Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-06-26; Planning Commission; MinutesMEE'!' Ii-«; OF: DATE OF 19!E'l'UC: 'l'IME OP l<EE'!'Iti:;: .. MINUTES PLA.'Nl ti; ClM'1 I SS i ON June 26 , l 98S 6 :00 P.H. \ 1! ~.\ Pl.ACE OF liFFl"TN::;: City 0lunci l O'\a:m..'>er s 0~ ,y~\11). '1a CO~MISSIONERS ~ ~~ ~\ CALL TO ORDER : The meeting 1otas ,al led to o rdet oy dlairman Schleh.Jber at 6 :00 p.m. Present: O'\ainnan Schlehuber , o:nmi ssioners l'tP'adden, 91, l th, Hal l , Ranbott s , K.>lr cus an:l L'He\.lreux. -'bsen t : t-ione. St.aft 11enbers Present: Olarles Grinm, Principal Planner Ki ke Howes, .\ssociate Planner Dan Hent.schke, Assist.ant City Attorney Kic:hael Hol mi 11 er, Lard Use Plann 1nq .--.aru,9e 1 Brad 'nlerrian, Pr 1ncipal C1vi 1 Eng 1neer PLANNING a:M'IISSJGI Pl<OC'.ID.JRES Olair:man Schlehuber cal l ed attem ion tc L">e Pla nning Carm1ssion Procedures being sho.m on the screen a.rd asked t...,e au:lience to tAlce a te... minutes to read then\. l. BIR 84-1/GPA{UJ 84-6/ZC-307 -COAST WASTE ~ -Requ1:!St for c-ertif1cati0,"l o{ an enviroraental i.a:plct report, general plan cimerrlment and pre-annexational :z:one change for 32. 9 &CTe parcel located south of the Palcmar >.irport 1:us1ness Park approximately one mile west of E.l Qmuno Real. Mike ~. 1\ssociate Pl..anne.r, gave the presentation on this item as contained in the sta!f report, using a transparency ro show the site . He men t i ooed that th 1 s was a conth:ued item an:I that otaff could only 49ree vith the proposed general plan ametdoellt am the pr~xat ional zone change if the applicant could gain access to the north Olairman Sd:llehubet opened the i;:ubllc hear inq at 6 :OS p.m. an, isaoed the invitation to speak. Mt. Don llgatep, 2956 RcoaeYel t, Car lsbcld, referred ro the aerial photo be placed on the ~11 am d 1 scusaed the reuac for tbe cantinuanoe. He dlsa•ssed his ~ • eodatlons regarding this I taD an:I urged the oam.iui110 to awrove planned industrial for that porti.oo of the aite. He iooicebld that the appl leant was willing t:c c:aq>ly with subeequent requirenents of land use in the future. Mr • Aire De.Jong, 7204 Ponto Dr i ve, Carl a.bed , alluded to cost. overrun diaoluiona at the City Courx:il meeti.ng an:I said that hu COlllplI1y may be located at the present location lcnger than the O:a:misaioners thought. (y MINUTES Jure 2fi , l'Hl~ Paqe ; COMMISSIONERS Kr. Ou1stopher Neils, l100 P-rospec-t, La J o l la, represE!'lted HP! a.~ referred to Larry C:anens' l ette sul::m!ttted to the Plannrng O:mn1 s~;i on. He emphas 1 zed that this type o! use was tundamef'ltal l ,· l~t :ble Wlth the residential use ard that rMny of :he effects a t this loa,tior. could not be mit 1gated . He also pointed out that the awlicant had unti l 1989 ..,t i t s present location. !'tr. El:l BoerSM, 7204 Ponto Dr i ve, Catls ood, rebut ted tJ1e ~nts l!8de by !'tr. Neils ard stated that the argu-nent was no longer val id since Coas t Waste Manctgement d 1d accept the Planning Ccmr.1ss1on's recamieniat.lon rot t o aove to this loc-~tion at this t~. Since no one e lse wished to spealc on t his 1 ten, publ ,c testimony was closed a t 6 :1~ p.m. Camlissioner 9ni th stated that unt 1 l access c-ould be gained to the north, he saw no point 1n approvi ng tJ'-P. generel plan l'lltlE''"alleflt or the zone change . He 1rrl 1cated there was pleo· of t llllll? for the appl 1cant t o request the changes at a l a ter date. Cl::mn1ss:oner !'larcus said that nothing had to lY. done on this i tan an:! quest1 oned 1 f t.hey could leave the l ard use the way 1 t was at t.he present t 1me. Dan Hentschl.e, Assistant City Attorney, advised that 1t was hi s un:!erstan:l1ng that changes were tMde regarding pre-annexational zoning and that ~ was allowing lan:l to be annexed wi th LC zoning on it am the City could reconside1: it later on. Cl::mnissi oner Marcus 1rrl1cated that she was not 1n favor of the proJect and -s In favor of some action for pre-- annexation. Kichae.l ttol zmi 11 et , Lan:! Use P lann Ing Kanaqer , menu oned t.'lat it has to be proven to l.A1"CO that there were no developnent plans being propose:! or planned in t.he near future . O:mliiasioner L'Heureux asked it it was ai:propri at:e to oa:rtify tho BIR, deny the general plan mnerdmetit, and to deny the :rooe change, thereb-j leaving i t the way I t was oow. Kichael Hol1211ille1: cautioned that t.here may be problems for a developer caning in later with developnent plans. o:a.iaaioaeL t.' Heurewt asked what OJUld be done and Kicbael Holzmiller said that they can g1,;e a zone awropdat:e for: a developnent plan. Dan Heotschke aaid that if they did nothing , the r i alt wouldn't be far this awlicant. He state:! that in order to develop thi• property, a zone change was required unless they build a faxm. He al.so pointe:l out that the rim mmtioaed by Kic:hae.l Holmiller were small. 0-iaicaer RmboUa suggested a a:1111m:mi!M3 Whereby there .aald be a 0Clllb1oat.ion of LC in the canyon areas an, ceaidmtial 00 the top portico. l'licbael Holzmiller r•pc......, that that wuld oot create 1/Z't'/ probl-. MINUTES June 2b , l Q8S p~ 3 Co:mi ss i oner ~n e iq,r essed that she f e ! t ll dee 1 s 1 on at this tune ~ pranature !0 1 anyt.'11:-,g ot,>-,er than LC. SX' said sh.,e would rot be 1n favor of zon109 anything res1dent 1a l 1n the area until a study was done . Chai rman Schlehuber -nt loned he had problems with industrial. He referred to the slopes am 1rd1cated t.N!t he w&!I rot cocw l nced that an lndl.lllt r ial zone was the answer. 1'1C P lanrung Cami1ss 1on awroved t.he fol lo ,nng Resolutions: RESCUJT I Clli NO. 244 l ~ I~ CER'fl Fl CAT I ON OP ~R:Nmn'At IMPl\C'r REPORT, f:l R 84-l , !"OR A PROJOC"l' GDi~Y I~Itc: l) GO.