Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-07-25; Planning Commission; Minutesl . t Meeting of: Date of Meeting: MINUTES ~ OMUSSICN July 25, 1984 1! :!! Tia of Naeting: Place of Meeting: 7:00 p.m. City Council Chamers ~~~~ COMMISSIONERS ,-,. ~\'\ \\ CAIL 'ID CHER: 'ft1e Meeting was called to oroer ~ Chairman Rcatx>tis at 7:01 p.111. R:>LL CAIL: Present: Chairman Rarb:>tis, a:mni.ssicners Rawlins, Marrus, Farrow and McFadden. Collllissiooer Schlehuber arriveo at 8:19 p.111. Absent: o:mnissicner Smith. PLEDGE CF ~ was loo ~ Chairman Ralbotis. P~ CXMUSSICN PRXmJRE: Chainan Raltx>tis announced the Planning Canni.ssia, Prooedlre was being shown en a transparency and asked the audience to spend a few minutes reading it. Staff MEM>ers Present: Bill Hofman, Principal Planner Charles GriJnn, Principal Planner Walter Brown, civil Engineer Marty Bot.lnan, Traffic Cmsultant Ex--Officio M8111bers Pre8ent: Dan Hentschke, Assistant City Attorney 1. ZC-302 -1tLa'1'EP ~Of -Request for a preannuat:iaial 2lOOe change fu:a County S-90 to City of carlal:m R-1 fer four pera!ls with a CDll'bined area of 20.27 ac:ns looated approxinlltely me-half mile northwest of the intersection of El Cmdn Real ~ Alga Road. Bill llofaln, Principal Planner, gave the staff PR,allltatim • contained in the staff report. OMl.iran Rclllllx,tis q,aled the public hearing at 7:06 p.m. and iuued the invitatim to speak. o..t Suitia, 2956 Roaeeftlt Street, t'e~ting Agatep prq,er ty o,nera, stated the applicant we in acJn-,l with ataff and ahe WII IIYllilable fer my (JJeStims the OONll1MUID llf.gbt have. Since no one elN w1ahed to speak at this item, the public teetlaany WII acncluded at 7:07 p.a. In___. to query regarding the ..-xatiat, staff stated the IIIPlicast had tried to get other pcq,ei ty <Mlera in the .toinity together to re-acne their p:operty and annex at the -U., but they we oot rudy to annu at the pr•lnt tlae. 0 .,1~· MINUTES July 25, 1984 Page 2 Planning Comnissioo ~ the Negative Declaratioo iBSued t:,,,, the Land Use Planning Manager and adopted the following Resolutioo: REOOU1l'ICll M'.>. 2324, Rfn»HN>Dli APPRJllAL OF 1' ~OW. i:iiE ~ nO! O'.XJNIY S-90 'IO CITY CF CARLSIW> R-1 CN PIOPERTY ~y LOCATED APPJOXIMA.TELY CllE-BAIF MILE N'.>RmWEST OF 'IHE ~ECTICN OF EL C1\MDO REM. NI) 1'IJ:,A IOAD. 2. V-361 -A'l'IAN1'1'.C RICliFIEU) -Request for an increase in allowahfe price sign area fra,, 16 square feet to 24 square fE"!t for-an existing service statioo located at the rorrneast rorner of I-5 and Palanar /l.irport Road. Charles Gri.Jnn, Principal Planner, gave the presentatioo as rontained in the staff report, stating if this statioo were given this varia.,oe, it would allow other statioos to get a similar variance. Staff fouoo that ft)St statioos cxmply with the or-dinance row: therefore, denial of this request is reCXlfflllended. Chairmn Rarbotis q>el'led the public hearing at 7:13 p.m. and issued the invi tatioo to speak. Mr. Bill Jtalinak, 1318 Garrett Stret, Anaheim, the applicant, addressed the Cannissioo, stating ARCO wanted to lt)date the statioo, and at that time the cnly problem vas vith the price sign. Mr. ltalinak used a wall chart to indicate the signs ARCO provided. He stated they row have me identificnticn sign and two price signs. Mr. ltalinak stated they were dropping cbm to less than 20 square feet fol" the identificntioo sign lll'ld the price sign ws dropping to 24 square feet. Be stated they were asking fol" 24 square feet at the ape• and directed to the highway traffic. Be felt the sign woold be an iJl>to.