Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-01-28; Planning Commission; Minutes-- MEETING OF: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: January 28, 1981 TIME OF MEETING: 7:00 P.M. PLACE OF MEETING:' City Council Chambers . C -I- CALL TO ORDER The meeting.was called to order at 7:Ol P.M. by Chairman Marcus. ROLL CALL Present: Chairman Marcus, Commissioners Rombotis, Larson, L'Heureux, Jose and Leeds. Commissioner Friestedt arrived at 7:03 P.M. Ex-Officio member Dan Hentschke, Assistant City Attorney, was also present. Staff members present were: Michael Holzmiller, Principal Planner Bill Hofman, Associate Planner Richard Allen, Principal Civil Engineer Mike Howest Assistant Planner PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Marcus. AGENDA ITEM COMMUNICATIONS Chairman Marcus inquired if there were any items for Commission consideration which were not reflected in the Agenda. Staff responded negatively. PLANNING COMMISSION PROCEDURE Chairman Marcus explained Planning Commission procedures in its capacity as an advisory commission to the City Council and identified those matters delegated to the Planning Commission for a final decision. Chairman Marcus further explained the procedure observed by the Commission during public hearing items. NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. ZCA-129, CITY OF CARLSBAD. An amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to modify parking requirements in the R-W Zone. A staff report was presented by Michael Holzmiller, essentially as contained in the Statement of the Matter. He briefly covered modifications to the original recommendations, as indicated in the staff report. Commission L'Heureux inquired how many undeveloped lots presently have pending condominium permit applications. Staff responded there were approximately two. Commissioner L'Heureux expressed concern over staff's original problem with tandem parking, and inquired how they will justify their change of position. Staff responded that after review with the committee, and of the maps, they felt that it was not as significant as originally thought. Commissioner Larson expressed concern over the grandfather clause, inquiring which standards would apply if the condominium standards did not. Staff responded they would be required to meet the standards for apartment development. l PAGE 2 January 28, 1981 Commissioner Friestedt requested clarification on the condominium ordinance for on-street parking, as staff is recommending it be amended to prohibit on-street parking in the R-W zone for undeveloped lots having no pending application. Staff responded that the ordinance is excluding already developed lots, and if they have a pending application, they would fall under the grandfather clause. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 7:18 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Mary Ann Haasl, member of the Board of Directors of the Bristol Cove Property Owners Association. Ms. Haasl stated she supported the amendment, although she feels that the on-street parking is not the problem it appeared to be initially. She discussed traffic flow and parking on Park and Cove, and stated it was some- thing that the city could control with future plans. Mrs. Haasl distributed maps of the area to the Commission. She concluded that she was in support of the amendment, but requested the Commission look at the parking situation, and perhaps control it for future development. Staff responded they felt strongly about two items, and were willing to make trade-offs in working with the committee. The first was that all undeveloped lots be broughl up to standard, as far as number of required parking spaces, both for residents and guests. Also, guest parking should be on the site. He further explained that for these two reasons, staff was willing to reconsider their original recommendation on the tandem parking, and grandfathering in the existing developments. The Commission.recognized Mr. Don Brown of La Jolla. Mr. Brown used a wall exhibit, and explained that 72 percent of the lots were already developed, and 28 percent were vacant; He stated his lot is undeveloped, with no application pending, and he feels those with undeveloped lpts are un- protected. He is also against a proposed bike lane on Park Drive. The Commission recognized Mr. Hugh Moore of Laguna Niguel. Mr. Moore stated he was speaking more from the standpoint of clarification. He stated he had not fil,ed an application, however, he will be proposing a 3-unit building on a lot less than 50 feet. Further, he stated he will be providing four car parking underneath the building; two spaces out in front, which will not be tandem parking, with an additional two spaces under the building that will be tandem, Mr. Moore requested an opinion from staff as to his position. He added that he would like to use his property to its fullest extent. The Assistant City Attorney responded that the Commission was not in a position to gove a commitment, in that none of the required steps under the ordinance have been undertaken. Also, he explained that staff was not in a position to give an opinion, as they had not had a chance to review the application. Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at 7:36 P.M. Commissioner Friestedt requested some insight on the bike path. , \ :OM~lISSIONERS . ..’ .-.- PAGE 3 January 28, 1981 Richard Allen explained that on the General Plan, Park Drive is one of the proposed routes for a future bike path. He stated that-since that time, they have done a traffic study in the area, which indicates that Park Drive may have to be ultimately four lanes to handle the traffic, which would eliminate both a parking and bike lane. The Assistant City Attorney addressed Exhibit "A" on the proposed ordinance. He stated his concern is,that if the Commission intends to carry out staff's intent, he suggests that it be returned to staff for re-drafting of the ordinance. He stated there are some difficulties with the drafting stage; i.e., the application for a condominium permit pre-supposes that the permit will be granted. He stated the Commission has to make a determination if the grandfather will be instituted by filing an application, or if once the application is filed, the project is exempted, or if they will be exempting the existing buildings. With regard to the exemption, he has some concern with the matter in which the present ordinance is drafted. Commissioner Jose expressed a difference in opinion with the Environmental Impact Assessment Form, Item No. 13b. Commissioner Larson stated he had no problem with issues 1,2, and 4 as listed in the staff report, however, he expressed concern on the issue of the location of guest parking, issue 3. Specifically, in not allowing on-street parking, as credit for existing undeveloped lots in the area. He stated the undeveloped lots should not be made to bear the entire burden. Commissioner Rombotis stated he felt it was successfully demonstrated that the single lot could provide more on-site parking, and the required visitor parking. A motion was made to approve the Negative Declaration, and direct staff to return a resolution approving ZCA-129. 2. CT 80-15(A)/PUD-17(A), SHAW, TALBOT, BUDGE AND DAVIS Request for approval of the second phase of a planned industrial development on Avenida Encinas between Cannon Road and Palomar Airport Road in the P-M zone. Michael Holzmiller presented a Statement of the Matter, briefly outlining the project. The staff report was continued by Bill Hofman, who, with the aid of wall exhibits, depicted the location, design, and project description. Mr. Hofman also gave a brief review of the background of the project. He concluded that staff can support the reduction of the P-M standards, based on the proposed amenities, Marcus Rombotis Larson L'Heureux Friestedt . Jose Leeds -- PAGE 4 . . January 28, 1981 Staff also feels the project is well designed, and compatible with Phase I. In response to inquiry by Commissioner Friestedt as to whether the developer will provide locker and shower . facilities for those who use the jogging course. Mr. Hofman stated the applicant would advise on this. Chairman Marcus opened the-public hearing at 7:59 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Mr. Robert Sundstrom, of Williamson and Schmidt, agent for the applicant. Mr. Sundstrom brought the Commission up to date as to what has taken place since Phase I was approved. He added that they have received approval from the City Council and the Coastal Commission, and have proceeded with Phase I. Mr. Sundstrom briefly covered the question of the time period to sever from Burroughs property. With Phase I, they have proceeded to acquire the dedication rights. He added that all plans have been submitted to the city, and they hope to break ground sometime in Marchr Mr. Sundstrom responded to Commissioner Friestedt's inquiry on locker and shower facilities, stating there will be some type of individual private locker facilities spread through- out the building, however, not each one of the buildings will have their own private facilities. They are designed in the individual buildings themselves. He added that the jogging course is not intented as a vigorous course, but is provided for the enjoyment of the employees of the business park. Mr. Sundstrom concluded that with respect to thestaff report, the property owner, applicant, sub-divider, and developer have reviewed each individual condition, and they concur with the conditions contained in same. Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at 8:07 P.M. _ Commissioner Friestedt stated that in regard to the Fire Department, it was his understanding that the Commission's intent based on past decisions was to base fire hydrant standards on Fire and Building Code requirements instead of on the Fire Marshall's determination. Michael Holzmiller responded that the Commission in the past had intended that only requirements for a fire sprinkler be based on code requirements. With respect to hydrants, there may be access problems, and a hydrant may be,necessary even though the fire code may not require one. Hydrant placement should therefore be up to the discretion of the Fire Marshall. Commissioner Friestedt requested clarification on Condition No. 31, ie., approval of the Fire Department on alarm systems, etc., it