~ Pt.AN ~ Pll0'1 RLM, RESIDF2-'!'1AL. LOW l'O,Dlt.)1 TOD , PUBLIC trrlLl'!'lF.S, AND 21 ZCNE oo..N::;E P'RO'l CXlmlrY S-90 'ro CARL.9.v\D R-1-10 ,000 . RE9:>Lln'Iet. ~. 2442 ~II«:; Drll!AL OF "'-"' AMDC:l'ID-.'T 1'Q nil: u.N) USE ~ Of THE G1NDVu. PLAN f'RO"I Rl..11, RES IDFN'l'lAL [..(M MEDltJ-1, ~4 00/AC TC U, PUBLI C UTILITIES ~ PROPmrY GrnERALLY 1...(£1\TID saJni OP TiiE PALCP'IAR Al RPORT WSTNESS PA.Rf; AWROX!KATELY ONE MILE WEST OP EL OJ'!!!'«) REAL . RESOW'I'leti NO. 2443 RD.Xff<f2ml~ APPRCN1"L Of A PRB-AHNEXATIQD.L ZCHE OWCE ~ CUJN"l'Y S-90 TO CITY Of OJ!LSBAD R-1-10 N PROPElni' G».'DW.LY Ux::ATrn SC'(Jffl OF n£E PAI.09.R MRPORT ElJSINESS PARJC Af'PROX119.TELY CNE MILE WEST OP D.. c»lfNO REAL. Approved ZC-307 wi th the following mod i f ications : Denied GP,VW 8416. Recomemed pre--.:mne xa t i ona l zoning o f LC . 2. GP!'Zf./5-5/ZC-333/1.0,-186 CITY OF o.RLSIW) - Ai -.,tB to the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance to establish a beach area rNer lay { BAO) , zone on a l l reaideotia.lly designated property i.n the area OOJnded by ~ He0 i ~ L.l.llgoon to the 80\J th, Buenll V 1 &tll Lagoon to the north, the An.SF Railroad right-of-way ro the-eaat and the Paci f 1c OcEa.n to the west • Char lea Gr 1:ma, Pr ire ipa.l Pl mmer , adv iaed that there were 81mara.l cha:Dgl!!s in the Resolutions: \oibrding in Resolutioo 2458, finding fl -chllnged frau •ensun,• to ■'hel.p prcnide•; wrding in Reaolutioo 2457 , finding I 3 -.s ctw>ged f ram "all ev ia tar to • i.q)roved• ; and 1 n Ex.hi bi t 2 , paragraph (eel, the word "medillll• deleted fran the eent;s)08 • ••• High density residential cl ass if ICll t ion character h :ed by low am rued 1 ID rise ... • . Charl• Gri:11111 gave the presentation on t.hie item as oootained in the at.aft report, uaing a tnmsparency abawiDg the • i t:e. He explained the proposed general plan a:id m oode 1\oe"ta and stab!d that there would be no graaUather claWM! for this ordinance. Omiaioae:r lladx>tis aalte:5 how the final map an:S OJP -=e afts:t:..1 and Charles Grum 81lJJ118I'ed hie question. Sd1lehuber X ~ X Rart>ot is X Kal 1 X 9n1th X Marcus X X L' He\lr eux lI .. MINUTES \ Junf' 21:,, : 98' Paq,-4 COMMISSIONERS O:rmi1 ss10ner 9nitn suted that they rn,al 1y d id no t know where they stood •nt h a pprova l pla ns an:l O\ar l es Gt·nn advised t.hat ai:;prox unately l'"> units were affected . CO:rm1ss1oner L'Heureux alluded tc the sp;-<:1c1l t reatment 1n this !lrea reccmnerrled ~· the C1t 1z.ens Carm1t tee ard asked wh.,t the d ifference would be Det>Jeen the over lay z.one a nd the special t=eatment area. O\ar les Gr 1.1ml resµ,n:led t:Nlt the awrooch ooing d1scu5542d that even1nq -s probably II t.e'!l)Orary approach to han:lle the problems unt 1 l they could l 001'; a: 11 ex-, a '. orx:,e, t e rm brui1s. Co:mll ss I oner Hall aslce:l how 1 ooq tl>e stud·; "'°'-l ld tak.e and Oiarles Grum, said that it wou ld talte approx11Mtel y ~ rronths llrrl would be subJect to d ir=tion by C ity Couni::1 l. Ccnm1ss1oner McFadden ~iz:ed that 1• ..as l!T\'.)Ortant to achieve cc:rq:,.at 1bi l tty 1n that ore.:i . She 1 rd 1cated that 1n looking at the ordinance, she not ia!d that tne dens1 t 1es were c::hanqed to those rE:O..t,metded by the Lan:l use Camli t tee an:l wa nte:' le now 1 f the o:mn 1 ss I on could caxment or, t1'\en. O\a1onan Schlehuber ird1cated they c-ould change them. H1chael ti017)llllle r, Lard Use Planning Ka.~ , pointed out that the Cann 1 ss 1 oo "'lad r ~ approva 1 of that ord 1 nance. Cllaicnan Sdllehuber announced that l etters and petitions ~e received fra:n Dooa.ld ard Busan Bentley. Norman and Lola Greve, wayne !'100dy, Trafford Morong, Mich.tel Enright, Roger Williams, ~n. all~. alor.g with a petition, and a letter frcxn George Courlas ard a pet:tlon 5UFPOrting the GPA ard ZO... In addition, Rd:lert King, c.w. S:n1 th, ard Harold and Carta Ri=ite.111 wished t o register their opposition alt.hovqh they d I d not vish to spe,,1';. O\a i CIWl Sch letuber opened the publ 1 c hear 1 ng at 7 : 40 p .m. and issued the invi Ult ion to speak . Ms. AiD Mauch, 3710 Garfield Street, c.arlsb.>d, suted she va.s in favor of the ttree resolutions a.rd suggested adding the following provisi .n that: •0ntil the beach area traffic study va.s caq>leted, densities sho.tld be kept at the low El1d range and oo residential projects be allowoo in the beactl area above the me.an.• Mr, Mario Monroy, 3610 Carlsbed Boulevard, CMlsbad, mentioned that he was in 8UR)Ort of the changes, particularly the density changes and sUted these should match the density changes agreed b:> last wecl.. tte ampba.aiz.ed that it was iJlt>ortant for eYeryone to recognJ z.e that the beodl area oeeded b:> be given special attention. Mr. Lew Pritt.en, 330 Otlngua.pin, Carlsbad, questioned the liJlitatioo of time for speakers a.rd O\aii::man Sdtlehuber explained t:hml to him. !'tr. Pri tten talked about l 1 ving in the area for the lo.st ten years and stated that the at.r•ta llleded to be pa-..ed on both sides of Tmiarack AW!l'l.le b:> rel 1-the tr a.ff ic on Garf ield am the Co!l5 t Bigt.ay. fie also re-, eldec:l that the Pl.anning Calmission lock Mrioualy inb:> the area 111here they allow parting in front o.f the units. © MINUTES PLANNI!C o::H<ilSSlON lune 26 , l <lS', COMMISSIONERS Ks. Margaret Bonas, 21: lltve Street, Car lsbad , e xpla1red why she fo-1 t the propoG<'<3 chaoqP,S were-q.;,c,:;l for , h<> a r ('A an::l d I SC\L'<Sed ~rk i ng r equ H ement s l n t.'le ar ea . KI . Salvador Rot1 , J',2<, Gad 1eld Stre<>t , -.At lsbad , 1nd1cate::l that he l ived tn r_hf,, area s1n..,"'f' 19',0 ard that problems 1n the are.11 were obv1ou.