The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3813; Summary of TIF Intersection Analysis; Traffic Impact Fees; 2006-01-16i ; TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ! TECHNICAL SUPPORT l **. Prepared for City of Carlsbad i I J J 1 635 Faraday, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Prepared by CONSULTING 5050 Avenida Encinas, Suite 260, Carlsbad, CA 92008 CONTACT: ROBERT DAVIS 760.476.9193 rdavis@rbf.com January 2006 JN 55-100214.001 DM f *•* f TABLE OF CONTENTS _• Summary Exhibit 1: Study Intersection Location Map I Exhibit 2' Study Intersections That Require Improvements Exhibit 3: Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes Table 1: Intersection Level of Service and Improvement Summary t Intersection Data Collection Monitoring Sheet Intersections 1-59 (Individually Tabbed) , 1 •m 1 1 J APPENDIX A: TECHNICAL METHODOLOGY APPENDIX B: SANDAG 2030 NODE NUMBERS i i i i i i i i i 1 4 5 6 10 ...31 34 I f •1 f •* t •m f 111 f m I '«• I I I i i 4 i i i i ** I CONSULTING January 16,2006 JN 55-100214.001 Mr. David Hauser CITY OF CARLSBAD 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: Summary of TIF Intersection Analysis Findings Carlsbad TIF Traffic Engineering Support Services Dear David: RBF Consulting has completed the analysis of the 58 intersections included in the Carlsbad TIF program based on SAN DAG Series 10 traffic forecast data. As discussed with you, we have re-packaged the results of the 2005 TIF intersection analysis results to better serve your needs in developing the new TIF program. The analysis of 2030 traffic forecast data at the study intersections and the ICU level of service analysis have been conducted for: 1. Existing Intersection Geometry or 2. Capital Improvement Program, TIF, or Developer Funded Intersection Geometry Where Appropriate. The location of intersections included in the 2005 TIF program analysis is illustrated in Exhibit 1. Included below is a brief discussion of the findings of our analysis. We have prepared the following attachments that illustrate and summarize the analysis findings. • Exhibit 1 - Study Intersection Location Map • Exhibit 2 - Study Intersections That Require Improvements • Table 1 - TIF Intersection Level of Service and Improvement Needs Summary • Exhibit 3 - Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes As shown in Table 1, the 2030 ICU analysis determined that 11 intersections operate at LOS E or worse during one or both of the peak-hour periods. These intersections will require additional improvements beyond existing lane geometries or what is currently planned for the CIP, TIF, or any approved developer funded improvements in order to maintain LOS D or better. The following intersections were determined to be deficient: 1. #3 Cannon Road/Paseo Del Norte 2. #10 Carlsbad Boulevard/Cannon Road 3. #22 El Camino Real/Tamarack Avenue 4. #26 El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Road 5. #30 El Camino Real/La Costa Avenue 6. #41 Palomar Airport Road/Avenida Encinas 7. #44 Palomar Airport Road/College Boulevard 8. #47 Palomar Airport Road/Melrose Drive 5050 Avenida Encinas, Suite 260. Carlsbad, California 92008 • 760.476.9193 • FAX 760.476.9198 Offices located throughout California, Arizona & Nevada • www.RBF.com 'f f »« f •q f m f ** I -m I I *«n I t i i --«< i i i •-u» i i i D. Mauser JN: 55-100214.001 Januaiy16, 2006 Page 2 9. #51 Olivenhain Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road 10. #54 Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Avenue 11. #56 Rancho Santa Fe Road/Melrose Drive t i For these intersections, additional improvements have been identified that will maintain LOS D or better during peak periods. Needed improvements are graphically depicted in Exhibit 3. It is recognized the nature of the improvements identified will have significant right-of-way implications and may ultimately be determined either infeasible and/or impractical. In some cases, it may be physically impossible to improve the intersection to the point needed to achieve LOS D or better. Understanding that the analysis herein does not examine the feasibility of the identified improvements, they should be considered and tentative and subject to revision. Thirty-four (34) intersections included in the 2030 TIF analysis were found to operate at LOS D or better with existing intersection geometries. These intersections, listed below, will not require any additional improvements: 1. #1 Alga Road/Alicante Road 2. #2 Cannon Road/Avenida Encinas 3. #5 Cannon Road/Faraday Avenue 4. #7 Carlsbad Boulevard/State Street 5. #8 Carlsbad Boulevard/Carlsbad Village Drive 6. #9 Carlsbad Boulevard/Tamarack Avenue 7. #12 Carlsbad Boulevard/Poinsettia Lane 8. #13 SB/NB Carlsbad Boulevard/Avenida Encinas 9. #14 Carlsbad Village Drive/Tamarack Avenue 10. #15 Carlsbad Village Drive/Monroe Street 11. #16 College Boulevard/Tamarack Avenue 12. #17 College Boulevard/Carlsbad Village Drive 13. #18 College Boulevard/Faraday Avenue 14. #19 El Camino Real/Marron Road 15. #20 El Camino Real/Carlsbad Village Drive 16. #21 El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue 17. #29 El Camino Real/Alga Road 18. #31 El Camino Real/Calle Barcelona 19. #32 El Camino Real/Olivenhain Road 20. #33 El Fuerte Street/Alga Road 21. #34 El Fuerte Street/Poinsettia Lane 22. #36 La Costa Avenue/Camino De Los Coches 23. #37 