HomeMy WebLinkAboutEIR 04-02A; Agua Hedionda & Calavera Creeks; Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (2)~ -;l~ic" "' .. , . -~ C I TV 0 F
CARLSBAD
LAND USE REVIEW
APPLICATION
P-1
.....,Development Services
Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
(760) 602-4610
www.carlsbadca.gov
APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES)
Development F!_ermlts
0 Administrative Permit
[E, Coastal Development Permit (j 0 Minor
0 Conditional Use Permit(*)
0 Minor 0 Extension
0 Environmental Impact Assessment
D Habitat Management Permit
0 Hillside Development Permit (*)
D Planned Development Permit
0Minor
(FOR DEPT. USE ONLY) Legislative Permits
ill
CDP 1>1/J -64 ~
~lA 6ll·ozf ~
D General Plan Amendment
D Local Coastal Program Amendment (*)
D Master Plan
0 Specific Plan
D Zone Change (*)
0Amendment
0 Amendment
0 Zone Code Amendment
(FOR DEPT. USE ONLY)
0 Residential 0 Non-Residential
0 Planned Industrial Permit
s outh Carlsbad Coastal Review Area Permits
D Review Permit
D Administrative 0 Minor D Major
0 Planning Commission Determination
0 Site Development Plan Vi llage Review Area Permits
0 Review Permit ~ Special Use Permit ...., ..,.,.--
~f?U)J-1&~-Jl tL\Pl>li-V ZJiJ • ~ Administrative D Minor 0 Major
0 Tentative Tract Map/Parcel Map
0 Variance 0 Administrative (*) = eligible for 25% discount
NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE
APPLICATION MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00P.M.
~
ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).:
PROJECT NAME: -Nau/"..HePlDPVD/::: C1leEtL ~t;a li k~ Crtfr&
BRIEFDESCRIPTIONOFPROje'cr:·· ~P6L ~(! ~ lH~ft?'t
BRIEF LEGAL DESC81PTI()N:
·,. \ '
LOCATION OF PROJECT:
STREET ADDRESS
JN THE: SIDE OF
(NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) (NAME OF STREET)
3ETWEEN AND
(NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET)
P-1 PaQe 1 of6 Revised 11112
~
c ,/}
OWNER NAME: (Print): Crt V Cf ~D APPLICANT NAME {Print): ~IZ
MAILING ADDRESS: r~o5~ w MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY, STATE, ZIP: ~u;.a~·~ CITY, STATE, ZIP: •
TELEPHONE: ~·t.an·~ TELEPHONE:
EMAIL ADDRI:SS: <. ~~L. h.QkQ1¥'d{JJ C4.~ . EMAIL ADDRESS:
eyvV' ...
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER
INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO
KNOWLfiwa \ /~}'UJ L?::>
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLSZJE. ~/:bo_~ ' IJ & SIG~~ SIGNATURE .ATE ATE
APPLJCANrS REPRESENTATIVE (Print):
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY, STATE, ZIP:
TELEPHONE:
EMAIL ADDRESS:
.1 CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATNE OF THE
APPLICANT AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND
CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
SIGNATURE DATE
IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING
COMMISSIONERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS
APPLICATION. 1/VVE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE.
NOTICE OF RESTRICTION: PROPERTY OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES AND CONSENTS TO A NOTICE OF RESTRICTION BEING
RECORDED ON THE TITLE TO HIS PROPERTY IF CONDITIONED FOR THE APPLICANT. NOTICE OF RESTRICTIONS RUN WITH
THE LAND AND BIND ANY SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST.
D!o'te~J&NERSIGNATURE -~ ~.ef...'t
FOR CITY USE ONLY
P-1 Page 2 of6
RECEIVED
JAN 2 ~ 2013
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DIVISION
DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED
RECEIVED BY:
Revised 11/12
----·--------------------~1-------------------------~~--------------------~
\(~ ,,~CITY OF
DISCLOSURE
STATEMENT
P-1{A)
Development Services
Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
(760) 602-4610
www.carlsbadca.gov CARLSBAD
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will
require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission
or Committee. ·
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project
cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note:
Person is defined as • Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association; social club, fraternal
organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county,
city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit."
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner
niust be provided below.
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a
financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership,
include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 1 0% of the
shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE
INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned
corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A
separate page may be attached if necessary.)
Person Corp/Part. ___________ _
Title ___________ _ Title _____________ _
Address _________ _ Address ___________ _
2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent)
P·1(A)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any
ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal
ownership (i.e., partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the
ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of
all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE
THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A} IN THE
SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and
addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.}
Person. ____________ _ Corp/Part. ___________ _
Title. __________ _ Title. _____________ _
Address _________ _ Address. ___________ _
Page 1 of2 Revised 07/10
c
3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust,
list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-
profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust. _________ _
Title, ___________ _ Title ____________ _
Address __________ _ Address ___________ _
4. Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City
staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12)
months?
D Yes D No If yes, please indicate person(s): ___________ _
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Signature of owner/date Signature of applicant/date
Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date
Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent
P-1(A) Page 2 of 2 Revised 07/10
Notice of Determination
To: Office ofrlanning and Research
P.O. Box 3044
Sacramento, CA 95812-3044
SD County Clerk
Attn: Jennifer Samuela
Mail Stop A-33
1600 Pacific Highway
San Diego, CA 92101
From: CITY OF CARLSBAD
Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(760) 602-4600
APR AU 9 2013
BY--· -=A=yu""y=ao
DEPUTY
Project ~o: EIR 04-02xi(A)/CDP 06-04xl(Al/SUP 06-02xl(A}
Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.
Agua Hedionda & Calavera Creeks
Project Title
2006041066 City of Carlsbad, Pam Drew (760) 602-4644
State Clearinghouse ~o. Lead Agency, Contact Person Telephone Number
Portions of Agua Hedionda & Calavera creeks to the east & west of El Camino Real, & south of Cannon Road,
within the Rancho Carlsbad residential community, City of Carlsbad, San Diego County.
Project Locations (include County)
Name of Applicant: Citv of Carlsbad
Applicant's Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Applicant's Telephone ~umber: 760-602-4644
Project Description: To: 1) install additional riprap in Agua Hedionda creek channel in place of slope
stabilization using V-rnax; 2) install riprap drop sttuctures in place of gabion drop sttuclures in Agua Hedionda and
Calavera creek channels; 3) install a riprap structure in Agua Hedionda creek channel, beneath the Cannon Road
bridge and in the Coastal Zone; 4) install additional riprap along both banks of Agua Hedionda creek channel
between the Cannon Road and El CaniDio Real bridges and in the Coastal Zone; and 5) remove approximately 7,000
additional cubic yards of sediment within the rwo channels to accommodate the riprap.
This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project on April3, 2013, and has made
the following detennination regarding the above described project.
1. The project wiU not have a significant effect on the environment.
2. D An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of
CEQ A. D A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQ A.
~ Tbis project was reviewed previously and an EIR (04-02) was prepared pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA and was certified by the Planning Commission at its January 16, 2008
meeting. Since that time, additional project changes have occurred. The city reviewed the
project changes and found that none of the requirements in CEQA Guidelines section 15162
or 15163 for supplemental or subsequent EIRa have been triggered. Therefore, the revised
project is within the scope of the certified EIR and use of an addendum to document the
project changes is appropriate. The addendum to the Fiual EIR was adopted at the April 3,
2013 Planning Commission meeting, in accordance with section 15164(a) of CEQA
Guidelines.
This is to certify that the final Addendum to the previouslv approved EIR is available to the General Public at
E CITY OF ARLSBAD.
Date received for filing at OPR:
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK
San Diego Cooo.IJ' on ...Afl& 0 !LMn__
Pos1ed MR 0 S 2],\RemQved: ~1'!JIY!lt"LUTf
Reillmad to agency lliL~. MA!f-i-114HfllBTI13--
Depu!Y, N. Ayuyao
Date
Revised 04/12
~"""" ~
State of California-The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE
2013 ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT
SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE. TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY
LEAD AGENCY
CITY OF CARLSBAD
COUNTYISTATEAGENCY OF FILING
SAN DIEGO
PROJECT TITLE
AGUA HEDIONDA & CALAVERA CREEKS
PROJECT APPLICANT NAME
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROJECT APPLICANT ADDRESS
1635 FARADAY AVENUE
PROJECT APPLICANT (Check appropriate box):
1Zl Local Public Agency D School District
CHECK APPLICABLE FEES:
1Zl Environmental Impact Report
D Negative Declaration
CITY
CARLSBAD
0 Other Special District
0 Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only)
D Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Program
1Zl County Administrative Fee
D Project that is exempt from fees
0 Notice of Exemption
D DFG No Effect Determination (Form Attached)
0 Other--------------------
PAYMENT METHOD:
0 Cash 0 Credit 1Zl Check D Other 243903
SIGNATURE
X
0
RECEIPT#
SD2013 0258
STATE CLEARING HOUSE #(ttappJicableJ
~006041066
STATE
CA
D State Agency
$2,995.25
$2,156.25
$850.00
$1,018.50
$50.00
TOTAL RECEIVED
DATE
04/09/2013
DOCUMENT NUMBER
*20130055*
PHONE NUMBER
760/602-4644
ZIP CODE
92008
0 Private Entity
$ ______ $o_.o_o_
$ _______ _
$ _______ _
$ _______ _
$ $50.00 --------
$ ______ _
$ $50.00 -----"----
!'" --------~--·~·-----------------··-----····--···-----·--·.----------------.. ·-·-------
\REM: 08/13/2008
1RCT: 343747
I
I L-------~--------.-.------~------------··-~~~--~-w~•-------------~-~-··-·-·-......·-·---------·-------
I
I I _ _j
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
ORIGINAL-PROJECT APPLICANT COPY-DFG/ASB COPY -LEAD AGENCY CDPY-CDUNTY CLERK FG 753.5a (Rev. 7/08)
........,
Notice of Determination
To: Office of Planning and Research
P.O. Box 3044
Sacramento, CA 95812-3044
From: CITY OF CARLSBAD
Planning Division
SD County Clerk
Attn: Jennifer Samuela
Mail Stop A-33
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(760) 602-4600 APR U 9 2013
BY. H. Ayuyao
1600 Pacific Highway
San Diego, CA 92101 DEPUTY
Project No: EIR 04-02xl(A)!CDP 06-04xl(A)!SUP 06-02xl(A)
Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.
Agua Hedionda & Calavera Creeks
Project Title
2006041066 City of Carlsbad, Pam Drew (760) 602-4644
State Clearinghouse No. Lead Agency, Contact Person Telephone Number
Portions of Agua Hedionda & Calavera creeks to the east & west of El Camino Real, & south of Cannon Road,
within the Rancho Carlsbad residential community, City of Carlsbad, San Diego County.
Project Locations (include County)
Name of Applicant: City of Carlsbad
Applicant's Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008
Applicant's Telephone Number: 760-602-4644
Project Description: To: I) install additional riprap in Agua Hedionda creek channel in place of slope
stabilization using V -max; 2) install riprap drop structures in place of gabion drop structures in Agua Hedionda and
Calavera creek channels; 3) install a riprap structure in Agua Hedionda creek channel, beneath the Cannon Road
bridge and in the Coastal Zone; 4) install additional riprap along both banks of Agua Hedionda creek channel
between the Cannon Road and El Camino Real bridges and in the Coastal Zone; and 5) remove approximately 7,000
additional cubic yards of sediment within the two channels to accommodate the riprap.
This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project on April 3, 2013, and has made
the following determination regarding the above described project.
1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
2. D An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of
CEQ A.
D A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQ A.
[8] This project was reviewed previously and an EIR (04-02) was prepared pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA and was certified by the Planning Commission at its January 16, 2008
meeting. Since that time, additional project changes have occurred. The city reviewed the
project changes and found that none of the requirements in CEQA Guidelines section 15162
or 15163 for supplemental or subsequent EIRs have been triggered. Therefore, the revised
project is within the scope of the certified EIR and use of an addendum to document the
project changes is appropriate. The addendum to the Final EIR was adopted at the April 3,
2013 Planning Commission meeting, in accordance with section 15164(a) of CEQA
Guidelines.
This is to certify that the final Addendum to the previously approved EIR is available to the General Public at
[
E cn:_oAARLSBAD.
_/leu '1-'-1-/J
DON NEU, City Planner Date
Date received for filing at OPR:
Revised 04/12
9 Q
Notice of Determination 0 1 4 6 3 5
To: Office of Planning and Research From: CITY OF CARLSBAD
P.O. Box 3044 Planning Department
Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 1635 Faraday Avenue
SD County Clerk
Attn: Anthony J. Consul
Mail Stop A-33 ·
1600 Pacific Highway
San Diego, CA 92101
If ~ [L JE: [Q)Carlsbad, CA 92008
Gregory J. Smith, Recorder /County Clerk (760) 602-4600
AUG 1 t. 2008
BY_ ...... !Vl__.;~o~-..~~="'
DEPUTY Project No: EIR 04-02
Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public
Resources Code.
City of Carlsbad Drainage Master Plan Update/ Agua Hedionda and Calavera Creeks
Project Title
2006041066 City of Carlsbad, Scott Donnell (760) 602-4618
State Clearinghouse No. Lead Agency, Contact Person Telephone Number
City of Carlsbad and particularly the creeks named above near El Camino Real and Cannon Rd.
