Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-08-05; Planning Commission; MinutesPlanning Commission Minutes August 5, 2015 Page 1 Minutes of: PLANNING COMMISSION Time of Meeting: 6:00 p.m. Date of Meeting: August 5, 2015 Place of Meeting: FARADAY CENTER CALL TO ORDER Vice Chairperson Anderson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Siekmann led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Vice Chairperson Anderson, Commissioners Black, L’Heureux, Montgomery, Segall and Siekmann Absent: None STAFF PRESENT Don Neu, City Planner Ron Kemp, Assistant City Attorney Bridget Desmarais, Administrative Secretary Christer Westman, Senior Planner Austin Silva, Associate Planner Chris Garcia, Assistant Planner Steve Bobbett, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF MINUTES Vice Chairperson Anderson asked if there were any corrections or revisions to the minutes of the meeting of June 17, 2015. MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Siekmann and duly seconded by Commissioner Black to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 17, 2015. VOTE: 4-0 AYES: Commissioner Black, Commissioner Montgomery, Commissioner Segall and Commissioner Siekmann NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Vice Chairperson Anderson and Commissioner L’Heureux PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA None. PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING Vice Chairperson Anderson asked Mr. Neu to introduce the first item and opened the public hearing on Agenda Item 1. Planning Commission Minutes August 5, 2015 Page 2 1. CUP 01-12x1(B) – LePORT SCHOOLS – Request for an amendment to Conditional Use Permit CUP 01-12x1(A) to broaden the approved student accommodations from grades one through six, to three years old through sixth grade for the Montessori Arts and Sciences School located at 3016 Highland Drive in Local Facilities Management Zone 1. The City Planner has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary of Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and is therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3). Mr. Neu introduced Agenda Item 1 and stated Associate Planner Austin Silva would make the staff presentation. Mr. Silva gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Vice Chairperson Anderson asked if there were any questions of staff. Vice Chairperson Anderson asked about the number of slots available. Mr. Silva stated all slots are filled. Vice Chairperson Anderson asked if there were any further questions of staff. Seeing none, she asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. Don Nguyen, project applicant, gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Vice Chairperson Anderson opened public testimony on Agenda Item 1. Pam Crisman, 3485 Valley Street, Carlsbad, suggested that the project be denied or continued. She stated she is concerned about traffic and the number of children allowed for the early childhood program. Ms. Crisman commented that she is not sure if all the previous conditions pertain to this amendment. Bertha M. Levy, 3021 Highland Drive, Carlsbad, concurred with the previous speaker. She commented that the brochure for the school says it allows children as young as 2½ years old. She added that she is concerned with the increase in traffic and further added that the applicant has never approached the neighbors regarding the project. Ms. Levy commented that the early public notice for the project was not visible where it was posted. She stated there is not enough room for more children at the school. Ms. Levy further stated that there was a time when someone was living at the school as she saw a light was on every night for more than a month. Vice Chairperson Anderson asked if there were any other members of the audience who wished to speak on the item. Seeing none, she closed public testimony on Agenda Item 1 and asked the applicant to respond to the issues raised during public testimony. Mr. Nguyen stated that to his knowledge no one was on the campus at night. Commissioner Segall asked when they took over the location. Mr. Nguyen stated September 2013. Mr. Nguyen commented that they are looking for another way to serve the community by offering classes for children in the preschool range, and it is not a daycare program. Mr. Nguyen also stated that the school will be governed by the Department of Social Services (DSS), and their conditions are stricter than the CUP. Commissioner L’Heureux commented that he is concerned with the early childhood students. Mr. Nguyen stated there are only three parents who are asking for aftercare and all students will be off campus by 5:00 p.m. He also added that he does not anticipate the hours of operation to change. Commissioner Siekmann asked for the maximum number in the age group for the early childhood program. Mr. Nguyen stated 19 total. Vice Chairperson Anderson asked about the brochure advertising for children 2½ years old. Mr. Nguyen stated that was a misprint and