Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-06-13; Planning Commission; MinutesMeeting of.: Date of. Meeting: Tiae of. Meeting: Placie of. Meeting: CALL'l'O Clll!!R: MINUTES PI.Mfin«; CXMUSSI~ June 13, 1984 7:00 p.m. City Council Chal'bers The Meeting was called to ceder by Vioe-<hairman Rawlins at 7:01 p.a. Pn!eent: Vice Chainan Rawlins, Caaissia1ers Schlehuber, smith, Marcus, and Farrow. Abeent: O\ainnan Ralb:>tie. PLBOOB CY ALUX;IAR:E was led by Vioe-Olaianan Rawlins. PIANNOO CXJIUSSI~ PRJCl!IXJRE: Vice Chainan Rawlins anoounoed the Planning Coa'aliseioo ProoeclJre WI being ahown ma transparency and asked the adience to spend a few minutes reading it. Staff Mellt>ers Present: Bill Bofmn, Principal Planner Charles Gria, Principal Planner Paul Klukas, Assistant Planner Walter Brown, Civil Engineer h-officio Malt>ers Present: Mike Holailler, Land Use Planning Manager Dan Hentachke, Assistant City Attorney Dave Hamer, Deputy City Engineer 1. = 84-1 -CrrY CY CAUaW> CIIDJIMl'Iai EU1U!Hl' -~ to clraititfui Blaent to revise allgraent:s and clwificatiorw of. certain future roadways located tbr.'oughout the city. Nilm Bolailler, Lam U.. Planning Manager, explained the Circulation oo..ittee ..ud a full ca.iuim ~t fer tbia ita, and Olairan Ramotis will rot return until after nut ~J therefore, a requeet for nantuu.ca .. acle. The cawa-..i ol. opinim WI to oontime this me it• to a llpeCia1 aet.ing, Nanday, June 25, 1984, at 8:30 p.a., in the ODuncll Chilean. P1-ing ca-1•ion aontimed the City of. carlabad Cirwl.4.t kin l!-nt Bearing to Ncndlly, Jm,e 25, 1984, at 8il0 p.L, in the Council Chlllbera. Vi~ ... u. .. allied for teetialny frGa myane .tlo oauld rot be p:-eamt at the JWle 25, 1984, hMring. llr. llaiy ~, 12f1 T...-.dt AWIUe, IIJl' Ollaittee, ldlltuaat tbt a.dN\Qn nguding mma for widening 111111 cat_.l._ t'amac:k, d lta dlelgnation • a 11 rar• t -.rial. Be atated the clanger to pedaatdw, Nbao1 dllMlrwt, 1oN ol. villaiJe at:aoaphere lft! nclaction of 1114t1Ety ..iu.. 0) X X I X X X , 'I MINUTES June 13 , 1984 Page 2 Mr. Haubert stated there had been a lot of debate oo this issue, with a ~tion fraft the Circulation Calllittl.!e of mking Tanrack a 48 foot pavement with a 60 foot right-of-wy. He stated that would be ronsistent with a>llector streets to allow for residential dri'V'f!WaYII. Mr. Halbert stated that oo the other hand, to allow the present plan for: Taarack to beoolle a four-lane secondary arterial would not be suitable. He stated if I-5 and El c.ino Real carry the rorth-«JUth traffic, why a>ul.dn't Bl.JII, cannon and Pal.calr Airport~ acoo.odate the east- west traffic. T .. rack is the ooly prilllarily residential st:n!et that is prq,oeed to be widened into a four-lane seoondaiy arterial. Mr. Haubert stated the traffic oounts were the priary reason for this rea:iaaendation, and he felt thoae oounts were high. Also, he stated if you ake wider streets, that generates mre traffic and at a higher rate of speed. Mr. Haubert ooncluded by stating it would be a Iii.stake to widen Tanrack and destroy a lot oL. prq,erty without the need to oo so. Mr. Inwen Ponte, 522 Taarack, addressed the ca.i.ssion on the Tmnarack Aveme widening, stating the Circulatioo Calllittee had reached agreea?nt oo all nN..1.-ndatioos except me-'l'aaradt Aveme widening. He stated the new SAR:lllG stul!y gives credence to the reoamendatioo to downgrade Taarack to a a>llector street, and he requested the PlaMing Caiai.ssion rec:xnaend that. Mr. Ponte stated the ooet to widen T amrack would be very high, taking me hoae 0011pletely, three garages would be destroyed and 16 htaea would be less than five feet l1ltlll.'f frm the right-of-my, with four hoaes less than two feet frm the right-of-wy. People will not be able to back out of their driV'f!RYB, and any peq,le will have to park on the street, since their driveways will oo longer be lonrJ enough to aoc, -date a oar. Mr. Ponte stated driwways are not pemitted on a eeccndary arterial~t tbeN will naain and beCXlllle a haurd. The speed lillit wculd reaain 25 11p1, 110 lily b.lild a 40 l!ph st:n!et for: a 25 llpl lpNC! lillit. A luge, wide street would encourage aotcriata to drive faster and create a danger to peclsatriarw and children. Mr. Ponte asked the caaission to join half of the Circulatioo Calllittee in voting to ~ade Taarack to a oollector street. Mr. Pante gave cxipiee of. his naarks to the Mellt:>ers of the cm.ieatcn. The Pw>lic Hearing .... oontinued lD'ltil June 25, 1984, at 8: 30 p.a. in the Council Chabers. 