HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-05-09; Planning Commission; Minutest
I
I I ', 8, * ' '% I I : cm OF CAWWAD I ', ', '8, , 8 ' h * 8% .
I I I I : N a me ',. 'x, 'I 8,8 , 8 8' ' ' Minutes of: PLANNING COClMI5,iO!-l . \\
:Date of Meeting: May 9, 1967 !Time of Meeting: 7:30. P. M. : of ,+?Q;> \\ 9, !Place of Meeting: 8 0 \, , '\ ;?d, Council Chambers : Member '.++$p ,oto*.P;P\\,& ,* \.I,
I~"""~"""""""""""""""""""""""""""~""""""~""""""""-"--- "" I ROLL CALL was answered by Commissioners Smith, ;McComas, Little and Voorheis. Commissioners :Palmateer and Sutherland were absent. Also I t 1 present were City Attorney Wilson, City Engineer i ;Lill, Associate Engineer Sprehe, Building Inspec- ; itor Osburn, and Planning Director Schoell.
!APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
'\, '\, '\,'8, *$:, '8 'g\
I I I I I Y 1
I 8 I
8 I
I
:(a) Minutes of the regular meeting of April 25,
i WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
1967, were approved .as corrected. 1 Voorheis
I I e
# *
8
I * 0. 8
I I !There were no written communications.
I ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
I
l 8
8 I
# :There were no oral communications. I
PUBLIC HEARING:
6 I
I
a 0 * :Vice-chairman Little asked the applicants or thei2 !representatives of the variance and tentative maps!
!if they wished to have the matters considered that: :night, in view of only having four Commissioners i :present. After consideration they all agreed to ; ;have their matters considered that night.
!'The following variance and tentative map of I :Helton Hinterland were considered. concurrently. . : 1.
I I a;'::
(a) VARIANCE - To consider a reduction in requireb ;.;:;;
;1;;1
!frontage from 60' to 28' on Lot 4 in Helton Hinters ;::;: ;:::I :land Subdivision, in order to create a "Panhandle"! : lot on property located Easterly of Arland Road ; ;::'I
#*I:I
!and Northerly of Buena Vista Way. Applicant: a 'I :::;: :Claud R. He1 ton. I : :,: i:
# I::;:
:Notice of hearing was read. Acting Secretary a 4:;:
I' i::;: IMcComas certified that property owners in the area! "11*1 :were notified of the public hearing, and then read; :;::I
I,~l; i the application. I I i-: I : ;
# 0 I;':;
;There were no written communications. 8 ;:::: ':.:;I
!TENTATIVE MAP - HELTON HINTERLAND - 7 Lots locatedi :::;: !Easterly of Arland Rd. and Northerly of Buena Vistb i:::: :Way. Owners and Subdividers: Claud R. Helton and: 4:;:
!The Secretary ,certified that adjacent property I :::;I :owners were notified and the various departments ; !I::: :and agencies, and then read the application. 8 ii:::
# I *I1 i Letter dated May 5, 1967, from Martha L. Cole Di'x,I :P.O.Box 581, Oceanside, protesting the approval of: :i{:; :the proposed subdivision unless another access, a !not affecting her property, is provided.
!MR. SPREHE reviewed the City Engineer's report to I $1:; ;::;I :the Planning Commission and explained that the :subdivision property will be severed from the I I@*l:
:existing parcels before the final map is approved.!
D
I l
I
8
I
I
I 8.
I
I * I ;!;;!
I : I ; 1;; I 1.1
':I#; a::
Gi 1 bert McLean. * I :::
11)
I I
I
;:'I:
a'::;
::;I, $1
I I !I:::
I I I (I:::
1';::
;::;: ;::;; :::::
I ;;:;I
I I ;I:#: 0 lib:;
I I ;:I
I I #;;I;
I
I
I
8 I
I
I
I I I :ii
I I !!;;I
f
'4
I I I '8 8'. . t. ,8 S\', I I I
I
1 (\. 8,8 .\\ ', 1
1 I l8 t8 8 8' - 2" , I l, (s,, 8'. y\,
I I Na me ' '8, '0 .$. 8. S8 '+, :&,
I : of \$&d;, ',L'z", ;, 8 '>\ ;3>
l""""""-"""""""""""""---"""""""""""~"""""l"""""""""""~~"~~ : Member \$a@,$X@':$
$1::
I:!::
:;;I: ::;ii ::;;:
-1 ii:;:
I
I
: Mr. Sprehe presented a map of the proposed'align-: ;'"I ment of James Drive which will be extended from
Buena Vista Way and end in a cul-de-sac at the : ;!I;* i Northern portion of the block. The street open- i ((1 11::: : ing of James Drive will provide access to this : i subdivision. 70.8% of the property owners have i : signed the petition to hold a public hearing. I Only 60% of the property owners'signatures are ; :;::i
I : required. 8 I ;:;;; i The City Attorney stated the hearing to hear any! l*l ;!!:i ; objections pertinent to the street opening is I '11:; scheduled for the next Council meeting and the ::;:: alignment has been approved by the City Council i ::;:;
:;a::
I ;;!:'
I I :;;;:
:::I:
a';:;
4:;
::I:: i the final map stage. I ;:'I;
I ;:I::
: and the Engineering Department.