<1. Ms. Kilrian Q\av·ez, 3360 Ga r f t el<l St ~eet, -:ar i sbacl , exp r essed her support for the ~w•:qt,t, den;;::~ ll xl p,H <t·~i ch.!mqes 1 n the beach area . Ms. Ka.r;one Monroy, }610 uu l sbi>:i Boul,;varc , '..:Ir :sb.')d , expl a ined that she o.ined property 1n this .!!le., (o r ten years ..tnd was beccxn1nq 1ncreas1ngly a!arrred a t the direct 1 on the beach area was t-oe.aded . ~ d 1 scussed U'!a t the seascape rrost be treated careful ly to, everyone co enJoy It ard expressed her s upport for changes 1n denstt';,, p:,rking require:i:ieots and h(>1ghts . (She ,lso represented Mr. Morse ..i t 3639 Garfield , Carlsbad. 1 ;.. pet 1 t 1 on was sutrn 1 t ted to Cha I rmar. Sen • ehube r r r err the "\..'ighbon; -..tic a lso al={)roved the p rop:)S('(! changes . Ms. Joye.> j oo,es , J93i Garfield , -.:arlsbad, st ated she was d resident 1n t.">e area for t>.oenty years Md expressed appreciation that t."iey would :'lOt ha= proble:ns w1t.'1 parking, density an:l height as 1n other areas as a result of the proposed Changes . She Sdld cnat real estate values would not go down as II r esul t o f these changes. l'ir. Klp P4cf3ane, 269) C:Xest Dr.ve, ..Ar 1st.ad, spoke 1n favor of the proposed changes am mentioned that the i ssue was one of cmmmity bui l.d1ng and not of property values. He explained that the long tem gains and values ... 'OUld offset the short term losses. He also 1rd1cated that he hl!d developable properties in the area but vas will1ng to reduce the density. I'll. Rainey l'llles, 29..41 ,1\11,a l".a.ria, Laguna N1g-1el, 0. 1odicate.:l that if the proposed changes were adopted, there 'IIOUld be a moratori\111 on devel opnent 1n the beadi a.re.11 since develq:ment was based upon econaruc consideratioos. He stated that lllOSt of the properties a,oquired 1n this area were dooe 50 vith the intention of building three units on then. He also discusse::l problens he had with the height restriction. He a.slte::l the Cx:mniss1on to taxe a look at the beadi area, poinunq out that 1 t was ~ pr !.madly o! rentals that were unkept all'.l suggested passing a moratori1D on building 1n the ar;ea unti I an adequate study ccwd be llli!lde . Mr. Kark Ford, 2620 Foothi ll BouleVllr::I, carlsbad, represented ft! arr! Edith Ford, aoo l'1e.l and 11'.llline Pord, and eir;plllined they had property that needed to be devel~. He pointed out thot it was not feasible to bui 1d two uni ts on the property • He ind i c., ted he was oot pleased with tbe way the ordinance was put together. Hr. Poro stated th:Jt he was oot oppo&ed to the proposed ?l,rlting am height restrictions. Kr. Reger Peter son, 180 Oler ry, Car l:.bai, mentioned he 11 wid in the are.a and was CJRX)9ed to the density, parking and height restrictions being proposed. Regarding ci.rcullltion, he said they CQ.Ud be iq>roYed by add!tior..l (fJ MINUTES June 26, i 98':> Pi,qe 6 COMMISSfONERS crossings at the r a 1 l road t.rads. He a lso stated that add l tl ona.l park 1 nq for the bead> area was a must aoo that enforcing e xist i.ng parting regulat1cns c-<XJld assist in al leviating pert of the park ing problans . He suggested looit ing into penr,1 ts for the residents of the area am IDl!!'ltioned that the ra1 lroad easenent could be loolted i nto for be.ach p,u:lr. 1ng . He C'Clll1le0ted on the proposed height restr ict ,ons ar)j stated that Car lshad had the momentl.11> to i.Jq>rove the ~ l i ty of I I fe In the area . !'IS. Bebe Grosse, saso Sura,y Creek Road , Car l sbad. merrt ione::l she used t.o l : ve in the are.} a rd was st l l l a property owner. She requested that the Cmm1 ss ion coosider adding to the ordinance a g rardfather claUS4? wtuch would apply to a l ready approved plans 111 this area so they c-ould st 11 1 develop urrler the approved pl ans. She ird1cated that heI proJect was a ni ne unit proJect ard telt It would be an asset to the area. l'!r. ~ ~11 ,ray , 3'>4 11Cac1", Carlsbocl , expla ined that he owned property 1n the area and talked about the changes made dur ing the p;ist ten years. He stated that he 1o10U l d 1,1. • to develop h1s property at one time; other.., .sc the ◄2 year old property would s a,y the -.,ay 1 t was. S 1 nee he only r eceived not1flcat1on the same day regarding the proposed changes, MI . 11CG1 lvray po1ntm cot that he d id not have an opportum t y to pr ep,re a fonro l not Ice but ~id th.et he fel t housing devt!lopnent 1n thl S are.c\ would be s igni f icantl y dim1n1shed i t the proposed changes were p!lSSE!d. MI. Pllt Bi I lex , P.O. Bolt 2302, Vtsta, 1rdicate::l hls intentions were to e ventual ly build on his p ro perty. He expressed his opposition to the l'leight an:l density changes an, statled be preferred that they remain as they were . He 811)ha.si2:e:l that lld:ii t i 0041 deve.lopnent that could be put i o would not ba ve m.x:h of an ilq>act on the e x i sti ng problems, aoo also ment i ooed that smie o' the peq,le wt¥:> spoke earl ier l'llld already developed their properties. 118. Ali~ Brovn, 5157 Shore Drive, Ca.rls b!lid, ln:l icated she CMled property ln the are-a for twenty years and that it "118 time tx, de.i;lop i t. She stated that if the prq:>OSe:l c:hangee were adopted, the area wou)d stay UM~t an, pnioted out that the area had the h ighest er une rates i n Car l.abad . Ks. Brown mentioned that part ing coul d be al mg tbe railroad tracu wtudl -.s propoee:l a nm>er of years ago but nothing vu dooe about It . Mr. Mayne l1oody, 160 Nest Color ado Boulevard, Pasadena, repr II rnted 81 ll an:, Mary Sit inner, an:! exp la l..oed he -.s an architect respooaible for remodeling an existi ng unit. He referred to a letter l!IUbm1 tt:ed to the Planning 0:mll.iaaion and rm.rized it. He d l SOJ;Baed the hei ght and parking r•trictiona and suggested that a more positive approadl would be to work with the iroi vidual properties. Kr. Jack Hall, 2619 cove Street, CMltU" of 182 C""l1flr1J,apin AYlll!DUC!, Cllrabad, aplained that he vas in the eleYenth hoar cf awrovala with his property and had already invested 818 ,000 • He referred tx, the -Y the proposed C'Nl)CJN were drafted an, irdicatad thl!lt it 8eemed that you bad to have a bui ldiog pm:m.i t or else you Wl!i!'e not veete:L O\arles Grimn npli«s that Mr . Hall ,ea correct. ,. MINUTES J une 26, 1985 COMMISSIONERS Mt. Ra l1 Also asked whll-o the i:on loq QVer lay a.n .men;tmen t to the a:aster pl.an became effect. 