Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3190; San Marcos Creek Rancho Santa Fe Road; San Marcos Creek Rancho Santa Fe Road; 1998-05-01Hydrology Study for San Marcos Creek at Rancho Santa Fe Road Prepared for Dokken Engineering 3914 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite A-153 San Diego, CA 92123 Prepared by Howard H. Chang May 1998 Howard H. Chang Consultants P.O. Box 9492 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 Hydraulic and Hydrologic Engineering Erosion and Sedimentation TEL: (619) 756-9050 FAX: (619) 756-9460 Howard H. Chang Consultants Hydraulic, Hydrologic and Sedimentation Engineering P.O. Box 9492 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 (619)756-9050, 594-6380, FAX: (619)756-9460 April 17, 1998 Mr. Rick Liptak Dokken Engineering 3914 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite A153 San Diego, CA 92123 Dear Rick: Subject: Rancho Santa Fe Road Project This is to transmit to you the completed report entitled "Hydrology Study for San Marcos Creek at Rancho Santa Fe Road". Enclosed please find a unbound copy and a bound copy ofthe report. The report contains the peak discharges as well as flood hydrographs. The flood discharges of San Marcos Creek at Rancho Santa Fe Road are as follows •m Location 10-yr flood 25-yr flood 50-yr flood 100-yr flood Rancho Santa Fe Road 7,520 10,800 14,000 16,500 Please let me know if you have any questions regardmg this matter. Sincerely yours, Howard H. Chang Ph.D., P.E. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Number I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. HYDROLOGIC SIMULATION 2 Basin Area 3 Hydrologic Soil Group 3 Precipitation Zone Number 3 Antecedent Moisture Condition 4 Runoff Curve Number 4 Precipitation 4 Lag Time 5 Flood Routing Through Lake San Marcos 7 III. SIMULATION RESULTS 8 REFERENCES 10 LIST OF FIGURES AND FIGURES 10 APPENDIX A. INPUT/OUTPUT LISTINGS OF HEC-1 FOR THE 24-HR STORM APPENDIX B. INPUT/OUTPUT LISTINGS OF HEC-1 FOR THE 6-HR STORM Hydrology Study for San Marcos Creek at Rancho Santa Fe Road I. INTRODUCTION The hydrology study was prepared to provide the discharges for floods of different frequencies for San Marcos Creek at Rancho Santa Fe Road, see Fig. 1. The existing Rancho Santa Fe Road Bridge on San Marcos Creek does not have an adequate capacity for passing the 100-yr flood; therefore, this bridge will be replaced as a part of the Rancho Santa Fe Road improvement project. Dokken Engineering is the prime contractor for the bridge and road improvement project sponsored by the City ofCarlsbad. Howard H. Chang Consultants is a subcontractor to Dokken Engineering responsible for the hydrology and bridge hydraulics. A previous hydrology study for San Marcos Creek was made by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers in 1971. Peak flows for intermediate regional floods at various points of concentration along the creek from the 1971 study are summarized in Table 1. The intermediate regional flood is one that could occur about once in 100 years on the average. In other words, the intermediate regional flood is equivalent to the 100-yr flood. Table 1. Summary of intermediate regional floods obtained by the Corps of Engineers Stream location Drainage area Intermediate regional flood m Square miles cfs Rancho Santa Fe Road 29.4 13,000 >m Discovery Street 23.0 12,000 •m MM State Highway 78 17.4 10,500 Upstream from east branch 11.3 7,400 Ohve Street 5.5 5,500 The hydrology study by the Corps of Engineers was made at a time before the master plan of development for the region was not available. For this reason, the study was for the physical conditions of the drainage basin existing at the time of study but it does not reflect the physical conditions when the drainage basin is fiilly developed^ The proposed Rancho Santa Fe Road Bridge will serve the region for a long period of time in the fiiture^ It is tiierefore necessary to design the bridge based on the ultimate 100-yr flood for tiie fiilly developed conditions of the drainage basin for San Marcos Creek. This hydrology study was made to detennine the ultimate flood discharges based on tiie master plan for fiiture development in the drainage basin of the creek. The ultimate 100-yr flood discharge is expected to be greater than the 1971 intermediate regional flood discharge by the Corps of Engineers. The conditions for fiiture development is based on the report "Master Plan for Drainage for the City of San Marcos", prepared by Fraser Engineering, dated January 1990. The uitimate development includes new industry to be located along the Highway 78 corridor. This highway has been widened to six lanes and it provides a convenient access to the Interstate 5 and Interstate 15 transportation routes. The ultimate development plan also inciudes new housing to be built in the northem and southem areas of the City. The new State Umversity campus in the City of San Marcos is also a part ofthe ultimate plan. II. HYDROLOGIC SIMULATION The flood discharges for San Marcos Creek were determined based on hydrologic simulation using infonnation on the rainfall and physical characteristics of the drainage basin. The Soil Conservation Service (SCS) unit hydrograph method was used herein. The hydrology study was guided by the National Engineering Handbook, Section 4 - Hydrology by the Soil Conservation Service (1972), USDA and the Hydrology Manual of the County of San Diego, updated in 1985 and 1993. The San Diego County hydrology manual is also based on the SCS method, but it has certain usefiil information specific to this semi-arid area. The HEC-1 computer model developed by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, which employs the SCS method, was the principal tool for this study. m The drainage subbasins as selected in this study are shown in Fig. 1. The points of concentration are at the respective subbasin outlets. The data for HEC-1 model was set up to generate inflow hydrographs of floods discharges at these points of concentration. Hydrologic parameters for the drainage basin, including tiie basin area, CN number, lag time, precipitation, AMC, roughness coefficient, etc. were selected as detailed beiow. The flood hydrograph generated for a subbasin was routed downstream tiirough tiie natural drainage paths; it was superimposed with other hydrographs at the confluences. Forthe purpose of hydrological computation, certain basin characteristics are required. Such characteristics include basin area, Antecedent Moisture Condition (AMC), precipitation, SCS curve number (CN), lag time, etc. Methods for obtaining such characteristics are described below separately. The measured and selected parameters for the drainage basin are summarized in Tables 2, 3, 4 and 5. Basin Area - The total drainage basin upstream of Rancho Santa Fe Road divided into six subbasins: A, B, C, D, E and F, as shown in Fig. 1. The area of each subbasin was measured directly from the drainage basin map. In this case, the USGS map with the scale of 1" — 2,000' was used for area measurements. Hydrologic Soil Groups - The hydrologic soil type for the subbasins were obtained from the Design and Procedure Manual (earlier edition) published by the County of San Diego. Types D soil is the dominate hydrologic soil type for the higher areas of the basin and Type C is the dominate type for alluvial valleys. Normally, each subbasin has more than one hydrologic soil group. The estimated fractions of different soil groups were used in the selection of the CN values. The CN values so obtained are for the AMC of 2. Adjustment of CN for other AMCs was based on the information shown in Table I-A-5 ofthe Hydrology Manual. Precipitation Zone Number (PZN) - This value for a subbasin was obtained from Fig. I-A- 23 of the Coimty Hydrology Manual. The coastal line has the PZN value of 1. Subbasins