Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-12-09; Planning Commission; MinutesMINUTES MEETING OF: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: December 9, 1981 TIME OF MEETING: 7:00 P.M. \ i PLACE OF MEETING: City Council Chambers COMMISSIONERS v CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Marcus at 7:02 P.M. ROLL CALL Present - Chairman Marcus, Commissioners Friestedt, L'Heureux, and Farrow. Commissioner Rombotis arrived at 7:03 P.M. Commissioner Schlehuber arrived at 7:07 P.M. Commissioner Jose arrived at 7:lO P.M. Ex-Officio Members James Hagaman, Planning Director; and Daniel Hentschke, Assistant City Attorney, were also present. Staff Members present were: Michael Holzmiller, Principal Planner Tom Hageman, Principal Planner Bill Hofman, Associate Planner Charles Grimm, Associate Planner Pat Tessier, Associate Planner Richard Allen, Principal Civil Engineer PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Chairman Marcus. CONTINUED ITEMS 1. EIR 81-2. FONTANA-MUDGE. With the aid of a transparency showing the location of the project, and the sensitive biological resources, Charles Grimm gave the staff report, essentially as contained in the written staff report. Commissioner Rombotis indicated he would abstain on this item, as he has an interest in the property in the area. Chairman Marcus opened the public heaing at 7:lO P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognised Mr. Wes Mudge, owner of the property. Mr. Mudge expressed willingness to respond to any questions. In response to Commission query, Mr. Mudge explained that the area which was proposed for low and moderate income housing will remain open space. The Commission recognised Mr. Paul Linowski, 4912 Neblina Drive, Carlsbad. Mr. Linowski expressed appreciation to Staff for their assistance, and indicated that all of their concerns have been satisfied. He referenced the area currently being used as an exercise area, and recommended that the City or the applicant keep same as a nature trail, He further suggested that the maintenance be done on a volunteer basis. Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at 7:15 P.M. -. MINUTES December 9, 1981 Page 2 COMMISSIONERS In response to Commission query, Richard Allen explained that he is not aware if there is an existing drainage district in the area, and indicated that if there is not, the developer will be required to install the facilities. Commissioner Jose referred to page lla of the Environmental Impact Report, and indicated that eucalyptus trees are a fire hazard. He suggested that the wording be revised to provide that other types of landscaping be used. The Commission concurred. Charles Grimm responded to Commission questions regarding the Ceanothus verracosus plant species. Commission discussion reflected on Condition No. 5 of the Resolution, and the Assistant City Attorney suggested that the findings of overriding consideration be incorporated into same. Following discussion, the Commission adopted the following Resolution, recommending certification of EIR 81-2 to the City Council, with the amendment of Condition No. 5 as suggested by the Assistant City Attorney: RESOLUTION NO. 1899, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR 81-2) FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. APPLICANT: FONTANA- MUDGE. NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. CT 80-43/PUD-24, SANDY. Request for a three lot Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development on property located on the south side of Magnolia Avenue between Grecourt Way and Adams Street in the R-1-7500 Zone. Michael Holzmiller gave a staff report on the matter, with the aid of a transparency showing the location of the project. Commissioner Farrow inquired as to other alternatives of access, rather than dividing the lots into a panhandle. Michael Holzmiller explained that when the previous variance and minor subdivision were approved, there was a review of the block and it was determined that a panhandle would preclude a street for the block. He added that the panhandle was approved by a previous action, and explained that currently there are two lots taking access from the panhandle, and with the approval of this request, there will be three. Mr. Holzmiller continued to respond to Commission questions regarding background on the project. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 7:25 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognised Mr. Joe Sandy, P. 0. Box 590, Carlsbad. Mr. Sandy expressed agreement with the staff recommendation; however, indicated concern with regard to Condition Nos. 14 and 25 of the Resolution, as written. Marcus Friestedt L'Heureux Farrow Rombotis Schlehuber Jose MINUTES December 9, 1981 Page 3 COMMISSIONERS In answer to Mr. Sandy's concerns with regard to Condition No. 14, Mr. Hofman suggested that the wording be revised to the affect, "The proposed garage on lot 2 (middle lot) shall be relocated away from the adjacent property line and meet all separation and building requirements, subject to the approval of the Planning Director. . . . .II Mr. Holzmiller stated that Staff's concern was that the wage, if separated from the residence, would have to observe a minimum separation of ten feet, and Staff does not feel it would be sufficient to meet the setback requirement. With regard to Condition