' 11 i scntat-iva uas pr>nsen.i GR? it' nny cne else wished i ;1:4: ;::::: :to speak in fa::3r of this applicat-ion. I 161:~1 I I::*:: I i;:::: i 'ii:erz were no pcrsons present desiring to speak : I;'::: :in favor of this application. I I 1:;s:: ;l;:l~ I ;;;::: !The Chairman asked if any person present wished I a18;l* ~1;;Is :to speak in opposition. F!o one spoke in c?pposi- i ;;#:I* : tion. I ' ;;::;: I ;;::*I :The public hearing was closed at 8338 P.iJ1. I I :a:: :I* 11 I:@;lt lol:@l !A motion was made to adopt Planning Commission : I 1; :!:!:I :Resolution No. 409 granting the variance for the I i:;:;: : following reasons: 1 :::;:: I :el I;::: I 1. That granting this request will still give! ::;;:: :more space between the existing dwelling and I ::;;;: i street than the existing buildings on each side i !;:;:! : have. I I I::;:; 2. The site has very little buildable area : ::: I:I : at street level. The remainder of the site has i ::::;: ;;a:;: ia steep slope dropping off to th3 beach. t ::::ii : 3. The parking area available is adequate in ::::,I :size if it is not to be covered. I I :I:::: I 18 : P:::: I i ~t u n n I )q ;x; : : i Planning Comnlission Resolution 20. 403. A RESOLU-rPalmateer ; !x: 1:: TION GRANTIfiG A VARIANCE OH PROPERTY AT 261 7 :McCarthy : ! :xi I ;OCEAN STREET, OF4 THE !dESTEP.LY SIDE QF OCEAN IizlcComas i i :x: : I; : i STREET, 5ETEIEEI.I CYPRUS AND BEECH AVEI:IUES, was :Lamb I Ix ;x: ; ; :adopted by title only and further reading waived. IFreistadt : !xi : i OLD DUSIRESS: ! (a) Harrison Street Extension - Vice-chairman jl4cComas explained that he and Commissioners Munn I : and Lamb had met with the Engineering Dept. and ; :: ithe Planning Director and studied this matter. :The Committee prepared a report for the Commis- I ision's consideration before recommending it to i :tile Council. This matter was not discussed at : i ';.he last rnzeting due to the lack of a quorum. !The Secretary read the proposed menorandurn and i :pointed oGt that this was not a public hearing. : :Letter from C. P. Von Herzen, Attorney, 725 :Citizens National 3ank Building, 453 S. Spring St;, i 1,os Angcies, dated October 7, 1965, asking that ;Harrison Street be kept open to the lagoon and noki'4unn 1 I I I I I I 11 18 1) 1 I I I I I It I I I (111 I 11 I I t The following resolution was presented: I I :$:: ::;:*a I - 11 )I I I I I :;:I:, 4 I j;1*1: - I ::;::: :::I ;:;;:: lo $11 1::;:; I: I I I ;: iii: I1 1:::;: :;:;$I @I( I 181t;: ::;; 1; I I I ;;:*;; I I "- ".- I I I I I I I I I I ;closed. ipalrnateer I I?,jcCarthy iAftcr csnsiderable 4iscussion, hy motfa7 of the iMcComas I i Ccmmissicn it WGS r?i;reed the merr;ora;tcl~:n be sent :Lamb ; 20 the Counci 1 as avendcd. iFreistadt i NE!4 BUSINESS: i (a) Letttlt- $0 tt;p :tt;,y r:~zrzgt-?r *;YCM the State i i Pivision of Highl:ca!<s, :13Zed October 15, 15865, - i rc: MaiKtcnancc! (;peration headquarters in earls-! ::i::: ; tad. b /4;: I I # I I I I- I I L I ""- * 6 I I I I I i:;::: 1::;;: ::;I I ' I :::;:I I :;:;:: I I.. I I I b 181 I I I 3 ; ':::!: /- I I I 1 ‘,..,*” I I I I I I I I I I I ’, 8, ’, ’\ ‘* I I I I -4- t Qf I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I :The Building Inspector explained that the new !Freeway will separate this maintenance yard from i jthe sewage treatment plant. I l !The Planning Director asked the Commission if :there bdere any basic facts the Commission wished :him to present to the Council. a I I I 4 I I I I I I I I (b) ” Prezoning of areas in the County that may I ;be annexed to the City. The City Attorney presentbd :a proposed resolition of intention regarding this : )it a t t e r . I I :The Planning Director stated that he had discussed! :this with the City Attorney. He explained that : bt the present time annexed lands come into the : :City with R-1-6 zoning and explained that pre- :zoning maps may be adopted before annexations. I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I -.