Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-09-10; Planning Commission; MinutesCITY OF CARLSBAD Minutes of: PLANNING COMMISSION Date of Meeting: September 10, 1980 Time of Meeting: 7;O0 P.M. Place of Meeting: City Council Chambers CALL TO ORDER was made by Chairman Schick at 7:00 P.M. ROLL CALL PRESENT: CHAIRMAN SCHICK COMMISSIONERS LARSON, LEEDS AND FRIESTEDT ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS ROMBOTIS, MARCUS AND JOSE Ex-Officio member Dan Hentschke, Assistant City Attorney, was also present. Staff members present were Hofman, Associate Planner, Engineer. Mike Holzmiller, Principal Planner, Bill and Richard Allen, Principal Civil AGENDA ITEM COMMUNICATIONS In response to inquiry by Chairman Schick, Mike Holzmiller indicated staff had received a letter from South Coast Asphalt Products Co., Inc., dated September 4, 1980 which would be presented to the Commission at the conclusion of the regular Agenda items. There were no additional communication items from the Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION PROCEDURE Chairman Schick explained the purview of the Planning Commission in its capacity as an advisory commission to the City Council and identified those matters delegated to the Planning Commission for a final decision. Referencing the overhead project displaying the outline, Chairman Schick explained the procedure observed by the Commission during public hearing items. Page 1 F CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. V 309, RUN20 - Request for a Variance to eliminate the required 10' rear yard setback in order to allow constructionof a storage building on the rear property line on property generally located on the south side of Elm Avenue, between Flashington Street and Carlsbad Boulevard in the C-2 Zone. Mike Holzmiller presented a statement ofthis matter, referencing the continuance from the August 27, 1980 meeting in order that staff might prepare and present an exhibit depicting the relationship between the elevation of the proposed building and the adjacent apartment building, which exhibit was included in the Commission-material. Due to an out-of-town appointment, the applicant was not present and had requested that the matter be continued for an additional two weeks. Mr. Holzmiller indicated, however, that a letter had been received on behalf of the property owners objecting to the Variance. Chairman Schick then reopened the public hearing at 7:08 P.M. and inquired if there were any persons present who desired to addresss the Commission regarding this matter. The Commission recognized Bea Nelson, Post Office Box 1121, Carlsbad, who indicated she was the Assistant Manager/Treasurer of the Monterey Homeowners' Association, and represented the group. Mrs. Nelson presented the Commission with signed statements from 29 of the 30 property owners protesting the Variance. Mrs. Nelson indicated they were concerned that a two-story building placed on the property line would obstruct the view from the apartments and expressed the opinion that the existing storage shed would suffice for the needs of the applicant. Chairman Schick then inquired as to the feelings of the property owners if the applicant were to construct his building within the setback requirements. Mrs. Nelson responded that any additional structure would reduce the necessary open space for residents in a commercial area and expressed the opinion tha,t the emotional well being of the residents would be jeopardized by any additional commercial'development. The Commission then recognized Patricia Joyce, 1754 E. Eldorado, Fallbrook, who expressed the opinion that a two-story building placed on the property line would have a detrimental effect on the property owners. Since no one else wished to speak, the public hearing was closed at 7:15 P.M. Page 2 - The Commission then directed this item continued to September 24, 1980. MOTION: SECOND: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: LARSON LEEDS CHAIRMAN SCHICK, COMMISSIONERS, LARSON, LEEDS AND FRIESTEDT None None COMMISSIONERS ROMBOTIS, MARCUS AND JOSE NEW PUBLI'C HEARINGS 2. CT 8'0~28,//P-llO', PULLMAN - Request for a 17 unit tentative tract map and condominium permit on property located on the east side of Gibraltar Street, La Costa. Mike Holzmiller presented a statement of the matter and outlined the major planning issues involved. The staff report was presented by Bill Hofman who, with the aid of wall map exhibits depicting the location and design of the project detailed the contents of the September 10, 1980 Memorandum to the Commission fromthe Planning Department. In response to Commission inquiry, Mr. Hofman explained the storage space would be provided in excess of the requirements, but would be separated between the garage, first floor and second floor of each unit. Furthermore, a condition would be added to require that the stairway depicted on the tentative map shall not encroach upon the existing drainage