The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSP 211C; HME CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS; GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS TECHNICAL REPORT; 2016-02-011 High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report February 2016 Prepared for: H.M. Electronics Inc. 1411 0 Stowe Dr. Poway, CA 92064 HELIX Environmental Planning Prepared by: HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 El Cajon Boulevard, Suite 200 La Mesa, CA 91942 .. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project Prepared for: H.M. Electronics Inc. 14110 Stowe Drive Poway, CA 92064 Prepared by: HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 El Cajon Boulevard La Mesa, CA 91942 February 2016 > TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page ES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of the Report .............................................................................................. 1 1.2 Project Location and Description ............................................................................ 1 1.3 Regulatory Requirements and Project Design Features That Reduce GHG Emissions ................................................................................................................ 1 1.3.1 Regulatory Requirements .............................................................................. 1 1.3.2 Project Design Features ................................................................................ 2 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ................................................................................. 3 2.1 Climate Change Overview ...................................................................................... 3 2.2 Greenhouse Gases ................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Regulatory Framework ............................................................................................ 5 2.3.1 Federal. .......................................................................................................... 5 2.3.2 State ............................................................................................................... 6 2.3.3 Local ............................................................................................................. 9 3.0 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE AND METHODOLOGY .......................... 11 3.1 Significance Criteria .............................................................................................. 11 3.2 Methodology and Assumptions ............................................................................. 11 4.0 PROJECT IMP ACTS ................................................................................................ 14 4.1 Direct and Indirect Emissions of Greenhouse Gases ............................................ 14 4.1.1 Business as Usual Emissions ...................................................................... 14 4.1.2 Project Emissions with GHG-Reducing Design Features .......................... 17 4.1.3 Comparison of Project and Business As Usual GHG Emissions ............... 20 4.2 Consistency With Local Plans Adopted for the Purpose of Reducing GHG Emissions .............................................................................................................. 21 5.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ....................................................................................... 22 6.0 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... 23 7.0 LIST OF PREPARERS ............................................................................................. 25 .. TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) LIST OF APPENDICES A CalEEMod Emission Calculations B Emission Reduction Adjustments for High-Tech Industrial Project LIST OF FIGURES Follows Page 1 Regional Location Map ....................................................................................................... 2 2 Project Vicinity Map (Aerial Photograph) .......................................................................... 2 3 Site Plan ............................................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF TABLES No. Title 1 Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes .................................................... 5 2 Construction Phases and Equipment ................................................................................. 14 3 Estimated Construction Emissions .................................................................................... 15 4 Estimated Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................. 17 5 Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions from State Measures ......................... 19 6 Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions from Project Design Features ........... 19 7 Estimated Annual Greenhouse Gas Emission ................................................................... 20 8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Determination ....................................................................... 21 ii AB ADT AEP BAU CAA CAFE CAP CARB CalEEMod CALGreen CAPCOA CBSC CCR CEC CEQA CFCs C2F6 CF4 CH4 City co CO2 CO2e EO op GHG GWP HFCs HVAC IPCC LCFS MMT mpg MPOs MT LIST OF ACRONYMS Assembly Bill average daily trip Association of Environmental Professionals business as usual Clean Air Act Corporate Average Fuel Economy Climate Action Plan California Air Resources Board California Emission Estimator Model California Green Building Standards Code California Air Pollution Control Officers Association California Building Standards Commission California Code of Regulations California Energy Commission California Environmental Quality Act chlorofluorocarbons Hexafluoroethane Tetraflouromethane methane City of Carlsbad carbon monoxide carbon dioxide CO2-equivalent Executive Order Fahrenheit greenhouse gas Global Warming Potential hydro fluorocarbons heating, ventiliation and air conditioning United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Low Carbon Fuel Standard million metric tons miles per gallon Metropolitan Planning Organizations metric tons iii NASA NHTSA NOAA· NOx N20 PFCs PI ppm Project RTP RPS SANDAG SB SCAQMD scs SF6 USEPA VMT voe LIST OF ACRONYMS (cont.) National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Highway Traffic Safety Administration National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration nitrogen oxides nitrous oxide perfluorocarbons planned industrial parts per million High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project Regional Transportation Plan Renewables Portfolio Standard San Diego Association of Governments Senate Bill South Coast Air Quality Management District Sustainable Communities Strategy sulfur hexaflouride U.S. Environmental Protection Agency vehicle miles traveled volatile organic compounds iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report evaluates the potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emission impacts associated with the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project ("Project" or "Proposed Project"). An assessment was made to estimate the total GHG emissions that would be emitted as a result of construction and operation of the Proposed Project. Construction sources of GHG emissions include heavy construction equipment, worker Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), and water use. Operational sources of GHG emissions sources include energy, transportation, water use, and solid waste. In their Climate Action Plan (CAP), the City of Carlsbad (City) established a 900 metric ton (MT) of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) per year screening threshold for determining significant impacts. Should a project exceed this threshold, it must demonstrate consistency with the CAP. CAP consistency is determined by comparing the Project's GHG emissions as proposed to the Project's GHG emissions if it were built using a Business-as-Usual (BAU) approach in terms of design, methodology, and technology. If the difference between the Project's emissions as proposed and the Project's emissions under the BAU scenario achieves the goal set by the City as published in the CAP, then the Project can be determined to be consistent with the CAP. According to the CAP, the 2020 reduction goal is 34.57 percent. The Project would be required to comply with the 2013 Title 24 Energy Code; AB 75, which requires 50 percent diversion of on-going operational waste through reuse and recycling; and the 2013 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen), which requires 50 percent diversion of on-site construction waste and reduction of potable water use and wastewater generation by 20 percent. The Project-related construction act1v1t1es are estimated to generate approximately 401 MT CO2e. Construction emissions are amortized over 30 years, such that the proposed construction activities would contribute an average of 13 MT per year of CO2e emissions. The Project-related operational and amortized construction GHG emissions are estimated to generate a total of approximately 2,347 MT CO2e per year. The Project's required compliance with state regulations, combined with Project features, would reduce the emissions by 37.38 percent, from 2,347 to 1,470 MT CO2e per year. The Proposed Project is consistent with the goals of the CAP and would not conflict with a statewide GHG plan. Thus, with the statewide and Project design measures identified in this report, it is expected that cumulative impacts with respect to Project-related GHG emissions would be less than significant. HELIX Envlronmenta/Planning------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 ES-I THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK HELIX EnvlronmenllllPlanni1111----------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 ES-2 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of the Report This report analyzes potential greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts associated with the proposed High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project (Proposed Project or Project), which includes an evaluation of existing conditions in the Project vicinity, an assessment of potential impacts associated with Project construction, and an evaluation of Project operational impacts. 1.2 Proiect Location and Description The Project site is located on Lots 18 and 19 of Whiptail Loop in Carlsbad, California (see Figure 1, Regional Location Map, and Figure 2, Project Vicinity Map [Aerial Photograph]). The Project site is currently vacant and is 9.31 acres in area. The Project proposes the construction of a 136,627 square foot 2-story, 37 foot tall tilt up concrete building with combined office, manufacturing, and warehouse uses. The Project includes a 108,381 square foot building footprint, 142,536 square feet of landscaping, and 154,421 square feet of paving to include 427 parking spaces (see Figure 3, Site Plan). The type of development is industrial. The City of Carlsbad zoning and General Plan designation for the site and general area is Planned Industrial (Pl). 1.3 Regulatory Requirements and Proiect Design Features That Reduce GHG Emissions 1.3.1 Regulatory Requirements Energy Efficiencies • The Project would be designed to meet current Title 24 energy-efficiency standards. In accordance with the requirements of 2013 Title 24, the Project would: o Install ceiling, attic, and wall insulation, o Install window glazing, o Have the installation of all heating ventilation and air condition (HV AC) units verified by a third party, and o Include roof anchors and pre-wiring to allow for the installation of photovoltaic systems. Water Conservation • In accordance with 2013 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) mandatory measures, the Project would: o Reduce potable water use by 20 percent, o Install low-flow water fixtures, o Reduce wastewater generation by 20 percent, o Install low-flow bathroom fixtures, and o Install weather-based smart irrigation control systems. HELIX EnvlronmentalPlanning------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 Solid Waste Reduction • In accordance with Assembly Bill (AB) 75, at least 50 percent of operational waste would be diverted from landfills through reuse and recycling. • The Project would provide areas for storage and collection of recyclables and yard waste in accordance with 2013 CAL Green. 1.3.2 Project Design Features The Project would include sustainability and efficiency features. These include, but are not limited to, the following: • Include 22 short-term and 22 long-term bicycle parking spaces, • Include preferential parking for clean air vehicles, and • No natural gas consumption. HELIX Environmenta/Plamill!I------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 ' COUNTY II RIVERSIDE ORANGE J SAN DIEGO l COUNTY COUNTY '··....:. ,,.· ...... ··-·· ......... I O'Nei/1 lakej_ Pacific Ocean / ,-r- Loveland Reservoir La Mesa eJ ""/ .r lemon Grove ----~wee/waler 4fl'4Reservoir :/ Otay Reservoir ® f ~ ".r,, ;, ,_ ;.. , S , ■---· U'NtTED STATE •-•-•-•-•--■-•-•--·-·-MEXICO ~ Regional Location Map HIGH-TECH CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS HELIX ~N o~ ... ============::::8 ~ Mi les Figure 1 Environment;,/ Planning _.__. _____________________________________________ ..,. __ _ Project Vicinity (Aerial Photograph) HIGH-TECH CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS HELIX /A 0;:::======::j2 ' 0i~., Figure 2 Environmental Planning ---------------------------------------------- 0 z ] g ~ ~I 'a, ~ I l ~ 9 ----/ ----------------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I / / I VACANT LAND i'----•~oo.:::'...-o-__ ;_.