Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-06-25; Planning Commission; MinutesMeeting of: Tlae of Meeting: Date of Meeting: MINUTES PLANNING COff4ISSION 6:00 P.M. :)..me 25, 1986 ~ ~ .. \ Place of Meeting: City Council Chanibers ~ ~ \".). ~ COMMISSIONERS ~ ~\_ ~\ C All TO ORDER: The Regular Meeting was called to order by Chairman Schlehuber at 6:11 P••· PLEDGE Of ALLEGIANCE was led by Chair111c1n Schlehuber. ROLL CALL: Present -Chairllliln Schlehuber, C011111lssioners McFadden, Hall, Marcus, HcBane, Holmes and Schra11111. r\bsent -None. Staff Metlbers Present: Chris OeCerbo, r\ssistant Planner Charles CriM, r\ssistant Planning Director Dan Hentschke, ,\ssistant City ,\ttorney Cary Wayne, Senior Planner Clyde lickhc1111, r\ssoclate Civil Engineer PLAtlUNC C(MUSSION PROCEDmES Chalr111an Schlehuber reviewed the Planning Connission procedures, shown on a transparency, for the benetit of the audience. ,\COl)A ,\OOITIONS, DELETIONS, OR ITEMS TO BE CONTINUED Chalnun Schlehuber lnfor111ed that Ite111 No. 2 did not have all the -.apping that ls required, and inquired whether the C~lssion wanted to continue this matter until all the .. ps are available. The C~lsslon concurred to continue the -.atter. No one froa the audience desired to address the C011111ission on It• No. 2. The Planning Coi.ission continued Item No. 2 -CT 84- ,3/<Y-}02 -CASAL~ COtl>OS to the next regular 111eeting of the Planning COIMlission. Chain111n Schlehuber lnfoniied that staff ls requesting that It• Noa. 5 and 6 be continued to a later date. No one froa the audience desired to address the COIMllsslon on It• Noa. 5 and 6 , The Plannint Co.iisalon continued Iteta No. 5 -ZC.\-194 - CITY (J" CARLSBAD (HILLSIDE ORDIHAHCF.), and Ite11 No. 6 - ZCA-19S -CITY <F CARLSRAD (PLANNED D£VELOPMEHT ORDINANCE) to a futur aeet lng date. (They will be renotlced.) Schlehuber X X Mcfadden X Hall X Marcus X McBane X Holaes X Schra• X Schlehuber X Mcfadden X Hall X X Marcua X McB.m, X Holaes X Schra• X (D MINUTES June 25, 1986 PLMtfINC C01fo4ISSIOH Page 2 COMMISSIONERS HFORMA TIOH ITEM 1. SNt>AC REPORT -AIRPORT The Planning C~ission was provided with copies or a dOCUtaent entitled, "Draft C0111prehensive Land Use Plan, McClellan-Paloaar Airport, San Diego, California". Charles Cr!-, Assistant Planning Director, announced that raeabers or the SMl>AC starr were in the audience and would be taaking a presentation on the Land Use Plan. Jack Koerper, San Diego Association or Covern111ents (SAl«>AC), highlighted the contents or the Draft C011Prehenslve Land Use Plan. He pointed out that the SAtl>AC Board or Directors, c:ctlng as the Airport Land Use C011aission, will be reviewing and approving the distribution or this Plan. The Plan will be sent out for a two-110nth review period, at which tinie SANOAC will be asking the City or Carlsbad and the County or San Diego to review the plan and adopt it. He stated that this presentation tonight was to 9lve the Cowalsslon an idea or what the Plan contains and thereby expedite the review process. He offered to C0111e back during the review period to answer further questions that the C~isslon 111c1y have regarding the contents or the Plan, once the City starr has C0111Pleted an analysis or the Plan. Mr. Koerper continued hJ _hllghtlng the provisions or the Plan, which ls an update or the 1974 Plan adopted by the Airport Land Use C~ssion. He stated that it was based on the new operations for the McClellan-Pal011c1r Airport. The noise contours that were prepared for the Plan are at the }26,000 operation level. This ls the capacity of the airport in tenas or the runway capacity; it does not indicate the capacity of the airport In tenns or parking space and on-the-ground facilities that are required to support the }26,000 operations. This ls the worst case noise contour for the airport. or the }26,000 operations, it ls anticipated that 51 will be jet actlvlty, and 51 will be helicopter activity. The noise contours were provid d by the County of San Diego. He pointed out and described the different noise contours displayed on a wall tUp. Mr. Koerper described the "flight Activity Zone and Clear Zon • ache11es proposed for the airport. He pointed out that this is a variation or the "Accidental