in the study area have PZN values ranging from 1.4 to 2.0. Antecedent Moisture Condition (AMC) - The AMCs for different floods were computed based on the Precipitation Zone Number (PZN) given in Fig. I-A-23 of the San Diego County Hydrology Manual. Runoff Curve Number (CN) - In the SCS mettiod for runoff estimation, the CN value was used. Table I-A-1 of the Hydrology Manual lists the CN values related to land use, land treatment or practice, hydrologic condition, and soil type. The CN values for the AMC of 2 are listed in the manual. Adjustment to other AMCs was based on the information shown in Table I-A-5 ofthe manual. Precipitation - The precipitation in inches for each subbasin was obtained from the precipitation map in the Hydrology Manual. Precipitation was distributed in accordance with the Type B distribution curve. The 6-hr and 24-hr storms were used separately in this study. The results obtained based on these storms were compared and the larger values were adopted. For small basins, the 6-hour storm normally produces higher runoff discharges than does the 24-hour storm. Table 2. Summary of basin characteristics for San Marcos Creek Subbasin Area n AE L Lc Lag sq. mi ft miles miles hours A 5.0 0.035 780 2.9 1.3 0.48 -mm B 5.8 0.03 800 4.7 2.4 0.68 C 7.2 0.035 350 5.0 2.5 0.83 D 5.5 0.03 500 3.3 1.7 0.53 •MD E 4.6 0.03 460 4.5 2.2 0.71 F 1.9 0.035 870 1.9 0.8 0.31 «• Total 30.0 Table 3. Selection of CN values for the subbasins for AMC=2 Subbasin Soil type Land use Hydrologic conditions CN Weighted CNfor AMC=2 A CD Medium density residential NA 87 82 A CD Open brush Fair, good 78 82 B CD Medium density residential NA 86 82 B CD Open brush Fair, good 78 82 B CD High density residential NA 88 82 C C,D Medium density residential NA 86 82 C C,D Open brush Fair, good 78 82 C C,D High density residential, industrial NA 88 82 D C Medium density residential NA 86 82 D C Open brush Good 76 82 D C High density residential, industrial NA 88 82 E CD Open bmsh Fair 83 84 E CD Medium and high density residential NA 87 84 F CD Open brush Fair 84 86 F CD Medium and high density residential NA 88 86 Lag Time - Lag is defined as the time in hours from the center of mass of the excess rainfall to the peak discharge, it is an empirical expression of the physical characteristics ofa drainage area in terms of time. The lag time relationship is based on criteria developed by the U. S. Army Crops of Engineers which is also adopted by the County of San Diego as given in its Hydrology Manual. Lag (hours) /L*Le\m = 24n ( 1 (1) iiiwil where n = Basin factor, representing a measure of overall basin roughness; m = 0.38, a constant; L - Length of the longest water course; Lc = Length along longest course in miles, measured upstream to the point opposite the center of area; S = Overall slope, in feet per mile, ofthe longest water course. Table 4. Summary of basin characteristics for San Marcos Creek Subbasin Soil type PZN AMC CN Subbasin Soil type PZN 100-yr 10-yr 100-yr 10-yr A CD 2.0 3.0 2.5 92 88 B CD 1.8 2.8 2.3 90 87 C C,D 1.8 2.8 2.3 90 87 D C 1.6 2.6 2.1 88 83 E C,D 1.5 2.5 2.0 89 84 F D 1.4 2.4 1.9 89 85 Table 5. Summary of basin characteristics for San Marcos Creek Subbasin 6-hr. Precip., in 24-hr Precip., in. Subbasin 100-yr 10-yr 100-yr 10-yr A 3.5 2.4 6.0 4.0 B 3.4 2.3 6.0 3.8 C 3.4 2.3 5.8 3.7 m0 D 3.3 2.2 5.5 3.5 E 3.2 2.1 5.4 3.5 UMI F 3.0 2.1 5.3 3.4 •m Flooding Routing Through Lake San Marcos - As the flood water travels through Lake San Marcos, the flow rate is modified by the lake due to the fact ttiat a part of the water will be stored in the lake as the lake level changes. In order to consider the storage effects due to the lake, each flood is routed through the lake based on the storage routing routine in the HEC-1 model. The lake and spillway characteristics are required in flood routing. Such information were provided by the Office of Emergency Services, State ofCalifornia. The storage volume of the lake is described by the surface area versus elevation relationship given in Table 6; it is also shown in Fig. 2. Table 6. Surface area - stage relation for Lake San Marcos Lake level, feet Surface area, acres 455 0 460 1.04 465 2.03 470 3.40 475 6.40 480 11.19 485 19.62 490 36.97 495 59.90 496 63.20 500 70.16 The configuration ofthe spillway has the following features: Spillway crest elevation: 493.5 feet Length of spillway (dimension perpendicular to flow): 256 feet from spillway crest to elevation 498.5; 284 feet above elevation 498.5 feet Spillway side slope: vertical The rating curve for the spillway is given in Table 7; it is also shown in Fig. 3. Table 7. Discharge - stage relation for the spillway Lake level, feet Discharge, cfs 493.5 0 494.5 736 495.5 2165 496.5 4,137 497.5 6,698 498.5 9,871 499.5 13,464 500.5 17,433 501.5 21,478 m. SIMULATION RESULTS Input/output listings of HEC-1 simulation based on the 24-hr storm are included in Appendix A ofthe report, those based on the 6-hr storm are given in Appendix B. Simulated peak flows for the 100-yr flood are summarized in Table 8 and those for the 10-yr flood are summarized in Table 9. The 100-yr fiood discharges are also compared with those by the Corps of Engineers. It can be seen tiiat discharges obtained in this smdy are generally higher than the corresponding ones by the Corps 8 but with some exceptions. Table 8. Summary of peak flows for 100-year flood in cfs Location Based on 6- hr storm Based on 24- hr storm Adopted Corps study Twin Oaks Ranch 4,815 3,274 4,800 Upstream from east branch 7,266 6,801 7,300 7,400 Downstream of east branch 11,692 10,847 11,700 Discovery Street 14,842 13,724 14,900 12,000 Lake inflow 17,471 16,072 17,500 Lake outflow 15,552 15,700 15,700 Rancho Santa Fe Road 16,058 16,425 16,500 13,000 Table 9. Summary of peak flows for 10-year flood in cfs m Location Based on 6-hr storm Based on 24-hr storm Adopted Twin Oaks Ranch 2,242 1,813 2,250 Upstream from east branch 3,022 3,086 3,100 Downstream of east branch 5,048 5,170 5,200 Discovery Street 6,112 6,426 6,450 Lake inflow 7,046 7,542 7,550 Lake outflow 5,736 7,224 7,220 Rancho Santa Fe Road 5,971 7,515 7,520 m Hydrographs for these floods are also included in the input/output listings of HEC-l. These hydrographs have short durations with flood discharge rising and falling rapidly as is characteristic ofthe semi-arid region. A statistical analysis was made to determine the peak discharges for floods of other retum periods. It was assumed that flood discharges of the stream reach follow a log-normal distribution. Other flood discharges were obtained from Fig. 4 based on interpolation of the computed lO-yr and 100-yr flood discharges following the log-normal distributions. The results are summarized in Table 10. Table 10. Summary of peak flows for various floods in cfs Location 10-yr flood 25-yr flood 50-yr flood 100-yr flood Twin Oaks Ranch 2,250 3,100 3,900 4,800 Upstream from east branch 3,100 4,500 5,500 7,300 Downstream of east branch 5,200 7,500 9,500 11,700 Discovery Street 6,450 9,400 12,000 14,900 Lake inflow 7,550 11,000 14,300 17,500 Lake outflow 7,220 10,300 13,000 15,700 Rancho Santa Fe Road 7,520 10,800 14,000 16,500 REFERENCES 1. Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, "Floodplain Information, San Marcos Creek", April 1991. 2. County of San Diego, "Hydrology Manual", 1993. 3. Soil Conservation Service, USDA, National Engineering Handbook, Section 4 - Hydrology, 1972. LIST OF FIGURES Fig. 1. Drainage basin map of San Marco Creek upstream of Rancho Santa Fe Road Fig. 2. Surface area versus elevation relationship for Lake San Marcos Fig. 3. Rating curve for the spillway of Lake San Marcos Dam Fig. 4. Frequency-flood discharge relations 10 BEST ORIGINAL 4^fyl^rfI^ig- 1 • Drainage basin map of San Marco Creek r^^^r / 4. - I v.'