-' I I I I I I I I \ ~ \ ING -----'k,,--1 --~ ~ N W -----~--------- EXIST. F.H. 521.55· N!9"2!'01"W 521.65' VACANT LAND VACANT LAND 0-HORTTERM BIC CLE SPACES w/ PERMANENTLY ANCHORED RACKS ~-----' EXIST. F.H. WALL PACK LIGHT (TYP.) PROPO ED BUILDING TYPE 111-8 CON TRUCTION FIRE SPRINKLE ED 2STORY 37'-0"HIGH 8, F-1 & S-1 OC UPANCIES (OFFICES, MAN FACTURING & STORAGE) ------------------------- 12-SHORT TERM BICYCLE SPACES w/ PERMANENTLY ANCHORED RACKS 22-LONG TERM . BICYCLE SPACES INCfl'JN-LJNK ENCLOSURE w/ SLIDING GATE LUNCH AREA 1485S.F. VACANT LAND VACANT LAND \ ----------'-" '\ \ \ \ I I I !.l=~~=""'"'~=~'--------------------------------------------::::::!S~it~e~P~l:an I so,ce KeMe<h D Smi<h Achi,ect & As=i"'~ '"'· HI-TECH CORPORA TE HEADQUARTERS Hf~!!anning-------------------------------------"--Figure 3 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 2.1 Climate Change Overview Global climate change refers to changes in average climatic conditions on Earth, as a whole, including temperature, wind patterns, precipitation, and storms. Historical records show that global temperature changes have occurred naturally in the past, such as during previous ice ages. To measure climate change, scientists look at long-term trends. The temperature trend, including data through 2010, shows the climate has warmed by approximately 0.36 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) per decade since the late 1970s (National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NASA] 2011 ). Global temperatures are moderated by naturally occurring atmospheric gases. These gases are commonly referred to as GHGs because they function like a greenhouse by letting light in but preventing heat from escaping. These gases allow solar radiation (sunlight) into the Earth's atmosphere but prevent radiative heat from escaping, thus warming the Earth's atmosphere. The resulting balance between incoming solar radiation and outgoing radiation from both the Earth's surface and the atmosphere maintains the planet's habitability. The Earth's surface temperature averages about 58°F because of the greenhouse effect. Without it, the Earth's average surface temperature would be somewhere around an uninhabitable 0°F. GHGs are emitted by natural processes and human (anthropogenic) activities. Anthropogenic GHG emissions are primarily associated with (1) the burning of fossil fuels during motorized transport, electricity generation, natural gas consumption, industrial activity, manufacturing, and other activities; (2) deforestation; (3) agricultural activity; and ( 4) solid waste decomposition. The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) constructed several emission trajectories of GHGs needed to stabilize global temperatures and climate change impacts. The statistical models show a "high confidence" that temperature increase caused by anthropogenic GHG emissions could be kept to less than two degrees Celsius relative to pre-industrial levels if atmospheric concentrations are stabilized at about 450 parts per million (ppm) carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) by the year 2100 (IPCC 2014). 2.2 Greenhouse Gases The GHGs, as defined under California's AB 32, include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF 6). Although water vapor is the most abundant and variable GHG in the atmosphere, it is not considered a pollutant; it maintains a climate necessary for life. CO2 is the most important and common anthropogenic GHG. CO2 is an odorless, colorless GHG. Natural sources include the decomposition of dead organic matter; respiration of bacteria, plants, animals, and fungi; evaporation from oceans; and volcanic outgassing. Anthropogenic sources of CO2 include burning fuels, such as coal, oil, natural gas, and wood. Data from ice cores indicate that CO2 concentrations remained steady prior to the current period for approximately 10,000 years. The atmospheric CO2 concentration in 2010 was 390 ppm, 39 percent above the concentration at the start of the Industrial Revolution (about 280 ppm in HELIX Envlronmenla/Planning------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 3 1750). As of November 2015, the CO2 concentration exceeded 400 ppm (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA] 2016). CH4 is a gas and is the main component of natural gas used in homes. A natural source of methane is from the decay of organic matter. Geological deposits known as natural gas fields contain methane, which is extracted for fuel. Other sources are from decay of organic material in landfills, fermentation of manure, and cattle digestion. N2O is produced by both natural and human-related sources. N2O is emitted during agricultural and industrial activities, as well as during combustion of fossil fuels and solid waste. Primary human-related sources of N2O are agricultural soil management, animal manure management, sewage treatment, mobile and stationary combustion of fossil fuel, adipic (fatty) acid production, and nitric acid production. Fluorocarbons are gases formed synthetically by replacing all hydrogen atoms in methane or ethane with chlorine and/or fluorine atoms. Chlorofluorocarbons are nontoxic, nonflammable, insoluble, and chemically nonreactive in the troposphere (the level of air at Earth's surface). Chlorofluorocarbons were first synthesized in 1928 for use as refrigerants, aerosol propellants, and cleaning solvents. They destroy stratospheric ozone; therefore, their production was stopped as required by the Montreal Protocol. SF6 is an inorganic, odorless, colorless, nontoxic, nonflammable gas. SF6 is used for insulation in electric power transmission and distribution equipment, in the magnesium industry, in semi- conductor manufacturing, and as a tracer gas for leak detection. GHGs have long atmospheric lifetimes that range from one year to several thousand years. Long atmospheric lifetimes allow for GHGs to disperse around the globe. Because GHGs vary widely in the power of their climatic effects, climate scientists have established a unit called global warming potential (GWP). The GWP of a gas is a measure of both potency and lifespan in the atmosphere as compared to CO2. For example, because methane and N2O are approximately 25 and 298 times more powerful than CO2, respectively, in their ability to trap heat in the atmosphere, they have GWPs of 25 and 298, respectively (CO2 has a GWP of I). CO2e is a quantity that enables all GHG emissions to be considered as a group despite their varying GWP. The GWP of each GHG is multiplied by the prevalence of that gas to produce CO2e. The atmospheric lifetime and GWP of selected GHGs are summarized in Table I, Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes. As shown in the table, the GWP for common GHGs ranges from I (CO2) to 22,800 (SF6). HELIX EnYlronmenta/Planning------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 Table 1 GLOBAL WARMING POTENTIALS AND ATMOSPHERIC LIFETIMES Greenhouse Gas Atmospheric Lifetime Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Methane (CH4) Nitrous Oxide (N2O) HFC-134a PFC: Tetraflouromethane (CF4) PFC: Hexafluoroethane (C2F6) Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) HFC: hydrofluorocarbon; PFC: perfluorocarbon Source: IPCC 2007 2.3 Regulatory Framework (years) 50-200 12 114 14 50,000 10,000 3,200 Global Warming Potential (100-year time horizon) 1 25 298 1,430 7,390 12,200 22,800 All levels of government have some responsibility for the protection of air quality, and each level (federal, state, and regional/local) has specific responsibilities relating to air quality regulation. GHG emissions and the regulation of GHGs is a relatively new component of air quality. 2.3.1 Federal Federal Clean Air Act The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on April 2, 2007, in Massachusetts v. US. Environmental Protection Agency (USEP A) that CO2 is an air pollutant, as defined under the Clean Air Act (CAA), and that the USEPA has the authority to regulate emissions of GHGs. The USEPA announced that GHGs (including CO2, CH4, N2O, HFC, PFC, and SF6) threaten the public health and welfare of the American people. This action was a prerequisite to finalizing the USEP A's GHG emissions standards for light-duty vehicles, which were jointly proposed by the USEPA and the United States Department of Transportation's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The standards were established on April 1, 2010 for 2012 through 2016 model year vehicles and on October 15, 2012 for 2017 through 2025 model year vehicles (US EPA 2011; USEPA and NHTSA 2012). Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards The USEPA and the Department of Transportation's NHTSA have been working together on developing a national program of regulations to reduce GHG emissions and to improve fuel economy of light-duty vehicles. The USEPA is finalizing the first-ever national GHG emissions standards under the CAA, and the NHTSA is finalizing Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act. On April 1, 2010, the US EPA and NHTSA announced a joint Final Rulemaking establishing standards for 2012 through 2016 model year vehicles. This was followed up on October 15, 2012, when the agencies issued a HELIX EnvlroM1611ta/Plllnning------------------------------ Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 5 Final Rulemaking with standards for model years 2017 through 2025. The rules require these vehicles to meet an estimated combined average emissions level of 250 grams of CO2 per mile by 2016, decreasing to an average industry fleet-wide level of 163 grams of CO2 per mile in model year 2025. The 2016 standard is equivalent to 35.5 miles per gallon (mpg), and the 2025 standard is equivalent to 54.5 mpg if the levels were achieved solely through improvements in fuel efficiency. The agencies expect, however, that a portion of these improvements will be made through improvements in air-conditioning leakage and the use of alternative refrigerants that would not contribute to fuel economy. These standards would cut GHG emissions by an estimated 2 billion metric tons and 4 billion barrels of oil over the lifetime of the vehicles sold under the program (model years 2017-2025). The combined USEPA GHG standards and NHTSA CAFE standards resolve previously conflicting requirements under both federal programs and the standards of the State of California and other states that have adopted the California standards (USEPA 2011; USEPA and NHTSA 2012). 2.3.2 State California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6 California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24 Part 6: California's Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings were first established in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California's energy consumption. Energy-efficient buildings require less electricity, natural gas, and other fuels. Electricity production from fossil fuels and on-site fuel combustion (typically for water heating) results in GHG emissions. The Title 24 standards are updated periodically to allow the consideration and possible incorporation of new energy-efficiency technologies and methods. The latest update to the Title 24 standards occurred in 2013 and went into effect July 2014. This update increases energy-efficiency requirements by 25 percent compared with the 2008 Title 24 standards. The 2016 update to the Title 24 standards will go into effect January I, 2017. California Green Building Standards Code The California Green Building Standards Code (24 CCR, Part 11) is a code with mandatory requirements for new residential and nonresidential buildings (including buildings for retail, office, public schools and hospitals) throughout California. The current version of the code went into effect on July I, 2014, and includes energy-efficiency updates resulting in energy usage reductions of 25 percent for residential buildings and 30 percent for nonresidential building (California Energy Commission [CEC] 2012). The 2016 update to the standards, which will result in further reduction to energy use, will go into effect January 1, 2017. The code is Part 11 of the California Building Standards Code in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations and is also known as the CALGreen Building Standards Code ([CBSC] 2014). The development of the CALGreen Code is intended to (I) cause a reduction in GHG emissions from buildings; (2) promote environmentally responsible, cost-effective, healthier places to live and work; (3) reduce energy and water consumption; and (4) respond to the directives by the governor. In short, the code is established to reduce construction waste; make buildings more HELIX Environmenta/Plannillfl------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 6 efficient in the use of materials and energy; and reduce environmental impact during and after construction. The CALGreen Code contains requirements for storm water control during construction; construction waste reduction; indoor water use reduction; material selection; natural resource conservation; site irrigation conservation; and more. The code provides for design options that allow the designer to determine how best to achieve compliance for a given site or building condition. The code also requires building commissioning, which is a process for the verification that all building systems, such as heating and cooling equipment and lighting systems, are functioning at their maximum efficiency. Executive Order S-3-05 On June I, 2005, Executive Order (EO) S-3-05 proclaimed that California is vulnerable to climate change impacts. It declared that increased temperatures could reduce snowpack in the Sierra Nevada, further exacerbate California's air quality problems, and potentially cause a rise in sea levels. In an effort to avoid or reduce climate change impacts, EO S-3-05 calls for a reduction in GHG emissions to the year 2000 level by 2010, to year 1990 levels by 2020, and to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Assembly Bill 32 -Global Warming Solution Act of 2006 The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, widely known as AB 32, requires that the California Air Resources Board (CARB) develop and enforce regulations for the reporting and verification of statewide GHG emissions. CARB is directed to set a GHG emission limit, based on 1990 levels, to be achieved by 2020. The bill requires CARB to adopt rules and regulations in an open public process to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective GHG reductions. Executive Order B-30-15 On April 29, 2015, EO B-30-15 established a California GHG reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. The EO aligns California's GHG reduction targets with those of leading international governments, including the 28-nation European Union. California is on track to meet or exceed the target of reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, as established in AB 32. California's new emission reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 will make it possible to reach the ultimate goal established by EO S-3-05 of reducing emissions 80 percent under 1990 levels by 2050. Assembly Bill 1493 -Vehicular Emissions of Greenhouse Gases AB 1493 (Pavley) requires that CARB develop and adopt regulations that achieve "the maximum feasible reduction of GHGs emitted by passenger vehicles and light-duty truck and other vehicles determined by CARB to be vehicles whose primary use is noncommercial personal transportation in the State." On September 24, 2009, CARB adopted amendments to the Pavley regulations that intend to reduce GHG emissions in new passenger vehicles from 2009 through 2016. The amendments bind California's enforcement of AB 1493 (starting in HELIX Envlronmenta/Plannillfl------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 7 2009), while providing vehicle manufacturers with new compliance flexibility. The amendments also prepare California to merge its rules with the federal CAFE rules for passenger vehicles (CARB 2013a). In January 2012, CARB approved a new emissions-control program for model years 2017 through 2025. The program combines the control of smog, soot, and global warming gases and requirements for greater numbers of zero-emission vehicles into a single packet of standards called Advanced Clean Cars (CARB 2013a). Assembly Bill 341 In 2011, the State legislature enacted AB 341 (California Public Resource Code section 42649.2), increasing the diversion target to 75 percent statewide. AB 341 also requires the provision of recycling service to commercial and residential facilities that generate four cubic yards or more of solid waste per week. Executive Order S-01-07 This EO, signed by Governor Schwarzenegger on January 18, 2007, directs that a statewide goal be established to reduce the carbon intensity of California's transportation fuels by at least 10 percent by the year 2020. It orders that a Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) for transportation fuels be established for California and directs the CARB to determine whether a LCFS can be adopted as a discrete early action measure pursuant to AB 32. CARB approved the LCFS as a discrete early action item with a regulation adopted and implemented in April 2010. Although challenged in 2011, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the District Court's opinion and rejected arguments that implementing LCFS violates the interstate commerce clause in September 2013. CARB, therefore, is continuing to implement the LCFS statewide. Senate Bill (SB) 375 SB 375 aligns regional transportation planning efforts, regional GHG reduction targets, and affordable housing allocations. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) are required to adopt a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS), which allocates land uses in the MPO's Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). Qualified projects consistent with an approved SCS or Alternative Planning Strategy categorized as "transit priority projects" would receive incentives to streamline California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) processing. California Air Resources Board: Scoping Plan On December 11, 2008, the CARB adopted the Scoping Plan (CARB 2008) as directed by AB 32. The Scoping Plan proposes a set of actions designed to reduce overall GHG emissions in California to the levels required by AB 32. Measures applicable to development projects include those related to energy-efficiency building and appliance standards, the use of renewable sources for electricity generation, regional transportation targets, and green building strategy. Relative to transportation, the Scoping Plan includes nine measures or recommended actions related to reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and vehicle GHGs through fuel and efficiency measures. These measures would be implemented statewide rather than on a project-by-project basis. HELIX EnvlronmentalPlannino------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 8 The CARB released the First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan in May 2014 to provide information on the development of measure-specific regulations and to adjust projections in consideration of the economic recession (CARB 2014a). To determine the amount of GHG emission reductions needed to achieve the goal of AB 32 (i.e., 1990 levels by 2020) CARB developed a forecast of the AB32 Baseline 2020 emissions, which is an estimate of the emissions expected to occur in the year 2020 if none of the foreseeable measures included in the Scoping Plan were implemented. CARB estimated the AB32 Baseline 2020 to be 509 million metric tons (MMT) of CO2e. The Scoping Plan's current estimate of the necessary GHG emission reductions is 78 MMT CO2e (CARB 2014b). This represents an approximately 15.32 percent reduction. The CARB is forecasting that this would be achieved through the following reductions by sector: 25 MMT CO2e for energy, 23 MMT CO2e for transportation, 5 MMT CO2e for high-GWP GHGs, and 2 MMT CO2e for waste. The remaining 23 MMT CO2e would be achieved through Cap-and-Trade Program reductions. This reduction is flexible-if CARB receives new information and changes the other sectors' reductions to be less than expected, the agency can increase the Cap-and-Trade reduction (and vice versa). 2.3.3 Local San Diego Association of Governments (SAND AG): Climate Action Strategy The SANDAG Climate Action Strategy serves as a guide to help policymakers address climate change as they make decisions to meet the needs of growing populations, as well as to maintain and enhance quality of life and promote economic stability (SANDAG 2010). The purpose of the strategy is to identify land use, transportation, and other related policy measures that could reduce GHG emissions from passenger cars and light-duty trucks as part of the development of the SCS for the 2050 RTP in compliance with SB 375. Additional policy measures are identified for buildings and energy use, protecting transportation and energy infrastructures from climate impacts, and assisting SANDAG and other local agencies in reducing GHG emissions from their operations. City of Carlsbad Climate Action Plan The City of Carlsbad (City) has developed the Climate Action Plan (CAP) to address the issues of climate change as it relates to growth in the City, and to protect the environment for visitors and residents alike (Carlsbad 2015). The CAP was adopted at the September 22, 2015 City Council meeting. The plan will help reduce traffic congestion and solid waste generation, improve air quality, increase safety for pedestrians and cyclists, and encourage more efficient use of energy and water. Additionally, this CAP requires meaningful GHG reductions, in accordance with the guidelines of AB 32, the Governor's EO S-3-05, and CEQA guidelines, which will help improve the quality of life in the City. The implementation of the CAP will also help lead agencies to assess cumulative impacts of a project and provide a means for future projects to address GHG impacts under CEQA. A lead agency may conclude that a project's GHG impact is not cumulatively significant if the project demonstrates consistency with the City's CAP (CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5[h][3]), thereby reducing overall project costs. Through the CAP, the City has established goals and policies that incorporate environmental responsibility into its daily management of residential, commercial and industrial growth, HELIX Environmenta/Ptanning------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 9 education, energy and water use, air quality, transportation, waste reduction, economic development and open space and natural habitats to further their commitment. The development of the CAP coincides with City's General Plan Update. The CAP includes a community-wide em1ss1ons inventory calculated using the socioeconomic growth rates from the General Plan Update. Various state policies have enacted programs that will also contribute to reduced GHG emissions in the City by the year 2020. Some of these policies include updated building codes for energy efficiency, the low carbon fuel standard, Pavley vehicle emissions standards and the Renewables Portfolio Standard for utility companies. By supporting the state in the implementation of these measures, the City will experience substantial GHG emissions reductions. In order to reach the 2020 reduction target, the City has included additional local reduction measures in the CAP which encourage energy efficiency and renewable energy in buildings, transit oriented planning, water conservation and increase waste diversion. HELIX Environmenla/Planning-------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 3.0 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE AND METHODOLOGY 3.1 Significance Criteria Given the relatively small levels of emissions generated by a typical development in relationship to the total amount of GHG emissions generated on a national or global basis, individual development projects are not expected to result in significant, direct impacts with respect to climate change. However, given the magnitude of the impact of GHG emissions on the global climate, GHG emissions from new development could result in significant, cumulative impacts with respect to climate change. Thus, the potential for a significant GHG impact is limited to cumulative impacts. According to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the following criteria may be considered in evaluating the significance of GHG emissions: Would the project: 1. Generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? 2. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs? Following the state's adopted AB 32 GHG reduction target, the City has set a goal to reduce emissions back to 1990 levels by the year 2020. This target was calculated as a 15% decrease from 2005 levels, as recommended in the AB 32 Scoping Plan. The estimated business as usual (BAU) City-wide emissions for the year 2020, based on population and housing growth projections associated with the assumptions used in the proposed General Plan Update, are 818,892 MT CO2e. In order to reach the reduction target, the City must offset this growth in emissions and reduce City-wide emissions to 535,764 MT CO2e by the year 2020. This equates to a BAU reduction target of 34.57 percent. The significance of the Project's GHG emissions is based on consistency with the CAP by comparing the Project's GHG emissions as proposed to the Project's GHG emissions if it were built using a BAU approach in terms of design, methodology, and technology. If the difference between the Project's emissions as proposed and the Project's emissions under a BAU scenario is at least the difference that has been determined by the CAP as necessary to meet AB 32's goals, then the project can be determined to be consistent with the CAP and, thus, not significant for purposes of CEQA. 3.2 Methodology and Assumptions The Project's GHG emissions were calculated using the California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMod), Version 2013.2.2. The emission sources include construction (off-road vehicles), mobile (on-road vehicles), area (landscape maintenance equipment), energy, water and wastewater, and solid waste sources. GHG emissions are estimated in terms of total MT of CO2e. HELIX Environm<1nta/Planning------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 II Construction Emissions. Emissions from the construction phase of the Project are assessed using CalEEMod. CalEEMod contains OFFROAD201 l emission factors and EMFAC201 l emission factors from CARB's models for off-road equipment and on-road vehicles, respectively. The construction analysis included modeling of the projected construction equipment that would be used during each construction activity. The analysis assessed annual emissions from individual construction activities, including grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating. Overall construction activity would begin in June 2016 and last approximately twelve months. A complete listing of the assumptions used in the analysis and model output is provided in Appendix A of this report. Construction emissions were amortized over 30 years and added to operational emissions (Association of Environmental Professionals [ AEP] 20 IO; South Coast Air Quality Management District [SCAQMD] 2009). Operation Emissions. Operational emissions were estimated using CalEEMod. The model estimates emissions from vehicle and stationary sources of pollutants. The BAU analysis calculates the net reduction in emissions from the proposed Project with design features compared to BAU 2020 level Project emissions. Project BAU GHG emissions represent the Project without the compliance of any applicable standards and regulations subsequent to 2008. This would exclude regulations with effects on energy-related emissions, such as the Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS), as well as regulations with effects on vehicle emissions, such as Pavley I, Pavley II, and the LCFS. For this analysis, it was assumed that the RPS would decrease energy emissions by 11 percent, based on the original 2008 Scoping Plan estimates. Adjustment calculations can be found in Appendix B of this report. The reduction for Pavley I and LCFS are based on the CARB Pavley I and Low Carbon Fuel Standard Postprocessor User's Guide. Tables I and 2 of this user's guide show that emissions from vehicles would be reduced by IO percent through LCFS by the year 2020 (CARB 2010a). An average of 29. 7 percent of emissions from light-duty automobiles and medium-duty vehicles would be reduced through Pavley I. The credit for Pavley II is based on the 2008 CARB Scoping Plan reductions for sector-specific activity. Pavley II reductions counted towards the 2020 target is 4 MMT CO2e (CARB 20 I Ob) and projected 2020 BAU transportation-related emissions is 168.2 MMT CO2e (CARB 2010c); therefore the reduction is 2.38 percent (4 MMT CO2e/168.2 MMT CO2e). It was assumed that a similar reduction would be appropriate for vehicle emissions in the City. Therefore, the combination of reductions from Pavley I, Pavley II, and LCFS would decrease the Project's motor vehicle emissions by 42 percent. These transportation-related emissions reductions would be achieved through mandatory regulations applicable to all vehicle emissions within the state and are not attributable to specific GHG reduction features of the Project. Because the reduction from these measures is not included in the 2008 Scoping Plan, it is acceptable to apply them to the reduction requirement. The vehicle emission factors in CalEEMod reflect the Pavley I and LCFS regulations. As a result, the CalEEMod results for the BAU scenario were corrected to reflect the conditions that were current at the time of the 2008 Scoping Plan. HELIX Environ11111nlll/Plannina------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 12 CalEEMod defaults for trip generation, length, distribution, and purpose were utilized. Mobile source emissions assumed 951 average daily trip (ADT) during weekdays, 340 ADT during Saturdays and 100 ADT during Sundays. All modeling output files are provided in Appendix A of this report. Operational emission estimates of the Project with design features take into account the following assumptions for the Project: • Energy efficiency in accordance 2013 Title 24 • Water conservation strategies to reduce water usage by a mm1mum of 20 percent compared with statewide averages • Operational solid waste diversion of 50 percent in accordance with AB 75 • No natural gas consumption. Other Project features listed in Section 1.3 are not incorporated into the emissions analysis due to limited information. Therefore, estimated GHG emissions in this report are likely to be conservative. HELIX EnvironmentalPlanning-------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 13 4.0 PROJECT IMPACTS This section evaluates potential impacts of the proposed Project related to the generation of GHG emissions. 