-at and he added if other statioos did this, he felt that would also be an illprovement. Sinoe no me else wished to speak en this item, the public testinJny vas CD'\cluded at 7:19 p.m. Staff stated that the applicnnt had not quite understood the <rdinanoe. Price signs are limited to 16 square feet n the other oalculatims are fer general signs. Thia sign did not aet the crdinanoe and staff rouldn't ab the findings. Also, the Engineering Department ■tated the precise looaticn would be a problem from a vi■ibility lltarq)oint md would haw to be IDYed badt into the lot. llllter Brown, Engineer, stated it <l:les not aanfon to City Engineering stan&lrds fer locatioo for eight di■tanoe at the interftect.ioo. In ...., to <JJKY, staff stated if the lpplioant uaed Ndl interNctioo, tM> sigM would be allCJlfed at 12 -..aare r.et, but aa me a:waent aign, it would be 16 f•t. Mr. lalinllk stated the sign would not be a barrier to villihility n at.aft stated the lpplicnnt vas ronfusing r.gular signing with price signing, that price signing 1• • -■parate thing. ' ' lbltx>tis Rawlins Marcus Farrow McFadden K K K K K K MINUTES July 25, 1984 Page 3 Bill Hofman stated he worked en the original ccdinance for price signing !lbout a year ~. and a mmtier of service stations wre ia noo-conformance at that time. Since then, the ordinance has been enforced and nest of the staticns are ronforming. He stated if this were to be granted, then the Cannissien might ronsider amending the rode. Planning Camdssien adopted the following Resolutien: REOOWI'ICfi N), 2329, DENY~ A VARim::E 'IO INCRFASE mE PRICE Siaw;E P1UI 16 SQUARE FEET TO 24 SQUARE FEET roR AN EXIS'l'IN:; SERVICE m'ATICfi <»IBRAILY IDCATID Cfi 'lHE ~ (DifiER OF EL CAMilO REAL AND LA cn;TA AVDUE. 3. ZCA-171 -Dt\Y CARE CENl'ERS -An amendment to the zming ordinance regulating family day care hares in the R-1 zcne. Bill Hofman, Principal Planner, gave the presentatien en thls ite111 as rontained in the staff report. Chairman Rcatx:>tis cpened the public hearing at 7:28 p.m. and issued the invitatien to speak. Since oo cne wished to speak en this item, the public testi.naly portien was closed. Ccmnissioner Marcus stated her roncern with rotifioatien going to property aimers within 100 feet and felt this was not far enough. camdssioner Parrow and Chairman Raltx>tis roncurred with camdssioner Marcus and also felt the notificatien ar~d should be l:roadened. 'Ihe Assistant City Attorney stated it could be increased to the usual 300 feet fa: notifioatioo. Staff stated there was no oojectioo en their part to changing this to 300 feet. Plarning Ccmmiesioo ~roved the Negative Declaratioo issued by the Land Use Planning Manager and adopted the following Reeolutim: RFS>WTICfi N), 2237, RBCDlmm~ APPJOVAL CF A 2rfiE (D)B NINJla!Nl', NIH)IM; TI'l'LB 21, ~ 21 .04, 21. 10 AR> 21.12 C:, 'fflB OUtLSBN> IIIJNICIPAL ODE, BY '1BE AIDIT!Qf C:, SBC!'ICNS 21.04.086, 21.04.106, 21.04.107, 21.10.010(11) Nm 21.10.010(12) NC> 'lHE DELETICfi CF Sl!Cl'IOI 21.12.050(4) 'ID PIOV'IDE fOR P'MILY ll\Y CARE IDIBS. biating oondition aetided rea:al!nding notificatim to prq,er.ty owners within 300 feet. 4. ICA-154~ RV CR>DWCE -Request to amend the 110n1ng aia (Sect.loo 21.44.165) regarding the padting of recreatimal vehicles in the noot yard Ntbedt in reeidential 110ne9, Notian ._ a&. to hold this item until C.anaissiooer Sc:hlehuber arrived. flt>tion died fer ladt of a eerond. Bill Bofan, Principal Planner, gave the presentation for thia ita • CD\tained in the ataff report and in~ llllrty ar..ayak, D1recto£ of Building and Pl.ln\ing, lltX> gave a further ltld4te oo the <Xdinanoe and the prq,oaed i:wviaiaw • CD\tained in the staff report. lbltx>tis Rawlins Marcus Farrow McFadden ~tis Rawlins Marcus Farrow Mc:f'ackten X X X X X X X X X X X X MINUTES July 25, 1984 Page 4 'ffle prq,oeed char.ges are: 1. Provide sane 1~ to c.he crdinanoe by M:!ing a hearing prooedl1re (prqxlBed to be ~ the Land Us! Planning fltanager and Marty Orenyak) to oonsider ptopertf and RV's and if there are physical barriers which preclude aJlll)lianoe to the crdinanoe. 2. Grandfather properties lihich had RV's en prqierty omed by than exmpt frcn crdinanoe imtil mved or sold. 3. To exaipt older, ooilt-up areas of the City. (Most new areas have CCR's prohibiting RV's er providing storage.) Staff's reo0111111!ndatiat was alternative 11. City Council preferred alternative t1, with a case by case basis for identifying problens with parking RV's. In inn,,er to query, staff stated that CCR' s would preaipt the crdinanoe, if the CCR's were nore restrictive. A transparency was shown to show the factors that the Land Use Planning Manager would CXll'ISider in allowing RV's in the front yard setback, 1) structural alteraticn to P.xisting residence (not fences): 2) amunt of grading req-Jired: 3) visual interference fran the p.lblic street; •) encroachnent into the p.lblic right~f-way. In answer to query, Marty Orenyalc explained that item t 1 was intended to mean a physical renoval of part of the house and that •ture landscaping would also be CXXVJidered. Re added that their decisiat rould be appealed, if the RV amer felt his case was valid. There was a disC\lSSiat about the definition of a recreaticnal. vehicle. CCllllissiooer Rawlins asked who would enforce this ordinance, and Mr. Or:enyak stated they were in the process of hiring a 2Dling enforcement officer. At the present time it is Mr. On!nyak and his staff. Chain11111 Rmlbotis cpened the p.lblic hearing at 7:47 p.m. and issued the invitatioo to speak. Mr. David McRati> II, 3505 Charter oak Drive, addressed the o-iealoo reading the definitioo of a recreaticnal. vehicle and stating he we in favor of the aierdaet,t as ptqlONd. Be stated the older areas cb not alla, side or niar yard puking of RV' s and there is no place in the City to store RV' s. '1be few in North County are expawive and wndal.isa ia eevere. '1be loss of the ability to part your vehicle m your own ptcpe1ty oould be an eaJneaic lala. Mr. NcRabb antiooed that the fthicl• are lioenaed and it is legal to park thee m the etreet and he felt they are no Ja.'!:'e offensive than ._. autxa:lbil•. Mr. llcllllti> autaitted a petitioo to the O:-issioo for the r:eard. Antada Pattenm, 3995 Hibiscus Circle, adt!resaed the CcaliNiat stating she mnnot get a vehicle past the aidee ot her tw:.e. She stated her trailer WB iJlpcrtant to her and her dlildnn. She felt each indivimal asse abauld be CXJMidenld. She W9 in faYCC of the _ 1.ldliint, rut felt further wilding was needed. JliiNUTES Julv 25, 1984 Page 5 Mr. Otto Bandelller, 3435 Seacrest Drive, a lll!!fti)er of the RV Asaociatim, spoke in flrJOr of the ordinance. Mr. Bandelller antimed the pet.. tims filed with CNer 400 naes. He added that not all of those signers are here tmight--ecJR are off c:mping. Hf! felt the ordinance, even •u'ded, is t.alCOl'\Stitutic:na.1, mfair and discrilli.natcxy. Mr. Bandener stated if a oonplaint is lllllde, you CS1' t enjoy your RV, but if no <XJll'Plaint