The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP 2018-0022; RESORT VIEW APARTMENTS; LEVEL 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS; 2019-06-01( ( Resort View Apartments Level 1 Traffic Impact Analysis SDP 2018~0022 HDP 2018~0006 ~City of Carlsbad· MAR 2 6 2019 ~lanning Division Prepared for: BNR Investment &:: Development, LLC 23800 Via Del Rio Yorba Linda, CA 92887 Prepared by: Marc Mizuta, PE, TE, PTOE MIZYI4 5694 Mission Center Road, #602~121 San Diego, CA 92108 June 2019 ( TABLE OF CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 STUDY AREA .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 ANALYSIS APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY .................................................................................... S 2.1 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................................................... 5 211 StreetTypology .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Pedestrian MMLOS ............................................................................................................. -........................................................................... 5 2.1.3 BicycleMMLOS ..... _________ ---------···················································6 3 PROJECT TRAFFIC .......................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ····························································································································· 7 4 NON-AUTO ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 MMLOS RESULTS ···············································································································································8 5 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................. 9 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1 Regional Vicinity Map ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 1-2 Project Area Map ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Figure 1-3 Site Plan ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1 Street Typology and Accommodated Modes ............................................................................................... 5 Table 2-2 MMLOS Thresholds .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Table 3-1 Project Trip Generation ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Table 4-1 MMLOS Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 8 APPENDICES Appendix A Scoping Agreement &: Comments on Draft Level 1 TIA Appendix B Excerpts from City of Carlsbad TIA Guidelines Appendix C MMLOS Worksheets&: Supporting Data Resort View Apartments Levell TIA MaZUTA I \ ( 1 INTRODUCTION This Level 1 traffic impact analysis (TIA) evaluates the traffic conditions associated with the proposed project (herein referred to as "the Project") located along Viejo Castilla Way in the City of Carlsbad. Figure l~l shows the location of the project within the San Diego region and Figure l~ 2 shows the project area. 1.1 Project Description The existing site is currently undeveloped and located on the west side of Viejo Castilla Way between Navarra Drive and Pirineos Way. The Project proposes to construct 26 apartment units located in five buildings on-site. Access to the project will be provided by two driveways located off of Viejo Castilla Way. The Project is estimated to be constructed by late 2019/early 2020. Figure l~ 3 illustrates the Project site plan. 1.2 Study Area This Level 1 TIA evaluates the City's multimodal level of service (MMLOS) methodology and guidelines for circulation element roadways. Although the fronting street of Viejo Castilla Way is not a circulation element roadway, this street is directly adjacent to the project site and provides a direct connection for pedestrians and bicyclists. A scoping agreement was prepared for the Project in accordance with the City of Carlsbad's Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated March 2018. Appendix A contains a copy of the scoping agreement prepared for the project and comments received on the draft Level 1 TIA. The following roadway segment is evaluated in this report: Roadway Segment Viejo Castilla Way between Navarra Drive and La Costa Avenue Resort View Apartments Level 1 TIA MIZUTA Fallbrook Pendleton Bonsall TRAFFIC CONSULTING Valley Center Pala-Pauma Ramona 61 Barona lakeside Alpine Crest-Dehesa Jamul Otay Tijuana. B.C., MEXICO Resort View Apartments Julian Figure},} Regional Vicinity Map M~ZUTA ----~ ---- Resort View Apartments TRAFFIC CONSULTING Project Site Segment for MMLOS Analysis Figure 1-2 Project Area Map Figure 1-3 Site Plan [Il> irl I-c~ I _:UILDING JJ> I 1~ : .fl~~~ @ RESORT VIEW APARTMENTS Re.t0tt Vkw Aparoncnu Level I TIA VIEJO CASTILLA WAY BUILDtNGC ✓✓✓/Drl """"""""""' I Ill ' ............................ r~~ l tt • I BUILOINGO I I ~ _.._ ............ ,,_ I ~I CCMUff'f' CMII ll'IIICI. Oft ---Tl'N,II.AWl.10/IT"IN.V _._ .... """""'""""' -v✓✓A> --·--···-•• 7✓✓/A II II ~---m-, ,., .. , I' I -----.... -~~z==~-= i J @ " =:"'..=-=---· 1l1L I ==r--a,~-~ .. l 1 IJJI LACOSTA a .. __ ,,_...,__ _,. "• ' GOLF COURSE '~i ~ I I @ n ..,_,., I ------------~---·,1 ® -~-Ii: --.. 18! ICIC&tOl<Jll"U"" ,,, =-·""°-t ~ BUILDING B .-i •• -~--Ii ---- ~~'=~~I I I ••i ---- =~-===:.-1\ ,,.1' ....... 0 ---~ :.=.-:.--• ,--,:· J ~ '"'~ I~_. 1----, ,.~ A,101 ..,_,,.,.. MaM~ 2 ANALYSIS APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY This section summarizes the analysis approach and methodology used to evaluate the study area associated with the Project. 2.1 Methodology 2.1.1 Street Typology As part of the City's Mobility Element, streets were classified into typologies and the typology of the roadway determines which modes of travel are subjected to the LOS D standard. The intent is to provide a balanced mobility system that emphasizes primary users as opposed to always providing ideal level of service for all modes on every facility. Table 2-1 summarizes the street typologies and the respective modes that need to be evaluated. Table 2-1 Street Typology and Accommodated Modes ',[Ill l I\ i''''ll!2_\ I \11[<1 I l\d,,t,1.111 I 1; 1, , , I, I I, lfl,fl Freeway • • Arterial Streets • • Identity Streets • • Village Streets • • Arterial Connector Streets • • • Neighborhood Connector Streets • • Employment/Transit Connector Streets • • • Coastal Streets • • School Streets • • Industrial Streets • • locaVNeighborhood Streets • • Source: City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated March 2018 The Viejo Castilla Way segment between Navarra Drive and La Costa Avenue is considered a local/neighborhood street. As a result, only pedestrian and bicycle MMLOS will be evaluated for these segments. 21.2 Pedestrian MMLOS The Pedestrian MMLOS criteria evaluates the quality of the pedestrian system ( e.g., number of travel lanes that need to be crossed and the speed of adjacent traffic), and the friendliness of the infrastructure at intersections ( e.g., pedestrian countdown heads, dedicated pedestrian phases [ scramble phase], curb extensions, refuge median). In addition, the connectivity and contiguity of the pedestrian system along street sections (particularly ADA-compliant connectivity/contiguity) is a critical component of pedestrian priority streets. Resort View Apartments Levell TlA 5 M~ZUTA ll;l•l#lilll•l41'111il@ 2.1.3 Bicyde MMLOS The Bicycle MMLOS criteria evaluates the quahty of the bicycle system ( e.g., bicycle routes, bicycle lanes, or bicycle pathway; presence of bicycle buffers from the vehicle travel way), the amenities of the system ( e.g., presence of bicycle parking), and the friendliness of the infrastructure ( e.g., bicycle detection at intersections, pavement conditions, presence of vehicle parking). In addition, the connectivity and contiguity of the bicycle system along street sections is a critical component of bicycle priority streets. Table 2, 2 summarizes the MMLOS thresholds for each non,auto travel mode. l'.11111 ...,, ,11 l 90-100 80-89 70-79 60-69 50-59 0 ,49 Source: City of Carlsbad, MMLOS Worksheet Table2,2 MMLOS Thresholds I I l h A B C D E F Appendix B contains excerpts from the City's Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines. Resort View Apartments Level 1 TIA 6 3 PROJECT TRAFFIC This section describes the estimated trip generation for the project. 