2. Cl' 84-16/CP-285 -OCBM VIllf CXIIXE -Request f'cx 1H4oiii1 cit' a tantatlve uiUvlelc:ii 11111> and oondoainim perait !CIC' nine W\ita oo the 80Utheut cnrner of c.arlebad Boulevud and Walmt Aveme in the R-3 zone. Charl• Gria, Principal Planner, gne the preeentatioo on thia it.• oontained in the staff report, ming a t~ of the locatioo ap showing the site, and wll dm'ta lto,ing the project. Rawlins Sdtlehuber Saith MaraJe Parrow © I I I I I I MINUTES ~ ~ June 13, 1984 Page 3 ~ ~>,~ 1f>. COMMISSIONERS ~ ~'-~\ In answer to Coll'lllission query, staff stated that the excess right-<>f-way along Carl~bad Boulevard requested for vacation should be "nine feet" instead of "ten feet" as indicated Wlder the Project Description. Vice--Olairmn Rawlins q>ened the public hearing at 7:25 p.m. and issued the invitation to speak. Mr. Dan YOlln:i, 118 catalina, Redondo Beadl, Ardlitect oo the project, addressed Council stating he was present to answer any ~estions. Mr. Al Fiechter, 110-112 Sycarrore, addressed the Cawission, stating these people have lots 1, 2 and 3, and hie lot is l"lllli>er 4, next ooor. Be stated the nape should read Sycamore Street-not Chestnut Street. Mr. Fiechter stated the !R)licant plans to ruild a spa in the 20 foot setback area, directly under hie window. Be asked whether it would be possible to m:,ve the spa OYer to the middle or other end of the project. Staff indicated they felt there was sufficient space between the !R)liamt's property and Mr. Fiechter's property. The location of the spa was pointed out oo a wall mp. Mike Holzmiller, Land Use Planning Manager, suggested the ardlitect be oonsulted about the possibility of roving the spa. The ardlitect stated that originally it was intended to have very lilftited r.ecreational facilities, but staff had rec:aaended the spa, and because of the shape of the building the spa was put oo the south side of the building. It oould be IIOll'ed north to the next "V" in the building, if staff "°'1ld allow it within the 20 foot setback. Staff did oot object to this, stating the spa was to be set <bwn into the ground below street level approximtely four feet with a screening wall to protect it f1XII the wind about three and a half feet above grade. This ~ IOlld be tucked into the patio area for privacy. Callliuiooer Farrow .ited whether it would pre~t a prob!• to a,v,e the spa <bwn me aore jog, and 11taff replied they had no problem with that. The applicant w• in agreeaent with this request. Mr. George Eutca, Registered Civil Engineer, stated the spa-. protected by the wall and was below grade about four feet with a eeven-foot wall. It will be Ull)088ihle to eee into er rut of the spa, and as far as ooise is oonoerned, it is well-protected and would cause n:, ooise prob!-. Arr/ noise wculd oot go in the direction of. Mr. Piechter'a hcae, even if it were extended as Mr. Fiechter ha incllcated. That extension oould oot go into the 20 foot Ntbadt, aalting m hpact ~ the planned mange Mr. Fiechter amtioned. The patio is the emne level as the subterranean garage, with four feet into grade with a 114Mtn-foot wall. Mr. P4staa stated he did not object to awing the epa as long • that did not delay the project. MINUTES P~ CXMMISSICfi June 13 , 1 984 Page 4 Sinoe oo me else wished to speak oo this item, the public test.iJD1y was ooncluded at 7:42 p.111. Plaming cannission aJ]proved the Negative Declaration issued by the Land Use Plaming Manager and adopted the following Resolution: RP.SCUJl'ICfi I«>. 