^ upstream of Rancho Santa Fe Road I i ft i i I i i I I iillilJIlftllliltitlfci Area-Elevation Curve for Lake San Marcos qo' GO CD cn CO Ot 1—1 O J3 g O CO Cfl I o cn Area, acres 455 460 465 470 475 480 485 490 495 Elevation, ft 500 IlllftJilliliiJllltlilliatlftiliiii^i^iJ Spillway Discharge Capacity Lake San Mareos Dam OQ* I—'. OQ n a Vl T3 O r o 00 o Discharge, cfs(Thousands) 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 Lake level, ft i J 3 '4 5 10^ Peak discharge, cfs 3 4 5 BEST ORIGINAL APPENDDC A. INPUT/OUTPUT LISTINGS OF HEC-1 FOR HYDROLOGICAL SIMULATION BASED ON THE 24-HR STORM • FLOOD HYDHOORAPH PACKAOB (HEC-1) * • SBPTSKBBR 1990 * • VBRSION 4.0 • • • • ROK DATB 03/30/1998 TME ISiSliO? • U.S. ARMY CORPS OP BNGINEERS HTDROLOQIC EKOINEBRIira CENTER 609 SECOND STREBT DAVIS, CALIFORNIA 95616 (916) 756-1104 X X XXXXXXX xxxxx X X z X X X XX X X X X X XXXXXXX xxxx X xxxxx X ttm X X X X X X X X X X X m X X XXXXXXX xxxxx xxx THIS PROGRAM REPLACES ALL PREVIOUS VERSIONS OF HEC-1 KNOWN AS HECl (JAN 73), HECIGS, HECIDB, AND HECIKW. THE DEFINITIONS OF VARIABLES -RTIMP- AND -RTIOR- HAVE CHANGED FROM THOSE USED WITH THE 1973-STYLE INPUT STRUCTURE. THE DEFINITION OF -AMSKK- ON RM-CABO WAS CHANGED WITH REVISIONS DATED 28 SEP 81. THIS IS THE FORTRAN?? VERSION NEH OPTIONS: DAMBREAK OUTFLOW SUBMERGENCE , SINGLE EVENT DAHAOB CALCULATION, DSSiWRITE STAGE FREQUENCY, DSS:READ TIME SERIES AT DESIRED CALCULATION INTERVAL LOSS RATE:GREEN AND AMPT INFILTRATION KINEMATIC WAVE: NEW FINITE DIFFERENCE ALGORITHM HEC-1 INPUT PAGB 1 ID HYDROLOGY STUDY FOR SAN MARCOS CREEK ID UPPSTREAM OF RANCHO SAHTA PB ROAD ZD FOR THB RSP ROAD PROJBCT SPONSORED BY THE CITY OP SAN HARCOS ID SUBCONTACT TO DOKKEN BNGINEBRING ID FOR ULTIMATE CONDITIONS OP WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT ID 24-HOUR STORM, 100-YBAR EVENT IT 5 1HAR98 1200 300 10 5 ,10 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 KK KM IN PB PI PI PI PI PI BA LS UD RUNOFF PROM SUBBASIN A 30 6.0 0 .014 .082 .01 .01 5.0 0.48 ,009 ,016 ,041 ,016 ,011 92 .007 .009 .009 .011 .009 .011 .012 .013 .017 .02 .023 .03 .045 .OS? .088 .096 .027 .023 .021 .02 .019 .01? .016 .018 .015 .014 .015 .012 .013 .01 .01 .009 .01 .009 .009 .009 .009 .01 .009 21 22 KK RK B CHANNEL ROUTING THROUGH B 30000 0.00825 0.035 40 23 24 25 26 2? KK B KM RUNOFF PROM SUBBASIN B BA 5.8 LS 90 UD 0.68 28 29 30 31 KK B KH COHBINE FLOWS OF SUBBASINS A AND B HC 2 KO 2 32 33 KK KH RUNOFF PROM SUBBASIN C A-l 34 35 36 37 PB BA LS DD 5.8 7.2 0.83 90 38 39 40 KK KH HC CXIKBINB FLOWS OF SUBBASINS A, B AND C 2 41 42 KK D CHANNEL ROUTING THROUGH D RK 13000 0.00346 0.030 TRAP HBC-1 INPtIT 40 PAGE 2 ,10 43 44 45 46 47 48 KK KM PB BA LS UD RUNOFF PROM SUBBASIN D 5.5 5.5 88 0.53 49 SO 51 KK KM HC CCniBINB FLOWS OF SUBBASINS A,B,C AND 0 2 52 53 54 55 56 57 KX B KM RUNOFF PROM SUBBASIN B PB 5.4 BA 4.6 LS 88 UD 0.71 58 59 KX KH COMBINE FLOWS OF SXmBASIHS A,B,C,D AND E 60 HC 2 61 KK LAKE ROUTING THROUCM LAKE SAN MARCOS 62 63 KO RS 0 1 2 ELEV 493.5 mm 64 SA 48 54 57.6 61.6 64.8 68 ?0.5 73 76 65 SQ 0 0 736 2165 4137 6698 98?1 13464 17433 66 SE 492 493.5 494.5 495.5 496.5 497.5 498.5 499.5 500.5 6? KK P CHANNEL ROirriNG THROUGH F mm 68 RK 7000 0.0186 0.035 TRAP 50 3 69 70 71 72 73 74 KK KH PB BA LS UD RUNOFF PROH SUBBASIN F 5.3 1.9 89 0.31 75 76 77 78 KK KH HC ZZ COMBINB PLOWS OF SUBBASINS A,B,C,D,S AHD F 2 • FLOOD HYDROGRAPH PACKAOE (HEC-1) • • SEFTEHBER 1990 • • VERSION 4.0 • • * • RUN DATE 03/30/1998 TIME 15:51:07 • U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER 609 SECOND STREBT DAVIS, CALIFORNIA 95616 (916) 756-1104 HYDROLOGY STUDY FOR SAH HARCOS CREEK UPPSTREAM OP RAHCHO SAHTA PB ROAD POR THE RSF ROAD PROJECT SPONSORED BY THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS SUBCmTACT TO DOKKEH ENGINEERING FOR ULTIMATE CONDITIONS OF WATERSHED DEVELOPHENT 24-HOUS STORH, lOO-YEAR EVENT OUTPUT CCmTROL VARIABLES A-2 IPRNT IPLOT QSCAL 5 PRINT CONTROL 0 PLOT CONTROL 0. HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE HYDROGRAPH TIMB DATA NMIN IDATE ITIME NQ NDDATE NDTIME ICENT 5 1HAR9S 1200 300 2MAR98 1255 19 MINUTES IN CCa*PUTATION INTERVAL STARTING DATB STARTING TIME NUMBER OF HYDROGRAPH ORDINATES EHDIHG DATB ENDING TIME CENTURY MARK COHPUTATION IHTBRVAL TOTAL TIHE BASB .08 HOURS 24.92 HOURS ENGLISH UNITS DRAINAGE AREA PRECIPITATION DEPTH LEHGTH, ELEVATION FLOW STORAGE VOLUME SURFACE ARBA TEMPERATURE SQUARE MILES INCHES FEET CUBIC FEBT PER SECOND ACRE-FEET ACRES DB^tBES FAHRENHEIT 28 KK 31 KO OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES IPRNT 5 PRINT CONTROL IPLOT 2 PLOT CONTROL QSCAL 0. HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE STATION DAHRMN 11200 11205 11210 11215 11220 11225 11230 11235 11240 11245 11250 11255 11300 11305 11310 11315 11320 11325 11330 11335 11340 11345 11350 11355 11400 11405 11410 11415 11420 11425 11430 11435 11440 1144S 11450 11455 0. FER 10- 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 lOO 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 20O 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 30O 310 320 330 340 350 360 1000. (0) OUTFLOW 2000. 3000. 4000. 5000. 6000. ?000. 0. 0. 0. 0. A-3 dll 11500 11505 11510 11515 11520 11525 11530 11535 11540 11545 11550 11555 11600 11605 11610 11615 11620 11625 11630 11635 11640 11645 11650 11655 H?00 11705 11710 11715 11720 11725 11730 11735 11740 11745 11750 11755 11800 11805 11810 11815 11820 11825 11830 11835 11840 11845 11850 11855 11900 11905 11910 11915 11920 11925 11930 11935 11940 11945 11950 1X955 12000 12005 12010 12015 12020 12025 12030 12035 12040 12045 12050 12055 12100 12105 12110 12115 12120 12125 12130 12135 12140 370 380 390 40O 410 . 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 490 SO.O 51.0. 52.0 53.0 54.0 55.0 56.0 57.0 58. O 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. ?3. ?4. ?5. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. 98. 99 • 100. 101. 102. 103. 104. 105. 106. 107. 108. 109. 110. 111. 112. 113. 114. 115. 116. 117. A-4 m 12145 118. 12150 119. 12155 120. 12200 121. 12205 122. 12210 123. 12215 124. 12220 125. 12225 126. 12230 127. 12235 128. 12240 129. 12245 130. 12250 131. 12255 132. 12300 133. 12305 134. 12310 135. 12315 136. 12320 137. 12325 138. 12330 139. 12335 140. 12340 141. 12345 142. 12350 143. 12355 144. 20000 145. 20005 146. 20010 147. 20015 148. 20020 149. 20025 150. 20030 151. 20035 152. 20040 153. 20045 154. 20050 155. 20055 156. 20100 157. 20105 158. 20110 159. 20115 160. 20120 161. 20125 162. 20130 163. 20135 164. 20140 165. 20145 166. 20150 167. 20155 168. 20200 169. 20205 170. 20210 171. 20215 172. 20220 173. 20225 174. 20230 1?5. 20235 176. 20240 177. 20245 178. 20250 179. 20255 180. 20300 181. 20305 182. 20310 183. 20315 184. 20320 185. 20325 186. 20330 18?. 20335 188. 20340 189. 20345 190. 20350 191. 20355 192. 20400 193. 20405 194. 20410 195. 20415 19S. 20420 197. 20425 198. m A-5 20430 199. 20435 200. 20440 201. 20445 202. 20450 203. 20455 204. 20500 205. 20505 206. 20510 207. 20515 208. 20520 209. 20525 210. 20530 211. 20535 212. 20540 213. 20545 214. 20550 215. 20555 216. 20600 217. 20605 218. 20610 219. 20615 320. 20620 221. 20625 223. 20630 223. 20635 324. 20640 225. 20645 226. 20650 227. 20655 328. 20700 229. 20705 230. 20710 231. 20715 232. 20720 233. 20725 234. 20730 235. 20735 236. 20740 237. 20745 238. 20750 239. 20755 240. 20300 241. 20805 242. 20810 243. 20815 244. 20820 245. 20825 246. 20830 247. 20835 248. 20840 349^ 30845 250. 20850 351. 30855 252. 20900 353. 20905 354. 20910 355. 30915 356. 20930 357. 20925 258. 20930 259. 20935 260. 20940 261. 20945 262. 209SO 263. 20955 264. 21000 265. 21005 266^ 21010 367. 21015 268. 21020 269. 21025 270^ 21030 271. 21035 272. 21040 273. 21045 274. 21050 275. 21055 276. 21100 27?. 21105 278. 21110 279. .0 .0 .0 .0. .0 .0 .0 .0 o o 0 0 0 o . o 0 0. o. o. o. 0. o. A-6 21115 280. 0 . 21120 21125 282. 0 . 21130 283. 0 . 21135 284. 0 . tiMH 21140 285. 0 . 21145 286. 0 . 31150 287. 