3.1 Project Trip Generation Trip generation rates for the Project were developed utilizing rates contained in the SANDA G's Brief Guide of Vehicular Trip Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April 2002. Table 3-1 summarizes the weekday trip generation rates and calculations. Notes: du: dwelling unit Table 3-1 Project Trip Generation I. The trip rates are based on SANDA G's Brief Guide of Vehicular Trip Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April 2002. As shown in the table, the Project is estimated to generate 156 daily trips (ADT) with 13 trips (3 inbound, 10 outbound) during the AM peak hour and 15 trips (11 inbound, 4 outbound) in the PM peak-hour. Resort View Apartments Levell TIA 7 MnZUTA ll;l·llllli11411lllllld 4 NON-AUTOANALYSIS The City of Carlsbad requires multimodal level of service (MMLOS) evaluation for pedestrian, bicycle, and transit users of the pubhc roadway system. The Viejo Castilla Way segment falls under the street typology of Local/Neighborhood Street and as a result, only pedestrian and bicycle MMLOS is required. 4 .1 MMLOS Results Table 4-I displays the MMLOS results for the Viejo Castilla Way roadway segment. Viejo Castilla Way (Navarra Dr to La Costa Ave) Table4-l MMLOS Summary 85 B 70 C As shown in the table, the MMLOS along Viejo Castilla Way resulted in LOS B for pedestrians and LOS C for bicycles. Appendix C contains the detailed MMLOS worksheets and supporting data for the analysis. Resort View Apartments Level 1 TIA 8 MnZUTA ll;l·llllli•il@1dll41 5 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following list provides a summary of the key findings for the Project: • The Project proposes to construct 26 apartment units located in five buildings on-site. • The Project is forecasted to generate 156 daily trips (ADT) with 13 trips (3 inbound, 10 outbound) during the AM peak hour and 15 trips (11 inbound, 4 outbound) in the PM peak-hour. • The Viejo Castilla Way segment falls under the street typology of Local/Neighborhood Street, which only requires pedestrian and bicycle MMLOS. • The pedestrian MMLOS resulted in LOS B conditions, while the bicycle MMLOS resulted in LOS C conditions along Viejo Castilla Way between Navarra Drive and La Costa Avenue. Resort View Apartments Level I TIA 9 MIZUTA (-... Appendix A Scoping Agreement & Comments on Draft Level 1 TIA C ( c- SCOPING AGREEMENT FOR TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT This letter acknowledges the City of Carlsbad requirements for the Transportation Impact Analysis of the following project. The analysis must follow the latest City of carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines dated March 2018. Case No. SDP 2018-0022/HDP 2018-0006 Project Name: Resort View Apartments Project Location: Viejo Castilla Way Project Description: 26 apartment units located in 5 buildings Related Cases: SP No.: EIR No.: GPA No.: Consultant Developer Name: Mizuta Traffic Consulting BNR Investment & Development, LLC Address: 5694 Mission Center Rd #602-121 San Diego, CA 92108 Telephont 858-752-8212 A. Site Plan jAttach a legible 11 'Xl 7' copy) 23800 Via Del Rio Yorba Linda, CA 92887 714-692-9120 x4113 B. Trip Generation: (Attach o trip generation table. Describe phasing & trip reduction factors proposed) E)listing Land Use R-23, Residential 15-23 du/ac Proposed Land Use General Plan Lano Use/ Zor RD-M, Residential Density-Multiple Proposed Zoning E)listing Daily Trips n/a Forecast Daily Trips R-23, Residential 15-23 du/ac RD-M, Residential Density-Multiple 156ADT Trip Generation Source: SANDAG (Not So) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April 2002 Type of Transportation Impact Analysis Report Required Scenarios to be Studied for Auto LOS MMLOS Existing Cumulative Rectonal Travel LMFPl.evel lped,blke, Trip Generation Condition Conditions Horizon Vear Demand Model Analysis transit) Table Analysis Analysis Analysl, Run Required Iii Level I • • D Level II • • • • D l.P.VPI Ill • • • • D Level IV • • • • • • D Level V • • • • • D Level VI • • • • • • D Level VII • • • • • • D Level VIII • • • • • • • D TIA is not Needed for this Project Approved by City of Carlsbad Page 1 NOTE: If a TIA is determined to be unnecessary, the applicant does not need to complete page l of this scoping agreement. Page l of the scoping agreement shall be completed if a TIA is determined to be requried and shall be submitted by a Registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. C. Trip Distribution: (Provide exhibit for detailed trip distribution and assignment.) n/a D Select Zone (Model Series __ ) D Manual Distribution O. Study Area: Provide exhibit illustrating project study area for each mode, The project study area will identify any and all exempt facilities within the project study area. E. Cumulative Projects within Study Area (if applicable) n/a City to provide ist of cumulative projects for co11sideration. Cumulative project