HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-09-01; Planning Commission; ; CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004 (DEV2020-0126) – ADAMS STREET HOMES
Item No.
Application complete date: July 8, 2021
P.C. AGENDA OF: September 1, 2021 Project Planner: Jessica Evans
Project Engineer: Tim Carroll
SUBJECT: CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004 (DEV2020-0126) – ADAMS STREET HOMES - Request for
approval of a Coastal Development Permit and Tentative Parcel Map to allow for the
subdivision of an approximately .97-acre lot into four parcels to construct a two-story,
3,182 square-foot single-family residence on each parcel. The project is located at 3745
Adams Street, within the Mello II Segment of the city’s Local Coastal Program and Local
Facilities Management Zone 1. The project site is not located within the appealable area
of the California Coastal Commission. The City Planner has determined that the project
belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have
a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the
requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15332,
“In-Fill Development Projects,” of the state CEQA Guidelines.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 7422 APPROVING Coastal
Development Permit CDP 2020-0043 and Tentative Parcel Map MS 2020-0004 based upon the findings
and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The subject .97-acre lot is located at 3745 Adams Street within the Mello II segment of the Local Coastal
Program and is currently vacant. The development of the project requires the approval of a coastal
development permit for the subdivision of land and the construction of the single-family residences. The
tentative parcel map is required to subdivide the .97-acre lot and is considered minor because it involves
the subdivision of land into four parcels. The junior accessory dwelling units (JADU) and the accessory
dwelling units (ADU) will be administratively reviewed and acted upon by the City Planner through a
separate minor coastal development permit subsequent to the planning commission’s action on the
current applications.
The project proposes to subdivide the .97-acre lot into four parcels, where two of the four parcels are in
a panhandle configuration. The project includes the construction of one single-family residence with one
attached JADU and one detached ADU on each parcel. Each two-story, single-family residence is
approximately 3,182 square feet and has four bedrooms with an attached two-car garage. A one bedroom,
499-square-foot JADU is attached to each single-family residence and is located on the second floor; and
a single-story, one bedroom, 512-square-foot detached ADU is located in the backyard of each parcel. The
architect describes the design as “coastal contemporary,” and the materials include white stucco, siding,
wood columns and knee braces as accent features, metal railings, and black-trimmed, recessed windows.
1
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004 (DEV2020-0126) – ADAMS STREET HOMES
September 1, 2021
Page 2
The roof design consists of dark gray shingles with 6:12 and 9:12-pitches. Photovoltaic solar panels are
proposed on the roof of each single-family residence and provisions for electric vehicle charging are
included in the garage.
Access to each parcel is taken from Adams Street and the project includes a shared driveway for the two
panhandle lots. Topographically, the existing lot has an elevation approximately 91 feet above mean sea
level (MSL) along the front property line and slopes down toward the rear of the lot to 81 feet above MSL.
A grading permit will be required for this project and estimated grading quantities include 45 cubic yards
of cut and 6,300 cubic yards of fill. Since the rear side of the subject property is currently located
approximately nine to 10 feet below the grade of Adams Street, approximately five and a half to six and a half feet of fill will be required to raise the pad elevation to install utilities and drainage facilities. In
addition, required frontage improvements will result in the removal of nine existing palm trees along
Adams Street. The palm trees are counted in the city’s street tree inventory; however, the Parks and
Recreation Department has reviewed the proposal and conceptually approved the removal of the nine
palm trees. The applicant will be required to obtain a tree removal permit from the Parks and Recreation
Department after grading plans are approved and will be required to replace the trees at a 2:1 ratio,
resulting in 18 new trees to be planted in the right-of-way surrounding the project site.
Table “A” below includes the General Plan designations, zoning and current land uses of the project site
and surrounding properties.
TABLE A – GENERAL PLAN, ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE
Location General Plan Designation Zoning Current Land Use
Site R-4 (Residential, 0-4 du/ac) R-1 (One-Family Residential) Vacant Lot
North R-4 R-1 Single-Family Homes
South R-4 R-1 Single-Family Home/Church
East R-4 R-1 Single-Family Homes
West VC (Visitor Commercial) C-T (Commercial Tourist) Church
The project meets the City’s standards for subdivisions, and as designed and conditioned, is in compliance
with the General Plan, Subdivision Ordinance, and relevant zoning regulations of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code (CMC).
III. ANALYSIS
The project is subject to the following regulations and requirements:
A. R-4 Residential General Plan Land Use Designation;
B. One-family Residential (R-1) Zone (CMC Chapter 21.10);
C. Coastal Development Regulations for the Mello II Segment of the LCP (CMC Chapter
21.201) and the Coastal Resources Protection Overlay Zone (CMC Chapter 21.203);
D. Subdivision Ordinance (CMC Title 20);
E. City Council Policy Nos. 44 (Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines)
F. Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (CMC Chapter 21.85); and
G. Growth Management (CMC Chapter 21.90).
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project’s consistency
with the applicable city regulations and policies. The project’s compliance with each of the above
regulations is discussed in detail in the sections below.
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004 (DEV2020-0126) – ADAMS STREET HOMES
September 1, 2021
Page 3
A. R-4 Residential General Plan Land Use Designation
The General Plan Land Use designation for the property is R-4, Residential. The R-4 designation allows
development of single-family residences at a density of 0 to 4 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The 0.97-
acre parcel would permit a maximum of 3.88 dwelling units. The proposed project density is 4.12 du/ac
which exceeds the maximum density of four dwelling units per acre by 0.24 of a unit. Land Use Element
Policy 2-P.16 of the General Plan allows for residential development above the allowed maximum density
on properties with an R-4 land use designation such as this when the implementing zone (R-1) would
permit a slightly higher density yield provided four specific findings can be made which is described in detail below.
Lastly, the project complies with the Elements of the General Plan as outlined in Table “B” below:
TABLE B – GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE
Element Use, Classification, Goal, Objective or
Program Proposed Uses & Improvements Comply?
Land Use Goal 2-G.3
Promote infill development that makes
efficient use of limited land supply,
while ensuring compatibility and
integration with existing uses. Ensure
that infill properties develop with uses
and development intensities
supporting a cohesive development
pattern.
Goal 2-G.4
Provide balanced neighborhoods with a
variety of housing types and density
ranges to meet the diverse
demographic, economic and social
needs of residents, while ensuring a
cohesive urban form with careful
regard for compatibility.
Policy 2-P.7
Do not permit residential development
below the minimum of the density
range except in certain circumstances.
Policy 2-P16
Allow residential development above
the allowed maximum density on
properties with a R-4 land use
designation when the implementing
The proposed project makes efficient
use of limited land supply by
subdividing a 0.97-acre lot into four
parcels to construct one single-family
residence on each lot. The project
meets all development standards,
provides adequate parking, and the
proposed design and materials ensure
the development will be compatible
with the surrounding neighborhood.
The project provides a variety of
housing types within the existing
neighborhood by constructing four
new single-family residences, which
will allow for one attached JADU and
one detached ADU on each newly
subdivided lot and will assist in
meeting the diverse needs of
residents.
The project has a density of 4.12 du/ac
which slightly exceeds the R-4
Residential density of 0-4 du/ac but is
not below the density range required
for this land use designation.
The project is located on a .97-acre lot
with a proposed density of 4.12 du/ac
where a maximum of 4 du/ac is
allowed. The implementing zone (R-1)
allows for a slightly higher dwelling
unit yield than the allowed maximum
Yes
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004 (DEV2020-0126) – ADAMS STREET HOMES
September 1, 2021
Page 4
Element Use, Classification, Goal, Objective or
Program Proposed Uses & Improvements Comply?
zone would permit a slightly higher
dwelling unit yield than the allowed
maximum density, subject to the
following findings:
a. The project is consistent with the
intended uses of the applicable land
use designation and other applicable
goals and policies of this General Plan.
b. There is sufficient infrastructure to
support the project.
c. The proposed density does not
exceed the allowed maximum density
by more than 25 percent.
d. The project qualifies for and will
receive an allocation of “excess”
dwelling units, pursuant to City Council
Policy No. 43.
density. The project meets all required
implementing R-1 zoning standards
such as lot size, lot width, and
setbacks.
The project is consistent with the R-4
Residential land use designation and
other applicable goals and policies of
the General Plan as described in this
table.
The site has sufficient infrastructure in
place and utilities and improvements
will be provided as part of the
development.
The proposed density is 4.12 du/ac
and does not exceed the maximum of
4 du/ac by more than 25 percent.
Pursuant to SB 330, Government Code
Section 66300 (b)(1)(D) and City
Council action (Resolution No. 2021-
074), the city cannot use the city’s
EDUB under the Growth Management
Program (City Council Policy 43) to
regulate the number of units built in
the city and to limit or prohibit
residential development. Therefore,
this finding is not applicable. One
dwelling unit will be withdrawn from
the EDUB for residential unit tracking
purposes.
Housing Program 3.1
For all ownership and qualifying rental
projects of fewer than seven units,
payment of a fee in lieu of inclusionary
units is permitted.
The project is conditioned to pay an
in-lieu fee on a per unit basis for four
units.
Mobility Policy 3-P.5
Require developers to construct or pay
their fair share toward improvements
for all travel modes consistent with the
Mobility Element, the Growth
Management Plan, and specific impacts
associated with their development.
The proposed project has been
designed to meet all circulation
requirements, including vehicular
access points to and from Adams
Street. In addition, the applicant will
be required to pay any applicable
traffic impact fees, prior to issuance of
a building permit, that will go toward
future road improvements.
Yes
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004 (DEV2020-0126) – ADAMS STREET HOMES
September 1, 2021
Page 5
Element Use, Classification, Goal, Objective or
Program Proposed Uses & Improvements Comply?
Noise Goal 5-G.2
Ensure that new development is
compatible with the noise
environment, by continuing to use
potential noise exposure as a criterion
in land use planning.
A noise study is required when a
project proposes five or more dwelling
units. Since this project involves four
single-family dwelling units, the
project was not required to submit a
noise study. However, to ensure that
city standards for interior noise levels
of residential units are met, the
project has been conditioned to meet
a 45 dB(A) CNEL interior noise level
when openings to the exterior of the
residence are closed. If openings are
required to be closed to meet the
interior noise standard, then
mechanical ventilation shall be
provided. In addition, because the
project is located near an existing
transportation corridor, the project is
conditioned to require the applicant
to record a notice that the property
may be subject to impacts from the
existing transportation corridor as
required by the city’s Noise Guidelines
Manual.
Yes
Public
Safety
Goal 6-G.1
Minimize injury, loss of life, and
damage to property resulting from fire,
flood, hazardous material release, or
seismic disasters.
Policy 6-P.6
Enforce the requirements of Titles 18,
20, and 21 pertaining to drainage and
flood control when reviewing
applications for building permits and
subdivisions.
Policy 6-P.34
Enforce the Uniform Building and Fire
codes, adopted by the city, to provide
fire protection standards for all existing
and proposed structures.
The proposed structural
improvements will be required to be
designed in conformance with all
seismic design standards. In addition,
the proposed project is consistent
with all the applicable fire safety
requirements including fire sprinklers.
Additionally, the proposed project is
not located in an area of known
geologic instability or flood hazard and
the site is not located in an area prone
to landslides, or susceptible to
accelerated erosion, floods or
liquefaction.
Yes
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004 (DEV2020-0126) – ADAMS STREET HOMES
September 1, 2021
Page 6
B. One-Family Residential (R-1) Zone (CMC Chapter 21.10)
The project is required to comply with all applicable regulations and development standards of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC) including the One-Family Residential (R-1) Zone. The proposed project
meets or exceeds all applicable requirements of the R-1 Zone as shown in Table “C” below.
TABLE C – R-1 ZONE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
STANDARD REQUIRED/ALLOWED PROPOSED
Minimum Lot Area Standard Lot: 7,500 sq. ft.
Panhandle Lot: 10,000 sq. ft.
Standard Lot: 8,568 sq. ft.
Panhandle Lot: 12, 576 sq. ft.
Lot Width 60 ft. 82 ft.
Front Yard Setback 20 ft. 20 ft.
Side Yard Setback Minimum 10% of lot width, or 10
ft., whichever is less
10 ft.
Rear Yard Setback Twice side yard setback, or 20 ft. 42 ft. 6 in.
Maximum Building
Height
Maximum 30 ft. if a minimum roof
pitch of 3:12 is provided, or
maximum 24 ft. if less than a 3:12
roof pitch is provided.
Height: 27 ft. 1 ½ in.
Pitch: 6:12
Lot Coverage 40% 31%
Parking Single-Family Residence: two-car
garage with a minimum interior
dimension of 20 ft. by 20 ft.
Panhandle Lot: three, open, non-
tandem parking spaces
The project satisfies this requirement by
providing an enclosed, two-car garage
with the minimum dimension of 20 ft.
by 20 ft. In addition, adequate back-up
and maneuvering space are provided.
Three, open non-tandem parking spaces
that meet minimum parking
dimensions, back-up and maneuvering
space.