2304, APPIIJITDl, A TENl'M' IVE &JB)IVlSICfi MAP Nil CIHX> PERU'!' FOR NINE mrrs Cfi .325 ACRFS Cfi PI01:!:Ri''r G!NEIWLY IDCM'ID Cfi 'mE nJmFA<n' CIRIER CF CARJ..SIW) BXJLEVAR> Nil ~ AvmuE. Modified that the spa will be roved oown one architectural jog in the plan to the north. 3. Cl' 84-14/P{IHi9 -TAMARACK POINI'E -Request for a 377- unit tentatlvetract nep and planned unit developnent oo property located east of Sierra Morena Avenue and rorth of Tamarack Avenue in the R-1 zone. Bill Hofman, Principal Planner, gave the presentation oo this item as oontained in the staff report, llBing a transparency shodng the site and a wall chart showing the landscape oonoept and formerly awroved map, blowup of rondo project and change fran cbplex to patio tones. Future Pontiac Aveooe will eventually be the main access. The aJll)licant has designed the project to step the streets and lots c:bm the hillside and preserve the views to the west. There is a 100-foot ~ easement and slope, with f urther setbadts, inaking a total distance of 240 feet between this project and the haaes, which is adequate separation. There 110Uld be RV parking under the easaent. The rondo access IIOUld be fran Pontiac off of a private street syatea. One of the oonditions of approval is to provide a seoondary access, because Pontiac will be rul.-de-sac. Teap:rary road llUSt be put in and oonatructed pri0r' to the 51st unit being occupied and naain until Pontiac is extended to the oorth and a nother acoesa is provided. There will be heavy landscaping and the uni ts are above the street. Reference was llllde to a oondition given to the coaiaaiooera taught requiring a wall along the tx:p of the bluf f tX> aerve as eound attenuaticn. This was in the !IR and llhoul.d be aMed to the ronditions. As tX> the vari ance request, the aJ]pliamt is pr:opoeing tX> delete the aidew.lk frca the Pontiac boumary of prq,erty. Staff camot euppcrt that request. Peq>le will be wlking tX> the park s ite and this IIOUld be a needed link. Staff we re<Draending denial ot the variance. In .... r to cpKy regarding the landscaping around the RV atcrage area, staff stat ed i t 110Uld be eet back frc:a T-.radt Averue and IIOUl d be fenced and screened and oot near lt6f/ living units. Staff defined patio hemes foe the coaission, stating thNe patio hcaee hllV'e a zero lot line. Rawlins Schlehuber smith Marcus Farrow X X X X X X MINUTES June 1 3 , 1 984 Page 5 ~ ~ 0~~~~ COMMISSIONERS ii~ ~\ Walter Brown, Civil Engineer, stated Engineering had gotten infonetioo this afternoon necessitating an additioo to Item 38, SUbeect.ioo M, stating sanitary sewers oo-1:1ite and Subeection N, sanitary sewers off-site should be included, subject to reintlursenent agieement satisfactay to the City Engineer. Bill Hofman stated in the a:>nditioo given to Coadssia1ers tonight, the word "Glasgow" should be changed to "Pontiac•. In answer to ca.dssia, query, Assistant City Attorney Hentschke stated Tanaradt had already been t:uilt in that area and the atly <peatioo was the sidewalk. Staff was asked to define grass-crete and stated it was ooncrete pavers with lcnobe stidting up and forming a rectangular pattern. It is possible to p..it soil and plant grass between the lcnobe. Callnissia,ers Rawlins and Marcus expressed their CDncern about the 8111:)UJlt of RV s torage space, stating when there is rot ernigh space, the RV's end up a, the street. Vice-<llainnan Rawlins q>ened the p..iblic hearing at 7:59 p.m. and issued the invitatioo to speak. Mr. Bob Ladwig, Ride Engineering, addressed the Ccalissioo to respond to the roaments llll!lde by the Callnissioo. He stated the final landscaping plan had to be approved by the Land Use Planning Manager before the building pennit oould be issued. Mr. Ladwig stated the CCR' s will oover the maintenance of the slopes. The RV parking area will be below, as the ~nt is depressed, and it will be hidden. He stated he IIIOUld like language added to the a:>ndition pertaining to the wall, stating that other measures be allowed if acceptable to the Land Use Planning Manager. Mr. Ladwig stated the applicant IIIOUld do a roise study and oould addrees the problen better at that