1 -and Dan HPn t sd,lf.e, Aaaistant Cl t:y Attorney, respocrled t.hl!t the zoning Otdioanoe became effective thlrty days ofter the ! 1~1 adoption by the Ci ty Counri l. l'tr. Hal l stated he was trying to find out 1! he had any cbance of get ting a wilding permit and Oia1rman Schlehuber advised him t.h!!t his questions Yere )USt apeculatiY'I! since they weren't law. He s:uqges~ that Mt. Hall give the Coamiission some furt.1-ier ll'lJl.lt on the issue. 1"1:. Roy 8.laclcford, 2942 Hard1ng Street , CU lsbad, commented on his concerns regard i ng reduct ion 1 n dens I t y, trAffic concerns, and the lack of a grandfather clause. Olalnnan Schlehuber polnU><' '-It that he; .:ould not t.ake a rebuttal from the spe.alters , ~--e the City .. as •he applicant. Since no one else wished to speruc, t.he put.: 1c test 1mony was closed at 7:45 p.m. Ci::IIUn i ss loner Rombot is Ind lea ted that he support.eel the resolutions ""1th the exception that It was oot :air that people in the pipeline who were effected did not reanve the benefit of a gr andfather clause. Coa.missiooeI Harcus CQ{rUtred ,,ith C=missiooer Rombou s. O:larles Grimm stated that this ordinance YOU!d not apply to projects that already received discretionary approval fran the City of Clulsbad. M the r~est of COounissloner Kc:Fadden, Olar les Grimn explained what was me411t by d iscretl ona.ry appr ova l • Chairman Schlehuber reiterated that there vere approximately 175 uni ts out there arc Olarles Grimm confi~ it. COm.miaaioner l'ld"adden stated that she ho!!d no object.ion rut would like a time limit on it. OJmmisaiooer L'ltl!lurau iaHcated he agreed that th.is prq,erty was io great tranai tion and that there-were coace,:u.s abouit parking, etc. in the area. lie stated that thllee W<Alld u1 timately be ao.sver~ aoo that this will coaie out of the special t:reetDent area analysis. Io the interim, holn!!?er, he added that ataLf's reoctno,e,wiations were better than simply ignoring the problems in this area. He asked about the ordinance on building height am was told that the ordinance read •2 ator ies or 25 feet or lees". He ~ bow lllell.llW:ements were made on properties with ~ •~• arxl Olarles Gri..mm pointed to a U:ADi&mtn:y am explained It. O:airaan Sdlleblber asked if ]' feet was really h.ighet than 25 feet and 0-.C. iaa 1 oner Q::im.bot is replied that 1 t could be. 0:-iaaiooer L'Heurewr as.lted it there waa a preci- definition of "'atx>ry" io the Code and Olarles Grimm replie:1 that there was. ' ' MINUTES June 26, l 98S Page S CcmmiBBioner L'He.lreux referred to the section oo parki.ng arxl aske::I if parklr,;; would be allowed on the street since this was one of the ma j or concerns of the neighbors. Olarle6 Grimm expla1red that they vould adopt the oordaminium standards which would a1lo"' 20\ ot required parking could be on street.. He mentioned lt waa posslble to get SaM credit for street parking. o:-uaaioner Romooti s ask.eel about the 20\ d 1 scret 1ooary and O\arles Grill:!ll answered that the intent was fot Ringle tllmily residences. camiaioner Smith explained he was concerned with whllt was going to hawen on the stn,et s, wonder inq "'here the residents were going to park when property was com-erted over to conjominiums ard api,rtments. He stated he was in agreement with a two story dwell! rg but felt th.at l f park in<; could be implemented under the bu i ld Ing, the building could be higher than 25 feet to account for park ing. He ll lso ind ic.a ted that the RHH should be 9-15 instead of 9.1 aro that the RH shoulo be from l S-2J ln lieu of l5. 1. Cl:mmissiooer L'lteureux mentioned t hat he not1CEd LJ°ll'\t the definition use:l ►.he term unns per gross acre arr:! tnat by inc.luding gross a=e, 1t would preclude us1nq the ne"' def inl t ic,ns. l'lichael HOJ.:cniller 8-llid that it would be better to talte out "gt-068• and use -per acre•. OJU.D iaaiooex Mc.~ aaka:l if the interim measure "'ould only awly for IIR)tOXimately eleven months and Cbarles Grima explained that 1t woukl depend oo the traffic study IIDd the amount of changes that Courr 11 wanted to see in the special trentment III(',11.. O:am.iuiooar McFadden aaJ<ed if the maximum wo.,ld be " year ond O:larles Grima stated that -.s reasonable. O:xali.asiooez Kd'tldden said that she would l lite to aee 04 dwelling unlu pez IIICTl' chang8' and Gtated she felt that the visiwr park1ng mentiooed oo page 2 was inadequate. Sbe mentiooed she would like to see one sp&ce for ead'l two and to remove 20\ di11Cret.ionary on the street. O:..iaaiooer ~•1e.1reux pointed out that one of the things that car.erned b.iJD was the ov-erall lad( of internal cir01Ut ion. Kit refernid tx> 21.82.070 and ~ including the language ~e a fir.:ling mudl like that made unds 7872 that wo do not awrove anything above the 111e«1 unlesa cia:ul.atioo aod l..m_pacts cauaed for this aree 0y the project C0llld be mitigated•. A lllOtioo vu lllade apprOYiog the llleg!ltive Declaration illllU«! by the Land Oae Planning l'Wlager and adopting the f'ollowing Rmolut1008: Resolutioc No. 2,56 reccmmerdiCJJ llR)l'DVal of ar> .._,.,_.,,: to t:hn Lan! Oae Elenent of t-!'la Olmral Plan from RH to RH(BJ and RKH to RKH(B) and .-:!ding page 2, of the Land OM Element Tert affecting property g10Ually located -t of the Ml.SP Rzlilroaid r1¢rt:.