-. Resolution of Intention FJo. 55. A RESOLUTION OF i 3N1 tNTI0N OF THE PLANNIf4G COMflISSIOfI OF THE CITY f firF CARLSBAD REGARDING Ai’lEMD?4EfdT OF SECTI3N 306 I 3F ORDIIfANCE I\IUi.lBER 51060 REGARDIllG CLASSIFICATIOfl; DF AfINEXED LANDS AND U3CLASSIFIED PROPERTY was : !cad in full and adopted. I I : (c) Wariances - The Planning Director stated i bhat he felt the Commission arc accustomed to his : f!ork now and that together they may be able to cut! Llown on the time spent on minor zoning items and : thus devote more tine to broader planning problems! and solutions. He asked the Commission to review booklet on Variances by ASP0 preliminary to a : tliscussion at the next meeting. ! (d) Conditional Use Permit for Trailer Park in i ,he City of (iceanside near Cake Calaveras - !kl*acent to the iake Caraveras property. hlanning Director 1-epor.teci this would be con- j bidered at the Oceanside Planning Commission on ; Flonday night and he would represent the City. I 1 I I I 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I J I I I I I I I I I I I I d (e) Planned Unit Development - The Planning i I Director reported a confcrcnce to be held on I I i:::;; :donday, ijovember 15, 1965, from 3:30 AI? to 4:45 i i::::: i P~I at the tlil ton Inn (formerly Oceanttouse) in i ;::::: : San Diego, covering Planned Devclopstent, Cluster ; ,,:I:, and Condominium. This will be a big help in .( I ::I::: h:;:; gaining knowledge on these matters and, he and :;;Ill :::!:: : the City ;:lanager, City Engineer will be attending: I:;;;: this meeting and asked the Commission if they I :::I : wauld like to attend to make their reservations i ;;I::: i as soon as possible as reservations were com- 11:::; I ::;*:t : pletely filled last year. This is co-sponsored ::I:;: tl by the San Diego Euilding Contractors Association! ::it:: ::I::: : and Title Insurance and Trust Company. I I 1 I d0;1; i The Planning Director spoke of the need for a stuay :1@l:8 :i::;: : of new methods of residential land development by! ::i;:: i the City. i,!ith the consent of the Coi,lmission, I :; : the Chairman asked the Planning Director to I 1:1*:1 initiate studies on Planned Unit Development and I : inquired if this would require extra meetings. I I c- !The Planning Director stated that is' the Commis- i sion's work load remained the same only one or i : two additional meetings by the Colnmission would : i be necessary. I I i (f) League of California Cities - The Planning: i Director reported attending the meeTing in San : : Francisco and felt the PlannJng discussion cias i I one of the best. He reported seeing a film on : :Planned Unit Development and he contacted the I i FHA in San iliego and they are trying to get it i : through the builders. I I (9) Planning Department Library - The Plannin3i i Director stated that there were few books in the i : Department when he started to work for the City ; i and they have obtained books and booklets which ! the Cornmission were welcome to borrow. ;;::;I 11:: 11(11 I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I 1 I I I t I rc- I 1 I t I I I iidagnolia Avenue School at 7:30 P.,!. i ADJ0URN;~IENT: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I * I 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I :By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at 10:O3 P.E-l. a I I I I 1 I 4