C. Coastal Development Regulations for the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program (CMC
Chapter 21.201) and Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (CMC Chapter 21.203)
The project site is located within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program. The site is not located
within the California Coastal Commission’s appeal jurisdiction but is located within and subject to the
Coastal Resources Protection Overlay Zone. The project’s compliance with each of these programs and
ordinances is discussed below:
1. Mello II Segment of the Certified Local Coastal Program and all applicable policies.
The Local Coastal Program (LCP) Land Use designation for the property is Residential, R-4. The R-4 LCP
Land Use designation allows for residential development at a density range of 0 to 4 dwelling units per
acre (du/ac). As discussed in Section “A” above, the proposal to build four single-family homes is
consistent with the General Plan. Therefore, the project is consistent with the Mello II Segment of the
LCP.
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004 (DEV2020-0126) – ADAMS STREET HOMES
September 1, 2021
Page 7
The project proposes the subdivision of the .97-acre lot into four parcels to construct four 3,182-square-
foot, 27 feet tall, two-story single-family residences with an attached, enclosed, two-car attached garage
on each parcel. The new homes are proposed in an area designated for single-family residential
development. The proposed two-story residences are compatible with the surrounding development of
one and two-story single-family residential structures. Additionally, the two-story residences will not
obstruct views of the coastline as seen from public lands or public right-of-way, nor otherwise damage
the visual beauty of the coastal zone. Furthermore, no agricultural uses exist on the site, nor are there
any known sensitive resources located on the site. The proposed single-family residences are not located
in an area of known geologic instability or flood hazard. Given that the site does not have any frontage
along the coastline, no public opportunities for coastal shoreline access or water-oriented recreational activities are available.
2. Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone
The project is consistent with the provisions of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (CMC
Chapter 21.203 of the Zoning Ordinance) in that the project will adhere to the city’s Master Drainage Plan,
Grading Ordinance, Storm Water Ordinance, BMP Design Manual and Jurisdictional Runoff Management
Program (JRMP) to avoid increased urban run-off, pollutants and soil erosion. No undevelopable steep
slopes or native vegetation is located on the subject property and the site is not located in an area prone
to landslides, or susceptible to accelerated erosion, floods, or liquefaction.
D. Subdivision Ordinance (CMC Title 20)
The Land Development Engineering Division has reviewed the proposed Tentative Parcel Map and has
found that the subdivision complies with all applicable requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and the
City’s Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20) for Minor Subdivisions. The subdivision is considered minor
because it involves the division of land into four or fewer lots (four lots proposed). The project has been
conditioned to install all infrastructure-related improvements concurrent with the development.
E. City Council Policy No. 44 (Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines)
The project is subject to City Council Policy No. 44 – Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines. A
justification of how the proposed project complies with the intent and purpose of the City Council Policy
No. 44 is provided in Table “D” below.
TABLE D – CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 44 INTENT AND PURPOSE COMPLIANCE
Goal Justification
Visually interesting The proposed project provides covered first level porches for all
units and substantial wall projections on the second floor for all
units along the front façade. All four buildings have a variety of
materials consisting of varied colors of stucco, board and batten
siding, varied roof pitches, recessed windows, and a variety in
window sizes.
Sufficient building articulation
to reduce bulk and mass
The second story wall planes provide articulation and various
rooflines that help reduce the bulk and mass of the project.
In scale to their lot size The project is permitted to have a lot coverage up to 40%. This
project proposes a lot coverage of about 31% and 21% for the two
panhandle lots. In addition, the residences are two-stories and
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004 (DEV2020-0126) – ADAMS STREET HOMES
September 1, 2021
Page 8
within the height limit and either meet or exceed required setbacks.
The project is in scale with the size of the lot.
Strongly contribute to the
creation of livable
neighborhoods
The project allows for four single-family dwellings as the zoning is R-
1 and General Plan Land Use is R-4 Residential. The project site is
surrounded by single-family residences. By developing four single-
family residences that are in scale and similar to the existing
neighborhood, the project will contribute to the ongoing character
of the existing single-family, livable neighborhood.
Please refer to Attachment No. 4 for a detailed analysis of project compliance with this policy.
F. Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (CMC Chapter 21.85)
For any residential development of less than seven units, the inclusionary housing requirements may be
satisfied through the payment of an inclusionary housing in-lieu fee. The proposal to construct four new
single-family residential dwelling unit has been conditioned to pay the applicable housing in-lieu fee prior
to the issuance of a building permit.
F. Growth Management (CMC Chapter 21.90)
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 1 in the northwest quadrant of
the city. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and its compliance with the adopted
performance standards, are summarized in Table “E” below.
TABLE E – GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE
STANDARD IMPACTS COMPLIANCE
City Administration 14.15sq. ft. Yes
Library 7.55 sq. ft. Yes
Wastewater Treatment 4 EDU Yes
Parks .03 acre Yes
Drainage 1.60 CFS/Basin B Yes
Circulation 40 ADT Yes
Fire Fire Station No. 1 Yes
Open Space N/A N/A
Schools Carlsbad (E=.7376/M=.4224/HS =.5764) Yes
Sewer Collection System 4 EDU Yes
Water 1,000 GPD Yes
The Growth Management Control Point (GMCP) for the property under the R-4 General Plan Land Use
designation is 3.2 du/ac. The GMCP is a tool utilized by the city to track anticipated growth within the city
and plan for future facility needs. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 330, Government Code Section
66300 (b)(1)(D), and City Council action (Resolution No. 2021-074) the GMCP cannot act as a residential
housing cap. At the GMCP, three dwelling units would be permitted on this 0.97-net-developable-acre
property (3.1 dwelling units rounded down to three dwelling units). With four units proposed, one
dwelling unit will be withdrawn from the EDUB for residential unit tracking purposes.
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004 (DEV2020-0126) – ADAMS STREET HOMES
September 1, 2021
Page 9
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The City Planner has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary
for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore
categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to
Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) Class 32 Categorical Exemption of the State CEQA Guidelines.
The project is consistent with the general plan as well as with the zoning ordinance, the project site is
within the city limits, is less than five acres in size, and is surrounded by urban uses; there is no evidence
that the site has value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species; approval of the project will
not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and the site can be
adequately served by all required utilities and public services. In making this determination, the City
Planner has found that the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 of the state CEQA Guidelines do not apply
to this project, including “historical resources.” The project site is currently vacant and does not include
any structures that are included in the local register of historical resources. A Notice of Exemption will be
filed by the City Planner upon final project approval.
The four single-family residences are required to comply with the city’s Climate Action Plan and the
recently adopted Climate Action Plan Ordinances, including electric vehicle charging infrastructure
(Ordinance No. CS-349), energy efficiency measures and solar photovoltaic systems (Ordinance No. CS-
347) and new residential standards for water heating (Ordinance No. CS-348).
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 7422
2. Location Map
3. Disclosure Form
4. City Council Policy No. 44 Compliance Table
5. Reduced Exhibits
6. Full Size Exhibit(s) “A” – “EE” dated September 1, 2021
ADAMS
STPIO
P
ICO
DR
MAGNO
LI
A
A
V
HARDING
ST
TAMAR
A
C
K
A
V
PALM
A
V
I-
5
TAMARACKNBONRAMP
JEF
FERSON
S
T ADAIR
W
Y
YVE
TTE
W
Y HIGH
LAND
DRPOLL
Y
LNGRECOURT
W
Y
MARGARETWYLARKSPUR LNMAGNO
LI
A
A
V
CDP 2020-0043 / MS 2020-0004
Adams Street Homes
SITE MAP
J
SITE
E
L
C
AMINO
R
E
ALLA COSTA AVCARLSBAD B
L MELROSE
DR
!"^$
ATTACHMENT 2
ATTACHMENT 3DocuSign Envelope ID: 288730E5-58BC-42D0-A932-F9E1B4EB75E6
( City of
Carlsbad
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
P-1(A)
Development Services
Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
(760) 602-4610
www.carlsbadca.gov
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will
require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission
or Committee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project
cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note:
Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal
organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county,
city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit."
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner
must be provided below.
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a
financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership.
include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the
shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE
INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned
corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A
separate page may be attached if necessary.)
Person N/A: Corp/Part__....,_;i,;_/A __________ _
Title.____________ Title _____________ _
Address ----------Address ------------
2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent)
P-1(A)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any
ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal
ownership (i.e., partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the
ownership includes a corporation or.partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of
all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE
THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE
SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and
addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.)
Person Dennis Gimian
Title Managing Member
PO Box 10537
Address Ne,~po, t Beac:h, eA 92658
Corp/Part. ___________ _
Title _____________ _
Address -------------
Page 1 of 2 Revised 07/10
DocuSign Envelope ID: 288730E5-58BC-42D0-A932-F9E 1 B4EB75E6
3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust,
list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-
profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non ProfiVTrust________ Non ProfiVTrust _________ _
Title ___________ _ Title _____________ _
Address Address ----------------------
4. Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City
staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12)
months?
D Yes [8;'{No If yes, please indicate person(s): __________ _
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
~"''""""" .,, o=!o::itWv 9/3/2020 ~ 9-28-20
Signature of owner/date Signature of applicant/date
Dennis Gimian Kirk Moeller
Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date
Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent
P-1(A) Page 2 of 2 Revised 07/10
ATTACHMENT 4
ADAMS STREET HOMES
CITY COUNCIL POLICY 44 – NEIGHBORHOOD ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
Architectural Guideline Compliance Comments
Floor Plans and Elevations
1 All residential projects shall be required to have a minimum number
of different floor plans, different front and corresponding matching
rear elevations with different color schemes as identified below:
2-4 dwelling units shall provide 1 floor plan and 2 different
elevations.
5-12 dwelling units shall provide 2 different floor plans and 2
different elevations.
13-20 dwelling units shall provide 2 different floor plans and 3
different elevations.
21+ dwelling units shall provide 3 different floor plans and 3
different elevations.
The project consists of four
dwelling units and provides for
one floor plan that is reversed
and two different elevations.
2 Every house should have a coherent architectural style. All elevations
of a house, including front, side and rear, should have the same
design integrity of forms, details and materials.
The elevations of the project
have consistent design on all
elevations with similar coastal
contemporary craftsman design
integrity.
3 In addition to the previous requirements, design details should
reinforce and enhance the architectural form and style of every house
and differ from other elevations of the same floor plan. A minimum of
4 complimentary design details, including but not limited to those
listed below, shall be incorporated into each of the front, rear and
street side building façade(s) of the house.
Design Details
Each single-family dwelling has
been designed to incorporate
the following:
1) Knee braces
2)Accent materials (siding)
3) Decorative eaves/fascia
4) Columns
5) Window trims Balconies
Decorative eaves and fascia
Exposed roof rafter tails
Arched elements
Towers
Knee braces
Dormers
Columns
Exterior wood elements
Accent materials (i.e.; brick,
stone, shingles, wood or siding)
4 Floor plans in a project shall exhibit a variety of roof ridges and roof
heights within a neighborhood.
The project provides for a
variety of roof ridges and roof
pitches that create variation in
the height of the units and
within the neighborhood.
CITY COUNCIL POLICY 44 – NEIGHBORHOOD ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
Architectural Guideline Compliance Comments
Single Story Requirements
9 A maximum of 20% of the total number of homes are exempt from
the requirement to have a single-story building edge. The remaining
total number of homes shall comply with one of the following
guidelines:
The home shall have a single-story building edge with a depth of
not less than 8 feet and shall run the length of the building along
one side except for tower elements. The roof covering the
single-story element shall incorporate a separate roof plane and
shall be substantially lower than the roof for the two-story
element. Porches and porte-cochere elements shall qualify as a
single-story edge. Houses with courtyards that are a minimum
of 15 feet wide located along the side of the house and setback a
minimum of 15 feet from the property line are not required to
have a single-story building edge.
The home shall have a single story-building edge with a depth of
not less than 5 feet and shall run the length of the building along
one side. The roof of the single-story element shall be
substantially lower than the roof for the two-story element of
the building.
The home shall have a single-story building edge with a depth of
not less than 3 feet for 40% of the perimeter of the building.
Each home is designed with a
porch which qualifies as a
single-story edge with a
separate roof plane that is
substantially lower than the
roof for the second story.
Multiple Building Planes
10 For at least 66% of the homes in a project, there shall be at least 3
separate building planes on street side elevations of lots with 45 feet
of street frontage or less and 4 separate building planes on street side
elevations of lots with a street frontage greater than 45 feet.
Balconies and covered porches qualify as a building plane.
The minimum offset in planes shall be 18 inches and shall include, but
not be limited to, building walls, windows, porches and roofs. The
minimum depth between the faces of the forward-most plane and
the rear plane on the front elevation shall be 10 feet. A plane must
be a minimum of 30 sq. ft. to receive credit under this section.
Each dwelling unit provides four
separate building planes on the
street side elevations.
The offset in planes are
approximately 24 inches, and
the minimum depth between
the faces of the forward-most
plane and the rear plane on the
front elevation exceeds 10 feet.
11 Rear elevations shall adhere to the same criteria outlined in Number
10 above for front elevations except that the minimum depth
between front and back planes on the rear elevation shall be 4 feet.
Rear balconies qualify as a building plane.
Each dwelling unit has four
separate building planes in the
rear and exceeds the 4 ft.
minimum. In addition, each unit
includes a rear balcony.
