HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-08-12; Draft SANDAG 2021 Regional Transportation Plan Comment Letter (Districts - All); Barberio, GaryTo the members of the:
.,,fl"f{ COUNCIL
Date~ CA x., CC .k-
CM ::J=:_ ACM _.;:k DCM {3) ~
Council Memorandum
Aug. 12,2021
To:
From:
Via:
Honorable Mayor Hall and Mem of the City Council
Gary Barberio, Deputy City Ma ager, ommunity Services Branch
Paz Gomez, Deputy City Manag , Pu lie Works Branch
Jeff Murphy, Community Develop
Tom Frank, Transportation Directo /Cu+-......,~
Geoff Patnoe, Assistant City Mana er
{city of
Carlsbad
Memo ID #2021154
Re: Draft SAN DAG 2021 Regional Trans rtation Plan Comment Letter (Districts -All)
This memorandum provides information on staff's recent comment letter (Attachment A) on the
San Diego Association of Governments (SAN DAG) proposed 2021 Regional Transportation Plan
(RTP), a long-term blueprint of the region's transportation system.
Background
RTPs are long-range planning documents (usually 30 years) that define how regions will make
future transportation investments, based on regional goals and estimates of available funding.
Federal regulations require that long-range RTPs be updated every four years. Beginning in 2016,
SAN DAG began the process of updating its RTP for the San Diego region. During development of
this draft RTP, an interim plan was adopted in 2019 to comply with federal requirements but did
not make substantial revisions to the previously adopted plan. The new RTP plan, once adopted,
will become the region's long-term plan to be implemented incrementally through the Regional
Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP).
Federal transportation legislation requires that regionwide transportation planning be
coordinated with local agencies and other stakeholders. To that end, the draft 2021 RTP was
circulated for public review and comment from May 28, 2021 to Aug. 6, 2021. Comments that
were received during the public review period will be reviewed and incorporated, as appropriate,
into the environmental analysis and/or final RTP.
Discussion
The draft 2021 RTP was the result of years of planning, data analysis and community engagement
where SAN DAG reimagined a more transformative transportation system, a sustainable pattern
of growth and development, and innovative demand and management strategies, referred to as
"5 big moves". The draft 2021 RTP also implements requirements for SANDAG under Senate Bill
375 to reduce greenhouse gas targets adopted by the California Air Resources Board. An
informational website, which includes the draft 2021 RTP plan, is available at
https://sdforward .com/.
Community Services and Public Works Branches
Community Development and Transportation Departments
1635 Faraday Avenue I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-4600 t
Council Memo -Draft SAN DAG 2021 RTP Comment Letter (Districts-All)
Aug. 12,2021
Page 2
To facilitate interagency consultation, city staff from the Community Development and
Transportation Departments reviewed available project materials and transmitted comments in a
letter on Aug. 6, 2021 (Attachment A). Below is a summary of the major issues/concerns and
recommendations provided in staff's Aug. 6, 2021, comment letter:
1) The draft 2021 RTP inventories and assesses existing and future conditions i_n each city.
However, despite previously providing information to SAN DAG staff, the assumptions
they used in the draft 2021 RTP for "existing" and "planned" land use and transportation
in the City of Carlsbad are not consistent with our adopted land use and transportation
policies (e.g., forecasted housing and roadway capacities). For example:
• SAN DAG projects over 700 new residential units will be constructed adjacent to
the McClellan-Palomar Airport Runway (residential use is not currently planned in
this area under the city's General Plan nor allowed by the Federal Aviation
Administration)
• Roughly 2,800 units are assumed to be developed on existing lands that are either
currently developed as hotel resorts or are dedicated open space
• SAN DAG assumes a declining population of roughly 2,300 persons in areas outside
of the city's local mobility hubs (most of the city) due to children who have grown
up and left their parents' homes. This assumption is being applied regionwide,
where they assume a reduction of approximately 85,000 persons throughout San
Diego
2) The land use assumptions, many of which are not substantially supported with facts, are
used to justify reduction targets in greenhouse gas emissions and vehicle miles travelled.
lftheir assumptions do not occur on the macro or micro level, which staff finds that it is
very likely that they will not be achieved, the draft 2021 RTP will adversely impact any
public and private projects that are required to use the regional transportation models for
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) purposes (e.g., future General Plan
amendments, private development projects). Existing land use and transportation plans
and studies should serve as the starting point to best understand how new goals, policies
and priorities may target transportation investments and best increase real choices in
travel modes. It should be clear how the draft 2021 RTP expects these changes to occur,
instead of modeling a scenario constructed in order to meet reduction goals.
3) Since the transportation system provides access and mobility to the traveling public and
land uses impose demands on the system, the draft 2021 RTP should address if there are
changes in ridership behavior which may have occurred because of the COVID-19
pandemic.
4) The draft 2021 RTP needs to more extensively address the disruption that is expected
from automated/shared vehicle technologies and conduct an alternatives analysis. For
example, autonomous vehicles are expected to have a huge impact on mobility demands
Council Memo -Draft SANDAG 2021 RTP Comment Letter (Districts-All)
Aug. 12,2021
Page 3
in the future, but the draft 2021 RTP does not provide enough analysis on how it will
impact future transportation needs.
5) Emphasis is being placed on regional rail improvements for a high-speed rail system,
including improvements to the LOSSAN Rail Corridor. More information is needed on the
anticipated alignment, segments and cost estimates. The portion of the corridor in the
City of Carlsbad will likely need to 'be a special study area.
6) The appendix in the draft 2021 RTP only lists potential projects; it does not show
potential alignments, right of way needed or coordination with specific agencies. More
information needs to be provided in the draft 2021 RTP on project implementation
phasing (both short-range and long-range improvements), unfunded projects and various
funding mechanisms that can bridge the unfunded gaps.
7) The draft 2021 RTP was released without the benefit of availability of the Draft
Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR), which staff were told would be released later
this summer. The quick release of the Draft EIR following the due date of comments for
the draft 2021 RTP makes it practically impossible to make changes to the Draft EIR
before it is released. SAN DAG should clarify how these comments will be addressed in the
Draft EIR required topic areas of CEQA.
Next Steps
SAN DAG reports that the Draft EIR will be released in summer 2021. According to the work
program schedule, the SANDAG Board of Directors will be asked to adopt the draft RTP in late
2021. City staff will continue to review all project-related materials and recommend changes at
each milestone as necessary to ensure that regional goals, policies and priorities are fiscally
responsible, safety-conscious, sustainable, context-sensitive and collaborative.
Attachment: A. City of Carlsbad letter dated Aug. 6, 2021
cc: Scott Chadwick, City Manager
Celia Brewer, City Attorney
Laura Rocha, Deputy City Manager, Administrative Services
Robby Contreras, Assistant City Attorney
Ron Kemp, Assistant City Attorney
Mike Strong, Assistant Director of Community Development
Nathan Schmidt, Transportation Planning & Mobility Manager
Don Neu, City Planner
Eric Lardy, Principal Planner
Attachment A
Aug. 6, 2021
San Diego Association of Governments
401 B Street, Suite 800
San Diego CA 92101
Via: SDForward@sandag.org
RE: City of Carlsbad Comments on Draft 2021 Regional Plan
To Whom it May Concern,
(cityof
Carlsbad
The City of Carlsbad appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the draft 2021 Regional Plan
("Plan"). This is an important plan for this region and will guide the next phase of growth for the
member agencies of the San Diego Association of Governments ("SAN DAG"). An effectively designed
and implemented regional transportation plan would help ensure improved transportation options for
area residents, businesses and other community members; meaningful reductions in greenhouse gas
("GHG") emissions; and improved quality of life as we grow our communities.