Potential Zones" included in the existing Plan. The intent ls to recognize that froa t111e to t111e there will be severe craahea/accidenta or airplane parts falling orr, and this should t.lken into account by the City or Carlsbad when it looks at developaent proposals around the airport. The only ohaf1941 in the "flight Activity Zone" froa the exlatint Plan••• to .,ve this zone 700 feet to the south, reaulti"9 froa the fact that there will not a second runway oonatructed at the airport. MINUTES June 25, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION 11th the aid of a wall map, Mr. Koeper pointed out the new airport influence area for the airport. This takes into account the new noise contours and the flight activity zones. He stated that the only chanqe within the area has been to extend it to the West to acconnodate the 60 CNEL (C«-.inlty Noise Equivalent Level). He added that when this presentation was made to the Palomar Airport Advisory C01M1ittee, a suggestion was made on the possibility of extending this area to the Southeast. SANOAG staff will be evaluating that suggestion. Mr. Koerper advised that they have not found any nonconforming uses within the airport influence area to date. There ls only one Sllldll zoning designation on El Ca111lno Real which 11\a)' have to be changed at the appropriate ti111e. He further added that it would be an advantage to the airport to adhere to the height limits set up by FM ln the flight activity zones. Mr. Koerper concluded by listing the five reco11111endatlons in the Plan which should be reviewed by the Planning Coi.lsslon: ( 1) Incompatible uses within the airport area should be prohibited; (2) The City should adopt the Plan and app l y It to the pertinent proposals for the General Plan; (J) The City should adopt an ordinance requiring that the existing noise insulation standards which applies to 111Ulti-fa111ily residences also apply to single-family detached residences; (4) Direct the appropriate County depart111ent (the airport operator) to record the location of aircraft accidents within five miles of the airport property boundaries. At the present time, there ls not a good accident history report for Palomar Airport. With the County department recording the location of airport accidents, this will help substantiate the need for the flight activity zones; and (5) The Land Use Plan should be reviewed every five years. Chair111an Schlehuber Inquired regarding a particular project off of Pal0111ar Airport Road and how It will be affected. Mr. Grl-stated that the Carlsbad Land Investor Project ls partly in the 60 CNEL zone and partly ln the 65 CHEL zone. Hr. Koerper pointed out that the lines which are shown on the wall map are for the purpose of penaitting a developer to develop the property on one side of the line with one type of use and the property on the other side of the line with another type of use. At the request of Chainaan Schlehuber, Mr. Koerper stated that he would 11ake arranget11ents with staff to give a deaonstration on sound -a presentation he had previously done for another group. Hr. Koerper further responded to a question by C~lssioner Hall stating that the flight activity lines drawn on the map follow the C0111110n flight tracks for the airport ln terlll!I of width. These lines were defined by the 1974 Plan, and there has been no deviation froa that. Chalnun Schlehuber thanked Hr. Koerper for his presentation. l I~ I~ MINUTES June Z5, 1986 PLANNING COf,f4ISSION Page 4 COMMISSIONERS CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING z. CT 84-43/CP-302 -CASA LOMA CONDOS -Request for approval of a tentative tract map and condomlnlu~ per11it to develop 18 units along the north side of Luciernaga Street, at the first undeveloped property east or Cebu Street. This item was continued to the next regular meeting of the Planning Ca.iission. NEW PUBl.IC HEARINGS 3. PCD-90/CUP-293 -JIM FINNEY PONTIAC -Request of a Planning co-Isslon determination for the construction and operation of an automobile dealership and a Conditional Use Pen11it for two freestanding signs on the same lot at 5445 Paseo Del Norte in Carlsbad Car Country. Gary Wayne, Senior Planner, gave the presentation on this ltee as