easement% Chairman Schick then opened the public hearing at 7:22P.M. and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Alex Friehauf, Architect, 11100 Roselle, San Diego, who indicated he was the project architect. Mr. Friehauf explained the units were townhomes and storage had been separated for the convenience of the homeowners. Mr. Friehauf expressed concurrence with conditions set forth by staff. Since no one else wished to speak, the public hearingwas closed at 7:24 P.M. Commissi‘oner Larson expressed some concern with the separation of storage, indicating that while storage requirements may be exceeded, that any one storage area -might not be large enough to accommodate large items of recreational equipment such as a bicycle and that perhaps the s-econd story storage area may not be convenient. Following discussion, all Commissioners agreed that separation of storage was an attractive feature and that second story storage would nbt be inconvenient in that first floor and garage storage would also be provided. Page 3 Based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, the Commission adopted the following Resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 1688, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A 17 UNIT CONDOMINIUM PERMIT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (CT 80-28/CP-110) ON PROPERTY GFNERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF GIBRALTAR STREET, LA COSTA. MOTION: SECOND: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: FRIESTEDT LARSON CHAIRMAN SCHICX, COMMISSIONERS LARSON, LEFDS AND FRIESTEDT None None COMMISSIONERS ROMBOTIS, MARCUS AND JOSE - Page 4 3. ZCA-123, MOBILE 'HOME PARK ZONE - To consider an amendment of the Zone Code to establish a mobile home park zone. Mike Holzmiller presented a statement of the matter, indicating that Bill Hofman, as the staff liaison to the mobile home park advisory committee would present the staff report. Mr. Hofman referenced the background of the matter and detailed the significant features of the ordinance, as summarized in the September 10, 1980 report to the Commission from the Planning Department. Mr. Hofman further pointed out that an additional exhibit (letter from Mary Casler, dated August 18, 1980) had been incorrectly labeled as Exhibit "C". References to Exhibit "C" were to the September 3, 1980 letter from Mrs. Casler which was included in Commission material, but not designated as an Exhibit. With regard to the suggested revisions set forth in Exhibit "C", Mr. Hofman indicated that rezoning of existing mobile home parks involved the public hearing process required by the State law. Furthermore, State law required a 10' minimum separation between a mobile home and an accessory building. In that the City cannot be less restrictive than the State, staff was not recommending that revision be made. With the exception of these two suggested revisions, staff was recommending all remaining revisions suggested by Mrs. Casler be included and incorporated in the final ordinance. In addition to the above revisions, Mr. Hofman indicated the Building Director had reviewed the ordinance and suggested some non-sub- stantial revisions, to wit: Section 21.37.828(a) -. Ac'ce.ssory Buildings - Add clarifying words and definitions to distinguish laundry facilities, recreation rooms, etc., from the small storage units commonly placed on mobile home sites. Section 21.37.100 - Development Standards - Add subsection requiring all new mobile homes to bear an insignia evidencing approval of the structure by the State for placement in a mobile home park. Section 21.3.7.'10'0'('7) - Delete the word "accessory" to indicate minimum separation between mobile homes or between a home and a building. Add the word "not" between the words shall and be in the last sentence. Section 21. 3.7.'10-O'('l0) - Reword to "the occupied area of the mobile home, as defined in the State Mobile Home Park Act, and accessory structures shall not cover more that 75% of the mobile home site- (For purposes of complying with State law). Section 2'1:37‘.10'0(;12A) - Add clarification to reflect that State law requires a 32' minimum if parking is allowed on one side. 40' is required to allow parking on both sides. Section 2‘1.37‘.110 Removal of Mobile Home Park Zone, Subsection (1) Delete the words "shall be made." Commissioner Friestedt inquired if the patio cover or carport were excepted as part of the mobile home unit, what would govern or control the size or location of carports or covered patios. If a mobile home unit itself occupied 75% of the lot, would a covered patio or carport be precluded. Mr. Hofman responded that the ordinance intended that the minimum lot size would allow location of a mobile home unit with an attached carport to meet not only the setback requirements, but also the building coverage requirement maximum of 75%. Chairman Schick opened the public hearing at 7:48 P.M. and extended the invitation to speak. Commission