Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1781 SKIMMER CT; ; CBR2018-0077; PermitBuilding Permit Finaled Residential Permit 4LCity of C arlsbad Permit No: CBR2O18-0077 Print Date: 08/03/2020 Job Address: 1781 SKIMMER CT, CARLSBAD, CA 92011-3609 Permit Type: BLDG-Residential Work Class: Parcel #: 2150505700 Track #: Valuation: $546,401.23 Lot #: Occupancy Group: . Project #: #of Dwelling Units: Plan #: Bedrooms: Construction Type: Bathrooms: Orig. Plan Check #: Plan Check #: Status: Closed - Finaled Single Family Replacemel Applied: 01/10/2018 Issued: 08/23/2019 DEV2018-0032 Finaled Close Out: Inspector: LStor Final Inspection: 08/03/2020 Project Title: SNYDER RESIDENCE Description: SNYDER: REPLACEMENT SFD 2-STORY 3,380 SF II 672 SF GARAGE //370 SF PATIO COVER Applicant: Property Owner: JACOR CONSTRUCTION INC SNYDER JAMES M & DRINCO DAVID MIKE SNYDER 1781 SKIMMER CT 10612 PROSPECT AVE, # SUITE 101 CARLSBAD, CA 92011 SANTEE, CA 92071-8500 (619)562-8183 FEE AMOUNT BRIDGE & THOROUGHFARE District 2-Zone 21 $16,000.00 BUILDING PERMIT FEE ($2000+) $2,178.00 BUILDING PLAN CHECK FEE (BLDG) - .$1,382.50 DRAINAGE FEE PLDAD Medium Runoff $3,566.36 ELECTRICAL BLDG RESIDENTIAL NEW/ADDITION/REMODEL , $96.00 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION $170.00 MECHANICAL BLDG RESIDENTIAL NEW/ADDITION/REMODEL $110.00 PLUMBING BLDG RESIDENTIAL NEW/ADDITION/REMODEL $224.00 PUBLIC FACILITIES FEES - outside CFD $10,996.94 5B1473 GREEN BUILDING STATE STANDARDS FEE $22.00 SEWER BENEFIT AREA FEES - J $2,032.00 SEWER CONNECTION FEE (General Capacity all areas) $960.00 STRONG MOTION-RESIDENTIAL $71.03 SWPPP INSPECTION FEE TIER 1 - Medium BLDG $246.00 SWPPP PLAN REVIEW FEE TIER 1 - MEDIUM $56.00 TRAFFIC IMPACT Residential Single Fam. Outside CFD $3,390.00 WATER METER FEE 1" Displacement (P) $54.00 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION FEE 3/4" DISPLACEMENT (P) $1,825.00 Total Fees: $43,379.83 Total Payments To Date: $43,379.83 Balance Due:. . $0.00 Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exaction." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to.timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of-limitation has previously otherwise expired. Building Division Page 1 of 1 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad CA 92008-7314 1 760-602-2700 1 760-602-8560 f I www.carlsbadca.gov FOLLOWING APPROVALS REQUIRED PRIOR TO'PEIIT ISSUANCE: [:]PLANNING,'- 0 ENGINEERING 0 BUILDING 0 FIRE [:]HEALTH 0 HAZMATIAPCD Building Permit Application Plan Check NoQ,BRl OTl Est. Value &. -Lfl. I YD 4&.,.. City of 1635 Faraday Ave., Càrlsbad, CA 92008 Ph: 760-602-2719 Fax: 760-602-8558 . Plan Ck. Deposit C arlsba.I email: buiIdingcarlsbadca.gov Date , , I ISWPP www.carlsbadca.gov JOB ADDRESS , 1781 Skimmer Court UITE#/SPACE#/UNIT# APN 215 - 050 - 57 - 00 CT/PROJECT U LOT U PHASE U U OF UNITS U BATHROOMS TENANT BUSINESS NAME CONSTR. TYPE [0Cc. GROUP 1 I #BEDROOMS, 4- 3 V-B R-3 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Include Square Feet of Affected Area(s) 2 story single family residence.3,38,0 s.f.living area EXISTING USE PROPOSED USE GARAGE (SF) PATIOS (SF) I QfCKS (SF) FIREPLACE AIR CONDITIONING FIRE SPRINKLERS Vacaiit Lot " SR 672 - 370 YESfJ# . NOE YES NOE YESNOE APPLICANT NAME Mike Snycer , Contact NAME O(OWNER Pftant James M. Snyder ADDRESS ' 10612 Prospect Ave ADDRESS 10612 Prospect Ave CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP Santee CA 92071 Santee CA 92071 PHONE FAX PHONE FAX 619-562-8183 619-562-8183 EMAIL . - EMAIL DESIGN PROFESSIONAL Roy Johnson CONTRACTOR BUS. NAME Js(- c"—' Z2- ADDRESS 7830 La MesaBlvd ADDRESS /e)" 2. P_.por ,4%J CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP La Mesa CA 91942 .7j6_ PHONE 619-462-8660 . FAX ' 4Z 172 Ir EMAIL PHONE FAX -1 rsjaia(sbcglobalnet EMAIL EMAIL c c',fl [STATE LIC. U C-7742 STATE UC.U. t. CLASS f-( CITY BUS. LIC,U k?Lo~ 1351 (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which .requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any.viotation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500)). Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penally of pe4ury one of the following declarations., I have and will maintain a certificate of consent W self.lnsure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of -the Labor Code, for the perfohnance of the work for which this permit is issued. and will maintain workers' comDensitión, as required by Section 37 0 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My workers' compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Co. ' t"' Policy No. Qçi,5-0 /_777 Expiration Dale /0I This section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dolls 00) or less. - [] Certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of lb Ii for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compen n coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars (&100,000), In addition to the cost of compensation, damages as prey' d r in Section 3 06 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE [:]AGENT DATE/—f .' -( 7 thereby affirm that lam exempt onfraclor's.License Law for the following reason: [J I, as owner of the prope r my employees with wages as their sale compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not pply loan owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). [J I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply loan owner of property who builds or improves thereon. and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). U I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: - I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. Elves [—]No I (have! have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. - I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name address! phone! contractors' license number): I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name! address! phone! contractors' license number): I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons 10 provide the work indicated (include name! address! phone! type of work): ..PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE []AGENT DATE I Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 Yes 0 No Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 Yes 0 No Is the facility lobe constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 Yes 0 No IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agencyfor the performance of the work this permit is issued (Sec. 3097 (I) Civil Code). Lenders Name Lender's Address I certitythat I have read the application and state that the above information is nect and thatthe information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representative of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the ye mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENS lCH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY INCONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0dee n emolilion or construction of structures over 3stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building alund rovisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become nut and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the bu g or a orized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced fora period of 180 days (Section 106A.4 Uniform BuildingCodé). .APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE - DATE /t Permit Type: BLDG-Residential Application Date: 01/10/2018 Owner: COOWNER SNYDER JAMES M & DRINCO DAVID Work Class: Single Family Replacement Issue Date: 08/23/2019 Subdivision: Status:. Closed - Finaled Expiration Date: 08/31/2020 Address: 1781 SKIMMER CT IVR Number: 8817 CARLSBAD, CA 92011-3609 Scheduled Actual Inspection Type - Inspection No. Inspection Primary Inspector Reinspection Inspection Date Start Date status Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Please relocate address numbers, Need Yes • final paperwork, HERS report, waste and recycling forms. Please provide pictures of • • a C, FAU uñitln attic space. BLDG-Plumbing Final • Yes BLDG-Mechanical Final Yes BLDG-Structural Final : Yes BLDG-Electrical Final Yes Monday, August 3, 2020 • • Page 4 of 4 Permit Type: BLDG-Residential Application Date: 01/10/2018 Owner: COOWNER SNYDER JAMES M & DRINCO DAVID Work Class: Single Family Replacement Issue Date: 08/23/2019 Subdivision: Status: Closed - Finaled Expiration Date: 08/31/2020 Address: 1781 SKIMMER CT IVR Number: 8817 CARLSBAD, CA 92011-3609 Scheduled Actual Inspection Type Inspection No. Inspection Primary Inspector Reinspection Inspection Date Start Date Status Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency No BLDG-18 Exterior 113205-2019 Passed' Luke Stomo Complete Lath/Drywall Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed • BLDG-Building Deficiency Path and drywall only No -Gas test required. 1211112019 12111/2019 BL6G-23 113432-2019 Passed Luke Storno Complete Gas/Test/Repairs • Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency No 02/14/2020 02/1412020 BLDG-33 Service 119523-2020 Failed Luke Storno Reinspdction Incomplete Change/upgrade Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed. BLDG-Building Deficiency Work not ready No 03I03/2020 03/03I2020 BLDG-33 Service 121066-2020 Passed Michael Collins Complete Change/Upgrade - Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Work not ready No BLDG-Building Deficiency EMR emailed to SDGE Yes 07IO2/2020 07/02I2020 BLDG-Gas Meter 131744-2020 Passed Michael Collins Complete Release Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency 7/02/20, GMR emailed to SDGE Yes BLDG-Building Deficiency No 07/23/2020 07/23/2020 BLDG-Final Inspection 133534-2020 Partial Pass Chris Renfro - - Reinspection Incomplete Checklist Item •. COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Please relocate address numbers, Need No final paperwork, HERS report, waste and recycling forms. Please provide pictures of a C, FAU unit in attic space. BLDG-Plumbing Final • No BLDG-Mechanical Final No BLDG-Structural Final • No BLDG-Electrical Final • • • No 08/03I2020 08/03/2020 BLDG-Final Inspection 134478-2020 Passed - Paul Burnette - - - Complete Monday, August 3, 2020 • • • • • Page 3 of 4 Permit Type: BLDG-Residential Application Date: 01/10/2018 Owner: COOWNER SNYDER JAMES M & DRINCO DAVID Work Class: Single Family Replacement Issue Date: 08/23/2019 Subdivision: Status: Closed - Finaled Expiration Date: 08/31/2020 Address: 1781 SKIMMER CT CARLSBAD, CA 92011-3609 IVR Number: 8817 Scheduled Actual Inspection Type Inspection No. Inspection Primary Inspector Reinspection Inspection Date Start Date Status BLDG-15 Roof/ReRoof 108357-2019 Passed Luke Stomo - Complete (Patio) - Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency No 11/20/2019 11/20/2019 BLDG-13 Shear 111434-2019 Failed Luke Stomo Reinspection Incomplete Panels/HD (Ok to wrap) Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Work not ready No 11122/2019 11/22/2019 BLDG-13 Shear. 