contained in the staff report, with the aid of a transparency showing the location of the site. He gave the background of the proposed project, and stated that the project 111eets all of the criteria of the specific plan for Car Country as amended, with respect to architecture, landscaping and signage. In addition, the project meets all of the City standards as well as the revised parking standards. The project ls consistent with the local coastal progrc1111. Starr ls reco11111endlng approval. Chalnaan Schlehuber declared the public hearing opened at 6:40 p.ffl. and issued the invitation to speak. Hr. Creg Rule, 9605 Scranton Road, Suite 202, San Diego, representing Ji• Finney, addressed the Coaaission and urged the Ca.alssion to approve this project. There being no other person in the audience desiring to address the Ca.aission, Chair11an Schlehuber declared the public hearing closed at 6:40 p.M. Ca.alssioner Marcus noted that the second story of the proposed building will have a sign on it, and stated that she thought that signs were generally not allowed, if visible froa the freeway. Charles Cri-, .\sslstant Planning Director, stated that Cotalssloner Marcus was correct. In the past, however, there has been quite a bit or flexlblllty used ln the car dealership area. Traditionally, they are not of a freeway-oriented use, but they ~re prl111c1rlly located ~long the freeways, and there has been soae flexibility in the past about all011lng those signs to occur. Mr. Crl-at.ated that generally a condition ls placed on a site developaent plan that a C0111prehenslve sign plan has to be approved by the Planning Director. Coaalssioner Mcfadden added that there are a nutllber or signs racing the fr ay, .,.d lt would seea rather inconsistent to not go along with lt now. , 'I MINUTES June 25, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION \~Jt~ Page 5 COMMISSIONERS ,~ ~~ \\ C~issioner McFadden inquired regarding the oil trap. She stated that she saw none existing. Since they are putting in no service bays and will be using the existing ones, she requested assurance that that would be taken care of for the entire site. Mr. Wayne stated that the Engineering Department has anticipated this proble~, and Condition No. 28 would require the developer to provide grease and oil traps for all surface drainage. The words "frOIII the entire site" can be added to the condition. In response to further ~uestions, Mr. Wickham stated that this particular project ls within 500 feet of a park and would not require a recreation facility. Further, the new parking requirements have been met for the entire site and exceeded by one extra space. A discussion ensued on the wordlnq of Condition No. 28 to Resolution No. 2566 to require a grease trap for all the surface drainage frOIII the entire site. Mr. Wayne answered various questions to clarify how this is done. The Planning Connission approved the Negative Declaration and adopted the following Resolutions approving PCD-9O/ CUP-293 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, to include the additional wording to Condition No. 28 to Resolution No. 2566: RESOLUTION NO. 2566 APPROVING A PLANNING COMMISSION otttRMiAATioR FOR THE CONSTRUCTION CJ" AN AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP OH PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5445 PASEO DEL NORTE IN CARLSBAD CAR COUNTRY. RESOLUTION NO. 2567 APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SECON> FREESTAtl>ING SIGN OH PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 5445 PASEO DEL NORTE IN CARLSBAD CAR COUNTRY. 4. CT 85-37/PU0-95/SOP 85-15/CT 85-38/PUD-96/SOP 85-19 - BATIQUITOS LAGOON EDUCATIONAL PARK -Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Planned Unit Developaent and Site Developaent Plan for Phase II (45.6 acres), and a Tentative Tract Hap , a Non- Residential Planned Unit Oevelopaent and Site Developaent Plan for Phase Ill (41.1 acres) of the subject Batiquitos Lagoon Educational Park Master Planned C~nity, located i111111ediately north of Batiquitos Lagoon between Interstate 5 and Carlsbad Boulevard. Charles Cri•, Assistant Planning Director, gave the lnltlal background of this itet11 wlth the aid of a tranaparency aap. He pointed