-of-way, bet:weeri Bueoa Vista Lagoon to the north and A1T.1a Hadioma ..aqoon to the south, excepting the village ~opment Area.; Aosolution Yo. 2,ss recamaeoding MINUTES J une 26 , 198S P&ge 9 COMMISSIONERS IIR)TOYal of a ~ code amen:hllen~ amending Title 21, of the Car ls.bad Nun lei pal Co::le, by ad::l 1 ng O\apter 21.8 2 creating the beach area overlay (Bll()l zone; an::! Resolut 1e11 No. 2'57 recoa:mending approval of a zone chang,e awly1rq tho beach aren overlay (BM)) zone to r esident ially designated propert; located west of the ,\.'6.SY Rai !road right-of-way, betveen aiena Vista i..e,goon to the north a.rd Aqua Hee! 1 oa:ia Lagoon to the sou th, e xcept! ng the v 1 11 <l9l' ReoE.velcpment -'.rea, based on the ! 1odings conta 1ned therein with the following changes: Change the density t o be c-onsistent •n th the Report wh1ch was just oent to Oiunc1 l from the Planr'llng camn1ss1on; change the parking re:JU!rements to glvE> a credit for OC1 street parki.rq; insert II c, .and father clause for proJ~s with discretion11ry approval, giving them a tvo year t 1rne limit to eecure a bui l.dirq permlt; density .,ould be per acre Ml :,utlined i n the Report submit.too to Couoc1l; an:! exempt subter r anean ptrk1 rq tot.ally be1ov the ei 1st1ra:i grade . The motion was seom:led and opened for d1SOJss1on . Oxmnis:1iooer L'Heurau ment ionoo tJu-ee or tour word ~ and Comm i ss 1 oner Ranbot 1 s, the mot 1 on i:naker , adda:l the word changes staff suggestoo a t the s tart o! the discussion. O\a i rman &:ti lehu.ber s ta tEd he coo ld supper t canm i ss I oner L'Heu.reux'e additionn. Clmm issiooer L'Heureux aslce:i st.af f about language 1n 070B regarding density am whet.her or not the wording was auff icient, particularly with regard to traffic i mpacts. Cla.rlea Grimm replied that they would havt:! the same ability they have now -any time there was a uaft1c problen, they could restrict it. Ctmmiaaiooer Hall aslced tor an expl.an4tion of graoofather clauae and O::mnisaioner lOzt>otis explained lt to him. O::nm ias 1 ooer McPadden men t ioned she was not clear about sabterranee.n paa1ng an:! Commissioner Ranbotia pointed oot that they were trying to encourage parld rq. Char l es Gr i mm clarifi.ed bui:ding h!!ight a..-rl "vhi~vru-waa less• was added to tbe IX)ti 00. OlaiDl'BD Schlebubed: SUI ted he could support it . '!'be Planning COmmiaalon adopted the Negative Declaration 1-.d by the I.ax! 08e Planning Manllger and adapted the foll=ving RIBolutiona: litlfUDfICII ~ 2456 RlD:lf1MDEilC APPRO'nJ.. OF A!I AKm)MDl"l' '%0 'l'H! I.Ml) 08B l!L!KDIT OF THE GfliERAl. PLAH P'ROM RH TO RB(B) NII) RNH TO mot~ ~ .\HlK>llC PIIGE 24 OF ffl! LNI) 0SE l!LDIJIJIT T!:rT AFP'l!CTllC PKIPERTY GalERALLY ux:ATED 'WEST C. 'ml ATI.SP RA.II.KW) RlQff-.OP....WU, B1:!'Wmi1 BJl!N.\ V~ Ll(lX& 'l'O THE IDffl.l AN:> IDJA HIDICH)A UIOOO, TO fflB SCl.mi, !ICZP'tua::: TH! Vlr...u.GE R!DBV'l!UPHl'.NT >.RP.. RE91XD'l'ICII Ill. 24S8 RBX)l9{!K)Ilf;:i APP9JVAL OF A ZQlE ODE ~, AMJI.NDitiC TITLE 21, OF 'fflE OJLSIW) l'CIN'ICIPAL CID, Bf MX>ING OiAP!'!R 21.82 CRE1'Tl!G 'niE BFJl£:H ARD. CJmLAf (BM>) t'XliE. Schleruber Mchdden !bltx>tia Hall Smith Karcus L'lieuraD X X X X X X X X ... MINUTES PLANNUC co+u SS l ON June 26, l 98':> Page l C ~ION In 2,57 R10JMKOIOI~ APPROV7'!.. OF A ZOlE Oo.NGE APJlUD«; THE BDO! MU'>. CJvERLAY (IW:I) ZONE TO RBSIOQr?"IAlLY DES IQiLl.ffD PROPERTY I..OCATID WEST OF THE A'n.SF RAIL.RO\D ,J GHT-OP-WAY, BE"n,"£nl BUD,l/\ VIS'!?. I..A£DOJ TO '!'HZ !i)Rffl AK) 1GJA Hl'DJCN». ~ TO ffiE SClmi, EXCEPT It«; THE VIU..JIG! RIDEVELOPNEN'l' ,\REA. With the fol loving changes: Clange the densit y to be consistent w I th the Report -.rh !Ch was just sent t oO>uncil from the Planning OJmn:>ission. O'lang1! the park inq requ1 rements to g Ive a cred It for on street perltin9. Insert a grardfather clause for projects with discretionary a;:proval, giving them e two year tll!I<' l 1m I t to secure a boilding permit . oensity would be per acre as outlined :n the Report sul:111 i t too to COUnc ! l . Ell'e1:11pt subterranean parking totally belo"' the existing grade. Olan:ie the wording in Re:soluuo.-, No. 2458, f1rd1ng tl, f,0?1 •ensure• to "help prov tde" . Clange the wording in Resolution NO. 2457, f ird1ng t3, fr<111 •alleviat«i• to • iq)roved•. Delet.e the word "med!1.1111" from Exhibit •r, pllragraph 2(ee). Incl\Xie the words •wtiichever 1s less• for building hPight. Olairman Sc:hlehuber declared e recess at 8:05 p.m., arxl the o:m:aiasion re--coovened at 8: 15 p.m. 3. FOJSI~ PLEKENr REVISION -Proposa1 revi sed arrl i;idabiid HOua ing El anent for the City of Carl &bad • '!hi• item waa oootinued until July 24, 1985 at the re:.uest ct the ReeeardvAnalysis Group. ,. SOP~~ -iUSl},;; CiL!'2w -Request to ~ a previ y approved a!'.te develOpDent plan which apprOYU:l the consttuctioo of 195 apartment units at the northwest corner of the Elm Avenue extension and !l CmDino Reel in the RD'l--0 zone. Kike Howes, Associate Planoer, ga~ the presentation on thi■ it:eia u ooat.ai:l8d in the staff report, using a tr~ to abo, the site aod pointing to dravinga on the board. He aentioned that th1a was a request far an • •••evt to a previoaaly awroved ai te de?elopaent plan a cut.lined the diff:erence:a be~ the tvo projecta. He rllferred to a amormx!um l'lanSed oat to the c:.miaiori and &aid that the appli~'l t rec:e i ""l!d a copy of the changes to to fUlding■ , an:1 S, an:! cocx!itioo t20 for the project. MINUTES Pl.ANNIN;; ~1SS ION June 26, 1985 Page 11 ------------------~-----...-------------- "Ir. Helait K!tf:mann, ~20 NI n1:nai Ro!ld, San Diego , s tated that he was aceltlng the Ccm:D.iaa1oo's approval for 11 revision o! the s igned devel op:ent plan an::! mentioned t.'