111737-2019 Failed Luke Storno Reinspection Incomplete Panels/HD (Ok to wrap) Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency No shear inspection No BLDG-84 Rough - 111738-2019 Cancelled Luke Storno Reinspection Incomplete Combo(14,24,34,44) Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency No BLDG-14 No Frame-Steel-Bolting-Welding (Decks) BLDG-24 Rough-Topout No BLDG-34 Rough Electrical No BLDG-44 No Rough-Ducts-Dampers 11/27/2019 11/2712019 BLDG-84 Rough 112211-2019 Passed Paul Burnette Complete Combo(14,24,34,44) Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes BLDG-14 Yes Frame-Steel-Bolting-Welding (Decks) BLDG-24 Rough-Topout Yes BLDG-34 Rough Electrical Yes BLDG44 Yes Rough-Ducts-Dampers 12/04/2019 12104/2019 BLDG-16 Insulation 112609-2019 Passed Paul York - Complete Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes 12/10/2019 12/10/2019 BLDG-17 Interior II3206-2019 Passed Luke Stomo Complete Lath/Drywall Monday, August 3, 2020 Page 2 of 4 Building Permit Inspection History Finaled city of Carlsbad Permit Type: BLDG-Residential Application Date: 01/10/2018 Owner: COOWNER SNYDER JAMES M & DRINCO DAVID Work Class: Single Family Replacement Issue Date: 08/23/2019 Subdivision: Status: Closed - Finaled Expiration Date: 08/31/2020 Address: 1781 SKIMMER CT CARLSBAD, CA 92011-3609 IVR Number: 8817 Scheduled Actual Inspection Type Inspection No. Inspection Primary Inspector Reinspection Inspection Date Start Date Status 1112512019 BLDG-84 Rough 112027.2019 Cancelled Luke Storno Reinspection Incomplete Combo(14,24,34,44) Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency No BLDG-14 No Frame-Steel-Bolting-Welding (Decks) BLDG-24 Rough-Topout No BLDG-34 Rough Electrical No BLDG-44 No Rough-Ducts-Dampers 08126/2019 08/26/2019 BLDG-SW-Pre-Con 101958-2019 Failed Paul Burnette Reinspection Incomplete Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency No 08/2812019 08128/2019 BLDG-SW-Pre-Con 102265-2019 Passed Paul Burnette Complete Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes 0910512019 0910512019 BLDG-21 103020-2019 Passed Paul York Complete undergroundlunderflo or Plumbing Checklist Item COMMENTS . Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes BLDG-22 Sewer/Water 103021-2019 Passed Paul York Complete Service Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency . Yes 09/1112019 09/1112019 BLDG-11 103740-2019 Partial Pass Paul York. Reinspection Incomplete FoundationlFtglPiers (Rebar) Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency . . No 1012312019 10/23/2019 BLDG-I3 Shear 108356.2019 . Failed Luke Storno Réinspection Incomplete Panels/HD (Ok to wrap) Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency No Mondays August 3, 2020 Page 1 of 4 EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION & ENGINEERING, INC. (Mailing) P. 0. Box 1941 • Lakeside, CA 92040 10925 Hartley Road, Suite "1" I Santee, CA 92071 Telephone (619) 258-7901 p • I t - I ___ R.S.CE1VFD CI FY OF CARLSBAD AUG 152019 Si Pc c (city of Carlsbad CM&t DIVISION PROJECT INSPECTOR: Eric Martinez PAD CERTIFICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT DATE: 8/12/2019 PROJECT ID CDP20I 8-0019 GRADING PERMIT NO.GR201 8-0053 LOT(S) REQUESTED FOR RELEASE: I N/A = NOT APPLICABLE • V= COMPLETE • 0 = incomplete or unacceptable - As-Built (Redlihes) are up to'date and available onsite for reference. All daily geotechnical observation reports, compaction reports and letters from geotechnical engineer 'submitted, including: pad,'retaining walls, utility trenches, slopes, paved access roads and parking lots. opt 3. Site security and fencing installed for separation of construction activity from public. 4. Letter from EOW documenting that the finished pad elevations match the plan elevations for specific V lot(s). S. Letter from the project QSD certifying that all construction related BMPs are installed in, accordance with rsJ fr City of Carlsbad Storm Water Standards. V 6. Site access to requested lot(s) adequate and logically grouped, including ,a designated staging area for building phase of work. All onsité underground utilities installed and ready for service. Identification and protection of city sewer infrastructure is implemented, including manhole protection, false bottoms and sediment traps. Permanent/Temporary Fire Access Plan approved by Fire Department representative, and implemented on site. rVI 10. Letter from Owner/Dev requesting pad certification of the specific lot(s) with 8'/a" xli" site plan.. Pad certification for the above stated lots is approved for the purpose of building permit issuance. V Issuance of building permits is still subject to all city requirements. U The above stated lots are conditionally approved for a building permit to install retaining walls required for pad certification only. re conditionally approved for a building permit to install foundations only.. Al qllq Date 07 Date Public Works Construction Management & Inspection 1635 Faraday Avenue I Carlsbad, CA 92008 1 760-602-2780 1760-438-4178 fax oc 2olq,or EsGil A SAFEbuRt Company DATE: 4/24/18 JURlSDlCTlON:C4r1thád (dPLICANT U JURIS. PLAN CHECK #.: CBR2018-0077 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 1781 Skimmer Court PROJECT NAME: SFR with Attached Garage, Deck & Covered Patio for James Snyder The plans transmitted herewith havebeen corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. J The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at EsGil until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the-check list has been sent to: Mike Snyder, 10612 Prospect Ave., Santee, CA 92071 EsGil staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. EsGil staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Mike Snyder Telephone #: 619 562-8183 Date contacted: " (by:Y Email: mikeiacor-sd.com Mail Telephone Fax In Person El REMARKS: By: ALl SADRE, S.E. (for T.F.) Enclosures: EsGil 4/17 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil A SAFEbulitCompany DATE: 3130/18 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK #.: CBR2018-0077 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 1781 Skimmer Court APPLICANT (2r PROJECT NAME: Custom SFR with Attached Garage, Deck and Covered Patio for James Snyder The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at EsGil until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. El The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Mike Snyder, 10612 Prospect Ave., Santee, CA 92071 EsGil staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. EsGil staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Mike Snyder Telephone #: 619 562-8183 Date contacted: 3 ( (i (by40) Email: mikeciacor-sd.com Telephone Fax In Person 6it ¶bI By: Tamara Fischer Enclosures: EsGil 3/22/18 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad CBR2018-0077 3/30/18 NOTE: The items listed below are from the previous correction list. These remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The numbers of the items are from the previous check list and may not necessarily be in sequence. The notes in bold font are current. Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit FOUR new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (THREE sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring TWO corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil is complete. EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS 6. Guards (Section R312): Please provide a referenced detail for each condition of guard, including along stair opening and along open sides of stairs. The details on sheet S-5 are incomplete. Shall have a height of 42" (may be 34" along the sides of stairs). Please dimension at stair guardrail. Openings between railings shall be less than 4". The triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a guardrail at a stair shall be less than 6". Please specify for all guardrails. Shall be detailed to show capability to resist a concentrated load of 200 pounds in any direction along the top rail. Table R301.5. Structural calculations may be required. Structural connection details and possibly calculations are required for each of the 3 guardrail conditions. CONTINUED Carlsbad CBR2018-0077 3/30/18 ROOFS/DECKS/BALCONIES 11. Specify a minimum slope for drainage at deck of W12". 2x12s will end up less than 9 ½" deep when ripped. Section R905.9.1. To achieve the required slope, the depth will be less than the required 9 1/2I at the ripped 2x12s. 13. Please specify Class A and approval IAMPO ER 493 for the Enduro-Kote deck covering. ICC ESR 2245 is no longer a valid report. Sorry for the typo in the original correction. The approval is IAMPO ER 483. GARAGE All elements supporting the floor above the garage shall be protected on the garage side with minimum ½" gypsum board. Section R302.6. I see the callout for walls, but not other supporting elements. SOILS AND STRUCTURAL Per City requirements, all new residential buildings require a soils report. An update letter is required if the report is more than 3 years old. Please provide a copy of the project soil report. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with Section R401.4. Also, please revise Design Criteria on sheet S-I to include the soil design parameters from the soil report. The soil report was received. The following corrections apply: The spacing of the slab steel per soil report recommendations should be maximum 16" o.c. 18" o.c. specified on the plans. Pad footings should have a minimum dimension of 24" and reinforcing of #4 at a maximum of 12" o.c. each way per soil report recommendations. Please revise the plans to Show compliance for all pads. CONTINUED Carlsbad CBR2018-0077 3/30/18 20. If the soils engineer recommends that he/she review the foundation excavations, note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and C) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." Please add the above note per the last paragraph on page 11 of the soil report. 21. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (if required by the soil report). Please provide the letter per the last paragraph on page 11 of the soil report. 23. Show distance from foundation to edge of cut or fill slopes and show slope and heights of cuts and fills. Show compliance with Section R403.1.7. (If applicable). I see 7' to daylight is shown. This would be adequate for a slope height of 21' maximum. From google earth it appears the height of the slope may exceed 21'. Please indicate the total height of the slope and show compliance with the above section. 27. Balconies and decks shall be designed for 150% of the live load required by Table 1607.1. CBC Table 1607.1, as amended by emergency building standards. Please revise calculations to show that deck framing and support complies. Also, please revise design criteria on sheet S-I to include deck loading. Please revise design criteria on sheet S-I to include deck loading. 