Marron Road/Monroe Street 24. #38 Marron Road/Jefferson Street 25. #39 Melrose Drive/Poinsettia Lane 26. #43 Palomar Airport Road/Armada Drive 27. #45 Palomar Airport Road/Camino Vida Roble 28. #48 Poinsettia Lane/Avenida Encinas 29. #49 Poinsettia Lane/Paseo Del Norte 30. #50 Poinsettia Lane/Aviara Parkway 31. #52 Rancho Santa Fe Road/Calle Barcelona 32. #53 Rancho Santa Fe Road/Camino De Los Coches I r f f m f •m I m I •m Im I m I *m 4 tf *m i I W 1 >m i D.Hauser JN: 5^-100214.001 Januaiy16, 2006 Page 3 33. #57 Rancho Santa Fe Road/Calle Acervo 34. #58 El Camino Real/Levante Street Thirteen intersections included in the 2030 TIP analysis were found to operate at LOS D or better with 2030 Base intersection geometries, which include CIP, TIP, or developer funded geometries. These intersections, listed below, will not require any additional improvements: 1. #4 Cannon Road/LEGOLAND Drive 2. #6 Cannon Road/College Boulevard 3. #11 Carlsbad Boulevard/Palomar Airport Road 4. #23 El Camino Real/Cannon Road 5. #24 El Camino Real/College Boulevard 6. #25 El Camino Real/Faraday Avenue 7. #27 El Camino Real/Camino Vida Roble 8. #28 El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane 9. #35 El Fuerte Street/Faraday Avenue 10. #40 Melrose Drive/Alga Road 11. #42 Palomar Airport Road/Paseo Del Norte 12. #46 Palomar Airport Road/El Fuerte Street 13. #55 Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Elijo Road Proposed intersection geometries for intersections to be considered for the 2005 TIP are graphically shown in Exhibits. Exhibit 2 illustrates which of the study intersections require improvement. If the intersection improvement needs are entirely consistent with planned improvements in the CIP, they have been identified as such. Exhibit 2 summarizes the findings the 2005 TIP intersection analysis. The exhibit classifies the 2030 analysis status for each 2005 TIP Study intersection as follows: Existing Geometry Sufficient Base Geometry Sufficient (CIP, TIP, or Developer Funded) Recommended Improvements/ Modifications If you have any questions concerning the findings of the 2005 TIP Program Intersection analysis, please feel free to call me at (760) 476-9193. Sincerely, Robert A. Davis Interim Project Manager Transportation Services H:\PDATA\2005-TIF\Cartsbad TIP findings.doc *ecj^.\ \ LEGEND 2005 TIP Study Intersection — Future Road 1 _. I m •?/£>•r/^3 fe. a <j ^ ^ <?/0)u_ &J I \,a Costa Avenue Ale Olivenhain Road Calle I?03 Otr cc Acervo 'Cammo De Los Coches 2005 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE STUDY INTERSECTION LOCATION MAP 55-100214.OU1 - December 2005 EXHIBIT 1 \ Legend 2005 TIP Study Intersection Future Road Existing Geometry Sufficient \. CIP, TIP, or Developer Funded Geometry Sufficient Improvements Needed non Road f-1 I m F/£> n^ V aa>a \3 L L L L L L L 3* \ \,a Costa Avenue AIS^ c?/ Bl^ Olivenhain Road Calle o'1 M ^nj oCC CC Acervo *f 'Camino De Los Coches "*^ 55-100214 001 - December 2005 STUDY INTERSECTIONS THAT REQUIRE IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 2 Existing Geometry Year 2030 Volume Base Analysis Geometry (CIRTIF or Developer Fees) Recommended Improvements/ Modifications 8UL<ucsj £ | < © VJVV fo ^-*- !l Cannon Rd. [o] Jt ~^ ^S t r c cUJ •D (A)v —.*-•*~ ISl^ Cannon Rd. 161 ^ Q) 1 t 1 Oz £ i © CM 0)CM CM r- 00 H! O-.- T- CM *> 1 vp Alga Rd. |C 70/19-^ 912/1028-^ 89/383 -^ ^32/3 -^- 975/721 ^-18/46 ^ t r CO T- O s !•- co C! 0 ^ Is- ^r•£ O) CO 5 1 J8 1AM/PM 3 " < ©in i^-co oo CD CO 00 OO T- T- 00 V | V J Cannon Rd. |c 22/12^ 293/225-^ 64/47 -^ AM/PM V 81/88 -- 238/553 ^ 361/348 1 * r >% t r\ i / "» CM O) CO .= CO CM O) iS co T- o ^ a CM t it •^ < ©^^^ CO CM CO CO CVJ CM T- CO O)CO CO T- ^ I V Cannon Rd. |i 355/69 -^ 1 569/952-* 389/214 -^ AM/PM V 131/42 -*- 51 9/1437 f 127/1 01 f ^ t /^ •i r>- co oo z T- oo co ? o5l | 1 1 © Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. © Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. ©^^ ^ V'V 1?Cannon Rd. |c J^J -^ w -^-*- n a ' '1 • Z I I Future roadway extensions require changes to the intersection configuration. © Existing geometry sufficient © Existing geometry sufficient © jf ^^^m "^ _ -A ^ ~^ ~~ - x s- 0Z ? 0. IT Intersection Geometrv and Traffic Volumes JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 EXHIBIT 3 (page 1 of 20) Existing Geometry Year 2030 Volume Base Analysis Geometry (CIRTIF or Developer Fees) Recommended Improvements/ Modifications O J _ Q. Q £Z 0 Q O y © ^ fCannon Rd. |i J -^ ^ _^ ^- I5| ^H""1 T3 U. © Cannon Rd. S I1 S •^ © -^- 855/1 289 ^-370/200 Cannon Rd. K 1180/1563-^ 778/195-^ AM/PM J ^ r "? 0 " 5 ^ ?= 5g, o5 r-- 6; < © CM T^ O CM T- 0 V \ ^ ^-2/2 •*- 864/526 ^-74/15 1 Cannon Rd. |g| , 8/18^ 329/11 70-* 742/198-^ AM/PM .