0 . 21155 288. 0 . 21300 289. 0 . m 21205 290. 0 21210 21215 292. 0 . 21220 293. 0 . 21225 294. 0 . m 21230 295. 0 . 21235 296. 0 . 21240 297. 0 . 21345 298. 0 . 21250 299. 0 . 21255 *•* •** •** *** *•* *•* *** *•* **• **• *•* •** >•* **• *** *** *•* *** *•* *** kn* *** a** •** **• 61 KK LAKE ROUTING THROtnSH LAKE SAN MARCOS 62 KO OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES IPRNT 5 PRINT CONTROL IPLOT 2 PLOT CONTROL QSCAL 0. HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE STATION LAKE DAHRMH 11200 11205 11210 11315 11220 11235 11230 11235 11240 11245 11250 11255 11300 11305 11310 11315 11320 11325 11330 11335 11340 11345 11350 11355 11400 11405 11410 11415 11420 11425 11430 11435 11440 11445 11450 11455 0. 0. PER II- 21 31 41 51 61 71 81 91 101 111 121 131 141 151 161 171 181 191 201 211 221 231 241 251 261 271 281 291 301 311 321 331 341 351 361 2000 0 (I) INFLOW, (0) OUTFLOW 4000. 6000. 8000 10000 12000. 14000. 16000 (S) STORAGE 200. 400 18000 600 A-7 11500 11505 11510 11515 11520 11525 11530 11535 11540 11545 11550 11555 11600 11605 11610 11615 11620 11625 11630 11635 11640 11645 11650 11655 11700 11705 11710 11715 11720 11725 11730 11735 11740 11745 11750 11755 11800 X1S05 11810 11815 11820 11825 11830 11835 11840 11845 11850 11855 11900 11905 11910 11915 11920 11925 11930 11935 11940 11945 11950 11955 12000 12005 12010 12015 12020 12025 12030 12035 12040 12045 12050 12055 12100 12105 12110 12115 12120 12125 12130 13135 12140 371 381 391 401 411 . . 421 43X 441 451 461 471 481 491 501 511 . . 521 531 541 551 5601 5701 5801 5901 60OI 6101. . 62.01 63.01 64.01 65.0 I 66.0 I 67.0 I 68.0 I 69. 0 I 70. ?1. 72. 73. 74. 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. 98. 99. 100. 101. 103. 103. 104. 105. 106. 10?. 108. 109. 110. 111. 112. 113. 114. 115. 116. 117. O I 0 1.. 0 I O I 0 I O I O I O I O I 0 I O I . O .1. 0 I 0 I 0 1 O I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 1..., 0 .1 O.I O. I O I O I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I • O. I . 0 I 0 o o 0 I 0 . . o . 0 I . 0 . I A-8 m 12145 118. 12150 119. 12155 120. 12200 121. 13205 133. 12210 123. 12215 124. 12220 125. 12225 126. 12230 127. 12235 128. 12240 129. 13245 130. 12250 131. 12255 132. 12300 133. 12305 134. 12310 135. 12315 136. 12320 137. 12325 138. 12330 139. 12335 140. 12340 141. 12345 142. 12350 143. 12355 144. 20000 145. 20005 146. 20010 147. 20015 148. 20020 149. 20025 150. 20030 151. 20035 153. 20040 153. 20045 154. 20050 155. 20055 156. 20100 157. 20105 158. 20110 159. 20115 160. 20120 161. 20135 162. 20130 163. 20135 164. 20140 165. 20145 166. 20150 167. 20155 168. 20200 169. 20205 170. 20210 171. 20215 172. 20220 173. 20225 174. 20230 175. 20235 176. 20240 177. 20245 178. 20250 179. 20255 180. 20300 181. 20305 182. 20310 183. 20315 184. 20320 185. 20325 186. 20330 187. 20335 188. 20340 189. 20345 190. 20350 191. 20355 192. 20400 193. 20405 194. 20410 195. 20415 196. 20420 197. 20425 198. I I I I 0 I 0 I 0 I o I 0 I 0 10.. ,1 0 ,1 0 ,ro .10 I 0 10 10 10 10 ,10 . . . . IO 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 .10 10 10 I I I 10 10 10 10 .10 . 10 10 IO 10 10 10 10 I 0 I 0 o . 0 • . I 0 o 0 o I • I O I . . .0. . . . I s. s s 1 I I 3 I 0 I O I . .1 I I 0 I 0 o 0 A-9 il 20430 20435 20440 20445 20450 20455 20500 20505 20510 30515 20520 20525 20530 20535 20540 30545 30550 30555 20600 30605 30610 20615 30620 20625 20630 20635 20640 20645 30650 20655 20700 20705 20710 20715 20730 20725 20730 20735 20740 20745 20750 20755 20800 20805 20810 20815 20820 20325 20830 20835 20840 20345 20350 20355 20900 20905 20910 20915 20920 20925 20930 20935 20940 20945 20950 20955 21000 21005 21010 21015 21020 21035 21030 21035 21040 21045 21050 21055 21100 21105 21110 199. 300. 201. 302. 203. 204. 205. 206. 207. 208. 209. 210. 211. 212. 213. 214. 215. 216. 217. 218. 219. 220. 231^ 222. 223. 234. 225. 336. 227. 238. 229. 230. 331. 333. 233. 234. 235. 236. 237. 238. 239. 240. 241. 243. 343. 244. 245. 246. 247. 248. 249. 250. 351. 352. 253. 354. 255. 256. 257. 258. 259. 260. 261. 262. 263. 264. 265. 266. 267. 268. 269. 270. 271. 272. 273. 274. 275. 276. 277. 278. 279. IO I I . I 0] 03 10 10 10 I I I . I . I I 10 10 10 10 I I I 10. . 10 10 10 I .10 .10 .10 ,10 .10 ,1. . . 10 10 10 10 10 10 I I I , I • I I I I I I I I I , I . I I I I I I I I I . I . I I I 10 10 10 10 10 • S .3 .s. .s .3 .3 .3 • S .3 .3 .S .3 .3. .S .S .3 .S .3 .S .s .s .s .3. .3 .3 .3 .3 • S 3 S 3 S S . S S 3 S 3 S 3 3 S 3 . S 3 S S s 3. S. 3. S. .S^ S. S. S. 3. S. S. s. s. s. .s. 3. S. 3. 3. S. 3. 5. S. 3. .3. S. S. s. s. s. 3. S. S. A-10 21115 280. 21120 281. 21125 282. 21130 283. 21135 284. 21140 285. 21145 286. 21150 287. 21155 288. 21200 289. 21305 290. 21210 291. 31315 292. 31320 393. 31325 394. 31330 395. 31335 396. 31340 297. 21245 298. 21250 299. 21255 300. RUNOFF SUHHARY FLOW IH CUBIC FEBT PER SECOND TIHE IN HOURS, AREA IN SQUARE MILES PEAK TIME OF AVERAGE FLOH FOR HAXIHUH PERIOD OPERATION STATION FLOH PEAK 6-HOUR 2 4-HOUR 7 2-HOTO BASIN HAXIHUH TIME OF ARBA STAGE MAX STAGE HYDROGRAPH AT 3274. 10.33 1649. 678. 653, 5.00 ROUTED TO 3270. 10.58 1649, 665. 641. 5.00 HYDROGRAPH AT 3531. 10.58 1833. 747, 720, 5.30 2 COHBINED AT 6801. 10.58 3481. 1413, 1361. 10.80 HYDROGRAPH AT 4070. 10.67 2179. 887, 854, 7.20 2 COHBINED AT 10847. 10.58 5660. 3399. 2215. 18.00 ROUTED TO 10841. 10.75 5662. 3279. 2195. 18.00 HYDROGRAPH AT 3981. 10.43 1496. 609. 586, 5.50 3 COHBINED AT 13724. 10.67 2888. 3782, 23.50 HYDROGRAPH AT 2349. 10.58 1219. 495. 4.60 2 COHBINED AT 16072. 10.67 8372. 3383. 3258. 28.10 ROUTED TO 15700. 10.83 8337. 3331. 3208. 38.10 500.06 10.83 ROUTED TO 15693. 10.92 8337. 3321. 3199. 28.10 HYDROGRAPH AT 1053. 10^17 507 • 207. 199. 1.90 i* 1 2 COMBINED AT 16425. 10.83 8826. 3528. 3399. 30.00 SUHHARY OF KIHEHATIC WAVE - HUSKIHGUH-CUNGB ROUTING (FLOW IS DIRECT RXnTOFF WITHOUT BASE FLOH) INTERPOLATED TO COHPUTATION INTERVAL A-11 ISTAQ ELEHENT DT PEAK TIME TO VOLUME DT PEAK TIMB TO VOLUME "* PEAK PEAK , (HIN) (CPS) (HIN) (IN) (HIH) (CFS) (HIN) (IN) B HAHE 5.00 3273.01 632.30 4.96 5.00 3269.79 635.00 4.95 -w* CONTINUITY SUMMARY (AC-FT) - INFLOW- .1345E+04 EXCESS- .OOOOE+00 OUTFLOW- .1321E+04 BASIN STORAGB- .2378E+02 PERCENT ERROR- .0 D HANS 3.71 10344.12 644.04 4.72 5.00 10840.85 645.00 4.71 CONTINUITY SUHHARY (AC-FT) - INFLOH- .4561B+04 EXCESS- .OOOOB+00 OUTFLOW- .4531E+04 BASIN STORAGE- .3675E+02 PERCENT ERROR- -.2 mm F HANE 1.17 15699.21 652.68 4.40 5.00 15693.90 655.00 4.40 CONTINUITY SUHHARY (AC-FT) - INFLOW- .6607E+04 EXCESS- .OOOOE-fOO OUTFLOW- .6590E+04 BA3IH STORAGE- .1890E+02 PERCENT ERROR- .0 NORHAL END OF HEC-1 m A-12 • FLOOD HYDROGRAPH PAC3CAGB (HEC-1) * • SBPTEHBER 1990 • • VERSION 4.0 • • • • RUH DATE 03/30/1998 TIME 16:07:06 • U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER 609 SECOND STREBT DAVIS, CALIFORNIA 95616 (916) 756-1104 X X XXXXXXX xxxxx xxx X J xxx X XXXXXXX xxxx X xxx X xxx X n xxxxx X X XXXXXXX xxxxx X XX X X X X xxx THIS PROGRAM REPLACES ALL PREVIOUS VERSIONS OF HEC-1 KHOWN AS HECl (JAN 73), HECIGS, HECIDB, AND HECIKW. THB DBFINITIOHS OF VARIABLES -RTIHP- AND -RTIOR- HAVE CHAHGED FHOM THOSE USED WITH THB 1973-STYLE IHPUT STRUCTURE. THB DEFINITION OF -AMSKK- OH RM-CARO WAS CHANGED WITH REVISIONS DATED 28 SEP 81. THIS IS THE PORTRAN77 VERSION NEH OPTIONS: DAHBRBAK OUTFLOW SUBMERGENCE , SZHGLE EVZNT DAHAOB CALCULATION, DSSiWRITE STAGE FREQUENCY, DSS!RBAD TIME SERIES AT DESIRED CALCULATION IHTBRVAL LOSS RATB:GREEN AND AMPT INFILTRATION KINEMATIC WAVE: NEH FINITE DIFFBREHCB ALGORITBH KEC-1 iNPxrr PAGE 1 ,8. .10 ID HYDROLOGY STUDY FOR SAN HARCOS CREEK ID UPPSTREAM OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD ID FOR THE RSF ROAD PROJECT SPONSORED BY THE CITY OP SAN MARCOS ID SUBCONTACT TO DOKKEH BHGINEBRIHG ID POR ULTIMATE CONDITIONS OF WATERSHED DEVELOPMEHT ID 24-HOUR STORM, 10-YEAR EVBHT IT 5 1HAR98 1200 300 10 s •m m 