list will be attached to the scoping letter. F. Horizon Vear Data Source (if applicable) n/a Provide a description of the forecast methodology for Horizon Vear volumes inouding SANDAG model series and horizon year. G. Other Jurisdictional Impacts (if appllcablf n/a ts this project within any other Agency's Sphere of Influence or one-mile radius of boundaries? D Yes If so, name of Jurisdiction: H. Specific issues to be addressed In the Study (in addition to the standard analysis described in the Guidelines) (To be compteted by City of Carlsbad) Submitted by: Consultant's Representative Scoping Agreement Submitted on Scoping Agreement Resubmitted on Approved Scoping Agreement: City of carlsbad 12/10/18 Date Date Date Date Page 2 Notes: du: dwelling unit 1. The trip rates for the convenience market are based on SANDA G's Brief Guide of Vehicular Trip Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April 2002. 1 ~~;;;;;;;;;;;~v;;;;;;;;;;;~~~~;id ::;::;;;;;:::;;;;;:::;;;;;:::;;;;;:::;;;;;:::;;;;;:~,9 ~::~Vl~E~J07C~A:ST:l:L=LA=WA=Y ::;;~)!1= ' / ' •~ ~ ~ ' ~ L, i i' ,,~----w-----, , •EEt ====::-=3 ~ ! J ! I I []]1 [Th ~ ... I ... ----.._ t / I I ~ BUILDING C (t) THIIEE IWROOM WJT>1 THl!.EE LEI/ti.Ii Of lMNO OVl:R ONE t.EVEL Of PAAKINO. l099't' SPACE ON ENTRY LEVEL. TH"E.ELEVf:..SOFTVf'fV CON& TIU.IC TION OVER CONCUTE POOIUM r f M . w i____ BUILDING D (I) THREE BE.DROOM UNITS Ytf'TH THltE£ LEVEL& OF lMNO O\lf.R Of,1£ LEVEL OF PAAK"'°-. COMMUMJTV OYM SPACE ON OftOUHD FUXlfll. THREE LEVELS Of lVPE I/ CONSTIUIC~ OVEII CONCRETE. POOIUM Ii L _ --~--------1:} -------------m--. I l"flO,JET~ CUBIT DftAWINGUT M I RESORT VIEW APARTMENTS IIIEJOCA81'llAW,.Y i CAALl!AD,CACID MR DEVELOPMENT PRE.OE.SIGH ~ ~ BUILDING A (3) Tl-UliEE BEDROOM TOINNl10USEI. EACH HAS PAIIKIMO AHO IEDIIOOM WfTH TWO LEVEi.a OF I.NINO AIOVt. &£PAA.ATE JlOOF'TOP Dt:C)( FOR EACH UNIT. w BUILDING B 13) niltEE IEOf!:OOM TCJ'MilHOUIEI. EACH HM PAltl<ING ANO 8£0ROOM 'nffH TWO LEVELS OP' LNING AIOV£. $EPAAATE ROOFTOP 0(0( FOR EACH UNIT. -----I --· ~--b --- ~I @ LACOSTA GOLF COURSE @ 192_ ......... ,.,oet-1,: 111t . M"1tt• 0 ~~ --~-I~ • • ~tan _...__ I --, 1WZ2/101t DIICAET!OfWt'f t:30"19PU RM!W I I SITE NOTES •. ~NOJUn.~~~~,tJlf.t«:11 1. 8Ql.lD.C.Ol\liU10N,~A.tCl ClflACNllDl'CU.CW'ilO.IIA~.ITATIO .. aa:ll.ox:Al..ltlPIOllf"°""'fl:~/JIC,l'r ~,IC.CMffll.-&.•.»10. l. .t.U.111:"0IIADIDac.o-.&.NlrlOnllP'Gt _,oo -'oM\l'l"ll0til ----••--•--•-•-CIONaT OCNlleNCl!Sft~WOl'IKI.INTI.AU. l)K;~NQC0NOfl'IDN9M,JIVf:IBtl ~l"l'MCMTICT. ._ .W.-«>a..uL•4"N:t!ONl!fl911,UAIII, IIICTl'\'MCKl"ICT a,. ~CIII IMCE1!.ICZID"'9G_,...._ 11. .t.U.8CIUD0MJWlll.....,av.l.l.Kit,V'llo .....,.,.ILCN.0#2'~~ """' IJ. ... OIIIANAOl~Wt.Yf'IIIOIIIIM.DNll'OII A~caT.oHCl!~W,AL"""""lWB.Y .~!«'..'!'~0#1"6~-LOCA.TED IITEUOEND @ '0 arre PLAN UX#1110NOIIITLIT'Y ~""'C:W,111--- A-101 Iii Ii 1~1·1tll! s liln I ii i ~~ I ~ ~i ~ I h I ! I: 6 m .. , I ii lo 11cnY201t • 'HViiioN'DA.Ti' RE\l'ISIOtilDATH Project Site Segments for MMLOS Analysis M~ZUTA --------- TRAFFIC CONSULTING Resort Yiew Apartments Project Study Map ..,....,,.. IIIM ---.... --• 0.41 ""'~ l..♦)41 -· ...... la, ■~Jl SOP 2018-0022/HDP 2018-0006 (DEV2017-0225) -RESORT VIEW APARTMENTS April 24. 2019 Pa e 3 LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION Planning: 1. Per the application submittal requirements as specified in the Development Permits P-2 hahdout, please provide the following information on the site plan: a. Approximate location of existing and proposed buildings, walls, fences, major vegetation, and permanent structures (adjacent properties included). Please show the entire adjacent property. 2. City Council Policy No. 84, Development Project Public Involvement Policy: Please be advised that you are required to send a public notice to the surrounding property owners (600-foot radius) withi.n 30 days of submittal of the development application. Please see the hyperlink below for additional instructions and details on the content of the notice. In addition, you are required to post an early public notice sign on the property consistent the policy. Staff will provide you with the appropriate verbiage for the notice. 3. Show building height on all elevations from the existing grade or finished grade, whichever is lower as described in Carlsbad Municipal Code {CMC) Section 21.04.065. Given the site's topography, please provide adequate cross sections to show the worst-case areas of the project. The sections shall include the existing grade and proposed grade. Please how height on all sections and elevations. 