HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-10-20; City Council; Resolution 2009-260EXHIBIT 1
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2009-260
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CORRECTIONS TO
3 THE AGRICULTURAL CONVERSION MITIGATION FEE GRANT
FUNDING AMOUNTS SPECIFIED IN EXHIBIT A OF
4 PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
2009-199, WHICH AUTHORIZED THE ALLOCATION OF GRANT
5 FUNDS FROM THE AGRICULTURAL CONVERSION
MITIGATION FEE FUND.
6 CASE NAME: AGRICULTURAL CONVERSION MITIGATION
FEE FUNDING CORRECTIONS
7
WHEREAS, on July 28, 2009 the City Council of the City of Carlsbad adopted
o
Resolution No. 2009-199, which authorized the allocation of grant funds from the Agricultural
Conversion Mitigation Fee (ACMF) fund (Fund); and
WHEREAS, the Agricultural Conversion Mitigation Fee Ad Hoc Citizens
Committee intended to recommend that $249,313 in ACMF funds be allocated to ACMF Grant
Project (AGP) 09-02 and that $234,830 in ACMF funds be allocated to AGP 09-10; and
WHEREAS, the ACMF funding amounts for AGP 09-02 and AGP 09-10 were
displayed incorrectly in Exhibit A of Resolution No. 2009-199; and
1, WHEREAS, it is necessary to correct Exhibit A to accurately reflect the ACMF
. „ funding amounts for AGP 09-02 and AGP 09-10.
18 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad does hereby
jo resolve as follows:
20 1 • That the above recitations are true and correct.
21 2. That the City Council hereby approves the corrections to the ACMF funding
amounts to be allocated to AGP 09-02 and AGP 09-10, as accurately reflected in the attached
22 "Exhibit A - Agricultural Conversion Mitigation Fee Program Committee Recommendation of
2009 Grant Applications and Environmental Review Status."
23
3. All other provisions and requirements of Resolution No. 2009-199 not
24 modified by this resolution shall remain in full effect.
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council
of the City of Carlsbad on the 20* day of October. 2009, by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Hall, Packard and Blackburn.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ATTEST:
WOOD, City Clerk
s<
s
xLU
EXHIBJIJ2
00
•o c
ortbe wo1.s(ft
O
E «
2^
o°S
^5 9
S ^S
c5«
O CT» >•^ ^s QJ4-> O »(D O >00 (M V
4= M- OC
I C »c .8 Eo -P <u
e-S |§J g I§ E •!u p c_: o m
3 « J+2 oc <
"5 <uu <u
K £
ou
;
<k_roEo
roQ.
1<;
rH
CTl
00
<J)
Q-
OU
^^£.ofM
/CUP 98-r^.o
r-«o
<Q.
U1
^^(J3
PTo(N
O.l/lu-
O
troQ.
^
4->
T3Ol^C
E
<D4-1QJ•oI/)ro5t/i4->C0)E(U>o
Q.
E
e access i.c4-*
^4-O
co
4^u3k_4-ft/1Couo>JZ4->iveway.^_
Q
9
S
QC
LU
Cro
Q.
u
£4-'u0)Q.to
£UcroQC
T3ro-Ouo
5•g
<4=
t!
Olu>.
(/I3
O
^o>k_Q.
OJ
-C
4-*
•5
01Q.
8woqjjz•M
go>'>o>
"ro4-f
0)
Eco
'>
0>dditionalro
Olt_
'5ITOlk_
4-1
Oc
to01
OT3
tjOl
'o1
Q.
01
4-J
14-O
™ SP d- =
co
Olj:
: 4-^
OlO)•4-J
<T3i—! ro
!§>
;fe
? ^"
l&
: oT
s not authoriz!§TJ
•sis! a.
i O' <
i£
!|
;l•. *^
: 100;SP
Awardil4-1
3tnOli_
4-*Oc
J
inT3C
^QO
1ro
ro
"5>•4-t
'>
ttro
Because the4J
U<D
'§
Q.
01
^4-o
o
tt
construc
vH
'S
"2ro$ro
0)JZ
4-»ironment,Olo>
4-*
CostOl
4Jcrou<<r
'cOD'm
ro
OlCO3
S
T3
OU
4->ro£4->
5"
'>'t;ro
£1^
Tn"
IDOLT>rH
C0
t30)toto
GuidelinecSLUU
O
4-*4-*Cro
3
i review pursvironmentalo>
8t»_
4->Q.
Eo>X01
uO)
'o"
Q.
Ol^:4-*
>^UcOJ00
rmitting a01Q.
73ro_OJ
k_
0)_c
4^o
k-o
4^u
OlJZ4-<o
submitted tilans areu.
01i
O•*-•co'+-»ro
E
|
4-*nsufficien_U1
0)
OJ
4-*
oT
E
V)lc+-*<
s
rsuant to CEQ.
•oOl4-*ro
^5ai
OlJ2
*-;oroa.
E;'.ro ;
C !•onme> ,c
0) ,
4-« i
rolu
t in any signifl3Jto ;
£!
