The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP 00-10; Pavilion The Forum The; Site Development Plan (SDP)• svP oo-ID · • PRELIMINARY REVIEW APPLICATION PROJECT NAME: ~~£.. OWNER (Print or type) * 'fi>~>'tt•t g'-R~Ii:~ i>R.o PS.~.:'t's.£S Address g 1,;,0'-t CA~,-o~ s,.~E~'l City,State&Zip <:;"A,.s 'Di&.$:0, CA '1Z.10lP Telephone (~I Cf)'So c-0~8'<' Signature ( s-~c o.~k•V Print Name r-\C..L.. \<"' ~ ~Si&..(.... APPLICANT (Print or type) \1A"1~~c;. t ~<;;<;o<::.\~.S l CA~oL..-,.,.;) Address \ pt S'PEc:.TR\Jvf ~~~-\:)«,. ~1.. aq City, State & Zip LA I<;~ f'o~£ST, CA ~ Z..C..3 0 Telephone (9'lct) S ~~-() cg c 0 Signature c:~ ~ • .k. . Print Name CA 12. U'~ c::;:-~~KA ):..c&:.l<, *Owner's signature indicates permission to conduct a preliminary review for a development proposal. PROJECT ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) (APN):_..;;::2:....:S":........::::;S_-....:;o.....:l......:'2..=---....:;(:).....,.3"--".._. --=o:;_'i~---- DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL (ADD ATTACHMENT IF NECESSARY): $U B'S-c A"-"\ A\..... ~t4 ~OR.~A t..><-te.. \:x HI~~\ WOULD YOU LIKE TO ORALLY PRESENT YOUR PROPOSAL TO YOUR ASSIGNED STAFF PLANNER/ENGINEER? D PLEASE LIST THE NAMES OF ALL STAFF MEMBERS YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY SPOKEN TO REGARDING THIS PROJECT. IF NONE, PLEASE SO STATE. l· ~' STE.JE;. W£-s..,..~ lA. ~ FOR CITY USE ONLY y ~ f" Q?J_.-~d. PROJECT NUMBER: S 'DY Oo ·<:ir\ FEEREQUIRED/DATEFEEPAID:tp'--~-'-(o~Q __ .Lj.!....----~_8_-_·()_3 _________ _ RECEIPT NO.:-~------------------------- RECEIVED BY: t!J.tM,J lj--t' dM.._ Fire FRM0025 02/03 PAGE3of3 • S J)P {){) -lC> • City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Applicant: MAYERS & ASSOCIATES Description Amount PRE03022 460.00 Receipt Number: R0034111 Transaction Date: 04/28/2003 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 7493 460.00 Transaction Amount: 460.00 ::3662 04/28/03 0002 01 02 CGP 460.00 04/26/2000 15:27 84/26/2eae 14:4S 4-:28-200 :2:40PM 6195230851 MEL ' 619.9 Kl. ~~NNING SYSTEMS 780 9315744 PAGE 04 PAGE 02185 P.2 CITY 'OJI CAI"LSBAD LAND USE A&VI&W APPIJCATION 11 APPLICATIONS APPliED FOR! (CHeCJC $0XES) lFOR OE'A"TMINT IFOA DI!F'AI'ITMENT USt!OIIILV)_ USI!ONLYJ 0 Administrative F'ermlt • 2nd 0 :PI.anned Industrial Permit Dwelling Uni' 0 Administrative Variance 0 'Piannlng·commfsslon ~ :ceterm I nation Coastal Development Ptrmit C()PO(i)3 7 0 precise Development. Plen 0 Con~ltlonal Use Perm·it 0 Redevelopm.tnt P'etmit D COt'ldomlnl.um Permit ~ Slte Development Plan .50 'P·oOD/0 ttl Erwlroru:nent•l Impact 0 Special Use Permit Asaeaament 0 General Plen Amendment 0 Specific Plan 0 Hillside Developmen~ Permit 0 :iFtl'l.fltiY• Ptl'lll '1411' Otnair'l fro~ Engineering "'~''""~tnt 0 Local Coestel Plan Amendment 0 tentative Tttct Map 0 Matter Plan .. 0 V!!rlance 0 Non-Re3identi111! Ptenned 0 Zone Change ; Development 0 Pl•nned Otvtlopment Permit 0 t,.ist other fSI)J;»Iications not sceclfred 21 ASSESSOPI PARCEL NO(SJ .: "2.Sc:i -0\\ -\'2. 1 \} ,\S' .; i 'Z. S $ -b'2. \ -0 S' • • • 0 8 3} PAOJECTNAME: ~·-~-·~~--?,-~~'-~~'~oN~--·----------------~~--------------------- 41 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 2(,0. ooo SQ"Mf; S::.,er:· QESnu. C£..:11£\2. 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Tyj)e) ftok-0..1\l I ~C.. ~\ fE Co-M~~.Jl11 et U..C 61 APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) ~ Stanley E. Thoma~ · M~ILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS 1101 ~~ ~ t-10 p.e1'l(\,. 300 Village Green Circle, S-200 CITY AND ST~Te. ZIP TELEPHONE . CITY AND STATE ZIP TeLEPHONE SIGNATUREi 71 BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOTE: 'A PROPOSED PRDJiiCT REQUIIaNG MULTIPLE AF'PUCATIONS Bi jJLID, MUST 81 SUBMITTI!D PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A. PROPOSED PROJECT AIQUIAINQ ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, M"ST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 ft.M. o;;v crs-oo1 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Applicant: THOMAS, STANLEY E. Set Id: S000000427 Description CDP00037 SDP00010 Transaction Pay Type Method -------------------- Payment Check Payment Check Payment Check 6389 6388 6390 Receipt 19,500.00 6,770.00 1,030.00 Transaction Amount: 27,300.00 CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 /05/00 0001 01 02 C-PRMT 27300-00 .. ' 86/19/2888 86:54 B4/26/20ae 14:4e 4~26-~ :2! 41 I'M 6195238851 MEL ' 619.9 MEL PLANNING SYS~ 780 9315744 PAGE 05 PA<£ Bj/B!S F'.3 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: S}~ C04w6cz. Q~ ON THE ~1)~;:;;: I.......:(~"'O==:R::T;,:=H.:.:!S~OU:=::i::-:H-:, E:":'A~ST=-.~w=Es:o::n:-1 BETWEEN [ EL. Ut.4.,JO i2.6AJ,...J INAME OF STREETI 9) LOCAL FACIL.ITIES MANAG.EMENT ZONE J 1 0) PROPOSED NUMSER OF LOTS r-:-1 11) NUMSEA OF EXISTING rJl.12.) PROPO.SEO NUMBER OF r:J1 L.!._j RESIOSNTIAI. UNITS . L£_j . AESIO~NTIAI. UNITS ~ 13) TYPE OF SUBOIVISION ~ 14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE"/ rn 15) P~OF'OSED COMM lzt,o,~oo SQUARE'FOOTAGE SQUAREFOO'T'AG! 161 PERCENTAGE OF PROPOS~O ~ 17) PRO,OSiiO INC~eASE till {lf zoq 1 8} PRQPOSiO SEW!A B PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE AOT . . : I USAGE IN EDU 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE ~ 20) EXISTI~O GENERAL ~ 211 PAOPOSEO GENERAL !wl"l PLAN PlAN O!!IGNATION 221 EXISTING ZONING lvc..l23l ~ftOPOSED.ZONING I tJIA I 241 IN ~HE PROCESS OF REVIEWING nus APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STA'FF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, D~SIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMEBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MSM9ER.S TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPeRTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. 1/WE CONSENT TO ENTAY FOR THIS PURPOSE ~~-~.Qs;>. at.t.~.,'· SIGNATURE c;:_6Q _e.,.,+.,;. ell..:.~ L,f-e CD .. ,.,'"''·~ f-,.:s .I...L<:_ FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION APPLICAllON TYPE TOTAL FEE ReOUIIUO DATE f:Ee PAID Form 16 FEER'i:OUIAEO J RECEIVED DATE STAMeJWf.PtOc;. tfiORECEIVED CITY OF CARLSBAD AECEI~ . RECEIPT NO. . .._I ___ : ....... !. PAGE 2 OF 2 • PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECTNAME: ~IIA~ jt( lheor$~~ APPLICANT-NAME:~ ~~~JE!!:>. Please dE?scribe fully the proposed project by application type. Include any details necessary to ~dequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also mclude any b~ckground information_ and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropnateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. The proposed project is a 260,00 square foot community commercial retail center to be located on the southeast side of Calle Barcelona between Leucadia Boulevard and El Camino Real. The center is located in LFMP Zone 24, at the southern end of the Green Valley Master Plan area. The proposed center will include eight buildings, three of which are proposed as restaurants. Building One will be two stories in height, and will be served by a two-story parking garage. A pedestrian trail is located along the eastern property boundary, adjacent to the riparian open space located along El Camino Real. Pavilion at La Costa utilizes a Main Street theme for the project. Retail shops line both sides of a central street with the outlying pad building restaurants complementing the centers theme. Included in the project are a standard parking area, a parking garage, and a trailhead parking for access to the pedestrian trail. Access to the project consists of three entrances to the site, one being an existing signalized entrance adjacent to tl1e Green Valley Assisted Living Community. A parking deck provides easy access from behind the two-story retail building to the retail shops located on the second floor. Vehicle access to the parking deck is located at the southern end of the site and a second access point is at the southeastern end of the site. The project 'Main Street' is lined with trees, decorative streetlights with banners, outdoor furniture, hardscape and landscape all along an enhanced paved 'Main Street'. Each retail shop has an individual identity, which is accented with metal and cloth awnings, individual signage, and a change in fa~ade building material to keep a pedestrian friendly theme. The architectural vocabulary consists of stone veneer at the storefront bases, stone and tile columns at the shop entries, tower elements, mission barrel tile at tlle sloped roofs, ceramic tile accents, and exterior cement plaster at the main building walls and parapets. Metal reveals, plaster reveals, and medallions are part of the fa~ade accents throughout the project. Trellis, decorative columns, and vertical trellis with landscape are located at the building elevations. All exterior elevations vary in height, color, and depth. Pedestrian walkways are located throughout the site to give access to parking areas to the shops, the parking garage, and the pedestrian trail. These walkways are identified with architectural towers, which act as visual focal points throughout the project. Outdoor dinning areas are provided at the restaurants along Calle Barcelona and at the two-story retail building. Project Description 1 0/96 Page 1 of 1 • 1 i ty of Carlsbad 1200 Carlsbad! Village Drive carlsbad tA ! 92008 Applicant: PLANNING SYSTEMS C}vuxvlt--v Description PRE99075 Amount 420.00 Receipt Number: R0007906 (I)S? 11/09/99 0001 01 C-PRMT Transaction : 11/09/1999 Description Amount Method Pay Type --------------------------420.00 ----------31089 Check Payment Transaction Amount: 420.00 I I 02 420- -• City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Applicant: THOMAS, STANLEY E. Set Id: S000000427 Description CDP00037 SDP00010 Total: Carlsbad CA Amount 19,500.00 7,800.00 27,300.00 92008 2027 07./.05/00 0001. 01 02 Receipt Number: R0013480 Transaction Date: 07/05/2000 Pay Type Method Payment Check Payment Check Payment Check Description 6389 6388 6390 Amount 19,500.00 6,770.00 1,030.00 Transaction Amount: 27,300.00 2"'?300~~00 ' \ .. Commonwealth Land Title Company 1455 Frazee Road, Suite 600 San Diego, California 92108 Issuing Policies Of 0 Commonwealth LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Commonwealth Land Title Company 1455 Frazee Road, Suite 600 San Diego, CA 92108 Attn: Your Ref: Pat Lee 1029082-PL Property Address: Vacant land Our No: 1029082-4 Title Officer: Edwin J. Kezar, Jr. Helen G. Wilson Direct (619) 686-6000 Fax (619) 299-7031 THIRD AMENDED PRELIMINARY REPORT Dated as of June 14, 2000 at 7:30A.M. In response to the above referenced application for a policy of title insurance, Commonwealth Land Title Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a Policy or Policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception below or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage of said Policy or Policies are set forth in Exhibit A attached. Copies of the Policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. Please read the exceptions shown or referred to below and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Exhibit A of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land. CLTA Preliminary Report Fonn (Rev. 111/95) 1029082 Page 2 SCHEDULE A The form of policy of title insurance contemplated by this report is: A CLTA Owners Policy An ALTA Loan Policy The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this report is: AFEE Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: Continuing Life Communities LLC, a California limited liability company The land referred to in this Report is situated in the State of California, County of San Diego, and is described as follows: SEE EXHffiiT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF CLTA Preliminary Report Form (Rev. 1/1/95) 1029082 Page 3 PARCEL A: EXHIBIT "A" Lot 3 of CITY OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 92-08, GREEN VALLEY, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. _____ , as filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, dated as File No. ----------- The above legal has not yet been created, but is a proposed legal description under a proposed map. The map must be recorded and all requirements in relation to the creation of the above legal description must be met prior to insurance. PARCELB: Lot 4 of CITY OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 92-08, GREEN VALLEY, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. ----, as filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, dated ----as File No. ___ __ The above legal has not yet been created, but is a proposed legal description under a proposed map. The map must be recorded and all requirements in relation to the creation of the above legal description must be met prior to insurance. CLTA Preliminary Report Form (Rev. 111/95) 1029082 Page 4 SCHEDULE B At the date hereof Exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed exceptions and exclusions in said policy form would be as follows: ITEMS AFFECTING PARCEL A: 1. Property taxes, including general and special taxes, personal property taxes, if any, and any assessments collected with taxes, to be levied for the fiscal year 2000 -2001 which are a lien not yet payable. 2. Property taxes, including general and special taxes, personal property taxes, if any, and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 1999-2000. Each Installment Amount: $244.02 Both Paid Code Area: 09134 Assessment No.: 255-011-13 Affects: A portion of the land described herein and other land. 3. Property taxes, including general and special taxes, personal property taxes, if any, and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 1999-2000. Each Installment Amount: $93.63 Both Paid Code Area: 09135 Assessment No.: 255-011-12 Affects: A portion of the land described herein and other land. 3. Property taxes, including general and special taxes, personal property taxes, if any, and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 1999-2000. Each Installment Amount: $66,603.30 Botht Paid Code Area: 09135 Assessment No.: 255-011-15 Affects: A portion of the land described herein and other land. 4. Property taxes, including general and special taxes, personal property taxes, if any, and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 1999-2000. Each Installment Amount: $64.68 Both Paid Code Area: 09141 Assessment No.: 255-021-05 Affects: A portion of the land described herein and other land. CLTA Preliminary Report Form (Rev. 111195) 1029082 Page 5 5. Property taxes, including general and special taxes, personal property taxes, if any, and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 1999-2000. Each Installment Amount $ll4,790.34 Both Paid Code Area: 09152 Assessment No.: 255-021-06 Affects: A portion of the land described herein and other land. 6. Property taxes, including general and special taxes, personal property taxes, if any, and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 1999-2000. Each Installment Amount: $24.78 Both Paid Code Area: 09134 Assessment No.: 255-021-07 Affects: A portion of the land described herein and other land. 7. Property taxes, including general and special taxes, personal property taxes, if any, and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 1999-2000. Each Installment Amount: $3,707.07 Both Paid Code Area: 09135 Assessment No.: 255-021-08 Affects: A portion of the land described herein and other land. 8. Intentionally deleted. 9. Supplemental or escaped assessments of property taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California. 10. Covenants, conditions and restrictions (deleting any restrictions indicating any preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin) as set forth in the document Recorded: September 5, 1929, in Book 1660, Page 476 of Deeds Said covenants, conditions and restrictions provide that a violation thereof shall not defeat or render invalid the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust made in good faith and for value. 11. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in document Granted to: Purpose: Recorded: Affects: La Costa Acres Corporation, a corporation Irrigation pipe line and ditches, telephone, telegraph and electric lines September 5, 1929, in Book 1660, Page 476 of Deeds The exact location and extent of said easement is not disclosed of record. CLTA Preliminary Report Form (Rev. 111195) 1029082 Page 6 12. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in document Granted to: Purpose: Recorded: Affects: San Diego Gas and Electric Company Public utilities, ingress and egress December 23, 1948, in Book 3059, Page 321 of Official Records Portions of the herein described land, the exact location of which can be determined by examination of the above-mentioned instrument, which contains a complete legal description of the affected portions of said land 13. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in document Granted to: Purpose: Recorded: Affects: County of San Diego Public road purposes February 28, 1950, in Book 3518, Page 226 of Official Records Portions of the herein described land, the exact location of which can be determined by examination of the above-mentioned instrument, which contains a complete legal description of the affected portions of said land Said instrument also grants the right to extend and maintain drainage structures and excavation and embankment slopes beyond the limits of said right of way where required for construction and maintenance. 14. Intentionally deleted. 15. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in document Purpose: Recorded: Affects: The privilege and right to extend drainage structures and excavation and embankment slopes beyond the limits of Road Survey No. 1800-1, where required for the construction and maintenance of said road November 28, 1969 as File Nos. 217326 and 217327, both of Official Records The exact location and extent of said easement is not disclosed of record. 16. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in document Purpose: Recorded: Affects: The privilege and right to extend drainage structures and excavation and embankment slopes beyond the limits of Road Survey No. 1800-1, where required for the construction and maintenance of said Road February 16, 1970 as File No. 27777 of Official Records The exact location and extent of said easement is not disclosed of record. CLTA Preliminary Report Fonn (Rev. 111195) 1029082 Page 7 17. A Notice of the San Diego County Local Agency Formation Commission Certificate of Completion for the "San Dieguito Reorganization", Ref. No. R085-9, recorded September 5, 1986 as File No. 86-390249 of Official Records. 18. Intentionally deleted. 19. Intentionally deleted. 20. A document subject to all the terms, provisions and conditions therein contained. Entitled: Dated: Executed by: Recorded: Payment of a Public Facilities Fee November 6, 1992 Carlsbad Partners, Ltd., a partnership and the City of Carlsbad, a municipal corporation December 10, 1992 as File No. 1992-0793137 of Official Records Reference is made to said document for full particulars. 21. The fact that said land lies within the San Dieguito Union High School District Proposed Boundary of CFD 94-1, as disclosed by instrument recorded June 22, 1994 as File No. 1994-0397507 of Official Records. 22. The fact that said land lies within the Community Facilities District #94-3 of the San Dieguito Union High School District as disclosed by instrument recorded August 11, 1994 as File No. 1994-0488541 of Official Records. 23. The fact that said land lies within the Community Facilities District #95-2 of the San Dieguito Union High School District as disclosed by instrument recorded November 16, 1995 as File No. 1995-0521631 of Official Records. 24. Intentionally deleted. 25. A document subject to all the terms, provisions and conditions therein contained. Entitled: Recorded: Notice of Waiver Concerning Proximity of the Planned or Existing El Camino Real and La Costa Avenue Transportation Corridor(s) Case No. : CT 92-08-Green Valley Tract map May 22, 1996 as File No. 1996-0259560 of Official Records Reference is made to said document for full particulars. 26. Notice of Special Tax Lien for Community Facilities District No. 95-2 of the San Dieguito Union High School District recorded September 23, 1996 as File No. 1996-0482282 of Official Records. CLTA Preliminary Report Form (Rev. 111195) 1029082 Page 8 27. A document subject to all the terms, provisions and conditions therein contained. Entitled: Dated: Executed by: Recorded: Improvement, Reimbursement and Easement Agreement December 15, 1996 Carlsbad Partners, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership and Encinitas Town Center Associates, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability Company January 22, 1997 as File No. 1997-0029022 of Official Records Reference is made to said document for full particulars. 28. Covenants, conditions and restrictions (deleting any restrictions indicating any preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin) as set forth in the document Recorded: February 27, 1998 as File No. 1998-0105197 of Official Records 29. Covenants, conditions and restrictions (deleting any restrictions indicating any preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin) as set forth in the document Recorded: February 27, 1998 as File No. 1998-0105198 of Official Records 30. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, and any other obligations secured thereby. Amount: Dated: Trustor: Trustee: Beneficiary: Recorded: Affects: $23,000,000.00 June 25, 1998 Continuing Life Communities LLC, a California limited liability company Equitable Deed Company, a California corporation Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, a national banking association June 29, 1998 as File No. 1998-0398422 of Official Records The hereindescribed land and other land. 31. An agreement to which reference is hereby made for full particulars, Dated: By and between: Regarding: Recorded: July 9, 1998 Continuing Life Communities LLC, a California limited liability company and City of Carlsbad Hold Harmless Agreement, Geological Failure November 24, 1998 as File No. 1998-0762384 of Official Records CLTA Preliminary Report Form (Rev. 111/95) 1029082 Page 9 32. An agreement to which reference is hereby made for full particulars, Dated: By and between: Regarding: Recorded: July 9, 1998 Continuing Life Communities LLC, a California limited liability company and City of Carlsbad Hold Harmless Agreement, Drainage November 24, 1998 as File No. 1998-0762385 of Official Records 33. An easement for the purposes shown below and rights incidental thereto as shown or as offered for dedication on the recorded map shown below. Map No: Easement purpose: Affects: Carlsbad Tract No. 92-08, Green Valley Public trail and drainage As shown on said Map 34. The Company will require that it be provided with the following with respect to the California limited liability company named below: (A) A copy of its operating agreement and any amendments thereto; (B) A certified copy of its articles of organization (LLC-1), any certificate of correction (LLC-11), certificate of amendment (LLC-2), or restatement of articles or organization (LLC-10); and (C) A copy of the current Statement of Information form (LLC-12) filed with the Secretary of State. Limited Liability Company: Continuing Life Communities LLC, a California limited liability company 35. Information in possession of the Company indicates that a division of land, as defmed in Government Code Section 66424, is contemplated in the current transaction, or has been divided from a previously existing parcel of land, and involves the land described in this report. Such division of land or contemplated division of land, would appear to fall within the purview of the Subdivision Map Act (commencing with Government Code Section 6641 0), and as a prerequisite to the issuance of any title insurance at least one of the following requirements must be accomplished to the Company's satisfaction: (A) That a Final (Tract) Map has been recorded in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and related ordinances; (B) That a Parcel Map has been recorded in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and related ordinances; or CLTA Preliminary Report Form (Rev. 111195) 1029082 Page 10 (C) That a Certificate of Compliance as provided for in the Subdivision Map Act has been recorded; or that other satisfactory evidence indicating compliance of nonviolation be furnished. 10. Intentionally deleted. ITEMS AFFECTING PARCEL B: 36. Property taxes, including general and special taxes, personal property taxes, if any, and any assessments collected with taxes, to be levied for the fiscal year 2000-2001 which are a lien not yet payable. 37. Property taxes, including general and special taxes, personal property taxes, if any, and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 1999-2000. Each Installment Amount: $66,603.30 Both Paid Code Area: 09135 Assessment No.: 255-011-15 Affects: A portion of the land described herein and other land. 38. Property taxes, including general and special taxes, personal property taxes, if any, and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 1999-2000. Each Installment Amount: $24,790.34 Both Paid Code Area: 09152 Assessment No.: 255-021-06 Affects: A portion of the land described herein and other land. 39. Property taxes, including general and special taxes, personal property taxes, if any, and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 1999-2000. Each Installment Amount: $3,707.07 Both Paid Code Area: 09135 Assessment No.: 255-021-08 Affects: A portion of the land described herein and other land. 40. Intentionally deleted. 42. Supplemental or escaped assessments of property taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California. CLTA Preliminary Report Form (Rev. 1/1/95) 1029082 Page 11 43. Covenants, conditions and restrictions (deleting any restrictions indicating any preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin) as set forth in the document Recorded: September 5, 1929, in Book 1660, Page 476 of Deeds Said covenants, conditions and restrictions provide that a violation thereof shall not defeat or render invalid the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust made in good faith and for value. 44. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in document Granted to: Purpose: Recorded: Affects: La Costa Acres Corporation, a corporation Irrigation pipe line and ditches, telephone, telegraph and electric lines September 5, 1929, in Book 1660, Page 476 of Deeds The exact location and extent of said easement is not disclosed of record. 45. Intentionally deleted. 46. A Notice of the San Diego County Local Agency Formation Commission Certificate of Completion for the "San Dieguito Reorganization", Ref. No. R085-9, recorded September 5, 1986 as File No. 86-390249 of Official Records. 47. Intentionally deleted. 48. Intentionally deleted. 49. A document subject to all the terms, provisions and conditions therein contained. Entitled: Dated: Executed by: Recorded: Payment of a public facilities fee November 6, 1992 Carlsbad Partners, Ltd., a partnership and the City of Carlsbad, a municipal corporation December 10, 1992 as File No. 1992-0793137 of Official Records Reference is made to said document for full particulars. 50. The fact that said land lies within the San Dieguito Union High School District proposed boundary of CFD 94-1, as disclosed by instrument recorded June 22, 1994 as File No. 1994-0397507 of Official Records. 51. The fact that said land lies within the Community Facilities District #94-3 of the San Dieguito Union High School District as disclosed by instrument recorded August 11, 1994 as File No. 1994-0488541 of Official Records. CLTA Preliminary Report Form (Rev. 1/1195) 1029082 Page 12 52. The fact that said land lies within the Community Facilities District #95-2 of the San Dieguito Union High School District as disclosed by instrument recorded November 16, 1995 as File No. 1995-0521631 of Official Records. 53. Intentionally deleted. 54. A document subject to all the terms, provisions and conditions therein contained. Entitled: Recorded: Notice of waiver concerning proximity of the planned or existing El Camino Real and La Costa Avenue Transportation Corridor(s) Case No. : CT 92-08 -Green Valley Tract map May 22, 1996 as File No. 1996-0259560 of Official Records Reference is made to said document for full particulars. 55. Notice of Special Tax Lien for Community Facilities District No. 95-2 of the San Dieguito Union High School District recorded September 23, 1996 as File No. 1996-0482282 of Official Records. 56. A document subject to all the terms, provisions and conditions therein contained. Entitled: Dated: Executed by: Recorded: Improvement, Reimbursement and Easement Agreement December 15, 1996 Carlsbad Partners, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership and Encinitas Town Center Associates, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability Company January 22, 1997 as File No. 1997-0029022 of Official Records Reference is made to said document for full particulars. 57. Intentionally deleted. 58. Covenants, conditions and restrictions (deleting any restrictions indicating any preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin) as set forth in the document Recorded: February 27, 1998 as File No. 1998-0105197 of Official Records 59. Covenants, conditions and restrictions (deleting any restrictions indicating any preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin) as set forth in the document Recorded: February 27, 1998 as File No. 1998-0105198 of Official Records CLTA Preliminary Report Form (Rev. 111195) 1029082 Page 13 --------------------------------------- 60. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, and any other obligations secured thereby. Amount: Dated: Trustor: Trustee: Beneficiary: Recorded: Affects: $23,000,000.00 June 25, 1998 Continuing Life Communities LLC, a California limited liability company Equitable Deed Company, a California corporation Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association, a national banking association June 29, 1998 as File No. 1998-0398422 of Official Records The herein described land and other land. 61. An agreement to which reference is hereby made for full particulars, Dated: By and between: Regarding: Recorded: July 9, 1998 Continuing Life Communities LLC, a California limited liability company and City of Carlsbad Hold Harmless Agreement, Geological Failure November 24, 1998 as File No. 1998-0762384 of Official Records 62. An agreement to which reference is hereby made for full particulars, Dated: By and between: Regarding: Recorded: July 9, 1998 Contir.ming Life Communities LLC, a California limited liability company and City of Carlsbad Hold Harmless Agreement, Drainage November 24, 1998 as File No. 1998-0762385 of Official Records 63. An easement for the purposes shown below and rights incidental thereto as shown or as offered for dedication on the recorded map shown below. Map No: Easement purpose: Affects: Carlsbad Tract No. 92-08, Green Valley Drainage and public trail As shown on said Map 64. The Company will require that it be provided with the following with respect to the California limited liability company named below: (A) A copy of its operating agreement and any amendments thereto; CLT A Preliminary Report Form (Rev. 111195) 1029082 Page 14 (B) A certified copy of its articles of organization (LLC-1), any certificate of correction (LLC-11), certificate of amendment (LLC-2), or restatement of articles or organization (LLC-10); and (C) A copy of the current Statement of Information form (LLC-12) filed with the Secretary of State. Limited Liability Company: Continuing Life Communities LLC, a California limited liability company 65. Information in possession of the Company indicates that a division of land, as defmed in Government Code Section 66424, is contemplated in the current transaction, or has been divided from a previously existing parcel of land, and involves the land described in this report. Such division of land or contemplated division of land, would appear to fall within the purview of the Subdivision Map Act (commencing with Government Code Section 6641 0), and as a prerequisite to the issuance of any title insurance at least one of the following requirements must be accomplished to the Company's satisfaction: (A) That a Final (Tract) Map has been recorded in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and related ordinances; (B) That a Parcel Map has been recorded in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and related ordinances; or (C) That a Certificate of Compliance as provided for in the Subdivision Map Act has been recorded; or that other satisfactory evidence indicating compliance of nonviolation be furnished. 