time. Mr. Ladwig referred to Mr. Hofllllln's statement about the aoceee after the 50th unit, stating that since Pointiac le a a>llector street and ro parking is allowed, they oould pit~ to 120 units before the eeoond access would be required. Walter Brown stated blo cul-de-sac a:>nditioos oould arise in thia aubdivieioo. Re stated Mr. Ladwig was rorrect as far • Pontiac we mnoemed, llhich oould allow ~ to 120 unita. eo.ever, if the townhoose eectioo is oonstruct.ed before that, it oould be a few as 50 units. AB far • Oonditioo 24 is ooncemed, Mr. Ladwig stated the l(lplioant agreed to accepting their fair share of the rolllt: Ji11f, but no at tcrneye ' f eee er interest should be edited to that. The Auiatet City Attorney stated the City's wdentanding w• that interest and attorney fees were not included. MINUTES June 13, 1984 Page 6 Mr. Lacwig stated the grass-crete l«>llld provide a hard surface with an ar.ea fer grass to grow and l«>llld be used where there '°11.d be tandem parking. Mr. Lacwig spoke en Conditien 38C, stating a menm-andt.ml had been sut.itted to the City Engineer en their understanding of that roooition. He stated they pr:q,osed to ?,lt a -V-ditch to the toe of the slope along the SOOlrE easement and pidc up drainage fran the subdivisim and protect the ditch fran storm water fran the creek in that area. Mr. Brown stated the two ronditions regarding sewers were added after a dis01SSim with the City Engineer and Developnent Divisim Chief Dave Hauser, to insure :.<lf\Structioo of off-site sewers to handle arrt problem that overloaded sewers en Tanaradc might cause. There was a discussioo with the Assistant City Attorney rnd Mr. Brown regarding the reillhlrse111ent to the developer fer arrt share above his use of the sewer- anything in excess of the need of his subdivision. If larger lines were installed than needed, then the applicant would be rei.Jl'bursed. Condition 40 and 38B and request for variance all tie together. Mr. Lacwig gave a map to the Cannissioners for their perusal. He explained the existing sidewalks and open space and suggested the IJR)licant wild a sidewalk fran the existing developnent to Pontiac, with a croeswalJc to the south side of the street to the existing sidewalk. The applicant's reasats for this request are the slope beya)d Tamaradc is steep and to build a sidewalk there ooul.d be a problem to pedestrians. Also, W)efl this gets into the Calavera Muter Plan, th~re is open epace and a steep slope~ El.II, where there is m sidewalk. He asked the ca.tssiooers to eliminate the need for a sidewalk en the north side. Conditim 40 is to clean up and repair the City's ditch. Mr. Ladwig stated this was installed as a part of an earlier develq:aent and the easell'ent granted to the City, the City has accepted the ditch, and the applicant feels it is the City's d:>ligation. He stated they would clean up lff/ daage they inflicted upon the ditch, but did not feel that we a fair request. Mr. Ladvig atated with the sidewalk en the other side of the street , that '°11.d diJlliniah the need for fencing around the ditch. ee asked for' a change to wild the sidewalk u ahown on the exhibit he presented: not clean out the ditch am delete roooitioo 38 fer the fence. In aMIMr to query about the alternative measure m the wall, Mr. Ladwig stated the wall was for sound-not viaual. He atOfld a P111Je of the EIR indicating the CNEL rating am stated the wall would be necessary to llitigate the miee. ~uioner Schlehuber stated he felt the fencing around the ditch '°11.d be to protect aall children and pecple-it :la a play,ground-,snd dangerous-attl it floods i n a dcMp:lur. He stated he ooul.d see m reaem for' deleting the fencft. MINUTES P~ <DIUSSIO. June 1 3 , 1984 Page 7 Mr. R:Jy Wl!rd, 3065 Madison, general partner, calavera Rills, addressed the Colllllission stating he had a letter fra11 Asaro and Associates reqarding Item 24. Re stated his a:mpany is me of the litigants with the City and it is a queetial uf proper ootioe raised as a natter of disagreement between the City and the <DIPM1Y. This matter of a potential reinhlrsement agreement with the ~layor and existing City Council is a result of a request to staff in Noveltler 1982 to a:ne to an agreement al rei.diursaaent agieenent with developnent of this pi:q,erty. Mr. ward stated he was ootifying the City and the owners and develq>ers that his i:onpany was i:ursuing this in c;µx'I ronscienoe. It was just a matter of noticing. Re added he spate in favor of this plan as a neighbor. With regard to the sidewalk a1 Tamarack, Mr. ward stated he agreed with Mr. Ladltig. If westerly sidewalk is continued l4> Taarack, the City should be aware this is a very eerious slcpe and there is the greatest danger of scmeaie falling off of the sidewalk. Mr. ward stated there are two sewer lines in Tamarack Avenue and those should be investigated as C{ltitv":.csl uses, as that might be a c;µx'I alternative for the sewers. Since oo me else wished to speak al this item, the public testina"ly was ooncluded at 8:23 p.m. Walter Brown spate in answer to the danger of the sidewalk, and stated as far as people falling off, that would be a design problem, and if that was the nDSt dllniJerous slope, then there should be a protective barrier, such a fencing, etc., but he disagreed that was the IID8t danerous slcpe in the area. The Assistant City Attorney stated the fence and walk were oonditiooed previously in a pdor subdivisial, with both to be installed. Re stated if the Ccmllissial is considering the p[q,oaed plan, he stroogly recamerded the City Traffic Engineer review for safety-particularly the croeswa.lk. Re had ooncems about that, and for deleting the reguireaent for the fence. If the sidewalk is ctaleted, in order to vary, the ec..issial nust make the aae findinga yo.i would ake for a varianoe-t.1Bl8Ual 00111Utioo bued al oonditioo of property lllllking standards unfair and discrillinatory against that property. The Traffic Engineer ahould ~row for safety and DBke findinp for a variance. Mr. Bentschke stated he had rot atui!ied the croeswa.lk oonditioo, but Council had said i:ut that wlk in. Mr. 8nMI stated staff~ al all iteE, since the fence -requind and the it• an,ealed to the City Council and then ~ld by the Council. Re stated it is illlporunt to protect that ditch. There was trouble with u.a~n there. Nr. 8rcM\ atated m the sidewalk in queetial, there had been incorr..._"t inforation-in Villac}e G of cal.av-era Bill• tantatiw -.p, oonditiooa require sidewalks along Taaracll. The City's intention ls to require a sidewalk GJ MINUTES June 13, 1984 Page 8 along the remaining portion of Tamarack Avenue, which is a portion of Village R of calavera Hills. The slope drqiping l!IMl!l'f frcn Tmnarack is steep and might require protectioo. If too dangerous, would not approve. He indicated the portion nerked for future park and stated there is a pedestrian underpass in place there at the present time. Mr. Brown stated the cleaning and neintenance of the ditch would have been required of this developer if it had not been ruilt in oonjunction with Tamarack and Calavara Hills. The ditch has silted areas and it appears the eource of siltation is fran material flowing across fran the adjacent ground-surface flOW'-Caused by agricultural q,erations, and the City suggests the rurden for neintenance of the ditch would indeed follow the land. camrlssiooer Schlehuber stated the sidewalk was reasonable in light of the underground crosswalk. carmissiooer Farrow stated he rould not ~te for the rotion if the rondition regarding the ditch were included. He stated if a wall were required to mitigate the eound, he would be willing to nodify that oondition subject to the approval of the Land use Planning Manager. Planning Camrl.ssion approved the Negative Declaration issued by the Land Use Planning Manager and adopted the following Resolutioo: RESOLUI'IOl ti:>. 2307, ~IM; APPFOJAL <:FA 377-unT Tl!Hl'ID'IVE TRACI' M.