clarified that the youngest will be 3 years old. Planning Commission Minutes August 5, 2015 Page 3 Commissioner Black asked about holiday events. Mr. Nguyen stated that they do plan to have holiday events, but if an event will cause traffic or other impacts to the neighborhood it will be held offsite. Commissioner Montgomery asked about the projection for the maximum number of students. Mr. Nguyen stated they anticipate a maximum of 35 students. Vice Chairperson Anderson asked for staff to respond to the issues raised during public testimony. Commissioner Segall asked why the expiration date was removed. Mr. Neu commented that when CUPs are operating without issues, expiration dates have been removed. He added that another expiration date can be placed on the project if the Commission felt it was appropriate. Commissioner Segall commented that many of the concerns of the Commission from the previous approval have not come to fruition and the site has held up the conditions as set forth. He asked if there is a condition about a staff member living onsite. Mr. Silva commented that Condition No. 22 of the City Council Resolution indicates that the building should not be occupied by any staff member as a place of residence. Commissioner Segall said the CUP was violated if someone was living in it. Vice Chairperson Anderson asked if the original conditions remain with this amendment. Mr. Silva stated yes. Commissioner L’Heureux asked how to prevent the school from becoming a daycare. Mr. Silva stated a condition can be placed on the project to maintain a specific number of students within the 3-6 year age range. Commissioner Siekmann asked if there will be an annual review with this project. Mr. Silva stated yes. DISCUSSION Commissioner Segall commented that an expiration date should be added as things are being done differently with the site. He stated he is concerned with the maximum number of students allowed and feels there should be a cap on the number of students per age group. Commissioner Montgomery stated he is in favor of the CUP but thinks an expiration date should be added. He does not agree with placing a cap on the number of students. By adding the preschool age, it limits the number of students in the other age groups. Commissioner Black commented that he was not happy to hear someone lived on the campus but he trusts that will not happen again. He added that he would like to see an expiration date added to the CUP. Commissioner Siekmann stated she is in favor of the project. She will agree to add an expiration date if it means the project will be supported. Commissioner L’Heureux commented that the Montessori school philosophy is different than the traditional school setting. By making the business change to add preschool age students, it will limit the overall number of students at the school. He stated that he believes it appropriate to add an expiration date. Vice Chairperson Anderson stated she agrees with her fellow commissioners regarding the addition of the expiration date. Mr. Neu commented that the original permit was approved for 5 years and it was approved to continue for another 5 years, then it was extended in perpetuity. Commissioner Segall suggested adding a 5 year expiration in order to monitor the concerns particularly because of the violation. Commissioner L’Heureux stated he was agreeable with a 5 year expiration. Planning Commission Minutes August 5, 2015 Page 4 Vice Chairperson Anderson asked for the Commission to vote on adding a 5 year expiration with the ability to extend the permit for 5 years after that. The Commission voted 5-1 (Siekmann) to include an expiration date on the permit. Commissioner Segall commented that he is still concerned with number of students. Mr. Neu stated the definition in the municipal code includes nursery school. He added that to a large degree, staff would rely on the state to regulate the school. Mr. Neu stated that daycare is an accessory use for before and after school. Commissioner Segall stated that he agrees with that and believes there will be enough protection. Commissioner L’Heureux suggested that the concern could be addressed by having the applicant submit a sworn statement indicating the number of the students and at what age. Commissioner Siekmann voiced her displeasure with how the Commission is handling this project and feels the Commission is treating the applicant like a felon. MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner L’Heureux and duly seconded by Commissioner Segall that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 7109 approving Conditional Use Permit Amendment CUP 01-12x1(B) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein with the additional condition of a 5 year expiration date. VOTE: 6-0 AYES: Vice Chairperson Anderson, Commissioner Black, Commissioner L’Heureux, Commissioner Montgomery, Commissioner Segall and Commissioner Siekmann NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Vice Chairperson Anderson closed the public hearing on Agenda Item 1, asked Mr. Neu to introduce the next item and opened the public hearing on Agenda Item 2. 