^ T r 5 CO T- T—< in ^ egfS£ csi 5 . & *~ 1"• T~ ? ®,0T- inO T— CO CO CO J 1 V V. 36/42 -^570/522 S 535/406 Cannon Road t 193/190 -^ 409/542 — 22/86 -^ AM/PM ? M r. CM m **• m § 5 ^o co m en 5 = S. | © --/ Cannon Rd. |o| -*• "VS /'X'— ^ £ &ovlp — LJ % >1 T3 ° ^ i O © Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. ®vw "^ ^HV f . . y ^k f 4^*>-da•*»• B •4^- 01 * 8 Future roadway extensions require changes to the intersection configuration. © Base geometry sufficient © Existing geometry sufficient © Base analysis geometry sufficient . C" Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 EXHIBIT 3 (page 2 of 20) Existing Geometry Year 2030 Volume Base Analysis Geometry (CIPJIF or Developer Fees) Recommended Improvements/ Modifications ^_,<a0) 55 £1355 9ro5 1 •o£(/)•c(0O 10 O)M T3 •n3 ro "5 •O mO 0) c CO •o 1 m<3 ^- free 4^*t xwT x^ fs)x^^x ^4 |V R Carlsbad Village Dr. |c y^f V.7-_ r CD n 1 © <D(D ,*i i ^ [i Beach Pkg. Lot [ free -~ ^ V f 5| Tamarack Ave. X. H*" ^CQ ®CNCM CO T- 00T- CO O ^ T- Ot^ CO| v^ 1 T3 •8•c AM/PM cS ^ 352/366 CT) 03 S ^ ^CO SO3 < ®ooO O) _*. ~^^ — £2 o ^^- oo in J 1 V J . V 84/1 14 — 37/131 ^ 234/271 PICarlsbad Village Dr. |c 18/44^ 37/117-* 14/33 -^ AM/PM f M r•d rj- CO t-i TJ- in Tfm j^ oo co | CM 55 t^ | a °°w 1 ® CO? s s $ ? CO^- O) OT J 1 L 1Beach Pkg. Lot |( 44/58 -^ 52/37 -* 58/63 -^ AM/PM V 79/244 — 43/72 f 608/350 j| Tamarack Ave. •d O CN •*i f.. to CO T3 O3 JI d 1 25 ^ a•c O T~ ^s.Q O) S © Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. ® Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. - © I i Ijti ^— free8klOJX. CQ ^*^ 1•Q•8Xo Caltrans signal warrants have been met. Intersection is listed on the City's Traffic Evaluation Policy. ®>i*— S Existing geometry sufficient ® Existing geometry sufficient -•- PBF • • • •JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes EXHIBIT 3 (page 3 of 20) t ^Hk i ^rtl i ^Bk i •• t ••! : ^Bt ; •• , ••§ . ••§ ^ IPI i •• i ••} l ••§ t ••! J ^"l I ^^1 i ^^L Base Analysis Geometry Ftecommended Tmprbvements"/ Existing Geometry Year 2030 Volume (CIRTIF or Developer Fees) Modifications T>moa: c ccCOO I "5o00•o x> •cCOo •o 01§•ea jlomarAiro_ •Eco> 1TJ 1 C§ Ql 3.s "fl) i-^ T3 5<B J?m •oro m0 (jo)^•-^ IV ^-ovlp ^~ [gl Cannon Rd. 11 TJ CQ •O S -cCOO J tr V 1 ) \\\ GRADE-SEPARATED ^-^ I INTERSECTION ^K\ ^fO)fJP\v5/ 'tpS^S-., V lit @ £ I; V^ i] Poinsettia Lane |o| J ~\ ^^tt(^ m S © §^ CM Tf CN) 0 1 v ^108/563 ,-109/219 [gl Cannon Rd. 1 •ri m•a 1 AM/PM o f t ro coo o T~ T~t: co s O) << © IcoT- CO Sea V. 260/339 -co ^240/7231 v 1'151 Palomar Airport Rd. [o| , t r & tM Om CN 0J gj c\i 5 AM/PM 3 rtS < ®coCN T- O J^ r; J?5 CM O T- 00 T- "^1Poinsettia Lane |( 8/2-^ 10/19-^ 4/13^ AM/PM ^118/163 ^ u/u ^ 276/491 5| >, i -- •0 T- T— O 1 P P 1 5 *" I Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. © n 1 X. 1 Palomar Airport Rd. J^ H/^ T3 s Capital Improvement Project (Future Geometry) © Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. - @ ^~-ovlpf 1 v ^~ |9| Cannon Rd. T fi^•o 1 • CD•o£ *cs © Base geometry sufficient @ Existing geometry sufficient C" Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 EXHIBIT 3 (page 4 of 20) Existing Geometry Year 2030 Volume Base Analysis Geometry (CIRTIF or Developer Fees) Recommended Improvements/ Modifications IDac.o&ro 1o> 5 •o (0 <0 3 CQ TD roO 0)=)c ^15 2ro £ .1 Q S>JO •O 1 s> w 1c 0) •c S. ™ O imO ® Hvt !iCQ 1 (5 CDCO | Avenida Encinas I! r X "l -*• 2m "2 "w *ffiOmz F- t T /^" 0. 0 © .*V Is V-i»- n Carlsbad Village Dr. |8]i ~- iJ T 0 < ^ c |2 Tr §• © a.1 ^ X r Carlsbad Village Dr. |S| . . s ^ "S MonroeSr 6$) 2 5 in T- CO 1 V AM/PM ^18/21 s- 230/227 I) Avenida Encinas r 1 — •. t r "> CM CMm O) CO-o CO CM £ 00 CD ^JQ ^- co ^-^ CM CO g ©^•^ toTJ- CO 3; CM F-^ CM •"4- CO r- ^ I ^ J Carlsbad Village Dr. |c 14/49 J 174/159-^ 5/5 -^ V. 34/143 •*- 100/223 ,-72/167 \\^\ r* in o co < m £2 ° 1 "~ § i AM/PM i2 < ©coh- COin o o ^ 2C !S CM ^- to J \ V Carlsbad Village Dr. |c 393/279 -S 1 83/503-* 27/73 -^ AM/PM V. 95/52 -^-348/428 1^6/18 r ^ t r O CO CM . ^t O i- tn ^ ^~ ^~ (13) Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. ©^•••••X Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. (15) ^^-^ Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. 63) Existing geometry sufficient ©^*— "^ Existing geometry sufficient ©^^^ ^ Existing geometry sufficient • ri ff Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes JN: 55-100214.001 December2005 EXHIBIT 3 (page 5 of 20) Existing Geometry Year 2030 Volume Base Analysis Geometry (CIRT1F or Developer Fees) Recommended Improvements/ Modifications «T a) c om 8> oO 0) LJ (1)U)ro S<n 8 •p m "3 &0) oO T ? < >,(073 2 i?-~.•g <0>£ S IoO © ft \ aTamarack Ave. (south) 151 -£T3 m O) « 6 © i| y , ' Carlsbad Village Dr. lol J^OVlp-N. ^Tr T3ama> I1s © li y "*^ r Faraday Ave. |6| J -^ ^\\YIm 1 \S/ coO) ^- O 5° oo ^ co T- in V|V ^ 148/65 -*- 35/10 ^215/65 Tamarack Ave. (south)|o| 152/52-^ 19/3-— 40/13^ AM/PM ^ t r •d CM CD CM^ co m oCQ ^J r— T— ra CM ~" O 5^ CM m D-o in 5o in < ^ vZ/ oo SCM O05 T- co oo ^: ^ en CM J 1 ^ J Carlsbad Village Dr. |c 448/303 -^ 1/6 -*• 145/81 -^ AM/PM v .^ 15/3 -^5/2 l^572 r ^ t r. o oo m•o t-~ C4 c$ |^| I 5 - | ©CM COCM O5 in^ in en CO (O COoo in r^co co •<*• BFaraday Ave. [c 64/275 ^ 179/388-*- 99/194 -^ AM/PM ^82/383 •+- 333/411 .x- 204/427 1 r M r . h- CO COJ CO CM CM | -§S 1= CM CO -t | O ^ © Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. (17) ^**-*^ Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. - © Existing geometry sufficient ©V^X Existing geometry sufficient ©^*~*r * B Faraday Ave. |j J ^ 'Operational V •^ I ^tt^sm "6O - CT Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 EXHIBIT 3 (page 6 of 20) Existing Geometry Marron Rd. & (DO 15a)a: 81mO CO (20) >4UV RCarlsbad Village Dr. K J V 7a El Camino Real "^>^ Chestnut Ave. e~.CC Year 2030 Volume (19) 8x_x co r*- CDCO T- CO ^co!CCM ^f coO T- r--T- CM T- V j V^ ^389/370 ^ *7 «l / "t O7"^ f I/ l^f ^117/218 Marron Rd. fel 96/1 82 J 66/269 -»• 52/248 ^ AM/PM _ ^ f ^| ss§ | CO J^ CO 53 CM CO T- 0._ CO g (20) °>6:v 01 t^ 05 O T- CMf^s g ^ 5 CM ^ ^ ^PCarlsbad Village Dr. |c 171/125-^ 73/257 -»• 201/115-^ AM/PM V. 289/1 63 — 221/21 5 r 73/24 S oj oo coa t^- oo CD ° SI £: 0)•I o j; v- 51 S8 I E « 1 lit?CO CO CO T- T- CO V-60/35 -^-255/86 ^30/13 Chestnut Ave. 257/58 -> 83/112- 253/205 - AM/PM S oo oo oT- 00 CO Ci?S3m 3^ T- T- CM Base Analysis Geometry (CIRTIF or Developer Fees) Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. 