Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout; Poinsettia Village; Geotech Observation and Compaction Report; 2005-07-15Converse Consultants Over 50 Years of Dedication in Geotechnical Engineering and Environmental Sciences July 15, 2005 Mr. Clint Knox Donahue Schriber Realty Group, Inc JU! 1 V ^^wJ 200 E. Baker Street, Suite 100 Costa Mesa, California 92626 Schater Development Group Re; Geotechnical Observation and Compaction Report -- Rough Grading North Island Credit Union (Poinsettia Village) 7190 Avenida Encinas Carlsbad, California Converse Proposal No. 05-32123-30 Dear Mr. Knox: This report presents the results of field density tests and geotechnical observations made during the rough grading of the pad for the North Island Credit Union at Poinsettia Village between July 11 and July 13, 2005. Converse previously performed a geotechnical investigation at the site and the results of the evaluation were presented in our report entitled, "Geotechnical Investigation Report, Two Retail Structures - Pad 4 and Pad 6, 7190 Avenida Encinas, Carlsbad, California" dated April 5, 2005. 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed building for the North Island Credit Union consisted of a one-story building with a plan area of approximately 5,800 square feet. Associated with the building are parking areas and various site improvements. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK Our scope of work for this project included on-call and full-time geotechnical observation during rough grading for the pad and field density testing to verify backfill compaction compliance with the project specifications, and geotechnical engineering consultation during construction. 3.0 PROJECT SPECIFICATION Earthwork was performed in general accordance with the project plans and specifications. The following reports, and project plans were used as a guide for the earthwork: • Converse Consultants (4/5/2005) "Geotechnical Investigation Report, Two Retail Structures - Pad 4 and Pad 6, 7190 Avenida Encinas, Carlsbad, California" Converse Project No. 05-32123-01, dated April 5, 2005. PriniBd 1^^^^ Recyclsd 185 East Paularino Avenue, Suite B, Costa Mesa, California 92626 p;^',"" Telephone: (714) 444-9660 • Facsimile: (714) 444-9640 • e-mail: costamesa@converseconsultants.com Rough Grading Observation Report North Island Credit Union Carlsbad, Califomia July 15, 2005 Page 2 • Project plans by O'Day Consultants, Inc., dated June 23, 2005. 4.0 LABORATORY TESTS One (1) representative bulk sample was obtained during grading observation to determine its laboratory maximum dry density and optimum moisture content per ASTM Standard D1557-00. Results of the tests are summarized in Table No. 1, Optimum Moisture Content and Maximum Dry Density Test Results. 5.0 FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Nuclear Gauge (ASTM Standard D2922-96) was utilized to evaluate the field density of compacted soils at random locations. Converse personnel performed these field density tests during the earthwork operation between July 11 and July 13, 2005. Results ofthe field density tests are presented in Table No. 2, Summary of Field Density Test Results, and the test locations are shown on Figure No. 1, Field Density Test Location Plan. The relative compaction for each field density test presented in Table No. 2, Summary of Field Density Test Results, is obtained by dividing the measured in-place dry density by the laboratory maximum dry density of the same "Soil Type" presented in Table No. 1, Optimum Moisture Content and Maximum Dry Density Test Results. Where results of a field density test indicate less than the required minimum relative compaction for that specific material, the fill volume representative of the failed test was reworked by the contractor until a subsequent test showed passing results. 6.0 GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATIONS AND DISCUSSION The following is a brief discussion of the field observations made during the construction of the project. —"~ • The upper five (5) feet of the building pa^UandToB-feet beyonSTtre-building liynit compactionr*^ were overexcavated and recompacted Ijdat least 90% relative compactior • Backfill soils were moisture conditioned, aiW plaued in 0- lu ti- iriclResloose lifts, and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. 