Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-10-28; Planning Commission; Minutes-, -. MEETING OF: MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: October 28, 1981 TIME OF MEETING: 7:00 P.M. \ % d PLACE OF MEETING: Council Chambers COMMISSIONERS CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Marcus at 7:03 P.M. ROLL CALL Present - Chairman Marcus, Conrmissioners Rombotis, Farrow, Jose, L'Heureux, and Friestedt. Commissioner Schlehuber arrived at 7:18 P.M. Ex-Officio Members James Hagaman, Planning Director; and Dan Hentschke, Assistant City Attorney, were also present. Staff members present were: Michael Holzmiller, Principal Planner Bill Hofman, Associate Planner Richard Allen, Principal Civil Engineer Charles Grimm, Associate Planner Joyce Crosthwaite, Assistant Planner Patrick Tessier, Associate Planner PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Chairman Marcus. PLANNING COMMISSION PROCEDURES: Chairman Marcus explained Planning Commission procedures in its capacity as an advisory Counnission to the City Council, and identified those matters delegated to the Planning Commission for a final decision. Chairman Marcus further explained the procedure observed by the Commission during public hearing items. NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. ZC-235, NEWPORT SHORES. Request for approval of a Zone Change from C-l to RD-M on property generally located on the southwest corner of Alga Road and El Camino Real. . With the aid of a transparency showing the location of the project, Bill Hofman gave the staff report, essentially as contained in the written staff report. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 7:07 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. Since no one wished to speak on the matter, the public hearing was closed. The Commission approved the Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance, and adopted the following Resolution, recommending approval of ZC-235 to the City Council, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained in the staff report: Marcus Rombotis Farrow Jose L'Heureux Friestedt RESOLUTION NO. 1881, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM C-l TO RD-M ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON TH SOIJTHWEST CORNER OF ALGA ROAD AND EL CAMINO REAL. APPLICANT: NEWPORT SHORES -. MINUTES October 28, 1981 Page 2 COMMISSIONERS 2. CT 81-38/CP-184, CARLSBAD INDUSTRIAL ASSOC. LTD. Request for a 22 unit industrial tentative tract map and condominium permit to convert an existing industrial building to condominiums on the north side of the intersection of Camino Vida Roble and Las Palmas Drive in the P-M Zone. With the aid of a transparency showing the location of the project, Michael Holzmiller gave a staff report on the matter. He indicated that except for requiring some upgrading of the landscaping and additional trash areas, the only real change created by the approval of this map and condominium permit will be the ownership of the spacer within the building. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 7:lO P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Mr. Wes Zicker, of Arevalo and Safino, 8913 Complex Drive, Suite C, San Diego, consulting engineers on the project. He indicated that the applicant is in agreement with the staff report, and expressed willingness to respond to any questions. Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at 7:ll P.M. The Commission adopted the following Resolution, recormnending approval of CT 81-38/CP-184 to the City Council based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein: RESOLUTION NO. 1880, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR A 22 UNIT INDUSTRIAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE INTERSECTION OF CAMINO VIDA ROBLE AND LAS PALMAS DRIVE. APPLICANT: CARLSBAD INDUSTRIAL ASSOCIATES, LTD. Marcus Rombotis Farrow Jose L'Heureux Friestedt 3. CP-36(A), LA COSTA VALE, LTD. An amendment to an approved condominium permit for a 336 unit condominium project located on Piragua and Venado Streets, west of Cadencia in the P-C Zone. Bill Hofman gave the staff report, with the aid of a transparency showing the location of the project. He indicated there was a modification to Condition No. 17, which he distributed copies of to the Commission. Commissioner Friestedt referred to Engineering Condition No. 34, and inquired how much of the street adjacent to the subdivision the applicant will be required to improve. Richard Allen explained that it will be whatever remains to be done, such as sidewalks and streetlight heads. He added that most of the improvements are already in. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 7:14 P.M., an extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Mr. Ken Lipinski, Principle on the project. Mr. Lipinski stated that the applicant is in agreement with all conditions contained in the staff report. MINUTES October 28, 1981 Page 3 . COMMISSIONERS ’ \ Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at 7:15 P.M. The Commission approved the Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance, and adopted the following Resolution, recommending approval of CP-36(A) to the City Council based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein; with the modification of Condition No. 17 as follows: 17. The following provisions shall be included in the CC&R's required pursuant to Condition No. 8: (a> No individual lots may be sold separately unless they are sold in groups of at least two lots and are contiguous. (b) All lots shall be subject to the CC&R's in perpetuity. (c) A common architectural theme shall be maintained for all lots. (d) All lots shall share the common recreation amenities. RESOLUTION NO. 1882, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A 336 UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON PIRAQUA AND VENADO STREETS, LA COSTA. APPLICANT: LA COSTA VALE, LTD. 4. SNC-17. Street name change from Cedar Avenue to Christiansen Way. With the aid of a transparency showing the location of the proposal, Michael Holzmiller gave the staff report, essentially as contained in the written staff report. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 7:18 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. Since no one wished to speak on the matter, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Schlehuber arrived at 7:18 P.M. Conuxissioner L'Heureux stated his opinion that consideration should be given to formally adopting a procedure for the naming of streets in commemoration of various citizens of the community, as currently no such policy exists. The Commission concurred. The Commission adopted the following Resolution, recommending approval of SNC-17: RESOLUTION NO. 1885, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A STREET NAME CHANGE FROM CEDAR AVENUE TO CHRISTIANSEN WAY ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF GRAND AVENUE BETWEEN OCEAN STREET AND THE AT&SF RAILROAD. APPLICANT: CARLSBAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. Marcus Rombotis Farrow Jose L'Heureux Friestedt Marcus Rombotis Farrow Jose L'Heureux Friestedt Schlehuber -. MINUTES October 28, 1981 Page 4 COMMISSION 5. CT 81-l/CP-146, CALSO. Request for 60 unit tentative tract map and condominium permit located on the south side of La Costa Avenue between El Camino Real and Nueva Castilla Way in the RD-M Zone. Bill Hofman gave a staff report on the matter, essentially as contained in the written staff report, and indicated that the project is approaching the one year time limit to approve or deny a project, He added that it is important that some action be taken before that time. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 7:21 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. Since no one wished to speak on the matter, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner L'Heureux inquired what the affect would be to deny the project without prejudice. Commissioner Rombotis explained that the applicant can resubmit the application within one year; whereas, if it was denied completely, he would be required to pay another fee. In response to Commission query, Bill Hofman explained that Staff has called the applicant numerous times within the last year, and in each case, the applicant advised Staff that plans were being redesigned; however, were not ready for submission. Mr. Hofman continued that Staff last talked with the applicant two months ago, and gave him a month deadline to submit plans, advising him that otherwise they would proceed with a denial without prejudice. The applicant advised Staff that he would attempt to make it within the months time; however, Staff has not heard from the applicant since that time. The Commission adopted the following Resolution, recommending denial without prejudice on CT 81-l/CP-146, based on the findings contained therein: RESOLUTION NO. 1886, RECOMMENDING DENIAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF A 60 UNIT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LA COSTA AVENUE BETWEEN EL CAMINO REAL AND NUEVA CASTILLA WAY IN THE RD-M ZONE. APPLICANT: CALSO LTD. Commissioner Jose stated his opinion that Staff time has been waisted, when it appears that the appliant had no intention of following through with the project from the beginning. He added that he feels the project should be denied outright. ITEM OUT OF ORDER Due to the number of GPA's to be heard at this meeting, Chairman Marcus suggested that Item No. 16 be heard at this time. The Commission concurred. Michael Holzmiller added that this item should be discussed at this time in case of a continuance on the General Plan, as the Capital Improvement Program will be forwarded to the City Council in the near future. Marcus Rombotis Farrow Jose L'Heureux Friestedt Schlehuber -. MINUTES October 28, 1981 Page 5 DISCUSSION ITEMS 16. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION FOR THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) Michael Holzmiller gave a brief introduction on the matter, indicating that Staff is requesting that the Planning Commission find that nine of the projects that are part of the proposed five year Capital Improvement Program, are consistent with the General Plan. With regard to the bicycle lanes, Commissioner Jose inquired as to the cost of $207,960. Joyce Crosthwaite explained that the cost is for striping, and installing raised medians for the bicycles to be separated from traffic lanes. Director Hagaman added that these are merely General Plan consistencies. The Commission adopted the following Resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 1879, FINDING GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY FOR A COORDINATED PROGRAM OF PROPOSED PUBLIC WORKS. ITEMS OUT OF ORDER Chairman Marcus indicated that there was a request to continue Items No. 6 and 7 for one week. She suggested that if the Commission cannot conclude all the General Plan Amendmgnts at this meeting, that the Commission grant the continuance. However, if time permits, she suggested that the Commission act on these items. The Commission concurred, and Items No. 6 and 7 were trailed to the end of the meeting. 