HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-03-25; Planning Commission; MinutesMEETING OF: PLANNING COMMISSION
DATE OF MEETING: March 25, 1981
TIME OF,MEETING: 7:OO P.M.
PLACE OF MEETING: Council Chambers s
CALL TO ORDER was made by Chairman Marcus at 7:03 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present - Chairman Marcus, Commissioners Rombotis, Leeds,
Larson, Friestedt, L'Heureux, and Jose.
Ex-Officio member Dan Hentschke, Assistant City Attorney, was
also present.
Staff members present were:
Mike Holzmiller, Principal Planner
Bill Hofman, Associate Planner
Richard Allen, Principal Civil Engineer
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Chairman Marcus.
AGENDA ITEM COMMUNICATIONS
Chairman Marcus indicated she had received three letters in
favor of the Mola Development project, and would submit same
for the record.
On Item No. 5, Mola Development Corp., Chairman Marcus
indicated the applicant has requested a continuance for two
weeks.
The Commission continued this item to the regular meeting of
Wednesday, April 8, 1981.
INFORMATION ITEMS
Mike Holzmiller requested the Commission determine a date for
the next General Plan Amendment hearings.
Following discussion, the concensus of the Commission was to
set the date for Thursday, May 14, 1981, in the afternoon.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. ZC-223/SDP 80-13/CUP-186, VALLAS. Request for a zone
change from L-C to CT-Q, a Site Development Plan for a
recreational/commercial development, and a conditional
use permit to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages on
property located on the southwest corner of Palomar
Airport Road and El Camino Real.
The staff report was presented by Mike Holzmiller, essentially
as contained in the Statement of the Matter. He explained
that there were three issues that were raised at the previous
public hearing on this item; the need for a driveway on
Palomar Airport Road to make it convenient for vehicles to
go north from the site, the requirement for an equestrian
easement which the County was objecting to, and the require-
ment for improvement o‘f Palomar Airport Road along the entire
frontage of the site, which the applicant was objecting to.
Mike Holzmiller indicated Bill Hofman would address the first
two issues, and Richard Allen would address the third issue.
OMMISSIONERS ‘;
Marcus
Rombotis
Leeds
Larson
Friestedt
L'Heureux
Jose
PLANNING COMMISSION March 25, 1981
.
Page 2
Bill Hofman indicated there were a couple corrections to
Resolution No. 1783:
Condition No. 19 should read, "A median island shall be
constructed along El Camino Real for the entire length of the
property, which shall allow left turn movements for traffic
proceeding north on El Camino Real into the site, however,
which shall prohibit left turn movements out of the site."
Condition No. 20 should read, "The applicant shall construct
half street improvements including a median island along the
project frontages on Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real
to City Standards prior to the occupancy of any buildings."
Due to the fact that the applicant has indicated that he is
no longer proposing a heliport, Conditions No. 21 and 22
should.be deleted.
Bill Hofman continued the staff report, with respect to the
driveway access and the equestrian easement, essentially as
contained in the Statement of the Matter. He pointed out as
clarification of the staff report, Mr. Safford, Assistant
Director of Airports, has indicated that the FAA inspector
who was contacted by Staff does not.have jurisdiction over
land use decisions, in and around the airport, and this
responsibility is with the FAA district office in Los Angeles.
Mr. Safford has written a letter requesting their input, and
has not yet received a response.
Mr. Hofman explained four alternatives for the Commission's
consideration: To require the easement along the north
property line as recommended in the Resolution, to direct
Staff to consider other trail alignments through-the park,
to locate the trail along the south side of the subject site
which would then connect to the El Camisb Real and.Palomar
Airport Road intersection, or not require anequestrian .
easement at all.
From a planning point of view, Staff believes a realignment
of the trail system to Camino Vida Roble makes the most sense*
However, until it is known whether such a trail would be
possible, given the existing development, Staff is recommendir
leaving the condition as it is stated in the Resolution, and
that the Commission direct Staff to study an ulterior
alignment.
Richard Allen concluded the staff report, with respect to the
improvements on Palomar Airport Road. He explained they
included a condition that requires the developer to install
half street improvements along the entire project frontage,
which is approximately 25 feet of pavement.
Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 7:24 P.&l*, and
extended the invitation to speak.
The Commission recognized Mr. Phil Safford, Assistant Director
of Airports, County of San Diego, 2198 Palomar Airport Road.