The City of Carlsbad ("city") is submitting comments based on the policies, projects, programs and other
improvements included in the Plan. Our agency's comment letter is divided into two sections. The first
section seeks clarity and other considerations that pertain to our agency's review of the Plan . The
second section identifies the city's preliminary comments and recommendations.
Implementing the regional transportation network outlined in the Plan requires municipalities to
support the regional vision and deliver on local infrastructure and services like the priority bus routes,
local bus services, and pedestrian and cycling connections to major transit infrastructure. These
components, which are delivered by municipalities, are essential to creating a coherent and
comprehensive local transportation network that feeds into regional services. For that reason, an
effective public review ofthe Plan should involve a transparent and thorough process for identifying and
evaluating potential hazards, physical changes to the environment and indirect (off-site and cumulative)
impacts that might result from implementation activities that may reasonably occur with the Plan.
The city's residents, businesses and other community members will greatly benefit from the
involvement and technical assistance from the prospective Draft Environmental Impact Report ("EIR").
Therefore, what follows in this correspondence represents our agency's preliminary comments and
recommendations. The city reserves the right to add, amend, change or replace comments and
recommendations based on additional review and understanding of the Plan and the environmental
analysis provided under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA").
The city thanks SAN DAG staff for meeting with city staff on Aug. 2, 2021, to discuss some of these
comments in advance of this letter. Following that meeting, SAN DAG provided language that they may
recommend adding to the Regional Plan for additional clarification on land use authority. The language
is, "Land use authority is reserved to local jurisdictions because they are best positioned to effectively
implement the objectives outlined in the Plan through understanding of the unique needs of their
communities and geographies." This language will be helpful to clarify that land use authority rests with
Transportation & Community Development Departments
1635 Faraday Avenue I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-2710 t
City of Carlsbad Comments on Draft 2021 Regional Plan
Aug.6,2021
Page 2
the local jurisdiction. The city still offers the following comments with the intent to support
development of a defensible and realistic regional plan.
SECTION 1: CLARITY AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
City staff have attended the series of workshops that SAN DAG hosted during the public review period,
and respectfully starts this section with several questions related to the process of the Plan and the
Draft EIR. By way of introduction, a jurisdiction's General Plan, such as the city's General Plan, identifies
the expected population of the city and any lands outside of the city limits but within their Sphere of
Influence where future growth is anticipated to occur. The city's General Plan identifies the subject area
adjacent to the McClellan-Palomar Airport for development under the designation for limited and light
industrial use.
For future land use planning, land use assumptions must reasonably proxy and be generally consistent
with local planning standards and programs, to be considered growth accommodating rather than
growth inducing. SAN DAG has the authority under Government Code Section 65584 to determine
existing and projected housing needs, as well as the share of housing needs to be allocated to cities and
counties, but it is unclear if SAN DAG has jurisdiction to allocate new housing growth to areas in a
manner not consistent with Government Code Section 65584. Attachment 1 includes additional
information on the applicable Government Code and standards. Therefore, and as indicated above, the
build-out of properties within the Business Park and flight activity zone must be done in accordance with
the city's General Plan Land Use Diagram, as amended, in accordance with city approval.
The initial questions on the planning process associated with developing the Plan are provided below:
1. The SAN DAG website states, "The SANDAG Sustainable Communities Strategy and Final EIR from
its 2015 Regional Plan will remain valid and in compliance for purposes of state funding
eligibility and other state and federal consistency purposes until the SAN DAG Board of Directors
adopts a new Regional Plan and EIR, provided those actions are completed by the end of
December 2021." SAN DAG needs to clarify how the Draft EIR, Response to Comments and
Adoption will be completed this year and what will occur if they are not completed by the end of
this year. Additionally, please clarify when the Draft EIR will be available; it is difficult to
completely assess the full impacts of this plan when the public review of the documents is
piecemealed.
a. SAN DAG should clarify how public comments on the Plan are going to be addressed in
the Draft EIR prior to its release.
b. In the Draft EIR, SAN DAG needs to clearly articulate the impacts to land use and if the
Plan will cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use
plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect. _Appendix F: Regional Growth Forecast and Sustainable
Communities Strategy Land Use Pattern appears to be inconsistent with the city's
General Plan and rezone program to accommodate the Regional Housing Needs
Assessment, as well as the general plans of other jurisdictions such as the cities of
Coronado, Del Mar and the County of San Diego. The Draft EIR should clarify how
implementation of this Plan can occur if those changes are not made.
City of Carlsbad Comments on Draft 2021 Regional Plan
Aug.6,2021
Page 3
2. The city has three mobility hubs, associated with the Employment Centers Published supporting
the SANDAG Regional Plan.1 McClellan-Palomar Airport is the fifth largest employment center in
the region, with Carlsbad State Beach and Carlsbad Village as "Tier 3 and Tier 4" employment
centers. The city thanks SAN DAG for providing data for analysis to determine impacts and
provide for accurate comments on the Plan. Attachment 2 shows a summary of the Mobility
Hubs and housing units assumed in the Series 14 Growth Forecast for the year 2050. In
summary:
a. The assumptions in the updated Series 14 Growth Forecast contain inconsistencies with
the city's General Plan. The Carlsbad Palomar Major Employment Mobility Hub does
include increases in density beyond what the citywide numbers appear to show when
they are looked at in more detail.
i. There are three locations in which density is shown to be inconsistent with good
planning principles, the city's General Plan and the Airport Land Use
Compatibility Plan. The three most problematic areas (shown in Attachment 3)
are:
1. 736 units on parcels immediately adjacent to the McClellan-Palomar
Airport runway. The location of the airport within this mobility hub was
shared with SAN DAG staff multiple times at workshops. This is
inconsistent with the regulations provided by the San Diego County
Regional Airport Authority and conflicts with standard planning
principles for siting housing away from hazards.
2. 2,755 units on existing developed resort properties and open space
dedicated lands adjacent to Legoland.
3. 65 units in a preserved open space area.
ii. SANDAG should provide additional detail why units were assumed in these
areas, what planning principles those decisions were based on, and how
SAN DAG expects this to be implemented.
iii. Concentration of units in the mobility hubs alone appears to conflict with the
direction received from the California Department of Housing and Community
Development ("HCD") to implement new Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
("AFFH"), which seeks to combat housing discrimination, eliminate racial bias,
undo historic patterns of segregation, and lift barriers that restrict access in
order to foster inclusive communities and achieve racial equity, fair housing
choice and opportunity for all Californians. The allocations of land use provided
by SAN DAG seem to focus all the higher density housing into one area of the
city. (This is one of the largest points of analysis that each jurisdiction in the
region needs to respond to in order to receive a certified Housing Element.)
b. Additionally, looking at the detailed data provided by SAN DAG, it is now clear why the
citywide numbers only show moderate increases in population. Our analysis has shown
that there is an assumed reduction of population by 2,310 persons in the areas within
the city but outside of the mobility hubs. This is likely due to assumed reductions in
persons per household over time, but SAN DAG should clarify the source and
reasonableness of this assumption. If housing is not provided consistent with these
areas, is it still reasonable to assume persons per household will be reduced in 2050?