No. 25, Mr. Sandy indicated that twenty feet of pavement would be adequate, as the other four feet is for emergency access. He requested that the condition be revised to require that twenty feet be paved, and the additional four to six feet landscaped. Richard Allen responded that Staff would prefer a roadway with twenty four feet to allow adequate two-way travel. He added that the project will also serve two or three off site houses that have an easement across same, and indicated that it would then be consistent with the newly proposed PUD Ordinance. The Commission recognized Ms. Terry Van Gorder, 1175 Magnolia Avenue, Carlsbad. Ms. Van Gorder expressed concern about drainage into her back yard, and requested that a condition be included to deal with same. Mr. Holzmiller indicated that Staff feels Condition No, 19 of the Resolution will satisfy Ms. Van Gorder's concerns. Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at 7:33 P.M. Commissioner L'Heureux referenced Condition No. 15 of the Resolution, and questioned whether the intent was to require installation of the common facilities "prior to the final occupancy of the last unit." Michael Holzmiller explained that the intent of the condition was that it be prior to final occupancy of the last unit in the project. Commissioner Schlehuber stated his opinion that a pool and recreation area should not be required on such a small unit. Commission discussion reflected the concerns of Ms. Van Gorder regarding drainage. In response to Commission query, Richard Allen explained that Condition No. 19 may not totally address the concerns of drainage; however, it will be kept under observation tc prevent the drainage from concentrating into one area. In addition, Mr. Allen stated that the Grading Ordinance accomplishes those concerns, as well as the plan check process. MINUTES December 9, 1981 Page 4 , COMMISSIONERS Y The Commission approved the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and adopted the following Resolution approving CT 80-43/PUD-24 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein; with the revision of Condition No. 14 as follows: "The proposed garage on lot 2 (middle lot) shall be relocated away from the adjacent property line and meet all separation and building requirements I' ,.... RESOLUTION NO. 1898, APPROVING A THREE UNIT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MAGNOLIA AVENUE BETWEEN GRECOURT WAY AND ADAMS STREET. APPLICANT: SANDY 3. CT 81-40, STABILE. Request for a 20 unit tentative tract map and condominium permit to convert an existing 17 unit apartment project to condominiums and to construct three new units at 351-357 ' Tamarack Avenue in the RD-M Zone. With the aid of a transparency showing the location of the project, Michael Holzmiller gave a staff report on the matter. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 7:47 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognised Mr. Ken Chriss, 2971 State Street, Carlsbad, Architect representing the applicant. Mr. Chriss stated that the project is below density level. With regard to parking, Mr. Chriss distributed copies of a drawing to the Commission, outlining the proposed revisions to same. Mr. Chriss continued to speak in favor of the project, and requested approval of same. The Commission recognised Mr. Lew Pritten, 330 Chinquapin, Carlsbad. He indicated he has no financial interest in the project, and expressed agreement with the staff report. Mr. Pritten continued that he spoke at the Coastal Commission hearing in opposition to the density, due to the existing hazards on Tamarack Avenue. In conclusion, he stated the building has been poorly maintained in the past, and requested denial of the project. Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at 8:Ol P.M. Commissioner Rombotis explained that the Coastal Commission was withholding approval due to traffic safety on Tamarack Avenue; however, subsequent to the City installing sidewalks in the area, they have been approving projects. In response to Commission query, Michael Holzmiller indicated that Staff would not change their recommendation based on the revisions proposed by the applicant. He added that the only change to the project is the addition of landscaping along the driveway. Marcus Friestedt L'Heureux Farrow Rombotis Schlehubel Jose MINUTES December 9, 1981 Page 5 . COMMISSIONERS \ The Commission adopted the following Resolution, denying CT 81-4O/CP-186, based on the findings contained therein: RESOLUTION NO. 1895, DENYING A 20 UNIT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 351-357 TAMARACK AVENUE. APPLICANT: STABILE 4. CT 81-44/CP-190, AMERICAN WEST. Request for a 19 unit tentative tract map and condominium permit on property located on the east side of Carlsbad Boulevard between Tamarack Avenue and Sequoia Avenue in the RD-M Zone. With the aid of a transparency showing the location of the project, Michael Holzmiller gave the staff report, indicating that the project was previously considered by the Planning Commission at its meeting of August 12, 1981. He explained that the project was subsequently denied by the City Council, based primarily on the massive appearance of the building, in relation to existing surrounding development. Mr. Holzmiller continued that the applicant has made the following changes, to make the project compatible with the area: 1) The number of dwelling units has been reduced from 21 to 19. 