Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-07-30; Planning Commission; Minutest . Meeting of: Time of Meet Ing: Date of Meetlno: Place of Meeting: CALL TO ORDER: MINUTES PLANNINC COMMISSION 6:00 P.H. July 30, 1986 City Council Chambers The Ad,fourned Regular Meeting •as called to order by Chairman Schlehuber at 6:01 p.m. PLEDGE Of ALLEGIANCE •as led by Chairman Schlehuber. ROLL CALL: Present -Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners McFadden, Hall, Marcus, Holmes, and Schra11111. Absent -Co11111lssioner McBane. (C011111issloner HcBane arrived at 6:09 p.m.) Staff Members Present: Charles Gri1111'1l, Assistant Planning Director Dan Hentschke, Assistant City Attorney Mike H°"es, Senior Planner Gary Wayne, Senior Planner PLANNING t'.(HHSSION PROCEDURES Chairman Schlehuber outlined the Planning Co11111ission procedures follo•ed in public hearings for the benefit of the audience. AGEtl>A ADOITIONS1 DELETIONS OR ITEMS TO BE CONTINUED Coffllllissioner Hcf adden expressed her concern at the length of time which will be spent on Item No. 1, and pointed out that there were people in the audience who desire to address Itet11 Ho. S. Therefore, because she has been assured by staff that Item No. Swill make the General Plan Allendment package to the City Council, she requested that this item be continued until August 13, 1986 as the first ite111 on that agenda. Chainlldn Schlehuber informed the public that ltet11 Ho. S will be opened as a public hearing today to allow those individuals !tho were present tonight to speak on this Mattet'. He fuc-ther informed that there were further docu111ents received relative to this item which the public Might be interested in reviewing prior to August 13, 1986. Coa11issioner Mc8ane arrived at 6:09 p.m. The Planning C~ission continued ltet11 No. S -GPA/LU 86- ~ -CITY CF CARLSBAD to the regular tweeting of the Planning Coaaisslon on August 13, 1986. Schlehuber ) McFadden ) ) Hall ) Marcus ) Mc8c1ne ) Holaes ) Schra.a )( MINUTES July 30, 191\6 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 2COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairman Schlehuber announcP.d that Item No. 5 would be taken out of order and be opened at this time to allow only those Individuals who cannot make the meeting on Auqust 13 to make their presentation tonlqht. 5) CPA/LU 86-4 -CITY Of CARLSBAD -A Genera~ Plan Amend,nent to cJ111end the land Use Element to .nclude the encourage,nent of childcare In the conrnunlty as a goal of the General Plan. Chairman Schlehuber declared the public hearing opened dt 6:11 p.m. and issued the Invitation to speak. Julie Nygaard, 3405 Spanish Way, representino Carlsbad School District, addressed the Conwnlsslonand informed that she WOl.lld not be able to attend the August 13th meeting. She spoke in favor of this General Plan Amendment. Hs. Nygaard informed that the Boys and Girls Club worked with Carlsbad School District to establish a program called Sca111pers which services 60 children at four different school sites. However, this is not meeting all the needs of Carlsbad. There are a number of people waiting to get Into this program, but there ls no more space. The cost is also excessive and continues to grow. The State ls considering licensing the program and If this ls done, t hen the cost will double which may eliminate the pr~ra~ C0111pletely. Hs. Nygaard further stated that at Valle} Junior Hlqh approximately 40 percent of the students are beinq serviced by an after school program. In two years, it ls predicted that approximately 60 percent of the students will be serviced by that program. She added that a recent bill passed by the Governor states in essense that anyone who works in Carlsbad will now be able to bring their children to Carlsbad schools. What this means ls that there will not be anything for those children to do and probably no where to go after school. She submitted a letter from San Harcos School District endorsing the approval of this General Plan Amendment. There being no other person in the audlenc~ des!, Ing to address the C~isslon on this 111atter. Chalr,nan Schlehuber declared the public hearing continued to August 13, 1986. 1) CPA/LU 86-8/ZC-347/LCPA 86-1 -CITY Of CARLSBAD - General Plan Aiiiendiiients, Zone Chang~s and local Coastal PJan Amendlllcnts to bring the General Plan, Zoning and Local Coastal Plan maps into conformance. Hike Howes, Senior Planner, stated the purpose of this report and rec«-endatlons ls to bring the land use designations on the General Plan, Zoning Hap and Local Coastal Plan into confor,nancy. Hr. Howes ga~e the staff presentation on the f irst section of the report dealing with the General Plan and Zoning inconsistencies outside of the Coastal lone. 6) MINUTES July 30, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION Exhibit "A" -Harding Street Mr. Howes described the location of the site, with the aid of a map, and stated that staff ls reconrnending a General Plan Amendment from RVH to RH and a Zone Change from RD-H to R-3. Mr. Howes gave the reasons for the proposed changes as contained ln the staff report. Chairman Schlehuber pointed to a wall chart which lists the descriptions of the various zone designations in the Cl t v for the benefit of the audience. Chairman Schlehuber declared the public hearing opened at 6: 16 p.m. and issued the invitation to speak. (Chairman Schlehuber informed that audience participation will be taken after each exhibit of 'tem No. 1 ls presented.) The Planning C011111lssion accepted staff's recommendations on Exhibit "A" as contained ln the staff report. Exhibit "B" -Altiva Place Mr. Howes described the location of the site, with the aid of a 111ap, and stated that staff ls recommending a General Plan A111endftlent from Rl4i to RLM. He gave the background and the reasons for the proposed amendment as contained in the staff report. Jim Scott, 1241 Elm Avenue, addrcsJed the Commission and stated that it ls a fairly dramatic cha,,ge from high density to low density. He stated he has plans to do a single-fa111ily subdivision. They were going to do eight lots on two acres. However, by chanqir,g the General Plan, the 111ap application they have in will n~t be acceptable. Further, if the City Council approves t~e proposed recoa.endation of having 0-3.4 units per acre, then the nuaber of units he proposed tc build ~ill go from 16 units to 6 units. He requested that the Planning Collftission allow ror RM with the 10,000 squar~ foot minimu111S to enable his plan for single-famll} lots to go forward. Mr. Howes stated that staff can understand the applicant's concerns; however, RLH and R-1-10,000 go together. If staff goes along with the RM General Plan designation, there is nothing to prevent the applicant from selling that property to sonieone else, and then having s0111e""e else COftle in six IIIDnths fr0111 now requesting a rezone to ROM. The Planning Ca.aission approved the staff's recoanenda- tions for Exhibit "B" as contained ln the staff's repot·t. Schlehuber McFadden Hall Marcus McBane Holmes Schramm Schlehuber McFadden Hall Marcus McBane Holaes Schra.i X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X MINUTES July 30, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 4 f_,._hiblt "C" -Monroe Street Mr. Howes described the locatlo,· of this site, with the aid of a maµ, and stated that staff ls recommending a zone change frOffl R-3 to R-1-7500. He oave the background and the reasons staff Is rec01T111endl11g the proposed zone change as contained In t he staff report. The Planning Commission approved the staff's reco11111enda- tlons for Exhibit "C" as contained In the staff's report. Exhibit "0" -Costa Real Propert} -El Camino Real Mr. Howes described the location of this site, with the aid of a map, and staled that staff Is recommendi ng a zone change from R-1-10 to M, wi th a O Overlay. He gave the reasons staff ls recommending the p:-oposed zone change as