1 SAN DAG Website: Employment Centers SAN DAG:: PROJECTS :: San Diego's Regional Planning Agency
City of Carlsbad Comments on Draft 2021 Regional Plan
Aug.6,2021
Page 4
c. Furthermore, this reduction in population is not limited to the City of Carlsbad . There is •
an approximately 85,000 reduction in population assumed outside of mobility hubs
regionwide. SAN DAG needs to address if that is a reasonable assumption and if this will
result in other impacts to public and private projects that will rely on this growth
forecast, and the associated Activity Based Model (2+) to project future impacts to
transportation, GHG, air quality and noise.
d. The forecast has decreased in future population based on current trends, but it is not
clear if there is enough housing provided with reductions and increases in some
jurisdictions. Will the reduced amount of housing that will be provided result in an
increased exacerbation of the affordability crisis?
e. There is a lack of clarity about how the Plan would be implemented at the municipal
level. SANDAG should develop an approach for engaging with municipalities to ensure
local support for delivering the regional tra.rsportation network. Staff from local
jurisdiction have the knowledge and ability to share where there are land use
assumptions that conflict with planning and zoning laws. Our analysis focused on the
City of Carlsbad, but if these types of assumptions are made regionwide, it presents
flaws in the overall analysis. These flaws put the assumed reductions in vehicle miles
traveled ("VMT") and ability to implement the Regional Plan into question.
3. The area designated is controlled for use and activity density and intensity through its spatial
association with the McClellan-Palomar Airport. The McClellan-Palomar Airport is defined by the
Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") as a commercial service airport that, in addition to
private aircraft, has regularly scheduled commercial flights to Los Angeles International Airport
("LAX"). The McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan ("ALUCP") is prepared
according to FAA requirements and adopted by the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority
acting as the Airport Land Use Commission for the County of San Diego.
a. The ALUCP provides measures to minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and
safety hazards within areas around the airport and identifies areas likely to be impacted
by noise and flight activity created by aircraft operations at the airport. These impacted
areas include the Airport11nfluence Area ("AIA"), the Clear Zone and the Flight Activity
Zone.
b. Within the AIA, the ALUCP establishes six safety zones for the purpose of evaluating
safety compatibility of new/future land use actions. The safety zone boundaries depict
relative risk of aircraft accidents occurring near the airport and are derived from general
aviation aircraft accident location data and data regarding the airport's runway
configuration and airport operational procedures. The ALUCP limits development
intensities in these zones by imposing floor area and lot coverage maximums, by
incorporating risk reduction measures in the design and construction of buildings,
and/or by restricting certain uses altogether. For example, all residential and virtually all
non-residential uses are considered incompatible land uses in some zones, while
considered to be either compatible or conditionally compatible with the airport in other
zones. Attachment 4 shows the McClellan-Palomar Airport, noise contours and
SANDAG's proposed housing units.
c. If the proposed SAN DAG land use assumptions are endorsed, an amendment to the
city's General Plan would be required to change the land use designation to Mixed-Use
Commercial or residential land uses within the existing Business Park in order to
effectuate the underlying assumptions of SAN DAG staff. This is not a realistic
City of Carlsbad Comments on Draft 2021 Regional Plan
Aug. 6,2021
Page 5
assumption. Further, the protected airspace referenced in the AIA and the ALUCP must
also be amended based on SANDAG's regional planning assumptions. (The FAA
establishes airspace protection zones in the airspace above and surrounding airports in
order to protect aircraft from obstructions such as buildings, towers, etc. in navigable
airspace.)
d. When a General Plan is adopted or amended, the allowable growth pattern of an area is
identified and the expansion or updating of the various land uses as specified in the
General Plan can occur throughout the planning horizon. Without such growth
considerations, the expansion or intensification of existing land uses could be
considered "growth inducing." Unplanned and uncontrolled growth may have significant
adverse impacts on the environment. CEQA requires a discussion of how a "project"
could increase population, employment or housing growth in surrounding areas and the
impacts resulting from this growth. The CEQA Guidelines indicate that a "project" would
normally have a significant effect on the environment if it would induce substantial
growth or a substantial concentration of population.
4. At this point, it is not clear if SANDAG's assumptions adequately contemplate the development
patterns included in the Sustainable Communities Strategy ("SCS")/Regional Transportation Plan
("RTP"), and Regional Air Quality Strategy ("RAQS"), local climate action planning business-as-
usual estimates, sub-regional traffic modeling, or the airspace assumptions of AIA and the
ALUCP.
5. The city seeks clarity on the Plan's underlying assumptions made to justify the proposed
extensive high-speed rail network considering the significant changes in travel behavior which
have occurr~d throughout the region as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and due to the
advancements in disruptive technologies such as telecommuting, autonomous vehicles,
microtransit, etc.
a. Recent North County Transit District ("NCTD") Coaster ridership data show riders are
not returning to riding the Coaster in comparison to other modes of travel as shown in
Attachment 5.
b. This question is consistent with comments made by SANDAG's panel expert Bob Poole .
regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on transit ridership and mega-transit
projects. (See comments by Bob Poole during the March 12, 2021 presentation to
SAN DAG starting at timestamp 1:30 p.m.: https://youtu.be/q-e6bNY5J 8?t=5410)
6. The city seeks clarity on why an alternatives analysis was not conducted with consideration of
other transit alternatives such as automated /shared vehicle technologies and personalized zero
emissions transit programs that are capable of utilizing the existing regional freeway
infrastructure in response to these recent developments explained in the above comment.
7. The city seeks clarity on why the Plan does not incorporate policies to promote roundabouts
over signalized intersections and include a budget line item under the Complete Corridors to
fund the construction of roundabouts at new locations and to replace signalized intersections
when found feasible. This clarification would support the Federal Highway Administration
("FHWA")'s project for Accelerating Roundabout Implementation in the United States and the
County of San Diego Air Pollution Control Board's support for implementing roundabouts to
address GHG and reduce fatalities.
8. The city seeks clarity on the project phasing proposed within the Plan. Specifically, the city is
seeking to understand the timing of implementation of unfunded Trans Net projects related to
City of Carlsbad Comments on Draft 2021 Regional Plan
Aug.6,2021
Page 6
the new projects presented within the Regional Plan. To support this, the city is requesting that
SAN DAG input the information requested in Table 1 (Attachment 6).
9. The city seeks specific data on the proposed 200 miles of rail service contemplated in the Plan.
To support this, the city is requesting that SAN DAG input the information requested in Table 3
(Attachment 7). Specific questions:
a. Please provide more information about the scope of the high-speed rail alignments,
potential vehicle technologies and their cost estimates.
b. Will the Coaster keep the same rail alignment?
c. What funding is programmed or planned for the Carlsbad Village railroad trench and the
other projects along the current NCTD/Coaster Service right-of-way?
d. Will some of the tracks be at grade with fencing and trains traveling at 110 miles per
hour speeds?
SECTION 2: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In addition to the comments on process and the Draft EIR provided above, city staff remain concerned
that there is not enough detail on the feasibility of implementation of this significant shift in
transportation strategy. On specific content in the plans, we outline our recommendations and
comments below:
1. Paying for the Plan:
The draft 2021 Regional Plan sets out an ambitious plan to build and operate a region-wide
system of transportation projects, programs and other improvements. This is a substantial role
for SAN DAG to play in supporting both the construction and operation of these projects,
programs and other improvements. SANDAG should set annual revenue targets to directly fund
everything and should approve any recommended sustainable revenue tools to help meet these
targets. Many of the funding strategies will require legislative changes, or voter-approved
taxation. SAN DAG should clarify what will occur if the funding is not available, if opposition to
projects stops them from construction, and if General Plans in the region are not modified to
implement the Plan.
2. Appendix D: Sustainable Community Strategy Documentation:
Appendix D includes the Sustainable Communities Strategy, which outlines assumptions
included in the Activity Based Model 2+ ("ABM 2+"), updated for this. This model will be
necessary for use by publicly and privately initiated land use projects preparing documents for
consistency with VMT/CEQA Guidelines and Traffic Impact Analysis ("TIA") Evaluations. City staff
respectfully request direction from SAN DAG on how to conduct modeling with the service
bureau and how to factor in these assumptions applied to ABM 2+. Specifically, the addition of
pricing, parking costs for coastal communities, 10% teleworking and micromobility. SAN DAG
should provide direction on how this could be worked into General Plans that are updated every
5-20 years.
