HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-08-11; Planning Commission; Minutesr·
' t
(·'· ··•
M!ETIRG OF:
DAT! OF MEETING:
,., MINUTES
PU.DI■~ CODISSIO■
August l l, 1982
' \
TIM! OF MEETING:
PI.AC!: OF MEETING:
7:00 P.11.
City Council Chambers
~ ~
COMMISSIONERS i~~"
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was call~d to order at 7:00 P.M. by Chairman
Farrow.
ROLL CALL
Present -Farrow, Rmobotis, Jose, and Rawlins.
Friestedt arrived at 7:10 P.H.
Absent -Marcus, and SchlPhuber.
Staff Members prpesent were:
Charles Grinn, Associate Planner
Michael Howes, Assistant Planner
Richard Allen, City Engineer
Ex-Officio Members present were:
Michael Holzmiller, Land Use Planning Manager
Daniel Hentschke, Assistant City Attorney
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Chairman Ferrow.
PLANNING COMMISSION PROCEDURES
Chair111Sn Farrow explained Planning Connission procedures
in its capacity £8 an advisory Coanission to the City
Council, and identified those matters delegated to the
Planning Coanission for a final decision. Chairman
Farrow further explained the procedure observed by the
Cm.ieeion during public hearing items.
CONJ'INUED PUBLIC HEARING
l. ZC-246, BONS -Request for a Preannexational Zone
Change from County S-90 to City of Carlsbad RD-H
(Residential Density Multiple) for three parcels on
9.18 acres of land located on the east and west
sides of El Camino Real approximately one mile north
of Alga Road.
Michael Howes gave a staff report on the matter. He
indicated that since the applicant did not have plane to
develop the property in the near future, the L-C
deaignation was previously acceptable to the applicant.
However, LAFCO would not approve an annexation of
property with an L~ designation, aa they felt the
property should have a acre definitive zoning. The
applicant ia now, therefore, requesting the E-A zone,
rather than the L~.
Mr. Bovee concluded that Staff i1 reco-nding that the
property be given a preannexational zoning of E-A
(!xcluaively Agricultural), and that Staff be directed to
reviae Reaolution No. 1990, to reco-nd approval of
ZC-246 fro■ County S-90 to City of Carlsbad E-A. He added
that the reviaed leaolution would be ready for Coaaiaaion
approval at the -•ting of Septeaber 8, 1982.
ror clarificaton purpoaea, the Aaaiat~nt City Attorney
explained the aiai.laritiea between ~he L~ and E-A zones.
MINUTES
Auguat 11, 1982 Page 2 COMMISSIONERS
Di1cuasion related to the pos1t1on taken by LAFCO on the
Mtter, and the feasibility of changing from the proposed
L-C to E-A.
Chairman Farrow opened the public hearing and extended
the invitation to speak.
The Conniseion recognized Hr. Joe Sandy, 2956 Roosevelt,
Carlsbad, representing the applicant . Hr. Sandy indicated
that their desire is annexation to the City; however, they
are willing to accept E-A in hopes that it will work. He
added that they are hoping to discuss the matter further
vith LAFCO between now and the time they go before the
City Council.
In response to Connission query regarding the proposed
reviaion of the Resolution to include E-A, Hr. Sandy
atated his opinion that same would stand a better chance
than the L-C at this point. However, he indicated that
LAFCO is somewhat inconsistent.
Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman
Farrow closed the public hearing.
The Connission continued the matter to the meeting of
September 22, 1982.
The Coanission recomended, by minute motion, that the
City Manager include the problems associated with this
pre-zoning when he meets with LAFCO.
N!W PUBLIC HEARINGS
2. CT 82-5/PUD-39/V-337, FONTANA/MUDGE -Request for
approval of a 64-unit tentative tract map and
planned unit develop-at, and a setback variance on
tvo of the units on property vest of Neblina Drive
and 1outh of future Ta-rack Avenue in the
R-A-1O,OOO zone.
Co.aia1ioner Roabotia indicated he would abstain on this
itea, aa he ha1 a pos1ible conflict of interest.
Michael Roves gave a ataff report on the matter, as
contained in the vritten report.
In reaponae to co-is1ion query regarding the open apace,
Nr. Rovea explained that it vill be planted in a mixture
of native apeciea, and drought tolerant exot i c specie,,
10 it vill blend into the natural habitat . He added that
a condition could be added to reflect 1uch a r equire-nt.