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 KK KM IN PB PI PI PI PI PI BA LS UD TX RK RUNOFF FROM SUBBASIN A 30 4.0 0 .014 .082 .01 .01 5.0 0.48 009 .007 .009 .009 .011 .009 • Oil .012 .013 016 .017 .02 .023 .03 .045 .067 • 088 .096 041 .027 .023 .021 .02 .019 • 017 .016 .018 016 .015 .014 .015 .012 .013 .01 .01 .009 Oil .01 .009 .009 .009 • 009 .01 .009 88 B CnUNNEL ROUTING THROUGH B 20000 0.00825 0.035 TRAP 40 m 23 24 25 26 27 KK B KH RUNOFF FROM SUBBASIN B BA 3.3 LS 87 UD 0.68 28 29 30 31 KK B KM COMBINE PLOWS OF SUBBASINS A AND B HC 2 KO 2 32 33 34 35 36 37 KK KM PB BA LS UD RXmOFF FROH SUBBASIN C 3.7 7.2 87 0.83 A-13 38 39 40 KK KM HC COMBINB PL0H3 OF SUBBASINS A, B AND C 3 41 42 KK O CHANNEL ROUTING THROUGH D RK 13000 0.00346 0.030 TRAP HEC-1 INPUT ID. 40 PAGE .10 43 44 45 46 47 48 KK KM PB BA LS UD RUNOFF FROM StTBBASIN D 3.5 5.5 83 0.53 49 50 51 KK KM HC COMBINB FLOWS OP SUBBASINS A,B,C AHD D 2 52 53 54 55 56 57 KK B KM RUKOFP FROH SUBBASIH E PB 3.5 BA 4.6 LS 84 UD 0.71 58 59 60 KK E KM COMBINB PLOHS OF SUBBASIH3 A,B,C,D AHD E HC 2 61 KK LAKE ROUTING THROUGH LAKE SAN MARCOS 62 KO 0 2 63 RS 1 ELEV 493.5 64 SA 48 54 57.6 61.6 64.8 68 70.5 73 76 65 30 0 0 736 2165 4137 6698 9871 13464 17433 66 SE 492 493.5 494.5 495.5 496.5 497.5 498.5 499.5 500.5 67 KK F CHANNEL ROUTING THROUGH F 68 RK 7000 0.0186 0.035 TRAP 50 3 •m 69 70 71 72 73 74 KK KH PB BA LS UD RUNOFF FROM SUBBASIN F 3.4 1.9 85 0.31 75 76 77 78 KK KH HC ZZ COMBINB FLOHS OP SUBBASINS A,B,C,D,E AHD F 2 FLOOD HYDROGRAPH PACKAGE SEPTEKBER 1990 VBRSIOK 4^0 (HEC-l) * HUN DATE 03/30/1998 TIME 16:07:06 • U.S. ARMY CORPS OP ENGINEERS HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERINO CENTER 609 SECOND STREET DAVIS, CALIFORNIA 95616 (916) 756-1104 HYDROLOGY STUDY FOR SAH MARCOS CREEK UPPSTREAM OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD FOR THB RSP ROAD PROJBCT SPONSORED BY THE CITY OF SAN HARCOS SUBCONTACT TO DOKKEN BHGINEBRIHG FOR ULTIMATE COHDITIONS OF HATERSHED DEVELOPHENT 24-HOUR STORM, 10-YEAR EVENT 8 10 OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES IPRNT 5 PRINT CONTROL IPLOT 0 PLOT CONTROL QSCAL 0. HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE HYDROGRAPH TIME DATA A-14 m NMIN 5 MINUTES IH COMPUTATION IHTBRVAL IDATE 1MAR98 STARTING DATB ITIME 1200 STARTING TIMB NQ 300 NUMBER OF BYDRCXTOAPH ORDINATES NDDATE 2MAR98 ENDING DATB NDTIHB 1255 ENDING TIMB ICBHT 19 CENTURY HARK COMPUTATIOH INTERVAL TOTAL TIHE BASE .08 HOURS 24.92 HOURS ENGLISH UHITS DRAINAGE AREA PRECIPITATION DEPTH LEHGTH, ELEVATION FLOH STORAGE VOLUHE SURFACE AREA TEMPERATURE SQUARE MILES INCHES PEET CUBIC FEBT PER SECOND ACRE-FEET ACRES DEQREBS FAHRENHEIT 28 KK 31 KO OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES IPRNT 5 PRINT CONTROL IPLOT 2 FLOT CONTROL QSCAL 0. HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE STATION m m m DAHRHH 11200 11205 11210 11215 11220 11225 11230 11235 11240 11345 11250 11255 11300 11305 11310 11315 11320 11325 11330 11335 11340 11345 11350 11355 11400 11405 11410 11415 11420 11425 11430 11435 11440 11445 11450 11455 11500 11505 11510 11515 11520 0. PEB 10- 20 30 40 50 60 70 30 90 lOO 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 20O 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 230 290 30O 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 40O 410 400. (0) OUTFLOW 800. 1200. 1600 • 2000. 2400. 2800. 3200. 0. 0. 0. A-15 11525 11530 11535 11540 11545 11550 11555 11600 11605 11610 11615 11620 11625 11630 11635 11640 11645 11650 11655 11700 11705 11710 11715 11720 11725 11730 11735 U740 11745 11750 11755 11800 11305 11810 11815 11320 11825 11830 11835 11840 11345 11850 11355 11900 11905 11910 11915 11920 11925 11930 11935 11940 11945 11950 11955 12000 12005 12010 12015 12020 12025 12030 12035 12040 12045 12050 12055 12100 12105 12110 12115 12120 12125 12130 12135 12140 12145 12150 12155 12200 12205 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 490 50O 510 . 520 530 540 550 560 570 580 590 60O 610 . 620 630 640 650 660 670 680 690 70O 71.0. 72.0 73.0 74.0 75.0 76.0 77.0 78.0 79.0 80.0 81.0. 82. 0 83. O 34. O 35. 0 86. < 87. • 88. 89. 90. 91. . 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. 98. 99. 100. 101. . 102. 103. 104. 105. 106. 107. 108. 109. 110. 111. . 112. 113. 114. 115. 116. 117. 118. 119. 120. 121. . 122. O . . . O A-16 12210 123. 12215 124. 12220 125. 12225 126. 12230 127. 12235 128. 12240 129. 12245 130. 12250 131. 12255 132. 12300 133. 12305 134. 12310 135. 12315 136. 12330 137. 12325 138. 12330 139. 12335 140. 12340 141. 1234S 142. 12350 143. 12355 144. 20000 145. 20005 146. 20010 147. 20015 148. 20020 149. 20035 150. 20030 151. 20035 152. 20040 153. 20045 154. 20050 155. 20055 156. 20100 157. 30105 158. 20110 159. 20115 160. 20120 161. 20125 162. 20130 163. 20135 X64. 20140 165. 20145 166. 20150 167. 20155 168. 20200 169. 20205 170. 20210 171. 20215 172. 20220 173. 20225 174. 20230 175. 20335 176. 20240 177. 20245 178. 20250 179. 20355 180. 30300 181. 20305 182. 20310 183. 203X5 184. 20320 185. 20325 136. 20330 137. 20335 138. 20340 189. 20345 190. 20350 191. 20355 192. 20400 193. 20405 194. 20410 195. 20415 196. 20420 197. 30425 198. 20430 199. 20435 200. 20440 201. 20445 202. 20450 203. A-17 20455 204. 20500 205. 20505 206. 20510 207. 20515 208. 20530 209. 20525 310. 20530 211. 20535 212. 20540 213. 20545 214. 205SO 315. 30555 216. 20600 217. 20605 213. 20610 2X9. 20615 220. 20620 221. 30635 222. 20630 223. 20635 224. 20640 225. 20645 226. 20650 327. 20655 228. 20700 229. 20705 230. 30710 331. 20715 233. 20720 233. 20725 234. 20730 235. 20735 236. 20740 237. 20745 233. 20750 239. 20755 240. 20800 241. 20805 242. 20810 243. 20815 244. 20820 245. 20825 246. 20830 247. 20835 248. 20840 249. 20845 250. 20850 251. 20855 252. 20900 253. 20905 254. 20910 255. 20915 256. 20920 257. 20925 258. 20930 259. 20935 260. 20940 261. 20945 363. 209SO 363. 20955 264. 21000 265. 21005 266. 31010 267. 21015 268. 21020 269. 21025 270. 21030 271. 21035 272. 21040 273. 21045 274. 21050 275. 21055 276. 21100 277. 2X105 278. 21110 279. 21115 280. 21120 281. 21125 282. 21130 283. 21135 284. O 0 0 0 0 o 0 .0 .0 .0 .o .0 .0 .0 .0 o o 0 0. 0. 0. A-18 •m 21140 285. 0. 2X145 286. 0. 21150 287. O. 21155 288. 0. 2X200 289. 0 -m 21205 290. 0 21210 291. . . . 0 21215 292. 0 m 21220 293. 0 21225 294. 0 4* 21230 295. 0 21235 296. 0 21240 397. 0 21245 298. 0 21250 299. 0 21255 61 KK LAKE ROUTIHG THROUGH LAKE SAH HARCOS 62 KO OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES IPRNT 5 PRINT CONTROL IPLOT 2 PLOT CONTROL QSCAL 0. HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE STATION LAKE 0. 0. DAHRMN PER 11200 11205 21 11210 31 11215 41 11220 51 11225 61 11230 71 11235 81 11240 91 11245 101 11250 111 1X255 121 11300 131 11305 141 11310 151 1131S 161 11320 171 11335 181 11330 191 11335 201 11340 2X1 11345 221 11350 231 11355 341 11400 251 11405 261 11410 271 11415 281 11420 291 11425 301 11430 311 11435 321 11440 331 11445 341 11450 351 11455 361 11500 371 1X505 381 11510 391 11515 401 11520 411 xooo (I) INPLOH, (O) OUTFLOH 2000. 3000. 4000 5000 0 6000 0 7000. 8000 (S) STORAGE 100. 200 -S-. s . 3 . S . S . S . 3 . s . s . s . 3 s . s s 3 s s s s s 3 s s s s s 3 s s 3 s s 3 S 3 S S 3 3 S . 3 0. 300. 0. 400. A-19 11525 11530 11535 11540 11545 11550 11555 11600 X160S 11610 11615 11630 11625 11630 X1635 11640 11645 11650 11655 1X700 11705 11710 1X7X5 11730 11735 1X730 11735 11740 11745 11750 11755 11800 X1805 11810 11815 11820 11835 11830 11335 1X340 11345 11850 11855 11900 1X905 11910 11915 11920 11925 11930 11935 11940 11945 11950 11955 12000 X2005 12010 12015 12020 X2025 X2030 X2035 X2040 12045 12050 12055 12100 12105 12110 12115 12120 12125 12130 12135 12140 12145 12150 12155 12200 X2205 421 431 441 451 461 471 481 491 501 5X1 . . 521 531 541 551 561 571 581 591 601 611 . . 621 631 641 651 661 671 681 691 701 711 . . 