With the aid of wall exhibits, Mr. Safford showed the lease
parcels on the airport, the clear zone, and the area referred
to in this project. .
With respect toithe equestrian easement, Mr. Safford explained
his position remains unchanged. He further explained the
conflicts between an equestrian trail and aircraft crossing
over that area, and the potential problems between an
equestrian trail and a driving range.
OMMISSIONERS
-
PLANNING COMMISSTON March 25, 1981
s
Page 3
Commissioner LlHeureux expressed concern over the airportrs
position, if the applicanttlessee were to leave. Mr, Safford
responded he was not in a position to answer the question
without checking further.
Bill Hofman used the General Plan Map to show the potential
location of an equestrian trail system, stating it would not
have to cross the approach pattern of the airport, but could
go south through the open space corridor.
The Commission recognizedMr. Ted Vallas, developer of the
property. Mr. Vallas expressed concern over Condition No.
27 of Resolution No. 1783, which requests a review after one
year. Bill Hofman explained that the condition allows a
review of the permit, to insure there are no traffic or other
operational problems, and is a standard condition for this
type of use.
Mr. Vallas continued to explain preparations for developing
the property, and the costs involved. He also requested that
they not improve Palomar Airport Road, for its entire length
up front, but instead, only improve the portion from the
proposed driveway to the intersection, and bond or agree to
improve in the future the rest of Palomar Airport Road, He
explained this would save approximately $150,000. Mr. ,Valla:
further requested that if they did post a bond for future
improvement, some consideration be given for changing the use
instead of a greenbelt, as he does not feel that a golf
course alone justifies the improvements on Palomar Airport Rd
Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman
Marcus closed the public hearing at 7:42 P,M.
For clarification purposes, Bill Hofman pointed out that, witl
respect to the.equestrian easement, Staff's intention is to
obtain the easement only, and not require the improvement of
the equestrian trail.
Following Commission discussion relative to the driveway
access on Palomar Airport ,Road, the equestrian easement, and
improvements on Palomar Airport Road, the Commission approved
the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director,
and adopted the following Resolutions: Nos. 1782, recommendi]
approval of ZC-223 to the City Council; and 1783 and 1784
approving SDP-80-13 and CUP-186, based on the findings and
subject to the conditions contained therein; with the
addition of the following:
That Conditions No. 19 and 20 of Resolution No. 1783 be rem
vised as suggested by Staff, and Conditions No. 21' and 22 be
deleted; That a 10 foot easement be required for the
equestrian trail on the south and east sides of the property;
That the applicant install the improvements on Palomar Airpori
Road, east of the driveway to El Camino Real; That Staff
negotiate a future street agreement with the County for those improvements west of the driveway; and That Staff study
alternative equestrian trail easement routes through the
business park, with the hope of connecting to Camino Vida
Roble.
RESOLUTION NO. 1782, APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE FROM L-C
(LIMITED COMMERCIAL). TO CT-Q (TOURIST COMMERCIAL WITH Q-OVER
LAY) ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
EL CAMINO REAL AND PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD.
\ i :OMMISSIONERS
Marcus
Rombotis
Leeds
Larson
Friestedt .
L'Heureux
Jose
PLANNING COMMISSION
March 25, 1981
w
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. 1783, APPROVING A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO
DEVELOP A RFCREATTONAL COMMERCIAL FACILliTY TO INCLUDE A %IOTEL,
RESTAURANT, OLYMPTC GOLF COURSE, CLUB HOUSE, HELTPORT, TENNIS
COURTS AND RACQUETBALL COURTS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EL CAMINO REAL AND PALOMAR AIRPORT #RD.
RESOLUTTON NO. 1784, APPROVING A CONDITTONAL USE PERMIT TO
ALLOW THE SALE AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EL
CAMINO REAL AND PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD.
Staff indicated they would re-word Condition No, 27 of
Resolution No. 1783, relating to a one year review, to clarify
that its' purpose is for review of operational aspects only.
2. ETR 80-4/ZC-226)CT 80-24/CP-102, POINT SAN MALO.
Request for approval of a zone change from R-3 and R-4
to RD-M and a tentative subdivision map and a condo-
minium permit to develop 40 units on the north side of
Ocean Street between the AT&SF Railroad and the Pacific
Ocean.
Chairman Marcus requested approval of the Commission to hear
this item as the last item on the agenda, due to the nature
of same. The Commission concurred.