66. Matters which may be disclosed by an inspection or by a survey of said land that is satisfactory to this Company, or by inquiry of the parties in possession thereof. An inspection of said land has been ordered, which may result in additional exceptions. ADDED ITEMS AS OF JUNE 14, 2000: 67. A document subject to all the terms, provisions and conditions therein contained. Entitled: Dated: Executed by: Recorded: Affordable Housing Agreement February 2, 2000 The City of Carlsbad, a municipal corporation and Continuing Life Communities LLC. , a California limited liability company March 15, 2000 as File No. 2000-0130367 of Official Records. Reference is made to said document for full particulars. Affects: Lots 3 and 4 hereinabove described. CLTA Preliminary Report Form (Rev. 1/1195) 1029082 Page 15 Note No.1: AS OF JANUARY 1, 1990, CHAPTER 598, CALIFORNIA STATUTES OF 1989, (AB 512; INSURANCE CODE SECTION 12413.1) BECAME EFFECTIVE. THE LAWS REQUIRE THAT ALL FUNDS BE DEPOSITED AND AVAILABLE FOR WITHDRAWAL BY THE TITLE ENTITY'S ESCROW OR SUBESCROW ACCOUNT PRIOR TO DISBURSEMENT OF ANY FUNDS. ONLY CASH OR WIRED FUNDS CAN BE GIVEN IMMEDIATE AVAILABILITY UPON DEPOSIT. CASHIER'S CHECKS, TELLER'S CHECKS AND CERTIFIED CHECKS MAY BE AVAILABLE ONE BUSINESS DAY AFTER DEPOSIT. ALL OTHER FUNDS SUCH AS PERSONAL, CORPORATE OR PARTNERSHIP CHECKS AND DRAFTS MAY CAUSE MATERIAL DELAYS IN DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS ON THIS ORDER. IN ORDER TO AVOID DELAYS, ALL FUNDS SHOULD BE WIRE TRANSFERRED. OUTGOING WIRE TRANSFER WILL NOT BE AUTHORIZED UNTIL CONFIRMATION OF THE RESPECTIVE INCOMING WIRE TRANSFER OR AVAILABILITY OF DEPOSITED CHECKS. WIRING INFORMATION FOR THIS OFFICE IS AS FOLLOWS: UNION BANK 530 "B" STREET SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 BANK NUMBER: CREDIT: ACCOUNT NUMBER: RE: 122000496 Commonwealth Land Title Co. 4000124120 Commonwealth Title/Escrow No. Note No.2: THIS COMPANY DOES REQUIRE CURRENT BENEFICIARY DEMANDS PRIOR TO CLOSING. If the demand is expired and a current demand cannot be obtained, our requirements will be as follows: (a) If this Company accepts a verbal update on the demand, we may hold an amount equal to one monthly mortgage payment. This hold will be in addition to the verbal hold the lender may have stipulated. (b) If this Company cannot obtain a verbal update on the demand, we will either pay off the expired demand, or wait for the amended demand, at the discretion of the escrow. CLTA Preliminary Report Form (Rev. 111/95) 1029082 Page 16 Note No. 3: Requirement that this Company be furnished with a copy of any supplemental tax bills now in existence which are not reflected on this report. Note No. 4: If taxes are posted paid less than 45 days, the Company will hold the tax amount plus delinquency amount until 45 days have elapsed. If taxes have been paid through an impound account or if a copy of the cancelled check can be provided to us, this requirement can be waived. Note No. 5: If any deed of trust in favor of "Private Parties" is to be omitted from our policy of title insurance, we will require that the original note, deed of trust and properly executed and notarized request for reconveyance be surrendered for review prior to close of escrow. CLTA Preliminary Report Form (Rev. 1/1/95) . L. LOT 10 ------oPttvSPAC£ CURVf TABlE ' I lW>VS NCIH " ,. ' C1 ,. ., • ' CJ .. '" " ftTOO'QO " <> Dl'lt I lthiN '" " ... •• """ Jf1 C1 .•. UJICO JI.GI " n ltiOD 1 • " ,,, J "" ,,. . II I Cll '""' IJUlO fiJfl ,,, 0 '00" ,, lli.U IJ ,, I JU HJ n ' Cll or'" OOClODO .... ,, 01'010 IIJIDO I I '" JTJO •O USJOO II '" ,.,,, ,. .. • CIJ 0 '0101 Jl'/0 • "' tW tXJ •m. SEE SHEET NO. ::~~' f_~~rrf~~'!f!ERS $AN /JI£CQ CAhfO'INI<t ,1101 In( (lit) 2JI-HII ,.._,~ /)1•.)()11 TRUE POINT OF BECINNINC '' '"',. ® CIM"ICoW( fOil CAJ(II(NI lOll lfltJAIC ~ RICOitOCD ·--· ·--··---AS Ill ~'..~. _____ . LOT 4 IB.JIJ ACRES 100' D' = CITY OF CARLSBAD Iff Jl" j/)0' •1' ,,. , SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY_/ CITY OFT ENCINITAS G • XT:JI.,I" • • NOCJ' .. ,,_,,. ./ \ LOT J OPEN SPACE t; . 14.815 ACRES .:: a i I 3 ( ,,. 't«C l'ltAI. CASCJ4Nt ~ VRf\CX:AalC aJTI' HCMDN ~ .. o • JUJru· ?i ll. • '¥10'JJ' ~= :::: ~ J§ ~; :::?: A • /l'lrlt' ~ ." ::;:•o· ~ 1 • ::CoJ: SUOOMSION BOUNDARY I • flfl' ( ~fJfl ,/ ' • IIJJ ... , .. --. -!' . "''" v.;:. 1/UCJ /IJ 11-04 \_ It r- ,~. ... , .... )\ . .•. ~ ... :t t~:'i::~~;: j l , ..... . ~=··~·-~U~=M=~·~= .. ='O·~··='-~·---==---~~~~~=-=-~=-~~~~~~~~~-=---==---==---~~=-~~=-----~--~--~--~---=---------------~ ------~-=~~--~-------------------------~--------------------------------------/ !· \ \ j / : :· r----·--~4---~-----~-------------· ~ TillS PLAT IS PROVI0£0 FOR IHFORMATIOH ONLY, ALTHOUGH. THE IHFORMATIOH ON THIS PLAT IS PART Of THE OFFICIAL. RECORDS, TilE ACCURACY OF THAT INFORMATION IS NOT GUARAHTEEO BY THIS COMPANY. THIS PLAT IS NOT TO BE COHSIDERED AS BEIHG A PART Of THE POLICY, REPORT, BIHDER, GUARAHTEE, OR OTHER PRODUCT ISSUED BY THE COHPAHY, TO WHICH IT HAY BE ATTACHED. Gray Davis GOVERNOR eSTATE OF CALIFORNIA • GOVERNOR'S OFFICE of PLANNING AND RESEARCH December 28, 2001 Christer Westman City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 State Clearinghouse Re: Notice of Determination The Pavilion SCH#: 2001129019 Dear Christer Westman: PLANNING DEPARTMEitT City Of Carlsbad >'• I ''I '· / The State Clearinghouse has received and posted your Notice of Determination (NOD) for the above Steven A. Nissen DIRECTOR project. For each NOD filed with the State Clearinghouse, we attempt to rna ~~cord of '· ....... the prior draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or Negative Declara · that was submitted for sfa~. level review. In the case of the subject NOD, we can find no record/ a prior draft EIR,,or Negative '·,\ Declaration having been submitted to the State Clearinghouse. Please Jet us know if the prior EIR/Negatiy Declaration was, in fact, submitted to the State Clearinghouse for i'tate level review so that we may correct our records. \ · \ ' ,/ Please refer to the CEQA Guidelines for EIR/Negative Declaration''sub.~ttal requirements (Puh1i9.-···/· Resources Code Sections 15205 and 15206) and NOD filing requirementsfPRC-S.ec.tions-15e7sJand 15094). I / If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact the State Clearinghouse ¢16) 445-0613, or send an e-mail to state.clearinghouse@opr.ca.gov. / Sincerely, ./ /' ,/ // Terry Robe - Director, State Clearinghouse cc: file ~ WIO"f... e t f2.. ~ q~q/o('t c,£.eO~ 'J~""r rffi~1tJZ... f\.-'1\1 1400 TENTH STREET P.O. BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95812-3044 916-445-0613 FAX 916-323-3018 WWW.OPR.CA.GOV/CLEARINGHOUSE.HTML ~ STAT. E OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT 209466 JFG 753.5a (6-01) Lea· Agency: n.t,r'l Qf ~}1j> _ Date: P-I Cf -D I County I tate Age~cy of Filing: ~ J>lbti D Document No.: Ol 0}-"f-1 Project Title: ~ P!Vl L-( 1> (ij f ~ Project Applicant Name: J!tOfiA_f\S. ~-pp..t $(5 _jr.( ~ . Phone Num er: c2_Q?~ .. ::f3Cf1- Project Applicant Address: OL .q .:24 e:AA\?jt~O "-/ Sf· 1 Sft · c9.-0 Y1 Sf\N j) l\;7i'O 1 Ott ~~ ' Project Applicant (check appropriate box): Local Public Agency D School District D Oth~~cial District D State Agency 0 Private Entity ~ ' CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: ( ) Environmental Impact Report ( ) Negative Declaration ( ) Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) ( ) Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs ( ) ;;ounty Administrative Fee $850.00 $ $1,250.00 $ $850.00 $ $850.00 $ $25.00 $ ( l/ Project that is exempt from fees TOTAL RECEIVED $ ---() - Signature and title of person receiving payment: --f~+--~------------------------ WHITE-PROJECT APPLICANT PINK-LEAD AGENCY GOLDENROD-STATE AGENCY OF FILING I t ' .. Notice ofDete~ination To: Office of Planning and Research From: P.O. Box 3044 ffi O lL, ~ [0) Sacramento, CA 9581~J. Smith. Recorder/OountyCierk DEC 19 2001 County Clerk ~ County of San Diego rrf------1~~ Mailstop 833, Attn: Wendy TY PO Box 121750 San Diego, CA 92112-1750 0 1 07 7 9 CITY OF CARL.SBAD Planning Department f. 1635 Farad~Y::'0\venuBfC 200J Carlsbad, s.~f-. 92~/NG DEPARTMENT (760) 602-4600. City Ot · · Carlsbad Project No: SDP 00-10/CDP 00-37 Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. The Pavilion Project Title NIA City of Carlsbad, Christer Westman (760) 602-4614 State Clearinghouse No. Lead Agency, Contact Person Telephone Number South and east of Calle Barcelona at the southern end of the Green Valley Master Plan area in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego Project Locations (include County) Project Description: 265,000 square foot retail center with second floor office space on an existing 18.3 acre graded pad. This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project on December 5, 2001, and has made the following determination regarding the above described project. 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment 2. This project was reviewed previously in the Green Valley EIR and a Negative Declaration was prepared pursuant to the provisions of CEQ A. 3. Mitigation measures were not made a condition ofthe approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations was not adopted for this project. 5. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions ofCEQA. This is to certify that the final EIR and the Negative Declaration with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the General Public at THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. u;~~ Date Date received for filing at OPR: Revised October 1989 . . ' Ill' e City e of Carlsbad l#lJFJ,J,Ji,J.i•J§.fJIIeei§eJI NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project Address/Location: Southeast of Calle Barcelona and west ofEl Camino Real. Project Description: New construction of a 260,000 square foot retail commercial center on an existing graded 18.3 acre pad. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an e~vironmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for lmplementat~on of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 20 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Christer Westman in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4614. DATED: DECEMBER 11,2000 CASE NO: SDP 00-10/CDP 00-37 CASE NAME: THE PAVILION PUBLISH DATE: DECEMBER 11, 2000 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (i} ' A CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME PO BOX 944209 SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2090 CERTIFICATION OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding Project Title/Location (Include County): The Pavilion/South and east of Calle Barcelona at the southern end of the Green Valley Master Plan area, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego Name and Address of Applicant: Thomas Enterprises Inc. 2924 Emerson Street, Suite 206 San Diego CA 92021 Project Description: 265,000 square foot retail center with second floor office on an existing 18.3 acre pad. Findings of Exemption: 1. The City of Carlsbad Planning Department has completed an Environmental Initial Study for the above referenced property, including evaluation of the proposed project's potential for adverse environmental impacts on fish and wildlife resources. 2. Based on the complete Environmental Initial Study, the City of Carlsbad Planning Department finds that the proposed project will not encroach upon wildlife habitat area, will have no potential adverse individual or cumulative effects on wildlife resources, and requires no mitigation measures to be incorporated into the proposed project which would affect fish or wildlife. Certification: I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above finding and that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 ofthe Fish and Game Code. Lead Agency: CITY OF CARLSBAD CW:mh Date: ___ .__I "2---t/----:.l-=3,f--'/u"""---'-l ___ _ Section 711.4, Fish and Game Code DFG: 1/91 e Cit of NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT The following project is located within the City of Carlsbad Coastal Zone. A coastal permit application for the project has been acted upon. SENT TO COASTAL COMMISSION ON p-/_5-0 I Application#: ~C=D~P_,0=0_,-3::....:7 _________ _ Filing Date: October 19, 2000 Case Name: The Pavilion Decision Date: December 5, 2001 Applicant: Thomas Enterprises Inc. Agent (if different): Address: 2924 Emerson Street. San Diego, CA Address: 92106 Phone: ACTION: D [g) D 619-222-4397 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS DENIED COASTAL COMMISSION APPEAL STATUS: Phone: [g) NOT APPEALABLE TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION. D APPEALABLE TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION pursuant to Coastal Act Section 30603. An aggrieved person may appeal this decision to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days following Coastal Commission receipt of this notice. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date the Coastal Commission's appeal period will conclude. Appeals must be made in writing to the Coastal Commission's district office at the following address: California Coastal Commission, 7575 Metropolitan Dr., Suite 103, San Diego, California 92108-4402, Telephone (619) 767-2370. The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedures, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than ninety (90) days following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten (1 0) days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such a record, the time within which such petition may be filed in coun is extended to not later than thirty (30) days following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California 92008. • 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (i} rn rn Ltl rn CJ r-'1 ru tr .::t" ru CJ CJ Po t ;.n f ~~3tu, ,n necei~ t ~ pe (EndtJrse·nnrJt Requr;ed) Restr·icted Del1very t-=ee (Endorsement Requir·ed) _ ---------1 Postmark Here a Total Postage & Fees $ CJ ru~~~~--,;=~~~~~--~~~~-. Ltl Recipient's Name (Please Print Clearly) (To be completed by maller) CJ CJ CJ CJ sireei:iiiir:-Nc,:;-,;;·;;o:saic-"No:----------------------------------------------------------- ~SENDER: "0 'iii Q) tfj lii ~ • Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. • Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this card to you. • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not permit. • Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below the article number. Gl • The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date £ delivered. I also wish to receive the following services (for an extra fee): 1. D Addressee's Address 2. D Restricted Delivery ai u -~ Jl Consult postmaster for fee. c. 4a. Article Number -~ /OoO-() rc) o-We)~ /.J;c~ £ c::: 3s·-33 5 ,9a:::tertified ~ D Insured ~ 0 COD ·~ PROOF OF PUBLIC.ION (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newapapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: November 23, 2001 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at San marcos , California this 23rd day of November, 2001 Legal Advertising This space is .e County Clerk's Filing Stamp Proof of Publication of Notice of Public Hearing NOTIC.E OF PUBLIC HEARING COMPLETE DATE: October 19, 2000 DESCRIPTION: Reques1 for approval of a new 265,357 square foot retail 1 center wRh second floor office spilce on an exls1lng 18.3 I acre graded pad. I LOCATION: ,· This project is wnhin the City of Carlsbad's Coastal Zone located south and eas1 of Calle Barcelaha at the south- , Facilities Management Zone 23. !.... ern end of the Green Valley Mas1er Plan area in Local ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 255-011-12 1 '· APPLICANT: Mel Kuhne! Thomas Enterprises I,: 2924 Emerson St. Ste 206 l San Diego CA 92106 ' • A public hearing on the above proposed project will be held by the Planning Commission 1n the Council Cham- bers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, on December 5, 2001 . at6:00p.m. . Persons are cordially inwed to attend the public hearing and provide the decision makers with any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. The pro- l'ect will be described and a s1aff recommendation given, allowed by public testimony, (jues1ions and a decision. Copies of ttie staff report will be available on or after · November 29, 2001. ~ . If you have any ques1ions, or would like to be notified of • the decisionLplease contact Christer Westman at the City of Carlsoad Planning Department, Monday through ; . Thursday 7:30a.m. to 5:30p.m,, Friday 8:00a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California ' ' 92008, (760) 602-4614. APPEALS \.. 'I· If you challenge the Site Development Plan and Coas1al Development Permit in court, you may be limited to rais-ing only those issues you or someone else. raised at the public nearing described in this notice, or in written corre-spondence <fellvered to the City of Carlsbad prior to the public hearing. 1. Aopeals to the City Council: Where the decision is a(>- pealable to the City Council, appeals mus1 be filed in wr~ lng within ten (10) calendar day11 after a decision by the Planning Commission. 2. Coastal Commission Appealable Project: This s~e is not located within the CoaStal Zone Appeal-able Area. Where the decision is appealable to the Coas1al Com-mission appeals mus1 be filed wnh the Coas1al Commis-sion within ten (1 0) working days after the Coas1al Com-mission has received a Notice of Final Action from the City of Carlsbad. Aprlicants will be notified by the Coas1al Commission o the date that their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office of the CoaStal Com- mission Is located at 7575 Metropolitan Drive, SuRe 103, San Dleao,California ,,, 92108~2. CASE FILE: SOP OQ-10/CDP 00-37 CASI: NAME: THE PAVILION THE PAVILION _SOP ()0..10JCDP 00-37 Legal71577. November e City • FilE COPY of Carlsbad IQ€111111ii·i•X§.flii••i§lil NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING COMPLETE DATE: October 19,2000 DESCRIPTION: Request for approval of a new 265,357 square foot retail center with second floor office space on an existing 18.3 acre graded pad. LOCATION: This project is within the City of Carlsbad's Coastal Zone located south and east of Calle Barcelona at the southern end of the Green Valley Master Plan area in Local Facilities Management Zone 23. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 255-011-12 APPLICANT: Mel Kuhnel Thomas Enterprises 2924 Emerson St, Ste 206 San Diego CA 92106 A public hearing on the above proposed project will be held by the Planning Commission in the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, on December 5, 2001 at 6:00p.m. Persons are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide the decision makers with any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. The project will be described and a staff recommendation given, followed by public testimony, questions and a decision. Copies of the staff report will be available on or after November 29, 2001. If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Christer Westman at the City of Carlsbad Planning Department, Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Friday 8:00a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008, (760) 602-4614. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 60~-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ APPEALS If you challenge the Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad prior to the public hearing. 1. Appeals to the City Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council, appeals must be filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the Planning Commission. 2. Coastal Commission Appealable Project: D This site is located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area. r8J This site is not located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area. Where the decision is appealable to the Coastal Commission, appeals must be filed with the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days after the Coastal Commission has received a Notice of Final Action from the City of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission of the date that their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office of the Coastal Commission is located at 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 1 03, San Diego, California 921 08-4402. CASE FILE: SOP 00-10/CDP 00-37 CASE NAME: THE PAVILION PUBLISH: NOVEMBER 23, 2001 -~----·~---------------., CITY OF ENCINITAS THE PAVILION SOP 00-1 0/CDP 00-37 NOT.AOF PUBLIC HEARING COUNT~ERK Mail to: County Clerk, County of SanD~ Mailstop 833, PO Box 121750, San Diego,~92112 Response must be received by: October 31, 2001 Public Hearing Date: November 7, 2001 Public Hearing Place: 1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, 92008 Public Hearing Time: 6:00 .m. .SFP 2 0 2001 Project Title: The Pavilion SDP 00-10/CDP 00-37 ( ~ Lead Agency: CITY OF CARLSBAD-PLANNING Contact Person: Christer Westman BY ~ Street Address: 1635 FARADAY AVENUE Phone: (760) 602-4614 -~~~!....!.!..!<2..!:!~!.__-'2.1..----.._-~Di!/'I!E~PU~TY~ City: CARLSBAD Zip: 92008 County: SAN DIEGO COUNTY ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ··'\'}.27:~.?~:.:?$.,;;~ ..... . PROJECT LOCATION~ c'"); , ·~:~\ County: SAN DIEGO COUNTY City/Nearest Community: CITY OF CARLSBAD '"v , Cross Streets: El Camino Real/Calle Barcelona Total Acres: __ __.1-"8=.3'---------H~--tft'Lf---.~tt-- Assessor's Parcel No. 255-021-5,6,7,8-00 Section: N/A Twp. N/A Range: N/A Base: n.;;~------"--':.::._- Within 2 Miles: State Hwy #: I-5 Waterways: Bati uitos La oon!Pacific Oce .:; ~'1 Airports: McCLELLAN/PALOMAR Railways: NCTD Schools: Elemen i h!Hi I $ Cartwcr 11" ··························-····················· .. -· .. ································································································································································································· .. ················································· ··'·f!t .. ··································· .. ·············"t:;;·'J.. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: "2't , ... -"0 CEQA: D NOP D Supplement/Subsequent l L 0 l G s f_ 0 '? D Early Cons 1:8] EIR (Prior SCH No.) EIR 92-01 (93041014) 1:8] Neg Dec D Other:------------------ 0 DraftEIR LOCAL ACTION TYPE: 0General Plan Update D 0General Plan Amendment D 0General Plan Element D Ozone Code Amendment 1:8] DEVELOPMENT TYPE: 0Residential: Units Specific Plan MasterPlan Planned Unit Development Site Plan Ooffice: Sq. Ft. _________ _ [8Jcommercial: Sq. Ft. _ .... 26"-'0""'0"""0~0 _____ _ 0Industrial: Sq. Ft.---------- 0Recreational: PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUMENT: [8JAestheticNisual D Flood Plain/Flooding [8]Agricultural Land D Forest Land/Fire Hazard [8]Air Quality D GeologicaVSeismic [8JArchaeologicaVHistorical 0 Minerals [8Jcoastal Zone D Noise [8JDrainagc/ Absorption D Population/Housing Balance 0Economic/Jobs 0 Public Services/Facilities 0Fiscal D Recreation/Parks Present Land Use/Zoning/General Plan Use D Rezone D UsePermit D Land Division (Subdivision, Parcel Map, Tract Map, etc.) D Annexation 0 Redevelopment 1:8] Coastal Permit D Other: _______ _ Acres--------- Acres ________ _ Acres 18.3 Acres ________ _ D Schools/Universities 1:8] Water Quality D Septic Systems D Water Supply/Ground Water D Sewer Capacity 1:8] W etland!Riparian 1:8] Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading 1:8] Wildlife D Solid Waste D Growth Inducing D Toxic/Hazardous l8l Land Use 1:8] Traffic/Circulation 1:8] Cumulative Effect 1:8] Vegetation D Other: The site has been graded and adjacent roadways constructed/Planned Community Zone with an adopted Master Plan (Green Valley) /Commercial -Office land use Project Description: New construction of 265,357 square feet of commercial and office space. The project is designed as several buildings with a central vehicular access (main street). Buildings are predominantly single story with one two-story building at the southern portion of the site. Access to the site is from three locations on Calle Barcelona. Where documents are located for Public Review: Community Development Center, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 February 2000 • • I FILED IN THE OH.--;lCE OF THECC)UNTY CLERK SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON._.s.EE_z__.._0_..200 .... 1"'----- 1 POSTED _ _§_~P i 0 2001 REMOVED OCT 2 2 2001 1 RETURNED TO ACJENCY ON OCT 2 2 2001 'DEPUTY ~ =J • PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudged newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the cities of Escondido, Oceanside, Carlsbad, Solana Beach and San Diego County; that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: December 11, 2000 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at this of San Marcos , California 11th day De cember , 2000 NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising 5lYPt>0 -I (;;;) c vJ This space is !the County Clerk's A ling Stamp Proof of Publication of Ne gative Decla r a tio n NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project Address/Location: Southeast of Calle Barcelona and -west of El Camino Real. Project Description: New construction of a 260,000 square foot retail commercial center of an existing graded 18.3 pad. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental re- view of the above described project pursuant to the Guide- lines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the C1ty of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a sig-nificant impact on the environment) 1s hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for th1s action 1s on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive docu-ments is on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California ~2008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 20 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Christer Westman in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4614. DATED: DECEMBER 11,2000 CASE NO: SOP 00-10/CDP 00-37 CASE NAME: THE PAVILION is/GARY S. WAYNE for MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director Legal 68811. December 11 , 2000 a: 0.. 0.. ~ lfi6\ \!V SHT 2 ~ ~ DETAIL 'A' 1"•200' 1--= .,,... t(<>d>_ ~I ~~~? ..... . '" .... 737.74 L@j \!V SHT 3 POR.3 1• SAl DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MA, IK 255 'G OJ @ SHT 4 140.51 AC A12•zs·os"N tS\··. @ SHT 1 ~ CALLE BARCELONA POR. ~ @ SHT 2 THS MAP WAS mEPAREO FOR ASSES9.4ENT IUJUSES ()U. N) UABil.ITY IS ASSLJ.lED FOR TH: ACCURACY a= THE DATA SHJWN. ASSESSCJI 'S PARCELS W.Y NJT a:JMll.Y WITH LOCAL SUOOMSON OR BiilDt-6 ORO~OCES. .@ SHT 2 . ..·. ~ ' "' 1• ClRL 15209 NSP CARLSBAD TCT 92-08 GREEN VALLEY 6£n \2V .. :SHT l 654\ @ SHT 3 OBSOLETE- SEE 255-012 255 01 ----==' z \ 1"=400' 5/1/01 JK CHANGES· LEUCADIA s 1s;;"ff~i' oo 4618 /BLVD _) '(" L__________- GARDEN VIEW. RD ~ ~ SHT 5 MAP 848-RHO LAS ENCINITAS-POR LOT I SEC 2-TI3S-R4W-POR W 1/2 & NEQ LS 222, 372 -ROS 62 69, 8734 © . . • l I • . : I . :<1 : ,. . ...... >: :~ . :'-1 .. ·~ . I:~ . ~ . . ~ • I.~ 6J SHT. 2 CENTER 25,52 AC e 5,41 AC N ea• '5 • 33'' .=- II All !)I EllO COUitTY ASSESSOR'S NAP Bk 255 PG 02 -SHT 2 Of 2 MAPPED fOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY \ . \ e 3.97 AC @ SHT. 2 ' . -1.66 AC 14-00 0 5.782 AC. ·!!t~ . Pelt 1.ss-ot.o-23/ ··-x·· \ ... .... . ···. ~ : ...... \ ... - \ ··r-.. . " .:-.·· : :··:. ·.; .. fCHA~S a.M OLD 1-.--tc:uJ' :~-... ... 02/ .3 4 ~ 7-1-7 ~~~ 4 / 7cf /,Ill/ 02.1 l ~ 2. 5-S 8'= 129& ' ~-·' .... . · . ;\. .. : ······· ... ··.:· :: .. ··· ..... ···· ... ··· .. ··:···: .~.._.· ,. .· =-·. . ·. : · ... T.lt.t;..l 19 ~ ~.,;£. g&.14 Q .... ; 5I ~ !a ,.. = = :::; !t ...,_ :SI ::::; (/} ~ ·w. >= < :8 ~ -.... z ·i en 0 ·~ o: < < ~ -(/) :n z ... g:; ?A ~ ::g "' ~ ~ :ill C"\J ~J ~ L.'"l ; 5I 6i 0 f.!:) ... "' ii 1111 Aa:!SS -=:5 ~ :II -... '-ii---, ....... ~ SHT 1 54 @ 21.49 AC 7-9-99 A..W. Dr-.:DATC IN l£!:7f F.-c I'Rtal CHANGES u I'RJ(R ...., 1 10...., 111 jcur MJ m IOIMJ(/1 17 • ZkJ IIJ._k 11 fill lfiT7 .. ·~'-.:.. 1 • PEOESlRIAN ACCESS ESMT i \ . 1-; . . ~ ~·,.;, -;aP." . -·········) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NIJ AJ:t!SS ~ 8 ·-.. rNIJ,__ ..... . \-........ . 641.!14 65 (o7) 10.~ AC @) n.J1 Ac ; \ 60 @) 17.18 AC OPEN SPACE LOT 63 IS ASSESSED ON PG 61 SHT 2 POR 63 @ 5.06 AC ...... """""' ........ ~ ............ _ ..... ·- 50 ~ ~ SHT 2 6:? SHT 5 @) 5.09 AC .l2151 OPEN SPACE 6;j SHT 5 = ~ >-cr ~ ..... 0 z >--< :::1 "' -' ~ ~ a.. yo ~ "' IX "' -< .. ~-.:·-,:.· i ~; -< ..... -< c ~ ~ >-(..) ;~ if ~ ..., = .25 .... c ..., ~ -< ~ ~ ::::1 ~ ::::1 0 .z ~ -' ~ "" ~· 0: ~ ..... r--z ..., O"l ~ 01 ....... ~ (T)~ o. 25 r.ri .... ru c 'q' ~ c. ..., CD .a: ru .~ '-.• 10 ~·. ~ :::1 ...... '-~ REMAINDER OF LOT 74 IS SHOWN 'UN PG 61 SHT 1 ... OPEN SPACE 74 @ 10.00 AC OPEN SPACE 401.72 67 @) 1•--: 11.34 AC --;::::-/ :(/) . . =~ ~: . -~ ................................................... =~ "': OPEN SPACE =~ :e:. 6ij SHT 1 LOT 68 IS ASSESSED ON PG 61 SHT 1 POR 68 :OPEN ..•..... · · · · · ..... : SPACE ...• . . . . . . . . ..... ... ••• 0 0 .... 0. 0 •••••• 0 ••••••• 0 •••••• "?i\ ... ... ~ SHT 1 JJO @) 2.50 AC JJO N89"t.J'IO"w ·t'&n 14.n" AC 75 ~.15:01 N89"t.J'/0"1f JJt.Z7 1096.27 @) 3.10 AC .197.6(} N89"t.J~O"'I JJ/.21 --"' .. ~ -.... -.... ,.: ~: ~~- -•-.~-~---· . .• ~ 579.9/ 66 (03) 10.0J' AC .... .... REMAINDER OF LOT 69 IS SHOWN ON PG 61 SHT 1 PEN ACE OPEN SPACE .... •• 0 •• ~ OPEN SPACE 69 @ 10.98 AC AG PR(C) @) 1.89 AC . ~ ® 2.66 AC / 64 -:.. .. .SEC. J 2SlB7 M13356 @) 8.55 AC REMAINDER Of' LOT 64 OPEN. SPACE 63 @ 9.84 AC IS SHOWN ON PG 61 SHT 3 2 ~ SAN DIEGO COONTY ASSESSOR's MAP SHT 2 OF 5 ~ 254-61 1" = 200' Orrmt: 11. BJ: £IT Ft:otn: 255-201 CHANGES lU PRICR N'N NEW N'N Ill aJTIKJ 611 01 T1f((J 10 1997 48 -201-07 II 1997 10024 1• PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ESMT ~ ~ SHT. 2 REMAINDER OF LOT 63 IS SHOWN ON PG 61 SHT 3 SHT 3 MAP 13356-ENCINITAs TCT No· 94-066 uNITs 4. 5 & 6 ......_.,.."-.._ .. ~ ...... ~., ......... -.-..... ,_-. 19 ~ SHT 1 ~ SHT 2 POR 71 (11) 14.~AC 73 sa ~ = ! ~ ~ >= ! 1 POR 74 en ;I LOT 7 4 IS ASSESSED @ 7.69 AC .. ..- 1• .... ON PC 61 SHT 2 0 I 0 @ 0 C\J C\J C\J ~ ru SHT 1 c Cri !&' 0 CL C\J r 6;j SHT 2 H85'2'0't Cl. i Q) ~ U') :II Q) !!! :::l I-iE N88'49'20't fJ0.17 749.88 -· 68 :· @ 21.04 AC REMAINDER OF LOT 68 IS SHOWN ON PC 61 SHT 2 l21.J4 @ 8.32 AC OPEN -.· SPACE I ... OPEN SPACE POR 69 LOT 69 IS ASSESSED t ON PC 61 SHT 2 SAN DIEGO COONTY ASSEssats YAP SHT 1 OF 5 ~ 254-61 1" = 200' 9/12/00 D.B Drown: /111'96 8 £IT " 254 201 11 IIY: tr1tlr - CHANGES fV( PRialAPN IEWAPN 610 or 1lfiU 06 2~4 7 1lfiU 10 J.7 ~ 10 PCS62 51111~2 8~9 11 6 12~ 1J 1• ClRLf 6054 NSP: CITY Of ENCINITAS TCT NO 99-074 ~ ~ SHT 2 'fR QJTIKJ 97 48 00 1457 00 47 00 1486 or 1180 MAP 13356-ENCINITAS TC NO 94-066 UNITS 4, 5 & 6 ,_j 19 elf lj ~ 3 K '~ ~ m 3 ~ en_ s: ;i· .·~ .~ a: .. > i -~ i i fi ~· -·:1 !c -· a ~ a !i 'i ? . '. :g ~ I !a ~ = ! ~ 0 :z >= ! en I -z: 01 • 01 01 ~ \ CTl \ C\J ~ lei ' ' CTl 0 ' ~ ' c.; a. 0 r C\J i ......... ::l ~ --;) :::. Q) en :::1 ~ 1-- E§J SHT 2 110«.98 OPEN SPACE .. ' { ' ~-! ~ \ 1 • ,•., ~ SHT 1 ·• <"'" . ·-······ ,... ® 01 '.: .· •' .... -. MAP 13778-ENCINITAS TCT NO 98-094 SAN DIEGO COJN1Y ASSESS(R'S YAP t 254-63 SHT 3 OF 3 , .. = 200' ~ l-15-9!J lk M FlfiiiC 254-201 !CHANGES IJlJ( PRKII NJft lEW NJft llr QJTM'J 6J1 1 (JIJ 49 09 19 LlliJ \g) SHT 1 ~ v-~f.73J @ 9.77AC @ .9. 90 AC r7 ~ \g) SHT 3 -SH r 2 or 2 8 16 28.85 AC @ 47.67 AC 3 2 __ ) NO-. ~~-..•.. ~. -z:~ \ o·. ·. ~\10 . "'· 6i1 \ · .. _:\~ SHT I · · • ,\26 •. ' . . " .. ~ " • loj, ... • :to·. .11 .. () 15 ~~ ·. IIC··. ~\ .. . t . ~ ~ THIS MAP WAS mEPARED FOR ASSESS\4ENT rurroSES CK.Y. ~ ll.t.BIUTY IS ASSUAED FOR H-E ACCURACY a= THE DATA SI-OWN. ASSESSOO 'S PARCELS MAY tilT C().RY WITH LOCAL SUOOIVISON OR BlilDN:l ORD~NCES. DETAIL\"C" WO SCALE POR LOT 14 w OPEN SPACE ESMT-SUBJ. TO SPECIAL USE PERMIT 6i7 SHT I MAP 8379-CArLSSAD TRACT N0.75-7 SEC 35 -T12S-R4W - S 1/2 & PORN ROS 5985,6269,10774,12639,16465 216-12 SHT20fZ ~ 1"=400' ttJ 02/02/01 JHH CHANGES ~ OLD NEW 1YR CUT J22. t~Jb ~2,.;3({~!75 '-4/]4 Ill. lnJ;.;c ~=-~:~FD .... 2.5!>-k:>t0-22. lf'p I 0.:.--., IZ4 !.f-Z-.. ~ 1-9 l78 /1)088 124 ~-10 11·/G 81 2.279 /Z4 IZI/14 17 83[3380 /ZZ l/.5:,./"" IR.a ;,:o ~.:11U.&! /ZZ /.5 ~...-:-'.=( l!'&" :0 .~ ~.53' 122 13 ~bt~71BG. r,zya 1'2.4 4-~U: \B~•~ 88 ZOIS /22. I,Z3,Z4, SA~A~j 88 1811 Z(, ~36 57. /'VI . 112 I f. 23 ~r. "',;,&. 89 4-1:, (.5 12'2 17 lf:}..;;_f,l9z 14784- 122. 18 I w-;,~ 92l4B22 122 2C. ~~~<p~ ~ r-4'14 124 7 SAI.IE & 98 1425 SUB !D'S RC ·~ l9o!:P"" -r "" ' "'"' ·~· [2. -16 . 124 19o!:POR 20&:21 98 1800 -123-06 122 ":,:2~ ~8G~5~ 99 13 122 24,36 POR 01 56 &37 255 PGO\ 124 5 22&:23 01 2130 124 1,2,3,18 PG 58 01 97 21&23 1/2 )9 SHT 3 t. 0 108. AC ~ \!D SHT 2 OPEN SPACE A 20.';tAC 6. JO~AC A. R•20 10.37 B. R•1t!6 10.28 C. R•66 12.55 0. N52"33'42''[ 1~98 E. R•JS-4 44.4e F. S2"55'55"W U9 G. S5"17"W 15.58 H. N88"58"E 16.82 L R•400 27.81 J. N40"38'47"E 33.45 K. R•271 11.87 1.. N4~"J5'2~"w 29.70 U. N1 43''4 W 54.03 N. NJ9"12,.5S"E 30.69 0. R•229 74.79 P. R•2S 11.81 Q. R•80 113.65 R. R•20 8.31 S. R•234 35.51 T. R•2078 121.22 ' . MATCH LINE "A" 1• NO ACCESS 2• PRIVATE ST 4 ~ 18. AC ® 0 SHT 1 i SAN OIECO ~TY ASS(SS(R'S UAP t 255-01 1" = 400" 1/8/2001 St.l a.-ID-21-tiO lilt lit~ '""" 15$-01 IC' H fl. N_C'-E_S lllJ( I'll/()// J/111 NCW N'll Iff CUT~ Dl1 oWa'tit ,J'5il&s 1-11 01 !ItS -D/1•05 11 Dl IDD/4 osofi.: O!J 1.1 11#11/ II 01 lfNISI ~ 14. AC OPEN SPACE 1• ~~ ·-..~ 11)1.1J / ~NMII085 SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOifS MAP SA4ct BOOK 216. PAGE 36 SHT. I OF 2 SHt 2 NI.O.J 0 POR.225:. . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . 6.08AC. . /~. 3 RUSTrco DH. MAPPED FOR J.<;<;F<;SMFNT PURPO<;F<; ONI Y ..... "' ::::> ':! (J) (.) ~ a: .~ w >- t9 ~ ~ w z z .... ~ 0 1~ -I ~~ 0 ~ ~ 0 -I ~ ID 17J.S/ r•coNDM ~ "' ~ !::! I ... ;;; ' ~~ s 0 ~ ~ "' g; l t) ... ~ ,J ;I ~l -s ~ r-:!. \II I .a't ' -tf\ /77 7 /~2 • ..51 8 2.43 AC ~~ CONDM !'i MONARCH VILLAS ~~ PHASE 2 DOC 88-351952 I (SEE SHT 3) UONARCH VILLAS PHASE I .DOC 88-310919 ~ (SEE SHT. 2) 2•CONDM MONARCH VILLAS PHASE 3 ooces-310920 (SEE SHT. 3) SHT. 2 - ESMT. 3U.I4 5 ~I C\J 6 I® 216-38 ~ SHT. I OF 3 r-, . ... Oo· 2.15AC. MAP 11085-CARLSBAD TCT NO. 83-I -(CONDM) MAP 8379-CARLSBAD TCT NO. 75-7. • ~S (SSOf:·, 'AAP · · 216 -'" ;~ 38 SHT. 2 ·-.. .. -~. ~:-.,:·.· '4. ASSESSMENT PAR. NO. 216-380-14 SUB. ID. @D-[36j NOTE:EACH SUB. 10. INCLUDES AN UNO INT. IN COMMON AREA ~l . . t0-'101 . ·. @) @] 10-103 10-102 @110-105 [illi0-104 r----· ---.J 8 LDG. 10 @310-107 t--~-IO: ....... -.. -IO....J6 ~ [!] 