out that the City Council and the Planning C~lsslon have approved the tentative Map and planned unit developaent of the first phase of the Master Plan. The itetllS before the C~ission are Phases II and III or the Master Plan. Mr. Crl• pointed out on a wall 111ap the specific deaignatlona of the General Plan for the site. He reviewed how the project related to the growth aanaget1ent progr•. He stated that Phase I, which was approved late 1 f85, hH been e,u,.pted frOM the ord l nance. Phases 11 and Ill wlll be part of the growth aanageMent syste111 and are not e11eapted1 the local and citywide '4cllltles 111anagetaent plana will have to be ln place before developaent proceeds ln thoae areas. Schlehuber X Hcf adden X Hall ) X Harcus ) HcBane ) Holmes ) Schrann ) MINUTES June 25, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION Chris De Cerbo, Assistant Planner, gave the presentation on this item as contained in the staff report. Phase II Hr. De Cerbo, with the aid of a wall map, gave a brief overview of each of the six planning ar.eas for Phase II. He listed the proposed developments that will be constructed in these areas, and concluded by stating that Phase II c0111plles with all t.he specific guidelines and develop11ent standards of the Batlqultos Lagoon Educational Park Master Plan. The only exception ls a school audltorlUIII building. The structure ls proposed to Include a 55-foot high fly loft for purposes of creating a proscenlu• stage. The Master Plan restricts all structure heights to a 111axi111Um of 35 feet within that plannlna area. An amend111ent will be required to be submitted for this height variance request. Staff has Included a condition to specify that this portion of the structure ls not approved at this tl111e, and a forthcoming Master Plan a111endillent will have to be processed. The Phase as proposed ls at Its taaxlmum structural footage in residential den,ity allowed by the Master Plan. However, staff feels that the project with its quality of architecture, and recreational open space amenities Justifies this Intensity. Phase Ill Hr. De Cerbo stated that Phase III ls COAll)osed of five planning areas. He gave an overview and breakdown of each of these planning arP.as as contained in the staff report. Phase III also COIIIJ)lles with all the specific guidelines and develoJ)IIICnt standards of the Batiqultos Lagoon Educational Park Master Plan. The only exception ls the hotel/conference cent~r where an atrium ls proposed at a height of 55 feet. Structural heights are restricted to 35 feet (aad1MJ111i by the Master Plan, and a Master Plan a111endlllent will ultiaately be required. Staff has Included the condition that the height ls not approved with this application. This phase ls at Its 111axl~m square footage, and staff ls rec~nding approval based upon the enhanceaents provided, the architecture, open space aaenlties, etc. In response to questions fr0111 Coanlssioners Schlehuber and Mcfadden, Mr. De Cerbo stated that the fi:st phase ,._.st precede the retaaining phases. Further, '.:here is a condition stating that the additional uses within Planning Area "A" of Phase II cannot go prior to the law school and educational uses being constructed In the same area. He confinaed that the 7l0 parking spaces of Phase I will be supplied ln Phase 11, and pointed to a deck parking lot included ln Phase II on the 111ap. The applicant will further address the parking Issue. At the ~uest of Coaaissloner Harcus, Clyde Wlckha•, Associate Civil Engineer, pointed out the traffic circulation of the entire site, and where traffic signals will be Installed if warranted. Chalraan Schlehuber declued the public hear:-lng opened at 7111 P••· and bsued the lnvltatlon to speak. MINUTES June 25, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION Jon Briggs, representing Sammis Properties, 2650 Camino Del Rio Horth, San Diego, gave the background of Phase I which was unanl1110usly approved by the Planning Commlsslon, the City Council, and the Coastal Commission. Further, an award of 111erlt was presented to them by the Pacific Coast Builders Co~ference on this project. In response to Co-lssloner McFadden's inquiry regarding the ~a rklng, Hr. Briggs pointed out the area in