is lade, you can enjoy it. Re talked about the expense to stcre an RV and stated the odginal or.:":~nanoe was directed at irq>erable cars, which he felt did have a negative illpact. Mr. Bandelller ooncluded by thanking the Coaiasim for: oonsidering the anmdment. Mr. Jun Nelsm, 3425 AM Drive, addressed the Cclllnissim stating when his txa! we built ro provisims were lll!lde for RV' s and there "'88 ro wtrf to get them to the side or bedt yard. Re believed he has a righ~ to have his RV a'I his pr:q,erty as long as it is not a safety hazard and it is mintaineo. He felt they shruld rot be lllll'{>ed in with cars. ~. Nel.aoo stated he had been in the autca,tive business for 25 years in Carlsbad, and storing RV's oot of town produces a negative effect a, the autalDtive services of the City. Mr. Bernard Markham, 4748 Inverness Oxn:t, state<'J he was not here to SlJRl(rt th£ aendment, but to nodify the language, if possible. He stated the OCP.'s where he lives restrict RV parking, and the new amencilent would be axe lenient. He asked the camissim to nodify the languarJe of. the W!ldtent to include the statement to the effect that exceptic~, be taken to disallow RV parking where the owner is a Dl!!llh!r of a haneowners associatioo which provides nearby parking facilities. He felt haleownera wJ.ght be t:ellpted to park RV's in the froot yard for: l!eC'Jri ty. Mr. Vince Sdunacher, 3980 Stella Maris Lane, stated he felt the ccdinanoe did not include a study of a parking lot fix these vehicles and felt th~ City should st.my the poasibility of letting sane land use in the City be la!d fix such parking. As far as policing of the ordinanoe, he stated he would like to suggest all vehicl• in the City be registered and at that time the plllOD be dsaignated where it would be kept. Be felt the ¥01:en ~d have a choice m this. Shum Pierce, 5310 Bl Arbol, spoke in favor of the -•IMnt, asking if the aeudllent is passed and a hcne ia 801d and the new people have an RV, and there is not enough spaoe fix that RV, lllhat haR>el&? Chairmn Ralbotu aplained they <DUl.d an,ly fix aiininistrative relief. Mr. Steve JU.•idt, 7912 La8 Nueces Place, President of Jamiou Dcalcwra Allllociatim, (418 halles) stated the cat•• d their ix..c.nera wociatim are axe natrictive than the crdinanoe m the txioks or the me ps:q,aaed. Be atated hia qipoeitim to mking natrictiana m lenient. He stated BD&t of. their c:mplainta a:e anonyacm and -t peq>le are~ to av•• parbd in the strNta, dri vevaya <r froot yards. lie felt the ~ra would be ~ to the 1d111111t. Mr. Jtiasidt added the ordinance IIOU.ld be in oanflict with the CCR's and the hcaeownera IIOU.ld then try b0 di.act.y the CCR' a, li!Gking tha diff irul t to -,fcr()k. r MINUTES July 25, 1984 Page 6 Ccaa.issicner Schlehuber arrived at 8:19 p.111. Mr. aJC!y Delgado, 3735 Sierra Mot-ena Avenue, addressed the c.o..iuia, stating RV owners c:b not t:Dther anyme. One RV owner took a hcllleowners associatim to rourt and 110n relief as the hcllleowners associatim was illegal. Mr. Delgade stated he pays taxes, extra license fees and extra ineuranoe and he asked the Ccmlllissioo to oonsider giving the RV owners relief. Mr. Willi• Doyle, 1758 cape May Place, me of the two cases in the City Attorney's office, stated he had a problai and rouldn 't park his w in the backyard. He is in favor of changing the ordinance, and asked about whose respa,sibility it is to tell the next persoo they can't park their RV there. He lives a1 a all~ and his neighbors amplained. Othe .. l:l i;ave