NEW PUBLXC HEARINGS:
3. CUP-197, KAHNAMOUX. Request for a conditional use
permit to allow a coin-operated arcade in an existing
building, located at the southeast corner of Elm Avenue
and State Street in the C-2 zone. -
With the aid of the overhead projector, the staff report was
presented by Mike Holzmiller, essentially as contained'in the
Statement of the Matter. He pointed out that Staff is not .
objecting to this type of use, but only to the acceptability
of this location. He also indicated that the Planning
Department received a petition with 97 signatures, mostly
comprised of residents or business owners of the area,
objecting to the approval of the conditional use permit.
Commissioner L'Heureux inquired as to the Redevelopment
Committee's position on the ,matter. Mike Holzmiller explained
that the Committee has reviewed it, and had 'a lengthy hearing
on it, and they felt that an arcade such as this type was not
an improper use for the redevelopment area, but this particu-
lar location did not appear to be adequate.
Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 8:13 P.M,, and
extended the invitation to speak,
The Commission recognized Mr. Alex Kahnamoui, the applicant,
Mr. Kahnamoui addressed security, hours of operation, and
briefly some of the rules and regulations that would be
imposed on the arcade, a .copy of which was distributed to the
Commission. With regard to parking, Mr. Kahnamoui responded
that the majority of his customers will be young children
on bicycles, or being dropped off by their parents.
The Commission recogniied Mr. Elmer Anderson, who explained
he is the owner of the lots to the rear of the proposed
arcade, and spoke in opposition, due to the parking problems
in the alley behind the subject site.
PLANNTNG COMMXSSION March 25. 1981
. .#
\ t Paae 5 COMMISSIONERS
The Commission recognized Matt Fiamengo, owner of Carlsbad
Camera Inc., 505 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad; who spoke in opposition
to the project. He explained he had received information from
Paul Childers of the Carlsbad Police Department, that there
had been an arcade on State Street at one time, and the
police department had a great deal of trouble with same, He
also expressed concern over the fact that there is a liquor
store so close to the proposed arcade.
The Commission recognized.Nancy Claire, 2082 Avenue of the
Trees, Carlsbad, who indicated she has had seven amusement
centers all over California. Ms. Claire added she does not
feel this is the proper area for this type of business in the
redevelopment area.
The Commission recognized Bill Ryburn, 457 Elm Avenue,
Carlsbad, who spoke in opposition to the project. He
emphasized that parking is a big problem in the downtown area,
and addressed the current trash and litter problem, and feels
that a use such as an arcade would only compound the problems.
The Commission recognized Mr. Harold Clark, 824 Caminito De1
Reposo, Carlsbad; owner of The Pantique, located at 2906 State
Street. Mr. Clark stated he is opposed to the granting of
this CUP, and stated he agreed with the comments of Mr. Bill
Ryburn. He further indicated he does not agree with the
position of-the Redevelopment Commission that another location
in the redevelopment area would be suitable for this operation
He suggested moving it out to the Plaza.
The Commission recognized Mr. Jerry Peters, owner of the
property, who explained.that the actual applicant is the
lessee. Mr. Peters requested to see the petition submitted
to the Commission, and briefly reviewe.d same. He addressed
the concerns of Staff, relative to compatibility to the area,
pedestrian safety; and responded that he does not believe
this type of operation will create any more problems than
the other operations in the area. He stated the traffic
signal at Elm and State offers a safe pedestrian route for
the young adults that would-frequent the arcade, Tn response
to parking, he explained they have ten parking spaces, the
requirement being 11. He added that the current spaces are
set up for large vehicles, and suggested re-striping them for
small vehicles, to meet the requirements. He emphasized'that
most of the customers of the arcade would not be coming in
vehicles,
Mr. Peters continued that he has visited the applicant's
arcade in Pacific Beach on several occasions, and found that
it is an extremely orderly situation, both in the day and
night hours; and expressed willingness to respond to any
questions.
The Commission recognized Helen Kiethe, 3080 State Street,
Carlsbad. Ms. Kiethe explained she is in agreement with
Mr. Ryburn and Mr. Anderson, but she is not against the
arcade if it was larger, and in an appropriate location.
The Commission recognized Jack Kahnamoui, co-applicant, who
reiterated the comments made by his partner, Alex Kahnamoui.
Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman
Marcus closed the public hearing at 8:43 P.M.