Project Locations (include County)
Name of Applicant: City of Carlsbad
Applicant's Address: c/o PlanningDepartment, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008
Applicant's Telephone Numbe·r: (760) 602-4600
Project Description: Program level approvals for the Citywide Drainage Master Plan Update
and project level approvals for the (1) Agua Hedionda and Calavera Creeks Dredging and
Improvement Project; and (2) long-term maintenance of Agua Hedionda and Calavera creeks.
This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project on August 5,
2008, and has made the following determination regarding the above described project.
1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
2. [81 An Environmental Impact report was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA.
D A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of
CEQA. D This project was reviewed previously and a Negative Declaration was pr 1819<o
pursuant to the provisions ofCEQA. ~~ ~ :.?~ ..
3. Mitigation measures were made a condition of the approval of the project. 1"\~ '\"-
'v t: 4. A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project. 2 -~ ~
5. A statement of Overriding Considerations was not adopted for this project. g UQ"" ~ r
6. · Findings-were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQ A. ~ Ptar,n,,-~ ~
. . \r ~
!his i~ to certify that the final ~IR with comments and responses and record ofprojec ~groval ,.=vi,~;;
Is avrulable to the General Public at THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. f.' C't _ ,£0;;_:o,---· a 21a 8-7-0&> ~
DON NEU, Planning Director
Date received for filing at OPR:
Date
Revised December 2004
~ .. ~.'-~~. ""'6 v Jt .1 U'. ..., ..... .. ...... 0
cfr NTY OF SAN DIEGO
ASSESS OR/RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK
ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
1600 Paciliclfighwoy, Room 103
SQJI Diogo, CA 92101·2480
www.sdarcc..com
RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
1600 Pncifoc Highw•y, Room 260
Tel. (619) 236·3771 • Fox (619) 557-4056
P.O. Box 121750 • San Diosa, CA 92112·1750
Tel. (619)237..0502 "Fax (619)SS7-41SS
FEES:
TraJJSactim fl.: 184346520080813
Deputy: RGONZAL2
Location: COUNfY ADMINISTRATION BUilDING
13-Ailg-200& 0&:4&
2,606.75 Ql;y of 1 FiBh & Game Env Impact (2500) fur Ref# NOD1463SRCI'343747
SO.OO Qty of 1 F"LSh and Game Filing Fee ----
2,656.75 TarALDUE
PAYMEN'IS:
2,656.75 Cbeck -----
2,656.75 'IENDF.RED
For your convenience, we~ now taldng appojntlnents to obtain a marriage I~ startlng .Tune 17th, 2008. Call
today to schedale your appointment Dowmoml office: 619-531-5088. Branch offitu: SSB-505-6197.
SERVICESAVAJLABLEAT
OFFICE LOCATIONS
• Thx.Bill.Address Changes
• Recotds and Certilied Copies:
Birth'Mmiage/ Death! Real Estate
• Ficlitious B~s Names ~_!)BAs)
• Mamage ljcmges and Cemmnies
• Assessor PaJx:el Maps
• l'ropelty Ownctslrip
• ~Re<Xmls
• Property Values
• Documem~
SERVICES AVAILABLE ON-LINE AT
'I'I'WW.sdanc.com
• Fritms and AwUcalions
• l'J:e(jUel\tly Askat ~tions (F AQs)
• Glamor/ Gantee Index
• Ficlilions BllSiness Names JJldo::x ~_!)BAs)
• Property Sales
• Weddings on the Web
• Qn.J...ine PuJchases
Assess~ Pa=J Maps
Property Clmactelistics
~Docnmenl.s
BRANCH OFFICES AVAILABLE TO SERVE YOU
MondAy llwut:n Friday 8:00 o.m .• 5:00p.m.
CHULA VISTA
590 111ird A.,....
Chula Vi .... CA 91910.2646
(619)49!1-2277
Salllldays s11ho Keamy Mcoa Ollice 9:00 o.m. ·3:00p.m.
ELCAJON
200 South Magnolia Ave.
El cajon, CA 92020·3316
(619) ~01-5750
KEARl'iY MESA
9225 Clairemolll Mesa Blvd.
S""Diego, CA92123·1211
(858) 505-6226
SAN MARCOS
141 E Cannci.SU.•t
SanM=os, CA 92078-4309
(760) 940-6858
c (
STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT
Lead Agency: CITY OF CARLSBAD
SAN DIEGO
0 \
*343747*
Date: 08/12/2008
Document No.: 14635 County/State Agency of Filing: --------------------------------------------
Project Title: CITY OF CARLSBAD DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN UPDATEIAGUA HEDIONDA AND CALAVERA CREEKS
Project Applicant Name: _C_I_TY __ O_F __ C_A_R_L_S_B_A_D ____________________________________________________ _
Project Applicant Address: 1635 FARADAY AVE ----------------------------------------------------City CARLSBAD State _C_A __ _ Zip Code _9_20.:...;0~8 __ _ Phone Number: (760) 602-4600
Project Applicant (check appropriate box):
0~~~o~~o~~~o~~o~~
check Arncable Fees:
./ Environmental Impact Report D Negative Declaration D Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) D Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs IZJ County Administrative Fee D Project that is exempt from fees D Notice of Exemption D DFG No Effect Determination (Form Attached)
Signature and title of person receiving payment:
WHITE-PROJECT APPUCANT YELLOW-OFGIFASB
$2,606.75
$1,876.75
$886.25
$886.25
$50.00
*343747*
$ 2,606.75
$
$
$
$ 50.00
2,656.75
Deputy
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
ErnC:tJ.Dronenburg,Jr.C>
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
ASSESSOR/RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK
ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
1600 Pacific Highway, Suite 103
San Diego, CA 92101-2480
Tel. (619) 236-3771 *Fax (619) 557-4056
www.sdarcc.com
RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
1600 Pacific Highway, Suite 260
P.O. Box 121750 *San Diego, CA 92112-1750
Tel. (619)237-0502 * Fax(619)557-4155
Transaction#: 2923 70220130409
Deputy: HA YUY AO
Location: COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
09-Apr-2013 16:49
FEES:
50.00 Qty of 1 Fish and Game Filing Fee for Ref# 20130258
50.00 TOTAL DUE
PAYMENTS:
50.00 Check
50.00 TENDERED
SERVICES AVAILABLE AT
OFFICE LOCATIONS
* Tax Bill Address Changes
* Records and Certified Copies:
Birth/ Marriage/ Death/ Real Estate
* Fictitious Business Names (DBAs)
* Marriage Licenses and Ceremonies
* Assessor Parcel Maps
* Property Ownership
* Property Records
* Property Values
* Document Recordings
SERVICES AVAILABLE ON-LINE AT
www.sdarcc.com
* Forms and Applications
* Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
* Grantor/ Grantee Index * Fictitious Business Names Index (DBAs)
* Property Sales * On-Line Purchases
Assessor Parcel Maps
Property Characteristics
Recorded Documents
• Complete Items 1, 2, a,,..,. 3. Also ~omplete
Item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is des1red.
• Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
• Attach this card to the back of the mailplece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
&uFofQ.\1~ ~f\L. eommkSS\DN
7{515 fl\£1RCPoLtlf\~~N£)6\)ITE 103 ~ b1e.~o)C#\ q~IOB--A.f!fe~
D. Is delivery address different from item 1?
If YES, enter delivery address below:
3. Service Type
0 Certified Mall 0 Express Mall
0 Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise
0 Insured Mall 0 C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes
2. Article Number
(rransfer from service labeQ 7010 2780 DODD 8476 9953
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595·02·M·1540 l
fTl
1.1")
U.S. Postal Service'"
RTIFIED MAIL, RECEIPT a
estic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provi~
~---~ ~--~=-~~~=--==-=--=-=~--~~~~~--~ f'-.:r co
CJ
CJCJ Return Receipt Fee
(Endorsement Required)
CJ ~~~~~=-~ Res1!1cted Delivery Fee CJ (Endorsement Required)
co ~----------~
f'-Total Postage & Fees $ ~ 5 ru ~..Jo.....:·~ot~__J
I
M41 LiUJ :f+/13 Q .
.. · Notice of Deternunation
To: Office of Planning and Research
P.O. Box 3044
Sacramento, CA 95812-3044
SD County Clerk
Attn: Jennifer Samuela
Mail Stop A-33
1600 Pacific Highway
San Diego, CA 9210 I
From: CITY OF CARLSBAD
Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(760) 602-4600
a FILE
Project No: EIR 04-02xl(A)ICDP 06-04xl(A)ISUP 06-02xl(A)
Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.
Agua Hedionda & Calavera Creeks
Project Title
2006041066 City of Carlsbad, Pam Drew (760) 602-4644
State Clearinghouse No. Lead Agency, Contact Person Telephone Number
Portions of Agua Hedionda & Calavera creeks to the east & west of El Camino Real, & south of Cannon Road,
within the Rancho Carlsbad residential community, City of Carlsbad, San Diego County.
Project Locations (include County)
Name of Applicant: City of Carlsbad
Applicant's Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008
Applicant's Telephone Number: 760-602-4644
Project Description: To: I) install additional riprap in Agua Hedionda creek channel in place of slope
stabilization using V-max; 2) install riprap drop structures in place of gabion drop structures in Agua Hedionda and
Calavera creek channels; 3) install a riprap structure in Agua Hedionda creek channel, beneath the Cannon Road
bridge and in the Coastal Zone; 4) install additional riprap along both banks of Agua Hedionda creek channel
between the Cannon Road and El Camino Real bridges and in the Coastal Zone; and 5) remove approximately 7,000
additional cubic yards of sediment within the two channels to accommodate the riprap.
This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project on April 3, 2013, and has made
the following determination regarding the above described project.
I. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
2. 0 An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of
CEQ A.
0 A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQ A. 181 This project was reviewed previously and an EIR (04-02) was prepared pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA and was certified by the Planning Commission at its January 16, 2008
meeting. Since that time, additional project changes have occurred. The city reviewed the
project changes and found that none of the requirements in CEQA Guidelines section 15162
or 15163 for supplemental or subsequent EIRs have been triggered. Therefore, the revised
project is within the scope of the certified EIR and use of an addendum to document the
project changes is appropriate. The addendum to the Final EIR was adopted at the April 3,
2013 Planning Commission meeting, in accordance with section 15164(a) of CEQA
Guidelines.
This is to certify that the final Addendum to the previously approved EIR is available to the General Public at
[
ECITY ~ARLSBAD.
-~ LI-'-1-/..J
DON NEU, City Planner Date
Date received for filing at OPR:
Revised 04/12
Planning Division NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
LJ FILE
www.carlsbadca.gov
The following project is located within the City of Carlsbad Coastal Zone. A coastal permit application for the project has
been acted upon.
SENT TO COASTAL COMMISSION ON April 4, 2013
Application#: EIR 04-02(A)/CDP 06-04X1(A)/
SUP 06-02X1(A)
Case Name: Agua Hedionda & Calavera Creeks
Applicant: City of Carlsbad
Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008
Phone: 760-602-4644
Filing Date: January 24, 2013
Decision Date: April3, 2013
Agent (if different):
Address:
Phone:
Project Description: To: 1) install additional riprap in Agua Hedionda creek channel in place of slope stabilization using V-max;
2) install riprap drop structures in place of gabion drop structures in Agua Hedionda and Calavera creek channels: 3) install a
riprap structure in Agua Hedionda creek channel, beneath the Cannon Road bridge and in the Coastal Zone: 4) install
additional riprap along both banks of Agua Hedionda creek channel between the Cannon Road and El Camino Real bridges
and in the Coastal Zone: and 5) remove approximately 7,000 additional cubic yards of sediment within the two channels to
accommodate the riprap.
Project location: Portions of Agua Hedionda and Calavera creeks to the east and west of El Camino Real, and south of Cannon
Road, within the Rancho Carlsbad residential community, City of Carlsbad, San Diego County
ACTION:
D APPROVED IZI APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
D DENIED
(Copy of final resolution/decision letter is sent to: Coastal Commission, any persons who specifically requested it, and the applicant).
COASTAL COMMISSION APPEAL STATUS:
0 NOT APPEALABLE TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION.
IZ! APPEALABLE TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION pursuant to Coastal Act Section 30603. An aggrieved person may
appeal this decision to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days following Coastal Commission
receipt of this notice. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date the Coastal
Commission's appeal period will conclude. Appeals must be made in writing to the Coastal Commission's
district office at the following address: California Coastal Commission, 7575 Metropolitan Dr., Suite 103, San
Diego, California 92108-4402, Telephone (619) 767-2370.
Attachment: -Location Map to CCC for non-appealable COPs
-Staff Report to CCC for appealable COPs
The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedures, Section 1094.6, which has been made
applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 16. Any petition or ather paper seeking judicial review must be filed in the
appropriate court not later than ninety {90) days fallowing the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten (10) days after the
decision becomes final a request far the record af the proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient ta cover the
estimated cost af preparation af such a record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended ta nat later than thirty {30) days
fallowing the date an which the record is either personally delivered ar mailed ta the party, ar his attorney af record, if he has one. A written request
or the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad,
li ornia 92008.