4. Please address staff red line comments on the Technical Studies. 5. Prior to planning commission hearing, please provide a color and materials board. Engineering: 1. 2. 3. The proposed infiltration BMPs, Maxwell IV Dry Wells, require comprehensive deep soil (to about 50 feet deep) infiltration rate evaluation at BMP locations using approved infiltration rate assessment methods provided in Appendix D of the BMP Manual. Submit the required infiltration rate study that indicates deep infiltration BMP feasibility and provides design recommendations for the proposed BMP. Ensure that there is adequate vertical separation between the BMP bottom and the water table at BMP locations. Provide a letter from Maxwell IV manufacturer confirming that their product wilt work at this location. The revised SWQMP dated March 5, 2019 is considered incomplete. Provide Maxwell IV Ory Well sizing calculations using actual deep soil infiltration rate results from a comprehensive deep soil infiltration rate study requested above. "'" Appendix B Excerpts from City of Carlsbad TIA Guidelines C C ("city of TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES Carlsbad __ ;_______:_:_;___;____:..::....:....:.::.___;___::_=_::__::_::_.::.___..,;__ ___________ c • I If or n 1 • --~ # .,, • ,,, ~ ___ ;.,,.i .#-.. _,~-- / -:,.,.--' ,..,.- Figure 1: MMLOS Required Analysis by Mobility Element Roadway April 2018 ~"'i • ,ell!'''~ . ,.f 11 I Page n n TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES Table 1: Types of Transportation Impact Analysis Report Required & Elements to be Included Land Use Conforms to Approved Specific Plan or Master Plan Conforms to General Plan or Zoning Does not Conform to General Plan or Zoning Forecast Project Generated Auto Trips f---------------~ ------~--- <500 ADT 500 to 1,000 ADT I 1,000 to 2,400 ADT or or or <SO peak hour trips SO to 100 peak hour trips 100 to 200 peak hour trips Level I Level I Level Ill Level V Level II Level IV Level VI >2,400 ADT or >200 peak hour trips Level VII Level VIII Scenarios to be Evaluated Trip Regional MMLOS Trip Distribution & Signalized Unsignalized Existing Cumulative Horizon Travel (ped, bike, Study Area Generation Assignment Intersection Intersection Conditions Conditions Year Demand transit) Map Table Figure Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis Model Run nr \ tcityof Carlsbad c d / i f o r n I a LFMP Specific TIA a:~ ~-:--~ ~~i !_: : ~··· ·· : : :. ~~ _: =.-L =t·--t_:_--_-___, levelV • -a,-• • i • • • • • LevelVI • ---• ----• -i-• • • • • • I • level VII • • i • I • • • • • • • ______ _ Note: All TIA's will require MMLOS Analysis. The modes evaluated for each study will be determined by street typology and project location, not total vehicular trips. Refer to Section 3.2 for additional information. March2018 13 I Page C Cityof __ T_R_AN_S_P_O_R_TA_T_I_O_N_IM_PA_CT_A_N_A_LY_S_IS_G_U_I_D_EL_IN_E_S ______________ Carlsbad Callf o tn,a STREr:t TYPOlOGV AND ACCOMMODAT D MOO£! ACCOMMODATED SUIJECJ STREET TYPOLOGY DESCRIPTION AND PREFERRED AMIBUlE.S MODES TO MMLOS STANDARD {Y/Nl Freeways iii:; y -------r--- r.;iiiiiiiil y Arterlal Streets y ,. • High-speed facilities ct.signed t.o acmmmodate vehicles and buas moving through the city and region • Bicycles and pedestrians are prohibited • These are the primary vehicle routes through the dty for both local and regional whide trips. • Designed to safely move all modes of trav.l while efficiently moving vehicles and buses throughout the city. • Traffic signals shall be coordinated to optimize veflfde movements • Bicycle lanes shall be provided and can be further enhana!d or complemented by other facilities or off➔treet pathways • Pedestrian facilities to be provided consistent witt'I ADA requirements 1--------+-------1 • Mid-block croalngs should not be provided y Identity Streets ,. y V r.iiiiiiiiiiiii Apri/2018 • On-street parking should be prohibited along these corridors • Vertical traffic calming techniques (such as speed tables, humps, ea:.) should not be considered • Special consideratioM can be considered on arterials witt'lin pn,ximlty to schools to enhance Safe Routes to Schools for pedestrians and blcydlsts. • These streets provide the primary acc11SS to and from the hNrt of the city • the Village • Designed to