HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 97-59; Levy Residence; Coastal Development Permit (CDP) (6)r.
-4
c
CITY OF CARLSBAD
LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION
APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES)
(FOR DEPARTMENT (FOR DEPARTMENT r Administrative Permit - 2nd
Dwelling Unit
Administrative Variance
Coastal Development Permit
Conditional Use Permit
Condominium Permit
Environmental Impact
Assessment
General Plan Amendment
Hillside Development Permit
Local Coastal Plan Amendment
Master Plan
Non-Residential Planned
Development
Planned Development Permit
Planned Industrial Permit
Planning Commission
Determination
Precise Development Plan
Redevelopment Permit
Site Development Plan
Special Use Permit
Specific Plan
Obtain from Engineering Depanment
Tentative Tract Map 0
0
0 E Variance
Zone Change
List other amlications not
5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type)
ROt3€RT SUKW =ow c. Lmjv , 3 R.
MAILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS
C/OT\\E SEA BR\GHT COMPAbY
. PLAT H471
CEKT OF COMPufiace -
NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMllTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M.
A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMllTED PRIOR TO 4:OO P.M. a
Form 16 PAGE 1 OF 2
0
8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: MOUNTAIN vc STREET ADDRESS
BETWEEN 1 CARCSBAD =vi0
VIEW RE.
(NAME OF STREET)
ONTHE -1 SIDEOF I Mou~,rA,n,
(NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST)
AND PAc\P\C STRW
TOTAL FEE REQUIRED
9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 171
10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF
RESIDENTIAL UNITS
1 1 ) NUMBER OF EXISTING
RESIDENTIAL UNITS
3 mxWl
15) PROPOSED COMM IN.A./ SQUARE FOOTAGE
14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ PI SQUARE FOOTAGE
13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION
DATE FEE PAID
16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED 17) PROPOSED INCREASE IN E1 18) FAEFEEWER
20) EXISTING GENERAL
PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE
El E( 21 1 PROPOSED GENERAL
PLAN PLAN DESIGNATION
19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE
12- 24- 97
22) EXISTING ZONING 23) PROPOSED ZONING
24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING
STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS,
BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY
MEMEBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
RTY'fHAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT
FEE COhPUTATlON RECEIVED
I -- I I
DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED
RECEIVED BY: '
Form 16 PAGE 2 OF 2
b ..- --4
“J + SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FORM FOR ALL
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITS
+ APPLICATION CHECKLIST FOR SINGLE FAMILY
REGULAR AND MINOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT
PERMITS
(Applimfion~~~F$mdL~~~mik~~~handwfl
This supplemental application is to be filed for any development requiring a Coastal
Development Permit issued by the City of Carlsbad.
Please answer all questions. Where questions do not apply, please indicate “not
applicable” or ‘“/A.
1. GENERAL BACKGROUND
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
>c
Form 15
Do you wish to apply for:
1. A Minor Coastal Development Permit
2. A Regular Coastal Development Permit )(
Street address of proposed development
OVAIT Alu VI EW DRIVE. CARLSBAO
y- 0€5\6Mll5D 1 Assessor’s Parcel Number of proposed development
IS5 -101-65 $155-190- 13 (ASJCGSSOR’S OFFKG j-Rj&
Development Description: L I+& 70 BWUOARY 44. Yt;7
1. Briefly describe project: ‘CuIUsT RucT A hEK) bRi\&WA\/
Ab0 BY !LO OE3E NEU SlN6L.E FAM \LY ReSr DENcG
UJTH A T)c: ‘ThChkb GARAG /GUEST ROOE/1
L1
2. Estimated cost of development: ‘5z 5 OOQ
Describe the present land uses (i.e. Vacant land, single family homes,
apartments, offices, etc.) that surround he proposed development to the:
North: HAB\fAT SET BACK ENA \risifi LAGOOM
South: \rb~CAr\, T COT
East: NAB\YP,T 5m BACK..
West: HANTA-T sm EA~ 13 U6blb
Is project located within a 100 year Aood plain?
