HomeMy WebLinkAboutEIR 05-05; PONTO BEACHFRONT VILLAGE VISION PLAN; Environmental Impact Report (EIR)(Final-Appendix Volume IV - Appendix F); 2007-08-01PONTO BEACHFRONT VILLAGE VISION PLAN
DRAFT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
SCH#2007031141
EIR 05-05/GPA 05-04/LCPA 05-01/DI 05-01
APPENDIX VOLUME IV
(APPENDIX F)
Prepared For:
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Contact: Christer Westman, Project Manager
(760) 602-4614
Prepared By:
RBF Consulting
9755 Clairemont Mesa Boulevard, Suite 100
San Diego, California 92124
(858) 614-5000
FAX (858) 614-5001
RBF JN 25-101951.001
August 2007
APPENDIX VOLUME IV
(APPENDIX F)
Appendix F: Acoustical Site Assessment (Technical Appendix)
APPENDIX F
Acoustical Site Assessment (Technical Appendix)
The Acoustical Site Assessment for the Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan EIR
was not prepared as a separate technical report. Instead, the Acoustical Site
Assessment was prepared and was formatted to follow the standard EIR format for
Chapter 5.0. The Acoustical Site Assessment is therefore included as Section 5.5 of
this EIR, and not as a separate document; however, the technical appendix, which
provides data upon which the Acoustical Site Assessment and findings are based, is
included herein as Appendix F.
.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Acoustical Site Assessment (Appendix)
for the
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
(EIR 05-05/GPA 05-04/LCPA 05-01/DI 05-01)
Prepared For:
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Contact: Christer Westman, Project Manager
(760) 602-4614
Prepared By:
RBF Consulting
97 5 5 Clairemont Mesa Boulevard, Suite 100
San Diego, California 92124
(858) 614-5000
FAX (858) 614-5001
RBF JN 25-101951.001
November 2006
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site Number: PB1
Recorded By: Kelly Chiene
Job Number: 25-101951
Date: 7/5/06
Time: 8:15 a.m.
Location: Whitewater Dr., Ponto Beach, CA
GPS:
Source of Peak Noise: Residential use, main entrance, vehicles
Leq I Peak I Lmax I Lmin I
54.1 I 84.9 I 65.1 I 41.9 I
Equipment
Category Type Vendor Model Serial No.
Sound Level Meter Larson Davis 820 1428
Sound Microphone Larson Davis 2561 1012
Preamp Larson Davis 827 0180
Calibrator Larson Davis CA250 0216
Weather Data
Duration: 10 minutes I Skv: ◊ partlv cloudy
Wind Note: dBA Offset = 15.6
Est. Speed (moh / m/s) I Direction Temperature
<5 I West 70
Photo of Measurement Location
Ldn I CNEL
54.1 I 54.1
Site#:
Cert. Date Note
3/13/06
3/15/06
3/13/06
3/13/06
I Sensor Height (ft): 5 ft
I Humidity
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Name:
Site:
Date:
Time:
Instrument:
Operator:
Calibration:
Data type:
Weight:
Samples:
Ponto Site 1
Measurement location
7/5/2006
8:12:46 AM
Larson-Davis 812/820/870
Operator name
Calibration
Intervals
A
11
Ponto Site J -Intervals -Leq
Ponto Site I -Interval, -SEL
Ponto s;1c I -lntl..-rvals -LMm
1,1111,, .,,1 • 1t1i.:n.1!-. \J.1,
Pr,ml, S111c \ -\ntcnn\, -I 1 Oil
Pomo Site I -Interval'--LS0.00
P11n10 .-:1t1.: I -lnh.:n ;ij, -I 90 00
Notes:
Line 1:
Line2:
Line3:
Title:
Notes
L-D Model 820
You may enter three lines of
personalized instrument name.
X:22 ~L~q
58.1 dB(A) 54. I dB(A)
75.7 dBiAI
50.2d8(A)
hJ }\ Ulh \I
n-1.~ dBi Al
55.0dB(Al
52.~ dB(A)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site Number: PB2
Recorded Bv: Kellv Chiene
Job Number: 25-101951
Date: 7/5/06
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Location: South end of Ponto Dr. (unofficial doQ park), Ponto Beach, CA
GPS:
Source of Peak Noise: Near Carlsbad Blvd., train
LeQ I Peak I Lmax I Lmin I
56.4 I 121.2 I 82.6 I 45.1 I
Equipment
Cateciorv Type Vendor Model Serial No.
Sound Level Meter Larson Davis 820 1428
Sound Microphone Larson Davis 2561 1012
Preamp Larson Davis 827 0180
Calibrator Larson Davis CA250 0216
Weather Data
Duration: 10 minutes I Sky: ◊ partly cloudy
Wind Note: dBA Offset = 15.6
Est. Soeed (mph / mis) I Direction Temperature
5 I West 70
Photo of Measurement Location
Ldn I CNEL
56.4 I 56.4
Site#:
Cert. Date Note
3/13/06
3/15/06
3/13/06
3/13/06
I Sensor Heiaht (ft): 5 ft
I Humidity
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Name:
Site:
Date:
Time:
Instrument:
Operator:
Calibration:
Data type:
Weight:
Samples:
90
dB
Ponto Site 2
Measurement location
7/5/2006
8:52:12AM
Larson-Davis 812/820/870
Operator name
Calibration
Intervals
A
11
Ponto Site 2 -Intervals -Leq
Ponto Sue:! -lmcnal'.--SEL
Ponto Site 2 -Intervals -LMm
'•'1111 -..1, -Im,·, .,1~ \!,1·
Pomn ~11': 2 -\mer\.;-.\, -I 11111
Pomo Sile 2 -lnti..:rval-. -L50.00
Pnn10 Site ~ -in1cn ,.i~ _ l C)(l fl{)
Notes:
Line1:
Line2:
Line3:
Title:
Notes
L-O Model 820
You may enter three lines of
personalized instrument name.
r
f
8:5~ .lLCq
65.8 dB(A) 56.4 dB(A)
8~.6 dB(Al
45.5 dB(A)
,2_,,liH1.-\1
""99dB(AI
53.3 dB(A)
-17.-l dBi Al
40----i-------::----:t1 ~----+----~·:+-r _____ -J:-____ _J
...; ~: h.m ,-s..i v ~r, X:5)>. lJ·OO l}•fl::!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site Number: PB3
Recorded By: Kelly Chiene
Job Number: 25-101951
Date: 7/5/06
Time: 9:20 a.m.
Location: Dory Ln. and Portaqe Way, Ponto Beach, CA
GPS:
Source of Peak Noise: Vehicles, electric qate
Leq I Peak I Lmax I Lmin I
49.1 I 83.2 I 63.1 I 39.4 I
EQuipment
CateQorv Type Vendor Model Serial No.
Sound Level Meter Larson Davis 820 1428
Sound Microphone Larson Davis 2561 1012
Preamp Larson Davis 827 0180
Calibrator Larson Davis CA250 0216
Weather Data
Duration: 10 minutes I Sky: ◊ partly cloudy
Wind Note: dBA Offset = 15.6
Est. Soeed (mph / mis) I Direction Temperature
5 I West 70
Photo of Measurement Location
Ldn I CNEL
49.1 I 49.1
Site#:
Cert. Date Note
3/13/06
3/15/06
3/13/06
3/13/06
I Sensor Height (ft): 5 ft
I Humidity
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Name:
Site:
Date:
Time:
Instrument:
Operator:
Calibration:
Data type:
Weight:
Samples:
80
dB r·:~ ... -···. -· ..
Ponto Site 3
Measurement location
7/5/2006
9:14:22 AM
Larson-Davis 812/820/870
Operator name
Calibration
Intervals
A
12
Ponto Site 3 -lntervals -Leq
Ponlo S1k 3 -ln1t:nals -SEL
Ponto Sl1c 3 -lntt:rvals -LMin
}11111,i ~,1<, : -Jnt~·n 1/• -\/:1
Ponto StlL' 3 -lmen~i, -LI 0(1
Ponto Site 3 -Interval:--L50.00
PonH1 S11',;" 1. -lnh:n:il, -l.90.flfl
Notes:
Line 1:
Line2:
Line3:
Title:
Notes
L-D Model 820
You may enter three lines of
personalized instrument name.
9:2➔
47.7 dB(A)
62.4 dB!A)
44.0dB(Al
"X <i d81.\1
S?.ndB(A)
46.8 dB(A)
-RJ dB/A)
J.Lcq
49.1 dB(A)
I I
l .1 I ]~~--;:---:t------+-=----··_fJ_:_:_ __ ---1:__:_ __ lJ·-7
11·1J tun •l·J11 ll:J;-. 1,,1:20 l):2.:: 9:2-t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·1
I
I
I
I
I
Site Number: PB4
Recorded By: KellyChiene
Job Number: 25-101951
Date: 7/5/06
Time: 10:15 a.m.
Location: San Luis Dr., near San Ramon, Ponto Beach, CA
GPS:
Source of Peak Noise: Minor construction (home im11rovements, drillinc ), train
Lea I Peak I Lmax Lmin Ldn I CNEL
48.3 I 79.9 I 65.7 42.0 48.3 I 48.3
Eauioment Site#:
Cateaorv Tvoe Vendor Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note
Sound Level Meter Larson Davis 820 1428 3/13/06
Sound Microohone Larson Davis 2561 1012 3/15/06
Preamo Larson Davis 827 0180 3/13/06
Calibrator Larson Davis CA250 0216 3/13/06
Weather Data
Duration: 10 minutes I Skv: ◊ oartlv cloudv I Sensor Heiaht (ft): 5 ft
Wind Note: dBA Offset = 15.6
Est. Speed (mph / mis) I Direction Temperature I Humidity
5 I West 70 I
Photo of Measurement Location
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Name:
Site:
Date:
Time:
Instrument:
Operator:
Calibration:
Data type:
Weight:
Samples:
80
dB
PontoSite4
Measurement location
7/5/2006
10:12:26 AM
Larson-Davis 812/820/870
Operator name
Calibration
Intervals
A
11
Ponto Site 4 -Intervals -Leq
Pomo Sui:➔ -!mer, aJs -SEL
Ponlo Site 4 -Intervals -LMin
l'1in11• ;<,11. "' -ln11.-·n:tJ~ -I '\liP
PonH) Sitl· ➔ -lmt'n al'--l. I 1111
Ponto Site 4 -Interval, -l.50.00
Pon10 S11c -t -!nt1..:n<1l!--! 90 on
r T I
Notes:
Line1:
Line2:
Line3:
Title:
Notes
L-D Model 820
You may enter three lines of
personalized instrument name.
10:22 ..il cq
47.3 dB(A) 48.3 dB(A)
61.9 dB(AI
4S.9dB(A)
~ n1,-,."-----------+-----------+-----------+------:h"----+----_,..,......_+----i
10:JX .10:20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site Number: PBS
Recorded By: Kellv Chiene
Job Number: 25-101951
Date: 7/5/06
Time: 10:45 a.m.
Location: Near train tracks, south end of orooertv, Ponto Beach, CA
GPS:
Source of Peak Noise: Train
Lea I Peak I Lmax I Lmin I
59.8 I 104.5 I 88.7 I 43.1 I
Equipment
Cateaorv Tvoe Vendor Model Serial No.
Sound Level Meter Larson Davis 820 1428
Sound Microphone Larson Davis 2561 1012
Preamp Larson Davis 827 0180
Calibrator Larson Davis CA250 0216
Weather Data
Duration: 30 minutes I Sky: ◊ partly cloudy
Wind Note: dBA Offset = 15.5
Est. Soeed (mph / mis) I Direction Temperature
5 I West 70
Photo of Measurement Location
Ldn I CNEL
59.8 I 59.8
Site#:
Cert. Date Note
3/13/06
3/15/06
3/13/06
3/13/06
I Sensor Heiaht (ft): 5 ft
I Humiditv
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Name:
Site:
Date:
Time:
Instrument:
Operator:
Calibration:
Data type:
Weight:
Samples:
Ponto Site 5
Measurement location
7/5/2006
10:49:18 AM
Larson-Davis 812/820/870
Operator name
Calibration
lnteNals
A
32
Ponto Site 5 -Intervals -Leq
Ponto S1ti.:: 5 -lnti.:n. als. -SEL
Pomo Site 5 -lmcrvals -LMin
1~\11lll1 ...,11~ " -ln1cn.:11, -l.!\la'
Ponto Sn.: "5 -lntt:nab -LI .Oil
Ponto Site 5 -Intervals -L50.00
Pon1n Slh:.:;: -!n1,,.-r\al, -I t)O on
dB 7_ _ --~ -=.:.: ~ --=
·11 ___ _
---
Notes:
Line1:
Line2:
Line3:
Title:
1-
Notes
L-D Model 820
You may enter three lines of
personalized instrument name.
11:19
45.2dB(A)
61.3 dB(Al
43.9 dB(A)
r «)dB1A1
-17 I <lBIAl
45.0dB(A)
.J.J.2dB(A)
~Lcq
59.8 dB(A)
1•1-------------------~:1-----------7--=:.:.:.:. _____ -4:.:.:.:. ___ .....:...__:......:.:..:::==~~U\~--=--~-=-·-i -::=--~---::~-===··~~-==--=--~J
l--~~==-,----✓
L ----------------------
111·-!ti hm ! I :ti~ ]]-()l} 11 -1::.
----------------
Federal Railroad Administration Copyright 1998, HMMH Inc.
High Speed Rail Initial Noise Evaluation
Case: Example Government users have unrestricted rights to this program
Results
Ldn at 100 ft w/ shielding
Leq day at 100 ft w/shielding
Leq night at 100 ft w/shieldin
Noise Calulations:
Reference Speed, mph
Reference Train Length, ft
Shielding Cs
--•o"""'.,._,,·-""""'"-~' --...... ,~~···-,
·~~-----• ,Shielding atten, dBA ---~--...,__ ~.,.. ... SEL at 50 ft, dBA
Leq day -,..,-.:•.r--,-----------------~-Leq night
Ldn at 50 ft .. ,-...--", -· "'---"• ~---·-------Ldn at 100 ft ----Ldn at 100 ft w/ sh~di~g ---·~·~=..------,Leq day at 100 ft w/shielding
Leq night at 100 ft w/shielding
60
5
Fossil-Fuel
776
1.00
0.56
I
87
5
20
73
-3
0
99.3
60.7
58.1
65.0
60
60
56.1
53.6
HSR Reference
Cale. from Inputs
·----Cale. from Inputs
Cale. from Inputs . -from Table 4-2
from Table 4·2
from Table 4-2
from Table 4·2
from Table 4-2 ·-~--from Table 4-3 ·~ --Inputs, Sect 4.2.3 -·-•-------from Table 4-4 ~~----from Table 4-4 ---from Table 4-4 ,-.. ..,,., from Table 4-4 __ ..:,._,....,...
from Sect 4.2.3
T"-. -from Sect 1.2.3 ... .__..,._ __ _., __ ,
from Sect 4.2.3
from Sect 4.2.3
!'Fable 4-2: Refence Parameters at 50 feet from Track/Guidewav
Reference Abbr. Speed Steel-Wheeled
Quantltv Realme Electric Fossil Fuel
Reference SEL $El.ref I 89 dBA 87 dBA
II 93 dBA 94 dBA
Ill 99 dBA dBA
Speed Coefficient K I 3 5
II 17 16
Ill 47
Reference Speed Sref I 20 moh 20 mph
II 90 mph 90 mph
ill 180 moh moh
Reference Length tenref I 73 feet 73 feet
II 634 feet 634 feet
Ill 73 feet feet
T ransilion Speed St1 1->ll 60 moh 60 mph
S11 ll->111 170moh moh
Table 4-3: Shieldina Corretions for Track Geometrv
Casa Speed Shielding
Realma CorrectionlCs'
1. Tracks in Shallow I 0
Cut II -10
Ill -3
2. Tracks in Deep I -10
Trench or cut II -15
Ill -10
3. Tracks on Aerial I 4
Structure II 4
Ill 2
4. Tracks on I 0
Embankment II -5
Ill 0
5. Noise Barrier I 0
II -10
Ill -5
---
Maglev
72 dBA
73 dBA
78 dBA
2
17
50
20 moh
60 moh
120 moh
82 feet
82 feet
82 feet
60 moh
120 moh
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
Federal Highway Administrati9n RQ-77-108 :
Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CAI!.VENO) I
Project Name:
Analyst:
Roadway:
Road Segment:
_Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Carlsbad Boulevard
Palomar Airport Road to Island Way
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: O
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: O
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Existing
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA :~::::~;~Y Traffic: .::· · ~4d~~
Peak Hour Traffic: 1422
Vehicle Speed: Ii:
Centerline Separation: \'.' · _,,;c;_;:ft
NOISE INPUTS
Site conditions HARD SITE
FLEET MIX
Type Dav Evenina Niaht Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 55.5 64.3 62.5 56.4 65.0
Medium Trucks: 63.2 57.0 50.6 49.0 57.5
Heavy Trucks: 67.4 56.0 46.9 48.2 57.6
Vehicle Noise: 69.8 65.6 -62.9 57.8 66.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.027 0.108 0.0083
CNEL
65.7
57.7
57.7
66.9
CNEL
Roadway Centerllne Noise Contour
602 800 190
60 600
400
200 -; 0 CII u..
-200
-400
-600
-800
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I I
Federal Highway Administratiqn RD-77-108
Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CAil.VENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Island Way to Breakwater
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: '0'
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ::i,;:tAl$:f;4
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1813.4
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: j~}r?Jf Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: o· Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 .::,ne cond1t1ons HARD ~• • t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tyoe Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.7 65.4 63.6 57.5 66.2 66.8
Medium Trucks: 64.4 58.1 51.7 50.1 58.6 58.9
Heavy Trucks: 68.6 57.1 48.1 49.3 58.7 58.8
Vehicle Noise: 70.9 66.8 64.0 58.9 67.5 68.0
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
768 1000 243 800
77 600
400
~ 200
G) 0
IL -200
-400
-600
-800
-1000
I
I I
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ._, -~--·. .,,.i.
' -~' ,
: I I
' Federal Highway Administration ~q>-77-108
' I Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CA VENO) ' Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Breakwater to Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: !'):¼%~,~~ Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1864.1
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: -· . iO
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: _ .,,•h, -'48
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 1::;ne conamons HARD ~• • t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 · 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.8 65.5 63.7 57.7 66.3 66.9
Medium Trucks: 64.5 58.2 51.8 50.3 58.7 59.0
Heaw Trucks: 68.7 57.3 48.2 49.4 58.8 58.9
Vehicle Noise: 71.0 66.9 64.2 59.0 67.6 68.1
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heaw Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
789 1000 250 800
79 600 I
400 ... 200
QI 0 QI LL -200
-400
-600
-800
-1000
I
I
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l Federal Highway Administration R.0-77-108 I I
' Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Poinsettia to Avenida Encinas
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: -. ;19"
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: . ti.8'6i, '. ",, .. ,.,'
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1885.3
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: il\&;;;.;t Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ::me conomons·HARD .::,11 c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenina Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: B
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.8 65.6 63.8 57.7 66.4 67.0
Medium Trucks: 64.5 58.3 51.9 50.3 58.8 59.0
Heavy Trucks: 68.7 57.3 48.3 49.5 58.9 59.0
Vehicle Noise: 71.1 67.0 64.2 59.1 -67.7 68.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
798 1000 252 800
80 600
400
200 ,; 0 Cl) u. -200
-400
-600
-800
-1000
I
I
I
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I.
I
1·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 :
' I .I I : Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CAil.VENO) 1
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Avenida Encinas to La Costa
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height {above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Existing
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
NOISE INPUTS
Site cond1t1ons HARD .)111:.
FLEET MIX
Type Day Evenina Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: ~90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 57.9 66.6 64.9 58.8 67.4 68.0
Medium Trucks: 65.6 59.3 52.9 51.4 59.9 60.1
Heavy Trucks: 69.8 58.4 49.3 50.5 59.9 60.1
Vehicle-Noise: 72.1 68.0 65.3 60.1 68.7 69.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1019 1500 322
102 1000
500
'i 0 ID u.
-500
-1000
-1500
,,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 1 I I
! Federal Highway Administration ~'f-77-108 ;
1 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) I
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: La Costa to Leucadia
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
Scenario: Existing
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: '.;1,t · · . ;fr~!f
Average Daily Traffic: 15~9tii!)'
Peak Hour Traffic: 1590 ·, Vehicle Speed: ,·, (#~SO
Centerline Separation: ,.: ,,.,:~j\::1~~
NOISE INPUTS
::me conc11tIons HARD ;:,111:
FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0
0
Type Day Evening Night Daily
Barrier Height: Auto 0.775 0,129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 56.4 65.1 63.3 57.3 65.9
Medium Trucks: 64.1 57.8 51.4 49.8 58.3
Heavy Trucks: 68.3 56.9 47.8 49.0 58.4
Vehicle Noise: 70.6 66.5 63.7 58.6 67.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night -Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.027
CNEL
66.5
58.6
58.5
67.7
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
673 800 213
67 600
400
200
a> 0 GI II.
-200
-400
-600
-800
0.108 0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' ' '
I
Federal Highway Administration ~!p-77-108
Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: South of Leucadia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: 'Q
" Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: 0 C
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1600
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ~' Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: --' __ ,_,Jt~-
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~IteconaIt1onsHAKU~1Ic
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavv Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.4 65.1 63.4 57.3 65.9 66.5
Medium Trucks: 64.1 57.8 51.4 49.9 58.4 58.6
Heavy Trucks: 68.3 56.9 47.8 49.0 58.4 58.6
Vehicle Noise: 70.6 66.5 63.8 58.7 67.2 67.7
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
678
214 800
68 600
400
200
$ 0 QI u..
-200
-400
-600
-800
'
I
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
!
!1
II ;1 ;i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,~1
I
I
I
, Federal Highway Administration RID-77-108 : I I I
1 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) i
Project Name:
Analyst:
Roadway:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Avenida Encinas
Scenario: Existing
Job#: 25-101951
Road Segment: Cannon Road to Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Rt View: 90 Lft View:
SITE DATA
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
?-•'>;_. ' ,o.
-; ~:':,r{,d.667
766.7 Peak Hour Traffic:
6=~~:~i;:;:~aration: 1:tf ~]~}\: .. ~J:
NOISE INPUTS
~1te conamons HARDS Tl:
FLEET MIX
Tvoe Dav Evenino Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 50.3 59.1 57.3 51.3 59.9
Medium Trucks: 59.3 51.2 44.8 43.3 51.8
Heavv Trucks: 64.1 48.0 38.9 40.1 49.9
Vehicle Noise: 66.5 60;2 57.7 52.3 60.9
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks: .
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
CNEL
60.5
52.0
50.0
61.4
CNEL
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
161
51
16
200
150
100
50
'i 0 CD u.
-50
-100
-150
-200
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 Federal Highway Administration RI' D-77-108 : I I Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) :
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: South of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Existing
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
:~:!:;~;~Y Traffic: ?it~~t4,~jj
Peak Hour Traffic: 1422
Vehicle Speed: -,,~fl
Centerline Separation: . _:.~l'.~"l~g:
NOISE INPUTS
Site concm1ons ~TE
FLEET MIX
Tvoe Day Evenina Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 53.0 61.8 60.0 53.9 62.6 63.2
Medium Trucks: 62.0 53.9 47.5 45.9 54.4 54.7
Heavy Trucks: 66.8 50.7 41.6 42.8 52.5 52.7
Vehicle Noise: 69.2 62.8 60.3 55.0 63.6 64.'I
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn. CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
, Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
299
95 400
30 300
200
100 .. g 0 u.
-100
-200
-300
-400
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ' I Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 I Traffic Noise Prediction Model (C~LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: North of Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: . -_,. .'~ls
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: '. 4,71~
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 474.8
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: >~o
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,, ;, ,.,;.',;; ;~-c ,~Q,
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~1tecono111onsHARU~11c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 44.8 53.6 51.8 45.7 54.3 54.9
Medium Trucks: 55.4 47.3 -40.9 39.3 47.8 48.1
Heavy Trucks: 61.0 44.8 35.8 37.0 47.1 47.3
Vehicle Noise: 63.5 55.1 52.3 47;2 55.8 56:3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
49 60 15
5 40
20
i 0 II..
-20
-40
-60
' I
' I
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' ' I
I Federal Highway Administration RID-77-108 I I ; Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Roadway:
Road Segment:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Avenida Encinas
South of Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier -0
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): O
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
0.5
0
Scenario: Existing
Job#: 25-101951
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
Peak Hour Traffic:
Vehicle Speed:
Centerline Separation:
SITE DATA
. · .. :.·:;·,,,.o
.',,;1~~~4
1435.4
~~~.·:::illt
NOISE INPUTS
~ne conditions HARD SITE
FLEET MIX
Observer Height {above grade): 0
0
Tvoe Dav Evening Niaht Daily
Barrier Height: Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 51.3 60.1 58.3 52.2 60.9 61.5
Medium Trucks: 61.0 52.9 46.6 45.0 53.5 53.7
Heavy Trucks: 66.2 50.1 41.0 42.2 52.1 52.3
Vehicle Noise: 68.7 61.3 58.7 53.5 62.1 62.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated
215
68
22
Leq Evening
200
100
0
-100
-200
Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
-300 _,__ _________________ .....J
i
;,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
j Federal Highway Administration ~~-77-108 :
I Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CA~VENO) 1
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: East of Ponto
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Existing
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: /-'.~~·::,,•,,-r\(}.I
Average Daily Traffic: •,c /1_7:.t~
Peak Hour Traffic: 377.7
Vehicle Speed: _-': t~~~;~i, ·3_~
Centerline Separation: .· -;~~:;;i;: .:,_3~ ' .: .. ·:i!',~::,<..U-!l,' • ~-
NOISE INPUTS
Site conamons HARD ::,111:
FLEET MIX
Tvoe Dav Evenina Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 45.7 54.5 52.7 46.6 55.3
Medium Trucks: 55.4 47.3 41.0 39.4 47.9
Heavy Trucks: 60.6 44.5 35.4 36.6 46.5
Vehicle Noise: 63.1 55.7 53.1 47.9 56.5
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS {With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.027 0.108 0.0028
CNEL
55.9
48.1
46.7
57.0
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
57
18 80
6 60
40
20 .. QI 0 Cl) u..
-20
-40
-60
-80
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Administration RID-77-108 I I : Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) :
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway:
Road Segment:
College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway
North of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
9
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Existing
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: · '-,'.,;:.:,:'((:. :o
Average Daily Traffic: ,---'.'~·Z2'8t"
Peak Hour Traffic: 1228.7
Vehicle Speed: --Jl.@.,
Centerline Separation: _ _ ~-"";.;,Jli
NOISE INPUTS
tme conamons HARD ~11 t:
FLEET MIX
Type Dav Evenino Nioht Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 55.2 64.0 62.2 56.1 64.8 65.4
Medium Trucks: 62.8 54.8 48.4 46.8 55.3 55.5
Heavy Trucks: 67.1 50.9 41.9 43.1 52.5 52.6
Vehicle Noise: 69.4 64.7 62.4 56.8 65.4 66.0
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
463
146 600 ,-------------------
46 400
200
~ 0
-200
-400
-600 ..__ _________________ ....J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 I I I ' I Traffic Noise Prediction Model (C~LVENO) '
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway:
Road Segment:
College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway
Palomar Airport Road to Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Existing
.lob#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: 'JB\\it~1f··· 0.
Average Daily Traffic: "}tft;i$24
Peak Hour Traffic: 1052.4
Vehicle Speed: --': : .. • ~~·
Centerline Separation: ~--_0 ,,,.~.II,:
NOISE INPUTS
::me conamons HARU ~• • t:
FLEET MIX
Type Day Evening Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 53.2 62.0 60.2 54.1 62.8 63.4
Medium Trucks: 61.5 53.4 47.0 45.4 53.9 54.2
Heavy Trucks: 66.0 49.8 40.8 42.0 51.5 51.7
Vehicle Noise:-68.3 62.8 60.5 .55.0 63.6 64.1
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heaw Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
300 400 95
30 300
200
100 -; • 0 a, u. -100
-200
-300
-400
-i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108
1
1
I I I : Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CA!LVENO) i
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway:
Road Segment:
College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway
Poinsettia Batiquitos
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Existing
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: ' ''@
Average Daily Traffic: t~;§'.~t
1555.7 Peak Hour Traffic:
Vehicle Speed:
Centerline Separation: itili::/ic~l:!~
NOISE INPUTS
~1te cond1t1ons HARD SI I t:
FLEET MIX
Type Dav Evenina Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 53.3 62.1 60.3 54.2 62.9 63.5
Medium Trucks: 62.3 54.2 47.8 46.2 54.7 55.0
Heavy Trucks: 67.1 51.0 41.9 43.1 52.8 53.0
Vehicle Noise: 69.5 63.1 60.6 55.3 63.9 64.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
327
104 400
33 300
200
100
I 0
-100
-200
-300
-400
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I, Federal Highway Administration R.0-77-108 1
I I
1 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) ,
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Paseo Del Norte
Road Segment: North of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Existing
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: '~j~;i;1·_0--•-•5--~!
Average Daily Traffic: ;,;J,;1\·t · ·; "~'
Peak Hour Traffic: 1055.B
Vehicle Speed: •1~~f .. 35:
Centerline Separation: fjj}f-, --~
NOISE INPUTS
;:;ne conamons HARD ~• • c
FLEET MIX
Type Dav Evening Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 50.0 58.8 57.0 50.9 59.5 60.1
Medium Trucks: 59.7 51.6 45.2 43.7 52.1 52.4
Heavv Trucks: 64.9 48.7 39.7 40.9 50.8 50.9
Vehicle Noise: 67.3 60.0 57.4 52.1 60.7 61.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
159 200 50
16 150
100
50
ai 0 GI II.