Windows/Doors
13 At least 66% of exterior openings (door/windows) on every home in
the project shall be recessed or projected a minimum of 2 inches and
shall be constructed with wood, vinyl or colored aluminum window
frames (no mill finishes).
All windows are proposed to be
projected a minimum 2 in.
14 Windows shall reinforce and enhance the architectural form and style
of the house through, the use of signature windows and varied
window shapes and sizes.
Each dwelling unit includes
windows with enhanced
architectural style and form
with large window trims that
complement the overall design
of the house, and all windows
vary in shape and size.
CITY COUNCIL POLICY 44 – NEIGHBORHOOD ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES CONTINUED
Architectural Guideline Compliance Comments
Front Porches
15 Fifty percent (50%) of the homes shall be designed with a covered
front porch, open courtyard, or balcony (each with a minimum depth
of 6 feet and a minimum area of 60 square feet) located at the front
of the dwelling. The minimum depth for a covered front porch shall
be measured from the front façade of the home to the inside of any
supporting porch posts. The front and sides of porches shall be open
except for required and/or ornamental guardrails. A variety of roof
elements shall be provided over porches. Porches may not be
converted to living space.
All four dwelling units include a
covered front porch that meet
the minimum depth and area.
Front Entries
16 Seventy-five percent (75%) of the homes must have a front entry to
the home that is clearly visible from the street. Walkways from the
front door to the street are encouraged.
The two street facing homes
have a front entry that is visible
from the street.
Chimneys
17 Chimneys and chimney caps shall be in scale with the size of the
home. No more than 2 chimneys shall be allowed for homes on lots
in planned developments having an area less than 7,500 square feet.
No chimneys are proposed.
Garage Doors
18 Garage doors for 3 or 4 cars in a row that directly face the street
must have a minimum of an 18” plane change between the garage
doors after the 2 car garage door.
The proposed garages are for
two cars and not designed in a
row. The garages are separate
and meet this guideline.
Date:9-28-20
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
ADAMS RESIDENCES3745 ADAMS STREETCARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAADAMS STREET HOMES11-18-20
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004
2 5-19-21
3 6-21-21
A0.1
TITLESHEET
A0.1MINOR RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION TO CREATE FOUR SEPARATE RESIDENTIAL LOTS. EACH WILL HAVESIMILAR FLOOR PLANS WITH TWO MIRRORED WITH VARYING COLORS AND MATERIALS FOR THEEXTERIOR FACADES. EACH HOME CONSISTS OF AN ATTACHED JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT ANDA DETACHED ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT. SITE IMPROVEMENTS CONSIST OF RECIPROCAL DRIVEWAYACCESS WITH ADEQUATE ON-SITE PARKING DEDICATED TO EACH RESIDENCE ON EACH INDIVIDUAL LOT.PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE INCLUDES STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES.
3745 ADAMS STREET205-270-13-00
MAIN RESIDENCE:
LOT AREA:EXISTING RESIDENTIAL LOT (MINOR SUBDIVISION):42.290 S.F. / .97 AC
RESIDENTIAL UNITS:
TOTAL MAIN RESIDENCE FLOOR AREA:2,722 S.F.
GARAGE:460 S.F.1,379 S.F.
R-4GENERAL PLAN R-1ZONINGYESCOASTAL ZONE
PROPOSED WATER USAGE
RESIDENTIAL 250 GPD X 4 UNITS = 1,000 GPD
RESIDENTIAL 10 TRIPS PER D.U. X 4 UNITS = 40 ADT
PARKING REQUIRED
ONE FAMIILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE:3 SP. PER UNIT
RESIDENCE A:
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED: 12 SPACES
PARKING PROVIDED
PROPOSED SEWER USAGE
RESIDENTIAL (EDU) = 220 GAL/DAY X 4 DU X (1 EDU PER/DU) = 880 GAL/DAY
SINGLE FAMILY:4 UNITS
OVERHANGING ELEMENTS AND EXTERIOR STAIRS:278 S.F.
DWELLING UNIT DENSITY:
ALLOWABLE DENSITY:
BUILDING AREAS:RESIDENCES A, B, C & D (LOTS 1-4):
NOTE: THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DOES NOT CONTAINACCESSIBLE UNITS.
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
3 SP.
PROPOSED DENSITY:
3 SP.
ADAMS STREET HOMES
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
3745 ADAMS STREET
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
SHEET INDEXPROJECT DIRECTORYPROJECT INFORMATIONCODESVICINITY MAP
SCOPE OF WORK
UTILITY/ SERVICE PROVIDERS
RICKY AND CHICO TRUST,GOLDENWEST CAPITAL LLCCONTACT: DENNIS GIMIANPO BOX 10537NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92658T: 714-612-1144dennisg2@cox.net
2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE
2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE
2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE
2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE
2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE
2019 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE
2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE
2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE
PLUMBING CALCULATIONS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER:ADDRESS:STORIES:HEIGHT (MAXIMUM):30-0"
DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
SITE PASCO LARET SUITER &ASSOCIATES (PLSA)CONTACT: TYLER LAWSON535 N HIGHWAY 101 STE ASOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92075T: 858-259-8212tlawson@pslaengineering.com
CIVIL:
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.CONTACT: KIRK MOELLER2888 LOKER AVENUE EAST, STE 220CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92010T: 760-814-8128kirk@kmarchitectsinc.com
ARCHITECT:
PARKING ANALYSIS
N
DAEDALUS DESIGN GROUPCONTACT: JEFF SMITH2725 JEFFERSON ST, STE 15BCARLSBAD, CA 92010T: 760-720-4337jeff@ddgla.com
LANDSCAPEARCHITECT:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, IN THE COUNTY OFSAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:ALL THAT PORTION OF TRACT NO. 236 OF THUM LANDS IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SANDIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP NO. 1681, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTYRECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DECEMBER SEPTEMBER 19, 2015.
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
SEWER DISTRICT:CARLSBAD WASTEWATER DIVISIONWATER DISTRICT:CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
ELECTRIC:SDGEGAS:SDGE
SCHOOL DISTRICT:CARLSBAD UNIFIEDFIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT:CARLSBAD FIRE
TELCO:AT&T
BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:V-BOCCUPANCY:R-3/ U (PRIVATE GARAGES)OCCUPANT LOAD:21DESCRIPTION OF USE:RESIDENTIALEXISTING USE:VACANTFULLY SPRINKLERED:NFPA 13R YESFIRE ALARM:NO
STORIES:2 (4 ALLOWED)HEIGHT:30'-0" MAX. (40' ALLOWED)
ARCHITECTURAL
A0.1 COVER SHEETA1.1 SITE PLAN
STANDPIPES:NO
OWNER:
A2.1A 1ST FLOOR PLAN RESIDENCES A & DA2.2A 2ND FLOOR PLAN RESIDENCES A & DA2.3A ROOF PLAN RESIDENCES A & DA3.1A BUILDING ELEVATIONS RESIDENCE AA3.2A BUILDING ELEVATIONS RESIDENCE AA3.3A ADU ELEVATIONS RESIDENCE A
A2.1B 1ST FLOOR PLAN RESIDENCES B & CA2.2B 2ND FLOOR PLAN RESIDENCES B & CA2.3B ROOF PLAN RESIDENCES B & CA3.1B BUILDING ELEVATIONS RESIDENCE BA3.2B BUILDING ELEVATIONS RESIDENCE BA3.3B ADU ELEVATIONS RESIDENCE B
RESIDENCE B:RESIDENCE C:3 SP.
RESIDENCE D:3 SP.
PRIVATE GARAGE:
TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 20 SPACES
(2 CAR GARAGE X 4 RESIDENCES) 8 SP.12 SP.DRIVEWAY SPACES:
2019 RESIDENTIAL CODE
PROPOSED LOT 1:8,568 S.F. / .20 ACPROPOSED LOT 2:8,574 S.F. / .20 ACPROPOSED LOT 3:12,572 S.F. / .29 ACPROPOSED LOT 4:12,576 S.F. / .20 AC
ADU:4 UNITSJUNIOR ADU:4 UNITS
4 D.U. / 0.97 D.U./AC = 4.12 D.U./AC0.97 AC X 3.2 D.U./AC = 3.1 UNITS
(1 D.U. TO BE ALLOCATED FROM THE EDUB)
ADU:512 S.F.
1ST FLOOR:
MAIN RESIDENCE:JUNIOR ADU:499 S.F.1,343 S.F.
COVERED PATIO:52 S.F.
2ND FLOOR:
LOT COVERAGE:LOT 1 (RESIDENCE A):LOT 2 (RESIDENCE B):2,629 S.F. / 8,574 S.F. = 31%2,629 S.F. / 8,568 S.F. = 31%
LOT 3 (RESIDENCE C):2,629 S.F. / 12,572 S.F. = 21%LOT 4 (RESIDENCE D):2,629 S.F. / 12,576 S.F. = 21%
ALLOWABLE FLOOR:UNLIMITED
RINCON HOMESCONTACT: KEVIN DUNN5315 AVENIDA ENCINAS, SUITE 200CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008T: 949-637-3254kdunn@rincongrp.com
DEVELOPER/CONTRACTOR:
CIVIL
1 OF 5 TITLE SHEET
LANDSCAPE
L-1 TREE SURVEY PLANL-2 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLANL-3 LANDSCAPE LEGENDL-4 WATER CONSERVATION PLANL-5 WATER USE EXHIBITL-6 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY
A3.1C BUILDING ELEVATIONS RESIDENCE CA3.2C BUILDING ELEVATIONS RESIDENCE CA3.3C ADU ELEVATIONS RESIDENCE C
A3.1D BUILDING ELEVATIONS RESIDENCE DA3.2D BUILDING ELEVATIONS RESIDENCE DA3.3D ADU ELEVATIONS RESIDENCE D
3 OF 5 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN4 OF 5 SECTIONS AND DETAILS5 OF 5 SECTIONS AND DETAILS
2 OF 5 PLANNING SITE PLAN
ATTACHMENT 5
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXS
W
989796969
6
969695959595959494939393939392 9292 929292
92 929
291
91
9
1
91
91
91 9191919190
9
0
90
90
90 90909090
8989898989 89
89
89 8989
8888
888888
88 888888
88
8787 87
87
878787
87
878
7
87
8786
86
86 86
8686868
686
8686
86
85
85
85
85
85 85
8585858585
858
5
858484
84 84
8
4
84
84
8
4848484
84
84
83 8383
838383838383
82
82
8
2 82828
2
8
2
82
81818181818180
X X X
X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXDENSE OVERGROWTHREQUIRES CLEARINGFOR A MOREACCURATE SURFACE
DENSE OVERGROWTHREQUIRES CLEARINGFOR A MOREACCURATE SURFACE
GS=80.8
GS=81.1
GS=81.0GS=79.1
GS=81.2
GS=79.1
GS=79.1 GS=81.3
GS=81.3
GS=82.8 GS=81.8 GS=82.7 GS=84.0 GS=84.7 GS=85.8 GS=90.5
GS=91.1
TW=85.53
TW=85.54
TW=85.59
TW=85.63
TW=85.68
TW=87.04
TW=86.99
TW=87.03 TW=88.37 TW=88.36
TW=89.70 TW=90.98
TW=91.68
TW=91.69
TW=90.43
TW=90.47
87.4 90.0
90.687.3
88.887.3
85.283.3
81.8
82.1
81.1
81.5
81.581.2
81.381.1 82.1
81.0 81.2
81.1 81.1
81.280.8
82.2
83.1
83.4
91.4
91.2
91.1
91.8
91.5
91.6
91.6
91.7
81.6
81.2
83.5
89.4
88.487.7
86.2
92.16 92.53
92.5592.20
92.23 92.61
92.6492.23
92.14 92.65
92.4492.15
91.85
91.59
92.10
TC=91.17 TC=92.21
TC=92.45
TC=92.74
FL=92.42
TC=92.60
FL=91.79
FL=92.01
FL=92.28
TC=92.89
FL=92.13
FL=90.69
SHIPPINGCONTAINER SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW W W
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOESD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDS
DSDSD
SDSDSDS
D
S
D
SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDS S SSSSSSSSSSSSS
S S SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSS
S S SSDSDSDSDS
S
S
S
W W W W
S S S
W W W W
SD
SD SDSDW W W W
W W W W
SD SD SD SD SD SD SD
/
/
/
/
/
//////////////////////////////////////////////XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X X X X X X X X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXX X X X
XXXXXXXXXX84
85 86
87
83
88
899091
88
8990878684
8583
8281829291929291899088923
5
4
6 194.94'N 61°51'38" E 216.91'
( 61°23'37" E 216.88', R1)
(N 61°21'15" E 216.87', R1)(194.95', R1)(N 28°38'05" W 292.28', R1)(194.80', R1)MAP 1681 ADAMS STREETN 61°51'44" E 216.98'N 28°07'09" W 292.48'194.93'N 28°07'09" W 702.55'N 28°08'21" W 292.41'(N 28°38'17" W 292.43', R1)91
92
RESIDENCE ATWO STORY2,722 SQ. FT.