recognized Joe Bastone, 7225 San Lucas, Lake Shore Gardens Mobile Home Park, Carlsbad. Mr. Bastone requested additional clarification with regard to computation of the 75% maximum building coverage and whether the minimum lot size would be 3500 or 370Q square feet. Mr. Hofman responded that for the purposes of calculating the separation of buildings, the carport structures, awnings, etc. would not be included, In the computation of lot coverage (that area that can be built upon), any coveraged area would be included. The Assistant City Attorney added that *'occupied space" as defined by State law, included any covered structure. In response to inquiry re minimum lot size, staff indicated the 3500 square foot figure was appropriate. Mr. Bastone then referenced his letter to the Planning Department of August 13, 1980 outling requested revisions, expressing the opinion the needs of mobile home park residents would not be met without the inclusion and incorporation thereof. Specifically, the ordinance as proposed without any amendments would not provide an incentive for development of mobile home parks for the reasons that lot size is too large, approval by all governmental agencies would be required, parking requirements were too great - design criteria and development standards were too restrictive to induce development of mobile home parks at a cost which would be feasible for those persons for whom a mobile home would be attractive. Mr. Bastone expressed further concerns that the requirements for conformance of existing parks to the development standards contained in the ordinance would result in two of the three currently existing parks being completely phased out. In response to specific inquiry by Chairman Schick, Mr. Bastone indicated he represented 7P8thrs of the interested parties and the parks represented concurred with the suggested revisions of Mrs. Casler, in that there was some divergence in the revisions contained in Mr. Bastone's letter. Page 6 - The Commission recognized R. A. Swanson, who indicated he was a member of the advisory committee and represented GSMOL Ranch0 Carlsbad Park. For the record, Mr. Swanson indicated that Mr. Bastone did not represent Ranch0 Carlsbad with regard to any representations made. Mr. Swanson expressed approval of the proposed ordinance, with revisions recommended by Mrs. Casler and those revisions contained in the August 19, 1980 letter to Mrs. Casler from Mr. Swanson and Messrs. Bank and Mozier -- member and alternate member, respectively, of the advisory committee. Mr. Swanson then requested clarification of the definition of accessory buildings. Mr. Hofman responded the definition as earlier articulated in the staff report was suggested by the Building Director for the purpose of distinguishing recreational rooms, laundry rooms, etc. from other small storage buildings commonly located on a mobile home lot. .- Mr. Swanson indicated some of the buildings attached to the basic unit, such as a screeened-in room at the rear of the driveway portion of a home, were considered by mobile home park residents to be an accessory building. In view of the requirement for 10' separation between residences, Mr. Swanson indicated that maximum use of a mobile home facility would not fit. Mr. Swanson suggested the definition of the buildings which should be 10' feet apart should be the main mobile home structure, not added porches, shade covers or added screen rooms. Mr. Hofman responded that any such structure, when attached to the basic mobile home unit would not be considered an accessory building. Secondly, those types of add-ons, as suggested would not be included when measuring distances between buildings. With the Assistant City Attorney illustrating at the blackboard, Mr. Swanson referenced an example relative to the maximum lot coverage of 75% with a minimum lot size, indicating that in order to have all facilities desired on a 50' lot and have those facilities fall within the 75% maximum coverage and required setbacks, same would have to be exceeded. Therefore, Mr. Swanson suggested the 75% maximum be eliminated. Mr. Hofman responded that the maximum lot coverage for a minimum lot would adequately accommodate a mobile home set up, including carport, awnings, etc, although not necessarily the largest design available, which, presumable, would be placed on larger lots. Mr. Hofman further reiterated the 75% figure was a State law and could not be foregone. Page 7 In an effort to encourage the development of mobile home parks, Mr. Swanson suggested: (a) narrower street width, prohibiting street parking and providing visitor parking (b) 1 visitor parking space for every 10 lots and (c) computing parking for laundry and recreation rooms combined on the basis of 1 space for every 10 lots, but reducing same in the event of a wider street, if required. In conclusion, Mr. Swanson requested that the area prescribed for relocation in the event of any conversion specify that "reasonably