1!tn01!
I!li^ *<u-C :ine whetdetermwOlto
t/>OJ
"oj•D
'5(J
c!
LU
U
O
+-*+-»CTO3
(/)i*_
3Q.
2
LU
U
E
: Exempt froing Studies)sign of trails01T3
T3Crou
Planninccro
Q.
•acro;>•FeasibilH(Nus<N
LTI
rH
m
iHro
co
uOlto
inOl
C
"53T3
'313
cS
LU
U
o4-J
Exempt from CEQA pursuantAvers property acquisition:rot_34-»ro
Z
;erve Existinghip of Interest in Land to Pres; 15325 (Transfers of Ownersii_
£
I/)•acro_j
M—(Acquisition csources), and Section 15313 iConditions and Historical Re"^01to
\ Wildlife Conservation Purpo73
C
t*_
4«lCro
M
OJO
P
emoval: awaHiding, and invasive species r; Wetland restoration, trail bi<Nr-uo
oo"CD
4^uOl
'cf
Q.
Ol£
"Sco
he construct!lorize, permit, or guarantee tfor AGP 09-02 does not authTOa>i/>3rou
33
^8
4-*ro
ny activity thding funds will not result in aBecause the activity of awarEo
*a.
101
.—
00
ironment, the award of fundisignificant effect on the envil/)
ro
Q.
c
O1
SI5
rn
on 15061(b)(ant to CEQA Guidelines Sectienvironmental review pursuT5
ro3
ro
>QJ
0)JD
1
tj01's1
Q.
01
4~t
other lead permitting agencvare submitted to the City ork_
o>.c3
Olc'Et_Ol4^01T3
O4->
0
4Wro
me, there is insufficient inferpursuant to CEQA. At this tito4-JUroQ.significant environmental im= 1ro i
_C |
4-*
3l/lO)L_
3
1o"
0.
5
•<— '
%
g
oo
73
*
CD
OC
c E
^ 4-*•3 ro
ro
C
Ol
= « 3 a .° 3 .h ro3 $
~ 3
i 11t; .£ 3 3
c =5
l
:js ^ o ci Q. 5 CO |-
&1 =
>•4-1k_o>Q.
O
0.
toh_Ol^I acquisition;^
OlQ.; Mitsuuchi procro
co
4Jrow
j wetland restogTO
'5_Q
14-*
>O
0)
toO)1 Invasive specicro
\ at Rosalena/SrHorH
>.ro
| Pacific/Highw,\ areas.o :=
(L) j_,k_ p- .^^
13 Q; "O C*
0 dJ J£ U
1 ro 51
<« 50^2•- o 'S
a- §>"S
« J3 ia> £
I 1 J
.2" § S« 15m ro3^
CO
EX
o
"5u
o
4-»ro
Om
Lfl<H
co
O)c
LUO
cro
I3a.
u
Eo
a.
01x
ooo
j >• .!£!
; | 'gsr! .E ^5 ~; oi *; c £i
: "*"* to **~ (Tt! 01 Ol *- o; S ^~ ° S
If!l» C cO. O t
ro c < a.
C X:o **
oi ai
o TJ *3
£T£C C
So *i
™ S
oT
ox:
=iro
O
aio
(N
ro
ro**_
O
>.
'>t5ro
01
4-»
O>to
s:'>
Ol
01XI
cotj.01
01
•£
c •- *io .5 p
LU T3U ro
01
Eco
S<£
00
:8a. co
ST£E .2 £3 S I
|£i
11S <•F oi £ <,
C j
ao Q \J o)
1/1
4^ "" 2 Z, Uu ro c ^ «.Si, oi £ S 2o to c +•• . ,b 3>*> « •* r-•a Q- ro =
£-0-5r = c
* 8 "
! ob O ro oi QO '*-' x: >.
C O *••*— •-» J_l
cro ">C .
— "&2-I43 ~ E" C
TO U) > E 01 m
5 c '4_. oi x: M^ O o x > oi< u ro O) 5 XI
OSo
LO
0)'TJ
8
«N(M00
CT1O
a.
O
01
_Q)a.E
01
c3
O
Ol•a
Iro
•acro
T301
Ero
a.
01
O)XI
OlT3COlEEo
01O
(N
00
•aai</)
aien
QO
C4_»1 of exis01T3O
Olcc
ro
1
roai
u
O
Oo
00c«O)E
ro
co
7301X
QDC
4-1S
Eoot_totoro
u
OOQO
X)
— .
Ol
4-t
COc
TJ
Cro
Eoo
cg
4-»roTJ
3
O
ro
1edionda
X
co
§>roI
CL
<iscoveryQ
at
o
o
'k_Ol4-<C
k_Ol
c01u
4-»rovemenQ.
E
s^
Cg
ro^_
O c" _
S -B 2>- ro 4-p
t = -a 5- — c 2ro 4j
— x: M 3+5 S C i;
S T3 1 S
3 ro * 8
ro ^.