-50
-100
-150
-200
-I .i
!
i1 'I
;J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Administration 1£?-77-108 :
1 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (C~LVENO) /
Project Name:
Analyst:
Roadway:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Paseo Del Norte
Scenario: Existing
Job#: 25-101951
Road Segment: Palomar Airport Road Camino de Las Ondas
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far !ane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Rt View: 90 Lft View:
SITE DATA
Road Grade: · · ,., -"I:)
Average Daily Traffic: >1Q;558
Peak Hour Traffic: 1055.8
Vehicle Speed: · <' · 40
Centerline Separation: ,~ii~JL~P-~
NOISE INPUTS
~me conomons HARD ;:,11 t:
FLEET MIX
Type Day Evening Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 51.7 60.5 58.7 52.7 61.3
Medium Trucks: 60.7 52.6 46.2 44.7 53.1
Heavv Trucks: 65.5 49A-40.3 41.5 51.2
Vehicle Noise: 67.9 61.5 59.1 53.7 62.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
CNEL
61.9
53.4
51.4
62.8
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
222 300 70
22 200
100 .. :B 0 u..
-100
-200
-300
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Administration R0-77-108 I I
I Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Paseo Del Norte
Road Segment: Camino de Las Ondas to Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: }:;r. :---.,::iP·
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ~,,ass;;~ 0 :55f:f ~t~?·:'~ , ,I ,,,.,_ .;:, ~·.:,
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1055.8
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ,:~;~111}~1§ii, Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ::ilte cona1t1ons HARD ~• 1 t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 51.7 60.5 58.7 52.7 61.3 61.9
Medium Trucks: 60.7 52.6 46.2 44.7 53.1 53.4
Heavy Trucks: 65.5 49.4 40.3 41.5 51.2 51.4
-Vehicle Noise: 67.9 61.5 59.1 53.7 62.3 62.8
.
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation}
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
222
70 300
22 200
100
ai 0 CD u.
-100
-200
-300
I
'
'
Daily
0,9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
: Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 '
i Traffic Noise Prediction Model (C.A!LVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Roadway:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Palomar Airport Road
Scenario: Existing
Job#: 25-101951
Road Segment: Carlsbad Boulevard to Avenida Encinas
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Rt View: 90 Lft View:
SITE DATA
Road Grade: · · ·O
Average Daily Traffic: · · ;, 1~~03
Peak Hour Traffic: · 1220.3
Vehicle Speed: 35
Centerline Separation: )~ /. . .. 3Q;,
NOISE INPUTS
Site conditions HARD Silt:.
FLEET MIX
Tvoe Dav Evening Niaht Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 50.8 59.5 57.7 51.6 60.3
Medium Trucks: 60.5 54.2 47.9 46.3 54.8
Heavy Trucks: 65.7 54.3 45.2 46.4 56.3
Vehicle Noise: 68.2 61.9 58.5 54.0 62.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
CNEL
60.9
55.0
56.5
63.0
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
226
72 300
23 200
100
~ 0 G)
LL
-100
-200
-300
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Administration R0-77-108 1
; Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CAlVENO) '
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachf~ont Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Avenida Encinas to Paseo del Norte
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height {above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Existing
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: ; . : · J~;ft';il~~
Average Daily Traffic: :.fijf9'iji
Peak Hour Traffic: 4829.4
Vehicle Speed: ·.: '.~;1~~;
Centerline Separation: .,_· ... :":..,., 31,2,
NOISE INPUTS
~ne conomons HARD .,, , ~
FLEET MIX
Type Day Evening Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 56.6 65.3 63.5 57.4 66.1
Medium Trucks: 66.3 60.0 53.6 52.1 60.6
Heavy Trucks: 71.5 60.1 51.0 52.2 62.1
Vehicle Noise: 73.9 67.7 64.2 ·59.8 ·68.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.027 0.108 0.0083
CNEL
66.7
60.8
62.3
68.8
CNEL
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
898
284
90 500
1 0
-500
i " ,,
!· I !
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
'
Federal Highway Administration ~[j>-77-108
i Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Paseo del Norte to Armada
PROJECT DAT A SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: -;~if~ii~~ .
Barrier (O=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 5220.8
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ,14$,
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ·"'~
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~,te conomons HAKU .:,11 c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq LeqDay Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 60.0 68.7 66.9 60.8 69.5 70.1
Medium Trucks: 68.2 62.0 55.6 54.0 62.5 62.7
Heavy Trucks: 72.8 61.3 52.3 53.5 63.0 63.1
Vehicle Noise: 75.1 70.3 67.4 62.4 71.0 71.5
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1715 2000 542
171 1500
1000
500 ,; 0 Cl) II.
-500
-1000
-1500
-2000
I
' ' '
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108
1 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (Q~LVENO) :
Project Name:
Analyst:
Roadway:
Road Segment:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Palomar Airport Road
Armada to Hidden Valley
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0
Barrier (O=wall, 1= berm): 0
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: O
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
0.5
0
Scenario: Existing
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: 0 -• 0
Average Daily Traffic: · ·-_ •. 4699$
Peak Hour Traffic: 4699.8
Vehicle Speed: . · \i~t{~
Centerline Separation: .,:~d~
NOISE INPUTS
Site conditions HARD ~I 11:
FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0
0
Tvoe Dav Evenina Nioht Daily
Barrier Height: Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 62.0 70.7 69.0 62.9 71.5
Medium Trucks: 69.1 62.9 56.5 54.9 63.4
Heavv Trucks: 73.1 61.7 52.6 53.8 63.1
Vehicle Noise: -75.4 71.9 --69.3 64.1 72.7
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.027
CNEL
72.1
63.6
63.2
73;2
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2519 3000 796
252 2000
1000
'i 0 " LL.
-1000
-2000
-3000
0.108 0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
I
J Federal Highway Administration ~~-77-108 I
I Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) ,
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway:
Road Segment:
Palomar Airport Road
Hidden Valley to College
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
0
0
0
100
0
0
Pad Elevation: 0.5
Road Elevation: 0
Observer Height (above grade): 0
Barrier Height: 0
Scenario:
Job#:
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
Peak Hour Traffic:
Existing
25-101951
SITE DATA
¾Ji~
4605.2
6=~~~~i~:;:~aration: i~ltl{{f~1;:i
NOISE INPUTS
::sne conditions HARD-SITE
FLEET_MIX
Tvoe Day Evenina Niaht Daily
Auto · 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0-.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 61.9 70.7 68.9 62.8 71.4
Medium Trucks: 69.0 62.8 56.4 54.8 63.3
Heavy Trucks: 73.0 61.6 52.5 53.7 63.0
Vehicle Noise: 75.3 71.8 69.2 -64.0 72.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
• Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.027 0.108 0.0083
CNEL
72.0
63.6
63.1
73.1
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2467
780 3000
247 2000
1000
1ii 0 QI u..
-1000
-2000
-3000
ii :!
'I
:I I
:1
ii II ii , I
I i
I
I
n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I-
I
I
I
: Federal Highway Administration R0-77-108 '
I I I
! Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CA,LVENO) f
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: College to Camino Vida Roble
PROJECT DAT A
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
Scenario: Existing
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade. ~::,-~,,,.,_, :.c«·t~; . ,::/ : __ . ?:~ Average Daily Traffic: ;;t1,y.;:,,~_1Ql~
Peak Hour Traffic: 3701.3
Vehicle Speed: ".<' ;, , . 55
Centerline Separation: ... ~:.::,4~
NOISE INPUTS
Site conditions HARD 511 t:
FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0
0
Type Day Evenina Night Daily
Barrier Height: Auto 0.775 0.129
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 61.0 69.7 67.9 61.8 70.5
Medium Trucks: 68.1 61.8 55.5 53.9 62.4
Heavy Trucks: 72.1 60.6 51.6 52.8 62.0
Vehicle Noise: 74.4 70.9 68.3 63.0 71.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
CNEL
71.1
62.6
62.2
72.1
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1982
627 2500
2000
198 1500
1000
7ii 500
a, 0 II. -500
-1000
-1500
-2000
-2500
0.096 0.9638
0.103 0.0279
0.108 0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I Federal Highway Administration ~D-77-108
Traffic Noise Prediction Model (C~LVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Camino Vida Roble to El Camino Real
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: -o
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: :\sis1a
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3287.8
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: i~li -~~ Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: -,•141~
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Siteconditions~SITE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Day Evenina Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS {No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 60.5 69.2 67.4 61.3 70.0 70.6
Medium Trucks: 67.6 61.3 54.9 53.4 61.9 62.1
Heavy Trucks: 71.5 60.1 51.0 52.3 61.5 61.7
Vehicle Noise: 73.9 70.4 67.8 62.5 71.1 -71.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS {With topographic or barrier attenuation) .
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1763
557 2000
176 1500
1000
500
ai 0 Cl) II.
-500
-1000
-1500
-2000
'
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
! Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 , i Traffic Noise Prediction Model (C~LVENO) '
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: El 'Camino Real to El Fuerte
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade}:
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Existing
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
Peak Hour Traffic:
Vehicle Speed:
Centerline Separation:
NOISE INPUTS
;::me conamons HARO 511 c.
FLEET MIX
Type Day Evening Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 62.3 71.0 69.3 63.2 71.8 72.4
Medium Trucks: 69.4 63.2 56.8 55.2 63.7 63.9
Heavy Trucks: 73.4 62.0 52.9 54.1 63.4 63.5
Vehicle Noise: 75.7 72.2 69.6 64.4 73.0 73.5
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2705
855 3000
270 2000
1000
'i 0 CII u.
-1000
-2000
-3000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
I
i Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 ' i Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CiLVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Scenario: Existing
Job#: 25-101951
Roadway:
Road Segment:
Palomar Airport Road
El Fuerte to Melrose
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Rt View: 90 Lft View:
SITE DATA
Road Grade: flii;);?>, ?Cf
Average Daily Traffic: \;,':· 536{)~:,
Peak Hour Traffic: 5360.3
Vehicle Speed: -/55
Centerline Separation: .:.~.~::.::.:~:,?!~.
NOISE INPUTS
~1te cona1t1ons HARD 511 t:
FLEET MIX
Type Day Evening Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq LeqDay Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 62.6 71.3 69.5 63.4 72.1 72.7
Medium Trucks: 69.7 63.4 57.1 55.5 64.0 64.2
Heavy Trucks: 73.7 62.2 53.2 54.4 63.6 63.8
Vehicle Noise: 76.0 72.5 69.9 64.6 73;2 73.7
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise;
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated
2872
908
287
Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
4000 -.---------------------,
3000
2000
1000
i 0 IL
-1000
-2000
. -3000
-4000 -'--------------------'
t,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
I
I
I
g
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Administration ~D-77-108 :
j Traffic Noise Prediction Model (C~LVENO) I
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: North of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier· Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Existing
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
Peak Hour Traffic:
6:~~~~i~:;:~aration: !~~!~~~Di ;
NOISE INPUT~S-------1
::me conamons HAKU .:,11 c
FLEET MIX
Type Day Evening Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peakleq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 54.8 63.6 61.8 55.7 64.3 65.0
Medium Trucks: 64.6 58.3 51.9 50.3 58.8 59.1
Heavy Trucks: 69.8 58.3 49.3 50.5 60.4 60.5
Vehicle Noise: 72.2 65.9 62.5 58.1 66.6 67.0 ·
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
615 800 195 600 62 400
200 -; 0 QI II..
-200
-400
-600
-800
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I
I Federal Highway Administration RID-77-108
I Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CiLVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: Palomar Airport Road to Camino Vida Roble
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ::.?~,il Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3214.8
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: '·,":: 35
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,,.'.;'·" 4,~,:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~,te conditions HARD SI It:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Dav Evening Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med,_Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 54.7 63.4 61.7 55.6 64.2 64.8
Medium Trucks: 64.4 58.2 51.8 50.2 58.7 58.9
Heavy Trucks: 69.6 58.2 49.1 50.4 60.3 60.4
Vehlcle Noise: 72.1 65.8 62.4 57.9 66.5 66.9
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
597
189 800
60 600
400
200 .... Cl) 0 Cl)
IL
-200
-400
-600
-800
I
I
I
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
I
I
·1
I
I
I
I
' Federal Highway Administration R:Df 77-108 !
Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALJVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: Camino Vida Roble to Cassia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: '"(" ,, 0
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ·fu~1s
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3082.5 ., .
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: 35
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: . :::~.,;~,' ... ~I
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~1te cona1t1ons HAKU ;:,11 c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 54.5 63.3 61.5 55.4 64.0 64.6
Medium Trucks: f 64.2 58.0 51.6 50.0 58.5 58.7
Heavy Trucks: 69.5 58.0 49.0 50.2 60.1 60.2
Vehicle Noise: 71.9 65.6 62.2 57.7 66.3 66.7
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL .
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
573
181 800
57 600
400
200 ... CII 0 CII II.
-200
-400
-600
-800
!
I
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108
! Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CA4VENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: Cassia to La Costa
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ,\ -.,,
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: '. 460:tt
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 4601.7
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ,55
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: __ ,:;"" L:~~~
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ::;1te conamons HARU ~,, c \
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 61.9 70.6 68.9 62.8 71.4 72.0
Medium Trucks: 69.0 62.8 56.4 54.8 63.3 63.5
l:leavv Trucks: 73.0 61.6 52.5 53.7 63.0 63.1
Vehicle-Noise: 75.3 71.8 69.2 64.0 72.6 73.1
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2467
780 3000
247 2000
1000 .. G) 0 G) u.
-1000
-2000
-3000
I
'
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Administration Rd-77-108 ' ' Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CA~VENO) I I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: La Costa to Leucadia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: . :·::·· : :;Lf
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ~
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3593.2
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: '
·•,-~$'
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
,. ~ .............. __
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~ne conditions HARD SI I t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day EveninQ NiQht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: I •90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavv Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 60.8 69.6 67.8 61.7 70.4 71.0
Medium Trucks: . 68.0 61.7 55.3 53.8 62.2 62.5
Heavv Trucks: 71.9 . 60.5 51.4 52.7 61.9 62.0
Vehicle Noise: 74.2 70.8 68.1 62.9 71.5 72.0
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: I
\
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1924
608 2500
2000
192 1500
1000
500 'i 0 GI II. -500
-1000
-1500
-2000
-2500
I
i
'
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
[ Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 '
I Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CA~VENO) I
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: Carlsbad to Avenida Encinas
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
Scenario: Existing
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
ft .. · ,o
)tX•;g;q~[
909.2 Peak Hour Traffic:
6:~~~~i;:S~~aration: ~:~t:;,.:~I;
NOISE INPUTS
::Site conditions HAKU :SI I t:
FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0
0
Tvpe Dav Evenina Night Daily
Barrier Height: Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 49.5 58.3 56.5 50.4 59.1
Medium Trucks: 59.2 51.2 44.8 43.2 51.7
Heavy Trucks: 64.4 48.3 39.2 40.4 50.3
Vehicle Noise: 66.9 59.6 56.9 51.7 60.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.027
CNEL
59.7
51.9
50.5
60.8
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
136
43 200
14 150
100
50 .. a> 0 Cl> u.
-50
-100
-150
-200
0.108 0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ' I Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 I I Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CA~VENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: Avenida Encinas 1-5
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: .:,i:i1;t1bg Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1780
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ?t~~~i.:: Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ;:,11e conarnons HAKU ;:,11 t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS {Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 52.3 61.1 59.3 53.3 61.9 62.5
Medium Trucks: 62.0 54.0 47.6 46.0 54.5 54.7
Heavy Trucks: 67.3 51.1 42.0 43.3 53.2 53.3
Vehicle Noise: 69.7 62.4 59.7 54.5 63.1 63.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation}
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
267 300 84
27 200
100
i 0 II.
-100
-200
-300
' I
' I
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
m.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i I I
I Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108
Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CA~VENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: 1-5 to Paseo del Norte
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: .. .:::::;:):o
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ~~iJ
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2076.2
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: .'-'t•:~
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: :~~~~:ii_~~~~
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ISite cona1t1ons HARO--slTI:
Road'Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
· Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heaw Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 53.0 61.8 60.0 53.9 62.6 63.2
Medium Trucks: 62.7 54.6 48.3 46.7 55.2 55.4
Heavy Trucks: 67.9 51.8 42.7 43.9 53.8 54.0
Vehicle Noise: 70.4 63.0 60.4 55.2 63.8 64.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
312
99 400
31 300
200
100
1l 0 u.
-100
-200
-300
-400
I
I I
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108
I Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CA~VENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: Paseo del Norte to Batiquitos
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: -, ,..-:i,_)•:::p
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: 29~7::
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2946.7
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: --,$
·' Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,.:J ~-,, ..
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 t>ne conamons HARD sn 1:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Dav Evenina Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heaw Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 54.4 63.2 61.4 55.3 I 64.0 64.6
Medium Trucks: 64.1 56.1 49.7 48.1 56.6 56.8
Heavy Trucks: 69.4 53.2 44.1 45.4 55.3 55.4
Vehicle Noise: 71:8 64.5 61.8 56.6 65.2 65.7
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
442
140 600
44 400
200
li 0 GI II.
-200
-400
-600
I
I
I
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I I Federal Highway Administration ~D-77-108 ,
1 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CA4VENO) 1
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: Batiquitos to Aviara
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height {above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Existing
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: ',.. ·;o:
Average Daily Traffic: •:22;•7~
Peak Hour Traffic: 2270.2
Vehicle Speed: --::·'." · -· 45:
Centerline Separation: Jt:: .. 4..j
NOISE INPUTS
~IteconamonsHARD~11c
FLEET MIX
lype Day Evening Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type -Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.4 65.2 63.4 57.4 66.0 66.6
Medium Trucks: 64.7 56.6 50.3 48.7 57.2 57.4
Heaw Trucks: 69.2 53.1 44.0 45.2 54.8 54.9
Vehicle Noise: 71.6 -66.1 63.7 58.2 66.8 -67.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
647 800 205
65 600
400
200
'S 0 QI II,,
-200
-400
-600
-800
I
g
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
n:
I
I
--1
I
I
I
l Federal Highway Administration Rtj-77-108 i
: Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CAl,.VENO) 1
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway:
Road Segment:
La Costa Avenue
Carlsbad to Vulcan
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: . Existing
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
NOISE INPUTS
Site conditions HARD SITE
FLEET MIX
Type Day Evenina Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 50.5 59.3 57.5 51.4 60.1 60.7
Medium Trucks: 60.2 52.2 45.8 44.2 52.7 52.9
Heavy Trucks: 65.4 49.3 40.2 41.5 51.4 51.5
Vehicle Noise: 67.9 60.6 57.9 52.7 61.3 61·.8
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
168
53 200
17 150
100
50
'i 0 CD II.
-50
-100
-150
-200
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway Administration RD~77-108 I I
'
I I I ' Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (C ~VENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing
Analyst: Maria Cadiz ,Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: La Costa Avenue
Road Segment: Vulcan to 1-5
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ·'J~
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): Average Daily Traffic: -14,9~1 0
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Tn:1ffic: 1498.1
Vehicle Speed: ----Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 • '~•,;•>s.35<
Barrier Neair Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: : '_:,,~~ii
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 .::,11e conamons HAKU .:,11 c
Road Eleva1tion: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Hei~1ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NIOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: -8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier i1ttenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 51.8 60.6 58.8 52.7 61.4 -62.0
Medium Trucks: 61.5 53.4 47.0 45.5 54.0 54.2
Heavy Trucks: 66.7 50.6 41.5 42.7 52.6 52.7
· Vehicle Noise: 69.1 61".8 59.2 53;9 62.5 63.1
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier a1ttenuatlon)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Tn.rcks:
Heaw Truclks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
225 300 71
22 200
100
-; 0 a> LL.
-100
-200
-300
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• 1 Federal Highway Adrnihistration R
; Traffic Noise Predictioh Model (C
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway:
Road Segment:
La Costa Avenue
1-5 to Piraeus
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevati,on:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Hei~1ht:
Rt View:
NI
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Hea Trucks:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
0
2.3
8
Scenario:
,Job#:
Existing
25-101951
Road Grade: :g: '1:-,.;,-,,u,,. . '
Average Daily Traffic: ;:~~~;;t.~;~2,f:
Peak Hour Traffic: 3392.1
6:~~~~i;:;:~;aration: )~11:,
NOISE INPUTS
UINMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier 21ttenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 55.1 63.9 62.1 56.1 64.7 65.3
Medium Trucks: 64.8 56.8 50.4 48.8 57.3 57.5
Heavy Trucks: 70.1 53.9 44.8 46.1 56.0 56.1
Vehicle Noise: 72.5 65.2 62.5 57.3 .65.9 66.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truclks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
509 600 161
51 400
200
-; 0 m LL.
-200
-400
-600
ll
0.096 0.9789
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Administration R ln-108
I I
I
I Traffic Noise Predictio,n Model (C L,VENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing
Analyst: Maria Cadiz ,Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: La Costa Avenue
Road Segment: Piraeus to El Camino Real
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: . -0
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: . ja:8-.·33()
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3333
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: l~ilf::·.:,I Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ::sne concfit1ons HARD :.,11 r:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Hei~Jht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day leq Evening leq Night ldn CNEL
Autos: 60.6 69.4 67.6 61.5 70.2 70.8
Medium Trucks: 67.7 59.7 53.3 51.7 60.2 60.4
Heavy Trucks: 71.7 55.5 46.5 47.7 57.0 57.1
Vehicle Noise: 74.0 70.0 67.8 62.2 70.8 7-1.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truclks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLH'-IE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1619 2000 512
162 1500
1000
500
'i 0 QI u.
-500
-1000
-1500
-2000
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Administration Dr77-108
I I
I
! Traffic Noise Predictidn Model (C L;VENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: La Costa Avenue
Road Segment: East of El Camino Real
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: 'Aijf.ltf.i Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ,-
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1001.5
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: .j{·r~(:, Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~1te conamon:s HAKU ~• • c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Hei~Jht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
~utos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UI.NMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peakleq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 53.0 61.8 60.0 53.9 62.5 63.2
Medium Trucks: 61.2 53.2 46.8 45.2 53.7 53.9
Heavy Trucks: 65.8 49.6 40.5 41.8 51.3 51.4
Vehicle Noise: 68.1 62.6 60.2 54.7 63.4 63.9
NIITIGATED·NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
286
90
29
400
300
200
100
'S 0 G) LI.
-100
-200
-300
-400
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
! Federal Highway Adm:inistration Q-77-108I
I I Traffic Noise Predicti9n Model (C ILVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Palomar Airport Road to Island Way
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: )~~:~ti~i~: Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1543.3
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ,,.,J:1tt: Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevatiion: 0.5 ~rte conamons HARD ~• • c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Hei!~ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Truc:ks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier ,attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 55.9 64.6 62.8 56.8 65.4 66.0
Medium TnJcks: 63.6 57.3 50.9 49.4 57.8 58.1
Heavv Trucks: 67.8 56.4 47.3 48.5 57.9 58.0
Vehicle Noise: 70.1 66.0 63.3 58.1 66.7 67:2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type PeakLeq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks>
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
653 800 206
65 600
400
200
i D u.
-200
-400
-600
-800
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Island Way to Breakwater
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Neair Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Eleva1tion:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Heii~ht:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
. ., .. -o:-77-108 I I
llVENO)
Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
:~:!~;~;~y Traffic: --1~l'.
Peak Hour Traffic: 1934. 7
Vehicle Speed: ,\'.\( ,' · -·SO
Centerline Separation: ;JiS,.:... ,(8,
NOISE INPUTS
Da Evenin Night Dail
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
1OISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 57.0 65.7 63.9 57.8 66.5 67.1
Medium Trucks: 64.6 58.4 52.0 50.4 58.9 59.1
Heavy Trucks: 68.9 57.4 48.4 49.6 59,0 59.1
Vehicle Noise: 71.2 67.1 64.3 59.2 67.8 68.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day LeqEvening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truclks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
819
259 1000
82 500
.. CD 0 CD u..
-500
-1000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
Federal Highway Administration 0
1
-77-1081 I
Traffic Noise Predictiqn Model (C l.:.VENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst:
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Breakwater to Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (O=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Nec1r Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Hei!~ht:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Rt View: 90 LftView:
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
Peak Hour Traffic:
~:~~~~i;:;:~aration: I}?t;ft:::~
NOISE INPUTS
Da
Auto 0.775 0.129
-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049
OISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Hea Trucks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier ;:1ttenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 57.1 65.8 64.0 57.9 66.6
Medium Trucks: 64.7 58.5 52.1 50.5 59.0
Heavy Trucks: 69.0 57.5 48.5 49.7 59.1
Vehicle Noise: 71.3 67.2 64.4 59.3 67.9
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
CNEL
67.2
59.3
59.2
68.4
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
840 1000 266
84 500
i 0 u.
-500 ·
-1000
0.096 0.9638
0.103 0.0279
0.108 0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Administration D-77-1081
I I
I Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (C ~VENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Poinsettia to Avenida Encinas
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: <~;;j!t Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2688.8
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ' . , ~o
Barrier NeE1r Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ...... -,:L'48
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 I~1te conamons HARD SI 11:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Dav Evenina Niaht Daily
Barrier Height: 0 Auto· 0.775 0.129. 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 . 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 58.4 67.1 65.3 59.3 67.9 68.5
Medium Trucks: 66.1 59.8 53.4 51.8 60.3 60.6
Heavy Trucks: 70.3 58.9 49.8 51.0 60.4 60.5
Vehicle Noise: 72.6 68.5 65.7 60.6 69.2 69.7
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1138
360 1500
114 1000
500 ... GI 0 GI u.
-500
-1000
-1500
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Administration 0~77-108 I
I
I
I Traffic Noise Predictitjn Model (C LlVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Avenida Encinas to La Costa
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ;:j.;;12.r~l Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3088.3
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ; ~--J;,ijt
Barrier Nea1r Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: '_Jt
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~me conamons HARD 5111:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Hei~~ht: · 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 59.0 67.7 65.9 59.9 68.5 69.1
Medium Trucks: 66.7 60.4 54.0 52.4 60.9 61.2
Heavv Trucks: 70.9 59.5 50.4 51.6 61.0 61.1
Vehicle Noise: 73.2 69.1 66.3 61.2 69.8 70.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Pea~ Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CEN'fERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline 11/olse Contour
1307 1500 413
131 1000
500 .. II) 0 Ill u.
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~1
I
I
I
, 1
1
' Federal Highway Administration 0~77-108 I I
Traffic Noise Predictiqn Model (C UVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: La Costa to Leucadia
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Nee1r Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Hei!~ht:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA ---------1 :i:::;~;~y Traffic: ~;~fi{
Peak Hour Traffic: 1741.6
Vehicle Speed: ; ?N~o
Centerline Separation: f'.{£.tO.
NOISE INPUTS
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
OISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Hea Truc:ks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier ;attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.8 65.5 63.7 57.6 66.3 66.9
Medium TnJcks: 64.5 58.2 51.8 50.2 58.7 59.0
Heavv Truc:ks: 68.7 57.2 48.2 49.4 58.8 58.9
Vehicle No,lse: 71.0 66.9 64.1 59.0 67.6 68.1
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier aittenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
738
233 1000
800
74 600
400
ai 200
Cl> 0 u.. -200
-400
-600
-800
-1000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
[ Federal Highway Adm!inistration 0-77-1081 I
I Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (C ~VENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: South of Leucadia
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0='Nall, 1 = berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Hei9ht:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: _ Existing Plus Project
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: · '·-· .. ,
Average Daily Traffic: :'l~;i16,~~
Peak Hour Traffic: 1691
'':!, -, ~= -;· ' _, '
Vehicle Speed: . ~~it~ff:,tJ>D
Centerline Separation: ... ~;. ·, .'30
NOISE INPUTS
~ne cona1tions HAKU .,, , c
FLEET MIX
Tvoe Day EveninQ Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med, Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trncks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier ,attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.7 65.4 63.6 57.5 66.2 66.8
Medium Trucks: 64,3 58.1 51.7 50.1 58.6 58.8
Heaw Truc:ks: 68.6 57.1 48.1 49.3 58.7 58.8
Vehicle No,ise: 70.9 66.8 64.0 58.9 67.5 68.0
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier att~nuation) -
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
716 800 226
72 600
400
200
'S 0 GI I&.
-200
-400
-600
-800
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Adm)nistration o;-77-1081
I I Traffic Noise Predictiqn Model (C L.!.VENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: Cannon Road to Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: :l:t~-;~~ Barrier (0=v.,all, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 766.7
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: i~~r::Jlt-Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conamons HARO :>11 c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Hei9ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Truc:ks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 50.3 59.1 57.3 51.3 59.9 60.5
Medium Trucks: 59.3 51.2 44.8 43.3 51.8 52.0
Heavy Trucks: 64.1 -48.0 38.9 40.1 49.9 50.0
Vehicle Nc,ise: 66.s · 60.2 57.7 52.3 60.9 61.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Center~ne Noise Contour
161 200 51
16 150
100
50 ... ,
GI 0 GI I.I-
-50
-100
-150
-200
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
l l! ti ,,
!! ,I
ij
ii ii I' :! li 'I
I I
I ii
I
i
I
I
I u [' ,I
~i !,
~ l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J Federal Highway Adm nistration d-77-1081 I
[ Traffic Noise Prediction Model (C LiVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: South of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=-11Vall, 1 = berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevfition:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Hei!~ht:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: .:,,,::-·-, • ·-o:
Average Daily Traffic: ··-~4i~l~
Peak Hour Traffic: 1437.2
Vehicle Speeid: t>.--· .:~J40
Centerline Separation: f:'_ ::,dJ~6_
NOISE INPUTS
!Site conditions ~SlTE
FLEET MIX
Type Dav Evenina Niaht Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 53.1 61.9 60.1 54.0 62.6
Medium TriJcks: 62.0 53.9 47.6 46.0 54.5
Heavy Truc:ks: 66.9 50.7 41.6 42.9 52.6
Vehicle No,ise: 69.2 62.9 60.4 55.0 63.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier a.ttenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.027 0.108 0.0028
CNEL
-63.2
54.7
52.7
64.1
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
30
96 400
30 300
200
100
i 0 II-
-100
-200
-300
-400
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Admjnistration ol.77.1081
I I I Traffic Noise Predictiqn Model (C ~VENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: North of Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: . '. ·o '
•. -0il~bo Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: '""·~"-' . :
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 490
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ·:,~:t:! Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad ElevaUon: 0.5 Site conamons ~A~ 51TE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Dav Evenina Night
Barrier Hei!~ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavv Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier ;attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 44.9 53.7 51.9 45.8 54.5 55.1
Medium Trucks: 55.5 47.4 41.0 39.5 48.0 48.2
Heavy Truc:ks: 61.1 45.0 35.9 37.1 47.3 47.4
Vehicle No,ise: -63.7 55.3 52.4 47.4 56.0 56.5
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day . Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise: i
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
50 60 16
5 40
20
1 0 GI II.