equitable amenities" be provided. Chairman Schick then inquired if Joe Bastone concurred with the statements made by 'Mr. Swanson. Mr. Bastone acknowledged concurrenced. The Commission then recognized Jack Swern, 7217 San Lucas, Carlsbad who indicated, for the benefit of those present in the audience most of whom were not familiar with the requested changes, that he desired to address the ordinance on a page-by-page basis. Mr. Swern inquired of the Assistant City Attorney as to the legal requirements for notice and public hearing prior to including existing mobile home parks under the ordinance. Mr, Swern indicated he desired that at the time the proposed ordinance was introduced that all existing mobile home parks be under the protection of same. Mr? Hentschke indicated the ordinance as proposed was intended to apply to existing mobile home parks. However, because of the legal requirements for'notice and public hearings, rezoning of existing parks can not take place until such hearings. Mr. Hentschke indicated these would be initiated following introduction of the ordinance by the City Council. Additional changes requested by Mr. Swern were: Page 6, subsection (16) deletion of the words, "landscaping", "or", and "both". Otherwise, Mr? Swern concurred with the changes recommended by Mary Casler, The Commission then recognized Jack Robinson, who indicated he was the owner of Lanakai Mobile Home Park, but resided in Los Angeles. Mr, Robinson expressed the opinion that the ordinance asoriginally proposed, without the changes recommended and discussed, would not encourage and provide for the development of mobile home parks., Mr. Robinson further expressed his philosophy that the Commission must deal with matters of economic concern as well as zoni.ng and land use,matters in order to meet the challenge of providing affordable housing for people in the future. Page 8 -. - Mr. Robinson concluded by presenting a petition signed by residents of the Lanikai Lane Mobile Home Park requested changes in the proposed ordinance and approval thereof by the Commission. There being no further desire to address the Commission, Chairman Schick closed the public hearing at 9:00 P.M. Following brief discussion, the Commission adopted the following Resolution based on the findings contained therein: RESOLUTION NO. 1690, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A ZONE CODE AMENDMENT (ZCA-123) TO TITLE 21 TO ESTABLISH A MOBILEHOME PARK ZONE, AND AMENDING CHAPTER 21.42, CONDITIONAL USES, TO DELETE MOBILEHOMES FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CHAPTER, with the changes recommended by staff as set forth in the letter from Mary Casler, and certain changes suggested by Robert Swanson as set forth in his letters attached to the staff report. MOTION: FRIESTEDT SECOND: LARSON AYES: CHAIRMAN SCHICK, COMMISSIONERS FRIESTEDT, LARSON AND LEEDS NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS ROMBOTIS, MARCUS AND JOSE 4. CUP-181, CUP-182, V-310 and SDP-80-11 - ECKE (PEA SOUP ANDERSEN'S) Request for: Two conditional use permits to allow the operation of a service station and to permit liquor service and a cocktail lounge: a Variance to the 35' height limitation to construct a 82+ windmill tower and a Site Development Plan for a Pea Soup Anderson restaurant facility, a 150 unit motel complex, and a retail convenience store on property generally located on the north side of Palomar Airport Road, between Interstate 5 and Paseo de1 Norte in the C-2-Q Zone. Mike Holzmiller indicated this item was a companion matter to Item No. 5 under New Discussion Items. Mr. Holzmiller presented a statement of the matters indicating that they would be presented concurrently and explaining the content of each application. The staff report was presented by Bill Hofman who, with the aid of exhibits, described the project location as to its relation to I-5, Palomar Airport Road and Paseo de1 Norte, location of individual development within the project, and the vehicular and pedestrian access. With regard to vehicular access, Mr. Hofman explained staff concerns and illustrated a revised site plan showing access to and from the project, designed as a compromise to allay staff concrens, yet meet the needs of the applicant. Staff's most signi- ficant concern was access onto Palomar Airport Road. Although staff is recommending a compromise solution to allow a right turn out only, the City's traffic engineer has indicated that there are potential hazards with this situation. Page 9 Mr. Hofman also indicated concerns with pedestrian circulation. Further, staff was recommending denial of the variance because 3 of the mandatory findings could not be made. Chairman Schick then opened the public hearing at 9:50 P.M. and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Ken Kruger, project architect, located in Santa Barbara California. Mr. Kruger explained the windmill was functional as well as aesthetic, being an energy-producing