2. CDP 12-27(A) – JAGUAR LAND ROVER CARLSBAD – Request for approval of a Coastal Development Permit Amendment to allow for a tenant improvement to create a 998 square foot second floor within the existing building shell consisting of a sales office, restroom, and two exit stairs in the Mello II Segment of the City’s Coastal Zone located at 5550 Paseo Del Norte within Local Facilities Management Zone 3. The project site is not within the appealable area of the California Coastal Commission. The City Planner has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found does not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15301(e) Existing Facilities of the state CEQA Guidelines. Mr. Neu introduced Agenda Item 2 and stated Associate Planner Austin Silva would make the staff presentation. Mr. Silva gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Vice Chairperson Anderson asked if there were any questions of staff. Seeing none, she asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. Omar Paraiso, from Bokal & Sneed Architects, stated he was available to answer any questions. Vice Chairperson Anderson asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Seeing none, she asked if any members of the audience wished to speak on the item. Seeing none, Vice Chairperson Anderson opened and closed public testimony on Agenda Item 2. Planning Commission Minutes August 5, 2015 Page 5 DISCUSSION Commissioner Segall stated he supports the project. Commissioner Montgomery stated he can support the project. Commissioner Black commented that he can support the project. Commissioner Siekmann stated she can also support the project. Commissioner L’Heureux stated he can support the project. Vice Chairperson Anderson stated she can also support the project. MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner L’Heureux and duly seconded by Commissioner Siekmann that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 7115 approving Coastal Development Permit CDP 12-27(A) based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. VOTE: 6-0 AYES: Vice Chairperson Anderson, Commissioner Black, Commissioner L’Heureux, Commissioner Montgomery, Commissioner Segall and Commissioner Siekmann NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Vice Chairperson Anderson closed the public hearing on Agenda Item 2, asked Mr. Neu to introduce the next item and opened the public hearing on Agenda Item 3. 3. CT 14-05/PUD 14-08/CDP 14-27 – MAGNOLIA TOWNHOMES – Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Planned Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit to demolish existing single-family structures and develop a 16-unit multi-family residential condominium project on a 0.68 acre infill site generally located on the south side of Magnolia Avenue, west of Jefferson Street, within the Mello II segment of the Local Coastal Program and in Local Facilities Management Zone 1. The project is not within the appealable area of the California Coastal Commission. The City Planner has determined that this project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 “In-Fill Development Projects” of the State CEQA Guidelines and will not have any adverse significant impact on the environment. Mr. Neu introduced Agenda Item 3 and stated Senior Planner Christer Westman would make the staff presentation. Mr. Westman gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Vice Chairperson Anderson asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner L’Heureux asked about the parking in the areas around the project. Mr. Westman stated the project complies with all the requirements of the Planned Development Ordinance and Parking Ordinance. Commissioner L’Heureux asked if any recent parking counts have been completed on Magnolia within a ¼ mile of the project. Mr. Westman stated there has not been a parking count or survey completed by staff. Vice Chairperson Anderson asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. Tony Sfreddo gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Planning Commission Minutes August 5, 2015 Page 6 Commissioner Siekmann asked why he was proposing 16 units instead of 17 units. Mr. Sfreddo stated the site is very tight and while the loss of one unit is a big financial issue, it would not compromise quality. Commissioner Siekmann asked if the issue was the affordable housing requirement. Mr. Sfreddo stated no. Commissioner Montgomery asked if the project will allow enough parking in the future. Mr. Sfreddo stated each unit will have a two car garage and there is enough parking per code. Mr. Sfreddo stated the landscaping requirements negate being able to add an extra parking space to the site plan. Vice Chairperson Anderson asked about vacation rentals. Mr. Westman stated that there is a 30 day minimum occupancy requirement per the proposed conditions of approval. Vice Chairperson Anderson opened public