\P JHl PLN1!m:> llUT ~00' OJ PJOIERl't camRALLY I!XM'ED EA9l' OF SIERRA ~ JHl NCR1'B <:F T~ AVEHJE. Amended to allow an alternative solution to the sound attenuatioo problem if approved by the Land Use Planning Manager. Glasgow Aveme changed to Pontiac Avenue in men:>randulll from Land Use Plarming Office dated June 13, 1984. Larmall)ing ara.md the RV stcrage area to be added as a conditioo. Amended to include iteff8 M, N of Condition 138 as provided by the Engineering Deparbaent. Letter fn:m Asaro , Associates to be filed and no actioo taken. 4. er 84-15/CP-284 -SBAFaU' CXHn3 -Request fa: approval of a tentative aubdivlslon ap and condceini1.111 permit for 100 units cri the eouthwieet oorner of lU Camino Real and Alga Road in the RD-fl 310ne. Bill Hot.an, Principal Planner, gave the presentation as oontained in the staff repcxt, with a transparency showing the site and wall imps l!howing location and building types. The q>erl apaoe between wilding• 11188 pointed out oo the nap and the recreation area under the SDGH, lllhidl hu been authodsed by sx;a.B. This i.a a tnrwitional area and staff indicated the different scnings. Rawlins Sdllehuber smith Marcus Farrow X X X X X X MINUTES PLAlfilH; ClJIUSSICtf June 13, 1984 Page 9 Vi~airan Rawlins cpened the public hearing at 8:45 p.m. and issued the invitation to speak. Mr. Bob Jahn, P. o. Bol: Drawer A, Huntington Beach, stated he was available for Canaission questions and concurred with staff re<X11Bendations and <Dnditions. Mr. Chris Hogan, 1856 Tule Court, addressed questions to the Camdssioo. He stated he did rot rect!ive notifioatioo of this hearing and two of his neighbors did not. He asked whether the ~ units would be tl«r stoey, and IIOUld that be ~tairs, downstairs er separate. He also stated his a:,ncern about grade change, and the fact that the easenent was the smne elevation and this prq,erty is plus 35 feet vertical rise. Vice- Chair:man Rawlins told Mr. Hogan this prq,erty had been graded pt"eViously. Mr. Hogan stated he took exception to this, as people oould lode oown into his 1-ane. Mr. Hogan stated he took exception to the Six;&E easement being used for recreation facilities. This 100- foot easement gave a visual buffer, and with picnic tables, a play oourt and parking there, it would result in trash and roise which would be unacceptable. Mr. Bob Byer, 185-4 Tule Court, stated he had rot reoeived notificatioo of the hearing. Staff stated the residents a, Tule Court had been notified, and~ checking the list of names, staff found these peq,le had recently moved to that street. Staff explained notices are sent to those a, the tax aaseamnent records, and those reoords are cnly ~ted once a year. The Assistant City Attorney stated by appearing at the hearing the people not receiving notice waived their objection, but did want evidence the notices were prq>erly prepared and miled. ~ staff supplying this infcxatioo, Mr. Hentac:hke stated the natter oould be heard by the ca.iuioo and not oontinued. He suggested when the •tter a:ata befcre the Council, that the appJ i oant penonally deliver the notioee to Tule Court. Mr. Byer agreed with Mr. Hogan, stating his hoa is 30 feet frca the SDGU eaament. He stated he had been told nothing IIOUld ever be done with that eue11ent. Mr. Byer atated he wnted the truh and piarlc tables a, their own develqaent, and not a, the eas-nt. The armcaping for the eBllellltnt was discusaed, but it waa felt that eucalyptus tnee hid been designated, and tMy 9a'J not acreen the activities £nm the hanee by the ••-nt-.. The ca.iuiooers did feel the landaclping pd,l• could be "Irked out satisfactorily. Mr. 1111111 o.bezg, 7219 Minlea Drive, apoke in favor of thia project, stating he will be happy to aee this tt.v.lq,ed, • the eeo-nt ia ., eyNOn. Mr. Ollbezg did feel thia -■ t10o mdl of a change £nm cxaaercial to naidlntial, 111d with the denaity of this project, he felt puking could be a probl•. Aleo, Mr. Olbezg atated then ... no .,.,_..._tion for: young children. There ia no neighbachood park ln this area, and he felt thia would not be ~ity living. He a>ncludod, stating this IIOUld oallN •CNaive traffic m Alga Road. MINUTES ~ CDIUSSICN June 1 3, 1 984 Page 10 Since ro a,e else wished