Phase II that includes the parking required for Phase I. He stated that the parking was a great concern to them and related the efforts 111ade to make sure there would be adequate parking. He described a safety valve built into this project. Two buildings will not be built in the second phase until there ls a parking study COIIIJ>leted to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that indicates that the parking ls adequate. The two buildings are to be selected by the Planning Director. Hr. De Cerbo pointed out this ls addressed by Condition Ho. 25 of Resolution Ho. 2556. Slides were shown of the site consisting of an aerie! view, the site plan, a list of the proposed develo,-nts, etc. Hr. Brlqgs pointed out that Hr. Harty Bouman reviewed various traffic studies which indicates that Poinsettia Street will continue to operate at an A-level of service. (This street will be impacted by Phase I). Further, they have agreed to do some liaprovements of the intersection of I-5 and La Costa Avenue through chanellzatlon and signalization. (Phases II and III will l111pact la Costa Avenue and Carlsbad Boulevard). However, the study indicates that the project will not cause these intersections to fall below an acceptable level of service. Hr. Briggs continued his presentation, pointing out that it ls a Mixed-use project which will be significant ln the traffic circulation area as large numbers of students and staff will live onslte. Blow ups of the projects were shown depleting various features of the buildings on the project. He stated that they hope, if the lagoon restoration process goes ahead, to 111ake the water feature salt water with water pu111ped froa the lagoon. A photograph of a aodel built to scale of t he project was also shown. Hr. Briggs concluded by stating their agree1111ent with the conditions recoaended by staff. They also request an additional standards variance for the enriched paving on llndrose Circle. The enriched paving will help identify entries to 111ajor area, and slow down traffic . In response to various questions by C~issloner Mcfadden, M'r. Briggs listed the schools and the institutions which will occupy Planning Area "A". He stated that he did not envision any aanufacturlng on the site at all. He stated th•t they see theaselves as eo11ing into the lnforinatlon •ge, Md these are people that are going to be working prlaarily with their lllinds. 0) r 1 MINUTES June 2S, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION Regarding the bicycle parking spaces, Hr. Briggs stated that an exhlblt was prepared ln answer to thls question whlch wlll be reviewed ln detail wlth staff. There are provlslons for bicycle parking throughout the slte, and pointed out the various locations on the public access plan showing the blke and pedestrian paths. He stated that there are storage c.1blnets or garages provided ln the residences whlch would accoaaodate thelr bicycles. In further response to questions, Hr. Briggs stated that all of the three phases wlll not be built out. At this tiae, they are proceeding wlth an assessnient district, whlch has been approved by the City Council. They hope to sell bonds ln August which will put in all of the infra- structure. Construction of the Phase I lnfrastrJcture will coa11ence upon recordatlon of the first phase final •ap. They will then proceed l11111edlately wlth the law school building, an office bulldlng which will house prlaarlly the architectural school, and the residential housing. The processing for Phases II and III will probably begin ln Septetllber or October upon receipt of the bulldlng pen11lts, at whlch ti111e the development of the student housing in Phase II, and the conwerclal village ln Phase III will begln. He stated that they expect the bulldout to occur ln a three to five year period. C~lssloner Holnies inquired regarding the auditorium building and how lt wlll be used. Hr. Briggs stated that the fly loft would be SS feet high designed to acc°"90date lectures, concerts, recitals, and dra111atic perfonnances. The opening of the stage is approxi.ately 20 feet. The height for scenery ls an additional 28 feet plus 7 more feet for the structural support. C~issloner Schra• pointed to the setbacks fr011 the slngle-f•lly ho.es on top of the bluffs, and inquired what would be done to keep people fr011 going within the setback area -fr011 the end of the property line to the end of the bluff itself. Hr. Briggs stated that the landscapi ng would take c.1re of that -thorny bushes, etc. C~ssioner Mcfadden inquired whether in the nelghborhood-c«-erclal area the ~rcial and residential units were lnten11lxed on the s.