3. Appendix A: Transportation Projects, Programs, and Phasing:
Trips to and from school sites result in a significant congestion, VMT generation, and peak hour
delay throughout the region. Additional funding and projects should be recommended with a
specific focus on improving safety and multi modal access in and around school sites along with
programs to incentivize non-single occupancy vehicle trips to schools.
City of Carlsbad Comments on Draft 2021 Regional Plan
Aug. 6, 2021
Page 7
Table A.11: Given the proven success of the Carlsbad Connector microtransit pilot program, the
city agrees with the Plan's recommendations to provide similar on-demand microtransit systems
throughout North County at all mobility hub sites and major transit centers.
Table A.13: The segment of El Camino Real between Poinsettia Lane and Camino Vida Roble is
proposed to be widened from two to three lanes to prime arterial standards. With the adoption
of the city's General Plan, the city has determined that the widening of this portion of El Camino
Real is not feasible due to constrained right-of-way and would result in negative impacts to
other travel modes. City staff recommend removal of this proposed project recommendation
CB32 {that is, a 'do nothing' scenario, or appraise and evaluate different mobility projects
and/or alternative designs).
The preferred lnterstate-5 freeway alternative identified in the North Coast Corridor ("NCC")
Final EIR/EIS is the refined 8+4 Buffer alternative, with four freeway lanes and two managed
lanes in each direction and completion by 2035. Appendix A, Table A.5 describes NCC project IDs
CC004, 007 -009 as "8F to 6F+4ML" with completion by 2050. While this might lead to further
study, it is not clear why there is a different freeway configuration (i.e., reduction in freeway
lanes) proposed. How does a reduction in lanes continue to meet NCC potential project benefits
of maintaining or improving traffic operations and improving the safe and efficient regional
movement of people and goods?
4. Active Transportation:
The city appreciates the Regional Plan's overall approach of providing a connected network of
high-quality bicycle facilities throughout the region. Regional bikeways are recommended
throughout the city including along Palomar Airport Road which will provide a key east-west
connection and El Camino Real which will provide a new north-south bikeway connection
through the city. Both roadways are proposed to include "on-street bikeways". Due to the high
traffic volumes and vehicle speeds experienced along most of both corridors, the city
recommends considering "off-street bikeways" or Class I facilities where feasible in order to
stimulate the shift from personal motor vehicle use to people choosing to bike.
It is extremely important that municipal transportation plans align with regional transportation
plans to achieve regional goals for land use and transportation and to promote the region
working together to build a cohesive regional transportation network. Considering there are
currently no mechanisms in place to ensure municipalities coordinate local transportation plans
with regional planning documents, the Plan should provide an approach on how SAN DAG plans
to engage with municipalities, especially in areas of potential disagreement or conflict (as
aforementioned in this subsection and others). It is also recommended that the Plan provide
additional direction regarding the application of protected bikeways in a variety of applicable
contexts. While vertical measures such as soft hit posts may be appropriate in lower volume and
lower speed roadways, arterial roadways with high traffic volumes and high speeds warrant
much more substantial physical protection from vehicles. In addition, special consideration
should be given at intersections and driveways which may be impacted due to the additional
width and visibility impacts created by protected bikeways.
City staff look forward to working with SAN DAG on improving mobility and land use access in the region
and building sustainable, equitable and healthy modes of transportation, and we appreciate the
opportunity to comment on the Plan that will help the region realize these goals.
City of Carlsbad Comments on Draft 2021 Regional Plan
Aug.6,2021
Page 8
If you have any questions related to comments on the transportation network, please contact Tom
Frank, Transportation Director/City Engineer, at Tom.Frank@carlsbadca.gov or if you need additional
information related to comments on the land use assumptions, please contact Eric Lardy, Principal
Planner, at Eric.Lardy@carlsbadca.gov.
Sincerely,
For
JEFF MURPHY
Community Development Director
TOM FRANK
Transportation Director/City Engineer
Attachments:
1. Government Code 65020 (S.B. 375) Summary
2. City of Carlsbad Mobility Hubs
3. City of Carlsbad -Palomar Airport Road Mobility Hub Analysis
4. Palomar-Mclellan Airport Flight Paths
5. Recent NCTD Coaster Ridership Data
6. Table 1 -Project Data Request
7. Table 3 -Detail of Proposed Rail Lines
cc: Scott Chadwick, City Manager
Celia Brewer, City Attorney
Geoff Patnoe, Assistant City Manager
Ron Kemp, Assistant City Attorney
Robby Contreras, Assistant City Attorney
Gary Barberio, Deputy City Manager, Community Services
Paz Gomez, Deputy City Manager, Public Works
Mike Strong, Assistant Director, Community Development
Don Neu, City Planner
Nathan Schmidt, Transportation Planning and Mobility Manager
Jason Geldert, Engineering Manager
Eric Lardy, Principal Planner
Scott Donnell, Senior Planner
Corey Funk, Associate Planner
Attachment 1: Government Code 65020 (S.B. 375) Summary
City of Carlsbad Comment Letter August 6, 2021
Government Code section (“GOV §”) 65080, also referred to as California Senate Bill 375 (Steinberg, 2008)
(“SB 375”), is one area of law that provides SANDAG with guidance to which a regional transportation plan
must be developed.
Among other things, the regional transportation plan that is developed “shall be an internally consistent
document” (GOV § 65080 (b)) and shall include a “sustainable communities strategy prepared by each
metropolitan planning organizations as follows” (GOV § 65080 (b)(2)(B)):
Each metropolitan planning organization shall prepare a sustainable communities strategy, subject
to the requirements of Part 450 of Title 23 of, and Part 93 of Title 40 of, the Code of Federal
Regulations, including the requirement to utilize the most recent planning assumptions considering
local general plans and other factors. The sustainable communities strategy shall (i) identify the
general location of uses, residential densities, and building intensities within the region, (ii) identify
areas within the region sufficient to house all the population of the region, including all economic
segments of the population, over the course of the planning period of the regional transportation
plan taking into account net migration into the region, population growth, household formation
and employment growth, (iii) identify areas within the region sufficient to house an eight‐year
projection of the regional housing need for the region pursuant to Section 65584, (iv) identify a
transportation network to service the transportation needs of the region, (v) gather and consider
the best practically available scientific information regarding resource areas and farmland in the
region as defined in subdivisions (a) and (b) of Section 65080.01 , (vi) consider the state housing
goals specified in Sections 65580 and 65581, (vii) set forth a forecasted development pattern for
the region, which, when integrated with the transportation network, and other transportation
measures and policies, will reduce the greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles and light trucks
to achieve, if there is a feasible way to do so, the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets
approved by the state board, and (viii) allow the regional transportation plan to comply with Section
176 of the federal Clean Air Act ( 42 U.S.C. Sec. 7506 ).
The 2021 draft Regional Transportation Plan includes a Sustainable Communities Strategy (“SCS”), as
required by SB 375 for the San Diego region (herein after called “draft Regional Plan”). The draft Regional
Plan indicates that “SB 375 requires the SCS to include a pattern for forecasted growth and development
that accomplishes the following: 1) When combined with the transportation network, the SCS will achieve
the regional GHG emission–reduction targets; 2). The SCS accommodates the Regional Housing Needs
Assessment (“RHNA”) Determination; and 3) The SCS utilizes the most recent planning assumptions.
(Reference p. 19 of the 2021 Regional Plan.)
Predicting the effect of transportation plans or projects on land uses and land use planning is critical to
developing context sensitive solutions for transportation projects. Therefore, utilization of the most
recent planning assumptions is not only necessary but is required as specifically stated therein GOV §
65080. If inconsistencies are found in the land use assumptions or adverse impacts are anticipated,
SANDAG should be actively engaged in the development of measures to address these issues.