BIORETENTION
TWOCARGARAGE499 SQ. FT.JADUABV.W/ DECK
DRIVEWAY
20'-0"DRIVEWAY
10'-0"S.Y.S.B.10'-0"S.Y.S.B.20'-0"F.Y.S.B.30'-0"20'-0"R.Y.S.B.10'-0"S.Y.S.B.20'-0"R.Y.S.B.
30'-0"
PARKING
STAIR64'-8"11'-0"10'-0"
29'-6"34'-4"23'-2"16'-0"10'-0"2'-1"20'-0"24'-0"7'-6"11'-6"
RETAINING WALL
DRIVEWAY10'-0"S.Y.S.B.10'-0"S.Y.S.B.20'-0"F.Y.S.B.
20'-0"R.Y.S.B.
PARKING
30'-10"10'-0"24'-0"RETAINING WALL
10'-0"S.Y.S.B.10'-0"S.Y.S.B.20'-0"R.Y.S.B.
RESIDENCE DTWO STORY2,722 SQ. FT.
TWOCARGARAGE499 SQ. FT.JADUABV.W/ DECK
PARKING
STAIR
16'-0"41'-2 1/2"16'-0"18'-0"6'-0"30'-10"LINE OF FIRE TURN AROUND
20'-0"F.Y.S.B.15'-0"LINE OF FIRE TURN AROUND512 SQ. FT.ADU
6'-0"32'-6"15'-9"32'-6"15'-9"55'-8"51'-6"
42'-6"64'-7"10'-0"6'-0"32'-6"15'-9"42'-6"17'-0"17'-1"10'-11"7'-5"11'-6"32'-6"15'-9"55'-8"TWOCARGARAGE
499 SQ. FT.JADUABV.W/ DECK
STAIR
29'-6"34'-4"23'-2"RESIDENCE BTWO STORY2,722 SQ. FT.
PARKING
10'-0"S.Y.S.B.RESIDENCE CTWO STORY2,722 SQ. FT.
TWOCARGARAGE
499 SQ. FT.JADUABV.W/ DECK
PARKING
STAIR
16'-1"18'-0"6'-0"20'-0"F.Y.S.B.14'-11"
PARKING
35'-6"
35'-6"
PARKING
D/W
REF
REF D/WW/D
D/W
REF
512 SQ. FT.ADU
512 SQ. FT.ADU
512 SQ. FT.ADU
PARKING
D/W
REF
REF D/WW/D
SIDEWALKSIDEWALKREF D/WW/D
D/W
REF
REF D/WW/D
PROPERTY LINE (TYP.)
PROPERTY LINE (TYP.)
PROPERTY LINE (TYP.)
PROPERTY LINE (TYP.)
30'-0"
CL
CL
CL
CL
CL8'-6"8'-6"20'-0"
8'-6"20'-0"8'-6"20'-0"8'-6"8'-6"20'-0"
FRONT YARD SETBACK AREA:1,468 S.F.PAVED PARKING AREA: 438 S.F.30% MAX. OF THE FRONT YARD SETBACK IS PAVEDPER CMC 21.44.060
1'-8"
1'-8"
FRONT YARD SETBACK AREA:1,468 S.F.PAVED PARKING AREA: 438 S.F.30% MAX. OF THE FRONT YARD SETBACK IS PAVEDPER CMC 21.44.060
BIORETENTION
PORCH60 S.F.
PORCH60 S.F.
PORCH60 S.F.
PORCH60 S.F.
Date:9-28-20
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
ADAMS RESIDENCES3745 ADAMS STREETCARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAADAMS STREET HOMES11-18-20
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004
2 5-19-21
3 6-21-21
APPROVED
THIS IS THE APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP/SITEPLAN FOR PROJECT NO. PER CONDITION
PLANNING DIVISION DATE ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE
NO. OF PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO.
A1.1
SITE PLAN
A1.1SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
5' 10'0 20'CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
N
D/W
REF
REF D/WKING SIZE BEDW/D
PANTRY
BEDROOM 1
CLOSET
KITCHEN
LIVING
DINING
STAIRS
GARAGE
STAIRS
DECKABOVE
JADUABOVE
OPENTOABOVE12'-9"22'-0"6'-6"7'-0"3'-6"20'-0"20'-0"
CLEANROOM
BATH 1
CLOSET
11'-0"2'-10"11'-6"
17'-10"
FIRST FLOOR1,379 SQ. FT.
TOTAL HOME2,722 SQ. FT.
KITCHEN
LIVINGBEDROOM 1
CLOSET
15'-9"A.D.U.512 SQ. FT.
BATH 1
UP
32'-6"
11'-6" @ RESIDENCE A10'-0" @ RESIDENCE D 11'-4"21'-2"45'-7" @ RESIDENCE A48'-7" @ RESIDENCE D3'-9"23'-2"11'-8"35'-6"
EVSE READYPARKING STALL
6'-11"
COVERED PORCH
COLUMN (TYP.)
FLOOR ABOVE
2'-11"
3'-0"
COVERED PORCHSTRUCTURE ABOVE
1'-8"6'-3"6"6'-5"19'-8"16'-6"
4'-10"12'-6"4'-5"3'-3"3'-6"31'-7"17'-11"8'-0"3'-9"2'-3"8'-8"2'-3"9'-6"LEARNINGCENTER
STORAGE
6'-0"
UP
4'-11"4'-6"6'-8"2'-10"1'-0"3'-5"8'-4"13'-8"7"Date:9-28-20
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
ADAMS RESIDENCES3745 ADAMS STREETCARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAADAMS STREET HOMES11-18-20
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004
2 5-19-21
3 6-21-21
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'RESIDENCES A & D FIRST FLOOR PLAN
N
A2.1A
RESIDENCESA & D FIRSTFLOOR PLAN
A2.1A
KING SIZE BEDD W
OPENCLOSETBEDROOM 3
MASTERBEDROOM
HALLWAY
STAIRS
W/D
REFCLOSETBEDROOM
LIVING
KITCHEN
DECK
GARAGEBELOWENTRYBELOWJADU499 SQ. FT.
SECONDFLOOR1,343 SQ. FT.
2'-5"13'-2"11'-5"7'-2"3'-6"10'-11"2'-5"4'-5"
BATH
CLOSET
BATH 2
MASTERBATH CLOSET2'-5"11'-0"14'-7"BEDROOM 211'-3"CLOSET
STORAGE4'-7"13'-4"4'-11"4'-4"3'-9"LINEN
18'-9"
DN.15'-9"32'-6"
11'-6" @ RESIDENCE A10'-0" @ RESIDENCE D 7'-6"25'-0"45'-7" @ RESIDENCE A48'-7" @ RESIDENCE D3'-9"12'-0"11'-8"35'-6"11'-2"9'-6"13'-2"17'-2"17'-11"8'-0"ADU BELOW
2'-0"
2'-0"
2'-0"14'-5"5'-5"3'-11"6'-7"3'-10"12'-2"3'-5"3'-3"2'-9"6'-6"3'-5"6'-5"3'-9"5'-7"
5'-8"5'-5"1'-3"11"2'-6"3'-0"
LAUNDRY
LEARNINGCENTER
1'-5"4'-2"
DN.
STAIRS
2'-6"
Date:9-28-20
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
ADAMS RESIDENCES3745 ADAMS STREETCARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAADAMS STREET HOMES11-18-20
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004
2 5-19-21
3 6-21-21
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'RESIDENCES A & D SECOND FLOOR PLAN
N
A2.2A
RESIDENCESA & D SECONDFLOOR PLAN
A2.2A
9:129:12
6:126:12 9:129:129:129:129:129:121'-6"1'-6"1'-6"1'-6"1'-6"1'-6"1'-6"
2'-8"
1'-6"
1'-6"1'-6"1'-6"1'-6"
1'-6"
RIDGE
RIDGERIDGERIDGERIDGE
RIDGE
LOW ROOF
LOW ROOF
6:126:126:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
6:126:12RIDGE
PV SOLAR ZONE
16'-9" FROM GABLE ENDPLANE TO ROOF LINE
6:126:129:129:12RIDGE
3'-0"3'-0"CRICKET
1'-6"
1'-6"
Date:9-28-20
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
ADAMS RESIDENCES3745 ADAMS STREETCARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAADAMS STREET HOMES11-18-20
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004
2 5-19-21
3 6-21-21
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'RESIDENCES A & D ROOF PLAN
N
A2.3A
RESIDENCESA & DROOF PLAN
A2.3A
3
7
4
5
A BDCEF GHJK
10'-0"9'-0"27'-1 1/2"1
1012
2
L D
34 57
ABD C EHK
10'-0"9'-0"27'-1 1/2"612
L
4 3
6
7
Date:9-28-20
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
ADAMS RESIDENCES3745 ADAMS STREETCARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAADAMS STREET HOMES11-18-20
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004
2 5-19-21
3 6-21-21
A3.1-3A
RESIDENCE AELEVATIONS
A3.1A
EAST ELEVATION
COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
GENERAL NOTES
1.T.O.P. = TOP OF PARAPET ELEVATION.
2.F.F.E. = FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION.
3.ALL NOTES ARE TYPICAL.
4.ALL PAINT COLOR CHANGES TO OCCUR AT INSIDE CORNERS U.N.O.
5.ALL PAINT FINISHES ARE TO BE FLAT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
6.ALL ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT TO BE SCREENED BY BUILDING PARAPET.
7.ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS PROVIDE WINDOW SURROUND TRIM THAT PROJECT 2" MIN.
B
A
C
DECORATIVE DARK COMPOSITE RAILING - SW7069 IRON ORE
LIGHT COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7005 PURE WHITE
DARK PAINT (FASCIA) - SW7069 IRON ORE
D
E
MEDIUM COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7660 EARL GREY
F
LIGHT PAINT (ACCENT/ TRIM) - SW7005 PURE WHITE
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING - SW7615 SEA SERPENT
KEYNOTES
NATURAL WOOD TONE FRONT DOORSG
CLEAR RESIDENTIAL GLAZING WITH BLACK TRIMH
MAIN BODY PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
ACCENT COLOR STUCCO PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
A
B
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULEE
DECORATIVE PAINTED GARAGE DOOR - SW7615 SEA SERPENTJ
DARK GRAY COMPOSITE SHINGLESK
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF - SW7069 IRON OREL
1
COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND
2 BUILDING ADDRESS LOCATION PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARDS
DECORATIVE BLACK EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE LOCATION.
3 DECORATIVE EAVES AND FACIA
4 KNEE BRACES
5 WOOD COLUMNS
6 DECORATIVE WOOD ELEMENT (GABLE END VENT)
7 ACCENT MATERIALS (SEE COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND)
1
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
NORTH ELEVATION2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
ADCE FHK
10'-0"9'-0"27'-1 1/2"1012
L
3 4 57
A BD CEFHK
10'-0"9'-0"27'-1 1/2"612
345
6
7
Date:9-28-20
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
ADAMS RESIDENCES3745 ADAMS STREETCARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAADAMS STREET HOMES11-18-20
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004
2 5-19-21
3 6-21-21
A3.1-3A
RESIDENCE AELEVATIONS
A3.2A
WEST ELEVATION
COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
GENERAL NOTES
1.T.O.P. = TOP OF PARAPET ELEVATION.
2.F.F.E. = FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION.
3.ALL NOTES ARE TYPICAL.
4.ALL PAINT COLOR CHANGES TO OCCUR AT INSIDE CORNERS U.N.O.
5.ALL PAINT FINISHES ARE TO BE FLAT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
6.ALL ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT TO BE SCREENED BY BUILDING PARAPET.
7.ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS PROVIDE WINDOW SURROUND TRIM THAT PROJECT 2" MIN.
B
A
C
DECORATIVE DARK COMPOSITE RAILING - SW7069 IRON ORE
LIGHT COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7005 PURE WHITE
DARK PAINT (FASCIA) - SW7069 IRON ORE
D
E
MEDIUM COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7660 EARL GREY
F
LIGHT PAINT (ACCENT/ TRIM) - SW7005 PURE WHITE
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING - SW7615 SEA SERPENT
KEYNOTES
NATURAL WOOD TONE FRONT DOORSG
CLEAR RESIDENTIAL GLAZING WITH BLACK TRIMH
MAIN BODY PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
ACCENT COLOR STUCCO PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
A
B
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULEE
DECORATIVE PAINTED GARAGE DOOR - SW7615 SEA SERPENTJ
DARK GRAY COMPOSITE SHINGLESK
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF - SW7069 IRON OREL
1
COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND
2 BUILDING ADDRESS LOCATION PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARDS
DECORATIVE BLACK EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE LOCATION.
3 DECORATIVE EAVES AND FACIA
4 KNEE BRACES
5 WOOD COLUMNS
6 DECORATIVE WOOD ELEMENT (GABLE END VENT)
7 ACCENT MATERIALS (SEE COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND)
1
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
SOUTH ELEVATION2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
A D CG HK
9'-0"13'-8"612
1 34
6
A C D H K
9'-0"13'-8"6 12
34
6
ACDEHK
9'-0"13'-8"3471
612
A CD HK
9'-0"13'-8"1012
347
E
Date:9-28-20
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
ADAMS RESIDENCES3745 ADAMS STREETCARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAADAMS STREET HOMES11-18-20
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004
2 5-19-21
3 6-21-21
A3.1-3A
RESIDENCE AADUELEVATIONS
A3.3A
EAST ELEVATION
COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
GENERAL NOTES
1.T.O.P. = TOP OF PARAPET ELEVATION.