10-109 10-108 ~ ~ 10-111 10-110 CONDOMINIUM MONARCH VILLAS PHASE I DOC 88-310919 - 216-38 SHI.2 ~, z NO SCALE MONp._RCf>- (P R IV ~IE. sf) MAP 11085-CARSBAD TCT. NO. 83-1 -LOTS 9.10& II \ \ MONARCH VILLAS PHASE 2 DOC 88-351952 ASSESSMENT PAR N9-, 216-380-15 SUB ID lQ!.J - ~ 7- Ill GAMIN ITO ~ 8- 100 7- 110 ~ §] 7- 109 7- 108 § BLDG 8 ~ ~ 7-7- 107 10 BLDG 7 7-7- 10 104 @D ~ 8-8-8-8-8-8 101 I03 105 107 109 I ll ~ ~~§!~ ~ ~ ~ 7-7- 103 101 7-7- 102 100 0 @] ~ :. .: : ~ ...:. -. . . ' .... ,. : ':' :.~. 216 C•.:. '" 38 SHT 3 "'-'~Ct';-:"\: ,.::r.-... , .•• .--...... ~- (PRIVATE ST) NOTE! EACH SUB IDINCLUDES AN UNO INT IN COMMON AREA ~c.,'r ~~ BLDG 5 ~0 CONDOMINIUM 216-38 SHT 3 NO SCALE MONARCH VILLAS PHASE 3 DOC88-310920 ASSESSMENT PAR. NO. r;::;;l r:;t;l 216-380-"16 SUB ID ~-~ MAP 11085 -CARLSBAD TCT NO 83 -I ..:.. LOTS 2-8 09 ® 9 SHT 2 ® 9 SHT 1 6) til ..-4 SHT 3 6) SHT 2. ~ 01 19. AC 6?j SHT 1 ® 5 SHT 2 G?J SHT 3 Cl cr co Porceb \ onJ. 3 ~ ~'.s \110(-> have.-be~ c hcxvjed, bv\- I.!Je dO/"\-t huve.-~ CA ... NV"O.rit-YY1cp OPEN SPACE 481 ® 11.74 AC R• taJfl ·.~nJ'511"lr -]1.91 6) SHT 2 6) SHT 3 io ('Q\\ec-\ ~ v'v"IOAjC.S. 'So \ \l{)c,\\Jc.led -the 9V'Ihre tJ\~ of @ 2 5 S-213 -\-o !Y\C\ ~ SL.Ar'Q ~ fvle. n0.1V rwce\ ~ 0/"e..-·, -f'\C;\vckd. 25.1'5" AC \~ycv hctve CM'1 q~sT"'cK'\~, -~"14'1' 0 \2D Let-fY'q_ \CM wJ . '-• LA' '>q ~ 483 28.~AC IIIJ&5.1 SHT 2 @ SHT .3 SAN DIECO COUJtlY ~'S YAP t 255-27 SHT 4 OF 4 1" = 400' 2/9/99 RAG ¢ ~ O!ltlrll'9f78!<' .HI ,,.,. 155-010 C~HANGES fiX PtffOl JI1N ICIII'N .,. QJTACJ 17J 10 '11 11 DllbtuOI 91 78 115~0f ,, ~ 11 9f IJJf I I 1• PEDESTRIAN & NON-UOTOR VEHICULAR RIGHT OF WAY 2• OPEN SPACE 3• SEE RECORD UAP FOR DIST & SRG DETAIL '"A" -1"=100' VOID -· 1, ... 09 !!! ~ ~ i ,., g .,. I CD ~ C1 ~ m CD ..., s i-..:. ... .... e .:0 ~ CD f 0 ; ~ 'a :a 'Q ~ a> :0: ... -,;:--~--- ,,.,. ____ .... ____ ........ ~~J--··-·--_ ... ___ ........ __ ... ____ ... _ ......... --~ ..... ______________ ·--~---·._ ...... _ .... ____ ... ,:... ............ -. ·-··---·-·----·····-... ··------·······--· ... ··--···--········· .. ·-··--·--·-... ·····---··---~---·· ··1 1-800-345-7334 [, , , , , , , , , 11 , 1 1 , , 1 , 1 ~~~ , , 1 1 , 1 1 ~~· 1 1 , 1 1 , , ~~ 1 1 , , 1 ' ' 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 ' 6 1 SCALE 1111/10 OF All INCH . . .':J m or IHKI 10 " 11 4$ .! 41 ll ~ 11 !IJ IJ,II 1• PEDESTRIAN .k NON-MOTOR VEHICULAR RIGHT OF' WAY @ SHT .3 g SHT 4 SAil DIEGO CQJNTY ASSEssar5 YAP ~ 255-26 SHT 2 OF 3 1" = 100' 7/8/98 RAG g SHT 2 @ SHT 1 .. .. .. 1-f -HJG 0 3 1998 Q) 'R MA~ 13386-CARLSBAD TCT NO 88-03-2 ARROYO LA COSTA UNIT j ~- ··· .... ····-····-···-·········-·-··------···· ~---:- 09 v> ~ ~ 3 3 ~ 0 = ::::» m 25 ~ en s: i m g ...J ... =· • >- c: i 0 Ul -0 z: > >-·--c CJ 2 en ~ t:: ~ 0.. 0.. a.. ro fi :::::£ t... ! 0 Ul Ul .I Ql Ul ·w ocr: ... ··o ·-· ·-c cn 0 Ql ~ ...... CJ c b ro >-en •!:;l IX 0 ··~· >-........ ~ c: :::> 25 0 (....J ... 0 ..... o:::J ·~ 0'1 en !£'} !!! nJ !: iri = 0 ~ -v :::; 0 z: 0 C\J >= _, >-l5 n:l :::::£ en ~ ~ tlJ ~ ·IX ::::» a.. -z: 0 ..... tJ1 ~ 1!1 C\.1 tx 1!1 en :..n -c nJ ·:5 -ttl ... :u o·· 0 ~ -c -a.. t... ..... ........ a: c: en u ~ ~ '-~ 0 3:: 2 -en -o iE g SHT 2 10/J _J <( w 0::: 0 S· :=i < (.) _J w ... ·.· .. 514.«1 . ,. 1• CALLE BARCELONA ~ ..... . 1JJ (2g 10.14 AC OPEN SPAcE REt.4AlNOER OF LOT 123 ·. SHOWN ON PG 25 SHT 2 ·. . . . . . . . . . . . .. ...... .... OPEN SPACE 214.Jf ® 190.56 7 ® 172.29 8 @) .... ..... 1!!6.04 9 @) 144.4 N89 "IZ'J "'lf' 89.52 ... ~ ~ 60 6iJ SHT 4 ... ,''.'!.·,· .• 6ij SHT 4 GRADO El TUPELO SHT 2 SAN DIEGO CWNTY ASSESS(R'S lotAP ~ 255-25 SHT 1 OF 4 1'' = 100' 5/20/98 DJ8 Omwr: ~7 !h .HI From: 255-041 CHANGES BIJ( PR/al APN NEWAPN 'IR QJTNO. 250 01 1HRfJ 12 199 77 01 ~ 02 IJ ~ 14 1999 lllJ 1• PEDESTRIAN & NON-t.40TOR VEHICULAR RIGHT OF WAY 2•. RES FUTURE ST MAP 13385-CARLSBAD TCT NO 88-03-1 ARROYO LA COSTA UNIT ~ 6j SHT 1 LOT 123 ASSESSED ON PG 25 SHT 1 OPEN SPACE POR 123 @ SHT 4 J79.54. • ~ SHT 1 fiJ 1tXJ 85 @) tt1.6J tt1D 0 _J w ll.. ::::> ttiZJJ5 1- _J 90 w @) 0 0 7Uti.J <( 0:: 91 (.!) @ tz/..1/J 611 6j SHT 3 ~ SHT 1 IIIJfJ'46'1J"E 1Dti.D! 56 ® m.tJI 55 ® t1J.f/1 ~ EL BOSQUE 8 AVE 53 ® ,.. 50 @ t1/J.411 49 @ SAN DIEGO CWfTY ASSESSa(S MAP ! 255-25 SHT 2 OF 4 1'' = 1 00' 0twtr: D!Mh1 BK .HI ftvm: 1!l6-M CHANGES /IX PRICIRNW NEWNW .. QITNIJ 1S fJIJII(IJ50 ~..,. 71 1• OPEN SPACE 2• RES FUlURE ST 9 MAP 13385-CARLSBAD TCT NO 88-03-1 ARROYO LA COSTA UNIT ~ 19 .,; t1 ~ 3 3 <.:1 3 Q .:::! ~ CD 3 ~ .,. i ~ g ~ .,. _. ~ 2i 11.. ~ VI VI ~ VI -c ~' ~m-:. . .c;· .,_ -c Q 1M = ·~ ·l:i -c ·,a:.. 'd' c..> < .... = ~ Q ...... ~ ~ >-= .:::! ~ :::; 0 :z >= _. ~ ·~· 0 0. a:: ~ 0. -:z co ..... en ~ en ~ VI r--< "" ~ ,-... .... "' 0 ..... "" ~ 0. ..... co a:: 0. 0 "' ;i ::J ~ "") ::::11 1:J "' aJ 'X 3:: 208 SHT 2 46 ® 1.90 AC • d OPEN ® ~. ~ SPACE 1 SHT 2 ~ -~ SHT 5 0 0::: ~ s: "" w ;;; ...... > J22 /06.16 269.J7 1 • ...... _1_•_ .......... ~ ~ ... ·..: ............... . 'Is 6 ~ ® 1.26 AC 9 @ 1.89 AC @ 3.98 AC ® .3.95 AC 25 ® 1.84 AC ~ SHT 2 207.42 ~ 2 @ 2.54 AC ~ 2.91 AC 276.05 18l61 3 . OPEN fo3\ :_ SPACE ~ ;c;;s 2.18 AC:. ..s ~~ 13 @ 12 ... @~ 1;55 AC ~0.87 AC '% 19 @ 1.20 AC 1J2.99 16 @ 0.78 AC 35 @ 1.50 AC JS6.01 SHT 15 ~ 2.5 AC lQ 1il OPEN SPACE 1 @ 2.4.3 AC J2l66 EAST : 14 '@ 2.61 AC ;, ;;; "' ~~ "' ... ... .., ~ OPEN SPACE lo.o ..... -..1l'; ~'!q li! .....J w Rs8919.40 14.01 150 _j <( w a::: 0 z 1-f ~ <( () _j w 150 ~ \87 SHT 2 ~<tt~ : . . 4-'.~x ~./11; ~D ® 2 SHT 1 ~ '~ SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S YAP ~ 257-50 SHT 1 OF 2 1" = 200' 7/8/98 RAG Orrnllr: 01/19/96 8 £SF A 255-020 lf)C• ffJtrl: CHANGES 8/J( PRltR APN NCWAPN YR aJTNO 500 or T1RI1 28 96 66 IJI109.21.22;< 2l2·1.25.26 29 T1RI1 J7 97 15 ~ 28 14 SAil( 1: 8A. 97 5598 10.11.1»17 J8 T1RI1 4] 99 IJJO h OPEN SPACE 2• PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT 3• RES FOR FUTURE STREET MAP 13333-AMEN ED MAP OF CITY OF ENCINITAS MAP NO 13258 09 \ \ © on· ~= in 0 0 ..... 6 ;;; S88"19'55''E N88"19"55"W 6 DETAIL 'A' NO SCALE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASS.ESSO~' S MAP BX 2SS PG 02 -SHT I Of 2 ~ \0 ..:( t1l 11) .J a: AG. PR. (C) =AGRICULTURAL P~ESERYE ( COttTRACT) ..:( u b.. @ 255-02 SHT. I Or 2 01-04-99 SAC 0 SHT 2 >-CHANGES- till\ ~ SHT 1 t-22. ~ 4-25 BLK OLD NEW!'i'R ~>-~~ i!:; ZJ ~~o;'~ 14 2!}13/J 02.0 ?7 3Ji3Z t:123 3/.32 /..., 2 OPEN PAR 2 SPACE 0 3.87 AC t:1.?~ 24" / tUO 6r'7 '13 O'ZO .Zflf'ftJ .34 @}) @ 02.:3 PICK .!1 OZ4 I l~s~i 024 I ~!.,..,. :.o+ ~ZA-z li~!",.. 02?>-~i'i (J:,~ 3~.~~ ~S'-46 SHT 3 ozo •·J: 1\ 41-46 020 ~· ,.., .. ,:,7 .. PO!IO 0<~'1' 2 SAM£~ $r o 024 2 SAMEk ST OP 020 47 ~ets 02J 111:2 SAME II OP SP 020 4 H~&. 8 0 9.79 AC OPEN SPACE 1• NO ACCESS r:5b \9 @ SHT 1 ·~ -WOOOLEi RD He~•...r.s-"Jo·-G 7~tr'. GC 234.5<4(Ros t•na) 255.43 ------- S r/~ Co~t - THS t.Wl WAS PIElA~ Fm ASSESS.EHT FUlPOSES ON..'!'. 00 LIABLITY IS ASSLtiED ~ TJ.E ACQ.RACY OF THE DATA SIDNN. ASSESSOR'S PARCaS W.Y t«lT CCJ.Ill.Y WITH LOCAL SUII)JYISOO ~ BUilOli'G OOOIWCES. saa•to'JO"E ~--~-! .s,•,s:n-, SEC 2-TI3S-R4W-POR 5 r/2 SEC JI-TI35-R4W-POR NJ/2 LS 222,372-ROS 6267, 8734,14rt8.15885 ~ .. 77 77 74 '> ~ 94. 25 15' ~5 % 9(6 ,, '" 1" 97 97 99 99 CUT 1"07 1475 3108 /dtlg/ !J~/8 21/t:J 554/ /8Z2 4"'5'7 15~1 J{, ljl 189~ "" "f783 4729 48 5552 1865 cc I !fAll .;.- 1 ..... _ 0 0 C"\.J (T) Cri r--.. 0 (T) C"\.J ::J J c: 0 :::E vi ~ ~ z ~ u = 0 = ~ 2S z 0 v; > 0 CD ~ ;/. g _, = ~ >-et a u -0 z >-< ::::1 V> _, ~ Si 0. Y' 0::: 0 V> V> ~ < :i ~1 '<· ·-< 0 .... i:!: b >-u ·-<· 0::: :&-<' .... i:!: 2S ....... 0 ..... ::::1 i7l V> < ~ >--::::; a; < ::::; 0 z > ..... i5 v>. ·~ 0 g,; ~ 0. -z .... ~ ~ V> < !5 ....... 0 .... ~ a.. ~ ~ ~ ::::1 V> ~ ~ ~ ~ SHT 3 EiJ SHT 4 586.J2 @) 17.67 AC 52 ·. ~. ® ... 5.34 AC SEE 5JI.86 @ 9.57 AC 1090.1!8 ~ SHT 51 ····· ·. I \ • .. ~ sf-n 2 @) .. ::. 6.11 .AC . __ ~-~ TCHLl~~-"A" ... _ ... OPEN SPACE 70 @) 102.05 AC -JI.B.J ..,., -,Q/6 ~ ;--6ifo? ..; lU fEB ~ SHT 2 ~ \£9 ~ ~ SHT 3 ~ ~ ............. ·T. !0:4H' ... ~ LEUCADIA BL VO (PRIVATE ST) ~r ..... -N89=.,~J'2~'2~"W_..._ ..... ~ J21.51 OPEN SPACE ~2! MATCHUNE "A" SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSE~'S loiAP ~ 254-61 SHT 5 OF 5 1" = 400' l ~ \2V SHT 1 ·--···--···--···--··· 07-05-2001 RC Ora.,: 1/112/IJl Br: F:8F From: 251-010 CHANGES v PH/OR APN NEW~ YR aJTNO 614 01 THRIJ 08 1991 #I 01, 02 1: OS PC66 01 57 OJ SAME 1: 02 4658 STCP -. MAP 13356-ENICINITAS TCT NO 94-066 UNITS 4i 5 & . 6 _j ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM-PART I (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT) CASE NO: DATE RECEIVED: --------=--:----:--:---:----:---::: (To be complete by staff) BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: The Pavilion at La Costa 2. APPLICANT: Thomas Enterprises, Inc 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 437 J St., Suite 205 San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 239-9755 Ph. (619) 239-9779 Fax 4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project involves the development of a 260,000 square foot commercial project on an 18 acre property to be located within Planning Area 2 of the Green Valley Master Plan area. The site has already been mass graded, with master infrastructure installed. The project is proposed within the development area of Planning Area 2 only. Approximately 10 retail buildings are proposed, to be serviced by several medium-sized parking lots, and a two layer parking structure. Three access points onto Calle Barcelona are proposed. No impact to the adjacent riparian corridor or the chaparral covered hillsides to the west are proposed by virtue of this project. A riparian corridor crossing at Calle Barcelona accessing the property has already been been approved by virtue of CT 92-08 (Green Valley master tentative map). The project is consistent with the Green Valley Master Plan which has been approved by the City of Carlsbad and the California Coastal Commission . . SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: Please check any of the environmental factors listed below that would be potentially affected by this project. This would be any environmental factor that has at least one impact checked "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" in the checklist on the following pages. X Land Use and Planning D Population and Housing D Geological Problems D Water X Air Quality X Transportation/Circulation D Bi_ological Resources D Energy and Mineral Res. D Public Services D Utilities and Service Systems D Aesthetics o Hazards X Cultural Resources D Noise D Recreation D Mandatory Findings of Significance 2 Rev. 03/28/96 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. • "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. • Based on an "EtA-Part II", if a proposed project could have a potentially significant effect on the environment, but a II potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required (Prior Compliance). > 3 Rev. 03/28/96 • When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR. • A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. • If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared .. • An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including but not limited to the ·following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. 4 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially (Supplemental documents may be referred to and Significant attached) Impact I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:. a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (The proposed project is in compliance with the Green Valley Master Plan MP 92-01, LFMP Zone 87-23 and the City of Carlsbad General Plan, in accordance with environmental review conducted EIR 93-02 and MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #1, #2, #3, #4, #6) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (Environmental plans, including resource preservation policies adopted for the site by the Coastal Commission, and wetlands preservation policies adopted by the Army Corps of Engineers and Department of Fish and Game, will not be adversely affected by the proposed project. No impacts to coastal resource areas are proposed. This fact is supported by EIR 93- 02.) Refer Analysis #3, #4, #6) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? (The proposed project is not adjacent to any non-compatible use. The project will not be incompatible with the residential retirement project proposed for the area immediately north of Calle Barcelona. No significant compatibility issue will result from development of the proposed project as concluded in EIR 93-02.) Refer Analysis #1, #3, #4) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses?) (The proposed project area has not been under agricultural cultivation for several years. In addition, agricultural lands uses are considered a temporary use by the City of Carlsbad General Plan Land Use Element. An agricultural conversion mitigation fee will be assessed and paid by the developer to fully mitigate any impacts to agriculture consistent with State Law.) RefeF Analysis #1, #3, #4) 5 Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorpor- ated X Less Than Signifi- cant Impact No Impact X X X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? (No established community, including low income or minority communities will be affected by development of the proposed site, as determined in EIR 93-02 and MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #1, #3, #4) II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? (The project will not add to present population projections since development of the project is non-residential and will be consistent with regional and local population projections as determined through certification of EIR 93-02 and MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #1, #3, #4) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (The proposed project is to be located within the City of Carlsbad city limits, in an area specifically defined for urban development. It is surrounded by development on all sides except specific conservation preserves. EIR 93-02 and MEIR 93-01 both concluded that development of the site consistent with City policies will not be growth inducing.) Refer Analysis #1, #3, #4) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? (No housing presently exists at the proposed site as determined through EIR 93- 02 and MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #1, #3, #4) 6 Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Signifi-cant Impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation lncorpo- rated X X X X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less Than No Impact (Supplemental documents may be referred to and Significant Significant Signifi-cant attached) Impact Unless Impact Mitigation lncorpor- a ted Ill. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involvina: a) Fault rupture? (The proposed project is not X located within an active fault area as concluded in EIR 93-02 and MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) b) Seismic ground shaking? (The proposed site is X not located within a seismic area as concluded in EIR 93-02 and MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? X (The proposed site is not located within an active seismic area as concluded in the geotechnical analysis associated with EIR 93- 02 and MEIR 92-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? X (The proposed project is not located within an area subject to seiche, tsunami or volcanic hazard as concluded in the analysis associated with EIR 93-02 and MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) e) Landslides or mudflows? (The proposed X project is not located in an area subject to landslides or mudflows as concluded in EIR 93- 02 and MEIR 93-01 ,) Refer Analysis #3, #4) f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable X soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (The proposed changes in topography associated with development of the project will be consistent with that addressed in EIR 93-02. All grading will be consistent with the City of Carlsbad Grading Ordinance reviewed and found to not constitute a significant impact in MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4, #7) g) Subsidence of the land? (The proposed project X is not located in an area where subsidence of . the land would be anticipated as determined in EIR 93-02 and MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) 7 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) h) Expansive soils? (The subject site does not contain significantly expansive soils as determined in the geological analysis associated with EIR 93-02.) Refer Analysis #3, #4, #7) i) Unique geologic or physical features? (No unique geological or physical features exist within the proposed development area. The unique natural hillside bluff slopes to the west, and the riparian woodland streambed to the east will both be preserved in their natural state in conjunction with development of the project.) Refer Analysis #3, #4, #7) IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? (The proposed project would not significantly change absorption rates, drainage patterns or surface runoff and will comply with Carlsbad policies regarding these issues, as determined in EIR 93-02 and MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4, #7) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? (The proposed project will be designed to avoid flooding under circumstances of the 100-year flood, and as a result has been determined to not be subject to water related hazards such as flooding through certification of EIR 93-02 and MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4, #7) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality {e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? {The proposed project does not anticipate significant alteration of surface water qualities into Encinitas Creek or Batiquitos Lagoon as determined in EIR 93-02 and MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4, #7) 8 Potentially Potentially Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Signifi- Impact Unless cant Mitigation Impact lncorpor- a ted X X X X X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? (The proposed project will not result in any significant change in the amount of surface water in any water body as determined in EIR 93-02 ande MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4, #7) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? (The proposed project will not affect water currents or the course or direction of water movements as concluded in certified EIR 93-02.) Refer Analysis #3, #4, #7) f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? (The proposed project will not affect or change the quality of ground waters, or affect any aquifers as determined in EIR 93-02 and MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4, #7) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (The proposed project will not alter the direction or rate of flow of groundwater to any significant degree as determined in EIR 93-02.) Refer Analysis #3, #4, #7) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (The proposed project will have no significant impacts to groundwater quality in the area as concluded in the hydrology analysis associated with EIR 93-02.) Refer Analysis #3, #4, #7) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? (The proposed project will not substantially affect or reduce the amount of groundwater available for public water supplies as determined in EIR 93-02 and MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) 9 Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorpor- ated Less Than Signifi- cant Impact No Impact X X X X X X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less Than No Impact (Supplemental documents may be referred to and Significant Significant Signifi- attached) Impact Unless cant Mitigation Impact lncorpor- a ted v. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to X an existing or projected air quality violation? (The proposed project will generate fewer automobile vehicular trips than that addressed in EIA 93-02 and MEl A 93-01, however the City of Carlsbad has been found to exceed projected levels.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? X (The proposed project will not expose any sensitive receptors to pollutants as determined in MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, X or cause any change in climate? (The proposed project will not alter air movement, moisture or temperature or cause any change in climate as determined in certified EIR 93-02 and MEIR 93- 01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) d) Create objectionable odors? (The proposed X project is not expected to create any objectionable odors.) Refer Analysis #4) VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? X (The proposed project will result in traffic generation in accordance with that modelled in the EIR 93-02 and MEIR 93-01, however the City of Carlsbad is considered cumulatively significant. Refer Analysis #3, #4) 10 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? (No hazards from design features associated with development of the project will result since the project will be required to comply with City of Carlsbad standards which have been determined to not constitute a significant impact as concluded in MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #2, #3, #4) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? (The proposed project will provide adequate emergency access to all aspects of the site and will comply with City of Carlsbad fire standards which have been determined to not constitute a significan impact as concluded in MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (The proposed project will comply with City of Carlsbad minimum standards for on-site parking for the proposed use. No off-site parking is proposed through approval of the project.) Refer Analysis #3, #4, #5) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (The proposed project will provide adeuqate circulation for pedestrians or bicyclists consistent with City of Carlsbad and Coastal Commission poilicies and as addressed in EIR 93-02 and MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4, #5) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (The proposed project does not conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation and will provide such materials consistent with that addressed in MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4, #5) g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? (The proposed project will not impact rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts because it will meet City of Carlsbad minimum standards as determined in MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4 11 Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorpor- ated Less Than Signifi- cant Impact No Impact X X X X X X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? (The project is proposed within an area in which no direct impacts to endangered, threated or rare species or their habitats will occur. Habitats which could support rare or endangered species are preserved in their natural state on the west and east of the proposed project. No disruption to these areas are proposed and adequate buffers from the areas are incorporated into the project as determined in EIR 93-02 and ACOE Permit 96-20154-DZ.) Refer Analysis #3, #4, #8) b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? (The proposed project will not affect locally designated species as determined in EIR 93-02 and MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (The proposed project does not include any impact to any natural plant community beyond that addressed in EIR 93-02 and which was found to not constitute a significan impact through ACOE Permit 96-20154-DZ.) Refer Analysis #3, #4, #8) d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? (The proposed project does not involve any disruption to wetland or riparian habitat. The master tentative map project addressed in EIR 93-02 did involve wetland impacts, which were determined to be fully mitigated through the conclusions of ACOE Permit 96-20154- DZ.) Refer Analysis #3, #4, #8) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (Wildlife dispersal and migration corridors will be maintained in their natural state through development of the proposed project. No impacts to these areas are proposed as determined in EIR 93-02 and ACOE Permit 96- 20154-DZ.) Refer Analysis #3, #4, #8) 12 Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorpor- ated Less Than Signifi- cant Impact No Impact X X X X X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal? IX. a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (The proposed project will not conflict with adopted energy conservation plans as determined in EIR 93-02 and MEIR 93-01.} Refer Analysis #1, #3, #4) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? (The proposed project will comply with City and County policies regarding resources and as a result will not result in any significant environmental impact as determined in MEIR 93-01.} Refer Analysis #1, #3, #4) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? (The proposed project will not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that could be of future value to residents of the State as determined in MEJR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #1, #3, #4) HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? (The proposed project does not involve any significant risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances as determined in EIR 93-02.) Refer Analysis #1, #3, #4) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (The proposed project does not involve the significant potential interference with any emergency response or evacuation plan as determined in certified MEIR 93-01.} Refer Analysis #1, #3, #4) 13 Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorpor- ated Less Than Signifi- cant Impact No Impact X X X X X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) X. c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazards? (The proposed project will not result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard as determined in EIR 93-02 and MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? (The proposed project does not involve increasing the exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards as determined in MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable -brush, grass, or trees? (The proposed project is not anticipated to increase fire hazards since it will meet City of Carlsbad Fire Department standards for fire suppression buffers, which have been determined to provide adequate mitigation for such potential impacts in MEIR 93- 01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (The proposed project will not increase noise levels over those identified in EIR 93-02 and determined to not constitute a significant noise impact) Refer Analysis #3, #4) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (The proposed project will not result in the exposure of people to severe noise levels as determined in MEIR 93-01, EIR 93-02.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) 14 Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorpor- ated Less Than Signifi- cant Impact No Impact X X X X X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the followina areas: a) Fire protection? (No substantive need for additional fire protection beyond that anticipated in the City of Carlsbad General Plan and the Growth Management Plan will result from development of the proposed project as determined in MEIR 93-01.) b) Police protection? (No substantive need for additional policie services beyond that anticipated in the City of Carlsbad General Plan and the Growth Management Plan will result from development of the proposed project as determined in MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) c) Schools? (A reduced need for school services will result from development of the subject project since it is a commercial project and will generate no students.) Refer Analysis #1, #2, #3, #4) e) Other governmental services? (No significant need for any other governmental services beyond those anticipated by the City of Carlsbad General Plan and the Growth Management Program will result from development of the proposed project.) Refer Analysis #1, #2, #3, #4) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (No significant need for additional maintenance of public facilities, including roads will result from development of the proposed project as concluded in EIR 93-02 and MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #2, #3, #4) 15 Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorpor- ated Less Than Signifi- cant Impact No Impact X X X X X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the followinq utilities: a) Power or natural gas? (The proposed project will not result in any substantial need for new power or natural gas supplies since it is on a site planned for urban development in the City of Carlsbad Land Use Element, and as determined in MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) b) Communications systems? (The proposed project will not result in any substantive need for new communications systems as determined in MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? (The proposed project will not result in any substantive increased need for regional water treatment or distribution facilities as determined in EIR 93-02 and MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) d) Sewer or septic tanks? (The proposed project will not result in any significant additional need for sewer systems. The project will not involve the.use of septic tanks) Refer Analysis #3, #4) e) Storm water drainage? (The proposed project will not result in any need for significdant storm drainage systems beyond those already identifieid and determined through EIR 93-02 to not constitute a significant impact.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) f) Solid waste disposal? (The proposed project will not result in any need for expansion of solid waste disposal systems as determined in EIR 93-02 and MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) g) Local or regional water supplies? (The proposed project will not result in any significant need for expansion of local or regional water supplies as determined in MEIR 93-01.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) 16 Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorpor- ated Less Than Signifi- cant Impact No Impact X X X X X X X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less Than No Impact (Supplemental documents may be referred to and Significant Significant Signifi- attached) Impact Unless cant Mitigation Impact lncorpor- a ted XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? X (The proposed project will not affect a scenic highway or vista as the site is generally hidden from public areas as determined in EIR 93-02.) Refer Analysis #2, #3, #4) b) Have a demonstrate negative aesthetic effect? X (The proposed project will meet all requirements of the Green Valley Master Plan MP 92-01 and will not have a demonstrable negative aesthetic affect as determined in EIR 93-02.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) c) Create light or glare? (The proposed project will X not create significant light or glare as determined in EIR 93-02.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? X (Grading of the site could disturb paleontological resources and will be mitigated through the use of a professional paleontological monitor during the grading effort as recommended in EIR 93-02.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) b) Disturb archaeological resources? X (Archaeological resources will be mitigated on the site prior to grading, as recommended in EIR 93-02. As a result no significdant impact to archaeological resources will result.) Refer Analysis #3, #4, #7) c) Affect historical resources? (No historical X resources exist on the site as determined in EIR 93-02.) Refer-Analysis #3, #4) 17 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (The proposed project does not have the potential to cause a physical change which could affect unique ethnic cultural values since no unique ethnic cultural values exist on the site as determined through certified EIR 93-02.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? (The proposed project will not restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the impact area since these uses have not been found within the project area as determined in EIR 93-02.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) XV. RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? (The proposed project will not significantly increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other facilities and may well decrease such demand since the project is a senior projec.) Refer Analysis #1, #2, #3, #4) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (The proposed project will not significantly affect existing recreational opportunities as determined in MEIR 93-01 and EIR 93-02.) Refer Analysis #3, #4) 18 Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorpor- ated Less Than Signifi- cant Impact No Impact X X X X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Refer Analysis #1, #3, #4) b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Refer Analysis #1, #3, #4) c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Refer Analysis #3, #4) 19 Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorpor- ated Less Than Signifi- cant Impact No Impact X X X Rev. 03/28/96 XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c}(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. · For effects that . ~re "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. ANALYSIS Earlier analyses used in conjunction with this assessment are: 1. City of Carlsbad General Plan, 1992 2. City of Carlsbad Growth Management Program, 1997 3. Carlsbad General Plan Master EIR (MEIR 93-01) 4. Green Valley Program EIR (EIR 93-02) 5. City of Carlsbad Zoning Ordinance, Municipal Code Title 21 6. Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities, December 1999 7. City of Carlsbad Grading Ordinance, Subdivisions Municipal Code Title 20 8. U.S. Army corps of Engineers Permit #96-20154-DZ 20 Rev. 03/28/96 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Please use this area to discuss any of the environmental factors that were checked "No impact" yet lack any information citations and any factors that were checked "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." The City has adopted a "Statement of Overriding Consideration" with regard to air quality and circulation impacts resulting from the normal buildout according to the General Plan. The following sample text is intended to guide your discussion of the impacts to these environmental factors. LAND USE: Agricultural operations have historically occurred on the subject site. These operations ceased to occur in the late 1980's due to the high cost of farming of the area. The City of Carlsbad Land Use policy dictates that agricultural operations are a temporary use, and that the ultimate use for the subject site is consistent with the residential and commercial land uses associated with. the General Plan. Even though City policy dictates that a change to urban uses is anticipated for the site, the Coastal Commission, through the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program, requires that a mitigation fee be paid for air agricultural lands converting to urban uses. The proposed project will comply with this requirement. AIR QUALITY: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles traveled. These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a "non-attainment basin", any additional air emissions are considered cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in the updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region. To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a variety of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand Management; 3) provisions to encourage alternative modes of transportation including mass transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5) participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included · as conditions of project approval. Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project is located within a "non-attainment basin", therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist 21 Rev. 03/28/96 is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for air quality impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of air quality impacts is required. This document is available at the Planning Department. CIRCULATION: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections will be severely impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These generally include all freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad Boulevard. Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number. of intersections are projected to fail the City's adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout. To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numerous mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to develop alternative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks, pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic from a failing Interstate or State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the failure of intersections at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through- traffic, therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for circulation impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of circulation impacts is required. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Grading of the proposed project could disturb paleontological resources that are · presently located underground. To mitigate this potential impact, the proposed project will hire professional paleontological monitors to observe the grading operation, and ensure avoidance of significant paleontological resources. 22 Rev. 03/28/96 • LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) 1. The developer shall pay an agricultural conversion fee in an amount approved by the City Council prior to urbanization of the property, if not already paid. 2. A paleontological monitor shall be available during grading operations to monitor activities to avoid impacts to paleontological resources. ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) 23 Rev. 03/28/96 FEBRUARY 7, 2008 TO: PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: Senior Planner APPLE AT THE FORUM The forum (AKA the Pavilions) was approved with the intention that all of the retailers would create a unique store front that is indicative of their product. The store fronts were to be approved by the Planning Director on an individual basis. In the meanwhile, the builder constructed the center with "generic" storefronts all of a consistent architectural style. Apple Computers is a tenant in discussion with Thomas Enterprises. Attached is a drawing of Apple's signature storefront that they want to use at the Forum. My opinion is that the stainless steel storefront can work as a standout identity. That the more tenants create their own identity the more the differences become the norm. However, I disagree with their request to remove/relocate the palm tree to the left of the space. And, I also am of the opinion that the stainless steel storefront would have a richer character if the adjoining wall surfaces were faced with a faux ledger stone or something else similar to the storefront shown in the marked photo on page P-2 of their information. Please let me know your position on their proposal so that they can begin with tenant za_ Christer Westman 2-~ Chf'is-lef', ::r-"'(j~ wi+Yt your re.CDtNt~a~. /Jte. ele...--h'f>ll ffttA+ laas -fo.CJ)( l~s let'le. 6!:1 let' -tf'tAn.rl"i»'ort] -1o -1-he s-h;;..-,&s s+eeJ ~ IJ~ o/ ~k C.C,.,;oci"fer.t, IN f-#t -r1e. ,Y.clvstC, o-f-yoVf' ('e.~~tieJ cJ,~ ~es :r CC\1"' s~ ~ /1~ l ~~ PROJECT NAME: Date: Project number: Staff Planner: CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Protection Services PROJECT REVIEW REPORT The Forum 07/02/07 PRE 07-20 C. Westman Engineer: Initial review: (Note: This report identifies fire protection issues associated with the project, and/or prescribes specific corrections or information needed to achieve Fire Department approval.) Fire Department has reviewed this project as requested and shall not approve this proposal. When this project was constructed, it was constructed to the minimum construction type permitted, Type V-N. With this fact in mind the developer elected to provide the following two basic items to increase the allowable square footage for the type of building and occupancies. The items were automatic fire sprinklers (otherwise required) and public ways or yards completely around this building. The proposed construction will essentially negate the required yards, thus mandating fire department denial of this application. GR • City of Carlsbad ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM May 14,2003 TO: Christer Westman, Planning Department FROM: John Maashoff, Engineering Department SUBJECT: The Pavilion at La Costa-PRE 03-22 (SDP 00-10) 2nd submittal I have completed my review second submittal of the substantial conformity exhibit. Listed below are items I feel need to be revised/clarified on the plan prior to recommending approval of the application. 1. The issue surrounding the proposed trail alignment still exists and needs to be resolved. The conformity request should not be approved unless all necessary easements are in place to construct the trail as shown on the plans. This issue has been outstanding for quite some time and needs to be resolved as soon as possible so construction of the project can move forward uninterrupted. 2. The encroachment permit currently being processed for the retaining wall tiebacks will need to be approved prior to approval of the conformity exhibit. 3. In the plan view of the wall and tiebacks it appears the tiebacks conflict with existing storm drain system in Calle Barcelona. Please detail this area of the wall in both the plan and profile views. 4. Please add stationing to the plan and profile views of the proposed tieback retaining wall. 5. The raised curb island behind building 1 A appears to be different than was on the original approved SDP and improvement plans. Please show all proposed changes to the approved plans/exhibits in red. Include a copy of the approved SDP exhibit with the next submittal (2"d request). 6. The truck turning template shown on the original SDP appears to work for the drive aisle behind building 1 A. The reason stated for needing smaller parking stalls along the southerly property line was because drive aisle widths needed to be maintained and the retaining wall proposed needed to be offset from the PL because of it's size. All proposed Page 1 of2 changes to the SDP should be included in this application. The truck turning template approved with the original SDP should be modified to include the proposed site changes and resubmitted as part of this conformity request. 7. The slope shown at the entry adjacent to Building 8 appears to conflict with the line-of-sight corridor plotted on the plan. Please profile line of sight to show no vertical obstructions exist within the restricted areas per City standards. 8. The note on sheet 1 indicates a 24' drive aisle should be maintained with doors to the trash enclosure open. It appears only 25.55' clearance exists between the curb face and the trash enclosure. Please detail how the 24' drive aisle will be maintained. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me at (760) 602-2747. C:\Documents and Settings\cwest.OOO\Local Settings\Temp\2nd issues letter 5-15-0J.doc Page 2 of2 From: To: Date: Subject: John Maashoff dmayers@mayerscivil.com; John Maashoff 1/16/02 8:33AM Fwd: Re: Pavilion The City has reviewed the traffic studies. for the project and a 300 foot left turn pocket may be acceptable. Dual left-turn lanes into the project from westbound Calle Barcelona are not required based on the projected traffic volumes alone. Feel free to submit improvement plans for the proposed modifications to the existing Calle Barcelona at anytime. p.s. please make sure that the required 120 foot taper into the 300 foot left turn pocket is in addition to and not included in the 300 foot taper. CC: Christer Westman; m.kuhnel@worldnet.att.net CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW DATE: October 4, 2001 TO: Christer Westman-Planning Department FROM: John Maashoff-Development Services Division VIA: Senior Civil Engineer-Development Services Division ___ _ SUBJECT: SOP 00-010, COP 00-037 The Pavilion Conditions of Approval Engineering Department staff has completed the review of the above-referenced project and are recommending: ...x._ That the project be approved subject to the conditions as listed on the attached sheet. That the project be denied for the following reasons: ...x._ The following is a final Land Development Section project report for inclusion in the staff report for this project. PROJECT ID: PROJECT NAME: LOCATION: LAND DEVELOPMENT SECTION Project Report SDP 00-010 The Pavilion Calle Barcalona at Rush Rost Street Gust west of El Camino Real Lot 4 Tract 92-08. BRIEF DESCRIPTION: A 265,357 SF Commercial Center located on an 18.33 acre site. The project will construct and site takes access from proposes two new signalized intersections along Calle Barcelona. The site was rough graded as part of the Green Valley project, and adequate sewer and water facilities exist within Calle Barcelona. TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION: Projected Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 18,613 Page 1 of7+9 A traffic analysis was prepared as part of the Green Valley Master Plan. A subseguentTr:affio study was prepared by Urban Systems Associates,ffio (USA). The average daily traffic generated by this development is less than what was projected in the original traffic study done for the Master Plan. Comment: The project as designed and conditioned will widen Calle Barcelona adjacent to the project and construct two new traffic signals at the project enterances. The USA report shows both signals will operate at an L.O.S. A during the year 2020 AM and PM peak hours. All frontage and project related roadways are conditioned to be designed and constructed concurrent with development. SEWER: Sewer District: Leucadia County Water District Sewer EDU's Estimated: 148 Comment: Existing sewer mains exist within Calle Barcelona. The existing infrastructure is adequate to serve the proposed development. WATER: Water District: Olivenhain Municipal Water District GPD Required: 220 gpd /1 OOOsf x 265,357 estimated Sq. Footage = 58,378 GPD Comment: No major water issues are associated with this proposed project. The existing infrastructure within Calle Barcelona is adequate to serve the proposed development. The development will loop a public system through their site SOILS & GRADING: Quantities: Cut: 33,077 cy Fill: 17,782 cy Permit required: Yes Off-site approval required: Yes Hillside grading requirements met: Yes Export: 15,295 cy Preliminary geo-technical investigation performed by: Southern California Geotechnical Comment: There are no major grading issues associated with this project. DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL: Drainage basin: Encinitas Creek Basin Preliminary hydrology study performed by: Mayers and Associates. Erosion Potential: Moderate Page2 of7+U Comment: There are no major drainage issues associated with this project. LAND TITLE: Conflicts with existing easement: None Easements dedication required: Yes Site boundary coincides with land title: Yes Comment: No major land title issues are associated with this project. IMPROVEMENTS: Off-site improvements: Widening of Calle Barcelona east of the subject property Standard variance required: No Comment: ENGINEERING CONDITIONS 6. NOTE: Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following conditions General must be met prior to issuance of a grading permit or any building permits. 7. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within this project, Developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. 8. Prior to issuance of any b1:1ilding pefffl:it,The Developer shall comply with the requirements of the City's anti-graffiti program for wall treatments if and when such a program is formally established by the City. 48. Developer shall install sight distance corridors at all street intersections in accordance with Engineering Standards and shall record the following statement in the CC&R's: "No obstructions shall impede nor conflict with the line-of-sight which is established per City Standard Public Street-Design Criteria, Section 8.B.3. No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object over 30 inches above the street level may be placed or permitted to encroach within the area identified as a sight distance corridor in accordance with City Standard Public Street-Design Criteria, Section 8.B.3." The underlying property owner shall maintain this condition. The limits Page 3 of7+6 of these sight distance corridors shall be reflected on any improvement, grading, or landscape plans prepared in association with this development. F ees!Agreements 17. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the City Engineer for recordation, the City's standard form Geologic Failure Hold Harmless Agreement. 18. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the City Engineer for recordation the City's standard form Drainage Hold Harmless Agreement regarding drainage across the adjacent property. 22. The Developer shall cause Owner to give written consent to the City Engineer to the annexation of the area shown within the boundaries of the subdivision into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscaping District No. 1, on a form provided by the City Engineer. Grading 24. The Developer shall submit to the City Engineer proof that a Notice of Intention for the start of work has been submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board. 26. This project requires off site grading. No grading shall occur outside the limits of this approval unless Developer obtains, records and submits a recorded copy to the City Engineer a grading or slope easement or agreement from the owners of the affected properties. If Developer is unable to obtain the grading or slope easement, or agreement, no grading permit will be issued. In that case Developer must either apply for and obtain an amendment of this approval or modify the plans so grading will not occur outside the project and apply for and obtain a finding of substantial conformance from both the City Engineer and Planning Director. 27. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the site plan, a grading permit for this project is required. developer shall apply for and obtain a grading permit from the City Engineer prior to issuance of any building permits for the project. Coastal Conditions 28. If a Grading Permit is required, all grading activities shall be planned in units that can be completed by October 1st. Grading activities shall be limited to the "dry season", April 1st to October 1st of each year. Grading activities may be extended to November 15th upon written approval of the City Engineer, obtained in advance, and only if all erosion control measures are in place by October 1st. Dedications/Improvements 31. Developer shall cause Owner to make an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City and/or other appropriate entities for all public streets and other easements shown on the site plan. The offer shall be made by a separate document and sllall he reeeFded prier ~a tile issuanee ef any grading er huilding pemlits. :.,_All land so offered shall be offered free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost. Streets that already public are not required to be rededicated. 32. Additional drainage easements may be required. Developer shall dedicate and provide or install Page4of7+tt drainage structures, as may be required by the City Engineer, prior to or concurrent with any grading or building permit. 34. Developer shall execute and record a City standard Development Improvement Agreement to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, public improvements shown on the site plan. Improvements include, but are not limited to: paving, base, sidewalks, traffic signals, curbs and gutters, medians, grading, clearing and grubbing, undergrounding or relocation of utilities, sewer, water, fire hydrants, street lights, retaining walls and reclaimed water. All improvements shall be constructed to City Standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Improvements shall be constructed within 18 months of approval of the development improvement agreement or such other time as provided in said agreement. 35. Except for driveway locations as shown on the site plan, the Developer shall cause Owner to waive direct access rights to Calle Barcelona. A separate document relinquishing access rights shall be reviewed, approved, and recorded prior to issuance of any grading or building permits. 77. The existing storm drain and trail easements shown as "to be quitclaimed" shall be rededicated as directed by the City Engineer. 39. -Developer shall have the entire drainage system designed, submitted to and approved by the City Engineer, to ensure that runoff resulting from 10-year frequency storms of 6 hours and 24 hours duration under developed conditions, are equal to or less than the runoff from a storm of the same frequency and duration under existing developed conditions. Both 6 hour and 24 hour storm durations shall be analyzed to determine the detention basin capacities necessary to accomplish the desired results. 40. Developer shall comply with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. Developer shall provide improvements constructed pursuant to best management practices as referenced in the "California Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook" to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be submitted to and subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Said plans shall include but not be limited to notifying prospective owners and tenants of the following: A. All owners and tenants shall coordinate efforts to establish or work with established disposal programs to remove and properly dispose of toxic and hazardous waste products. B. Toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds such as gasoline, motor oil, antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives, and other such fluids shall not be discharged into any street, public or private, or into storm drain or storm water conveyance systems. Use and disposal of pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers and other such chemical treatments shall meet Federal, State, County and City requirements as prescribed in their respective containers. C. Best Management Practices shall be used to eliminate or reduce surface pollutants when planning any changes to the landscaping and surface improvements. Page 5 of7':/(t \ ' Prier te the issuaaee ef gradiag pera1it er lnlildiag permit, whiehe·<'er eeeurs first, the The applicant shall submit for City approval a "Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)". The SWPPP shall be in compliance with current requirements and provisions established by the San Diego Region of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. The SWPPP shall address measures to reduce to the maximum extent possible storm water pollutant runoff at both construction and post-construction phases of the project. At a minimum, the Plan shall: 1) Identify existing and post-development on-site pollutants. 2) Recommend source control Best Management Practices (BMPs) to filter said pollutants. 3) Establish specific procedures for handling spills and routine clean up. Special considerations and effort shall be applied to employee education (Cheese eae EMPLOYEE ,~ .. ND CUSTOMER OR RESIDENT) edueatiea on the proper procedures for handling clean up and disposal of pollutants. 4) Ensure long-term maintenance of all post construct BMPs in perpetuity. 5) Identify how post-development runoff rates and velocities from the site will not exceed the pre-development runoff rates and velocities for a 10-year, 6-hour storm event. If maintaining post-development rates at pre-development levels cannot be achieved, adequate justification subject to the City Engineer's approval must be provided. 41. Prior to occupancy, the developer shall complete the construction of all roadway and signal improvements on Calle Barcelona. 44. The Developer shall design, apply for and obtain approval of the City Engineer, for the structural section for the access aisles with a traffic index of 5.0 in accordance with City Standards due to truck access through the parking area and/or aisles with an ADT greater than 500. The structural pavement design of the aisle ways shall be submitted together with required R-value soil test information and approved by the City Engineer as part of the building or grading plan review whichever occurs first. 55. The preliminary drainage study prepared by Mayers and Associates, dated November 12, 2001, is conceptual only. A detailed report for the proposed project will be required as part of the grading plan. The report shall include a detailed analysis of pre and post developed conditions. On-site detention or replacement of the existing downstream storm drain system will be required to mitigate any increase in runoff during the 100 vear 6-hour storm event. Code Reminder The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to the following: 49. Developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 15.16 (the Grading Ordinance) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 50. Some improvements shown on the site plan and/or required by these conditions are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the owner has sufficient title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of title or interest. The Developer shall immediately initiate negotiations to acquire such property. The Developer shall use its best efforts to effectuate negotiated acquisition. If unsuccessful, Developer shall demonstrate to the City Engineer its best efforts, and comply with the requirements of the Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 20.16.095 to Page6of7+9 .~ , notify and enable the City to successfully acquire said property by condemnation. 55. Page 7 of 7+tt From: lo: Date: Subject: Mr. Mayers; John Maashoff dmayers@ mayerscivil.com 9/24/01 5:35PM The Pavilion During our meeting this morning the City was asked if we would allow grading on a portion of the Pavilion property adjacent to the City boundary. It was indicated that the City of Encinitas was about to issue a grading permit which included grading onto a portion of the property in Carlsbad. In order to better understand the situation , I would ask that you send me a copy of the grading plans that are currently being processed with the City of Encinitas. Upon receipt of the plans i will review them and determine if modifications to an existing permit will be satisfactory, or a new grading permit (and possibly discretionary approvals} will be required. If you have questions, please feel free to call me at (760} 602-2747. Sincererly, John Maashoff CC: Christer Westman Page 1 From: To: Date: Subject: John Maashoff Christer Westman 9/24/01 5:14PM the pavilion After meeting with Mike S. i have determined that no designed was agreed upon for the median/driveway area for the Pavilion project. I called the new Engineer (Dru Mayers) and let him know that he should use the design submitted in Sept '00 and the comments produced by Mike S. in Oct '00 to come up with a revised design. I asked Mr. Mayers to pass along my findings to the project representative (Mel ?). If you think it's necessary for me to contact them directly, please let me know. City of Carlsbad ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM September 17, 2001 TO: Christer Westman, Planning FROM: John Maashoff, Engineering SUBJECT: SDP-00-10, CDP 00-37: The Pavilion at La Costa Third review Engineering Department staff has completed the third review of the project. Staff has reviewed the submittal for completeness and has determined that the application and plans submitted for the project are incomplete. This review does not constitute a complete review of the project and additional items of concern may be identified upon resubmission of a complete re-submittal. 1. Please resubmit a "Civil" Site Development Plan along with the conceptual landscape plan, Truck Access Exhibit and "Architectural" Site Plan. Please create one set of plans titled "Site Development Plan". This set of plans should include the Architectural, Civil and Landscape drawings as part of the plan set. Proposed development and improvements shown should be consistent on all sheets. 2. Please submit a signed original preliminary Hydrology Study for the proposed development. Unless the previously submitted study is updated, the project will be conditioned to install "off-site" improvements to the existing storm drain system. 3. Please submit an updated Geotechnical Investigation for the subject site. The report should also include recommendations and conclusions for this specific development. Please be advised, additional grading issues may arise once the updated site specific report is submitted and reviewed. 4. The plans submitted appear to have an easterly driveway shown. As previously indicated, the plans should show construction of a raised median along Calle Barcelona adjacent to this driveway. The plans should show existing and proposed right-of-way, dedications, transitions, striping plans, etc. 5. Please submit an updated preliminary title report for review. Please submit a copy of all easement and other encumbrance documents affecting the property. C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\Comment Memo 9-14-0l.doc SDP-00-10 Page 2 of2 6. Please make sure all drive aisles are 24 feet wide and are not subject to obstructions. Trash enclosure doors should not encroach into the 24 foot drive aisle. 7. Please show turning template for the jogged area of the drive aisle behind Building 3. Two trucks should be able to pass one another at the same time a truck is in the loading dock adjacent to "Jimbo's". 8. Make sure all end parking stalls that are located at 90 degrees (or less) adjacent to each other have an additional 5 foot offset. For example, the most southerly parking spot along the eastern property line and the most easterly parking spot along the southerly property line should each be widened by 5 feet. 9. Loading zones should not encroach into line of sight easements, revise the loading area adjacent to Building 6. If you or the applicant has any questions, please feel free to contact me at (760) 602-2747. c: Skip Hammann, Senior Civil Engineer PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM November 21, 2000 TO: ASSOCIATE PLANNER -CHRISTER WESTMAN FROM: Associate Engineer-Engineering/Development Services SOP 00-10, COP 00-37: PAVILION(@ LA COSTA GLEN) SECOND ISSUES STATEMENT Engineering Department staff have completed a second review of the above-referenced project. Prior to a determination being made on the project, the following engineering issues of concern still must be adequately resolved/addressed: Traffic and Circulation 1. Thank you for showing all of the street and site cross-sections. As previously requested, please make sure that the on-site and off-site street-sections and plan view dimensions on the Civil Site Plan (CSP) match the Architectural Site Plan (ASP) and Landscape Site Plan (LSP). For example, the dimensions on the CSP north and west street-sections still do not match the ASP plan view dimensions. Please decide which plan set is correct and make sure that all plans conform to one another. 2. The CSP and LSP have not been revised to show that the eastern most driveway and proposed raised median, on Calle Barcelona, have been deleted. Please revise all of the applicable plan sets; plan views; and, cross-sections, showing correct existing and Qroposed right of way widths and striping configurations. necessitated by deleting the driveway and median. Again, please make sure that all plans conform to one another. 3. Please show a 1 0' minimum painted median for the westerly "leg" of the Calle Barcelona/Northerly Private Drive intersection. Carry this painted median to the west beyond the La Costa Glen parking lot driveway. Also carry this painted median to the east, tapering (if needed) to the Calle Barcelona/Northerly intersection. Please relocate the eastbound to northbound left-turn-pocket to its customary location (right of the painted median). Also, please show westbound to southbound and eastbound to northbound 'P' Vehicle turning radii, from the "outer most" turn lanes to see if any turning conflicts exist. Please revise all of the applicable CSP and ASP plan sets. Please be advised, this is a Traffic Department requirement. 4. There are still some issues to be addressed regarding the proposed parking structure, as follows: • The proposed 21' drive aisle located at the lower level eastern end of the parking structure must be increased to a 24' minimum width; • As previously requested, please add an additional 2ft. of width to any proposed parking stall that is adjacent to a wall (If the narrow lines on the plans are representative of curbing or striping then most of the plan set ·is acceptable, however, there are a couple of revisions. Please see the check prints.); • As previously requested, please provide 5ft. offsets at proposed parking stalls which are located at 90° (or less) adjacent to each other (see check prints for minimal locations); • As previously requested, please show the width of the drive aisle entrance to the lower level of the structure. \ A 'SOP 00-10, COP 00-37: PA.ON (@LA COSTA GLEN) SECOND ISSUES REVIEW C. WESTMAN MEMO; NOVEMBER 21, 2000 2 5. As previously requested, please show (the revised) loading zones for proposed buildings 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8, on the CSP and LSP (the ASP shows them)? Additionally, please revise the CSP Truck Turning Exhibit and show that Caltrans 407D (42' radius) and 407E (60' radius) turning templates can ingress/egress and circulate through the site, with the easterly driveway deleted. Please show the turning radius dashed lines again too. (On- site drive aisle widths have not changed have they?) Finally, show ingress/egress and circulation to the revised loading zones, in accordance with the 8Y:z'' x 11" exhibits that were provided to staff on November 20, 2000. Drainage 1. Since the applicant's consulting engineer does not want to reanalyze the hydrology with the proposed on-site storm drains at this stage in the project, please be advised, that the project will be required to install "off-site" improvements to the existing storm drain in Calle Barcelona as a Condition of Approval. The current Hydrology Study indicates that this project does (moderately) increase pressure flow in the existing storm drain in Calle Barcelona. Since the report will not be updated further, staff cannot gauge the impact that this increase will have on the existing system. If the impacts are determined to be insignificant at the final storm drain design stage of the project, then this Condition of Approval will be waived at that time. Grading 1. As previously indicated, the Soils report that was submitted was for the previous project and is outdated (i.e., July 11, 1996). Please have the report updated, and. make it site specific. Please be advised. additional grading issues may arise once the updated site specific Soils Report is submitted and reviewed. Miscellaneous 1. As previously requested, for City record keeping purposes, please create a seven (7) sheet site plan set out of the existing plans as follows: (The CSP was correctly renumbered, however, the ASP and LSP still must be renumbered.) For your information, the plan set should be as follows: "Site Development Plan" (on 24" x 36" Sheets) • Sheet 1 -"Architectural" Conceptual Site Plan (SA.1) • Sheet 2 -"Civil" Site Development Plan (Sheet 2) • Sheet 3 -"Civil" Site Development Plan (Sheet 3) • Sheet 4 -"Civil" Site Development Plan (Sheet 4) • Sheet 5 -"Civil" Site Development Plan (Sheet 5) • Sheet 6 -Truck Access Exhibit (Sheet 6) (Truck Exhibit needs modified in accordance with new design, i.e., easterly property line driveway deletion and addition of various loading zones.) • Sheet 7 -Landscape Concept Plan (this needs to be revised to 24" x 36") 2. Please have Mr. David A. Hammar sign the Hydrology Study. Also, please make revisions to Section II, Page 1, of the Study, as noted. 