should be the Building Code and Fire Code, with the Fire Marshall using his discretion on hydrants. A motion was made recommending approval of the Notice of Prior Compliance, and the following resolutions were adopted, recommending approval of CT 80-15(A) and approval of PUD-17(A) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. OMI’IISSIONERS ’ vIarcus Rombotis Larson L'Heureux lriestedt Jose Leeds -- PAGE 5 . January 28, 1981 RESOLUTION NO. 1703, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR A 6 LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON AVENIDA ENCINAS BETWEEN PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND CANNON ROAD. RESOLUTION NO. 1704, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR 6 LOT, 11 BUILDING INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON AVENIDA ENCINAS BETWEEN PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND CANNON ROAD. 3. X-227, CITY OF CARLSBAD; Consideration of a change of zone of existing mobile home parks in Carlsbad to the RMHP zone (Mobile Home Park Zone) in order to implement the new Mobile Home Park Ordinance. The staff report was presented by Michael Holzmiller, essentially as contained in the Statement of the Matter. Mr. Holzmiller pointed out, for clarification purposes, that on the Negative Declaration, under the Project Description, the term "Administrative Zone Change" was not applied in a legal sense, it was a planning term in that the zone change is not being requested for development. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 8:14 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Mr. Joe Tengler, 7214. San Bartolo, Carlsbad; representing the Rent Negotiating Committee of Lakeshore Gardens Mobile Home Park. Mr. Tengler expressed his support of the zone change, and he represented 2,000 other park residents who recommended approval of the zone change. The Commission recognized Mr. Jack Robinson, owner of the Lanakai Lane Mobile Home Park. Mr. Robinson indicated that he was not opposed to the zone change, but only a portion of it. Mr. Robinson expressed concern with 21.37.110(3), sub-paragraph (b), of the Mobilehome Ordinance.dealing with the changing the use of a mobile home park at a future date. Mr. Robinson also expressed opposition to the provision of relocating the tenants within 15 miles of the Pacific coastline, stating he did not feel this would be a feasible condition. The Commission recognized Mr. Ken Reed, 4051 Sunnyhill, Carlsbad; a lawyer speaking in behalf of Ranch0 Carlsbad Mobile Home Park. Mr. Reed stated his opposition to the Mobilehome Park Ordinance as previously expressed by Mr. Jack Robinson. The Commission recognized Mr. R.A. Swanson, 3553 Don Carlos Drive, Carlsbad. Mr. Swanson stated he served as a member of the Advisory Committee to the Planning Commission in considering the contents of the ordinance. Mr. Swanson reviewed the background of the ordinance, and stated he feels the four parks should be included and zoned according to the Mobile Home Park Zoning Ordinance. Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at 8:41 P.M. :OMFIISSIONERS ' IVzUN’U ‘KU 23 - I .-- PAGE 6 January 28, 1981 In response to an inquiry from Chairman Marcus regarding the provision for relocation of the tenants, Michael Holzmiller responded that the Ordinance does not state the tenants must be relocated. It states there are a number of factors that should guide the Council in approving or disapproving the request to remove the Mobile Home Park Zone. One of the factors is the availability of relocation housing. Mr. Holzmiller explained that at the time that a request would be made to remove the zone, there would have to be a relocation plan submitted with the application, and it would have to include information on how the impact on the tenants would be reduced. Commissioner L'Heureux suggested-to the park owners that they seek to amend the zone code. The Commission discussed alternatives to the adoption of the zone change. A motion was made to approve the Negative Declaration, and adopt Resolution No. 1755, recommending approval of ZC-227 to the City Council, based on the findings contained therein. The motion died due to lack of a second. A motion was made to continue this item to the next Planning Commission meeting, and that staff be directed to prepare a resolution indicating the Commission's intent for a zone code amendment, specifically addressing the relocation issue, as discussed at this meeting. Commissioner Friestedt amended the motion to continue this item to the meeting of March 25, 1981. A motion was made to direct staff to prepare a Resolution of Intention to amend the Mobile Home Park Zone, as titled by Commissioner Friestedt. RECESS Chairman Marcus called a recess at 9:07 P.M., and the ' Commission reconvened at 9:23 P.M. 4. CUP-191, SUN FAIRE. Request to conduct annual faire on the easterly portion of Carlsbad Raceway in the C-2 zone. The staff report was presented by Bill Hofman. With the aid of wall exhibits, Mr. Hofman detailed the location and design of the Faire. He reported that staff had two concerns with the project; first the potential traffic impacts, and secondly, the amount