30. Please show vertical supports for girder trusses. One of the posts is shown at grid 4 instead of grid 3. CONTINUED Carlsbad CBR20 18-0077 3/30/18 34. The lateral calculations at several walls state, "Perforated" and the entire wall length, including openings is used for overturning calculations. These walls are not shown on the plans as perforated shear walls. Either show them as perforated or use each separate wall length (between openings) for overturning calculations. I see additional calculations and details have been provided. The following corrections apply: Please make it clear on the plans at all perforated shear wall locations that the entire wall, including above and below openings is to be sheathed. It is unclear why the total shear was divided by (37x2) at line B/C. 37. Shear wall line at the back of garage / back of powder and bath 4 should be calculated separately from walls at front of garage / front of bedroom 4. They are offset by up to 28'. I see the new calculation for grid line A.7; however, grid line BIC needs to be recalculated to remove the lengths from A.7. Even though the shear load to the line will be reduced, it appears that the unit shear will be significantly higher. Detail 111S5 which is referenced at 2/S5 is missing. I see 11/S4 is now referenced, but this detail does not show the deck joists. Please provide a detail which shows the deck joists. Please call out all joist and truss hangers. I do not see that truss hangers are called out PME 50. Are there two FAUs? The 65,000 BTU unit seems low for the entire house. Also, energy design states there are 2 FAUs. If there is another one, please show its size and location. Provide an 18" raised platform for relocated FAU in the garage which may generate a flame or spark. CPC Section 507.13. CONTINUED Carlsbad CBR2018-0077 3/30/18 Specify on the plans the following information for the direct vent gas fireplace: The ICC number now specified is for an Isokern Fireplace which is a masonry modular fireplace (and would require calculations and detailing for its foundation and anchorage by the engineer). Keynote 10 specifies a metal fireplace. Please clarify. The ICC report for the Isokern fireplaces covers a wood-burning model which does not allow installation of glass doors and is in conflict with the California Energy standards which require glass doors, a B-vent gas model and a ventless gas model, neither of which comply with the California Green Code requirement of a direct-vent gas model. Most direct vent gas metal fireplaces do not have ICC approval. We will accept a UL listed model, but the manufacturer's name and product name or number must be indicated on the plans. Include on the plans the following specifications for electrical devices installed in dwellings: CEC Article 210 & 406 (See bold requirements for items requiring correction). All kitchen and laundry outlets must be combination GFCl I AFCI. Arc-fault protection for all outlets (not just receptacles) located in rooms described in NEC 210.12(A): Kitchens, laundry areas, family, living, bedrooms, dining, halls, etc. GFCI protected outlets for locations described in NEC 210.8(A): Laundry areas, kitchen dishwashers, all kitchen outlets, garages, bathrooms, outdoors, within 6' of a sink, etc. RESIDENTIAL GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS 61. Recycling. Note on the plans that the contractor shall submit a Construction Waste Management Plan, per CGC Section 4.408.2. Please submit the completed Carlsbad Special Form for Waste Management Plan (included). The completed form will be required before permit issuance. MISCELLANEOUS To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. indicate: Yes 0 No L3 The jurisdiction has contracted with EsGil, located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Tamara Fischer at EsGil. Thank you. EsGil A SAFEbuutCompany DATE: 1/23/18 U APPLICANT URIS. JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK #.: CBR2018-0077 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 1781 Skimmer Court PROJECT NAME: Custom SFR with Attached Garage, Deck and Covered Patio for James Snyder The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at EsGil until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Mike Snyder, 10612 Prospect Ave., Santee, CA 92071 EsGil staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. EsGil staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Mike Snyder Telephone #: 619 562-8183 2te coptacted\ (by rt)— Email c -' I~M-ail eIephon\ Fax In Person LII REMASJ'" By: Tamara Fischer Enclosures: EsGil 1/16/18 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad CBR20 18-0077 1/23/18 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK #.: CBR2018-0077 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 1781 Skimmer Court FLOOR AREA: 3380 sq ft SFD 672 sq ft Garage, 370 sq ft Coy Patio REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 1/23/18 STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: 25' approx per CRC DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 1/16/18 PLAN REVIEWER: Tamara Fischer FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the California version of the International Residential Code, International Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that construction comply with the 2016 edition of the California Code of Regulations (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 2015 IRC, 2015 IBC, 2015 UPC, 2015 UMC and 2014 NEC. The above regulations apply, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 105.4 of the 2015 International Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad CBR20 18-0077 1/23/18 Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit FOUR new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (THREE sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602- 2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring TWO corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil is complete. . PLANS On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items that will have a deferred submittal (fire sprinklers). Additionally, provide the following note on the plans: "Submittal documents for deferred submittal items shall be submitted to the registered design professional in responsible charge, who shall review them and forward them to the building official with a notation indicating that the deferred submittal documents have been reviewed and that they have been found to be in general conformance with the design of the building. The deferred submittal items shall NOT be installed until their design and submittal documents have been approved by the building official." . FIRE PROTECTION 2. Please provide the following note on the plans, "Smoke alarms shall be positioned to comply with the following: They shall be not less than 3' from the door opening of a bathroom. They shall be at least 20' from a cooking appliance. They shall be at least 3' from supply registers of heating/cooling systems. They, shall be at least 3' from the tip of the blade of a ceiling-mounted fan." . GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS 3. Bathrooms must be mechanically ventilated (an openable window won't suffice). Section R303.3.1. Portions of master bath and bath 2 with tubs and shower. CONTINUED Carlsbad CBR20 18-0077 1/23/18 4. Please specify header heights for windows. It appears that F windows at bathtubs will be within 5' of the standing surface of the tubs, thus requiring safety glazing. Please indicate this on the window schedule. Where a window sill is more than 6' above the finished grade, the lowest part of the window shall be at least 24" above the finished floor of the room. Glazing between the floor and a height of 24" shall be fixed or have openings such that a 4" sphere cannot pass through. Section R312.2. It appears that this may be a problem at some of the second-floor windows. If revising windows, keep in mind that each bedroom will still need an emergency egress window complying with section R310 and single hung windows generally need to be 5' high to comply. 5. Please specify the elevation difference between the garage and house. If more than 7 3/4", a step will be required. EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS 6. Guards (Section R312): Please provide a referenced detail for each condition of guard, including along stair opening and along open sides of stairs. Shall be installed along open-sided walking surfaces that are located more than 30" above the floor or grade below. Shall have a height of 4' (may be 34" along the sides of stairs). Openings between railings shall be less than 4". The triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a guardrail at a stair shall be less than 6". Shall be detailed to show capability to resist a concentrated load of 200 pounds in any direction along the top rail. Table R301.5. Structural calculations may be required. Show compliance with section 2407.1, 2016 CBC for the glass guard rail (glass type, factor of safety, support, etc). 7. Specify minimum stair run to be measured from the projection of the nosing. 8. A nosing (between %" and 1-W) shall be provided on stairways with solid risers. Exception: No nosing is required if the tread depth is at least 11 inches. Section R311.7.5.3. 9. Handrails (Section R311.7.8): The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-% inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. See Section R311.7.8.3 for alternatives. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 144 inches between the wall and the handrail. Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends. CONTINUED Carlsbad CBR20 18-0077 1/23/18 The walls and soffits of the enclosed usable space under stairs shall be protected on the enclosed side with Y2-inch gypsum board. Section R302.7. ROOFS/DECKS/BALCONIES Specify a minimum slope for drainage at deck of %":12". 2x12s will end up less than 9 W deep when ripped. Section R905.9.1. Enclosed framing in wood exterior balconies and decks shall be provided with openings that provide a net free cross ventilation area not less than 1/150 of the area of each separate space. CBC Section 2304.12.2.6, as amended by emergency building standards. Please specify Class A and approval IAMPO ER 493 for the Enduro-Kote deck covering. ICC ESR 2245 is no longer a valid report. Please specify Class A and which system # from ICC approval ESR 1388 is to be used for the Patio Cover roof covering. I see the deck drains shown. Please call out overflow drains or scuppers per Section R903.4- Overflow roof drains shall terminate in an area where they will be readily visible and will not cause damage to the building. If the roof drain terminates through a wall, the overflow drain shall terminate 12" minimum above the roof drain. City Policy 84-35. In order to use 1/300 of attic area for required ventilation, at least 40% (but not more than 50%) of the required vent area must be located no more than 3' below the ridge. Otherwise 1/150 must be used. Section R806.2. GARAGE All elements supporting the floor above the garage shall be protected on the garage side with minimum 1/z" gypsum board. Section R302.6. SOILS AND STRUCTURAL Per City requirements, all new residential buildings require a soils report. An update letter is required if the report is more than 3 years old. Please provide a copy of the project soil report. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with Section R401.4. Also, please revise Design Criteria on sheet S-I to include the soil design parameters from the soil report. CONTINUED Carlsbad CBR20 18-0077 1/23/18 If the soils engineer recommends that he/she review the foundation excavations, note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b). The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and c) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (if required by the soil report). Shear wall type 3 requires anchor bolts at 32" o.c. Detail 1/S4 (referenced where type 3 is called out) specifies 48" o.c. anchor bolt spacing. Show distance from foundation to edge of cut or fill slopes and show slope and heights of cuts and fills. Show compliance with Section R403.1.7. (If applicable). Note on plans that surface water will drain away from building and show drainage pattern. The grade shall fall a minimum of 6" within the first 10 feet. Section R401.3. The minimum compressive strength for concrete slabs on grade is 2500 psi per table R402.2. Please revise foundation note #1 accordingly. Please show stair footing on the foundation plan. Balconies and decks shall be designed for 150% of the live load required by Table 1607.1. CBC Table 1607.1, as amended by emergency building standards. Please revise calculations to show that deck framing and support complies. Also, please revise design criteria on sheet S-I to include deck loading. It does not appear that trusses have been designed to accommodate the attic FAU. Please provide evidence that the engineer-of-record (or architect) has reviewed the truss calculation package prepared by others for configuration and loading (i.e., a "review" stamp on the truss calculations or a letter). CBC Section 107.3.4.1. Please show vertical supports for girder trusses. CONTINUED Carlsbad CBR20 18-0077 1/23/18 31. Please justify 4x6 hips over garage and specify the size of the ridge. Additionally, it is unclear how the intersection of the hips and ridge will be supported. Provide complete detailing for all connections in this area (including right side of the ridge beam and rafters to hips). 32. Nails for shear transfer connection (using A35's, etc.) may not be driven parallel to the flanges of TJI's (i.e., along the sides), per city policy, unless specific written approval from Truss-Joist Macmillan is first obtained. Details or notes on the plans should make this clear. Nails may be driven perpendicular to TJI flanges. (Detail 11/8-4). 33. Please review calculations for FB5. The point loads from the roof framing over left of garage and from girder truss above are not included. 34. The lateral calculations at several walls state, "Perforated" and the entire wall length, including openings is used for overturning calculations. These walls are not shown on the plans as perforated shear walls. Either show them as perforated or use each separate wall length (between openings) for overturning calculations. 35. Please check overturning at the 21' shear wall at grid 3 lower (actually located about grid 3.1). 36. Please review the plans for required location of drag straps so the lateral resisting system will perform as designed. It appears that drag straps would be needed at several locations. See for example, gridline 2, lower. 37. Shear wall line at the back of garage / back of powder and bath 4 should be calculated separately from walls at front of garage / front of bedroom 4. They are offset by up to 28'. 38. Regarding garage front shear walls: The shear panel between the garage doors is called out as 2'6". There is only 2' available. Per Table 4.3.4. (SDPWS Section 4.3.4), the maximum height to width ratio for plywood shear walls is 3 1/2:1. Boundary members are not detailed for force transfer around the openings at the garage front, so the 10' plate height should be used as the pier height, requiring a minimum shear panel width of 210". 39. Provide knee braces in both directions and at each post or address lateral loads at patio cover in the structural calculations. 40. Structural detailing is incomplete. Please review plans and provide and reference details for each unique condition, including shear transfer at each shear wall condition, support of framing and shear transfer at beams, support of patio roof joists at bearing wall and support beams, etc. CONTINUED Carlsbad CBR20 18-0077 1/23/18 Please ensure that all shear transfer elements are shown on details: boundary nailing, shear panels with edge nailing shown, shear transfer hardware, etc. Detail I 1/S5 which is referenced at 2/S5 is missing. Please call out all joist and truss hangers. Please indicate on the floor framing plan that wall between kitchen and pantry/stairs is a bearing wall. PME All new residential units shall include provisions specifically designed to allow the later installation of any system which utilizes solar energy as an alternative energy source. No building permit shall be issued unless the piping or conduit and roof penetration details required pursuant to this section are indicated in the building plans. Show the minimum 30" deep unobstructed working space in front of the attic installed furnace. Section CIVIC Section 304.1. The access opening to attics must be large enough to remove the largest piece of mechanical equipment and be sized not less than 30" x 22". CIVIC Section 304.4. Note that passageway to the mechanical equipment in the attic shall be unobstructed, have continuous solid flooring not less than 24 inches wide, and be not more than 20 feet in length from the access opening to the appliance. CIVIC Section 304.41. Show a permanent electrical receptacle outlet and lighting fixture controlled by a switch located at the entrance for furnaces located in an attic. CIVIC Section 304.4.4. Are there two FAUs? The 65,000 BTU unit seems low for the entire house. Also, energy design states there are 2 FAUs. If there is another one, please show its size and location. Specify on the plans the following information for the direct vent gas fireplace: a) Manufacturer's name/model number and ICC approval number, or equal. The ICC approval number specified (ESR 2074).is for automatic foundation flood vents. CONTINUED Carlsbad CBR2018-0077 1/23/18 52. Include on the plans the following specifications for electrical devices installed in dwellings: CEC Article 210 & 406 (See bold requirements for items requiring correction). Tamper resistant receptacles for all locations described in 210.52 (i.e., all receptacles in a dwelling). Arc-fault protection for all outlets (not just receptacles) located in rooms described in NEC 210.12(A): Kitchens, laundry areas, family, living, bedrooms, dining, halls, etc. GFCI protected outlets for locations described in NEC 210.8(A): Laundry areas, kitchen dishwashers, all kitchen outlets, garages, bathrooms, outdoors, within 6' of a sink, etc. 53. Per CEC Article 210.11(C)3, note on the plans that bathroom circuiting shall be either: A 20 ampere circuit dedicated to each bathroom, or At least one 20 ampere circuit supplying only bathroom receptacle outlets. 54. Show on the plans a wall receptacle within 36" of lavatory in the bathroom (powder). CEC 210.52(D). CEC considers the powder room to be a bathroom. 55. Include a receptacle outlet in any hallways 10 feet or more in length. CEC Article 210.52(H). Entry hall. 56. Show the T and P relief valve at the water heater and the discharge pipe size and routing to the exterior. CPC Section 608.3. . RESIDENTIAL GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS The California Building Standards Commission has adopted the Green Building Standards Code and must be enforced by the local building official. CGC Section 101.3. . Please revise or add the following notes and requirements per the 2016 code. 57. Electric Vehicle Charging. Note on the plans that electrical vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) is required in NEW one and two family dwellings and townhomes with attached garages. Include the following information on the plans: A minimum size 1" conduit originating from a panel or service having a spare 40 ampere 240 volt capacity terminating in a box located in close proximity to the location of the future EV charger. CGC 4.106.4. CONTINUED Carlsbad CBR20 18-0077 1/23118 Storm water drainage/retention during construction. Note on the plans: Projects which disturb less than one acre of soil shall manage storm water drainage during construction by one of the following: A. Retention basins. B. Where storm water is conveyed to a public drainage system, water shall be filtered by use of a barrier system, wattle or other approved method. CGC Section 4.106.2. Grading and paving. Note on the plans that site grading or drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering buildings (swales, water collection, French drains, etc.). CGC Section 4.106.3. Exception: Additions not altering the drainage path. Recycling. Note on the plans that a minimum of 65% of construction waste is to be recycled. CGC Section 4.408.1. Please revise Green Building Standards Code note 5 on sheet A-9. Recycling. Note on the plans that the contractor shall submit a Construction Waste Management Plan, per CGC Section 4.408.2. Please submit the completed Carlsbad Special Form for Waste Management Plan (included). Note on the plans that the gas fireplace(s) shall be a direct-vent sealed- combustion type. CGC Section 4.503.1. Please revise California Green Standards note 2g to 1.2 GPM for lavatory faucets, per 2016 requirements. Note on the plans that prior to final inspection the licensed contractor, architect or engineer in responsible charge of the overall construction must provide to the building department official written verification that all applicable provisions from the Green Building Standards Code have been implemented as part of the construction. CGC 102.3. . ENERGY CONSERVATION Include on the Title Sheet of the plans the following statement: 'Compliance with the documentation requirements of the 2016 Energy Efficiency Standards is necessary for this project. Registered, signed, and dated copies of the appropriate CFI R, CF2R, and CF3R forms shall be made available at necessary intervals for Building Inspector review. Final completed forms will be available for the building owner." Provide a gas piping design for the entire building (isometric or pipe layout) based upon a minimum input of 200,000 btu/hr for water heater. ES 150.0(n) CONTINUED Carlsbad CBR20 18-0077 1/23/18 Instantaneous water heaters shall have isolation valves on both the cold and the hot water piping leaving the water heater complete with hose bibs or other fittings on each valve for flushing the water heater when the valves are closed. ES 110.3 All domestic hot water piping to have the following minimum insulation installed: 1/2" pipe (1/2" insulation); %" pipe (I" insulation); 1" to 144" pipe (144" insulation). CPC 609.11 & ES 150.00) Additionally, the ½" hot water pipe to the kitchen sink, and the cold water pipe within 5' of the water heater both require 1" minimum insulation. ES 150.00) Below grade hot water piping is required to be installed in a waterproof and non- crushable sleeve or casing that allows for replacement of both the piping and insulation. Residential Energy Lighting Requirements (please update notes to indicate the following):: ES 150.0(k) Dimmers or vacancy sensors shall control all LED style luminaires. Two exceptions: Fixtures installed in hallways or (closets under 70 square feet). . MISCELLANEOUS To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes No L3 The jurisdiction has contracted with EsGil, located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Tamara Fischer at EsGil. Thank you. Carlsbad CBR2018-0077 1/23/18 [DO NOT PAY - THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK #.: CBR2018-0077 PREPARED BY: Tamara Fischer DATE: 1/23/18 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1781 Skimmer Court BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 / U BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.) Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) SFD 3380 141.76 479,149 Gar 672 36.98 24,851 Coy Patio 370 12.33 4,562 Fireplace 1 3,373.05 3,373 Air Conditioning 3380 5.39 18,218 Fire Sprinklers 4052 4.01 16,249 TOTAL VALUE 546,401 Jurisdiction Code 1cb IBY Ordinance 1997 UBC Building Permit Fee V 1997 UBC Plan Check Fee Type of Review: 177,J Complete Review Structural Only U Other Repetitive Fee V Repeats U Hourly * EsGil Fee I I $2,178.261 I $1,415.871 I $1,241.611 Sheet 1 of 1 EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION AND ENGINEERING, INC. 10925 HARTLEY ROAD, SUITE "1" SANTEE, CALIFORNIA 92071 (61.9)258-7901 Fax 258-7902 James M. Snyder April 4, 201.8 10612 Prospect Avenue Project No. 1.8-.1127E5 Sarftee, California 92071. .1 Subject: Foundation Plan, and. Details Review Proposed Single-Family Residence 1781 Skimmer Court Carlsbad, California 92011 Reference: 'timited Geotechni.cal investigation, Proposed Single-Family Residence, 1781 Ski,.mnier Court, Carlsbad, California 92011". Project No. 18-1i27E5, Prepared by East County Soil, Consultation and Engineering, Inc., Dated March 1, 2018. Dear Mr. Snyder: In accordance with your request, we have reviewed the foundation, plan and details prepared by Roy Johnson. Architect of La Mesa, California for the proposed single-family residence at the subject site. The foundation plan and details were -:found to be in accordance with the recommendations provided , in the referenced geotechnical report. Our firm should observe the foundation excavations for proper size and embedment into competent bearing soils. If we can. he of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully Submitted, Man adou Saliou Diallo. P.E. RCE .54071, GE 2704 MSD/md. Q,c2o(- 0011. RECEIVED EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION AND ENGINEERING, INC. 10925 HARTLEY ROAD, SUITE "1" SANTEE, CALIFORNIA 92071 (619) 258-7901 Fax 258-7902 MAR 20 2018 CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DIVISION James M. Snyder March 1, 2018 10612 Prospect Avenue Project No. 1,8-1.127E5 Santee, California 92071 Subject: Limited Geotechnical investigation Proposed. Single-Family Residence 17.81 Skimmer Court Carlsbad, California 92011 Dear Mr. Snyder: In accordance with your request, we have performed a limited geotechnical investigation at the subject site to discuss the geotechnical aspects of the project and provide recommendations for the proposed residential development. Our investigation has found that proposed building pad is underlain by undocumented fill soils to a maximum depth of approximately. 3 feet below existing grade. Dense sandstone of the Santiago Formation was encountered below the fill soils to the explored depth of 6 feet. It is our opinion that the development of the proposed single-family residence is geotechnically feasible provided the recommendations herein are implemented in the design and construction. Should you have any questions with, regard to the contents of this report, please do not hesitate to contact our office. - Respectfully submitted, .OFESSIok SpQ S. UJ GE 2704 °\MM Cr k EXP. / OF W 1C W Mamadou Saliou Diallo, P.E. RCE 54071, GE 2704 MSD/md a I A0 1810P 4*~~ James M. Snyder! 1781 Skimmer Court/Carlsbad Project Wo. 18-1127E5 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................................3 SCOPEOF SERVICES......................................................................................................................................3 SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ............ . ........................................................... 3 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING........................................................................4 GEOLOGY.........................................................................................................................................................4 GeologicSetting .................................................................................................................................... 4 SiteStratigraphy....................................................................................................................................4 SEISMICITY......................................................................................................................................................5 RegionalSeismicity ................................................................................................................................ 5 SeismicAnalysis...................................................................................................................................5 2016 CBC Seismic Design Criteria......................................................................................................5 GeologicHazard Assessment ................................................................................................................. 6 GEOTEC1-IN1CAL EVALUATION..................................................................................................................7 CompressibleSoils................................................................................................................................7 ExpansiveSoils ................................................... . ................................................................................... 7 Groundwater..........................................................................................................................................7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................7 GRADINGAND EARTHWORK......................................................................................................................8 Clearingand Grubbing..........................................................................................................................8 StructuralImprovement of Soils ............................................................................................................ 8 TransitionsBetween Cut and Fill . ... ..................................................................................................... 9 Methodand Criteria of Compaction......................................................................................................9 ErosionControl......................................................................................................................................9 StandardGrading Guidelines.................................................................................................................9 FOUNDATIONSAND SLABS ........................................................................................................................9 SETTLEMENT....................................................................................................... . ........................................ .10 PRESATURATIONOF SLAB SUBGRADE ................................................................................................. 10 TEMPORARYSLOPES .................................................................................................................................. 11 TRENCHBACKFILL ...................................................................................................................................... II DRAINAGE..................................................... . ................................................................................................ II FOUNDATIONPLAN REVIEW....................................................................................................................11 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION .........................................................................................................12 ADDITIONALSERVICES ............................................................................................................................12 PLATES Plate 1- Location of Exploratory Boreholes Plate 2- Summary Sheet (Exploratory Borehole Logs) ....................................................................13 Plate 3 - USCS Soil Classification Chart PAGE L- 1, LABORATORY TEST RESULTS..............................................................................................14 REFERENCES.................................................................................................................................................15 'II James M Snyder! 1781 Skimmer Court! Carlsbad Project No. 18-1127E5 INTRODUCTION This is to present the findings and conclusions of a limited geotec h n i c a l i n v e s t i g a t i o n f o r a proposed two-story, single-family residence to be located at 17 8 1 S k i m m e r C o u r t , i n C a r l s b a d , California. The objectives .of the investigation were to evaluate the existing s o i l s c o n d i t i o n s a n d p r o v i d e recommendations for the proposed development. SCOPE OF SERVICES The following services were provided during this investigation: Site reconnaissance and review of published geologic, seismological an d g e o t e c h n i c a l r e p o r t s and maps pertinent to the project area O Subsurface exploration consisting of three (3) boreholes within the l i m i t s o f t h e p r o p o s e d a r e a of development. The boreholes were logged by our Staff Geologist. Collection of representative soil samples at selected depths. The obtaine d s a m p l e s w e r e s e a l e d in moisture-resistant containers and transported to the laboratory for subse q u e n t a n a l y s i s . Laboratory testing of samples representative of the types of soils encount e r e d d u r i n g t h e f i e l d investigation Geologic and engineering analysis of the field and laboratory data, whi c h p r o v i d e d t h e b a s i s for our conclusions and recommendations Production of this report, which summarizes the results of the above anal y s i s a n d p r e s e n t s o u r findings and recommendations for the proposed development SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The subject site is a rectangular-shaped residential lot located on the east s i d e o f S k i m m e r C o u r t , i n City of Carlsbad, California. The property which encompasses an a r e a o f 4 7 , 8 5 0 s q u a r e f e e t ( 4 3 5 ' x 110') was occupied by a single-family residence with a detached ga r a g e . W e u n d e r s t a n d t h a t t h e residence was burned down leaving the garage and the concrete founda t i o n a n d s l a b . T h e b u i l d i n g pad is relatively level with moderate slopes to the east. Vegetation con s i s t e d o f g r a s s , s h r u b a n d trees. The parcel is bordered by Skimmer Court to the west, a simila r r e s i d e n t i a l d e v e l o p m e n t t o the south and vacant properties to the remaining directions. The preliminary plans prepared by Roy Johnson, Architect of La Mesa , C a l i f o r n i a i n d i c a t e t h a t t h e proposed construction will include a new single-family residence f o l l o w i n g r e m o v a l o f t h e remaining foundation and slab. The structure will be two-story , w o o d - f r a m e d a n d f o u n d e d o n continuous and spread footings with a slab-on-grade floor. 