Qiair-n Farrow opened the public hearing and extended
the invitat ir,n to apeak.
The co-ia1~on recognized Mr . Wea Mudge, the applicant,
2238 Del Mar ~eight• Road, Del Mar. Hr. Mudge gave 1ome
bacltground on the -tter, and indicated that becau1e of
the uniquenesa of the property he choae to develop••-
under the nev PD Ordinance. Mr. Mudge alao addre1aed hie
atteapt to preaerve a good portion of the property••
natural, open apace.
Farrow
Rombotis
Jose
Rawlins
Friestedt
Farrow
Romboti1
Jose
Rawlins
Friestedt
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
1
MINUTES
Auguat 11 , 1982 Page 3 COMMISSIONERS
With regard to landscaping, Mr. Mudge indicated that there
•••afire that occurred on the property, and that area
will be hydroaeeded with natural materials and temporarily
landacaped. He added that it i1 their intention, as soon
•• grovth occurs there, to remove the irrigation and the
area vill be put back to its natural state.
The Coaaission recognized Mr. Dan Groth, 4957 Avila,
Carlabad. He inquired if there would be no final map
approval on the projer.t until there is public street
acceaa secured across to Tamarack and Skyline.
Mr. Roves indicated that it is required that they connect
to Ta-rack Avenu~.
In response to query fr0111 Mr. Groth regarding balancing of
the earthwork on the site, Mr. Mudge explained that the
aite does balance with the exception of Highridge Avenue,
vhich is the existing link between an existing tentative -P· He added that in the grading process, some dirt will
be removed.
Mr . Groth inquired if there would be a temporary or
pe~neot pump station to handle sewage at Neblina and
Avila.
Richard Allen, the City Engineer, indicated that he is not
faai.liar with the details of the first phase of the
project, whether there will be a need for any temporary
aever pump, or whether it would gravity right fr01D the
beginning. Be added that there will be no permanent pump
atationa ; however, he is not familiar with the phasing.
Mr. Mudge further indicated that there is no need for a
temporary pump station.
With regard to the recreational and RV storage areas, Mr.
Groth exprease rl concern with regard to the future corner
lot, a1 i t is likely to have two public streets around it,
border,, ae well aa a paved area with RV etorage. He
concluded by sugge~t iog that eoae alternative epots be
atudied for th~ RV atorage.
Mr. Bovee reaponded that Staff hae worked with the
applicant eitenaively, and feel, that once the RV etorage
ia in, it will be heavily landecaped, and the corner lot
vill look back into a wall of vegetation.
Mr. Groth reiterated hi1 concern regar di ng the propoeed RV
atorage area and it, affect on the f uture corner lot, and
requeated co-iaaion conaideratioo of aaae.
The Co~aaion recognized Mr . Nick Banche, 702 Fourth
Street, Oceanaide, repr~;~oting Mr . and Mr a. Safri who
reaide on Skyline Road. Mr. Bauche spoke in oppo,itiou to
the project, and indicat~d that very aevere slope, are
being left alone ea they cannot be ueed. He added that
other are•• are being bypaaaed a, they contain 1en1itive
botanical -teriala. Re eipreaaed the opi nion that the
open apace• are thoae are•• that cannot be uaed under any
circuaatance,, theref or e, there are 64 uni t, on 13 acrea.
Mr. Banche continued, requeating the Coaaiaaion conaider
that thi a i 1 the firet project being preaented under the
n-Ordi nance, vhich ••• deaianed to encourage ,enaitive
ua~ of land, prevent unneceaaary grading, and encourage
uaa ?f cluater houaing.
MINUTES
August 11 , 1982 Page 4
Mr. Banche continued that if approved, the City would
loose the protection given to establish neighborhoods in
the past. He indicated he felt that the findings cannot
be made from a legal standpoint to support the variance,
and expressed willingness to respond to any questions.
Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman
Farrow closed the public hearing.
Hr. Mudge responded to Commission questions regarding the
distribution mix of lot sizes.
The Conmission adopted the following Resolutions,
recol!Elending epproval of CT 82-5, PUD-39, and V-337 to
the City Council, based on the findings and subject to
the conditions contained therein; with the addition of a
condition to provide for hydroseeding of the open space :
3.