: The Planning Director pointed out that the open- ::;;I i ing of James Drive was not to be considered that I : ni.ght. He explained the location of proposed I ::;::
: of a large block of land, and in order to open ; ;il:l i the land, the property owners are planning to i I ;I'
: construct a street. The land will be severed in ; ;::::
I The Chairman announced that the Commission would : i:::; ; now hear from the applicant or his representativi ; and any others wishing to speak in favor of the i :. applications. I :::;, 81
i MR. GILBERT McLEAN, 2740 Arland Road, stated tha4 : he owns Lot 5 in Wilsonia Tract, and part of his: i;:::
;tl;l i subdivision. He pointed out that they have an : 4:;: 11 ; easement that runs 210' easterly from Arland Road, :;::: : and they would not like to have it closed off. :
: MR. HELTON stated that the existing 10' wide t I :;;:: a1:a;
easement would not be affected as it is along th4 ;I::: : north side of propose-d Lot 4. I ;:;::
: MR. JOHNSON stated that it is an easement of i record and extends from Arland Road down to a i : garage. He then read the legal description of : ;ll;l' i the easement. I ::::I;
a
Lot 4 and that the subdivision is in the center f i: 11
I I ::;;; 1:::
I
I::;,
::;I; ::;::
I i:::: ;::;:
I*!:;
:;::;
I
property will be Lots 6 and 7 in the proposed
I a I
9 I
I I :::!I
I :ii:i I ::;:;~ ::;:;~
;::::I :::;:; : now hear from any one wish.ing to speak in oppo- ; ;::;:] i sition. ;::;:I
i No one spoke in opposition. ;::;:;
I l*(1*1
I *:;1;1 I ::;:;: i The public hearing on the request for a variance: :;;:;: ; was closed at 8:05 P. M. I ::;:;:
i The following resolutioFs were presented: I liii;! : After due consideration a motion was made to : adopt Resolution No. 501 granting a variance for: i reduction in required frontage from 60 feet to : i 28 feet on Lot 4 in Helton Hinterland Subdivisioh, ;::I:I ; in order to create a "Panhandle" lot, on the #*I;';
I'
I I I ;::;:;
8 I :::;:;
The Chairman -announced that the Commission would!
I
a e 1
1- I
I I I ::;;I: 0
I
'I
I t r I t !::;:I ;:;I:'
I I I:I:;:
:tl::i ;::;:;
I I:;;;,
I I ::;;::
I :::':I
I I :;;:::
I I e#';:; :;
I ::i:
*I I l I ip:;:
I I :81:':
I I :::;:;
~ ~~ I ;::;:;
81:'
I
I
I I
I
I
I ;l~:~l I
I 8
I
I
I
I
I
h
I I ',8'* ... ,,\ I I. I I I I I I I I
F '\ 8s\ '\\ \\ ', ', 8 8'
'X, '. '\ t, ', '.
I -3-. I ; ~a me *,, 8:~. *,, '?$J,
I i of \,$,o;: ' \A I 'f2.r. ',>2, '.$+,?L*, \ ,o ,o ..p+ :>$ ;~"""""""""~"""-"-"""""""""""""~""""""""""""""-""""--""-
I I !:I;: i requirements of the City "Panhandle" Lot Spl it i 11:;:
:;;4u : Policy be met by applicant, and on the condition i :::a; i that Helton Hinterland Subdivision is finally I ::;:; : approved and recorded and provides proper access : :::i: ii::: i to this lot. The following facts and reasons werd 118 : found'to exist: I ::::; i 1. It is in conformance with the General Plan as! ; far as zoning is concerned. a I I :.; I ; i:;:' i 2. It will constitute a reasonable land use on I 11;: ; restricted radius cul-de-sac. I I ::;,:
I . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 ii::: 1 Planning Commission Resolution N'o. 501. A.RESOLU-i Smith. i:ki: ! TION GRANTING A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY ON LOT 4 IN. : McComas ;x: Fi i i HELTON HINTERLAND SUBDIVISION, EASTERLY OF ARLANDi Little i I y : ; : ROAD AND NORTHERLY OF BUENA. VISTA WAY, was adopted Voorheis ; i