3. Thank you for indicating the future disposition of the existing storm drain and trail easements. Since the plans are going back for revisions on other issues, please take this opportunity to change the word "vacate" to "quitclaim"; quitclaim is the proper terminology for relinquishing easements. Also, as previously requested, please submit a recorded copy of the following document: PR Schedule 'B,' Item No. 57, "Improvement, Reimbursement and Easement Agreement." • •SOP 00-10, COP 00-37: PA.ON (@LA COSTA GLEN) SECOND ISSUES REVIEW C. WESTMAN MEMO; NOVEMBER 21, 2000 3 4. Thank you for submitting documentation from the various Water Districts and Carlsbad Fire Department. However, as previously requested, please meet with the Building Department staff regarding the proposed parking structure and provide documentation of. any comments that staff may have. (As was done with the Fire Department, submitting a copy of a letter to engineering staff, from the applicant's consultant engineer to Building Department staff, addressing their issues, is sufficient.) 5. Please add SDP 00-10 and CDP 00-37 to the CSP, ASP and LSP. 6. Red-lined check prints are enclosed for the applicant's use in making the requested revisions. These check prints must be returned with the revised plans to facilitate continued staff review. Associate Engineer-Eng eering/Development Services Attachment Cc: Senior Civil Engineer-Engineering/Development Services CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Protection Services INITIAL PLAN REVIEW REPORT PROJECT NAME: The Pavillion Date: 11-08-00 Project number: Planning SDP 00-10 · Engineering Initial review: (Note: This commentary identifies fire protection issues associated with the project, and/or prescribes specific corrections needed to achieve Fire Department approval.) Issues: 1. Emergency access to parking levels is unclear. Please request that applicant provide additional detail regarding vertical clearance, ramps, maximum weight limitations etc. Requirements 2. All structures, including enclosed areas of the parking facility, must be protected by approved automatic fire sprinkler systems. 3. Enclosed areas of the parking garage must be equipped with combination stand pipe outlets for fire fighting purposes. t City of Carlsbad ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM October 30, 2001 TO: Mr. Dru Mayers, Mayers & Associates FROM: John Maashoff, Engineering SUBJECT: The Pavilion at La Costa SAP 00-10 CC: Christer Westman, Planning Department I have completed my review of the revised site plan which was submitted October 171h. Listed below are some items I feel need to be revised/clarified on the site plan. 1. The conceptual landscape plans should be revised to match the site plans. The landscape plans should include a raised landscaped median. Maintenance of the median will be the responsibility of the center. 2. I am still waiting to receive an updated soils report, traffic study, drainage study, and SWPPP. Additional comments may be generated upon receipt and review of these documents. 3. Please revise the typical section of Calle Barcelona to include the following: List the limits of the widening (Sta xx-Sta xx); Please add T.l. = 8. The structural section noted is a minimum, actual section will be based on R values determined at the time of construction. Does the 99' right of way vary between station 16 & 18 ? 4. The typical section of the private entrances are shown to drain towards the median. How will runoff be handled? Concentrated drainage leaving the site should not drain over the pedestrian path of travel. Why aren't the driveways crowned at the median? 5. The plans should show property line bearings and distances. Please note data for the existing ROW as well as the proposed ROW. 6. The line of sight distances should be clearly plotted and areas of sight distance restrictions/easements should be noted. It appears Calle Barcelona was constructed as a secondary arterial and should have sight distance corridors based on a 40 mph design speed (440'). 7. All trash enclosures should have a PCC apron, please revise the plans as necessary. 8. The plan view of the north entrance should show sidewalk continuing on both sides of the entry to match the typical section on sheet 1. Page 1 of2 I 9. Parking along the easterly property line should be clearly dimensioned. It appears the stalls are located right on the property line, if this is the case, they should be relocated so they are setback. Please include a typical section for the easterly property line. 10. What is the origin of the 50' open space corridor along the southerly boundry of the site? Is it really a ''wildlife" corridor or just an open space easement? 11 . Proposed grading along the south & east property lines should be shown as proposed. The contour lines should be the same line weight as the other proposed improvements. It appears there are several sources of topo shown in some areas. Please revise the plans to clearly delineate between existing and proposed. Clearly show daylight line. 12. It appears there is already an easement over the trail in the southeast portion of the site, but the note says an easement will be rededicated, please explain. 13. The proposed wall along the southerly property line should be shown as proposed (change line weight). Please also give TW and BW elevations along the wall. 14. Please show water surface elevation for 0100 in section A-A and B-B. 15. Will the retaining wall shown in section B-B also have a sound/screen wall on top of or adjacent to it ? 16. The wall along the Calle Barcelona ROW should have pedestrian protective railing installed on top of it. 17. Why aren't you tying into the existing water mains shown as stubbed out on plan 349-3? If you have any questions, or would like to meet and discuss any items, please do not hesitate to call me at (760) 602-2747. C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\pavil.doc Page 2 of2 PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM October 17, 2000 TO: ASSOCIATE PLANNER -CHRISTER WESTMAN FROM: Associate Engineer-Engineering/Development Services SOP 00-10, COP 00-37: PAVILION(@ LA COSTA GLEN) COMPLETENESS REVIEW & INITIAL ISSUES STATEMENT Engineering Department staff have completed a review of the above-referenced project for application completeness and have determined that the application and plans submitted for the project are complete and suitable for continued review. Prior to a determination being made on the project, the following engineering issues of concern must be adequately resolved/addressed: Traffic and Circulation 1. Thank you for showing all of the street and site cross-sections. As previously requested, make sure that the on-site and off-site street-sections and plan view dimensions on the Civil Site Plan (CSP) match the Architectural Site Plan (ASP) and Landscape Site Plan (LSP). For example, the dimensions on the CSP north and west street-sections do not match the ASP plan view dimensions. 2. The required right of way dedication for Calle Barcelona for the dual-left-turn lanes and raised median is not being shown in plan or street-section view on the CSP. The ASP shows this required right of way dedication, but in accordance with the City's Transportation Engineering Department four (4) addition feet are required to be dedicated, so that the intersection operates adequately. Therefore, please revise the CSP and ASP in accordance with the following: • Existing "Turn Lane" Exhibit proposes 95' right of way; • Per Transportation Division staff, need 2' shift to the south, and a minimum 4' median; • Therefore, add 4' to proposed 95' = 99' (existing 84' right of way + 15' = 99'). 3. Please show handicap ramps at the secondary driveways (i.e., easterly DIW and parking structure DIW). 4. Thank you for indicating the various public utilities as existing or proposed. As previously requested, please label all streets (both on-site and off-site) as existing or proposed, and, public or private. Please label in plan and street-section views. Also, verify and label the M-9 barricade at the southerly terminus of Calle Barcelona as existing, and, label the Calle Barcelona street improvement drawing number, in plan view. 5. As previously requested, please show the distance between all of the proposed intersections along Calle Barcelona. This can be shown on CSP sheet 1. 6. Please add a traffic signal to the ASP and CSP at the "westerly" main project intersection with Calle Barcelona. SOP 00-10, COP 00-37: PA.ON (@LA COSTA GLEN) COMPLETENESS REVIEW C. WESTMAN MEMO; OCTOBER 17,2000 2 7. Thank you for showing clear Caltrans Corner sight distance on the LSP and CSP. The site lines shown on the LSP were shown exceptionally well. However, on the LSP, the westerly intersection, looking south, needs to be slightly revised (see redlined LSP check print). Additionally, as previously requested, clear sight lines of a minimum of 440ft. must be met at all intersections along Calle Barcelona. The CSP shows 405'. This is incorrect, please revise. 8. Thank you for more fully dimensioning the plan sets and for showing the right of way dedication on the ASP and LSP (the CSP dimensioning is incorrect). As previously requested, please submit full preliminary striping plans for Calle Barcelona, and, at all intersections along Calle Barcelona (for all 'legs' of the intersection), including: all dimensions, full width raised median tapering to a 4' median 'nose,' and required right of way dedication. Please be advised, there should be existing approved striping plans included in the Calle Barcelona improvement plan set (DWG. 349-3), or, preliminary striping plans in the La Costa Glen site plan set (SOP 98-01, sheet 8 of 8). Coordinate "Pavilion" striping configurations with these plan sets. 9. Thank you for reconfiguring the access to the proposed parking structure. This new configuration works much better. Regarding the parking structure, please revise as follows: • Please dimension the drive aisles (24' minimum) on the CSP; • Please dimension the parking spaces (as previously requested, please add an additional 2ft. of width to any proposed parking stall that is adjacent to a wall); • As previously requested, please provide 5ft. offsets at proposed parking stalls which are located at 90° (or less) adjacent to each other; • Please indicate how positive drainage for the parking structure will be obtained; • As previously requested, please show that a standard AASHTO "P"-Vehicle can ingress/egress the parking structure. 10. As previously requested, please show loading zones for proposed buildings 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8? Please be advised, all proposed buildings must have designated loading zones (and not just striped-out parking stalls). Drainage 1. As previously indicated, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) criteria must be met. Since this site drains into an existing detention basin, less extensive measures can be proposed for on-site pollutant mitigation. However, something must be proposed. Staff suggests constructing oil separator/filter systems at all loading zone sumps, and, installing filters at all on-site inlets with a maintenance program included in the CC&R's and lease agreements for the project. Please show this suggestion, or something proposed by the applicant, on the CSP. 2. Please tie the proposed brow ditch that travels along the southerly perimeter of the site into an inlet, and connect a storm drain to the proposed storm drain that travels along the eastern perimeter. See sheet 3 of the CSP red lined check prints. 3. The CSP shows a lot of surface drainage at less than the required 1%. Where this surface drainage is shown that has a greater cross-fall, do not show the minimal 0.5- 0.7% fall because it will not do that. Where there is no substantial cross-fall, then show this surface drainage at 1% minimum fall. SOP 00-10, COP 00-37: PA.ON (@LA COSTA GLEN) COMPLETENESS REVIEW C. WESTMAN MEMO; OCTOBER 17,2000 3 4. The proposed on-site storm drain in the middle of the project (that connects at sheet's 2 & 3) does not go anywhere. Please revise. 5. Where parking lot surface drainage is directed to planters, create longitudinal curb cuts so that the runoff keeps flowing and does not pond in a parking space. 6. Please show some inlet elevations (ie's) on the proposed storm drains so that gravity flow can be verified. 7. Please add a cross-section for the easterly parking structure. Please show, Calle Barcelona, the slope/ditch, and, the parking structure. 8. Please make sure that the proposed brow ditches around the parking structure have enough clear room for maintenance of the brow ditches; should have a minimum of 6 feet. Please verify, revise and dimension. 9. Hydrology Study comments, as follows: • The Study seems to be "over-simplified," i.e., it was prepared without showing any proposed on-site storm drains and just using "sub-drainage areas" as nodes. Staff assumes that the storm drain system was not designed when the study was prepared. Now that the storm drain is being proposed, does including this on-site storm drain change any of the Q's in the study (via different times of concentration, runoff coefficients, etc.); or, is this surface analysis equivalent? If it is equivalent, then explain and state this in the report; • What is the on-site effect of the increased Q at Node 2? Please explain in the report. • What is the offsite effect at the existing basin outfall of the increased Q at Node 1? Please explain in the report. • Staff has some concern over the increased Q's, per Study Table #1, as follows: • 24" Existing Q = 24.5cfs -Proposed Q = 20.6cfs; • 36" Existing Q = 25.2cfs -Proposed 40.3cfs; • @Outfall Existing = 45.7cfs -55cfs. Two of the above pipe segments have a substantial increase in the proposed Q. What effect does that have on these pipe segments? Can the existing pipe segments and joints handle this increased Q? Do these pipe segments heed to be upsized? Please verify and explain in the Study. Grading 1. The Soils report that was submitted was for the previous project and is outdated (i.e., July 11, 1996). Please have the report updated, and, make it site specific. Please be advised, additional grading issues may arise once the updated site specific Soils Report is submitted and reviewed. Also, this is generally a "Completeness Item," but since the rest of the plans are acceptable, staff is calling the project complete. SOP 00-10, COP 00-37: PA.ON (@LA COSTA GLEN) COMPLETENESS REVIEW C. WESTMAN MEMO; OCTOBER 17,2000 Miscellaneous 4 1. Thank you for indicating applicable easements. As previously requested, also please indicate the future disposition of these easements (e.g., existing storm drain easement at northeastern corner of property, and, the southerly end of the trail easement). Also, in accordance with Preliminary Title Report (PR) Schedule "8," please submit recorded copies of the following documents: 57, 70 and 71. 2. Thank you for showing cross-sections around the perimeter of the site. Since you are now proposing relocation of the existing trail, please show a cross-section at the southerly end of the trail, as Section "G." Please show the existing slopes/tope and trail, and, proposed slopes, trail, drive/parking aisle, building, major vegetation, etc. 3. As previously requested, please provide documentation that Leucadia County Water District (LCWD) and Olivenhain Municipal Water District (OMWD) have reviewed this site plan for sewer and water concerns, respectively. 4. As previously requested, please meet with the Building and Fire Department staff regarding the proposed parking structure. Provide documentation of any comments that staff may have from these two Department's. 5. For City record keeping purposes, please create a seven (7) sheet site plan set out of the existing plans as follows: "Site Development Plan" (on 24" x 36" Sheets) • Sheet 1 -"Architectural" Conceptual Site Plan • Sheet 2 -"Civil" Site Development Plan (Sheet 1) • Sheet 3 -"Civil" Site Development Plan (Sheet 2) • Sheet 4 -"Civil" Site Development Plan (Sheet 3) • SheetS -"Civil" Site Development Plan (Sheet 4) • Sheet6 -Truck Access Exhibit • Sheet? -Landscape Concept Plan (this needs to be revised to 24" x 36") 6. A red-lined check print is enclosed for the applicant's use in making the requested revisions. This check print must be returned with the revised plans to facilitate continued staff review. attachment c: Senior Civil Engineer-Engineering/Development Services • PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM August 2, 2000 TO: ASSOCIATE PLANNER-CHRISTER WESTMAN FROM: Associate Engineer-Engineering/Development Services SOP 00-10, COP 00-37: PAVILION(@ LA COSTA GLEN) COMPLETENESS REVIEW Engineering Department staff have completed a review of the above-referenced project for application completeness and have determined that the application and plans submitted for the project are incomplete and unsuitable for continued review due to the following incomplete items: Incomplete Items 1. Please indicate whether the utilities (i.e., storm drain, water, sewer, street light standards, fire hydrants, etc.) being shown are existing or proposed. Please show Calle Barcelona connections to El Camino Real (ECR) and Leucadia Boulevard indicating existing/proposed contours, transitions. spacing of existing and potential driveways/intersections. etc. This plan shows sewer lines heading to the north from Calle Barcelona. Sewer lines also exist across the Calle Barcelona bridge. Please indicate which direction gravity flow sewer facilities will flow with inlet elevations (ie's). 2. A new Preliminary Title Report (PR) must be submitted. The final map for the property has recorded. 3. A number of private drainage easements were recorded along with the final map that may or may not effect this parcel. The title company should verify if any of these easements do effect this parcel, and if so, indicate applicable easements in Schedule "B" of the PR. Additionally, these easements are going to be quitclaimed and new easements dedicated. Please contact P&D Consultants to determine if any of the new easements will effect this parcel, and indicate them on the site plan if they do. Also provide a copy of the plat and legal of any applicable new easements. Finally, please indicate the future disposition of all easements and encumbrances. 4. The Civil Site Development Plan (CSDP) indicates "proposed boundary." Staff does not believe that this is part of the Adjustment Plat (ADJ) that La Costa Glen is going to process? So, if it is not, then what is this boundary adjustment for? What effect does this boundary adjustment have on existing Open Space (OS) boundary/square footage requirements? Additionally, please contact P&D Consultants to determine if the proposed ADJ will effect this parcel, and indicate any new property lines on the site plan. Also provide a copy of the ADJ. 5. Please show a minimum of 250ft. off-site around the project perimeter. Show existing/proposed buildings, vegetation, etc. This includes showing Encinitas Ranch facilities/buildings and La Costa Glen buildings. La Costa Glen building information can be obtained from approved SOP 98-01. SOP 00-10, COP 00-37: PA.N (@LA COSTA GLEN) COMPLETENESS REVIEW C. WESTMAN MEMO; AUGUST 2, 2000 2 6. Thank you for showing typical street sections for Calle Barcelona, and the Section 'A' drive/parking aisle. Please indicate that Calle Barcelona is 'public' and that the drive/parking aisles are 'private.' Indicate existing and proposed improvements for the Calle Barcelona section (including street light standards and fire hydrants) and all on-site drive/parking aisle sections. Please show a section for the drive/parking aisle that intersects at the other end of Calle Barcelona (Section 'B'). Also, please show two (2) sections at both major on-site intersections with Calle Barcelona. Finally, make sure that the sections and plan view dimensions on the CSDP match the Architectural Site Development Plan (ASDP). For example, CSDP Section 'A' shows a drive aisle width of 25ft., while the ASDP shows a width of 24ft. Also, there is no reduction for overhang for compact parking spaces. So, the 17.5ft. compact space dimension on CSDP Section 'A' must equal a clear 18ft. 7. Please show the distance between all of the proposed intersections along Calle Barcelona. 8. The CSDP needs to be brought up to general SOP standards. For example, the following items must be included, but are not limited to: All parking stalls and drive aisles must be clearly shown; proposed facilities must be labeled (e.g., loading docks <sump or at grade>, retaining walls in general and as part of structures <@parking garage>, etc.); clearly show the proposed parking structure (staff could not even tell that a parking structure was being proposed on the CSDP); coordinate plans with the ASDP and Preliminary Landscape Plan (PLSP) (e.g., the proposed driveway to the upper deck of the parking structure is not shown on the CSDP); show proposed NC drive aisle/parking contours; and, fully dimension the CSDP. 9. Please indicate how a semi-truck with a 60ft. turning radius (CaiTrans 407-D) will circulate throughout the site to all loading areas from Calle Barcelona. Show this on the CSDP and ASDP. 10. Show the FEMA 100-Year flood line for Encinitas Creek or indicate that it is not applicable to this project. This information can be obtained from the original Green Valley substantial conforming tentative map (CT 92-08) or from P&D Consultants. 11. Please show sections around all sides of the perimeter of the site. Show Calle Barcelona, slopes, drive/parking aisles, buildings, major vegetation/habitat, etc. as part of the sections 12. Please provide documentation that Leucadia County Water District (LCWD) and Olivenhain Municipal Water District (OMWD) have reviewed this site plan for sewer and water concerns, respectively. Additionally, staff has conducted a review of the project for major engineering issues of concern only. Major engineering issues which must be resolved or adequately addressed prior to staff making a determination on the proposed project are as follows: SOP 00-10, COP 00-37: PAAN (@LA COSTA GLEN) COMPLETENESS REVIEW C. WESTMAN MEMO; AUGUST 2, 2000 Major Engineering Issues of Concern 3 1. As discussed at an applicant/staff meeting on May 10, 2000, clear CaiTrans Corner Sight Distance sight lines of a minimum of 440ft. must be met at all intersections along Calle Barcelona. Any vegetation, walls, monument signs, etc. must be relocated out of these sight lines. Also, sight distance should be met at all on-site drive aisle intersections. Sight distance requirements must be indicated on the CSDP, ASDP and PLSP. 2. As discussed at an applicant/staff meeting on May 10, 2000, intersection spacing standards of a minimum of 600ft. must be met along Calle Barcelona. Two (2) proposed intersections do not meet this Standard (the "truck access" intersection and the upper level parking structure intersection). As discussed at the meeting, staff can support a decrease in the minimum 600ft. spacing requirement for these two intersections if left turns are prohibited. However, also as discussed at the May 10, 2000, meeting, the only effective way to limit these intersections to a right-in/right-out configuration. and the only measure that staff will support. is construction of a standard raised median on Calle Barcelona. As discussed at the meeting, striping, bollards, delineators, median "pork chops," etc. will not be permitted to prohibit left turns. Due to the width of Calle Barcelona, the only way to fit a raised median on the street is for the developer to dedicate additional right of way. Please be advised, this is a major issue of concern. 3. Please submit full preliminary striping plans for Calle Barcelona, and, at all intersections along Calle Barcelona. Show all proposed dimensions; traffic signal left-turn-pocket and through lane striping; striping for all 4 "legs" of the intersections; and, required right of way dedication for raised medians. Also, show the required right of way dedication on the preliminary striping plan; on the Civil, Architectural, Landscape Calle Barcelona plan views; and, on the CSDP Calle Barcelona typical sections. Please be advised, there should be existing approved striping plans included in the Calle Barcelona improvement plan set (DWG. 349-3), or, preliminary striping plans in the La Costa Glen site plan set (SOP 98-01, sheet 8 of 8). Coordinate "Pavilion" striping configurations with these plan sets. 4. The on-site "at grade" ramp into the parking garage seems somewhat difficult to access. At a minimum, please show that a standard AASHTO "P"-Vehicle can ingress/egress the structure. Also, why not relocate the on-site at grade entrance to the structure to in the middle of proposed Building 1? 5. In accordance with City Standards, please straighten the Section 'A' drive/parking aisle skew so that it intersects with Calle Barcelona at 90°. 6. Please clearly dimension each drive/parking aisle width at its intersection with Calle Barcelona. 7. Please show loading zones for proposed buildings 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8? Please be advised, all proposed buildings must have designated loading zones (and not just striped-out parking stalls). 8. Indicate how National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) criteria will be met. This could include, but not be limited to, doing one or a combination of the following: directing surface run-off through vegetated swales prior to discharge to a storm drain or the public right of way, constructing a gravel/sand filter system, etc. Also, any loading areas that are located in a sump must have pump facilities to direct drainage to a pollutant mitigation area. .... . ; SOP 00-10, COP 00-37: PAV.N (@LA COSTA GLEN) COMPLETENESS REVIEW C. WESTMAN MEMO; AUGUST 2, 2000 4 9. Please provide 5ft. offsets at proposed parking stalls which are located at 90° adjacent to each other. Also, add an additional 2ft. to any proposed parking stall that is adjacent to a wall (e.g., in the parking structure). 10. Please meet with the Building and Fire Department's regarding the proposed parking structure. Provide documentation of the meetings, as well as any comments that staff may have from these two Department's. 11. Please be advised, since the application was deemed incomplete general engineering issues of concern could not be reviewed. Once the application is deemed complete, it will be possible to review general engineering issues of concern at that time. 12. A red-lined check print is enclosed for the applicant's use in making the requested revisions. This check print must be returned with the revised plans to facilitate continued staff review. s, please either see or call me at 602-2747. attachment c: Senior Civil Engineer-Engineering/Development Services e e City of Carlsbad I#IJL'·''''''·'•*4·t•aa;.tg;sa June 28, 2007 Mel Kuhne! 2385 Shelter Island Drive San Diego, Ca 92106 SUBJECT: PRE 07-20 -THE FORUM APN: 255-012-04 Thank you for submitting a preliminary review for a retail addition and parking structure at an existing shopping center project. The project site, an approximately 18.3 acre lot, currently is developed with an existing shopping center, the Forum. The owner is proposing to add an additional 25,360 sq. ft. of retail space and a two-level parking structure. In response to your application, the Planning Department has prepared this comment letter. Please note that the purpose of a preliminary review is to provide you with direction and comments on the overall concept of your project. This preliminary review does not represent an in-depth analysis of your project. It is intended to give you feedback on critical issues based upon the information provided in your submittal. This review is based upon the plans, policies, and standards in effect as of the date of this review. Please be aware that at the time of a formal application submittal, new plans, policies, and standards may be in effect and additional issues of concern may be raised through a more specific and detailed review. Planning: General 1. General Plan and zoning designations for the property are as follows: a. General Plan: Community Commercia~/Office/Residential Medium High b. Zoning: Planned Community c. The property is located in Planning Area 2 of the Green Valley Master Plan; Master Plan 92-01. d. The property is in the Coastal Zone. The Local Coastal Program Land Use and Zoning designations are the same as the General Plan and Zoning above. 2. The project requires the following permits and legislative actions: a. Site Development Plan Amendment (SOP 00-10) b. Coastal Development Permit Amendment (COP 00-37) The project may require the following legislative actions (see discussion below): c. Master Plan Amendment (MP 92-01) e. Local Coastal Program Amendment (MP 92-01) 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (i} ,----PRE 07-20 -THE FORUM June 28, 2007 Page 2 1. The existing Green Valley Master Plan (MP 92-01) limits the maximum square footage of commercial use within the boundaries of PA 2 of the Master Plan to 300,000 square feet. City files indicate that the existing retail center (The Forum) contains 267,128 sq. ft. of commercial space. A Site Development Plan (SOP 05-16) was approved last year on the vacant commercial site located to the west of The Forum which is also within the boundaries of PA 2 of the Green Valley Master Plan. That approval was for 21,904 square feet. Therefore, an increase of greater than 10,968 square feet in building area at The Forum would require either an amendment to the Green Valley Master Plan to increase the total commercial space beyond the 300,000 sq. ft. limit or the approved commercial office project (SOP 05-16) would need to be withdrawn. 2. An amendment to the Green Valley Master Plan will require an amendment to the City's Local Coastal Program since the Master Plan serves as the Coastal Land Use Plan and Implementing Plan for this area of the city. A Local Coastal Program Amendment requires the approval of the California Coastal Commission. 3. An amendment to the Master Plan to increase the total allowable retail area will require an update to the Green Valley Master Plan EIR. The main concern will be the additional traffic generated by the increased retail floor area. An updated traffic impact study will be required. It is recommended that the applicant coordinate and discuss the scope of the updated traffic report with City staff prior to initiating work on the update. 4. Pedestrian access to the proposed, new retail building (12,682 sq. ft.} located adjacent to the rear, southerly property line of The Forum needs to be increased in size and enhanced. One way to accomplish this is to increase the width of the pedestrian walkway along the new retail shops (9,590 sq. ft.} proposed next to the existing Sur La Table store. This walkway should be increased to a minimum of 15 ft. in width so that it is similar in width to the other pedestrian walkways at The Forum. Enhanced paving that designates a pedestrian crossing in the driveway in front of the proposed, southerly retail building should be provided. Additionally, it is recommended that a public space be provided in the front of this building, perhaps with a water feature similar to that provided in other pedestrian areas of The Forum. The side of the building along the new retail space proposed next to the existing Borders store (3,086 sq. ft.} should also be architecturally treated to enhance the appearance of this side of the building for pedestrians walking in this area of the project. 