RESOLITTION NO. 1998, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A 64-
UNIT TENTATIVE TRACT HAP AND PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOATED WEST OF
NEBLINA DRIVE AND SOITTH OF FUTURE TAMARACK AVENUE IN
THE R-A-10,000 ZONE .
RESOLITTION NO. 1999, APPROV HlC A VARIANCE T) REDUCE
THE FRONT YARD SETBACK OIJ TWO UNITS OF A 6l,-!JNIT
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
WEST OF NEBLINA DRIVE AND SOUTH OF FITTURE 1 .-\MARAC:I(
AVENUE.
CT 82-141 MCMILLIN DEVELOPMENT, IN~. -Request for
approval of a tentative subdivision map to create 38
single family lots east of Pontiac Drive, north anu
south of Victoria Avenue and west of f uture Elm
Avenue in the R-1-7500 Zone .
Charles Grium gave the staff report, essenti.ally as
contained in the written report . He indicated that Staff
is recoumending the following addition to Condition No .
14 of the Resolution:
'"The Land Use Planni ng Manager shall have the
authority to approve minor encroachments of decks or
similar uncovered structures within the first 10
feet of the open space easement, abutting lots 231
through 244. Plans for development of such
structures shall be approved prior to issuance of a
building permit, or placement of such structures."
Chairman Farrow opened the public hearing, and extended
the invitation to speak.
The co-is• ion recognized Hr . E,1 E 11 iot t, Vice-President
of HcHillin Development, 2727 Ho?ver Avenue, National
City. Hr. Elliott referenced ConJition No . 32, and
indicated that the Ci ty received a le tter from
Woodeide/Kubota, explaining that the applicant has
existing contracts with Costa Real Municipal Water
Dietrict, regardless of the local situation. lo
conclueion, Hr. Elli ott expresseci willingness to respond
to any questions.
Since no one else wished to speak on the matt e r, Chairman
Farrow cloaed the public hearing .
Farrow X
Rombotis X
Jose X
Rawlins X
Friestedt X X
MINUTES
August 11 , 1982 Page 5
The Comnission approved the Negative Declaration issued
by the Land Use Planning Manager, and adopted the
following Resolution, approving CT 82-14, baaed on the
findings and subject to the conditions contained in the
etaff report, with the addition to Condition No. 14:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000, APPROVING A TENTATIVE
SUBDIVISION MAP TO CREATE 38 SINGLE FAMILY Lars ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF PONTIAC DRIVE ,
HORTH AND SOUTH OF VICTORIA AVENUE AND WEST OF
FUTURE ELM AVENUE .
, '
4. CT 82-11/PUD-44, PLAZA SERENA DE LA COSTA -Request
for an 8 unit Tentative Tract Hap and Planned Unit
Development on property loated at the end of
Luciernaga Court between Luciernaga Street and
Argonauts Place in the R-2 Zone.
Michael Howes gave a staff report on the matter,
indicating that Staff is recoamending that if the
Co-ission approves the project, that Staff be directed to
return at the next meeting with the approva l documents,
at which time the new Planned Development Ordinance will
be in effect.
Chairman Farrow openeJ the public hearing, and extended
the invitation to speak.
The Coamie~ion reco~nized Hr . Dan Goodman, •he developer,
13665 Pine Nee~l~s ~r~ve, ~~l Har. With the 9id of a
wall exhibit, Mr. Goodman briefly outlined the design of
the project, and expreased willingness to respond to any
questions.
The Comiasion recognized Mr. Charles Duff, 630 Sabrina
Way, Vista, speaking on behalf of hie eister and brother-
in-law, Frank and Charlene Scott, 7103 Babilonia, La
Costa, vho are out of town on business. Mr. Duff
indiceted that they oppose the project due to t he mix in
values of the different properties . He expressed the
opinion that the properties on the top of the hill wi l l
detract from the values of those properties across t he
street from the subject property. Hr. Duff added that
other concerns are traffic and density.
The Comnission recognized Mr. Seymour Canter, 2600
Argonauts Place, Carlsbad. Mr . Canter inquired regarding
the number of units allowed on certain lots, and
expressed concern with regard to the affects of the
project on adjacent property owners, i.e ., views,
denaity. He concluded by expressing opposition to the
project.
Mr. Hovea responded that the 111ze of the lots would have
to be calculated, and it would also depend on the shape
of the lota.