neight:Drs who a:> not cmplain. Be felt it is a bad policy to have neighbors OJlll)laining a1 neighbors. Mr. Doyle further ~ted he was not in favot" of hiring saneooe to enforce this ordinance. Be felt the realtors should tell the ~ive t:lJyers about the crdinance. He asked whether the next buyer oould sue him if oot told by hul, and the Assistant City Attorney answered he oould not. Mr. ~ stated if the CCR's ar :. i'Pre restrictive, that takee precedence CNer the ordinance. Mnl. Virginia Packard, 1752 Cape May Place, Mr. Doyle;s neighbor:, Btbted Mr. Doyle parked six other cars at the end of the all-de-sac, and if he nuved his 'IN, there would be mre space. Since oo me else wished to speak a1 this item, the public testiD:lny WB ooncluded et 8:28 p.m. o:--tuimer Ratline stated he favored this ordinance m than the p:evioua me, wt it still should be ll'O['e leniatt, that it wa ill-cooceived and pocrly written. Be adlted there IICUl.d be cloeer to 600 W's in town, and he felt this we \S\fair and a striA)ing of pr:operty ri~ta. Olaiman Rc:llbotis asked that en page two of t."le oalirMlnCe the .xding be changed to •significant, •ture andlail>ing•. Be further aMed that to alleviate aJf1I ooofuaion, th:la ordinance cbea not pree11pt CCR's. Bill BofNrl stated fer 1Anda0111>ing, it llli~t he 1m-e l(lpt<44iate in It:81 fl. Oolaluimer Parrow stated fer the te<X>rd that in talking about aignifimnt landaclping, a law hedge the full lmgth ol the pcq,cty llhould be oonaidftred. Be did not. wnt th:la to be 11.aited to she. Mr. lk>fllal at:atedl this '°11.d be oonaidftred at a cue--to-cme basis. Pllming ca.iuion ~ the Negative Declaratim 1--by tbe Lind ON Planning Manager ff. adopted the following a.olutim1 © MINUTES Jul)• 25, 1984 Page 7 RIEQD1'IClf K>. 2328, REcrJIUH>IM, APPRJVAL CF A 2DIE CXDE ii■oan:, WIM; TITU: 21, ClW'TER 21.44, BY 'DIE AIBLBII Of ~Cfi 21.44. 165 'ID RlllJLATE 'fflF. PARll:Dr, OP Vl!BICU:S IN 'DIE PIUfl' YARD 1H> SI'REET YARn ARFAS (F RBSIDl!N'l'IAL Wl'S. Add the fol la,ing a:inditioo: Significant, mature lmdloaping (as discussed by the Calllnissioo). 'l'hia crdinanoe cbes not preenpt CCR' s where they are acre restrictive. ea.issicner Rawlins stated withc\!t the grandfather claUtle, he oould not StJR>O['t the amerdrent. Ra::ESS: Olairan Ralbotis declared a recess at 8:37 p.m. and the ca.dssioo re-<Xll"lvened at 8:47 p.m. with six ca.nissicners pt"e8f!f\t ar.d ec-issicner Smith absent. Chaitmn Ralbotis statf':d that there had been a discussioo with staff today suggesting changing the zatl.ng ordinance fer R-1 aubdivisioos. ~ a 70-foot lot there mat be 7 feet oo each side, and the suggestioo was aide to have Council CXX1s ider amending the crdinanoe to alla, juggling the side yard to have 10 feet oo me side and 5 on cne side, to try to eliminate the problem of no side yard access to the rear of the lot in the future. Ocamissicner Mcf'~ suggested to staff that they prepare a report oo this item for the next agenda and ellaline the alternatiws. Consensus of the ec..issioo waa to agree with this suggestioo. I'ffllS Pat DISClESIOl: s. m> 84-4,1\1-360 -PAU::MR \'ffl'lURES -Request fcr -wr:wa! of. a sl te develqment plan and a variance for the oonatructia: of two teeearch and develqment buildinge at t:M oorthwet mmer of Palamr Airpcrt lad and Awnida Bncin• in the P-M-Q ?:one. Bill Bc!an, Principal Plamer, gave the r,cesentatioo oo thla it• • CXlnt.ained in the staff report, using a trlnlpm:wK.y to &haw the site and a Mall chart ahowing the tuildinga and puking CXlnfiguratioo. He stated tl.n la me iaaue -Awnidll Encinas, and staff is nquirlng the lfilP).icant to Jedicate an additiooal 14 feet. staff ACJl __ dl daletioo of the parking area to ptWidt far the eet:bac:b • required by the crdinanoe, and the lllPlicsit ube i.uue with that. Mr. lbfaan atated etaff wiahed ttlf' o-duf~ to take the teetim,y and cllfer the vote mtil they hear the teetia:lny oo the pcq,erty m• the street. Staff AU.