3 James M Snyderl 1781 Skimmer court! Carlsbad Project No. 18-1127E5 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING On 'February 13, 2018, three (3) boreholes were excavated to a maximum depth of approximately 6 feet below existing grade with a hand auger. The approximate locations of the boreholes are shown on the attached Plate No. 1, entitled "Location of Exploratory Boreholes". A continuous log of the soils encountered was recorded at the time of excavation and is shown on Plate No. 2 entitled "Summary Sheet". The soils were visually and texturally classified according to the filed identification procedures set forth on Plate No. 3 entitled "USCS Soil Classification". Following the field exploration, laboratory testing was performed to evaluate the pertinent engineering properties of the foundation materials. The laboratory-testing program included moisture and density, maximum dry density and optimum moisture content, particle size analysis and expansion index tests. These tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM standards and other accepted methods, Page L-1 and Plate No. 2 provide a summary of the laboratory test results. GEOLOGY Geologic Settin The subject site is located within the southern portion of what is known as the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province of California. The geologic map pertaining to the area (Reference No. 6) indicates that the site is underlain by sandstone/ claystone of the Santiago Formation (Tsa). Site Stratigraphy The subsurface descriptions provided are interpreted from conditions exposed during the field investigation and/or inferred from the geologic literature. Detailed descriptions of the subsurface materials encountered during the field investigation are presented on the exploration logs provided on Plate No. 2. The following paragraphs provide general descriptions of the encountered soil types. Undocumented Fill (Qufl Undocumented fill soils were encountered in the boreholes to depths ranging from approximately 6 inches to 3 feet below existing grade. They consisted of light brown sand with silt that was dry to moist and loose in consistency. Santiago Formation (Tsa Sandstone of the Santiago Formation was encountered below the fill soils. The material generally consisted of light gray, silty sand that was dry to moist and dense in consistency. 2 James M. Snyderl 1781 Skimmer court' Carlsbad Project No. 18-1127E5 SEISMICITY Regional Seismicity Generally, Seismicity within California can be attributed to the regional tectonic movement taking place along the San Andreas Fault Zone, which includes the San Andreas Fault and most parallel and subparallel faults within the state. The portion of southern California where the subject site is located is considered seismically active. Seismic hazards are attributed to groundshaking from earthquake events along nearby or more distant Quaternary faults. The primary factors in evaluating the effect an earthquake has on a site are the magnitude of the event, the distance from the epicenter to the site and the near surface soil profile. According to the Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones Act of 1994 (revised Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act), quaternary faults have been classified as "active" faults, which show apparent surface rupture during the last 11,000 years (i.e., Holocëne time). "Potentially-active" faults are those faults with evidence of displacing Quaternary sediments between 11,000 and 1.6 million years old. Seismic Analysis Based on our evaluation, the closest known "active" fault is the Rose Canyon Fault located approximately 6 miles (10 kilometers) to the west. The Rose Canyon Fault is the design fault of the project due to the predicted credible fault magnitude and ground acceleration. The Seismicity of the site was evaluated utilizing the 2008 National Hazard Maps from the USGS website and Seed and Idriss methods for active Quaternary faults within a 50-mile radius of the subject site. The site may be subjected to a Maximum Probable Earthquake of 6.9 Magnitude along the Rose Canyon Fault, with a corresponding Peak Ground Acceleration of 0.41g. The maximum Probable Earthquake is defined as the maximum earthquake that is considered likely to occur within a 100-year time period. The effective ground acceleration at the site is associated with the part of significant ground motion, which contains repetitive strong-energy shaking, and which may produce structural deformation. As such, the effective or "free field" ground acceleration is referred to as the Repeatable High Ground Acceleration (RHGA). It has been determined by Ploessel and Slosson (1974) that the RHGA is approximately equal to 65 percent of the Peak Ground Acceleration for earthquakes occurring within 20 miles of a site. Based on the above, the calculated Credible RHGA at the site is 0.27g. 2016 CBC Seismic Design Criteria A review of the active fault maps pertaining to the site indicates the location of the Rose Canyon Fault Zone approximately 10 km to the west. Ground shaking from this fault or one of the major active faults in the region is the most likely happening to affect the site. With respect to this hazard, the site is comparable to others in the general area. The proposed residential structure should be designed in accordance with seismic design requirements of the 2016 California Building James M. Snyder! 1781 Skimmer Court! Carlsbad Project No. 18-112 7E5 Code or the Structural Engineers Association of California using the following seismic design parameters: _ i2o6B.: $EfRE.FENcEs Site Class D Table 20.3-1/ ASCE 7, Chapter 20 Mapped Spectral Acceleration For Short Periods, S. 1.068g Figure 1613.3.1(1) Mapped Spectral Acceleration For a 1-Second Period, S1 0.413g Figure 1613.3.1(2) Site Coefficient, F. 1.073 Table 1613.3.3(1) Site Coefficient, F 1.587 Table 1613.3.3(2) Adjusted Max, Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration for Short Periods, SMS 1.146g Equation 16-37 Adjusted Max. Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration for I-Second Period, SMI 0.655g Equation 16-38 5 Percent Damped Design Spectral Response Acceleration for Short Periods, SDS 0.764g Equation 16-39 5 Percent Damped Design Spectral Response Acceleration for 1-Second Period, SDI 0.437g Equation 16-40 Geologic Hazard Assessment Ground Rupture Ground rupture due to active faulting is not considered likely due to the absence of known fault traces within the vicinity of the project; however, this possibility cannot be completely ruled out. The unlikely hazard of ground rupture should not preclude consideration of "flexible" design for on-site utility lines and connections. Liquefaction Liquefaction involves the substantial loss of shear strength in saturated soils, usually sandy soils with a loose consistency when subjected to earthquake shaking. Based on the absence of shallow groundwater and consistency of the underlying bedrock material, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction is very low. Landsliding There is no indication that landslides or unstable slope conditions exist on or adjanent to the project site. There are no obvious geologic hazards related to landsliding to the proposed development or adjacent properties. Tsunamis and Seiches The site is not subject to inundation by tsunamis due to its elevation and distance to the ocean. The site is also not subject to seiches (waves in confined bodies of water). James M. Snyder! 1781 Skimmer Court! Carlsbad Project No. 18-1127E5 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Based on our investigation and evaluation of the collected information, we conclude that the proposed residential development is feasible from a geotechnica[ standpoint provided the recommendations herein will be properly implemented during construction. In order to provide a uniform support for the proposed structure, footings should be embedded into properly compacted fill soils or the dense sandstone of the Santiago Formation. The foundations may consist of reinforced continuous and/ or spread footings with reinforced slabs. Recommendations and criteria for foundation design are provided in the Foundation and Slab recommendations section of this report. Comnressible Soils Our field observations and testing indicate low compressibility within the dense sandstone of the Santiago Formation, which underlies the site. However, loose undocumented fill was encountered to a maximum depth of approximately 3 feet below surface grades. These soils are compressible. Due to the potential for soil compression upon loading, remedial grading of these loose soils, including overexcavation and recompaction will be required unless footings are extended to the dense sandstone of the Santiago Formation. Following implementation of the earthwork recommendations presented herein, the potential for soil compression resulting from the new development has been estimated to be low. The low-settlement assessment assumes a well-planned and maintained site drainage system. Recommendations regarding mitigation by earthwork construction are presented in the Grading and Earthwork Recommendations section of this report. Expansive Soils An expansion index test was performed on a representative sample of the fill soils to determine volumetric change characteristics with change in moisture content. An expansion index of 9 was obtained which indicates a very low expansion potential for the foundation soils. Groundwater Static groundwater was not encountered to the depths of the boreholes. The building pad is located at an elevation over 300 feet above Mean Sea Level. We do not expect groundwater to affect the proposed construction. Recommendations to prevent or mitigate the effects of poor surface drainage are presented in the Drainage section of this report. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following conclusions and recommendations are based upon the analysis of the data and information obtained from our soil investigation. This includes site reconnaissance; field investigation; laboratory testing and our general knowledge of the soils native to the site. The site is 7 James M. Snyder! 1781 Skimmer Courti Carlsbad Project No. 18-1127E5 suitable for the proposed residential development provided the recommendations set forth are implemented during construction. GRADING AND EARTHWORK Based upon the preliminaiy plans and the information obtained during the field investigation, we anticipate that the proposed residence will be founded on continuous and/ or spread footings, which are supported by properly compacted fill or dense terrace deposits. The following grading and earthwork recommendations are based upon the limited geotechnical investigation performed, and should be verified during construction by our field representative. Clearing and Grubbing The area to be graded or to receive fill and/or structure should be cleared of vegetation and concrete waste from the demolition of the remaining foundation and slab. Vegetation and the debris from the clearing operation should be properly disposed of off-site, The area should be thoroughly inspected for any possible buried objects, which need to be rerouted or removed prior to the inception of, or during grading. All holes, trenches, or pockets left by the removal of these objects should be properly backflhled with compacted fill materials as recommended in the Method and Criteria of Compaction section of this report. Structural Improvement of Soils Information obtained from our field and laboratory analysis indicates that loose, undocumented fill soils cover the building pad to a maximum depth of approximately 3 feet below existing grade. These surficial soils are susceptible to settlement upon loading. Based upon the soil characteristics, we recommend the following: All undocumented fill and other loose natural soils should be removed from the