-20
-40
-60
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I: i
' ' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.
I
I
I Federal Highway Administration □:-77-1081 I
I Traffic Noise Predicticin Model (C LlVENO) I
Project Narne: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz .. Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: South of Poinsettia --
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ·,.";-;/XO
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: :~/:t.fi06
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1450.6
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: 5
Barrier Neair Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,;, __ -·
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~lte conditions HARD SI 11:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenina Niaht
Barrier Hei!~ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
N10ISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 51.3 60.1 58.4 52.3 60.9 61.5
Medium Trucks: 61.1 53.0 46.6 45.0 53.5 53.8
Heavy Trucks: 66.3 50.1 41.1 42.3 52.2 52.3
Vehicle Noise: 68,7 61.4 58.7 53.5 62.1 62.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLll~E NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
218
69 300
22 200
100
ai 0 GI II..
-100
-200
-300
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Administration RDf 77-108 II I I I Traffic Noise Predictidn Model (C LJVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz ,Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: East of Ponto
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ;,::;•., -A
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ,.:-4;~.(i}i
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 408
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ., ,;,3~I tr·· .,
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Sejparation: ~~~~~'i~ ~; --·~,, 7·:, .. 11;,,a
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 :::;ne conamons HARD ~• • c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenina Night
Barrier Hei~1ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
Nt:)ISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier a1ttenuation)
Vehicle Type PeakLeq LeqDay LeqEvenlng Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 46.0 54.8 53.0 47.0 55.6 56.2
Medium Trucks: 55.7 47.7 41.3 39.7 48.2 48.4
Heavy Trucl<s: 61.0 44.8 35.7 37.0 46.9 47.0
Vehicle Nouse: 63.4 56.1 53.4 48.2 56.8 57.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLIHE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
61 80 19
6 60
40
20
li 0 CD u,.
-20
-40
-60
-80
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ' I I
Federal Highway Administration D1"77-108I
I Traffic Noise PredictiJn Model (C LLVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway
Road Segment: North of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ,11tti~. Barrier (0='Nall, 1= berm): 0 Average DailSr Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1274.2
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: :,_Y: .~~
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,,;;.~ ... ·_;,a
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevatiion: 0.5 ~ne conomons HARD :s11 E
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Day Evening Night
Barrier Hei!~ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavv Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 55.3 64.1 62.3 56.3 64.9 65.5
Medium Trucks: 63.0 54.9 48.6 47.0 55.5 55.7
Heaw Trucks: 67.2 51.1 42.0 43.2 52.6 52.8
Vehicle Noise: 69.5 64.9 62.6 57.0 65.6 66.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLll~E NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
481 600 152
48 400
200
1i 0 GI II-
-200
-400
-600
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Adm1inistration q-77-1081
I
I
i Traffic Noise Predictibn Model (C ILVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway
Road Segment: Palomar Airport Road to Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: :t:~t~l;;1'. Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daillf Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1173.7.
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: -·_-'.-f-iil Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: " ' <.?,~~{{: • ,,,',,,,h...,.,,,1-it!:.,1:1;"'.• ,_.
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~:me conaiuons HARD ~• • c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Day Evenina Night
Barrier Hei!ght: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation) -
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 53.7 62.5 60.7 54.6 63.2 63.8
Medium Trucks: 61.9 53.9 47.5 45.9 54.4 54.6
Heavv Truc:ks: _66.5 50.3 41.2 42.5 52.0 . 52.1
Vehicle No,ise: 68.8 63.3 60.9 55.4 64.0 64.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
335 400 106
33 300
200
100 ... GI 0 GI IL
-160
-200
-300
-400
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i Federal Highway Administration 0
1
-77-108 II I
i Traffic Noise Predicti6n Model (C IJ.VENO) I
Project Narne: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway
Road Segment: Poinsettia Batiquitos
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: i:;;};~;;:1b~. Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1570.9
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ,, ~·:·:~)ii'
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: _;,, ,,~. '. ' ,~:~ii
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevatiion: 0.5 :=;1te conamons HARD ;,11 t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenina Night
Barrier Hei!~ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavv Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type PeakLeq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 53.4 62.2 60.4 54.3 62.9 63.5
Medium Trucks: 62.3 54.2 47.9 46.3 54.8 55.0
Heavv Trucks: 67.2 51.0 41.9 43.2 52.9 53.0
Vehicle No,ise: 69.5 63.2 60;7 55.3 63.9 -64.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier a1ttenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium TrL1cks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
330 400 104 300 33 200
100
i 0 II.
-100
, -200
-300
-400
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway :Adm nistration 0,-77-1081 I
Traffic Noise Prediction Model (C L.:VENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Paseo Del Norte
Road Segment: North of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: '~,_ ;,. ~: ~ '.lll ';c''
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: : ,: it~;7JO,
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1071
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: dttt:;'.!:: Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevatbn: 0.5 1~,ite conc11t1ons HARD SI I t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height {above grade): 0 Tyoe Dav Evening Nioht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Truc:ks: ' 8
U.NMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 50.0 58.8 57.0 51.0 59.6 60.2
Medium Trucks: 59.7 51.7 45.3 43.7 52.2 52.4
Heavy Trucks: 65.0 48.8 39.7 41.0 50.9 51.0
Vehicle Noise: 67.4 60.1 57.4 52.2 60.8 61.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noi:se:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
161 200 51
16 150
100
50 ... : 0 u.. -50
-100
-150
-200
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Administration 0~77-1081
I I Traffic Noise Predictidn Model (C WVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Paseo Del Norte
Road Segment: Palomar Airport Road Camino de Las Ondas
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ,:,.". · .. "''.Ill
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: :\.::/1:1 Ii~~
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1116.4
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ·~~t:;(; • 1!,;. ~ .)\~
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 · Centerline Separation: Jf;:~· '~~-
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~,ite conamons HARD ~,, c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night Daily
Barrier Hei9ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet} Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Truc:ks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier ,attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 52.0 60.8 59.0 52.9 61.5 62.2
Medium Triucks: 60.9 52.9 46.5 44.9 53.4 53.6
Heavy Truc:ks: 65.8 49.6 40.5 41.8 51.5 51.6
Vehicle Nc►ise: 68.1 61.8 59.3 53.9 62.5 -53;0
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier 21ttenuatlon)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
235
74 300 -..------------------~
23 200
100
1l 0 u.
-100
-200
-300 -'-----------------------.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway Admristration R t77-108
Traffic Noise Prediction Model (C LVENO) I I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz ,Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Paseo Del Norte
Road Segment: Camino de Las Ondas to Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: i·\?lt~1::~!s~r Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily· Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1116.4
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: . ,·H~l)
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,,c,i .,i~11i
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 1:::;1fe cona1f1ons HAKU .:>I I t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Hei~jht 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) He~vyTruck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heaw Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 52.0 60.8 59.0 52.9 61.5 62.2
Medium Truck~: 60.9 ~2.9 46.5 44.9 · 53.4 53.6
Heavv Trucks: ,. 65.8 · 49.6 · 40~5 .. ~· 41:8 51.~ 51:6
Vehicle Noise: 68.1 61.8 59.3 53.9 62.5 63.0
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
)lehi-'ft Tuftft Peak· L,eq · Leq Day ·. beq~venu;ag,. ~eq Night ·Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
235 300 74
23 200
100 .. a, 0 a, LL
-100
-200
-300
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
' '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Administration R I Traffic Noise Predictio,n Model (C
Project Narne: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
:Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst:
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Carlsbad Boulevard to Avenida Encinas
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline l)ist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Rt View: 90 Lft View:
N(>ISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Tnicks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Road Grade:
Auto
-90 Med. Truck
Heavy Truck
,Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
:\'i-::_,f''0
1/\1}!iooe,
1250.6
I"',
0.775 0.129
0.848 0.049
0.865 0.027
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 50.9 59.6 57.8 51.7 60.4 61.0
Medium Trucks: 60.6 54.3 48.0 46.4 54.9 55.1
Heavy Trucks: 65.8 54.4 45.3 46.5 56.5 56.6
Vehicle Noise: 68.3 62.0 58.6 54.1 62.7 63.1
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heaw Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
ig
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
232
73 300
23 200
100
i 0 u..
-100
-200
-300
0.096
0,103
0.108
ii
0.9
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway Admristration R ~77-108
Traffic Noise Prediction Model (C LNENO) I I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz ,Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Avenida Encinas to Paseo del Norte
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline IDist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ~~~t,1i' Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver B.arrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 4859.7
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ,-'\$~:
Barrier Nes1r Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,.
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~lie cono1t1orns lfARD ::,11 t:
Road Elevc1tion: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade}: 0 Tvpe Dav Evenina Niaht
Barrier Heit~ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Truc:ks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peakleq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.6 65.3 63.5 57.5 66.1 66.7
Medium Trucks: 66.3 60.0 53.7 52.1 60.6 60.8
Heavy Trucks: 71.5 60.1 51.0 52.3 62.2 62.3
Vehicle Noise: 74.0 67.7 64.3 59.8 68.4 68.8
.
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
902 1000 285
90 500
.. a, 0 a, LL
-500
-1000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
B
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway Admjnistration 0~77-108 I I
' Traffic Noise Prediction Model (C µVENO) I I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Paseo del Norte to Armada
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: '' .)\\'O"
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: :,-,.Jif$i1:1
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 5251.1
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: '·< ' 4j
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ~~:;·, -, ,1,.:
:!li",,i,;l.~,,.~ _.;;.. ;,;.i ·:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevatiion: 0.5 1.::,110 conamons HARD :.11 t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Hei1~ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Truc:ks: 8
U_NMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 60.0 68.7 66.9 60.8 69.5 70.1
Medium Trucks: 68.3 62.0 55.6 54.0 62.5 62.8
Heavy Truc:ks: 72.8 61.3 52.3 53.5 63.0 63.2
Vehicle No,ise: 75.1 70.3 67.4 62.5 71.0 71.5
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trncks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadiivay Centerline Noise Contour
1726 2000 546
173 1500
1000
500 .... GI 0 GI IL.
-500
-1000
-1500
-2000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I
I I
I Federal Highway Administration RD!.77-108
I Traffic Noise Predictitjn Model (C I LVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz ,Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Armada to Hidden Valley
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline IDist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: .~~:1fi:4iiJ: Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 4760.4
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: j'TN~,~-,F~-55: lL'i! ; ~.,, ~ ;\'Z!.a•\7'••,., •
Barrier Nea1r Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: .~ ' ' -.~M ,,,,,~:i.1 ,_ .,
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~Ite conamon:s HARD 511 t:
Ro?td Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Hleight (above grade): 0 Type IDav Evening Niaht Daily
Barrier Hei!1ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NiOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening . Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 62.1 70.8 69.0 62.9 71.6 72.2
Medium Trucks: 69.2 62.9 56.5 55.0 63.5 63.7
Heavy Trucks: 73.2 61.7 52.7 53.9 63.1 63.3
Vehicle Noise: 75.5 72.0 69.4 64.1 72.7 73.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noi:se:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2548
806 3000
255 2000
1000
-; 0 GI u.
-1000
-2000
-3000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway AdmiJnistration R f77-108
! I I I Traffic Noise Prediction Model (C LVENO) I ' Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz ,Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Hidden Valley to College
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: Ht ,,:s.,w•-0
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ,. 4~~ij
Receiver B,:irrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 4665.8
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ·,ti• .,,,_,r,-
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ., "",·:_:;-~
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~Ile cona1l1ons HAKU ::,11 C
Road Eleva1tion: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier HeifJht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: .90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0 '
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 62.0 70.7 68.9 62.8 71.5 72.1
Medium Trucks: 69.1 62.8 56.5 54.9 63.4 63.6
Heavy Trucks: 73.1 61.6 52.6 53.8 63.0 63.2
Vehicle Noise: 75.4 71.9 69.3 64.0 72.6 73.1
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks: "'--
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2501 3000 791
250 2000
1000 .. Cl) 0 Cl) u.
-1000
-2000
-3000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
:j
:1 :i
:1 ,1 !I ,1
\i ,;
!i
'i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
[ Federal Highway Admiristration R ~77-108 I I
1 Traffic Noise Predictior Model (C LVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: College to Camino Vida Roble
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far llane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
Road Grade:
Scenario:
.lob#:
Average Daily Traffic:
Peak Hour Traffic:
Vehicle Speed:
Centerline Separation:
Da
Existing Plus Project
25-101951
SITE DATA
3837.7
Barrier Hei~Iht:
0
0 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View:
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Hea Truclks:
0
2.3
8
-90 Med. Truck 0.848
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier a1ttenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 61.1 69.9 68.1 62.0 70.6
Medium Trucks: 68.3 62.0 55.6 54.0 62.5
Heaw Truclks: 72.2 60.8 51.7 52.9 62.2
Vehicle Noiise: 74.5 71.0 68.4 63.2 71.8
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucl<s:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.049 0.103 0.0279
0.027 0.108 0.0083
CNEL
71.2
62.8
62.3
72.3
CNEL
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2057
650 3000
206 2000
1000
al 0 GI LL.
-1000
-2000
-3000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
Federal Highway Admijnistration R ~77-108
Traffic Noise Prediction Model (C LNENO) I I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan :Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz ,Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Camino Vida Roble to El Camino Real
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: . ,i/,-0
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm}: 0 Average Daily Traffic: 3~~.1
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3409.1
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: <:;\$5
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: .... :j1ti::A•i.
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 1slie cono1i1ons HARD SI It:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade}: 0 Tvoe Day Evenina Night
Barrier Hei~iht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 ' 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UINMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 60.6 69.3 67.6 61.5 70.1 70.7
Medium Trucks: 67.7 61.5 55.1 53.5 62.0 62.2
Heavy Trucks: 71.7 60.3 51.2 52.4 61.7 61.8
Vehicle-Noise: 74.0 70.5 67.9 62.1 71.3 71.8
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS {With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Laq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLll~E NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1825 2500 577 2000 182 1500
1000
-; 500
Cl) 0 II. -500
-1000
-1500
-2000
-2500
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
!' l' \ I
I ! l ' f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.:I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway Admi
1
nistration R t77-108
Traffic Noise Predictio,n Model (C L:'J'ENO) I I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz .Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: El Camino Real to El Fuerte
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade:
·,s-. .:~~~~;, Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 /1.verage Daily Traffic:
Receiver B,mier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 5119.6
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ~;ff·} Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~rte cona1t1ons HARD ~• • c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Niaht
Barrier HeifJht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
Nt::>ISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UINMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier crttenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 62.4 71.1 69.3 63.2 71.9 72.5
Medium Trucks: 69.5 63.2 56.9 55.3 63.8 64.0
Heavy Trucks: 73.5 62.0 53.0 54.2 63.4 63.6
Vehicle Noise: 75.8 72.3 69.7 64.4 73.0 73.5
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trt1cks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Nciise:
CENTERLll~E NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2743 4000 867
274 3000
2000
1000
1i 0 GI II..
-1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
I
I
I
I
D
0
I
0
g
'
I
'
I I
Federal Highway Administration R t77-108
I Traffic Noise Predicti In Model (C 1.cVENO) '
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz ,Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: El Fuerte to Melrose
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: J'..:)j1,f~ Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 5436.1
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: .• -·.-.~'
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Se1Paration: :~·~;~fl::
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conamorn; HARD s11 t:
Road Eleva1tion: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height {above grade): 0 Tvoe Dav Evenino Nioht
Barrier Heit1ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: .go Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heaw Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic: or barrier ;;attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 62.6 71.4 69.6 63.5 72.2 72.8
Medium Trucks: 69.8 63.5 57.1 55.6 64.0 64.3
Heaw Trucks: 73.7 62.3 53.2 54.5 63.7 63.8
Vehicle Noise: 76.0 72;6 69.9 64.7 73.3 73.8
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier a1ttenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLlfl.lE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2912
921 4000
291 3000
2000
1000 ..
$ 0 LL.
-1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
ff
I
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/ Federal Highway Admihistration R -:77-108 I /
1 Traffic Noise Predictio Model (C LVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: North of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline [)ist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far llane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Hei9ht:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Existing Plus Project
,lob#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: · 0
Average Daily Traffic: >,,;~$Joo
Peak Hour Traffic: 3330
Vehicle Speed: .· ~$.
Centerline Separation: ,,,: .. : ... ';_.,,~
NOISE INPUTS
Site conditions HARD SIi E
FLEET MIX
Tvoe Dav Evenina Niaht Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
N()ISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)·
Autos:
Medium TrL1cks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 54.9 63.6 61.8 55.7 64.4
Medium Trucks: 64.6 58.3 51.9 50.4 58.8
Heavy Trucl<s: 69.8 58.4 49.3 50.5 60.4
Vehicle Noiise: 72.2 66.0 62.5 58.1 66.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucl<s:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.027 0.108 0.0083
CNEL
65.0
59.1
60.6
67.1
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
618
196 800
62 600
400
200
'i 0 I» ~
-200
-400
-600
-800
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Administration RID~77-108 I I
Traffic Noise Prediction Model (C L!VENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Roadway:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
El Camino Real
Scenario: Existing Plus Project
,Job#: 25-101951
Road Segment: Palomar Airport Road to Camino Vida Roble
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline !Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation: ·
Road Elevc:1tion:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Heii~ht:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Rt View: 90 Lft View:
SITE DATA
Road Grade: ~}:,;; . ' :'Ji
Average Daily· Traffic: :;;J;1t$?4~1
Peak Hour Tr:affic: 3245.1
Vehicle Speed: :;,$
Centerline Separation: .'.=-: . > -~~i
NOISE INPUTS
.:ine conaItIons HARD .:,11 c
FLEET MIX
Type Day Evening Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 54.7 63.5 61.7 55.6 64.3
Medium Trucks: 64.5 58.2 51.8 50.2 58.7
Heavy Trucks: 69.7 58.2 49.2 50.4 60.3
Vehicle Noise: 72.1 65.8 62.4-58.0 66.5
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv True.ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
CNEL
64.9
59.0
60.4
67.0
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
603 800 191
60 600
400
200 -QI 0 QI LI.
-200
-400
-600
-800
i· ! I
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: Camino Vida Roble to Cassia
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=w•all, 1 = berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevatic1n:
Road Elevation:
Observer Hi~ight (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
• • • I -t7-108 I I ... VENO)
Scenario:
Job#:
Existing Plus Project
25-101951
SITE DATA
NOISE INPUTS
1te cond1t1ons
T e Day Evenin Night Dail
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NC)ISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Hea Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuaticm)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 54.6 63.3 61.5 55.4 64.1 64.7
Medium Trucks: 64.3 58.0 51.6 50.1 58.6 58.8
Heavy Trucks: 69.5 58.1 49.0 50.2 60.1 60.3
Vehicle Noise: 71.9 65.7 62.2 57.8 66.3 66.8
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
578 800 183
58 600
400
200 • D QI u.
-200
-400
-600
-800
i
i :
l· !.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
~I
I
I
I
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway:
Road Segment:
El Camino Real
Cassia to La Costa
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm):
Receiver B,mier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Hi3ight (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
• • • I ... -77-108 I I
VENO)
Scenario:
Jlob#:
Existing Plus Project
25-101951
SITE DATA
:~=r~i;~;IY Traffic: (~i:i1~)1;;2i~
Peak Hour Tra1ffic: 4632
Vehicle Speed: .... 55
Centerline Separation: • . ;,~~
NOISE INPUTS
Type Da Evening Ni ht Daily
Auto 0. 775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
)ISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Hea Trucl(s:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic: or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 61.9 70.7 68.9 62.8 71.5 72.1
Medium Trucks: 69.1 62.8 56.4 54.9 63.3 63.6
Heaw Trucks: 73.0 61.6 52.5 53.8 63.0 63.1
Vehicle Noise: 75.3 71.9 69.2 64.0 72.6 73.1
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucl,s:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2484 3000 786
248 2000
1000
ai 0 (II u.
-1000
-2000
-3000
' i
I· I i !
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Admiristration R -!7-108
I I I Traffic Noise Predictio Model (C LVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Jlob#: 25-101951
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: La Costa to Leucadia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ,,·,,. '(il
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ~~Ri4
Receiver B,mier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Tre,ffic: 3608.4
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ~.{~f :~ -, :~17,5,
Barrier Nea1r Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ~f4;~,
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 :::;ne conamons HARIJ .:,11 r:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer H19ight (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Nioht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trncks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UIIIMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 60.9 69.6 67.8 61.7 70.4 71.0
Medium Trucks: 68.0 61.7 55.3 53.8 62.3 62.5
Heavy Trucl<s: 71.9 60.5 51.5 52.7 61.9 62.1
Vehicle Noise: 74.3 70.8 68.2 -62.9 71.5 .12.0
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier at:tenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1933 2500 611 2000
193 1500
1000
al 500
GI 0 LL -500
-1000
-1500
-2000
-2500
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I.
i ' J
l I
I I l
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1·
I I
I I
I Federal Highway Administration RDl77-108
I Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (C LJVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz ,Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: Carlsbad to Avenida Encinas
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ':::,{;,;;~;;: Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1591.4
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ,~itii~:: Barrier Ne;a1r Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ·::,ne conamons HARD :::,11 t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenina Niaht
Barrier Heii~ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Truc:ks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 51.9 60.7 58.9 52.9 61.5 62.1
Medium Trncks: 61.7 53.6 47.2 45.6 54.1 54.3
Heavy Trucks: 66.9 50.7 41.7 42.9 52.8 52.9
Vehicle Noise: 69.3 62.0 59.3 54.1 62.7 63.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLll"11E NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
239
75 300
24 200
100
'i 0 CD IL
-100
-200
-300
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
:, \'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway Admihistration R 177-108 I I
Traffic Noise Predictio~ Model (C L~ENO) I I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz ,Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: Avenida Encinas 1-5
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: . ··'.z~i;;,' Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2462.2
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ' •:,:f~f
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,t,7~.' ,.:. :,~j:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 S.1ie conclit1ons HARD Sin:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Dav Evenina Niaht Daily
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavv Truc!ks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier a1ttenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 53.7 62.5 60.7 54.7 63.3 63.9
Medium Tn.1cks: 63.4 55.4 49.0 47.4 55.9 56.1
Heavy Trucl{s: 68.7 52.5 43.5 44.7 54.6 54.7
Vehicle Nolise: 71.1 63.8 61.1 55.9 64.5 65,0
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier al1enuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Laq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv T rucl<s:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
370
117 500 -.--------------------
37 400 +----::=-----------------i
300
200
100
: 0
u.. -100 .,.
-200
-300
-400 +=~---===============::=:i -500 ...____ _________________ ___J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway Administration R! t77-108 I I
Traffic Noise Predictid,n Model (C l.NENO) I
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: 1-5 to Paseo del Norte
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=i.ivall, 1= berm):
Receiver B,arrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Hei~Jht:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
:Scenario: Existing Plus Project
,Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Da
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Hea Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier 21ttenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 53.4 62.2 60.5 54.4 63.0
Medium TrL1cks: 63.2 55.1 48.7 47.1 55.6
Heavv Trucks: 68.4 52.2 43.2 44.4 54.3
Vehicle Noiise: 70.8 63.5 60.8 55.6 64.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier a1ttenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucl<s:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.027 0.108 0.0028
CNEL
63.6
55.9
54.4
64.7
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
346 400 109
35 300
200
100 ... GI 0 GI u.
-100
-200
-300
-400
'I ll
H ii )I
,1
.)
d .,
i (j ,,
" "
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·I
I
I
I
, I Federal Highway Administration R
I Traffic Noise Predictio1n Model (C
I I :
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
• Scenario:
.Job#:
Existing Plus Project
25-101951
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: Paseo del Norte to Batiquitos
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm):
. Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Hei~iht:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
SITE DATA
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
Peak Hour Tn:iffic:
Vehicle Speed:
Centerline Separation:
0.775 0.129
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049
N1DISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
utos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 54.7 63.5 61.7 55.6 64.2 64.8
Medium Trucks: 64.4 56.3 49.9 48.4 56.8 57.1
Heavy Trucks: 69.6 53.4 44.4 45.6 55.5 55.6
Vehicle Noise: 72.0 64.7 62.1 56.8 65.4 65.9
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLllr-.lE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigatecl
467
148
47
Leq Evening
400
200
i 0 u..
-200
-400
Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
Dail
0.096 0.9
0.103 . 1
0.108 0.0028
-600 _.__ _________________ __J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Administration RDLl77-108 I I
, Traffic Noise Predictitjn Model (C LjVENO)
Project Narne:
Analyst:
Roadway:
Road Segment:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Poinsettia Lane
Batiquitos to Aviara
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100
Barrier Ne.;1r Lane CL Dist: 0
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0
Pad Elevation: 0.5
Road Elevation: 0
Observer Height (above grade): 0
Barrier Hei9ht: 0
Scenario: Existing Plus Project
.Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
Peak Hour Traffic:
Vehicle Speed:
Centerline Separation:
NOISE INPUTS
::;ne conditions HARD SI I t:
FLEET MIX
Type. Day Evening Nioht Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.7 65.5 63.7 57.6 66.3 66.9
Medium Trucks: 65.0 56.9 50.5 48.9 57.4 57.7
Heavy Trucks: 69.5 53.3 44.3 . 45.5 55.0 55.2
Vehicle Noise: 71.8 66.3 64.0 58.5 67.1 67.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
687 800 217
69 600
400
200 .... GI 0 GI u..
-200
-400
-600
-800
t ! +-·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway Administration RDt77-108 I I
Traffic Noise Predictici,n Model (C ~VENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway:
Road Segment:
La Costa Avenue
Carlsbad to Vulcan
PROJECT DATA
Centerline IDist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline ID ist. To Observer:
Barrier Nea1r Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Existing Plus Project
,Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
NOISE INPUTS
Site conamon:s HARD SITE
FLEET MIX
Type Dav Evenino Nioht Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 52.1 60.9 59.1 53.0 61.7
Medium Trucks: 61.8 53.8 47.4 45.8 54.3
Heavy Trucks: 67.0 50.9 41.8 43.1 53.0
Vehicle Noise: 69.5 62.2 59.5 54.3 62.9
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day LeqEvening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.027 0.108 0.0028
CNEL
62.3
54.5
53.1
63.4
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
243
77 300
24 200
100 .. GI 0 GI IL
-100
-200
-300
f I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
Federal Highway Administration RD~77-108
I Traffic Noise Predictidn Model (C l.)VENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz ,Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: La Costa Avenue .
Road Segment: Vulcan to 1-5
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade:
I1f t;;1ill. Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Tr:affic: 1998.4
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ·•. :3s, tl:<: Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: . ·,,;g~,
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site cond1t1ons HARD ~• • t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Heii~ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
IAutos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier ;1ttenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 53.0 61.8 60.0 54.0 62.6 63.2
Medium Trucks: 62.7 54.7 48.3 46.7 55.2 55.4
Heavy Truc:ks: 68.0 51.8 42.7 44.0 53.9 54.0
Vehicle N0,ise: 70.4 63.1 60.4 55.2 63.8 64.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium TnJcks:
Heaw Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
300 400 95
30 300
200
100
q; 0 GI IL
-100
-200
-300
-400
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Admiristration R
1 Traffic Noise Predictiori Model (C
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway:
Road Segment:
La Costa Avenue
1-5 to Piraeus
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade}:
Barrier Heiuht:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario:
.Job#:
Existing Plus Project
25-101951
T
~~=!~;~;~Y Traffic: : '~;~~-~~;
Peak Hour Traffic: 3513.4
Vehicle Speed: .•,-, · .. _ ~~-
Centerline Separation: ·'::-'. ... o.l~:
NO
Da Even in Night Dail
0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Hea Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 55.3 64.1 62.3 56.2 64.9 65.5
Medium TnJcks: 65.0 56.9 50.5 49.0 57.5 57.7
Heavy Truc:ks: 70.2 54.1 45.0 46.2 56.1 56.2
Vehicle No,ise: 72.6 65.3 62.7 57.4 66.0 66.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
• Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
527
167 600
53 400
200
ai 0 Cl) II.
-200
-400
-600
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project Narne:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: La Costa Avenue
Road Segment: Piraeus to El Camino Real
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Eleva1tion:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Hei{~ht:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
... }77-108 I I L,VENO)
:Scenario: Existing Plus Project
,Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
Peak Hour Traffic:
Vehicle Speed:
Centerline Separation:
0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Hea Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 60.7 69.5 67.8 61.7 70.3 70.9
Medium Trucks: 67.9 59.8 53.4 51.8 60.3 60.6
Heaw Trucks: 71.8 55.7 46.6 47.8 57.1 57.2
Vehicle Noise: 74.1 70.2 68.0 62.3 70.9 71.5
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerllne Noise Contour
1672
529 2000
167 1500
1000
500
ti 0 GI II.
-500
-1000
-1500
-2000
(,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway 'Administration o:-77-1081
I I Traffic Noise Predicti n Model (C ~VENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Existing Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: La Costa Avenue
Road Segment: East of El Camino Real
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: w:~){~~i!i;; Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1031.8
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ;~1~,rt: Barrier Ne1:1r Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevatiion: 0.5 !Site conamons HARD :SI 11:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenino Night
Barrier Hei1~ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium TriJcks: 2.3
Heavy Truc:ks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier ,:1ttenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 53.1 61.9 60.1 54.0 62.7 63.3
Medium Trucks: 61.4 53.3 46.9 45.4 53.8 54.1
Heavy Truc:ks: 65.9 49.7 40.7 41.9 51.4 51.6
Vehicle Nc,ise: 68.2 62.8 60.4 54,9 63.5 64.0
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
294
93 400
29 300
200
100
ai 0 GI IL
-100
-200
-300
-400
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Adm\nistration RD~77-108
I I I Traffic Noise Predicti n Model (C ~VENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan · Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz ,Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Palomar Airport Road to Island Way
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: 1~~}},• ; ''"If .::;;;,~'
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: , 2000;·,
< •' ,·
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2060
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ' ---~ A111::· Barrier Nec:1r Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~ne conamons HARD 511 t:.