-:r1ed approval of the site dewlqaant plan and the variance. '1be varianae la a pJbl!c hearing, tut the site develqaent pi.in la oot. lbltlotia X Rawlins X Schlehuber ~ Marcus X X Farrow X l'icf'addel'\ X MINUTES July 25, 1984 Page 8 Mr. F. M. Brua&ellu, 31877 Del Obispo Street, 8an Juan Capistrano, addressed the camdssiai, stating because of the project across the street, the restrict.ioos a, their ptopet Ly u.y delay er change the project, due to the request to dedicate 14 feet and redloe the parking area. Be stated they wnted the plan as delineated and ~'l'Olled blo wek8 aJO· Mr. Brusseau added he wanted the 14 feet to ~ rut of the green belt m:-ea without redlcing the parking area er dlanging the drawings. Mr. George Bor:Mbeny, C M Engineering, Vista way, Vista, referred to Item 24 and 26. Be felt the street did rot need to be widened and is opposed to those two i tens, t 24 and 126 a and h. Re stated the traffic ooes rot warrant the type of devl!lOl=ft!rlt proposed. 6. SIP 83-11 -PAIJ:MAR , CXJIPANY -Request for c!R)I"OVal of a site developnent plan to oonstroct. a hotel, dinner theater, and two freestanding restaurants, en a 6.8 acre site, lOOl!lted en the northwest oorner of I-5 and Palanar Airport laid. Olarles Grilmn, Principal Planner, gave the presentatioo a, this item as oontained in the staff report, using a transparency and nmtiooing changes oontained in the -.ranlla dated July 25, 1984, which applicant has seen and agreed to. Another transparency was used to show the proposed occupants of the center and Mr. Grimn explained that beolluae of the narrowness of the lot there were oonoeuiaw mde ~ staff with a redlct.ioo of landscaping and dense uses allowed. <n! issue staff and applicant are rot in agreement is the nlllber of driveways &1'td the distance between those driveways a, Avenida Ericinas, "'nich is a se<Dndary arterial. Spacing of driveways should be 600 feet and a graptic wo uaed ahowing applicant's~ as ooapared with staff's reaiaendatioo. Ddveway ;1 would be a right tum in and rut a, the applicant's ~. but IIIOUl.d be a ahadowl.,. right tum in ally m staff's. Staff'• nMOI\ for this IIIOUl.d be at peak U. traffic IIIOUl.d be al.owed tl:M'I md hlpaired on r,•,enida Encinas and ewl\ onto Palmar Airport !Qld. Aleo, people nd.ght try to ab a U-turn there <:Dling rut of a right-tum rut. On the IIFPlimnt's prqxieal, the driveways cb not line~ with tbaee acrOJa the street, and staff 1110Uld x~.cl eliainating one of. the ddvways and line me driveway ~ with the Paloar Vanturee project across the street. Mr. Gr1-stated ainoe City sta'ldarda are being violated en both p:qaoeala, a ~i M-1e IOlld have to be granted and Mr. ar:o.n IOlld disOlSS this further. llr. ~. llhgineer, stated four variances for this p:oject wre to allow right~111}' frca Avenich Bncinas fl.QII 70 f•t to iaxiaa of 92 feet near the aou~~ end of the psoject., • qipoeed to 84 feet et:reet right-of-11ay owr the mtin fra'ltage. Ir 1, MINUTES July 25, 1984 Page 9 Mr. Brown stated the proposed shadowlane oorthbound right turn atl.y frart Avenida Encinas was to serve