to speak en this item, the public testim:)ny a:>ncluded at 9:12 p.m. In answer to query, staff indicated other projects had put parking en an SOOI.E easement. Camdssia,er Maro.is stated she liked this type of use for easaaents and felt the landscaping problem oould be solved. She did state oonoern for the am:xmt of play area for dlildren. Bill Hofman stated there were sane legitimate oonoerns regarding the recreatioo area in the SOC-E easement. Staff was recaaending an increase in density partly because of this extra recreatien area urder the SOOI.E eMe111ent. Be stated if the canission did rot agree with the ~tioo area, the density CX>Uld not be justified. 'l'he play oourt was discussed, with the applicant stating it was not to be a lighted oourt. camdssiooer Schlehuber stated he had a problem with the density and felt it should be sent back for re~ign. Upon questiooing the applicant, he indicated he would rather have the project sent back er re-1110rking. There was a questioo about i:utting a wall on the south side of the eaae11ent, but staff indicated Soo.E did not pendt 1fff structure to be wilt oo an easement. Planning Cc:adssioo returned this item to staff fer nH!eeign and the hearing will be re-ootioed. It was reo.._~nded the present residents give their nws and adl!reuee to staff. RICPSS: Vioe-Otairan Rawlins declared a recess at 9:25 p.m., and the Planning eo..iasion re-convened at 9:35 p.m. with fiw cc..d.uionera preeent. 5. Rl>-68 -MC IOllft -A request for a four-lot irw:llatrlal plinnid iiilt deve]qaent on property located on the eoutheaat oomer of Palcaar Airpxt Road and Yarrotl Driw in the P-fll acne. Bill Hofman, Principal Planner, gave the presentation as conuiined in the staff niprt, using a wall 1111P aho,ing the pcojec:t n a trarwpareancy aho,ing the site. Vice-<:hainan Rawline q,ened the public hearing at 9: 38 p.a. n ~ the invitation to apeak. Nr. Jlldt lldloaay, 5451 !l Cai.no Real, addreeaed the 0c:ee1-atcn., atating be CXlllOlrred with staff .-.c,c I I rAatiorw ""' oonditia'\8 and IIIOUl.d answer any queaticna. Since n, one elae wiahed to apea>c oo this ite111, the public t:Ntiaaqy wa mnclmed at 9:39 p.m. Rawlins Schlehuber Slldth Marcus Farrow @ X X X X X X MINUTES PINfiDC <DIIISSICN June 13, 1984 Page 11 Plaming ca.isaim adopted the following Resolutim: Rl!SUJl'ICN ~-2302, APPKJII/Il,I; A FOOR-ID!' ~ RismMm PiW tJnT ~ CN PRlPERrY Gl!NBMLLY UXM'l!D (N 'IBE SX7l'HFA91' ~ CF PAUJIAR AIRPCR' RW> AR> ~ DRIVE. 6. tCA-173 -Cl'l'Y Cl CAIU.S8AD -An amendment to the Zoning Ordlnancie to iieke iiilnor revisions to the Residential and Non-Residential Planned Developnent Ordinance. Charles Grina, Principal Planner, gave the presentatim as CDntained in the staff report, using a trgnsparency showing Exhibit A, parcel parking space en public er private street. Mr. Grillln stated develq,ers had received oo-street visitol." parking credit f<X pdvate streets, but oot for public streets, with the result being that many single family detached projects are being approved with private streets. The City feels that ultimately this will cause a problem, since mintenanoe f<X private streets will fall l4lOO the halleowners and oot the City. The amendment would give credit for <XH1treet parking en public streets for single fatly detached projects which should result in mre public streets being oonstructed in the new projects. The eec,ond part of the oode anendment involves 11\i.nor non- :-esidential planned developnents. currently, the ordinance pennits adlllinistrative l!R)roval of minor non- residential planned developnents I.U'O!r cne acre. H011eVer, since all inclJstrial lots are mre than cne acre, staff is proposing to drop the cne acre minim.ml am state that Sr/ minir project of less than five lots CX>Uld be 41Ptoved adlllinistratively. This would speed ~ the IIA)lOval prooeaa and rewoe the Planning Cc::mli.ssien and staff's mrk load. Refeninoe ws lade to the neDrardn fran the Land Use Plaming Office to the Planning Ccadssion adding the lflXd ·detached•. The AUistut City Attorney stated the