structure. Mr. Kruger also presented slides illustrating existing Pea Soup Andersen's travel complex and emphasized the windmill is part of the total design and a trademark. Also distributed were copies of the September 10, 1980 letter from San Diego Gas & Electric Company regarding their support of the concept of wind generation resulting from the windmill. Mr. Kruger also objected to the condition regarding the requirement for funding a feasibility study re widening of Palomar Airport Bridge. The Commission then recognized Mr. Salter, President of Wind Power Systems, a San Diego based firm involved in the fundamentals of parallel generation. In that energy conservation and energy generation by ultimate means is mandated in this area, the proposed windmill is a unique structure, serving both as a viable energy source and as an educational tool on the fundamentals of parallel generation. Mr. Salter concluded the height of the tower was essential in this kind of energy was extremely integrity of the building depends upon the uniform and non- turbulent flow of air. The Commission then recognized Tim O'Healy, Secretary/Treasure of Pea Soup Andersens. Mr. O'Healy explained the company's basic philosophy of providing a full travel service complex, with all amenities associated with the company. Mr. O'Healy set forth the many attractive benefits which will accrue to the City of Carlsbad as a result of the location of Pea Soup Andersens. However, the issue of the windmill, as an established trademark of Pea Soup Andersens, could not be compromised. Mr. O'Healy distributed examples of other towers and concluded the windmill as designed by the company was essential to the overall complex. Also reiterated were concerns with Condition No. 26 requiring the traffic study. The Commission then recognized Don Brown, Executive Vice-President of the Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce, who spoke favorably of this project. Chairman Schick then closed the public hearing at lo:55 P.M. Page 10 - Commission gave consideration to elimination of Condition No. 26. Richard Allen, Principal Civil Engineer indicated that if the State could be pursuaded to fund the study, as they had originally agreed, it would provide the information necessary to make a determination with regard to traffic, access and circulation. Mr. Allen further indicated if the bridge were widened and when the signals installed, the situation would be "liveable." Tim O'Healy - Offered to pay for traffic study (Condition #36) if he is allowed to have access on Palomar Airport Road. Ed Shick - Said he would reconsider position if a traffic study r was initiated. Asked if $10,000 is enough to get study completed. Richard Allen - Stated he was not sure, however, it will get study started. Tiiti O'Healy - Stated time is of essence. Wanted a decision tonight. Eric Larson - Suggested modification of Condition # 32 to require signing to I-5 south. Jon Freistedt r Asked about traffic study. Should it be required? Ed Shick - Thought widening of Palomar Airport Road bridge would alleviate situation and thus no study would be required. Richard Allen - Concurred with Ed Shick. Based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, the Commission adopted the following Resolutions: RESOLUTION NO. 1691, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATION ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PASEO DEL NORTE AND PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, ADJACENT TO I-5 (CUP-181) RESOLUTION NO. 1692, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN CONJUNCTION WITH TWO RESTAURANTS AND A CONVENIENCE STORE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PASEO DEL NORTE AND PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, ADJACENT TO INTERSTATE 5 (CUP-1821 RESOLUTION NO. 1694, APPROVING A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SDP-80-11) FOR A 15Q UNIT MOTEL, 2 RESTAURANTS, GASOLINE STATION, CONVENIENCE STORE AND RELATED COMMERCIAL SHOPS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PALGMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND PASEO DEL NORTE, ADJACENT TO INTERSTATE 5, with the addition to Condition No. 32 to add signing to direct traffic to I-5. Page 11 ,- MOTION: SECOND: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: LARSON LEEDS CHARIMAN SCHICK, COMMISSIONERS LARSON, FRIESTEDT AND LEEDS None None COMMISSIONERS ROMBOTIS, MARCUS AND JOSE Based on the findings, the Commission adopted the following Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 1693, DENYING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A BUILDING (WINDMILL TOWER) TO EXCEED THE 35 FEET HEIGHT RESTRICTION OF THE C-T ZONE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND PASEO DEL NORTE (V-3101, approving, however, the concept of the windmill and directing staff to prepare necessary documents to initiate appropriate amendments to provide for same. MOTION: SECOND: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: LARSON FRIESTEDT CHAIRMAN SCHICK, COMMISSIONERS LARSON, FRIESTEDT AND LARSON None None COMMISSIONERS ROMBOTIS, MARCUS AND JOSE NEW DISCUSSION ITEMS 6. SDP 80-9, BEVERLY HILLS - Request for a savings and Loan building on the northeast corner of El Camino Real and Alga Road in the C-l-Q Zone. Mike Holzmiller presented a statement of the matter and Bill Hofman presented the staff report recommending a condition to re-align the pedestrian walkway from El Camino Real to a position further north. Based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, the Commission adopted the following Resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 1698, APPROVING A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SDP 80-9) FOR A SAVINGS AND LOAN OFFICE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF EL CAMINO REAL AND ALGA ROAD. MOTION: SECOND: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: LARSON FRIESTEDT CHAIRMAN SCHICK, COMMISIONERS LARSON, LEEDS AND FRIESTEDT None None COMMISSIONERS ROMBOTIS, MARCUS AND JOSE - 7. PCD-24, MOREY - Request FOR A Planning Commission Determination to construct a 10' fence on the north side of Acuna Court east of El Fuerte Street in the P-C Zone. A staff report was presented by Mike Holzmiller with the aid of transparencies. Page 12 Mike Holzmiller indicated staff was recommending the additicn of a condition to restrict the hours during which the lighting may be operated in order to shelter adjacent homes. The applicant had expressed his concurrence. Based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, the Commission adopted the following Resolution; RESOLUTION NO. 1695, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION OF A 10' FENCE TO SURROUND A TENNIS COURT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ACUNA COURT EAST OF EL FUERTE STREET. PCD-24, with an additional condition as articulated by staff. MOTION: SECOND: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: FRIESTEDT LEEDS CHAIRMAN SCHICK, COMMISSIONERS FRIESTEDT, LEEDS AND LARSON None None COMMISSIONERS JOSE, MARCUS AND ROMBOTIS 8. REVISED PLANNING FEES The commission indicated their review of the September 10, 1980 Planning Fees Report, expressed their approval of same and directed the matter forwarded to the City Council for approval. MOTION: SECOND: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: LARSON LEEDS CHAIRMAN SCHICK, COMMISSIONERS LARSON, LEEDS AND FRIESTEDT None None COMMISSIONERS ROMBOTIS, MARCUS AND JOSE 9. BUILDING RELOCATION - PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT - Request to move a building from Perenne Street to 3055 Levante Drive at the Levante School/Park Site. With the aid of a location map on the overhead projector, Mike Holzmiller presented a statement of the matter. The Commission approved the proposed relocation, subject to the condition that all rules and regulations of the Carlsbad Municipal Code regarding the moving of a structure shall be complied with. MOTION: SECOND: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: LARSON LEEDS CHAIRMAN SCHICK, COMMISSIONERS LARSON, LEEDS AND FRIESTEDT None None COMMISSIONERS ROMBOTIS, MARCUS AND JOSE Page 13 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 10. RESOLUTION NO. 1676, ZC-214, SUDAJ!J INTERIOR MISSION Mike Holzmiller referenced the continuance of this item from prior meetings, indicating if the Commission felt comfortable in approving the Resolution, same could be accomplished with the record reflecting votes on adoption were not the same as those directing preparation of the document. Based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, the Commission adopted the following Resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 1676, APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE FROM L-C TO R-1-10,000-Q ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON WEST SIDE OF LAUREL TREE ROAD, SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD. (ZC-214) MOTION: SECOND: AYES: FRIESTEDT LEEDS CHAIRMAN SCHICK, COMMISSIONERS LARSON, LEEDS AND FRIESTEDT INFORMATION ITEM Bill Hofman referenced the September 4, 1980 letter from South Coast Asphalt Products Co., Inc. regarding extension of their operating times. He also indicated that no complaints have been received by the Planning Department. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Minutes of MOTION: SECOND: AYES: The Minutes of the meetings of August 13, 1980 and August 27, the July 23, 1980 meeting were approved as presented. LARSON LEEDS CHAIRMAN SCHICK, COMISSIONERS LARSON, LEEDS AND FRIESTEDT. 1980 were continued to the next meeting. ADJOURNMENT By proper motion, the Commission adjourned at 11:47 P.M. to Tuesday, September 16, 1980 at 8:00 P.M. in the St. Elizabeth Seton Church in La Costa for a Special Meeting to conduct a notice public hearing on the revised La Costa Master Plan. Respectfully submitted, JAMES C. HAGAMAN, Secretary to the Planning Commission Page 14