Road Eleva1tion: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Hei9ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Truc:ks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 57.1 65.9 64.1 58.0 66.7 67.3
Medium Trucks: 64.8 58.6 52.2 50.6 59.1 59.3
. Heavy Trucks: 69.0 57.6 48.6 49.8 59.2 59.3
· Vehicle Noise: 71.4 · 67.3 64.5 59.4 68.0 68.5
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trncks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
873 1000 276
87 500
.... 411 0 411 u.
-500
-1000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
: ;
tt q
~ il ii ii i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway AdmiJnistration R ~77-108
Traffic Noise Prediction Model (C '-!VENO) I I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz ,Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Island Way to Breakwater
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ··~::?·.o
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ,}{~i:~~Q;
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2060
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: it~r _: .. _:;; · ,,
:
Barrier Necir Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevatiion: 0.5 Site conaltlons HARD .>11 t:
Road Elevation: ' 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Dav Evening Night
Barrier Hei!~ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq 'Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 57.2 66.0 64.2 58.1 66.7 67.4
Medium Trncks: 64.9 58,6 52.3 50.7 59.2 59.4
Heavy Truc:ks: 69.1 57.7 48.6 49.9 59.3 59.4
Vehicle Nc1ise: 71.4 67.3 64.6 59.5 68.1 68.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier a1ttenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
R~adway Centerline Noise Contour
871 1000 276
87 500
'i 0 G) u..
-500
-1000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i Federal Highway Admiristration R ~77-108
I I
I I Traffic Noise Prediction Model (C L;I/ENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz .Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Breakwater to Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: -.\j~~roi: Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Ho,ur Traffic: 2110
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: _;;{]f Jfi Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 I~Ite conamons HARD SITE
Road Elevartion: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe !Day Evenina Niaht
Barrier Hei9ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Truc:ks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 57.3 66.1 64.3 58.2 66.8 67.5
Medium Trucks: 65.0 58.8 52.4 50.8 59.3 59.5
Heavy Truc:ks: 69.2 57.8 48.7 50.0 59.4 59.5
Vehicle No,ise: 71.6 67.4 64.7 59.6 68.2 68.7
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium T-rucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
894
283 1000
89 500
'S 0 GI u..
-500
-1000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,,,
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Administration R r77-108
I I I Traffic Noise Predictidn Model (C LJVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz .Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Poinsettia to Avenida Encinas
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier· 0 Road Grade: , . 0
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: . ··-'.,207.61.@
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2070
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: :'.~iiL~ {;,I Barrier Nec1r Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~neconamonsHARDSII~
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night Daily
Barrier Hei!ght: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UINMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier ,attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 57.3 66.0 64.2 58.1 66.8 67.4
Medium Trucks: 64.9 58.7 52.3 50.7 59.2 59.4
Heaw Trucks: 69.2 57.7 48.7 49.9 59.3 59.4
Vehlcle Nc>ise: 71.5 67.4 64.6 59.5 _ 68.1 68.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier ~tttenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
875 1000 277
88 500
-; 0 G> II,.
-500
-1000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway Admihistration R ~77-108
Traffic Noise Predictio~ Model (C LYENO) I I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz .Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard '
Road Segment: Avenida Encinas to La Costa
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: (/,.· i::~;\0-
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ·_[!ie:·,21iw ·:i,-r} '' ;,•,., ~.
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour_ Traffic: 2750
Centerline Dist. To Observer: -100 Vehicle Speecl: Jt: _;,
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ~ .... . . ....;,.,~ ....... ,
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 l;::\118 conamom; HARD ~• • 1:
Road Elevaition: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenina Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Truc:ks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 58.5 67.2 65.4 -59.4 68.0 68.6
Medium Trucks: . 66.2 59.9 53.5 51.9 60.4 60.7
Heavy Truc:ks: 70.4 58.9 49.9 51.1 60.5 60.6
Vehicle N<l,ise: 72.7 68.6 65.8 60.7 69.3 69.8
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1165
368 1500
116 1000
500 ... a, 0 a,
LL.
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
:1 -1 ·i :,
ii ,i
'I ll
11 i! :r
i-1
:1
/1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Admi1nistration R f77-108
I I I I Traffic Noise Predictid,n Model (C LVENO)
Project Name: . Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz ,Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: La Costa to Leucadia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: "·•·.·:~:i~og; Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2550
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: . 5()j;
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ·,,:_;, . :ii
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conamons HARD ~• • t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenina Night
Barrier Hei!~ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Truc:ks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 58.4 67.2 65.4 59.3 68.0 68.6
Medium Trucks: 66.1 59.9 53.5 51.9 60.4 60.6
Heavy Truc:ks: 70.3 58.9 49.8 51.1 60.5 60.6
Vehicle Nc•lse: 72.7 68.6 65.8 60.7 69.3 69.8.
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier e1ttenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerllne Noise Contour
1079 1500 341
108 1000
500
.... GI 0 GI IL
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway Admiristration R ~77-108
I
I
I Traffic Noise Prediction Model (C LYENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz ,lob#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: South of Leucadia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ,·_:,,·-,-.:··u
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ~ldoo
Receiver Bimier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2280
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: _}{tt};~]I Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ;::me conamons HARD ::,111:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenina Night
Barrier Heiflht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NIDISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS {Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn I CNEL
Autos: 58.0 66.7 64.9 58.8 67.5 68.1
Medium Trucks: 65.6 59.4 53.0 51.4 59.9 60.1
Heavy Trucks: 69.9 58.4 49.4 50.6 60.0 60.1
Vehicle Noise: 72.2 68.1 65.3 60.2 -5s,s 69.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerllne Noise Contour
966
305 1500
97 1000
500
-; 0 Ill II-
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
! Federal Highway Administration RDr77-108 I I I Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (C L./VENO) 1
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: Cannon Road to Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ; ''\j< •:~;
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: .·. {,; · · 1201\ ' ... ' J .. ,.,,,
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1520
Centerline Dist. To Observer:. 100 Vehicle Speed:
;~s-: -:,s;J:, Barrier Nec:1r Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ;:s11e conditions HARD ~• • t:.
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenina Nii:iht
Barrier Heii~ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3 I Heavy Trucks: 8 '
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 53.3 62.1 60.3 54.2 62.9 63.5
Medium Trncks: 62.3 54.2 47.8 46.2 54.7 55.0
Heavv Trucks: 67.1 50.9 41.9 43.1 52.8 53.0
Vehicle Noise: 69.5 63.1 60.6 55.3 63.9 64.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
320
101 400
32 300
200
100
ai 0 GI LL.
-100
-200
-300
-400
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
:[
;i
!\ :i ,i
:I ii " ',!
ii i!
i
I
I
I ii ii ll ti 'I
II
ri ii
II
l' ,1 fl
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.,I
I
I
I
· I Federal Highway Admihistration R
j Traffic Noise Predictio~ Model (C
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Scenario: Interim
Analyst: .Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: South of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Hei~1ht:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
Peak Hour Traffic:
Vehicle Speed:
Centerline Separation:
NO
0.775
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848
N!JISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy True.ks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 52.4 61.2 59.4 53.3 61.9
Medium Trucks: 61.3 53.2 46.9 45.3 53.8
Heavy Trucks: 66.2 50.0 40.9 42.2 51.9
Vehicle Noise: 68.5 62.2 59.7 54.3 62.9
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening LeqNight Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noi:se:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
CNEL
62.5
54.0
52.0
63.4
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
257
81 300
26 200
100 .. G 0 GI LL
-100
-200
-300
0.096 0.9789
0. 0.0184
0.108 0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Administration o;-77-108 / I
I
I Traffic Noise Predicticin Model (C ll.VENO) , I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: North of Poinsettia -, ~ .
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: .ii~(~",l Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 920
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: !j~t . '~e Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: . \~]~i
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~ne conamons HARD SI 11:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day EveninQ NiQht
Barrier Hei9ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 · 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 · 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Truc:ks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier ,attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 47.6 56.4 54.6 48.6 57.2 57.8
Medium Trucks: 58.2 50.2 43.8 42.2 50.7 50.9 ·
Heavy T ruc;ks: 63.9 47.7 38.7 39.9 50.0 50.1
Vehicle Nc,ise: 66.4 58.0 55.1 50.1 58.7 59.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier c11ttenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
95 150 30
9 100
50 ... G) 0 G) LL
-50
-100
-150
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Administration RDf7-108 ' I I I I
/ Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (C ~VENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfro11t Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: South of Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA
Centerline IDist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Nea1r Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Interim
,Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
:~:!:;~;~y Traffic: · ;\::: ;t,6,jr~
Peak Hour Traffic: 1630
Vehicle Speed: · ~< ;,'35,
Centerline Separation: '--._tfiJt\~t;
NOISE INPUTS
Site conditions HARD :SI I t:
FLEET MIX
Tvoe Day Evenina Niaht Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier ;:1ttenuation}
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 51.8 60.6 58.9 52.8 61.4 62.0
Medium Trucks: 61.6 53.5 47.1 45.5 54.0 54.3
Heavy Trucks: 66.8 50.6 41.6 42.8 52.7 52.8
Vehicle No1ise: 69.2 61.9 59.2 54.0 62.6 63.1
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerllne Noise Contour
244
77 300
24 200
100 ... Cl) 0 QI u.
-100
-200
-300
i,
ii 'i
,I
< i
11 n ;:
11 ),I
li
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project Narne:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: East of Ponto
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Nec1r Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Hei!~ht:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
. . ... t77-108 I I L.VENO)
Scenario: Interim
,Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: ; ;... -,;: 0
Average Daily Traffic: 6;Jeo
Peak Hour Traffic: 610
Vehicle Speed: -i· 3~
Centerline Separation: :..;. . -_ \,:; -~
NOISE INPUTS
Da
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
OISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Hea Truc:ks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier ,:tttenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 47.8 56.6 54.8 48.7 57.3 58.0
Medium Trucks: 57.5 49.4 43.0 41.5 50.0 50.2
Heavy-Truc:ks: 62.7 46.5 37.5 38.7 48.6 48.7
Vehicle Nc•ise: 65.1 57.8 55.2 49.9 58.5 59.0
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier aittenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
91 150 29
9 100
50 .... CD 0 CD u.
-50
· -100
-150
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I federal Highway Administration o
1
Ln-108 I I
1 Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (C L.!VENO)
Project Name:
!Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway:
Road Segment:
College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway
North of Palomar Airport Road,. . ,· __ _ _
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevatiion:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Hei9ht:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Interim
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: :;_ · : '.> .. ~i
Average Daily Traffic: Jf;. ~11.00,l'
Peak Hour Traffic: 280
Vehicle Speed: (.ill >·\5Qi
Centerline Separation: <f¾I jf;~~
NOISE INPUTS
~ne concmIons HARD :;11 t:
FLEET MIX
Type Day Evening Niqht Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Tri~cks:
Heaw Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier ,attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 48.7 57.5 55.8 49.7 58.3 58.9
Medium Trucks: 56.4 48.4 42.0 40.4 48.9 49.1
Heavy Trucks: 60.6 44.5 35.4 36.7 46.0 46.2
Vehicle Noise: 63.0 58.3 56.0 50.4 59.0 59.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peakleq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
106
33 150
11 100
50
i 0 u.
-50
-100
-150
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Adm1inistration D-77-1081
I I
I Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (C lvENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway
Road Segment: Palomar Airport Road to Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: l~1:~~,i~; Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm}: 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1270
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: .. '',,,,~,
Barrier Ne::1r Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: :;\_ "'i'6 -;~~1 ·,...-:J:~1/,, ,
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conamons HARD ::,11 c:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NIOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type, Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 54.0 62.8 61.0 54.9 63.6 64.2
Medium Trucks: 62.3 54.2 47.8 46.3! 54.7 55.0
Heavy TruGks: 66.8 50.6 -41.6 42.8ii 52.3 52.5
Vehlcle N<>ise: 69.1 63.7 -61.3 55.8 64.4 64.9
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier ,1ttenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day LeqEvenlng Leq Night 0 Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerllne Noise Contour
363
115 400
36 300
200
100 -; 0 GI u.
-100
-200
-300
-400
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
i1 !!
1: ,, r, jl
I/!
!
ti ;·
!I ii ~I cl
I
-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' Federal Highway Admi7istration RD-77-108
I I !
I Traffic Noise Predictio Model (CA VENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway
Road Segment: Poinsettia Batiquitos
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ' ' 'O
Barrier (0=vvall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: 1~;100,
Receiver Ba1rrier Dist: 0 P13ak Hour Traiffic: 1910
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 V13hicle Speed: -Am dii~t Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: '
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~•te cona1t1ons~ARD ~11 E
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenina Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NC>ISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic: or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 54.2 63.0 61.2 55.1 63.8 64.4
Medium Trucks: 63.2 55.1 48.7 47.1 55.6 55.9
Heavy Trucks: 68.0 51.8 42.8 44.0 53.7 53.8
Vehicle Noiise: 70.4 64.0. 61.5 -56.1 64.8 65.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
402
127 500
400
40 300
200
-; 100
Ill 0 u.. -100
-200
-300
-400
-500
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I '
I I
I Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 I I I
I Traffic Noise Predicti n Model (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz ,Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Paseo Del Norte
Road Segment: North of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Hoad Grade: ~I;fi~af Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2010
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ·n.:35
Barrier Nea1r Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: }if: .. ; :J:42· . ,, ... , .... , '~·~
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~ilte conc11tIon:s HAKU ~• • c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Hei!Jht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS {Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Truc:ks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographi1c or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 52.8 61.6 59.8 53.7 62.3 62.9
Medium Trucks: 62.5 54.4 48.0 46.4 54.9 55.2
Heavy Truc:ks: 67.7 51.5 42.5 43.7 53.6 53.7
Vehicle Nc,ise: 70.1 62.8 60.2 54.9 63.5 64.0
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic: or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
301
95
30
400
300
200
100
1, 0 Q> II.
-100
-200
-300
-400
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I Federal Highway ~dmipistration RD-77-108
I I I ' Traffic Noise Predictior Model (C~LVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim I I
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Paseo Del Norte
Road Segment: Palomar Airport Road Camino de Las Ondas ' '
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA I
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ·:o '. ':•,:;-I
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: \' · : 2ov!,fflo
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2060
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: : ::40
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: .... ;Ji,. .:t36 ! ,,,.......,_:;,..,.
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS!
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conait1ons HAKU ~• • t: I
Road Eleva1tion: 0 FLEET MIX I
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day EveninQ 1".•liQht · Daily
Barrier Hei~,ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 I 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 I 0.103 0.0184
N10ISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 I 0.108 0.0028
Autos: 0 I
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Truc,ks: 8 i
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 54.6 63.4 61.6 55.6 64.2 64.8
Medium Trucks: 63.6 55.5 49.1 47.6 56.0 56.3
Heavy Trucks: 68.4 52.3 43.2 44.4 54.1 54.3
Vehicle No,ise: 70~8 64.4 62.0 56;6 65.2. 65.7
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium TnJcks.
Heav Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR I
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
433 600 137
43 400
200
-; 0 Cl> LL.
-200
-400
-600
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
: ! Federal Highway :Admlnist~ation ~D-77-108 I I ~ I Tratfic Noise Predicti~n Model (C~LVENO) I
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Paseo Del Norte
Road Segment: Camino de Las Ondas to Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Interim
Job#: 25-101951 ,
SITE DATA
Road Grade:
Average Dai~, Traffic:
Peak Hour Traffic:
Vehicle Speed:
Centerline Separation:
NOISE INPUT~
o.775 0.129 I 0.096 o.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck o.848 0.049 I 0.103 o.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 ! 0.108 0.0028
UINMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 54.6 · 63.4 61.6 55.6 64.2 64.8
Medium Trucks: 63.6 55.5 49.1 47.6 56.0 56.3
Hea Trucks: 68.4 52.3 43.2 44.4 54.1 54.3
Vehicle Nc>ise: 70.8 64.4· 62.0 56.6 65.2 65.7
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Hea Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR
Leq Day Leq Evening
433
137 600
43 400
200 ... CD 0 Ill IL
-200
-400
-600
Leq Night Ldn CNEL
I
I Roadway Centerline Noise Contour I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,.I
I
I
I
I I I Federal Highway Admilnistration RD-77-108
I I I I I I I I I I Traffic Noise Predictio.n Model (CAL VENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Carlsbad Boulevard to Avenida Encinas
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline !Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ~}~t, _,,,,._ @i . : ,,;:,-,.,.,..___ l ~
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ~"tifiQ~
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1600
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: · it:I~~~i:, : Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS,
Pad Elevatiion: 0.5 Site conditions HARD ::;11 t:.
Road Elev~1tion: 0 FLEET MIX I
I
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Eveninq ~lioht Daily
Barrier HeiiJht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 : 0.103 0.0279 :
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
Autos: 0
Medium Triucks: 2.3
Heavy Truc:ks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 52.0 60.7 58.9 52.8 61.5 62.1
Medium Trucks: 61.7 55.4 49.0 47.5 55.9 56.2
Heavy T ruc:ks: 66.9 55.5 46.4 47.6 57.5 57.6
Vehicle Nc,ise: 69.3 63.0 -59;6 55.2 63:7 64.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
297
94 400
30 300
200
100
ti 0 II> II.
-100
-200
-300
-400
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
j I Federal HighwaylActm!inisfration ~D-77-1081 I I '
I Traffic Noise Prepicti~n Model (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim i
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951 /
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Avenida Encinas to Paseo del Norte I
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA I
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: t~sJK 1
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 4450
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ,_'. . 3~
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,·?L. ___ ;~~
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 I::s1te conamons HAKU ~• • c I
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX I
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Day EveninA Nioht
Barrier Heiight: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 I
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 I
MOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 I
Autos: 0 i
I Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8 I I
tJNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Typ11 Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.2 64.9 63.2 57.1 65.7 66.3
Medium Trucks: 65.9 59.7 53.3 51.7 60.2 60.4 I Heavy Trucks: 71.1 59.7 50.6 51.9 61.8 61.9.
Vehicle N1:>ise: 73.6 67.3 63.9 59;4 68.0 68.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle TYl)Et Peak Leq Leq Day
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
826
261
83
Leq Evening
1000
500
; 0 GI u.
-500
-1000
Laq Night Ldn CNEL
I
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
I
I
0.096
0.103
0.108
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I l Federal Highway Admijnistration R:D-77-108 I
I I
l
I Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim I I
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Paseo del Norte to Armada I
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA I
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: :\f{ '. ,,._,,,"' CV I
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ....... :ci
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour T raffle: 6220
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ;; '' :t:: i Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ·,.·. _.,,;.;,, ...
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS,
Pad Elevatiion: 0.5 :::;ne conamons HAKU .>11 c I
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX I
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Dav Evening Night
Barrier Hei!Jht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 i
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 o.049 I
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 ' i
Autos: 0 '
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Truc:ks: 8 I
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 60.7 69.4 67.7 61.6 70.2 70.8
Medium Trucks: 69.0 62.7 56.3 54.8 63.3 63.5
Heavy Truc:ks: 73.5 62.1 53.0 54.2 63.8 63.9
Vehicle Nc►ise: 75.8 71.1 68.1 63.2 71.8 -72.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Hea Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR
2042
646
204
Leq Evening
2500
2000
1500
1000 .. 500
a, 0 a, u.. -500
-1000
-1500
-2000
-2500
Leq Night Ldn CNEL
!
Roadway Centerline Noise Cont6ur
I
0.096
0.103
0.108
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
i
I :·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
) /' Federal Highway ~drni'nistr,ation Rp-77-108 I I
I : Traffic Noise Predictid.n Model (CALVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway:
Road Segment:
Palomar Airport Road
Armada to Hidden Valley
PROJECT DAT A
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Nea1r Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Hei!~ht:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Interim i
Job#: 25-101951 '
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
Peak Hour Traffic:
Vehicle Speed:
Centerline Separation:
SITE DATA : . ;,o I
. · 61r~Go
6130
i~.L.,:J~t
NOISE INPUT~
!Site conamons HARD ::tin: I
FLEET MIX I
Tvoe Dav Evenina l'i,liaht Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 I 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 o.049 I 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 i 0.108 0.0083
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 63.2 71.9 70.1 64.0 72.7 73.3
Medium Trucks: 70.3 64.0 57.6 56.1 64.6 64.8
Heavy Trucks: 74.2 62.8 53.8 55.0 64.2 64.4
Vehicle Nc,ise: 76.6 73.1 70.5 65.2 73.8 74.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heaw Trucks: t:-c-.,..,...........,..,...,... __ ,.__ __ ----1-___ -1--___ --+-___ --+-___ 4--__ -11
Vehicle Noise:
----·-----------------------------------!
CENTERUNE NOISE CONTOUR
3282
1038
328
Roadway Centerline Noise Contt>ur i
4000 -r--------------'-------
3000
_ 2000
1000 1 0
-1000
-2000
-3000
-4000 -'--------------'--------.-J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I Federal Highway Admi'nist~ation RD-77-108
I I
' I
I i Traffic Noise Predictitjn M~del (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Hidden Valley to College
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ~; ~ji~;~ Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 5700
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ( ','.)f ~ ~ 5
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: )fti~k ,1:i
., ... i;.
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevatiion: 0.5 ~:me conamons HARD ~111: '
Road Elev~1tion: 0 FLEET MIX I
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Dav EveninQ Night
Barrier Hei1~ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 ' 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 ' 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Triucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 62.8 71.6 69.8 63.7 72.4 73.0
Medium Trucks: 70.0 63.7 57.3 55.8 64.2 64.5
Heavy Truc;ks: -73.9 62.5 53.4 54.7 63.9 64.0
Vehicle Nc,ise: 76.2 72.8 70.1 64.9 73.5 74.0.
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heaw Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
3056 4000 966
306 3000
2000
1000
1i 0 QI II.
-1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,.1
I
I
I
I Federal Highway !Administration RD-77-1081
I I ' ! Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (C~LVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: College to Camino Vida Roble ~
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA I
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ., .. , ;,· ··.::to · ...
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: -: .. ··· 41too
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 4190
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed:
·,_;::/.
5$:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ·."{Si I •• ;,;., .,.lol I
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUT$
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~Ile conamons HAKU ::.11 c :
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX :
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Eveninq Nioht Daily
Barrier Hei,ght: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 ' 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 ! 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027, 0.108 0.0083
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Truc;ks: 8
UINMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL ' ' Autos: 61.5 70.2 68.5 62.4 71.0 71.6 ;
Medium Trucks: 68.6 62.4 56.0 54.4 62.9 63.1 .
Heaw Truc:ks: 72.6 61.2 52.1 53.3 62.6 62.7;
Vehicle Nc,ise: 74.9 71.4 68.8 63.6 72.2 72.7 ·
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: I
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2245
710 3000
224 2000
1000
ai 0 G II.
-1000
-2000
-3000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
· : Federal Highway Admi1nist~ation Rb-77-108 I I
; I Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (C4LVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Roadway:
Road Segment:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Palomar Airport Road
Camino Vida Roble to El Camino Real
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100
Barrier NecIr Lane CL Dist: 0
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Hei!Jht:
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Interim
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
Peak Hour Traffic:
6:~~~~i;:~:~aration: ~~.~·:5;~~~::::~
NOISE INPUTS,
Auto 0.775 0.129 : 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 : 0.103 0.0279
OISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Hea Truc:ks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 61.3 70.0 68.2 62.1 70.8
Medium Trucks: 68.4 62.1 55.7 54.2 62.7
Heavv Truc:ks: 72.3 60.9 51.8 53.1 62.3
Vehicle Nc,ise: 74.7 71.2 68.6 63.3 71.9
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day, Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise: .
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.027 ' 0.108 0.0083
CNEL
71.4
62.9
62.5
72.4
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2114
669 3000
211 2000
1000
~ 0 41 u.
-1000
-2000
-3000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
; ; Federal Highway Administration R!D-77-1081 I
, Traffic Noise Predictitjn M<;>del (C~LVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: El Camino Real to El Fuerte
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevatiion:
Road Elevation:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
Scenario: Existing Plu$ Project
Job#: 25-101951 :
SITEDATA 1
:i:!~;~;~y Traffic: ~w~J~it~tl
Peak Hour Traffic: 6710 ,
Vehicle Speed: ' -,:·5,c,, g;
Centerline Separation: ,_-_I~.L4t£
NOISE INPUTS.
.:,ne conamons HAKU :;11 c
FLEETMIX '
Observer Height (above grade): 0
0
Tvoe Dav Evening ~ight Daily
Barrier HeiiJht: Auto 0.775 0.129 : 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 I 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 63.6 72.3 70.5 64.4 73.1
Medium TriJcks: 70.7 64.4 58.0 56.5 65.0
Heavv Truc:ks: 74.6 63.2 54.1 55.4 64.6
Vehicle Nc,ise: 77.0 73.5 70.9 65.6 74.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.027
CNEL
73.7
65.2
64.8
74.7
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
3599 4000 1138
360 3000
2000
1000 • 0 GI LI.
-1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
0.108 0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I Federal Highway Admihistration RD-77-108
I I I ! Traffic Noise Preciictio~ Model (CALVENO) ' I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: El Fuerte to Melrose
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: it,.,,, .. , 0
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ,:'l\;eti'ii
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 6180
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ·.:~::: Barrier Neair Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ii,<' ,;i,\' ,·
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~ne conamons HARD 511 1:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Heii~ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Tr1Jcks: 2.3
Heavv Truc:ks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 63.2 71.9 70.1 64.1 72.7 73.3
Medium Trucks: 70.3 64.1 57.7 56.1 64.6 64.8
Heavv Truc:ks: 74.3 62.8 53.8 55.0 64.3 64.4
Vehicle No1ise: 76.6 73.1 70.5 65.2 73.8 74.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type · Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
3312 4000 1047
331 3000
2000
1000
'i 0 Ill LL
-1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 Federal Highway Admi1nist~ation R:D-77-108 I I
1 Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (C~LVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: North of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline !Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Hei!~ht:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Interim
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA l
Road Grade: -{'</): , :G;' i
Average Daily Traffic: :/(ij,13Eflif i
Peak Hour Traffic: , _, ,,,~Z!
5
o_ !
Vehicle Sp_eed: ·' '_ ,j;:-'f'"' , :
Centerline Separation: '_ ,\;:.'.~'.: .. 4,; : '
NOISE INPUTS,
.::,ne conomons HAKIJ :;11 c: I
FLEET MIX i
Type Day Evening tiJight Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 ! 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 i 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck o.865 0.027 I 0.108 o.ooa3
i
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.4 65.1 63.3 57.2 65.9 66.5
Medium Trucks: 66.1 59.8 53.5 51.9 60.4 60.6
Heavy Trucks: 71.3 59.9 50.8 52.0 61.9 62.1
Vehicle No,ise: 73.8 67.5 64.1 59.6 68.2 68.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS {With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day LeqEvening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks: .
Heaw Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
I
879 1000 278
88 500
~ 0 ~ u.
-500
-1000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, : Federal Highway ~dmihistration RD-77-108 / I
: ' Traffic Noise Predictioh Model (C~LVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Roadway:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
El Camino Real
Scenario: Interim I
Job#: 25-101951 ,
Road Segment: Palomar Airport Road to Camino Vida Roble
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Eleva,tion:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Hei{1ht:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Rt View: 90 Lft View:
SITEDATA I
Road Grade: '''0 I
Average Daily Traffic: 41;~0 '
Peak Hour Traffic: 4130
Vehicle Speed: t-~ , :.:~I~~/~ '3f; I
Centerline Separation: D .. ~1,t\;; .. ~ 1
NOISE INPUTS!
~rte conamons HARD s11 1: !
FLEET MIX I
Tvoe Dav Evening Night Dailv
Auto 0.775 0.129 I 0.096 0.9638
-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 i 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.021 I 0.108 0.0083
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Truc:ks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 55.8 64.5 62.7 56.7 65.3
Medium Trucks: 65.5 59.3 52.9 51.3 59.8
Heavy Truc:ks: 70.7 59.3 50.2 51.5 61.4
Vehicle No1ise: 73.2 66.9 63.5 59.0 67.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks: '
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR
CNEL
65.9
60.0
61.5
68.0
CNEL
I
I
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
768
243 1000
800
77 600
400
ai 200
QI 0 u. -200
-400
-600
-800
-1000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:
Federal Highway IAdministration RD-77-1081
Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (C~LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: Camino Vida Roble to Cassia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: --.Ii .. :~'..
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: };· :ff82~tl-" ·,, ..
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 4820
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: [.: ,:rtJ!l: f_. Barrier Ne~~r Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: i:~·
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUT&
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conomons HARD ~• • t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX I
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day EveninQ NiQht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 , 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049, 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027: 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy TruGks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.5 65.2 63.4 57.3 66.0 66.6:
Medium Trucks: 66.2 59.9 53.5 52.0 60.5 60.7
Heavy Tru<~ks: 71.4 60.0 50.9 52.1 62.0 62.2:
Vehicle Ne>ise: 73.8 67.6 64.1 59.7 68.2 68.7.
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation) i
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL :
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Tru<;ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
896 1000 283
90
500
$ 0 IL
-500
-1000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway !Administration RD-77-1081
' Traffic Noise Predicti~n Mbdel (C~LVENO) i I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: Cassia to La Costa
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: '~--si~tg Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 5970
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: .::i~~--· ::5J
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,·.,· -,:''/i·-@; ~lil,t1•1:.s1,1!1::w1.,l.kl).