1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559
.Jf~A_ CITY OF
VcARLSBAD
Planning Division
April4, 2013
Sherri Howard
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
c
PLANNING COMMISSION
NOTICE OF DECISION
LJ FILE
www.carlsbadca.gov
SUBJECT: EIR 04-02{A)/CDP 06-04x1/SUP 06-02xl{A)-AGUA HEDIONDA & CALAVERA CREEKS
At the April 3, 2013 Planning Commission meeting, your application was considered. The Commission
voted 6-0 to approve your request. The decision of the Planning Commission is final on the date of
adoption unless a written appeal to the City Council is filed with the City Clerk within ten {10) calendar
days in accordance with the provisions of Carlsbad Municipal Code section 21.54.150. The written
appeal must specify the reason or reasons for the appeal.
If you have any questions regarding the final dispositions of your application, please contact your project
planner Pam Drew at (760) 602-4644 or pam.drew@carlsbadca.gov.
DON NEU, AICP
City Planner
DN:PD:sm
c: Data Entry
File
enc: Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6950, 6951 and 6952
1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559
• Complete items 1, :.., _,,d 3. Also complete
Item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired.
• Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
• Attach this card to the back of the mailplece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
California coastal Commission
Attn: Kanani Brown
Suite 103
7575 Metropolitan Drive
San Diego, CA 92108-4402
D. Is delivery address different from Item 1?
If YES, enter delivery address below:
3. Service 'JYpe
~Mall c Expraa8 Mall
[J Registered .)liii01etwn Receipt for Mercllailcllle
[J Insured Mall [J C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extnl Fee) [J Yes
2. Article Number
(Tiansler from service label) 7012 1640 0001 2248 8291
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt
U.S. Postal ServiceTM
,;
[!""
ERTIFIED MAILn1 RECEIPT
mestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Pro
~~~~~~~~~iiiiiii.iii
~~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--_j
ru ru
,....,
Postage $
1-----------l
CertifledFee
CJ Return Receipt Fee CJ (Endorsement Required)
CJ ~----------~ Restricted Delivery Fee CJ (Endorsement Required)
Postmark
Here
3·,;:)1·1.:!>
::2" 61:~ o"f C.OP £A') lY PI+ /I'D ~ Total Posta~ California Coastal Commis~ion
ru ,...., sent o Attn: Kanani Brown
Suite 103
0 sfriisf.A'Pt"Ni
("-or PO Box Na
ciii.&afe.-zi
7575 Metropolitan Drive
San Diego, CA 921 08-4402
102595-()3.M.1540 I !
4~A_ CITY OF
VcARLSBAD
0 0 FILE COPY
3 ·.7:JI·J3
Community & Economic Development www.carlsbadca.gov
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public
hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on
Wednesday, April3, 2013, to consider a request for the following:
CASE NAME: EIR 04-02(A)/ COP 06-04xl(A)/ SUP 06-02xl(A) Agua Hedionda & Calavera Creeks
PUBLISH DATE: March 22, 2013
DESCRIPTION: Request for approval of an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 04-02, and an
amendment to Coastal Development Permit No. 06-04xl and Special Use Permit No. 06-02x1 to: 1) install
additional riprap in Agua Hedionda creek channel in place of slope stabilization using V-max; 2) install riprap
drop structures in place of gabion drop structures in Agua Hedionda and Calavera creek channels; 3) install a
riprap structure in Agua Hedionda creek channel, beneath the Cannon Road bridge and in the Coastal Zone;
4) install additional riprap along both banks of Agua Hedionda creek channel between the Cannon Road and
El Camino Real bridges and in the Coastal Zone; and 5) remove approximately 7,000 additional cubic yards of
sediment within the two channels to accommodate the riprap, located on portions of Agua Hedionda and
Calavera creek channels at, and near, the intersection of El Camino Real and Cannon Roads, within the
Rancho Carlsbad residential community, and within Local Facilities Management Zones 8, 14, 15 and 24.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide
the decision makers with any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. Copies of the
staff report will be available online at http://www.carlsbadca.gov/cityhall/meetings/Pages/meeting-
videos.aspx on or after the Friday prior to the hearing date.
If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Pam Drew in the
Planning Division at (760) 602-4644, Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Friday 8:00 a.m. to
5:00 p.m. at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008.
APPEAlS
The time within which you may judicially challenge these projects, if approved, is established by State law
and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to raising
only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written
correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
u Appeals to the City Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council, appeals must be
filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the Planning Commission.
u Coastal Commission Appealable Project:
[8]
[8]
This site is located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area.
Application deemed complete: 02/06/2013
Where the decision is appealable to the Coastal Commission, appeals must be filed with the Coastal
Commission within ten (10) working days after the Coastal Commission has received a Notice of Final Action
from the City of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission ofthe date that their appeal
period will conclude. The San Diego office of the Coastal Commission is located at 7575 Metropolitan Drive,
Suite 103, San Diego, California 92108-4402.
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DIVISION
Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559
c
SITE MAP
• N
NOT TO SCALE
Agua Hedionda & ca·lavera Creeks
EIR 04-02(A) I COP 06-04x1 (A) I SUP 06-02x1 (A)
NOTICOF PUBLIC HEARING-CITY OFJRLSBAD
Response must be received by: March 20, 2013
Public Hearing Date: !-'A~ri~l ~3 ..... 2~0~1~3--------------------------------
Public Hearing Place: 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California 92008
Public Hearing Time: ~6~:0~0~.m~. -----------------------------------
Project Title: Agua Hedionda & Ca1avera Creeks-CDP 06-04xl(A)/SUP 06-02xl(A)
Contact Person: Pam Drew, Associate Planner
Phone: (760) 602-4644
Lead Agency: Citv of Carlsbad -Planning
Street Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue
City: Carlsbad Zip: 92008 County: ~S,an"'-"='D"'ie~g..,o'---------
PROJECT LOCATION:
County; San Diego City/Nearest Community: ""'C~itv:.,L....>o~f_,C""ar,..,l.,s""b:::ad=---------------
Cross Streets: El Camino Real & Cannon Road Total Acre: .::.3"'3'-"0""'0..:clm""'· ,e.:::al,__,£""e""'et=-----------------
Assessor's Parcel Nos. 215-801-2800 Section: N/A Twp. N/A Range: N/A Base: N/A Agua Hedionda Land Grant
Within 2 Miles: State Hwy #: 1-5 & SR 78 Waterways: Agua Hedionda & Calavera creeks & Agua Hedionda Lagoon
Airport: McClellan/Palomar Railways: NCTD Schools: ""'C""ar,_..ls,b'-"a""d __________ _
ENVffiONMENT AL DOCUMENT:
CEQA: 0 NOP 0 Supplement/Subsequent
0 Early Cons ~ EIR (Prior SCH No.) 2006041066 (Amendment)
0 Neg Dec 0 Other: -----------------
0 DraftEIR LJ FILE
LOCAL ACTION TYPE:
0General Plan Update 0
0General Plan Amendment 0
0General Plan Element 0
Ozone Code Amendment 0
Specific Plan
Master Plan
0 Rezone 0 Annexation
~ Special Use Permit Amendment 0 Redevelopment
Planned Unit Development
Site Plan
0 Land Division (Subdivision, ~ Coastal Permit Amendment
Parcel Map, Tract Map, etc.) 0 Other: _______ _
DEVELOPMENT TYPE:
0Residential: Units .._,N'-"IA..:...,_ __________ Acres ------
Ooffice: Sq. Ft. NIA Acres _____ _
Ocommercial: Sq. Ft. NIA Acres------
0Industrial:. Sq. Ft. NIA Acres _____ _
0Recreational: .wNtu/A..!o.,_ ___________________ _
PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUMENT:
~AestheticNisual ~ Flood Plain/Flooding
0Agricultural Land D Forest Land/Fire Hazard
~Air Quality D Geological/Seismic
0Archaeologicai/Historical 0 Minerals
~Coastal Zone 0 Noise
0Drainage/ Absorption D Population/Housing Balance
0Economic/Jobs D Public Services/Facilities
0Fiscal D Recreation/Parks
Present Land Use/Zoning/General Plan Use
Present Land Use: creek channels
D Schools/Universities
D Septic Systems
D Sewer Capacity
~ Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading
0 Solid Waste
D Toxic/Hazardous
~ Traffic/Circulation
D Vegetation
Zoning: Residential Mobile Home Park (RMHP) and Open Space (OS)
General Plan: Medium Density (RM) and Open Space (OS)
~ Water Quality
D Water Supply/Ground Water
D Wetland/Riparian
~ Wildlife
0 Growth Inducing
D Land Use
D Cumulative Effect
D Other:
Project Description: Request for approval of an Amendment to Environmental Impact Report No. 04-02, Coastal Development
Permit No. 06-04x1 and Special Use Permit No. 06-02x1 to: 1) install additional riprap in Agua Hedionda creek channel in place of
slope stabilization using V-max; 2) install riprap drop structures in place of gabion drop structures in Agua Hedionda and Calavera
creek channels; 3) install a riprap structure in Agua Hedionda creek channel, beneath the Cannon Road bridge and in the Coastal
Zone; 4) install additional riprap along both banks of Agua Hedionda creek channel between the Cannon Road and El Camino Real
bridges and in the Coastal Zone; and 5) remove approximately 7,000 additional cubic yards of sediment within the two channels to
accommodate the riprap, located on portions of Agua Hedionda and Calavera creek channels at, and near, the intersection of El
Camino Real and Cannon Roads, within the Rancho Carlsbad residential community.
Mail notice to: San Diego County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Public Notice Hearings, Mailstop A-45, Room 402, 1600 Pacific Highway,
San Diego, CA 9210 I
Where documents are located for Public Review: Planning Division, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 April2011
ITl t:J
t:J
t:l F1estric~ed Delfvery Fee
POlllmark
Here .,.rz, ·13
t::l (Fndorsemm\1 R~";e:) /PD
1"-Total Postage California Coastal Commission
[; Attn: Kanan; Brown
Suite 103
7575 Metropolitan Drive
San Diego, CA 92108-4402
0 0 FILE COPY
~~~CITY OF
i?· I CJ .f~
~PCARLSBAD
Community & Economic Development www.carlsbadca.gov
I EARLY PUBLIC NOTICE
PROJECT NAME: Agua Hedionda and Calavera Creeks
PROJECT NUMBER: COP 06-04x1 (A)/ SUP 06-02x1 (A)
This early public notice is to let you know that a development application to amend a
previously approved Conditional Use Permit (COP 06-04) and a Special Use Permit
(SUP 06-02) to dredge and improve Calavera and Agua Hedionda creeks, within your
neighborhood, has been submitted to the City of Carlsbad on January 24, 2013. The
project application is undergoing its initial review by the City.
LOCATION: The project primarily affects portions of Agua Hedionda and Calavera
creeks to the east and west of El Camino Real, and south of Cannon Road, within the
Rancho Carlsbad residential community.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City of Carlsbad proposes to amend the previously
approved COP and SUP to: 1) install additional rip rap in Agua Hedionda Creek in place
of slope stabilization using V-max; 2) install riprap drop structures in place of gabion
drop structures in Agua Hedionda and Calavera creeks; 3) install a riprap structure in
Agua Hedionda Creek, beneath the Cannon Road bridge; and 4) remove approximately
7,000 additional cubic yards of sediment within the two creeks to accommodate the
riprap.
Please keep in mind that this is an early public notice and that the project design could
change as a result of further staff and public review. A future public hearing notice will
be mailed to you when this project is scheduled for public hearing before the Planning
Commission.
CONTACT INFORMATION: If you have questions or comments regarding this
proposed project please contact Pam Drew, Associate Planner at
Pam.Drew@carlsbadca.gov, (760) 602-4644, City of Carlsbad Planning Division, 1635
Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 or Sherri Howard, Associate Engineer at
Sherri.Howard@carlsbadca.gov, (760) 602-2756, City of Carlsbad Utilities Department,
1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008.
· · ... Planning Division ~· 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559
I
DATE:
CITY OF CARLSBAD
REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO
JANUARY 24, 2013
PROJECT NO(S): SUP 06-02xl(A}
PROJECT TITLE: AGUA HEDIONDA & CALAVERA CREEK (CHANNEL DREDGING)
APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD/SHERR! HOWARD
TO: • D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Land Development Engineering-Administration
Police Department-J. Sasway
Fire Department-Greg Ryan
Building Department-Will Foss
Recreation-Mark Steyaert
Public Works Department (Streets)-Nick Roque
_____________ Water/Sewer District
Landscape Plancheck Consultant -PELA
_____________ School District
North County Transit District-Planning Department
Sempra Energy-Land Management
Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5)
Parks/Trails-Liz Ketabian
*ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS
FROM: PLANNING DIVISION
Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the PLANNING TRACKING DESK
in the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 2!i4/13. If you have "No Comments," plea;e
so state. If you determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the
application "complete" for processing, please immediately contact the applicant and/or their
representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them know.
Signature
PLANS ATTACHED
Review & Comment 12/12
. • ' ....
\ AECOM
February 4, 2013
Ms. Sherri Howard
City of Carlsbad
c
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
AECOM
1420 Kettner Boulevard
Suite 500
San Diego, CA 92101
www.aecom.com
.....