1 •» i ••§ I Recommended Improvements/ Modifications Existing geometry sufficient Existing geometry sufficient Existing geometry sufficient Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 EXHIBIT 3 (page 7 of 20) Existing Geometry Tamarack Ave. Year 2030 Volume@A O CO T-CO T- TT J | ^^ Tamarack Ave. |c 40/37 J 132/1 80-* 386/147 -^ AM/PM ^24/51 -*- 127/220 ^377/176 f ^s t rS ii' r? CO 0) N-o oo co r-c co h- ^ E o> IZ 25 s s ^~ in < Base Analysis Geometry (CIRTIF or Developer Fees) Recommended Improvements/ Modifications X 7 Tamarack Ave. J Tamarack Ave. ovlp Cannon Rd. T aom a>D)£"3O El Camino Real J free JN: 55-100214.001 December2005 ^ Sn\t2) 0 CM CN— co T- oo £i co nco in •* T- 00 4 CO T- T- J l^c Cannon Rd. |c 202/243 -S 276/669-* 137/125-^ AM/PM V. 118/181 ^-488/444 ,-334/11 l^ t ro •<*• o ina: in T- •t 0 T- Tf T- 1 co ^C IS 5n 00 O 00 £ T~ •< CO CO•<i- inh- ^ CO JT c\i K^CO CO i-^ CO t»»V I w V. 765/775 •+- 1321/1 675 ,-119/58 El Camino Real |oJ _ A _j 24/39 -S 1703/1171-^ 835/245-^ AM/PM ^ 1 r• ii . CM ^- •*•§ O) CM O5 in oo T- f cS f^ ?3 - S^50 16 | f U Cannon Rd. o: Base geometry sufficient r El Camino Real free Developer Funded £ Base geometry sufficient Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes EXHIBIT 3 (page 8 of 20) ^•k 'BML JlML Existing Geometry Year 2030 Volume Base Analysis Geometry (CIPJIF or Developer Fees) Recommended Improvements/ Modifications 0) c -I mT3 ra ro<uo: P 0 01 rooa: 8. < ro OJQ_ ra0)Ct oc 8 UJ JDO ro Camino Vi<<00)or 0c o UJ (25) ^»«^^ -4 T T ^^ . ^f [o] Faraday Ave. |oj -Jfi ^*- ~\ 1^\\\\r g o UJ © Q. g l< x_ ^ -*- ^Palomar Airport Rd. (6J ^^ ^ "5 \T TT f"?*' 1 t f1? C © R Camino Vida Roble |< _J -< > _ ^^\ 1 t S. 8 E ^ UJ (2$) * \*—/ CD T- CO j^ TT in o f- 77" ^ 242/603 — 509/268 .-62/65 f r 29/72 J 317/426-^ 201/495 -^ AM/PM 1 ^-J- 00 o CD O CO I ^ 5 CO sS CM ^1 f^- ?0 CM IO T- ^ UJ 00 CO -| CO < T— 126) co co rov— ^ CD CM O T— T— V- ^ CD M*CM •* COID 00 CO J I ^J Palomar Airport Rd. (C 149/467-^ 1020/1807 — 102/84^> V. 1090/784 — 1360/700 ^477/993 K t r S O) "^J- COo: l^ CM in i oo SJ t:E CO CM CM 5n Tj- T- Q.O in to S= AM/PM CJ ^ < © 1CM CM •* O COCM T- CM Camino Vida Roble [c 63/266 J 10/9 — 104/655^ AM/PM ^27/28 — 14/9 j r / ^ t r. £ Is- O ^"£ CN CD J^ a O CD Q.0 00 T- § m CO ^ CM (25) ^*—^ V 1 i 1 Vv V. "*" f A ^_^5" i 'Vs 1 1 K o s li TIF Funded "Operational (26)V_x Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. © -4UV r V < Camino Vida Roble |oj J T _ -^» A A ±r« > > I I • o O UJ Future roadway extensions require changes to the intersection configuration. (25)Vfc^X Base geometry sufficient (26)^— ^ >^ 1 1 WV |s Palomar Airport Rd. " ^' ^~ ^ V. free — 1 ^" j _>, A A A *•*• 1 f O UJ Base geometry sufficient . C" Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 EXHIBIT 3 (page 9 of 20) Existing Geometry Year 2030 Volume Base Analysis Geometry (CIRTIF or Developer Fees) j l!""• *Recommended Improvements/ Modifications 1 (0tsa>tftc snr 8 S UJ ^0. !!! CO < •O 05 O 1 m<uCtL 8 iD 11 Alga Rd. & § .1 1 UJ (30) ^•-•^ . F ^ -•- 1 La Costa Ave. |5J J -J », .^ ^| s"*^ ft r o 1o A uj (28) | CO r;- CO r- CO CO t- ^~ J 1 v J Poinsettia Ln. |c 132/32^ 288/133 — 196/42 -^ ^95/21 *- 64/1 43 ^219/830 P x + /<_ \ \ rS o r^ oo 0 ^^^1 m H CM s15 01 in co Q.O rn x*- ^ AM/PM iD in ' <CM (29) g^ CM CM COCM ^ CO ^ CO CO m T- T- VIV Aviara Pkwy. |C 108/105^ 224/506 — 308/452 -^ AM/PM ^308/132 ^-478/312 ^- 748/403 ] Alga Rd. S t r DC CO ^" CDo ^ O) 00•§ T^ co In sa CO m CD 0.o co m in 5ui CN < @ O CMN- 0 T- CM CM ^~t: CD C? r- in co *> I ^K ^404/236 ^-472/406 ,-189/167 LaCostaAve. |^| ^ ^ ^ 1126/629-^ 372/617 — 324/277 -v ^ •\ i / S t*~ CM O g CM h- ^~ •1 -^1- H CO 5S CO h~ CO 0,f 1 f\l CO S AM/PM E " O) ^ @ ^iivv Poinsettia Ln. |c J ~* T X "*~" il J« ^ ft t r or 0 1 UJ (29) Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. (30) Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. (28) Base geometry sufficient (29) Existing geometry sufficient (30) ^^•^ ^- ovlp^__ o -^ — La Costa Ave. lol A ^\ \\V*-O i t 1 1 i ± l<*• i— »• i UJ C" Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 EXHIBIT 3 (page 10 of 20) tr a Existing Geometry -4 U r Calle Barcelona J Olivenhain Rd. Leucadia Blvd. "> S3 Alga Rd. J Year 2030 Volume © I^j2c0oo T- in -?