The SANDAG Board of Directors approved the final RHNA plan with the final housing unit allocation on
July 10, 2020, which was based on the most recent land use planning assumptions and an adopted
methodology to allocate housing in accordance with GOV §§ 65584.04(d and m). The City of Carlsbad
received a total RHNA allocation of 3,873 units as a result of RHNA plan adoption. The adopted April 6,
2021 city’s Housing Element accommodates its housing needs through current zoning and other programs
Attachment 1: Government Code 65020 (S.B. 375) Summary
City of Carlsbad Comment Letter August 6, 2021
as needed to meet the city’s RHNA obligation at all income levels. The land use inputs derived from this
local planning document constitutes the most recent land use assumptions. On July 13, 2021 the
Department of Housing and Community Development found “the adopted housing element is in
substantial compliance with State Housing Element Law (Article 10.6 of the Gov. Code).
The most recent planning assumptions are critical for the development of the draft Regional Plan as the
document must comply with other specific state and federal mandates including a SCS per California
Senate Bill 375, which achieves GHG emissions reduction targets set by the California Air Resources Board
and compliance with federal civil rights (Title VI) requirements, environmental justice considerations, air
quality conformity, and public participation. To monitor compliance and attainment of state reduction
goals in GHG, GOV § 65080 (b)(2)) requires that:
(H) Prior to adopting a sustainable communities strategy, the metropolitan planning organization
shall quantify the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions projected to be achieved by the
sustainable communities strategy and set forth the difference, if any, between the amount of that
reduction and the target for the region established by the state board.
(J)(i) Prior to starting the public participation process adopted pursuant to subparagraph (F), the
metropolitan planning organization shall submit a description to the state board of the technical
methodology it intends to use to estimate the greenhouse gas emissions from its sustainable
communities strategy and, if appropriate, its alternative planning strategy.
There is inevitably some uncertainty regarding the use of projected future conditions. However, what is
certain is that the project will not operate under the conditions that exist today. There will be new
residential and employment growth in the intervening years between now and the proposed build‐out of
the draft Regional Plan. Nonetheless, projections utilized should represent the best available information
assembled by the local agencies with jurisdiction and expertise. Judgments about land use assumptions
utilized in the draft Regional Plan should be based on and supported by facts, adopted plans, and “most
recent planning assumptions,” rather than speculation and personal opinions. The land use assumptions
for “uses, residential densities, and building intensities within the region” (as required by GOV § 65080
(b)(2)(B)(i)) should also be the same, as that provided to the state board (as required per GOV §§ 65080
(b)(2)(H and J) in estimating and analyzing GHG from the SCS and the effect on growth and whether the
effects of that growth would be significant in the context of the region’s plans, natural setting, and growth
patterns. Ultimately, the SCS must demonstrate whether SANDAG can meet the per capita passenger
vehicle‐related GHG emissions targets for 2035 set by the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”).
SB 375 directs CARB to accept or reject the determination of SANDAG that its SCS submitted to CARB
would, if implemented, achieve the region’s GHG emissions reduction targets. CARB’s technical evaluation
of SANDAG’s draft Regional Plan would be based on all the evidence provided, including the models, the
data inputs and assumptions, the SCS strategies, and the performance indicators.
The transportation and planning assumptions are also extremely important as it is relied on for other
master planning exercises. The Regional Air Quality Strategy (“RAQS”) relies on information from CARB
and SANDAG for information regarding projected growth in the cities and San Diego County. This in turn
is utilized to address other state requirements, including the San Diego portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (“SIP”) and promulgating their own rules and regulations regarding air quality in the
region or to address federal requirements.
Attachment 1: Government Code 65020 (S.B. 375) Summary
City of Carlsbad Comment Letter August 6, 2021
The analysis of land use impacts for transportation projects is guided by FHWA Technical Advisory T 6640.8
and the CEQA Guidelines.
Under the FHWA Technical Advisory T 6640.8 (G)(1), Guidance for Preparing and Processing
Environmental, states:
This discussion [of land use] should identify the current development trends and the State and/or
local government plans and policies on land use and growth in the area which will be impacted by
the proposed project. These plans and policies are normally reflected in the area's comprehensive
development plan, and include land use, transportation, public facilities, housing, community
services, and other areas.
The land use discussion should assess the consistency of the alternatives with the comprehensive
development plans adopted for the area and (if applicable) other plans used in the development
of the transportation plan required by Section [23 U.S. Code §] 134. The secondary social,
economic, and environmental impacts of any substantial, foreseeable, induced development
should be presented for each alternative, including adverse effects on existing communities.
Where possible, the distinction between planned and unplanned growth should be identified.
There is also a requirement to analyze the land use planning inconsistencies per CEQA Guidelines §
15126.2(a), which specifies that an EIR for a proposed project include:
The Significant Environmental Effects of the Proposed Project. An EIR shall identify and focus on
the significant effects of the proposed project on the environment. In assessing the impact of a
proposed project on the environment, the lead agency should normally limit its examination to
changes in the existing physical conditions in the affected area as they exist at the time the notice
of preparation is published, or where no notice of preparation is published, at the time
environmental analysis is commenced. Direct and indirect significant effects of the project on the
environment shall be clearly identified and described, giving due consideration to both the short‐
term and long‐term effects. The discussion should include relevant specifics of the area, the
resources involved, physical changes, alterations to ecological systems, and changes induced in
population distribution, population concentration, the human use of the land (including
commercial and residential development), health and safety problems caused by the physical
changes, and other aspects of the resource base such as water, historical resources, scenic quality,
and public services. The EIR shall also analyze any significant environmental effects the project
might cause or risk exacerbating by bringing development and people into the area affected. For
example, the EIR should evaluate any potentially significant direct, indirect, or cumulative
environmental impacts of locating development in areas susceptible to hazardous conditions (e.g.,
floodplains, coastlines, wildfire risk areas), including both short‐term and long‐term conditions, as
identified in authoritative hazard maps, risk assessments or in land use plans addressing such
hazards areas.
Since the new land use assumptions are being utilized, as described by this letter, the EIR that is prepared
shall also analyze any significant environmental effects the project might cause by bringing development
and people into the area affected. The following are the basic steps in analyzing land use impacts as part
of the community impact assessment process:
Attachment 1: Government Code 65020 (S.B. 375) Summary
City of Carlsbad Comment Letter August 6, 2021
1. Inventory the existing land use patterns (including undeveloped land), development trends, and
transportation systems. The inventory of existing land uses should include the following land use
types: residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, institutional, public services, community
services, emergency services, transportation, utilities, agriculture, and undeveloped land in the
study area. The study area should include the surrounding community that is generally
associated with the project area within which community impacts could occur. The inventory
should also address development trends and identify recent developments in the study area to
include the development’s name, size, status (planned, built, under construction), and the
jurisdiction in which it is located. A map showing the location of existing and planned land uses
in the area should also be prepared.
2. Determine whether the project is consistent with local and regional policies that govern land use
and development. For the consistency analysis, the policies and programs considered in the
analysis should include: transportation plans and programs (MTPs/RTPs and MTIPs/RTIPs),
regional growth plans, local General Plans that establish land use and growth management
policies for the study area, and any specific or pipeline development proposals. This analysis
should also include a discussion of consistency with the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972,
California Coastal Act of 1976, the National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 USC 1271) and the
California Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (Pub. Res. Code § 5093.50 et seq.). After preparing a
preliminary list of relevant plans to be considered in the analysis, the SANDAG planner should
meet with the staff of the various agencies to review the list to determine if it is complete and
revise the list as necessary.