R.R. TWC. Ks I CARLSWb BLVD
VITTA LAGQOd
0 Yes [XI No?
1973 ARMY &RPS ~l,Oy i4As FGOOb PLAIN Q Eebr 9$(c.p/ SNcL)
\955 SvQY BY bbTE $ks=. khs FCOOO pLAjd e &4’@0Q EMCC)
.
II. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
A. Are there existing structures on the property? Dyes 4 No
If yes, please describe.
~
B. Will any existing structure be demolished? Dyes a NO
Will any existing structure be removed/demolished? 0 Yes No
If yes to either question, describe the extent of the demolition or removal,
including the relocation site, if applicable (also show on plans).
111. LOT COVERAGE
A. Existing and Proposed
Existinq New ProDosed Total
Building Coverage 0 sq. ft. 25048 sq. ft. 5048 sq. ft.
Landscaped Area NA. sq. ft. \2,623 sq. ft. 12,623 sq. ft.
Unimproved Area
(Left Natural) NSA. sq.ft. 57064 sq.ft. 57064 sq.ft.
B. Parking: Number of existing spaces a
Number of new spaces proposed 4
Existing/Proposed TOTAL: 4
Number of total spaces required
Number of covered spaces
Number of uncovered spaces
Number of standard spaces
Number of compact spaces
Is tandem parking existing?
Is tandem parking proposed?
C. Grade 'Alteration:
Is any grading proposed?
z
N. A-
If yes, please complete
1. Amount of cut cu. yds.
2. Amount of fill 7 5 cu. yds.
3. Maximum height of fill slope I feet
Form 15 9/96 Page 2 of 7
4. Maximum height of cut slope 5 feet
5. Amount of import or export cu. yds.
IV.
V.
6. Location of borrow or disposal site
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Submit Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Part I with Regular Coastal
Development Permits; check with Planning Staff regarding Minor Coastal
Development Permits and Single Family Regular Coastal Development Permits for
any environmental review requirements.
GENERAL APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
(For Single Family Regular and Minor Coastal Development Permits; Regular
Coastal Development Permits covered under separate handout)
A. Site Plan: Four (4) copies for a Minor Coastal Development Permit, four (4)
copies for a Single Family Regular Coastal Development Permit prepared on
a 24” x 36 sheet@) folded to 8%” x 11”. The site plan shall include the
following information:
1. General
a.
b.
C.
Name and address of applicant, engineer and/or architect, etc.
Location, size and use of all easements.
Dimensions and locations of: access, both pedestrian and vehicular,
showing service areas and points on ingress and egress, off-street
parking and loading areas showing location, number and typical
dimension of spaces, and wheel stops.
Distance between building and/or structures.
Building setbacks (front, rear and sides).
Location, height and materials of walls and fences.
A summary table indicating the following information (if applicable to
the application):
(1) Site acreage
(2) (3) Proposed land use
(4) Total building coverage
(5) Building square footage
(6) Percent landscaping
(7) Number of parking spaces
(8)
(9)
d.
e.
f.
g. Dimensions/location of signs.
h.
Existing zone and land use
Square footage of open/recreational space (if applicable)
Cubic footage of storage space (if applicable)
B. Building elevations (all sides of all buildings) and floor plans: Four (4) copies
for a Minor Coastal Development Permit and four (4) copies for a Single
Family Regular Coastal Development Permit, prepared on 24” x 36” sheets
folded to 8%’’ x 11“ size. The building and floor plans shall include the
following:
1.
2.
Location and size of storage areas (if applicable)
All buildings, structure, walls and/or fences, signs and exterior lights.
Form 15 9/96 Page 3 of 7
Y
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION
PROJECTNAME: LEVY % SIWENCE OFF M7N V IEd DRIVE
Please describe fully the proposed project by application type. Include any details
necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project.
You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding
the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if
necessary.