-e floor. Hr. De Cerbo stat ed t hat there ls a half-story difference between the nearest c«-ercial floor fr011 the upper story residential. Hr. Br iggs stated that there w111 be no direct access fr011 t he residential apart111ent units to the c«-rclal units . They will not share the sa111e floor. Hr. Crl-added that t his aatter l s specifically addressed in the new conditions staff is rec011111ending. Dale Schreiber, 1-S7 Crest Drlve , Enclnltas, addressed the C~aalon and read a letter into the record (a copy was subaltted) inquiring about t he Ci ty property which will be leased to 5-ls Properties and expressing his opposltlon to the leasing of this property and suggesting that the City oonaider hiring a property unager t o adlllinlster all ot the City-owned properties. Hr. Cri-explained that the posslblllty of a land swap with the City tor an area along Carlsbad Boulevard ls being consider, however, this ls not a flnallzed action. MINUTES June ZS, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSlON Mr. Briggs reappeared and emphasized that they do have strong support of the nelgh~oring residents to the North, Lakeshore Gardens, and also Batlqultos Lagoon Foundation supports the project. There being no other person present In the audience desiring to address the Commission, Chairman Schlehuber declared the public hearing closed at 7:SZ p.m. C011111lssloner Schra111111 inquired regarding the Windrose Circle -lt has the width to allow parking along one side. She stated that she underst ood that no parking was allowed there. Mr . Wickhclffl stated that the width does allow the parking, but that it ls pretty much for handicapped Individuals. Commissioner McBane Inquired regarding the street standards for Carlsbad Boulevard, and whether the standards allow for meandering sidewalks. Mr. Wickham stated that typically meandering sidewalks have been encouraged; In this case, he would see no reason for not al lowing it. Commissioner McFadden Inquired regarding the underground parking and the number of cars In one place with only one exit and entry s ide by side. Mr. De Cerbo stated that he checked wlth the Building Department and was assured that the Uniform Building Code requires that stairwell access be provided with underground parking for rrultl-famlly residential as we ll as co11111ercial and Industrial areas. Commissioner McFadden inquired what the water source would be f or the wat er feature and who will be paylng tu pump lt to all the places. Mr . Grimm stated that It ls Included In one of the new conditions; tt places the responsiblllty on the Homeowners Assoclatlon . Co-hsioner Mcfadden inquired regardl11y Condition No. 31, page 8, the Local Coastal Plan Compliance. Mr. Grimm stated that in one of the new conditions, there ls a proposal to eliminate t he words "Permit No . 6-AS-482" from Condition Nos. 30 and 31 and thereby only require C0111Pllance with the Local Coastal Program. C011111hsi oner Marcus Inquired regarding the City ar.reage. Mr. Wlckhdlll estimated It to be around )1 acres; however, the actual land swap concept has not come before a public hearing yet. Mr . Wickham stated that he believed It to be a purchase. Unit No . l of tht project has a cufl(1ltlon that tr the ldnd swdp concept ls not dpproved, then Unit Ho. ) ls null dnd void. MINUTES June 25, 1986 PLANNIN~ COMMISSION Commissioner Holmes expressed his concern with the recreation area wlthln 30 feet of mobile homes, especially with the noise problem. Chairman Schlehuber questioned the possibility of that concern being addressed by sound barriers or walls. Mr. Gri"'" stated that staff has prepared wording for a possible condition on this to require the applicant to put in a six-foot acoustical wall on the north side of the recreation area and further to 11.mlt the hours of operation. In