5. The calculation of existing building area square footage provided on the submitted plan (263,844 sq. ft.) does not match the calculation on the city-approved Site Development Plan (SOP 00-10(A)) for The Forum which indicated 267,128 sq. ft. of building area. Assuming that the existing building area of The Forum is 267,128 sq. ft. as was indicated in SOP 00-10(A) and that an additional 25,360 sq. ft. of new retail space is being proposed, The Forum would now have a total of 292,488 sq. ft. of building area. Parking is required at a ratio of 1 space for each 200 sq. ft. of building area. A total of 1,462 parking spaces are required to meet the standard. However, a parking reduction of up to 15% may be granted by the Planning Commission for "common facilities". The submitted plan indicates that with the proposed parking structure, 1,320 parking spaces would be provided which is 142 spaces less than required by City standards or a 9.7% reduction. It is noted that the submitted plan has calculated required parking at a ratio of • PRE 07-20 -THE FORUM June 28, 2007 Page 3 1 space per 250 sq. ft. of building area rather than the City standard which requires 1 space· per 200 sq. ft. of building area. If a further reduction of required parking is requested, a new parking analysis similar to the one conducted in conjunction with SDP 00-10(A) will be required to identify peak parking demands and the justification for a reduction of required parking. 6. We may want to consider a vehicular access, right-in and right-out only onto Calle Barcelona from the upper tier of the parking deck. Please consider and analyze the potential for this kind of connection with a formal submittal. 7. The parking structure elevations that are visible from public rights-of-way will require architectural treatment that blends the structure in with the larger Forum project. 8. New structures within the Forum will require architectural treatment that blends the buildings into the larger Forum project. In keeping with the original approvals and concepts of the Forum, each tenant is expected to create a unique storefront identity but coordinate with its neighboring tenant. The city is very interested in having your project move forward as The Forum has been very well received by the city and its residents. Staff would like to work closely with you to address these preliminary comments. All necessary application forms, submittal requirements, and fee information are available at the Planning counter located in the Faraday Building at 1635 Faraday Avenue or on line at www.carlsbadca.gov. You may also access the General Plan Land Use Element and the Zoning Ordinance online at the website address shown; select Department Listing; select Planning Home Page. Please review all information carefully before submitting. Engineering: Engineering Department staff has completed a preliminary review of the above subject. This preliminary review does not constitute a complete review of the proposed project and additional items of concern may be identified upon formal project application submittal. 1. This project shall comply with Order No. 2001-01 issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) as well as the City of Carlsbad's Standard Urban Storm water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) current document. The applicant should submit a Storm Water Applicability Checklist concurrently with the site development plan application package. The applicant should also prepare and submit concurrently with the SOP, a preliminary Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP). Onsite treatment and structural BMP's should be anticipated. 2. All existing and proposed improvements to surrounding roadways should clearly be shown on the SOP/CUP submittal package. 3. The developer should anticipate completing and submitting a detailed Traffic Study to analyze and review traffic impacts and the cumulative effect of the proposed parking structure and additional commercial buildings. The study should follow SANTEC e PRE 07-20 -THE FORUM June 28, 2007 Page4 • Guidelines for the preparation of Traffic Studies. Additional mitigation from a cumulative aspect should be anticipated. 4. Please redesign the circulation and parking plan to anticipate the increase in traffic and parking congestion. Parking bays next to walls and obstructions need to be 10 wide and offset 3'. Paved distance behind perpendicular parking bays should be a minimum of 24'. 5. Please consider Trash Truck access circulation and turnaround. Also: Emergency vehicle, ambulance and Fire Truck access, circulation and turnaround will be required. Loading zones will be required. Additional Dumpster locations and access needs to be considered. 6. Please check the proposed project with the anticipated traffic generations of the approved Master Plan. 7. Any proposed public utility easements (storm drain, sewer, etc) need to be a minimum of 20 feet in width. The Site Plan should clearly identify proposed public easements and/or dedications. Generally, the on-site (looped) Water system will be public if Fire Hydrants are located on it. 8. The site plan should reference the adjacent existing and proposed development. 9. The site plan should show proposed fire hydrant locations within and adjacent to the proposed development. 10. Provide a preliminary drainage study that identifies the development discharge flows and preliminary recommendations on the anticipated storm drain infrastructure required as part of the development. 11. The site plan should show all existing and proposed retaining walls adjacent to the project. 12. The site plan should show all existing and proposed utilities within, and adjacent to, the project. Please include reference drawing numbers for existing improvements/utilities. 13. This project will require a grading permit pursuant to Title 15 of the City's Municipal Code. A preliminary grading plan should accompany the SOP application. The grading plan should be designed in accordance with the requirements of Title 15 and other applicable standards. Please be sure the plan includes topography, structures,· and improvements located offsite but adjacent to the subject property. Typically a 50' buffer is enough detail offsite. 14. Please submit a preliminary geotechnical investigation concurrently with the SOP application. PRE 07-20 -THE FORUM June 28, 2007 Page 5 e Fire Department has reviewed this project as requested and shall not approve this proposal. When the original project was constructed, it was constructed to the minimum construction type permitted, Type V-N. With this fact in mind the developer elected to provide the following two basic items to increase the allowable square footage for the type of building and occupancies. The items were automatic fire sprinklers (otherwise required) and public ways or yards completely around this building. The proposed construction appears to negate the required yards. The applicant will need to provide evidence of compliance with the allowable building area provisions of the building and fire codes. If you would like to schedule a meeting to discuss this letter with the commenting departments, please contact Christer Westman at the number below. You may also contact each department individually as follows: • Planning Department comments: Christer Westman, Senior Planner, at (760) 602-4614. • Engineering Department comments: Clyde Wickham, Project Engineer -Engineering Development Services, at (760) 602-27 42. • Fire Department comments: Greg Ryan, Fire Inspections, at (760) 602-4663. rr:l~ DON NEU Planning Director DN:CW:aw c: Gary Barberio, Team Leader Clyde Wickham, Project Engineer Fire Prevention Bill Plummer File Copy Data Entry CALLE BARCELONA .. ~·····""''' .. I - - I I I ·1'-----' I I THOMAS ENTERPRISES lt11(L IIUil.DING tA 28,222 B.F." Bed -& lle!<>nd 1100 m BIILDINGtB 33,7828.F. -wnss.• -II.OOS S.F'.• .YI 58,602 S.F. lfl-t GROUND LEVEL ~ < z 0 ~ ....1 w 0 a:: < ~ m w -J ....1 < 0 '"' I 86.07.17 AREA ANALYSIS EXIS1Hl BUilDING 1PiA 1ST FLOOR 217,849SF 2ttlR.OOR 45,885SF TOTALfXISTING 283,844 SF PROPOSED U.lliNG WA PROPOSED RET AI. 2!5,360SF TOTAL PROPOSED 25.360SF TOTAI.IU..DINGWA TOTAL EXISTING 283,844 SF TOTAL PROPOSED 2!5,360 SF TOTALEXISllHG+ 289,l04SF PROPOSED PARKING ANALYSIS PAAI<IIG REQ\HNENTS TOTAL PARKmREOOREO: 289l04 SF 0 4.0 CARS/1.000 SF 1,157CARS TOTAL PARI<rlG PRJVIlEO: SURFACE PARKm PAR!<~@ S1RUCTURE THE FORUM AT CARLSBAD CloRl.S8AD, CoU'ORNIA 982CARS 3M CARS 1,320CARS SlJUII.US (+163 CARS) MEZZANINE LEVEL UPPER LEVEL r • • * ,....._ THOMAS ENTERPRISES MEZZANINE AND UPPER LEVELS RTKL E'Mtdlloll 2111 4,268 &.F.· "' I fl6.87.17 THE FORUM AT CARLSBAD CM.SIWI.~ 5465 Morehouse Dr Suite 165 San Diego California 92121 858. 552.8424 FAX 552.8429 Nadel Architects Inc Herbert Nadel, Architect, FAIA Architecture Planning Interiors August4,2003 Christer Westman, Associate Planner City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: The Forum at Carlsbad Carlsbad, California NADEL #: 01188.00 Dear Christer: Per our phone conversation this morning, I would like to thank you for your quick response to our request for a site visit to examine the issue regarding roof screening on Building 1. As you are aware, all parapets for this project are designed to extend well above all roof equipment. Unfortunately, due to the elevation of Calle Barcelona at the Southwest corner of the site, it becomes difficult to fully screen all portions of the roof at Building 1. Based on your visit to the site, we understand that you take no exception to the condition as-is. If you have any other concerns, please do not hesitate to call me. cc: Mel Kuhnel, Thomas Enterprises John Allan, VCC .. .. ~ _LoJLli03 • e ~~{'~ City of Carlsbad l#llfhhhit·i•X§.Jhlibl§hl June 3, 2003 Mel Kuhne! Fourth Quarter Properties 3604 Carleton Street San Diego CA 92106 SUBJECT: SOP 00-10 ...,.forum at Carlsbad The Planning Director has completed a review of your application for substantial conformance, (APN: 255-012-03). After careful considerati.on of the circumstances surrounding this request, the Planning Director has determined that the application quanfies for substantial conformance with the approved permit and therefore, approves the changes to the project based on Planning Director Administrative Policy No. 35. Please submit two (2) blueline copies (24" X 36") of all applicable exhibits for the project file and a reproducible 24" X 36" mylar copy of the amended site plan. The mylar must be submitted, stamped "Substantial Conformance", and signed by the Planning Director prior to issuance of any building permits for the project. CITY OF CARLSBAD MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director MJH:CW:bd c: Principal Planner, Gary Barberio Project Engineer, John Maashoff File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ • Cit of • Carlsbad --------~------~~~~ May 13,2003 Dear Sirs: The City of Carlsbad and the City of Encinitas have met to discuss the coordination of a common public trail connecting at the adjoining property line between the Encinitas Home Expo and Carlsbad Forum at La Costa. Both cities agreed that the trail connection as designed is desirable and will provide benefit to the public at large. A portion of an existing trail in the City of Encinitas will be abandoned, removed and replaced with appropriate landscape for the easement. In order for the developer of the Forum at La Costa to complete the work necessary for the connection on your property, a letter of permission from you is required. The developer of the Forum at La Costa will be responsible for all costs incurred for the trail connection. Grading and improvement plans will be required by both the City of Encinitas and City of Carlsbad prior to commencing any work. Attached is a drawing of the proposed trail connection and identification of the existing trail segment to be removed. Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated. Please call me with any questions at (760) 602-4614. Sincerely, Christer Westman, AICP Senior Planner C: Liz Ketabian 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us {!) " .. /-,.~~" ~, Ji.~t! I :;: -II 'Ill :&~ lt I II ~ l i ~,.,.,_ I ~ I v ,·r<. I ·; ~ . j 3.26\ c. ~ .-,: ~ --:> ~ --;;;.. /::_1-. ,·' -~·J / , -. --. 1.-~c:::..:._ . Z __ -=-~-------------90-------I I . \ l\ ·---------------i\::-:~ .... "12AiL. ~e:t:(Ht-.rn-r \b Ae.A-no::,-"'\ I - - - - - - - ---~------··-----·------,_._..,..,., ------------_-___ -_ ~~---------E • May 5, 2003 Mr. Christer Westman City of Carlsbad Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Reference: Your letter of April29, 2003 Dear Mr. Westman, • East of Bali Salon & Day Spa In consideration of the parking spaces to accommodate our Salon/Day Spa operation, please consider the following information: 1. A key consideration for us locating our business at The Forum at Carlsbad is the proximity to the adjacent La Costa Glen Retirement Center. We expect to have in excess of25% of our business from these residents who will either walk over or be transported by the Centers shuttle. We have been discussing our layout with some of these residents and have altered our design and services to accommodate their needs. 2. An additional 25% to 30% of our business will come from families and groups of 2-4 people who tend to travel together. This is the "bread and butter" of our operation where we offer family and special occasion packages. 3. Approximately 90% of our customers will also visit a restaurant or other retail shop prior to or after visiting East of Bali. This is a major reason why most major shopping complexes seek a high-end salon/day spa anchor like us to bolster traffic at other stores. 4. Our peak business is on Thursday, Friday and Saturday from lOAM to 4PM. We have little parking needs during the peak restaurant hours of 5PM to 8PM. I hope this helps with some of your concern over the parking issues. Please call me at 760-930-9239 ifl can be of further assistance. l~ Jeff Huston East of Bali @The Forum P.O. Box 131117 Carlsbad, CA 92013 Tel: 760-438-7630 Fax: 760-930-9625 OMAS Cbrister Westman, AICP City of.Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue SPPc:'ZJ-tD RE: East ofBaJ.i at Th1) Forum at Carlsbad Dear Christer •. • May 5, 2003 Per our telephone con' rersation on this date rc1garding the parking issue of the refenmced . tenant. we offer the f(l: lowing scenano. . 1. The tenant mix oftbe shopping center will be such that not all tenants will occupy the :r spaces simultaneously. Example: Bucca de Bepo is a 10,000 square foo I restaurant which will be open for business in the evening for dinner oni:, ·. Bed Bath & Beyond. mta. and Borders are large retail tenants with a maj' )rity of their space being used for storage and display and thus will not have S custO:mers per square foot at any given time. 2. We as lanc:Jords are not concerned regarding the parking ratio which East of Bali will c'>nsume as it is averaged throughout the center. 3. East ifBal i's business will be such that a percentage of their customers will be walk in tmde ftoin the adjacent retirement village. Also, a percentage of their .. customers Will be customers of the other retail tenants. We appreciate your ct.IOperation regarding this matter. If you reqwre additional. information please cal me at619-3Q0 .. 0484. Sincerely, ~ I Mel Kuhnel '1 VP Development Thomas Enterprises Wcslem Division 1935-TP Calle Barcelona Carlsbad, California 92009 760/479-0634 office · 760/479~0639 fax • ~w t0-~ • fH . .t rr · City of Carlsbad IQFihbl;t.MaJ§•LJillel§bl April29, 2003 Jeff Huston East of Bali PO Box 131117 Carlsbad CA 92013 RE: EAST OF BALI SALON AND DAY SPA Dear Mr. Huston: Thank you for responding to my phone call the other day regarding the number of employees there may be at the day spa. Based on your information, there could be as many as 26 employees and I am guessing a total of 15 day spa users at any given time during the day. This could require as many as 41 parking spaces to accommodate all of the employees and the day spa users. The approvals for the Forum at Carlsbad only anticipated an allocation of 17 parking stalls for the 4,200 square feet of suite area. At this juncture, I must inform you that I will not be able to issue permits for tenant improvements for the spa as long as the parking need exceeds the availability of parking on the site. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (760) 602-4614. Sincerely, CHRISTER WESTMAN, AICP Senior Planner CW:mh c: Mel Kuhnel, Thomas Enterprises, 2924 Emerson Street, Suite 206, San Diego, CA 92106 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us <!) < • ERS & ASSOCIATES Civil Engineering. Inc. PLAJ-JNING • H.GINEERING • SURVEYING April 25, 2003 RECE.\\/E.O Mr. John Maashoff Associate Engineer Public Works -Engineering CITY OF CARLSBAD 1635 Faraday ~PR 'L S '._}'"· p..RLSSP-.0 C~~~~G oEPi. Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 Subject: Dear John: Pavilion at La Costa (Forum at Carlsbad) Substantial Conformance On behalf of my client, I am writing you to summarize the proposed changes from the Conforming Site Development Plan, the reason behind the proposed changes, and the reasons why the proposed Substantial Conformance Exhibit as submitted is in conformance and equivalent to the Conforming Site Development Plan. The only substantial change consists of adding parking spaces parallel to Calle Barcelona at the southwest corner of the site. This change required the retaining wall to be realigned and pushed a portion of it closer to Calle Barcelona. The height of the retaining wall had to be increased approximately s· to 9' along this realigned portion of the wall. The maximum wall height increased to 31'p at the very southwest corner of the wall due to the grade differential between the existing Catle Barcelona and the parking lot currently under construction. There are limited methods of construction for this wall due to its height, the proximity of the existing street, and the limited area in which to work. It has therefore been determined that the best method of construction is to utilize a composite steel and formed concrete wall with tiebacks under the existing Calle Barcelona. All of the tiebacks will be deep enough below street grade as to not impact any existing and/or future utilities that can reasonably be anticipated in this area. The substantial conformance exhibit as submitted is in conformance and equivalent to the Conforming Site Development Plan because both show a retaining wall in this location, the parking has been increased in this area and not decreased, and the grade differential between Calle Barcelona and the site parking lot remains unchanged. Also shown on the Substantial Conformance Exhibit are a few minor changes to areas where the parking or loading areas have been modified to meet the needs of the future tenets. These are shown only to make the Substantial Conformance Exhibit as consistent as possible with the final developed condition of the site. Another change consists of the construction of a soil retention type retaining wall along the south side of the site along the Wildlife Corridor. Actually, this is not technically a change because the type of wall was never called out on the Conformed Site Development Plan. The reason that this type of wall is used is both for aesthetic reasons and the fact that the I C wall can be constructed from the "bottom up" without impacting the existing Wildlife Corridor. The last change reflected on the Substantial Conformance Plan consists of the addition of the monument walls to the plan. Again, this is not really a change to the original Conformed Site Development Plan but merely gives a more accurate picture of the anticipated final condition of the constructed site. We request that you approve the changes shown on the Substantial Conformance Plan so that the project can proceed on schedule in order to complete what will surely be a welcome addition to the City of Carlsbad. Very truly yours, MAYERS & ASSOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. Dru J. Mayers RCE 38474 President DJM:em Cc: Christer Westman, Carlsbad Mel Kuhner. Thomas J.N. 01-0064-01 04/09/2003 WED 12:00 FAX 858 552 8429 NADEL ARCHITECTS .. ~ MOrehOUSe Dr, 9uilll1611 Soa1 Di•99 C..lifQmle, t2121 !!51!m8424 FAX 1581152 114211 Nadal e Facsimile Transmission Date: Aprll9, 2003 Architects Inc Regarding: The Forum at Carlsbad Nadel Project Number: 01188 TO: The City of Carlsbad -Planning FAX NO.: (760) 602-8559 ArrENTION: Christer Westman NUMBER OF PAGES: 6 (lneludlng this page) WE ARE SENDING YOU: 30' Lighting for main parking areas THESE ARE: 0 D for your approval for review and comment Remarks: Christer, D D --· ·-·-----·--~--- per your request for use on job D D for your files signature Please compare this to the electrical site plan, and you will see how these att.ached fixtures are being used throughout the center. If enclosures listed above are not received, notify at once. cc: File Very truly yours, Nadel Architects lnr.. by Steven Kohn, AlA ~001 ------------------ 04/09/2003 WED 12:00 FAX 858 552 8429 NADEL ARCHITECTS ~002 • • • Francis Krahe • • • • • & Associates, Ia.e. THE PA VlLIONS AT LA COSTA l. TYPE SA: 30' STREET POLE WITH PEDESTRIAN LANTli:RN AT 14' (l OF 2) . . ..~ ..... 1 ·~ m .·~~·: ··l \J) ; .... . . . I ·I ' Tilt P;avilion$ ill t.. c~~~l<l NP160spcc.doe 10 Apri12002 l'a;c: 11'15<10 -17 04/09/2003 WED 12:00 FAX 858 552 8429 NADEL ARCHITECTS ~003 • • • Francis Krahe . . . • • • & Associates, Inc. THE PAVILIONS AT LA COST A 3. TYPE SA.-1: Housing: Pole: Reflector: Lc:Dli: Mounting: Ballast Lamp: Manufacturer: Note: 30' STREET POLE WITHOUTPEDESTRTANT.ANTIJ:RN 0 OF2) UL listed for wet locations. l?ixture to have IIrinimum of IP65 rating, by written verilil;ation . .tlimsh to be selected by Lighting Consultant. 30' tapered steel pole welded to steel base. Type TV asymmetric distribution, semi cut oft: seaJed optical chamber consistinJ;: of a reflector pennanently assembled on lop of a prismatic refractor. Clear polycarbonare Fixture to be mounted at 30' above furished ground with 8' ann extension Integral, HPF constant wattage. Electric111 Ensineer to verify voltage. (1) 400W Metal Halide CDM400S51N/0/4T< Mastercolor R.llt'l'O White by Philips (20,000 hour lamp life, 36,000 lwncns, CRI 90, CCT 4000K) Lumec 400MH-RN20-THB3-PC-volts-SMA-CRN8'-R92D-30'-.fmish-GFI-options 1. Provide 120 volt outlets in base fo.r seasonal lighting, locatt:d pe~pcndicular to Renaissance fixture head. 2. Provide handhole access for safety switch with gasketed covt~, grotmdcd as per NEC. Provide soldered conduit lends to pole, primary and secondaty protective devices in Nema 3R enclosure. 3. SttuCtw'al Engineer :>tru~;lurul fuundaliun ~ required per lu•;nlmd naliunal cudcs. 4. Provide conductor strain reliefs at top of pole inside. · S. l?rovidc matchmg pole and BIDl assembly as all SA and SB fixture type series . • I .:::... -=:'i:t.!=~.:" "'llliii.'\Ui.'l'l; I t!Z 1 '!!'*!.t*'* IF.:!!Z!' """""""_ .. , •• ~oo~ooo -·----~ l :.-r;"'Jl'l"' .... ~';~~~, .(=Jtl :!.=~:: . ..... .,. ~~g:;;-: ... . g_ ··~.1."~"··· . ~ ! -...... -~,~ ·-.-._.!!' ... ; Tile Pavilioos at La Costa NP160eptc.doc 10 April 2002 a>u;e 16500 • 18 04/09/2003 WED 12:01 FAX 858 552 8429 NADEL ARCHITECTS 141004 • • • Francia Krahe • • & Associates, Inc • THE PAVILIONS AT LA COSTA 4. TYPE SA-l: 30' STUET POLE WITIIOU1' PEDESTRIAN LANTERN i:2 OF 2) L ••• .:..;;.-- ~~,:1;'::_,.,~ ---,;;;;;;'iiioi"'"" 1.: ~.~:~/ j I .. ~ ... -1.:.:'· .. ~~:· lfl'to '"itiiii:·~· _..,_. ___ _, The Pa viii on¥ 11t La Cosca NP 160spcc.doc I 0 A.prillOOl Pase IG500 -\9 04/09/2003 WED 12:01 FAX 858 552 8429 NADEL ARCHITECTS ~aroo5 • • • Franeis Krahe . . . • • • & Associates, Jnc. THE PAVILIONS AT LA COSTA 5.TYPE SB: Housing: Pole: Refleaor: Lens: Mountina: Ballast; Lamp: Manufacturer: Note: DECORATIVE Mll:TAL HALIDE 14' STREET POLE UL listed for wet locations. Fixture to have mi~.iro:wn of IP65 rating. by written verification. Fi.uiili to be selected by Lighting Consultant. 14' tapered steel pole welded to steel base with bracket ann Type m asymmetric distnbution, segmented cut off reflectot set m faceted arc-imaie duplicating patterns Satin clear polycarbonate Fixture to be mounted at 14' above finished ground lnteg).'al, HPP constant wattage. Electrical E~ineer to vetif;y vultage. (1) lOOW Metal Halide MHCIOO/UIMP/3K Mastercolor b;y Philips (12,500 hour lamp lifo, 8800 lumens, CRI 85, CCT 3000K) Lumec I OOMH-L80-PCCS-SE3-volts-SFS-C:R.f·S IA-R92D-14 '·finish~options 1. Provide 120 volt outlets in base for seasonal. lighting, located perpendicular to Lantern fixture head. 2. Provide handhole access for safety switch with gasketed cover, grounded as per NBC. Provide soldered conduit leads to pole, primary and second~ry protective devices in Nema 3R enclosure. 3. Structural llngineer slructuml foundation as required per lo·~ and national codt::~. 4, Provide conductor strain reliefs at top of pole inside. 5. Provide matching pole and arm as all SA and SD fl>.."tUre type series. -= •''kiib •1 , .... MMri:r'N.. ! ..... ~-~~~-~~--~· ~-;~. ~:¥:~~~· .m=:·-·~"'. .; --..~:__ =-==.=r;-,~ ; ' ... --~-· 1:"'--.. ::::=-- .. ;z=::;~:~:~~ .. :·· .... ~··=-.. ~..... ~=..-.; -i;;i-t± ;,.;. :;,;..: ====·~ ........ ~'I:"''J"r.'I' ... M -t.~M Ito~~ ......... m .. .__ m::,. ,."'"e),.., .............. ,. .....,..., .. . . .. ~.,.,...,.. ~ ~=---· ~..::::=!!.!!! "-'11.•-~NIII,....... llo~-"wotolll~~~~~~~.i. ~ ........ .._...,....,I. :::.:::'.!!...:!~=:"..:: . ,..,......=..~ ~.rr.-"~,==-~~. ::=r~:;.~ ~·~E~~::~.~.:~_: : .. :::, ....,.,..,.,Mit:-'-'111' ... UDI.III_,.n .,.,.... __ _...,,.MIMI ~.:=.:::::...~., ~E;;,.w;p.1iiii!lli ~::-W:::..."'::":: ...... Qr.,l_,_,...... -~-~ !='1!1!.:~~:·.:: :-::.::.::~~= Miiiifiii' • ~"T>~Ii?W·!~~.~:: =~~-:-~-·-~·~ ~-···- --r~~l .. _, .. 1~& __ !1"_ ,-·· _ :.:·J 1be Pavllioalilal La Costa NPI6~.d0<: 10 April 2002 Pae.: lGsoo -20 04/09/2003 WED 12:02 FAX 858 552 8429 NADEL ARCHITECTS 141006 • • • Franc:ls Krabe • • • • • • & Associates. Inc. THE PAVILIONS AT LA COSTA 6. TYPE SB-1: Howing: Pole: Reflector: Lem: MoLUJting: Ballast: Lamp: Manufuc~et: Note: DECORATIVE METAl, HALIDE DOUBLE HEADED 14':STREET POLE UL listed for wet locations. Fixture to have minimum of IP6S ~11tin;;, by writte.n verification. Finish to be selected by Lighting Consultant. 14' tapered steel pole welded to steel base with (2) bracket arms. Type m asymmetric distribution, seamented cut off refle,:tor set in faceted arc-image duplicating patterns Satln clear polycalbonate Fixtures to be mounted at 14' above finished ground Integral. HPF constant wattage. Electrical Engineer to verifY voltage. (2) IOOW Metal Halide MHC100/tiiMP/3K Mastercolor by l'hilips (12,500 hour lamp life, 8800 lumens, CRI 8.5, ccr 3000K) Lumec 1 OOMH-L80-PCCS-SE3-volts-SFS-CRFS2A-R92D-14 '-r.inish-opticms 1. Provide 120 volt outlets in base for seasonal lighting, located pe~pcndicular to Lantern flXture head. 2. Provide handhole access for sofety switch with g11:skctcd cov::r, grounded as per NBC. Provide soldered conduit leads to pole, primary and secondary protective devices in Nema 3R encl()$1ll'e. 3. Structural Engineer stmctural foundation as required pa lo;;~.l and national codes. 4. Provide conductor strain reliefs at top of pole inside. 5. Provide matching pole and ann as all SA and SB fixture type series. ME -~~~-~=:;: ! =~=---· ~~~~ ~ tt==t!!!\--;:: .. ~=r~ ttitiifi~----!W'ant'r.'! -,.,.. _.,.""11 _ _,_ ' .. ,....,... ................ , y.l'f.. ~~.QIUtlll(~ l1 ==~~ =-=:~..:;;~~;;;";;;-r.,., ,....,....,....._,..._. =:••,._,t;:..,: :..· .... ~--~.... gre:. ...r;::...... ' ........,.~~.~,. .. ~ --U.r,. • .,; .. e,,.,.tt .....,~ .. ._, A lWI_. ~•)IIWI,:u.,...,~~~o~~~~~~~~ ... -. ......... ~lllf\~"' tV' "'-"' .... _,_,., .....,...., ............ ,.. -~~~==::: L..~ =;::::-:;::,.~;:=:-.=,~ .. ~-~:iii:i==--..... ~ ........• _ ........ ==~=--:-........ ~·-·--"" =-..:...~~-.... .,.. .. ~ .. -~ .;;:;.m ........ -.,. .... __ , ... ,..._.,... ....................... ._.... -. ......,..,.... ...... ,_ ....... ~'~=~-...... :==::-tM. ~)"1!1'-..; ......... ::; .. "'::::.·=·=-. -·-~~~-· ,......, .... ".-~;;;:a,.,.... -·-~-;;::.... .... The PtviUor.s tt 1:.:1 Cosb. N.l'l6~.doc l0Apri12001 PBJ:C 16500-21 . ' , . r 5465 Morehouse Dr. Suite 165 San Diego California, 92121 858 552 8424 FAX 858 552 8429 Nadel Architects Inc Architecture Planning Interiors November 21, 2002 Mr. Christer Westman, AICP Senior Planner City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA. 92008-7314 RE: The Forum at Carlsbad Carlsbad, CA NADEL #: 01188.00 Dear Christer: I: I,~. !<.,'' Thank you for taking time to meet with me the other day, I know that you have a busy schedule but your continued cooperation on this project is appreciated. As we discussed I want to summarize our agreement to the following three points regarding the landscape plan check comments generated by Mr. Larry Black during his review of the plans prepared by ADL Planning Associates, Inc. Crib Wall Planting The comment states that the irrigation and planting associated with the existing retaining wall on the west side of Calle Barcelona is inadequate. This cannot apply to our project. While this condition may be valid, the wall is not within the property boundaries of our project and can not be addressed as part of our work. Pedestrian Crosswalks The comment states that the pedestrian crosswalks are not acceptable in a location that includes the accessible parking space side aisle. We do not think that this comment is correct. The ADA criteria requires that an accessible path of travel be established between all buildings on the site and that this path, where possible, be as convenient for the disabled individual as it is for the ambulatory individual. The commonly established and widely accepted practice therefore is to create a path of travel that includes the parking space side aisles. To do otherwise would create a situation where the path for the disabled individual is not equivalent to that for the ambulatory individual. The crosswalks as designed and shown on our plans are acceptable. Landscape within Utility Easements The comment states that landscape plant material is not permitted within the utility easements. Our discussions with the serving utility companies suggest that this comment is not valid. The serving utility companies have reviewed and approved the improvement plans for this project and do not have a concern in this regard therefore neither should the City. There is criteria from the serving utility companies that states that the location of trees needs to be considered with relation to their proximity to the actual utility pipe. Our plans respect that criteria. The planting layout as designed and shown on our plans should be acceptable to the City. Thank you again for your help in this matter. Very Truly Yours, NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC ~- for Page Winkler, Senior Vice President Cc: Mel Kuhne!, Thomas Enterprises Tony Lawson, ADL • Cit of December 10, 2001 Mel Kuhnel Thomas Enterprises 2924 Emerson St., Ste. 206 San Diego, CA 92106 PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF DECISION SUBJECT: SDP 00-10/CDP 00-37-THE PAVILION At the Planning Commission meeting of December 5, 2001, your application was considered. The Commission voted 6-0 (Commissioner Nielsen Absent) to APPROVE (AS AMENDED) your request. The decision of the Planning Commission became final on December 5, 2001. The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the ninetieth day following the date which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the Planning Director, Michael J. Holzmiller, Secretary of the Planning Commission, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the final dispositions of your application, please call the Planning Department at (760) 602-4600. Sincerely, MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director MJH:CW:mh Enclosed: Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5079, 5080, 5081 c: Page Winkler Nadel Architects 5465 Morehouse, Ste. 165 San Diego, CA 92121 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us <!) e • City of Carlsbad I R Fi ••.• I .c. I •A§ ·L• a I I .cg ·'I November 13, 2001 Mel Kuhnel Thomas Enterprises Ste 206 2924 Emerson St San Diego CA 92106 SUBJECT: SOP 00-1 0/CDP 00-37 -THE PAVILION The preliminary staff report for the above referenced project will mailed to you on Friday, November 16, 2001. This preliminary report will be discussed by staff at the Development Coordinating Committee {DCC) meeting which will be held on November 27, 2001. A twenty {20) minute appointment has been set aside for you at 9:00. If you have any questions concerning your project you should attend the DCC meeting. It is necessary that you bring your required unmounted colored exhibit{s) with you to this meeting in order for your project to go forward to the Planning Commission. Your colored exhibits must be submitted at this time to ensure review by the Planning Commission at their briefings. If the colored exhibits are not available for their review, your project could be rescheduled to a later time. If you do not plan to attend this meeting, please make arrangements to have your colored exhibit(s) here by the scheduled time above. If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact your Planner, Christer Westman at {760) 602-4614. CITY OF CARLSBAD /!,lwA _s/pj-/YL. ~GARY E. WAYNE V -Assistant Planning Director GEW:CW:cs c: Page Winkler, Nadel Architecture, Ste 165, 5465 Morehouse Dr., San Diego .CA 92121 File Copy 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ('!) e • llitQPMts)~ November 6, 2001 Mr. Christer Westman, AICP City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Re: THE PAVILION AT LA COSTA Dear Christer: Our project was originally scheduled for the November 7, 2001 Planning Commission meeting. You have told us that our project will now be presented at the December 5, 2001 meeting. As you are aware, we have a critical schedule regarding the project and the tenants planned opening ofNovember 2002. The project has been through staff review, revisions, and re-submittals for the last 16 months. While we are addressing a few minor issues, it is our understanding that our current submittal is in compliance with staff requirements. We have therefore directed our architects and engineers to complete the contract documents for the project. Our goal is to submit for a building permit prior to the December 5th meeting. Please acknowledge your agreement with this, and if possible, issue a letter authorizing us to submit said documents to the proper authorities. Thank you for your cooperation. We look forward to a successful completion of the project. Sincerely, ~I V Cc: Stan Thomas Western Division 2924 Emerson Street Suite 206 San Diego. California 92 I 06 619/222-4397 office 619/222-5967 fax & ASSOCIATES Civil Engineering, Inc. PLANNING • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING November 1, 2001 Mr. John Maashoff Associate Engineer Public Works -Engineering CITY OF CARLSBAD 1635 Faraday Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 Subject: The Pavilion at La Costa SAP 00-10 Reference: Memorandum to Dru Mayers from John Maashoff dated October 31, 2001 Dear John: We have completed the changes to the Site Development Plan. Below is a list of our responses to the items that you felt needed to be revised/clarified on the plan. We have used the same numbering system that you used in your referenced letter. 