of parking required for the use. He stated that in respect to the potential traffic impacts, a Traffic Impact Report was prepared, as staff was concerned as to whether the street system, both on-site and off-site, could accommodate the traffic generated by the project. The report indicates several mitigation measures that, if adopted, would minimize the traffic impact to an acceptable level. :OMMISSIONERS y Marcus Rombotis Larson L"heureux Friestedt Jose : Leeds Marcus Rombotis Larson L'Heureux Friestedt . Jose Leeds NllN lJ’4*fiS - Z -- / , PAGE 7 January 28, 1981 Mr. Hofman stated that staff has added these measures as conditions of approval. With respect to the second concern regarding the amount of parking, Mr. Hofman indicated the amount of parking available on the site should alleviate any problems. Mr. Hofman explained that in the event more traffic is anticipated, the applicant would lease more property, located between the site and Palomar Airport Road. Mr. Hofman concluded that additional conditions have been placed regarding security and traffic control. Overall, staff feels the site is very well suited to this type of project. Mr. Hofman explained that if unforeseen problems occur, a condition has been placed to require a review of the use after one year. The item could be scheduled for a new public hearing. Otherwise, the permit would be good for a period of six years. Mr. Hofman added that the applicant has personally met with representatives from each city departments including the Police and Fire Departments, and has satisfactorily resolved their concerns. ' Mr. Hofman stated that staff wished to make one change to the resolution, Item No. 11; changing "from May to September only," to read "from May 1 to September 30 only." Commissioner L'Heureux expressed concern on Condition No. 5, inquiring who was responsible to pay for traffic control. Staff responded that it would be private traffic, control, provided by the operators of the Faire, in coordination with our Police Department, and to their satisfaction. Com- missioner L'Heureux also inquired if paramedics would be required to be on-site. Mr. Holzmiller requested that the applicant might be able to address this. Commissioner Larson expressed concern over the potential of a traffic problem for five full months, and inquired as to what alternatives there are, rather than having to wait a full year to review the CUP for the following year. Michael Holzmiller responded this was discussed with the applicant, and they are very interested in taking care of any problems that do occur. The Police Department will monitor the situation, and work with the applicant. If there is a need to add conditions after the Faire has started, the applicant is agreeable to this. Mr. Holzmiller stated that a condition could be added at this time to insure same. Commissioner Jose expressed his opposition to allowing alcoholic beverages. He also stated he feels there should be public drinking fountains provided. He also feels that the restroom facilities are inadequate. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 9:37 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Mr. Steve Robbat, 692 Orchid Lane, De1 Mar, one of the producers of Sun Faire. Mr. Robbat explained the theme of Sun Faire. He stated it is an international festival and a cultural event. Mr. Robbat briefly explained what,type of activities, entertainment, and food would be presented in each region. He addressed the potential traffic problem, stating that an average group will be able to go through the Faire in approximately two hours; thus they project 400 to 500 people going through at one time. :OMTIISSIONERS r PAGE 8 . c Mr. Robbat also pointed out that the raceway is normally set is for the public to pay at the entrance; however, the Faire is suggesting the public will come all the way through to the parking entrance where they will go through booths to pay. Mr. Robbat stated he feels this will somewhat alleiriate‘ the potential traffic problem. He explained they will have 10 to 12 employees directing traffic, and 16 to 18 on the weekends. In response to Commission inquiry reference medical personnel availability, Mr.. Robbat explained that they will have a Registered gurse on duty at all times. Mr. Robbat addressed the issue of alcoholic beverages, stating that they are creating a family atmosphere. There will be no hard liquor served; just beer and wine. He indicated he did not feel they would have problems with intoxication or rowdiness,.as the major portion of the Faire is held in the daytime, and he again stressed the family atmosphere. Also, he pointed out that it is subject to the approval of the Police Department and the Alcoholic Beverage Control. Commissioner Friestedt inquired if there was a budget for this project. Mr, Robbat responded that it was $200,000.00. Commissioner Jose stated he would like a condition added for more stringent dust control. Also, he would like to see provisions made for an additional drinking fountain. In. conclusion, Mr. Robbat stressed that Sun Faire was striving for authenticity and providing activities, entertainment, and food that are cultural in