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conamons HARD ~• • t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenina Niaht Daily
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS {Feet} Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UINMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS {No topographic or barrier attenuation}
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 63.0 71.8 70.0 63.9 72.6 73.2
Medium Trucks: 70.2 63.9 57.5 56.0 64.4 64.7
Heavy Trucks: 74.1 62.7 53.6 54.9 64.1 64.2
Vehicle Nc,ise: 76.4 73.0 70.3 65.1 73.7 74.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS {With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
3200
1012 4000 ...------------------
320
ai G IL,
3000
2000
1000
0
--1000
-2000
-3000 -4000 _._ ________________ ____J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
: , Federal HighwaylAdmlinist~ation ~D-77-1081 I
' Traffic Noise Predicti1;m Mt>del (CAL VENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: La Costa to Leucadia
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Interim
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: :}'.: '::.O
Average Daily Traffic: · ,c:;-:i-501~0
Peak Hour Traffic: 501 0
Vehicle Speed: -.:-55
Centerline Separation: _ · ::::: Ali
NOISE INPUTS
~lte conditions HAKU ~111:
FLEET MIX
Type Day Evenino Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
MOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle TypE1 Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 62.3 71.0 69.2 63.1 71.8 72.4
Medium Trucks: 69.4 63.2 56.8 55.2 63.7 63.9
Heavy Trucks: 73.4 61.9 52.9 54.-1 63.4 63.5
Vehicle Nc>ise: 75.7 72.2 69.6 64.3 72.9 73.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle TypEI Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heaw Trui:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2686 3000 849
269 2000
1000 .. QI 0 QI II,,
-1000
-2000
-3000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Administration Rb-77-108
I I
I
I ' Traffic Noise Predicti~n M9del (C4LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: Carlsbad to Avenida Encinas
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: -:<~)O
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ·~124:~.oo
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1050
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ·.:.1.~r:.11 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conamons HARD .:,1 1 c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenina Night
Barrier Hei1~ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Truc:ks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation}
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 50.1 58.9 57.1 51.1 59.7 60.3
Medium Trucks: 59.8 51.8 45.4 43.8 52.3 52.5
Heavy Trucks: 65.1 48.9 39.8 41.1 51.0 51.1
Vehicle Noise: -67;5 60.2 57.5 52.3 60.9 61.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
157 200 50
16 150
100
50
'qj 0 GI u..
-50
-100
-150
-200
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-I
I
I
I
Federal Highway !Administration ~D-77-1081 /
: I Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (C~LVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Scenario: Interim
Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: Avenida Encinas 1-5
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Rt View: 90 Lft View:
SITE DATA
:~:!~;~;~y Traffic: \;t~4;i;t·
Peak Hour Traffic: 2480
Vehicle Speed: -:,1/35
Centerline Separation: <iL•. :Zt~.
NOISE INPUTS
site conctltlons ~ SITE
FLEET MIX
Type Dav Evenina Niaht Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NIOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type, Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 53.8 62.6 60.8 54.7 63.3 63.9
Medium Trucks: 63.5 55.4 49.0 47.5 55.9 56.2
Heavy Trucks: 68.7 52_5 43.5 44.7 54.6. 54.1
Vehicle Nc>ise: 71.1 63:8 61.2 55.9 64.5 -65.0
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type, Peak Leq Leq Day
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
372
118
37
Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
500 -.--------------------
400 -1-=-==--=-==-----------____j
300
200
100 l o
u. -100
-200
-300
-400 +--=---=---=="'--============i
-500 -------------------------1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
! Federal Highway Administriation Rb-77-108
Traffic Noise Predictitjn M9del (C4LVENO) I I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: 1-5 to Paseo del Norte
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ,l~jt\i◊:i; Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3060
:;~i:~ ""', . Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: . :\'.~5
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: --,:J'.~a.
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conditions HARD ~• • t:.
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenino Nioht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Truc:ks: 8
UINMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 54.7 63.5 61.7 55.6 64.3 64.9
Medium Triucks: 64.4 56.3 49.9 48.4 56.9 57.1
Heavy Trucks: 69.6 53.5 44.4 45.6 55.5 55.6
Vehicle Nc,ise: 72.0 64.7 62.1 56.8 65.4 66:0
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heaw Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLliNE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
459
145
46 400
200
0
-200
-400
0.096
0.103
0.108
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
-600 .,__ __________________ ..J
;,
i i !
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I ' I I
I i Federal Highway Administration ~D-77-108
I : Traffic Noise Predicti~n M9del (CJ;),LVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: Paseo del Norte to Batiquitos
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ••_'" 0:
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: t ,2fN10~ ~ ....,~, ~
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2870
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: .'::l~f~f~,,:I Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~:me conditions HARD ;,11 t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3 J
Heavy Truc:ks: 8
UINMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 54.3 63.1 61.3 55.2 63.9 64.5
Medium Trucks: 64.0 56.0 49.6 48.0 56.5 56.7
Heavy Truc:ks: 69.2 53.1 44.0 45.2 55.1 55.3
Vehicle Nc►ise: 71.7 64.4 61.7 -56,5 65.1 65.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Tmcks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
431
136
43 400
200
'z 0 u..
-200
-400
0.096
0.103
0.108
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
-600 ~--------------------'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I Federal HighwaylAdm1inist~ation RD-77-108 I I
I Traffic Noise Predicti~n Mpdel (Cf.LVENO) I I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: Batiquitos to Aviara
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: k>::-~ ·,.,;~t)
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: :1fiii1J~lf
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2290
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ilt~}'.:i Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: "
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 t;1te concllt1ons HARD ~• • c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NIOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy TruGks: 8
LIN MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation) .
Vehicle Type, Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.5 65.3 63.5 57.4 66.0 66.7
Medium Trucks: 64.7 56.7 50.3 48.7 57.2 57.4
Heavy Truc;ks: 69.3 53.1 44.0 45.3 54.8 54.9
Vehicle Nc>ise: 71.6 66.1 63.7 58.2 -66;9 67.4
IIIIITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type, Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc;ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
653
207 800
65 600
400
200 ... Cl) 0 Cl) IL
-200
-400
-600
-800
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
ii I
11
ii ! :, .I ,,
:1
11 'I :I ,, .,
I ,,
;j
!I
:1 :I :1 ;i
!I •I •!
l
,/ ,, ;! u
fl ~i H
:1
;1
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
·I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal HighwayiAdniinist:ration RD-77-1081
I : Traffic Noise Predicti~n Mpdel (CAL VENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: La Costa Avenue
Road Segment: Carlsbad to Vulcan
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ' ':;\i~J: 0
Barrier (0=:wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: 'l!i~O
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1560
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: 1,}i? --~ Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: . i.ffl:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 .:>ne conamons HARD 511 t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Typ11 Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 51.9 60.7 59.0 52.9 61.5 62.1
Medium Trucks: 61.7 53.6 47.2 45.6 54.1 54.4
Heavy Trucks: 66.9 50.7 41.7 42.9 52.8 52.9
Vehicle N•:>ise: 69.3 62.0 59.3 54.1 62.7 63.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle TypE• Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
234 300 74
23 200
100
-; 0 QI II.
-100
-200
-300
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
!i
!i .,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway 1Admlnist~ation ~D-77-1081 I
I i Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (C~LVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway:
Road Segment:
La Costa Avenue
Vulcan to 1-5
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Interim
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
Peak Hour Traffic:
~:~~~~i~:S:!aration: ;)L:,: }~~!l{
NOISE INPUTS
Site conamons HARD SITE
FLEET MIX
Tvoe Dav Evenino Nioht Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 52.4 61.2 59.4 53.4 62.0
Medium Trucks: 62.1 54.1 47.7 46.1 54.6
Heavy Trucks: 67.4 51.2 42.1 43.4 53.3
Vehicle Ne>ise: 69.8 62.5 59.8 54.6 63.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
0.027 0.108 0.0028
CNEL
62.6
54.8
53.4
63.7
CNEL
CENTERLI.INE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
261
83
26 200
100
'S II) 0 LL.
-100
-200
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i Federal HighwayiAdm1inistration ~D-77-1081
' Traffic Noise Predicti◊n Mpdel (CALYENO) ' :
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: La Costa Avenue
Road Segment: 1-5 to Piraeus
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: _:. '~ :~};'}~.~ <t~--
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ·,,!~·58~ ..,~~.--f .• ,, ,.;t-," '
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2250
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: f _i: ~~~,,/ '·~~;,,·-
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: 0, • .,~c• •3(;. i,lL;:Jntfi&L ~t:.1..:,,,.
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ;:,ne conamons HARD .,, , c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Tyl)Et Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 53.3 62.1 60.4 54.3 62.9 63.5
Medium Trucks: 63.1 55.0 48.6 47.0 55.5 55.8
Heavy Trucks: 68;3 52.1 43.1 44.3 54.2 54.3
Vehicle N4>ise: 70.7 63.4 60.7 55.5 64.1 64.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle TypE1 Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
338 400 107
34 300
200
100
i 0 GI u.
-100
-200
-300
-400
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I ' I I ; Federal Highway ~dministration RD-77-108
I : Traf,fic Noise Predicti~n M~del (C~LVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: La Costa Avenue
Road Segment: Piraeus to El Camino Real (
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ... -.. '.~'}:"-'~
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: -.-?\~1 ;4.-0
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak HourTraffic: 3140
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: 1~t,im;4CJI Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 -:sI1e conamons HARD s11 t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Tru<;ks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 60.3 69.1 67.4 61.3 69.9 70.5
Medium Trucks: 67.5 59.4 53.0 51.4 59.9 60.2
Heavy Trucks: 71.4 55.3 46.2 47.4 56.7 56.8
Vehicle N<>ise: 73.7 69.8 67.6 61.9 70.5 71.1
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1528 2000 483
153 1500
1000
500
1i 0 Cl) u.
-500
-1000
-1500
-2000
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
;_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
; I I ' I I : I Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108
' i Traf;fic Noise Predicti~n Model (C~LVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: La Costa Avenue
Road Segment: East of El Camino Real
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: )~iil~o~ Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1930
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: '·-,i,( Barrier Ne.;1r Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: i.,, .• _-.,•.S. 1,.,,.,r4;;;...,," .. "
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevatiion: 0.5 ::sne conamons HARD s I t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Dav Evenina Night
Barrier Hei!Jht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium TriJcks: 2.3
Heavy Truc:ks: a-
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 55.8 64.6 62.8 56.7 65.4 66.0
Medium Trucks: 64.1 56.0 49,6 48.1 56,6 56.8
Heavy Truc:ks: 68.6 52,5 43.4 44.6 54.2 · 54.3
Vehicle No•ise: 70.9 65.5 63.1 57.6 66.2 66.7
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Tnicks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
551 800 174
55 600
400
200 ... QI 0 QI u.
-200
-400
-600
-800
Daily
0.9789
0.Q184
0.0028
' i'
'·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i Federal HighwaylAdministration RD-77-108 I I
' : Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (CALVENO) I I
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Palomar Airport Road to Island Way
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm}:
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Hei!ght:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
Peak Hour Traffic:
Vehicle Speed:
Centerline Separation:
NOISE INPUTS
Site conditions HARD ;,111:.
FLEET MIX
Type Day Evening Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 57.4 66.1 64.3 58.3 66.9 67.5
Medium Trucks: 65.1 58.8 52.4 50.9 59.3 59.6
Heavy Trucks: 69.3 57.9 48.8 50.0 59.4 59.5
Vehicle-Nc►ise: 71.6 67.5 64.8 59.6 68.2 68.7
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
924 1500 292
92 1000
500 -CD 0 a, u.
-500
-1000
-1500
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I~
I
I
I
I
I
I
: i Federal Highway ~dmihistr'ation Rp-77-108 I
I Traffic Noise Predictio~ Mqdel (CALVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Island Way to Breakwater
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier HeifJht:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Interim Plus Project ·
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
NOISE INPUTS
site conamons HARD :,11 t:
FLEET MIX
Type Day Evening Niqht Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NIDISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet}
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation}
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 57.5 66.2 64.4 58.3 67.0
Medium Tnicks: 65.2 58.9 52.5 50.9 59.4
l:leavy Trucks: 69.4 57.9 48.9 50.1 59.5
· Vehicle Noise: 71.7 67.6 64.8 59.7 68.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.027 0.108 0.0083
CNEL
67.6
59.7
59.6
68.8
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
923 1500 292
92 1000
500
-; 0 QI IL
-500
-1000
-1500
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
: I Federal Highway ~dministration RD-77-108 I I
1 , Traffic Noise Predictio~ Model (CJXLVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Breakwater to Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Eleva1tion:
Observer Height (above grade}:
Barrier Hei~Jht:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: -:.:'-0:' ·•f:Jt:9:
Average Daily Traffic: 31®
Peak Hour Traffic: 2231.3
Vehicle Speed: fg~":; --~-s'DY
Centerline Separation: :1~1Iir:~ _ · }~
NOISE INPUTS
::me conamons HAKIJ .::,11 c
FLEET MIX
Type Dav Evening Night Dailv
Auto 0.775 0.129 -0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Truc:ks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 57.6 66.3 64.5 58.4 67.1 67.7
Medium Trucks: 65.3 59.0 52.6 51.0 59.5 59.8
Heavy Truc:ks: 69.5 58.0 49.0 50.2 59.6 59.7
Vehicle No,ise: 71.8 67.7 64.9 59.8 68.4 68.9
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq LeqDay Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
944 1500 299
94 1000
500
0 0 GI II.
-500
-1000
-1500
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
: Federal Highway ~dmihistr~tion RD-77-108 1
1
II
; / Traffic Noise Predictio~ Mtjdel (CALVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Poinsettia to Avenida Encinas
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Eleve1tion:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Hei!~ht:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: :Interim Plus Project
Job#: 25-101951 :
SITE DATA I
Road Grade: :,;f>' · · · · ;g I
Average Daily Traffic: ?}ff287~:$! I
Peak Hour Traffic: 2873.5 :
6:~~~~i;:;:~aration: ;1,~t;ii{ I· I
NOISE INPUTS/
ISite conamons HARD ~ITt: I
FLEET MIX I
Tvoe Dav Evenina Niaht Daily
Auto 0. 775 0.129 i 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 i 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trncks:
Heaw Truc:ks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 58.7 67.4 65.6 59.5 68.2
Medium Trncks: 66.4 60.1 53.7 52.1 60.6
Heavy Truc:ks: 10.6 -59.1 50.1 51.3 60.7
Vehicle Noise: 72.9 68.8 66.0 60.9 69.5
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium TnJcks:
Heavv Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
0.027 : 0.108 0.0083
CNEL
68.8
60.9
60.8
70.0
CNEL
I
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway CenterUne Noise Contour
1217
385 1500
122 1000
500 .. G) 0 Cl) u.
-500
-1000
-1500
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Admi'nistration RD-77-108
I
I '
I I I J I Traffic Noise Predictio,n Model (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Avenida Encinas to La Costa
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: --·o
Barrier (0=\~all, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ;~$2~
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3432.2
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ,·~~ii?~:-~. !i Barrier Nes1r Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conamons HARD SI 11:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Day Evenina Night
Barrier Heii~ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium TriJcks: 2.3
Heavy Truc:ks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 59.5 68.2 66.4 60.3 69.0 69.6
Medium Trucks: 67.1 60.9 54.5 52.9 61.4 61.6
Heavy Truc:ks: 71.4 59.9 50.9 52.1 61.5 61.6
Vehicle N<l•ise: 73.7 69.6 66.8 61.7 70.3 70.8
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1453
459 2000
145 1500
1000
500
i 0 II.
-500
-1000
-1500
-2000
.
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway ~dmihistration RD-77-108
I I i Traffic Noise Predictio~ Mddel (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: ,Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: La Costa to Leucadia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ]i: ' .;:;/-~9:
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: • .r;,. -.. ~,01,!f
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2701.6
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ::;~:{ .. ·. i;t~~-Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ··;,.:;;i,r,,,' ,,,,~i .•.
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 . ::,11e conamons HARD SITE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Day Evenina Niqht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Truc;ks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 58.7 67.4 65.6 59.6 68.2 68.8
Medium Tr1Jcks: 66.4 60.1 53.7 52.2 60.6 60.9
Heavy Truc:ks: 70.6 59.2 50.1 51.3 60.7 60.8
Vehicle ·Nc,ise: 72.9 68.8 66.1 60.9 69.5 70.0
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Triucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1143
361 1500
114 1000
500
~ 0 Ill u.
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
li ii i
ii
!i
ii
!\
ii
!i
!! ll
ii
l! ;I ;I
:1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
! Federal Highway ~drnihistr~tion RD-77-108
I
I
' '
I I Traffic Noise Predictio'n Model (CALVENO) ' I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: 'Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: South of Leucadia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: '/',:~~'[" ·0: -.. -:rtrr1i. Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2371
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ' .. jf:r~1 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~me conditions HARD ~• • t:
Road Eleva1tion: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height {above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Hei~1ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
RtVi.ew: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2;3
Heavy Truc:ks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 58.1 66.9 65.1 59.0 67.6 68.2
Medium Trucks: 65.8 59.5 53.2 51.6 60.1 60.3
Heavy Trucks: 70.0 58.6 49.5 -50.8 .60.'I 60.3
Vehicle No,ise: 72.3 68.2 65.5 60.4 69.0 69.5
MITIGATED NOISE l.EVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heaw Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noiise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1005
318 1500
100 1000
500
1i 0 G) II..
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
ii
\1 Ii l ii ii
l1 ii
[! ,,
fl ,,
11
i! ii ij !, f 1)
(!
j! ) ii ii ll !I
!I !i li
jf
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
: i Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108I .
. ; Traffic Noise Predictitjn Mc;>del (CJ;\LVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Roadway:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Avenida Encinas
Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Job#: 25-101951
Road Segment: Cannon Road to Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier {0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Rt View: 90 Lft View:
SITE DATA
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
Peak Hour Traffic:
Vehicle Speed:
Centerline Separation:
NOISE INPUTS
Day Evening Night Dail
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Hea Trucks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 53.3 62.1 60.3 54.2 62.9
Medium Trucks: 62.3 54.2 47.8 46.2 54.7
. Heavy Trucks: 67.1 50.9 41.9 43.1 52.8
Vehicle Nc,ise: 69.5 -63.1 60.6 55.3 63.9
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise: .
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR
CNEL
63.5
55.0
53.0
64.4
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
320 400 101
32 300
200
100 ... II) 0 II) u.
-100
-200
-300
-400
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I
I I
I Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108
I
I Traffic Noise Predictioh Mqdel (CA!L VENO) ' I
' I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: South of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: " ~i'sg '"
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: "
Receiver B1mier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1235.2
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ' -:>(i4'0
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: '$6 ' .. •,-..1.,.;M):i,;;;,._....._
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 I~1te COndltlOns HARD :SI I c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenina Niaht Daily
Barrier Hei~1ht: 0 Auto 0.775 · 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 I 0.027 0.108 0.0028
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 52.4 61.2 59.4 53.3 62.0 62.6
Medium Trucks: 61.4 53.3 46.9 45.3 53.8 54.1
Heavy Trucks: -66.2 50.0 41.0 42.2 51.9 52.1
Vehicle Noise: 68.6 62.2 59.7 54.3 63.0 63.5
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Tnicks:
Heaw Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOJSE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
260
82 300 -.-------------------~
26 200
100
I o
-100
-200
-300 .,__ _________________ __,
!1
ii ,.
11
'.l
;)
;1 ;!
'I I
:1 ii
n ,! '.I ,,
~ ii
;1
jJ ;1 !I !i n !1
II jl
I l !
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Administration Rb-77-108 I I I I Traffic Noise Predictid,n Model (C4LVENO) I I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: North of Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ,. '
:ii~~; Barrier (0=vtfall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 935.2
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ~ll 0,'
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: b
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~ne conamons HAKU .:,11 c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Dav EveninQ Nii:iht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NIOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavv Trucks: 8
l.lNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type, Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Laq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 47.7 56.5 54.7 48.6 57.3 57.9
Medium Trucks: 58.3 50.2 43.8 42.3 .50.8 .. 51.0
Heavy Truc;ks: 63.9 47.8 38.7 39.9 50.1 50.2
Vehicle Noise: 66.5 -58.1 55.2 50.2 58.8 ·59,3
I\/IITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type, Peak Laq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
96 150 30
10 100
50 .. GI 0 GI u..
-50
-100
-150
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway f,dmihistrhtion RD-77-108
Traffic Noise Predictio~ Model (CJXLVENO) I I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: South of Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ~-:.;\-:~·· 0
Barrier (0::,,ivall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: :,i,t-452 ·:,--,",t .
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1645.2
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ,~ •' 35 ·-
Barrier Nea1r Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,., .. , ,_,::~44:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ::site concm1ons HJffiD SITE
Road Eleva1tion: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Dav Evenina Niaht
Barrier Hei!~ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 -0:103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Truc:ks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 51.9 60.7 58.9 52.8 61.5 62.1
Medium Trucks:-61.6 53.5 47.2 45.6 54.1 54.3
Heavy Truc:ks: 66.8 50.7 41.6 42.8 52.7 52.9
Vehicle Nc,ise: 69.3 61.9 59.3 54.1 -62.7 63.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Tmcks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Nolse:
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
247
78 300
25 200
100
ii 0 GI u..
-100
-200
-300
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
Federal Highway 4dm+str~tion R~-77-108
Traffic Noise Pred,ictio11 Model (CALVENO) I I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: East of Ponto :
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: •,• ··•:.?'"'0 I
~;~63 '
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 640.3
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: .... ~ ' 35 i
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: , c.J,Jii;i,' l@i
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS i
Pad Elevation: 0.5 t>1te cona1t1ons HARU :SI I c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX I
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day EveninQ NiQht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 ' 0.103 I
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 48.0 56.8 55.0 48.9 57.6 58.2
Medium Trucks: 57.7 49.6 43.2 41.7 50.2 50.4
Heavv Trucks: 62.9 46.8 37.7 38.9 48.8 49.0
Vehicle Noise: 65.4 58.0 55.4 50.2 58.8 59.-3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
96 150 30
10 100
50 .. QI 0 a, II,,
-50
-100
.,--150
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
l
f l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I Federal Highway Admi'nistration RD-77-108
I I I I I ' I
' Traffic Noise Predictio,n Mqdel (CALVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus 1Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951 ;
Roadway: College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway I
Road Segment: North of Palomar Airport Road I
; PROJECT DATA SITE DATA I
I
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: iL~iL. ::Jl I Barrier (0=vvall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ,;c\;~:!1'25'45'5': •·1•";,'r.'-.',~~,~~~\~" • .. ':
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2845.5
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: \so ,,, '' i
Barrier Neair Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: :i~6,
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS:
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ;::,ne conamons HARD ~• • c i
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX I
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Day Evening Niaht
Barrier Height: i 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 I 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 o.049 I 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 I 0.108 I
Autos: 0 '
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8 I
I
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 58.8 67.6 65.8 59.7 68.4 69.0
Medium Trucks: 66.5 58.4 52.0 50.5 59.0 59.2
Heavy Trucks: 70.7 54.6 45.5 46.7 56.1 56.2
Vehicle No,ise: 73.0 68.3 66.1 60.5 69.1 69.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation) i Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks: : Vehicle Noise: I I
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Cont~ur
' I
1073 1500 339
107 1000
500
ai 0 QI I&.
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway ~dministfation RD-77-108 I
Traffic Noise Predicti~n M~del (C~LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway
Road Segment: Palomar Airport Road to Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: -;I .••f•,··o ''::=1,;.J~>:', ,--'
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ,,: . 1"3.\~3
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1391.3
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: .-:.ti~~i'Y~.:1 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 !Site conait1ons lU'tRD SITE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Niaht Daily
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 54.4 63.2 61.4 55.3 64.0 64.6
Medium Trucks: 62.7 54.6 48.2 46.6 55.1 55.4
Heavy Trucks: 67.2 51.0 42.0 43.2 52.7 52.9
Vehicle Noise: 69.5 64.1 61.7 56.2 64.8 65.3 -
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise: '
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR (
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
397
126 500 ,--------------------
40
400
300
200
100 J 0
u.. -100
-200
-300
-400 -500 ....._ _________________ ____J
(
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II Federal Highway[Adm'inistration ~D-77-1081 I
Traffic Noise Predictic;rn M~del (CALVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway:
Road Segment:
Coll~ge Boulevard/Aviara Parkway
Poinsettia Batiquitos
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm}:
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height {above grade}:
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: <\·:· · ,.~
Average Daily Traffic: •i'1~j2S:f'.
Peak Hour Traffic: 1925.2
Vehicle Speed: 4~
Centerline Separation: .1;;;,:, · .i.~.
NOISE INPUTS
Site conamons HARD :s11 t:
FLEET MIX
Tvoe Dav Evenina Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heaw Trucks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 54.2 63.0 61.3 55.2 63.8 64.4
Medium Trucks: 63.2 55.1 48.7 47.2 55.7 55.9
Heaw Trucks: 68.0 51.9 42.8 44.0 53.8 53.9
Vehicle Noise: 70.4 64.1 61.6 56.2 64.8 65;3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise: . I
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
405
128
40
Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
.
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
500 ~-------------------
400
300
200
... 100 = 0 u. -100
-200
-300
-400 -500 ..._ _________________ __.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
Federal Highway IAdm,nisttation ~D-77-108 I
Traffic Noise Predictiqn M~del (CALVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Paseo Del Norte
Road Segment: North of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: t\::~~1i11r Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2025.2
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: fil· -.i Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ;:,11e conamons HARD .:,11 t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy, Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 52.8 61.6 59.8 53.7 62.4 63.0
Medium Trucks: 62.5 54.4 48.1 46.5 55.0 55.2
Heaw Trucks: 67.7 51.6 42.5 43.7 53.6 53.8
Vehicle Noise: 70.2 62.8 60.2 55.0 63.6 64.1
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
303 400 96
30 300
. 200
100 .. GI 0 GI IL
-100
-200
-300
-400
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway!Adm'.inist~ation RD-77-1081 I
, Traffic Noise Predictic;m M~del (CALVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Roadway:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Paseo Del Norte
Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Job#: 25-101951
Road Segment: Palomar Airport Road Camino de Las Ondas
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Rt View: 90 Lft View:
SITE DATA
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
Peak Hour Traffic:
6:~~:~i;:~:!aration: J!{L?li
NOISE INPUTS
:::me conditions HARD ::,11 t:
FLEET MIX
Type Day Evening Nicht Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 54.8 63.6 61.8 55.7 64.3
Medium Trucks: 63.7 55.6 49.3 47.7 56.2
Heavv Trucks: 68.6 52.4 43.3 44.6 54.3
Vehicle Noise: 70.9 64.6 62.1 56.7 65.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
CNEL
64.9
56.4
54.4
65.8
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
446
141 600
45 400
200 .. a, 0 a, u..
-200
-400
-600
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway 1Adm\nistration ~p-77-1081
Traffic Noise Prediction Model (C~LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Paseo Del Norte
Road Segment: Camino de Las Ondas to Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ' ., (3'
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ·-,?-t,20@
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2120.6
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: :1ii~J;: :, jl Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: -ii~.11
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~,te conditions HARD 51TE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Dav Evenina Night Daily
Barrier Height 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 54.8 63.6 61.8 55.7 64.3 64.9
Medium Trucks: 63.7 55.6 49.3 47.7 56.2 56.4
Heavy Trucks: 68.6 52.4 43.3 44.6 54.3 54.4
Vehicle Noise: 70.9 64.6 62.1 56.7 65.3 65.8
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
446 600 141
45 400
200 -GI 0 GI u..
-200
-400
-600
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway Ad~inis~ration ~D-77-108I
Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Carlsbad Boulevard to Avenida Encinas
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA.
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ·<:11,;;: Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1630.3
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ~Jf'._.,~ Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 tilte conaiuons MAKU :::,11 t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet} Heavy Truck 0.865 0:027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavv Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 52.0 60.8 59.0 52.9 61.5 62.2
Medium Trucks: 61.8 55.5 49.1 47.5 56.0 56.3
Heavv Trucks: 67.0 55.5 46.5 47.7 57.6 57.7
Vehicle Noise: 69.4 63.1 59.7 55.3 63.8 64.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
303 400 96
30 300
200
100
'S 0 QI LL -100
-200
-300
-400
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway iAdrn)nisttation ~D-77-1081
Traffic Noise Preclictiqn M~del (C~LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Avenida Encinas to Paseo del Norte
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ''-. ,O· '• .,
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ,.:<Me,oa
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 4480.3
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: "~ -:-.,_,.'
t~~t~i.'. ; ' : '·. -
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,,jft11~;1;i;i\J:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conamons HARD ~• • t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenina Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavv Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.2 65.0 63.2 57.1 65.7 66.4
Medium Trucks: 66.0 59.7 53.3 51.7 60.2 60.5
Heaw Trucks: 71.2 59.7 50.7 51.9 61.8 61.9
Vehicle Noise: 73.6 67.3 63.9 59;5 68.0 68.4
MITIGATED'NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heaw Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
832
263
83 500
1 0 II-
-500
' ;·
Daily f,
0.9638 i
0.0279
Q.0083
i, ;,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway:Adm'inistbtion ~D-77-108 I
Traffic Noise Prediction M~del (CALVENO) I I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
!Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Paseo del Norte to Armada
PROJECT DAT A SITE DATA
Road Grade: :Jati~j Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 ' .
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ',, .
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 6250.3
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: :.il}l:41 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~me conditions HARD s Tf:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Dav Evening Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 60.7 69.5 67.7 61.6 70.2 70.9
Medium Trucks: 69.0 62.8 56.4 54.8 63.3 63.5
Heavy Trucks: 73.5 62.1 53.0 54.3 63.8 63.9
Vehicle Noise: 75.9 71.1 68.2 63.2 71.8 72.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2052
649 3000
205 2000
1000 .,
CD 0 CD u..
-1000
-2000
-3000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway:Adm'inistration ~D-77-1081
Traffic Noise Prediction Mpdel (CALVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Armada to Hidden Valley
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: '_ :,,,-.:,.0
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: -tfJ05·
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 6190.6
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ,';: \:-5S
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: _, ~
.. -. '~ ;,:. ' .