^o) in T-T- CM vJ \ vp ^-170/166 -- 222/1 79 ^-228/166 Calle Barcelona |5I 229/291 -> 88/267 — 36/168 -^ AM/PM i ^ t r 1$ O t- CD- in T— co.1 j£ *~ £i! ™ CM co co 9: - f- 5UJ CO < *$£) oo coin T— CDT— ^S OO ^ codO CM •* vT v J ^403/79 -^- 972/685 ,x- 728/685i V|0| ' Olivenhain Rd. Leucadia Blvd. |F 105/248 J 540/889 — 191/172^ AM/PM t"s t r o CO CO OOL CO O T-0 CM CO O5•I f^: s; cS 5| ^gs | T- < (33) O) COO COr- <O *too S° o5co m coV 1 o Alga Rd. |c 145/82 J 1104/663 — 10/39 -^ AM/PM ^311/64 -e- 587/950 f 83/266 ^ t rt^ o o f co ^ 25CO 00 CM 5 n | Base Analysis Geometry (CIRTIF or Developer Fees) i ••! i ••! i ••! a • Recommended Improvements/ Modifications Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. Existing geometry sufficient Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. Existing geometry sufficient Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis.Existing geometry sufficient Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 EXHIBIT 3 (page 11 of 20) Existing Geometry Year 2030 Volume Base Analysis Geometry (CIRTIF or Developer Fees) Recommended Improvements/ Modifications CJ3 ro Street /Poinset, fl eet / Fara55 0) li. UJ intmino De L0 c" La Costa Ave. -*• ~\ o * & ^ f & 1o © CMO T-1 1^ s?C; T coCO t CO Poinsettia Ln. |i 65/12^ 636/504 -*- 13/37^ ^-31/69 •*- 176/81 4 ^12/191 ^ t ^^ CO CO CM0) JO CM ^ •n O) CO in __o CO 00 CO 2if in T- p- AM/PM uJ < © T- O O CO CM iS ) i L ^13/5 -^-787/941 x- 97/221 Ipl'Faraday Ave. |f 15/5-^ 1205/655 — 62/310^ ^ t r • 8 2i S5; Ci o SJo CO f~ N-•c Tf ^- sS CM -r- |u. =t AM/PM uJ f ®^*""^ -^61/85 ^54/25 La Costa Ave. 54/128 — 454/176-^ AM/PM 1 ^ /*"*• 5 CO O -; o5 5C^ i N 10 < Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. © ik^r^ J Faraday Ave. |c •^> ^ -* /•L r ^t/^ to 1 UJ Capital Improvement Project (Future Geometry) (36)^••^ Existing geometry sufficient (34)^-^ Existing geometry sufficient © Base geometry sufficient (36) ^•"•^ Existing geometry sufficient [T Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 EXHIBIT 3 (page 12 of 20) Existing Geometry Year 2030 Volume Base Analysis Geometry (CIPJIF or Developer Fees) Recommended Improvements/ Modifications 'o O o @ Man-on Rd. |c J — *T X •*~ 1J ^s I i^ s1 os (38) V H ^ p Jefferson St. |( J -r \ f 1 North County Plaza •dOH c:i(0 (39)^^ as Poinsettia Ln. |< ji ^-v -**• ?] Paseo Corto 3] ... "*S*\ 1 T r d s "o ©m T-t- O COCM T- en CM CM S5 CM T- T- Marron Rd. |£ 62m4-S 143/339 -*• 109/377 ^ AM/PM ^34/127 — 147/352 ^96/475 P >\ I /"^ i rin en CM CO CM •* 0) T- T- T- g o^=?5 s£ T- CO CO P- o CO CO 5 (38) CM o> in^- ' co o enCM in CM co CM r>-TT N- CO CO CM T- ^ ' [CJefferson St. ^ 100/262-^ 19/62-* 29/78 •>." AM/PM V. 67/385 — 18/42 ,-21/149 1 North County Plaza ^ t rco co co. gj in co 1 °* E 5 < ®-£t^ COCO T-***^ ^^» torn en ~;^ CM ilt- in CO V * V BPoinsettia Ln. |< 711/502^ 9/36-* 36/99 -^ AM/PM ^19/4 — 23/12 ,-36/16 jl Paseo Corto f' >. f /*" CD CO O u co co 3-Q ^M ^^ ^^CO •*!, ^3S ^~ jr T™ 5 i s | © Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. © Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. (3§)^•^ Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. - (37) Existing geometry sufficient (38) Existing geometry sufficient (39)^— ' Existing geometry sufficient r_~ Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 EXHIBIT 3 (page 13 of 20) Existing Geometry Alga Rd. •coe- s. v Palomar Airport Rd.| J V.ovlp Palomar Airport Rd. Year 2030 Volume ®t-O) r- CM O ^5^o ^- £ico co in V | V^ Alga Rd. ^ 555I34Q -J 3/33 — 843/739 -^ ^-24/10 — 17/12 co in co u: CO ^f CMQ 9J !$ co8 h~ enjb O) 00 -TT ^fr fOAM/PM ^ ' ^ 5 4 ©T- in 5>in o co in ^ ooCM CO t- J \ ^R Palomar Airport Rd. k ^127/76 -^ 705/357-^ 155/34-^ AM/PM ^316/313 — 299/576 f 360/276 J •^ i *•^ I /^ | fe^| l5 S CO ?5 5• CD O) Q_ "° T~ 55 < ©* *CO O5 CO 111 T- 00 T- ^ * ^FPatamar Airport Rd. |! 220/329 -> 2314/1249 — 170/573 -. ^ AM/PM V. 236/229 — 967/2535 ^105/311 1 •« A .r1 f o O) CM00 rf CO - CM T1 T-® -*Z **^. —Q TJ- m co 5o co T- co i?8 CM CO CM > < Base Analysis Geometry :iP,TIF or Developer Fees) Recommended Improvements/ Modifications (40) li AlgaRd. v |< ^ 1 ^y se TIP funded ® Base geometry sufficient Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis.Palomar Airport Rd. lol V_ovlp Palomar Airport Rd. Base geometry sufficient Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 EXHIBIT 3 (page 14 of 20) i Bb * Existing Geometry Year 2030 Volume Base Analysis Geometry (CIRTIF or Developer Fees) Recommended Improvements/ Modifications 1Q 13a fe <DO .2- (0Foma. <D 3& O)JB oO 13roo •c .£•^ roFo CL o>n0 nTJ5 d / Gamineoff •e &<L_ CO omQ_ ©Q 1; | i i ^-ovlp ^S~1 i 'Palomar Airport Rd. |< y :i ovlp-^> % . c 1 3 @ V S f ;j i o ^- -*-Y |0| Pabmar Airport Rd. |c ~jt Z^— ^- ^ \ ^\\\ri rx n 1 (45) * i X r Palomar Airport Rd. |o| . J -*• "%• « ^ A 7 ^5 >o 'iaO (43) -.^-s in CO >;CO 0 CM Oo s° 5 •§ £ 5 en g/ i i "^ ^367/141 •*- 11 23/21 47 ,-105/285 rn ' Palomar Airport Rd. Ipl 301/184-^ 2406/1122-^ 140/152^ AM/PM 8 ^ T r 2 ^- o) inS $ oo Cio Tt CM r-- 5is o> m PL S 5o < 64)l-iO ,'v- — ' oo ^ Sh~ in co 03 x- IP CM J1 •^- T- in =| V { V° V- 44/79 -^914/1838 f 61/260 Palomar Airport Rd. |? 948/410-^ 1749/1166 — 67/243 -- ^ AM/PM ^ t r . •* CM Is-j- N- in co 2 CO O CM W.s CM in CM ^^ 1 (45) co o coin T- co o> o m CM Tf CDJ \ V Palomar Airport Rd. [^ A119/56-^ 1287/1185 — 500/256 -^ AM/PM V. 177/49 -^889/947 f 173/94 J ^ i -r 3 CM O) CM I c5 ° c5 5 rQ ^~ C4.I 1 CS (43) Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. (44) •***\ ^»3v. rrPalomar Airport Rd.l£ -^ -^ ^ ~> TIP Funded ^ V. m _^ f -*-s-8 y- u | 5 05)^— ' Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. @ Existing geometry sufficient (44) I 1 IV l 1? Palomar Airport Rd.l£ J -t- ^- "\ $5)^— ^ •6 ^~ CD ^ p) •* —5 s- 8 £ ;| r Q.e 1 Existing geometry sufficient . I" Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 EXHIBIT 3 (page 15 of 20) Existing Geometry Year 2030 Volume Base Analysis Geometry (CIRTIF or Developer Fees) Recommended Improvements/ Modifications "S£w <D•S0) LL Qj •orooa:•e .1 ^E J3 Q- 0> Q Se "3> TJ gor•c2. < TO o (0Q_ |5 5 1 <DC 3 E 0)cf^s *o ® >4|W Palomar Airport Rd. |< -»- ^ X ^ — ^Mt" w ^§ii:GJ @ "^~ ~*~, IF1 Palomar Airport Rd. £ ^-^ ^ J ^ ff Q Q i (48) V_-X V|\ R Poinsettia Ln. |( j _». ~^"T Vv ^UJ a> ^\ \ /"" I £ •8 vl^x eoT- Tf r>~o ^" co O) T- OCD CM T- Palomar Airport Rd. [c 581/86-^ 1738/30 12-* 22/286 -^ AM/PM ^415/46 •*- 2853/2080 ^-64/151 ' ^ t r (/j \£} «rt- ^— •c in IB ^s> oo in oo s ut CO CM h- S: ®t--co m r^r^- ^~ o O) 00 CM 00 CM COCO •* T- ^ I ^R Palomar Airport Rd. |< 723/385 -^ 1200/1 397-* 191/252-^, AM/PM V- 245/71 -^- 1697/1 291 f 250/563 ^ ^ t r\ i /•«t in T- Q CM CO CMS co ^- co s2 in o oo ?