2) The southern most part of the building has been reduced from 3 stories to 2 stories. 3) The overall height of the remaining portions of the building has been reduced by 4 feet. 4) Each individual story of the building has been stair-stepped back from the front property line. 5) Three additional guest parking spaces have been provided on site, which results in having four more spaces than required by the Ordinance. Mr. Holzmiller continued the staff report, essentially as contained in the written report. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 8:09 P.M., an extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Mr. Howard Anderson, 2194 Carmel Valley Road, De1 Mar, Architect representing the applicant. With the aid of a project model and wall exhibits, Mr. Anderson gave some background on the project, and outlined the revisions to same. He continued that the applicant has lowered the height of the building, and increased the visitor parking from 8 spaces to 11 spaces. He added that an additional parking space could be obtained with a trade-off of landscaping. In conclusion, Mr. Anderson requested approval of the project, and expressed willingness to respond to any questions. Michael Holzmiller referenced a petition received by Staff this date in opposition to the project, which contains 242 signatures. He added that the main objections are the massive appearance of the building, and the impact of traffic circulation in the area. Marcus Friestedt L'Heureux Farrow Rombotis Schlehuber Jose - December 9, 1981 - MINUTES \ 4 Page 6 COMMISSIONERS The Commission recognized Mr. William Bonas, 241 Olive, Carlsbad. Mr. Bonas spoke in opposition to the project, and expressed concern to the impact the density will have on the area if same is approved. In conclusion, Mr. Bonas suggested that the area be rezoned, and requested denial of the project. The Commission recognized Mr. Allen Ogden, 169 Sequoia Avenue, Carlsbad. Mr. Ogden expressed concern with regard to view obstruction and traffic impact if the project is approved. The Commission recognized Mrs. Mary Melideo, 159 Hemlock, Carlsbad. Mrs. Melideo expressed concern with regard to the height of the building, and traffic impact on Tamarac Avenue. She referenced a previous project which was denied for this site, and spoke in opposition to the proposed project. The Commission recognized Mrs. Joyce James, 3931 Garfield, Carlsbad. Mrs. James indicated that she was th author of the petition submitted to Staff, and requested denial of the project on the basis of existing safety conditions and traffic congestion in the area. The Commission recognized Ms. Gail Tinnerstet, residing o the corner of Sequoia Avenue and Garfield, Carlsbad. She expressed concern with regard to traffic safety, density, and the number of units proposed. She requested that consideration be given to reducing the number of units to 12. The Commission recognized Mrs. Jeanette Lowe, 3955 Garfield, Carlsbad. Mrs. Lowe spoke in opposition of the project, expressing concern with traffic, parking, and high density. The Commission recogniied Mrs. Ryan, a resident of Sequoia Avenue, Carlsbad. Mrs. Ryan inquired about a proposed recreation area on top of the two story building. Mr. Anderson, the Architect, explained that half of the area on top of the second story portion would be a deck area; however, there would be no additional structure or height added. The Commission recognized Mr. J. C. Herd, 151 Sequoia Avenue, Carlsbad. Mr. Herd stated his opinion that the changes proposed by the applicant are essentially cosmetic, and expressed concern with regard to the massive architecture of the building. In conclusion, Mr. Herd requested denial of the project. The Commission recognized Mr. Lew Pritten, 330 Chinquapin, Carlsbad. Mr. Pritten spoke in opposition to the project, based on density and traffic, and requested denial of same. Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at 8:51 P.M. In response to Commission query regarding the adequacy of the streets, Richard Allen explained that currently there is a design contract out on Tamarack Avenue, which is al-s included in the Capital Improvement Budget to be widened next year from Carlsbad Boulevard to Interstate 5. - MINUTES December 9, 1981 Page 7 Mr. Allen continued that Tamarack Avenue will be widened to four lanes (two lanes of parking.) He added that there is also a design contract to widen the Agua Hedionda Bridge, and Carlsbad Boulevard from the Bridge north to Tamarack Avenue. Commissioner Friestedt inquired as to the adequacy of the improvements with regard to traffic circulation. Richard Allen responded that the improvements, once in place, will be adequate. Commission discussion reflected on the time frame for completion of the improvements in the area, and concerns expressed during public testimony with regard to the height and bulk of the building. Commission concensus indicated that the proposed project would not greatly affect the existing traffic situation in the area. Commissioner Jose expressed concern with regard to the design of the project, and stated his 'opinion that the property owner has a right to develop his property. He added that although he is not completely satisifed with the proposed project, he feels it is an improvement over the