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~me conditions HARD :,1 fE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Dav Evenina Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0,129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 63.2 71.9 70.1 64.1 72.7 73.3
Medium Trucks: 70.3 64.1 57.7 56.1 64.6 64.8
Heavv Trucks: 74.3 62.9 53.8 55.0 64.3 64.4
Vehicle-Noise: 76.6 73.1 70.5 65.2 73.8 74.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
3320 4000 1050
332 3000
2000
1000 ... CD 0 CD IL
-1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
Federal HighwayiAdm'inist1ration RD-77-1081
Traffic Noise Predicti~n M~odel (CALVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Hidden Valley to College
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: '''.', i
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: "•(-
, ,, ...... :~,;~', ·"1',
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 5760.6
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: :!!0f~1:fi Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ;:;ne conamons HARD s1 1 t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night Daily
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0;9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 62.9 71.6 69.8 63.8 72.4 73.0
Medium Trucks: 70.0 63.8 57.4 55.8 64.3 64.5
Heavy Trucks: 74.0 62.5 53.5 54.7 64.0 64.1
Vehicle Noise: -76.3 72.8 70.2 64.9 73.5 74.0
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
3084 4000 975
308 3000
2000
1000 .. GI 0 GI u..
-1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway Adrni'.nist~ation RD-77-108 I I
Traffic Noise Predictio'.n Mcidel (CALVENO) I I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: College to Camino Vida Roble
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: -· .. :;!!
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ~$
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 4326.4
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: _:::65
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ., _,;,.;_~~
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 :::me conamons HARU :>11 c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 · 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavv Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 61.6 70.4 68.6 62.5 71.2 71.8
Medium Trucks: 68.8 62.5 56.1 54.6 63.0 63.3
Heavy Trucks: 72.7 61.3 52.2 53.5 _62.7 62.8
Vehicle Noise: 75.0 71.6 68.9 63.7 72.3 72.8
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2318 3000 733
232 2000
1000
ai 0 QI II..
-1000
-2000
-3000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway
1
Adrn'inist~ation RD-77-1081
Traffic Noise Predicti9n M~del (C~LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Camino Vida Roble to El Camino Real
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ,_<J;J,G":o
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: 'ff!.f}'t13 ,'-;:_·"h~~!':-•', ;
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 4071.3
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: 1t;fr-':~i Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 .:;ne conditions HARD ::m t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 61.4 70.1 68.3 62.2 70.9 71.5
Medium Trucks: 68.5 62.3 55.9 54.3 62.8 63.0
Heavy Trucks: 72.5 61.0 52.0 53.2 62.5 62.6
Vehicle Noise: 74.8 71.3 68.7 63.4 72.0 72.5
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2184 3000 690
218 2000
1000
~ Cl) 0 Cl) u..
-1000
-2000
-3000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway:Adm'inist~ation ~D-77-108I I
Traffic Noise Predicti<;>n M~del (CALVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: El Camino Real to El Fuerte
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: , ·· 0
Average Daily Traffic: , -iij~858
Peak Hour Traffic: 6785.8
Vehicle Speed: ._ : ;i,t;~:!i;~•-
Centerline Separation: :,· __ :;,~~Jitli~:
NOISE INPUTS
Site conamons HARD ::,11 ~
FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade):
0
0
0
Type Day Evening Night Dailv
Barrier Height:
Rt View: 90 Lft View:
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heaw Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Auto 0.775
-90 Med. Truck 0.848
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 63.6 72.3 70.5 64.5 73.1
Medium Trucks: 70.7 64.5 58.1 56.5 65.0
Heaw Trucks: 74.7 63.3 54.2 55.4 64.7
Vehicle Noise: 77.0 73.5 70.9 65.6 74.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks: ..
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.129 0.096 0.9638
0.049 0.103 0.0279
0.027 0.108 0.0083
CNEL
73.7
65.2
64.8
74.8
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
3632 4000 1149
363 3000
2000
1000 -; 0 a, II.
-1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
'7 ; I 'i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-I
I
I
I
Federal HighwayiAdm)nist~ation ~D-77-1081
Traffic Noise Predictibn Mpdel (C,l\LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: El Fuerte to Melrose
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: --~1r,~;: Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 6258.8
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ::~ •. · -,f}i5
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,:!,;~-: ' --. -~~-1a ,..,:~;-~
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 site conditions HJffiD ~ITE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Dav Evenina Niaht Daily
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 ·0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 63.3 72.0 70.2 64.1 72.8 73.4
Medium Trucks: 70.4 64.1 57.7 56.2 64.7 64.9
Heavy Trucks: 74.3 62.9 53.8 55.1 64.3 64.4
Vehicle Noise: 76.7 73.2 70.6 65.3 73.9 74.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
3351
1060 4000
335 3000
2000
1000
~ 0 GI IL -1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·• ··:... .: ·., \,_ ·,.··~
I
Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 I ' ' I
Traffic Noise Predicti6n Model (CALVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: North of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: Ii~'4i1l Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 4745.2
Centerline Dist. To Observer: Vehicle Speed: ~(:' .,.
100 ~
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ·-.. ~ ~ ,,,_;
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ::;11e conamons HARD ~111:.
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day EveninQ Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS {Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS {No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:· 56.4 65.1 63.3 57.3 65.9 66.5
Medium Trucks: 66.1 59.9 53.5 51.9 60.4 60.6
Heavv Trucks: 71.3 59.9 50.8 52.1 62.0 62.1
Vehicle Noise: 73.8 67.5 64.1 59.6 68.2 -68.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
881
279
88
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
t I f,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, Federal Highway
1
Ad~inistration RD-77-1081 I
Traffic Noise Predictipn M~odel (CALVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Roadway:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
El Camino Real
Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Job#: 25-101951
Road Segment: Palomar Airport Road to Camino Vida Roble
PROJECT DATA·
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
0
0
0
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
Peak Hour Traffic:
SITE DATA
:'~-• ·._<,tto ;_; .:,.fflel03,
4160.3
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
100
0
0
0.5
0
6=~~~~i~:;:!aration: ~:;:{•f~~~·~J{};;
NOISE IN~PU~T~S------------1
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
Rt View: 90 Lft View:
0
0
Site conditions HARD ~u I t:
FLEET MIX
Tvpe Dav Evening NiQht Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 55.8 64.6 62.8 56.7 65.3
Medium Trucks: 65.5 59.3 52.9 51.3 59.8
Heavv Trucks: 70.8 59.3 50.3 51.5 61.4
Vehicle Noise: 73.2 66.9 63.5 59.0 67.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
CNEL
65.9
60.0
61.5
68.0
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
773
244 1000
800
77 600
400 ... 200
CD 0 CD IL -200
-400
-600
-800
-1000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway 1Administ~ation RD-77-108 I I
Traffic Noise Predicti~n M9del (C*LVENO) I I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: Camino Vida Roble to Cassia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: -/~f~Y~~~:~~~{\'f():
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ·.:t',; '~-8503.
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 4850.3
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: '-,' ··:,::~i.
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,;._ .. ,.~ :, ..... >~I
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~necona111onsHAKU~11c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Day Evenino Nioht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.5 65.2 63.4 57.4 66.0 66.6
Medium Trucks: 66.2 59.9 53.6 52.0 60.5 60.7
Heavy Trucks: 71.4 60.0 50.9 52.2 62.1 62.2
Vehicle Noise: 73.9 67.6 64.2 59.7 68.3 68.7
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks: ·
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
902 1000 285
90 500
-GI 0 GI u..
-500
-1000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway:Adniinis~ration ~D-77-108I
Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (C~LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: Cassia to La Costa
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ~JfiJirio~-Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 6000.3
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: lit/;"~Jl: Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site cona1t1ons HARD 51TE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Dav Evenina Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 63.1 71.8 70.0 63.9 72.6 73.2
Medium Trucks: 70.2 63.9 57.6 56.0 64.5 64.7
Heavy Trucks: 74.2 62.7 53.7 54.9 64.1 64.3
Vehicle Noise: 76.5 73.0 70.4 65.1 73.7 74.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
3215 4000 1017
321 3000
2000
1000
1ii 0 cP u.. -1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I I ' ' ' Federal HighwaylAdministration ~D-77-1081 I
Traffic Noise Preclicti~n M~del (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst:
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: La Costa to Leucadia
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: O
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
0.5
0
0
0 Barrier Height:
Rt View: 90 Lft View:
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
~Ite conamons HARD 51 1 t:.
FLEET MIX
Type Day Evening
Auto 0.775 0.129
-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 62.3 71.0 69.2 63.2 71.8
Medium Trucks: 69.4 63.2 56.8 55.2 63.7
Heaw Trucks: 73.4 61.9 52.9 54.1 63.4
Vehicle Noise: 75.7 72.2 69.6 64.3 72.9
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
CNEL
72.4
63.9
63.5
73.5
CNEL
Nia ht Daily
0.096 0.9638
0.103 0.0279
0.108 0.0083
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
851 3000 2693
269 2000
1000
-; 0 Ill LL
-1000
-2000
-3000
11
H
l!
II
:j
" 'I
;1 ,,
'I li 'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highwa~ Ad~inistration ~D-77-108 [ I I I I Traffic Noise Predictipn l\'lodel (C~LVENO) 1 I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: Carlsbad to Avenida Encinas
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: '.'<O
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: t7;~2
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1732.2
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ~;rJ1iii1ll Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ::;ne conamons HARD .:,11 t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Nioht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 52.3 61.1 59.3 53.2 61.9 62.5
Medium Trucks: 62.0 54.0 47.6 46.0 54.5 54.7
Heavy Trucks: 67.2 51.1 42.0 43.2 53.1 53.3
Vehicle Noise: 69.7 62.4 59.7 54.5 63.1 63.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
260 300 82
26 200
100
-; 0 CII u.
-100
-200
-300
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway!Adrtjinist'ration RD-77-1081 I
Traffic Noise Pre1dicti~>n M~del (CALVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: Avenida Encinas 1-5
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
Peak Hour Traffic:
Vehicle Speed:
Centerline Separation:
NOISE INPUTS
~1te conamons HARD SI It:
FLEET MIX
Type Day Evenina Niaht Dailv
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 54.8 63.6 61.8 55.7 64.4
Medium Trucks: 64.5 56.5 50.1 48.5 57.0
Heavy Trucks: 69.8 53.6 44.5 45.8 55.7
Vehicle Noise: 72.2 64.9 62.2 57.0 65.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: '
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.027 0.108 0.0028
CNEL
65.0
57.2
55.8
66.1
CNEL
'
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
474
150 600
47 400
200 ... a, 0 a, u.
-200
-400
-600
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway IAdrn!nist~ation ~D-77-1081
Traffic Noise Preclictiqn M~del (C~LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: 1-5 to Paseo del Norte
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: {;'.i .. ;>;J•
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: a2iijf4
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3287.4
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: .,,'35
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,.. .·:LL:§6.
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ::me conamons HAKU ::;11 c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Dav Evenina Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 55.0 63.8 62.0 55.9 64.6 65.2
Medium Trucks: 64.7 56.6 50.3 48.7 57.2 57.4
Heavy Trucks: 69.9 53.8 44.7 45.9 55.8 56.0
Vehicle Noise: 72.4 65.0 62.4 57.2 65.8 66.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERUNE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
493
156 600
49 400
200
';j 0 QI I&.
-200
-400
-600
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' Federal Highway lf\dministiation R'o-77-108I
I Traffic Noise Predictitjn M~del (C-4,LVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: Paseci del Norte to Batiquitos
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: /i~i~i~~;i Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3036.8 ·
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: !till1,{, 351
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: T42.·
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~11e conomons HARD 511 t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 54.5 63.3 61.6 55.5 64.1 64.7
Medium Trucks: 64.3 56.2 49.8 48.2 56.7 57.0
Heavy Trucks: 69.5 53.3 44.3 45.5 55.4 55.5
Vehicle Noise: 71.9 64.6 61.9 56.7 65.3 65.8
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
455 600 144
46 400
200 .. a, 0 a, u..
-200
-400
-600
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal HighwayjAdniinist1ration RD-77-108I
Traffic Noise Predicti~n M~odel (C'A.LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: Batiquitos to Aviara
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: _.,;-J;;\;-c•';• -. 0 ..
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: /-·i 5'24 264 1~-1\~ , , .
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2426.4
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: --. 41~;
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,;:,.''• . _· __ (2t
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~ne cona1t1ons HARD .:,11 t::
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.7 65.5 63.7 57.6 66.3 66.9
Medium Trucks: 65.0 56.9 50.5 49.0 57.5 57.7
Heavy Trucks: 69.5 53.4 44.3 45.5 55.1 55.2
Vehicle Noise: 71.8 66.4 64.0 58.5 67.1 67.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
692
219 800
69 600
400
200
'i 0 .. LL.
-200
-400
-600
-800
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway[Adm
1
inistration ~b-77-1081 I Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (CALVENO) , I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: La Costa Avenue
Road Segment: Carlsbad to Vulcan
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA ·,
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: :•.-\,,";._, -·o
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: s~~tm(~Q3
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2060.3
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: Jti'.~ Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: I
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 site conanions HARD :>11 1:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 53.2 62.0 60.2 54.1 · 62.7 63.3
Medium Trucks: 62.9 54.8 48.4 46.9 55.3 55.6
Heavy Trucks: 68.1 51.9 42.9 44.1 54.0 54.1
Vehicle-Noise: 70.5 63.2 60.6 55.3 63.9 64.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINENO~ECONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
98 400 309
31 300
200
100
(D 0 G) II.
-100
-200
-300
-400
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
ii
" :1 ii
II ,I
!I
II i
:1
\l :1 .,
:1 Tl ii
11
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
Federal Highway IAdm,inistbtion RD-77-1081
Traffic Noise Predictiqn M~del (CALVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: La Costa Avenue
Road Segment: Vulcan to 1-5
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ,i>f'~":, 0 ,,_ ·-,
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: .;;;:i1~i.403
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2240.3
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: 35
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ~•, :., 24
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 -:>Ire conamons HARD ~• • c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 53.5 62.3 60.5 54.5 63.1 63.7
Medium Trucks: 63.2 55.2 48.8 47.2 55.7 55.9
Heavv Trucks: 68.5 52.3 43.2 44.5 54.4 54.5
Vehicle Noise: 70.9 63.6 60.9 55.7 64.3 64.8
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
336 400 106
34 300
200
100 -; 0 Cl) II,,
-100
-200
-300
-400
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway 1Administfation RD-77-1081
Traffic Noise Predicti~n M~del (C~LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: La Costa Avenue
Road Segment: 1-5 to Piraeus
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ':t~-2s:t1:I\ Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2371.3
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: W~~~··~=~-~l ,. ·'•
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ft£·:]:.,, -,...,. ..,
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~necona1t1onsHARU~11c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenino Nioht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 53.6 62.4 60.6 54.5 63.1 63.8
Medium Trucks: 63.3 55.2 48.8 47.3 55.7 56.0
Heavy Trucks: 68.5 52.3 43.3 44.5 54.4 54.5
Vehicle-Noise: 70.9-63.6 61.0 55.7 64.3 64.8
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
355
112 400
36 300
200
100 -GI 0 GI II.
-100
-200
-300
-400
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal HighwayiAdminist~ation Rb-77-1081 I
Traffic Noise Predicti~n Mbdel (C~LVENO)
Project Name;
Analyst:
• Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: La Costa Avenue
Road Segment: Piraeus to El Camino Real
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: .. ,,, :g;
Average Daily Traffic: 3g,~_@,
Peak Hour Traffic: 3246.1
6=~~~~i~:;:~aration: tj,: ;: {ilhli.
NOISE INPUTS
Site conc:11t1ons ~ SITE
FLEET MIX
Tvoe Dav Evening Niaht Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0,865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos; 60.5 69.3 67.5 61.4 70.1
Medium Trucks; 67.6 59.5 53.2 51.6 60.1
Heavy Trucks: 71.6 55.4 46.4 47.6 56.8
Vehicle Noise: 73.9 69.9 .67.7 62.0 70.7
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.027 0.108 0.0028
CNEL
70.7
60.3
57.0
71.2
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1578 2000 499
158 1500
1000
500 .. GI 0 GI u.
-500
-1000
-1500
-2000
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway 1Administration RD-77-1081
Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (CALVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Interim Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: La Costa Avenue
Road Segment: East of El Camino Real
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: :~;j~{~ci1 Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1960.3
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ~T:1~~211 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ::>rte conditions HARD ::,11 t:.
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Dav Evening Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 55.9 64.7 62.9 56.8 65.5 66.1
Medium Trucks: 64.2 56.1 49.7 48.1 56.6 56.9
Heavy Trucks: 68.7 52.5 43.5 44.7 · 54.2 54.4
Vehicle Noise: 71.0 65.5 63.2 57.7 66.3 66.8
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
560
177
56
800
600
400
200
i 0 I.I.
-200
-400
-600
-800
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
!-I
I
I
I
1:
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway 1Adminisdation RD-77-1081
Traffic Noise Predicti6n Mbdel (C~LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Palomar Airport Road to Island Way
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ,:L~~~~~ Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2338.7
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ;;~ ·. '~
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: -,· .,: __ -:iffl~
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 s,te conc11t1ons HARD ~• • t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 57.7 66.4 64.6 58.6 67.2 67.8
Medium Trucks: 65.4 59.1 52.7 51.2 59.6 59.9
Heavy Trucks: 69.6 58.2 49,1 50.3 59.7 59.8
Vehicle Noise: 71.9 67.8 65.1 59.9. 68.5 69.0
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
990
313 1500
99 1000
500 .. GI 0 G> II.
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
Federal HighwaylAdm1inist~ation RD-77-1081
Traffic Noise Preclicti~n M~del (C~LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Island Way to Breakwater
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: )(?,,,',Qi
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: . 23aa/
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2338.7
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: " . ·-:-~,:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: i: '.L~tiJ
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: ' 0.5 ~1te cond1t1ons HARD :,11 t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 -0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavv Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 57.8 66.5 64.7 58.6 67.3 67.9
Medium Trucks: 65.5 59.2 52.8 51.2 59.7 60.0
Heavy Trucks: 69.7 58.2 49.2 50.4 59.8 59.9
Vehicle Noise: 72.0 67.9 65.1 60.0 68.6 69:1
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
989 1500 313
99 1000
500
'ai 0 Cl> LL
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway! Adniinistration RD-77-108 I I
I Traffic Noise Predictibn M'.odel (CJl.LVENO) I I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Breakwater to Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ,c,:'-· .,li), ,-;:\.1/"t:-i,
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: l~~~~~38:i:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2338.7
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: . ·.··~: .:f?~s(f
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,: .... , ~\Jl~!
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 I::;1te cona1t1ons HAKLJ ::;11 c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night Daily
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavv Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 57.8 66.5 64.7 58.6 67.3 67.9
Medium Trucks: 65.5 59.2 52.8 51.2 59.7 60.0
Heavy Trucks: 69.7 58.2 49.2 50.4 59.8 59.9
Vehicle Noise: 72.0 67.9 65.1 -60.0 68.6 69.1
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerllne Noise Contour
989 1500 313
99 1000
500
-; 0 ~ LL.
-500
-1000
-1500
I
I
I
I.
I
I.
I
I
I'
I
I
I
.I
·1
I
I
I
I
I
' Federal HighwayIAdniinist1ration RD-77-1081
I Traffic Noise Predictibn M~odel (Cl;\LVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Poinsettia to Avenida Encinas
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ,._, . .-,_.,-, 0 ... _·,.•.•,,·
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: .·' f\!~:,065
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1406.5
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: · ·.:> •!80
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: "' ;~-,~·;;:.'48
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site cond1t1ons HARD ~I I I:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Nioht Daily
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NIOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 55.6 64.3 62.5 56.4 65.1 65.7
Medium Trucks: 63.2 57.0 50.6 49.0 57.5 57.8
Heavy Trucks: 67.5 56.0 47.0 48:2 57.6 57.7
-Vehicle Noise: 69.8 65.7 62.9 57.8 66.4 66.9
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
596
188 800
60 600
400
200
ai 0 GI II..
-200
-400
-600
-800
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway1Adm'inist1ration ~D-77-1081
Traffic Noise Predictibn Mpdel (CALVENO) I I -
I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Avenida Encinas to La Costa
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ~;:~~g:· Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2607.8
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: -\~
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: :;.: -.. ::_flt
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~Ile cond1t1ons HARD :SI It:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Dav EveninQ Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 58.3 67.0 65.2 59.1 67.8 68.4
Medium Trucks: 65.9 59.7 53.3 51.7 60.2 60.4
Heavy Truc;ks: 70.2 58.7 49.7 50.9 60.3 60.4
Vehicle Noise: 72.5 68.4 65.6 60.5 69.1 69,6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1104
349 1500
110 1000
500
'lii 0 CD u..
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily.
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway[Adm)nist~ation ~D-77-1081
Traffic Noise Predictitj>n M~del (CALVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: La Costa to Leucadia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: .,<~;;~ Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3138.4
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ,''" '5Q
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,, .··,,, ,;,j~~:'
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site cond1t1ons HARD ::,11 t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Dav Evenino Nioht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 · 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 59.3 68.1 66.3 60.2 68.9 69.5
Medium Trucks: 67.0 60.8 54.4 52.8 61.3 61.5
Heavv Trucks: 71.2 59.8 50.7 52.0 61.4 61.5
Vehicle Noise: 73.6 69.5 66.7 61.6 70.2 70.7
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heaw Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1327
420 1500
133 1000
500 .. IP 0 IP u..
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway/Ad~inis~ration 1.0-77-1081
Traffic Noise Predicti9n M,odel (C~LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: South of Leucadia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: . : :'·:O:
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ·3f~G <,.',):·,,,) ,, ,'
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3199
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ;;~;;,,~iii Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ::me conditions HARD SI It:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Dav EveninQ NiQht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 59.4 68.2 66.4 60.3 68.9 69.5
Medium Trucks: 67.1 60.8 54.5 52.9 61.4 61.6
Heavy Trucks: 71.3 59.9 50.8 52.1 61.4 61.6
Vehicle Noise: 73.6 69.5 66.8 61.7 70.3 70.8
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1355
429 1500
136 1000
500
-; 0 Ill II-
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway1 Adrriinis~ration ~.D-77-108I
Traffic Noise Pr~dicti~m M,odel (CALVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: Cannon Road to Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ' :_·' :Q,
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: :_::{{i~900
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 990
Vehicle Speed: ff Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 ~td:, . ; :f:I: Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,,, ·?~.,J
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ::;ne conamons HAKU .:,11 c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Dav EveninQ NiQht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0 .
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heaw Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day LeqEvening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 51.4 60.2 58.5 52.4 61.0 61.6
Medium Trucks: 60.4 52.3 45.9 44.4 52.9 53.1
Heavy Trucks: 65.2 49.1 40.0 41.2 51.0 51.1
Vehicle Noise: 67.6 61.3 58.8 53.4 62.0 62.5
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
208
66 300
21 200
100 ., a, a, ll.
-200
-300
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway 1Administ~ation RD-77-1081
I I Traffic Noise Predicti~n Mbdel (CALVENO) ' Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: South of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DAT A SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ")clri: Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1004.8
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: r iiJ;\-::~: Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 1;::me cono1t1ons HARD-siTE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Dav Evening Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavv Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 51.5 60.3 58.5 52.4 61.1 61.7
Medium Trucks: 60.5 52.4 46.0 44.4 52.9 53.2
Heavy Trucks: 65.3 49.1 40.1 41.3 51.0 51.2
Vehicle Noise: 67-.7 61.3 58.8 53.5 62.1 62.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
211
67 300
21 200
100
ai 0 GI LL.
-100
-200
-300
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~-I
I
I
I
I I
Federal HighwayIAdm1inist~ation RD-77-108 I
Traffic Noise Predicti~n Mpdel (CJl.LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: North of Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: }'.•···.· ·,::;t!; Barrier (O=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ; · ,10.~§,.
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1004.8
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: !Att .·;:s:~11 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~ne conamons HARO tt11 c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening NiQht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 48.0 56.8 55.0 48.9 57.6 58.2
Medium Trucks: 58.6 50.5 44.2 42.6 51.1 51.3
Heavy Trucks: 64.3 48.1 39.0 40.3 50.4 50.5
Vehicle Noise: 66.8 58.4 55.5 50.5 59.1 59.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
103 150 33
10 100
50 .. a> 0 a> u..
-50
-100
-150
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
' ~ ii i 1 Ii !
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ' Federal HighwaylAdm1inist~ation RD-77-1081
Traffic Noise Pre~icti~n M~del (C~LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: South of Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: JD
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: t5-'tl48 , -~r"
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1574.8
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ~,. t:I;i~~-Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ::me cona1t1ons ~ SITE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Day Evening Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavv Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 51.7 60.5 58.7 52.6 61.3 61.9
Medium Trucks: 61.4 53.3 47.0 45.4 53.9 54.1
Heavv Trucks: 66.6 50.5 41.4 42.6 52.5 52.7
Vehicle Noise: 69.1 61.7 59.1 53.9 62.5 63.0
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
236
75 300
24 200
100 .. GI 0 GI u..
-100
-200
-300
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, Federal HighwaylAdm1inist~ation ~D-77-108I I
Traffic Noise Predicti~n Mpdel (C.O.LVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Roadway:
Road Segment:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Avenida Encinas
East of Ponto
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: O
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Future
Job #: 25-101951
SITE DATA
:3:!:;~;~y Traffic: ,· ._ ·'.~iiJk~i
Peak Hour Traffic: 1559.7
Vehicle Speed: \}35
Centerline Separation: . .:1~i.:. .,. ~Q:
NOISE INPUTS
Site conamons HARD ~n ~
FLEET MIX
Tvoe Dav Evenina Niaht Daily
Auto 0. 775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 51.8 60.6 58.9 52.8 61.4 62.0
Medium Trucks: 61.6 53.5 47.1 45.5 54.0 54.3
Heavy Trucks: 66.8 50.6 41.6 42.8 52.7 52.8
Vehicle Noise: 69:2 61.9 59.2 54.0 62.6 63.1
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS {With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
234
74 300
23 200
100 .. QI 0 QI LI.
-100
-200
-300
' !'
,.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway~Adm1inist1ration RD-77-108 / /
1 Traffic Noise Pre1dicti~n M1,odel (CALVENO) I I
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria-Cadiz
Roadway:
Road Segment:
College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway
North of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Future
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
Peak Hour Traffic:
Vehicle Speed:
Centerline Separation:
Day Even in Night Daily
0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
. UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 58.6 67.4 65.6 59.5 68.2 68.8
Medium Trucks: 66.3 58.2 51.8 50.2 58.7 59.0
Heavy Trucks: 70.5 54.3 45.3 46.5 55.9 56.0
Vehicle Noise: 72.8 68.1 65.8 60.3 68.9 69.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1018
322 1500
102 1000
500
al 0 QI Ii.
-500
-1000
-1500
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I '
Federal Highway!Adm1inist~ation ~D-77-1081
Traffic Noise Predicti~m M~del (CALVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway
Road Segment: Palomar Airport Road to Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: '-'.:\'.,:t i.O
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: -~~i~ar
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 938.7
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: it~t : ' ·4$,
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ' ;_,, ... :~ii.~]
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ::,ne conamons HARD ::»u I c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night Daily
Barrier Height 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 52.7 61.5 59.7 53.6 62.3 62.9
Medium Trucks: 61.0 52.9 46.5 44.9 53.4 53.7
_ Heavy Trucks: 65.5 49.3 40.3 41.5. 51.0 51.2
Vehicle Noise: 67.8 62.3 60:0 54.5 63.1 63.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
268
85 300 ..--------------------.
27 200
100
i 0 u..
-100
-200
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-I·
I
I
I
I
' Federal Highway[ Adniinist'ration RD-77-1081
I ' Traffic Noise Predicti~n M~del (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway
Road Segment: Poinsettia Batiquitos
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ,_. \_::t:~0\
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: <)lgi!~' '\ .. }~ .. ;-'.-,-..
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1984.8
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: :··>.Tft4o
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: i ~-~:~t~~;~ii
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~1te conamons HARD SI 11:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night Daily
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.Q184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 54.4 63.2 61.4 55.3 64.0 64.6
Medium Trucks: 63.3 55.3 48.9 47.3 55.8 56.0
Heavy Trucks: 68.2 52.0 43.0 44.2 53.9 54.0
Vehicle Noise: 70.5 64.2 61.7 56;3 64.9 65.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
417
132 600
42 400
200
~ 0 CD IL
-200
-400
-600
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highwa/Administ~ation RD-77-1081 I
, Traffic Noise Predicti~n M6del (C~LVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Paseo Del Norte
Road Segment: North of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Future
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: ,,::i:<,-. :0.
Average Daily Traffic: ~8\~;6.il,j:
Peak Hour Traffic: 2364.8
Vehicle Speed: ,~,,;,:,1
-;_~~:
Centerline Separation: , . -.,. ,
NOISE INPUT~S-------11
"'re conamons HARD 511 a:
FLEET MIX
Type Day Evening Night -Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 53.5 62.3 60.5 54.4 63.0 63.6
Medium Trucks: 63.2 55.1 48.7 47.2 55.6 55.9
Heavy Trucks: 68.4 52.2 43.2 44.4 54.3 54.4
Vehicle Noise: 70.8 63.5 60.9 55.6 64.2 64.7
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
355 400 112
36 300
200
100 -; 0 GI LI.
-100
-200
-300
-400
j' ! i-·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I Federal Highway IAdministtation RD-77-108 I
I I Traffic Noise Pre~icti~n M~del (C~LVENO) 1 I
Project Name:, Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Paseo Del Norte
Road Segment: Palomar Airport Road Camino de Las Ondas
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ,, . -}=iO
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ~~894 ~?i/': ',.
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1799.4
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: }~;tJi1t~Jl Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conditions HARD :SI I t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenino Nioht Daily
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 54.0 62.8 61.1 55.0 63.6 64.2
Medium Trucks: 63.0 54.9 48.5 47.0 55.5 55.7
Heavy Trucks: 67.8 51.7 42.6 43.8 53.6 53.7
Vehicle Noise: 70.2 63.9 61.4 56.0 -64.6 65.1
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
378
120 500 .---------------------,
38
400
300
200
100 l o
u.. -100
-200
-300
-400 -500 ..._ _________________ .....J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway ~dminist~ation R:D-77-108 I I
Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (C~LVENO) 1 ,
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Scenario: Future
Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Paseo Del Norte
Road Segment: Camino de Las Ondas to Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Rt View: 90 Lft View:
SITE DATA
Road Grade: ' · · · 0
Average Daily Traffic: i;~Jf1f7;99~.