area, which is planned to receive compacted fill and/or structural improvement. The bottom of the removal area should expose competent materials as approved by ECSC&E geotechnical representative. Prior to the placement of new fill, the bottom of the removal area should be scarified a minimum depth of 6 inches, moisture-conditioned within 2 percent above the optimum moisture content, and then recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (ASTM D1557 test method). Overexcavation should be completed for the structural building pad to a minimum depth of 2 feet below the bottom of the proposed footings. The limit of the required area of overexcavation should be extended a minimum of 5 feet laterally beyond the perimeter footing (building footprint). * Soils utilized as fill should be moisture-conditioned and recompacted in conformance with the following Method and Criteria of Compaction section of this report. The actual depth and extent of any overexcavation and recompaction should be evaluated in the field by a representative of ECSC&E. James M. Snyder/ 1781 Skimmer Court/ Carlsbad Project No. 18-112 7135 Transitions Between Cut and Fill The proposed structure is anticipated to be founded in properly compacted fill soils or dense sandstone of the Santiago Formation. Cut to fill transitions below the proposed structure should be completely eliminated during the earthwork construction as required in the previous section. Method and Criteria of Compaction Compacted fills should consist of approved soil material, free of trash debris, roots, vegetation or other deleterious materials. Fill soils should be compacted by suitable compaction equipment in uniform loose lifts of 6 to 8 inches. Unless otherwise specified, all soils subjected to recompaction should be moisture-conditioned within 2 percent over the optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction per ASTM test method D1557. On-site soils, after being processed to delete the aforementioned deleterious materials, may be used for recompaction purposes. Should any importation of fill be planned, the intended import source(s) should be evaluated and approved by ECSCE prior to delivery to the site. Care should be taken to ensure that these soils are not detrimentally expansive. Erosion Control Due to the granular characteristics of on-site soils, areas of recent grading or exposed ground may be subject to erosion. During construction, surface water should be controlled via berms, gravel/ sandbags, silt fences, straw wattles, siltation or bioretention basins, positive surface grades or other method to avoid damage to the finish work or adjoining properties. All site entrances and exits must have coarse gravel or steel shaker plates to minimize offsite sediment tracking. Best Management Practices (BMPs) must be used to protect storm drains and minimize pollution. The contractor should take measures to prevent erosion of graded areas until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control measures have been installed. After completion of grading, all excavated surfaces should exhibit positive drainage and eliminate areas where water might pond. Standard Grading Guidelines Grading and earthwork should be conducted in accordance with the standard-of-practice methods for this local, the guidelines of the current edition of the California Building Code, and the requirements of the jurisdictional agency. Where the information provided in the geotechnical report differs from the Standard Grading Guidelines, the requirements outlined in the report shall govern. FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS a. Continuous and spread footings are suitable for use and should extend to a minimum depth of 18 inches for the proposed two-story structure into the properly compacted fill soils or dense sandstone of the Santiago Formation. Continuous footings should be at least 15 inches in width and reinforced with a minimum of four #4 steel bars; two bars placed near the top of the footings and the other two bars placed near the bottom of the footings. Isolated or spread footings should have a minimum width of 24 inches. Their reinforcement should consist of a minimum of #4 bars spaced 12 inches James M Snyder! 1781 Skimmer C'ourl! Carlsbad Project No. 18-1127E5 on center (each way) and placed horizontally near the bottom. These recommendations are based on geotechnical considerations and are not intended to supersede the structural engineer requirements. Interior concrete slabs-on-grade should be a minimum 4 inches thick. Reinforcement should consist of 43 bars placed at 16 inches on center each way within the middle third of the slabs by supporting the steel on chairs or concrete blocks "dobies°. The slabs should be underlain by 2 inches of clean sand over a 10-mil visqueen moisture barrier. The effect of concrete shrinkage will result in cracks in virtually all-concrete slabs. To reduce the extent of shrinkage, the concrete should be placed at a maximum of 4-inch slump. The minimum steel recommended is not intended to prevent shrinkage cracks. Where moisture sensitive floor coverings are anticipated over the slabs, the 10-mil plastic moisture barrier, should be underlain by a capillary break at least 2 inches thick, consisting of coarse sand, gravel or crushed rock not exceeding 3/4 inch in size with no more .than 5 percent passing the #200 sieve. An allowable soil bearing value of 2,000 pounds per square foot may be used for the design of continuous and spread footings at least 12 inches wide and founded a minimum of 12 inches into the properly compacted fill soils or dense sandstone of the Santiago Formation as set forth in the 2016 California Building Code, Table 1806.2. This value may be increased by 400 psf for each additional foot of depth or width to a maximum value of 4,000 lb/ft2. Lateral resistance to horizontal movement may be provided by the soil passive pressure and the friction of concrete to soil. An allowable passive pressure of 250 pounds per square foot per foot of depth may be used. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 is recommended. The soils passive pressure as well as the bearing value may be increased by 1/3 for wind and seismic loading. SETTLEMENT Settlement of compacted fill soils is normal and should be anticipated. Because of the type and minor thickness -of the fill soils anticipated under the proposed footings and the light building loads, total and differential settlement should be within tolerable limits. PRESATURATION OF SLAB SUBGRADE bue to the granular characteristics of the subgrade soils, presoaking of subgrade prior to concrete pour is not required. However, subgrade soils in areas receiving concrete should be watered prior to concrete placement to mitigate any drying shrinkage, which may occur following site preparation and foundation excavation. 10 James M. Snyder! 1781 Skimmer Court! Carlsbad Project No. 18-1127E5 TEMPORARY SLOPES For the excavation of foundations and utility trenches, temporary vertical cuts to a maximum height of 4 feet may be constructed in fill or natural soil. Any temporary cuts beyond the above height constraints should be shored or further laid back following a 1:1 (horizontal to vertical) slope ratio. OSHA guidelines for trench excavation safety should be implemented during construction. TRENCH BACKFILL Excavations for utility lines, which extend under structural areas should be properly backfihled and compacted. Utilities should be bedded and backfihled with clean sand or approved granular soil to a depth of at least one foot over the pipe. This backfill should be uniformly watered and compacted to a firm condition for pipe support. The remainder of the backfill should be on-site soils or non-expansive imported soils, which should be placed in thin lifts, moisture-conditioned and compacted to at least 90% relative compaction. DRAINAGE Adequate measures should be undertaken after the structure and other improvements are in place, such that the drainage water within the site and adjacent properties is directed away from the foundations, footings, floor slabs and the tops of slopes via rain gutters, downspouts, surface swales and subsurface drains towards the natural drainage for this area. A minimum gradient of 2 percent is recommended in hardscape areas adjacent to the structure. In earth areas, a minimum gradient of 5 percent away from the structure for a distance of at least 10 feet should be provided. If this requirement cannot be met due to site limitations, drainage can be done through a swale in accordance with Section 1804.4 of the 2016 California Building Code. Earth swales should have a minimum gradient of 2 percent: Drainage should be directed to approved drainage facilities. Proper surface and subsurface drainage will be required to minimize the potential of water seeking the level of the bearing soils under the foundations, footings and floor slabs, which may otherwise result in undermining and differential settlement of the structure and other improvements. FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW Our firm should review the foundation plan and details during the design phase to assure conformance with the intent of this report. During construction, foundation excavations should be observed by our representative prior to the placement of forms, reinforcement or concrete for conformance with the plans and specifications. 11 James M. Snyder! 1781 Skimmer court! Carlsbad Project No. 18-1127E5 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION Our investigation was performed using the skill and degree of care ordinarily exercised, under s i m i l a r circumstances, by reputable soils engineers and geologists practicing in this or similar localities.. N o other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice inc l u d e d i n this report, This report is prepared for the sole use of our client and may not be assigned to ot h e r s without the written consent of the client-and ECSC&E, Inc. The samples collected and used for testing, and the observations made, are believed representativ e o f site conditions; however, soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between ex p l o r a t i o n trenches, boreholes and surface exposures. As in most major projects, conditions reveale d b y construction excavations may vary with preliminary findings. If this occurs, the changed c o n d i t i o n s must be evaluated by a representative of ECSC&E and designs adjusted as required or altern a t e designs recommended. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner , o r o f h i s representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are broug h t t o t h e attention of the project architect and engineer. Appropriate recommendations should be inco r p o r a t e d into the structural plans. The necessary steps should be taken to see that the contra c t o r a n d subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field. The findings of this report are valid as of this present date. However, changes in the conditions o f a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they are due to natural processes or the work s o f man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards ma y occur from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this repo r t m a y be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside of our control. Therefore, this report is subject t o review and should be updated after a period of two years. ADDITIONAL SERVICES The review of plans and specifications, field observations and testing under our direction are int e g r a l parts of the recommendations made in this report. If East County Soil Consultation and En g i n e e r i n g , Inc. is not retained for these services, the client agrees to assume our responsibility for any po t e n t i a l claims that may arise during construction. Observation and testing are additional services, wh i c h a r e provided by our firm, and should be budgeted within the cost of development. Plates No. I through 3, Page L-1 and References are parts of this report. 