\at they were Geek Ing approval to Ir-crease the chAr8Cter and cpa 11 ty of the 19 5 apart:mcnta prev i oos l y appr oved. He irxHcated that the property was PJrc:h.u«l fran another developer an1 that It waa an eir=llent pro)~ with no increuc in denaity . O'Mliomn Schlehuber referred to a letter that cas wr1 tum before the change• made by ot.a.f f. 0::r:irl e■iooer 9:uth a.site::! t or a d1scuuloo of the malteup o! the project and Olalrman Sdl.letl.lber rt!(Jl led that he could ask questions of the s~er 1! he wished. O::ual I aa iooer 9ni th asked i,bou t the ~rash areas an::! expr~ his concern that there was only one aroa in t.lle entire ocapuu. Kr. Kifflmnn replled that the arch1 tect -one::! out the dew i l s for It. 0:mllias iooer 9:111 th a.slced about the laun:Sry artM and PU. lCiffman resp:,rda:I by say Ing that approx lmatel y 2/ 3 of the apartment.a had spi,oe for them. He a l..so I rrd !ca tee! there ~ a ~lBl!ent.al area In add1t 100 to t he area beh1rd the 'PO()l. Omni aa I oaer 9n1 th ut..,;J about ma in tenance of El Cmll no frontage and Mr. Ki ffmann lncHC!ltoc that the pr! vate property would be ma int.a i ned by the de">e loper and the r 1ght-of-vay >fOU.ld be 112 i nta 1ned by the City. 0:-1 aa i oner Hcl"a6den quest 1 onerl the aequenoe of g r od i rr,i and Kr • It i ffmann st.a tm that i t vould be dooe ooncurrently. In an-r to II q.i.ery by O\tliam.n Sdllehuher regarding the c:benglm to corxH t I on t 20 , l't . Kif fmlsnn r epl led that he accepted them. ComU. ui ocer 8:D.1 th a.sked about the g m en area& for the chi ldrC!ll am questioaa:i 1 t the pool was the on1 y one set ui.de. Mr. ltiffmann replied thot it could be vorlted on. Kilte ~ irxHcat:ed that there vu an area in the northMst corner of the propc!'["ty that could po,-aibly be u:.d for an addi tiOC'l41 greeri are11 for the dtl ldren. Hr • N 1.cbolu 8.'lllche, 810 f't.iu i oo Avenue, Oceana ide, r~eu 1t:ed a IDlbar of people in the area and referred to pet:J t iODS IIUba.1 tted to cait ioue protected covenan ta. He aak8' thoee people lltlo ~rt:ed him regard~ protecting single tm.ily in-on &lm Avenue to at.aoo (thirty people). o:.tluiODBr Rmltoti■ a.altod for his cx:maents regarding the ~randaa ~ c...rt this evening am after quatico.ing one of the i~ Md .eoeiv1ng a satisfactory ca.er frCD Deo Hlrltadlke, A.uiatant City Attorney, MI. BaDc:bit arb.1 tt:ed that it did rel i eve hi■ concerns • @ MINUTES June 26 , 1985 Pace 12 Ptt . J 1m Gaiaet, 3 340 Ridgec:reat Or Ive, Car labad , exp la 1 nad that there w:1re more people ln atten::lanoe ear I ier but ainoe it vu late, ~ people had to leave. Olaiz::man SChlehube:r rocogn! ~ that thirty people -re subst.antia I . Mr. ICi fflmnn cl az i f led that the previoua developer told h 1m that the property wo.i l.d be gr oded at the amie t I.me and that It may have been a cler ical error . John ~. 2230 Nob Hill Dr Ive, CArlsi-i, represented property CM'lert on lou 2, 3, , an:! 5 and incl icat:ed he eent a detailed IDl!IIIOran:!~ on the issue. He discus-1 the eaaaent going throu_h thr-of the propertie11 and stated that he was not opposing me jes lgn of the road per se but uplair-,d he wruld I Ike to aee a crib wll..l I sponsored by the ~oper . He er.pr--' h is conoerne a.tx,,.i t noi ae and pollution and referred to an article in 9.mset '1!1qazine regarding nolae an:! high density. O::amiaaioner L' Heureux queet ioned staff about cord! tlon t 7 an:! wanted to lcnow whet, the one year au, r tee!. I'! Ike Howes ~ed that It .-rule! start frao thet evening. cam.iaaionru: L' Heureux asked wh.,t "'10Uld happen It the tract map vu ext:en:led, and Hike H~ resporde:'l that the IIA)licatioo "0111.d expire urues.s an extension was r4q1ested. camiaioner L' Heureux explained that he l\!ld a rea.l probl-1n undentllnding oordi tions '34 and 37 as they intm:relate and apecif\cally with con:Htion t37(d ) regard.ing street iJll:,ro..-nts on !Um Aver1..1e . He wanted to Ian, how the C 1 ty "°'1ld monitor when the 121 st unit .ea occupied a.ad PUite Howiee replied that the CertH icate o f Ocx:upllncy lllOUld give them the infocmation. o:-iuiooe.r L' Heureux uked vhy the deterru.1.nat ion ~ llllde and PUite Ho.N!s expl4 i ned it was the City ' a cul -de-aac policy. ca..iuiooer L ' Heu.re.a pointed out t:ha t they could be !aced with 121 unlte am oo conti nuation on Elm A~ a:a:1 PUite Hicwas ~ed that It was the case unleea the City require/I it otheniiee. c.i Smblctl)ce l.mic.ated the coali tion parrotted the apprc,-e:, t:ent:Ati Ye mp. a:-.iuioaer L'ttl!urell ~nted that he was coocerned abQJt: the lact of a recreation area for dlildren, atd 41.ao that be did aot lilte comi tion t 59 aioce in the past there bed i:-, probl-vi th inadequate or oo maintensnce. ca.iuioaer ~ witiooed ahe felt t:hat ~iti- wce llldting in that pa.dting vaa rainimal, am recreational fac:iliU.. ..r• ir:Mldeqnate. Sbe aaid that they could poa1bly r•> d the Cowril damsoue a the portion of project u an .,-..,t-am OeD Keotacbke pointed out that th.-o-•-ion could tee, d that the Cou.ocll tm:&JOII! the piq;cty, but tl...lt it m.e a eeparate item. @ MINUTES Jurv, 26, l 985 Page l 1 Comtiuioner l't::.P'l!dden asltecl :)an Hent.schlce about spec It le prcx:,edures of apprO\lal and teo:mnetdat ions and Dan Hentscblce indic.ated that it needed to be approve::! by o:ionc 11 . He stated they could recauue1 ,d that C.ounc i l cha.'lge those part icu.la.r cood i t ions ard a1 so recaimero th.at the City (!n;Jineer make the decisions. Ca:lmi as 1 oner L' lteureux asked Dan Hen t.sch)ce about add i ng that specific 1nfocmation reqardtng grshng appear on the f ino.l map and Dan Hent£.Chlce repl ie::! that It was not the kird of condition appropriate for the final =P· CXllmiaa loner Sn i th 1ru99ee ted that the cann i 881 on cord 1 t 1 on thllt the trash area:s be increase:!, and mentioned he would like to see a green area or play area for the children. Dan Kent.sch):e resporrled it would be appropriate. Q::111111 aa i oner Rallbot 1 a st.a ta1 he share:! the feel i ngs exp~ on the tr ash and add i tl ona l recrea t 1 on areas. '!'111! Pl ann i rs;; caim1 as 1 an adopted the toll ow 1 ng Reso l ut 1 on : RBX.OTI~ ~. 