Peak Hour Traffic: 1799.4
Vehicle Speed: Ifttl 40
Centerline Separation: fj/: j}.ibali
NOISE INPUTS
i:me conamons HARD ~• • t:
FLEET MIX
Type Day Evening Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 54.0 62.8 61.1 55.0 63.6 64.2
Medium Trucks: 63.0 54.9 48.5 47.0 55.5 55.7
Heavv Trucks: 67.8 51.7 42.6 43.8 53.6 53.7
Vehicle Noise: 70.2 63.9 61.4 56.0 64.6 65.1
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
378
120
38
Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
500 -.-------------------, 400 __________________ _,
300
200
100 'i 0
u. -100
-200
-300
-400 ;----------------~~--1 -500 _._ _________________ _,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' Federal Highway lo.dministlation R1D-77-108 I
I ' Traffic Noise Predictitjn M6del (Ck,LVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Carlsbad Boulevard to Avenida Encinas
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: .· . -•--'~
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: --. 1~t~tr
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1419.7
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ~,.;;i}:§fii~ Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 site conamons HARD ::;11 t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavv Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 51.4 60.2 58.4 52.3 60.9 61.6
Medium Trucks: 61.2 54.9 48.5 46.9 55.4 55.7
Heavv Trucks: 66.4 54.9 45.9 47.1 57.0 57.1
Vehicle Noise: 68.8 62.5 59.1 54.7 63.2 63.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:·
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
264 300 83
26 200
100
al 0 Ill u.
-100
-200
-300
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal HighwayfAdniinistration RD-77-108I
Traffic Noise Predicti~n M~del (CALVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Avenida Encinas to Paseo del Norte
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ,,,;rt12{:;~ Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 7219.7
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: _;:<·.$·
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,_·,,,:·<-:4::2
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ::me conamons HARD s11 t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 58.3 67.0 65.3 59.2 67.8 68.4
Medium Trucks: 68.0 61.8 55.4 53.8 62.3 62.5
Heavy Trucks: 73.2 61.8 52.7 54.0 63.9 64.0
Vehicle Noise: 75.7 69.4 66.0 61.5 70.1 70.5
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise: . .
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1340
424 1500
134 1000
500 .. GI 0 GI LL.
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway ~dministfation RD-77-1081
Traffic Noise Predicti~n M~del (C~LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Paseo de! Norte to Armada
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: st',:,_t~if; Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Dally Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 6719.7
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: " ,:;i'.~' -. ' 45,
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ri:, i · ,: :, ,':~jj
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~Ite conditions HARD SITE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Dav Evenino Nioht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 61.0 69.8 68.0 61.9 70.6 71.2
Medium Trucks: 69.3 63.1 56.7 55.1 63.6 63.8
Heavy Trucks: 73.8 62.4 53.4 54.6 64.1 64.2
Vehicle Noise: 76.2 71.4 68.5 63.5 72.1 12.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2209
698 3000
221 2000
1000 .. GI 0 Cl> II.
-1000
-2000
-3000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway ~dmjnistfation ~D-77-1081
Traffic Noise Predictiqn M6del (CJ;\LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Armada to Hidden Valley
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ,,, 64~j; Barrier ( 0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 6479.4
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: .::,; '.· l,•~~~lr
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ·">~';~~~s~
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~ne conamons HARU ::;11 c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Nioht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 63.4 72.1 70.3 64.3 72.9 73.5
Medium Trucks: 70.5 64.3 57.9 56.3 64.8 65.0
Heavy Trucks: 74.5 63.1 54.0 55.2 64.5 64.6
Vehicle Noise: 76.8 73.3 70.7 65.4 74.0 74.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
3469
1097
347
4000
3000
2000
1000 -; 0 CII IL
-1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway ~dminist~ation R;D-77-108 i I
I
I Traffic Noise Predictitjn Model (C~LVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Hidden Valley to College
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ::t ·-,0
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ·. ·-•·· (5~i~d,f
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 6109.4
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ir.;ij:. :· ,:}!i; Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~ne cona1t1ons lfARD SITE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Day Evenino Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 63.1 71.9 70.1 64.0 72.7 73.3
Medium Trucks: 70.3 64.0 57.6 56.1 64.5 64.8
Heavy Trucks: 74.2 62.8 53.7 55.0 64.2 64.3
Vehicle Noise: 76.5 73.1 70.4 65.2 73.8 74.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
3275
1036 4000
327 3000
2000
1000 ,; 0 Cl> u..
-1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I Federal Highway ~dministtation RD-77-1081
Traffic Noise Predicti~n M~del (CALVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: College to Camino Vida Roble
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: --_;li~i~ll Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3923.6
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: : Ii~r::: Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~,re conamons HARD ::,11 t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenina Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 61.2 70.0 68.2 62.1 70.7 71.3
Medium Trucks: 68.4 62.1 55.7 54.1 62.6 62.9
Heavy Trucks: 72.3 60.9 51.8 53.0 62.3 62.4
Vehicle Noise: 74.6 71.1 68.5 63.3 71.9 72.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2100
664 3000
210 2000
1000 • 0 41 I/.,
-1000
-2000
-3000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,.1
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Administ~ation Rb-77-108
I I I Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model cc4LVENO} I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Camino Vida Roble to El Camino Real
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ;.:~iti,w~~: Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3938.7
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: \ •· ·/:~,s~:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: IJ,t4~i
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conditions HARD ~• • t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenina Night Daily
Barrier Height: 0 Auto· 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 61.2 70.0 68.2 62.1 70.8 71.4
Medium Trucks: 68.4 62.1 55.7 54.2 62.6 62.9
Heavy Trucks: 72.3 60.9 51.8 53.1 62.3 62.4
Vehicle Noise: 74.6 71.2 68.5 63.3 71.9 72.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heaw Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2109 3000 667
211 2000
1000
ai 0 a> IL
-1000
-2000
-3000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway: Adr,iinis~ration RD-77-1081
Traffic Noise Predicti~>n M,odel (C~LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: El Camino Real to El Fuerte
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade:
:::f ~iil\~4{ Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 7234.2
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: --~,.i~~:: Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 :sne conamons HARD ~• • c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night Daily
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 63.9 72.6 70.8 64.7 73.4 74.0
Medium Trucks: 71.0 64.7 58.4 56.8 65.3 65.5
Heavy Trucks: 75.0 63.5 54.5 55.7 65.0 65.1
Vehicle Noise: 77.3 73.8 71.2 65.9 74.5 75.0
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
3874
1225 5000 ,----------------------,
387
4000
3000
2000
1000 i 0
u.. -1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
-5000 ~----------------~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway 1Administfation R'o-77-1081 I
I Traffic Noise Predicti~n M~del (C4,LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: El Fuerte to Melrose
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: '' 0
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ,,', · 72342
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 7234.2
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ' ' 5$'., -~;~~i:: \1'·
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: j;,k:,.J_8
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ::site conamons HARD ~• • ~
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvpe Day Evenina Niaht Daily
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 63.9 72.6 70.8 64.7 73.4 74.0
Medium Trucks: 71.0 64.7 58.4 56.8 65.3 65.5
Heavy Trucks: 75.0 63.5 54.5 55.7 65.0 65.1
Vehicle Noise: 77.3 73;8 71.2 65.9 74.5 75.0
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
3874
1225 5000 ,----------------------.
387
4000
3000
2000
1000 i 0
u. -1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
-5000 ~-------------------'
,I I ;! :I
:1
:1
ll
'1 I' ;/ !I i!
!i :1 ,,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ' Federal HighwayfAd~inist'ration RD-77-1081
I ' Traffic Noise Predicti~n M~odel (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: North of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ,, -'£1'
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: if.~.ttJQ648
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 4964.8
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: X~t~:i;i~~!i Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ::me conomons HAR.U ~• • c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Dav Evenina Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.6 65.3 63.5 57.5 66.1 66.7
Medium Trucks: 66.3 60.1 53.7 52.1 60.6 60.8
Heavy Trucks: 71.5 60.1 51.0 52.3 62.2 62.3
Vehicle Noise: 74.0 67.7 64.3 59.8 68.4 68.8
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
923
292 1500
92 1000
500 ... G) 0 Cl> II.
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway ~dmi1nist~ation R,D-77-108
I I I Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (CALVENO)
· Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: Palomar Airport Road to Camino Vida Roble
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: I:,~1;J{i~f ~~~! Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 5299.7
Centerline Dist. To Observer: Vehicle Speed: '·" '35 100
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: .,.=;..;;:,... ...... 4ff
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conamons HARD ;:,11 t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peakleq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.9 65.6 63.8 57.7 66.4 67.0
Medium Trucks: 66.6 60.3 54.0 52.4 60.9 61.1
Heavy Trucks: 71.8 60.4 51.3 52.5 62.4 62.6
Vehicle Noise: 74.2 68.0 64.6 60.1 -68.7 69.1 -
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
984 1500 311
98 1000
500
~ 0 Cl) LL
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily I
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I :
Federal Highway Administ~ation Rlo-77-108
Traffic Noise Predicti~n M9del cc4LVENO) I I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: Camino Vida Roble to Cassia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: }:0/'';~ .0.
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: t['f!.' :\ . 49,Jli
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 4979.7
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: :::::~llrll: Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ;:,ne cona1t1ons HARD :111 c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Dav Evenina Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.6 65.3 63.6 57.5 66.1 66.7
Medium Trucks: 66.3 60.1 53.7 52.1 60.6 60.8
Heavv Truc:ks: 71.5 60.1 51.0 52.3 62.2. 62.3
Vehicle Noise: 74.0 · 67.7 64.3 59;8 68.4 68.8
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
925 1500 293
92 1000
500 .. CII 0 CII u..
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I
I I
I Federal Highway Administr'ation RD-77-108 I Traffic Noise Predictio~n Mtidel (CALVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: Cassia to La Costa
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline l)ist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ~~:iii Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ,,
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 6159.7
Centerline l)ist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: , ,.~::2jll Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conomons HARD 511 t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Dav Evenina Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq LeqDay Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 63.2 71.9 70.1 64.0 72.7 73.3
Medium TnJcks: 70.3 64.0 57.7 56.1 64.6 64.8
Heavy Trucks: 74.3 62.8 53.8 55.0 64.3 64.4
Vehicle Noise: 76.6 73/1 70.5 65.2 73.8 74.3-
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
3297
1043 4000
330 3000
2000
1000 .. Cl> 0 if
-1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal HighwayiAdm1inist~ation RD-77-1081 I
' '
I ' ' Traffic Noise Predicti◊n Mpdel (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: La Costa to Leucadia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: :~i~~\ Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 4694.B
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: .:~1!:!~~I:: Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conc11tIons HARD SITE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Day Evening Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 62.0 70.7 68.9 62.9 71.5 72.1
Medium Trucks: 69.1 62.9 56.5 54.9 63.4 63.6
Heavy Trucks: 73.1 61.7 52.6 53.8 63.1 63.2
Vehicle Noise: 75.4 71.9 -69.3 64.0 72.6 73.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2513
795 3000
251 2000
1000
-; 0 GI u..
-1000
-2000
-3000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
i;
! ,,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' , Federal Highway lA.dminist~ation RD-77-108I I
1 Traffic Noise Predictitjn M~del (C~LVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Roadway:
Road Segment:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Poinsettia Lane
Carlsbad to Avenida Encinas
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): O
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
0.5
0
Scenario: Future
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA :~:!::~;!y Traffic: ~,~f}[~;;7~
Peak Hour Traffic: 627 .8
Vehicle Speed: . . ---35
. Centerline Separation: ;\1:,\'-i, ··" ~Jt
NOISE INPUTS
Site conamons HARD SITE
FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade}: 0
0
Type Day Evenino Nioht Daily
Barrier Height:
Rt View: 90 Lft View:
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet}
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
0
2.3
8
Auto 0.775
-90 Med. Truck 0.848
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 47.9 56.7 54.9 48.8 57.5
Medium Trucks: 57.6 49.5 43.2 41.6 50.1
Heavy Trucks: 62.8 46.7 37.6 38.8 48.7
Vehicle Noise: 65.3 57.9 55.3 _50.'1 58.7
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise: '
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.129 0.096 0.9789
0.049 0.103 0.0184
0.027 0.108 0.0028
CNEL
58.1
50.3
48.9
59.2 -
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
94
30 150
9 100
50
ai 0 CII u.
-50
-100
-150
' ,--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal HighwayiAdm1inist1ration RD-77-1081
I
'
I Traffic Noise Predicti~n M,bdel (CALVENO) 1
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: Avenida Encinas 1-5
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: :-11•~:'. ;!~\::"fl
Barrier ( 0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: .. >:X~'ei21~
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 627.8
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: .3fr
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: i.i_...._,,, .. .. :~.
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conamons HARD ::,111:;
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening NiQht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Truc;:ks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 47.8 56.6 54.8 48.7 57.4 58.0
Medium Trucks: 57.5 49.4 43.1 41.5 50.0 50.2
Heavv Trucks: 62.7 46.6 37.5 38.7 48.6 48.8
Vehlcle Noise: 65.2 57.8 55.2 50.0 58.6 -59.1
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERUNE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
94 150 30
9 100
50 .. Q) 0 Cl) u.
-50
-100
-150
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway ~dmihistr~tion RD-77-108 I I
, Traffic Noise Predictioh M~del (CP!LVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: 1-5 to Paseo del Norte
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
Scenario: Future
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
Peak Hour Traffic:
6:~~:~i;:;:~aration: . ,::i~iiff
NOISE INPUTS
Site conditions lfARD 51H:
FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade):
0
0
0
Type Dav Evenina Night Daily
Barrier Height: Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trncks:
Heavv Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 55.1 63.9 62.1 56.0 64.7
Medium TrtJcks: 64.8 56.8 50.4 48.8 57.3
Heavv Trucks: 70.0 53.9 44.8 46.1 56.0
Vehlcle Noise: 72.5 65.2 62;5 57.3 65.9
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.027
CNEL
65.3
57.5
56.1
66.4
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
508
161 600
51 400
200 .. Cl> 0 Cl> u..
-200
-400
-600
0.108 0.0028
)I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway Administiation RD-77-108 I
I I Traffic Noise Pre~ictitjn M6del (C4,LVENO) 1 I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: Paseo del Norte to Batiquitos
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ;;:,./(3~}~11 Barrier (O=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3443.2
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: :3:5:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ' , ,,A2]
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conamons HARD SITE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenina Niqht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 lftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: ·s
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 55.1 63.9 62.1 56.0 64.7 65.3
Medium Trucks: 64.8 56.7 50.4 48.8 57.3 57.5
Heavy Truc:ks: 70.0 53.9 44.8 46.0 55.9 56.1
Vehicle Noise: 72.5 65.1 62.5 57.3 65.9 66.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise: --
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
517 600 163
52 400
200
'i 0 CD II.
-200
-400
-600
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway1Adm1inist~ation RD-77-1081
I : Traffic Noise Predicti~n M~del (CALVENO) , I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: Batiquitos to Aviara
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: Q
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ', 16,93ti
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1693.6
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: L~,tI!I Barrier Necir Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ::;ne conamons HARD SI u:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Dav Evenina Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavv Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 55.2 64.0 62.2 56.1 64.7 65.3
Medium Trucks: 63.4 55.4 49.0 47.4 55.9 56.1
Heavv Trucks: 68.0 51.8 42.7 44.0 53.5 53.6
Vehicle Noise: 70.3 64.8 62.4 56.9 65.5 66.1
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
483
153 600
48 400
200 .. CD 0 CD LL.
-200
-400
-600
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' Federal Highwa~ Adrriinis~ration ~D-77-1081 I
Traffic Noise Predicti~n fVlodel (CALVENO) 1 1
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway:
Road Segment:
La Costa Avenue
Carlsbad to Vulcan
PROJECT DAT A
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=-wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Future
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
:~:!~;ai;:y Traffic: . )floo~g~
Peak Hour Traffic: 1329.7
Vehicle Speed: ·: ·':'·'' · 35
Centerline Separation: . .-'.,:/:t--2.;.4;
NOISE INPUTS
Sitecond1t1onsHARDSl1~
FLEET MIX
Type Dav Evenina Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 51.3 60.1 58.3 52.2 60.8 61.4
Medium Trucks: 61.0 52.9 46.5 44.9 53.4 53.7
Heavy Trucks: 66.2 50.0 41.0 42.2 52.1 52.2
Vehicle Noise: 68.6 61.3 58.7 53.4 62.0 62.5
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
199 250 63 200
20 150
100 ... 50
IP 0 IP I&. -50
-100
-150
-200
-250
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highwayf Adniinistration RD-77-1081
I I : Traffic Noise Predicti~n M:odel (C~LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: La Costa Avenue
Road Segment: Vulcan to 1-5
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: .. --·o
. Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: . ;,f~l)97
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1609.7
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ~Jf ti,~;:·:11 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conditions HARD ~• rE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenino Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0_.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day LeqEvening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 52.1 60.9 59.1 53.0 61.7 62.3
Medium Trucks: 61.8 53.7 47.4 45.8 54.3 54.5
Heavy Trucks: 67.0 50.9 41.8 43.0 52.9 53.1
Vehicle Noise: 69.5 62.1 59.5 54.3 62.9 63.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
241
76 300
24 200
100
i 0 II-
-100
-200
-300
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
"' :1
;/
!I ·1
Ii I
i
i
11 ii
I' l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highwa~ Adrrlinis~ration ~D-77-1081
Traffic Noise Predicti~n ~ode( (CALVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: La Costa Avenue
Road Segment: 1-5 to Piraeus
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ,·. 0
Barrier (0=:wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: . $'9.)187
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3918.7
Centerline Dist. To Observer; 100 Vehicle Speed: l\~:X ---~,: Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation; ,f> ·· Ail
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~,te cona1t1ons ~~ SITE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Day Evenino Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Typu Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos; 55.7 64.5 62.8 56.7 65.3 65.9
Medium Trucks: 65.5 57.4 51.0 49.4 57.9 58.2
f,feavy Trucks: 70.7 54.5 45.5 46.7 56.6 56.7
Vehicle Noise: 73.1 65.8 63.1 57.9 66.5 67.0
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
589
186 800
59 600
400
200
i 0 II-
-200
-400
-600
-800
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Fed,eral Highway! Adrriinis~ration RD-77-1081 I
, Traffic Noise Predicti~n M,odel (C~LVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vi~ion Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: La Costa Avenue
Road Segment: Piraeus to El Camino Real
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=:wall, 1= berm}:
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Future
Job#: 25~101951
SITE DATA
:~::a~;~:;y Traffic: ,: ,:: ;~ii.I:
Peak Hour Traffic: 3933.9
Vehicle Speed: :-;-:,J:+;:..;~55
Centerline Separation: !~,l1~~->" ~2
NOISE INPUTS
Site conamons HARD Sn t:
FLEET MIX
Tvoe Day Evenino Nioht Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening LeqNight Ldn CNEL
Autos: 61.3 70.1 68.3 62.3 70.9 71.5
Medium Trucks: 68.5 60.4 54.0 52.4 60.9 61.1
Heavy Trucks: 72.4 56.3 47.2 48.4 57.7 57.8
· Vehicle Noise: 74.7 70.8 68.5 62.9 71.5 72.1
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1911
604 2500
2000
191 1500
1000 .. 500
a> 0 a> u.. -500
-1000
-1500
-2000
-2500
1 ;·
!
i '
f i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, Federal Highwa~ Adn\inistration ~D-77-108I I
I Traffic Noise Predictipn ~odel (CALVENO}
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: La Costa Avenue
Road Segment: East of El Camino Real
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=:wall, 1 = berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
0
0
0
100
0
0
Scenario: Future
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
--il.>~-:'-::, , o
"{~J~t~~?:.
Peak Hour Traffic: 2049.7
Vehicle Speed:
Centerline Separation: if,,,;:::~,'.il
NOISE INPUTS
Da
Barrier Height:
0.5
0
0
0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heav Trucks:
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.1 64.9 63.1 57.0 65.7 66.3
Medium Trucks: 64.4 56.3 49.9 48.3 56.8 57.1
Heavy Trucks: 68.9 52.7 43.7 44.9 54.4 54.6
Vehicle Noise: 71.2 65.7 63.4 57.9 66.5 67.0
,
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
585
185 800
58 600
400
200 -;; 0 II) LI.
-200
-400
-600
-800
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal HighwayfAdm1inist~ation RD-77-1081
Traffic Noise PredictiJn Mbdel (CALVENO} I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Palomar Airport Road to Island Way
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ~l~ f;;,\Q
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm}: 0 Average Daily Traffic: ;-~ ,, ' -'246Q(~i
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2460
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ,: __ \:.·;t}~!ii
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: -~.~~~~~~jl;_-1JJ1:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~ne conamons t1AKU :s1, c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade}: 0 Type Day Evening Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 57.9 66.7 64.9 58.8 67.4 68.0
Medium Tr1Jcks: 65.6, 59.3 52.9 51.4 59.9 60.1
Heavy Trucks: 69.8 58.4 49.3 50.5 59.9 60.1
Vehicle Noise: -72.1 68.0 65.3 60.2 68.7 69.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE GONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1042 1500 329
104 1000
500
-; 0 QI u.
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway Admi'nistr1ation RD-77-108
I I I Traffic Noise Predictid.n M~del (CALVENO) I ' Project Narne: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: _ Island Way to Breakwater
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: 0
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: 24600
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: ·2460
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: 1l;ii~;:,~,~ Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ::me conditions HARD ~• • t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Dav Evenina Niaht
Barrier Hei~Jht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trncks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 58.0 66.7 64.9 58.9 67.5 68.1
Medium Tnicks: 65.7 59.4 53.0 51.5 59.9 60.2
Heavy Trucks: 69.9 58.5 49.4 50.6 60.0 60.1
Vehicle Noise: 72.2 68;1 65.4 60.2 68.8 69.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise: '
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1040 1500 329
104 1000
500
~ 0 QI IL
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
Federal Highway IAdminist~ation RD-77-1081
Traffic Noise Predicti~n Mhdel (C~LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Breakwater to Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier _ 0 Road Grade: ·'"·ttRii Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: >2,4' ___ ,,:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2460
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed; . ' "'.'1/~{r
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: --.;.~i::i~
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ::me conamons HA"Rrr"Sll t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Dav Evenina Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavv Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 58.0 66.7 64.9 58.9 67.5 68.1
Medium Trucks: 65.7 59.4 53.0 51.5 59.9 60.2
Heavy Trucks: 69.9 58.5 49.4 50.6 60.0 60.1
Vehicle Noise~ 72.2 68.1 65.4 60.2 68.8 69.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLllNE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1040
329 1500
104 1000
500
ai 0 Q) LL.
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway Admi1nist~ation Rb-77-108
I I I i I I I
' i Traffic Noise Predictio,n Model (C~LVENO)
' Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Poinsettia to Avenida Encinas
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: \'-,'(' 0
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: i'.22100
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2210
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: C• :J'.,t50
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ~~ :, ;. :";;!zJSi
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 :site conditions HARD 51TE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenina Night
Barrier Hei!Jht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 57.5 66.3 64.5 58.4 67.1 67.7
Medium Trucks: 65.2 59.0 52.6 51.0 59.5 59.7
Heavy Truc:ks: 69.4 58.0 48.9 50.2 59.6 59.7
Vehicle Noise: 7.1.8 67.6 64.9 59.8 68.4 68.9
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
936
296 1500
94 1000
500
~ 0 GI u.
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
;
I l r i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
' Federal Highway Admi'nist~ation Rb-77-108
I I : I Traffic Noise Predictid,n M~del (C4,LVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: Avenida Encinas to La Costa
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: :t/r!32~~1; Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3290
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: , : ;i/i;(a
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ~ , .. : -, :'~~1!!.
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~ite conditions HARD SI I t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day EveninQ Niqht Daily
Barrier Hei!ght: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
lJINMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic-or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 59.3 68.0 66.2 60.1 68.8 69.4
Medium Trucks: 66.9 60.7 54.3 52.7 61.2 61.4
Heavy Trucks: 71.2 59.7 50.7 51.9 61.3 61.4
Vehicle Noise: 73.5 .69.4 66.6 61.5 70.1 10.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1394
441 2000
139 1500
1000
500 .. Cl! 0 Cl! u..
-500
-1000
-1500
-2000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' Federal Highway Admi1nist~ation RD-77-108
I I
I
I I Traffic Noise Predictid,n Mc;,del (CA.LVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: La Costa to Leucadia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: if)~~--,_\~-~; :-~)-~I
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: t'· 3_it~i~:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3290
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed:
:
1~t~t~l~lf Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ..
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ;::;ne conel1t1ons HARD s11 t:
Road Elevc1tion: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Niaht
Barrier Hei!~ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Tr1"cks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 59.5 68.3 66.5 60.4 69.1 69.7
Medium Trucks: 67.2 61.0 54.6 53.0 61.5 61.7
Heavy Trucks: 71.4 60.0 51.0 52.2 61.6 61.7
Vehicle Noise: 73.8 69.7 66.9 61.8 -10.4 70;9
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trncks:
Heavv Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise: '
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1393
441 2000
139 1500
1000
500 .. a, 0 a,
IL
-500
-1000
-1500
-2000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
! i L I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I
I
I Federal Highway ~dministration RD-77-108
Traffic Noise Predicti~n M6del (C4,LVENO) ' ' ' Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Carlsbad Boulevard
Road Segment: South of Leucadia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: J)
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: 32;~tf
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3290
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ' e '.15(}, ~ ., ; ,.._
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: .• -·3b" -.. ...-..,
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ::me conamons HARD ~• • t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Day Evening Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 59.5 68.3 66.5 60.4 69.1 69.7
Medium Trucks: 67.2 61.0 54.6 53.0 61.5 61.7
Heavy Trucks: 71.4 60.0 51.0 52.2 61.6 61.7
Vehicle Noise: 73:8. 69:7 66.9 61.8 70.4 70.9
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1393 2000 441
139 1500
1000
500
ai 0 GI LL
-500
-1000
-1500
-2000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~-1
I
I
I
I I I I I I
I
Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108
I ' Traffic Noise Predicti~n M~del (C~LVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: Cannon Road to Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ).iij;~~i Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 990
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: -/',:/\48-
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ~li~t~it)la§
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conamons HAAO--sJT t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade}: 0 Type Dav Evening Niaht Daily
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0,027 0.108 , 0.0028
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 51.4 60.2 58.5 52.4 61.0 61.6
Medium Trucks: 60.4 52.3 45.9 44.4 52.9 53.1
Heavy Trucks: 65.2 49.1 40.0 41.2 51.0 51.1
Vehicle Nc>ise: 67.6 61.3 58.8 53.4 62.0 62.5
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
, Vehicle Noise:
CENTERUNE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
208
66 300
21 200
100
ai 0 QI u..
-100
-200
-300
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I
I
I I Federal Highway Administration ~D-77-108
I i Traffic Noise Predicti~n M9del (C~LVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: South of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: .. ' :\~~i, Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: .!'-
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1020
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: . <11tl Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 It>1te conamons HARD ~• • c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 51.6 60.4 58.6 52.5 61.2 61.8
Medium Trucks: 60.5 52.5 46.1 44.5 53.0 53.2
Heavy Trucks: 65.4 49.2 40.2 41.4 51.1 51.2
Vehicle Nc,lse: 67.7 61.4 58:9 53:5 62.1 62.7.
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINENO~ECONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
215 300 68
21 200
100 .. Q) 0 Q) u..
-100
-200
-300
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
; Federal Highway IAdministtation ~D-77-1081 j
, , Traffic Noise Predicti~n M~del (C~LVENO) .
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: North of Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Future Plus Project
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: •;-: -, · ''·'\"O:
Average Daily Traffic: 1~,2QO-
Peak Hour Traffic: 1020
Vehicle Speed: . . · 30
Centerline Separation: · :·;,L · :~.P~
NOISE INPUTS
::;ne conamons HARD ~• • t:
FLEET MIX
Tvoe Dav Evenina Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 48.1 56.9 55.1 49.0 57.7 58.3
Medium Trucks: 58.7 50.6 44.2 42.7 51.1 51.4
Heavy Trucks: 64.3 48.2 39.1 40.3 50.5 50.6
Vehicle Noise: 66.9 5804 55.6 50.6 59.2 59.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERUNE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
105 150 33
10 100
50 .. a, 0 a,
IL.
-50
-100
-150
!1
:I f!
I
'i :1 :I ii
,1 ;:
ii I!
11 ,I i/ 'I ,.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, Federal HighwaylAdministtation RD-77-1081 I
; Traffic Noise Predicti~n M9del (CALVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: South of Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
Scenario: Future Plus Project
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
~ --=··•,~:i -.,.e .... ·
~}f\sJij:
Peak Hour Traffic: 1590
6:~~~~i~:~:~aration: { .:~:L(Ji::
NOISE INPUTS
!Site conamons ~Mil-SITE
FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0
0
Tvoe Day Evenino Nioht Daily
Barrier Height: Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 51.7 60.5 58.8 52.7 61.3
Medium Trucks: 61.5 53.4 47.0 45.4 53.9
Heavy Trucks: 66.7 50.5 41.5 42.7 52.6
Vehicle Noise: 69.1 61.8 59.1 53.9 62:5
IIIIITIGATED NOISE LEVELS {With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.027
CNEL
61.9
54.2
52.7
63.0
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
238 300 75
24 200
100 -CD 0 CD II.
-100
-200
-300
0.108 0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' Federal Highway Admi'nistration RD-77-108
I I I Traffic Noise Predictio'.n M~del (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria .Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Avenida Encinas
Road Segment: East of Ponto
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: "'}•, . ·o. ..
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ... i~jo(i
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1590
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ,',"J;,~(~3~
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: •. i ;;kl~: · ?.~.