8. GPA-59(B), SANTA FE COMPANY. Request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Neighborhood Commercial, Residential Medium Density and Residential Low Medium Density to Planned Industrial. With the aid of a transparency showing the location of the proposal, Charles Grimm gave the staff report, essentially as contained in the written staff report. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 7:32 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Mr. Barney Rickett, Professor of the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the University of California at San Diego. With the aid of transparencies showing the boundary between the open space and the planned industrial, and topographic contours; Mr. Rickett explained the relationship between this project and the UCSD solar wind radio antenna. Mr. Rickett continued that he is concerned about the possible interference by industrial users with this sensitive radio antenna, and outlined sources of same. Marcus Rombotis Farrow Jose L'Heureux Friestedt Schlehuber MINUTES - October 28, 1981 Page 6 4 COMMISSIONERS ’ \ Mr. Rickett continued that he feels the University has a priority in the use of the antenna, as it was there first and a number of other projects have met difficult radio interference standards. He suggested that by changing the zone boundaries, the developments could be screened effectively. He added that they would also have to request some measures in the Specific Plan. Mr. Rickett extended an invitation to the Commission to visit the antenna site. In response to Commission query with regard to the effect if the buildings are built in the line of sight, Mr. Rickett explained that the effect depends on what activity is occurring in the particular building; however, the screening requirements would be much more stringent if the building was in the line of sight. Mr. Rickett continued that parts of the shredding station of the Palomar Waste Transfer Station were in the line of sight of the antenna, and that project did involve specific steps to avoid the radiation. Discussion reflected the feasibility of grading to bring the buildings below the line of sight, as well as shielding measures for those that may be within the line of sight. Mr. Rickett responded that it is not clear to him that grading is a feasible solution; however, by avoiding the line of sight, it would make it easier on the users of this land. Commissioner Rombotis stated his opinion that Mr. Rickett's request is inequitable, as it is a request to deny a use of an adjacent property owner. He added that the antenna was poorly sited, and he cannot support Mr. Rickett's contentions. Mr. Rickett responded that the steps taken to make the Palomar Waste Transfer Station compatible with the solar wind antenna were a substantial percentage of the cost of that project. He added that their rights and requests were taken seriously, and suggested that their rights have validity. Mr. Rickett continued that the project is funded by the Federal Government, at approximately $150,000 per year, and has been running for over ten years. He stated that at the time of original siting, it was a remote piece of property, and at that time a site survey was done of possible interferring sources. Commissioner Schlehuber expressed concern that the University is suggesting that private funding provide shielding measures. In response to Commission query, Mr. Rickett estimated that it would cost an equivalent of one or two years of operating costs to relocate the solar wind antenna; however, he indicated that they have not priced same. Commissioner Friestedt responded that the Commission respects the position of the University; however, he concurs that the uses proposed by the applicant are consistent with the General Plan. - MINUTES October 28, 1981 Page 7 Commissioner Friestedt continued that in order to make both uses acceptable, the applicant would have to incur significant financial loss. He added that he is inclined to move approval of the amendment, and respectfully indicate the Commissions' acknowledgement of Mr, Rickett's concerns. Charles Grimm explained that many of the things being discussed are more functions of the Specific Plan than the General Plan Amendment. He added that the issue before the Commission is whether or not they wish to alter the location of the open space on the map. The Commission recognized Mr. Bob Ladwig, of Rick Engineering, 3088 Pio Pica Drive, Carlsbad, representing the applicant. Mr. Ladwig stated that they do object to the requests of Mr. Rickett and the University for an amendment to the open space areas. With the aid of a transparency showing the cross sections, Mr. Ladwig explained that the line of sight for part of the antenna is not anywhere near the property, because of the natural buffer existing on the outside of the property itself. He added that Staff and the Commission do not have the information to make any changes to the request at this meeting, and it is an item that should be addressed with the Specific Plan at a later date. In conclusion, Mr. Ladwig urged approval of the request as submitted. The Commission recognized Mrs. Ida Dawson, Ranch0 Agua Hedionda Via Los Monos, Vista. With the aid of a transparency, Mrs. Dawson pointed out her land, and expressed concern over the effects on her property if development occurs on the slope to the north. She requested that drainage not be allowed onto her property. Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at 8:02 P.M. Commissioner L'Heureux suggested that before the Specific Plan comes before the Commission, they go out and look at the site, and learn more about the solar wind antenna. Director Hagaman indicated that Staff would arrange a tour of the antenna for the Commission. The Commission recommended approval of GPA-59(B) to the City Council. 9. GPA-59(C), OCCIDENTAL. A request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Travel Service (TS) to Community Commercial (C), from Residential Commercial CRC) to a Combination District (Travel Service and Community Commercial) and from Open Space (OS) to Residential Medium (RM) Density. With the aid of a transparency showing the location of the amendment, Charles Grimm gave the staff report, essentially as contained in the written staff report. Marcus Rombotis Farrow Jose L'Heureux Friestedt Schlehuber - MINUTES October 28, 1981 Page 8 With regard to the open space, Commissioner Friestedt inquired if it would be a dedication to the City, or an open space easement required of the applicant. Charles Grimm responded that same would be determined at the time the project is adopted. The Parks and Recreation Department and Commission has indicated that they do not want any type of park site here. He added that when the project comes, the open space may be utilized to satisfy the'open space requirements of the project. Commissioner Jose inquired as to the proposed fire station. Mr. Grimm explained that the Fire Department has indicated this area is no longer important as a potential site. Commissioner L'Heureux inquired if there is going to be some mechanism to ensure that when the site plans are submitted, that they are done in an integrated fashion. Mr. Grimm explained that the applicant has anticipated the Commissions' concern, and on Area 1, the City has a request for a zone change from C-2 to C-2-0, which would give the Connnission the opportunity to review the site development plan for that property. He added that it would be for all of Area 1. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 8:14 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Conznission recognized Mr. Joe Sandy, P. 0. Box 594, Carlsbad, representing the applicant. Mr. Sandy expressed willingness to respond to any questions. Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at 8:15 P.M. The Commission recommended approval of GPA-59(C) to the City Council. 10. EIR 80-7, RANCH0 CARRILLO. For certification of an The staff report was presented by Patrick Tessier, essentially as contained in the written staff report. With the aid of transparencies, he explained the existing and proposed General Plan alignments, the proposed natural vegetation and unstable areas, and ultimate noise exposure. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 8~28 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. Ms. Annette Sanchez of Larry Seeman and Associates responded to Commission questions regarding weekly street cleaning, home buyers being apprised as to influence of the airport prior to close of escrow, transportation, and bus shelters, as contained in the EIR. Mr. Tessier explained that these are merely suggestions and guidelines, as the Master Plan will contain the revised mitigation measures. Marcus Rombotis Farrow Jose L'Heureux Friestedt Schlehuber MINUTES October 28, 1981 Page 9 The Commission recognized Mr. Jim Goff, representing the Daon Corporation, and all the property owners in the Ranch0 Carrillo area, Mr. Goff explained that in the draft Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, are, in Chapter 2, a complete restatement of all the mitigation measures that Mr. Tessier indicated the Commission would be discussing, that have come from the EIR. He added that all of those that the City intends to judge each subsequent development from, they will adhere to. Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at 8:29 P.M. The Assistant City Attorney suggested that the Commission move on to the General Plan Amendment, and then take action on the Environmental Review and the General Plan Amendment at the same time. The Commission concurred. 11. GPA-59(D), RANCH0 CARRILLO. A request to amend the Land use Element for the designation of RLM, RM, RMH, C, RC, PI, and E. The staff report was presented by Patrick Tessier, who indicated that there has been some concern that because the General Plan Amendment allows density in excess of what the EIR has covered, that there could be some conflict. Mr. Tessier continued that Staff feels that if there was a proposed amendment to the Master Plan requesting more than 2,998 units, that it would invalidate the existing EIR, and additional environmental studies would be required. With the aid of a transparency, Mr. Tessier explained the comparison of the existing and proposed General Plan land uses. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 8:37 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Mr. Jim Goff, representing the Daon Corporation, and speaking on behalf of all the other property owners in the area. Mr. Goff stated that they concur with the Staff recommendation, and that the deletion of the special treatment area should not be deleted and should be retained in the General Plan Amendment. Mr. Goff continued that the draft Master Plan more than adequately sets the safeguards in terms of mitigating measures under the EIR, in terms of performance standards in general for the development of those areas, to protect the uses within those areas and the adjacent areas. Mr. Goff urged that the public hearing be held at the earliest date on the draft Master Plan, which restricts the density in that area that is subject to the General Plan Amendment. In conclusion, Mr. Goff referred to the alignment of Palomar Airport Road, and stated that before it becomes a reality in a new location, they would like to come back to the Commission and Council and present all the appropriate arguments for retention of that alignment in its present location. - - MINUTES October 28, 1981 Page 10 Since no one else wished 'to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at 8:45 P.M. The Assistant City Attorney explained that his office has some concerns with the General Plan Amendment. He explained that the General Plan does not analyze the density at the high end of the density range, which is th' standard way to analyze a General Plan change. He added that there is a complete lack of information with regard to the impact of the high density. Mr. Hentschke continued that in his opinion, the Environmental Impact Report is not adequate to address the General Plan Amendment; however, that does not mean that it is illegal if the Commission chooses to approve it, unless it is challenged. Counnissioner Jose inquired if the Commission could state that the EIR and the General Plan Amendment is limited to the 2,998 units, and approval was based on that figure. Mr. Hentschke explained that there is no way to condition a General Plan Amendment. Ms. Annette Sanchez of Larry Seeman and Associates addressed the Commission, and exlained that at this time they have not conducted any analysis on the additional residential units. Ms. Sanchez continued that when they originally started this process, they were under contract to prepare it on the Master Plan, and at that time there was no General Plan Amendment. They prepared the initial screen check preliminary draft on the Master Plan, and at that time Staff decision was that there was a General Plan Amendment required as a result of the Master Plan. Ms. Sanchez explained that since that time, they have had a revised Master Plan, as well as a revised General Plan Amendment. They did not conduct further analysis, as the intent of the developer was 2,998 units that was specifically in the Master Plan, which was the primary project that they were analyzing. The Assistant City Attorney explained that the Commission can approve the General Plan Amendment, and can certify the EIR; however, they must recognize the risk, which is not on the City, but on the developer. Conznissioner L'Heureux stated while he sees the problem in a conceptual nature, he does not feel it is a practical problem. The Commission adopted the following Resolution recommending that the City Council certify EIR 80-7, retained the special treatment area, and approved GPA 59(D): RESOLUTION NO. 1871, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 031~ 80-7) FOR A PROJECT GENERALLY INCLUDING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND MASTER PLAN REVISION. APPLICANT: DAON CORPORATION. Marcus Rombotis Farrow Jose L'Heureux Friestedt Schlehuber MINUTES October 28, 1981 Page 11 RECESS Chairman Marcus called a recess at 8:56 P.M., and the Commission reconvened at 9:08 P.M., with seven members present. 12. GPA-59(E), CARLTAS. Request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Non-Residential Reserve to Planned Industrial on the south side of Palomar Airport Road, approximately 600 feet east of Paseo De1 Norte. With the aid of a transparency showing the location of the proposal, the staff report was presented by Charles Grimm. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 9:lO P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Mr. John White, representing the applicant. Mr. White stated that the applicant supports the General Plan Amendment as written, however, would like to request an amendment to the General Plan. Mr. White continued that after some research, they received a Certificate of Compliance for both lots in August, and the applicant feels that the 1.3 acre parcel on the west should be a commercial land use, and they would like an opportunity to work with Staff to determine if there is a way to obtain a higher use than planned industrial. Mr. White explained that the applicant feels he can develop the smaller parcel commercially, without requesting any additional ingress or egress onto Palomar Airport Road. In conclusion, Mr. White explained that are requesting one of two things; they would like the property to be considered for a higher commercial use under the same application, and if that is not possible, they would like to withdraw the 1.3 acre parcel, which is now a legal parcel from the General Plan Amendment. Mr. Grimm explained that Staff did look at the possibility when the application was first submitted, of changing this particular parcel to commercial; however, there is no access to this parcel through the commercial areas. He added that another reason Staff eliminated commercial as a possibility is because it would further the appearance of strip commercial along Palomar