7.0 CONCLUSIONS The conclusions and opinions developed during the course of our field assignments are based on our field observations and the results of field and laboratory testing combined with our experience. Based on the field tests, observations, and our professional judgment, it is our opinion that the compacted fills reported herein meet the intent of the project requirements. CONVERSE CONSULTANTS K:\Project Files\05-32123-01 Rough Grading Observation Report North Island Credit Union Carlsbad, Califomia July 15, 2005 Page 3 Our field testing was performed at random locations and at various time intervals during the fill placement operations. Converse did not actually sample or test every portion of the fill material placed at the site. While our test results are considered representative of the compacted fills in general, variations in material properties, relative compaction, and moisture condition should be expected in lateral and vertical directions. Such variations may have resulted due to non-uniformity of earth materials and variations in the earthwork operations such as: variable lift thickness, non-uniform moisture conditions and non-uniform compactive effort. Therefore, any localized areas of deviations in fill quality and compaction requirements cannot be detected by our limited field observations and tests. 8.0 LIMITATIONS Our services have been performed in accordance with currently accepted professional engineering practice in the field of geotechnical engineering. We make no other warranty, either expressed or implied. Neither our office nor our representatives were responsible for construction techniques and the type of equipment used to accomplish fill placement and compaction to meet the project specifications. Professional opinions presented in this report are based on our observations, on evaluations of the technical information gathered, on our general understanding of the earthwork construction, and on our general experience in the geotechnical field. We do not guarantee the performance of the project in any respect, only that our engineering work and opinions rendered meet the standard of care of our profession at this time. Respectfully submitted. CONVERSE CONSULTANTS Krishnamenon Nadaraja, P.E. Project Engineer End: Table No. 1, Optimum Moisture Content and Maximum Dry Density Test Results Table No. 2, Summary of Field Density Test Results Figure No. 1, Field Density Test Location Plan Dist: 5/Addressee CONVERSE CONSULTANTS K:\Project Files\05-32123-01 North Island Credit Union Poinsettia Village 7190 Avenida Encina Carlsbad, California Converse Project Number 05-32123-01 TABLE 1 OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AND MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY TEST RESULTS Material Type Description Optimum Moisture Content (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) 1 Silty Sand(SM) with clay 10.0 127.5 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS Converse Project No. 05-32123-01 c o c 3 ? ™ 1 £ = UJ ^ .s -S "a £ c s o « m «> > (OOo ~ a o> o o CM CM n O XJ •°" § (S Q> "I « 2 c 5 (0 3 OT Ul U. I-W u w z UJ o Q _I LU U. O < s s 3 OT w E •- S s? E c flj o o ee. o - < In <» £ <D <D (fl m 0) (V w T3 0} a. in 00 o <n £ « «3 CO CVJ CO I in o 6 z t3 o 0 > c: o O .2 0, I ss o o ^ s u CM CO 00 o CO eg in CM C3) CM CO CNJ CO h-: CO a-°- o cvi m m 8 £ I- c >< .2 2 I CO CO in CO in CO CO in CO •o ca a. ca a (0 o o (0 I w ca LU •o a 0) •D ro Q. 0) T3 ro •D ro a (0 Sl •D ro a (0 T3 ro a TJ ro - 0) V T3 ro Cl T3 ro a 0) ro .c o m o o CM Si CM CO in (O 3 o (0 •D c ro "55 o T3 ro a w i c •c o T3 ro a. *—• CO r o •D ro a M i 3 O w T3 ro CL .4—. u (U .£: r o T3 ro CL ..—• CO ro .c •c o z T3 ro Cl (0 i o CO T3 ro CL 10 0 5 .c •c o z ro a ro Q. u5 ro <u JC o z 00 C3> CM CO 0} B ro O I ro 3 0) ro tn ro o m CO 00 (0 c ro 3 (O c o O ro S2 ro > c o O SCALE IN FEET FIELD DENSITY TEST LOCATION PLAN North Island Credit Union 1790 Avenida Encinas Carlsbad, California Project No. 05-32123-01 _ ^ .X X Geotechnical Engineering Converse Consultants ^ ^p^,.^^ ^^.^^^^^ Figure No. 1