4.1 Direct and Indirect Emissions of Greenhouse Gases 4.1.1 Business as Usual Emissions Construction Emissions GHG emissions would be associated with the construction phases of the Project through use of heavy equipment and vehicle trips by the construction crew commuting to the Project site (see Table 2, Construction Phases and Equipment, for construction phases and anticipated equipment). Emissions of GHGs related to the construction of the Project would be temporary. As shown in Table 3, Estimated Construction Emissions, based on emission estimates from CalEEMod for heavy construction equipment, total GHG emissions associated with construction are estimated at 401 MT C02e for the duration of construction. Table 2 CONSTRUCTION PHASES AND EQUIPMENT Construction Phase Duration Equipment Number Site Preparation 1 day Graders 1 Crawler Tractors 1 Grading 2 weeks Scrapers 2 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 Graders 1 Underground Utilities 5 weeks Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 Cranes 1 Building Construction 10 months Forklifts 1 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 Aerial Lifts 1 Architectural Coating 2 weeks Air Compressor 1 Pavers 1 Paving 1 month Rollers 2 Paving Equipment 1 Source: Hamann Co. 2016 HELIX Environmenra/Plaming------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 14 Table3 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS Source Emissions (MT CO2e) Site Preparation Grading Underground Utilities Building Construction Paving Architectural Coating TOTAL1 Amortized Construction Emissions2 Source: CalEEMod (output data is provided in Appendix A) 1 The total presented is the sum of the unrounded values. 2 Construction emissions are amortized over 30 years. <0.5 26 4 358 11 2 401 13 Construction emissions were amortized over 30 years per AEP and SCAQMD recommendations (AEP 20 IO; SCAQMD 2009). The proposed construction activities, therefore, would contribute 13 MT CO2e emissions per year. Operational Emissions Operational sources of GHG emissions include: (1) energy use ( electricity and natural gas); (2) area sources (landscaping equipment); (3) vehicle use; (4) solid waste generation; and (5) water conveyance and treatment. Energy Use Projects that increase electricity consumption also result in an indirect increase in GHG emissions. The generation of electricity through the combustion of fossil fuels typically yields CO2, and to a much smaller extent, methane and nitrous oxide. The electricity use associated with the Project was estimated using CalEEMod defaults. The annual GHG emissions from energy usage are estimated to be 875 MT CO2e per year. Area Sources Area sources include GHG emissions that would occur from the use of landscaping equipment, as well as from the use of consumer products and architectural coatings. Area source emissions were calculated using default values for both the project and the BAU scenario. A small amount of GHGs, approximately 0.01 MT CO2e per year, would result from area sources (primarily landscaping equipment). HELIX Environmenta/Plaming-------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 15 Vehicular (Mobile) Sources Mobile-source GHG emissions were based on CalEEMod defaults. The total annual VMT was estimated to be 1.9 million miles, and vehicle-related GHG emissions were estimated to be 1,207 MT CO2e per year. Solid Waste Sources Solid waste generated by the Project would also contribute to GHG emissions. Treatment and disposal of solid waste produces significant amounts of methane. Using CalEEMod defaults, GHG emissions from Project-related solid waste would be 77 MT CO2e per year. Water Sources Water-related GHG emissions are from the conveyance and treatment of water. The CEC's 2006 Refining Estimates of Water-Related Energy Use in California defines average energy values for water in Southern California. These values are used in CalEEMod to establish default water- related emission factors. Using these defaults, the Project's estimated GHG emissions related to water treatment and conveyance would be 174 MT CO2e per year. Other GHG Emission Sources Ozone is also a GHG; however, unlike other GHGs, ozone in the troposphere is relatively short-lived and, therefore, is not global in nature. According to CARB, it is difficult to make an accurate determination of the contribution of ozone precursors (oxides of nitrogen [NOx] and volatile organic compounds [VOCs]) to global warming (CARB 2004). Therefore, it is assumed that emission of ozone precursors associated with the Project would not significantly contribute to climate change. At present, there is a federal ban on chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs); therefore, it is assumed that the Project would not generate emissions of this GHG. Implementation of the Project may emit a small amount of HFC emissions from leakage, service of, and from disposal at the end of the life of refrigeration and air-conditioning equipment. However, these emissions are not quantifiable and are assumed to be negligible. PFCs and sulfur hexafluoride are typically used in heavy-duty industrial applications. The proposed Project would not include heavy-duty industrial applications. Therefore, it is not anticipated that the Project would contribute significant emissions of these GHGs. Summary Project BAU emissions do not include reductions from Project design features, or state and federal mandates after 2008 (the baseline year for the CARB Scoping Plan). As illustrated in Table 4, Estimated Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions, without emission reduction measures, the Project would result in 2,347 MT CO2e per year. HELIX Envlronmenta/Planning------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 16 Table 4 ESTIMATED ANNUAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (Project BAU Emissions) Emission Sources Emissions of CO2e (MT/year) Area Sources <0.5 Energy Sources 875 Vehicular (Mobile) Sources 1,207 Solid Waste Sources 77 Water Sources 174 Operational Subtotal 2,334 Construction (Annualized over 30 years) 13 TOTAL PROJECT 2,347 Source: CalEEMod output data is provided in Appendix A; CalEEMod Adjustments are provided in Appendix B Note: CalEEMod mobile sources emissions were adjusted to remove the GHG reductions from the Pavley I and LCFS. Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding. 4.1.2 Project Emissions with GHG-Reducing Design Features Construction Emissions It is assumed that construction-related emissions would be the same as BAU conditions. Operational Emissions Energy Use The Project would incorporate energy-efficiency features that would exceed 2008 California Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards by 30 percent through mandatory compliance with 2013 Title 24 standards (CEC 2014). According to California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) Guidance, the reduction in energy use associated with this efficiency is based on building type, size, and climate zone. CalEEMod estimated an 8. 7 percent reduction in GHG emissions due to compliance with 2013 Title 24 standards. As detailed in Appendix B, achieving California's Renewable Electricity Standard would result in an 11 percent reduction in electricity-related emissions when compared with the RPS applied to the unmitigated scenario. As detailed in Section 1.3.2, the Project would not result in the consumption of natural gas. With the incorporation of these measures, the Project's annual GHG emissions from energy use are estimated to be reduced to 565 MT CO2e per year. Area Sources The Project does not include any features that would reduce area source emissions, which would remain at 0.01 MT CO2e per year. HELIX Envlronmenta/Ptanning------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 17 Mobile Sources The effect of California-mandated programs (Pavley I, Pavley II, and LCFS) to reduce vehicle- related GHG emissions was applied towards the Project's reduction target (see Section 3.2 of this report for assumptions). These reductions would reduce the Project's vehicle-related annual GHG emissions to 718 MT CO2e per year. Waste Sources Through mandatory compliance with AB 341, the Project would achieve an average 75 percent diversion of waste during operations. Because San Diego County already achieves high diversion rates (assumed to be 50 percent), a conservative 25 percent reduction was attributed to AB 341. This 25 percent reduction would reduce the Project's solid waste-related emissions to 58 MT CO2e per year. Water Sources The Project would implement water conservation features to increase water use efficiency and decrease indoor water use demand by approximately 20 percent compared with statewide averages. This results in an approximately 22 percent reduction in overall water use. Water- related emissions are due to the electricity used to convey and treat water; therefore, the RES reduction can also be applied to water-related emissions. As detailed in Appendix B, achieving California's Renewable Electricity Standard would result in an 11 percent reduction in electricity-related emissions when compared with the RPS applied to the unmitigated scenario. These reductions would decrease the Project's water-related GHG emissions to 116 MT CO2e per year. Other GHG Emission Sources Other GHG emissions such as HFCs, PFCs and sulfur hexaflouride would be the same for the Project with design features as for the BAU condition. Emissions of these GHGs would be negligible. Summary The state of California has mandated a number of GHG reduction measures as part of the CARB Scoping Plan for achieving the goals of AB 32. As identified in Table 5, Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions from State Measures, state-mandated Scoping Plan measures would result in GHG emissions reductions of approximately 589 MT CO2e per year. HELIX Envlronmenla/Ptamillfl------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 18 Table 5 ESTIMATED GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS FROM STATE MEASURES (MT/year) Percent BAU CO2e Measure Source Reduction 2 Reduced3 from BAU1 CO2e Assembly Bill 1493 (Pavley I Mobile 29.7 1,207 359 Standards) Executive Order S-1-07 (Low Carbon Mobile 10 1,207 109 Fuel Standard) Assembly Bill 1493 (Pavley 11 Mobile 1.8 1,207 22 Standards) Renewables Portfolio Standard Energy 11 721 80 Renewables Portfolio Standard Water 11 174 19 Subtotal-MT CO2e Reduced 589 1 Source: CARB 2008 and 2010b 2 Emissions available from Table 3, Estimated Operational Annual GHG Emissions (Project BAU Emissions), by source. 3 CO2e Reduction is quantified by multiplying the Percent Reduction from BAU by the BAU CO2e value. In addition to reductions from state mandates, the Project has incorporated several measures that would further reduce GHG emissions. As discussed above, these Project design features would result in GHG emission reductions of approximately 26 percent for energy, 22 percent for water, and 25 percent for waste. As identified in Table 6, Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions from Project Design Features, the proposed Project design features would result in GHG emissions reductions of289 MT CO2e per year. Table 6 ESTIMATED GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS FROM PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES (MT/year) Feature Source Percent Reduction BAU CO2e from BAU CO2e Reduced Energy-Efficient Features Enernv 26 875 231 Solid Waste Diversion Solid Waste 25 77 19 Water Conservation Features Water 22 174 39 Subtotal -MT CO2e Reduced 289 Source: CalEEMod (output data is provided in Appendix A) HELIX Environmenta/l'lanning------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 )9 As shown in Table 7, Estimated Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions, with reductions associated with state mandates and implementation of the proposed design features, the Project would result in GHG emissions of 1,470 MT CO2e per year. Table 7 ESTIMATED ANNUAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (Project with Design Features) Emission Sources Emissions of CO2e (MT/year) Area Sources <0.5 Energy Sources 565 Vehicular (Mobile) Sources 718 Solid Waste Sources 58 Water Sources 116 Operational Subtotal 1,456 Construction (Annualized over 30 years) 13 TOTAL PROJECT 1,470 Source: CalEEMod output data is provided in Appendix A; CalEEMod Adjustments are provided in Appendix B Note: Mobile sources emissions were adjusted to include the GHG reductions from Pavley II. Energy emissions were adjusted to include the GHG reductions from the RPS. Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding. 4.1.3 Comparison of Project and Business As Usual GHG Emissions BAU-level GHG emissions attributable to the Project at full buildout in 2020 are compared to Project GHG emissions with Project design features. BAU GHG emissions of 2,347 MT CO2e represent the BAU condition in compliance with applicable standards and regulations as of 2008. As illustrated in Table 8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions Determination, the total GHG emission reductions related to state-mandated Scoping Plan Measures and proposed design features equals 877 MT CO2e per year. This amount subtracted from the Project BAU GHG emissions results in GHG emissions of 1,470 MT CO2e per year for the Proposed Project. HELIX Envlronmenta/Plannina-------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 20 Table 8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS DETERMINATION Emission Sources BAU Area Sources <0.5 Energy Sources 875 Mobile Sources 1,207 Waste Sources 77 Water Sources 174 Construction (Annualized over 30 years) 13 TOTAL 2,347 Total Reduced Emissions Percent Reduction Greater than 34.57 Percent Reduction? Sh?:nificant Impact? Source: CalEEMod (output data is provided m Appendix A) Note: Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding. Annual Emissions (MT CO2e) Reductions State Project Measures Design Features -- (80) (231) (489) - -(19) (19) (39) -- (589) (289) (877) 37.38% Yes No Project <0.5 565 718 58 116 13 1,470 As determined by the City's CAP, a reduction of at least 34.57 percent below BAU level is necessary to demonstrate that a project would be consistent with the goals of the CAP. Table 8 shows that the reductions from state-mandated measures and Project design features would result in a GHG emissions reduction of 37.38 percent. Because this reduction is greater than the 34.57 percent required by the CAP, no mitigation measures are required and impacts are less than significant. 4.2 Consistency With Local Plans Adopted for the Purpose of Reducing GHG Emissions The Project, by providing a 37.38 percent reduction in GHG emissions compared to BAU, may be seen to exceed its fair share in achieving the state's reduction target. Additionally, the Project would be constructed in accordance with the energy-efficiency standards, water reduction goals, and other "green" standards contained in the CALGreen Building Standards. As such, the Project would be consistent with plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. HELIX Envtronmenla/Planning------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 21 5.0 CUMULATIVE IMP ACTS With incorporation of Project design features, the Proposed Project would result in a 37.38 percent reduction from the BAU condition. As this percentage reduction is greater than the 34.57 percent required by the CAP, the GHG emissions related to the Proposed Project would not have a significant cumulative impact with respect to climate change. HELIX Environmenla/P!annino------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 22 6.0 REFERENCES Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP). 