safely move all modes of tr8'lef while enhancing mobility for pedenrians and blcyclists • Vehicle speeds should be managed to promote safe pedestrian and bleyde m~ent • No pedestrian shall cn:111 more than five vehicular travel and/or turn lanes • In addition to ADA compliant ramps and sict.walla, sidewalks should support the ad.la· cent land uses as follows: -Adjacent to retail uses, modified~ sidewalks should generally be • minimum of 10 feet {12 feet preferred) in width where fusible and taking into considerlJtlon the traffic volumes of the adjac.nt roadway, and allow for the land use to utilln the sidewalk wlth outdoor 1Nting and other activities -Adjacent to residential uses, modified/new sidewalks should be a minimum of six feet In width 'Elsewhere, modtft~ sidewalks should be a minimum of eight feet In width • Where feasible, bic:yde lanes should be provided • Vehide spNds should comphtment the adjacent land uses • Bicycle parking should be provided in retell areas • Bike racks should be rudlly provided within the public right-of-way and ena,uraged on private property · • Traffic calming devices, such as curb extensions (bulbouts) or enhanced pedestrian crossings should be considered and IY■luated for implementation • Street furniture shall be orientad toward the busil'IISMI • Mld-block pedestrian crossings could be provided at appropriate loc:atiom (e.g. where sight dlstana, is adequate and speed$ are appropriata) • On-street vehlde parking should be provided. In areas with high parking demand, in- novative parking management techniques should be implemented / considered • Pedestrians should typically be •buffered• from vehicle tnrfflc using landscaping or parbd vehicles 25 I Page C Cityof __ T_RA_N_S_P_O_R_TA_T_IO_N_IM_PA_Cf_A_N_A_LY_S_IS_G_U_I_D_EL_IN_E_S ______________ Carlsbad California STREET TYPOLOGY AND ACCOMMODATED MODtS ACCOMMO m, I SUBJECT STREET TYPOlOGY DESCIIIPTlON AND PREFERRED ATTIJIUTES MODES TO MMLOS STANDARD (YIN) VIiiage Streets N • Primary purpoN ls to move people throughout the Village; providing acte11 to busi- nesses, residences, transit and recreation within the Village am. • Designed to sat.ly mow all modes of travel while enhancing mobility for pedatrlans and bicyclists. • Vehicle speeds should be managed to promote safw pedestrian and bicycle mOftment • Promote pedestrian and bicycle connectivity through short block lengths -------+---1----· • Blc:yde lanes should be provided • Bkyde boulwards un be comid•red N Artslal Connector Streets y -----l-y I y I ----t--N Neighborhood Connector Street N -I- --- • Pedestrians should be accommodated on sidewalks adjacent to the trllW!I way (mini- mum .5' wide sidewalk) • Mid-block pedestrian crossings and traffic calming devices should be mnsldered, but only at locations with high pedestrian activity levels or mljor destlnatlonslattractlons • On-ttreet parking may be provided • Primary purpose is to connect people to different arHS and land uses of the city by con-I netting to/from an.rial streets • O.ignld to Mf91y move all modn of trav11I whii. enhancing mobility for pedesvians and bicyclists and .tflcl1ntly moving whides between art.rial strHts. • Bicycle lanes should be provided • Pedestrians should be 1CC01T1modated on sidewalks adjacent to the trawl way (mini- mum 5' wide sidewalk) • Mid-block pedestrian crossings and traffic ulming devices should be mnsidered. but only at loc:ations with high pedestrian activity lewis or mator destlnlltionsllttractlons • On-strHt parking may be provict.d • Primary purpose is to connect people to dttter.nt neighborhoods and land usa of the dty • Designed to safely move all modes of travel while enhandng mobility for pedestrians and bicyclists. • Vehicle speeds should be managed to promote safe pedestrian and bicycle movement • Bkyde lanes should be provided y • Bicycle boulevards can be considered N Apri/2018 • Pedestrians should be acc:ommod.ted on sidewalks adjacent to the travel way (mini- mum 5' wide sidewalk) • Mid-block pedestrian crossings and traffic calming devices should be a>nsidered, but only at locations with high pedestrian activity levels or major destlnlltlonslattractlons • On-ffl'Nt parking may be provided 26 I Page {:Cityof __ T_RA_N_S_P_O_RT_A_T_IO_N_I_M_P_A_CT_A_N_A_L_YS_IS_G_U_I_D_EL_IN_E_S ______________ Caflsbad California SfREET TYPOLOGY AND ACCOMMODATED MDOES ACCOMMODATED SUBJECT STREET TYPOLOGY DESCRIPTION AND PREFERRED