721 731 741 751 761 771 781 791 801 311 . . 3201 8301 8401 8501 8601 870 I 88.01 89.01 90.0 I 91.0.1. 92.0 I 93.0 I 94. O I 95. 96. 97. 98. 99. 100. 101. 102. 103. 104. 105. 106. 107. 108. 109. 110. 111. 112. 113. 1X4. 115. 116. 117. 113. 119. 120. 121. 122. O 0 0 0 0 0 s . S • S . s . s . s . s . s . s . s . s. s. 3. s. 3. 3. S s 3 . 3 A-20 12210 12215 12220 12225 12230 12235 12240 12245 12250 12255 12300 12305 12310 X2315 12320 12325 12330 12335 12340 12345 12350 12355 20000 20005 20010 20015 20020 20025 20030 20035 30040 20045 20050 20055 20100 20X05 20110 20115 20120 20125 20130 20135 20140 20145 20150 20155 20200 20205 20210 20215 20220 20225 20230 20235 20240 2C245 20250 20255 20300 20305 20310 20315 20320 20325 20330 20335 20340 20345 2035O 20355 20400 20405 20410 20415 20420 20425 20430 20435 20440 20445 20450 123. 124. 125. 126. 127. 128. X29. X30. X3X. X33. 133. 134. X3 5. X36. X37. 133. 139. 140. 141. 142. 143. 144. 145. 146. 147. 148. 149. 150. 151. 152. 153. 154. 155. 156. X57. 158. 159. 160. 161. 163. 163. 164. 165. 166. 167. 168. 169. 170. 171. 172. 173. 174. 175. 176. 177. 178. 179. 180. 181. 182. 183. 184. 135. 136. 137. 188. 189. 190. 191. 192. 193. 194. 195. 196. 197. 198. 199. 200. 201. 202. 203 . I I I I I I C I 0 I 0 ,1. 0 . I 0 I 0 I o I 0 .1 0 .1 0 .1 o .10 I o .10.. 10 10 10 I.o 10 10 ro I 0 I 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 IO 10 I 0 10 10 10 10 I o 10 10 10 10 10 10 I o ... 0 0 0 I I I 0 I 0 0 0 0. . . . s. s s O I 01 I o 0 s 3 s 3 s s s 3. s. .3. A-21 m 20455 204. 20500 205. 20505 206. 205X0 207. 205X5 208. 20520 209. 20525 210. 20530 211. 20535 212. 20540 213. 20545 214. 20550 215. 20555 316. 20600 217. 20605 213. 206X0 2X9. 20615 220. 20620 221. 20625 222. 20630 223. 20635 224. 20640 235. 20645 226. 20650 227. 20655 228. 20700 229. 20705 230. 20710 231. 20715 232. 20720 233. 20725 234. 20730 235. 20735 236. 20740 237. 20745 238. 20750 239. 20755 340. 20800 241. 20805 242. 20810 343. 203X5 244. 20820 245. 20325 246. 20830 247. 20335 248. 20840 249. 20345 250. 20850 251. 20355 252. 20900 253. 20905 254. 20910 255. 20915 256. 20920 257. 20925 258. 20930 259. 20935 260. 20940 261. 20945 262. 20950 263. 20955 264. 21000 265. 21005 266. 21010 267. 21015 268. 21020 269. 21025 270. 21030 271. 21035 272. 21040 273. 21045 274. 21050 275. 21055 376. 21100 277. 21105 278. 21110 279. 21115 280. 21120 281. 21125 282. 21X30 283. 21135 284. 10 10 10 10 .1. I I I I 10 10 10 10 10 I . 10 10 10 10 10 IO 10 IO 10 10. 10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 ,1 ,1. . .1 .1 .1 .1 10 10 10 10 10 A-22 21140 335. I 21X45 286. I 21150 387. I 21X55 288. I 21200 389. I 21205 390. I 21210 291. . I 21215 392. I 21220 393. I 31225 294. I 21230 295. I 21235 296. I 21240 397. I 21245 398. I 21250 399. I 2X255 s s s s s s . s s s 3 s 3 S S 3 OPERATION HYDROGRAPH AT ROUTED TO HYDROGRAPH AT 2 COHBINED AT HYDROGRAPH AT 2 COHBINED AT ROtTTED TO HYDROGRAPH AT 2 COHBINED AT HYDROGRAPH AT 2 COHBINED AT ROUTED TO ROUTED TO HYDROGRAPH AT 2 COHBINED AT STATION LAKE RUNOFF SUHMARY FLOH IH CUBIC FEET PER SECOND TIME IN HOintS, AREA IH SQUARE MILES PEAK TIHE OF FLOW PEAK 1813. 10.42 1812. 10.75 1279. 10.67 3086. 10.67 2083. 10.33 5170. X0.75 5163. 10.92 1339. 10.58 6426. 10.83 1119. 10.75 7542. 10.75 7224. 11.08 7218. 11.08 502. 10.17 7515. 11.08 AVERAGE FLOW FOR MAXIMUM PERIOD 6-HOUR 24-HOUR 72-HOOR 896. 895. 654. 1548. 1105. 2653. 2653. 660. 3310. 575. 3885. 3840. 3839. 239. 4060. 365. 354. 266. 620. 449. 1070. 1055, 272, 1328. 236. 1564. 1530. 1523. 98. X62X. 351. 341. 256. 597. 433. 1030. 10X7. 262. 1279. 227. 1506. 1473. 1467. 95. 1562. BASIK AREA 5.00 5.00 3.30 8.80 7.20 16.00 16.00 5.50 21.50 4.60 26.10 26.10 26.10 1.90 28.00 ISTAQ BLEMEHT OT (HIH) MAXIMUM TIHE OF STAGE MAX STAGE 497.67 SUMMARY OP KIHEHATIC WAVE - HUSKINGUM-CUHGE ROUTING (PLOW IS DIRECT RUNOFF HITKOXTT BASE FLOW) INTERPOLATED TO COMPUTATION INTERVAL PEAK TIME TO VOLUME DT PEAK TIMB TO VOLUME PEAK PEAK (CFS) (HIN) (IH) (MIH) (CFS) (HIN) (IN) m A-23 li B HAKE 5.00 1813.22 643.15 2.65 5.00 1811.63 645.00 2.63 *" CONTINUITY SUHHARY (AC-FT) - INFLOH- .723XE+03 EXCESS- .OOOOE+00 OUTFLOH- .7058E+03 BASIN STORAGE- .X852E+02 PERCENT ERROR- -.3 m D MANE 4.69 5X67.63 653.35 2.45 5.00 5163.57 655.00 2.45 CONTINUITY SUMMARY (AC-PT) - INFLOH- .3121E+04 EXCESS- .OOOOE+00 OUTFLOH- .2094E+04 BASIN STORAGB- .2683E+02 PERCENT ERROR- .0 F HAHE 1.54 7221.74 666.90 2.17 5.00 7218.20 665.00 2.17 'm llfl CONTINUITY SUHHARY (AC-FT) - INFLOW- .3034B+04 EXCESS- .OOOOE+00 OUTFLOW- .3022E+04 BASIN STORAGE- .1288E+02 PBRCEHT ERROR- .0 HORMAL END OP HEC-1 •** A-24 APPENDDC B. INPUT/OUTPUT LISTINGS OF HEC-l FOR THE 6-HR STORM FLOOD HYDROGRAPH PACKAGE SEPTEKBER 1990 VERSION 4.0 (HEC-1) RUH DATE 03/31/1998 TIME 09)21:35 • U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS HYDROLOGIC ENGIHBERIHQ CEHTER 609 SECOHD STREBT DAVIS, CALIFORHIA 95616 (916) 756-1104 X X XXXXXXX xxxxx X X X X X X XX X X X X X XXXXXXX xxxx X xxxxx X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXX xxxxx xxx THIS PROGRAM REPLACES ALL PREVIOUS VERSIONS OF HEC-1 KHOWH AS HECl (JAH 73), HECIGS, HECIDB, AHD HECIKW. THE DEFINITIONS OF VARIABLES -RTIMP- AND -RTIOR- HAVB CHANGED FROM THOSE USED WITH THE 1973-3TYLB INPUT STRUCTURE THB DEFINITION OP -AMSKK- ON RH-CARD WAS CHANGED HITH REVISIONS DATED 28 SEP 8X. THIS IS THB FORTRAN?? VERSION NEH OPTIONS: DAMBREAK OUTFLOW SDBMBRGEHCE , SINGLE EVENT DAMAOE CALCULATION, DSSiWRITE STAGE FREQUEHCY DS3:READ TIMB SERIES AT DESIRED CALCULATIOH INTERVAL LOSS RATE:GREEN AHD AMPT INFILTRATION KINEMATIC HAVE: NEW FINITE DIFFEREHCE ALGORITHM HEC-1 IHPUT PAGE 1 LIHE 1 ID HYDROLOGY STUDY FOR SAH MARCOS CREEK 2 ID UPPSTREAM OF RANCHO SANTA PE ROAD 3 10 POH THE RSF ROAD PROJECT SPOHSORED BY THB CITY OP , 4 ID SUBCONTACT TO DOKKEH EHGINBERING 5 ID POR ULTIMATE CONDITIONS OF WATERSHED DBVBLOPMBHT 6 ID 6 HOUR STORM, lOO-YEAR EVENT 7 IT 5 1MAR98 1200 30 8 10 5 9 KK A 10 RH RUHOPP PROH SUBBASIN A XX IN 15 X2 FB 3.5 13 PI 0 .0175 .0175 .0225 .0225 .0275 .0275 14 PI .X85 .05 .05 .04 .04 .0275 .0275 15 PI .02 .02 .02 .02 .02 16 BA 5.0 17 LS 92 18 UD 0.48 19 KK B CHANNEL ROUTING THROUOH B 20 RK 20000 0.00825 0.035 TRAP 40 3 21 KK B 22 KH RUNOFF PROH SUBBASIN B 23 BA 3.4 24 LS 90 25 UD 0.68 26 KK B 27 KM COHBINE FLOWS OF SUBBASINS A AND B 28 HC 2 ,10 .0475 .0225 .0475 .0225 0.185 .02 B-1 29 KO 30 31 32 33 34 35 KK KM PB BA LS UD RUNOFF PROH SUBBASIN C 3.4 7.2 90 0.83 36 37 38 KK KH HC COMBINE FLOWS OP SOBBASIHS A, B AHD C 2 39 40 KK RK D CHAHHBL ROUTIHG THROOGH D 13000 0.00346 0.030 TRAF 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 LINE KK KH PB BA LS OD RUNOFF FROH SUBBASIN D 3.3 5.5 88 0.53 ID. HEC-X IHPUT 4 5. PAGE 2 .10 47 48 49 KX KM HC COHBINE PLOHS OF SUBBASINS A,B,C AND D 2 50 51 52 53 54 55 KK KM PB BA LS UD RUNOFF FROM SUBBASIN E 3.2 4.6 88 0.71 56 57 58 KK B KM COMBINE FLOHS OF SUBBASIHS A,B,C,D AND E HC 2 59 60 61 62 63 64 KK LAKE ROUTIHG THROUGH LAKE SAN HARCOS KO 0 2 RS 1 ELEV 493.5 SA 48 54 57.6 61.6 64.8 68 SQ 0 0 736 2X65 4137 6698 SB 492 493.5 494.5 495.5 496.5 497.5 70.5 9871 498.5 73 13464 499.5 76 17433 500.5 65 66 KK RK P CHANNEL ROUTING THROUGH F 7000 0.0186 0.035 50 67 68 69 70 71 72 KK KM PB BA LS UD RUNOFF PROH SUBBASIH F 3.0 1.9 89 0.31 73 74 75 76 KK KH HC ZZ COKBIVE FLOHS OF SUBBASIHS A,B,C,D,E AND F 2 • FLOOD HYDROGRAPH PACKAGE (HEC-1) * • SEPTEMBER 1990 * • VERSIOH 4.0 • • * • RUN DATE 03/31/1998 TIMB 09:21:35 • * U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS • * HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER • * 609 SECOND STREET • * DAVTS, CALIFORNIA 95616 • * (916) 756-1104 • * * *****************•******•*•***••*•*•*•• B-2 HYDROLOOY STUDY FOR SAN MARCOS CREEK UPPSTREAM OP RAHCHO SANTA FE ROAO FOR THB RSF ROAD PROJECT SPONSORED BY THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS SUBCONTACT TO DOKKEN EHGINBERING FOR ULTIMATE OUIDITICafS OP HATERSHED DEVELOPHENT 6 HOUR STORH, 100-YBAR EVENT 3 10 OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES IPRNT 5 IPLOT 0 QSCAL 0. PRINT CONTROL PLOT COHTROL HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE HYDROGRAPH TIMB DATA NHIN IDATE ITIME HQ NDDATE NDTIME ICEHT 5 1KAR98 1200 80 1HAR98 1835 19 HIHUTES IH COHPUTATION INTERVAL STARTING DATB STARTING TIME NUMBBR OF HYDROGRAPH ORDINATES EHDINa DATE ENDING TIMB CENTURY HARK COHPUTATION INTERVAL TOTAL TIME BASB .08 HOURS 6.58 KOXntS ENGLISH UHITS DRAIHAGB AREA PRBCIPITATION DEPTH LENGTH, ELEVATION FLOH STORAGB VOLUME SURFACE AREA TEMPERATURE SQUARB MILES nrCHBS FEBT CUBIC FEET FER SECOND ACRE-PEET ACRES DEGREES FAHRENHEIT •** **• *** *** *** »** *** •** *** *** •** >• *** *»• *** **• *•* •< 26 KK 29 KO OUTPUT COHTROL VARIABLES IPRNT 5 PRIKT CONTROL IPLOT 2 PLOT CONTROL QSCAL 0. HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE STATION DAHRMH 1X200 11205 112X0 11215 11220 1X225 11230 11235 11240 11245 11250 11255 11300 11305 11310 11315 11320 11325 11330 11335 11340 11345 11350 11355 0. PER 10-- 20 30 40 50 60 70 30 90 lOO 110 . 