The Comiaeion recognized Mr . John Conti, 6817 Luciernaga
Court, Carlsbad. Mr. Conti spoke in opposition of the
project, and expressed concern with regard to traffic,
density, and parking.
The co-iaaion recognized Mr. Richard Mather, 6816
Luciernaga Court, Carlsbad. Mr . Mather expressed the
opinion that the project will not enhance his property,
and spoke in opposition of same due to increased density.
Farrow I x
Rombotis X
Jose X I x
Rawlins X
Friestedt X
5
MINUTES
~ '\
August 11, 1982 Page 6
0~ ~~"~
COMMISSIONERS ~ i~ ~\
The Cotmniesion recognized Hr. Bill Watt, 6814 Luciernaga
Court, Carlsbad. Hr. Watt expressed opposition to the
project, and indicated he was in agreement with the
co-nte made by his neighbors.
The Cotmnieeion recognized Hr. Arthur Gilad, 2958 Levante
Street, Carlsbad. Re inquired regarding the size and
value of the unite proposed.
Mr. Goodman responded that the units will be valued at
approximately $245,000., and will be 2200 to 3000 square
feet.
Mr. Gilad indicated that he 1s the owner of lot #182 on
the opposite side, and is currently breaking ground for a
duplex. Re added that the units will be 2300 square foot,
2-atory units, and they will be valued at approximately
$160,000. He continued to express hie opinion that there
ia no room for the 8 units proposed by the applicant 1n
this particular area, and at that price. He concluded
that he opposes the development as it is not compatible
with the area .
Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman
Farrow closed the public hearing.
With r egar ~ t o traffic, Richard Allen, the City Engineer,
explained that there 1s no problem with r~b 1rd to the
street capacity handling the through traffic. With regard
to parking, he indicated there will be a problem on the
cul-ae-sac; however, the developer has to put in all the
parking spaces required by the ordinance on-site, which 1s
two spaces per unit for each owner, plus one space for
every two units for visitors .
For clarification purposes, Ccmmissioner Friestedt
addressed the issue of p1zservation of views.
It was noted that the project was reviewed under the new
PUD Ordinance; however, the Ordinance does not go into
effe~t until August 20, 1982. Therefore, the Commission
agreed that the project could be approved at this meeting,
and the documents returned for adoption at the meeting of
August 25, 1982 , at which time the Ordinance would be in
effect.
The Co11Dission approved the Negative Declaration issued
by the Land Use Planning Manager, and directed Staff to
return at the next regular meeting with a Resolution of
approval for CT 82-11/PUD-44 .
RECESS
Qlairman Farrow called a recess at 8:57 P.H., and the
Co-iasion reconvened at 9:10 P .H., with five members
present.
5. CT 82-4/PUD-38 BIRTCHER BUSINESS CENTER -Request
for approval o! a Tentative Subdivision Hap and
Planned Un it Development to create 7 industrial lots
on the south side of Palomar Airport Road to the
we~t of Palomar Oaks Way in the P-H Zone.
Michael Howes gave a staff report on the Matter, as
contained in the written report.
Farrow
Roaabotis
Jose
Rawlins
Fries tedt
X
X
X
X X
X
MINUTES
1! '' ~ ~"",~ ~
____ Au_1_u_•t_1_1,_19_s_2 __________ P_a.;;..ge_7 ___ c_O_M.,.M_I_SS_IO_N_E_AS __ o~._.~~;:..-l~,~~~~~ ..... "
1
Chairman Farrow opened the public hearing.
The Co11111iasion recognized Hr. Bob Campbell, representing
Birtcher Pacific, 2 Morrow Bay, Corona Del Mar. Hr.
Caapbell indicated that the final draft of the conditions
eliminated Condition No. 30, and added a new condition
with regard to the City controlling water service. He
added that he was not previously aware of the condition,
and indicated that the applicant has substantial
inveatment in the Costa Real Municipal Water District, and
would like to retain that, as opposed to changing over to
City atandards.
Michael Holzmiller responded that this is a standard
condition that has been put on all project approvals, and
it juat indicates that water shall be provided by the City
of Carlsbad, unless some other arrangement is approved by
the City Council. He added that it was not part of the
staff report when it went to the DCC meeting, which was an
oversight, and it was subsequently added.