Description/Explanation:
Project Description 10196 Page 1 of 1
t- -*r -?-Zy-$ *' - 1 REC'D FROM 6)- i; c-mm 7SO*o(j
ACCOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
I I I I
I
RECEIPT MO; 49412 NOT VALID UNLESS VALIDATED BY
@ Rintedonraycledppper.
- "~
CITY OF CARLSBAD i \ i:c I 1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
434-2867
fl( 1 REC'D FROM ((hii iz (i {( I+ *I ,?\ DATE ",
# J I
ACCOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
@ Rintcd on recycled paper.
NOT VALID UNLESS VALIDATED BY
CASH REGISTER TOTAL I
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NO.
I I
4322 Sea Bright Place + Carlsbad, CA 92008 + Telephone/FAX 619-720-0098
b 4
BY
SIGNED
INSTRUCTIONS TO SENDER
1. KEEP WHITE COPY. 2 SEND YELLOW AND PINK COPIES INTACT
INSTRUCTIONS TO RECEIVER;
I. WRITE REPLY. 2. KEEP PINK COPY, RETURN COPYTO SENDER
PRELIMINARY REvlEw APPLICATION
PROJECTNAME: &Eb+A V\S-rA LR GOON LTS VIA hN\( IEW DR.
MAILING ADDRESS: 43Zz SEARR \G HT k.cA RL3W D,CA 9mz
PHONE NUMBER: \9-720- 009% ( PH$ FAX)
PROJECT ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) (APN): t S5-iOi - 65 f 155 d 190 - 17
APPLICANT NAME: %OK SoKuP (FORTOH N LEVY\
WOULD YOU LIKE TO ORALLY PRESENT YOUR PROPOSAL TO YOUR ASSIGNED STAFF
PLANNEFUENGINEER? yEsm
40
PLEASE LIST THE NAMES OF ALL STAFF MEMBERS YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY SPOKEN TO
REGARDING THIS PROJECT. IF NONE, PLEASE SO STATE.
TthENcJ
LA1 OTC IK
FOR CITY USE ONLY
PROJECT NUMBER pw or-&? /
FEE REQUIRED/DATE FEE PAID: IaJ-, od /(I9 -23-57riiS 3-lfTD-
RECEIPT NO.: 2
RECEIVEDBY: 1/,bvr
f
Staff would like to know what information you primarily want from this review. With this known, we can focus most of our attention on
researching and answering your main questions(s). Please check the
one or two boxes below which best describes the information you
would like us to concentrate on, and/or check the box marked
"other" and tell us in your own words what information you would like from us.
SITEDESIGN:
Focus is on reviewing issues such as development standards (setbacks, building height, etc.), hillside compliance, landscaping, signage, open space requirements,
and other physical aspects of zoning. Plans adequately illustrating these features are
needed for review.
0 LANDUSE: Focus is on determining the compatibility of the proposed land use with the existing
general plan and zoning designations, determining whether staff could support a
general plan amendment or zone change, and determining compatibility of the
proposed land use with surrounding land uses.
0 ARcHlTE(=TuRE:
Focus is on establishing quality architecture and checking its compatibility with the
surrounding area and against any applicable guidelines or plans. Building elevations
or other architectural information are needed for review.
0 ZONING I'NTERPRETATION
Focus is on interpreting any aspects of the zoning ordinance.
ENGINEERINGSTANDARDS
Focus is on reviewing all engineering-related issues, such as grading, drainage,
circulation and traffic, street vacations, easements, subdivisions, etc.
moTHER: In the space below, please list any other issues you would like us to review.
4322 Sea Bright Place + Carlsbad, CA 92008 + Telephone/FAX 619-720-0098
L
V BY I
INSTRUCTIONS TO SENDER
I. KEEP WHITE COW 2 SENDYELLOWAND PINK COPIES INTACT
INSTRUCTIONS TO RECEIVER.
1. WRITE REPLY 2. KEEP PINK COW, RETURN COPY TO SENDER.
0
0
0
tn
- N 0 0 P 0
I
! -.
VI 0, 0 0 w P 0 0
i-- 4. . 1 ...... .. .. f
I I I
... ;.. . .... - .
1. . -.