3. Assess the changes that would occur in land uses and growth with and without the project.
4. The draft Regional plan and each project alternative should be considered separately since the
results may be different.
5. Develop measures to avoid, minimize, and/or mitigate potential adverse effects.
The resulting environmental analysis should identify the current development trends and the State and/or
local government plans and policies on land use and growth in the area which will be impacted by the
proposed project. These plans and policies are normally reflected in local General Plans. If found to be
consistent, then the findings in the EIR should be documented in the report and no further analysis or
action is necessary. When found not to be inconsistent with a policy or program, then consideration must
be given to modifying the draft Reginal Plan alternative to make it consistent, or measures to address the
inconsistency must be developed. SANDAG should be actively engaged in the development of measures
to address these issues and be prepared to assess the consistency of the draft Regional Plan and
alternatives with the comprehensive development plans adopted for the area and (if applicable) other
plans used in the development of the transportation plan required by Section 23 U.S. Code § 134. For any
new land use growth assumptions, the secondary social, economic, and environmental impacts of any
substantial, foreseeable, induced development should be presented for the draft Regional Plan and each
alternative, including adverse effects on existing communities. The results should be shared with the
public during the public involvement process, e.g., at community meetings, etc. Public input should be
considered by SANDAG and if necessary, the findings of the analysis should be revised to reflect
information gained through the public involvement process.
--
Carlsbad
Village
(Coastal)
Carlsbad Palomar
(Major Employment
Center)1 2
1
125
65 10
248
5
79521
581
228
1010 217 4916241517851
SE
NW
NE
SW
Carlsbad
Village
Coastal 14087 6430 15095 6539 9290 16177 7075 9667 17293 7607 10044
Carlsbad
Palomar
Major
Employment
Center
12853 5475 12275 5461 61074 19465 8503 67005 21080 9265 72900
N/A Outside of
Hubs
86239 34247 88793 35855 13896 84039 35855 14345 83929 35855 14900
N/A All of
Carlsbad
113179 46152 116163 47855 84260 119681 51433 91017 122302 52727 97844
Hub Name Hub Type Total
Population
2016
Total
Houses
2016
Total
Population
2025
Total
Houses
2025
Total Jobs
2025
Total
Population
2035
Total
Houses
2035
Total Jobs
2035
Total
Population
2050
Total
Houses
2050
Total Jobs
2050
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS
FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages,
consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City
of Carlsbad for any and all liability of any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
SANDAG Mobility Hubs
#Mobility Hub MGRAs with 2016-2050 Increased Unit Change
Carlsbad Mobility Hubs
Carlsbad MGRAs
Carlsbad Quadrant
Carlsbad Boundary
0 21
Miles
N
A
[DJ -D -
I ~----_JI
3
83
34 21
50
14
2
2
1
1
4
38
5
35
18 27
72
72
50 227 36
63 8
92328603615141
231411158161117
87
2
171
11
24
83
32
8
6
4
1
3 1
2
36
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS
FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages,
consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City
of Carlsbad for any and all liability of any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
#Mobility Hub MGRAs with
2016-2050 Increased Unit Change
Carlsbad Mobility Hubs
Carlsbad MGRAs
Carlsbad Boundary
0 0.50.25
Miles
Carlsbad Village Mobility Hub MGRAs
N
A
c:::J
CJ
c::::J
Carlsbad
Village
(Coastal)
Carlsbad Palomar
(Major Employment
Center)
1
2
1
125
65 10
248
5
79
521
581
228
1010 217
49
162
415 178 51
SE
NW
NE
SW
Copyright nearmap 2015
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City
of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages, consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad for any and all liability of
any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
Carlsbad Boundary
Carlsbad Quadrant
CarlsbadMobilityHubs
Carlsbad MGRAs
Carlsbad Palomar MGRAs with 2016-2050 Increased Unit Change
General Plan Land Use
L, Local Shopping Center
OS, Open Space
P, Public
PI, Planned Industrial
PI/O, Planned Industrial/Office
R, Regional Commercial
R-1.5, Residential 0-1.5 du/ac
R-15, Residential 8-15 du/ac
R-23, Residential 15-23 du/ac
R-4, Residential 0-4 du/ac
R-8, Residential 4-8 du/ac
TC, Transportation Corridor
VC, Visitor Commercial
VC/OS, Visitor Commercial/Open Space
0 0.250.13
Miles
MGRA Closer Look
N
A
c::::J
r --, ---CJ
D
CJ
D
D -D
D -D
D -D
D
D -
R-4
OS
Carlsbad Palomar
(Major Employment
Center)
1 Unit
Change 2 Unit Change
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City
of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages, consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad for any and all liability of
any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
Carlsbad Boundary
Carlsbad Quadrant
CarlsbadMobilityHubs
Carlsbad MGRAs
Carlsbad Palomar MGRAs with
2016-2050 Increased Unit Change
General Plan Land Use
OS, Open Space
R-15, Residential 8-15 du/ac
R-4, Residential 0-4 du/ac
VC/OS, Visitor Commercial/Open
Space
0 0.010.01
Miles
MGRA: 14249
c::::J
i --. ---CJ
CJ
c::::J
N
A CJ
CJ
R-4
OS Carlsbad Palomar
(Major Employment
Center)
1 Unit Change
2 Unit
Change
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City
of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages, consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad for any and all liability of
any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
Carlsbad Boundary
Carlsbad Quadrant
CarlsbadMobilityHubs
Carlsbad MGRAs
Carlsbad Palomar MGRAs with
2016-2050 Increased Unit Change
General Plan Land Use
OS, Open Space
R-15, Residential 8-15 du/ac
R-4, Residential 0-4 du/ac
TC, Transportation Corridor
VC/OS, Visitor Commercial/Open
Space
0 0.040.02
Miles
MGRA: 14251
c::::J
i - -I
CJ
CJ
c::::J
N
A CJ
CJ
VC TC
R-8
Carlsbad Palomar
(Major Employment
Center)
1 Unit
Change
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City
of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages, consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad for any and all liability of
any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
Carlsbad Boundary
Carlsbad Quadrant
CarlsbadMobilityHubs
Carlsbad MGRAs
Carlsbad Palomar MGRAs with
2016-2050 Increased Unit Change
General Plan Land Use
OS, Open Space
R-8, Residential 4-8 du/ac
TC, Transportation Corridor
VC, Visitor Commercial0 0.010.01
Miles
MGRA: 14265
c::::J
i --. ---CJ
CJ
c::::J
N
A CJ
1111
CJ
1111
L
R-23
Carlsbad Palomar
(Major Employment
Center)
125 Unit
Change
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City
of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages, consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad for any and all liability of
any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
Carlsbad Boundary
Carlsbad Quadrant
CarlsbadMobilityHubs
Carlsbad MGRAs
Carlsbad Palomar MGRAs with
2016-2050 Increased Unit Change
General Plan Land Use
L, Local Shopping Center
PI, Planned Industrial
R-23, Residential 15-23 du/ac
0 0.020.01
Miles
MGRA: 17984
c::::J
i --. ---CJ
CJ
c::::J
N
A CJ
CJ
1111
OS
Carlsbad Palomar
(Major Employment
Center)
65 Unit
Change
5 Unit Change
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City
of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages, consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad for any and all liability of
any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
Carlsbad Boundary
Carlsbad Quadrant
CarlsbadMobilityHubs
Carlsbad MGRAs
Carlsbad Palomar MGRAs with
2016-2050 Increased Unit Change
General Plan Land Use
OS, Open Space
R-15, Residential 8-15 du/ac
0 0.040.02
Miles
MGRA: 22902
Majority owned by
State of CA
Small portion owned by Kelly Land Co. and Agua Hedionda
Lagoon Foundation
c::::J
i --. ---CJ
CJ
c::::J
N
A CJ
CJ
OS
PI
R-4
Carlsbad Palomar
(Major Employment
Center)
10 Unit
Change
248 Unit
Change
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City
of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages, consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad for any and all liability of
any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
Carlsbad Boundary
Carlsbad Quadrant
CarlsbadMobilityHubs
Carlsbad MGRAs
Carlsbad Palomar MGRAs with
2016-2050 Increased Unit Change
General Plan Land Use
OS, Open Space
PI, Planned Industrial
R-4, Residential 0-4 du/ac
0 0.040.02
Miles
MGRA: 22906
c::::J
i --. ---CJ
CJ
c::::J
N .