120 130 140 X50 X60 170 180 190 200 210 . 220 23.0 24.0 1000, (O) OUTFLOH 2000. 3000. 4000. 5000. 6000. 7000. 8000. 0. 0. B-3 11400 11405 11410 1X4X5 X1420 11425 11430 11435 11440 1X445 11450 11455 11500 1X505 11510 11515 11520 1X525 11530 1X535 11540 1X545 11550 11555 11600 X1605 11610 11615 11620 11625 11630 11635 11640 11645 1X650 11655 11700 11705 11710 1X7X5 11720 1X725 11730 11735 11740 11745 11750 11755 11800 11805 11810 11815 11820 11825 11330 1X835 25.0 26.0 27. O 28. O 29. O 30. O 31. • . O . 32. 0 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 43. 49. 50. 51 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71 72 • 73. 74^ 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 59 KK ROtJTIHG THROUCm LAKE SAN MARCOS 60 KO OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES IPRNT 5 PRINT CONTROL IPLOT 2 PLOT CONTROL QSCAL 0. HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE STATION LAKE 0. 2000. (I) INPLOH, (0) OUTFLOH 4000. 6000. 8000. xoooo. X2000. 14000. 16000. 18000, 0. 0. B-4 DAHRMN 11200 11205 11210 X1215 11220 11225 11230 11235 11240 11245 11250 11255 11300 11305 11310 11315 11320 11325 11330 11335 11340 11345 11350 11355 X1400 X1405 11410 11415 11420 11425 11430 11435 11440 11445 11450 11455 11500 11505 11510 11515 11520 11525 11530 11535 11540 11545 11550 11555 11600 11605 11610 11615 11620 11625 11630 11635 11640 11645 11650 11655 X1700 11705 11710 11715 11720 11725 11730 11735 11740 11745 11750 11755 11300 11305 0. PER II 21 31 41 51 61 71 81 91 101 111 ... . 131 X3I X4I 151 161 171 181 191 301 211 ... . 321 231 2401 2501 2601 270 I 280 I 29.0 I 30.0 I 31.0. . .1. 32. 0 33. O 34. 0 35. C 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57 • 58. 59. 60. 61 62. 63. 64. 65. 66 • 67. 68. 69. 70. 71 72. 73. 74. 0. 0. 0. (3) STORAGB 200. 400. 600, 0. 0. s I s I 0 0 o SI 3 S S 3 S 3 I 0 0 o o I . . 0 I I I I I I 0 I 0 I o .1. 0 . I o 0 0 0 o I o I 0 I o B-5 1X3X0 11815 11820 « 11825 11830 « 11835 1 1 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. . I O . 10 .1 0 .10 .10 S . S . 3 . S m 41 OPERATION HYDROGRAPH AT ROUTED TO HYDROGRAPH AT 2 COMBIHED AT HYDROGRAPH AT 2 COHBINED AT ROOTED TO HYDROGRAPH AT 2 COMBINED AT HYDROGRAPH AT 2 COHBINED AT ROUTED TO ROUTED TO HYDROGRAPH AT 2 COMBINED AT STATION RUNOFF SUHHARY PLOH IH CUBIC FEET PER SECOND TIHE IN HOURS, ARBA IN SQUARE MILES PEAK TIME OF FLOH PEAK 4815. 3.08 4758. 3.25 2508. 3.25 7266. 3.35 4557. 3.50 11692. 3.33 11614. 3.42 3883. 3.03 14842. 3.42 2655. 3.33 X7471. 3.42 15552. 3.67 15480. 3.75 1570. 2.92 16053. 3.67 AVERAGE FLOH FOR HAXIHUH PERIOD 6-HOUR 2 4-HOUR 7 2-HOTO 1372. 1276. 841. 2117. 1672. 3790. 3648. 1182. 4829. 919. 5748. 5378. 5310. 383 . 5692. 1251. 1163. 766. 1930. 1524. 3454. 3324. 1077. 440X. 638. 5239. 490X. 4339. 349. 5X83. X25X. 1163. 766. 1930. 1524. 3454. 3324. 1077. 4401. 838. 5239. 4901. 4339. 349. 5138. BASIH HAXIHUH TIHE OF AREA STAGE HAX STAGE 5.00 5.00 3^40 8.40 7.20 15.60 15.60 5.50 21.10 4.60 25.70 25.70 25.70 1.90 27.60 ISTAQ ELEHEHT B HANE DT SUHHARY OF KIHEHATIC HAVB - HUSKINOUH-CUHGE ROUTIHG (FLOH IS DIRECT RUNOFF HITHOITT BASE FLOH) INTERPOLATED TO COHPUTATION INTERVAL PEAK TIHE TO VOLtJMB DT PEAK TIHE TO PEAK PEAK 500.03 (HIN) (CFS) (HIH) (IH) 4.77 4793.58 197.98 2.39 (HIN) (CFS) (HIN) 5.00 4757.61 195.00 VOLUME (IN) 2.37 3.67 CONTINUITY SUHMARY (AC-PT) - INFLOW- .6805E+03 EXCESS- .OOOOE+00 OUTFLOH- .6366E+03 BASIN STORAGB- .4288E+02 PERCENT ERROR- .1 B-6 ^ D HANE 3.63 11651.45 206.15 2.20 5.00 11614.17 205.00 2.17 CONTINUITY SUHHARY (AC-FT) - INFLOH- .X879E+04 EXCESS- .OOOOB+00 OUTFLOW- .X829B+04 BASIH STORAGE- .6076E+02 PBRCEHT ERROR- -.6 F HAHE 1.27 15543.77 222.53 1.93 5.00 15479.64 225.00 1.92 tm COHTIHUITY SUMMARY (AC-FT) - IHPLOH- .2667E+04 EXCESS- .OOOOE+00 OUTFLOH- .2642B+04 BASIN STORAGB- .3064E+02 PBRCEHT ERROR- -.2 W mi ••* HORMAL EHD OP HEC-1 d« B-7 • FLOOD HYDROGRAPH PACKAGE (HBC-1) • • SEPTEMBER 1990 " • VBRSIOH 4.0 * • * • RUN DATB 03/31/1998 TIME 09:24:58 • U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS HYDROLOGIC BKGIHBERING CENTER 609 SECOND STREET DAVIS, CALIFORNIA 95616 (916) 756-1X04 X X XXXXXXX xxxxx xxx XX xxx X XXXXXXX xxxx X xxx X xxx XX X X XXXXXXX xxxxx XXXXX X XX X X X X xxx THIS PROGRAM REPLACES ALL PREVIOUS VERSIONS OF HEC-X KHOWH A3 HECX (JAH 73), HECXOS, HECIDB, AHD HECIRH. THE DBFIHITIONS OF VARIABLES -RTIHP- AND -RTIOR- HAVB CHANOED FROH THOSE USED HITH THE 1973-STYLE IHPUT STRUCTURE. THE DEFIHITION OF -AtfSKX- ON BM-CARO HAS CHANGED HITH REVISIONS DATED 28 SEP 81. THIS IS THE PORTRAN77 VERSION NEH OPTIONS: DAMBREAK OUTFLOH SXmHBRGENCB , SIHGLE EVENT DAMAGE CALCULATION, DSS:HRITE STAGE FREQUENCY, DSS:READ TIME SERIES AT DESIRED CALCULATION INTERVAL LOSS RATE:GBEEH AND AMPT INFILTRATION KINEMATIC HAVE: HEH FINITE DIFFERENCE ALGORITHM KEC-1 INPUT PAGE 1 ,8. .10 ID HYDROLOGY SfODY POR SAN HARCOS CREEK ID UPPSTREAM OF RANCHIO SAHTA FB ROAD ID POR THB RSP ROAD PROJECT SPOHSORED BY THE CITY OF SAN HARCOS ID SUBCONTACT TO DOKKEH EHGIHEERING ID FOR ULTIMATE COHDITIONS OP HATERSHED DBVBLOPMBHT ID 6 HOUR STORM, 10-YEAR EVENT IT 5 XMAR98 1200 80 10 5 9 KK A XO KH RUNOFF FROM SUBBASIN A 11 IN 15 12 PB 2.4 13 PI 0 .0X75 .0X75 .0225 .0225 .0275 .0275 14 PI .185 .05 .05 .04 .04 .0275 .0275 15 PI .02 .02 .02 .02 .02 16 BA 5.0 17 LS 88 m 18 UD 0.48 19 KK B CHANNEL ROUTIHG TSROUm B 20 RK 20000 0.00825 0.035 TRAP 40 3 21 KK B 32 KH RUNOFF FROH SUBBASIH B 23 BA 2.3 m 24 LS 87 25 UD 0.68 26 KK B 27 KM COHBINE FLOHS OF SUBBASIHS A AND B 28 HC 2 29 KO 2 m 30 KK C 31 KM RXmOFF PROM SUBBASIH C 32 PB 2.3 33 BA 7.2 m 34 LS 87 .0475 .0225 .0475 .0225 0.185 .02 B-8 35 UD 0.83 36 37 38 KK KH HC CXHBINB PLOWS OF SUBBASIHS A, B AND C 2 39 40 KK RK D CHANHEL ROUTIHG THROUGH D 13000 0.00346 0.030 TRAP 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 KK KM PB BA LS UD ROHOPF FROM SUBBASIN D 2.2 5.5 83 0.53 ID. HBC-1 INPOT 4 5. PAGB 2 ,10 47 48 49 KX KM HC CCIHBIHB FLOHS OF SUBBASINS A,B,C AHD D 2 SO 51 52 53 54 55 KK KH PB BA LS E ROHOFF FROH SUBBASIH E 2.1 4.6 84 0.71 56 57 58 KK KH HC COKBTNB FLOHS OF SUBBASINS A.B,CD AHD B 2 59 60 61 63 63 64 KK LAKE ROUTING THROUGH LAKE SAN HARCOS KO 0 2 RS 1 ELEV 493.5 SA 48 54 57.6 61.6 64.8 68 SQ 0 0 736 2165 4137 6698 SE 492 493.5 494.5 495.5 496.5 497.5 70.5 9871 493.5 73 76 13464 17433 499.5 500^5 65 66 KK RK F 7000 CHANNEL ROUTING THROUGH F 0.0186 0.035 TRAP 50 67 68 69 70 71 72 KK KM PB BA LS BOHOFF PROK SUBBASIN F 2.1 1.9 85 0.3X 73 74 75 76 KK KH HC ZZ COHBINE FLOHS OF SUBBASINS A,B,C,D,E AHD F 2 FLOOD HYDROGRAPH PACKAGE SEPTEMBER 1990 VBRSION 4.0 (HEC-1) • RUN DATE 03/31/1998 TIME 09:24:58 * U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS HYDROLCXIIC BNGINEERING CENTER 609 SECOND STREBT DAVIS, Cy^LIFORHIA 95616 (916) 756-1104 HYDR0LC»3Y STUDY FOR SAH HARCOS CREEK