•5 in co ^- t5 ^~ < @ ^""^ O ^" T™in •«*• cot- j- 55o in CM^- CO t-v * SPoinsettia Ln. K 58/64 > 1 53/349-* 39/72 -^ AM/PM V. 242/241 -^-296/364 ^292/414 f M r « r^. CM t**.c CO t- 00 uj ^* oo O) 5 •§ T- 5 >^ < (46) p Palomar Airport Rd.U J. *" > ^~*r Vx>. + 4*" 55 u. UJ Developer Funded @ Q. g VfffW Palomar Airport Rdjc ^ -*. ^. V, ^_ ^] x^ Q. C > LJ O 0 ^1 Improvements based on Year 2030 volumes for the future turning movements (48) ^*— * Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. ® Base geometry sufficient © -«- 1 •*- y1 m W J, ^ Palomar Airport Rd. ^ J ^.^, i i i A ^ ^ ^^ S g ~t 1 -N. •§ A (48) ^fc--^ Existing geometry sufficient M M Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 EXHIBIT 3 (page 16 of 20) Existing Geometry 01•co toQ. m X Poinsettia Ln.-4 Poinsettia Ln. ovlp V.. | Rancho Santa Fe Rd. Olivenhain Rd. J Year 2030 Volume (49) 5) CO CO ^ •* V \ ^^ Poinsettia Ln. K 647/504 •> 799/1069-^ 20/83 -^ AM/PM ^51/36 — 1052/11 34 I <r"29 .Mr £ en oo oo •5 J^ oo co Q CM CO CO o Is* ;?(n n °- < @ 05 K coO5 CO N- 03 T- 00Is- T- O3 ^ * ^ PPoinsettia Ln. |< 535/218^ 435/313-^ 228/463 ^ AM/PM V 107/59 -^300/637 [^8/24 ^ t r O Is- CO f' in N- ^ £2 Ci coQ- CM O3 5 .a co 10 g < © 1 £1 ti S° % ? CM CM 1 J \ ^ .1 ^13/23 -^1137/978 ^-458/504 191 Rancho Santa Fe Rd. Olivenhain Rd. |e 10/15^ 984/1212— 71/468^ AM/PM j i „ CO CO 00 _ (J5 co o £ O ^ ^^ ^ i Base Analysis Geometry (CIRTIF or Developer Fees) Recommended Improvements/ Modifications (49) Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. ® Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. © Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. © Existing geometry sufficient © Existing geometry sufficient © e V. o § Rancho Santa Fe Rd. ^ 1 J 1 Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 EXHIBIT 3 (page 17 of 20) Existing Geometry Year 2030 Volume Base Analysis Geometry (CIP,TIF or Developer Fees) Recommended Improvements/ Modifications Rancho Santa Fe Road / La Costa Avenue Rancho Santa Fe Road / Camino De Los Coches Rancho Santa Fe Road / Calle Barcelona® Calle Barcelona |C J \ 1 Rancho Santa Fe Rd. *—J^(53) ^\ V fl Cmo. De Los Coches Rancho Santa Fe Rd. "^•T® La Costa Ave. \ L Rancho Santa Fe Rd.' JT/co\ f^(§2) «co T— o) 555° ^ CO —en oo CD T- T- CO Calle Barcelona [c 132/116^ 132/113-^ 97/63 -^ AM/PM ^115/38 — 11 9/68 ^-278/108 Rancho Santa Fe Rd. "^48/91 J1542/1426-^229/200-^AM/PM® § ^ CO CN S°co inT- !>>. AM/PM ^163/72 ^457/193 [Icmo. De Los Coches I t ra: O CN « " C!I SICNl 5(0 CO O Q_w m m ^o CD 5 •Q T~ i /c^\ «OI KAl rn^-X cnS Is- T^ ?3 o) t:T— O CO La Costa Ave. |( 428/202 -^ 153/192-^ 176/84-^ AM/PM V 73/46 -e- 125/1 88 f 10/59 5 o in CNo co T- co © Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. © Existing geometry sufficient (53) Existing geometry sufficient @ B La Costa Ave. R |>! 1 0 CT Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 EXHIBIT 3 (page 18 of 20) Existing Geometry Year 2030 Volume Base Analysis Geometry (CIPJIF or Developer Fees) Recommended Improvements/ Modifications TJ03S. QJ cto T3 8a: 0)u. CO A) Cr? .> a <S "35 rcry <1> (0 (0 CO oJC mK. o 8 nta Fe Road / Calle fmin R g<n{£ © } j V ili ^-ovlp f 1 San Elijo Rd. >1 •d i j^" a o 1o•s ©^~^ * i? X 1 Melrose Dr. l°l . Jt J -+• ~~\ 2 >\ | i*'o ^ ' ri(0U)1§ 0£ Intersection is located in the City of San Marcos © fAvda. De La Posta [ -f f g] Calle Acetvo £ 1a(O 1 S. ©^""^ O ^~n- inr>~ oj in ^ g S•<-(•-•* R lc 87/20 J 36/16-* 10/10 -^ AM/PM V. 370/186 -"-9/42 ^-609/196 1 San Elijo Rd. i^ t r "£ o o m co o 5 C 1 ° ^^ g 1 *" " | cCOa: ©0^CT) r>~ Or** co cj) co CM -^rCNJ O) x- V { V V 106/1 50 -*- 61 1/548 x- 50/251 * Melrose Dr. [Si ^ i 752/381 -^ 41 9/622-* 445/825 -^™ AM/PM ^\ T r 2 O O5 Oa, in in m "- £2 *" I?5| CN ^ CN 5 W O) x~ ^o O) 5 C a: © c,0 -r- COin r^ T- r-~ co mo> m CN Avda. De La Posta [( 51 ^O-^ 34/8-^ 23/9-^ AM/PM V 61/39 -^114/39 f 142/75 1r CalteAcervo f^ t r K O) TT OO | CO CN 00 5 •5 < S (55)^— • ' J||| V • >r f T T ^^ •*• ^ (0| San Elijo Rd. Kl J s^Htr 1 *CO</J 1 Developer Funded ©^—^ VVffjW 1 Melrose Dr. |£ j -^-*• -^ \_ ^^>l 5 '^B.'* i 4 1 0) 1^ it f 3 OT 5 C K Developer Funded © Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. (55)^—S Base geometry sufficient (56) w^— * i^ -+m vvmvvl? Melrose Dr. lo| A -a "*^\ T J7^ -^ i? — *• ^S tQ ~\ *" ~*\ ^ C(DOL © Existing geometry sufficient ™ Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 EXHIBIT 3 (page 19 of 20) Existing Geometry V Levante St. Legend •»- Geometry Mitigation -*• Existing Geometry XX7XX AM/PM Peak Hour Turning Movements [51Igl Signalized Intersection ovlp Right-turn Overlap free Free Right-turn ^ Stop Sign *-/ Future Roadway Ext. Year 2030 Volume (5§) a CM co CM 00 tO T- I" tOv I vp Levante St. K 78/1 5 -> 2/3-* 76/21 -^ AM/PM *- 165/87 ^-190/100 *, ^ t r£ -r- 10 CO | CM J^ O S — CO 5u* a> <. Base Analysis Geometry (CIPJIF or Developer Fees) Recommended Improvements/ Modifications Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. Existing geometry sufficient JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes EXHIBIT 3 (page 20 of 20) Table 1 TIP Intersection Level Of Sen/ice and Improvement Summary City of Carlsbad 2005 TIP Intersection 1) Alga Rd. / Alicante Rd. 2) Cannon Rd. / Avenida Encinas 3) Cannon Rd. / Paseo Del Norte 4) Cannon Rd. / LEGOLAND Dr. 5) Cannon Rd. / Faraday Ave. 6) Cannon Rd. / College Blvd. 7) Carlsbad Blvd. / State St. 8) Carlsbad Blvd. / Carlsbad Village Dr. 9) Carlsbad Blvd. / Tamarack Ave. 10) Carlsbad Blvd. / Cannon Rd. 1 1 ) Carlsbad Blvd . / Palomar Airport Rd . 