the f•t food restaurant. Re read the findings for the variance. The project uaee in this JXOject Me inte-,se and will generate 2/3 of the eouthbound traffic l.fl Aver1ida Encinas md Palamr. Palamr Ventures project across the street will add nore traffic. Staff carefully ronsidered the intensive uses, and driveways needed to ainWn flow of traffic and level of safety at least equivalent to that which would exist if there were no variance. Staff felt variance should be granted and design variance also. Mr. Grinl stated staff rea::11111ended !l)prC)'Val of the project as proposed by staff and Mr. Marty Bcunan was here to answer IJff/ queeticns. In auNer to Colllnissioo query, Mr. Bc:unan stated this WIOUld be a raised Edian oo Avenida Encinas. A transpan!nCy was referred tc showing the two driveways for: Pal.caer Ventures. Mr. Blllnan stated the existing right~f~ i.s not parallel~and by having Palcam-Ventures n!IIDYe curbing and guttering to the prq,erty line md a IBJl:inan of 14 feet narrowing to 1 O feet, that would eliminate Palcnar & Coapany having tc pay for curbing md ~ttering to the pn:iperty line, with am equitable distriootioo of the CDSt for each project. Mr. Brown stated if 7 feet had been taken frail each side of the street, that would not have served the developers or the City. Mr. aiuel.l Grt.'<19e, 5850 Sumy Creek Jt>ad, the applic:9lt, epoke giving the hist.cxy and background of ti-p:q,etty. He used wall charts showing the CXJnfiguratioo of. the Sltire oonplex. Mr. Robert ~, 4883 Rcnsoo Court, San Diego, spoke about the dnelqlllent of. this JXOject, stating it would be • 150--roca uecutive hotel, restaurant md ooffee ahop with a dimer theater. He talked about the OOlll)atibility c:4. the JXOject and benefit to the aaamnity. K..,s. Pat 11\ite will be the Manager Directer of the dinner theater and he talked about Mrs. Nli te 's crectlntiala. Nr. Graue stated he had me diaagreee.nt-Iteffl 125, that ol. the aooaa... Be cnncurred with the right turn only requ~t, but stated Mr. Chudt Strmg had a:me "'I:> with ... ahibita diatriooted tx> the O--iuimers 8bawing their ideM m the ckivewiy deeigr.. Mr. Grosse •tauct although the~ wre ~. the traffic WIB not all at the._ U. and not at the uaual rush toms. Nr. O'illrlN Strong, 52525 Balboa Avenue, San Diego, 11111[-d the 0--iuion stating the traffic m Awnida lncinM .. that ol. a aulector: street-relatively low. MINUTES July 25, 1984 Page 10 Be stated the fut food effect IIIOUld be felt at ma,, the hotel all day, and the dinner theater after the dimer hour. Mr. Strmg Ul5ec:'I a transparency to indicate when the IA)lioant desired to have the drive,ay1 that the eeocnd driveway should be acroB8 frail the driveway acrou the streot. Mr. Strmg suggested that staff's rec::wa..mtioo -,uld result in nm-e oongestioo at the dri~ and the problem would be better served with IA)lia.-.t 's propoaaI as ,'."'OOtained in the llllp8 given to the Ccaaiuioo. Mr. Groue stated the street was there to serve the ptq,ei ty and the propoaal now (X'Olrides for a straight aCl'088 driVWII)' into both prq,erties. His concern was for the traffic flow on the property. The applicant concluded his presentatioo at 9:58 p.m. The Colai.ssioo asked staff for an analysis of the latest pTq)08a1 by applicant. Mr. Bcullln stated staff was concerned about what tl .t: plan doee for both ptoperties or other pecple driving t ' ,rough at the street. He stated the standards say they can have b«> drivewaya at the IIDBt and the applicant wants too 11111:,y. 