ATTRIBUTES MOl>ES TO MMLOS STANDARD (Y/NJ Employment/Tl'llnsit Connector Streets I l Coastal Streets ---- N • Primuy purpose is to connect people to ind from the employment 1reu of the dty, 11 ' y '( N f y well a Important desti111tlons and m1jor transit facilities. • Designed 1X> safely move all modes of travel while enhancing mobility for pedestrians and bkydlsts and efficiently moving buses 1X> employment. transit stations ■nd maJor destinations. • Vehicle speeds should be m1n1ged to promote sat. pedestrian and bicycle movement • Direct ronnections to bus stops should be provided • Enhanced bus stops should be considered that include shel1lerl, benches, and lighting • Bicycle lanes end sidewalks should be provided • Pedestri1n crossing distances should be minimized • On-street partclng may be provided -------- • Prim1ry purpose is to move people 1long the dty's OCNn waterfront and connect people to the bN.ch, recrution, businaRS and residenan in d011 proximity to the waterfront. The street terws as I destination for people who seek to drive, wait ind bicycle along the OClHn w1terfront. • Designed 1X> safely move all modes of travel while enhancing mobility for pedestrians and bicyclists. • Vehicle speeds shall be managed to support uses 1long the coast • Enhanced bicycle and pedestrian crossings should be provided, including: -High visibility aoaMllks -Enhanced pedestrian notifications (e.g. responlive push-button devic:e5) -Enhanced bkyde detection -Blcyde lanes shall be provided ind can be furth« l'l'lhanced or tomplement.d by other facilitift (5Uch 15 bicycl• lane butt.n or off-strNt pattiw.ys) • Pedestrl1n facilities should be • minimum of five feet ind shall strive for six to eight feet In width ind shall conform to ADA requirements i---------.----,.----4 • Pedestrian crouing dist.Inca should be minimized • Trail facilities should be encour1ged • Opportunities for mid-block pedestrian crossings should be lnwsdg1ted • On-street pertclng should be provided • Transit facility ind operation imprOV'lfflenb should_be_e_nmu~_rag...::;_ed _______ _, April 2018 27 I Page ) Catyof __ T_RA_N_S_P_O_R_TA_T_I_O_N_IM_PA_CT_A_N_A_L_YS_IS_G_U_I_D_EL_I_N_ES ______________ Carlsbad Ca l t t o,nla STREET TYPOLOGY AND ACCOMMODATED MODES ACCOMMODATED MODES SUBJECT STREET TYPOLOGY DESCRIPTION ANO PRE.FERRED ATTRIBUfES TOMMLOS 5TANDAAD (YIN} School Streets N y '( H Industrial Streets ---y • Prirn11ry purpose Is to connect people to schools from nNrby residential neighbor• hoods. • Designed to .-fely l'IICMI 111 modes of travel with an emphasis on providing safe pedes- trlen end bicycle acceu for students traveling to and from neatby schools. • Vehicle 1Pff(b shill be m-ged to tupport school UMK (typically 25 MPH) • Enhanced bicycle ■nd pedestrian croulngs should be provided, induding: -High vislbillty crouwalks -Enhanced pedestrian notlflc.■tions {e.g. responsive push-button devl<2S) -Enhanced blcyde detection -Blcyde lanes shall be provided and can be further enhanced or complemented by other fadlitle, or off-street pathways • Pedestrian fadlltles should be I minimum of till feet and shall strive for eight feet in width and thall conform to ADA requirements • Pedestrllln crossing dlsunces should be minimized • Opportunities for mid-block pedestrian crossings should be lnwstlgated • Traffic calmlng dwlces that Improve service lwels and Hf.ty for 1)9dntrilns and bky- cllsts should be considered • Prifflllry purpose is to connect people to buslntlSMI within the city's industrial parks. -~ • Designed to safely move 111 modes oftrewl while effldently mOYing vehldes and bU5eS --1---------1 from 1rterlal streeb and employment/trW1Stt connector streets to buslneste1. N N r: ' ----y Local/NefGhborhood Street -N ., --., - • Tl'afflc calmlng devices ant generally dismura91(1 gtwn the propentlty for la111er trudcs and heevy whides in this area • On-street parking may be provided u long •s lt does not Interfere with the turning radii of hNVY vehitles. • Pril'l'lllry purpose is to connect people to •nd through residential neighborhoods and loul •us af the dty. • Designed to safely move 111 modes of trawl while enhancing mobility for pedettri1n1 end blcydlsts . • Vehicle speed• should be l'l'lllnaged to promote safe pedfflrlan •nd blcyde m0119ment • Pedestrians should be accommodated on • sidewalk or soft surface trall (such u de• a,mposad granite) unless those fadlltles are Inconsistent with