2,s s APPRJlfIN:; AN~ ro SITE OBV!LOPK!!2ff PLAN !I). 84-3 , ro AUnw OEVl'.LOPN!:NT' Of' l 95 APAJmmn" UNI'l'S ell 9.59' ACRES Cti PROPERTY Gl!NERALLY c.oc::M'l'D CN THE t-OR'ntWEST Cl)R'NER OF ~ c»rI NO RF.AL AID l'UT{JRE ~ AVDIJE. 1111th the followi ng additions: A coo:H t1on relating to trash en:::losur~ to the aatiafact:ion of the Land Oae Planning l'lanager be locaaid throughout the pro)ect . A oon::!ition requiring additional recreational a_reas be cw,,eloped subject to the satisfaction of the Larx1 Use Planning Manager • A mot ion 1188 IWSe by Comti aaioner Mchdden recauneid ing to Cnmcil that thay r ezone thia area to a l~ density lilhicb "'°'1.ld lnclude 8 general plan dlDE!IIDl!!lit. Motioo failed dua to ladt of -=x:im. 5 . CD-78 -PI~STABILl!I -Requeat for a Planning 6-lalon oetciiJnadoo for a."I 8-unit apartment project on onicornio Street near Uga Reed and Kl Puerte in the ~ IOOI!!. Oiarl• Q:!Ja, Principal Plamler, gave the presentation a, thia itc aa outlu.:5 in the staff niport, using a ttamparen::y to atl0W the ait:e and pointiog to a map on the bou:d. 811 apla.1~ that staff felt the project IIIU justified and deecri.bed the mauties inclooed in the project. Qmiu.iooer ~. ~tioned Why the a!!C1Jirement for a •i~lt OD Alga -00t included an::! Brad Thenian, Pri.Dcipal Civil Bn;ii:mer, ln::!i.cated that it -an overaJ.ght an::! rec, uw "61 that it be il'IC.l ~ • Schlehuber J( ltFadden I[ Rcmbotis I[ I[ Hall I[ 9:llith I[ Marcus I[ L'Heureux 1( MINUTES June 26, l 98~ Page 14 O;nmias1onez l'tF'lldden po I nted out that she d 1d not f 1 ~ <'I r equirmier.t for a fence along IU.g<'I on the slope an:l Olarles Grum, r eplied that lt should be ~ to include a 6 foot high fence similar to the fence being required 1'1-::n, the side yard. 1'le Planning Oxa:ni88lon approved the Negat 1ve Declarat ton is:aue:1 by the t..and use Planning Kl!Mger an:l odopte:I the following Resolution: IU:9'.Xm[Ctl NO . 2,sJ APP~Il'C AN 8 :JNIT A.PAlm1ENI' PRO..JFJ:T Cl< PROPERTY GmlERAU.Y ux:ATU) Cl< "THE sa.ml SIDE OY UNICDRNIO S'MU1ZT NEAR ~ ROAD Am a PUEl'!'t"E Sl'RE'""T . Wi th the foll owing changes : A cooo!u on be added requiring s1dewal1ts along A..lga. Condition t lS be ill?lB1ded to require 1nstal lauon of a silD.i la.r fenoe al<ll"q the rear of the property. 6. ~70 -~ -Request for a Planning Carmiss1on Deteciilnation to allow a 14-unit apartment project located on the north side o f -'c:ac1a ,t,venue , 250 feet ea.at of Garfield Street in the R-3 zone. O\arles Gr imll, P-rinc1pal Planner, gave the presentat 100 on this itml as contained in the staff report, using a transparency to &'low the site. He iooicated that this was a clem:rup I ta=. 1'le Planning CCJmuaaion adopted the following Resol ution: RBS:LOTIClil W. 2387 D!NYU«; A PLANNH«; cnt'USSICtl DET!ll'aNM'lCl,I TO WDlll 1' 14-oNIT AP>Jma>lr PR:>Jl!rl' LOC'AT!D ~ 'nil! NJR'ffl S IDB Ol' M;N;l.1' AV!XJE, 250 f"g!'!' l'AS'l' OP GMFI!U> ST'REET. 0:mn1 u 1 oaer L • Heurewr suggested that 1 n the future, the o:-.iaian ahould not act on add I tiooal cond 1 tiOOB i ncll.rlec ln their padteta unlesa !lall8thing else was pointed out about tlwD. O:m.1-uioner 9:11 th ..,_. concenm about reoe iv ing eleven pi.-of lit:enatu.re given out that evening, and 0:-,taaioaer 11::Padden explaioed that at a worlalhop she and o:-iaaiCDer 1'111.rcua attended last -i-., they -re told that the Om/ ca i oo d id not have to ao::,ept theee 14 te aubl.iuiooa. O.itmim Sc:blellu.bel: l.ooicated he could umeratan:, It ~t felt that it -iqlortant for c i ti zena to be a.l 1~ to give their if.l]Ut. ec...iaianer 811.ith explained he could awreciate it ~t IQlld lika to mabt a SU9CJeStion that thoee people bi:iag ~ to the IIGCretary am make thaa a part of the mirutes. CaaiaiCDer ~ pointed out 1 t lllOUl.d be up t'l the imivi&al oamusaioner tx:> decide "1hether or not to incl.me 1 t . Schl ehube.r l ~ lt Rartx>tis X Hall lt 9nith I Marcus I( L'Heureux I I( Sctuehuber l[ Nchdden l[ Rmtx>tis l[ Kall 'l[ 9111th 'l[ Marcus l[ L'lieu:rewi I I ,., MINUTES June 26, l 98S 1'le Minutes of Apr 11 24, 1985 were approved as presented. The l'Unut:es of May 8 , 1985 were approved as presented. 1',e H1nutes of l'iay 22, 1985 were approved as corrected. 'nlC Ki nutes of June ll, 1985 we.re approved as presenter'. By proper 11.lOtion, the meeting of June 26, 1985 was adjourned at 9: 15 p.m. RMpectfull y 11Ubni t ted, Lam Oae Planning Hanager Ruth Stark l't.inuta Clerk Nm'tllCS ARE ALOO 'l'APl'D .v.:, l':EPl' 00 l"ILB tm1 L fflE HIYJT&S ARB AWll)llJ![). Schlehuber I l't:P'adden X Ralt,otis lt Hall JI 911ith JI Marcus I L'Heureux I[ ll Schlehuber I l'tFlldden I Ra!i:>ot ill X Hall X Sui th X ~r~ l L'Heureux I[ I Schlehuber X P'l::Plldden l[ Ralt>ot is X Hall JI 9'cl th X Marcus X L'Heureux X l[ Schlehuber Jl 1'1::hdden I[ Ra!lbotia l[ Hall lt 911ith JC Marcus l L'Heureux I It --NOTICE ~f PUBL IC HEARIN~ !CTTCE ts HERD3Y GI\'El-1 that the Planru.nq Q:mnl.sSl..00 o f the City o f ca.rl..ebad will hold a pu>lic hear i.nq at the C 1 ty Co.inc 1 l O'IM:0e rs , 1200 Elm A\.elue , Car l.sbad, Callfocni..a, at 6:00 ~.:n. cn loe::!nesday. J\rlf! 26, 1985 , to a:nslder awruval of a Z(n8 chanqe , ZO'le ccxle atrenarent and qeneral p tan arrencm!n t to reduce density fran 20-30 du.lac to l.S-23 du/ac RH to RH-B l and 10 to 20 du.lac to 9 . l to 15 du/ac (Fttl t> Roa-Bl and est.abl.l.sh an ow.rlay une cn res~denually-deingnated P~rt.l.es in the be~ &re4 add.l.ng addl.Ucna l parti.nq and helqht rest.rl.ctlO'\S cn property qenerally lccated l.n the area tx:><nd by Aqua !iedicnda Laqocrl to the SOJth • Buena Vi Sta ~ t:O the north , the AT~SF Ra l I rQl'(j n qh t -o f -..ray to the east and the Pacl f !.c Ocean to the ~t. 1hcee perscns Wl slu.ng to speak cn th LS propo.4.l are cordl..1111 y trwi ted to attend [ ! you have any ~tlaus p le.a5e call the Land Use P~l..ng I f you ch4llenge t:he une dlan98, zcne code airenckrent or qeneral pU!n arreno:rent 1.n court, you may be lunited t o ra..LSi.nq cnly those LSBUes you o r .9CJJEc o a else nu.sed at the ~llc hea.n.nq de.sen.bed L"' thJ.s ~1ce, or L"' -.n tten oonuspcudei,.::e delivered to the Dty of Cdrls~ at or prior to the oublic nearinq . CASE FTI.