12 James M. Snyder! 1781 Skimmer courz/ Carlsbad Project No. 18-1127E5 PLATE 140.2 SUMMARY SHEET BOREHOLE NO. 1 DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION Y M Surface UNDOCUMENTED FILL (Quf) light brown, moist, loose, sand with silt 0.5' SANTIAGO FORMATION (isa) light gray, dry to moist, medium dense to dense, silty sand 1.0' 108.7 12.5 3.0' bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater borehole backfilled 2/13/18 BOREHOLE NO.2 DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION Y M Surface UNDOCUMENTED FILL (Quf) light brown, dry to moist, loose, sand with silt 1.5' SANTIAGO FORMATION (isa) light gray, moist, medium dense to dense, silty sand 6.0' bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater borehole backfi[led 2/13/18 BOREHOLE NO.3 DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION Y M Surface UNDOCUMENTED FILL (Quf) light brown, dry to moist, loose, sand with silt 1.0 88.1 9.8 3.0' SANTIAGO FORMATION (isa) light gray, moist, medium dense to dense, silty sand 6.0' bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater borehole backfitled 2/13/18. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y = DRY DENSITY IN PCF M = MOISTURE CONTENT IN % I 13 James M Snyder! 1781 Skimmer Court! Carlsbad Project No. 18-1127E5 PAGE L-1 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT (ASTM D1557) The maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of the fill materials as determined by ASTM D1557, Procedures A and B which use 25 blows of a 10 pound slide hammer falling from a height of. 18 inches on each of 5 equal layers in a 4 inch diameter 1/30 cubic foot compaction cylinder and Procedure C .which uses 56 blows of a 10 pound slide hammer falling from 'a ,height of 18 inches on each of 5 equal . layers in a 6 inch diameter 1/13.3 cubic foot compaction cylinder are presented as follows: OPTIMUM. MAXIMUM MOISTURE SOIL TYPE/ . DRY DENSITY CONTENT PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION (PCF) (%) LOCATION I/A . LIGHT BROWN SILTY SAND 115.0 . 12.0 BH-3 ® 1.5' EXPANSION INDEX TEST (ASTM D4829) . INITIAL SATURATED INITIAL DRY MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSITY EXPANSION CONTENT(%) CONTENT(%) (PCF) INDEX LOCATION 12.3 22.3 102.2 • ? BH-3 @ 1.5' PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS (ASTM D422) I" 1/2" - - • - . - 3/8" - - #4 100 • - #8 • 99 100. #16 96 99 #30 90 • :94 #50 • 61 56 #100 • . 20 28 #200 9 .• 19 • USCS SP-SM • SM James M. Snyder! 1781 Skimmer Court! Carlsbad Project No. 18-1127E5 REFERENCES "2016 California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of 2", Published by International Code Council. "Geologic Map of the San Diego 30' x 60' Quadrangle, California", by Michael P. Kennedy and Slang S. Tan, 2008. "Concrete Engineering of Streets and Local Roads", Reference Manual, by the American Concrete Association (acpa), Updated December 2000. "Geotechnical and Foundation Engineering: Design and Construction", by Robert W. Day, 1999. "Maps of Known Active Fault Near-Source Zones in California and Adjacent Portions of Nevada to be used with 1997 Uniform Building Code", Published by International Conference of Building Officials. "Geologic Maps of the Northwestern Part of San Diego County, California", Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, by Slang S. Tan and Michael P. Kennedy, 1996. "Bearing Capacity of Soils, Technical Engineering and Design Guides as Adapted from the US Army Corps of Engineers, No. 7", Published by ASCE Press, 1994. "Foundations and Earth Structures, Design Manual 7.2", by Department of Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command, May 1982, Revalidated by Change 1 September 1986. "Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction during Earthquakes", by H.B. Seed and I.M. Idriss, 1982. 15 RECEVED ityof AUG 23 2019 Carl sbad CITY (V CERTIFICATION OF SCHOOL FEESPAID This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not Issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project # & Name: DEv2018-0032, SNYDER RESIDENCE Permit #: CBR2018-0077 Project Address: 1781 SKIMMER CT Assessor's Parcel #: 2150505700 Project Applicant: COOWNER SNYDER JAMES M & DRINCO DAVID (Owner Name) Residential Square Feet: New/Additions: 3,380 Second Dwelling Unit: Commercial Square Feet: New/Additions: City Certification: City of Carlsbad Building Division Date: 05/22/2019 Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration (Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the, building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner. Carlsbad Unified School District 6225 El Camino Real Carlsbad CA 92009 Phone: (760) 331-5000 Encinitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encinitas, CA 92024 Phone: (760) 944-4300 x1166 San Dieguito Union H.S. District 684 Requeza Dr. Encinitas, CA 92024 Phone: (760) 753-6491 Ext 5514 (By Appt. Only) San Marcos Unified Sch. District 255 Pico Ave Ste. 100 San Marcos, CA 92069 Phone: (760) 290-2649 Contact: Katherine Marcelja (By Appt.only) Vista Unified School District 1234 Arcadia Drive Vista CA 92083 Phone: (760) 726-2170 x2222. SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. The undersigned, being duty authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. Signature of Authorized School District Official: Title: Date: Qk CID CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Name of School District: CARLSBAD CA 92009 Community & Economic Development - Building Division 1635 Faraday Avenue I Carlsbad, CA 92008 1 760-602-2719 1 760-602-4581x I building@carlsbadca.gov Building Fee $1,098.15 F Plan Check Fee $768.711 Strong Motion Fee $49.00 Green Bldg. Stand. Fee $8.00 Green Bldg PC Fee $170.00 License Tax/PFF 8,12j License Tax/PFF (in CFD) $4,226.09 CFD Land Use: Density: Improve. Area: Fiscal Year: Annex. Year: Factor: CREDITS PFF and/or CFD Explanation: City of Carlsbad Valuation Worksheet Building Division 3rJc F cd Address Assessor ParcerNo. Date By I SLE Type of Work Area of Work Multiplier VALUE SFD and Duplexes 1,638 $141.76 $232,202.88 Residential Additions $169.50 $0.00 Remodels / Lofts $46.51 $0.00 Apartments & Multi-family $126.35 $0.00 Garages/Sunrooms/Solariums $36.98 $0.00 Patio/Porch $12.33 $0.00 Enclosed Patio $20.03 $0.00 Decks/Balconies/Stairs $20.03 $0.00 Retaining Walls, concrete, masonry $24.65 $0.00 Pools/Spas-Gunite $52.39 $0.00 TI/Stores, Offices $46.51 $0.00 TI/Medical, restaurant, H occupancies $64.72 $0.00 Photovoltaic Systems/ # of panels $400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fire Sprinkler System . $4.01 $0.00 Air Conditioning - commercial $6.47 $0.00 Air Conditioning - residential $5.31 $0.00 Fireplace/ concrete, masonry $4,961.73 $0.00 Fireplace/ prefabricated Metal $3,373.05 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 TOTAL 5232,202.88 Valuation: $232,203 Comm/Res (CIR): C CFD Yes (PFF=1.82%) 0 No (PFF = 3.5%) Plumbing $62.00 Mechanical $42.00 Electrical $41.00 iq, t24.o4 STORM WATER COMPLIANCE FORM TIER I CONSTRUCTION SWPPP BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) SELECTION TABLE Erosion Control Sediment Control BMPs Tracking Non-Storm Water Waste Management and Materials BMPs . Control BMPs Management BMPs Pollution Control BMPs .2 .2 . C C 5 0 .5 5 -D a) C a) C .9 — . c .I- -•-' (I) i5 • . CL 0 >. W 01 C a) U) a) Best Management Practice* 01 £ D - u 2 - : g a (BMP)Description -3 C_ . 0 CL o 0 '-6 °- '-.E o w C 0L. ao -1 >W.i-' .00 o ' 0 CC NC CC a) (B 0 0 .1... w U) .2 -.-. U) U) C) 2 I.e.. 0 i.. (B . 0 fl> C, U) 00 I.. U) Cl. U) £ . 0 Cl) 0 L D 0 C 0.. 0 0 0.. a) > C) 0 . U) 0 . Cl) 0. 0 Cl) C) 0 U) 0 0 0 0 0 CASQA Designation -3 r- cc 0) -. * in co r- — T ? i L? ? ' LLLJLLLLLLLJLLJJ c ,# Construction Activity . Li Li Li L& U) Cl) Cl) U) U) U) U) U) . rading/SoiIDistuthance (. Trenching/Excavation Stockpiling .. . Drilling/Boring Concrete/Asphalt Sawcutting ' Concrete Flatwork . — - - - . - - - - — - - — — — - - - I — NA — - - — - — - Paving . Conduit/Pipe Installation . Stucco/Mortar Work Waste Disposal Staging/Lay Down Area - Equipment Maintenance and Fueling - - - - - - - - — - - - — — — - - _••_• - — - - — — - Hazardous Substance Use/Storage Dewatering Site Access Across Dirt Other (list): —1-1 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES ALL NECESSARY EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON SITE TO FACILITATE RAPID INSTALLATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPs WHEN RAIN IS EMINENT. THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO WORKING ORDER TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY INSPECTOR AFTER EACH RUN—OFF PRODUCING RAINFALL. THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR DUE TO INCOMPLETE GRADING OPERATIONS OR UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH MAY ARISE. ALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY WHEN THE FIVE (5) DAY RAIN PROBABILITY FORECAST EXCEEDS FORTY PECENT (407.). SILT AND OTHER DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAINFALL ALL GRAVEL BAGS SHALL CONTAIN 3/4 INCH MINIMUM AGGREGATE. ADEQUATE. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND PERIMETER PROTEC11ON BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED.. THE CITY INSPECTOR SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO ALTER THIS PLAN DURING OR BEFORE CONSTRUCTION AS NEEDED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH CITY STORM WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS. Instructions: Check the box to the left of all applicable construction activity (first column) expected to occur during construction. Located along the top of the BMP Table is a list of BMP's with it's corresponding California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) designation number. Choose one or more BMPs you intend to use during construction from the list. Check the box where the chosen activity row intersects with the BMP column. Refer to the CASQA construction handbook for information and details of the chosen BMPs and how to apply them to the project. OWNER'S CERTIFICATE: I UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUST: (1) IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE TO AVOID THE MOBILIZATION OF POLLUTANTS SUCH AS SEDIMENT AND TO AVOID THE EXPOSURE OF STORM WATER TO CONSTRUCTION RELATED POLLUTANTS; AND (2) ADHERE TO, AND AT ALL TIMES, COMPLY NTH THIS CITY APPROVED hER 1 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION WORK IS COMPLETE AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. r7 DATE Page 1 of 1 PROJECT INFORMATION Site Address: /71 ç Assessor's Parcel Number: 2 ('• OS' - Emergency Contdct: Name: 24 Hour Hour Phone: Construction Threat to Storm Water Quality (Check Box) MEDIUM . EJ LOW REV 11/17