619.233.1454 tel
619.233.0952 fax
Subject: Agua Hedionda and Calavera Creek Improvements Project Preliminary
CEQA Assessment
Dear Ms. Howard:
At the request of the City of Carlsbad (City), AECOM has reviewed the Agua Hedionda
Creek and Calavera Creek Improvements Project for its prior coverage under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), considered the changes in the project since that prior
CEQA coverage, and conducted additional environmental impact analysis of the revised
project for the City's review as they consider options for obtaining CEQA compliance for the
revised project. AECOM is providing this letter to summarize the findings of this analysis.
Project Background
The City's Drainage Master Plan Update EIR (2007 EIR) was prepared in 2007 and certified
by the City as CEQA lead agency on the associated master plan. This EIR provided
project-level analysis of work to remove sediment from and construct physical improvements
in adjacent segments of Agua Hedionda Creek and Calavera Creek in central Carlsbad,
near the intersection of El Camino Real and Cannon Road. The Carlsbad Utilities
Engineering Division is preparing to implement this project, but the current plan for the
dredging and other improvements differs from the project plans that were analyzed in the
2007 EIR. The City is seeking to obtain CEQA compliance for the project prior to
commencing construction.
Changes to the project include installation of additional riprap in Agua Hedionda Creek
(rather than a combination of riprap and bank stabilization with Vmax slope-treatment
material), installation of riprap drop structures in place of gabion drop structures at Agua
Hedionda Creek, and installation of riprap drop structures in Calavera Creek. Placement of
this additional riprap requires a slight increase in the amount of dredging beyond that
anticipated in the 2007 EIR. Another change is the proposed installation of a riprap structure
in Agua Hedionda Creek beneath the Cannon Road bridge, at the edge of the project's
western limits, whereas the 2007 EIR included the potential to improve that location by
constructing encasements around the bridge's existing piers. In addition, the project may
include additional features for the improvement of water quality within Agua Hedionda and
Calavera Creeks, as required by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) for
401 Certification.
The revised project would improve the capacity of Agua Hedionda Creek and Calavera
Creek and remove residences from the 1 00-year floodplain. The existing FIRM for the area
shows over 100 structures in the floodplain. The most recent analysis of post-project
AECOM
Mr. Sherri Howard
City of Carlsbad
February 4, 2013
Page 2
conditions shows 22 structures remaining in the 1 00-year floodplain after project
implementation.
AECOM reviewed the proposed changes in the project and considered how these changes
might affect the analysis and conclusions of project impacts as they were presented in the
2007 EIR. Based on a preliminary review, AECOM identified five environmental issues that
needed to be addressed-Visual Resources (Section 4.3 of the 2007 EIR),
Transportation/Circulation (Section 4.4), Air Quality (Section 4.5), Hydrology/Water Quality
(Section 4.9), and Greenhouse Gas Emissions (not included in the 2007 EIR). AECOM
determined that the remaining sections of the 2007 EIR would not be affected in a
meaningful way by the changes in the project and do not warrant detailed assessment.
Explanations of why the project changes did not affect the substance or conclusions of the
2007 EIR are provided in the attached table.
AECOM conducted the appropriate analyses of the revised project for the environmental
issue areas listed above and compared the results of the analyses to the discussions in the
respective sections of the 2007 EIR, and is presenting the results of this comparison to the
City for their consideration of the appropriate approach to achieving CEQA compliance for
the project. For each issue area, this memo presents a summary of the 2007 EIR
conclusions, a summary of why the changes in the project affect the discussion of the issue
area, and a revised analysis of the project that includes a discussion of whether the revised
analysis identifies new or substantial increases in significant impacts that were identified in
the 2007 EIR.
In summary of the discussion presented below, the changes to the project do not indicate
new significant impacts that were not identified in the 2007 EIR or substantial increases in
any significant impacts that were identified in the 2007 EIR.
Visual Resources
2007 EIR Conclusions
Section 4.3.3.3 of the 2007 EIR concluded that the project would have a less-than-
significant impact on visual resources. That section stated that though temporary
construction activities would be visible from the adjacent El Camino Real and Cannon Road,
which intersect near the project site and are designated as a Community Theme Corridor
and a Community Scenic Corridor in the Carlsbad General Plan, respectively, this would not
be considered significant because it would be only a temporary disturbance to the area's
visual character. Furthermore, the staging activity was determined not to be visible to
motorists and Rancho Carlsbad residents due to intervening walls.
With respect to the project's permanent impacts, the lowered and widened channel bottoms
were identified as minimally visible to motorists traveling on El Camino Real and Cannon
Road so as not to have a significant effect on the scenic quality as perceived from these
roads. Project-related vegetation removal was determined to reduce some existing
screening along the roadways, but the EIR concluded that retention of mature trees along
...
AiCOM
Mr. Sherri Howard
City of Carlsbad
February 4, 2013
Page 3
c
the banks in this area would maintain adequate screening. Accordingly, the project was
concluded to not conflict with the City's Scenic Corridor Guidelines, which require "visually
pleasing intersections at points where scenic corridors cross," especially because certain
cleared areas would be re-landscaped to maintain the area's overall visual quality. The
ultimate conclusion of the 2007 EIR is that the project would result in an overall visual
enhancement of the creeks by removing eroded slopes and concrete and replacement with
vegetated and Vmax-stabilized slopes.
The 2007 EIR did not include visual simulations.
Reasons for Revising Analysis
Visible changes in the project include installation of riprap to provide bank stabilization
rather than the originally proposed Vmax-treated slopes, as well as a greater amount of
excavation in the creek beds beyond that which was considered in the 2007 EIR.
Revised Analysis of Project Impacts
Riprap installed in the banks of the creeks would be visible to residents of Rancho
Carlsbad-a gated community-and to motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians traveling on
El Camino Real and Cannon Road, which are designated as scenic features in the General
Plan. Current views of this area are of earth-bottom creeks with patchy vegetation and some
degraded concrete lining in certain places, which would be replaced by slopes and channel
bottoms lined with riprap, typically composed of grey-brown rocks of various sizes. Figure 1
shows visual simulations of the project upstream and downstream from the El Camino Real
bridge compared to existing conditions, and Figure 2 shows a simulation from the Don Juan
Drive bridge over the project within the Rancho Carlsbad community. Don Juan Drive is a
private road located within the gated community. The greatest degree of visibility of the
project would be to the residential viewers of Rancho Carlsbad. The elevation of the public
roads above the creek would limit direct views from the roadway, which would be further
obscured in certain areas due to the intervening railing on the bridge and surrounding
vegetation. Project changes would be visible from certain residences and from private roads
and adjacent common areas within the development, but would have limited visibility to
public viewers.
Because the 2007 EIR did not include visual simulations of the project, a side-by-side
comparison of the two versions of the project is not possible. It is reasonable to assume that
some viewers may respond negatively to the appearance of the riprap, which could be
interpreted as adding an industrial appearance to an area that once had a more natural
setting. This would constitute a greater impact than indicated in the 2007 EIR for the area
upstream of El Camino Real, as the Vmax slopes proposed for that area would have
maintained an appearance that could be interpreted by neighboring viewers as more natural
than the riprap-lined feature. The project-related span downstream of El Camino Real
currently features riprap underneath the sediment and vegetation. Uncovering the riprap in
this downstream location, as shown in Key View 1 (Figure 1 ), does not substantially differ
A:COM
Mr. Sherri Howard
City of Carlsbad
February 4, 2013
Page4
from the plan considered in the 2007 EIR, and there is no change in the aesthetic impacts
due to the project changes.
Many views of the portion of the project upstream of El Camino Real, including those from
the neighboring Rancho Carlsbad residences, are screened by intervening vegetation
outside the project limits that would not be disturbed as part of the project (see Figure 1, Key
View 2 and Key View 3). Furthermore, project-related vegetation planting would generally
improve visual conditions in the area once project construction is complete. Existing trees
that would remain pursuant to the project tree plan include a variety of cottonwood,
sycamore, citrus, cyprus, eucalyptus, oak, oleander, palm, pine, and yucca. Additional trees
that will be planted include western sycamore, Fremont cottonwood, and California live oak.
With a combination of the project maintaining existing vegetation and planting additional
vegetation, there would not be a significant change to the overall scenic quality of the project
area. Therefore, though the impacts on scenic quality associated with the revised project
would be greater than the less-than-significant impact stated in the 2007 EIR, the increase
would not be substantial enough to trigger a significant impact.
Similar to the project's original proposal, the project would remove some vegetation from
within and along the edge of the creeks, though the revised project would entail a slight
increase in vegetation removal, compared to that analyzed in the 2007 EIR. As with the
originally proposed project, some of this removal would be visible from El Camino Real and
Cannon Road, which are designated as scenic corridors in the General Plan. A slight
increase in the amount of vegetation removed from this area would not affect the 2007 EIR
conclusion with respect to compatibility with the City's Scenic Corridor Guidelines, which
require "visually pleasing intersections at points where scenic corridors cross." Landscaping
in this area as part of the project would ensure the area remains visually pleasing when
viewed from this intersection.
Due to the installation of riprap and additional excavation from the creeks, the project would
entail a more intensive construction process than initially anticipated in the 2007 EIR. The
less-than-significant visual impact identified for construction activities in the 2007 EIR would
remain and would be slightly greater than stated in the 2007 EIR, but this short-term impact
would not be considered significant.
Traffic
2007 EIR Conclusions
Section 4.4.3.3 of the 2007 EIR concluded that the project's trip generation would be most
intense during off-hauling of the dredged channel spoils. Hauling was estimated at 1 ,650
haul loads over 55 working days, or an average of 30 loads per day when spread throughout
the span of the project, which equate to an average-daily-trips (ADT) count of 60. Because
segments and intersection counts at Cannon Road and El Camino Real, the two public
roadways nearest to the project site, showed the facilities operating at either level of service
(LOS) A or LOS B under existing conditions, the addition of this small amount of truck traffic
A:COM
Mr. Sherri Howard
City of Carlsbad
February 4, 2013
Page 5
c
was determined to not result in a substantial increase in local traffic or substantial
degradation of segment or intersection service.
The 2007 EIR also concluded that project construction would not result in a significant traffic
hazard or safety issue because the project would include preparation and implementation of
a traffic control plan, which would include measures such as notices to local neighbors,
signage, flaggers, and other warning devices to control heavy equipment traffic and direct
pedestrians to safe crossings. This plan would also identify emergency access routes,
leading to the conclusion that project construction would not impair emergency access to
and from the Rancho Carlsbad community.
With respect to operational impacts, Section 4.4.3.3 of the 2007 EIR indicated that
maintenance traffic would occur in relation to ongoing sediment-and waste-hauling in the
project area. The referenced discussion did not quantify maintenance trips, although it did
characterize maintenance trips as likely to be much less than the 60 ADT estimated for off-
hauling of dredged channel spoils and therefore insignificant.
Reasons for Revising Analysis
The existing conditions information that served as the basis for the 2007 EIR traffic analysis
is several years old, with the traffic counts occurring in 2005 and 2006. Establishing an
appropriate baseline for the construction-period traffic impact analysis requires updated
traffic data.
The proposed changes in the project compared to that which was analyzed in the 2007 EIR
also entail an increase in construction-period traffic due to haul trips for riprap and increased
amount of excavated material hauling.
The project changes would not result in additional maintenance trips to and from the project
area, as the same level of effort and frequency of maintenance would be required for the
revised project as for the project analyzed in the 2007 EIR. Therefore, there is no change to
the maintenance-related operational traffic impact analysis or conclusions stated in Section
4.4.3.3 of the 2007 EIR.
Revised Analysis of Project Impacts
The project changes have no bearing on emergency access or safety hazards impacts
during construction; therefore, no revision of this analysis is necessary. The increase in
construction traffic due to riprap hauling and increased excavated materials hauling,
however, would slightly increase the severity of the less-than-significant impact identified in
the 2007 EIR, and this impact is considered below.
Updated ADT counts for the segments of El Camino Real and Cannon Road adjacent to the
project site were obtained from the Carlsbad Transportation Department. The updated
A: COM
Mr. Sherri Howard
City of Carlsbad
February 4, 2013
Page 6
counts were recorded in 2009 through 2011, allowing a more current approximation of .
existing traffic conditions.1 Table 1 shows the updated counts compared to the prior counts.
Table 1
ADT Comparison
I 2007 EIR I Updated
Counts Counts
Cannon Road
Frost Ave. to El Camino Real I 9 300 I 11,775
El Camino Real to Hilltop Street I 14,700 I 17,710
El Camino Real
Crestview Drive to Cannon Road I 27,700 I 25,748
Cannon Road to Rancho Carlsbad Drive I 32 500 I 32,597
Source: Crty of Carlsbad Transportatron Department
As the table shows, traffic appears to have generally increased in the project area since the
counts were taken in 2005 and 2006. All of these segments were identified as operating at
LOS A and LOS B under existing conditions in the 2007 EIR. The increase in traffic since
those counts is not substantial enough to result in a major downgrade in LOS for these
segments, and the segments continue to operate at acceptable levels. Updated intersection
LOS information for the El Camino Real/Cannon Road intersection shows that the
intersection is operating at LOS B and LOS C in the morning and evening peak hour. This is
an acceptable level of operation, though a downgrade in service since the 2007 EIR, which
listed the intersection as operating at LOS A in the morning peak time and LOS B in the
evening peak. Though there is a slight increase in the amount of traffic using the roads in
the vicinity of the project site since publication of the 2007 EIR, segments and intersections
that would carry project-related construction and maintenance traffic are operating at
acceptable levels and, therefore, there has not been a significant change in existing
conditions compared to the existing conditions stated in the 2007 EIR.