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conomons HAKU ~11 t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (~bove grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet} Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heaw Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation}
Vehicle Type Peak Leq LeqOay Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 51.9 60.7 58.9 52.9 61.5 62.1
Medium Trucks: 61.6 53.6 47.2 45.6 54.1 54.3
Heaw Truc:ks: 66.9 50.7 41.7 42.9 52.8 52.9
Vehicle Noise: 69.3 62.0 59.3 54.1 62.7 63.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation}
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERUNE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
239 300 75
24 200
100
$ 0 G) u..
-100
-200
-300
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway Admihistration RD-77-108
Traffic Noise Predictio~ M~del (CALVENO) I I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway
Road Segment: North of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ''.{_;2~j! Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm); 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2750
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: , \;.j,~~·~9
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,·.-<:--~~~
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ::;rte conaItIons HARD Sin:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Day Evening Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavv Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 58.7 67.5 65.7 59.6 68.3 68.9
Medium Trucks: 66.3 58.3 51.9 50.3 58.8 59.0
Heavv Trucks: 70.6 54.4 45.4 46.6 56.0 56.1
Vehicle Noise: 72.9 68.2 65.9 60.3 68.9 69.5
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1037
328 1500
104 1000
500
-; 0 GI u..
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
;1
ii
!j
Ii
11
ii ,1
:1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
: Federal HighwayiAd~inistration ~D-77-108I
I I Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway
Road Segment: Palomar Airport Road to Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA '
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ~::-;:{~,g}! Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hbur Traffic: 1060
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ~l?ifi& Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conamons HARD SITE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 53.2 62.0 60.2 54.1 62.8 63.4
Medium Trucks: 61.5 53.4 47.0 45.5 54.0 54.2
Heavy Trucks: 66.0 49.9 40.8 42.0 51.6 51.7
Vehicle-Noise: 68.3 62.9 60.5 55.0 63.6 64.1
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
303
96 400
30 300
200
100 -; 0 GI LL.
-100
-200
-300
-400
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Fe~eral Highwa~ Adniinistration ~D-77-1081
I I I
I I Traffic Noise Predictipn Model (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plu~ Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway
Road Segment: Poinsettia Batiquitos
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA I
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: t~~&::o·~~ Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2000
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: < ,_• . -~ 40
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: . ....:~,~~-42.
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ;::,ne cona111ons HAKLJ .:,11 c I
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX:
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day EveninQ Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129: 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049: 0.103
NIOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 · 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heaw Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 54.4 63.2 61.4 55.3 64.0 64.6
Medium Trucks: 63.4 55.3 48.9 47.3 55.8 56.1
. 1-ieavy Truc:ks: 68.2 52.0 43.0 44.2 53.9 54.0
Vehicle-Noise: 70.6 64.2 61.7 56.3 65.0 65.5
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium TrrJcks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
421 600 133
42 400
200
-; 0 Q).
IL.
-200
-400
-600
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highway! Adniinist:ration RD-77-108I
I Traffic Noise Predicti~n M'.odel (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Paseo Del Norte
Road Segment: . North of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ,::}~~~\J: Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2380
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ,Jj'5
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: .. ,. i·~:;;:4?.
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site concm1ons ~ SITE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvne Dav Evenina Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
t-.lOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS {Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
!Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavv TruGks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle TypE1 Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 53.5 62.3 60.5 54.4 63.1 63.7
Medium Tr,ucks: 63.2 55.1 48.8 47.2 55.7 55.9
Heavv Trucks: 68.4 52.3 43.2 44.4 54.3 54.5
Vehicle Nc>ise: 70.9 63.5 60.9 55.7 64.3 64.8
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Tru<;ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
357
113 400
36 300
200
100
al 0 QI u.
-100
-200
-300
-400
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I! Federal Highwa~ Ad~inis\ration ~D-77-1081 I
i , Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Visiori Plan
Maria Cadiz
Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Paseo Del Norte
Road Segment: Palomar Airport Road Camino de Las Ondas
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=:wall, 1 = berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Rt View: 90 LftView:
SITE DATA
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic: ·· .{8;~;
Peak Hour Traffic: 1860
Vehicle Speed: ·· '4&
Centerline Separation: .,.}]t~
NOISE INPUTS
Da
Auto 0.775 0.129
-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049
IOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Typ11 Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 54.2 63.0 61.2 55.1 63.8
Medium Trucks: 63.1 55.1 48.7 47.1 55.6
Heavy Trucks: .68.0 51.8 42.8 44.0 53.7
Vehicle N4:>ise: 70.4 64.0 61.5 56.1 64.7
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle TypE1 Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle No,ise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
CNEL
64.4
55.8
53.8
65.3
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
392 500 124 400
39 300
200
0 100
GI 0 IL. -100
-200
-300
-400
-500
0.096 0.9789
0.103 0.0184
0.108 0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·-1
I
I
I
i I I ' I I I ' I Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108
I I Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (C~LVENO) I I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Paseo Del Norte
Road Segment: Camino de Las Ondas to Poinsettia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: /~f-&l ~t -j~<~t
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: '"~,• ·18~0(;) .:N:.·, ·1.:.:.
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1860
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: filt~~t:: Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conditions HA"RD 51 IE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening NiQht
Barrier Hei9ht: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavv Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 54.2 63.0 61.2 55.1 63.8 64.4
Medium Trucks: 63.1 55.1 48.7 47.1 55.6 55.8
Heavv Truc:ks: 68.0 51.8 42.8 44.0 53.7 53.8
Vehicle Nc,ise: 70.4 64.0 61.5 56.1 64.7 65.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
392
124 500
400
39 300
200
100 'i 0 if -100
-200
-300
-400
-500
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
:I ii ;:
'I ct :1 'i 'I ·i ·j
i[
,! .,
·i
I II ii ii
!I ~ ,1 }l Ji f t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, ~ Federal Highway: Adrrlinistration RD-77-1081 I
1 i Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (C~LVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Roadway:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Palomar Airport Road
Scenario: Future Plus Project
Job#: 25-101951
Road Segment: Carlsbad Boulevard to Avenida Encinas
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (O==wall, 1 = berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Fair lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade}:
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Rt View: 90 Lft View:
SITE DATA
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
Peak Hour Traffic:
Vehicle Speed:
Centerline Separation:
NOISE INPUTS
Site cond1t1ons ~ 511 t:
FLEET MIX
Tvoe Dav Evenina Niaht Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
Autos:
Medium Tirucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Ty1>41 Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Laq Night Ldn
Autos: 51.5 60.3 58.5 52.4 61.0
Medium Tirucks: 61.2 55.0 48.6 47.0 55.5
Heavy Trucks: 66.5 55.0 46.0 47.2 57.1
Vehicle-Noise: 68.9 62.6 59.2 54.7 63.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Typ11 Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERL.INE NOISE CONTOUR
CNEL
61.6
55.8
57.2
63.7
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
269 300 85
27 200
100
'S 0 CP u.
-100
-200
-300
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
; Federal HighwayiAdniinist'ration RD-77-108I
I ' I Traffic Noise Predicti~n Mpdel (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Avenida Encinas to Paseo del Norte
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: :,:r· . '.~Q,
Barrier (0=wall, 1;= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ~.'. •, ·72~~
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 7250
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: /35:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,.,, '"'~' ~·.:~~~,~
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 I::;ne cond1t1ons ~ SITE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Dav Evenina Niaht
Barrier Hei,ght: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Truc:ks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 58.3 67.1 65.3 59.2 67.8 68.4
Medium Tr1Jcks: 68.0 61.8 55.4 53.8 62.3 62.6
Heavy Truc:ks: 73.3 61.8 52.8 54.0 63.9 64.0
Vehicle Noise: 75.7 69.4 66.0 61.5 70.1 70.5
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1346
426 1500
135 1000
500
i 0 u.
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Federal Highwa~ Ad1inistration ~D-77-1081
Traffic Noise Predictipn Model (C:ALVENO) I
Project Naime: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Paseo del Norte to Armada
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ~E/\~ill Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 6750
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: Jfi10rl::'. Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~1te conamons HARO 51TI::
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Dav Evenina Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 61.1 69.8 68.0 61.9 70.6 71.2
Medium Trucks: 69.3 63.1 56.7 55.1 63.6 63.9
Heavy Trucks: 73.9 62.4 53.4 54.6 64.1 64.3
Vehicle Noise: 76.2 71.4 68.5 63.5 72.1 72.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise: I
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2219
702 3000
222 2000
1000 ... GI 0 GI IL
-1000
-2000
-3000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal HighwayiAdrriinist:ration RD-77-108I
I ' I I Traffic Noise Predicti~n M:odel (CALVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segrnent: Armada to Hidden Valley
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0' Road Grade: , · :\;;::r; o
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: -• :;;,;Jf~40.p,
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 6540
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ~si}t· _., --
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ('.'
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 'NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ::me conamons HARD SITE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Dav Evenina Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto • 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NIOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 63.4 72.2 70.4 64.3 73.0 73.6
Medium Trucks: 70.6 64.3 57.9 56.4 64.8 65.1
Heavv Trucks: 74.5 63.1 54.0 55.3 64.5 64.6
Vehicle Noise: 76.8 73.4 70.7 65.5 74.1 74.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
3501
1107
350
4000
3000
2000
1000
ai 0 Ill u.
-1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' Federal Highway Ad,inistration ~D-77-1081
I
I
! I Traffic Noise PrJdicti,on W]odel (C,ALVENO)
Project N,ime: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Hidden Valley to College
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: {\::i¥~:: Barrier (0==wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 6170
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: --~S~t
Barrier Near Lane Cl Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: , ,:_,_ -~~~ ~1~~i
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~:me conditions HARD 51TE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Dav Evenina Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
~mlSE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Tirucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Typn Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn-CNEL
Autos: 63.2 71.9 70.1 64.1 72.7 73.3
Medium Trucks: 70.3 64.1 57.7 56.1 64.6 64.8
Heavv Trucks: 74.3 62,8 53.8 55.0 64.3 64.4
-Vehicle Noise: -16.6 73.1 70.5 65:2 73.8 74.3
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle TYJ>Ei Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
3305
1045 4000
330 3000
2000
1000
'i 0 GI IL,
-1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
:I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal HighwayjActm
1
inistration ~D-77-108 I I I I
' Traffic Noise Predicti~n Mpdel (C~LVENO) I I I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: College to Camino Vida Roble
PROJECT DATA ,,SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ~c;i~:i~:;.--, '.<:~:
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: c"n;;;,:4{)6@&Ji! .!.!~l ;~.:;,J__:; ~ ~ ,_ell, ,
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 4060
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: Ji~1t:li Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 'Site conamons HARD SI 11:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NIOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type• Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 61.4 70.1 68.3 62.2 70.9 71.5
Medium Trucks: 68.5 62.2 55.9 54.3 62.8 63.0
Heavy Trucks: 72.5 61.0 52.0 53.2 62.4 62.6
Vehicle Noise: 74.8 71.3 68.7 63A 72.0 72.5
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peakleq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERUNE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2173
687 3000
217 2000
1000
al 0 Cl) u.
-1000
-2000
-3000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
I ,i ·I i I :i
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I i Federal Highway Adnrinistration ~D-77-1081 I
'. : Traffic Noise PrJdictipn Model (CALVENO) 1
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst:
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: Camino Vida Roble to El Camino Real
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0
Barrier (0==wall, 1= berm): 0
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0.5
0
0
0
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA --~::a·
ie1M8a: ' ' ~--" ... , ...
4060
Da
0.775 0.129
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049
tJOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium T1rucks:
Hea Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Typ1J Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 61.4 70.1 68.3 62.2 70.9 71.5
Medium Trucks: 68.5 62.2 55.9 54.3 62.8 63.0
Heavy Trucks: 72.5 61.0 52.0 53.2 62.4 62.6
Vehicle Noise: 74.8 71.3 68.7 63.4 72.0 72.5
IMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle TypE1 Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
2173
687 3000
217 2000
1000
'S 0 CD u..
-1000
-2000
-3000
0.096 0.9638
0.103 0.0279
0.108 0.0083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway!Adrrlinis~ration RD-77-108I I
'. 1 Traffic Noise Predicti~n M,odel (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst:
Roadway: Palomar Airport Road
Road Segment: El Camino Real to El Fuerte
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
0
0
0
100
0
0
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: • . : .'.~I~:
Average Daily Traffic: ro,
Peak Hour Traffic: 7310
Vehicle Speed: ·,.};',°,'. \55'
Centerline Separation: ;.; : {;fb;'lfis
NOISE INPUTS
Observer Height (above grade):
0.5
0
0
0
T e Da Evenin Night
Barrier Height:
Rt View: 90 LftView:
IOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Hea Tru-cks:
0
2.3
8
Auto 0.775
-90 Med. Truck 0.848
Heavy Truck 0.865
tJNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle TypEI Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 63.9 72.7 70.9 64.8 73.4
Medium Trucks: 71.1 64.8 58.4 56.8 65.3
Heavv Trucks: 75.0 63.6 54.5 55.7 65.0
Vehicle Nclise: 77.3 73.8 71.2 66.0 74.6
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle TypEt Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle N0iise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.129
0.049
0.027
CNEL
74.0
65.6
65.1
75.1
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
0.096
0.103
0.108
Dail
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
3919
1239 5000 -,-------------------~
392
4000
3000
2000
1000 i 0
u.. -1000
-2000
-3000
-4000 -5000 ..__ _________________ __J
!!
!J ·, :i
ii It :I .I
:1
:,
fl
1i
j
i! Ii ll '[ ti !i ii I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I I I I I i Federal Highway
1
Adminis~ration ~D-77-108I I
: : Traffic Noise Predicti~n W!odel (CALVENO)
Project Naime:
Analyst:
Roadway:
Road Segment:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Palomar Airport Road
El Fuerte to Melrose
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0
Pad Elevation: 0.5
Road Elevation:
Scenario: Future Plus Project
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
:i:!::~;1y Traffic: ::,\);s~og:
Peak Hour Traffic: 7310
Vehicle Speed: \i~11!}/ · , _5~
Centerline Separation: llilr~%.'i., .... ,~&\;
NOISE INPUTS
Observer Height (above grade):
0
0
0
Day Evening Ni ht Dail
Barrier Height: 0. 775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
IOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Tru,cks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Tyl)E1 Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 63.9 72.7 70.9 64.8 73.4 74.0
Medium Trucks: 71.1 64.8 58.4 56.8 65.3 65.6
Heavv Tru1::ks: 75.0 63.6 54.5 55.7 65.0 65.1
Vehlcle Nc>ise: 77.3 73.8 71.2 66.0 74.6 75:1
IVIITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type, Peak Leq Leq Day
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc~ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
3919
1239
392
Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
5000 -r------------------4000
3000
2000
1000 i 0
u.. -1000
-2000
-3000
-4000 -5000 ..._ ________________ __,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.,,I
I
I
I
I Federal Highway1Adm1inist1ration RD-77-1081
I I Traffic Noise Predicti~n Mbdel (CALVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: North of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: .-11:ijeod~ Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 4980
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: t~11;£:}{}~~: Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ':i; ,&
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~ne conamons HARD .:,11 c
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Day Evenino Nioht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NIOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type· Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.6 65.3 63.6 57.5 66.1 66.7
Medium Trucks: 66.3 60.1 53.7 52.1 60.6 60.8
Heavv Tru<~ks: 71.5 60.1 51.0 52.3 62.2 62.3
Vehicle Nc,ise: 74.0 67.7 64.3 59.8 68.4 68;8
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
925 1500 293
92 1000
500
ai 0 GI LL
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
' I
I
I '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highwa~ Adrr\inis~ration ~D-77-1 os I
I !
I Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (CALVENO) I I '
Project Naime: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: Palomar Airport Road to Camino Vida Roble
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: f:r'. '.(J
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: 533lf~i
Receiver Elarrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 5330
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ~k·"~'.i~i Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 !Site conditions HARD ::,11 t:
Road Elev,ation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evenina Nioht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NIOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.9 65.6 63.8 57.8 66.4 67.0
Medium Trucks: 66.6 60.4 54.0 52.4 60.9 61.1
Heavy Trucks: 71.8 60.4 51.3 52.6 62.5 62.6
Vehicle Nciise: 74.3 68.0 64.6 60.1 68.7 69.1
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Tn1cks:
Heayy Trucks:
, Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
989 1500 313
99 1000
500
~ 0
-500
-1000
-1500
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
ii ii 'I " ;i ;I .1 ,,
'I :I 'I :1
i! ~ ii • I 'I ii t1
11 H ; I l I l I i I i I i I 11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 i Federal Highway IAdminist~ation ~D-77-1081 I
, ; Traffic Noise Predicti~n M9del (C~LVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: Camino Vida Roble to Cassia
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Future Plus Project
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: .... ,,_•.•a .. 0
Average Daily Traffic: :sorno
5010
-. ,,:{g'~
Peak Hour Traffic:
Vehicle Speed:
Centerline Separation: .•...
NOISE INPUTS
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9638
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0279
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
utos:
Medium Trucks:
Hea Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0083
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 56.6 65.4 63.6 57.5 66.1 66.8
Medium Trucks: 66.3 60.1 53.7 52.1 60.6 60.9
Heaw Trucks: 71.6 60.1 51.1 52.3 62.2 62.3
Vehicle-Nc•ise: 74.0 67.7 64.3 59.8 68.4 68.8
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
931 1500 295
93 1000
500
al 0 Q) II.
-500
-1000
-1500
!I
'1
:1 li lj :j
1j ii
" " !j
t! <1 ,,
!1 ,I :I
ii ii li ll
Ll
f I fl Ii
'I i.1 !!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I Federal Highway[ Adniinist'.ration RD-77-1081
I I
I I Traffic Noise Predicti~n Model (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: Cassia to La Costa
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: Ji}: 61~i~:, Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 6190
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ·:_\55
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: :.::. ,, .,,,-~8 ..
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conditions~ SITE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Day Evenina Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
fllOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Typ11 Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 63.2 71.9 70.1 64.1 72.7 73.3
Medium Trucks: 70.3 64.1 57.7 56.1 64.6 64.8
Heavv Tru,cks: 74.3 62.9 53.8 55.0 64.3 64.4
Vehicle Noise: 76.6 73.1 70.5 65.2 73.8 74.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle TYPE• Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
3312 4000 1047
331 3000
2000
1000
G) o II) IL
-1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
i
ii
'I
:1
:I
ii -,
fl 'I
:1
J ,! ii .,
" :1 ll i) ,,
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal HighwayfAdm1inist~ation RD-77-1081
I ' ! Traffic Noise Predicti~n Mbdel (CALVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: El Camino Real
Road Segment: La Costa to Leucadia
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: '··: :.;t·o·
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: ,. .·.,t-100~ ;.•_--', '
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 4710
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: t\Ilttl;· Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~,te conamons HARD :>a 11:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NIOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavv Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type, Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 62.0 70.7 69.0 62.9 71.5 72.1
Medium Trucks: 69.1 62.9 56.5 54.9 63.4 63.6
Heavy Trucks: 73.1 61.7 52.6 53.8 63.1 63.2
Vehicle N<>ise: -75.4 71.9 69.3 64.1 72.7 73.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
252 3000 798
252 2000
1000 .. G> 0 G> IL,
-1000
-2000
-3000
Daily
0.9638
0.0279
0.0083
·I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--1
I
I
I
' 1 Federal Highway1 Adniinistration RD-77-1081 I
: I Traffic Noise Predicti~n M'.odel (C~LVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: Carlsbad to Avenida Encinas
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Ne,ar Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elev,ation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Fut~re Plus Project
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade: ' . ., · · ·o
Average Daily Traffic: f\}_t,3jfi,t
Peak Hour Traffic: 1310
Vehicle Speed: _ :///
Centerline Separation: _jl._1:
NOISE INPUTS
Site conditions HARD ~I 11:
FLEET MIX
Tvoe Dav Evenino Night Daily
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type, Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 51.1 59.9 58.1 52.0 60.7 61.3
Medium Trucks: 60.8 52.7 46.4 44.8 53.3 53.5
Heavv Trucks: 66.0 49.9 40.8 42.0 51.9 52.1
Vehicle Noise: 68.5 61.1 58.5 53.3 61.9 62.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehlcle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heayy Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise: '
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR
Unmitigated Roadway Centerllne Noise Contour
196
62 250
200
20 150
100
50 li 0 GI II. -50
-100
-150
-200
-250
L
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
' Federal HighwaylAdm1inist'ration RD-77-1081
, : Traffic Noise Preclicti~n Mpdel (CALVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: Avenida Encinas 1-5
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Future Plus Project
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Road Grade:
Average Daily Traffic:
Peak Hour Traffic:
Vehicle Speed:
Centerline Separation: , , :,;...i;
NOISE INPUT
Auto 0.775
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 Med. Truck 0.848
OISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heav Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 51.0 59.8 58.0 51.9 60.6
Medium Trucks: 60.7 52.6 46.3 44.7 53.2
Heavy Trucks: 65.9 49.8 40.7 41.9 51.8
Vehicle Nc>ise: 68.4 61.0 58.4 53.2 61.8
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLIINE NOISE CONTOUR
CNEL
61.2
53.4
52.0
62.3
CNEL
Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
197
62 250
200
20 150
100
50 ai 0 QI u.. -50
-100
-150
-200
-250
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
~ II !i " I' ii
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' Federal Highwa~ Adn-\inistration ~D-77-1081
I Traffic Noise PrJdicti~n Model (CALVENO) I
Project Ns1me: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: -Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: 1-5 to Paseo def Norte
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: ~",_~~tiE~ Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3610
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: 3$'. ' (
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ,.,,· .. ~.~.,. 3£3',
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site cona1t1ons HARD SITE
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Dav Evenina Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 LftView: -90 .Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier-attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 55.4 64.2 62.4 56.3 65.0 65.6
Medium Trucks: 65.1 57.0 50.7 49.1 57.6 57.8
Heavy Trucks: 70.3 54.2 45.1 46.3 56.2 56.4
Vehicle-Nc:,ise: 72.8 65.4 62.8 57.6 66.2 66.7
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy TruGks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
542
171 600
54 400
200
-; 0 CP II.
-200
-400
-600
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
; Federal HighwayiAdm1inis(ration ~D-77-1081 I
1 I Traffic Noise Predicti¢n Mpdel (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst:
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: Paseo del Norte to Batiquitos
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
Day Evening Ni
Auto 0.775 0.129
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Hea Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 55.3 64.1 62.3 56.2 64.9
Medium Trucks: 65.0 56.9 50.6 49.0 57.5
Heavv Trucks: 70.2 54.1 45.0 46.2 56.1
Vehicle Nc,ise: 72.7 65.4 62.7 57.5 66.1
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Truc:ks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
0.027
CNEL
65.5
57.7
56.3
66.6
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
541 600 171
54 400
200
1 0 GI II.
-200
-400
-600
ht, Dail
0.096 0.9789
0.103 0.0184
0.108 0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' ; Federal Highwayf Adniinis~ration RD-77-1081 I
: . Traffic Noise Predicti~n M,odel (Clo.LVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: Poinsettia Lane
Road Segment: Batiquitos to Aviara
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade:
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic:
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffi_c: 1830
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0
0.5
0
6:~~~~i;:;:!aration: ·'.;~1,
NOISE IN~P.:,::,U~TS-------1
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Height:
0
0
Rt View: 90 Lft View:
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heav Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Da
0.775 0.129
-90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Typo Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 55.5 64.3 62.5 56.4 65.1 65.7
Medium Trucks: 63.8 55.7 49.3 47.7 56.2 56.5
Heavy Trucks: 68.3 52.1 43.1 44.3 53.8 54.0
Vehicle Noise: 70.6 65.1 62.8 57.3 65.9 66.4
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle TypEt Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heaw Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Ni ht Dail
0.096 0.9789
0.103 0.0184
0.108 0.0028
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
523
165 600
52 400
200
~ 0 Cl> IL
-200
-400
-600
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Federal Highwayf Adm1inistration RD-77-1081
I I
I Traffic Noise Predicti~n M~del (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: La Costa Avenue
Road Segment: Carlsbad to Vulcan
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: :•:t~;j!: .,
Barrier (0=wall, 1 = berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: t; ~
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1830
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ·:·3~
Barrier Near lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: ·-2,41: -:.:. .. ~-,~~-~
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~,te cona1t1ons HARD s11 t:
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0 Tvoe Dav Evening Niaht
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 r,Jled. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavv Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Typ11 Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 52.6 61.4 59.7 53.6 62.2 62.8
Medium Trucks: 62.4 54.3 47.9 46.3 54.8 55.1
Heavv Trucks: 67.6 51.4 42.4 43.6 53.5 53.6
Vehicle Noise: 70.0 62.7 60.0 54.8 63.4 -63.9
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle TypEt Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evenlrig Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
275 400 87
27 300
200
100
i 0 LI,
-100
-200
-300
-400
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I i Federal Highwa~ Adrriinis~ration ~D-77-1081
I I Traffic Noise Predictibn l'J1odel (CALVENO) I
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst: Maria Cadiz Job#: 25-101951
Roadway: La Costa Avenue
Road Segment: Vulcan to 1-5
PROJECT DATA SITE DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: i0"
Barrier (0==wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: , , c': ;21 Ai~et
Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2110
Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: ~~\l:~,itf t Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 NOISE INPUTS
Pad Elevation: 0.5 ~:ilte conamons HARD :;11E
Road Elevation: 0 FLEET MIX
Observer !Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night
Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103
~JOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108
Autos: 0
Medium Trucks: 2.3
Heavy Trucks: 8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 53.3 62.1 60.3 54.2 62.8 63.4
Medium Trucks: 63.0 54.9 48.5 47.0 55.4 55.7
Heavv Trucks: 68.2 52.0 43.0 44.2 54.1 54.2
Vehicle N,oise: 70.6 63.3 60.7 55.4 64.0 64.5
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night .Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavv Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
317 400 100
32 300
200
100 .. GI 0 GI u..
-100
-200
-300
-400
Daily
0.9789
0.0184
0.0028
i,
' !
i I ; ,.
,. ;
j,
t-L
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, Federal Highway)Adm1inist1ration RD-77-1081 I
I Traffic Noise Predicti◊n M'.odel (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst:
Roadway:
Road Segment:
La Costa Avenue
1-5 to Piraeus
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elev:ation:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
:i=~~;ai;~Y Traffic: :{\~40,~~:
Peak Hour Traffic: 4040
Vehicle Speed: ,: • iii
Centerline Separation: . ~J.:i.~ , jf~l
NOISE INPUTS
~:me conditions HARD ;:,11 t:
FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade): 0
0
Type Day Evening Night Daily
Barrier Height: Auto 0.775 0.129
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049
NIOISE.SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 55.9 64.7 62.9 56.8 65.5
Medium Trucks: 65.6 57.5 51.1 49.6 58.1
Heavy Trucks: 70.8 54.7 45.6 46.8 56.7
Vehicle Nc>ise: 73.3 65.9 63.3 58.1 66.7
IIIIITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type· Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy TruGks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR
CNEL
66.1
58.3
56.9
67.2
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
606 800 192
61 600
400
200 -;; 0 GI IL.
-200
-400
-600
-800
0.096 0.9789
0.103 0.0184
0.108 0.0028
f l
I I
i ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' ' Federal Highway IAdm1inistration RD-77-1081 I
I ; Traffic Noise Predicti~n M6del (C~LVENO)
Project Name:
Analyst:
Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Roadway: La Costa Avenue
Road Segment: Piraeus to El Camino Real
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
Observer Height (above grade):
Barrier Hei!Jht:
0
0
0
100
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
Scenario: Future Plus Project
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
:~:!~;~;~y Traffic: r.~~!~lo.~~i}
Peak Hour Traffic: 4040
Vehicle Speed: ,f (~i!f
Centerline Separation: ,," . .;;.;:J~g
NOISE INPUTS
Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9789
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet)
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
0
2.3
8
Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0028
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos: 61.4 70.2 68.5 62.4 71.0 71.6
Medium Trncks: 68.6 60.5 54.1 52.5 61.0 61.3
Heavy Trucks: 72.5 56.4 47.3 48.5 57.8 57.9
Vehicle Noise: 74.8 70.9 ss~s 63.0 71.6 72.2
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERLII\JE NOISE CONTOUR Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
1964 2500 621 2000
196 1500
1000
'ID 500
Cl) 0 IL -500
-1000
-1500
-2000
-2500
f
I r, lj Ii
ti fl ,,
;i (j
!I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, Federal HighwayjAdm1inistration ~D-77-108 I I
Traffic Noise Predicti~n M9del (CALVENO)
Project Name: Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan
Maria Cadiz
Scenario: Future Plus Project
Analyst:
Roadway: La Costa Avenue
Road Segment: East of El Camino Real
PROJECT DATA
Centerline Dist to Barrier
Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm):
Receiver Barrier Dist:
Centerline Dist. To Observer:
Barrier Near Lane CL Dist:
Barrier Far lane CL Dist:
Pad Elevation:
Road Elevation:
0
0
0
100
0
0
Job#: 25-101951
SITE DATA
:~:!:;~;;y Traffic: :si~~fu,a~!t
Peak Hour Traffic: 2080
Vehicle Speed: ·..;1/fiA-F'' · 4'j,
Centerline Separation: ,,J;!);. ~;
NOISE INPUTS
s,te conamons HARD s11 t:
FLEET MIX
Observer Height (above grade):
0.5
0
0
0
Type Day Evening Night Daily
Barrier Height: Auto 0.775 0.129
Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049
NIOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy TrUl~ks:
0
2.3
8
UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type, Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos: 56.1 64.9 63.2 57.1 65.7
Medium Trucks: 64.4 56.4 50.0 48.4 56.9
Heavy Trucks: 68.9 52.8 43.7 44.9 54.5
Vehicle Noise: 71.3 65.8 63.4 57.9 66.5
MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation)
Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn
Autos:
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Vehicle Noise:
CENTERL:INE NOISE CONTOUR
CNEL
66.3
57.1
54.6
67.1
CNEL
Roadway Centerline Noise Contour
594 800 188
59 600
400
200
'; 0 Cl> II.
-200
-400
-600
-800
0.096 0.9789
0.103 0.0184
0.108 0.0028