PLANNING COMMISSION .
March 25, 1981 Page 6
Following discussion, the concensus of the Commission was that
this was not the proper location for this type of use.
The Commission adopted the following Resolution, denying
CUP-197, based on the findings contained therein:
RESOLUTTON NO. 1788, DENYING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
ALLOW A COIN-OPERATED ARCADE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ELM AVENUE AND STATE STREET.
RECESS
Chairman Marcus called a recess at 8~47 P.M., and the
Commission reconvened at 9:Ol P.M., with all members present.
4. CT 81-4/CP-150, PACIFTC SHORES. Request for a 14 unit
tentative map and condominium permit on property
located on the west side of Jefferson Street, over-
looking Buena Vista Lagoon.
The staff report was presented by Bill Hofman, essentially as
contained in the Statement of the Matter: with Mike Holzmiller
using wall exhibits to point out the project design and
location.
With regard to the requirement of a pedestrian path along
the shore of the lagoon, Commissioner 3ose inquired how close
the six foot wall would be to the shoreline. Bill Hofman
responded that there is a large distance from the property
line to the shoreline, so it would not preclude public passage
along the shoreline of the lagoon; and explained the reason
for the wall is, at the'request of the Department of Fish and
Game, to restrict access to the lagoon itself through the
property.
Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 9:05 P.M., and
extended the invitation to speak.
The Commission recoynized Mr. John Maple,-design architect
for the project, who gave some background on the project.
He added they have addressed the environmental concerns, and
have attempted to provide a view corridor to minimize view
reductions,
In response to query as to the distance between the wall and
the shoreline, Mr. Maple explained that there is a 20 foot
setback , .and the average distance at one point is 120 feet
from the water line, and at another is 85 feet. He stated
they would like to develop a natural landscape solution, or
a small fence, which would discourage access, and are
negotiating this with Staff at the present time.
The Commission recognized Glenn Castens, 2424 Jefferson Street
Carlsbad; who spoke in opposition to the project. He
circulated pictures to the Commission of the view from his
residence. He stated he is also representing Mr. John
Sasser, who was unable to attend as he has just returned home
from the hospital. He addressed the traffic situation in the
area, and the odor problem that currently exists.
Mr. Castens added th.at.the project would take approximately
70 percent of his view away, and requested the Commission
continue this project, to allow him to obtain signatures and
input from others that may be affected by this project.
\ i OMMISSIONERS
Marcus
Rombotis
Leeds
Larson
Friestedt
L'Heureux
Jose
PLANNING COMMTSSTON March 25, 1981
.
Page 7
The Commission recognized Bill Pinder, 2755 Jefferson Street,
Carlsbad; President of the Homeowners Association of
Sanctuary Condominiums. Mr. Pinder responded to the odor
problem referred to by Mr. Castens, and explained they have a
system that operates automatically 24 hours a day, and there'
is no holding tank. He further indicated he was in favor
of the project, and feels it is compatible with surrounding
projects.
Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman
Marcus closed the public hearing at 9:24 P.M.
The Commission approved the conditional negative declaration
issued by the Planning Director, and adopted the following
Resolution, recommending approval of CT 81-4/CP-150, to the
City Council based on the findings and subject to the
conditions contained therein:
RESOLUTTON NO. 1789, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR A FOURTEEN
UNIT CONDOMTNIUM PROJECT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE
WEST SIDE OF JEFFERSON AVENUE.
5. CT 81-3/CP-149, MOLA DEVELOPMENT CORP. Request for an
80 unit tentative tract map and condominium permit to
convert an existing apartment project to condominiums
on the east side of El Camino Real, south of Swallow
Lane in the RD-M(Q) zone.
As indicated earlier in the meeting, this item was continued
to the regular meeting of Wednesday, April 8, 1981, at the
request of the applicant.
CONTINUED NEW DISCUSSION:
6. MS-505, AVTS/O'DAY. Request for a minor subdivision
creating three lots one of which would be a panhandle.
lot on property generally located on the east side of
Arland Road between Buena Vista Avenue and Highland
Drive in the R-1-7500 zone.
The staff report was presented by Mike Holzmiller, essentially
as contained in the statement of the matter of February 25,
1981; with Bill Hofman using wall exhibits to show the project
location. As indicated at the previous meeting, the applicant
has been ill and in the hospital; however, they did have an
engineer representing them, and Staff has not heard from the
engineer since the original problems were brought up.