12) Carlsbad Blvd. / Poinsettia Ln. 13) SB Carlsbad Blvd. / Avenida Encinas 13) NB Carlsbad Blvd. / Avenida Encinas 14) Carlsbad Village Dr. / Tamarack Ave. 15) Carlsbad Village Dr. / Monroe St. 16) College Blvd. / Tamarack Ave (south) 17) College Blvd. / Carlsbad Village Dr. Year 2030 ICU Results V/C - LOS AM 0.628 - B 0.346 - A 0.788 - C 0.683 - B 0.611 -B 0.623- B 0.735 - C 0.581 - A 0.826 - D 0.824 - D 0.723 - C 0.578 -A 0.516 -A 0.381 -A 0.329 - A 0.513 -A 0.871 - D 0.569 -A PM 0.620 - B 0.533 - A 0.966 - E 0.850 - D 0.695 - B 0.697 - B 0.811 -D 0.709 - C 0.846 - D 0.967 - E 0.632 - B 0.745 - C 0.589 - A 0.292 - A 0.294 - A 0.590 - A 0.742 - C 0.748 - C Assumed 2030 Geometry: Existing or Base Geometry ( TIP, Developer, or CIP Fees) Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Base Geometry. Base Geometry. Existing Geometry. Base Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Base Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Additional Improvements Required? No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) Yes (See Exhibit 3) No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient) (See Exhibit 3) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient) (See Exhibit 3) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) Yes (See Exhibit 3) No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient) (See Exhibit 3) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) Year 2030 V/C - LOS With Recommended/ Improvements shown in Exhibit 2 AM 0.788 - C 0.642 - B PM 0.854 - D 0.751 - C Note: Deficient intersection operation indicated in bold. Table 1 TIP Intersection Level Of Service and Improvement Summary City of Carlsbad 2005 TIP Intersection 18) College Blvd. / Faraday Ave. 19) El Camino Real / Matron Rd. 20) El Camino Real / Carlsbad Village Dr. 21) El Camino Real / Chestnut Ave. 22) El Camino Real / Tamarack Ave. 23) El Camino Real / Cannon Rd. 24) El Camino Real / College Blvd. 25) El Camino Real / Faraday Ave. 26) El Camino Real / Palomar Airport Rd. 27) El Camino Real / Camino Vida Roble 28) El Camino Real / Poinsettia Ln. 29) El Camino Real / Alga Rd. 30) El Camino Real / La Costa Ave. 31) El Camino Real / Calle Barcelona 32) El Camino Real / Olivenhain Rd. 33)EIFuerteSt./AlgaRd. 34) El Fuerte St. / Poinsettia Ln. 35) El Fuerte St. / Faraday Ave. Year 2030 ICU Results V/C - LOS AM 0.661 - B 0.763 - C 0.829 - D 0.726 - C 0.960 - E 0.653- B 0.756 - C 0.876 - D 0.854 - D 0.637 - B 0.704 - C 0.806 - D 1.029-F 0.822 - D 0.607 - B 0.602 -B 0.516 -A 0.650 - B PM 0.707 - C 0.788 - C 0.771 - C 0.519 -A 0.920 - E 0.607 - B 0.811 -D 0.823 - D 1.088-F 0.758 - C 0.754 - C 0.876 - D 0.859 - D 0.807 - D 0.805 - D 0.717 -C 0.608 - B 0.551 - A Assumed 2030 Geometry: Existing or Base Geometry ( TIF, Developer, or CIP Fees) Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Base Geometry. Base Geometry. Existing Geometry. Base Geometry. Existing Geometry. Base Geometry. Base Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Base Geometry. Additional Improvements Required? No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) Yes (See Exhibit 3) No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient) (See Exhibit 3) No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient) (See Exhibit 3) No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient) (See Exhibit 3) Yes (See Exhibit 3) No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient) (See Exhibit 3) No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient) (See Exhibit 3) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) Yes (See Exhibit 3) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient) (See Exhibit 3) Year 2030 V/C - LOS With Recommended/ Improvements shown in Exhibit 2 AM 0.861 - D 0.720 - C 0.869 - D PM 0.731 - C 0.868 - D 0.772 - C Note: Deficient intersection operation indicated in bold. Table 1 TIP Intersection Level Of Service and Improvement Summary City of Carlsbad 2005 TIP Intersection 36) La Costa Ave. / Camino De Los Coches 37) Marron Rd. / Monroe St. 38) Marron Rd. / Jefferson St. 39) Melrose Dr. / Poinsettia Ln. 40) Melrose Dr. / Alga Rd. 41) Palomar Airport Rd. / Avenida Encinas 42) Palomar Airport Rd. / Paseo Del Norte 43) Palomar Airport Rd. / Armada Dr. 44) Palomar Airport Rd. / College Blvd. 45) Palomar Airport Rd. / Camino Vida Roble 46) Palomar Airport Rd. / El Fuerte St. 47) Palomar Airport Rd. / Melrose Dr. 48) Poinsettia Ln. / Avenida Encinas 49) Poinsettia Ln. / Paseo Del Norte 50) Poinsettia Ln. / Aviara Pkwy. 51) Olivenhain Rd. / Rancho Santa Fe Rd. 52) Rancho Santa Fe Rd. / Calle Barcelona 53) Rancho Santa Fe Rd. / Camino De Los Coches Year 2030 ICU Results V/C-LOS