Hr. Holzmiller continued that the City has reached an
interim agreement with Costa Real Municipal Water District
(CRMWD), and boundaries have been drawn which primarily
follow the same boundaries that a.e currently served by
the City and CRMWD. He added that the City will continue
to place this condition on all projects as it is only an
interim agreement, and each project will be served by the
district it is presently in.
The Coamission recognized Hr. Al Aladray, Rancho Santa Fe,
owner of the property west of the Birtcher property. He
indicated he had planned to put a 10,000 square foot
office building and warehouse on his property; however, it
the road goes in to the rear of his property, it will take
half of the property away.
Richard Allen responded that Staff's proposal is to put a
continuous frontage road that goea from this project to
the future College Avenue, west of the second large lot .
He continued that a condition could be added that would
require th~ developer to provide approximately 3,000
aquare feet to the middle property, in exchange for the
middle property dedicating 40 feet across the property,
and when the property to the weat comes in they would be
required to give 3,000 square feet to the middle property
for that dedication. The middle property would not loose
any square footage, and it would enable the people to the
eaat and west to connect their two roads.
Mr. Campbell responded that the applicant was approached
by the City, indicating they did not like the cul-de-sac,
and what they wanted was a frontage road going through to
College. He added that the applicant was willing to go
along with the cul-de-aac and give Hr. Aladray the right
turu only easement on both •idea; howe"er, it was the
City's decision not to go along with th~t.
Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman
Farrow continued the public hearing.
The Coamiaaion continued the matter to the meeting of
Auguat 25, 1982, and directed Staff to return with a
plan acceptable to the applicant, adjacent pro?erty owner
and the City, regarding the frontage road.
Farrow X
Rombotia X
Joae X
Rawl i na X
Frieatedt X X
@J
MINUTES
Augu1t 11, 1982 Page 8 COMMISSIONERS
6. CT 82-9/CP-210, P--+1 INDUSTRIES -Request for
approval of a 12-unit Tentative Tract Map and
Condominium Permit, located on the north side of
Luciernaga Street, west of Urubu Street in the RD--+1
Zone.
Charles Gri11111 gave a staff report on the matter .
Chairman Farrow opened the public hearing and extended
the invitation to speak.
The Co11111ission recognized Hr. Richard Armstrong, Architect
representing the applicant, 2286 Valley Road, who
expressed willingnees to respond to any questions.
Mr. Armstrong responded to Commission questions regarding
landecaping and design criteria.
The Comnission r£cognized a representative from Brian
Saith Engineers, 2656 State Street, Carlsbad. He
indicated that they own an adjacent lot, and will be
filing a one lot subdivision, and will have to include
the adjacent lot by adjueting the line five feet into the
adjacent property.
Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman
Farrow closed the public hearing.
The Colll!lission approved the Negative Declaration issued
by the Land Use Planning Manager, and directed Staff to
return Resolution NO. 2001, approving CT 82-9/CP-210,
baeed on the findings and subject to the conditions
contained in the staff report .
7. CT 82-13/PUD-43, HAMSAYEH/ADESHIRI -Request for
approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit
Development to create four single-family lots on the
south side of El Fuerte Street, 140 feet west of
Cacatua Street. This area is zoned R-1-7500.
With the aid of a wall exhibit showing the driveway
alignment of the project, Charles Gri11111 gave a staff
report on the matter.
Co11111issioner Rawlins expressed concern with regard to the
elope and drainage, although it is comparatively stablized
at present, and requeeted further information with regard
to the eoil, to pre.eat further slippage. C~111111ission
di1cuaaion reflected aame.
Mr. Allen indicated that a condition could be added,
requiring the applicant to eubait a soil stability
report. He added that he will have to submit a soil
engineering report ae a part of the grading condition.
Chairman Farrow opened the public hearing and extended
the invitation to ■peak.
The co-i■■ion recognized Mr . Morey Alters, 2844 Cacatua
Street, Carl■bad. Kr. Alter■ expressed concern in that
the applicant was not pre■ent at the meeting to an■wer
questions, and epoke in oppo■ition of the project due to
grading and compati bi lity of prope rty values.
Farrow
Rombotis
Jose
Rawlins
Friestedt
X
X
X X
X
X
MINUTES
August 11, 1982 Page 9 COMMISSIONERS
The Coanission recognized Hs. Jane Smith, 2840 Cacatua
Street, Carlsbad. He. Smith expressed concern with regard
to drainage, grading, and the affect regarding property
values, and expressed the opinion that further study
should be conducted on the project.