addition, the Master Plan requires a forest through that area ln terms of landscaping. One other factor taken into consideration ls the fact that there ls a six-foot hlqh wall that separates the mobile home oroperty from the Sammis prorerty which ~Ill help to reduce noise. In response to a concern raised by Commissioner Mcfadden regarding the construction of improvements as It relates to the build-out in the different phases, Hr. Wickham stated that the Improvements would be required to be designed and bonded before the final maps can be approved for either phases. Once those bonds are submitted, they will have a 12-month expiration date on them. They can start construction of everything while the bonds are in effect. The bonds will become due in 12 months. If the improveaents are not constructed, the City can require those Improvements to be made or go after the bonds to guarantee those improvements. Chairman Schlehuber expressed his concern that as the project ls being built, that it ends up being solely a housing project. Mr. Grimm stated that staff took this Into consideration. Essentially, the worst that the City can end up with ls a hous ing project. In this event, there ls the possibility of a rP-sidentlal project with an office develop111ent in the center. The impacts uf that would be relatively light because it would probabl) actually reduce the overall traffic. The Plarning Co11111lsslon adopted the following resolutions recoa1endlng approval of CT 85-37/PUD-95/SOP 85-15/CT 85- 38/PU0-96/SOP 85-19, based on the findings and subject tu the conditions contained therein, to further Include the additional conditions contained In a memorandum dated June 25, 1986 to the Planning Commission from the Engineering Staff/Planning Department, and to lncludc a standards variance for the enriched paving. RESOLUTION NO. 2555 REC<M4ENDING APPRJVAL CJ' A 51 LOT TENTATIVE TRACT tW' ANO 432 UUT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OH PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED IMMEDIATELY NORTH CJ' BATIQUITOS LAGOON BETWEEN INTERSTATE-5 AND THE AT&SI- RAILWAY (PHASE II ~-175). RESOLUTION NO. 2556 APPROVING A SITE DE:VE.LOPMENT PLAN NO. 85-15, TO Al.Lot CONSTRUCTION CJ' SIX EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE BUILDIHCS (115,900 SO, FT.), TWO CJ'FICE BUILDINGS (135,800 SQ. FT.), THREE RESEARCH ANO DEVELOPMENT BUILDINGS (192,500 SO. FT.) ANO 1,312 PARKING SPACES, WITHIN PLAHHIHC AREA "A" Of THE BATIQUITOS LAGOON £DU ATIONAL PARK 14ASTER PLAN GENERALLY LOCATED OH THE INTERIOR (J' WINOROSE CIRCLE JUST NORTH <»" BA TIQUITOS LAGOON ( PHASE I I Of ~-ln). Schlehuber ) Mcfadden ~ Hall ) ~ Marcus ~ McBane ~ Holmes ~ Schrann ~ @ MINUTES June 25, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 11 COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION HO. 2557 RECOtfo4ENOIHG N>PROVAL CJ. A 1J LOT fEATAf!Vt fflAcf R-0> AHO A NON-RESIDENTIAL PLANNED !MIT DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF BATIQUITOS LAGOON BETWEEN CARLSBAD BOULEVARD ANO THE AT.tSf RAILWAY (PHASE III OF f4>-i75). RESOLUTION HO. 2558 APPROVING A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN HO. TI':19, TO A([oi CONSTRUCTION OF A NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL CENTER (61,000 SQ. FT.), A 150 SUITE EXECUTIVE HOTEL WITH 25,000 SQ. fT., eotf'EREHCE CENTER AHO 220 HOTEL SUITES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF BATIQUITOS LAGOON BETWEEN CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AHO THE AT&Sf RAILWAY (PHASE III OF 14>-175). Co.1issloner Hall stated that the Master Plan completed on this project ls excellent and will definitely be an asset to the City. Cha!rl'lcln Schlehuber ~greed, and further c01N11ended the planner, Mr. De Cerbo, who was assigned to the project. 5. ZCA-194 -CITY OF CARLSBAD (Hillside Ordinance) -An a111endment to the Zoning Ordinance to add a new Chapter 21.95 HJllslde Ordinance regulating develoJ)lll6nt on hillside areas. This iteM was continued to a later date. It will be renotlced. 