contained In the staff report. lom Bra~ -ell, losta Real Muni cipal Waler Olslrlct, 5950 El Camino Rtal, addressed the Commission and read a letter Into the record requesting a conti nuance of this matte r. (The letter was submitted to the Clerk.) In response to a question pose~ by Commissioner McFadden, Mr. Brarrmell stated that he would request the matter be delayed to allow theffl to discuss this matter at their board 111eetlng on August 6, 1986. The Planning C0111111!sslon continued Exh i bit "0" to the reqular meeting of the Planning Comrnisslon on August 1.3, 1986. [ll.hihlt "[" -Carlsbad Raceway Area Hr. Howes described the location of the site, with the aid of a map, and gave the reasons why staff ls reco1m1endlng a zone change to PH as contained in the staff report. C~asiooer Harcus requested clarification on the background of this .alter. When the Carillo Ranch OevelOp11ent c-before the Planning Co-lsslon, Palomar Airport Road was going to be 1110ved to the North. Chainun Schlehuber pointed out that the Connlssion decided not to because the power lines were going to have to be aoved. The Planning C«-isslon approved the staff's rec~nda- t1on1 on Exhibit "[" as cootalned In the staff report. COUNCIL MEMBERS Schlehuber McFadden Hall Marcus HcBane Holmes Schramrn Schlehuber HcF adden Hall Marcus McBane Holmes Schramm Schlehuber Hcf adden Hall Harcus HcRane Hol111es Schra.. (f) MINUTES \~\~\ Page 5COMMISSIONERS ,~~ -...---------------------------- July 30, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION Hr. Howes stated that at this time Gary Wayne, Senior Planner, will be giving the starr report on the second part of this presentation dealing with Coactal Issues. General Plan -Local Coastal Program (LCP) Consistency Gary ldyne, Senior Planner, stated that the City ls divided into sh LCP segments. The LCP segments have a long history of preparation and adoption, and lt has not been until very recently that the City has accepted the LCP's, and has been willing to approve the LCP's with amend111ents and therefore, take the responsiblllty of implementing the LCP segments. He explained that In order to acco111plish the Implementation, the City has to make Its General Plan and Zoning lnterndlly consistent with the LCP. Mr. Wayne continued explaining what ls involved in order to ensure consistency anio,,g the General Plan, Zoning, and Local Coastal Program as contained In the staff report. Hr, Wayne pointed out that staff will be returning to both t.he Planning C011111isslon and the City Council at a later date to process other General Plan Amendments and Zone Code Amendments which baslcully involve text changes. Tonight, staff will only be dealing with the map changes to bring all or the documents into conformity. Exhibit "F" -Hughes Property, Highway 78 and Jefferson Street Hr. Wayne described the location or the site, with the aid or a map, and gave the reasons why staff ls recommending a General Plan Amendment from RR! to OS and a zone change fr0111 C-2-0 to OS as contained in the staff report. He .. dded that it has come to staff's attention that the Buena Vista Creek does not follow the precise boundar les that are outlined in the Local Coastal Progra~. Therefore, staff will be processing an LCP amendment to have open space designation .fust apply to the resource involved, Buena Vista Cr~ek. For clarification, Hr . Wayne e~plalned that LCP means Local Coastal Progra111 which ls made up or two parts --the land use plan and an il!lple111entatlon section. The City has already adopted the Land Use Plan, but at this tiine the plan does not confor1111 to the General Pldn. C~issioner Harcus noted that the C~ission's Exhibit "F" was di frerent fr011 the Exhibit "F" on display. Hr. Wayne stated that that was correct, and explained that the inforaation of the precise boundaries or the Buena Vista Creek, as well as a 25-foot buffer, came to the attention of staff this aornlng. Coalssloner Mcfadden inquired whether a portion of the property in question was a sewer plant and therefore, governmental . Mr. Wayne responded that 1t was. She further inquired why then was that portion being designated RRI. MINUTES July JO, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION Mr. Wayne explained that that portion was original!) designated RRI, which ls not Inconsistent with the use there. /\ governme11t building can be situated in any zone. The City has utility pump stations all over the City in whatever General Plan designation they happen to be In and zoned. They are allowed therr by a CUP. C<>11111issloner Mcfadden further inquired how much of the land ls actually RR! aside from the sewer pump.Mr. Wayne pointed out on the map tne portion of the site that would be RR! that ls not the sewer plant. Charles Grimm, Assistant Planning Director, stated that the concern of the City ls that a developab.1.e piece of property be designated from ~RI to Open Space. This would take away the property owner's development rights. For further clarification, Mr. Jayne stated that the City's General Plan does not designate the portion in question as Open Space. However, the Local Coastal Progra~ designates the whole strip there (which would basically follow the City's boundary at the northern line) as Open Space. It's the City's interpretation of the OS General Plan designation to designate Open Space for its intended uses. The intended use here ls resource protection which ls Buena Vista Creek, and therefore the area to the north of It which ls RRI on the City's General Plan should rP.ally not be part of the resource protection. There ls adequate buffer that was already considered in the granting of ~he Coastal Development permit by the Coastal C011111ission. Therefore, it ls staff's reconnendatlon that this area that ls not really open space not be designated Open Space on the LCP. Dan Hentschke, Assistant City Attorney, further clarified that with regard to both the LCP amendment and the General Plan Allend111ent, the C011111isslon 's only action tonight would be to direct staff to notice that for a public hearlnq at its next C0111111ss1on meeting (August 13). This portion does not have to be discussed in detail since a public hearing ls necessary for an LCP amend111ent. The Planning C011111isslon continued E xhlbl t ''f" to the next regular 111eetlng of the C01911ss1on on August 13, 1986. Exhibit "G" -First row of lots adjacent to Buena Vista Lagoon along Jefferson Street C~lssloner Hol11es abstained fr0111 participation on this exhibit. Chalraan Schlehuber 111ent1oned that tl,e C011111lsslon has received a 111e110randum frOIII the Planning Department containing an additional paragraph to this exhibit. Schlehuber ) Hcf adden JI ) Hall ) Harcus ) HcBane ) Holmes ) Schra-) MINUTES July 30, 1986 PLANNING C0l+IISSI0N Page 7 Hr. Wayne described the location of the site, with the aid of a map, and gave the reasons for the staff's reconmendation for an LCP amend111ent from RLM lo RMH. He pointed out that the LCP h~s a map note which would designate all first row of lots adjacent to the lagoon as RLH. Staff has dl~cussed the problems with this type of designation with the Coastal Collllllllssion. The City has enacted a number of recent changes with its decrease ln density and not counting 401, slopes and wetlands for density calculations, and requiring buffers and setbacks from the wetlands as part of an LCP approval. There ls enough resource protection ava l lable ln the existing docuinents to ensure adequate protection of Buena Vista Lagoon. Hr. Wayne added that there are a number of existing condomln.lu111s and 111.Jltlple ownerships of single lots there which would be affected lf the designation were changed to RLH from RM-i. Therefore, staff feels, given the number of recent changes ln policy and General Plan Amendments, that the adequate resource protections exist ln the City documents a~ well dS the LCP and that the RMH makes more sense fo~ this area. Co11111i