AM 0.509 - A 0.419 -A 0.414 -A 0.679 - B 0.679 - B 0.924 • E 0.767 - C 0.618 -B 0.697 - B 0.662 - B 0.854 - D 0.912 - E 0.627 - B 0.817 -D 0.558 - A 0.926 - E 0.672 - B 0.685 - B PM 0.291 - A 0.796 - C 0.742 - C 0.604 - B 0.836 - D 0.806 - D 0.766 - C 0.790 - C 0.910 -E 0.601 - B 0.782 - C 0.881 - D 0.739 - C 0.873 - D 0.721 - C 1.085-F 0.566 - A 0.497 - A Assumed 2030 Geometry: Existing or Base Geometry ( TIP, Developer, or CIP Fees) Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Base Geometry. Existing Geometry. Base Geometry. Existing Geometry. Base Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Base Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Additional Improvements Required? No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient) (See Exhibit 3) Yes (See Exhibit 3) No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient) (See Exhibit 3) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) Yes (See Exhibit 3) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient) (See Exhibit 3) Yes (See Exhibit 3) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) Yes (See Exhibit 3) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) Year 2030 V/C - LOS With Recommended/ Improvements shown In Exhibit 2 AM 0.685 - B 0.665 - B 0.780 - C 0.632 - B PM 0.697 - B 0.787 - C 0.798 - C 0.674 - B Note: Deficient intersection operation indicated in bold. Table 1 TIP Intersection Level Of Service and Improvement Summary City of Carlsbad 2005 TIP Intersection 54) Rancho Santa Fe Rd. / La Costa Ave. 55) Rancho Santa Fe Rd. / San Elijo Rd. 56) Rancho Santa Fe Rd. / Melrose Dr. 57) Rancho Santa Fe Rd. / Calle Acervo 58) El Camino Real / Levante St. Year 2030 ICU Results V/C - LOS AM 0.905 - E 0.698 - B 0.903 - E 0.839 - D 0.633 - B PM 0.728 - C 0.523 - A 0.680 - B 0.761 - C 0.636 - B Assumed 2030 Geometry: Existing or Base Geometry ( TIP, Developer, or CIP Fees) Existing Geometry. Base Geometry. Base Geometry. Existing Geometry. Existing Geometry. Additional Improvements Required? Yes (See Exhibit 3) No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient) (See Exhibit 3) Yes (See Exhibit 3) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) Year 2030 V/C - LOS With Recommended/ Improvements shown in Exhibit 2 AM 0.728 - C 0.857 - D PM 0.678 - B 0.631 - B Note: Deficient Intersection operation indicated in bold. TIF Intersection Data Collection Monitoring Sheet lnt# north-south east-west Count Data Geometry Post-Process Worksheet ICU Worksheet Mitigation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 . 18 19 20 Friday, January Alicante Avenida Encinas Paseo Del Norte LegoLand Faraday Avenue College Carlsbad Blvd Carlsbad Blvd Carlsbad Blvd Carlsbad Blvd Carlsbad Blvd Carlsbad Blvd Carlsbad Blvd Tamarack Monroe Street College College College El Camino Real El Camino Real 13, 2006 0 a Cannon 0 0 Cannon Road 0 0 Cannon 0 0 Cannon Road 0 0 Cannon fj 0 State Street 0 0 Carlsbad Village Drive 0 0 Tamarack 0 0 Cannon 0 0 Palomar Airport Road 0 0 Poinsettia 0 0 Avenida Encinas 0 0 Carlsbad Village Drive 0 0 Carlsbad Village Drive 0 0 Tamarack (S) 0 0 Carlsbad Village Drive 0 0 Faraday 0 0 Marron 0 @ Carlsbad Village Dr 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 00 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 00 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 .0 D 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 D Page 1 of 3 Report: Intersection List 2 Int # north-south east-west Count Data Geometry Post-Process Worksheet ICU Worksheet Mitigation 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 El Camino Real El Camino Real El Camino Real El Camino Real El Camino Real El Camino Real El Camino Real El Camino Real El Camino Real El Camino Real Calle Barcelona Olivenhein El Fuerte El Fuerte El Fuerte Camino de los Coches Marron Marron Melrose Drive Melrose Drive Avenida Encinas Paseo Del Norte Chestnut 0 0 Tamarack 0 0 Cannon 0 0 College 0 0 Faraday 0 0 Palomar Airport Road 0 0 Camino Vida Roble 0 0 Poinsettia 0 0 Alga 0 0 La Costa 0 0 El Camino Real 0 0 El Camino Real 0 0 Alga 0 0 Poinsettia (Future) fj 0 Faraday (Future) Q 0 La Costa Avenue 0 0 Monroe 0 0 Jefferson 0 0 Poinsettia 0 0 Alga 0 0 Palomar Aiport Road 0 0 Palomar Airport Road 0 0 a • 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 00 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 00 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 00 0 - 0 D Friday, January 13,2006 Page 2 of 3 Report: Intersection List 2 Int # north-south east-west Count Data Geometry Post-Process Worksheet ICU Worksheet Mitigation 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 Armada/Costco College-Aviara Camino Vida Roble El Fuerte Melrose Drive Avenida Encinas Paseo Del Norte Aviara Rancho Santa Fe Calle Barcelona Camino de los Coches La Costa Rancho Santa Fe Rancho Santa Fe Rancho Santa Fe El Camino Real Palomar Airport Road 00 0 Palomar Airport Road 00 0 Palomar Airport Road 00 0 Palomar Airport Road 00 0 Palomar Airport Road 00 0 Poinsettia Lane 00 0 Poinsettia 00 0 Poinsettia 00 0 Olivenhain-Camino Al 0 0 0 Rancho Santa Fe 0 0 0 Rancho Santa Fe 0 0 0 Rancho Santa Fe 0 0 0 San Elijo Road .00 0 Melrose Dr 00 0 Calle Acervo 00 0 Levante 00 0 0 D 0 0 0 D 0 D 0 0 0 a 0 a. 0 D 0 0 0 D 0 D 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 n Friday, January 13, 2006 Report: Intersection List 2 Page 3 of 3