2.F.F.E. = FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION.
3.ALL NOTES ARE TYPICAL.
4.ALL PAINT COLOR CHANGES TO OCCUR AT INSIDE CORNERS U.N.O.
5.ALL PAINT FINISHES ARE TO BE FLAT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
6.ALL ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT TO BE SCREENED BY BUILDING PARAPET.
7.ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS PROVIDE WINDOW SURROUND TRIM THAT PROJECT 2" MIN.
B
A
C
DECORATIVE DARK COMPOSITE RAILING - SW7069 IRON ORE
LIGHT COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7005 PURE WHITE
DARK PAINT (FASCIA) - SW7069 IRON ORE
D
E
MEDIUM COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7660 EARL GREY
F
LIGHT PAINT (ACCENT/ TRIM) - SW7005 PURE WHITE
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING - SW7615 SEA SERPENT
KEYNOTES
NATURAL WOOD TONE FRONT DOORSG
CLEAR RESIDENTIAL GLAZING WITH BLACK TRIMH
MAIN BODY PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
ACCENT COLOR STUCCO PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
A
B
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULEE
DECORATIVE PAINTED GARAGE DOOR - SW7615 SEA SERPENTJ
DARK GRAY COMPOSITE SHINGLESK
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF - SW7069 IRON OREL
1
COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND
2 BUILDING ADDRESS LOCATION PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARDS
DECORATIVE BLACK EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE LOCATION.
3 DECORATIVE EAVES AND FACIA
4 KNEE BRACES
5 WOOD COLUMNS
6 DECORATIVE WOOD ELEMENT (GABLE END VENT)
7 ACCENT MATERIALS (SEE COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND)
1
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'NORTH ELEVATION2
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
WEST ELEVATION3
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'SOUTH ELEVATION4
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
3
7
4
5
A BDCEF GHJK
10'-0"9'-0"27'-1 1/2"1012
LD
1 23457
ABD C EHK
10'-0"9'-0"27'-1 1/2"612
LD
4 3
6
7
Date:9-28-20
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
ADAMS RESIDENCES3745 ADAMS STREETCARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAADAMS STREET HOMES11-18-20
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004
2 5-19-21
3 6-21-21
A3.1-3D
RESIDENCE DELEVATIONS
A3.1D
EAST ELEVATION
COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
GENERAL NOTES
1.T.O.P. = TOP OF PARAPET ELEVATION.
2.F.F.E. = FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION.
3.ALL NOTES ARE TYPICAL.
4.ALL PAINT COLOR CHANGES TO OCCUR AT INSIDE CORNERS U.N.O.
5.ALL PAINT FINISHES ARE TO BE FLAT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
6.ALL ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT TO BE SCREENED BY BUILDING PARAPET.
7.ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS PROVIDE WINDOW SURROUND TRIM THAT PROJECT 2" MIN.
B
A
C
D
E
F
KEYNOTES
1
COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND
2 BUILDING ADDRESS LOCATION PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARDS
DECORATIVE BLACK EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE LOCATION.
G
H
MAIN BODY PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
ACCENT COLOR STUCCO PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
A
B
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULEE
J
K
DECORATIVE DARK COMPOSITE RAILING - SW7069 IRON ORE
LIGHT COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7005 PURE WHITE
DARK PAINT (FASCIA) - SW7069 IRON ORE
DARK COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7615 SEA SERPENT
LIGHT PAINT (ACCENT/ TRIM) - SW7005 PURE WHITE
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING - SW7660 EARL GREY
NATURAL WOOD TONE FRONT DOORS
CLEAR RESIDENTIAL GLAZING WITH BLACK TRIM
DECORATIVE PAINTED GARAGE DOOR - SW7615 SEA SERPENT
DARK GRAY COMPOSITE SHINGLES
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF - SW7069 IRON OREL
3 DECORATIVE EAVES AND FACIA
4 KNEE BRACES
5 WOOD COLUMNS
6 DECORATIVE WOOD ELEMENT (GABLE END VENT)
7 ACCENT MATERIALS (SEE COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND)
1
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
NORTH ELEVATION2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
ADCE FHK
10'-0"9'-0"27'-1 1/2"1012
L
3 4 57
A BD CEFHK
10'-0"9'-0"27'-1 1/2"612
345
6
7
Date:9-28-20
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
ADAMS RESIDENCES3745 ADAMS STREETCARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAADAMS STREET HOMES11-18-20
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004
2 5-19-21
3 6-21-21
A3.1-3D
RESIDENCE DELEVATIONS
A3.2D
WEST ELEVATION
COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
GENERAL NOTES
1.T.O.P. = TOP OF PARAPET ELEVATION.
2.F.F.E. = FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION.
3.ALL NOTES ARE TYPICAL.
4.ALL PAINT COLOR CHANGES TO OCCUR AT INSIDE CORNERS U.N.O.
5.ALL PAINT FINISHES ARE TO BE FLAT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
6.ALL ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT TO BE SCREENED BY BUILDING PARAPET.
7.ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS PROVIDE WINDOW SURROUND TRIM THAT PROJECT 2" MIN.
B
A
C
D
E
F
KEYNOTES
1
COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND
2 BUILDING ADDRESS LOCATION PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARDS
DECORATIVE BLACK EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE LOCATION.
G
H
MAIN BODY PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
ACCENT COLOR STUCCO PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
A
B
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULEE
J
K
DECORATIVE DARK COMPOSITE RAILING - SW7069 IRON ORE
LIGHT COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7005 PURE WHITE
DARK PAINT (FASCIA) - SW7069 IRON ORE
DARK COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7615 SEA SERPENT
LIGHT PAINT (ACCENT/ TRIM) - SW7005 PURE WHITE
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING - SW7660 EARL GREY
NATURAL WOOD TONE FRONT DOORS
CLEAR RESIDENTIAL GLAZING WITH BLACK TRIM
DECORATIVE PAINTED GARAGE DOOR - SW7615 SEA SERPENT
DARK GRAY COMPOSITE SHINGLES
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF - SW7069 IRON OREL
3 DECORATIVE EAVES AND FACIA
4 KNEE BRACES
5 WOOD COLUMNS
6 DECORATIVE WOOD ELEMENT (GABLE END VENT)
7 ACCENT MATERIALS (SEE COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND)
1
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
SOUTH ELEVATION2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
A D CG HK
9'-0"13'-8"612
34
6
1
A C D H K
9'-0"13'-8"6 12
34
6
ACDEHK
9'-0"13'-8"3741
612
A CD HK
9'-0"13'-8"1012
E
347
Date:9-28-20
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
ADAMS RESIDENCES3745 ADAMS STREETCARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAADAMS STREET HOMES11-18-20
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004
2 5-19-21
3 6-21-21
A3.1-3D
RESIDENCE DADUELEVATIONS
A3.3D
EAST ELEVATION
COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
GENERAL NOTES
1.T.O.P. = TOP OF PARAPET ELEVATION.
2.F.F.E. = FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION.
3.ALL NOTES ARE TYPICAL.
4.ALL PAINT COLOR CHANGES TO OCCUR AT INSIDE CORNERS U.N.O.
5.ALL PAINT FINISHES ARE TO BE FLAT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
6.ALL ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT TO BE SCREENED BY BUILDING PARAPET.
7.ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS PROVIDE WINDOW SURROUND TRIM THAT PROJECT 2" MIN.
B
A
C
D
E
F
KEYNOTES
1
COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND
2 BUILDING ADDRESS LOCATION PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARDS
DECORATIVE BLACK EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE LOCATION.
G
H
MAIN BODY PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
ACCENT COLOR STUCCO PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
A
B
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULEE
J
K
DECORATIVE DARK COMPOSITE RAILING - SW7069 IRON ORE
LIGHT COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7005 PURE WHITE
DARK PAINT (FASCIA) - SW7069 IRON ORE
DARK COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7615 SEA SERPENT
LIGHT PAINT (ACCENT/ TRIM) - SW7005 PURE WHITE
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING - SW7660 EARL GREY
NATURAL WOOD TONE FRONT DOORS
CLEAR RESIDENTIAL GLAZING WITH BLACK TRIM
DECORATIVE PAINTED GARAGE DOOR - SW7615 SEA SERPENT
DARK GRAY COMPOSITE SHINGLES
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF - SW7069 IRON OREL
3 DECORATIVE EAVES AND FACIA
4 KNEE BRACES
5 WOOD COLUMNS
6 DECORATIVE WOOD ELEMENT (GABLE END VENT)
7 ACCENT MATERIALS (SEE COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND)
1
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'NORTH ELEVATION2
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
WEST ELEVATION3
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'SOUTH ELEVATION4
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
D/W
REF
REF D/W
KING SIZE BEDW/D
PANTRY
BEDROOM 1
CLOSET
KITCHEN
LIVING
DINING
STAIRS
GARAGE
STAIRS
DECKABOVE JADUABOVE
OPENTOABOVE
12'-9"22'-0"6'-6"7'-0"3'-6"20'-0"20'-0"
CLEANROOM
BATH 1
CLOSET 11'-0"2'-10"11'-6"
17'-10"
FIRST FLOOR1,379 SQ. FT.
TOTAL HOME2,722 SQ. FT.
KITCHEN
LIVINGBEDROOM 1
CLOSET15'-9"4'-11"4'-6"6'-8"A.D.U.512 SQ. FT.
BATH 1
UP
32'-6"
11'-6" @ RESIDENCE B10'-0" @ RESIDENCE C 11'-4"21'-2"45'-7" @ RESIDENCE B48'-7" @ RESIDENCE C3'-9"23'-2"11'-8"35'-6"
EVSE READYPARKING STALL
6'-11"
COVERED PORCH
COLUMN (TYP.)
FLOOR ABOVE
2'-11"
3'-0"
COVERED PORCHSTRUCTURE ABOVE2'-10"1'-0"3'-5"8'-4"13'-8"1'-8"6'-3"6"6'-5"19'-8"16'-6"
4'-10"
12'-6"4'-5"3'-3"3'-6"31'-7"17'-11"8'-0"3'-9"2'-3"8'-8"2'-3"9'-6"LEARNINGCENTER
STORAGE
6'-0"
UP7"Date:9-28-20
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
ADAMS RESIDENCES3745 ADAMS STREETCARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAADAMS STREET HOMES11-18-20
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004
2 5-19-21
3 6-21-21
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'RESIDENCES B & C FIRST FLOOR PLAN
N
A2.1B
RESIDENCESB & C FIRSTFLOOR PLAN
A2.1B
KING SIZE BEDD W
OPEN
CLOSETBEDROOM 3
MASTERBEDROOM
HALLWAY
STAIRS
W/D REFCLOSETBEDROOM
LIVING
KITCHEN
DECK
GARAGEBELOW
ENTRYBELOWJADU499 SQ. FT.
SECONDFLOOR1,343 SQ. FT.
2'-5"13'-2"11'-5"7'-2"3'-6"10'-11"2'-5"
4'-5"
BATH
CLOSET
BATH 2MASTERBATH
CLOSET2'-5"11'-0"14'-7"BEDROOM 2
11'-3"CLOSET
STORAGE4'-7"13'-4"4'-11"4'-4"3'-9"LINEN
18'-9"
DN.15'-9"32'-6"
11'-6" @ RESIDENCE B10'-0" @ RESIDENCE C 7'-6"25'-0"45'-7" @ RESIDENCE B48'-7" @ RESIDENCE C3'-9"12'-0"11'-8"35'-6"11'-2"9'-6"13'-2"17'-2"17'-11"8'-0"ADU BELOW
2'-0"
2'-0"
2'-0"14'-5"5'-5"3'-11"6'-7"3'-10"12'-2"3'-5"3'-3"2'-9"6'-6"3'-5"6'-5"3'-9"5'-7"
5'-8"5'-5"1'-3"11"2'-6"3'-0"
LAUNDRY
LEARNINGCENTER
1'-5"4'-2"
DN.