1. We have talked with Page Winkler of Nadel Architects and coordinated our Site Plan layout to match his. He in turn will coordinate with Tony Lawson of ADL Planning Associates to insure that his base plan is the same as ours. This will include the raised landscaped median. We acknowledge that the maintenance of this median will be the responsibility of the center. 2. An updated soils report is being prepared and will be submitted by Greg Mitchell of Southern California Geotechnical. (714) 777-0333. It is our understanding from our last meeting, and subsequent conversations with Christer Westman, that we will not be providing an updated traffic study. We will be utilizing the previous study's recommendations. It is our understanding that this will be conservative due to our decrease in building square footage since the last report was completed. An updated drainage study signed by an engineer from our firm has been included with this submittal. It is our understanding that an initial SWPPP was prepared for the overall development prior to our client purchasing this lot. After discussing this with Christer Westman, it is our intention to submit a new SWPPP along with filing of the Notice of Intent under our client's name with the State of California prior to the start of any grading associated with this site. It is our intent to have our new SWPPP ready for your review at approximately the same time as our final grading plans for the site are ready for second plan check. 3. The cross section has been revised to include this information. We acknowledge that the structural section noted is a minimum, and that the actual section will be based on R values determined at the time of construction. However, since R values have already been taken, and Calle 19 Specrrum Pointe Drive, Suite 609 • Lake Forest, CA 92630 • (949) 599·0870 office • (949) 599-0880 fax Barcelona has already been paved, the structural section will most likely match that which is already there. The right-of-way does vary from approximately station 16+50 to 23+25. 4. It is our intention to modify some of these sections during final design so that they will be either straight graded all the way across or crowned. We do not intend to have concentrated drainage leaving the site draining over the pedestrian path. We also do not intend to drain up against the median, as was Hunsaker's previous intention per the Site Development Plan. 5. This information has been added to the plan. 6. The line of sight has been added to the plan. This site distance was calculated using the Caltrans method for site distance based upon a 40 mile per hour design speed as instructed by City personnel. However, we do not calculate a distance of 440'. The distance that we have calculated is 345'. These calculations have previously been submitted for your review. We have included another copy of these calculations with this submittal. 7. This has been done. 8. This has been done. 9. The parking stalls along the easterly property line are set back 2'. We have included a typical section showing this condition. 1 0. The 50' open space corridor along the southerly boundary of the site is truly a "wildlife" corridor. It was required as a condition of the City of Encinitas on the development immediately to the south of our site. We have reviewed this with Christer Westman. 11. This has been done. 12. To accommodate the design of the trail shown on the site plan, we intend to ask that the City vacate a portion of the existing trail easement and a new easement will be offered to cover the trail in its revised location. 13. This has been done. 14. The amount of water flowing through the wildlife corridor is minimal. The only tributary area is the corridor itself. In addition the corridor is relatively wide. The 1 00-year water surface would be mere inches off of the finished grade of the bottom of the corridor. 15. Per our discussions with Tom Curriden at the City of Encinitas, they would like to see a 42" high screen wall along the northerly side of the "wildlife" corridor. However, we have not shown this on our cross sections because it has not been a requirement of the City of Carlsbad. You may want to make that a condition of the approval of this Site Development Plan. 16. We have added a note to this affect on the plan. 17. We thought that it would be preferable from a maintenance standpoint to have the line continue straight out to the street at the north entrance. The west entrance does not show a stub out on plan 349-3 that would be necessary for looping the line through our site. If the City prefers we can try to utilize the existing stub out near the northerly entrance to our site. Hopefully we have satisfactorily addressed all of your concerns. We would like to suggest that any remaining issues be addressed as conditions of the site plan approval. Very truly yours, MAYERS & ASSOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. Dru J. Mayers, RCE 38474 President cc: Christer Westman, Planning Department Page Winkler, Nadel Architects Tony Lawson, ADL Planning Mel Kuhnel, Thomas Enterprises Greg Mitchell, So. Cal. Geotechnical e ·;rHO MAS :1-1 f N T E R P R I S E S, I N C. June 26, 2001 Mr. Christer Westman City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, Ca. 92008-7314 Re: SPD 00-10/CDP 00-37-The Pavilion Dear Christer: We are in the process of completing the site plan and building plans for submission to the City of Carlsbad for final review. In the process of working with the City of Carlsbad and the retail tenants to bring the project to fruition, we have encountered several issues, which we would like to address. The plan as previously submitted was comprised of265,000 square feet of retail tenants. Due to the fact that the City of Carlsbad would not allow full access to the upper level parking deck from Calle Barcelona, the retail tenants who were on the second level refused to proceed with lease negotiation. Therefore, we had no choice but to design the project with 219,000 square feet of ground floor retail and 46,000 square feet of second level office space. Thus, the requirement for a parking structure was eliminated. Per the enclosed site plan, we now have two major intersections with traffic signals and two right-in, right-out intersections. With the previous submittal it was determined by the City of Carlsbad Engineering department that the North signalized intersection be designed in a manner that would require us to dedicate an additional eleven feet of right-of-way and reconstruct the road as it is presently built. Our request is that the City of Carlsbad reconsider this requirement due to the fact that we now have a mixed-use project of retail and office use that will significantly reduce the traffic count at that intersection. Also, the road was constructed according to the Green Valley Reduced Project Alternative. Western Division 2924 Emerson Street Suite 206 San Diego. California 92 I 06 619/222-4397 office . 619/222-5967 fax The criteria for the design was to accommodate a master plan that stipulates a retail use impact of300,000 square feet. We have reduced that impact to 219,000 square feet of retail use. With this reduction and the fact that the road was constructed in compliance to the City of Carlsbad requirements, we ask that we not be required to dedicate the additional right-of-way and that we not be required to demolish and reconstruct the existing road and improvements. The requirement to do so has a significant impact on our project budget in that it will require us to remove existing paving, curbs, sidewalks, screen walls, light poles, utility lines and fire hydrants. Also, of significant importance is that the additional eleven feet of right-of-way greatly affects the design and efficiency of our site plan design. Thus, your decision on the matter is critical. If you require additional information or wish to discuss the situation, please call. )Q\cv{p~ MelKuhnel Cc: Stan Thomas Page Winker-Nadel Architects 1T. ·.att-JOMAS "ENTERPRISES,INC. June 1, 2001 Christer Westman AICP City of Carlsbad Planning Department 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA. 92008-7314 Re: Pavilion at La Costa-SDP 00.10 Dear Christer: In response to your letter regarding the CEQA guidelines, we offer the following explanation for the requirement of additional time. At the time of our application being deemed complete on October 19, 2000 we had an assembly of retail tenants that fit the project guidelines and would have allowed us to proceed with construction. However, due to an economic downturn and a climate of uncertainty, we had muhiple tenants pull back or out of the project. Since that time, through hard work and our efforts in promoting the dynamics of our site, we have managed to breath new life into the project with most of the original retailers plus many new tenants that add to the excitement of the project. With the vitality that the City of Carlsbad has to offer and the high standards that we have set for the project, we are more than ever convinced that this project will be an overwhelming success. We appreciate your patience and understanding. By granting us the time extension required, we now anticipate submitting the final drawings within the next thirty days. Please call me if you wish to discuss the project in greater detail. Sincerely, N Cc: Stan Thomas Western Division 2924 Emerson Street Suite 206 San Diego. California 92 I 06 619/222-4397 office 619/222-5967 fax June 1, 2001 Mel Kuhnel e City Thomas Enterprises 2924 Emerson Suite 206 San Diego CA 92106 e of Carlsbad I #11 Fi ,, ,, ,,,.I aX§ ·t• a I '·'4 ,,, RE: PAVILION AT LA COSTA· SOP 00-10 Dear Mel: According to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines, the appropriate environmental review, in this case a Negative Declaration, must be completed within 180 days of deeming a project application complete. Since the Pavilion at La Costa application was complete on October 19, 2000, the Negative Declaration should have been either adopted or denied by April 19, 2001. In order to bring the project back into compliance with the CEQA time limits, a suspension of the time period may be granted if the applicant and the City mutually agree that there are compelling circumstances which justify a time extension. The alternative to a time extension is denial and resubmittal of the project. Please respond to this letter with an explanation of the circumstances which justify additional processing time for the Pavilion at La Costa application. Sincerely, Christer Westman AICP Associate Planner CW:cs 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (i) December 20, 2000 Mike Comulada MCG Architects 12555 High Bluff Drive San Diego CA 92130 e City of RE: THE PAVILION PARKING DISTRIBUTION Dear Mike: e Carlsbad • uta'""·*·' ·14·L'*'. ·*4 ·'' Enclosed is a site plan with suggested distribution of standard, compact, motorcycle, and bicycle parking. I spoke with Mike Shirey and he agreed that reducing the "main street" to 28 feet would be OK. The combination of 28 feet, and a 17.5 long standard stall (which overhangs the pedestrian sidewalk by 2.5 feet) creates the opportunity to get some more standard size stalls in and increase planters between aisles to at least 5 feet. Any questions, give me a call at 760-602-4614. Sincerely, ~~ Christer Westman, AICP Associate Planner CW:cs 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ -------------------------------------- November 20, 2000 Mel Kuhnel e City Thomas Enterprises, Suite 206 2924 Emerson San Diego CA 92106 e of Carlsbad I ill f31.1 ,J I .t.M •14 ·Fi II •• 14111 RE: SOP 00-10 THE PAVILION AT LA COSTA Dear Mr. Kuhnel: The original signature date for the Calle Barcelona improvements adjacent to the Pavilion at La Costa is July 15, 1998. The signature indicates that the improvements were approved for construction as of that date. If you should have any further questions, please contact me at (760) 602-4614. Sincerely, ~~ Christer Westman AICP Associate Planner CW:cs C: Mike Shirey, Associate Engineer 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ November 14, 2000 Mel Kuhne! e City Thomas Enterprises, Inc. 2924 Emerson, Suite 206 San Diego CA 92106 e of Carlsbad I :1161 ,J II 1.1. I •l§ ·fl 31, .I§ ell SUBJECT: SOP 00-01/CDP 00-37 -THE PAVILION Dear Mr. Kuhne!: This letter shall serve as an official statement regarding the proposed project's consistency with the property's zoning. The current zoning of the property is Planned Community (PC). Planned Community does not identify allowed uses nor does it describe development standards. It does however stipulate that a Master Plan must be developed which will address both zoning and development standards. To that effect, the site is part of the adopted Green Valley Master Plan and is identified as Planning Area 2 and is zoned within the Master Plan as C2 (General Commercial). Attached is an excerpt from the zoning ordinance relating to C2 (General Commercial). If you should have any questions, please call me at (760) 602-4614. Christer Westman AICP Associate Planner CW:mh Attachment 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (!) October 30, 2000 Mel Kuhne! e City Thomas Enterprises, Inc. 2924 Emerson, Suite 206 San Diego CA 92106 e of Carlsbad IQfJ,J;ti.t.i•A§.f;jii,l§bl SUBJECT: SOP 00-10/CDP 00-37 ·THE PAVILION Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit, application no. SOP 00-10/CDP 00-37, as to their completeness for processing. The items requested from you earlier to make your Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit, application nos. SOP 00-10/CDP 00-37 complete have been received and reviewed by the Planning Department. It has been determined that the application is now complete for processing. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is October 19, 2000. Please note that although the application is now considered complete, there may be issues that could be discovered during project review and/or environmental review. Any issues should be resolved prior to scheduling the project for public hearing. In addition, the City may request, in the course of processing the application, that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise, supplement the basic information required for the application. Please contact your staff planner, Christer Westman, at (760) 602-4614, or staff engineer Mike Shirey, at (760) 602-2747, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, Planning Director MJH:CW:mh c: Adrienne Landers Mike Shirey File Copy Data Entry Planning Aide 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (!) .----------------------------- ISSUES OF CONCERN No. SOP 00-1 0/CDP 00-37 -THE PAVILION Planning: 1 . A better pedestrian connection can be made between the restaurant pads. 2. A retaining wall seems to be missing from the space west of building No.1 and Calle Barcelona. Engineering: Traffic and Circulation 1. Thank you for showing all of the street and site cross-sections. As previously requested, make sure that the on-site and off-site street-sections and plan view dimensions on the Civil Site Plan (CSP) match the Architectural Site Plan (ASP) and Landscape Site Plan (LSP). For example, the dimensions on the CSP north and west street-sections do not match the ASP plan view dimensions. 2. The required right of way dedication for Calle Barcelona for the dual-left-turn lanes and raised median is not being shown in plan or street-section view on the CSP. The ASP shows this required right of way dedication, but in accordance with the City's Transportation Engineering Department four (4) addition feet are required to be dedicated, so that the intersection operates adequately. Therefore, please revise the CSP and ASP in accordance with the following: • Existing "Turn Lane" Exhibit proposes 95' right of way; • Per Transportation Division staff, need 2' shift to the south, and a minimum 4' median; • Therefore, add 4' to proposed 95' = 99' (existing 84' right of way+ 15' = 99'). 3. Please show handicap ramps at the secondary driveways (i.e., easterly D/W and parking structure D/W). 4. Thank you for indicating the various public utilities as existing or proposed. As previously requested, please label all streets (both on-site and off-site) as existing or proposed, and, public or private. Please label in plan and street-section views. Also, verify and label the M-9 barricade at the southerly terminus of Calle Barcelona as existing, and, label the Calle Barcelona street improvement drawing number, in plan view. 5. As previously requested, please show the distance between all of the proposed intersections along Calle Barcelona. This can be shown on CSP sheet 1. 6. Please add a traffic signal to the ASP and CSP at the "westerly" main project intersection with Calle Barcelona. 7. Thank you for showing clear Caltrans Corner sight distance on the LSP and CSP. The site lines shown on the LSP were shown exceptionally well. However, on the LSP, the westerly intersection, looking south, needs to be slightly revised (see redlined LSP check print). Additionally, as previously requested, clear sight lines of a minimum of 440ft. must be met at all intersections along Calle Barcelona. The CSP shows 405'. This is incorrect, please revise. 8. Thank you for more fully dimensioning the plan sets and for showing the right of way dedication on the ASP and LSP (the CSP dimensioning is incorrect). As previously requested, please submit full preliminary striping plans for Calle Barcelona, and, at all intersections along Calle Barcelona (for all 'legs' of the intersection), including: all dimensions, full width raised median tapering to a 4' median 'nose,' and required right of way dedication. Please be advised, there should be existing approved striping plans included in the Calle Barcelona improvement plan set (DWG. 349-3), or, preliminary striping plans in the La Costa Glen site plan set (SOP 98-01, sheet 8 of 8). Coordinate "Pavilion" striping configurations with these plan sets. 9. Thank you for reconfiguring the access to the proposed parking structure. This new configuration works much better. Regarding the parking structure, please revise as follows: • Please dimension the drive aisles (24' minimum) on the CSP; • Please dimension the parking spaces (as previously requested, please add an additional 2ft. of width to any proposed parking stall that is adjacent to a wall); • As previously requested, please provide 5ft. offsets at proposed parking stalls which are located at 90° (or less) adjacent to each other; • Please indicate how positive drainage for the parking structure will be obtained; • As previously requested, please show that a standard AASHTO "P"-Vehicle can ingress/egress the parking structure. 10. As previously requested, please show loading zones for proposed buildings 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8? Please be advised, all proposed buildings must have designated loading zones (and not just striped-out parking stalls). Drainage 1. As previously indicated, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) criteria must be met. Since this site drains into an existing detention basin, less extensive measures can be proposed for on-site pollutant mitigation. However, something must be proposed. Staff suggests constructing oil separator/filter systems at all loading zone sumps, and, installing filters at all on-site inlets with a maintenance program included in the CC&R's and lease agreements for the project. Please show this suggestion, or something proposed by the applicant, on the CSP. 2. Please tie the proposed brow ditch that travels along the southerly perimeter of the site into an inlet, and connect a storm drain to the proposed storm drain that travels along the eastern perimeter. See sheet 3 of the CSP red lined check prints. 3. The CSP shows a lot of surface drainage at less than the required 1%. Where this surface drainage is shown that has a greater cross-fall, do not show the minimal 0.5- 0.7% fall because it will not do that. Where there is no substantial cross-fall, then show this surface drainage at 1% minimum fall. 4. The proposed on-site storm drain in the middle of the project (that connects at sheet's 2 & 3) does not go anywhere. Please revise. 5. Where parking lot surface drainage is directed to planters, create longitudinal curb cuts so that the runoff keeps flowing and does not pond in a parking space. 6. Please show some inlet elevations (ie's) on the proposed storm drains so that gravity flow can be verified. 7. Please add a cross-section for the easterly parking structure. Please show, Calle Barcelona, the slope/ditch, and, the parking structure. 8. Please make sure that the proposed brow ditches around the parking structure have enough clear room for maintenance of the brow ditches; should have a minimum of 6 feet. Please verify, revise and dimension. 9. Hydrology Study comments, as follows: • The Study seems to be "over-simplified," i.e., it was prepared without showing any proposed on-site storm drains and just using "sub-drainage areas" as nodes. Staff assumes that the storm drain system was not designed when the study was prepared. Now that the storm drain is being proposed, does including this on-site storm drain change any of the a·s in the study (via different times of concentration, runoff coefficients, etc.); or, is this surface analysis equivalent? If it is equivalent, then explain and state this in the report; • What is the on-site effect of the increased a at Node 2? Please explain in the report. • What is the offsite effect at the existing basin outfall of the increased Q at Node 1? Please explain in the report. • Staff has some concern over the increased a·s, per Study Table #1, as follows: • 24" Existing Q = 24.5cfs -Proposed a = 20.6cfs; • 36" Existing a = 25.2cfs -Proposed 40.3cfs; • @Outfall Existing = 45.7cfs -55cfs. Two of the above pipe segments have a substantial increase in the proposed Q. What effect does that have on these pipe segments? Can the existing pipe segments and joints handle this increased Q? Do these pipe segments heed to be upsized? Please verify and explain in the Study. Grading 1. The Soils report that was submitted was for the previous project and is outdated (i.e., July 11, 1996). Please have the report updated, and, make it site specific. Please be advised, additional grading issues may arise once the updated site specific Soils Report is submitted and reviewed. Also, this is generally a "Completeness Item," but since the rest of the plans are acceptable, staff is calling the project complete. Miscellaneous 1. Thank you for indicating applicable easements. As previously requested, also please indicate the future disposition of these easements (e.g., existing storm drain easement at northeastern corner of property, and, the southerly end of the trail easement). Also, in accordance with Preliminary Title Report (PR) Schedule "8," please submit recorded copies of the following documents: 57, 70 and 71. • ' 2. Thank you for showing cross-sections around the perimeter of the site. Since you are now proposing relocation of the existing trail, please show a cross-section at the southerly end of the trail, as Section "G." Please show the existing slopes/tope and trail, and, proposed slopes, trail, drive/parking aisle, building, major vegetation, etc. 3. As previously requested, please provide documentation that Leucadia County Water District (LCWD) and Olivenhain Municipal Water District (OMWD) have reviewed this site plan for sewer and water concerns, respectively. 4. As previously requested, please meet with the Building and Fire Department staff regarding the proposed parking structure. Provide documentation of any comments that staff may have from these two Department's. 5. For City record keeping purposes, please create a seven (7) sheet site plan set out of the existing plans as follows: "Site Development Plan" (on 24" x 36" Sheets) • Sheet 1 -"Architectural" Conceptual Site Plan • Sheet 2 -"Civil" Site Development Plan (Sheet 1) • Sheet 3 -"Civil" Site Development Plan (Sheet 2) • Sheet 4 -"Civil" Site Development Plan (Sheet 3) • Sheet 5 -"Civil" Site Development Plan (Sheet 4) • Sheet 6 -Truck Access Exhibit • Sheet 7 -Landscape Concept Plan (this needs to be revised to 24" x 36") A red-lined check print was previously forwarded to you for use in making the requested revisions. This check print must be returned with the revised plans to facilitate continued staff review. --------------------------- October 3, 2000 Mel Kuhnel e City Thomas Enterprises Suite 206 2924 Emerson San Diego CA 92106 e of Carlsbad IQ fh h elI .t. I •A§ ·ih J I I .t§ ,J I RE: SOP 00-10 THE PAVILION AT LA COSTA Dear Mr. Kuhnel: We are in receipt of your re-submittal for the Pavilion at La Costa. We are currently reviewing the plans for any remaining issues that there may be. A cursory review indicates that most if not all previous comments have been addressed. We look forward to completing the discretionary review process with you on the Pavilion at Carlsbad and believe that when the project is built it will be a great asset to the City of Carlsbad. If you should have any questions please call me at (760) 602-4614. Sincerely, ~4"Iv01~~ Christer Westman AICP Associate Planner CW:cs 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ ,------------------------------------------------------------------------------- II PLANNING I SYSTEMS 8/21/00 LAND USE I COASTAL PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • IA3900 POLICY AND PROCESSING ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION Mike Shirey, Associate Engineer City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: The Pavilion financial deadline Dear Mike, Just a:s a_ follow up to my letter to you regarding the traffic design alternatives earlier today, my client has asked me to provide a summary of the project's immediate financial deadline. I know you are charged with ensuring the most workable project design, but in the interest of conveying the forces at work on the developers side of the project, this information may be worth while. Thomas Enterprises is in the process of working through a contingency purchase of The Pavilion site from La Costa Glen. Over the last few months, as the project planning progressed certain financial payments were made towards the final property purchase. As time and project design moves along larger payments are necessitated by contract. This Friday is a date which requires a "substantial" payment to the property owner. Because of the critical nature of the additional right-of-way possibility described in my earlier letter, Thomas Enterprises may not choose to fulfill the Friday payment "drop71• · If there is a decision regarding Calle Barcelona roadway improvements prior to this Friday, it would be great interest to my client. Both the purchaser and seller are obviously anxious to move past this financial deadline and go on to the next phases of property transfer and development. Both believe in the viability of the project and its value to the community. · If you can provide any insight into the project status prior to this Friday, it would be eatly appreciated. Please feel free to call my client Mel Kuhnel, or me if Y.: have any information. c. Bob Wojick, Deputy City Engineer • J•~~dtMestwqlJ, Planning Dept. 1530 FARADAY AVENUE • SUITE 100 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • (760) 931-0780 • FAX {760) 931-5744 • planningsystems@nctimes.net • meg architecture FAX TRANSMITTAL DATE August 25, 2000 TO FROM REBAR DING HO. OF PAGES ORIGINALS TO FO~LOW REMARKS cc Christer Westman City of Carlsbad Planning (760) 602-8559 Michael A. Comulada, Project Director The Pavilion at La Costa -Carlsbad, California MCG Project No. 00.173.10 2 (including cover page) 0 Yes 181No Further to your telephone conversation today with Ron Grunow of Hunsaker and Associates, we have attached a sketch of a proposed redesign of the main signalized try to the project which provides for two left turn lanes into the site with one through Ia bike lane, and a 4' raised median nose. This solution requires giving over an additio al4' of R.O.W. to accommodate the median. The sketch also includes the necessary tran ition tapers each side of the driveway entrance. Due to the location of the existing bridge and riparian habitat we would not be able to provide the necessary transition tapers each side of the main entry driveway if we are required to provide 2 left turn lanes and two through lanes for traffic from El Camino Real. We would appreciate your early review and discussion of this proposal with Mike Shi ey and would welcome your comments as soon as possible. Mike Shirey, City of Carlsbad Engineering Mel Kuhnel, Thomas Enterprises Eric Johnston, Planning Systems Ron Grunow, Hunsaker & Associates Retail . Entertal11111ent • luapltallty • Oftice Sam Kab, Urban Systems Linda Moreland, MCG Architec s Norman Barrett, MCG Architect! I ZOO/tOO'd £081# O£l3:IQ N'lS 8JW uLuB OS£ BSB su:st OOOZ.SZ'f:lflV • • ~-lrt-YL----PAINTED DOUBLE RAISED MEDIAN I IIi !!{~Hi H if+D 9WHH1J I - UffiHHHV: !W!_Wd:Oj \_ RIPARIAN WOODLAND l YELLOW PED. PATH ---------t+---EXIST. BRIDGE Striping Options Partial Site Plan The PaviUon 8t C.lle Barcelona Thoma Entarprl .. C.rlsh~, C.ttrornle I ZOO/ZOO'd £081# ~ ·~~e.: --oo.m:m : 0-'-" NO.: n..tl,.n 1 • . ~~~~·----. ·---UJI~_!__ : Scale: 1 "=1 DO' -0" : Dlta: 8125100 . . . . . : '~' lEG JIICIIIECn ALL IIIGIITS IIUEREI omna Nils 8:)W meg architecture ' August 25, 2000 e Cit Tom Hagaman PLANNING SYSTEMS 1530 Faraday Avenue, Suite 100 Carlsbad, CA 92008 SOP 00-10/CDP 00-37: THE PAVILION RIGHT OF WAY/RAISED MEDIAN ISSUE -RESPONSE Dear Tom, Staff is in receipt of your two August 21, 2000, letters and "right of way/raised median" issue exhibits. This correspondence is being written for two reasons: 1) To respond to the proposed right of way/raised median exhibits; and, 2) for clarification purposes regarding the two letters. Regarding item No. 1, staff has reviewed the exhibits and is agreeable to the installation of a combination of raised medians and striping configurations to prohibit left turns from the service entrance and parking garage driveways. By providing this combination, it seems that additional right of way dedication will not be required. However, staff does not support any of the exhibits that were provided; although, Option No. 1 (attached) is headed in the right direction. Therefore, some guidelines that the developer's engineer should design to are as follows: (a) The raised medians should take up the full 1 0' width of the two-way-left- turn lane; (b) they must be long enough to prohibit motorists from attempting to make any illegal left turns into or out of the mall (while not interfering with left turn queuing into the mall at the next intersection); (c) bike lanes must be provided; (d) transitioning of through lanes, bike lanes, and left turn striping must be considered closely; and, (e) the raised medians must have decorative "stamp-crete" installed. As staff was reviewing the Pavilion traffic report, for the first time, to make our determination on the right of way/raised median issue, it was observed that there is a very high left turn movement at the main entrance to the mall (i.e., across from the La Costa Glen community). This high number of left turns necessitates dual left-turn pockets (L TP) into the mall. Although, the raised medians may not require additional public right of way dedication, these dual L TP's will. Therefore, if the developer wishes to resubmit, please submit a dual LTP design, with appropriate lane widths and transitions, showing the additional right of way that is required. As with the raised median/striping design above, the two bike lanes and four through lanes must remain. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2720 • FAX (760) 602-8562 {!) SOP 00-10/CDP 00-37:.E PAVILION RIGHT OF WAY/RAISED MEDIAN ISSUE-RESPONSE T. HAGAMAN LETTER; AUGUST 25, 2000 2 Regarding Item No. 2, staff feels that some clarification is required concerning some of the statements that were made in the first letter, dated August 21, 2000. The statement was made that the developer has been "working with planning and engineering for over 8 months" and that "many on-site and off-site issues have been resolved." This is incorrect. First, engineering met with the original developer (for "The Avenue" preliminary review) once in approximately the Fall of 1999. The next time that engineering met with any developer for this site was on May 10, 2000, with the current developer. In no way has engineering been "working with the developer for over 8 months" on this project; and, in no way have "many on-site and off-site issues been resolved." The current developer may have been working with the Planning Department on site design but their perception that issues were resolved is unfounded. Issue resolution generally does not even begin until a formal application is submitted and deemed complete. The Pavilion was formally submitted on July 5, 2000, and was deemed incomplete. The statement was made that " ... only recently ... a raised median exclusively (and related additional right of way) has been added as a possible requirement." Again, this is incorrect. In the preliminary review for The Avenue (in which Planning Systems was involved) in December 1999, staff indicated, " ... as discussed at the applicant/staff meeting, the only effective way to limit the drive aisle intersections to a right-in/right-out configuration, and the only measure that staff will support, is construction of a standard raised median on Calle Barcelona. Due to the width of Calle Barcelona, the only way to fit a raised median on the street is for the developer to dedicate additional right of way." (Emphasis added.) Planning Systems acknowledged this potential raised median/right of way requirement in a letter to the Assistant Planning Director, dated February 1, 2000. The potential for a raised median/right of way requirement was discussed a second time at the May 10, 2000, meeting with the current developer. At that meeting staff specifically stated again, that the only effective way to prohibit left turns was the installation of a standard raised median which may require the dedication of additional right of way. This requirement was again reiterated in The Pavilion's incomplete letter dated August 2, 2000. Now, staff has tentatively agreed with the developer's proposal of a combination of raised median and striping, as long as, an acceptable configuration can be designed. So the right of way issue, at least regarding any raised medians, may no longer be a concern. Staff did however want to clear the record on this issue. Lastly, the comment in the letter stating, ''To sacrifice a project such as this over one remaining issue .... " is also incorrect. Currently, The Pavilion is incomplete with two pages of completeness issues and two pages of "issues of greater concern" (of which the raised median issues discussed above were part of). Also, as indicated in Engineering Item No. 11, of the August 2, 2000, incomplete letter, " . . . since the application was deemed incomplete general engineering issues could not be reviewed." As you can see, there is more "than one remaining issue" to be resolved. SOP 00-10/CDP 00-37~E PAVILION RIGHT OF WAY/RAISED MEDIAN ISSUE-RESPONSE T. HAGAMAN LETTER; AUGUST 25, 2000 3 Staff takes exception to the first August 21, 2000, letter. It seems that it was an attempt to sway the issues and make staff look like they are not being helpful, when in reality, staff has worked with the developer, as evidenced by the tentative agreement regarding the raised median/striping configuration discussed above. Staff does not believe that this is an effective way to work together, and hopes that the developer and their consultants can diligently attempt to resolve all of the project's issues rather than resort to writing letters in an attempt to circumvent the issues. That being said, staff will continue to work with the developer. However, the dual L TP is a major issue. If the developer is completely set on not dedicating the required additional right of way and installing the dual L TP and any required transitions to mitigate their left turn volumes, engineering staff would not be able to support the project. If you, or the developer have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at 760/602-2747. Sincerely, M~~b Associate Engineer-Engineering/Development Services attachment c: Deputy City Engineer-Engineering/Development Services Senior Civil Engineer-Engineering/Development Services Associate Planner-C. Westman Mel Kuhne! THOMAS ENTERPRISES, INC 2924 Emerson, Suite 206 San Diego, CA 92106 ... e ---(' (' ,, RESTAURANT _, 6,500 SF I I I ~ I II :I ·' :J 'I II I \ • OPTION NO.1. -NORTH DRIVEWAY RAISED MEDIAN ACROSS TRUCK DRIVEWAY ONLY, WITH DOUBLE YELLOW TURN POCKET. --. -. :/ ~'f---+'-.!L' --+--4--~~fulj BIKE LANE Striping Options Partial Site Plan The Pavilion at Cslle Barcelona Thomas Enterprises Carlsbad, California ------SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION I 5' II' It' 10',11' It' 5' <( z 0 ~I <( co ~I u Project No.: Drawing No.: Scale: Date: lf-'- 1 1-l)----l._li +---PAINTED DOUBLE YELLOW BIKE LANE I I 00.173.01 Option 1 8/21/00 RAISED MEDIAN meg architecture cr I!U:iiJilll <l' II!IJSI.84TI ~~ IICG ARCHITECTS AU RIGHTS RESERVED 12555 High Bluff DIM. Slitl l!il, Sin DieQa, CA 921:11 EB North e e City of Carlsbad IQtUJ,JI,t.i•X§.JUiii•i§.il August2,2000 Mel Kuhnel Thomas Enterprises, Inc. 2924 Emerson, Suite 206 San Diego CA 92106 SUBJECT: SOP 00-10/CDP 00-37 ·THE PAVILION Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Plan, applications no. SDP 00-10 and CDP 00-37, as to their completeness for processing. The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information which must be submitted to complete your application. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. The second list is issues of concern to staff. When all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, July 5, 2000, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. Please contact your staff planner, Christer Westman, at (760) 602-4614 or your staff engineer Mike Shirey at (760) 602-2707, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, MICHAEL J. HO Planning Director MJH:CW:cs c: Adrienne Landers Mike Shirey File Copy Data Entry Planning Aide 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 {i) LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION No. SDP 00-10/CDP 00-37-THE PAVILION Planning: 1. Indicate the outdoor hardscape areas for the restaurant pads on the grading plan. 2. Verify that the grading condition shown on the grading plan is correct between Calle Barcelona and building one and the parking structure. The"slopes shown don't account for the parking structure entry or ramp, the outdoor patio area for the restaurant in building one, or the retaining wall shown in section on the architectural plans. 3. Provide southerly off site information showing the trail connection to the City of Encinitas and the slope contours and elevations of the wildlife corridor on the grading plan. 4. Verify that the orientation labels are correct for each of the architectural elevations. Building six is incorrectly labeled. Some elevations are labeled as north because they are the north side elevation and others as north because that is the direction the observer is facing. Please use a consistent point of view. 5. Provide spot elevations for the Calle Barcelona sidewalk immediately across from the adjacent buildings on the grading plan. This information will help me understand the relationship of the street to the buildings. Engineering: 1. Please indicate whether the utilities (i.e., storm drain, water, sewer, street light standards, fire hydrants, etc.) being shown are existing or proposed. Please show Calle Barcelona connections to El Camino Real (ECR) and Leucadia Boulevard indicating existing/proposed contours. transitions. spacing of existing and potential driveways/intersections. etc. This ·plan shows sewer lines heading to the north from Calle Barcelona. Sewer lines also exist across the Calle Barcelona bridge. Please indicate which direction gravity flow sewer facilities will flow with inlet elevations (ie's). 2. A new Preliminary Title Report (PR) must be submitted. The final map for the property has recorded. 3. A number of private drainage easements were recorded along with the final map that may or may not effect this parcel. The title company should verify if any of these easements do effect this parcel, and if so, indicate applicable easements in Schedule "B" of the PR. Additionally, these easements are going to be quitclaimed and new easements dedicated. Please contact P&D Consultants to determine if any of the new easements will effect this parcel, and indicate them on the site plan if they do. Also provide a copy of the plat and legal of any applicable new easements. Finally, please indicate the future disposition of all easements and encumbrances. 4. The Civil Site Development Plan (CSDP) indicates "proposed boundary." Staff does not believe that this is part of the Adjustment Plat (ADJ) that La Costa Glen is going to process? So, if it is not, then what is this boundary adjustment for? What effect does this boundary adjustment have on existing Open Space (OS) boundary/square footage requirements? Additionally, please contact P&D Consultants to determine if the proposed ADJ will effect this parcel, and indicate any new property lines on the site plan. Also provide a copy of the ADJ. 5. Please show a minimum of 250 ft. off-site around the project perimeter. Show existing/proposed buildings, vegetation, etc. This includes showing Encinitas Ranch facilities/buildings and La Costa Glen buildings. La Costa Glen building information can be obtained from approved SOP 98-01. 6. Thank you for showing typical street sections for Calle Barcelona, and the Section 'A' drive/parking aisle. Please indicate that Calle Barcelona is 'public' and that the drive/parking aisles are 'private.' Indicate existing and proposed improvements for the Calle Barcelona section (including street light standards and fire hydrants) and all on-site drive/parking aisle sections. Please show a section for the drive/parking aisle that intersects at the other end of Calle Barcelona (Section 'B'). Also, please show two (2) sections at both major on-site intersections with Calle Barcelona. Finally, make sure that the sections and plan view dimensions on the CSDP match the Architectural Site Development Plan (ASDP). For example, CSDP Section 'A' shows a drive aisle width of 25ft., while the ASDP shows a width of 24ft. Also, there is no reduction for overhang for compact parking spaces. So, the 17.5 ft. compact space dimension on CSDP Section 'A' must equal a clear 18 ft. 7. Please show the distance between all of the proposed intersections along Calle Barcelona. 8. The CSDP needs to be brought up to general SOP standards. For example, the following items must be included, but are not limited to: All parking stalls and drive aisles must be clearly shown; proposed facilities must be labeled (e.g., loading docks <sump or at grade>, retaining walls in general and as part of structures <@ parking garage>, etc.); clearly show the proposed parking structure (staff could not even tell that a parking structure was being proposed on the CSDP); coordinate plans with the ASDP and Preliminary Landscape Plan (PLSP) (e.g., the proposed driveway to the upper deck of the parking structure is not shown on the CSDP); show proposed AIC drive aisle/parking contours; and, fully dimension the CSDP. 9. Please indicate how a semi-truck with a 60 ft. turning radius (CaiTrans 407-0} will circulate throughout the site to all loading areas from Calle Barcelona. Show this on the CSDP and ASDP. 10. Show the FEMA 100-Year flood line for Encinitas Creek or indicate that it is not applicable to this project. This information can be obtained from the original Green Valley substantial conforming tentative map (CT 92-08) or from P&D Consultants. 11. Please show sections around all sides of the perimeter of the site. Show Calle Barcelona, slopes, drive/parking aisles, buildings, major vegetation/habitat, etc. as part of the sections 12. Please provide documentation that Leucadia County Water District (LCWD) and Olivenhain Municipal Water District (OMWD) have reviewed this site plan for sewer and · water concerns, respectively ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Places to sit within the project seem to be concentrated around buildings 4 and 5. Benches should be scattered throughout the project. Because benches have backs, the mix of benches to seat walls should be weighted more towards benches. 2. A landscape element could be introduced onto the parking structure with vines on the trellises, or as planter boxes along the structure edge. Additional trellises might be added to the top floor of the parking deck as well. 3. A stronger connection between the restaurants may benefit the project's pedestrian focus. Currently, a trash enclosure is located where a logical connection between building 6 and 7 could be made. If the parking between buildings 7 and 8 were moved closer to the street, a pedestrian path could be incorporated into a widened planter island running parallel to the drive aisle. 4. The vehicle connection between buildings 3 and 5 may be more appropriately used as a significant pedestrian connection. Additional parking could be an added benefit to removing the vehicle connection. 5. Trash bins used by restaurants can become very messy and smelly because of the type of waste being thrown into them. Is there a better trash solution for the proposed three free standing restaurants? 6. The separation between shop 402 and 403 is less than allowed by the Green Valley Master Plan. Buildings are to either be contiguous or have a separation equal to the building height. Because of the utility doors located along this corridor, the narrow space, and the lack of visual or audible stimulus drawing people into the space, there is the potential that it will become a dead area. A suggestion which may regain the area is to connect the buildings with a tower and cupola and add a fountain and benches. The effect could be a "hidden piazza". Engineering: 1. As discussed at an applicant/staff meeting on May 10, 2000, clear CaiTrans Corner Sight Distance sight lines of a minimum of 440ft. must be met at all intersections along Calle Barcelona. Any vegetation, walls, monument signs, etc. must be relocated out of these sight lines. Also, sight distance should be met at all on-site drive aisle intersections. Sight distance requirements must be indicated on the CSDP, ASDP and PLSP. 2. As discussed at an applicant/staff meeting on May 10, 2000, intersection spacing standards of a minimum of 600ft. must be met along Calle Barcelona. Two (2) proposed intersections do not meet this Standard (the "truck access" intersection and the upper level parking structure intersection). As discussed at the meeting, staff can support a decrease in the minimum 600ft. spacing requirement for these two intersections if left turns are prohibited. However, also as discussed at the May 10, 2000, meeting, the only effective way to limit these intersections to a right-in/right-out configuration. and the only measure that staff will support. is construction of a standard raised median on Calle Barcelona. As discussed at the meeting, striping, bollards, delineators, median "pork chops," etc. will not be permitted to prohibit left turns. Due to the width of Calle • Barcelona, the only way to fit a raised median on the street is for the developer to dedicate additional right of way. Please be advised, this is a major issue of concern. 3. Please submit full preliminary striping plans for Calle Barcelona, and, at all intersections along Calle Barcelona. Show all proposed dimensions; traffic signal left-turn-pocket and through lane striping; striping for all 4 "legs" of the intersections; and, required right of way dedication for raised medians. Also, show the required right of way dedication on the preliminary striping plan; on the Civil, Architectural, Landscape Calle Barcelona plan views; and, on the CSDP Calle Barcelona typical sections. Please be advised, there should be existing approved striping plans included in the Calle Barcelona improvement plan set (DWG. 34g-3), or, preliminary striping plans in the La Cdsta Glen site plan set (SDP g8-01, sheet 8 of 8). Coordinate "Pavilion" striping configurations with these plan sets. 4. The on-site "at grade" ramp into the parking garage seems somewhat difficult to access. At a minimum, please show that a standard AASHTO "P"-Vehicle can ingress/egress the structure. Also, why not relocate the on-site at grade entrance to the structure to in the middle of proposed Building 1? 5. In accordance with City Standards, please straighten the Section 'A' drive/parking aisle skew so that it intersects with Calle Barcelona at goo. 6. Please clearly dimension each drive/parking aisle width at its intersection with Calle Barcelona. 7. Please show loading zones for proposed buildings 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8? Please be advised, all proposed buildings must have designated loading zones (and not just striped-out parking stalls). 8. Indicate how National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) criteria will be met. This could include, but not be limited to, doing one or a combination of the following: directing surface run-off through vegetated swales prior to discharge to a storm drain or the public right of way, constructing a gravel/sand filter system, etc. Also, any loading areas that are located in a sump must have pump facilities to direct drainage to a pollutant mitigation area. g_ Please provide 5ft. offsets at proposed parking stalls which are located at goo adjacent to each other. Also, add an additional 2ft. to any proposed parking stall that is adjacent to a wall (e.g., in the parking structure). 1 0. Please meet with the Building and Fire Department's regarding the proposed parking structure. Provide documentation of the meetings, as well as any comments that staff may have from these two Department's. 11. Please be advised, since the application was deemed incomplete general engineering issues of concern could not be reviewed. Once the application is deemed complete, it will be possible to review general engineering issues of concern at that time. 12. A red-lined check print is enclosed for the applicant's use in making the requested revisions. This check print must be returned with the revised plans to facilitate continued staff review. DUDEK Environmental Sciences and .eering, Planning, & ASSOCIATES, INC. Professional Teams for Complex Projects Management Services July 7, 2000 Mr. Ronald D. Grunow, PE Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc. 10179 Huennekens St., Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92121 Corporate Office: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 760.942.5147 Fax 760.632.0164 1228-00 Re: LCWD Response to Request For Sewer Availability for Commercial Lot 4 of Green Valley Master Tentative Map, CT 92-08 Dear Mr. Grunow, This letter provides a response to your request for proof of sewer availability from Leucadia County Water District (LCWD or District) for the City of Carlsbad Application Checklist. At this time, we request that you provide payment to LCWD of $1,000 for this tenative map review with future plan check and inspection fees required as noted below. Any unused map review funds will be available for subsequent plan check activities by LCWD. Green Valley Lot 4 has previously been annexed to LCWD and therefore annexation procedures and fees are not required for the proposed development. Sewer service will be provided to Lot 4 of the Green Valley Master Tentative Map CT 92-08 through local downstream sewers now in construction in the La Costa Glen Development. The La Costa Glen sewers have not yet been accepted by LCWD, nor have the necessary easements required for the La Costa Glen sewers been recorded. The La Costa Glen sewers must be completed by Continuing Life Communities, easements recorded, and all necessary work accepted by LCWD prior to final connection of Lot 4 to the LCWD system. Currently, the regional sewer facilities downstream of La Costa Glen have adequate capacity to convey wastewater flows from the subject project. To maintain sufficient capacity, future planned downstream sewer improvements include: Leucadia Pump Station Improvements; Batiquitos Influent Sewer; Batiquitos Pump Station Improvements, and Occidental Sewer Improvements. These projects are scheduled in the 1999 LCWD Wastewater Master Plan and will be funded by existing LCWD reserves and future connection fees. The District currently owns adequate capacity at the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility to treat wastewater from the subject project. Tentative and Final Maps, Grading Plans, and Improvement Plans must be submitted to the District for review. Private development plan checking and other applicable fees shall be paid to LCWD. Following plan check, the developer must enter into a development agreement with the District and make deposits for field and television inspection of the newly constructed sewer. Actual LCWD costs may vary depending on the issues encountered during the design and construction process. Mr. Ronald Grunow City of Carlsbad Sewer Availability Letter July 7, 2000 Page 2 of2 Connection fees must be paid after acceptance of sewer construction and prior to house connection. The District assesses connection fees of$3,950 for each Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) within the development. A single family house, condominium, or apartment is one EDU. Equivalent commercial EDU's are specified in the LCWD Standard Specifications and District Resolutions. The connection fees may be adjusted from time to time. The District also assesses an annual sewer service fee last adjusted (reduced) on July 1, 1999 to $155 per EDU per year. The project will not represent a significant increase in wastewater flows into the District's wastewater system. The project will increase District maintenance requirements, however, this impact is not considered to be significant. Annual sewer service fees paid by residents will cover the additional cost of this increased maintenance including pumping, transmission, treatment, and disposal. Thank you for this opportunity to provide comments. Please call, if you have any questions. Very truly yours, DUDEK & Associates, Inc. 7Sl~ri~~ LCWD District Engineer cc: Mike Bardin, LCWD Assistant General Manager Frank Reynaga, LCWD April 19, 2000 TO: FROM: VIA: RE: Assistant Planning Director Associate Planner Principal Planner~ GREEN VALLEY MASTER PLAN There is an inconsistency within the Green Valley Master Plan and between the master plan, Coastal Development Permit and the Army Corps 404 permit for Green Valley regarding parking as an allowed use within the 130 foot riparian buffer corridor. The Green Valley Master Plan (page IV-12) states: "The riparian buffer corridor is comprised of a minimum 130 foot wide area between the ed e of the preexisting or new native riparian woodland and any permanent structure or arking lot.' Figure IV-5 (attached) of the Green Valley Master Plan graphically shows Street "A" within the 130 foot buffer. The inconsistency is that the graphic shows a public street with parking on both sides within the 130 foot buffer yet the text states that parking is not allowed. In line with the master plan graphic, the Green Valley Coastal Development Permit states " A minimum 50 foot buffer shall be provided from all existing and newly created riparian habitat." Additionally, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer's Section 404 permit states" The permittee shall also provide a minimum 130 foot buffer adjacent to the edge of habitat preserved and/or created as part of the project and any structure (e.g. houses or other buildings)." The Army Corps and Coastal Development Permits prohibit structures within 50 or 130 feet of the riparian woodland. The same prohibition is clear within the master plan. Neither the Army Corps permit nor the Coastal Development Permit prohibit streets or parking within the area which is from 50 to 130 feet of the riparian woodland. The Green Valley Master Plan allows streets within the 130 foot riparian buffer corridor. Parking has no greater potential impact on sensitive resources than a street. Therefore, staff has made the interpretation that the word~ parki~ere mistakenly included within the paragraph on page IV-12 and that streets and parking are allowed uses within the 130 riparian woodland corridor buffer but may not be any closer than 50 feet to pre-existing or newly created riparian woodland habitat. This determination shall become a note to the file and shall be included with the specified text within the Green Valley Master Plan. I - I J I I I I I I I I I ------ I• ~ ~ CJ:J/>.II;;f!M_ '1'6\n::-u:rf'\U..t~ t>C:::;')t..\1-AI '\ Figure IV-5 Riparian Buffer Corridor Page IV-14 ·- II PLANNING I .. SYSTEMS 2/1/2000 Gary Wayne LAND USE I COASTAL PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • LA39<Xl POLICY AND PROCESSING ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION Assistant Planning Director City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: LA COSTA GLEN COMMERCIAL SITE GREEN VALLEY Dear Gary: In your preliminary review comments regarding the subject site there were three items which we believe warrant additional discussion. These are the right turn in and out status of the far west drive north of the main drive, the combination of vehicles and pedestrians on the main drive, and the "environmental" setback from the riparian corridor. We would like to meet with you and your staff on these issues as soon as possible. The project architect is preparing information on the combination of vehicles and pedestrians and the traffic engineer is working on addressing the driveway issue. Included here is our understanding of the riparian setback circumstances. The Green Valley Master Plan indicates that; "The riparian buffer corridor is comprised of a minimum 130-foot wide area between the edge of the pre- existing or new native riparian woodland and any permanent structure or parking lot." The Coastal Development Permit stipulates; "A minimum 50- foot buffer shall be provided from all existing and newly created riparian habitat." and, Army Corps Section 404 Permit states; "The permittee shall provide a minimum 50-ft biological buffer between the edge of habitat preserved and/or created as part of the project and any development (e.g. roads and sidewalks) .... The permittee shall also provide a minimum 130-ft buffer adjacent to the edge of habitat preserved and/or created as part of the project and any structure (e.g. houses or other buildings)." We have had no difficulty in complying with the setback requirements articulated in the Coastal Permit and the Army Corps permit. These stipulate a 50-foot biological setback (only native landscape and public trail) and a 130- foot buffer for buildings, but allow other uses such as roads, sidewalks and landscaping within the 130-foot buffer. Unfortunately the Master Plan includes parking lots to the prohibited uses within the 130-foot buffer. Please see the attached pages quoting the respective documents. 1530 FARADAY AVENUE • SUITE 100 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • (760) 931-0780 • FAX {760) 931-5744 • planningsystems@nctimes.net The Master Plan refers to several cross-section exhibits which demonstrate the 130-foot buffer in its relation to future structures. At no other place does the document reference a 130-foot parking lot buffer. It seems that the most environmentally "operative" of the three sets of requirements should be the Corps Permit. As you may recall during the Master Plan preparation most of the setback discussion centered on then "Street A" which ran along the riparian corridor between structures and the stream course. As a practical matter Street A, which now has been removed from La Costa Glen (and never existed on the subject portion of the Master Plan), would have allowed parking adjacent to the travel lanes. As the EIR, Cal Fish and Game and Corps review progressed, it became clear that the purpose of the 130 foot setback was to separate structures from the stream course. It appears that reference to parking lots in the Master Plan is a remnant of some original draft wording that has never been made consistent with other requirements. As you can appreciate, there is not much difference between a paved travel lane and a parking lot from an environmental standpoint. Planning Systems has prepared the riparian mitigation plans for the La Costa Glen project and we are prepared to discuss the relationship between the native and revegetated areas in the riparian corridor and the parking lot with you. In addition to the horizontal distance between the riparian area and the parking lot, there is a significant upslope distance (vertical separation) as well. Our proposed design maintains a minimum 60-foot (average 100-feet) along the Planning Area 2 parking lot frontage with the riparian corridor. All structures maintain a minimum 130-foot setback. We offer this overview as background to a meeting to discuss all the issues. I will be contacting you this week in order to schedule a convenient time. Thomas Hageman cc: Mel Kuhne! Paul Klukas Attachment Green Valley Master Plan Reduced Project Alternative Final Document -Includes Coastal Commission LCP Changes Page IV-12 Riparian Buffer Corridor To create a separation between the riparian woodland in Planning Area 1 and urban development in Planning Areas 2 and 3, an area along the western edge of the riparian woodland will be designated a riparian buffer corridor (Figure IV-5). The riparian buffer corridor is comprised of a minimum 130-foot wide area between the edge of the pre-existing or new native riparian woodland and any permanent structure or parking lot. Included in this area may be a roadway, Street "A", and adjacent to the woodland, a fifty-foot (50') minimum landscaped buffer. No construction of any kind will oam within the easterly twenty-five foot (25') portion of the fifty-foot buffer immediately adjacent to the riparian woodland. Within the westerly twenty-five feet of the fifty-foot minimum buffer will be a pedestrian/bicycle trail. Westerly of the fifty-foot buffer may be the right-of-way of Street 'A'. Coastal Development Permit No. 6-96-18 Carlsbad Partners, Ltd. 3/2/98 Special Condition No. 2(e) Page4of7 2. Final Wetlands/Riparian Mitigation Plans e. A minimum 50 foot buffer shall be provided from all existing and newly created habitat. Deparbnent of the Army Permit No. 96-20154-DZ Carlsbad Partners 2/8/98 General Condition No. 4 Page3 4. The permittee shall provide a minimum 50-foot biological buffer between the edge of habitat preserved and/ or created as part of the project and any development (e.g. roads and sidewalks). A 12-ft recreational trail will be allowed within the upper 25 ft of the central portion of the 50-ft buffer (approx. 42% of total trail length), as well as the 30-ft wide Olivenhain Municipal Water District (OMWD) water line easement and 15-ft wide City of Carlsbad sewer line easement (outside of wetland mitigation area), as shown on the attached drawing. No other trail, easements, development or maintenance shall be allowed in the 50-ft biological buffer. The permittee shall also provide a minimum 130-ft buffer adjacent to the edge of habitat preserved and/ or created as part of the project and any structure (e.g. houses or other buildings). Native plant species shall be used in all landscaped areas within the 130-ft buffer area on the Encinitas Creek side of the public street easterly sidewalk, and within 50-ft of the wetland and buffer area preserved and/ or created where no public street will be constructed. OWNER Thomas EnterpriseS. Inc. 2924 Emei$OII Slreet. Sljte 206 San Diego. CA 92106 (619) 222-4397 ARCHITECT Nadel Architecls. Inc. 5465 Morehouse Drive. Sljte 165 San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 552-8424 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ADL Planning Associates 2979 State Street. Suite C Carlsbad. CA 92008 (760) 729-8637 CIVIL ENGINEER Mayers & Associates Civil Engineering. Inc. 19 Spectrum Pointe Dr .. Suite 609 Lake Forest. CA 92630 (949)~0 Summary Proposed Land Use Site Area 18.33 ac. Building Coverage % Building Area: Ground Floor Second Floor TOTAL BLDG. SF: Parking: Required Commercial 798,455 sq fl 33.5% ()q '3it:C1 <¥17 ,,:::~.<~::> '0.3 d-~a.. 219,891 sq fl J?.n 47,237 sq ft~ 267,128 sq ft \\/(i} 1/200-retail 1089 1/250-office 189 Trail Parking 6 Total Required 1284 Standard (8'-6• x 20'-0.) 1004 Compact Spaces -{8'-0• x 15'-0•) 234 Accessible [20+(3501100) req'd.] 30 Motorcyde 15 Trail Parking 6 Total Provided 1289 Building Sq. Ft. BuDding 1: Ground Floor Second Floor Building2: BuDding 3: Building4: Building 5: BuildingS: BuDding 7: Building 8: Residential I .. ;s Golf Course I! i _, Vicinity Map 62,011 sq fl 47,237 sq ft 17,649 sq ft 58,969 sq ft 32,018 sq ft 23,346 sq ft 6,000 sq ft 10,000 sq ft 9,898 sq ft Pacific Ocean Coaslal . 101 ln-5 Residential ---·~·-·······--···--- 11-- Building1A Building1A 2ndAoor 2ndAoor 10.441 S.F 10.934 S.F. @) e ....... / Legends • u. Rases3 151. Building 1B Building 1B 2nd Floor 2ndRoor 12.635 S.F. 13.227 S.F. @) @ L_.s-- loLA LaCoslBSpa ~-~ -----= ·---- . ... ···-··------··--.... --·------··-·------------,~---------------·· ....---· ---,-:--···-··--------. -------------. _,. --------------. -... ·:----.-~·~. ~--..,-... ··----~· 1---------- BUILDING1A 28.241 S.F. Bed Bath & Beyond e ur.a 10.208 S.f . ® BUILDING1B 33,770S.F. Borders 2J.104 s.r. CALLE BARCELONA Tlly·s .., .. 51. 0 BUILDING4 32.018S.F. Vodoria"s Available Avalable J Crew Secret ~ s.r. 5.111 u. &.276 u. 6.649 u. 0 0 @) 0 1-IT~TITITITITI . ·-----.. ··-..•. Jimllo"s 18.088 s.r. 0 BUILDING3 58.969 S.F .. ~ '-------.--! WARNING!! This site plan is not to scale. It is a diagrammatic representation of lease areas and should not be used as a reference for distances. .. ~ a. w ~ w ...J