by title only and further reading waived. . I. '4 ;I' I
I I I D !;I;:
After further consideration a motion was made to : ;:::: : adopt Resolution No. 502 recommending approval of! 1"; i the tentative map of Helton Hinterland Subdivisio4, ;::*I
,*I:,
:subject to the recommendations of the various I I a::;: i departments and agencies, with the exception that! :;,:I
: Item 11 be changed to read "The subdivision must ; ;;!:;
: be severed from the parcels fronting on Arland i iii:; I Road; therefore, lot splits shall be processed ; p:; ;ii!i
8 8 I::::
!Resolution No. 502. A RESOLUTION OF THE CARLSBAD Smith 1;::: i; 8,; !-CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVA'L OF McComas :x: kt; ; THE TENTATIVE MAP OF HELTON HINTERLAND SUBDIVISI.Ot$,Little ; ; 11 :
:was adopted by title only and further reading i Voorheis ; !x!; 8 i waived. I I ;I/: ;:;::
I I 0';:; ;:,;I
I ;:'I: i located on the Easterly side of El Arbol Drive, .l;l;: !:::I
:South of Cannon Road. Owner and Subdivider: I ; 1.::: i Pacific Investment CO. I ;::;:
I ;:::; !The Secretary certified that notices of the map i ;:"I ;;::: :were sent to the adjacent property owners and to ; I:!;; I' :::;; ithe various departments and agencies, and then ; : read the application. I ;!:;I
I I .'I :; i i I i There were no written communications except from ;8": :#I ithe various departments and agencies.. I 8 ,@;I, ::I::
8 ::I:; :Mr. Sprehe reviewed the City Engineer's recommen- i ill!:
jdations for the subdivision. I ;::;:
6 .* I,',; I ::::; !The Planning. Director Concurred with the City t '::;e
:Engineer's recommendations. I ::;;:
!The Chairman asked to hear from the applicant or i ;;;:: !his representative and any others wishing to speak! iii::
;in favor of this subdivision. I 18~;: I I I I ::i;i !MR. WILLIAM . D. CANNON, representing Pacific I ;:,SI ,a;:;
:Investment Corp., stated that he concurred with thk ;: 1:::
Engineering Department's recommendations. I :;':;
I I :;::; ;,:;I
!The Chairman asked if any one wished to speak in i. ;::;:
:opposition to the subdivision. 8 I'll; s ;::;;
I' 111#(
:No one spoke in opposition. 8 * ;:::I ;::;I
8 I I :I!;:
', '\, 't8 '\ 8\,'8, ' . f,, '
8 : Member
following conditions and limitations that all
1"-
It
;::!: bga
Ill:;
:D:':
' *.I
and approved prior to approval of the final map." i
I I
I I :TENTATIVE MAP - TERRAMAR UNIT NO. 7 - 16 Lots
I
k' I
I
I
I
I I :*
I
e 8
! I !Ib!l
1
I # ', %*, 8'. I I I. I P 0
"- I 'a, X,, 8. % \\ '\
I I ', '\\ , \
I ; I fda me '*, '%<%\ 8, .OX -4- *84>c?;> ', 9,
8 , " , \'
I 0 , ,'\.' I *\ ', ' *' '\ '\ ' 8,2;
I : of 8 0 \, , ' '7,' '.f,\Gc.' $',<:5!,
: In answer to questions.from the Commission, Mr. : Cannon stated that all of the lots in the subdivi; 4:;:
; sion would have 6,000 square feet or more on land: ::I::
ithat would not be in the lake. The lake adjacent; :;;o'
:::I; :to this property covers approximately 3 acres and: :::I: ;is approximately 35' deep. Water drains from the i p;@' ; State'Highway, Cannon Road, El Arbol and Palomar : ;::q ::
:Airport Road into this lake whi'ch has fish and i ;!;I1 ;ducks. If the lake were drained it would be an : ,:I
; eyesore'". He pointed out that Cannon Road will i 1.; ; ;; ;have an 80' right of way instead of 60' as origin-: ::::i !ally planned.