2010. Spring 2010 Advanced CEQA Workshop. San Diego Chapter. May 13. California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2014a. May. First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan: Building on the Framework. Available at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/2013 update/first update climate change scopin g plan.pdf 2014b. California Greenhouse Gas Inventory for 2000-2012. May. Available at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/pubs/reports/ghg inventory 00-12 report.pd[ 2013a. Clean Car Standards -Pavley, Assembly Bill 1493. Accessed September 2014. Available at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/ccms/ccms.htm 2010a. Pavley I and Low Carbon Fuel Standard Postprocessor. April 29, 2010. Accessed March 2015, available at http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/sb375/too1s/postprocessor.htm 201 Ob. Staff Report. Proposed Regional Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Targets for Automobiles and Light Trucks Pursuant to Senate Bill 375. August 9. 201 0c. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Data -2000 to 2008. 2008. Climate Change Scoping Plan -A Framework For Change. December. 2004. Technical Support Document for Staff Proposal Regarding Reduction of GHG Emissions from Motor Vehicles Climate Change Overview. California Building Standards Commission (CBSC). 2014. Adopted 2013 Code, Triennial California Building Standards Commission (CBSC). Adopted 2013 Code, Triennial Edition. Sacramento, CA: CBSC. http://www.bsc.ca.gov/ California Energy Commission (CEC). 2014 (July 1). News Release -New Title 24 Standards Will Cut Residential Energy Use by 25 Percent, Save Water, and Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Sacramento, CA: CEC. Available at: http://www.energy.ca.gov/releases/2014 releases/2014-07- 0 I new title24 standards nr.html 2012 (May 31 ). News Release -Energy Commission Approves More Efficient Buildings for California's Future. Sacramento, CA: CEC. Available at: http://www.energy.ca.gov/releases/2012 releases/2012-05- 31 energy commission approves more efficient buildings nr.html HELIX EnvlronmentatPlanning----------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 23 Carlsbad, City of. 20 I 5. Climate Action Plan. September. Available at: http://www.carlsbadca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload .aspx?B lobID=2 93 61 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2014. Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, 0., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlomer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, and New York, NY, USA. 2007 (February). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Summary for Policy Makers (Working Group Fourth Assessment Report). Available at: http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2feb07.pdf. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Institute for Space Studies (NASA). 2011 (January 12). NASA Research Finds 2010 Tied for Warmest Year on Record. Available: http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/news/20110112/. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2016. Earth System Research Laboratory. Available at: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/global.html, accessed January 29, 2016. Pers. Comm. 2016. Email between Gregg Hamann of Hamann Co. and Victor Ortiz of HELIX. January 20. San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG). 2010 (February I). Climate Action Strategy. Preliminary Draft available at: http://www.sandag.org/uploads/publicationid/publicationid 1481 I 0940.pdf. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2009 . Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group 14. Available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/ceqa/handbook/GHG/2009/nov l 9mtg/ghgmtg 14.pdf. November 19, 2009. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2011 (November 22, last update). Proposed Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under t the Clean Air Act. Washington, D.C.: USEPA. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/endangerment/ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (USEPA and NHTSA). 2012 (October 15). 2017 and Later Model Year Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards. Federal Register (Volume 77, No. 199, pp. 62623-63200). Washington, D.C.: USEPA and NHTSA HELIX EnvironmentalPlamino----------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 24 Preparers: Victor Ortiz Joanne M. Dramko, AICP 7.0 LIST OF PREPARERS Air Quality Specialist Quality Assurance Reviewer HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 El Cajon Boulevard La Mesa, CA 91942 HELIX Ellvlronmenta/Planni11g------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 25 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK HELIX EnvironmentalPlaming----------------------------------- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report for the High-Tech Corporate Headquarters Project I HML-01 I February 2016 26 Appendix A CALEEMOD EMISSION CALCULATIONS CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses I Size Industrial Park 136.63 Page 1 of 32 High-Tech Corporate Headquarters San Diego County, Annual l Metric 1000sqft Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM j Lot Acreage I Floor Surface Area l Population : 3.14 , 136,630.00 : 0 ------------------------------;------------------------------.;..---------------------"""--------------~-----------------~---------------Parking Lot : 427.00 : Space 3.84 170,800.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (mis) 2.6 Precipitation Freq (Days) 40 Climate Zone 13 Operational Year 2020 Utility Company San Diego Gas & Electric CO2 Intensity 720.49 CH4 Intensity 0.029 N2O Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Project Characteristics - Land Use - Construction Phase -Assumptions based on info provided by Hamann Co. Off-road Equipment -Assumptions based on info provided by Hamann Co. Off-road Equipment -Assumptions based on info provided by Hamann Co. Off-road Equipment -Assumptions based on info provided by Hamann Co. Off-road Equipment -Assumptions based on info provided by Hamann Co. Off-road Equipment -Assumptions based on info provided by Hamann Co. Off-road Equipment - Grading - Architectural Coating - Area Coating - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Energy Mitigation - Water Mitigation - Waste Mitigation - Table Name I Column Name I Page 2 of 32 Default Value I New Value tblConstructionPhase : NumDays : 20.00 j 10.00 Date: 1/29/201612:49 PM -----------------------------4-----------------------------~-----------------------------t--------------------------tblConstructionPhase : NumDays : 230.00 I 217.00 -----------------------------4-----------------------------~-----------------------------t--------------------------tblConstructionPhase : NumDays : 20.00 I 10.00 -----------------------------4-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------tblConstructionPhase : NumDays : 10.00 I 1.00 ·······----------------------~-----------------------------.;..-----------------------------t--------------------------tblConstructionPhase : PhaseEndDate : 3/14/2017 I 5/26/2017 -----------------------------4-----------------------------~-----------------------------t--------------------------tblConstructionPhase • PhaseEndDate • 5/12/2017 1 5/13/2017 ■ • I -----------------------------4-----------------------------~-----------------------------t--------------------------tblConstructionPhase : PhaseEndDate : 6/9/2017 I 2/28/2017 -----------------------------4-----------------------------~-----------------------------t--------------------------tblConstructionPhase : PhaseEndDate : 7/20/2016 I 7/13/2016 -----------------------------4-----------------------------~-----------------------------t--------------------------tblConstructionPhase • PhaseStartDate • 3/1/2017 1 5/15/2017 • • I -------.. ---------------------4 -----------------------------~--------------------------1--.. --.. ---.. ------------... ----tblConstructionPhase : PhaseStartDate : 5/14/2017 2/1/2017 _. CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 3 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM tblConstructionPhase : PhaseStartDate : 6/16/2016 6/9/2016 ---------------------------. --I -.. ---.. ---. -• --.... -. --.. ----I . ---. ----. --. -. ------.. --. --. -t -. ---. --.. -. --. -. --.. -. -.. tblGrading : Material Exported : 0.00 I 15.00 ------------------------------1------------------------------=------------------------------f--------------------------tblOffRoadEquipment : LoadFactor : 0.43 I 0.43 -----------------------------~-----------------------------~-----------------------------t--------------------------tblOffRoadEquipment : LoadFactor : 0.48 I 0.48 -----------------------------~-----------------------------~-----------------------------+--------------------------tblOffRoadEquipment : LoadFactor : 0.37 I 0.37 -----------------------------~········-·········------------=------------------------------+--------------------------tblOffRoadEquipment : OffRoadEquipmentType : I Graders -----------------------------~------------------------------=------------------------------t--------------------------tblOffRoadEquipment : OffRoadEquipmentType : I Crawler Tractors -----------------········----~------------------------------1-------------------------------+--------------------------tblOffRoadEquipment : OffRoadEquipmentType : I Scrapers -----------------------------~-----------------------------~-----------------------------+--------------------------tblOffRoadEquipment : OffRoadEquipmentType : I Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes -----------------------------~-----------------------------~-----------------------------+--------------------------tblOffRoadEquipment : OffRoadEquipmentType : I Aerial Lifts -----------------------------~-----------------------------~-----------------------------+--------------------------tblOffRoadEquipment : OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount : 1.00 I 0.00 -----------------------------~-----------------------------~-----------------------------+--------------------------tblOffRoadEquipment : OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount : 3.00 I 1.00 -----------------------------~-----------------------------~-----------------------------+--------------------------tblOffRoadEquipment : OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount : 1.00 I 0.00 -----------------------------~-----------------------------~-----------------------------+--------------------------tblOffRoadEquipment : OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount : 2.00 I 1.00 -----------------------------~------------------------------1-------------------------------+--------------------------tblOffRoadEquipment : OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount : 2.00 I 1.00 -----------------------------~-----------------------------~-----------------------------t--------------------------tblOffRoadEquipment : OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount : 3.00 I 2.00 -----------------------------4-----------------------------~-----------------------------+--------------------------tblOffRoadEquipment : OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount : 3.00 I 0.00 -----------------------------~-----------------------------~-----------------------------+--------------------------tblOffRoadEquipment : OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount : 2.00 I 1.00 -----------------------------~-----------------------------~-----------------------------+--------------------------tblOffRoadEquipment : OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount : 4.00 I 0.00 -----------------------------4------------------------------1-------------------------------+--------------------------tblOffRoadEquipment : OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount : 3.00 I 0.00 -----------------------------~-----------------------------~-----------------------------+--------------------------tblOffRoadEquipment : OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount : 1.00 I 0.00 -----------------------------~-----------------------------~-----------------------------+--------------------------tblOffRoadEquipment : OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount : 0.00 I 1.00 -----------------------------~-----------------------------~-----------------------------+--------------------------tblOffRoadEquipment : PhaseName : I Building Construction -----------------------------~-----------------------------~------------------------~--------------------------tblProjectCharacteristics : OperationalYear • 2014 2020 2.0 Emissions Summary CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 4 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx Year co SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 I Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr 2016 :: t 0.0000 : 232.2782 : 232.2782 : 0.0359 • 0.0000 : 233.0318 •• I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ---······••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------"'l""-------~---··•·1-------,-------,-------,-------~----··· 2017 :: O O O I O O t 0.0000 : 167.3055 : 167.3055 O 0.0243 O 0.0000 O 167.8162 • I •• I_ _...!_____ ' Total JI/litigated Construction ROG NOx co SO2 Year Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 0.0000 399.5837 I 399.5837 0.0602 0.0000 400.8479 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 ( Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr 2016 :: t 0.0000 : 232.2781 : 232.2781 : 0.0359 • 0.0000 : 233.0317 ■1 I I ■1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------"T"'-------~•••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 2017 :: I I I O I I I O O t 0.0000 ' 167.3055 O 167.3055 O 0.0243 O 0.0000 O 167.8161 ■I I I ■I I _I __ I __ I __ . I _I ___ I ___ I I __ Total 0.0000 I 399.5835 I 399.5835 0.0602 0.0000 I 400.84TT ROG NOx co SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBlo-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oo 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 5 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx Category co SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 I NBlo-CO2 I Total CO2 CH4 MT/yr Area ., t 0.0000 • 0.0101 0.0101 3.0000e-• 005 u l N2O CO2e 0.0000 • 0.0106 •• I I I I I I I I I I •-----,, 0 0 0 •••••••••••n--------,--------,--------,--------.--------,--------,-------,--------,-------"'l"'--------t•••••••1---------,--------,-------T••••••• Energy •• , , • • • • • , l 0.0000 , 871.7842 • 871.7842 1 0.0319 • 8.7900e-• 875.1793 :: I I I I :003• ■o -i-----• I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • n-------,--------,--------.--------,--------,--------,--------,-------.,...--------t •"""""" • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------"T •••••••I Mobile :: 1 • • • • 1 t 0.0000 : 739.2716 : 739.2716 : 0.0287 • 0.0000 : 739.8745 u l ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n--------,--------,--------,-------,------,--------,--------,--------,-------.,...