ssloner McFadden referred to the memorandum and requested clarification as to the location of the slte. Hr. Wayne explained that Exhibit "G" ls broken down Into two parts. The memorandum deals with another area along Jefferson that has the same map note. He explained that staff was somewhat confused when the LCP was first adopted as to the map note that designates the first row of lots as RLH; Staff wanted to cl~rlfy the map note, and lt has been discussed with the Coastal Co11111lsslon staff. The area Identified ln the memorandum as "G-1" ls not a first row of lots, because they are separated from the lagoon by Jefferson Street. A Hotlon was made to approve staff's recommendations on Exhl bit "G" as contained ln t he staff's report. Chalr111an Schlehuber expressed his concern about the amount of edts en Jefferson Street. It ls a main thoroughfare between the 111all and downtown Carlsbad. co .. lssloner HcBane suggested that a O Overlay be placed on Exhibit "G" to glve the Co11111lsslon an opportunity to review the specific plans . Follo•ing further discussion, the Planning Co111111ssion approved start' s rec011111endatlon on E.xhlbit "G" as contained in the starr' s report and directed the starr to return Exhibit "G" to consider placing a O Overlay on this s ite. Upon ~ question raised on the action that should be taken on Exh ibit "G-1", Hr . Grl-clarltled that there ls no LCP a11endlllent involved. Ho Planning Ca.ilsslon action ls necessary. Starr wlll interpret the 111ap note as to the approprlate LCP designation for thls property. Schlehuber McFadden Hall Harcus HcBane Holaes Schraai MINUTES 1uly 30, 1986 PLANNING CO~,J,!ISSION Page 8 Exhibit "H" -Single family neighborhood around Buena Vista Creek Hr. Wayne described the location of the site, with the aid of a map, and stated staff's reconmnendatlon for a General Plan Amendment from R..i to RLM as contained in the staff report. Gene Bell, property owner in the area, addressed the Plannlnq Commission and pointed out on the map an area which ls currently zoned R-3, and stated that lt ls his understanding that that would not be changed. Hr. Wayne stated that that was correct . It was a drafting error. This has been a tremendously complex project and even with the numerous checks, there are bound to be errors. The Planning Co11111lsslon approved staff 's recommendations on Exhibit "H" as contained ln the staff's report with the deletion of the area currently zcned R-3. Exhibit "I" -Lots on north side of Laguna Drive between State and Roosevelt Streets Mr. Wayne described the location of the site, with the ald of a map, and stated staff's reconwnendatlons for an LCP amendment from RH to R..i/O as contained ln the staff report. He added that a portion of the area ls within the V 111 age Redevelopment Area, and that area plan wl th those uses have already been approved by the Coastal Connlsslon. However, there has been no map change. Co11111lssioner McFadden pointed out that the text states that the site locntlon ls between State and Roosevelt Streets. However, the map states between State and Madison Streets. Hr. Wayne stated that the map exhibit was correct • Mr. Wayne responded to various questions posed by C~lssloner McFadden for clarlflcatlon. He pointed out that the public was noticed of this a111endment through a display ad In the newspapers. The property owners were directly noticed. The Planning C011111lsslon approved staff's recommendations on Exhibit "I" as contained ln the staff report. Sch l ehuber X HcF adden X X Hall X Harcus X HcBane X Holmes X Schra11111 X Schlehuber X HcF adden X Hall X X Marcus X Hc8ane X Holaes X Schraaa X @ MINUTES July JO, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 9 Exhibit "J" -Ticor ( APN 155-101-65 and 155-190-13) and Native Sun (APN 203-010-21) located near the 1110uth of Buena Vista lagoon Hr. Wayne described the location of the site, with the aid of a 111c1p. He stated staff's rec011111endatlons for a General Plan Amendr.ient from RH/OS to RLM, and a Zone Change from R-A to R-1-20 for the Ticor parcels and from R-A to R-1-10 for the Native Sun parcels Hr. Wayne explained th~t it had come to their attention that the property ls under private ownership. He pointed out that staff ls also proposing an LCP amendment from OS to RLH . He stat~d that it has also come to their attention that Native Sun has a recorded irrevocable offer to dedlcate the entire parcel as Open Space. If that ls the case, staf?'s recOffll'llendation wlll be to change the designation to Open Space with the acceptance of the offer. C011111issioner Mcfadden pointed out that this area was ln the Beach Overlay Area, and inquired why lt was included In the recominendatlons. Hr. Wayne stated that staff has been directed by Council to 1110ve forward with all necessary ducuments to implement the Local Coastal Plan. One of the things that nust be done to l!llplement the LCP ls to adopt a map. Either a map should be adopted with the current Open Space designation, knowing that there ls private property out there, or staff should try to do s0111ethlng about it. Hr. Wayne explained that the action that the Connisslon will be taking on LCP amendments would be a rec0111111enda- tlon for approval Oil those amendments that the C011111lssion feels ls appropriate, which would open a six-week review period. At that tl111e interested parties trould have a chan~t to exa~lne the documents and respond in writing or orally. Staff would then 111ake a sunnary of the c011111ents and sublnlt a report to the Planning COll'alisslon at which tline the Planning CO!Mllssion will make a decision. That decision will be forwarded to the City Council. In the discussion that ensued, C011111issloner HcBane inquired why staff was rec011111endlng RLH rather than RL since it ls going t~ be a R-1-20,000 zone (for the Tlcor parcels). Hr. Wayne replied that this ls done to be consistent with the LCP. In response to a C011111ent by C~issloner HcBane, Hr·. Wayne pointed out that the LCP amendment will be to change the •ap note of all properties to RL. C0ta1lssioner HcBane pointed that there was the concern that the property owner aay eo111e back and ask fur a change in zoning to be consistent with the General Plan designation at a higher density. Hr. Wayne stated that could be possible. City Attorney tientschke stated that if all the other properties are RL designation, you have to go to a larger lot size and it 1t0Uld need SOiie sort of illlJ)lewientlng zone. @ MINUTES July 30, 1986 PLANNING COl'fi4ISSION Hr. Wayne stated that his understanding of that 111ap note ls to allow develop111ent that ls sensitive to the resource (lagoon) so that you don't have a lot of grading, a lot of site disturbance next to the lagoon. It is also to preserve views. In this case the site is flat; so, there ls not going to be a lot of site disturbance. So that 111eets the intent of the first part. But as far as being adjacent to the lagoon in the view corridor, certainly a lower designation or a lower density would be better at preserving the ,·tsual resources. Hike Poynor, Attorney for Ticor Title, Sternberg, Eggers, Kidder I Fox, 22S Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, addressed the C«-lssion ar,d requested a continuance of this 111atter because Ticor has not had an opportunity to analyze the various alternatives in this matter. Upon a C011111ent 111ade by Chairman Schlehuber regarding the water levels out there, Hr. Poynor stated that he did not want to respond at this ti111e until he is thoroughly prepared to speak on this 111atter. He requested that the matter be continued to August 13, 1986. C«-issioner Mcfadden reiterated her concerns that this area ls in the Fleach Overlay Area, and stated that she felt that staff not only needs to address the densities or how high the tide ls, etc., but the traffic issue also needs to be addressed. She suggested that this matter be continued until there ls a report In from the Beach Overlay Study COR1ittee. In response to Coiaissioner Schra11111, Hr. Wayne stated that staff can still submit a package to Council. However, LCP a11enct.ents 111ay be necessary later. He added that If the Beach Overlay Study C~lttee could have their report In during the six-week review period, then the c1111end11ent could still be included ln the package to l111ple111ent the Local Coastal Plan. C«-issloner Harcus questioned how long it ls estimated for the report to be in. Coaaissioner Mcfadden stated that the bridge needs to be opened, and after that tiae approxlaately two 1111>nths ls estlaated betore the report would be C0111pleted. Dan Hentschke, .