As with the prior version of the project, the most notable traffic issue will be construction
hauling. The project will result in a greater amount of haul trips than analyzed in the 2007
EIR due to an increase in spoils off-hauling and the addition of on-haul trips for riprap, which
were not anticipated in the 2007 EIR. The EIR estimated the ADT for spoils hauling at 60
ADT, based on 1,650 haul loads spread out over 55 working days. The revised project is
estimated to require 1,750 truck loads for the spoils hauling (35,000 cubic yards in 20-cubic-
yard truck loads), plus 1,250 truck loads for the riprap hauling (25,000 cubic yards in similar
trucks). Dredging is anticipated for a duration of 55 working days, while bank stabilization is
anticipated for a duration of 45 working days, both of which are consistent with the
construction schedule stated in EIR Table 3-5. On average, this would mean 32 haul loads
per day during the dredging phase of the revised project, or an ADT of 64, and 28 haul loads
a day during the riprap installation phase, or an ADT of 56. The dredging-phase ADT of the
1 The segments included in the updated data are not identical to those that appeared in the 2007 EIR data, and
the segments appearing in the 2007 EIR are slightly longer than those that appear in the updated counts;
however, the segments do overlap and all segments from the updated data are contained within the prior
segments, giving an adequate basis for comparison.
A:COM
Mr. Sherri Howard
City of Carlsbad
February 4, 2013
Page 7
c
revised project is slightly higher than anticipated in the 2007 EIR for spoils off-hauling, while
the riprap-phase ADT of the revised project is slightly lower than that estimated for spoils off-
hauling. This slight increase in ADT during the dredging phase and additional trips resulting
from the rip rap installation phase do not represent significant impacts. The local roadway
system continues to operate under acceptable conditions, and the project's addition of traffic
would not constitute a significant traffic impact to daily conditions. The increased duration of
the haul trips would extend the occurrence of this less-than-significant impact for a longer
duration, but this impact would remain less than significant.
Air Quality
2007 EIR Conclusions
Section 4.5.3.3 of the 2007 EIR presented an analysis of the project's air quality impacts.
The analysis included quantitative estimates of construction-related emissions associated
with the project, including spoils hauling, equipment delivery and operation, and worker trips.
Since the San Diego Air Pollution Control District (APCD) does not have quantitative
emissions criteria for CEQA evaluations, the analysis used conformity thresholds developed
for assessment of federal projects. These conformity thresholds (or "de minimis" thresholds)
are annual figures stated in tons per year that are based on the federal non-attainment
status of the relevant air basin. Threshold values are 1 00 tons per year for reactive organic
gases (ROG), oxides of nitrogen (NOx). and carbon monoxide (CO); and 70 tons per year for
fine particulate matter (PM10). The estimated project emissions were considerably less than
these thresholds and the project's construction-related impacts were determined to be less
than significant.
The analysis also indicated that there would be a potential for odor emissions from the
dredging and removal of wet sediments from the creek channels. However, the 2007 EIR
stated that if odors occurred, they would dissipate relatively rapidly and would not be
anticipated to be noticeable for more than one week. Potential air quality impacts associated
with stockpiles of dredge material would be minimized with implementation of the project
design features/measures and construction practices. Therefore, project-related odor
impacts were determined to be less than significant.
With respect to operational impacts, Section 4.5.3.3 also identifies maintenance-related
emissions from equipment, stating that the intensity and duration would be less than that for
the project's construction effort, which would be less than significant.
Reasons for Revising Analysis
The changes in the project would not result in an extension of the construction schedule
identified in the 2007 EIR but would result in additional haul truck trips that were not
included in the 2007 EIR analyses. The analysis in the 2007 EIR also relied on the 2002
version of the commonly used URBEMIS emissions modeling software, which was the most
current version at the time of the analysis. Newer software has been developed since that
A: COM
Mr. Sherri Howard
City of Carlsbad
February 4, 2013
Page 8
-
time. Changes to the emission factors and methodology pursuant to the updated modeling
software would result in different emission estimates.
Furthermore, the air quality analysis presented in the 2007 EIR relied on federal conformity
thresholds. Since publication of the 2007 EIR, APCD has identified daily trigger levels that
are more relevant to California's air emissions policies and to this project's local
environment. Though these trigger levels do not specifically apply to construction projects,
they are instructive for comparative and analytical purposes, and are useful for analysis of
short-term construction projects because they daily emissions rather than annual emissions.
The County of San Diego, for instance, has established these levels as screening-level
thresholds that may be used to evaluate construction projects. Therefore, it is appropriate
for informational purposes to analyze project impacts pursuant to these thresholds.
The project changes would not result in additional maintenance, as the same level of effort
and frequency of maintenance would be required for the revised project as for the project
analyzed in the 2007 EIR. Therefore, there is no change to the maintenance-related
operational air quality impact analysis or conclusions stated in Section 4.5.3.3 of the 2007
EIR.
Revised Analysis of Project Impacts
Construction emissions associated with the project were quantified using the California
Emission Estimator Model (CaiEEMod) Version 2011.1.1. For construction projects,
CaiEEMod allows the user to enter project-specific information such as types of equipment,
vehicle trip generation rates, and construction phasing and schedule.
For this analysis, it was assumed that the project would consist of three non-overlapping
phases that last for a total of 100 construction days (approximately 5 months), with the first
two phases being dredging and sediment removal along different parts of the project
alignment (including sediment off-hauling), and the third phase being riprap delivery and
installation. Construction equipment is anticipated to include 1 dozer, 2 loaders, and 2 heavy
trucks operating for the full duration of construction period. Additional equipment would
include 1 crane and 1 scraper operating for 75% of the construction period. It was also
assumed that 35,000 cubic yards of dredged and excavated materials would be hauled off-
site. Assuming a truck capacity of 20 cubic yards, off-site hauling would result in 32 round
trips per day to a disposal site located approximately 20 miles from the project site. The
project would also involve the delivery of 25,000 cubic yards of riprap, or 28 round trips per
day, to the project site. The nearest supplier is approximately 20 miles from the project site.
Estimated construction emissions are shown in Table 2. The particulate-matter emissions
shown in this table reflect dust-control benefits from watering the site 2 times per day, which
is mandatory for standard construction practices in San Diego County, pursuant to APCD
requirements.
A!COM
Mr. Sherri Howard
City of Carlsbad
February 4, 2013
Page 9
c
Table 2
Summary of Modeled Construction Emissions
Emissions (lbs/day)
ROG NOx co SOx
Phase 1 13 115 57 0.1
Phase 2 13 115 57 0.1
Phase 3 12 112 56 0.1
Maximum Daily Emissions 13 115 57 0.1
Significance Threshold 75 250 550 250
Exceeds Threshold? No No No No
Source: AECOM 2012
PM1o PMu
45 7
12 7
37 7
45 7
100 55
No No
As shown in Table 2, construction-related emissions of ROG, NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, and
PM2.s would not exceed the screening-level thresholds and would not violate any air quality
standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. The
less-than-significant impact identified in the 2007 EIR would be slightly greater due to the
extended construction period, but would remain less than significant.
Hydrology/Water Quality
2007 EIR Conclusions
Section 4.9.3.3 of the 2007 EIR presented an analysis of the project's hydrology and water
quality impacts. The analysis determined that dredging and construction activities had the
potential to degrade water quality in Agua Hedionda and Calavera creeks, but because the
project would be required to incorporate design features and construction BMPs as part of
the project-specific Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in compliance with all
relevant permit requirements, these impacts would be less than significant. The 2007 EIR
stated the project would implement in-stream water quality controls, as well as upland
construction site BMPs to minimize water quality impacts. Ultimately, the 2007 EIR
concluded the project would improve flood control within the creeks and reduce the 1 00-year
floodplain within the project area. Potential short-term impacts to hydrology/water quality
during construction were determined to be less than significant, and long-term impacts were
determined to be beneficial.
Reasons for Revising Analysis
The proposed changes in the project as compared to the version of the project analyzed in
the 2007 EIR involve increases in the amount of dredged material and riprap installation in
both creeks. These proposed changes require an increase in dredging and construction
activities, which could potentially increase construction-related impacts to water quality.
In addition to these project changes, a number of the compliance documents referenced in
the 2007 EIR have been updated since the EIR was published, as summarized below:
AS' COM
Mr. Sherri Howard
City of Carlsbad
February 4, 2013
Page 10
• The NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with
Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Construction General Permit) has
been updated since publication of the 2007 EIR, which references Order No. 99-08-
DWQ. The project would now be required to adhere to Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ
(as amended by 2010-0014-DWQ), which was prepared in 2009. The updated permit
includes updated compliance measures that would be required to be implemented by
the project.
• The San Diego Municipal Storm Water Permit Tentative Order No. R9-2006-0011
referenced in the 2007 EIR has been revised since publication of the EIR. The
project would be required to comply with the current Municipal Permit, Order No.
R9-2007-0001, which was prepared in 2007.
• The 303(d) list referenced in the 2007 EIR has been updated since the 2007 EIR
was published. Agua Hedionda Creek was listed for trace metals (manganese and
selenium), sulfates, and total dissolved solids (TDS) on the 303(d) list at the time the
EIR was published, but is now also listed as impaired for coliform bacteria, nutrients
(phosphorus and nitrogen), and toxicity on the most recent 303(d) list, which was
prepared in 2010.
• The 2004 California Stormwater Quality Association Construction BMP Handbook
referenced in the 2007 EIR was updated in 2009.
It also should be noted that the 2007 EIR identifies the need for the project to obtain a
Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from the
Federal Emergency Management Agency to address the change in Flood Insurance Rate
Maps (FIRM) for the area. FEMA issued the CLOMR in October 2011, and the LOMR is still
outstanding. This issuance does not change the analysis or conclusions in the 2007 EIR.
Revised Analysis of Project Impacts
The proposed project changes entail an increase in dredging and the introduction of riprap,
which would slightly increase the intensity of construction and result in a slight increase in
the temporary impacts to water quality that were identified in the 2007 EIR. Additionally,
Agua Hedionda Creek, to which the project would discharge, is now listed as an impaired
water body on the 303(d) list for additionalpollutants than it was listed for at the time the
2007 EIR was published.However, being principally a temporary construction-related impact
that provides long-term beneficial impacts to streambed and bank stability and the project
would not contribute the pollutants of concern as a result of implementation, no additional
impacts would be expected.
Similar to the conclusions stated in the 2007 EIR, the project would be required to comply
with all relevant permits, standards and regulations, including both the Municipal Permit and
Construction General Permit. As stated in the 2007 EIR, erosion and sediment controls
would be used and a project-specific SWPPP would be in place during construction
activities to reduce the amount of sediments disturbed and to prevent disturbed sediments
A.: COM
Mr. Sherri Howard
City of Carlsbad
February 4, 2013
Page 11
c
from entering runoff to receiving waters. Updates to the Construction General Permit
(2010-0014-DWQ) since publication of the 2007 EIR include:
• Monitoring and reporting of and numeric effluent limitations for pH and turbidity in
storm water discharges;
• A Rain Event Action Plan for higher-risk sites;
• Annual reporting on monitoring activities; and
• Specific training or certifications of key personnel (e.g., SWPPP preparers,
inspectors) to ensure their level of knowledge and skills are adequate to ensure their
ability to design and evaluate project specifications that will comply with General
Permit requirements.
Construction-related impacts to water quality from the additional dredging and riprap
placement would be temporary and, by successfully complying with relevant permit
requirements and required construction measures, impacts would be less than significant.
The increased amount of riprap proposed for the project would be beneficial to
post-construction water quality, as it would provide additional bank stabilization and erosion
control over the original design initially evaluated in 2007.
Ultimately, the proposed project would improve flood control within Agua Hedionda and
Cal avera creeks and reduce the 1 00-year floodplain within the project area, thereby
alleviating the majority of residences from inundation during a 1 00-year flood event.
Therefore, long-term impacts of the proposed project would be beneficial to water quality,
hydrology, drainage capacity, and creek bed and bank stability. No new significant impacts
are anticipated with the revised proposed project.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
2007 EIR Conclusions
The 2007 EIR did not include greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions analysis because this was
not a required component of CEQA at the time the EIR was published.
Project Changes Affecting Greenhouse gas emissions
Revisions to the State CEQA Guidelines made in 2011 include a requirement to consider
analysis of GHG emission impacts.