I 4 .......
- - ./' .
. .. .
L
='I p= 2,LZ /
4322 Sea Bright Place + Carlsbad, CA 92008 4 Telephone/FAX 760-720-0098
SIGNED
INSTRUCTIONS TO SENDER
I. KEEP WHlTE COW 2 SEND YELLOW AND PINK COPIES INTACT
INSTRUCTIONS TO RECEIVER,
1 WRITE REPLY 2 KEEP PINK COPY, RETURN COPY TO SENDER
b
i i
,t' c .
4.f / , CONCEPTUAL LEVEL f
The recreational enhancement proposals set forth in this study are very conceptual in
nature and would require further environmental, planning, engineering, and survey/title
work for more in depth feasibility analysis and ultimate project development. For
example, one of the proposed projects calls for realignment of State Street into a "T"
intersection at Carlsbad Boulevard. Although from a preliminary standpoint this appears
feasible, further engineering, circulation studies and the necessary environmental permits
(i.e. impact to wetlands) may ultimately prove to be fatal flaws for the project. These
types of "ISSUES" are identified and discussed in each project description that follows.
Additionally, there may also be some other unforeseen issues that exist.
A LTE R N AT1 VES .
As a further refinement from the October '91 study, three (3) options for development
were explored (Alternative 1, 2, and 3). Alternative 1 proposes the least level cf
development with corresponding least cost. Alternative 3 proposes the most amenities
at the greatest cost. Alternative 3 also has more potential issues associated with it (i.e.
environmental, engineering) that would need to be explored/resolved.
COSTS
Costs estimated for each project are also preliminary and based on concepts only. Unit
costs used are based on previous similar projects in some cases, while other figures are
simply allowances based on staff's past experience and judgment.
TOTAL COST FOR ALL PROJECTS IN THE ALTERNATIVE 1 $2,690,000
HOSP GROVE/BUENA VISTA LAGOON STUDY ALTERNATIVE 2 $3,225,000
AREA (INCLUDING CONSULTANT STUDIES) ALTERNATIVE 3 $5,8OO,C90
ORIGINAL $1 1,290,00@
Costs are broken down on a per project basis in Section II "Project Descriptions." In addition,
the basis for the costs is found in Appendix A.
NOTE: Costs for environmental mitigation (if required) are not included because they are
unknown at this time. If costs occur, it may be possible to pay for the mitigation out of the
"contingency" percentage that has been added to each project cost.
2
,
u 4
s'
/'
L
0
...
,
OVERFLOW LIMITS LEGEND:
INTERMEDIATE
REGIONAL FLOOD
M-/- 2-50 ___ - MILES ABOVE MOUTH a-, CROSS SECTION
400 ________GROUND ELEVATION IN FEET
ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL
CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET AND 2 FEET
NOTES:
LIMITS OF OVERFLOW INDICATED MAY VARY FROM
ACTUAL LOCATIONS ON GROUND, AS EXPLAINED
IN THE REPORT.
DATE OF TOPOGRAPHY 1960 AND 1972
BASE TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS FURNISHED BY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY - DEPT OF SANITATION
AND FLOOD CONTROL AND THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD.
AREAS OUTSIDE THE FLOOD PLAIN
MAYBE SUBJECT TO FLOODING IFROM
LOCAL RUNOFF. w
SCALE IN FEET
600 I200
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
FLOOD PLAIN INFORMATION
BUENA VISTA CREEK
SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
FLOODED AREAS
JULY 1973
PLATE 3
NOTE:
COASTAL BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS
APPLY ONLY LANDWARD OF THE
SHORELINE SHOWN ON THIS MAP.
?
2 n 0 rn zs 4 c i 5
N c I x r 0
m 4 I
s
. .-
--1
\'
p,s" . - - !!
t +$ *
e.