\sslstant City Attorney, suggested that this utter be continued to August 13 to give staff an opportunity to address the tide levels, water levels, the traffic, etc., to see what will be available for that Tlcor parcel. He added that because the City Councll ls really pushing to get the coastal pen11lt authority for the City, it llight cause soae problet!IS to delay this another two 110nths. In response to a previous question by Coaaissioner Mcfadden on the reason this area was included in the recoaendatlons, Hr. Wayne pointed out that staff ls dealing with soaething t hat has been already approved and adopted. In addition, in all the cases, these are going towards 1110re restrictive uses. Further, the Coastal staff hu given their support that the rec0a11ended changes will be COlllpatlble with the decisions. ® MINUTES July 30, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 1(!oMMISSIONERS Chairman Schlehuber inquired lf the C~lsslon could go back and ask for LCP a111end111ents should It conflict with t t\e Reach Overlay Study report. Mr. Wayne stated that there was nothing preventinq the COfflllllssion fr°"' going back and dolno that. The Planning C011111ission continued Exhibit "J" to August 13, 1986. Exhibit "K" -State Beach parking lot south of Oak Street Mr. Wayne descrlbf>d the location of the site, with the aid of 111ap, and stated the staff's recommendation for an LCP a111endlllent to correct an apparent drafting error. The a111enti111ent would be ,'rom RH to OS. The Pl anning C0talssion approved staff's rec0111111endation on [~hlblt "K" as contained In the staff report . Exhibit "l" -Area on t he north side of Pine Avenue between Lincoln Street and the railroad tracks M~. Wayne described the site location, with ~he aid of a aap, and stated that staff ls reconwending a General Plan Alllendaent fr011, RVH to RH and a Zone Change from RD-H to RO-Mas contained In the staff report. Jack Pouch, owner of the subject parcel, addressed the Planning C~isslon and expressed hls opposition to the proposed changes. lte stated that In the event of a disaster, he would onl y be allowed to rebuild half of his project according to the new General Plan !M's lgnatlon. Mr. Gri-confir111e~ that according to the General Plan, if aaended, the applicant would be allowed to only build back half the project if it was coapletely destroyed. C~issloner M.~F adden pointed out that this was also in the Beac'lh Ove rlay Zone, and t hat action should be withheld until the report ls in. ~«-!•~loner Mc8ane questioned whether there was a llalt to hOlt aany LCP aaendlllent.s the City could request. Mr. Wayne stated that he ls r.ot aware of any l h1l t to the nuaber of aendlllents allowed. further , the General Plan Aaendllent allotaent does not have to be used in l111Pleaent ing LCP a111endlllents. He deferred to Mr. Blrnbau~. Schlehuber Mcfadden Hall Marcus McBane Hol111es Schra- Schlehub-~r Mcfadden Hall Marcus McBane Holmes Schra111111 l ' l J ' l J ' ) l ) ) ) ) ) l MINUTES July 30, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION Ada111 BlrnbaUffl, Local Coastal C011111isslon, 1333 Camino Del South, San Dleqo, addressed the Commission and conflniied that there ls no llmlt on LCP amendments. Hottever, the Coastal C~isslon does like to review the amendments ln packages lf possible If there are golno to be a number or amendlllents. The Planning C011111lsslon approved staff's recOll'lllendatlons on EKhlblt "L" as contained ln the staff report. RECESS The Planning C01a1lsslon recessed at 7:29 p.m. and 1·econvened at 7:40 p.m., wlth all members present. ltein No. 2 -Alicante Hills Portion Chaln11an Schlehuber stated that a request has been made fr0111 one or the property owners on Item No. 2 that because they have not been able to arrive from TeKas In time for this meeting that the Allcante Hills portion on Item No. 2 be continued to August 13, 1986. The Planning Connission continved the Allcante Hills portion of Iten1 No. 2 to August 13, 1986. Item No. 1 (Continued) hhibit "H" -Southeast corner or Pio Pico and Magnolia (APA 205-270-301 391 33 portion) Hr. Wayne described the location or the site, with the aid or a aap, and stated staff's rec011111endations for a General Plan Aaendllent fr0111 RC/0 to TS/0, and a Zone Change frOIII R-3 to CT-Q. The Planning •.:oalssion approved starr 's recoanendatlons on [xhlblt "H" as contained in st aff's report. Schlehuber X Hcf adden Hall X MaL"CUS X X McBane X Hoh1es X Schra-X Schlehuber X Hcf adden X hdll X Harcus X X HcBane X Hohies X Schra.., X Schlehuber )I Mcfadden )I Hall )I Harcus X )I Mc8ane )I Hol111es )I Schra.. ) MINUTES July 30, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 1J Exhibits "N" and "0" -Area in the v iclnlty of Harr hon and Acta111s Streets and Chinquapl n Avenue Mr. Wayne described the locdtlon of the slte, with the aid of a Np, and stated staff's recc>1aendatlons for a General Plan Aaen<t.ent fr0111 RLM to RM, three Zone Changes frOlll R-1 t o RD-M, and a General Plan A111endllent frOIII RLM to RMH. He l isted the various parcels/portions which will require these aaen<t.ents/ zone changes as cont a lned In the staff report. He pointed out that this area Is l11 two distinct UY segi11ents . Bob Hart, Ad•s Street, addressed the t<Malsslon and expressed hls concern with potent.la I traff le proble .. s In the area by increasing the designation to iaedlum c1enslt). Barbara Meade, 4140 Adaas Street, addressed the Co.hslon, and e11pressed her concern with the traffic situation of the area. She stated that she felt that there are a lot of apart111ents, 111Ultl-fa111ily ct.elllngs, that are being built, and that It should be 111alntalned at the RLM density for the present. She stated that all or the property to the east ls developed at RLM densities. Plus, the zoning on the propPrty there to the south wi ll support the RLM zone. Ther·efore, It should be kept (the whole plot all t he way to Harrison) the RLM designation. R~ther than bringing the Adams side of the property to 11eet the Harrison (i.e. increasing the density), the Harrison side should 111eet •~e Adams (or lower density). Ja11es Bender, 4070 Ada111s, addressed the C0111111isslon and s t ated that he did not receive any ~,bllc notice about this hearing. He stated that he ls a property owner across fr0111 the proposed rezo11lng area.He requested an explanation as to why he did not receive notification of this hearing. Chairaan Schlehuber e-.plalned that the notification was gi ven in the public newsµapers together with a 111ap showing the particular property and the proposed changes. lh:e to the fact that there could be 6,000-10,000 people affecte<l by proposed changes in this hearing, the display ad in the paper was the 111ediU111 of conveyance to the public. It 111et t he requiret11ents by la~. Paul McCarthy, 4049 Adair.