'ftlMe driveways at?. intersections. Mr. Bounan oonclucled, stating st.11: .i. was ~ching this fran a traffic engineering logic rather than the proposal as presented. COllmissioo disaJSSian centered a, the driveway oonfiguratiata and staff state-1 thet if driveways handle traffic YOllllleS similar to streets, then street st:mduda are applied. As in this instance, the street standard applied here (600 feet spitcing) is the standard baNc! ai generally accepted State and Natiooal standardl by CalTrans, Federal Highway Adlninistratioo, etc. , for safe and efficient IIDVl!!tllet\t of traffic. In aw11er t.o CcaaissiCI\ ~, staff stated they had not oonaidend the internal traffic flow as iaplrtant as ai- atreet clrculatioo. oa.d.asicner likfaMen stated ooncern llbout where the aplO'J988 fral the Palaar Ventures wilding \QlJ.d eat. 'l'be IR)limnt stated they '°11.d lanr:lsaipe th,: area for the ~. with a lunch rooa outside and apace out.aide for .. ting lunch. OlwiBBicner Mcradc!en requaet:ed piauc tllbl.• be inclooed in the ootaide area. Plaming <naiuiat ~ the Negative Declaration 1--' by the 1.-.d ON Plaming Manager and a:rpted the following Reeolutiaw: IIIDD1'ltlf II). 2326, APPR1IDI; SIT! Cl!VBlaW!l!lr PLAN 84- 4, m dllRALl fll> ImAIOI ME IZVBUBllff IIJIIDD«;S CII WI CIIIIMTl,Y UXM'IID CM 'DI! lDdtN.',-1' CIRmR r, IIWlllU AlJIIIC8!' IIW> ME A~ l!NCINM. ~ II>. 2327, APPRJVDI; A 1/ARIAKE '10 IIDK.E 'DJB W--i-tS JD A U. M1'BRIAL PIQ 50 FP.BT '10 2 PBl'.!T lU A IUJIDDG CIIIINIU,Y U>CMl!D C11 '1M .OUWT CDIIIIR r, NUJ1M ADlalT IIW> Mm AVl!Nlm l!ICDN. Dei.te OOnditicl\ U6 on ~ 5 of 12326. -. id pnpe«atiat ol variance that 14 feet be takm ot die lS-ft. ri~t-<, ~ a greenbelt. MINUTES PLARmC CDl(ISSIClf July 25, 1984 Page 11 Pimic tables be placed oo a comer of the site. Plaming ec-iuioo approved the Negatl voe Declaratioo iuued t7j the Lind UH Planning Manager and adopted the following Rieeolutioo: ~ NO. 2325, APPICNIM; A SI'M IEVBWPMl!NT PLAN M:J. ~ a.,-11, ro , •.• A fD'l'EL, DDll!R TR!A'l'ER, Na> '1'I) PIIIBSrNl>DC Jm'l'N.JIWffS 0. PIOPERn 1'.DCATED Clf 'nlE NOR!il&J! aRaR ~ I-5 Ata> PAUJIM AIRFCRJ' RW>. Subject to dUtimal <Xlnditions hal"ded out t7j staff tcni~t md varianoee • presented t7j City l!hgineer, July 25, 1984. APPRJllAl, ~ IXXlllllft'S: 7. CUP-2'8 -CITY ~ CMlSIW) Mr. Mlllter 8rcM'I reported oo the cblllent for" approval, giving the CNltgee. '!be Auistant City Attomey stat~ there mmot be juat me party to the agce-ut. Chairan Ralh>tis Mked Conditioo 111 be stricken and City C'amcil add ~ts oo Laguna Drive. RIBCIW'l'la. !I>. 2322, APPll7IDC A CIH>ITI~ t.m: PFaaT ro iu5 dlihWkhClf CP A IOma\R IIJIU>n«. Clf P10PERTY GIIIIMLLY IDC1d'l!D Clf 'nlE K>RftmMT ~ Cl1 EUI AV!HJE Ala> Pro PICX> IIUVE. Dal'CIIVd'IClf 1'191: 8. CT 82-15 -ALICMl'E BILIS RMJL RXm: Bill Hofilan, Principal Planner, gave the staff report uaing a trarwparency to show the prq,oeed route, lilhich woold new aake this a minor revisioo. CcmaiS11ioo agreed by CllnNIWU8. APIW:MU. ~ MIRJTl!S: 'lbe Nimue of the July 11, 1984, meting were approved .. ~ted. By prc:!pB' mtioo, the 111Nting of July 25, 1984, we adjoumed at 10129 p.11. Aupct.fully eul:aitted, NICZUL J. ID.INILLBR Lind ON Planning Manager Barriett latt>itt Nirllt..Clerlt W11118 MB ltl.BJ '1U1!D Na> DPT Clf PILB tmIL 'D1E IIDIJl'l8 MB APl'IDJID. RoaJotia Rawlinl Schlehuber Mara. Parrow f".ct'adl1en lblb:>tis Rawlins Schlehuber I J.Parrow Mcf'adl1en lalllotie Rawlins Schlehuber Marcus P'arrc.o1 Mc:Paaden X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X