testimony on Agenda Item 3. John Bailey, 790 Magnolia Avenue, Carlsbad, lives across the street from the project, commented that even though the project is compliant, there simply is not any parking in the area. From a practical standpoint this project will cause chaos in the neighborhood. Bob Guddee, 710 Anchor Way, Carlsbad, commented on the parking issue. He stated he is concerned with his property being disrupted. Mr. Guddee stated he would like to know about the SUMP pump, and stated he is concerned with algae, mosquitos, smell, light problems, noise and clutter, privacy issues, trash collection, rodent problems, grading issues with dirt and dust and hours of construction. Linda Salazar, 769 Magnolia Avenue, Carlsbad, stated she lives next door to these units and is concerned with the ADT for the project. She commented that when Jefferson Elementary gets out there is too much traffic already. She is concerned with fire and police access as well as the safety of the kids in the neighborhood. Vice Chairperson Anderson asked if there were any other members of the audience who wished to speak on the item. Seeing none, she closed public testimony on Agenda Item 3 and asked if the applicant wished to respond to the issues raised during public testimony. Mr. Sfreddo stated that the trash enclosures have been relocated and will no longer back to Anchor Way. As far as rodents, there will be an HOA, which can resolve the issues if any arise. Mr. Sfreddo stated that the property currently drains to Anchor Way but he has worked to resolve that issue and have the drainage reversed. Construction hours are 7:00 to 5:00 and no work will be done in excess of that. He stated there will be some amount of dust but it will be minimized. Mr. Sfreddo commented that the proposed lighting is per city standard and he does not think it will be a concern. A second story will be backing to Anchor Way, but that is allowed per code. He further commented that there will be 2 SUMP pumps to allow reverse drainage which will be maintained by the HOA. Commissioner Siekmann asked if the SUMP pumps will be underground. Mr. Sfreddo stated yes and there will be minimal noise as they will only run during rain or irrigation. Commissioner Siekmann asked about outdoor lighting. Mr. Sfreddo stated there will not be any streetlights, only house lights. Commissioner L’Heureux asked if there will be windows on the second story unit overlooking the neighboring property on Anchor Way. Mr. Sfreddo stated there will only be a bedroom window. Commissioner L’Heureux asked if SUMP pumps have been used in other projects. Mr. Sfreddo stated no but the grading calls for that type of drainage. Commissioner L’Heureux asked about standing water. Mr. Sfreddo stated that standing water should not be an issue. Commissioner Segall asked about adding onsite parking. Mr. Sfreddo stated it is possible to add one parking spot at the back of the project but it would be very difficult as landscaping would have to be removed and then the project would not be in compliance with the Landscape Manual. Commissioner Segall asked about the definition of a guest parking spot and if a homeowner can use a guest spot. Mr. Westman stated it would become an HOA and CC&R regulation. Mr. Sfreddo commented that he would be willing to make parking in the garages a requirement. Planning Commission Minutes August 5, 2015 Page 7 DISCUSSION Commissioner Segall stated he is troubled with the code stating that offsite parking on the adjacent public street frontage constitutes onsite parking as it does not make sense. He added that he believes it is a beautiful project. Commissioner Montgomery commented that it is a nice looking project. He cannot penalize the applicant because the project is complying with code. Commissioner Montgomery added that he does not want to give up green space for a parking space. Commissioner Black thanked the applicant for the project. He commented that the issue with parking cannot be solved with this project. He added that he does not want to mess with the parking and is in favor of keeping the grassy area. Commissioner Black stated he can support the project. Commissioner Siekmann stated she can support the project. The applicant has followed all the rules and there are 2car garages for each unit. Commissioner L’Heureux stated he is torn as one of his long standing concerns is that changes in things such as density are negatively impacting the residents who live in the area. Mr. Neu stated the next task would be to start the zoning code update process once the general plan update is approved. One of the challenges with infill development is asking one project to solve the issues of the whole area. Commissioner L’Heureux stated he can support the project only because the applicant has followed the code. He commented that it does not make sense to take out landscaping to add a parking spot. Vice Chairperson Anderson stated she agrees with her fellow commissioners. Commissioner Segall commented that he is troubled