nature. Also, the number of merchants allowed will be limited in each region, and only top quality items will be sold and displayed-. Commissioner Friestedt inquired if they had a Standard 'Operating Procedures Manual. Mr. Robbat responded that 'they did not at this time, however, one could be provided. However, Mr. Robbat stated they have been working on this project for over two years, and they .have quidelines and very detailed plans. The Commission recognized Mr. Don Brown, Executive Vice- President of the Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Brown spoke in favor of the project, stating that it would be very beneficial to the city. . .The Commission recognized Mr. Danny'-Starr;who expressed his appreciation to the Commission. He stated that Sun Faire would be a cultural experience for children and adults, and he is very much in favor of the project. The Commission recognized Ms. Helise Bridges, who expressed her support of the applicant, and.the project. The Commission recognized Mr. Jack Adams, 1234 Orangewood 6r., Escondido; owner of 120 acres immediately to the east of this project. Mr. Adams stated he is not in opposition to the project, however, expressed concern over the serving of alcoholic beverages on the property, dust control, and the traffic situation. . Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at lo:07 P.M. January 28, 1981 COflElISSI ONERS -- PAGE 9 ‘ . * January 28, 1981 A motion was made to approve the Negative Declaration, and adopt the following resolution, approving CUP-191, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, with the addition of the following conditions: A change to Condition No. 4, that all-parking areas shall be sprinkled with water on a weekly basis, or more -frequently as needed, as to the satisfaction of.the Planning Director; the changes staff recommended on Condition No. 11; Adding a Condition No. 23, that a weekly -trash pick-up shall be conducted from the site to the intersectipn of El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road; Add a Condition No. 24, that traffic control and parking shall be reviewed in conjunction with the Police Department and Planning after the first and fifth weeks of operation; Add a Condition No. 25, that Sun Faire shall be conducted as a family-oriented, cultural event, not,,to include carnival, sideshow games and rides. Food items, games and merchandise offered for sale shall be pertinent to each cultural area; and add a Condition No. 26, two additional public drinking fountains shall be provided on the site. An amendment was.made to the motion, changing Condition No. 24 to read: that traffic control and parking shall be reviewed in conjunction with the Police Department and Planning after the first week, and every four weeks thereafter. Also, Condition No. 21 will be changed to read: "This conditional use permit shall be scheduled for review on an annual basis." RESOLUTION NO. 1760, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW AN ANNUAL FAIRE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EASTERLY PORTION OF CAFUSBAD RACEWAY NORTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND WEST OF LINDA VISTA ROAD. . . Commissioner Jose indicated that his abstention was due to the fact that more definitive information has not been provided the Commission for consideration. 5. V-317, DORFMAN, Request for a variance of the zoning ordinance to reduce the.front'yard setback from 20' to 16' on property located on the west side of Almaden Lane, between Alga Road and Pamplona Way and addressed as 7049 Almaden Lane in the R-l zone. . .The staff report was presented by Bill Hofman, essentially as contained in the Statement of the Matter. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at lo:28 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Mr. Endre Bartanyi, 1319 Stratford Court, De1 Mar, architect for the applicant. With the aid, of a wall exhibit, Mr. Bartanyi explained the location and project description. He stated the request for the variance was due in the fact that the garage of the existing house is virtually unusable. Mr. Bartanyi also addressed the four findings. The Commission discussed alternatives to the variance with Mr. Bartanyi. Marcus Rombotis Larson L'Heureux Friestedt Jose Leeds .: 3 c , /’ PAGE 10 January 28, 1981 m--e Since no else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at lo:37 P.M. A motion was made to adopt the following resolution, denying V-317, based on the findings contained therein: 'RESOLUTION NO. 1754, DENYING A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 20' TO 16' ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED 0~ THE WEST SIDE OF ALMADEN LANE BETWEEN ALGA ROAD AND PAMPLONA WAY, Commissioner L'Heureux inquired if the Commission would entertain hearing Item No. 10 at this time, due to the late- ness of the hour, and the number of people preqent to hear this item. The Commission concurred. NEW DISCUSSION 10. MS-505, AVIS/O'DAY, Request for a minor subdivision creating three lots, one of which will be a .panhandle lot on property generally located on the east side of Arland Road between Buena Vista Avenue and Highland Drive in the R-1-7500 