UPPSTREAM OF RANCHO SAHTA FB ROAO FOR THE RSP ROAO PROJBCT SPOHSORED BY THB CITY OF SAN HARCOS SUBCONTACT TO DOKKEN EKGIHEERIHO FOR ULTIMATE CONDITIONS OF HATERSHED DEVELOPHENT 6 HOUR STORM, 10-YBAR EVENT B-9 8 10 OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES IPRNT 5 IPLOT 0 QSCAL 0. PRINT CONTROL PLOT COHTROL HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE HYDROGRAPH TIHE DATA NHIH IDATE ITIHE NQ NODATE NDTIHB ICENT 5 1MAR98 1200 80 1HAR98 1835 19 MINUTES IN COHPUTATION INTERVAL STARTING DATE STARTIHG TIME NUHBER OF HYDROGRAPH ORDINATES EHDIHG DATB EHDING TIKE CBHTURY MARK COMPUTATIOH INTERVAL TOTAL TIHE BASE ENGLISH UNITS DRAINAGE AREA PRECIPITATIOH DEPTH LEHGTH, BLEVATION FLOH STORAGB VOLUHE SURFACE AREA TEMPERATURE .08 HOURS 6.58 HOURS SQUARB MILES INCHES FBET CUBIC FEBT PER SECOND ACRE-FEET ACRES DEGREES FAHRENHEIT *** «•• *** *** *** «•• •** •** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ••• •** **• **• *•* *•* *•• 26 KK 29 KO OUTPUT COHTROL VARIABLES IPRNT 5 PRINT COHTBOL IPLOT 2 PLOT aytlTROIt QSCAL 0. HYDROGRAPH PLOT SC:ALE STATION 0. DAHRMN PER mm 11200 10--- 11205 20 11210 30 ^— 11215 40 11220 SO IMI 11225 60 11230 70 11235 30 11240 90 11245 lOO Ml 11250 11255 120 11300 130 11305 140 11310 150 11315 160 11320 170 11325 180 11330 190 11335 20O m 1X340 11345 220 11350 230 m 11355 240 11400 250 m 11405 260 11410 270 11415 280 •mm 11420 29.0 11425 30.0 m 11430 31. 0 400, (0) OUTFLOH 800. 1200, 1600. 2000. 2400. 2800, 3200. 0. 0. 0. B-10 1X435 32. 11440 33. 11445 34. 11450 35. 11455 36. 11500 37. 11505 38. 11510 39. 11515 40. 11530 11525 11530 43. 11535 44. X1540 45. 11545 46. 11550 47. 11555 43. 11600 49. 11605 50. 11610 116X5 52. 11620 53. 1X625 54. 11630 55. 11635 56. 11640 57. 1X645 58 • 11650 59. 11655 60. 11700 1X705 62. 11710 63. 11715 64. X1720 65. 11725 66. 11730 67. 11735 68. 11740 69. 11745 70. 1X750 11755 72. 11800 73. 11805 74. 11810 75. 11815 76. 11820 77. 11825 78. 11830 79. 11835 0 0 0. o. 0. o. 0. o. 59 KK ROUTIHG THROUGH LAKE SAN HARCOS 60 KO OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES IPRNT 5 PRINT CONTROL IPLOT 3 PLOT CCmHOL QSCAL 0. HYDRCX3RAPH PLOT SCALE STATION LAKE (I) INFLOW, (O) OUTFLOW 0. 1000. 2000. 3000. 4000. 5000. 6000. 7000. 8000. (S) STORAGE 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. XOO. 300. DAHRHH PER 11200 II - . S-. .- 11205 21 . • • . . . S . 11210 31 . . . . . . S . 11315 41 . • • . S . 0. 300. 0. 0. B-11 m 11220 11325 11230 11335 11240 11245 11250 11255 11300 11305 11310 11315 11320 11325 11330 X1335 11340 11345 11350 11355 11400 11405 1X4X0 11415 11420 X1425 11430 11435 1X440 11445 11450 11455 11500 11505 11510 11515 11520 11525 11530 11535 11540 11545 11550 11555 11600 11605 11610 11615 11620 11625 11630 11635 1X640 11645 11650 11655 11700 11705 X17X0 117X5 11720 X1725 X1730 11735 11740 11745 11750 11755 11830 11835 51 61 71 81 91 101 111 . . . 131 131 141 151 161 171 181 191 201 211 .. . 221 231 241 351 261 271 281 291 30OI 3101. . . 320 I 33.0 I 34.0 35. 0 36. 0 37 • 0 38. C 39^ 40. 41. . . . 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. . . . 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 53. 59. 60. 61. . . . 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. . . . 72. 79. 80. • I I 1 I I I O I O I 0 I o I 0 o 0 o 0 0 I 0 0 o 0 0 0 01 I 0 .1. 0 . RUNOFF SUMHARY FLOW IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND TIHE IN HOURS, ARBA IN SQUARB HILES PEAK TIME OF AVERAGE FLOH FOR MAXIMUM PERIOD BASIN TIME OF B-12 OPERATION STATION FLOW PEAK 6-HOUR 24-HOUR 72-HOUR AREA STAGE MAX STAGE HYDROGRAPH AT 2242. 3.03 670. 610. 610. 5.00 ROOTED TO 2232. 3.42 598. 545. 545. 5.00 HYDROGRAPH AT 793. 3.33 282. 257. 257. 2.30 2 COMBIHED AT 3022. 3.42 879. 801. 801. 7.30 HYDROGRAPH AT 2072. 3.58 799. 728. 728. 7 .20 2 COHBINED AT 5048. 3.43 1678. 1529. X529. 14.50 ROOTED TO 5036. 3.58 1581. 1441. X441. 14.50 HYDROGRAPH AT 1350. 3.17 466. 435. 425. 5.50 2 COHBINED AT 6112. 3.58 2048. 1866. 1866. 20.00 HYDROGRAPH AT 957. 3.42 363. 335. 335. 4.60 2 COHBINED AT 7046. 3.58 24X5. 2201. 2201. 24.60 ROUTED TO 5736. 4.00 2163. 1976. 1976. 24.60 497.12 4.00 ROUTED TO ^730. 4.08 2121. 1933. 1933 . 24.60 HYDROGRAPH AT 653. 2.92 174. 159. 159. 1.90 2 COMBINED AT 5971. 4.08 2296. 2092. 3092. 26.50 ISTAQ ELEHENT DT SUHHARY OP KIHEHATIC HAVE - MUSKINGUM-CUNGE ROUTING (PLOH IS DIRECT RUNOFF HITHOOT BASE FLOH) INTERPOLATED TO COMPUTATION INTERVAL PEAK TIHE TO VOLUME DT PEAK TIHE TO PEAK PEAK B HAHE (HIH) (CFS) (HIH) (IH) 4.39 2237.50 304.31 X.13 (MIM) (CPS) (MIN) 5.00 2231.95 205.00 (IN) X.ll CONTINOTTY StJMMAHY (AC-FT) - INFLOH- .3320E+03 EXCESS- .OOOOE+00 OUTFLOH- .3021E+03 BASIN STORAGE- .3274E+03 PERCENT ERROR- -.8 4.73 5040.63 315.59 5.00 5026.07 215.00 1.01 CONTINUITY SUMMARY (AC-PT) - INFLOW- .8330E+03 EXCESS- .OOOOE+00 OOTFLOW- •7850E+03 BASIN STORAGE- •4174E+03 PBRCEHT ERROR- .6 F HANE 1.71 5734.16 243.75 .81 5.00 5730.04 245.00 .80 CONTINUITY SUHHARY (AC-FT) - INFLOW- .1075E+04 EXCESS- .OOOOE+00 OOTFLOW- .1059S+04 BASIN STORAGE- .2083E+02 PERCEHT ERROR- -.4 NORMAL END OF HEC-1 *** B-13 Howard H. Chang Consultants Hydraulic, Hydrologic and Sedimentation Engineering P.O. Box 9492 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 (619)756-9050, 594-6380, FAX: (619)756-9460 May 27, 1998 Mr. Kirk Bradbury Dokken Engineering R E C IV F ^ 3914 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite A153 i^^-^i VtLU San Diego, CA 92123 MAY 2 9 1998 Dear Kirk- Fne.I^fS ^/^" UearKirK. ^^^^^^ Engineeri-y Subject: Rancho Santa Fe Road Project This is in response to tiie review comments on tiie hydrology sUidy for San Marco Creek. The comments and my responses are detailed below. Comment 1. The references for tiie master plan of future development is requested. In response to tilis comment, I wish to state that ttie conditions for fiiture development is based on tiie report "Master Plan for Drainage for the City of San Marcos", prepared by Fraser Engineering, dated January 1990. The ultimate development includes new industiy to be located along tiie Highway 78 corridor. This highway has been widened to six lanes and it provides a convenient access to the Interstate 5 and Interstate 15 ti-ansportation routes. The ultimate development plan also includes new housing to be built in tiie northem and southem areas of tiie City. The new State University campus in tiie City of San Marcos is also a part ofthe ultimate plan. Comment 2. The hydrologic soil groups were obtained from an earlier version ofthe Design and Procedure Manual. The latest version ofthe manual should be used. In response to this comment, I wish to point out that tiie latest version ofthe Design and Procedure Manual is dated April, 1993. However, ttiis latest version does not contain tiie information on the hydrologic soil groups. Comment 3. The smdy report should include an analysis of tiie CN values and how tiiey were derived. In response to ttiis comment, I have added one more table showing the detailed steps in deriving the CN values for the subbasins. The changes have also been incorporated into the text of the report. The revised report is attached herewith. Howard H. Chang Ph.D., P.E. Table 3. Selection of values for the subbasins for AMC=2 Subbasin Soil type Land use Hydrologic conditions CN Weighted CNfor AMC=2 A CD Medium density residential NA 87 82 A CD Open brush Fair, good 78 82 B CD Medium density residential NA 86 82 B CD Open brush Fair, good 78 82 B CD High density residential NA 88 82 C C,D Medium density residential NA 86 82 C C,D Open brush Fair, good 78 82 C C,D High density residential, industrial NA 88 82 D C Medium density residential NA 86 82 D C Open brush Good 76 82 D C High density residential, industrial NA 88 82 E C,D Open brush Fair 83 84 E C,D Medium and high density residential NA 87 84 F CD Open brush Fair 84 86 F CD Medium and high density residential NA 88 86