Revised Analysis of Project Impacts
Environmental and Regulatory Setting
Emissions of GHGs have the potential to adversely affect the environment because such
emissions contribute, on a cumulative basis, to global climate change. Although it is unlikely
AS" COM
Mr. Sherri Howard
City of Carlsbad
February 4, 2013
Page 12
that a single project would contribute significantly to climate change, cumulative emissions
from many projects could impact global GHG concentrations and the climate system. GHGs
are present in the atmosphere naturally, are released by natural sources, or are formed from
secondary reactions taking place in the atmosphere. The following are the gases that are
widely seen as the principal contributors to human-induced global climate change:
• Carbon dioxide (C02)
• Methane (CH4)
• Nitrous oxide (N20)
• Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)
• Perfluorocarbons (PFCs)
• Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6)
Senate Bill (SB) 97, signed August 2007, acknowledged that climate change is a prominent
environmental issue that requires analysis under CEQA. This bill directed the California
Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to prepare, develop, and transmit to the California
Natural Resources Agency guidelines for the feasible mitigation of GHG emissions or the
effects of GHG emissions, as required by CEQA by July 1, 2009. The California Natural
Resources Agency adopted those guidelines on December 30, 2009, and the guidelines
became effective March 18, 2010.
Methodology
Global warming potential (GWP) is a concept developed to compare the ability of each GHG
to trap heat in the atmosphere relative to another gas; GWP is based on several factors,
including the relative effectiveness of a gas to absorb infrared radiation and length of time
that the gas remains in the atmosphere ("atmospheric lifetime"). The GWP of each gas is
measured relative to C02, the most abundant GHG. GHGs with lower emissions rates than
C02 may still contribute to climate change because they are more effective at absorbing
outgoing infrared radiation than C02. The concept of C02-equivalents (C02e) is used to
account for the different GWP potentials of GHGs to absorb infrared radiation over a
1 00-year timeframe. The reference gas for GWP is C02; therefore, C02 has a GWP of 1.
The other main GHGs that have been attributed to human activity include CH4, which has a
GWP of 21, and N20, which has a GWP of 31 0. For example, 1 ton of CH4 has the same
contribution to the greenhouse effect as approximately 21 tons of C02.
Thresholds of Significance
As stated in Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines, the significance criteria established
by the applicable air quality management district may be relied on to make determinations
about the CEQA significance of a project's GHG impacts. However, at the time of this
writing, neither the California Air Resources Board (ARB) nor APCD has identified a CEQA
significance threshold for GHG emissions.
.CCOM
Mr. Sherri Howard
City of Carlsbad
February 4, 2013
Page 13
c
In light of the lack of established GHG emissions thresholds that would apply to the project,
CEQA allows projects to use thresholds of significance applicable to a proposed project that
are supported by substantial evidence. Therefore, to establish additional context in which to
consider the order of magnitude of the project's operational GHG emissions, this analysis
takes into account the following considerations by other government agencies and
associations about what levels of GHG emissions constitute a cumulatively considerable
incremental contribution to climate change:
• The County of San Diego has established a threshold of 2.500 MT C02e per year as
a project-level "bright line" GHG significance threshold that would apply to
operational and construction emissions from land use development projects.
• South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is considering a threshold
of 3,000 MT C02e per year as a project-level "bright line" GHG significance threshold
that would apply to operational emissions from land use development projects.
• Facilities that generate greater than 25.000 MT C02e per year are mandated to
report their GHG emissions to ARB pursuant to AB 32.
At the time of this writing, no federal, state, regional, or local air quality regulatory agency
has adopted a quantitative threshold of significance for construction-related GHG emissions.
This information is presented to put project-generated GHG emissions into the appropriate
statewide context to evaluate whether the GHG emissions contribution from the project
would result in a significant cumulative impact pursuant to CEQA.
Project Impacts
Heavy-duty off-road equipment, materials transport, and worker commutes during
construction of the project would result in exhaust emissions of GHGs. GHG emissions
generated by construction would be primarily in the form of C02. Construction activities are
the same as those discussed earlier under "Revised Analysis of Project Impacts" related to
Air Quality, and construction-related GHG emissions were also quantified using CaiEEMod.
Construction-related GHG emissions that would occur as a result of implementation of the
project would total 655 metric tons of C02e. The total construction-related C02e emissions
associated with the project would be less than any of the adopted or proposed GHG levels
or thresholds discussed earlier in this section. Standard mitigation measures for construction
exhaust, including minimizing idling time, would also reduce GHG emissions. Therefore, the
project would not generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the environment. This impact would be less than significant.
Conclusion
As detailed above, the project would not result in any new significant impacts that were not
identified in the 2007 EIR, nor would it substantially increase any significant impacts that
were identified in the 2007 EIR.
A5"COM
Mr. Sherri Howard
City of Carlsbad
February 4, 2013
Page 14
Please contact me if you have any questions about our analysis, and let me know when you
are available to meet with use to discuss the results of this effort and the prospective
approaches to CEQA compliance for the revised project.
Sincerely,
~d~
Project Manager
Attachments:
1. Discussion of additional EIR sections
2. Visual simulations
60211529 CEQA Assessmnt Howard Ltr
EtR Topk Swnmary of 2007 EIR condusion
Section
4.1 Land Use Less than significant. Project does not entail
changes in land use or zone designations and
consistent with the General Plan; project is
consistent with the McClellan-Palomar Airport
LUCP; project is not within HMP's Hardline
Preserve Area.
4.2 Agricultural Resources Less than significant. Project is adjacent to Prime
Agriculture, Farmland of Statewide Importance,
and Unique Farmland, but these areas are not
suitable for agricultural use, or zoned for
agricultural use, or subject to a Williamson Act
contract.
4.6 Noise Less than significant. Project construction and
maintenance would generate noise adjacent to
residences, limited to daylight hours, as permitted
by the City's noise ordinance. When equipment is
within 50 feet of a residence, short-term noise
levels would exceed 75 dBA, and 1-hour average
noise levels would likely exceed 75 dBA. The
duration of the noise impact at any residence is
anticipated to be 1-3 days, as the dredging would
proceed along each creek at approximately 50-
100 feet per day. Because construction activity
would not result in excessive noise levels for a
period of greater than 3 days, impacts would be
less than s.ignificant.
Attachment 1
Discussion of Additional EIR Sections
Reason for no detailed ...ays~s
Proposed changes do not alter the project location or
substantially expand the project boundaries;
additional excavation and inclusion of riprap would
have no bearing on the 2007 EIR's land use
conclusions.
Proposed changes do not alter the project location or
expand the project boundaries; additional excavation
and inclusion of riprap would have no bearing on the
2007 EIR's agricultural resources conclusions.
Proposed changes do not entail activities that would
increase noise levels, nor new work locations that
would subject additional receptors to construction-
related noise that was not anticipated in the 2007 EIR.
The riprap component of the project would be a larger
effort than that anticipated in the 2007 EIR, but the
total duration of the project's noise generation would
not increase. Similar to the previously proposed
project, the revised project includes two three-day
construction phases, though in the revised project the
second of these phases includes a greater amount of
rip rap installation in place of the previously
anticipated bank stabilization. The increased rip rap
installation would generate similar noise levels
1
EIR Topic Summary of 2007 ElR conclusion Ro8son. far no dllbilld .,..lysis
Section
anticipated in the slope stabilization considered in the
2007 EIR. With the project changes, project
construction would not cause any residences to
receive noise for longer than 3 consecutive days, as
the installation phase would follow the dredging
phase.
4.7 Recreation Less than significant. The project site does not Proposed changes do not alter the project location or
contain any recreational facilities and the project expand the project boundaries; additional excavation
would not affect any recreational facilities. The and inclusion of riprap would have no bearing on the
Rancho Carlsbad community pool is located 2007 EIR's recreational conclusions.
approximately 300 feet from the site and would
be unaffected by 1project activity.
4.8 Geology/Soils Less than significant. Project activities would Proposed changes do not alter the project location or
conform to City's erosion control requirements. substantially expand the project boundaries, and
Project area has potential to feature expansive would have no bearing on the 2007 EIR's geology and
soils, which would be addressed through proper soils conclusions. Project would entail additional
design and incorporation of BMPs. Project would excavation beyond that considered in the 2007 EIR,
conform to City Building Code and Uniform but this would not change the geologic conditions of
Building Code to minimize threat of damage the site, expose different soil conditions, or subject
associated with seismic activity. Project area is flat the project to additional or greater hazards beyond
and not subject to hazardous landslides. There are those identified in the 2007 EIR. Installation of riprap
no mineral resource recovery areas in the project would require different design considerations than the
area. prior plans to limit potential hazards from expansive
soils and seismic events, but this would not expose the
project to additional or greater hazards beyond those
identified in the 2007 EIR.
4.10 Biological Resources Wildlife. Less than significant with mitigation. No Wildlife. Proposed changes do not alter the project
listed species were identified during surveys and location or substantially expand the project
none are anticipated to occur in the project area, boundaries, so the changes would not result in
but listed species were observed within 500 feet impacts on additional species not identified in the
of the site, downstream of the Cannon Road 2007 EIR. Addition of riprap installation would not
Bridge . Tberetore, project construction has the extend the construction duration and, therefore,
2
•
,
EIR Topic SUmmary of 2007 EIR condusiol1 Realofl for ,.o d$Ned •tvsls
Sedlon
potential to result in significant indirect impacts would not increase indirect impacts on listed bird
on least Bell's vireo, southwestern willow species identified in the EIR. The project will be
flycatcher, and light-footed clapper rail due to required to implement the same mitigation measures
increased noise and activity during construction. listed for listed species in the 2007 EIR.
Mitigation was listed for these species, including Habitat/Jurisdictional Areas. Proposed changes do the following measures not entail a substantial increase in habitat removal.
' • Bio-7a: pre-construction surveys for nesting The project will be required to implement the same
birds if work is proposed during breeding mitigation measures for habitat, including
season, delay of vegetation removal if nests revegetation of wetland and sensitive communities.
are present The City is currently finalizing the revegetation
• Bio-7b (clapper rail): pre-construction clapper mitigation plan, which will identify acreage of impact
rail survey downstream of El Camino Real, and revegetation.
flush nests if present
• Bio-7c (vireo): no work in vireo habitat during Wildlife Movement. Addition of the riprap component
breeding season; pre-construction survey of of the project would add an obstacle to wildlife
areas where construction noise levels may movement through the project area, but this
exceed 60 dBA; implement noise-reduction movement would not be completely restricted
measures if vireo are present because of existing vegetated areas that would remain
Bio-7d (flycatcher): no work in flycatcher adjacent to the creek, which would be enhanced with • additional, native plantings. This does not constitute habitat during breeding season; pre-an additional significant impact that was not identified construction survey of areas where in the 2007 EIR. construction noise levels may exceed 60 dBA;
implement noise-reduction measures if Consistency with plans. None of the project changes
flycatcher are present would represent a considerable change to the
• Bio-7e: install temporary construction fence project's relationship to the HMP or LCP.
on downstream side of Cannon Road before
I dredging or vegetation removal to discourage
sensitive bird species from entering site
Habitat/Jurisdictional Areas. Less than significant
with mitigation. The project: would result in
3
EIR Topic Summart of 2W1 EIR condusf Reason for na detailed analysis
Section
temporary and permanent impacts on
unvegetated channel, willow riparian forest,
southern willow s'crub, and non-
native/ornamental vegetation, as noted in Table
4.10-10 in the 2007 EIR. Impacts to willow riparian
forest (0 acres of temporary impacts and 0.53 acre
of permanent impacts) and southern willow scrub
(0 acres of temporary impacts and 0.03 acre of
permanent impacts) would be considered
significant. Mitigation measure Bio-la calls for no
net loss of these significant habitats and states
that replacement ratios and specific locations of
mitigation lands will be determined in
consultation with the agencies during the
permitting process for the project. Measure Bio-
2b states that ratios will be consistent with the
HMP.
Wildlife Movement. Less than significant. Project
area serves as moderate wildlife corridor for
vario.us species and links up stream open space
areas to Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Construction and
ongoing maintenance activities would result in
temporary obstruction to this movement, but the
project would not result in long-term loss of this
function.
Consistency with plans. Less than significant with
mitigation. Project is not within the HMP Hardline
Preserve. HMP establishes conservation goal of no
net loss of wetlands and the project would result
in impacts on wetland communities; measure Bio-
4 \
•
•
I EIR Topic Summ•ry of 2007 !IR conclusion ReMan for no detailed analysis I
Section
' 1a and Bio-2b (discussed above) addresses this.
Agua Hedionda channel improvement is
anticipated by HMP, listed in Appendix B-3 in a list
of future drainage projects needed to complete
the Master Dra inage Plan and Storm Water
Quality Management Plan. Project is consistent
with Local Coastal Plan Policy 3-1.7(a)(S), which
I permits impacts to wetlands for dredging required
for pubilic service pu~pos.es.
4.11 Cultural Resources Less than significant. No resources were identified Proposed changes do not alter the project location or
during records search and field survey of the substantially expand the project boundaries. Project-
project area; none are expected to be related dredging would involve deeper excavation
encountered during project earthwork due to the than previously considered, but this does not change
previous level of disturbance. No mitigation is the conclusion that resources are not expected to be
required. encountered due to the previous level of disturbance
in the area. Therefore, there are no changes to the
conclusions of the 2007 EIR.
4.12 Paleontological Less than significant. The project area is located Proposed changes do not alter the project location or
Resources on Quaternary Alluvium, which has been assigned substantially expand the project boundaries, and
I a low sensitivity for paleontological resources. would have no bearing on the 2007 EIR's
i paleontological resources conclusions.