: Member ~~"""""""""""""""""""~""""""-"""""""-""-";"""-""-"--------- ,(j.,**.+p \'a
; * ; i"o- ,' '1
t'
I
i :'; ' ;
I ::':;
0 I'
'(I
-B b :+; B. e @:I*;
8 :The following resolution was presented:
8 ::::I ;bl
I 0 :::;o
I :Resolution No. 503 recommending approval of this ; I::;;
::;;: i:::: ; ;x:x1 I
{After due considerati'on a motion was made to adopj ;:::I 11;:
:subdivision, subject to the recommendations of the: ;::;: ivar.ious departments and agencies. b I 4::: I i Resolution No. 503. A RESOLUTION OF THE CARLSBAD Smith :CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF :McComas ; !.:x; : I:
." :THE TENTATIVE MAP OF TERRAMAR UNIT NO. 7 SUBDIVI-. Little ; ; :xi ; :SION, was adopted by title only and further read- : Voorheis j, I ;X: I ting waived. D @Dl;l .. 0 i;:;:
:OLD BUSINESS: I ,:;!!;
D '0 i::;:
!(a) Required Improvements - re: Lot Splits and ; 8'61;
,. -I ;::;; :-Zone Chang.es. Commissioner McComas reported that ; ::ii; :the committee has requested the City Engineer and i ;: ;;:
::II; .. :Planning Director to prepare a tentative resolu- ; 'e:;: :tion on this subject to be used at an open commit-: .; :
jtee meeting study session on Friday, May 19, 1967,; f I 1;::;
::'o; ;at 1:00 P. M. in the Council Chambers. I I i;:::
'I a ;:i::
!NEW BUSINESS: -0::::
I .' 'VI
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . :::I:
!(a) .Comme'rcial Signs. 'alon'g Fr'e.eways. The Planning! 6.8 1:
i." :Director s.tated that he has' be'en gathering consid-i .-. :::;o ;@I ab:
jerable material on this subject and would like to : @tl:a
!adjourn this meeting to Friday, May 19, 1967, in ; :order to present the material, and then to ride out ;;;:I 18 :to review some of th- existing signs.
i(b) Fence Location Study. The Planning Director ! !explained that at the last meeting, the Building i ;::@I ;Inspector brought up the fact that he is being 0
,:confronted by people having problems with fences i ,b&*(
-;on corner lots. The Planning Director presented a: :'I :block study explaining the different type of lots i ;:;i: b@I 0 !in the block, He pointed out-that corner lots I D:::: :require a 20' front yard setback and -10' side yard! !:::I
' !setback on the street, side. Fences over 42" high : ;:::I :cannot be built closer than 10' from the property : (:line on corner lots on the street side, and 20' - a;*@:
jfrorn the front yard property line; The main ;reasons for a setback along the street is a jsafety factor and the other is a visual feature. : ;A reversed corner lot should not be reduced. He i jexplained the safety features needed for cars ~back~ng into the street and the factors to be
!considered on flat land and on land with steep ;banks. He stated he felt that on back to back
I I 11 11
..
B
0
I
I. 0
.:
I l
0 I
;::;:
:::a:
D .,*:;o ;;'I:
... .- I $11; ::; i!:;;
;:;::
; ; ;.: ;
$1:;
0 0 I
'0
;::;I
I I I I I
I ,*::;
I ::i;: I :1*41
I ;::I:
l *t1;4 I ;::;:
I b :p:i
I I !;:@'
I ;:: I I /::: ;:
I I ;::;:
I
D
I
I *I b
1.1 I
2
Y
!
P
I
I. I. I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I - 5 -.
I
I I :"""""""""""""".""""""""""""""""""""~~""~~ corner lots on hillsides, fences 6' high or less ! : could be constructed along the street side prope'rk i ty line from a point to the rear of a 45" line ; ; passing through the intersection of the front and: I side setback line, such fence may extend to the ; : rear property line. Mr. Schoell suggested that a,h i ordinance be set up to allow the Building Inspec-: ; tor to issue permits for fences along the street : side that would not be detrimental as far as I I ; safety and visibility are concerned. This would i delete a lot of the needs for variances that work! ; a hardship on the property owners. If the Build-: ; ing inspector does not feel he should issue a i permit for the fence because of ingress or egress: ; to the garages, the property owners could still i i apply for a variance if they wished. 8
i The Commission agreed to have the Planning Direc-!
I : tor and Building Inspector work with the City : Attorney preparing a draft for.an amendment to : : the ordinance to permit the Building Inspector ! i to issue permits for fences when it does not hurt! : the health, safety and welfare of the people. I
I I
. I
(c) Front yard setbacks on Ocean Street, North i ; of Grand Avenue. The Building Inspector called ! attention to the setbacks on Ocean Street and ! i asked the Commission to consider them. He pointGd : out that most of them have 5' front yard setbacks! ; and there are people planning to develop some of; : the properties who will be 'coming in for variance$ in the near future. I
With the consent of .the Commission, the Chairman
! asked that a study be made and presented to the i Commission at the meeting on June 13, 1967. I
*-
I I
I I
I l
i (d) Industrial Zoning. The Planning Director I
:. reported that he was working on this and would complete it as soon as the sign matters are out Gf : the way.
; ADJOURNMENT: I
By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at 9:Ql i P. M. to Friday, May 19, 1967, at 2:nn P. M. in i : the Council Chambers to study Commercial Signs : i along the Freeways. I I
.I ': Respectfully submitted, I
; /F
: DOROTHY M. OSBURN I i Recording Secretary I
8 I
I D I I
I I I
I D
I
I ,p&+q,&&w I
& I
I
I I -&
#
I I
I I I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I I
I I
I
I
.I 8
I
I * *
I
I
I I
D I
I I
I
I
I
I
I I I
I I
I I I
I I
I I I n
r
~ - "