--------t•••••-•1--------,--------,--------,-------T••••••• Waste :: t 34.3907 : 0.0000 : 34.3907 : 2.0324 • 0.0000 : 77.0718 u l ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -• • '" '" • • • • • • .. --------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------"T"-------.. • • • • -• •1--------,--------,--------,--------r •••••••I Water :: • 1 f 10.0239 • 134.4516 • 144.4754 • 1.0350 • 0.0254 1 174.0927 u l l Total 44.4146 I 1,745.51711,789.932 4 0 3.1280 0.0342 1,866.228 9 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 6 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx Category co SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 I NBlo-CO2 I Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Area •• t 0.0000 • 0.0101 • 0.0101 • 3.0000e-• 0.0000 , 0.0106 & ' 005 ' ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I -----------.. -------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------.. -------,-------,-------,-------,-------"T·------Energy ., • • • • • • • • I 0.0000 • 758.7506 • 758.7506 • 0.0281 , 7.48008-• 761.6606 :: f : 1 1 1 003 1 ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I • • • • • • • ,. • • • .. --------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------"T"-------.. ,. • • • • • •1-------"'1--------,--------,-------"T •••••••I Mobile :: • • • • • • • • • t 0.0000 : 739.2716 : 739.2716 : 0.0287 , 0.0000 : 739.8745 ■I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' .. • • • • • • • • • .. --------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------.--------,-------...--------.. • • • ...... •1--------,--------,--------,-------"'I" • • • • • • •I Waste •• t 25.7931 : 0.0000 : 25.7931 : 1.5243 • 0.0000 : 57.8039 I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • ---------.--------.--------.--------.--------.--------.--------.--------.-------"T" _______ ,. • • • • • • •1--------.--------.--------.-------"'I" • • • • • • •I Water ., • • • • • • • t 8.0191 • 103.8280 • 111.8471 • 0.8278 • 0.0203 • 135.5281 Total ROG NOx co SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 Percent o.oo o.oo o.oo o.oo 0.00 o.oo o.oo 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ' ' Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total o.oo 0.00 33.8121 I 1,so1.860 11,635.672 3 5 2.4090 Bio-CO2 NBlo-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 23.87 8.23 8.62 22.99 0.0278 N20 1,694.8n 6 CO2e 18.79 9.18 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 7 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 : Site Preparation :Site Preparation 16/1/2016 :61112016 I 51 1 I I I I I -------1------------------------:-----------------------l------------~------------~--------~--------4-------------------------2 :Grading :Grading :6/212016 :6/15/2016 : 5: 10: -------1------------------------=-----------------------1------------~------------~--------~--------4-------------------------3 :Underground Utilities :Trenching 16/9/2016 :7/13/2016 I 51 25: I I I -------1------------------------=-----------------------1------------~------------~--------~--------4-------------------------4 :Building Construction :Building Construction 17/14/2016 :511312011 I 51 211: I I I -------l------------------------1-----------------------l------------~------------~--------~--------4-------------------------5 :Paving :Paving :21112017 :2128/2017 : 5: 20: -------l------------------------~----------------------,1,------------4-----6 :Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 30 Acres of Paving: O :511512011 :5/26/2017 I I I --~--------r--------••••••---------•• 5: 10: Residential Indoor: O; Residential Outdoor: O; Non-Residential Indoor: 212,631; Non-Residential Outdoor: 70,877 (Architectural Coating -sqft) OffRoad Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 8 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount Usage Hours T Horse Power ] Load Factor I 1 6.QQI I I Architectural Coating :Air Compressors 78: 0.48 ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------1---------r--------------Site Preparation :Graders : 1 a.oo: 174: 0.41 ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------1---------r--------------Grading :crawler Tractors : 1 8.00: 208: 0.43 ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------1---------r--------------Grading :Excavators : O a.oo: 162: 0.38 ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------1---------r--------------Building Construction :cranes : 1 7.oo: 226: 0.29 ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------1---------r--------------Building Construction :Forklifts : 11 a.oo: 89: 0.20 ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------1---------l---------------Building Construction :Generator Sets : 0 a.oo: 84: 0.74 ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------1---------l---------------Paving :Pavers : 1 a.oo: 125: 0.42 ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------1---------l---------------Paving :Rollers : 1 a.oo: so: 0.38 ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------1---------l---------------Grading :Scrapers : 2 8.00: 361: 0.48 ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------1---------l---------------Grading : Rubber Tired Dozers : 1 8.00: 255: 0.40 ---------·-------···-·-··---:---------------------------~-----------------------------1---------l-----·····---·· Building Construction :Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes : 2 7.oo: 97: 0.37 ----------------------------:---------------------------~-----------------------------1--------4--------------Grading :Graders : 1 a.oo: 174: 0.41 •••••----•••••••••••••••----=---------------------------~----------------•••--•••••-•• I•••••••••••••• Grading :Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes : 01 a.oo: 97: 0.37 ---·---·-··-------·····-·-·-=---------------------------r-----------------------------1---------l-••---·-···---· Paving : Paving Equipment : 1 8.00: 130: 0.36 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••--=---------------------------r----------------••••••••-----I•••••••••-•••• Site Preparation :Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes : o a.oo: 97: 0.37 ••••••••••••-•••••••••••••••=---------------------------r------------------•-••--•••--I•-•-••••••-••• Site Preparation : Rubber Tired Dozers : 0 8.00: 255: 0.40 --······----··-------······-=---------------------------r-----------------------------1--------4•---·-···---·· Building Construction :Welders : O a.oo: 46: 0.45 --······---············-····=---------------------------~-----------------------------1--------4••----··-·---· Underground Utilities :Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes : 1 a.oo: 97: 0.37 --·-··----·-·--····-··------~---------------------------1----------___ ._ ___________ -1--------------~---·····----·· Building Construction :Aerial Lifts 1: 8.00: 62: 0.31 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 9 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Underground Utilities : 1 I 3.oo; o.oo: o.oo; 10.801 7.30: 20.00: LD_Mix :HDT_Mix :HHDT I I ------.. --... -. -:---------------1-----------:-..... ----~----------1---,----------~----------1--------------1----------+ .. --...... Site Preparation : 1: 3.00; 0.001 2.00; 10.ao: 7.30: 20.00:LD_Mix :HDT_Mix IHHDT ... -----....... -:---------------1-----------1-.. ----... ~----------1-----------1----------~----------1--------------1--------. -+ .... --. --. Grading : s: 13.00; o.oo: o.oo; 10.ao: 7.30: 20.00:LD_Mix :HDT_Mix IHHDT . -........ -... --:---------------1-----------1--....... -~----------•-----------,----------~----------1--------------1----------+. --..... --Building Construction : s: 129.oo; so.oo: o.oo; 10.ao: 7.30: 20.00:LD_Mix :HDT_Mix IHHDT ... _ ......... _. -:---------------1-----------1·. -.. -----~----------l-----------1----------~----------1--------------1---" .. -... + .. --...... Paving : 3: a.oo; 0.001 o.oo; 10.ao: 7.30: 20.00:LD_Mix :HDT_Mix IHHDT -.. ---------......... -=---------------+----------.;....----------1----------,1,---------1-----------1---------➔ -.. ------.... Architectural Coating . 1: 26.00: : 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Clean Paved Roads 3.2 Site Preparation -2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx co Category SO2 o.oo; Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 PM10 tons/yr o.oo: PM10 Total 10.ao: Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 7.30: PM2.5 Total 20.00:LD_Mix :HDT_Mix ;HHDT Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 I Total. CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Fugitive Dust :; t 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 I •• I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------------,-------"T"'-------~•••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• Off-Road •• , , , , , &1 0.0000 , 0.2946 , 0.2946 , 9.0000e-, 0.0000 , 0.2964 :: & 005 1 ., ----~---~~---~----~----~----~---~~---~----~-----'-----' Total 0.0000 0.2946 o.2946 I 9.ooooe-I 0.0000 005 0.2964 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 10 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM 3.2 Site Preparation -2016 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx co Category SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 I NBlo-CO2 I Total CO2 MT/yr CH4 I N2O I CO2e Hauling :: t 0.0000 • 0.0683 • 0.0683 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0683 • I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••m--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------"T""-------.. •••••••1--------,--------,--------,-------T••••••• Vendor :: • • • • • • t 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ••••••••••••--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------.--------.. •••••••1--------,--------,--------,-------T••••••• Worker :: • • • t 0.0000 • 0.0112 • 0.0112 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0112 •• I ., ,___ _I__ __,_ ~ f Total 0.0000 0.0795 I 0.0795 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0795 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx co Category Fugitive Dust :: SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 I Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr t 0.0000 ' 0.0000 O 0.0000 I 0.0000 O 0.0000 o 0.0000 I ■I I I I I ---,---I I I I I I I I I I --------.. ----------,-------,-------,-------,----,-------,-------,-------..... -------.. -------,-------,-------,-------,-------.... -------1 Off-Road •• t 0.0000 • 0.2946 • 0.2946 , 9.0000e-• 0.0000 • 0.2964 = I 005 " ___ , ___ , ----·-'---__ , -I Total 0.0000 0.2946 0.2946 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2964 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 11 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM 3.2 Site Preparation -2016 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I Category co I SO2 -,. Fuglti~ Exhaust-r PM10 I Fugitive PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 tons/yr Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 I Total CO2 MT/yr CH4 N2O CO2e Hauling :: 1 0.0000 0.0683 • 0.0683 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0683 n I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ••••••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------"T""-------~•••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• Vendor :: • • • • • • • 1 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 n I ■I I I I I I I I I I & I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------r--------~•••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• Worker :: • : • • • • • • 1 0.0000 • 0.0112 • 0.0112 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0112 ■1 I ' •• __ ! O__ _ __ I ___!_ L_ I__ _O Total I 3.3 Grading -2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx co Category I I SO2 Fugitive PM10 I Exhaust PM10 tons/yr I PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 0.0000 I 0.0795 0.0795 0.0000 Bio-CO2 I NBlo-CO2 I Total CO2 CH4 MT/yr 0.0000 0.0795 N2O CO2e Fugitive Dust :: 1 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 n I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------"T"-------~•••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• Off-Road •• • • • • • • • • • ', 0.0000 • 24.8630 • 24.8630 • 7.5000e-• 0.0000 • 25.0205 :: , 003 1 n I Total 0.0000 24.8630 I 24.8630 I 1.5000e- 003 0.0000 25.0205 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 12 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM 3.3 Grading -2016 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx co Category SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 I Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Hauling :: 1 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 •• I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------,--------••••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• Vendor :: , 1 1 , • • • 1 0.0000 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 • 0.0000 •• I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------,--------••••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• Worker •• • • • • • 1 1 0.0000 , 0.4858 0.4858 • 3.0000e-• 0.0000 • 0.4863 I 005 Total Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx co SO2 Category Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I 0.0000 0.4858 0.4858 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 I Total CO2 3.0000e- 005 CH4 MT/yr 0.0000 0.4863 N2O CO2e Fugitive Dust :: 1 0.0000 , 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ···········n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------"T"-------•···-·••1-------,-------,-------,-------~-------Off-Road •• , • 1 , • • • • 1 0.0000 24.8630 , 24.8630 , 7.5000e-, 0.0000 , 25.0205 :: I 003 •• __ , ---~----~----~---~----~----~----~-I Total 0.0000 24.8630 24.8630 I 7.SOOOe- 003 0.0000 25.0205 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 13 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM 3.3 Grading -2016 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx co SO2 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 PM10 Category tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 I Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr ~~: t~·~·~·~·~·~ " I ■I I I I I I I I I I j I I I I I -------------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------.. -------.-------,--------.-------,-------... -------Vendor :: • • • • 1 0.0000 , 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 " I ■I I I I I I I I I I j I-----' I 0 -.. ------------------.--------.-------,--------.-------,-------,--------.-------,-------..,..-------.. --.. ----,------,-------,-------... ----.. --Worker •• , , , , • • • 11 0.0000 , 0.4858 • 0.4858 • 3.0000e-• 0.0000 • 0.4863 ' I 005 Total 3.4 Underground Utilities -2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx co Category Off-Road ., ' I ., ' I ., ' I ., ' I Total SO2 I ' I ' I ' I ' Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 tons/yr I I ' I I I ' ' ' I ' ' ' I ' ' I 0.0000 PM2.5 Bio-CO2 Total I I 0.0000 ' I I ' I I ' I I ' 0.0000 0.4858 0.4858 NBlo-CO2 Total CO2 3.0000e- 005 CH4 MT/yr 3.6556 I 3.6556 I 1.1000e• O I I 003 ' I I ' I I I 3.6556 3.6556 1.1000e- 003 0.0000 0.4863 N2O CO2e 0.0000 I 3.6787 ' ' ' 0.0000 3.6787 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 14 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM 3.4 Underground Utilities -2016 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx co Category SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 I NBlo-CO2 I Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Hauling :: t 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----------.. --------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------"T"-------.. -------·-------,-------,--------.