6. ZCA-195 -CITY OF CARLSBAD (Planned Development Ordinance) -An c1111end111ent to the Zoning Ordinance to revise Chapter 21.45, the Planned Development Ordinance. Th is ite111 was continued to a later date. It will be renotlced. /\PPROVAL OF MINUTES Chaln11c1n Schlehuber pointed that in the minutes of one of the 111eetings COtlaissioner McFadden was given the credit for voting against the Brodine l'lclt ter. However, it was his recollection that he was the lone "no" voter. Ca.aissioner McFadden clarified that she did vote "no" on the rescission of the action. (The minutes were reviewed and found to be correct as presented.) Coaissioner Marcus requesting the expansion the following par~graph on page 5 of the May 28, 1986 ~inutes: "Coalssloner Marcus st>.~ed that she agreed with ChalnMn Schlehuber's concern at.out widening the Interior streets fr011 24 feet to 26 feet." The following will be added to the paragraph: ~However , the 2,-toot width streets do presently iaeet the 5tandards for lnterlor streets. She rec01a11ended that, lf the COMioslon desires the 26-foot width ~treets, the standards be .-ended to require that . ChairMctn Schlehuber concurred.• The Planning Coai1ssion approved the ialnutes of May 28, 1966 and June 4, 1986 with the noted oorrectlons. Schlehuber McFadden Hall Marcus HcBane Hoh,es Sehr..,_. @ X X X X X X X X ----,0------------------ AOOEll ltE:MS Atll REPORtS Statt MINUTIS Charles Ctllllill, Assistant Planning Oltector, Hlfetted to a project across ft""' Catls~d High School -a slngle-taml ly project done by Hr. Jim Vine. there had previously been discussions ft1>111 n@lghbtltlng residents concerned about the vle1ts. Basically; tt was decided that the applicant would work this out with statt. Mt. Ctl111111 stated that they have not been able to wutk It out, and ate considering bringing it back to the Planning Cunnlssion, ot to have the applicant proc~d with his project . Dan Hentschke, Assistant City Attorney, pointed out that since this ls a single-fandly subdivision with no planning action, the bullding cannot be regulated. tr staff wants to retone the property, all slmllarlly situated properties will have to be retoned. C«-lssioner Mc8ane pointed out that at the same meeting, the applicant agreed to SOMe restrictions on the l andscaping. Hr. Hentschke stated that the only way that c an be enforced ls to put that kind of a restriction in the CCIR. However, the City cannot enforce those r estrictions at this tl111e. Planning Conalsslon ChairMan Schlehuber stated that on July d at 7 p.m. the Planning Co-lsslon has agreed to meet with the Arts COMllllss lon. However, the Planning Co111nlsslon will meet at 6100 p.m. on that date, since there are agenda items scheduled. Becau,e certain Co11111lssioners will not be able to make the July 9th 111eeting, Chair111c1n Schlehuber inquired on the possibility or having the 11eetlng scheduled for another day. Following discussion, the Planning Commission rescheduled the 111eeting of July 9, 1986 to July 30, 1986. Hr. Gri-inquired wt1ether the C01111isslon would consider scheduling so. or the Slldll iteias ror11erly scheduled for July 9th to th~ July 23rd iaeetlng. The C011111hs loners agreed. Coaalssloner Mcfadden inquired what the Co.nisslon can do r99arding a letter received rr0111 Hr. Dolllngoet requesting a public hearing on a 1W1tter. Hr. Gri• advised that he bell ved that it goes through a roraal hearing process with the City Engineer, at which point the decision c.1n be appeaied. Hr. Hent~~hke confired that the Cowaisslon ta ea no action. The letter constitutes a rorMal 4',peal. The Cl t)' Engin er /Planning Dh-eotor wll l take upon t he a~al. Schlehuber X X Hcradden X Hall X Harcus X HcBane X Hol111es X Schra-X ® MINUTES June 25, 1986 Pl.\NHING COl'l41 SSI ON Page 1 J COMMISSIONERS Mr. Cri._ referred to the Hunt Property Inc. public hearing and gave the reasons why the applicant ls requesting that this matter be scheduled for a special ~eeting prior to the regular nieeting of August 27th. The Planning Cow.lsslon scheduled the Hunt Property Inc. project for a special ~etlng on August 20, 1986. ADJOUUf4ENT By proper motion, the Meeting of June 25, 1986 was adjourned at 8:25 p.M. Respectfully submitted, /VVl. Planning Director Elizabeth Caraballo Minu ces Clerk EC:tb '4EETINCS ME ALSO TAPED ANO KEPT 00 FILE IMTIL THE MINUTES ARE APPROVED. Schlehuber McFadden Hall Marcus McBane Holmes Schrann @ X X X X X X X X