problem with private etreete is that whenever a problem arises, the citiselw think it ia the City's teSpCJnSibility--not theirs. The City ll0Uld like to get back in the positioo of biking care of the needs of the haleowners. The aarlting of. putting ~ m streets was disa1■eed. and at:aff atatec! the public streets are the City's nap01•ibility, but they ally aarlt apaoee en arterial CJrD atnete -buainea streets. Vioe-Caiman RWlina q>erled the public hearing at 10: 10 p.L and iuued the invitation to speak. Nr. A. Banefa:t, Vim President, Cesoo Develqaent, 110 -t C streH, Ban Diego, atcb:eaed the Ccaliuion in f1190r ot. at:aff'• tacw -Mation, stating this wuld bring to wlative par the mlatian■hip bet.wen oounting credit an private n public streets in a devel.qaent. Rawlins Schlehuber Sititj, Marcus Farrow @ MINUTES June 13, 1984 Page 12 Since no me else wished to speak oo this item, the public teetim:)jlY was ooncluded at 10:15 p.m. Planning C<mllission ~ the Negative Declaratioo issued by the Lard Use Planning Manager and n:,pted the following Re90lution: ~ICN t«>. 2303, RECX:MHlH>IH; APPRJ\/AL CF AZ~ CIDE Ml!JDll!Nl', Ml!R)n«; TITLE 21 OIAPl'ER 45 SECI'IOi 090(d) AR> CBAPl'ER 47 SECl'IOi 110(a), BY THE AIDITIOi CF SCJB61D'IOi (3) TO SECl.'IOi 21.45.090(d) TO ALIDf CREDIT ~ QJBSI' PI\RltIH; CN LOCAL POBLIC Sl'REE!'S SERVIN:; STIGE PMILY RESIDl!NCES, ~ THE M'.DIFICM'IOi CF SECl.'IOi 21.47.110(a) TO ALIDtf NIUNISl'Rm'IVE APPRJ\/AL CF MilO ~RBSIDH'IAL PlARm> ~00'S Oi PR:>PERI'Y ~ THAN CNE N:RE. 7. PCD-58 -CMit«> POIHl'E CARLSBAD -Request for a Plaming C<iilsslon Deteriiilnatlon for a 150-unit apart:a!nt project oo prq,erty located oo the mrth and south sides of Hosp MIi}' ~imately 900 feet west of El Callli.no Real in the P-C :zone. Charles Grillln, Principal Planner, gave the presentation on this item as <Dntained in the staff report, using a transparency of the location 1111P showing the site. Mr. Joe Sandy, 2956 JoJBevelt, representing the applicant, spoke to the Colllnission, calling attention to <Dldition 28. Mr. Sandy .El,lt a wall chart oo the board and stated .El,ltting a ?Jblic easanent across there µits them in an awkward poeitioo fran a liability starq,oint. Be stated this stairway goes fran Marron Road to the top of the project, and they did not want ?Jblic use of this. The Assistant City Attomey stated this was a cpxl &Ul}l}e9tioo, as a lot of people use this and this would put Mr. Sandy's client and the City oo the hook. Be stated he wnted that oondition deleted. Malter Brown stated the intent was to have the stairs uaed by the pj>lic and to have the public protected, but he would defer to the Attorney's advice. The Plaming r.aaiasion IA)roYed the Negative Declaration iuued by the wne Use Planning Manager and adopted the following Reeolut.ioo: RISCl:UJ'ICN t«>. 2305, APPRJVD«; A 1 So-unT APARl'MBNI' iii1icr QI PIUtsRl.k Q!NBRALLY u:x::JtrBD CN THE M:mB ~ 9CUl'B 8IDIIS at IDIP NU APPIDXDWJ.'BLY 900 Far tESl' CF BL CMDI) NW.,. OClnditioo 28 regarding the eaaaient was deleted. AJ:l!O!al of Docmanta B. Y..359 -DBVBUBl!Nl' CXHIOill'AHl'S -Raqueet for a variinoi oft& fciilnrJ Ordinance to oonatruct a 10-foot tenni• &nee within the rear y.r eetbadt of a through- lot at 7117 CblillCO Circle. Rawlins Schlehuber smith Marcus Farrow Rawlins Schlehuber a.1th Marcus Parrow X X X X X X MINUTES June 13 , 1 984 Page 13 Plaming CCllllission adopted the following Resolution: RESOWl'ICfi I«). 2299, APPKWn«; A VARIANCE TO a:RJI'RO' A 1o-iio:Jr PIH:Z 1n'CP A 7-POCJr R£l'AINIH:; ~ Wl'l'BDI 1HE RBAR YARD sm'BAa CP A THIUDI IDr ~ PR>PERl't Gl!NERAILY UJCllll'l!D CM 'l1IE ten' SIDB CF CBLISCD CIICLE. The Miootes of the May 23, 1984, meeting were approved as presented. By prq,er notion, the neeting of June 13, 1984, was adjourned to Monday, June 25, 1984, at R: 30 p. m. , in the Council Chmi>ers. Respectfully eutaitted, ' MICBABL J. I Land Use Planning Manag@r Harriett Babbitt Miootee Clerk Rawlins Sdtlehuber &nith Marcus Farrow Rawlins Schlehuber Smith Marcus Farrow Rawlins Schlehuber &nith Marcus Farrow APPIOJFD. X