zone. Michael Holzmiller titled the project. The staff report was continued by Mike Howes. The Commission recognized Mr. Claude Helton who expressed his concern with the project, indicating, however, that he does agree with the staff report. He stated that any street that goes in should be in the center of the block. _* The Commission recognized Mr. Doug Avis; 2740 Arland Road, Carlsbad, the applicant. He expressed concern as staff has indicated that "Super Block" was designated and..to be studied in 1975, and since that time no action has been taken% Also, a moratorium has been imposed for any future sub- division of that property. Mr. Avis stated that the implementation of a panhandle subdivision of his‘ property will keep the balance of the neighborhood in a status quo. He added that the city of Oceanside encourages the development of panhandle to retain rural atmospheres. Mr. Avis continued that if the staff recommendation is ., followed, his application will be denied, and' an action will .take place that has not taken place.in seven years. He stated he is willing to work out the panhandle design with the staff, however, he does not understand the need to take action on his map. The Commission recognized Ms. Debbie Belton, Wilson Drive; who expressed her concern, and stated her opposition to the project. , The Commission recognized Mr. Gilbert, 2697 Wilson Drive, Carlsbad, who stated he is opposed to any part of his property being used fo a future street. The Commission recognized Ms. Marian McQuen, 2724 Arland Road, Carlsbad, who stated he,r opposition to the project. Ms. McQuen submitted a letter of opposition from Mr. and Mrs. Herbei S. Mooney, 2684 Highland Drive, Carlsbad, for the record. Marcus Rombotis Larson L'Heureux Friestedt Jose Leeds 9 c PAGE 11 January 28, 1981 The Commission recognized Mr. Charlie Dix, 1600 Buena Vista WayI Carlsbad; who expressed his opposition to the project. The Commission briefly discussed their views on panhandle lots, and alternatives to same. A motion was made to continue this item to the meeting of February 25, 1981, to allow the applicant to design a panhandle lot meeting city standards. i. Commissioner L'Heureux stated that while the Commission might be in favor of future planning, due to the fact thati there is no support within the block, the specific plan is not practical or feasible at this time. 6. CT 79-7(A)/CP-10(A), HESCON. Request for approval of an, amendment to a subdivision map and condominium permit for 39 units on the southwest corner of Santa Isabel Street and El Fuerte Street in the RD-M zone. Michael Holzmiller titled the project, and the staff report was continued by Bill Hofman, with the aid of wall exhibits. .Mr. Hofman stated that the project is an amendment to a previously approved 39-unit,project on the site.' Mr. Hofman outlined the location and project description, essentially as contained in the Statement of the Matter. He added that staff feels that the project is superior than that which was previously approved. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 11:16 P.M., and .extended the invitation to speak. . . . The applicant stated his willingness to answer any questions. Since no one wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at ll:i7 P.M. A motion was made to approve the Negative Declaration and the following resolution was adopted, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein: RESOLUTION NO. 1758, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SANTA ISABEL STREET AND EL FUERTE STREET. 7. ZC-225,&P-149(F), ROSTON. Zone change from P-C and C-2 to RD-M and an amendment to the La Costa Master Plan on property lodated.on the west and east sides of Centella , Streets, south of Levante Street in La Costa. The staff report was presented by Michael Holzmiller, essentially as contained in the Statement of the Matter. Mr. Hozmiller stated there was a correction to the Background Data Sheet, in that the figures under density proposed should be deleted, as a project is not under review at this time. Chairman Marcus opended the public hearing at 11:20 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Mr. Bob Ladwig, Rick Engineering, representing the applicant. He stated they agree with the staff report and recommendations, with one exception. They have requested the RD-M zone, and object to the Q Overlay. He stated that the-General Plan has not than ed, ptgr$ay would require another application an 8 and the Q review with the . Marcus Rombotis Larson L'Heureux Friestedt Jose Leeds Marcus Rombotis ' Larson L'Heureux Friestedt Jose Leeds c PAGE 12 January 28, 1981 Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing,at l1:22 P.M. In response to Commission inquiry, Michael Holzmiller explained that the Q overlay was recommended as the property is surrounded on two sides by single family residences. Staff's concern is that they are at a lower elevation and there is a posssibility that the units, if two story, would be looking straight down into the rear yards. He continued that by applying a Q overlay, the Commission could review the design of the project', possibly requiring setbacks along the property, and minimizing the impact on the single family residences. A motion was made to approve the Negative Declaration and adopt the following Resolutions approving ZC-225 and MP-149(F) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, with a change on Finding No. 1 to remove the Q overlay, with the deletion of Finding No. 2: RESOLUTION NO. 1756, APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE FROM C-2 AND P-C TO RDM .ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON CENTELLA STREET, SOUTH OF LEVANTE STREET IN LA COSTA. RESOLUTION NO. 1757, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMEND- MENT TO THE LA COSTA MASTER PLAN TO DELETE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM SAID PLAN GENERALLY LOCATED ON CENTELLA STREET, SOUTH OF LEVANTE STREET IN LA COSTA. 8. CT 80-8/CP-58/V-302, IZBICKI. Request for a tentative track map and condominium permit to convert 8 apartment units to ccndominiums, and a variance to allow parking in the front yard setback on property generally located on. the north side of La Costa Avenue between Gibralter Avenue and Romeria Street in the RD-M Zone. The staff report was presented by Michael Holzmiller, essentially as contained in the Statement of the Matter. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 11:27 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Mr. Jack Madison, architect, representing the applicant. Mr. Madison stated they were requesting a continuance, as they would like staff to prepare a new report, due to the changes and additions to the project. Chairman Marcus-indieaeed- that-she would let the public hearing.open, due to the continuance. A motion was made to continue CT 80-8/CP-58 and V-302 to the Planning Commission meeting of March 11, 1981. b \ . :OM~lISSIOf\IERS Marcus Rombotis Larson L'Heureux Friestedt Jose Leeds Marcus Rombotis Larson L'Heureux Friestedt Jose Leeds Marcus Rombotis Larson L'Heureux Friestedt Jose Leeds . X X X X X X X X X X X X X X PAGE 13 - January 28, 1981 . 9. ZCA-131, CITY OF CARLSBAD. An amendment to the zoning ordinance to allow advertising on bus shelter structures. The staff report was presented by Michael Holzmiller, essentially as contained in the Statement of the Matter. Commissioner Jose inquired if Staff had considered putting lighted bus route maps on the advertising panels in the shelters. Bill Hofman indicated that to his knowledge it was never discussed, but agreed with the concept. In response to Commission inquiry as to the monitoring of the types of advertising allowed in the bus shelters, the Assistant City Attorney responded that the contract entered into between the City and the developer, will provide the guidelines by which the applicant and/or advertiser will agree to comply. In addition, they are subject to the sign ordinance. The Commission discussed their views on shelters. Chairman Marcus opened the public hearing at 11<38 P.M., and extended the invitation to speak. The Commission recognized Mr. Jack Henthorn, Housing and Redevelopment Director, who stated that he was speaking to reaffirm the stance of the Housing and Redevelopment Advisory Committee, in that they were opposed to the location of bus benches within the redevelopment area. The basis for the opposition is that they had a Master Plan done for the commercial area located within the redevelopment area, which contained recommendations as to what the street furniture should look like. Since no one else wished to speak on the matter, Chairman Marcus closed the public hearing at 11:47 P.M. A motion was made to deny Resolution No. 1753, due to the . Commission's concern over the monitoring of the types of advertising, and the fact that our climatic conditions do not. require she.ltering at the bus stops. NEW DISCUSSION 10. MS-505, AVIS-O'DAY. Request for a minor subdivision creating three lots, one of which will be a panhandle lot on property generally located on the east side of Arland Road between Buena Vista Avenue and Highland Drive in the R-1-7500 Zone. This item was discussed after Item No..~. RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION 11. V-3.12, DOMINY. Commissioner L'Heureux suggested that in the Findings, it be pointed out that this deals with Ocean Street. A motion was made to adopt the following Resolution, with the proposed amendment: RESOLUTION NO. 1736, APPROVING VARIANCES TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD, TO ALLOW PARKING IN THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD AND SIDE YARD, AND TO PERMIT TANDEM PARKING FOR A CONDOMINIUM BUILDING GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF OCEAN STREET BETWEEN BEECH STREET AND CYPRESS AVENUE. \ 7 :OMMISSIONERS Marcus Rombotis Larson L'Heureux Friestedt Jose Leeds Marcus : Rombotis : Larson : L'Heureux : Friestedt : Jose : Leeds : PAGE 14 January 28, 1981 APPROVAL OF MINUTES A motion was made to approve the minutes of January 14, 1981, as corrected. ADJOURNMENT By proper motion, the meeting was adjourned Respectfully Submitted, JAMES C. HAGAMAN Secretary to the Planning Commission Ann Moyer, Minutes Clerk . COMTlISSIONERS the meeting of at 11:55 P.M. Marcus Rorqbotis Larson. L'Heureux Friestedt Jose Leeds X X X X. X X X