-s Street, addressed the C~ission and expressed his con~ern with the traffic situation on AdMS Street. Hultip1e ct.elllngs would create 110re danger for the resi dents or that area. He expressed his hope that t he area wi ll retaa ln s ingle -fa11lly. 811 1 D0111lnguez , 4378 . daas Street , addressed the C«-lsslon and pointed out that this area has had a long record of probleas and changes in planning approach. The priaary consideration has been trarr1c and the lnC01111Patlble uses In land use designations that occurred during the long and arduous hearing processes of the 1970's and t he ear ly 1980's . He stated that he agreed wlth t he proposition presented by Hs. Barbara Meade 111ade earlier today. He urged the C~ission to reconsider the approach that staff is rec~ndlng and to limit the increased density on t he west side or Harr ison Street . MINUTES July 30, 1986 PLAHNit«: COMHI SSIOH Page 14 Sharon Johnson, 1125 Cape Aire Ldne, dddressed the Coaalsslon and stated that starr ls making the area Inconsistent with what ls already existing ln the neighborhood; prlaarlly, 1lngle-fa111lly dwellings. She gave her reasons why ~he felt that this are~ should be Maintained R-1 lone. Hr. Wayne stated that what stdrr ls doing ls changing half t"e block to bring It Into conformance with the LCP. He stated that starr would be will Ing to research this 111atter further and discuss lt with the Coastal C~lsslon star, to see whether t~ey would be willing to process an LCP aaendller.• on It. He added that the [nglneerlng Depart111ent also has soae concerns about the traffic sltua-tlon on Ad•s Street. Dan Hentschke, Asslstdnt City Attorney, stdted thdt tr the C01ahslon ls lncllned to agree wlt.h the past testlMOny wi t h reqard to the traffic probleMS ln the area, then the Coiahslon could direct starr to bring back dnd notice dn LCP aaendllent to .-e-nd the LCP to he consistent with the Ceneral Plan and lonlng. Hr. Wayne pointed out that the General Plan designates the half block as RMH; therefore, tr the Co..lsslon's desire ls to go all the way to Harrison Street, that would also require a general plan .-endlllent to RLH. Ca.alsslor,er Mcfadden stated that she felt that this ared ls an la.,act area and should definitely be left R-1 zoning. However, she ddded that the two lots to the west which front the freeway should be RD-H. This will keep It consistent with the rest or the area, as that entire area ls built out ROM. The Planning C01alsslon directed starr to return at the next regular aeetlng with a rec~ndatlon ror an LCP Allendllent on Exhibit "N" and "0" .:,nd a General Plan Aaendaent to R-1 Zoning for the half block to the west that ls inconsistent with the R-1 zoning. Coaisslon HcBane inquired whether lt would be practical to send notices within the 600-root radius on this LCP aaendllent. He eo-«,nted that he felt that on zonings that really have a treaendou~ affect on existing neighborhoods, every effort should be 11ade to let the• know what ls happening. In the discussion that ensued, It was agreed that staff would notify the property owners, and the affected people in the 600-foot radius. Staff indicated that due to the short tiae fraae, the affected parties would probably receive notice only a few days before the hearing. However, a display ad In the newpapers will .eet the law r equJ.re11ents ln thls llli!lt ter. Schlehuber X Mcfadden X X Hall X Harcus X HcBane X Holaes X Schraai X MINUTES July 30, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 15 COMMISSIONERS hhiblt "P" -Snug Harbor Area Mr. Wayne gave the staff presentation as contained ln the staff report on this Exhibit. He gave the background of the previous action taken relative to this area. He pointed out that this would just be a clean-up General Plan Aaendlllent fr011 RH to RC and a Zone Change from RD-H t o R-T. Bill D011lnguez, ~378 Ada111s Street, addressed the C~isslon and expressed his support of this rec0111111endatlon. Barbara Meade, 4140 Adams Street, addressed the C011111ission and gave the background history relative to this area and inQuired whether the boating facility, Including the zoning, would 1110ve over to the south side of the lagoon. Mr. Cri-explained that when this was negotiated with the City and the Coastal COMRlssion, that possibility was discussed. The Coastal C~ission's feeling ls that that ls a possibility in the future. The facility itself cannot be 110ved, hut changing the zoning from the site and 1110ving it down to an even larger site, the south side of the lagoon, is a possibility. However, the Coastal C~ission is not willing to discuss that possibility in any detail until Cannon Road is opened up, so that access could be provided to that site. Even then, they are not c~ltted to It, and ll ls still some time away before Cannon Road will provide access to the south shore of the lagoon. Mr. Cri-further explained that in the hearinqs that took place before the City Council on this issue, the C0111Pr011ise was -..de that the Coastal C011111ission would go along with down zoning the area if the City would keep the Snug Harbor as recreation ~rclal. Staff ls basically i11Ple111enting the Council action. The Planning C01111ission approved staff's rec01111endations on Exhibit "P" as contained in the staff report. Exhibit "0" -Kelly Ranch Master Plan Mr. ~ayne gave the staff pr~sentation on this ite111 as cont ined ln the staff report. He gave the background of the Master Plan, and explained that this would be a Cener•l Pl•n Aaendlllent to designate portions of the site ne•r the l•gOOfl as open space. These open space areas h•ve already been added to the Master Plan by the LCP -.tdlllent end the Coastal Developaent P~niit. Schlehuber Mcfadden Hall Marcus McBane Holaes Schraa. )( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( MINUTES July 30, 1986 PL~NIHC COMMISSION Mr. Wayne 111ade reference to the 111ap on displ ay and pointed out that It was not eot11plete. He stated that it has C0111e to the attention of staff that there ls an expansion of certain of the areas. However, this 111ap will be .-ended to cunfol'lll to the 111ap that was accepted in the Coastal Developaent Permit. The Planning Cotaisslon approved staff's reco1111endations on Exhihlt "0" as contained in the staff report with the 110dl flcatlons as approved in the Coastal Developt11Cnt Pentlt. Exhibit "R" -frontage lots, west side of Carlsbad Boulevard between Shore Drive Loop Mr. Wayne gave the staff presentation, with the aid of a fflap, on this lte111 as contained ln the staff report. He gave the reasons that staff ls reco111111ending a zone change frOffl R-2 to R-1-7500. Gary Nesslffl, 800 Grand Avenue, addressed the C011111lsslon and stated that he has one of the lots in escrow, and urged that the zoning remain R-2. He added that by keeping these lots R-2, the Com.11lsslon would be allowing 1110re people to llve near the beach. Rita Windru~, 4230 Clearview Drive, owner of Lot 33 on the west side of Carlsbad Bl vd ., addressed the C011111isslon and inquired why the owners are held to the CCIR, yet the City can i111ple11ent these zone changes. She expressed her opposition to the zone change and urged that lt ret11aln a uniform plan and not be changed. Kevin Forsyth, 2746 Arion Drive, San Diego, addressed the C~ission and stated that he has one of the lots in escrow. He added that he ls buying the lot 111ainly because it is a duplex, and urged the C01a1lsslon to 111aintain the R-2 zoning. Trish Spencer, 354 Rich111c1r, San Marcos, representinQ the owner of one of the duplexes, addressed the Coaaission and pointed out that the duplexes have been existing for approxlaately 30 years. further, there is only one driveway access per duplex and would create no proble111. Additionally, it would allow for 1110re people to live close to the beach. Chainaan Schlehuber pointed out for clarification that the zone change will not affect the existing duplexes unless they are destroyed. Ms. Spencer pointed out that it will affect the value of the duplexes, however. C01aissloner 14arcus coaaented that she would be inclined to leave the duplexes as they are zoned now. Coaaissioners Holaea and NcBane expressed their concurrence ln that 501 of the lots are already developed on an R-2 basis, and lt doea provide affordable housing in the area. Chainun Schlehuber inquired whether staff had discussed this part icular ltea wlth the Coastal