original proposal. A motion was made to continue the matter, to allow the applicant time to work with Staff in attempt to reduce the height and bulk of the building, and consider a re-design of the general appearance of the structure; incorporating the concerns expressed during public testimony. The Assistant City Attorney explained that because of the Subdivision Map Act, the Commission would have to approve or deny the project, or have the applicant agree that the time limits under the Subdivision Map Act would not apply and also agree to the continuance. Following brief discussion with the applicant, Mr. Howard Anderson indicated that the applicant would prefer an action on the matter, rather than a continuance. The motion was subsequently withdrawn. The Commission adopted the following Resolution, approving CT 81-44/CP-190 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein: RESOLUTION NO. 1896, APPROVING A 19 UNIT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT ON PROPERTY GENERALY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD BETWEEN TAMARACK AVENUE AND SEQUOIA AVENUE. APPLICANT: AMERICAN NEST RECESS Chairman Marcus called a recess at 9:08 P.M., and the Commission reconvened at 9:21 P.M., with seven members present. Rombotis Marcus Friestedt L'Heureux Farrow Rombotis Schlehuber Jose X X MINUTES December 9. 1981 Page 8 COMMISSIONERS 5. MP-139(A), RANCH0 CARRILLO. Reqest for a Master Plan Amendment. TomHageman gave some background and a brief introduction on the matter. The staff report was continued by Pat Tessier, essentially as contained in the written report. He showed a slide presentation, outlining the project and proposed Master Plan Amendment. Mr. Tessier responded to Commission questions regarding the Master Plan, and the re-alignment of Melrose Avenue. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 9:58 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Mr. Jim Goff, representing the Daon Corporation, and speaking on behalf of all the property owners. Mr. Goff indicated that they are in agreement with the staff report, and indicated that they are doing everything possible with regard to circulation in the area. Mr. Goff requested approval of the staff recommendation, and expressed willingness to respond to any questions. Mr. Goff responded to Commission questions regarding mass transit. The Commission recognized Mr. James Downs, 1303 Crestridge Drive, Oceanside, representing Mr. Harry Grismer, owner of the Carlsbad Raceway. Mr. Downs indicated that his client is in favor of the project; however, has concerns with regard to Melrose Avenue and Palomar Airport Road. Mr. Downs continued that the present alignment does not match with the alignment of Melrose Avenue, coming out of Vista; and stated they would prefer a straight line. In conclusion, Mr. Downs requested approval of the project, in addition to a meeting between City Staff and the raceway engineers to work out a better design for the intersection of Melrose Avenue and Palomar Airport Road. In response to Commission query, Richard Allen explained that the Master Plan is significantly flexible, and could be modified to accomodate any changes to the road. The Commission recognized Mr. David Thomas, Thomas and Sowards Engineering, 7518 Quinta, Carlsbad, Civil Engineer. With the aid of a wall exhibit, Mr. Thomas explained the road re-alignment. Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at lo:25 P.M. Following brief discussion, the Commission adopted the following Resolution, recommending approval of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan Amendment: RESOLUTION NO. 1897, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR A MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT FOR CARRILLO RANCH. APPLICANT: THE PLANNING CENTER Marcus Friestedt L'Heureux Farrow Rombotis Schlehuber Jose , . r : * December 9, 1981 MINUTES Page 9 COMMISSION DISCUSSION ITEMS 6. PLANNING COMMISSION PROCEDURES This was an informational item only. 7. ORDINANCE REGARDING VOTING PROCEDURES The Commission accepted the Ordinance regarding Voting Procedures, and directed that same be forwarded to the City Council for approval. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of the Regular Meeting, held November 18, 1981, were approved with the following correction: Revising Page 4, Paragraph 7 under Item 4 (CUP- 140(A), County of San Diego,) to read, "Commissionel Rombotis referred to Condition No. 5, and suggested that same be revised to read, "This approval shall become null and void unless a building permit is issued, or if construction commences one year after the CUP." ELECTION OF NEW CHAIRMAN Chairman Marcus opened nominations for the position of Chairman for the year 1982. Commissioner Jose nominated Commissioner Friestedt. At the request of Commissioner Friestedt due to previous committments, the nomination was subsequently withdrawn. Commissioner Rombotis nominated Commissioner Farrow for Chairman, and Commissioner Schlehuber for Vice-Chairman. ADJOURNMENT By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at lo:40 P.M. Respectfully Submitted, JAMES C. HAGAMAN Secretary to the Planning Commission Ann R. Alleman, Minutes Clerk Marcus Friestedt L'Heureux Farrow Rombotis Schlehubel Jose Marcus Friestedt L'Heureux Farrow Rombotis Schlehubel Jose Marcus Friestedt L'Heureux Farrow Rombotis Schlehuber Jose