The Commission adopted the following Resolution, denying
MS-505, based on the findings and subject to the conditions
contained.therein:
RESOLUTION NO. 1759, DENYTNG THE CREATION OF ONE PANHANDLE LOT
AS PART OF A MINOR SUBDTVCSTON LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
ARLAND ROAD IN THE R-1-7500 ZONE.
NEW DISCUSSION ITEMS:
7. CT 80-44/CUP-190, SUDAN INTERIOR MISSION. Request for a
modification in the grading of a previously approved
tentative tract map and conditional use permit on
property generally located southwest of the intersection
of Palomar Airport Road and Laurel Tree Road in the
R-l-10,000(Q) zone.
Mike Holzmiller indicated that was an information item, and
was a previously approved conditional use permit and tract map
./
\ t OMMISSIONERS
Marcus
Rombotis
Leeds
Larson
Friestedt
L'Heureux
Jose
Marcus
Rombotis
Leeds
Larson
Friestedt
L'Heureux
Jose
.
-
. r PLANNTNG COMMTSSION
March 25, 1981 Page 8
He further explained that the applicant wants to amend the
conditional use permit in the future to add some additional
units to the property, which would be permitted by the zoning
and General Plan. However, at this time with Phase $, they
wanted to proceed with the grading on the entire site.' He
indicated Staff has no problem with this, as it is just the
grading, and the applicant realizes he would have to come back
in for an amendment to the conditional use permit for
additional units.
The Commission agreed to allow the applicant to grade for the
construction of five additional duplexes, but directed the
applicant be informed he must amend CT 80-44/CUP-190 to
construct any additional buildings.
8. MS-521, SANGER. Request for approval of a minor
subdivision to create two lots, one of which is a
panhandle lot, on the southeast corner of Adams Street
and Cape Aire Lane in the R-1-7500 zone.
With the aid of the overhead projector, the staff report was
presented by Bill Hofman, essentially as contained in the
Statemen& of the -Matter.
The Commission adopted the following Resolution, recommending
approva.1 of MS-521, based on the findings and subject to the
conditions contained thereih:
RESOLUTION NO. 1786, APPROVING THE CREATION-OF ONE PANHANDLE
LOT AS PART OF A MliNOR SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF ADAMS STREET AND CAPE AIRE LANE IN THE R-1-7500 ZONE
0FF:AGENDA ITEM - General Plan Conformity
Mike Holzmiller explained this item is a conformity determin-
ation with the Genera.1 Plan, for a portion of Jefferson Street
that is going to be vacated; however, Staff has no formal
staff report.
The Commission found this item to be in conformity with the
General Plan.
2. EIR 80-4/ZC-226/CT 80-24/CP-102, POINT SAN MALO.
Request for approval of a zone change from R-3 and R-A
to RD-M and a tentative subdivision map and a condo-
minium permit to develop 40 units on the north side of
Ocean Street between the AT&SF Railroad and the Pacific
Ocean.
Commissioners L'Heureux and Rombotis indicated they would be
abstaining from this item, for the reasons stated at the
previous public hearing, and left at 9:33 P.M.
Mike Holzmiller indicated Staff had not intended to give a
presentation, as the item was continued in order to obtain
additional public testimony.
MMISSIONERS \
Marcus
Rombotis
Leeds
Larson
Friestedt
L'Heureux
Jose
Marcus
Rombotis
Leeds
Larson
Friestedt
L 'Heureux
Jose
Marcus
Rombotis
Leeds
Larson
Friestedt
LfHeureux
3ose
i
r
-
. . PLANNING COMMISSION
March 25, 1981 Page 9
Mike Holzmiller added that Staff has received a letter from
the applicant, concerning comments made at the previous public
hearing, which was included in the Commission's packet.
a letter from a Mr.
Also,
Platt to Staff, regarding the use of the
subject site by migratory birds, which was provided to .the
Commission this evening. A series of photographs, and their
description, submitted by Mr. L. B. Hamlin who testified at
the last meeting, and owner of the property immediately
adjacent to the property in question; has been mounted, and
was made avai,lable to the Commission for their review.
The Commission recognized Richard Ely, 2425 Mountain View Dr.,
Carlsbad. Mr. Ely expressed willingness to respond to any
questions relating to the articles he distributed to the
Commission at the.last public hearing on this matter. In
conclusion, he stated his feeling that until the issue is
settled with state lands, this project should be put on hold.