STAIRS
2'-6"
Date:9-28-20
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
ADAMS RESIDENCES3745 ADAMS STREETCARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAADAMS STREET HOMES11-18-20
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004
2 5-19-21
3 6-21-21
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'RESIDENCES B & C SECOND FLOOR PLAN
N
A2.2B
RESIDENCESB & C SECONDFLOOR PLAN
A2.2B
9:129:12
6:126:12
9:129:129:129:129:129:121'-6"1'-6"1'-6"1'-6"1'-6"1'-6"1'-6"
2'-8"
1'-6"
1'-6"1'-6"1'-6"1'-6"
1'-6"
RIDGE RIDGERIDGERIDGERIDGE
RIDGE
LOW ROOF
LOW ROOF6:126:126:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
6:12RIDGE
PV SOLAR ZONE
16'-9" FROM GABLE ENDPLANE TO ROOF LINE6:126:129:129:12RIDGE3'-0"3'-0"CRICKET
1'-6"
1'-6"
Date:9-28-20
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
ADAMS RESIDENCES3745 ADAMS STREETCARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAADAMS STREET HOMES11-18-20
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004
2 5-19-21
3 6-21-21
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'RESIDENCES B & C ROOF PLAN
N
A2.3B
RESIDENCESB & CROOF PLAN
A2.3B
3
7
4
5
AEDCAB FGHJK
10'-0"9'-0"27'-1 1/2"1012
L D E
12 3 45 7
AE D CEBFHK
10'-0"9'-0"27'-1 1/2"612
D
3 45
6
7
Date:9-28-20
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
ADAMS RESIDENCES3745 ADAMS STREETCARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAADAMS STREET HOMES11-18-20
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004
2 5-19-21
3 6-21-21
A3.1-3B
RESIDENCE BELEVATIONS
A3.1B
EAST ELEVATION
COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
GENERAL NOTES
1.T.O.P. = TOP OF PARAPET ELEVATION.
2.F.F.E. = FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION.
3.ALL NOTES ARE TYPICAL.
4.ALL PAINT COLOR CHANGES TO OCCUR AT INSIDE CORNERS U.N.O.
5.ALL PAINT FINISHES ARE TO BE FLAT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
6.ALL ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT TO BE SCREENED BY BUILDING PARAPET.
7.ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS PROVIDE WINDOW SURROUND TRIM THAT PROJECT 2" MIN.
B
A
C
DECORATIVE DARK COMPOSITE RAILING - SW6993 BLACK OF NIGHT
LIGHT COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7009 PEARLY WHITE
D
E
MEDIUM COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7660 EARL GREY
F
LIGHT PAINT (ACCENT/ TRIM) - SW7009 PEARLY WHITE
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING - SW9149 INKY BLUE
KEYNOTES
NATURAL WOOD TONE FRONT DOORSG
CLEAR RESIDENTIAL GLAZING WITH BLACK TRIMH
MAIN BODY PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
ACCENT COLOR STUCCO PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
A
B
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULEE
DECORATIVE DARK GARAGE DOOR - SW6993 BLACK OF NIGHTJ
DARK GRAY COMPOSITE SHINGLESK
DARK PAINT (FASCIA) - SW7069 IRON ORE
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF - SW7069 IRON OREL
1
COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND
2 BUILDING ADDRESS LOCATION PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARDS
DECORATIVE BLACK EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE LOCATION.
3 DECORATIVE EAVES AND FACIA
4 KNEE BRACES
5 WOOD COLUMNS
6 DECORATIVE WOOD ELEMENT (GABLE END VENT)
7 ACCENT MATERIALS (SEE COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND)
1
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
NORTH ELEVATION2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
A D CEFHK
10'-0"9'-0"27'-1 1/2"1012
L
3457
A ED CEHK
10'-0"9'-0"27'-1 1/2"612
L
43
6
7
Date:9-28-20
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
ADAMS RESIDENCES3745 ADAMS STREETCARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAADAMS STREET HOMES11-18-20
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004
2 5-19-21
3 6-21-21
A3.1-3B
RESIDENCE BELEVATIONS
A3.2B
WEST ELEVATION
COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
GENERAL NOTES
1.T.O.P. = TOP OF PARAPET ELEVATION.
2.F.F.E. = FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION.
3.ALL NOTES ARE TYPICAL.
4.ALL PAINT COLOR CHANGES TO OCCUR AT INSIDE CORNERS U.N.O.
5.ALL PAINT FINISHES ARE TO BE FLAT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
6.ALL ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT TO BE SCREENED BY BUILDING PARAPET.
7.ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS PROVIDE WINDOW SURROUND TRIM THAT PROJECT 2" MIN.
B
A
C
DECORATIVE DARK COMPOSITE RAILING - SW6993 BLACK OF NIGHT
LIGHT COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7009 PEARLY WHITE
D
E
MEDIUM COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7660 EARL GREY
F
LIGHT PAINT (ACCENT/ TRIM) - SW7009 PEARLY WHITE
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING - SW9149 INKY BLUE
KEYNOTES
NATURAL WOOD TONE FRONT DOORSG
CLEAR RESIDENTIAL GLAZING WITH BLACK TRIMH
MAIN BODY PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
ACCENT COLOR STUCCO PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
A
B
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULEE
DECORATIVE DARK GARAGE DOOR - SW6993 BLACK OF NIGHTJ
DARK GRAY COMPOSITE SHINGLESK
DARK PAINT (FASCIA) - SW7069 IRON ORE
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF - SW7069 IRON OREL
1
COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND
2 BUILDING ADDRESS LOCATION PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARDS
DECORATIVE BLACK EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE LOCATION.
3 DECORATIVE EAVES AND FACIA
4 KNEE BRACES
5 WOOD COLUMNS
6 DECORATIVE WOOD ELEMENT (GABLE END VENT)
7 ACCENT MATERIALS (SEE COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND)
1
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
SOUTH ELEVATION2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
A D CGH K
9'-0"13'-8"5 12
3 4
6
1
AD CHK
9'-0"13'-8"612
3 4
6
7
ADCEHK
9'-0"13'-8"1012
3 47
A DCE HK
9'-0"13'-8"3 4 7
612
1 47
Date:9-28-20
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
ADAMS RESIDENCES3745 ADAMS STREETCARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAADAMS STREET HOMES11-18-20
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004
2 5-19-21
3 6-21-21
A3.1-3B
RESIDENCE BADUELEVATIONS
A3.3B
EAST ELEVATION
COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
GENERAL NOTES
1.T.O.P. = TOP OF PARAPET ELEVATION.
2.F.F.E. = FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION.
3.ALL NOTES ARE TYPICAL.
4.ALL PAINT COLOR CHANGES TO OCCUR AT INSIDE CORNERS U.N.O.
5.ALL PAINT FINISHES ARE TO BE FLAT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
6.ALL ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT TO BE SCREENED BY BUILDING PARAPET.
7.ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS PROVIDE WINDOW SURROUND TRIM THAT PROJECT 2" MIN.
B
A
C
DECORATIVE DARK COMPOSITE RAILING - SW6993 BLACK OF NIGHT
LIGHT COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7009 PEARLY WHITE
D
E
MEDIUM COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7660 EARL GREY
F
LIGHT PAINT (ACCENT/ TRIM) - SW7009 PEARLY WHITE
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING - SW9149 INKY BLUE
KEYNOTES
NATURAL WOOD TONE FRONT DOORSG
CLEAR RESIDENTIAL GLAZING WITH BLACK TRIMH
MAIN BODY PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
ACCENT COLOR STUCCO PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
A
B
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULEE
DECORATIVE DARK GARAGE DOOR - SW6993 BLACK OF NIGHTJ
DARK GRAY COMPOSITE SHINGLESK
DARK PAINT (FASCIA) - SW7069 IRON ORE
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF - SW7069 IRON OREL
1
COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND
2 BUILDING ADDRESS LOCATION PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARDS
DECORATIVE BLACK EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE LOCATION.
3 DECORATIVE EAVES AND FACIA
4 KNEE BRACES
5 WOOD COLUMNS
6 DECORATIVE WOOD ELEMENT (GABLE END VENT)
7 ACCENT MATERIALS (SEE COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND)
1
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'NORTH ELEVATION2
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
WEST ELEVATION3
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'SOUTH ELEVATION4
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
3
7
4
5
ABDCE FGHJK
10'-0"9'-0"27'-1 1/2"1012
L
12 3 45 7
AB D CEFHK
10'-0"9'-0"27'-1 1/2"612
3 45
6
7
Date:9-28-20
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
ADAMS RESIDENCES3745 ADAMS STREETCARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAADAMS STREET HOMES11-18-20
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004
2 5-19-21
3 6-21-21
A3.1-3C
RESIDENCE CELEVATIONS
A3.1C
EAST ELEVATION
COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
GENERAL NOTES
1.T.O.P. = TOP OF PARAPET ELEVATION.
2.F.F.E. = FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION.
3.ALL NOTES ARE TYPICAL.
4.ALL PAINT COLOR CHANGES TO OCCUR AT INSIDE CORNERS U.N.O.
5.ALL PAINT FINISHES ARE TO BE FLAT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
6.ALL ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT TO BE SCREENED BY BUILDING PARAPET.
7.ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS PROVIDE WINDOW SURROUND TRIM THAT PROJECT 2" MIN.
B
A
C
DECORATIVE DARK COMPOSITE RAILING - SW6993 BLACK OF NIGHT
LIGHT COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7009 PEARLY WHITE
D
E
F
LIGHT PAINT (ACCENT/ TRIM) - SW7009 PEARLY WHITE
KEYNOTES
G
CLEAR RESIDENTIAL GLAZING WITH BLACK TRIMH
MAIN BODY PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
ACCENT COLOR STUCCO PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
A
B
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULEE
DECORATIVE DARK GARAGE DOOR - SW6993 BLACK OF NIGHTJ
DARK GRAY COMPOSITE SHINGLESK
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING - SW9149 INKY BLUE
NATURAL WOOD TONE FRONT DOORS
DARK PAINT (FASCIA) - SW7069 IRON ORE
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF - SW7069 IRON OREL
MEDIUM COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7660 EARL GREY
1
COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND
2 BUILDING ADDRESS LOCATION PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARDS
DECORATIVE BLACK EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE LOCATION.
3 DECORATIVE EAVES AND FACIA
4 KNEE BRACES
5 WOOD COLUMNS
6 DECORATIVE WOOD ELEMENT (GABLE END VENT)
7 ACCENT MATERIALS (SEE COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND)
1
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
NORTH ELEVATION2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
A D CEFHK
10'-0"9'-0"27'-1 1/2"1012
L D
3457
A BD CEHK
10'-0"9'-0"27'-1 1/2"612
L
43
6
7
Date:9-28-20
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
ADAMS RESIDENCES3745 ADAMS STREETCARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAADAMS STREET HOMES11-18-20
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004
2 5-19-21
3 6-21-21
A3.1-3C
RESIDENCE CELEVATIONS
A3.2C
WEST ELEVATION
COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
GENERAL NOTES
1.T.O.P. = TOP OF PARAPET ELEVATION.
2.F.F.E. = FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION.
3.ALL NOTES ARE TYPICAL.
4.ALL PAINT COLOR CHANGES TO OCCUR AT INSIDE CORNERS U.N.O.
5.ALL PAINT FINISHES ARE TO BE FLAT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
6.ALL ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT TO BE SCREENED BY BUILDING PARAPET.
7.ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS PROVIDE WINDOW SURROUND TRIM THAT PROJECT 2" MIN.
B
A
C
DECORATIVE DARK COMPOSITE RAILING - SW6993 BLACK OF NIGHT
LIGHT COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7009 PEARLY WHITE
D
E
F
LIGHT PAINT (ACCENT/ TRIM) - SW7009 PEARLY WHITE
KEYNOTES
G
CLEAR RESIDENTIAL GLAZING WITH BLACK TRIMH
MAIN BODY PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
ACCENT COLOR STUCCO PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
A
B
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULEE
DECORATIVE DARK GARAGE DOOR - SW6993 BLACK OF NIGHTJ
DARK GRAY COMPOSITE SHINGLESK
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING - SW9149 INKY BLUE
NATURAL WOOD TONE FRONT DOORS
DARK PAINT (FASCIA) - SW7069 IRON ORE
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF - SW7069 IRON OREL
MEDIUM COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7660 EARL GREY
1
COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND
2 BUILDING ADDRESS LOCATION PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARDS
DECORATIVE BLACK EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE LOCATION.
3 DECORATIVE EAVES AND FACIA
4 KNEE BRACES
5 WOOD COLUMNS
6 DECORATIVE WOOD ELEMENT (GABLE END VENT)
7 ACCENT MATERIALS (SEE COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND)
1
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
SOUTH ELEVATION2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
A D CGH K
9'-0"13'-8"6 12
3 4
6
1
AD CHK
9'-0"13'-8"612
3 4
6
7
ADCEHK
9'-0"13'-8"1012
3 47
A DCE HK
9'-0"13'-8"3
612
1 47
Date:9-28-20
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
ADAMS RESIDENCES3745 ADAMS STREETCARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAADAMS STREET HOMES11-18-20
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004
2 5-19-21
3 6-21-21
A3.1-3C
RESIDENCE CADUELEVATIONS
A3.3C
EAST ELEVATION
COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
GENERAL NOTES
1.T.O.P. = TOP OF PARAPET ELEVATION.
2.F.F.E. = FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION.
3.ALL NOTES ARE TYPICAL.
4.ALL PAINT COLOR CHANGES TO OCCUR AT INSIDE CORNERS U.N.O.
5.ALL PAINT FINISHES ARE TO BE FLAT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
6.ALL ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT TO BE SCREENED BY BUILDING PARAPET.