Coaaisslon. Hr. Wayne replied in the afflrNtive. The problea was people trying to get dr iveways out of arterials would point to thla area as an ex11111ple. Staff has been considering a text change to the LCY. Schlehuber ~ Mcfadden ~ Hall ) ~ Marcus ~ McBane ~ Hol111es ~ Schra111n ~ MINUTES July 30, 1986 PLANNING COfit41SSION He pointed out that staff had a hard tlme 111aking the findings for this change to the General Plan. He added that staff would try to take care of the duplex lots around the City. Since 50 to 6~ of the lots are already developed as duplexes, we are talking about affordable housing. He stated that we could go as planned and keep the lots as designated In the exlsting designations. A 1110tlon was made to approve staff's reconnendatlons on Exhibit "R" as contained in the staff report. The 1110tlon failed passage. A 110tion was 111ade to not accept staff's recoanendations on Exhibit "R" and to a111end the General Plan and the Local Coastal Plan designations to conform to the R-2 lone. Hr. Wayne explained that It would require a text change to the General Plan to allow the R-2. The CorJ11ission could only refer to the duplexes rather than change the designation of the whole area to RH. He Inquired whether the Coaisslon wanted to amend the LCP to RH or to anend the text to allow for s0111e of these existing areas to have the R-2 Zone. CO!Mllssloner Harcus ainended the 1110tion to have staff do whatever ls necessary to ensure that the duplexes will reaain R-2. C01111lssloner HcBane, the seconder, agreed. C01a1lssloners Hall and Mcfadden spoke against the 1110tlon because of the high density. Ca.alssloner Harcus clarified that her intention was not to rec«-nd high density for the area, but to iRrely lapleaent whatever 11easures are necessary to ..alntain the duplexes in the R-2 Zone. Following further discussion, the Planning Ca.aisslon directed staff to leave the duplex lots as zoned, and to change the text of the LCP and the General Plan to retain the R-2 zoning of the site to allow the developaent of the duplexes. Exhibit "5" -Prorrty owned by the State, west side of Carisbid Boulevar between Cerzo and Manzano Drives Mr. Wayne gave the presentation on this item as contained in the staff report and described the location of the site with the aid of a iaap. Staff ls rec01M1ending a General Plan Aaendllent fr011 RLH to OS and a zone change fr011 R-1 to OS. Schlehuber McFadden Hall Harcus HcBane Hol111es Schra11111 Schlehuber McFadden Hall Harcus McBane Holaes Schra.a X X X X , ) ) ) ) X X X X l l I MINUTES July 30, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 1 ~OMMISSIONEAS The Planning Commission approved staff's reco,-ndatlons on Exhl bl t "S" as contained in the staff report. Exhibits "T" and "U" -Paseo Del Norte between PalOlllar Airport Road and Encinas Creek Hr. Wayne gave the presentation on this Item as contained In the staff report and described the location of the site with the aid of a niap. Staff ls r·econmendlng an LCP a1111endllient to conform to the General Plan designation of TS/0. Further, a zone change ls being recommended from C-2 to CT-0 for the area north of the Caltrans property on both sides of Paseo Del Norte. Andrew McReynolds, addressed the Co11111lsslon and requested that this item be continued until August 13, 1986 to give him an opportunity to consult with staff to see whether there ls a better alternative. He inquired as to what recourse he would have during the six-week review period for an LCP a1111endnlent. Hr. McReynolds was advised that at the end of that time staff would return with a report to the C011111isslon incorporating the public co111111ents. The Co11111lsslon, In turn, will inake a rec011111endatlon on the matter to the City Council. The City Council will then hold a public hearing on the 111atter. After that, the Coastal C011111lsslon will have a public hearing. There will be a lot of time to •ake ~nts between now and any subsequenl .-..iendment. The Planning Conftlsslon accepted staff's reco.-endatlons on Exhibits "T" and "U" as contained In the staff report. Exhibit "V" -Sudan Mission Mr. Wayne gave the staff presentation on this ltet11 as contained in the staff report and described the location of the site with the aid of a 111ap. Staff ls proposing an LCP aaendaent fr011 PI to RH. Coalssloner Mcfadden inquired where the area was in relation to the airport influence zone, and expressed her concern on what influence the airport will have on this area and whether staff was setting a precedent by aaking this a non-confor•ing use. She further added that she had trouble with all of the following .-endllents which are in the airport influence zone. Schlehuber HcF adden Hall Harcus HcBane Hol111es Schra- Schlehuber Mcfadden Hall Harcus HcBane Holmes Schra- @ X X X X X X X X ' l ' ' l l l ' (. MINUTES July JO, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 19 COMMISSIONERS Mr. Wayne pointed out the location of the various exhibits on the ,up. Mr. Crl-pointed out that the Council upheld the residential use of the Cobblestone Sea Village, which ls In the airport Influence area. Cc>allssloner Mcfadden suggested that staff be directed to look further into the airport zone areas before taking any action on it. Mr. Wayne advised that this was one of the areas that has been included In the next staff report (Item No. 2) for consideration of future study. In the discussion that ensued on this m.1tter, Dan Hentschke, Assistant City Attorney, pointed out that another fact to conslderls that the land use decisions have already been 1.ade by the City on these amendments. Following further discussion, the Planning Cogilssion approved staff's recoiaiendatlons on Exhibit "V" as contained in the staff report. Exhibit "W" -Re~ldentlal designated area north or Cobblestone Sea village Mr. Wayne gave the presentation on this ite111 as contained In the staff report and described the location of the site with the aid of a ,nap. Staff ls proposing an LCP aaendllent fr0111 RLM to RL, and the appropriate zone change will occur with the annexation of the subject area. This will also create a new LCP designation of RL. He added that this was also an area that in the next staff report (ltea No. 2), staff has asked for C011111lsslon guidance as far as future studies are concerned on the i111pact of the airport. C~lssloner Mcfadden inquired why this area was designated residential. Mr. Wayne stated that this ls designated RL on the City's General Plan, and there has never been any request to change it. However, this ls also soaethlng that staff ls asking in its next staff report to undergo further study. Don Agatep, 2956 Roosevelt Street, representing Mr. ~1 I C011pany, addressed the C01aission and stated that although he understands what staff ls trying to do by lowering the density of the area, he stated that he could not understand why the area was designated residential in the first place considering the direct l11pacts of the airport. He suggested that the Planning C01alsslon and the City Council aeet to 11111ke sure that the Airport Master Plan oonfol'IIS to those uses south of the airport. C~sslo,,er Marcus noted that her copy of the .ap on this e•hlblt NS different fr011 the aap on display. Mr. Wayne stated that that was correct. There was a drafting error on the first .. p (the C~lsslon's copies). The boundaries of the Ceneral Plan Np took in -,re than the slntl• property. It also took in a portion of Cobblestone Sea Villa.,. Schlehuber McFadden Hall Marcus McBane Hol111es Schra11111 X X X X X MINUTES July 30, 1986 PLANNING C0"'4ISSION Page l9oMMISSIONEAS In the discussion that ensued, Hr. Agatep readdressed the C011111isslon and explained that the portion of Cobblestone Sea Village depleted on the inap ls presently designated as RLM on the G~.,.eral Plan. The Specific Plan on Cobblestone Sea Village, however, only allows open space until the airport issue ls resolved. The Planning