B. DRAINAGE, EROSION, SEDIMENTATION, HABITAT
(1) BUENA VISTA LAGOON <-=f
Developments located along the first row of lots hordcring Dueiiii
Vista Lagoon, including the parcel at the mcuth of the Lagoon,
shall be designated for residential development at a density of up
to 4 dwelling units per acre. Proposed development in this area
shall be required to submit topographic and vegetation mapping and
analysis, as well as soils reports, as part of the development
permit application. Such information shall be &)r0-<?~:2e?; in
addition to any required Environmental Impact Xenort., ai;d shall be
prepared by- qualified professionals and in s~i:~Cl.cit?;~t 6ctx'L tc,
locate the boundary of wetland and upland areas .-r:*? Z.;.L'~-~S GE
slopes in excess of 25%. Topographic maps shall kr: ?ab?~Ltt:C ,ZL i
scale sufficient to determine the appropriatc dzvzlo:>c51? ~~25,
generally not less than a scale of 1" = 100' sit11 B topgL-3phic
contour interval of 5 feet, and shall include an overlay
delineating the location of the proposed project. The lagoon and
wetland area shall be delineated and criteria =sed to i2entify any
wetlands existing on the site shall be those r~f Scc'cL~,i 23121 cf
the Coastal Act and based upon the standards c~f t:.c LCC'EP C~astel
- -_ _".- -. - - c_
.-_
i- - - - _. __ ~ -_.
Program Mapping Regulations. Mapping of we'ils~iis as:?: ?i'-i,ig c;
development shall be done in consultation ancj sukjzct: to tke
approval of the Department of Fish and Game. ij -3- .I e 1 c. ;~:~i en I: s h ol 1
be clustered to preserve open space for i-inbitzt pr~kcctioz,
Minimum setbacks of at least 100 feet from x~.-1andc-/'i.a~occ. :-hail
be required in all development, in order to 'c:.iffer siicl:i-- sen::iti.ve
habitat area from intrusion. Such buffer S.TE,?.S, r?c .,:e:.:.
open space areas required in permitted de-Jclcp::ie:,L '23 1.;:-c
habitat areas, shall be permanently preserveci for %ahitat uszs
through provision of an open space easement as h con2i-cLai? 01
project approval. In the event that a wetlan3 area is SG~CC,:~S, Ly
steep slopes (in excess of 25%) which will act as a ~atural buffer
to the habitat area, a buffer area of less thsri I00 feet in width
may be permitted. The density of any permitted developmcat ::?.all
be based upon the net developable area of the parcel, exciudi-ng
any portion of a parcel which is in wetlands lagoon. As
specified in (a), a density credit may be provided €or that
portion of the parcel which is in steep slopes.
Storm drain'alignments as proposed in the Czrlsbnii ~astzr
Drainage Plan which would be carried through OK empty into Buena
Vista Lagoon shall not be permitted, unless slich ir;7rcvesents
comply with the requirements of Sections 30230, 3G731, 30233, z%::r:
30235 of the Costal Act by maintaining or eilh3,;cing th2
functional capacity of the Lagoon in a manner acce~ti7bli3 co the
State Department of Fish and Game.
Land divisions shall only be permitted on parclzls boxGzrii?q the
Lagoon pursuant to a single planned developmen': permit fer the
entire original parcel.
r4 -e* +we- -)_. . B. (2) BATIQUITOS~LAGOON WATERSHED - Deve1o;;r nt lo - -' c ~ L ._ tir> .A i dL
--* .,-. 1-5 (generally referred to as the Savage ~EC:?~?L.I'~:-')
designated for a maximum density of developxicnc ci I -1
gross acre, excluding wetlands subject to irIci:ciAc: 3s -,:-~viiic< ir;
(h) below. Development shall take place acco::d;nq =o chi
ATTACV :!TX'i 2 ( G 51' 12
4322 Sea Bright Place + Carlsbad, CA 92008 + TelephonejFAX 619-720-0098
SIGNED
INSTRUCTIONS TO SENDER,
1, KEEP WHITE COPY 2. SEND YELLOWAND PINK COPIES INTACT
INSTRUCTIONS TO RECEIVER;
1. WRITE REPLY. 2. KEEP PINKCOPY, RETURN COPYTO SENDER.