7.ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS PROVIDE WINDOW SURROUND TRIM THAT PROJECT 2" MIN.
B
A
C
DECORATIVE DARK COMPOSITE RAILING - SW6993 BLACK OF NIGHT
LIGHT COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7009 PEARLY WHITE
D
E
F
LIGHT PAINT (ACCENT/ TRIM) - SW7009 PEARLY WHITE
KEYNOTES
G
CLEAR RESIDENTIAL GLAZING WITH BLACK TRIMH
MAIN BODY PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
ACCENT COLOR STUCCO PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
A
B
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULEE
DECORATIVE DARK GARAGE DOOR - SW6993 BLACK OF NIGHTJ
DARK GRAY COMPOSITE SHINGLESK
PAINTED DECORATIVE BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING - SW9149 INKY BLUE
NATURAL WOOD TONE FRONT DOORS
DARK PAINT (FASCIA) - SW7069 IRON ORE
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF - SW7069 IRON OREL
MEDIUM COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - SW7660 EARL GREY
1
COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND
2 BUILDING ADDRESS LOCATION PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARDS
DECORATIVE BLACK EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE LOCATION.
3 DECORATIVE EAVES AND FACIA
4 KNEE BRACES
5 WOOD COLUMNS
6 DECORATIVE WOOD ELEMENT (GABLE END VENT)
7 ACCENT MATERIALS (SEE COLOR/ MATERIAL HATCH LEGEND)
1
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'NORTH ELEVATION2
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
WEST ELEVATION3
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'SOUTH ELEVATION4
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'
From:Steve Linke
To:Planning
Cc:Jessica Evans
Subject:9/1/2021 Planning Commission hearing Item 1: Adams Street Homes
Date:Friday, August 27, 2021 3:38:18 PM
Please distribute this to the Planning Commission and read it into the record at the meeting:
The proposed development appears to include four 3,182 square-foot single-family home dwelling
units, plus four 499 square-foot junior accessory dwelling units, plus four 512 square-foot accessory
dwelling units. However, the Circulation impact related to General Plan compliance (Table E) only
describes 40 average daily trips (or ADT), which only addresses the four single-family home dwelling
units based on the standard SANDAG trip generation rate of 10 ADT per single-family detached
residence.
The other eight proposed dwelling units will have circulation and parking impacts independent of the
single-family dwelling units, based on the fact that additional vehicles will be used by the additional
residents. Therefore, it would seem more appropriate to include all of these additional dwelling units
in the ADT calculation, for example at SANDAG’s trip generation rate of 6 ADT per apartment. That
would result in a total trip generation of 88 ADT for the overall development.
I would like to get answers to the following two questions:
1. Why are only the single-family dwelling units being used to calculate ADT for the overall
development?
2. Will the traffic impact fee collected for this development reflect only the 40 ADT from the single-
family dwelling units, or will it reflect an increased number for all of the dwelling units?
Disclaimer: I am a member of the Traffic and Mobility Commission, but, because staff has chosen not
to include our commission in the review of traffic impacts for development projects, I am
commenting as an individual.
Best regards,
Steve Linke
Carlsbad, CA
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
/
/
, August 31, 2021
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Ave
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Ms. Bui and Planning Commissioners,
I live immediately north of the proposed development at 37 45 Adams Street and am writing to
request you deny Coastal Development Permit CDP 2020-0043 as it is not compatible with the
existing adjacent properties and the proposed plan does not take into consideration the natural
topography of the site.
The project is proposing a 2-3 foot high retaining wall along the property line between my house
and the development, creating a building pad that is up to 8 feet higher than the existing grade
of the site. As shown on section A-A on sheet 4 of the grading plan, and as noted on the
landscape plans (6-foot max height wall/fence), the wall will have a·property line fence that is 3-
4 feet high above the wall. This means that anybody walking along the property or looking north
from the 2nd story of the proposed building, will have a free unobstructed view into my backyard
and into the bedrooms along the south side of my house. The developer should be required to
lower the proposed building pads, and heights of the proposed buildings, making the
development more consistent with the surrounding properties.
Federal law requires vehicle headlights to be between 2 and 4-1/2 feet above the ground
elevation. With only a 3 to 4 foot high property line fence, headlights from vehicles pulling into
the most northerly parking spot will shine directly into the rooms on the south side of the my
house.
In _addition, if the Planning Commissioin allows the roof elevation of the building proposed to the
south of my house to be 5 feet higher that is allowed by the underlying zone, it will drasfically
reduce the amount of sunlight reaching my property. (existing elevatoin 84, proposed pad
elevation 90.7, proposed top of roof elevation 118.9). Our property will be shaded by the
proposed development tremendously and, as calculated below, premitting the roof elevation to
be 5 feet above what is allowed by code will increase the time my home is in the shadow of the
proposed structure by an 34 additional minutes.
I have lived, raised my family, and periodically operated a successful home day-care center
from my home on Adams for almost 27 years. The proposed development will infringe on my
family's privacy and create a situation where the proposed building heights exceed those
allowed in the R1 zone. Please do not approve the requested permit.·
T~ ~
Cindy Esth
3725 Adams St.
PS: It is also fairly dark on that portion of Adams Street and the neighbors have asked for an
additional streetlight several times in the past. The existing lights are not standard city lights,
they are attached to wooden poles and some are paid for by residents as part of the dusk-to-
dawn lighting program. Whenever a development for the subject property is approved, please
ensure they install a standard city streetlight as required by the municipal code.
Solar Shade Calculator exhixit:
Print
Cflittact
H~lp &Al)l
Nore for Moun1PfonelslSateJllles
From:Dani Minkoff
To:Planning
Subject:Case Name: CDP 2020-0043/MS 2020-0004 (DEV2020-0126) - ADAMS STREET HOMES
Date:Tuesday, August 31, 2021 7:18:40 AM
To Whom It May Concern:
We've been neighbors to 3745 Adams Street for nearly 6 years. We've seen and heard about
the commotion between the lenders and prior residents. We are happy to see new developmenttake place where older, decaying homes were long overdue for a facelift. What we are not
happy about is the number of ADUs proposed to be erected for each new property.
We moved to Olde Carlsbad because it had and still has a great combination of bigcommunity-feel without being overcrowded. Taking ~1 acre and splitting it into 4 parcels
magnifies the number of people that used to inhabit the property by a minimum of 4x. Addingin 2 additional ADUs per new site compounds that number to ~16x. There is already enough
traffic on Adams Street due to the number of families attending St. Patrick's Catholic Churchand St. Patrick's Catholic School.
With that background, here are our questions:
1. Why do you feel the need to allow for so much housing? What benefit do the 2 ADUsper property serve to the community?
2. How do you plan to address traffic control, with and without the ADUs? 3. Can we leverage the construction opportunity to provide a reasonable level of safety for
our community? Currently, there are no speed bumps, no stop signs, no school zonespeed signs, and no designated crosswalks for pedestrians.
Cordially,
-- Dani Minkoff, CPA, MBA
3730 Adams StreetCarlsbad, CA 92008
(760) 522-4451dminkoff22@gmail.com
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
From:Don Neu
To:Ronald Kemp
Cc:Melissa Flores
Subject:FW: FW: 9/1/2021 Planning Commission hearing Item 1: Adams Street Homes
Date:Monday, August 30, 2021 7:42:26 AM
For your information.
From: Kevin Sabellico <kevin@kevinsabellico.org>
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2021 5:12 PM
To: Steve Linke <splinke@gmail.com>
Cc: Don Neu <Don.Neu@carlsbadca.gov>; Jessica Evans <Jessica.Evans@carlsbadca.gov>
Subject: Re: FW: 9/1/2021 Planning Commission hearing Item 1: Adams Street Homes
Steve,
Gov. Code § 65852.2, subd. (f)(3) reads as follows:
"A local agency, special district, or water corporation shall not impose any impact fee upon
the development of an accessory dwelling unit less than 750 square feet. Any impact fees
charged for an accessory dwelling unit of 750 square feet or more shall be charged
proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit."
I hope this answers your question.
Kind regards,
Kevin
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 4:56 PM Planning <Planning@carlsbadca.gov> wrote:
From: Steve Linke <splinke@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2021 3:38 PM
To: Planning <Planning@CarlsbadCA.gov>
Cc: Jessica Evans <Jessica.Evans@carlsbadca.gov>
Subject: 9/1/2021 Planning Commission hearing Item 1: Adams Street Homes
Please distribute this to the Planning Commission and read it into the record at the meeting:
The proposed development appears to include four 3,182 square-foot single-family home
dwelling units, plus four 499 square-foot junior accessory dwelling units, plus four 512 square-foot
accessory dwelling units. However, the Circulation impact related to General Plan compliance
(Table E) only describes 40 average daily trips (or ADT), which only addresses the four single-
family home dwelling units based on the standard SANDAG trip generation rate of 10 ADT per
single-family detached residence.
The other eight proposed dwelling units will have circulation and parking impacts independent of
the single-family dwelling units, based on the fact that additional vehicles will be used by the
additional residents. Therefore, it would seem more appropriate to include all of these additional
dwelling units in the ADT calculation, for example at SANDAG’s trip generation rate of 6 ADT per
apartment. That would result in a total trip generation of 88 ADT for the overall development.
I would like to get answers to the following two questions:
1. Why are only the single-family dwelling units being used to calculate ADT for the overall
development?
2. Will the traffic impact fee collected for this development reflect only the 40 ADT from the
single-family dwelling units, or will it reflect an increased number for all of the dwelling units?
Disclaimer: I am a member of the Traffic and Mobility Commission, but, because staff has chosen
not to include our commission in the review of traffic impacts for development projects, I am
commenting as an individual.
Best regards,
Steve Linke
Carlsbad, CA
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
--
Kevin Sabellico
He, Him, His
(760) 814 - 7260
@KevinSabellico
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
From:Mark Kuhn
To:Planning
Subject:CDP2020-0043
Date:Friday, August 27, 2021 1:33:32 PM
As the Pastor for New Song Carlsbad at 3780 Pio Pico, I have concerns about development
project CDP2020-0043.
I'm not an engineer, however in my opinion the design for the drainage runoff is inadequate and if
developed as proposed will create a situation that will cause erosion and flooding and compromise the
integrity of the wall along my easterly property line. I would like to object to this current design and ask for
a redesign that does not impact our property.
Please advise what can be done about this and that you are in receipt of this email.
Blessings!Mark R. Kuhn
Executive Pastor New Song Community Church
Tel: 760-822-8906
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
August 31, 2021
Dear Planning Commissioners,
I am writing to request that the Planning Commission deny the Coastal Development Permit
application (CDP 2020-0043) or add a condition to the resolution limiting the height of the
proposed buildings to thirty feet above existing grades which would normally be required for
any non-discretionary building permit.
The staff report states " ... five and a half to six and a half feet of fill will be required to raise the
pad elevation to install utilities and drainage facilities." This statement is untrue and
misleading. The site could easily be redesigned in a manner where the need for fill is limited
and the project is more consistent and compatible with adjacent properties.
The developer has stated the elevated pads are needed in order to adequately dispose of
sewage and to comply with stormwater regulations; I disagree. The utility and drainage
constraints are a result ofthe proposed design which creates horizon/ocean views and
maximizes the size of the flat yards and number of structures proposed .
Sewage
The elevation of the existing sewer main in Adams Street is at an elevation of approximately
77.3 feet, approximately 14 feet below the grade of the road. As noted in my email
correspondence to the developer, this depth would allow for a gravity sewer system to
adequately serve homes on pads that were much closer to existing elevations. If this depth
wasn't sufficient, the developer should request a variance from city's building official,
allowing sewer laterals to have a slope of 1% as permitted by the Uniform Plumbing Code.
The developer asked if the city would permit individual sewer pumps as part of the project's
preliminary review application, indicating they were not opposed to installing pumps if
needed.
When it was approved, the Planning Commission Staff Report for the Tamarack Five
Subdivision stated "The project also requires private sewer pumps in lieu of a gravity sewer
..... Gravity sewers would have necessitated raising the southern pad elevation 6' above
existing grade which would have negatively impacted adjacent properties."
As designed, this project will have negative impacts to adjacent property owners and should
not be approved. If after redesigning the project it is determined individual sewer pumps
are necessary for some of the buildings, the developer would be permitted install pumps. As
with the Tamarack Five Subdivision, pumps are commonly used when sewage cannot be
discharged via a gravity system.
Stormwater
In lieu of installing a gravity outlet pipe from the biofiltration basin, the developer could
install an individual pump to discharge runoff. Package pump stations are an efficient and
economic way of installing drainage systems where drainage by gravity is not possible.
As an alternative to significantly altering the existing grades of the property, stormwater
systems sufficient to support development of this parcel can be accomplished by redesigning
the project. For example, smaller individual basins within HOA maintained areas could be
created and strategically dispersed throughout the project. This might result in the loss of
one of the ADU's or some of the propose flat yard areas. However, consider that the project
as proposed exceeds the allowable density of the General Plan Land Use designation and, as
designed, is not compatible and does not integrate with existing uses.