. A CJ
CJ
1111
OS
PI
R-4
Carlsbad Palomar
(Major Employment
Center)
10 Unit
Change
248 Unit
Change
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City
of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages, consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad for any and all liability of
any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
Carlsbad Boundary
Carlsbad Quadrant
CarlsbadMobilityHubs
Carlsbad MGRAs
Carlsbad Palomar MGRAs with
2016-2050 Increased Unit Change
General Plan Land Use
OS, Open Space
PI, Planned Industrial
R-4, Residential 0-4 du/ac
0 0.030.01
Miles
MGRA: 22910
c::::J
i --. ---CJ
CJ
c::::J
N
A CJ
CJ
1111
OS
OS
R-4
OS
Carlsbad Palomar
(Major Employment
Center)
65 Unit
Change
5 Unit Change
217 Unit
Change
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City
of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages, consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad for any and all liability of
any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
Carlsbad Boundary
Carlsbad Quadrant
CarlsbadMobilityHubs
Carlsbad MGRAs
Carlsbad Palomar MGRAs with
2016-2050 Increased Unit Change
General Plan Land Use
OS, Open Space
R-1.5, Residential 0-1.5 du/ac
R-15, Residential 8-15 du/ac
R-4, Residential 0-4 du/ac0 0.040.02
Miles
MGRA: 22917
c::::J
i --. ---CJ
CJ
c::::J
N
A CJ
CJ
CJ
1111
PI
OS
Carlsbad Palomar
(Major Employment
Center)
79 Unit
Change217 Unit
Change
162 Unit
Change 178 Unit
Change
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City
of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages, consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad for any and all liability of
any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
Carlsbad Boundary
Carlsbad Quadrant
CarlsbadMobilityHubs
Carlsbad MGRAs
Carlsbad Palomar MGRAs with
2016-2050 Increased Unit Change
General Plan Land Use
OS, Open Space
PI, Planned Industrial
0 0.030.01
Miles
MGRA: 22925
I
---I I ---CJ ....
CJ • •
c:::J
N
A CJ
CJ
PI
VC
OS
Carlsbad Palomar
(Major Employment
Center)
521 Unit
Change
581 Unit
Change
1010 Unit
Change
415 Unit
Change
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City
of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages, consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad for any and all liability of
any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
Carlsbad Boundary
Carlsbad Quadrant
CarlsbadMobilityHubs
Carlsbad MGRAs
Carlsbad Palomar MGRAs with
2016-2050 Increased Unit Change
General Plan Land Use
OS, Open Space
PI, Planned Industrial
R, Regional Commercial
VC, Visitor Commercial0 0.050.03
Miles
MGRA: 22926
Owned by Gemological Institute
of America
Owned by
CB Ranch
Enterprises
OS
---. ·---CJ
CJ
c:::J
N
A CJ
CJ
1111
1111
OS
VC
PI
Carlsbad Palomar
(Major Employment
Center)
5 Unit
Change
521 Unit
Change
581 Unit
Change
1010 Unit
Change
415 Unit
Change
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City
of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages, consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad for any and all liability of
any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
Carlsbad Boundary
Carlsbad Quadrant
CarlsbadMobilityHubs
Carlsbad MGRAs
Carlsbad Palomar MGRAs with
2016-2050 Increased Unit Change
General Plan Land Use
OS, Open Space
PI, Planned Industrial
VC, Visitor Commercial
0 0.040.02
Miles
MGRA: 22928Owned by M and A Gabaee
OS
Owned by Grand
Pacific Carlsbad LP
VC designation
does not allow residential uses
i --. ---CJ
CJ
c:::J
N
A CJ
CJ
1111
PI
PI/O
OS
OS
Carlsbad Palomar
(Major Employment
Center)
5 Unit
Change
79 Unit
Change217 Unit
Change
162 Unit
Change
178 Unit
Change
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City
of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages, consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad for any and all liability of
any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
Carlsbad Boundary
Carlsbad Quadrant
CarlsbadMobilityHubs
Carlsbad MGRAs
Carlsbad Palomar MGRAs with
2016-2050 Increased Unit Change
General Plan Land Use
OS, Open Space
PI, Planned Industrial
PI/O, Planned Industrial/Office
0 0.030.01
Miles
MGRA: 22930
c::::J
i --. ---CJ
CJ
c::::J
N
A CJ
CJ
CJ
PI
Carlsbad Palomar
(Major Employment
Center)
49 Unit
Change
51 Unit
Change
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City
of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages, consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad for any and all liability of
any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
Carlsbad Boundary
Carlsbad Quadrant
CarlsbadMobilityHubs
Carlsbad MGRAs
Carlsbad Palomar MGRAs with
2016-2050 Increased Unit Change
General Plan Land Use
PI, Planned Industrial
0 0.020.01
Miles
MGRA: 22931
N
A
i --. ---CJ
CJ
c:::J
PI
PI/O
OS
Carlsbad Palomar
(Major Employment
Center)
79 Unit
Change
217 Unit
Change
162 Unit
Change
178 Unit
Change
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City
of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages, consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad for any and all liability of
any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
Carlsbad Boundary
Carlsbad Quadrant
CarlsbadMobilityHubs
Carlsbad MGRAs
Carlsbad Palomar MGRAs with
2016-2050 Increased Unit Change
General Plan Land Use
OS, Open Space
P, Public
PI, Planned Industrial
PI/O, Planned Industrial/Office0 0.030.01
Miles
MGRA: 22933
c::::J
i --. ---CJ
CJ
c::::J
N
A CJ
1111
CJ
CJ
OS
VCPI
Carlsbad Palomar
(Major Employment
Center)
521 Unit
Change
581 Unit
Change
1010 Unit
Change
415 Unit
Change
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City
of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages, consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad for any and all liability of
any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
Carlsbad Boundary
Carlsbad Quadrant
CarlsbadMobilityHubs
Carlsbad MGRAs
Carlsbad Palomar MGRAs with
2016-2050 Increased Unit Change
General Plan Land Use
OS, Open Space
PI, Planned Industrial
VC, Visitor Commercial
0 0.020.01
Miles
MGRA: 22934
i --. ---CJ
CJ
c:::J
N
A CJ
CJ
1111
OS
PI
Carlsbad Palomar
(Major Employment
Center)
79 Unit
Change
217 Unit
Change
162 Unit
Change
178 Unit
Change
51 Unit
Change
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City
of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages, consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad for any and all liability of
any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
Carlsbad Boundary