-------"'I" ------.. , Vendor :: • • • • • • 1 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 • I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -------------------,--------.-------,--------.-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,---------t•------,-------,-------,-------,-------"'l"-------Worker •• • • • • • • • • 1 0.0000 • 0.2802 • 0.2802 • 1.0000e-• 0.0000 • 0.2806 I 005 Total Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx co SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 Category tons/yr Off-Road .. I ' ' I ' ' ' I ., ' I ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' I ' ' ' ' ' ' .. I ' ' ' ' ' ' I Total I 0.0000 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 PM2.5 Total I I 0.0000 ' I I ' ' I ' ' I ' 0.0000 0.2802 0.2802 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 1.0000e- 005 CH4 MT/yr 3.6556 ' 3.6556 I 1.10008· 0 I ' 003 ' ' ' ' ' I ' 3.6556 3.6556 1.1000e- 003 0.0000 0.2806 N2O CO2e 0.0000 ' 3.6787 ' ' ' 0.0000 3.6787 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 15 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM 3.4 Underground Utilities -2016 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx co Category SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 I Total CO2 I CH4 I N2O CO2e MT/yr Hauling :: i 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 ■I I I ■I I I I I --..--I I I I I I I I I I -----------.. --------.-------,-------,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------""I"'-------• -------,-------,-------,-------,-------~ ------•' Vendor :: • • • i 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----------.. --------.-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------r-------•-------.-------,-------,-------,-------~-------Worker :: • • • • • i 0.0000 • 0.2802 • 0.2802 • 1.0000e-: 0.0000 • 0.2806 ,, , I 005 -__ , ----' ----__ , -·-----~----~---__ , -·--_,_ !__ L L Total 3.5 Building Construction -2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx co Category Off-Road -' ' -' ' -' ' -' ' Total SO2 ' ' ' ' Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 tons/yr ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 0.0000 I 0.2802 I 0.2802 1 1.0000e-I 005 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM2.5 Total MT/yr ' ' I 0.0000 • 78.0109 • 78.0109 • 0.0235 ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' 0.0000 78.0109 78.0109 0.0235 0.0000 0.2806 N2O CO2e 0.0000 • 78.5050 ' ' ' 0.0000 78.5050 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 16 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM 3.5 Building Construction -2016 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx co Category SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 I Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Hauling :: t 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------,-------T-------.. •••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------"T••••••• Vendor • • • • • • • • • 1 0.0000 • 65.8028 • 65.8028 • 5.2000e-• 0.0000 • 65.8136 :: i I I I 004 I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • •'" • • • n-------,--------,--------,-------,--------.--------,--------,--------,-------T-------.. • • • • • • •1--------,--------,--------,-------"T ••••.,••I Worker • • • • • • • t 0.0000 • 58.8059 • 58.8059 • 3.11 00e-• 0.0000 • 58.8711 I 003 Total Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx co SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 Category tons/yr Off-Road .. . ' ' ' ' ' ' . .. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' .. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' .. ' ' . ' ' ' ' ' Total l 0.0000 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 PM2.5 Total ' I 0.0000 ' I ' I ' I 0.0000 124.6086 I 124.6086 I 3.6300e- 003 NBIo-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 MT/yr • 78.0108 • 78.0108 • 0.0235 . ' ' . ' ' . ' ' 78.0108 78.0108 0.0235 0.0000 124.6847 N2O CO2e ' 0.0000 • 78.5049 ' ' . ' ' ' 0.0000 78.5049 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 17 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM 3.5 Building Construction -2016 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx co Category SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 I Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Hauling :: t 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 ■I I I I I I I I I I j I I I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ••••••••••• ... --------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t•••••••1--------,--------,--------,-------T••••••• Vendor •• • • • 1 0.0000 • 65.8028 • 65.8028 • 5.2000e-• 0.0000 • 65.8136 :: j I I '0041 I ■1 I I I I I I I I j I I I I I .. -------.. -..... -------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------..-----,-------,--------,--------.. -------,-------,-------,-------,-------"'I" -.. -.. ---· Worker •• , , • t 0.0000 • 58.8059 • 58.8059 • 3.11 ooe-• 0.0000 58.8711 I 003 Total 3.5 Building Construction -2017 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx co Category Off-Road ., ' ' ., I I ., I I ., I I Total SO2 ' ' I I I I I I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 tons/yr ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total ' I I I I I I I 0.0000 I 124.6086 I 124.6086 I a.6ao0e- ooa Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 MT/yr 0.0000 ' 59.7776 I 59.7776 I 0.0183 ' I I ' I I ' I I 0.0000 59.7776 59.7776 0.0183 0.0000 I 124.6847 N2O CO2e I 0.0000 I 60.1622 I I I I I I 0.0000 60.1622 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 3.5 Building Construction -2017 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx co Category Hauling I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr ■I I I I I I I ------.. ---.... --------.-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,, Vendor •• PM10 Total Page 18 of 32 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 I Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr t 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 I I I I ' I I I I I ----,--------,-------"T"--------t -------,--------,-------,--------.-------"'I" .. ---.. -- I I I I 0.0000 ' 50.3737 I 50.3737 I 3.8000e• I 0.0000 1 50.3817 t O O I 004 I I .... • • .. • • .. '" • • ::-------..:-------..:-------..:-------..:-------..:--------,-----..:-------..:-------.:..-------~ • • • .. • • -:-------..:-------..:-------..:-------..:.••• .. •••I Worker •• , , , , 1 1 1 0.0000 , 44.0222 , 44.0222 , 2.2400e-, 0.0000 , 44.0692 I 003 Total Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx co SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr Off-Road ., I I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I I Total l 0.0000 PM2.5 Bio-CO2 Total I I 0.0000 I ' I I I I 0.0000 94.3959 NBlo-CO2 94.3959 I 2.62ooe-ooa Total CO2 CH4 MT/yr ' 59,7775 I 59.7775 I 0.0183 ' I I ' I I ' I I 59.7775 59.7775 0.0183 0.0000 94.4509 N2O CO2e I 0.0000 I 60.1621 I I I I I I 0.0000 60.1621 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 19 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM 3.5 Building Construction -2017 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx co Category SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 I NBlo-CO2 I Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Hauling :: t 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 " ' H I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----.. ------.. -------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------,-------,-------"T"--------t -.. -----,-------,-------,-------,-------... -------Vendor •• , , , , , , , , , 1 0.0000 , 50.3737 , 50.3737 , 3.8000&-, 0.0000 , 50.3817 :: i I I I 004 I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ........................ -------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------..,...--------t••···-·1-------,-------,-------,-------... ---···· Worker ., , , , , • t 0.0000 • 44.0222 • 44.0222 • 2.2400e-, 0.0000 , 44.0692 I 003 Total 3.6 Paving -2017 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Category Off-Road ., ., ., ROG NOx co SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total ■1 I I I I I I I .. -------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------, Paving :: Total ., ., Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I 0.0000 94.3959 94.3959 I 2.6200e- 003 Bio-CO2 I NBlo-CO2 I Total CO2 CH4 MT/yr 0.0000 94.4509 N2O CO2e II 0.0000 ' 10.3467 I 10.3467 I 3.1700e-I 0.0000 I 10.4133 I I I I 003 I I ' I I I I ..------...... -------• ----.... -1--------,-------..-------.--------r ............ .. t 0.0000 ' 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I _! 0.0000 10.3467 1 o.3467 I 3.17000- 003 0.0000 10.4133 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 20 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM 3.6 Paving -2017 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx co Category S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 I Total CO2 MT/yr CH4 N2O I CO2e Hauling :: t 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 " I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I -------------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------.--------.. -------.-------,-------,-------,-------~-------Vendor :: ' ' ' ' ' ' ' t 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 " I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -------------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------,--------.. -------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------Worker " • ' ' ' ' ' ' ' t 0.0000 • 0.5748 • 0.5748 • 3.0000e-• 0.0000 • 0.5754 : I ~ ■I L & Total Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx co S02 Category Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 0.0000 0.5748 0.5748 Bio-CO2 I NBlo-CO2 I Total CO2 3.0000e- 005 CH4 MT/yr 0.0000 I 0.5754 N2O CO2e Off-Road •• I 0.0000 • 10.3467 • 10.3467 • 3.1700e-• 0.0000 • 10.4133 :: I I I : 003 I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ---.. ---------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------'T"-------.. -------,-------,--------,--------,-------.,. ------•; Paving :: ' ' ' f 0.0000 • 0.0000 , 0.0000 • 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 " I .. ~ ' Total 0.0000 10.3467 1 o.3467 I 3.17ooe- 003 0.0000 10.4133 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 21 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM 3.6 Paving -2017 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx co SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 I Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling :: 1 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • I ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I -------------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------~-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------Vendor :; • • • • • 1 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -------------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------,--------~-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------Worker :: • • • • • 1 0.0000 • 0.5748 • 0.5748 , 3.0000e-: 0.0000 , 0.5754 ■1 I I I 005 I ■I _I_ ___!_ _I -__ I _____ ,__ __, _I -_!__ L Total 3. 7 Architectural Coating -2017 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx co Category SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 0.0000 0.5748 0.5748 Bio-CO2 I NBio• CO2 I Total CO2 3.0000e- 005 CH4 MT/yr 0.0000 I 0.5754 N2O CO2e Archit. Coating :; 1 0.0000 , 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 , 0.0000 • I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • •., • n-------,-------,-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------"T"-------• •,.,.,.,.•••--------,--------,--------,-------"'I"•,.•••• •I Off-Road :; 1 0.0000 • 1.2766 • 1.2766 • 1.3000e-• 0.0000 , 1.2795 • I ~ 00 __ I_ _I_ _!__ I__ • Total 0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.2795 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 22 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM 3. 7 Architectural Coating -2017 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx co SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 I Total CO2 CH4 N2O I C02e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling :: t 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 , 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 ■I I I ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -------------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,.-----,-------,-------,-------.,..-------~-------·-------,-------,-------,-------~-------Vendor :: • • • • t 0.0000 • 0.0000 ' 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 -' ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -------------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-.-------~-------·-------,-------,-------,-------~-------Worker • • t 0.0000 0.9340 • 0.9340 , 5.0000e-• 0.0000 • 0.9350 : ' ~ ■1 _J I I '·----' __ 0 __ _ Total Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx co Category SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 0.0000 0.9340 0.9340 5.0000e- 005 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 I Total CO2 CH4 MT/yr 0.0000 1 0.9350 N2O CO2e Archit. Coating :: t 0.0000 , 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 -' ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• Off-Road :: 1 0.0000 , 1.2766 • 1.2766 • 1.3000e-• 0.0000 • 1.2795 ., , 004 ., __!__ __!_ _I -_!___ _,_ I Total 0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.2795 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 23 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM 3.7 Architectural Coating -2017 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx co Category SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 I Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Hauling :: t 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 : 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 ■I j I ■I I I I I I I I -,------,-j I I I I I --.. -.. ---.. ----------,-------,-------,--------.-------,-------,--------.-------_______ ,. -------,-------,-------,--------,--------r .... ----- Vendor :: t 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 -' ■I I I I I I I I I I j I I I I I ----.. ---.. ----------,-------,-------,--------.-------,-------,--------.-------,-------"T'"-------.. -----.. -,-------,-------,--------,-------... ----.. -.. 1 Worker • • • • • • • • t 0.0000 • 0.9340 • 0.9340 • 5.0000e-• 0.0000 • 0.9350 , 005 Total 4.0 Operational Detail -Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx co Category SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total ' 0.0000 0.9340 0.9340 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 I Total CO2 5.0000e- 005 CH4 MT/yr 0.0000 0.9350 N2O CO2e Mitigated :: t 0.0000 : 739.2716 : 739.2716 : 0.0287 • 0.0000 : 739.8745 -' ■I I I I I I I I I I j I I I I I ------.. -.... -.,.. _ -----...,.._ -----...,.._ -----...,.. -------.