£: GP,VW 85-5/U::-JJJ 'ZCA-196 APPt.IC/Wr: CITY CF o.RLSBAD PUBUSH: J..ne 15 , l ~85 r £¾ I g .:,~ J~., ~~· ~o .... f>J4J .3f21 Go1',,e \6. ~t Co'C'\sb<ld., Co\,' qioo8 SITE ' CITY OF CAR\.SSAO ZC-333 City Council City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Ave. Carlsbad, California 92008 909 Bonnybrook Terrace Glendale, California 91207 June 22, 1985 SubJect: Publ i c Hearing 6-2 6-8 5 , GPA, u: 85-5/ZC-)))/ZCA-186 Gentlemen : To-day, I received your No tice o f Public Hear1ng t o consider approval ~. o f a zone change .zo ne code dJnendment and qeneral plan amendment to reduc e the o ens1ty, requ1r1ng add 1tional parking and invoking height r estr ictions on new construction 1 11 the Aqua Heeli o nda L.lqoon t o the south and Buena Vista Lag oon t o t he north ; AT~Sf RR t o the east and the Pacific Ocean t o the west. Bec ause 1 will be absent from sa:d hearing, I wi s h to vo i c e, by letter, my support o f these res trictio ns. I am the o wner o f Lot l 8lk O Palisades Map tl 7 4 7, known 35 351 01 3512 Garfie l d S t. Carlsbad. On June ), 1985, my lette r t o your Plann1nq Department voiced a high de<.1ree of concern as t c the cur rent rate o f new cons truction on Acacia and r e sultant traf f1c that will ~~anate thereto. Density, as currently evident, wil l a lso create a no ise level we ll beyond the norm for those living near the area. I aln0 firmly support t t e height re s tr 1ct 1o ns recommended , f r om three and ~our stories t o two s t o ri es maximum. We value li fe at the beach area . We plan t o stay. Obv1o usly, we welcome ne\oi construction but ~ot to the d etriment o f curren t residents and o wners . Your support to implement the amendment s, 1s reques ted . Yo ur.s truly, ~ff°u,~~~ cc: Anetta Mauch L My name i s Margaret Bonas. I have lived on Olive Avenue, 1n the beach area f o r almost 20 years. so l aJD well acquainted with the neighborhood. We own nine-tenths o f 4Il acre with t wo s1ngle family home s , each o n a separate lot. S1nce the early 70 's r have served o n several c1ty commi ssions under three mayors, and c urrently am a member o f two reglonal boards--wh1 c h proves I real ly c are about my commun ity. I am here t o urqe the Planning Comm1ss1on t o appro ve PCR 's t24S6, 2 4 51, and 2458. I a.m part icularly pleased at the i nclusio n in the Beach Area O,.•erlay Zone o f p r o v1s1ons l 1m1 t 1ng the he1qht o f new buildings t o 2 sto ries o r 2~ f e et . This 1s a sa fer he i g ht lim1t for f ire protect i on , especi ally 1n high density ar~as, and p reserves the amen 1t1es o f view , light, and sea b r eezes ,,rr._,,, .. for a larger number o f res1dents1- •-""'4-. -· .,.-t"-Most unporta.nt, 1 t 1 s a good start towards f ul filling the c it y 's commi tment to neiqhborhood compa tab1 l 1ty. I am also ple ased that you a r e addressing the impro vement of park ing in the beach area . ;,;hi l e I do not bel 1eve the cur rent -cond o requirements are ade quate f o r the beach, ra 1s1ng the parking requirement s f or apa rtment< 1s essentia'. And a.gain, a good start 1n the r i ght direction. I honest ly fee l we all share a comnon goal, which is the continued betterment o f our c ity. The resolutions before you v ill contribute t n that goal, and I urge your unan imous approval. Th.:,.nk yo u . o/ .sr-n..--\;u ,... ; l: -J l {; ~{,t, • .' t . "r,, ; .' . ; t -. J<l-l « ,11 Of'.fl 0 6d,c" (<: Ut ~ ..:c-~c c'l .. ng(, ..;.,,n, (.9a.: ..L!l~L a11a: l9€,.a l n /ari :i,.11.r,d,:c~I :c 1e d u c 11. J ~ri•,l;;. arid .2dd,lc,,ia { natA,•g ,a11d .\.c.,gl'at 1.c..t.lt1 c (.:("''1 ~ ,,., fll « i«oc "\ ..l'1 t:..J c u,,~n tl_, z.cr.,a ~-..... • d C -. i l , . ' s.-...n,... VJ r s-e ,rtl/'ilN I ff 0Pf>OS /1!0 f 1,1,_, til#. u.nd'-"-"Lgrt<!d (a-tl6tad ~4!.6«iLnl.i a.rid P,op«"-lv o wnvt .. _j_aA-t , ,n oppo .. .t,or. i.c lh-t . .lO!l41 change. lOfl« code ~~-l tnd gcnc-ta ( p (an Jac naacnt (c t c d u c c d #.n .. ,lv and add,t ona( JpaAA:tnp and ll•<tJllt -tcot -i ,ct,o n o ,,, lite L-tach a -tea cu,tJl.c,illv I 1 .zo a, d z a • rn .d..,,_/ ;u.. OWlf + l,..) ,'Iv,- IN dlfl i 1~DD ~£CCJ -(PH0Nll optiona(J J\.,60 ci~J. 6Juci • 'v /l.';/rr ,. .. -- 3:::o gji~l;h ~(>;;;:_ 3 ':lit:!..-(I 14, /4J.J /!4«f l ~ .3 -&"S J YJ y (L,.,R,,t...s&,.a B,L~~ ~V~.}- ~¥-c;.<~_p_ ~ ~✓p- 3 { /;/2.L.S'~A D /3l.Vt:') 6 -)4-8-5 • "f ~ l:i. I/ 'I 6, -,J4 •8 s ------+---------------------------·------ - r' -r 1-:> ~ ~ , ---7 • ~-. j ._. -i I v ,--....__, f(_ <r.. S , 0 U v -S A,--., ~ fl2 C;.:; c:_ 1--r-f O '-"-',,__, E__R__.S . Mi... I A/ a r Pc j 'T7 <),..,,, ju 77d t:. z__of'.., L (__~ Z 0 f'JZ--1._JDL ..LJTYlb-'D/h~./~D (;,v-J~.__ . P~0 ~ UV L-1\/\UV-r-TO £..W ~ ~L ...Q ~AIS-L TYr . A-{) 0 A-0 [) iii r., N ll-<__ ?Atz-KA Alu A,v' £J fH:._ 1 ~ /cf, 5V7ZA c:nCitJ, . vJ ~ Z~~ _LM_f:A CLAl{,{f.J_dv-1..c_Y ~.'--'cJ'-'U)___,'------ , 2 0 -~U V'-" /Ac.. a~~tJt 7 X ~-_J/!!c~~- ,. -----1--------