because of a one size fits all ordinance for parking which does not work in some areas, but he can still support the project. MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner L’Heureux and duly seconded by Commissioner Black that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 7116 approving a Tentative Tract Map (CT 14-05), Planned Development Permit (PUD 14-08), and Coastal Development Permit (CDP 14-27) based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. VOTE: 6-0 AYES: Vice Chairperson Anderson, Commissioner Black, Commissioner L’Heureux, Commissioner Montgomery, Commissioner Segall and Commissioner Siekmann NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Vice Chairperson Anderson closed the public hearing on Agenda Item 3. RECESS Vice Chairperson Anderson called for a 10 minute recess at 8:20 p.m. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER Vice Chairperson Anderson called the meeting to order 8:30 p.m. with all Commissioners present, asked Mr. Neu to introduce the next item and opened the public hearing on Agenda Item 4. Planning Commission Minutes August 5, 2015 Page 8 4. PUD 13-06(A)/PUD 13-06(B)/SDP 15-01 – ROBERTSON RANCH PLANNING AREAS 3, 4, 6, AND 13 – A request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Robertson Ranch Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR 03-03) and subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration and a request for approval of single- family home floor plans and architectural elevations, plotting for the 197 single-family lots, design of neighborhood parks within Planning Areas 3, 6 and 13, and the floor plan, architectural elevations, and site plan for the Planning Area 4 West Village community recreation facility located south of Tamarack Avenue, east of El Camino Real and north of Cannon Road in Local Facilities Management Zone 17. Mr. Neu introduced Agenda Item 4 and stated Senior Planner Christer Westman would make the staff presentation. Mr. Westman gave a detailed presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Vice Chairperson Anderson asked if there were any questions of staff. Seeing none, she asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. Greg Deacon, representing Toll Brothers, gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Commissioner Montgomery asked about the recreation center. Mr. Deacon stated the residents in the entire west village will have access to the center along with the residents of the apartments. Vice Chairperson Anderson asked if there is a provision to change elevations. Mr. Deacon stated that any changes to the elevations would need to go before the commission. Vice Chairperson Anderson asked if there were any members of the audience who wished to speak on the item. Seeing none, she opened closed public testimony on Agenda Item 4. DISCUSSION Commissioner Segall commented that this is a beautiful project and he can support the project. Commissioner Montgomery stated he can support the project. Commissioner Black stated he can support the project. Commissioner Siekmann stated she can also support the project. Commissioner L’Heureux thanked the applicant for the work put into the project and stated he too can support the project. Vice Chairperson Anderson stated her concurrence with her fellow commissioners and stated she can support the project. MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner L’Heureux and duly seconded by Commissioner Siekmann that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 7117 approving Planned Development Permit amendment PUD 13-06(A), Planned Development Permit amendment PUD 13-06(B) and Site Development Plan SDP 15-01 based on the findings and subject to the conditions therein. VOTE: 6-0 AYES: Vice Chairperson Anderson, Commissioner Black, Commissioner L’Heureux, Commissioner Montgomery, Commissioner Segall and Commissioner Siekmann NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Planning Commission Minutes August 5, 2015 Page 9 Vice Chairperson Anderson closed the public hearing on Agenda Item 4, asked Mr. Neu to introduce the next item and opened the public hearing on Agenda Item 5. 5. PUD 15-05/SDP 15-05/CDP 15-10/MS 15-03/AV 15-03 – 165 PINE AVENUE – Request for approval of a Planned Development Permit, Site Development Plan, Coastal Development Permit, Tentative Parcel Map and Minor Variance to demolish two existing single-family homes and to allow the development of a two-family, residential air-space condominium project on a 0.12 acre infill site located at 165 Pine Avenue, within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and Local Facilities Management Zone 1. The project site is not within the appealable area of the California Coastal Commission. The City Planner has determined that this project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 “In-Fill Development Projects” of the State CEQA Guidelines and will not have any adverse significant impact on the environment. Mr. Neu introduced Agenda Item 5 and stated