the existing daslrable neighborhood dwlracter • Bkydes ain be 1a:omrnodawd with e bicycle lane or route lf whlde YOIUITll5 ind/or speeds necauit.llw; otherwise bicycles can 5har• th• stre.t ~-------4-------l • Blc:yde boulevards can be considered April 2018 • Traffic calmlng fflNSUffl should be comldered when supported by the neighborhood or when warranted for safety l'NSOns • On-stre@t parking should be considered 28 I Page C AppendixC MMLOS Worksheets & Supporting Data C C ROADWAY INFO Viejo Castilla Way La Costa Ave Local/Neighborhood Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width In Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement Is 4'): 5 5 • Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., Yes Yes cross-slope and trip hazards)? • Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA Yes Yes requirements? Yes Yes 25 mph or lower 25 mph or lower 1 1 0 be aossed without pedestrl No No in count) bu~er between pedestrian O'to 2' O' to 2' acillty and vehicle travel wa : Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more Yes Yes buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? ny apparent sight di No No No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing No No width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-tum median island)? Do crosswalks appear to be high vislblllty? No No Are there Intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown No No heads)? Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at No No street crossings? No No rb No No st No No or Do the street No No than 50% . ......,. • Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)? • Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? • Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Is on-street parking provided? Speed limit (miles per hour -mph): Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at Intersections? Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? Bicycle Facility Provided: EI LOS Yes Yes Yes arall r 25 mph or lower Side Street Only No No SB SCORE I LOS 70 IC Yes Yes Yes 2 Side Street Only No No Day: Th ursday Date: 5/30/2019 Prepared by National Data & 5urveying Services VOLUME Viejo Castilla Way Bet. Navarra Dr & La Costa Ave City: Carlsbad Project#: CA19_1117 _001 DAILY TOTALS 1---*1- AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL 00:00 4 1 5 12:00 18 13 31 00:15 7 2 9 12:15 17 18 35 00:30 s 1 6 12:30 19 10 29 00:45 1 17 2 6 3 23 12:45 10 64 23 64 33 128 01:00 2 1 3 13:00 19 10 29 01:15 1 0 1 13:15 13 16 29 01:30 2 2 4 13:30 11 16 27 01:45 0 s 8 11 8 16 13:45 13 56 25 67 38 123 02:00 1 1 2 14:00 15 19 34 02:15 1 0 1 14:15 22 20 42 02:30 1 1 2 14:30 33 15 48 02:45 0 3 1 3 1 6 14:45 23 93 16 70 39 163 03:00 1 1 2 15:00 25 19 44 03:15 0 2 2 15:15 26 12 38 03:30 2 1 3 15:30 23 17 40 03:45 0 3 0 4 0 7 15:45 29 103 21 69 so 172 04:00 0 1 1 16:00 18 26 44 04:15 0 1 1 16:15 30 16 46 04:30 0 s s 16:30 28 14 42 04:45 0 4 11 4 11 16:45 38 114 17 73 55 187 05:00 2 1 3 17:00 34 24 58 05:15 4 13 17 17:15 33 19 52 05:30 3 14 17 17:30 37 16 53 05:45 2 11 9 37 11 48 17:45 26 130 16 75 42 205 06:00 4 16 20 18:00 37 21 58 06:15 2 10 12 18:15 41 16 57 06:30 3 21 24 18:30 37 17 54 06:45 3 12 25 72 28 84 18:45 31 146 19 73 so 219 07:00 5 31 36 19:00 30 19 49 07:15 4 36 40 19:15 22 18 40 07:30 6 38 44 19:30 21 6 27 07:45 14 29 36 141 50 170 19:45 21 94 8 51 29 145 08:00 12 27 39 20:00 23 12 35 08:15 7 37 44 20:15 21 8 29 08:30 10 26 36 20:30 24 11 35 08:45 s 34 27 117 32 151 20:45 20 88 8 39 28 127 09:00 11 17 28 21:00 18 10 28 09:15 9 22 31 21:15 20 10 30 09:30 11 20 31 21:30 10 8 18 09:45 14 45 22 81 36 126 21:45 17 65 s 33 22 98 10:00 14 16 30 22:00 11 s 16 10:15 15 25 40 22:15 s 1 6 10:30 11 20 31 22:30 7 1 8 10:45 18 58 26 87 44 145 22:45 8 31 2 9 10 40 11:00 15 14 29 23:00 7 1 8 11:15 11 15 26 23:15 5 1 6 11:30 19 26 45 23:30 2 1 3 11:45 13 58 20 75 33 133 23:45 6 20 1 4 7 24 TOTALS 275 645 920 TOTALS 1004 627 1631 SPLIT " 29.9% 70.1% 36.l " SPLIT" 61.6% 38.4% 63.9" DAILY TOTALS 1---*1- AM Peak Hour 11:30 07:00 07:30 PM Peak Hour 18:00 13:30 18:GO AM Pk Volume 67 141 1n PM Pk Volume 146 80 219 Pk Hr Factor 0.882 0.928 0.885 Pk Hr Factor 0.890 0.800 0.944 7 -9Volume 63 258 321 4-&Volume 244 148 392 7 • 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:30 4 • 6 Peak Hour 16:45 16:45 16:45 7 • 9 Pk Volume 43 141 in 4 -6 Pk Volume 142 76 218 Pk Hr Factor 0.768 0.928 0.885 Pk Hr Factor 0.934 0.792 0.940