-------...,.. ------...,.. -------.-------...,.. -------.--------.. ------•r-------.,.. -------,--------,--------r -------Unmitigated •• • 0.0000 • 739.2716 • 739.2716 • 0.0287 • 0.0000 , 739.8745 ., ., CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 24 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday I Saturday jSunday AnnualVMT Annual VMT Industrial Park • 950.94 , 340.21 1 99.74 • 1,945,649 • 1,945,649 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ~--------------~-----------t-----------~------------------------1--------------------------Parking Lot : 0.00 , 0.00 1 0.00 • ~ Total 950.94 I 340.21 I 99.74 1,945,649 1,945,649 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip% Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW Primary I Diverted I Pass-by Industrial Park . 9.50 I 7.30 I 7.30 . 59.00 I 28.00 I 13.00 . 79 . 19 . 2 . I I ■ I I ■ • ■ ■ • • • • ■ • • ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ • • • ■ ■ • • ■., .. • • • • • • -• • T -• • • -• • • -,. • • -• • • • • • • -r • • • • • • -.. -r • .. • • .. • • • ·r • • -• • • -• • -• w • -• • • -• • • '" • ., -• • • • • • .. • • r • • -• • • • • • • • • • • • • .. Parking Lot . 9.50 ' 7.30 ' 7.30 . 0.00 0.00 ' 0.00 . 0 . 0 . . ' ' . ' . . . LDA 1 LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCV I SBUS I 0.513300· 0.073549• 0.191092• 0.130830• 0.036094• 0.005140• 0.012550' 0.022916• 0.001871 • 0.002062· 0.006564• 0.000586• ■ I I I I I I I I I I I §·9 ijP8£WJ>etail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Exceed Title 24 0 MH 0.003446 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 25 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM ROG I NOx I co I SO2 I Fugitive I Exhaust I PM10 PM10 Category tons/yr PM10 Total I Fugitive I PM2.5 Exhaust I PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 I Total CO2 I MT/yr CH4 I N2O I C02e Electricity Mitigated •• I 0.0000 • 642.2316 • 642.2316 • 0.0259 • 5.3500e-• 644.4324 :: i I I I 003 I ■I I I I I I I I I I I -~--0 O o --•••••••••----------------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------••••••••1---------,--------,-------T••••••• Electricity •• t 0.0000 • 718.4524 • 718.4524 • 0.0289 • 5.9800e-• 720.9144 Unmitigated :: 1 ' ' ' 003 ' ■I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I -----.. -----.. --,-----....-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------,-------"T"-------• -------,-------,-------,-------,-------"T -------NaturalGas •• ', 0.0000 , 116.5190 • 116.5190 • 2.2300e-• 2.1400e-• 117.2281 Mitigated :: 1 ' ' ' 003 ' 003 ' ■I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ----------•.r-------.--------,--------.--------,--------,--------.--------,-------..,..-------,--------•-.. -.... -•r--------,--------,--------,--------r ------- NaturalGas •• • 0.0000 • 153.3318 • 153.3318 • 2.9400e-• 2.8100e-• 154.2649 Unmitigated :: : 003 003 5.2 Energy by Land Use -NaturalGas Unmitigated Land Use NaturalGa sUse kBTU/yr ROG NOx co SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 I Total CO2 CH4 MT/yr N2O CO2e Industrial Park • 2.87333e 11, 11 0.0000 , 153.3318 • 153.3318 • 2.9400e-, 2.8100e-• 154.2649 :+0061: 1 ' ' '003' 003' I 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----------.-------.. -------,-------,-------,-------,---.-----,------,-------,-------"T"--------1 -------1-------,-------,-------,--------r -------Parking Lot O t , 1 • t 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 Total 11 ' & I, ---~---~ __ ,______ ----~--• ---~-- 0.0000 153.3318 I 153.3318 I 2.94ooe- 003 2.81 00e-I 154.2649 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 5.2 Energy by Land Use -NaturalGas Land Use NaturalGa s Use kBTU/yr ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr Page 26 of 32 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 I Total CO2 CH4 N20 C02e MT/yr Parking Lot O :; t 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 ~ I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----------,.. ------•1--------,--------,-------,-------.,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"-------.. ---.. -.. -,--------,--------.--------,-------"T' -.. -----Industrial Park , 2.183480 &, • • • • • • • I 0.0000 • 116.5190 • 116.5190 • 2.2300e-• 2.14000-• 117.2281 : +006 :: t ' 003 003 ~-11 __ I I -__ I ___ _ Total 5.3 Energy by Land Use -Electricity Unmitigated Land Use Electricity II Total CO2 Use kWh/yr CH4 N20 C02e MT/yr Industrial Park : 2.048080 :: 669.3317 : 0.0269 : 5.57000-: 671.6254 ,+006&, I ,003, I 11 I I I Parking Lot ~ 150304 i',, 49.1207 ~ 1.98000-~ 4.10000--;-49.2890 ,: I 003 004 &, Total 718.4524 I 0.0289 I 5.98ooe-I 720.9144 003 0.0000 I 116.5190 I 116.5190 I 2.2300e-I 2.14000-I 117.2281 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 5.3 Energy by Land Use -Electricity Land Use Electricity II Total CO2 Use kWh/yr CH4 MT/yr N20 CO2e Industrial Park : 1.81486e :: 593.1110: 0.0239 : 4.9400e-: 595.1434 ,+0061, , ,003, I 11 I I I Parking Lot :-150304 •11: 49.1207 ~ 1.98008-~ 4.1 000e-";° 49.2890 ' 1: ' 003 004 Total 6.0 Area Detail 1, ____ ,_ 642.2316 I o.02ss I s.3so0e-I 644.4324 003 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area Page 27 of 32 ROG I NOx I co I SO2 Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 PM2.5 PM2.5 l Total Category tons/yr Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM Bio-co21 NBio-CO2 I Total co~L I N20 I C02e MT/yr Mitigated •• ', 0.0000 0.0101 • 0.0101 • 3.0000e-, 0.0000 • 0.0106 :: I 1 005 1 ■I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • .r-------.--------r-------.--------.--------r-------..... -------.--------.--------,--------· • • • • • • •~--------,--------.--------.--------r •••••••I Unmitigated •• • 0.0000 • 0.0101 • 0.0101 • 3.0000e-• 0.0000 • 0.0106 : : ~ CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 28 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG I NOx SubCategory I co I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 tons/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 I NBlo-CO2 I Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Architectural :: t 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 Coating ., 1 ■I I I I I I I I I I j I I I I I ••••••••••••--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------T--------t••••••-1--------,--------,--------,-------T••••••• Consumer •• • • t 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 Products :: 1 ■I I I I I I I I I I j I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • ---------,--------,--------,--------.--------,--------,--------,--------,-------T--------t • • •"' • • •1--------,-------"t--------.--------r •••••••I Landscaping :: • • • • t 0.0000 , 0.0101 • 0.0101 , 3.0000e-• 0.0000 • 0.0106 •• I 005 Total Mitigated Subcategory ., _I ___ ,____ I I I I ROG NOx co SO2 I Fugitive I Exhaust I PM10 PM10 PM10 Total tons/yr I Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 0.0000 0.0101 0.0101 3.0000e- 005 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 I Total CO2 CH4 MT/yr 0.0000 0.0106 N2O CO2e Architectural •• t 0.0000 , 0.0000 1 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 Coating :: , 1 ■I I I I I I I ·----i----I j I I I I I .. ----.. ---.. -.. -------,-------,-------,--------.-------,-------,-------,----,--------.. ---.... --,--------.--------.--------.-------... -------Consumer •• • • • t 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 1 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 Products :: & ■1 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I f • • • • • • • • .. • • .. --------.--------.--------.--------.--------.--------.--------.--------.-------"T"--------t .. • • • • • •1--------.--------.--------.--------.-• .. •••••I Landscaping :: • • • • • ! 0.0000 • 0.0101 0.0101 • 3.0000e-• 0.0000 • 0.0106 •• , I 005 ., '---· _,__ __,_ _ __ ,_ ~ . Total I I I I 7.0 Water Detail 0.0000 0.0101 0.0101 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0106 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Apply Water Conservation Strategy Total CO2 I CH4 I N2O Category MT/yr Mitigated ., 111.8471 • 0.8278 ' 0.0203 ., ' ' ., ' ' I CO2e : 135.5281 ' ■I I I I -----------.r ------..,.. ------..,.. -------r ---.. -.. -Unmitigated •• 144.4754 • 1.0350 ' 0.0254 • 174.0927 .. . ., ' .. ' 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated ' ' lndoor/Outll Total CO2 I CH4 door Use Land Use Mgal . N2O MT/yr CO2e Industrial Park , 31.5957 / :• 144.4754 • 1.0350 • 0.0254 , 174.0927 : 0 1: : : I I 11 I I I Parking Lot ,. 0 / 0 !'1, 0.0000 ~ 0.0000 ~ 0.0000 -;-0.0000 ' ' I, I, Total 144.4754 I 1.0350 o.0254 I 174.0927 Page 29 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated lndoor/Outll Total CO2 I CH4 door Use Land Use Mgal N20 MT/yr C02e Industrial Park • 25.2766 / :• 111.8471 • 0.8278 , 0.0203 • 135.5281 : 0 ,: : I I 11 I I I Parking Lot .. 0 IO 1: 0.0000 , 0.0000 ~ 0.0000 -;-0.0000 1, 11 --~ Total 111.8471 I 0.8278 0.0203 I 135.5281 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services CategoryNear Total CO2 I CH4 I N20 I C02e MT/yr Mitigated :: 25.7931 : 1.5243 • 0.0000 : 57.8039 ■I I I ■I I I I •• U..;-~itig"ai;d·. ::-34~3907-:--2.0324--:--0.0000--:- 0 77~0718 -., Page 30 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Land Use Waste II Total CO2 Disposed tons CH4 N2O MT/yr CO2e Industrial Park • 169.42 :: 34.3907 : 2.0324 : 0.0000 : 77.0718 11 I I I I, I I I Parking Lot ,. O .. ,,, 0.0000 ., 0.0000 ~ 0.0000 -;-0.0000 . . ~ . 1, ---'-----' Total 34.3907 I 2.0324 0.0000 I 77.0718 Mitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MT/yr Industrial Park : 127.065 :: 25.7931 I 1.5243 I 0.0000 I 57.8039 I I I . I, I . . . I, . I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• Parking Lot . 0 I, 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 . I, I I I . I, I I I . I, I I I Total 25.7931 1.5243 0.0000 57.8039 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Page 31 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 32 of 32 Date: 1/29/2016 12:49 PM 10.0 Vegetation .. Appendix B EMISSION REDUCTION ADJUSTMENTS FOR HIGH-TECH INDUSTRIAL PROJECT .. EMISSION REDUCTION ADJUSTMENTS FOR HIGH-TECH INDUSTRIAL PROJECT Methodology for Calculating Mobile Emissions for Business as Usual (BAU) and Project with Design Features Transportation-related emissions reductions would be achieved through mandatory regulations applicable to all vehicle emissions within the state and are not attributable to specific greenhouse gas reduction features of the Project. The vehicle emission factors in CalEEMod reflect the Pavley I and Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) regulations. As a result, the CalEEMod results for the BAU scenario were corrected to reflect the conditions that were current at the time of the 2008 Scoping Plan. The reduction for Pavley I and LCFS are based on the CARB Pavley I and Low Carbon Fuel Standard Postprocessor User's Guide. Tables I and 2 of this user's guide show that emissions from vehicles would be reduced by IO percent through LCFS by the year 2020 (CARB 2010a). An average of 29.7 percent of emissions from light-duty automobiles and medium-duty vehicles would be reduced through Pavley I. Therefore, BAU emissions were corrected to reverse the 39.7 percent mobile emissions reduction. The credit for Pavley II is based on the 2008 CARB Scoping Plan reductions for sector-specific activity. Pavley II reductions counted towards the 2020 target is 4 MMT CO2e (CARB 2010b) and projected 2020 BAU transportation-related emissions is 168.2 MMT CO2e (CARB 2010c), therefore the reduction is 2.38 percent (4 MMT CO2e/168.2 MMT CO2e). It was assumed that a similar reduction would be appropriate for vehicle emissions in the City. Project emissions were corrected to account for mobile emission reductions associated with Pavley II. Table B-1 UNCORRECTED AND CORRECTED CALEEMOD OUTPUTS FOR BAU AND PROJECT WITH DESIGN FEATURES EMISSIONS (MOBILE) (ANNUAL MT CO2e) BAU BAU Project Project Source CaIEEMod CalEEMod CaIEEMod CalEEMod Emissions Emissions Emissions 2 Emissions ( uncorrected) ( corrected) 1 (uncorrected) ( corrected)3 Vehicular (Mobile) Sources 739.87 1,207.17 739.87 717.69 Notes: 1 Reverses the 39.7 percent mobile emission reduction to adjust model default to allow reduction credit for Pavley I and LCFS. 2 Includes Pavley I and LCFS reduction (model default) 3 Includes reduction of 2.3 percent for Pavely II regulations B-1 .. Methodology for Calculating Energy-related Emissions from BAU and Project with Design Features Energy-related emissions reductions would be achieved largely through state regulations, goals, and policies. Based on the 2008 CARB Scoping Plan, the Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) would reduce energy-related emissions by 11 percent. Refer to Table B-2 for calculations. Table B-2 RENEW ABLES PORTFOLIO STANDARD REDUCTION CALCULATIONS Sector1 Projected 2020 Emissions (MMT CO2e) Electricity 139.2 Commercial and Residential 46.7 TOTAL 185.9 Reduction Counted Reduction Measure2 Toward 2020 Target (MMTCO2e) Renewables Portfolio Standard 21.3 Percenta2e Reduction 11% Notes: 1 Source: 2008 Scoping Plan, Table 1, 2002-2004 Average Emissions and 2020 Projected Emissions (BAU) 2 Source: 2008 Scoping Plan, Table 2, Recommended Greenhouse Gas Reduction Measures CalEEMod defaults do not include reductions from the RPS; therefore, the BAU scenario did not require a correction. Emissions for the Project with design features were corrected to include the reduction from this measure. Table B-3 UNCORRECTED AND CORRECTED CALEEMOD OUTPUTS FOR BAU AND PROJECT WITH DESIGN FEATURES EMISSIONS (ENERGY) (ANNUAL MT CO2e) BAU Project Project Source CalEEMod Emissions CalEEMod Emissions CalEEMod Emissions ( uncorrected)1 ( corrected)2 Energy Sources 875.18 644.43 564.56 Notes: 1 Includes reduction for energy efficiency in accordance with 2013 Title 24 and no natural gas consumption 2 Includes reduction of 11 percent for RPS. B-2 . ' Methodology for Calculating Water-related Emissions from BAU and Project with Design Features As shown in Table B-2, the RES would reduce electricity-related emissions by 11 percent. Water-related emissions are due to the electricity used to convey and treat water; therefore, the RES reduction can also be applied to water-related emissions. CalEEMod defaults do not include reductions from the RES; therefore, the BAU scenario did not require a correction. Emissions for the Project with design features were corrected to include the reduction from this measure. Table B-4 summarizes adjustments due to the above correction and project design features. Table B-4 UNCORRECTED AND CORRECTED CALEEMOD OUTPUTS FOR UNMITIGATED (BAU) AND PROJECT WITH DESIGN FEATURES EMISSIONS-WATER (ANNUAL MTCO2e) Source Unmitigated/BAU Project (uncorrected)1 Water 174.09 135.53 Notes: 1 Includes project design features discussed in Section 2.0. 2 Includes electricity reduction of 11.1 percent for RES. B-3 Project ( corrected)2 116.24