E ro
pT ^
= S3 isw to
i =S ">m .2 ^Ol" •+: 15 oi
2 2 £ ro
W) O ro ,V"s s E
u S £
a. S
00
E .£5
o
. _ .E •- e ^ 8*- 4-1 C IA UQ- ro oi ro ">o E ooxi $
ro
c TJ '§
CO
Olk_
34->ro
= J3XI 2
S <U 00 ._•< c JB
<4-» 4-1_ « C9 X OJ< 01 U
S
m
'§
°
-c c
E E
i!
_5 c oi
i S: to
JS 01 Oi
§ S?
r5
a. 3
< S
a. 3
^ o
CHIBITAJE VERSION OF AMENDMENTS TO:•*> —UJ _]
ucz
D
C
Cm
STRIKE OUT/ion Mitigation Fee Programition of 2009 Grant Applicationsental Review Status(/) f~L_ "O ElQ} ^ i^
c c •-
S §"°JJ3 f^ ~S
38<— $2
*!O on Mitigation Fee Programtion of 2009 Grant Applicationsental Review StatusI As part of SP 207(G)/LCPA 07-07/CUP 98-20(B)/CDP 98-91(A) - Palomar Airport Road\ Driveway, the construction of the access improvements was determined to be within1 the scope of the previously certified Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan EIR 94-01. The funding: of the project does not require additional environmental review.•S TO C If V V *y* ^5 c >.*' , i t-»<n J~ c y * £• * o
> 5 S * ,' rn*E «^ *— (
w > . ' lH
^ Q UJ "-.*•
i: w "c ''*^ k +- - •-$ cc < ^:- o ^ &
CUD *^" t * I o "n '~ ro f f
E P (/) •— i-t/^ O TO „
„ (j ^_ 'C ro ^ o
u , ' 1 S •& § ™ S s,• '§111111> (/) «3 <= 0) CC Tl !/)
J= s
C 'Cm a.
00 4-1u £V. vs
i"* "'|K\y "•'' * QJ Jj^;-i- 1 UKJ* . | -o c ^t * I, i ro uj u
'W ^ M .£33
»-r .% ro .3)
,\ ;' — "-
^
" ' a 9^ O)Awarding grant funds for AGP 09-02 does not authorize, permit, or guarantee theconstruction of the project. Because the activity of awarding funds will not result in anyactivity that could cause a significant effect on the environment, the award of funding isexempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).When plans are submitted to the City or other lead permitting agency, the project willbe evaluated pursuant to CEQA. At this time, there is insufficient information todetermine whether the project will result in any significant environmental impacts.oh m
rl «Ho> m
;? §
<• i r>j•utv v>Planning and design of trails: Exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section43 QD ti \Modifying two flow-through raceway uni; into one re-circulatiri unit for propagationwhite sea bass.^l-g
i S *oo a:
- -^
TOai 4-,
3 |T33 £ -o
8 S •=z%s
<•§
... ,. ...UJ, ,
^ O
QJ
|
C
£•OJx:u
TOI
,3P
<G•o
T3Cnj
DOc
'cc(D
CL 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies)Avers Drooertv acquisition: Exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sectionro
« 5
! ofMurphy Trail By paBoardwalk and RosalTrail;15325 (Transfers of Ownership of Interest in Land to Preserve Existing NaturalConditions and Historical Resources), and Section 15313 (Acquisition of Lands forWildlife Conservation Purposes)Wetland restoration, trail building, and invasive species removal: awarding grant fundsfor AGP 09-02 does not authorize, permit, or guarantee the construction of the project.Because the activity of awarding funds will not result in any activity that could cause ai significant effect on the environment, the award of funding is exempt fromi environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). When plansare submitted to the City or other lead permitting agency, the project will be evaluatedpursuant to CEQA. At this time, there is insufficient information to determine whetherthe project will result in any significant environmental impacts.Revised: 8/27/09rsips, I
LO
oo" j
w
s
"i 1 i
TO O
£! 1 S
S ro « c >>. OL i_ 01 to nj it O O .. 'o^S^c s.|3? &ll
00 xi'-TJ ">STH 111 ill,
S. 1 •= S 1 S « a 81>*tj ^^Ii_: ?4-»TOk-i< ro <i s .5 i ro Q- ro i
« S0 c .2.*ti rt •*"*
&|^ !
'« 3 i '60 £ I
^zw C ~ |li =
o- c J)
.— Q ^
™ Oj?60 ro ^ i
— 1
!
S?<§
CO
z
LU
Q
Z111
<
LL
O
Zg
<2buj ii
UJ
(£UJ
Oz
o
CO
Q-
O
UJ
5:
c/p rampplicationst_ -
8>-l<$
CO
Hiro 2
rn CO
l>°|
I'S^
^ c rac .2 c
II m
0
oO
15
c
0)
E
.2 $^- 7^O)'^<ioO
-ro4-<C
OJ£
QJ
"5.
E
he Fund•a01•s(D
m
T3Cnj
"S
E
IQ.
Olu.
OlJ3
S
rsi
oo
•b
9!i