Carlsbad Quadrant
CarlsbadMobilityHubs
Carlsbad MGRAs
Carlsbad Palomar MGRAs with
2016-2050 Increased Unit Change
General Plan Land Use
OS, Open Space
P, Public
PI, Planned Industrial
PI/O, Planned Industrial/Office0 0.030.01
Miles
MGRA: 22936
i --. ---CJ
CJ
c:::J
N
A CJ
1111
CJ
CJ
PI
Carlsbad Palomar
(Major Employment
Center)
49 Unit
Change
178 Unit
Change
51 Unit
Change
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City
of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages, consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad for any and all liability of
any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
Carlsbad Boundary
Carlsbad Quadrant
CarlsbadMobilityHubs
Carlsbad MGRAs
Carlsbad Palomar MGRAs with
2016-2050 Increased Unit Change
General Plan Land Use
P, Public
PI, Planned Industrial
0 0.010.01
Miles
MGRA: 22937
i --. ---CJ
CJ
c:::J
N
A 1111
CJ
PI
VC
VC
OS
Carlsbad Palomar
(Major Employment
Center)
521 Unit
Change
581 Unit
Change
228 Unit
Change
1010 Unit
Change415 Unit
Change
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City
of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages, consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad for any and all liability of
any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
Carlsbad Boundary
Carlsbad Quadrant
CarlsbadMobilityHubs
Carlsbad MGRAs
Carlsbad Palomar MGRAs with
2016-2050 Increased Unit Change
General Plan Land Use
OS, Open Space
PI, Planned Industrial
R, Regional Commercial
VC, Visitor Commercial0 0.040.02
Miles
MGRA: 22941
c::::J
i --. ---CJ
CJ
c::::J
N
A CJ
CJ
1111
1111
PI
VCCarlsbad Palomar
(Major Employment
Center)
581 Unit
Change
228 Unit
Change
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City
of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages, consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad for any and all liability of
any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
Carlsbad Boundary
Carlsbad Quadrant
CarlsbadMobilityHubs
Carlsbad MGRAs
Carlsbad Palomar MGRAs with
2016-2050 Increased Unit Change
General Plan Land Use
OS, Open Space
PI, Planned Industrial
VC, Visitor Commercial
0 0.020.01
Miles
MGRA: 22947
c::::J ---I I ---CJ
CJ
c::::J
N
A CJ
CJ
1111
70 dB
C
N
E
L
65 dB CN
E
L
60
d
B
C
N
E
L
70 dB CNEL
65 dB CNEL
60 dB CNEL
75+
d
B CN E L
79
217
49
162
178
51
Path: \\shares\GIS_App\RequestsMarch2015\ComEconDev\Planning\RITM0023436_21\SANDAG Mobility Hubs.aprx
The City of Carlsbad disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of this map. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. In no event shall the City
of Carlsbad become liable to users of this map, or any other party, for any loss or damages, consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use, operation or modification of the map. In using this map, user further agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad for any and all liability of
any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the map, or the use of the map.
Carlsbad Quadrant
MGRAs with 2016-2050
Increased Unit Change
Airport MGRA
ALUCP 2010 Safety Zones:
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
0 0.080.04
Miles
Notes
1. 2010 McClellan-Palomar Airport ALUCP Policy 3.3.3 prohibits residential uses on properties, or portions of properties,
with airport noise exposures greater than 65 dB CNEL.
2. 2010 McClellan-Palomar Airport ALUCP Policy 3.4.4 prohibits residential uses on properties, or portions of properties,
within airport safety zones 1, 2 and 5.
Carlsbad Palomar Mobility Hub MGRAs Near Airport
---
---
..
.. --, , , , , , , , , ,
-, , , , , , ,
, ,
N
A
i --. ---
c:::J
c:::J
CJ
CJ
CJ
CJ
CJ
CJ
' ' '
Attachment 5
PLEASE NOTE: PRELIMINARY RIDERSHIP DATA ‐ UNAUDITED AND SUBJECT TO ADJUSTMENTS
Month
FY21 FY20 Variance %
July 10,263 149,515 (139,252) (93.1%)
Aug 9,412 133,482 (124,070) (92.9%)
Sept 10,020 114,233 (104,213) (91.2%)
Oct 10,968 111,045 (100,077) (90.1%)
Nov 9,232 94,551 (85,319) (90.2%)
Dec 7,519 83,951 (76,432) (91.0%)
Jan 6,848 98,791 (91,943) (93.1%)
Feb 7,866 91,845 (83,979) (91.4%)
Mar 11,203 46,510 (35,307) (75.9%)
Apr 15,184 5,244 9,940 189.5%
May 19,214 6,207 13,007 209.6%
June**44,978 8,734 36,244 415.0%**Not final as of July 19, 2021
YTD Total 162,707 0 (781,401)
FY Total 162,707 944,108
Month
FY21 FY20 Variance %
July 10,263 131,218 (120,955) (92.2%)
Aug 9,412 112,100 (102,688) (91.6%)
Sept 10,020 92,159 (82,139) (89.1%)
Oct 10,968 105,601 (94,633) (89.6%)
Nov 9,232 80,912 (71,680) (88.6%)
Dec 7,519 75,534 (68,015) (90.0%)
Jan 6,848 89,920 (83,072) (92.4%)
Feb 7,866 84,613 (76,747) (90.7%)
Mar 11,203 44,368 (33,165) (74.7%)
Apr 15,184 5,244 9,940 189.5%
May 17,221 6,207 11,014 177.4%
June**35,192 8,734 26,458 302.9%**Not final as of July 19, 2021
YTD Total 150,928 0 (685,682)
FY Total 150,928 836,610
Month
FY21 FY20 Variance %
July - 9,415 (9,415) (100.0%)
Aug - 14,348 (14,348) (100.0%)
Sept - 8,449 (8,449) (100.0%)
Oct - 3,247 (3,247) (100.0%)
Nov - 8,385 (8,385) (100.0%)
Dec - 4,387 (4,387) (100.0%)
Jan - 3,218 (3,218) (100.0%)
Feb - 5,181 (5,181) (100.0%)
Mar - 665 (665) (100.0%)
Apr - 0 0
May 1,387 0 1,387
June**5,881 0 5,881 **Not final as of July 19, 2021
YTD Total 7,268 0 (50,027)
FY Total 7,268 57,295
Month
FY21 FY20 Variance %
July - 8,882 (8,882) (100.0%)
Aug - 7,034 (7,034) (100.0%)
Sept - 13,625 (13,625) (100.0%)
Oct - 2,197 (2,197) (100.0%)
Nov - 5,254 (5,254) (100.0%)
Dec - 4,030 (4,030) (100.0%)
Jan - 5,653 (5,653) (100.0%)
Feb - 2,051 (2,051) (100.0%)
Mar - 1,477 (1,477) (100.0%)
Apr - 0 0
May 606 0 606
June**3,905 0 3,905 **Not final as of July 19, 2021
YTD Total 4,511 0 (45,692)
FY Total 4,511 50,203
COASTER - TOTAL RIDERSHIP
COASTER - WEEKDAY
COASTER - SATURDAY
COASTER - SUNDAY
I
I
I
I
T bl 1 P . t I f a e ro1ec n orma 10n f R eques
Project
San Dieguito Lagoon Double Track and Platform
Batiquitos Lagoon Double Track and
Bridqe Replacement
Eastbrook to Shell Double Track
Carlsbad Villaqe Trench
La Costa to Swami Double Track
San Onofre Bridge Replacements
Rose Canyon Bridqe Replacements
ATTACHMENT 6 - Project Data Request
t
Estimated Current Draft RTP Assumed
Total Project Planned Year of Assumed Year Federal/State Cost Construction of Construction Matching Funding (%)
ATTACHMENT 7 - Detail of Proposed Rail Lines
T bl 3 D t ·1 f P a e e a1 o ropose al mes d R ·1 L"
Average Interoperable
Rail Mode (CR, Directional % of Directional Number Distance Average with
LR, HSR, Miles Miles Grade of Between Speed COASTER Hybrid) Separated/Tunnel Stations Stations Operated equipment
(Y/N) New Rail Line