The Coanission recognized Hr. Joe Nicosia, 2861 Cacatua
Street, Carlsbad. Hr. Nicosia inquired how the Homeowners
Association is going to provide for the irrigation and
maintenance of the slope, and what size houses are going
to be built on the subject property. He further expressed
the opinion that since the applicant was not present, the
matter should be tabled.
Charles Griam responded that all surrounding areas are
zoned R-1-7500. With regard to the Homeowners
Association, he explained that there is a requirement that
an Association be formed, and that CC&R 's br: established.
The Coamiss ion recognized Hr. Gene Smith, '..840 Cacatua
Street, Carlsbad. Hr. Smith inquired with regard to lot
size, and the ability to split a lot.
Hr. Howes responded that it would depend on the zoning and
size of the lot.
Hr. Smith further inquired if the developer has submitted
any plans for the houses.
Hr . Griam responded that no development plans have been
submitted to date.
The Coanission recognized Hrs. Louise Schoos, 2824 Cacatua
Street, Carlsbad. Hrs. Schoos expressed concern regarding
the slope and drainage, and requested clarification of the
lot split issue.
Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman
Farrow closed the public hearing.
Michael Holzmiller indicated that Staff feels the proposal
is good in concept &B the property is zoned R-1-7500, and
the applicant could come in and divide it up into standard
lots, and Staff feels it is better to move the development
onto the flatter portions of t;1e site. However, when the
plan va• submitted, Staff did indicate that normally under
a Planned Unit Development plans must be submitted for the
houses, and the applicant indicated that he wanted to do a
custom lot project; therefore, the plans have not been
formalized to date.
Mr. Holzmiller continued that Staff cannot answer any
questions with regard to the size and architecture of the
units; however, he added that if there is concern on the
part of the Co-isaion, Staff feels the applicant should
be reepon1ible for anavering to same, in proving that the
unite to be placed on the property will be compatible with
the surrounding area. He concluded that the applicant waa
infor-d of the meeting, and was aware of the concern■
·regarding the plan• not being submitted for the houaes .
co-iseioner Rombotis expressed the opinion that a ■lope
stability analyaia 1hould be required to the satiafaction
of the City Engineer, prior to approval; and that there be
no further 1ubdivi1ion on lot 4 . He added that he would
like to 1ee the CC&R'1.
MINUTES
August 11, 1982 Page 10 COMMISSIONERS
Following brief discussion, the Counnission continued the
matter to the meeting of September 8, 1982, to allow
for the presence of the developer, to address the issues
of the elope analysis, the type of houses proposed for
the lots, and the CC&R's.
DISCUSSION ITEM
8. SOP 82-2, KOLLS/WELLS -Request for approval of a
Site Development Plan to allow the grading of a 17
acre parcel of industrially zoned property located on
the east side of El Camino Real immediately north of
the Cablevision Building.
Charles Grimm gave a brief staff report on the matter, as
contained in the written report .
Mr. Frank Finney, Engineer representing the applicant,
addressed the Co1m1ieaion. Mr. Finney expressed concern
with regard to the requirement for the concrete drainage
ditch, and indicated that same is contrary to what they
are trying to do. He added that it was deleted from the
Resolution; however, was not deleted from the staff
report. He further indicated that the complete set of
grading and erosion control plans have been submitted,
and requested that the reference to the drainage ditch be
removed from the staff report. He concluded by
expressing willlingness to respond to any questions.
The Commission approved the Negative Declaration issued
by the Planning Director, and adopted the following
Resolution , approving SOP 82-2, based on the findings and
subject to the conditions contained therein:
RESOLlITION NO. 1997, APPROVING A SITE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN NO. 82-2 TO ALLOW THE GRADING OF A 17 ACRE
PARCEL ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST
SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF THE
CABLEVISION BUILDING.
APPROVAL OF MINtrI'ES
Minutes of the Regular meeting, held July 28, 1982, were
approved as submitted.
ADJOURNMENT
By proper motion, the meeting was adjourned at 10:22 P.H.
Respectfully Submitted,
Ann R. Alleman, Minutes Clerk
(Minutes prepared from tape.)
Farrow
Rombotis
Jose
Rawlins
Friestedt
Farrow
Rombotis
Jose
Rawlins
Friestedt
Farrow
Rombotis
Jose
Rawlins
Friestedt
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X