C011111ission approved staff's reco11111endatlons on Exhibit "W" as contained in the staff report, incor- porating the correction to the map as pointed out by staff. RECESS --- The Planning Co11111isslon recessed at 9:00 p.m. and reconvened at 9:10 p.m. hhiblt "X" -Area south of Cobblestone Sea Village Hr. Wayne gave the presentation on this item as contained in the staff report and described the location of the site with the aid of a map. He stated that staff ls proposing a General Plan Alnend!lent fr0111 RL to RLM. He pointed out that originally this area was prl111c1rily agriculture. Recent developnient around the area, and recent changes to the LCP regarding conversion of agricultural land no longer isolates this property as 111Jch as it once did. This is not part of any AC area in the LCP and it doe5 not have a lot of develop11ent constraints. He added that it is his understanding that a letter fr0111 the property owner has been sent to staff which supports this amendment. C0111111issioner Mcfadden inquired what else was occuring in the area --whether soae type of neighborhood connercial zoning will be needed. Hr. Wayne stated that there is no coaaercial designation on the General Plan as it stands right now. There are proposals for ca..ercial in that general area right now, but not on that property. The Planning Ca.iission approved staff's rec~ndatlons on Exhibit "X~ as contained in the staff report. Hr. Wayne pointed out that Exhibit "X" had an error. states that it ls an LCP a111endaent. However, it is a General Plan A.!ndaent. The Planning C~ission incorporated the correction to Exhibit "X" as pointed out by staff. It Schlehuber Hcf adden Hall Harcus McBane Holmes Schramm Schlehuber Mcfadden Hall Harcus Hc8ane Holaes Schra.- Schlehuber Mcfadden Hall Marcus McBane Holaes Sehr.- X X X X X X X X MINUTES July JO, 1986 Pl~NNING COMMISSION \Jnt Property along El Camino Real (APN 215- Mr . ., ;ne 11Jve the prese11LJllon on this Item as contained In H .: staff report ,md described the location of the site with the aid ,.~ ~ llldp. He pointed ,.1ul that this was a portion of' the H~nt Property that Is not part of the Master Plan. Staf'f Is proposlnq an LCP amendment from PC to RM. The Planning C~lsslon .ipproved staf'f''s rec0111111endatlons on [1<hlblt '"I'" as contained In lhe staf'f' report . [11hlblt "l" -[ast side of Avenld,, tnclnds north of Harle Callenders Restaurant Mr. Wayne gave the presentc1tlon on this Item as contained ln the staff' report c1nd described the location of' the s l lt: with the .Jld of' a 111c1p. Starr I !I propos I no a General Plan ~W!nd!lent f'r0111 RS to Pl. Coalssloner Mcfadden lnqulre r1 why the prupos,11 was to change It to Pl ,tnd not Cf-0. since there Is qolng tu be d hotel rlqht ne11t door. Mr. Wayne pointed out that tht> site was rather constrained for Industri a l 11ses rather than of'flce uses. Mr. Grl-staled that bdslcall> on the cxl,tlnq office use ls -,re c0111pailble with the properties <Kruss the street. He added that by changlnq the dcslqnatlun to Cf-0, this would 1111ke the Grosse's prupcrt> an Illegal non-confor•lng use on the site. The f>iMnlng CO!allss Ion ,jpproved st arr' s rec~ndat Ions on [11hlblt "l" as contained In the starr report. E11h1b1t "M" -Northeast corner of Avenlda Encinas and Paloaar Airport Roicl Mr . Wayne gav~ the presentation on this lte111 as contained In the sta,r report and described the location of' the site with the ald of' a Np. Staf'f' ls proposing dn LC'P -ndllent f'r011 Pl l o TS , lhe Plarml09 Coalulon approved sldf't's recCMaendatlons on [11hlblt "M" H conldlned ln the sldfr report. Schlehuber Hcf adden Hall Marcus McBane Holmes Schra-, Schlehuber Mcfadden Hall Marcus McBane Hulaes Sehr- Schlehuber Mcfadden H•ll Marcus McBane Holaes Sehr- X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X MINUTES July JO, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION Chalr111an Schlehuber Inquired of' the people In the audience on the i tems they were waiting to speak on. Two i ndividuals In the audience indicated their Intention to speak on Exhibits "EE" and "CG". One lndlvldual Inquired whether his property was included under Item No. 2. (Mr . Gri-spoke to the lndlvldual personally regarding his questions as to Item No. 2.) Chaln11an Schlehuber announced that E.xhlblts "EE" and "CG" will be heard al this tl111e. Exhibit "EE" -COl!fflerclal area, northwest of Alga Road and ti Ca,llino Real Mr. Wayne gave the presentation on this Item as contained In the staff report and described the location with the aid of a 111ap . He pointed out that this item involved two separate act i ons: (1) A General Plan Amendment from C to RH for the portion north of Dove Lane, west of El Camino Real; and (2) An LCP amendment from RM to C to extend the c0111111erclal area north•est of Alaa Road and El Camino Real all the way up to Dove Lane. He also pointed out an error ln the staff report which states that the subject area ls not annexed. The area ls already annexed and was zoned C- 2-0 consistent with the c011111erclal designation of the General Plan. Jim Francln, ~00 Camino D'Arqulta, addressed the Ca.ilsslon and stated that In 1981 he went through the General Plan amendments and annexation in order to make this part of the City with its present zoning designation, which ls c0111patlble with the Mola property to the 1-dlate south. There ls some nutual ingress and egress there in order to provide for traffic flow. He inquired where a O Overlay could be placed on t he area in order to continue the coiaerclal deslqnatlon as it presently exists within the present planned boundary. In the discussion that ensued on this 111atter, Mr. Grl111111 stated that the boundary line went to the top of Mr. Francln's property and that was to be the final boundary because staff was worried about strip c<>1Rerclal. At that tlae, however, it was assumed that Dove Lane would e111pty into t he ~rclal -that the road would go right into a parking lot, and it 111ade sense to take it to the top of his property. Since t hat tl111e the Engineering Depart111ent has done a study. He noted that on the left hand side of the 11ap on display there were a number of parcels, and stated that was a lot of concern on how those would be served. The Engineering Depart111ent, consequently, decided that Dove Lane would have to go through. Once Dove lane goes through, it does not inake ser,se fr011 a planning st~ndpoint to leave a bit of ca.aercial on the north side of that. As a result, it was decided that Dove lane would be the appropriate stop. The Planning C~isslon approved staff's rec~ndations on Exhibit "EE" as contained ln the staff report with the de) lion of the last sentence dealing with the annexation, iltld instead include a sentence stating that the northern portion of the property wi ll be zoned ROM. Schlehuber ) Hcf adden ) ) Hall ) Harcus ) McBane ) Holaes ) Schra.. ) @ MINUTES July JO, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 23 Exhibits "CC" and "HH" -south end of Batiqultos Drive (Savage and Lyman Properties) Mr. Wayne gav~ the presentation on the above item as contained in the staff report and described the location of the site with the aid of a map. He stated that staff is proposing a General Plan Amendment fro111 RMH/OS to RM/OS. William Savage Jddressed the Commission and requested a continuance until the next regular meeting (Auyust 13, 1986). Chairman Schlehuber expressed his interest to review the letters filed by Mr. Savage supporting h:s position. Dan Hentschke, Assistant City Attorney, clarified that he believed that the documentation that Chairman Schlehuber is requesting are the documents he will be reviewing with Mr. Savage and his att orney with regard to the density and the appropriate designati ons resulting from the Coastal Commission's approval of the land use plan on the site. He informed the C011111ission that some of the docur.,entation is in the Land Use Plan, and advised that he will provide the Cocnission with the copies of these letters at its next regular 111eet i ng. The Planning Co11111ission continued Exhlhlts "CG" and "HH" to the next regular meeting (August 13, 1986). Dan Hentschke, Assistant City Attorney, advised t hat the C~isslon could expedite this public hearing by elimating the oral presentation if the Commissioners have read the s t af'f' reports. Chair111an Schlehuber agreed , and inquired whether the Co.iissioners had any particular questions on any of' the re111c1inlng Exhibits. Exhibit "KK" C01111lssioner Mcfadden inquired whether SOC&[ could sell t heir property to whoever they wanted t o . Mr . Cri- responded that although they do have an existing specific plan on t he sit e, it 1s very general in nature. However, he bel ieved t hat t hey could probabl) sell the propert). There being no other persons in the audience desiring to address t he Ca.11ission on this matter, Chair,aan Schlehuber declared the publ ic hearing on ltei,i No . 1 closed at 9:J~ p.111. Schlehuber ) Mcfadden ~ ) Hall ) Marcus ) McBane ) Holmes ) Schramm ) MINUTES July 30, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 24 COMMISSIONERS The Planning C011111ission approved staff's reconwnendatlons on the follo•ing exhibits as contained in the staff reports: Exhibit "BB" -Occidental Master Plan, northwest of 1-5 and Poinsettia Lane; Exhibit "CC" - Southwest corner of 1-5 and Poinsettia Lane; Exhibit "00" -Spinnakn Hill; Exhibit "FF" -South of Alga Road between El Cat11ino Real and Manzanita Drive; Exhibit "II" -East and west corner of Avenlda Encinas at Cannon Road; Exhibit "JJ" -Cannon Lake Park; Exhibit "KK" -soc.tE property, north•est corner uf 1-5 and Cannon Road; Exhibit "LL" -Southeast corner of Magnolia Avenue and Jefferson Street intersection; and General Plan Aaiendlllent to the LCP -Density Ranges. The Planning COll'lllisslon directed staff to prepare docu111ents rec011111ending approval of the Negative Declaration for the ite111s considered by this C011111ission and i rco1·poratlng the actions taken by the Commission on the various individual items considered by it. The Planning C~ission directed staff tu provide public notice pursuant to the Coastal Act of the Coastal Cow.lsslon regulations of all amendments affecting property within Coastal zones and opening a public review period starting July 31, 1986 and ending on September 11, 1986. 2) GPA/LU 86-5/ZC-346 and GPA/LU 86-6 -CITY Of CARLSBAD -Two General Plan Amendnients and a Zone change to revise the General Plan designation and zoning on two properties which have Inappropriate designations. Mr. Hentschke advised that it was legall) appropriate, if everyone has read the written staff reports, to go directly to Coawlssion questions. It was pointed out that GPA/LU 86-6 -South of Corte de la Vista, east of Allcante Road in La Costa was continued to August 13, 1986. Chalnun Sc~lehuber declared the public hearing opened at 9139 p.m., and there being no persons in the audience desir ing t o address the C011111ission, the public hearing was closed. Coal s sloner Harcus ~nted that she felt that this -ndllent was long overdue. The Planning C«-ission rec~nded approval of the Negative Declarat ion and adopted the following Resolution recu..nding approval or GPA/LU 86-5, ZC-346, based on the f i ndings contained therein: RESOLUTION HO . 2581 RECOMHDIHNG APPROVAL ~ AN AHUl>- NEMT TO ffit CXti> 05l ELEMENT ~ THE GENERAL PLAN FROM RM, RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM 4-8 00/AC ro RLH, RESIDENTIAL LOI MEDIUM, 0-4 00/AC ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTHWEST CORH-R ~ 0. CAMINO REAL ~ OiESfNUT AVENUE. Schlehuber McFadden Hall Marcus fl'.cBane Hob1es Schra- Schlehuber McFadden Hall Marcus McBane Holmes Schramm Schlehuber McFadden Hall Marcus McBane Holmes Schra- Schlehuber McFadden Hall Harcus Mc8ane Hol11es Sehr- X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X MINUTES July ~O, 1986 PLANNING COf,f,!ISS[ON 3) SNC-22 -CITY Of CARLSBAD -Request ror a street nanie change frOIII forest Street to Wintergreen Drive, generally located east or Monroe, south of Marron and west of El Camino Real . The public hearing was opened at 9:40 p.m. and there being no persons ln the audience desiring to address the C011111lssion, the public hearing was closed. C011111issloner McFadden inquired whether the road across the way from the proposed Wintergreen Drive was a pr ivate one. Hr. Crllllffl replied ln the affirmative. The Planning C~lsslon adopted the following Resolution rec0111111ending approval of SNC-22 based on the findings contained therein: RESOLUTION HO. 2569 RECOf,f,!ENDINC APPROVAL Of A STREET NAME CHANCE FROM FOREST STREET TO WINTERGREEN DRIVE LOCAfED JUST EAST Of MONROE, WEST Of EL CAMINO REAL AND SOUTH Of MARRON ROAD. 4) CUP-294 -CITY Of CARLSBAD (2075 LAS PALMAS) - Request for a conditional use permit to allow the lease of a 22,627 square foot building for Building, Engineering, Planning and Utilities and Maintenance Oepart111ent offices located at 2075 Las Palmas Drive. C011111issioner McFadden inquired whether the parking lot would be ready berore occupancy of the building and why there was no sign saying no parking in the driveway. Mr. Crim connended Bobbie Hoder who worked on this project and began coordinating this in April of this year. She advised staff that they would be moving in by August 1. This ls the first City project that ls finished at deadline. The Planning C~ission approved the Negative Declaration and adopted the following Resolution approving CUP-294 based on the findings and subject lo the conditions contained t herein, including the condition not allowing parking in the driveway. RESOLUTION NO. 2580 APPROVING A COM)ITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALUJI M [£Ast <t' 22,627 SQUAAE FEET Of Of-F ICE SPACE FOR BUILOIHC, EHCINEERINC, PLANHIHC AND UTILITIES ,\HO MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT en ICES FOR THE CI rY Of CARLSRAO ~ PROPERTY GENERAi.LY LOCATED ~ TttE SOUTH SIDE Of LAS PAI.MAS DRIVE NEAR ITS WESTERN TERMINUS WITH CAMINO VIDA ROBLE . ADDED ITEMS At1> REPORTS Hr. Hentschke stated t hat the Planning Ca-lsslon adopted Resoluti•.>n No. 2581 on Iteia No. 2; however, the Planning C«-1.ssion needs to adopt Resolution No . 2582 which changes the zoning. Schlehuber X Hcf adden X X Hall X Harcus X HcBane X Holmes X Schra11111 X Schlehuber X Mcfadden X X Hall X Marcus X HcBane X Holaes X Schra-X MINUTES July 30, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 26-COMMISSIONERS The Planning Co11111lssion adopted the following Resolution recOfflfflending approval or the zone change on Item No. 2 -ZC-346. RESOLUTION NO . 2582 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL Of A ZONE CHANCE FROH RO-H-0 To R-1-10 ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER Of El CAMINO REAL .\ND CHESTNUT AVENUE. The Planning C011111lssion agreed to follow the staff's suggestions regarding Exhibits "C , D and E of Item No. 2" and directed staff to further study those Jreas. Mr. Gri11111 referred to the meeting scheduled for August 20th dealing with the Hunt Properties, and stated that It has COllle to their attention, based on the fact that HPI has not turned over some things to Engineering, that they will not be ready on the 20th. Therefore, the meeting set for August 20 can be cancelled. The Planning C011111Jssion cancelled the special meeting set for August 20, 1986. ADJOUR~ENf By proper 1111>tion, the Meeting of July 30, 1986 was adjourned at 9:45 p.m. Respectfully subtllitted, MICHAEL t«>l.ZMILLER Planning Director Elizabeth Caraballo Minutes Cl erk EC:tb MEETINCS ARE ALSO TAPED ANO KEPT ON fllE UNTIL THE MINUTES ARE APPROVED. Schlehuber Mcfadden Hall Marcus McBane Hol111es Schrann Schlehuber Mcfadden Hall Marcus McBane Hol11es Schra11111 Schlehuber Mcfadden Hall Marcus McBane Hol111es Schra11111 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X