Airport Road, The Commission recognized Mr. Don Agatep, 2956 Roosevelt, Carlsbad, representing the applicant in a planning context. He stated that the real question is whether or not the City will allow additional access to Palomar Airport Road from the lot. He explained that the applicant is requesting the joint use of the driveway, between the Growing Grounds and the 1.3 acre site, having a secondary access through a loop street. In conclusion, Mr. Agatep reiterated that the applicant is not asking for additional access to Palomar Airport Road, but would like an alternative land use to planned industrial for this 1.3 acre parcel. MINUTES October 28, 1981 Page 12 Mr. Grimm explained that whether or not the driveway is shared, it would still put additional traffic onto Palomar Airport Road. In response to Commission query reference the disposition of the parcel if it is deleted, Director Hagaman explained it would remain non-residential reserve, or could go as planned industrial. Discussion reflected the individual Commissioners' feelings with regard to the deletion of the 1.3 acre parcel. For clarification purposes, Mr. Grimm explained that the non-residential reserve is a holding category, and if the Commission approves a section of this, it would be a planned industrial section that has two areas of non- residential reserve on each side. Therefore, it is possible that the parcel changed to planned industrial could be developed without providing proper access to the non-residential reserve to the west; and access may have to be granted directly onto Palomar Airport Road in the future. Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at 9:30 P.M. The Commission approved the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and recommended approval of GPA-59(E) as originally proposed to the City Council. 13. GPA-59 (H . . .>, CITY OF CARLSBAD. Request to change the Lana use designation of the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Planned Industrial (PI) to a Combination District comprised of commercial travel services (TS)/Professional (Office) and Related (0). With the aid of a transparency showing the location of the proposal, the staff report was presented by Charles Grimm, essentially as contained in the written staff report. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 9:34 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Mr. Andrew McReynolds, owner of part of the property in this proposal. Mr. McReynolds stated he does not object to the zoning which would promote development that would best serve the wishes of Alta Mira; however, stated he does have some concerns with regard to the multiple recommendation as it effects the potential development of his property on the east side. In conclusion, Mr. McReynolds stated he would like to see a proper blending from the road back to the industrial portion, with progression from office buildings to industrial. He suggested same be made possible by retaining the office portions of the PI designation. Marcus Rombotis Farrow Jose L'Heureux Friestedt Schlehuber -i MINUTES October 28, 1981 Page 13 COMMISSIONERS y% The Commission recognized Mr. Jim Hicks, 7316 El Fuerte, Carlsbad. Mr. Hicks indicated he was neither speaking in favor of or in opposition to the proposal, and inquired what zones will be used to implement the travel service, and the 0. Mr. Grimm responded that there is no direct zone which implements office use; however, generally the R-P zone is used and it allows residential. Staff is proposing that the area be zoned C-T, since a Specific Plan is required on the site as a result of the combination district being utilized. It can be utilized as a vehicle to indicate that any of the area can go office, C-T, or layout specific locations for office uses. The Commission recognized Mr. Tom Landers, 1626 N. Santa Fe, Vista. Mr. Landers inquired if garden office condominiums could come under planned industrial. Mr. Grimm responded that they could be allowed under the 0 designation. Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at 9:46 P.M. The Commission approved the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and recommended approval of GPA-59(H) to the City Council. 14. GPA-59(I)', HIEATT. Request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Non-Residential Reserve to Planned Industrial. With the aid of a transparency showing the location of the proposal, Charles Grimm gave a staff report on the matter. In response to Commission query regarding access, Mr. Grimm explained that access will not be provided through the Koll property, but will be provided through the Signal Landmark property which is to the west. He added that Staff has seen a preliminary proposal on same, and it will be a requirement of the Signal Landmark Specific Plan. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 9:50 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. Since no one wished to speak on the matter, the public hearing was closed. The Commission approved the Conditional Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and recommended approval of GPA-59(I) to the City Council. Marcus Rombotis Farrow Jose L'Heureux Friestedt Schlehuber Marcus Rombotis Farrow Jose L'Heureux Friestedt Schlehuber -, - MINUTES October 28, 1981 Page 14 15. GPA-59(J), CITY OF CARLSBAD. Request to amend the Land Use Element o the General Plan by creating a new, higher density residential designation. Michael Holzmiller gave the staff report, essentially as contained in the written staff report. Commissioner Jose expressed concern with regard to the impact upon existing transportation systems with the increase in density. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 9:52 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. Since no one wished to speak on the matter, the public hearing was closed. The Commission approved the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and recommended approval of GPA-59(J) to the City Council. Commissioner L'Heureux indicated he would abstain on Items No. 6 and 7, as he is Counsel for the adjoining property owner. 6. EIR 81-5, SHERMAN. For certification of an Environmental Impact Report. With the aid of a transparency showing the location of the proposal, Charles Grimm gave a staff report on the matter, indicating that the applicant has requested a continuance, as neither the applicant or his consultant could be present at this meeting. Mr. Grimm added that the EIR did not address noise from the South Coast Asphalt plant, although it did address noise from Highway 78. He explained that the reason was that the actual plant operation is not adjacent to the subject parcel; however, South Coast Asphalt does own property which is not in use for the asphalt operation at the current time, but is adjacent to the subject property. Mr. Grimm indicated he spoke with a representative of South Coast Asphalt, Mr. Boyce, who informed him that even if this site was utilized for collecting materials for the production of asphalt, the actual operation of the plant would remain on the existing parcel. In response to query regarding the applicant on this project, Mr. Grimm explained that the applicant was given the required notice that the public hearing was to be held this date. Mr. Grimm added that it has been evident for some time that the hearing would be held October 28, 1981. Mr. Grimm continued that another problem is that the applicant changed agents during the processing, and the property owner was notified by regular notice. The agent was not notified until two days after, which was still plenty of time to allow someone to attend the hearing. Marcus Rombotis Farrow Jose L'Heureux Friestedt Schlehuber . MINUTES October 28, 1981 Page 15 Mr. Grimm added that the agent has complained they did not have time to attend the DCC meeting. Mr. Grimm indicated he spoke with the applicant via telephone and agreed to set up a meeting any time prior to this hearing, and the response was, "We don't have time." Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 9:59 P.M., and extended the invitaion to speak. Since no one wished to speak on the matter, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Rombotis suggested that the matter be continued to the next General Plan hearing. Director Hagaman indicated that the next hearing on the General Plan Amendment will be held in-May or June, 1982. He added that in speaking with the consultants on this matter, they opted for the continuance knowing they would have time to deal with some issues they were concerned with; however, they did appreciate the possibility that the Commission might make a decision at this meeting, and indicated they would deal with it. Mr. Hagaman suggested that the Commission take action on the matter. The Assistant City Attorney indicated that an EIR must be certified within one year from the date that a project is submitted. The Commission recommended that the City Council certify EIR 81-5. 7. GPA-59(A), SHERMAN. A request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Residential Low Medium (RLM) to Residential Medium Density (RM), Professional and Related Commercial (0) and Neighborhood Commercial (N). Charles Grimm gave a staff report on the matter, essentially as contained in the written staff report, with the aid of a transparency. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at lo:07 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. Since no one wished to speak on the matter, the public hearing was closed. The Commission denied GPA-59(A). Mr. Grimm indicated that the City Attorneys' Office has requested the addition of the following finding, as Finding No. 6, to the Resolution, and the Planning Staff agrees with same: "The amendments approved under GPA-59 are consistent with the City's Housing Element, as there is no oral reduction in the City's ability to provide suitable land use designations for housing." Marcus Rombotis Farrow Jose L'Heureux Friestedt Schlehuber Marcus Rombotis Farrow Jose L'Heureux Friestedt Schlehuber . * . MINUTES October 28, 1981 Page 16 Commissioner L'Heureux voted for the Resolution; however, abstained on Items No. 6 and 7. The Conxnission adopted the following Resolution, with the addition of Finding No. 6, as proposed by the City Attorney, and the Planning Staff: RESOLUTION NO. 1884. RECOMMENDING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CARLSBAD SPHERE OF INFLUENCE. \ 5 \ % COMMISSIONERS “s1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of the Regular Meeting, held September 23, 1981, were approved as submitted. ADJOURNMENT By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at 1O:ll P.M., to Wednesday, November 18, 1981 at 7:00 P.M. Respectfully Submitted, JAMES C. HAGAMAN Secretary to the Planning Commission Ann R. Alleman, Minutes Clerk Marcus Rombotis Farrow Jose L'Heureux Friestedt Schlehube Marcus Rombotis Farrow Jose L'Heureux Friestedt Schlehube,