The Commission recognized Earl Lupe, from the State Department
of Fish and Game, Long Beach; who explained he has the
responsibility for the lagoon wetlands in San Diego and Orange
Counties. They have asked that for the proposed wall there be
at least a 100! setback fromthe.weir. With regard to the issul
of fill wetland area, this should be acted upon by the Coastal
Commission. He showed the Commission some aerial photographs,
depicting the edge of the lagoon. He added the mouth is being
closed off to the extent they are not allowing for any
options at a later date, and the biggest concern is the
siltation problem.
The Commission recognized Andy Grant, 2468 Ocean Street,
Carlsbad; Director of the Zoological Society of San Diego.
Mr. Grant emphasized that if siltation continues, the lagoon
as it is presently, will no longer be. He referred to a
letter he had received from the City Manager on January 8,
1981, relating to siltation in the Buena Vista Lagoon. .
He concluded that the problems of ownership, access,
siltation, unaddressed environmental, impact, and concerns of
the Coastal Commission and Fish and Game must be addressed
prior to any zone change or approvals taking place.
The Commission recognized Jeff Bell, 221 Normandy Lane,
Carlsbad. Mr. Bell indicated his concern lies with the
certification of the environmental impact report, and feels
it should not be taken lightly. He pointed but some concerns
that he feels should be more adequately addressed; beach
erosion, traffic, and the environmental impact of the project
on the area. In conclusion, Mr. Bell stated the City does not
have adequate information to certify the EIR.
The Commission recognized L. B. Hamlin, 2445 Ocean Street,
Carlsbad, who spoke in opposition to the project.
The Commission recognized Nicholas Banche, 702 4th Street,
Oceanside; representing the applicant. Mr. Banche indicated
they were in complete agreement with the Department of Fish
and Game. He pointed out that EIR must be adequate, as it
raised a number of issues on the part of the public; the only
test is whether or not it raises the issues of environmental
concern. If the EIR is certified, the only issue is whether
or not the plan, as presented, is consistent with the General
Plan of the City of Carlsbad. He further pointed out that
this land has zoning which would permit the development.of
80 units, however, this application is to reduce the existing
zone. He also pointed out that Condition No. 17 satisfies the
issues of public trust, in his opinion.
.
OHMISSIONERS ’ \
r
PLANNING COMMISSTON
March 25, 1981 Page 10
The Commission recognized Janette Cushman, 2469 Ocean Street,
Carlsbad; who spoke in opposition of the project, and stated
her feeling that the applicant should be required to develop
within the zoning requirements for that zone.
Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman
Marcus closed the public hearing at lo:34 P.M.
Following brief discussion, the Commission directed Staff to
prepare documents, recommending to the City Council
certification of the Environmental Impact Report, with the
findings as addressed in the staff report and by public
testimony.
Commissioner Jose indicated his abstention was due to the fact
that there are certain mitigating measures in his opinion that
the EIR does not answer, and have not been resolved.
Commissioner Friestedt indicated that, in light of the existin
zone, and the ability of the applicant to put a greater
density with the existing zone on the property, and the
concern of the City, Commission, and' Council that the density
be reduced to the number that has been proposed by the
applicant, a motion was made to adopt Resolution No. 1779,
approving ZC-226. The motion failed due to lack of a
majority.
Based on the concensus of the Commission not to change the
zone at the request of the applicant, the Commission denied
CT 80-24&P-102, and directed Staff to bring back a
Resolution of Denial for both ZC-226 and CT 80-24/P-102,
APPROVAL OF.MINUTES
Minutes of the Regular Meet
approved as submitted.
ADJOURNMENT
.ng, held March 11, 1981, were
By proper moti,on, the meeting was adjourned at lQ:49 P-M,
Respectfully Submitted,
JAMES C. HAGAMAN
Secretary to the Planning Commission
Ann R. Alleman, Minutes Clerk
. \
\ 3 0 4 .
XIMISSIONERS ’
?arcus
qombotis
Leeds
Larson
?riestedt
;fHeureux
Jose
larcus
iombotis
Leeds
Larson
Viestedt
;'Heureux
Jose
larcus
iombotis
Leeds
Larson
Friestedt
;'Heureux
Jose
llarcus
Leeds
iarson
priestedt
Jose
r