5
Key View 1
KeyView2
Source: AECCIM 2012
Agua Hedionda and Cal avera Creek Improvements -CEQA Assessment Memorandum
Patll P:\;JOJ/\1 J:JIJOJ2~01_.41/fiDIIMkJttt4.VJJOr .. lt:11J.4 ]I'DJ'..Orr¥liaWtn.l ~\Fjprv\F..,.I.o:oi, lfnl/2, A_,al.
Existing Conditions
Existing Conditions
Location Map
Location Map
Proposed Conditions (Simulation)
Proposed Conditions (Simulation)•
Figure 1
Existing and Proposed Conditions
KeyView3
Sown:.: AECOM lOll
Agua Hedionda and Calavera Creek Improvements -CEQA Assessment Memorandum
Pallt P;l2011\JJJIIOIJJ.OJ_~ ..... 'Ii~\J.I_Prq_~taWDMIJ~\F,.,_IF'IJI-lM. ltYJ/11.A..,,L
Existing Conditions Location Map Proposed Conditions (Simulation)
Figure 2
Existing and Proposed Conditions
•
-LEGEND
ProjactAraa
-Modified 100-Year Floodplain (Proposed)
r:;) FEMA 100-Year Floodplain (Existing)
City of Carlsbad Drainage Master Plan Update EIR
Plllll:P:Il«l:MSSOIlDJAp;IH-ItltutM-C._,CrwkP,.d!XJI~-Uptlt$--t-J-a . .U.. (;f/JIJ/01, ~ .. lb
Figure3-6
Existing and Proposed 100-Year Floodplain Boundaries
3.0 Project Description
This page intentionally left blank.
Page 3-40 City of Carlsbad Drainage Master Plan Update EIR
. 04080/JS Cambad DMP EIR.doc 61/311007
--
200 0
, inch • 400 leal
""DIUiflifG Cll FU "MIESil.....-o lr..uMINI)C'JIUMtU.FOR ITSQ...EM' ANJIIIn'
110f.CCICDORIII&tlllMOUIWIITIDIMlHOIIll1ti'IOIIo llt.E10111EALmwl.fMT\II£ Of B.K.nateW.~S ~IIIMDNDf ... YCIII'IMI5FORIIC:O.MCYCRCOIIfiN'f
.u.DAC*OM.EIIODIMJ ~IT MMMD IIIIOVGED stULY~ eotr.~a«;E flMl
tSQIIU.f'ICIIN.PUIIFOI51 .... MI»CM.rJteliiiMIDMl--SEifi'ATUtS~G IUITMI.i1YQIIIftflrBS R»1 AIWifDA.MA.-oef:
BRIDGE
BUILDING
CONCRETE
100-year Inundation
Contours
DELINEATED 100-YEAR
INUNDATION AREA
OWNER'S STATEMENT
WE HEREBY STAlE THAT WE ARE THE OWNERS OF OR ARE 1Nl£RESTED
IN THE LAND COVERED BY THIS PARCEL MAP AND WE CONSENT TO THE
PREPARATION AND RECORDATION OF THIS MAP.
WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE PUBLIC COLLEGE BOULEVARD FOR STREET AND
PUBLIC UTiliTY PURPOSES. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD
THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES ALL AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP.
WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND
EGRESS OVER THE PRIVATE ROADWAYS AND COMMON LANDSCAPED AREAS BETWEEN THE ROADWAYS SHOWN HEREON WITH THE OBLIGATION TO REPAIR N(f DAJMAGE
TO THE PRIVATE ROADS OR LANDSCAJPED AREAS CAUSED BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD
OR ITS REPRESENTATIVES OR ASSIGNS IN THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OR
MA1Nl£NANCE OF THE DRAINAGE FACILITIES.
WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD THE PRMLEGE AND RIGHT TO
EXTEND DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND
THE Ul.tiTS Of THE HEREON DEDICATED COLLEGE BOULEVARD WHERE REQUIRED
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF SAID DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
AND SLOPES RESERVING UNTO OWNER, ITS SUCCESSORS, OR ASSIGNS,
THE RIGHT TO ELIMINATE SUCH SLOPES AND/OR DRAINAGE STRUCTURES OR
PORTIONS THEREOF, BY SUBSTITUTING OTHER PROTECTION, SUPPORT AND/OR DRAII'h\GE fACILITY, PROVIDED SUCH SUBSTITUTION IS FIRST APPROVED IN
WRITING BY THE CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ..
WE HEREBY RELINQUISH AND WAIVE TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD THE ABUTTERS
RiGHTS OF ACCESS APPURTENANT TO PARCEL 1 IN AND TO El CAMINO REAL
AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP.
PARCEL 1 OF THIS PARCEL MAP IS A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AS DEFINED IN
SECTION 1351 OF THE CIVIl CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CONTAINING
A MAXIMUM OF 504 DWELLING UNITS AND IS FILED PURSUANT TO THE SUB-
DIVISION MAP ACT AND RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME PERMIT NO. 96-01 GRANTED
BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ON JANUARY 21, 1997.
RANCHO CARLSBAD PARTNERS, A CALIFORNIA
GENERAl PARTNERSHIP, AS OWNER
BY: THE CARLSBAD RESIDENT ASSOCIATION, INC.
A CALIFORNIA NON-PROFIT MUTVAl BENEFIT
z:ENERAL PARTNER J..:-1-J ....... BY:_)l~Q J:_
LEE ANDERSON NANCY FIS H~ PRESIDENT SECRETARY
BY: CARLSBERG RANCHO, LTD.,
A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
GENERAL PARTINER
U ., PR I
BY: fU.IIto4aM ,~,,.,,,
ABRAHAM KEH. GENERAL PARTNER •
BY: BROOKVALE TERRACE BUILDING COMPANY A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
GENERAL PARTNER BY~lrl,.,_
ABRAHAM KEH, GENERAl PARTNER
BY· ~c~l~E-~ PARTNER
BY: OAK SHADOWS BUILDING COMPANY
A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
GENERAL PARTNER
1423_PM1 MANlTOU ENGINEERING CO.
l
----------------------------~~~1\~I\~~~~~L~~I~Vl~r
PARCEL MAP
CARLSBAD M.S. N0.96-08
BEING A DMSION OF A PORTION OF lOTS "r! AND "E" OF RANCHO M;UA HEDIONDA IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF
SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 823 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER
OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY NOVEMBER 18, 1896.
TITLE REPORT FURNISH BY: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE CO. ORDER NO. 987051
PARCEl MAP GUARANTEE NO. 987051. DATED• OECEMB'ER 22,1997
GENERAL ElECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, A NEW YORK
CORPORATION, AS BENEFICIARY UNDER DEED OF TRUST
RECORDED SEPT. 7, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995-0396035
OF OFFICAL RECORDS.
THE SIGNATURES OF THE PARTIES LISTED BELOW, OWNERS OF EASEMENTS PER DOCUMENTS NOTED BELOW HAVE BEEN OMITTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS
OF SECTION 66436 SUBSECTION (o)(3)(A)(i) OF THE SUBDMSION MAP ACT,
THEIR INTEREST IS SUCH THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE TITLE AND SAID
SIGNATURES ARE NOT REQUIRED BY THE GOVERMNG BODY.
1. EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROAD PURPOSES TO GEORGE W. &
EDWINA TARRY, HUSBAND AND WIFE, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 10, 1957 IN
BOOK 6740 PAGE 102 OF OFFICIAl RECORDS.
2. EASEMENT FOR WATER CONDUITS TO W.O. CANNON PER DEED RECORDED
FEBRUARY 27, 1952 IN BOOK 4385 PAGE 532 Of OFFICIAL RECORDS.
3. EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WA'I' TO SAN DIEGO GAS & ElECTRIC CO. RECORDED
OCTOBER 7. 1971 AS FILE/PAGE NO. 231011 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS
4. EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES TO COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO RECORDED
JUNE 5, 1970 PER DOCUMENT NO. 97854 0" OFFICIAL RECORDS. CITY
OF CARLSBAD, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST.
5. EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INGRESS AND EGRESS TO SAN
DIEGO GAS &: ELECTRIC CO. PER DOCUMENT RECORDED MARCH 20, 1956
IN BOOK 6024, PAGE 26 AND RECORDED OCTOBER 29, 1971 PER
DOCUMENT NO. 251396 All OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
6. EASEMENT TO CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FOR FACILITIES AND
INGRESS AND EGRESS RECORDED APRIL 4, 1957 IN BOOK 6523, PAGE 348
OF OFFICIAl RECORDS.
7. EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS TO JOSEPH CANTARINI, ET AL
RECORDED APRIL 27, 1967 PER DOCUMENT NO. 58827 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS.
B. EASEMENT FOR ROAD PU~POSES TO THE CIT'I' OF CARLSBAD RECORDED
JANUARY 11, 1971 AS DOCUMENT NO. 5170 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS
9. EASEMENT FOR POLES. WIRES, PIPES AND UTILITY STRUCTURES TO
EDWARD KEllY ET -AL RECORDED JULY 29, 1936 IN BOOK 541 PAGE 244
OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
10. THE RIGHT AND PRIVILEGE TO SPill WATER TOGETHER WlTH THE RIGHT TO CROSS PROPERTY FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS IN DEED TO CARLSBAD
MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT RECORDED 01-M-63 AS F/P NO. 1851 &
1652 O.R.
11. EASEMENTS TO SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC CO. FOR INGRESS, EGRESS
& PUBLIC UTILITIES RECORDED 6-12-70 AS FILE NO. 102776 O.R. AND
RECORDED 7-29-75 AS FILE NO. 75-197485 O.R.
12. EASEMENT TO SAN 'DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC CO. FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES,
INGRESS AND EGRESS RECORDED 11-26-1965 AS FILE NO. 214035 O.R.
SHEET·l OF 7 sa· TS . ~ :~
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
I, FRANCIS W. FITZPATRICK, A PROFESSIONAl LAND SURVEYOR, STATE
THAT THE SURVEY OF THIS PARCEL MAP WAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER
MY DIRECTION BETWEEN NOVEMBER, 1996 AND DECEMBER, 1996
AT THE REQUEST OF THE RANCHO CARLSBAD PARTINERS AND
SAID SURVEY IS TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SHOWN; THAT MONUMENTS
ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICAlED AND
ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. I HEREBY
STATE THAT THIS PARCEl MAP SUBSTANTIAllY CONFORMS TO APPROVED
OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF N(f.
p: ·u16Wz { ~~..,
FRANCIS W. FITZFfATRICK LS. 4539
EXPIRES: 9-30-98
CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT
I, LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD STATE THAT
THIS MAP CONFORMS WITH TITLE 20 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE
AND THE APPROVED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AND DOES NOT APPEAR TO
BE A MAP OF A MNOR SUBDIVISION FOR WHICH A FINAL MAP IS
REQUIRED PURSUANT TO SECTION 66426 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT.
I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND At.4 SATISFlED THAT ALL THE PROVISIONS
OF THE SUBDMSION MAP ACT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND N(f
LOCAL ORDINANCE OF SAID CITY APPUCABLE AT THE TIME OF THE APPROVAL
OF THE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH, AND I AM
SATISFlED THAT SAID MAP IS l£CHNICALl Y CORRECT. I HEREBY APPROVE
AND RECOMMEND THIS MAP.
ALSO. I HEREBY ACCEPT DEDICATION OF COLLEGE BOULEVARD FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES; ACCEPT DEDICATION OF DRAINAGE EASEMENTS
FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES;ACCEPT DEDICATION OF
RIGHTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS; ACCEPT DEDICATION OF EASEMENTS FOR DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND SLOPES; ACCEPT ABUTTERS RIGHTS OF ACCESS APPURTENANT TO PARCEL 1 IN AN TO EL CAMINO REAL,
All AS DEDICATED HEREON.
BY r"Vu~.A/.. __ ~
UC. EXPIRES 12-31-97
DATE:_LZ-'1-.::..3-_..q-(...._._ ___ _
I, THOMAS J. PASTUSZKA. CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDMSION MAP N:T
(DMSION 2 OF TITLE 7 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE) REGARDING (A)
DEPOSITS FOR TAXES, AND (B) CERTIFICATION OF THE ABSENCE OF
LIENS F0R UNPAID STATE. COUNTY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL TAXES OR
SPECJA!. ASSESSMENTS COLLECl£0 AS TAXES EXCEPT THOSE NOT YET PAYABLE, HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH. .
THOMAS J. PASTUSZKA "'"' "' "" ....., :z;:
DAlE· Z~tf-9-D BY· ~-
UTY
RECO~DER'S CERTIFICATE
FILE NO. ~fi?B-QO~IJ'(
FILED THIS DAY J2.~0F~ 1998111 ~:~/ o·ctocK ,A.M .• IN eooK oF PARCEL ~ PAGE r1Jf AT THE REQUEST OF FRANCIS W. FITZPATRICK.
GREGORY J. SMITH
COUNTY RECORDER ~ ._ BY~. fif5 DEPUTY COUNTY RECOR tR
-
EASEMEh.->
C.L EXISTING 20.00' EASEIAENT TO SAN DIEGO GAS &
ELECTRIC CO. RECORDED MARCH 20, 1956 BOOK 6024
PAGE 26 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
t5ii' C.L. EXISTING EASEIAENT TO SAN DIEGO GAS & \.::SI ELECTRIC CO. RECORDED OCTOBER 29, 1971 PER
DOCUIAENT NO. 251396 Of OFF1CIAL RECORDS.