Another solution for discharging stormwater could be securing an easement from an
adjacent or downstream property owner. In speaking with neighbors north and west of the
project, the developer made no attempt to look at this alternative design solution.
There is no need to create large elevated flat building pads to mitigate stormwater runoff or
to comply with stormwater regulations.
Drainage:
The Preliminary Hydrology Study overestimates the pre-development runoff, resulting in an
undersized detention basin for the proposed development. Rather than calculate the pre-
development time of concentration, the engineer chose to use a "minimum time per
SDDHM". The study also used the wrong acreage for the pre-development calculations. Had
the engineer used the appropriate acreage and calculated the time of concentration the
resulting pre-development U100 would have been shown as .81 CFS, not 1.60 CFS. Because
the pre-development runoff quantity was overestimated, the final design will need to
account for additional retention and mitigation.
In addition, the study states " ... once drainage passes through the adjacent wall {along the
westerly property line} via weepholes or local low spots, it continues .... " The weepholes in
the existing wall are not adequate to convey runoff coming from the proposed development.
They are a common feature in wall construction included to relieve backpressure on the
wall, they are not intended to convey runoff. The "local low spot" is the northwest corner
of the property. Runoff will pond between the existing wall and the proposed wall causing it
to be discharged in a concentrated fashion at the northwest corner of the property. This will
result in post-development flows that are inconsistent with pre-development. Additionally,
localized flooding, erosion, and deterioration of existing infrastructure will occur.
In December 2020 and January 2021 I requested the developer redesign the project and lower
the proposed building pads. The responses I received included "The existing topography
doesn't allow an appropriate flat pad for our homes including the detached part of the homes."
and "If we don't put the retaining walls in we would need to install a 2 to 1 slope and lose too
much yard and frankly the site becomes undevelopable from our perspective".
The responses clearly demonstrate that it is entirely possible to develop the property in a
manner more compatible with the surrounding and adjacent properties, however, they weren't
willing to consider any redesign. The project has been designed to maximize profit. Further,
they didn't take me up on my offer to meet with them, their design team and/or engineer to
discuss my concerns or thoughts on how the property could be developed with lower pad
elevations. I've included a portion our email correspondence as an attachment.
The proposed development does not take into consideration the natural topography of the site
and it is not compatible with with the existing grade of adjacent and surrounding properties.
Please deny the application for Coastal Development Permit No. CDP 2020-0043 as currently
designed thereby denying the request to construct homes that exceed the zoning height
restrictions.
Thank you for your consideration,
John Maashoff, P.E.
1075 Magnolia Ave.
Attachments
Tom St.Clair <tstclair@rincongrp.com>
To:corozam
Wed, Jan 6 at 12:29 PM
Appreciate your feedback.
If we don't put the retaining walls in we would need to install a 2 to 1 slope and lose too much yard and
frankly the site becomes undevelopable from our perspective. On a positive note, (if you live close by) we
build a great product and strongly feel this will make the entire surrounding area better and boost home
values in the area.
Thanks,
Tom St.Clair, Principal
Rincon Homes
m: 714.724.5647
rincon-homes.com
On Jan 5, 2021, at 9:45 AM, coroza m <cOroza@yahoo.com> wrote:
Tom,
Thanks for the prompt response, I appreciate it. I am opposed to the development as currently
designed.
In reviewing the plans it appears to me the following elevations exist:
Elevations of the existing topography on lots 3 and 4 is generally 81 -85 feet
Existing pad areas of lots 3 and 4 is generally 82-83 feet
The elevation of the existing sewer in Adams is 77.30 feet
The sewer lateral from the ADU's on lots 3&4 (furthest point away from connection) is approximately 225
lineal feet away from connection point. This means the elevation of the sewer (@2%) will be at an
elevation of 81.8 feet. Assuming a foot of cover on the lateral and adding another 6 inches to traverse the
ADU 's the pad elevations could be at an elevation of 82.3 feet.
I respectfully request you redesign the site such that the pads of lots 3 and 4 are lowered 5 feet,
eliminating the need for importing so much soil and construction of a 6 foot retaining wall along the
westerly property line.
In addition, although of lesser concern for me, is the site drainage. I haven't yet reviewed the drainage
study but the storm drain system appears to drastically alter pre-development site conditions.
I'm happy to meet with you, your team and/or engineer to discuss further. Thank you for considering my
request.
~L-
On Thursday, December 10, 2020, 09:21 :29 AM PST, Tom St.Clair <tstclair@rincongrp.com> wrote:
The existing topography doesn't allow an appropriate flat pad for our homes including the detached part
of the homes. Regardless, we still would need to raise at least a couple feet for sewer drainage for
appropriate fall. By the way, what was your name?
Thanks for your question.
Best,
Tom
On Thu , Dec 10, 2020 at 8:56 AM coroza m <cOroza@yahoo.com> wrote:
Yes, thanks for responding . I'm an adjacent owner and have concerns about the amount of fill being
brought in to the property and the proposed pad heights for the lots. In reviewing the plans the proposed
residences could gravity sewer to the main in Adams from the existing site elevations, I wondered why the
project is proposing to raise the existing grade of the property as much as is shown on the plans?
Thanks in advance.
On Monday, December 7, 2020, 05:00:25 PM PST, Tom St.Clair <tstclair@rincongrp.com> wrote:
Hello,
I understand you have some questions regarding 37 45 Adams?
Best,
Tom St.Clair, Principal
Rincon Homes
m: 714.724.5647
rincon-homes.com
The City of Carlsbad's Municipal Code (Code) section 21.10.050 limits the height of any building,
with a minimum roof pitch of 3:12, to thirty feet.
21.10.050 Buildin g height.
In the R-1 zone no building shall exceed a height of thirty feet and two stories if a
minimum roof pitch of 3:12 is provided or twenty-four feet and two stories if less than a
3:12 roof pitch is provided for lots under twenty thousand square feet. Single-family
residences on lots with a lot area of twenty thousand square feet or greater and within a
R-1 zone and specifying a -20 or greater area zoning symbol shall not exceed thirty-five
feet and three stories with a minimum roof pitch of 3:12 provided. {Ord. NS-718 § 7, 2004}
The Code elaborates on the requirement by stating:
"When non discretionary permits allow retaining walls, fill or other grading, which create a
finished grade higher in elevation than the grade that existed prior to the retaining wall,
fill, or grading, then building height shall be measured from existing grade. {Ord. CS-045 §
Ill, 2009; Ord. NS-675 § 1, 2003; Ord. NS-204 § 2, 1992; Ord. NS-180 § 3, 1991; Ord. 9667,
1983; Ord. 9498 § 1, 1978; Ord. 9141 § 1; Ord. 9060 § 212}"
The Code defines how a buildings height is to be measured from existing grade, or proposed
finished grade, whichever is lower:
21.04.065 Building height.
"Building height" is limited to the vertical distance measured from "existing grade"
(defined: Section 21.04.160) or "finished grade" (defined: Section 21.04.161), whichever is
lower, at all points along the "building coverage" (defined: 21.04.061) up to a warped
plane located at a height, above all points along the "building coverage, 11 that is equal to
the height limit of the underlying zone. All portions of the building shall be located at or
below the building height limit, except as provided below.
The Code allows for a building height to exceed the requirements listed above only if a
discretionary permit is approved showing finished grades higher than existing grades. The Code
requires that prior to approving a discretionary permit with finished grades higher than existing
grades, the approvers shall consider the existing topography and compatibility with
surrounding properties as noted below:
21.04.065 Building height
2. If a discretionary permit for a development or alteration of an existing development is
approved, and such approval includes a grading plan that shows a finished grade higher in
elevation than the existing grade, then building height may be measured from the
approved finished grade. In approving a finished grade through a discretionary permit
that is higher in elevation than the existing grade, consideration shall be given to the
natural topography of the site, compatibility with the existing grade of adjacent and
surrounding properties, and the need to comply with required access, utility and drainage
standards.
The proposed project should not be approved as designed. The development as designed does
not take into account existing topography and is not compatible with adjacent and surrounding
properties.
• The development as proposed is importing over 6,000 cubic yards of soil and creating
pad elevations that are 5.6 to 8.7 higher than the existing grades on the property
• The proposed pad elevations will be 3.5 to 6 feet higher than the adjacent properties to
the north and south.
• This project is proposing perimeter retaining walls of up to 4 feet in height to support
the proposed pad elevations. As proposed the project retaining walls and 2:1
manufactured are 4 to 7 feet above existing grade.
If the discretionary CDP permit is approved it will result in homes that are several feet higher
than would otherwise be permitted in the Rl zone. This will result in privacy issues as well as
reduce the amount of sunlight reaching my property. The proposed structure on a pad
elevated 6' above the existing grade will result in a reduction of 28 minutes of direct sunlight at
the southerly portion of my home.
e-w HAHM./ D 0.:i1:. lnn-ca1t-1v,1 ,., / /,,,•'· /\ ,,, ... ~ ' Master Bedroom will be in the shadow of the proposed structure an additional 28 minutes if allowed to build on a Pad with an elevation of 87.5 ~rlnt ro,1t11a Ht-Ip It. API Horr. tor Mn<H1f Pt..m<:1!ol!,n\\•llit~ aZ: ·a·· ,:.<ad D t'a1·.11111-C.ubb.~I 111111111
From:Steve Linke
To:Planning
Subject:9/1/2021 Planning Commission hearing Item 1: Adams Street Homes (revised)
Date:Friday, August 27, 2021 7:14:49 PM
Commissioner Sabellico alerted me to a California regulation that answered the questions in my
previous communication. Please retract that communication and distribute the following revised
version to the Planning Commission and read it into the record at the meeting:
I normally only comment on larger proposed developments that have bigger impacts on traffic.
However, the increasing frequency of conversions of single-family homes to multi-family dwellings
and the proliferation of accessory dwelling units (ADUs) are of concern. The current project
proposes four single-family homes, each with both a detached ADU and an attached junior ADU, for
a total of twelve dwelling units.
I am not opposed to these types of projects, but I feel they need to mitigate their traffic and parking
impacts to the extent possible. Treated individually, they would not have a large impact, but there
will be cumulative impacts as more and more of them are completed. Carlsbad’s traffic impact fee
program will be undergoing review to potentially add projects intended to reduce vehicle usage (and
vehicle miles traveled) to mitigate these types of impacts.
Although the future residents of the eight ADUs likely will use additional vehicles independent of
those in the four main dwelling units, State regulations (65852.2(f)(3)(A)) prevent traffic impact fees
from being charged for ADUs less than 750 square feet in area. However, a related State regulation
(65852.2(a)(1)(A)) allows cities to designate areas where ADUs may be permitted based on the
“adequacy of…traffic flow and public safety.”
I encourage the Planning Commission and City Council to explore the ability by ordinance to restrict
ADUs in areas where they will add traffic to extremely congested street facilities, such as those that
are failing the Growth Management Program vehicle performance standard, and to carefully
consider lot divisions.
Disclaimer: I am a member of the Traffic and Mobility Commission, but, because staff has chosen not
to include our commission in the review of traffic impacts for development projects, I am
commenting as an individual.
Best regards,
Steve Linke
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
August 27, 2021
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Ave
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: Proposed subdivision at 37 45 Adams Street
To whom it may concern:
I am the property owner of 3764 Adams Street and would like to voice my opposition to the
project as proposed. The project as proposed artificially elevates the building pads by importing
soil and creating building pads that are well above the existing and adjacent grades.
Every residential building's finished floor elevation, for properties accessing Adams Street from
the west between Tamarack and Palm Ave, is lower than Adams Street. Photographs of each
of these properties is included as an attachment for reference. The proposed project should be
held to the same standard and the project should not be allowed to exceed the building height
restrictions of the municipal code based solely on a discretionary action.
The development as proposed is not compatible with the adjacent and surrounding properties
and should not be approved as designed .
Thank you for your consideration,
Tony White
C: Planning Commissioners
Page 1 of 4
ECF D
AUG 2 7 2021
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANN!NG DIVISION
3659-3667 Adams -First floor of buildings ~g feet below Adams Street
3647-3651 Adams -First floor of buildings ~6 feet below Adams Street
Page 2 of 4
RECEf ED
AUG 2 7 2021
CITY OF CARLSBAD
P!_A~N 1NG D!V!S'GN
3043 Adams Street -Building ~5 feet below Adams Street
3725 Adams Street -Building ~4 _5 feet below Adams Street
Page 3 of 4 AUG 2 7 20?1
CITY OF CARL~BAO
P~A!\!~!!\!G !J!V1S!G'\l
3781 Adams Street -Building ~s feet below Adams Street
Page 4 of 4
RFCF'J !ED
AUG 2 7 2071
CITY OF CARLSBAD
P'._P, '\!1\.1 I l\!G !J!\/!S1C . I
From:coroza m
To:Planning; Jessica Evans
Subject:Sept 1 PC meeting - CDP 2020-0043
Date:Wednesday, September 1, 2021 8:44:13 AM
Attachments:PC letter.pdf
Jessica,
Could you please request the first 3 pages of the attached are read into the record at this evenings PCmeeting. If there is a time constraint, you can skip the sections under the Drainage section.
Thanks in advance.
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.