Assistant Planner Chris Garcia would make the staff presentation. Mr. Garcia gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Vice Chairperson Anderson asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Segall asked about the undergrounding of the power poles. Mr. Garcia stated that two power poles along Pine will be underground and possibly one on Garfield. Commissioner Siekmann asked about the addressing of the new unit. Mr. Garcia stated each will have its own address and the project does include the demolition of the existing units. Chairperson Anderson asked about the threshold for handicap parking. Mr. Garcia stated the threshold is multi-family and 3 or more units. This project is considered a 2 family unit. Chairperson Anderson asked about perpendicular parking on the street. Mr. Garcia stated the 60 foot right of way is adequate and he does not anticipate any additional parking. Vice Chairperson Anderson asked if there were any further questions of staff. Seeing none, she asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. Ronald Rasak, 387 Pine Avenue, gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer questions. Vice Chairperson Anderson asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Montgomery asked about the roof deck. Mr. Rasak stated that will be for the second story unit only. Commissioner Black asked about the bonus room. Mr. Rasak stated it will be for use by the second story unit only. Vice Chairperson Anderson asked if there were any further questions of the applicant. Seeing none, she opened public testimony on Agenda Item 5. Ryan Hart, 235 Pine Avenue, Carlsbad, commented that many people on Garfield are against multi-level structures. He stated that he wants to look at the ocean instead of a structure. Mr. Hart commented that the intersection is a blind intersection in both directions. He added that it should matter what neighbors think of the project. Vice Chairperson Anderson asked if there were any other members of the audience who wished to speak on the item. Seeing none, she closed public testimony on Agenda Item 5. Vice Chairperson Anderson asked for staff to respond to the issues raised during public testimony. Planning Commission Minutes August 5, 2015 Page 10 Mr. Garcia commented the existing home’s setbacks are pretty close to this proposed setbacks. Roger Bassinger, BP Associates, stated the existing setbacks are right along the sidewalk and the new structure will actually be setback further from the sidewalk. Mr. Rasak commented that he has cut back on the mass of the building to improve the visibility and to make the corner less intrusive. He commented that construction should take 8-12 months with most of it being interior work. Commissioner Montgomery inquired about the minor variance. Mr. Garcia stated it is for the setback requirements along Pine Avenue. Commissioner Segall asked if the undergrounding of the utility poles is voluntary for the project. Mr. Garcia stated yes. DISCUSSION Commissioner Segall commented that it is a great project and is happy the applicant is undergrounding the utilities. He stated he can support the variance and the project. Commissioner Montgomery stated he can support the project and approves the minor variance. Commissioner Black commented that the Commission does listen to public testimony. He can support the project. Commissioner Siekmann stated this is a wonderful project and thanked the applicant for talking to the neighbors and for undergrounding the utilities. She can support the project. Commissioner L’Heureux stated he can support the project. He commented that he likes the steps the applicant has taken to alleviate some of the concerns of the neighbors. Vice Chairperson Anderson can also support the project. MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner L’Heureux and duly seconded by Commissioner Segall that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 7118 approving Planned Development Permit (PUD 15-05), Site Development Plan (SDP 15-05), Coastal Development Permit (CDP 15-10), Tentative Parcel Map (MS 15-03) and Minor Variance (AV 15-03), based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. VOTE: 6-0 AYES: Vice Chairperson Anderson, Commissioner Black, Commissioner L’Heureux, Commissioner Montgomery, Commissioner Segall and Commissioner Siekmann NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Vice Chairperson Anderson closed the public hearing on Agenda Item 5 and thanked staff for their presentations. COMMISSION COMMENTS Commissioner L’Heureux thanked former Chairperson Scully for her time served on the Commission. CITY PLANNER COMMENTS Mr. Neu reminded the Commission that there will be no meeting on August 16, 2015. Planning Commission Minutes August 5, 2015 Page 11 CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS None. ADJOURNMENT By proper motion, the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of August 5, 2015 was adjourned at 9:34p.m. DON NEU City Planner Bridget Desmarais Minutes Clerk