@
0
COLLEGE BOULEVARD DEDICATED HEREON, TOGETHER WITH
RIGHTS TO EXTEND DRAINAGE AND SLOPES.
EXISTING 60.0D' EASEMENT TO JOSEPH & ULUAN
CANTARINI AND BANNING CANARINI RECORDED 4-1-67
AS DOCUMENT NO. ~27 OF OFFlCW. RECORDS AND 9-7-95 AS FILE NO. 1995-D398033 OF OffiCIAL RECORDS
EXISTING EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF SAN DlEGO
RECORDED JUNE 5, 1970 PER DOCUMENT NO.
97854 OF OffiCiAL RECORDS.
@ i:XISTING 12.00' EASEMENT TO SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 1965 AS FILE/PAGE N0.214035, O.R.
G) EXISTING 60.00' EASEIAENT AND RIGHt OF WAY FOR ROAD PURPOSES
TO GEORGE W. & EDWINA TARRY RECORDED SEPTEMBER 10, 19S7 IN
BOOK 6740 PAGE 102 O.R.
@ C.L. EXISTING 4' EASEMENT TO SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC CO. FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND PUBUC UTIUTIES RECORDED 6-12-70
AS f /P NO. 1 02776 O.R.
NOTE:
{,;"\ EASEMENT FOR POLES. WIRES. PIPES AND UTILilY STRUCTURES TO EDWARD
\..:./ KELLY ET Al RECORDED JULY 29. 1936 IN BOOK 541 PAGE 244 O.R. HAS NO SPECiFIC LOCATION SET fORTH IN DEED AND CANNOT BE
PLOTTED.
0 EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY fOR DISiRlBU110N AND TRANSIAISSION OF
ELECTRICITY TO SAN DIEGO GAS &: ELECTRIC CO. RECORDED OCTOBER 7, 1971 AS fiLE/PAGE NO. 231011 OffiCiAL RECORDS HAS NO SPECIFIC
LOCATION SET FORTH IN DEED AN.D CANNOT BE PLOTIEO.
Q THE RIGHT AND PRIVILEGE TO SPILL WATER TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO
\(V CROSS PROPERTY FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS IN DEED TO CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT RECORDED 1 -4-63 AS f /P NO. 1851
AND 1fl52 O.R. HAS NO SPECIFIC LOCATION SET fORTH IN DEED AND
CANNOT BE PLOITED N65'41'24•E
494.33'
NO. LENGTH REMARKS
370.33' C.L 12' EASEMENT
317.74' C.L. 12' EASEMENT
349.35' C.L. 12' EASEMENT
637.35' C.L. 12' EASEMENT
5 N66'3B'30"E 356.94' C.L. 12' EASEMENT
6 N44'36'30''W 15.00' C.L. 4' EASEMENT
7 N07'14'15"W 20.00' C.L. 4' EASEMENT
B N07'18'45"W 1 0.00' C.L 4' EASEMENT
9 NJZ30'35 W 15.00' C.L. 4' EASEMENT
10 N47'39'15"W 15.00' C.L. 4' EASEMENT
11 N2.:5'22'51 E 15.49' C.L 4' EASEMENT
1423_PM5 MA!~ITOU ENGINEERING CO.
.P Al<C.I!;L M i\P NU. ----------------------------------------------------
~ .,_ !:IIJ'C1'l 5'
5 OF 7 SHEETS EASEMENT
PARCEL 3
FOR DATA SEE SHT. NO. 3
RANCHO
EASEMENT DETAIL
NOT TO SCAlf
AGUA HEDJONDA
DETAILS
COVENANT Of EASEMENT ~ FOR EMERGENCY INGRESS
E.lll£ FlLE/PAGE ~Q EG~S RECORDED
NO. 91-!! ___ O.R.
0 300
SHEET
.mrrE
THE FOLLOWING EASEMENTS ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY Of EL CAIAINO REAL.
EXISTING EASEMENT FOR WATER CONDUITS TO W.
0. CANNON PER DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 27. 1952 IN BOOK 43fl5 PAGE 532 Of OFFICIAL
RECORDS.
EXISTING EASEMENT fOR PIPELINE TO CARLS8AO
MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT RECORDED APRIL 7,
1!157 IN BOOK 6523 PAGE 348 Of OffiCIAl
RECORDS.
EXISTING EASEMENT FOR COUNlY HIGHWAY TO THE
COUNTY Of SAN DIEGO RECORDED JUNE 5, 1970
PER DOCUMENT NO. 97854 OF Off"ICIAL RECORDS. (EXCEPT WHERE SHOWN OTHERWISE)
EXISTING EASEMENT FOR ROAD TO THE CITY Of
CARLSBAD RECORDED JANUARY 11, 1971 PER
DOCUMENT NO. 5170 Of OFRCIAL RECORDS.
EXISTING EASEMENT TO SAN DIEGO GAS &: ElECTRIC
COMPANY RECORDED JULY 29, 1975 AS FILE NO.
75-197485 Of OF"FlCIAl RECORDS.
---------.,
"-,~COLLEGE BOULEVARD M:Jt~~ "'-, "-< (EASEMENT RECORDED ~AS
'"'-.. ~ "'-. "'-. AS ALE/PAGE N0.9I-) _ O.R.
R~R~MAINOER 6 :~;E'l-~""-..,
F'OR DATA SEE SHT. 3 "\.'\, '\ I
LOT B \ \
823 \\ \j y
I
LOT B
600 900 1200
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 TABULATED DATA
RADIUS LENGlH
10.75'
40.37'
62.24'
90.54'
16.59'
99.91'
54.84'
157.29'
51.92'
49.35'
56.85'
108.40
120.42'
49.25'
52.48'
50.95'
3.75'
5:2.44'
5:2.94'
55.37'
9.59'
20.68'
8.1i1'
7.00'
25 N79'01'00"W 51.15'
26 N69'25'00"W 52.70'
27 N5!1"13'0o"W 55.90';
28 N61'26'0o"W 56.22'
·-
29 5.00'
JO 70.21'
31 56.89'
32 23.43'
33 >H.58'
34 66.H' 0
35 111.06'
1423_PM6 MANITOU ENGINEERING CO.
.PA.I:<C~L MAP --------------------------------------------------~~--~--
l~U .... .[ .£UOD ~==i
DETAIL OF DRAINAGE EASEMENTS
FOR
CREEl\ & LAKE AGUA HEDIONDA
M.S. NO. 96-08
RANCHO AGUA HEDJONDA
LOT
200 600 800
GRAPHIC SCALE
·~-..,
0 -.....;
SHEET 6 OF 7 Si ... ....~ETS
PARCEL 3 &: 4
SEE SHEET N0.5
.120.00'
@
@
0
FlOS
8
823
EASEMENTS
C.L. EXISTING 20.00' EASEMENT TO SAN DIEGO GAS It
ELECTRIC CO. RECORDED MARCH 20, 1956 BOOK 6024
PAGE 26 OfFICIAl RECORDS AND CITY OF CARLSBAD.
C.L EXISTING EASEMENT TO SAN DIEGO GAS It ELECTRIC
RECORDED OCTOBER 29, 1971 PER DOCUMENT NO. 251396
OfFICIAl RECORDS.
EXISTING 60.00' EASEMENT TO JOSEPH & UUJAN CANTARINI
AND BANNING RECORDED APRIL 27, 1967 loS DOCUMENT NO.
58827 OfRCIAL RECORDS.
EXISTING 60.00' ROAD EASEMENT TO GEORGE AND EDWINA TARRY RECORDED SEPTEMBER 10, 1957 IN BOOK 6740,
PAGE 102 OfflCIAl RECORDS.
LOTS LOCATED WITHIN THE FLOODPLAIN
SPACE SPACE SPACE SPACE
53 146 209 254
54 147 210 255 55 148 2\1 256 56 149 212 271 57 150 213 272 58 151 214 273 59 152 215 274 60 153 216 288
61 154 217 289 62 155 218 306 63 156 219 307 64 157 220 JOB 65 158 221 353 66 159 222 496 106 160 223 497 113 ' 161 226 502 114 162 227 ADMIN. 115 163 228 CLUBHOUSE 116 164 229 RECREATION 117 165 230 118 166 231 119 167 232 120 168 233 127 169 234 128 170 238 129 171 239 130 172 240 131 173 241 132 174 242 133 175 243 1:34 176 244 135 177 245 136 178 246 137 201 247 138 202 ... BUILDING 139 203 248 140 204 249 141 205 250 142 206 251 143 207 252 144 208 253 145
CITY OF CARLSBAD PARCEL
FOR
RMHP 96-01 MS 96-08
NONTITLE INFORMATION
PARCEL
PARCEL 1\'\P NO.
MAP
SHEET 7 OF 7 SHEETS
PARCEL 4
PARCEL 3
TYPICAl. AIRS0ACE FOR MOBILE HOME
,....---PoR CN Ot CARLSBAD R.I.'.H.P. 96-01.
LEGEND
APPROXit.<ATE AREA OF 11\IJNDATIOI\
=iY 100 YEA<> F ~000
NOlL A· 1'\FOR\IATION SHOWN ON T-iiS SHft IS
10V1'>0"Y ONLY ANC 'S NW INTEND[] TO
t,frE CT RcCORJ TI.LE INTrRCSl
.,.,,....·r• ,,_,.r 2· IN>"D'1111ATION S'iOWN HE'<EON IS COM"'ILED fPOIII
PUEL!C RtCORDS OR REPOR·s AND lTS •NCLUSION
•< JH S IIIAP DOES NOT •\!PLY THE CO'<R£CNESS OR SU:Cf'ICi?NCY OF lli[SL RECORDS 0" REPO'liS
~y Tr£ PREPA"!:R a~ T1!S VAP.
NOTES:
ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PARK ARE PRIVATE AND ARE TO BE PRIVATELY
MAINTAINED IIY THE HOt.IEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. THE IMPROVEMENTS AND PROPERTY
LOCATED WITHIN THE AREAS Otf'ERED FOR DEDICATION ARE TO BE MAINTAINED SY THE
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION UNTIL SUCH OFFERS ARE ACCEPTED IIY THE CITY AND THE
MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILmES ARE ACCEPTED IIY CITY COUNCIL ACTION.
THIS SUBDMSION CONTAINS A REMAINDER PARCEL. NO BUILDING PERNIT SHAlL BE ISSUED
FOR THE REt.IAINDER PARCEL UNTIL fT IS FURTHER SUBDMDED PURSUANT ro THE
PROVISIONS OF Tm.E 20 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAl. COOE.
BUILDING PERMfTS WILL NOT BE ISSUED FOR DEVElOPUENT OF' THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
UNLESS THE DISTRICT ENGINEER DETERMINES THAT SEWER FACIUTIES ARE AVAil.ASLE.
THE OWNERS OF THIS PROPERTY ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND ALL OF fTS SUCCESSORS
IN INTEREST HAVE AGREED TO HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFY THE CITY Of CARlS8AO FROM ANY ACTION THAT MAY ARISE THROUGH ANY DAMAGES CAUSED SY THE DRAJNAGE
SYSTEM AND SUBSEQUENT DAMAGE THAT MAY OCCUR ON, OR AOJACE+lT TO, THIS
SUBDMSION DUE TO fTS CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION OR MAINTENANCE.
THE ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHALL liE t.IAINTAINED IN PERPETUilY 8Y THE UNDERLYlNG
PROPERTY OWNER UNLESS ACCEPTED IN WRmNG BY THE CITY: AND THAT All FlJTURE' USE OF THE PROPERTY WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN WILL NOT RESTRICT, IMPEDE,
DIVERT OR OTHERWISE ALTER DRAINAGE F'LOWS IN A MANNER THAT WIU RESULT IN
DAMAGE ro THE UNDERLYING AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES OR THE CREATION OF A
PUBLIC NUISANCE.
Planning Division www.carlsbadca.gov
February 6, 2013
City of Carlsbad, Utilities Department
Sherri Howard, Associate Engineer
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
SUBJECT: 1st REVIEW FOR COP 06-04xl(A)/SUP 06-02xl(A) -AGUA HEDIONDA & CALAVERA
CREEK
Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Division has reviewed
your Coastal Development Permit and Special Use Permit Amendments applications no. COP 06-04xl(A)
and SUP 06-02xl(A), as to its completeness for processing.
The application is complete, as submitted. Although the initial processing of your application may have
already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. The
City may, in the course of processing the application, request that you clarify, amplify, correct, or
otherwise supplement the basic information required for the application. In addition, you should also
be aware that various design issues may exist. These issues must be addressed before this application
can be scheduled for a hearing. The Planning Division will begin processing your application as of the
date of this communication.
Sincerely,
_dl~.L~
DAVE DE CORDOVA
Principal Planner
CD:PD:sm
c: Don Neu, City Planner
Bill Plummer, Utilities Engineering Manager
Glen Van Peski, Senior Civil Engineer
Scott Donnell, Senior Planner
File Copy
Data Entry
1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ®