HomeMy WebLinkAbout1781 SKIMMER CT; ; CBR2018-0077; PermitBuilding Permit Finaled
Residential Permit
4LCity of
C arlsbad
Permit No: CBR2O18-0077 Print Date: 08/03/2020
Job Address: 1781 SKIMMER CT, CARLSBAD, CA 92011-3609
Permit Type: BLDG-Residential Work Class:
Parcel #: 2150505700 Track #:
Valuation: $546,401.23 Lot #:
Occupancy Group: . Project #:
#of Dwelling Units: Plan #:
Bedrooms: Construction Type:
Bathrooms: Orig. Plan Check #:
Plan Check #:
Status: Closed - Finaled
Single Family Replacemel
Applied: 01/10/2018
Issued: 08/23/2019
DEV2018-0032 Finaled Close Out:
Inspector: LStor
Final Inspection: 08/03/2020
Project Title: SNYDER RESIDENCE
Description: SNYDER: REPLACEMENT SFD 2-STORY 3,380 SF II 672 SF GARAGE //370 SF PATIO COVER
Applicant: Property Owner:
JACOR CONSTRUCTION INC SNYDER JAMES M & DRINCO DAVID
MIKE SNYDER 1781 SKIMMER CT
10612 PROSPECT AVE, # SUITE 101 CARLSBAD, CA 92011
SANTEE, CA 92071-8500
(619)562-8183
FEE AMOUNT
BRIDGE & THOROUGHFARE District 2-Zone 21 $16,000.00
BUILDING PERMIT FEE ($2000+) $2,178.00
BUILDING PLAN CHECK FEE (BLDG) - .$1,382.50
DRAINAGE FEE PLDAD Medium Runoff $3,566.36
ELECTRICAL BLDG RESIDENTIAL NEW/ADDITION/REMODEL , $96.00
GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION $170.00
MECHANICAL BLDG RESIDENTIAL NEW/ADDITION/REMODEL $110.00
PLUMBING BLDG RESIDENTIAL NEW/ADDITION/REMODEL $224.00
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEES - outside CFD $10,996.94
5B1473 GREEN BUILDING STATE STANDARDS FEE $22.00
SEWER BENEFIT AREA FEES - J $2,032.00
SEWER CONNECTION FEE (General Capacity all areas) $960.00
STRONG MOTION-RESIDENTIAL $71.03
SWPPP INSPECTION FEE TIER 1 - Medium BLDG $246.00
SWPPP PLAN REVIEW FEE TIER 1 - MEDIUM $56.00
TRAFFIC IMPACT Residential Single Fam. Outside CFD $3,390.00
WATER METER FEE 1" Displacement (P) $54.00
WATER SERVICE CONNECTION FEE 3/4" DISPLACEMENT (P) $1,825.00
Total Fees: $43,379.83 Total Payments To Date: $43,379.83 Balance Due:. . $0.00
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter
collectively referred to as "fees/exaction." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these
fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the
protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
3.32.030. Failure to.timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their
imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection
fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the
statute of-limitation has previously otherwise expired.
Building Division Page 1 of 1
1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad CA 92008-7314 1 760-602-2700 1 760-602-8560 f I www.carlsbadca.gov
FOLLOWING APPROVALS REQUIRED PRIOR TO'PEIIT ISSUANCE: [:]PLANNING,'- 0 ENGINEERING 0 BUILDING 0 FIRE [:]HEALTH 0 HAZMATIAPCD
Building Permit Application Plan Check NoQ,BRl OTl
Est. Value &. -Lfl. I YD 4&.,.. City of 1635 Faraday Ave., Càrlsbad, CA 92008
Ph: 760-602-2719 Fax: 760-602-8558 . Plan Ck. Deposit C arlsba.I email: buiIdingcarlsbadca.gov
Date , , I ISWPP www.carlsbadca.gov
JOB ADDRESS ,
1781 Skimmer Court
UITE#/SPACE#/UNIT# APN
215 - 050 - 57 - 00
CT/PROJECT U LOT U PHASE U U OF UNITS U BATHROOMS TENANT BUSINESS NAME CONSTR. TYPE [0Cc. GROUP
1
I #BEDROOMS,
4- 3 V-B R-3
DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Include Square Feet of Affected Area(s)
2 story single family residence.3,38,0 s.f.living area
EXISTING USE PROPOSED USE GARAGE (SF) PATIOS (SF) I QfCKS (SF) FIREPLACE AIR CONDITIONING FIRE SPRINKLERS
Vacaiit Lot " SR 672 - 370 YESfJ# . NOE YES NOE YESNOE
APPLICANT NAME Mike Snycer , Contact
NAME O(OWNER
Pftant James M. Snyder
ADDRESS '
10612 Prospect Ave
ADDRESS
10612 Prospect Ave
CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP
Santee CA 92071 Santee CA 92071
PHONE FAX PHONE FAX
619-562-8183 619-562-8183
EMAIL . - EMAIL
DESIGN PROFESSIONAL Roy Johnson CONTRACTOR BUS. NAME Js(- c"—' Z2-
ADDRESS
7830 La MesaBlvd
ADDRESS
/e)" 2. P_.por ,4%J
CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP
La Mesa CA 91942 .7j6_
PHONE
619-462-8660 .
FAX '
4Z 172 Ir
EMAIL
PHONE FAX
-1
rsjaia(sbcglobalnet
EMAIL EMAIL
c c',fl
[STATE LIC. U
C-7742
STATE UC.U.
t.
CLASS f-( CITY BUS. LIC,U
k?Lo~ 1351
(Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which .requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the
applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the
Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any.viotation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a
civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500)).
Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penally of pe4ury one of the following declarations.,
I have and will maintain a certificate of consent W self.lnsure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of -the Labor Code, for the perfohnance of the work for which this permit is issued.
and will maintain workers' comDensitión, as required by Section 37 0 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My workers' compensation insurance carrier and policy
number are: Insurance Co. ' t"' Policy No. Qçi,5-0 /_777 Expiration Dale /0I
This section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dolls 00) or less. - [] Certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of lb Ii for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of
California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compen n coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars (&100,000), In
addition to the cost of compensation, damages as prey' d r in Section 3 06 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees.
CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE [:]AGENT DATE/—f .' -( 7
thereby affirm that lam exempt onfraclor's.License Law for the following reason:
[J I, as owner of the prope r my employees with wages as their sale compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's
License Law does not pply loan owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for
sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale).
[J I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply loan owner of
property who builds or improves thereon. and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law).
U I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: -
I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. Elves [—]No
I (have! have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. -
I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name address! phone! contractors' license number):
I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name! address! phone! contractors' license number):
I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons 10 provide the work indicated (include name! address! phone! type of work):
..PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE []AGENT DATE
I
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the
Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 Yes 0 No
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 Yes 0 No
Is the facility lobe constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 Yes 0 No
IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF
EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT.
I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agencyfor the performance of the work this permit is issued (Sec. 3097 (I) Civil Code).
Lenders Name Lender's Address
I certitythat I have read the application and state that the above information is nect and thatthe information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction.
I hereby authorize representative of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the ye mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD
AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENS lCH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY INCONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT.
OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0dee n emolilion or construction of structures over 3stories in height.
EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building alund rovisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become nut and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within
180 days from the date of such permit or if the bu g or a orized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced fora period of 180 days (Section 106A.4 Uniform BuildingCodé).
.APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE - DATE /t
Permit Type: BLDG-Residential Application Date: 01/10/2018 Owner: COOWNER SNYDER JAMES M &
DRINCO DAVID
Work Class: Single Family Replacement Issue Date: 08/23/2019 Subdivision:
Status:. Closed - Finaled Expiration Date: 08/31/2020 Address: 1781 SKIMMER CT
IVR Number: 8817 CARLSBAD, CA 92011-3609
Scheduled Actual Inspection Type - Inspection No. Inspection Primary Inspector Reinspection Inspection
Date Start Date status
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency Please relocate address numbers, Need Yes
• final paperwork, HERS report, waste and
recycling forms. Please provide pictures of • •
a C, FAU uñitln attic space.
BLDG-Plumbing Final • Yes
BLDG-Mechanical Final Yes
BLDG-Structural Final : Yes
BLDG-Electrical Final Yes
Monday, August 3, 2020 • • Page 4 of 4
Permit Type: BLDG-Residential Application Date: 01/10/2018 Owner: COOWNER SNYDER JAMES M &
DRINCO DAVID
Work Class: Single Family Replacement Issue Date: 08/23/2019 Subdivision:
Status: Closed - Finaled Expiration Date: 08/31/2020 Address: 1781 SKIMMER CT
IVR Number: 8817 CARLSBAD, CA 92011-3609
Scheduled Actual Inspection Type Inspection No. Inspection Primary Inspector Reinspection Inspection
Date Start Date Status
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency No
BLDG-18 Exterior 113205-2019 Passed' Luke Stomo Complete
Lath/Drywall
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed •
BLDG-Building Deficiency Path and drywall only No
-Gas test required.
1211112019 12111/2019 BL6G-23 113432-2019 Passed Luke Storno Complete
Gas/Test/Repairs •
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency No
02/14/2020 02/1412020 BLDG-33 Service 119523-2020 Failed Luke Storno Reinspdction Incomplete
Change/upgrade
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed.
BLDG-Building Deficiency Work not ready No
03I03/2020 03/03I2020 BLDG-33 Service 121066-2020 Passed Michael Collins Complete
Change/Upgrade -
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency Work not ready No
BLDG-Building Deficiency EMR emailed to SDGE Yes
07IO2/2020 07/02I2020 BLDG-Gas Meter 131744-2020 Passed Michael Collins Complete
Release
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency 7/02/20, GMR emailed to SDGE Yes
BLDG-Building Deficiency No
07/23/2020 07/23/2020 BLDG-Final Inspection 133534-2020 Partial Pass Chris Renfro - - Reinspection Incomplete
Checklist Item •. COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency Please relocate address numbers, Need No
final paperwork, HERS report, waste and
recycling forms. Please provide pictures of
a C, FAU unit in attic space.
BLDG-Plumbing Final
•
No
BLDG-Mechanical Final No
BLDG-Structural Final • No
BLDG-Electrical Final • • • No
08/03I2020 08/03/2020 BLDG-Final Inspection 134478-2020 Passed - Paul Burnette - - - Complete
Monday, August 3, 2020 • • • • • Page 3 of 4
Permit Type: BLDG-Residential Application Date: 01/10/2018 Owner: COOWNER SNYDER JAMES M &
DRINCO DAVID
Work Class: Single Family Replacement Issue Date: 08/23/2019 Subdivision:
Status: Closed - Finaled Expiration Date: 08/31/2020 Address: 1781 SKIMMER CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011-3609 IVR Number: 8817
Scheduled Actual Inspection Type Inspection No. Inspection Primary Inspector Reinspection Inspection
Date Start Date Status
BLDG-15 Roof/ReRoof 108357-2019 Passed Luke Stomo - Complete
(Patio) -
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency No
11/20/2019 11/20/2019 BLDG-13 Shear 111434-2019 Failed Luke Stomo Reinspection Incomplete
Panels/HD (Ok to wrap)
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency Work not ready No
11122/2019 11/22/2019 BLDG-13 Shear. 111737-2019 Failed Luke Storno Reinspection Incomplete
Panels/HD (Ok to wrap)
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency No shear inspection No
BLDG-84 Rough - 111738-2019 Cancelled Luke Storno Reinspection Incomplete
Combo(14,24,34,44)
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency No
BLDG-14 No
Frame-Steel-Bolting-Welding
(Decks)
BLDG-24 Rough-Topout No
BLDG-34 Rough Electrical No
BLDG-44 No
Rough-Ducts-Dampers
11/27/2019 11/2712019 BLDG-84 Rough 112211-2019 Passed Paul Burnette Complete
Combo(14,24,34,44)
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes
BLDG-14 Yes
Frame-Steel-Bolting-Welding
(Decks)
BLDG-24 Rough-Topout Yes
BLDG-34 Rough Electrical Yes
BLDG44 Yes
Rough-Ducts-Dampers
12/04/2019 12104/2019 BLDG-16 Insulation 112609-2019 Passed Paul York - Complete
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes
12/10/2019 12/10/2019 BLDG-17 Interior II3206-2019 Passed Luke Stomo Complete
Lath/Drywall
Monday, August 3, 2020 Page 2 of 4
Building Permit Inspection History Finaled
city of
Carlsbad
Permit Type: BLDG-Residential Application Date: 01/10/2018 Owner: COOWNER SNYDER JAMES M &
DRINCO DAVID
Work Class: Single Family Replacement Issue Date: 08/23/2019 Subdivision:
Status: Closed - Finaled Expiration Date: 08/31/2020 Address: 1781 SKIMMER CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011-3609 IVR Number: 8817
Scheduled Actual Inspection Type Inspection No. Inspection Primary Inspector Reinspection Inspection
Date Start Date Status
1112512019 BLDG-84 Rough 112027.2019 Cancelled Luke Storno Reinspection Incomplete
Combo(14,24,34,44)
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency No
BLDG-14 No
Frame-Steel-Bolting-Welding
(Decks)
BLDG-24 Rough-Topout No
BLDG-34 Rough Electrical No
BLDG-44 No
Rough-Ducts-Dampers
08126/2019 08/26/2019 BLDG-SW-Pre-Con 101958-2019 Failed Paul Burnette Reinspection Incomplete
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency No
08/2812019 08128/2019 BLDG-SW-Pre-Con 102265-2019 Passed Paul Burnette Complete
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes
0910512019 0910512019 BLDG-21 103020-2019 Passed Paul York Complete
undergroundlunderflo
or Plumbing
Checklist Item COMMENTS . Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes
BLDG-22 Sewer/Water 103021-2019 Passed Paul York Complete
Service
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency .
Yes
09/1112019 09/1112019 BLDG-11 103740-2019 Partial Pass Paul York. Reinspection Incomplete
FoundationlFtglPiers
(Rebar)
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency .
.
No
1012312019 10/23/2019 BLDG-I3 Shear 108356.2019 . Failed Luke Storno Réinspection Incomplete
Panels/HD (Ok to wrap)
Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed
BLDG-Building Deficiency No
Mondays August 3, 2020 Page 1 of 4
EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION
& ENGINEERING, INC.
(Mailing)
P. 0. Box 1941 • Lakeside, CA 92040
10925 Hartley Road, Suite "1" I Santee, CA 92071
Telephone (619) 258-7901
p • I t - I ___
R.S.CE1VFD
CI FY OF CARLSBAD
AUG 152019
Si Pc c
(city of
Carlsbad
CM&t DIVISION
PROJECT INSPECTOR: Eric Martinez
PAD CERTIFICATION
FOR BUILDING PERMIT
DATE: 8/12/2019
PROJECT ID CDP20I 8-0019 GRADING PERMIT NO.GR201 8-0053
LOT(S) REQUESTED FOR RELEASE: I
N/A = NOT APPLICABLE • V= COMPLETE • 0 = incomplete or unacceptable
-
As-Built (Redlihes) are up to'date and available onsite for reference.
All daily geotechnical observation reports, compaction reports and letters from geotechnical engineer
'submitted, including: pad,'retaining walls, utility trenches, slopes, paved access roads and parking lots.
opt 3. Site security and fencing installed for separation of construction activity from public.
4. Letter from EOW documenting that the finished pad elevations match the plan elevations for specific V lot(s).
S. Letter from the project QSD certifying that all construction related BMPs are installed in, accordance with
rsJ fr City of Carlsbad Storm Water Standards.
V
6. Site access to requested lot(s) adequate and logically grouped, including ,a designated staging area for
building phase of work.
All onsité underground utilities installed and ready for service.
Identification and protection of city sewer infrastructure is implemented, including manhole protection,
false bottoms and sediment traps.
Permanent/Temporary Fire Access Plan approved by Fire Department representative, and implemented
on site. rVI 10. Letter from Owner/Dev requesting pad certification of the specific lot(s) with 8'/a" xli" site plan..
Pad certification for the above stated lots is approved for the purpose of building permit issuance.
V Issuance of building permits is still subject to all city requirements.
U The above stated lots are conditionally approved for a building permit to install retaining walls required
for pad certification only.
re conditionally approved for a building permit to install foundations only..
Al qllq
Date
07
Date
Public Works
Construction Management & Inspection
1635 Faraday Avenue I Carlsbad, CA 92008 1 760-602-2780 1760-438-4178 fax
oc 2olq,or
EsGil
A SAFEbuRt Company
DATE: 4/24/18
JURlSDlCTlON:C4r1thád
(dPLICANT
U JURIS.
PLAN CHECK #.: CBR2018-0077 SET: III
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1781 Skimmer Court
PROJECT NAME: SFR with Attached Garage, Deck & Covered Patio for James Snyder
The plans transmitted herewith havebeen corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
J The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's
codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building
department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at EsGil
until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant's copy of the-check list has been sent to:
Mike Snyder, 10612 Prospect Ave., Santee, CA 92071
EsGil staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
EsGil staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Mike Snyder Telephone #: 619 562-8183
Date contacted: " (by:Y Email: mikeiacor-sd.com
Mail Telephone Fax In Person
El REMARKS:
By: ALl SADRE, S.E. (for T.F.) Enclosures:
EsGil
4/17
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576
EsGil
A SAFEbulitCompany
DATE: 3130/18
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PLAN CHECK #.: CBR2018-0077 SET: II
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1781 Skimmer Court
APPLICANT
(2r
PROJECT NAME: Custom SFR with Attached Garage, Deck and Covered Patio for
James Snyder
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's
codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building
department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at EsGil
until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
El The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Mike Snyder, 10612 Prospect Ave., Santee, CA 92071
EsGil staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
EsGil staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Mike Snyder Telephone #: 619 562-8183
Date contacted: 3 ( (i (by40) Email: mikeciacor-sd.com
Telephone Fax In Person
6it ¶bI
By: Tamara Fischer Enclosures:
EsGil
3/22/18
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad CBR2018-0077
3/30/18
NOTE: The items listed below are from the previous correction list. These
remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The numbers of the items
are from the previous check list and may not necessarily be in sequence. The
notes in bold font are current.
Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit FOUR new
complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (THREE sets of plans for
residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted
in one of two ways:
Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760)
602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil and the Carlsbad Planning,
Engineering and Fire Departments.
Bring TWO corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil, 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all
remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad
Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire
Departments.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil only will not be reviewed by the
City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil is complete.
EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS
6. Guards (Section R312): Please provide a referenced detail for each condition of
guard, including along stair opening and along open sides of stairs. The details
on sheet S-5 are incomplete.
Shall have a height of 42" (may be 34" along the sides of stairs). Please
dimension at stair guardrail.
Openings between railings shall be less than 4". The triangular openings
formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a guardrail at a stair
shall be less than 6". Please specify for all guardrails.
Shall be detailed to show capability to resist a concentrated load of 200
pounds in any direction along the top rail. Table R301.5. Structural
calculations may be required. Structural connection details and
possibly calculations are required for each of the 3 guardrail
conditions.
CONTINUED
Carlsbad CBR2018-0077
3/30/18
ROOFS/DECKS/BALCONIES
11. Specify a minimum slope for drainage at deck of W12". 2x12s will end up less
than 9 ½" deep when ripped. Section R905.9.1. To achieve the required
slope, the depth will be less than the required 9 1/2I at the ripped 2x12s.
13. Please specify Class A and approval IAMPO ER 493 for the Enduro-Kote deck
covering. ICC ESR 2245 is no longer a valid report. Sorry for the typo in the
original correction. The approval is IAMPO ER 483.
GARAGE
All elements supporting the floor above the garage shall be protected on the
garage side with minimum ½" gypsum board. Section R302.6. I see the callout
for walls, but not other supporting elements.
SOILS AND STRUCTURAL
Per City requirements, all new residential buildings require a soils report. An
update letter is required if the report is more than 3 years old. Please provide a
copy of the project soil report. The report shall include foundation design
recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with
Section R401.4. Also, please revise Design Criteria on sheet S-I to include the
soil design parameters from the soil report. The soil report was received. The
following corrections apply:
The spacing of the slab steel per soil report recommendations
should be maximum 16" o.c. 18" o.c. specified on the plans.
Pad footings should have a minimum dimension of 24" and
reinforcing of #4 at a maximum of 12" o.c. each way per soil report
recommendations. Please revise the plans to Show compliance for
all pads.
CONTINUED
Carlsbad CBR2018-0077
3/30/18
20. If the soils engineer recommends that he/she review the foundation excavations,
note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building
Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building
official in writing that:
The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report,
The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and
C) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and
bearing capacity conform to the soils report."
Please add the above note per the last paragraph on page 11 of the soil
report.
21. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan,
grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been
determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly
incorporated into the construction documents (if required by the soil report).
Please provide the letter per the last paragraph on page 11 of the soil
report.
23. Show distance from foundation to edge of cut or fill slopes and show slope and
heights of cuts and fills. Show compliance with Section R403.1.7. (If applicable).
I see 7' to daylight is shown. This would be adequate for a slope height of
21' maximum. From google earth it appears the height of the slope may
exceed 21'. Please indicate the total height of the slope and show
compliance with the above section.
27. Balconies and decks shall be designed for 150% of the live load required by
Table 1607.1. CBC Table 1607.1, as amended by emergency building
standards. Please revise calculations to show that deck framing and support
complies. Also, please revise design criteria on sheet S-I to include deck
loading. Please revise design criteria on sheet S-I to include deck loading.
30. Please show vertical supports for girder trusses. One of the posts is shown at
grid 4 instead of grid 3.
CONTINUED
Carlsbad CBR20 18-0077
3/30/18
34. The lateral calculations at several walls state, "Perforated" and the entire wall
length, including openings is used for overturning calculations. These walls are not
shown on the plans as perforated shear walls. Either show them as perforated or
use each separate wall length (between openings) for overturning calculations. I
see additional calculations and details have been provided. The following
corrections apply:
Please make it clear on the plans at all perforated shear wall locations
that the entire wall, including above and below openings is to be
sheathed.
It is unclear why the total shear was divided by (37x2) at line B/C.
37. Shear wall line at the back of garage / back of powder and bath 4 should be
calculated separately from walls at front of garage / front of bedroom 4. They are
offset by up to 28'. I see the new calculation for grid line A.7; however, grid
line BIC needs to be recalculated to remove the lengths from A.7. Even
though the shear load to the line will be reduced, it appears that the unit
shear will be significantly higher.
Detail 111S5 which is referenced at 2/S5 is missing. I see 11/S4 is now
referenced, but this detail does not show the deck joists. Please provide a
detail which shows the deck joists.
Please call out all joist and truss hangers. I do not see that truss hangers are
called out
PME
50. Are there two FAUs? The 65,000 BTU unit seems low for the entire house. Also,
energy design states there are 2 FAUs. If there is another one, please show its
size and location. Provide an 18" raised platform for relocated FAU in the
garage which may generate a flame or spark. CPC Section 507.13.
CONTINUED
Carlsbad CBR2018-0077
3/30/18
Specify on the plans the following information for the direct vent gas fireplace:
The ICC number now specified is for an Isokern Fireplace which is a
masonry modular fireplace (and would require calculations and detailing
for its foundation and anchorage by the engineer). Keynote 10 specifies a
metal fireplace. Please clarify. The ICC report for the Isokern fireplaces
covers a wood-burning model which does not allow installation of glass
doors and is in conflict with the California Energy standards which require
glass doors, a B-vent gas model and a ventless gas model, neither of
which comply with the California Green Code requirement of a direct-vent
gas model. Most direct vent gas metal fireplaces do not have ICC approval.
We will accept a UL listed model, but the manufacturer's name and product
name or number must be indicated on the plans.
Include on the plans the following specifications for electrical devices installed in
dwellings: CEC Article 210 & 406 (See bold requirements for items requiring
correction). All kitchen and laundry outlets must be combination GFCl I
AFCI.
Arc-fault protection for all outlets (not just receptacles) located in rooms
described in NEC 210.12(A): Kitchens, laundry areas, family, living,
bedrooms, dining, halls, etc.
GFCI protected outlets for locations described in NEC 210.8(A): Laundry
areas, kitchen dishwashers, all kitchen outlets, garages, bathrooms,
outdoors, within 6' of a sink, etc.
RESIDENTIAL GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS
61. Recycling. Note on the plans that the contractor shall submit a Construction
Waste Management Plan, per CGC Section 4.408.2. Please submit the
completed Carlsbad Special Form for Waste Management Plan (included). The
completed form will be required before permit issuance.
MISCELLANEOUS
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number,
calculation page, etc.
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a
result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly
describe them and where they are located in the plans. indicate: Yes 0
No L3
The jurisdiction has contracted with EsGil, located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive,
Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to
perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding
these plan review items, please contact Tamara Fischer at EsGil. Thank you.
EsGil
A SAFEbuutCompany
DATE: 1/23/18 U APPLICANT
URIS.
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PLAN CHECK #.: CBR2018-0077 SET: I
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1781 Skimmer Court
PROJECT NAME: Custom SFR with Attached Garage, Deck and Covered Patio for
James Snyder
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's
codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building
department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at EsGil
until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Mike Snyder, 10612 Prospect Ave., Santee, CA 92071
EsGil staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
EsGil staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Mike Snyder Telephone #: 619 562-8183
2te coptacted\ (by rt)— Email c -'
I~M-ail eIephon\ Fax In Person
LII REMASJ'"
By: Tamara Fischer Enclosures:
EsGil
1/16/18
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad CBR20 18-0077
1/23/18
PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES
PLAN CHECK #.: CBR2018-0077 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1781 Skimmer Court
FLOOR AREA: 3380 sq ft SFD
672 sq ft Garage, 370 sq ft Coy Patio
REMARKS:
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
JURISDICTION:
DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW
COMPLETED: 1/23/18
STORIES: 2
HEIGHT: 25' approx per CRC
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION: 1/16/18
PLAN REVIEWER: Tamara Fischer
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the California version of
the International Residential Code, International Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code,
Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy
conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on
regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on
laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or
other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of
a building permit.
Present California law mandates that construction comply with the 2016 edition of the California
Code of Regulations (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 2015 IRC, 2015 IBC,
2015 UPC, 2015 UMC and 2014 NEC.
The above regulations apply, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance.
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 105.4 of
the 2015 International Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of
any state, county or city law.
To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc.
Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans.
Carlsbad CBR20 18-0077
1/23/18
Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit FOUR new
complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (THREE sets of plans for
residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one
of two ways:
1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-
2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and
Fire Departments.
2. Bring TWO corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil, 9320 Chesapeake
Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of
plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for
routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil only will not be reviewed by the City
Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil is complete.
. PLANS
On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items that will have a deferred
submittal (fire sprinklers). Additionally, provide the following note on the plans:
"Submittal documents for deferred submittal items shall be submitted to the
registered design professional in responsible charge, who shall review them and
forward them to the building official with a notation indicating that the deferred
submittal documents have been reviewed and that they have been found to be in
general conformance with the design of the building. The deferred submittal
items shall NOT be installed until their design and submittal documents have
been approved by the building official."
. FIRE PROTECTION
2. Please provide the following note on the plans, "Smoke alarms shall be
positioned to comply with the following:
They shall be not less than 3' from the door opening of a bathroom.
They shall be at least 20' from a cooking appliance.
They shall be at least 3' from supply registers of heating/cooling systems.
They, shall be at least 3' from the tip of the blade of a ceiling-mounted
fan."
. GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS
3. Bathrooms must be mechanically ventilated (an openable window won't suffice).
Section R303.3.1. Portions of master bath and bath 2 with tubs and shower.
CONTINUED
Carlsbad CBR20 18-0077
1/23/18
4. Please specify header heights for windows.
It appears that F windows at bathtubs will be within 5' of the standing
surface of the tubs, thus requiring safety glazing. Please indicate this on
the window schedule.
Where a window sill is more than 6' above the finished grade, the lowest
part of the window shall be at least 24" above the finished floor of the
room. Glazing between the floor and a height of 24" shall be fixed or have
openings such that a 4" sphere cannot pass through. Section R312.2. It
appears that this may be a problem at some of the second-floor windows.
If revising windows, keep in mind that each bedroom will still need an
emergency egress window complying with section R310 and single hung
windows generally need to be 5' high to comply.
5. Please specify the elevation difference between the garage and house. If more
than 7 3/4", a step will be required.
EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS
6. Guards (Section R312): Please provide a referenced detail for each condition of
guard, including along stair opening and along open sides of stairs.
Shall be installed along open-sided walking surfaces that are located
more than 30" above the floor or grade below.
Shall have a height of 4' (may be 34" along the sides of stairs).
Openings between railings shall be less than 4". The triangular openings
formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a guardrail at a stair
shall be less than 6".
Shall be detailed to show capability to resist a concentrated load of 200
pounds in any direction along the top rail. Table R301.5. Structural
calculations may be required.
Show compliance with section 2407.1, 2016 CBC for the glass guard rail
(glass type, factor of safety, support, etc).
7. Specify minimum stair run to be measured from the projection of the nosing.
8. A nosing (between %" and 1-W) shall be provided on stairways with solid risers.
Exception: No nosing is required if the tread depth is at least 11 inches. Section
R311.7.5.3.
9. Handrails (Section R311.7.8):
The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-% inches nor
more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. See Section R311.7.8.3
for alternatives.
Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 144 inches between the
wall and the handrail.
Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or
bends.
CONTINUED
Carlsbad CBR20 18-0077
1/23/18
The walls and soffits of the enclosed usable space under stairs shall be
protected on the enclosed side with Y2-inch gypsum board. Section R302.7.
ROOFS/DECKS/BALCONIES
Specify a minimum slope for drainage at deck of %":12". 2x12s will end up less
than 9 W deep when ripped. Section R905.9.1.
Enclosed framing in wood exterior balconies and decks shall be provided with
openings that provide a net free cross ventilation area not less than 1/150 of the
area of each separate space. CBC Section 2304.12.2.6, as amended by
emergency building standards.
Please specify Class A and approval IAMPO ER 493 for the Enduro-Kote deck
covering. ICC ESR 2245 is no longer a valid report.
Please specify Class A and which system # from ICC approval ESR 1388 is to
be used for the Patio Cover roof covering.
I see the deck drains shown. Please call out overflow drains or scuppers per
Section R903.4-
Overflow roof drains shall terminate in an area where they will be readily visible
and will not cause damage to the building. If the roof drain terminates through a
wall, the overflow drain shall terminate 12" minimum above the roof drain. City
Policy 84-35.
In order to use 1/300 of attic area for required ventilation, at least 40% (but not
more than 50%) of the required vent area must be located no more than 3'
below the ridge. Otherwise 1/150 must be used. Section R806.2.
GARAGE
All elements supporting the floor above the garage shall be protected on the
garage side with minimum 1/z" gypsum board. Section R302.6.
SOILS AND STRUCTURAL
Per City requirements, all new residential buildings require a soils report. An
update letter is required if the report is more than 3 years old. Please provide a
copy of the project soil report. The report shall include foundation design
recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with
Section R401.4. Also, please revise Design Criteria on sheet S-I to include the
soil design parameters from the soil report.
CONTINUED
Carlsbad CBR20 18-0077
1/23/18
If the soils engineer recommends that he/she review the foundation excavations,
note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building
Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building
official in writing that:
a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report,
b). The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and
c) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and
bearing capacity conform to the soils report."
Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan,
grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been
determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly
incorporated into the construction documents (if required by the soil report).
Shear wall type 3 requires anchor bolts at 32" o.c. Detail 1/S4 (referenced where
type 3 is called out) specifies 48" o.c. anchor bolt spacing.
Show distance from foundation to edge of cut or fill slopes and show slope and
heights of cuts and fills. Show compliance with Section R403.1.7. (If applicable).
Note on plans that surface water will drain away from building and show drainage
pattern. The grade shall fall a minimum of 6" within the first 10 feet. Section
R401.3.
The minimum compressive strength for concrete slabs on grade is 2500 psi per
table R402.2. Please revise foundation note #1 accordingly.
Please show stair footing on the foundation plan.
Balconies and decks shall be designed for 150% of the live load required by
Table 1607.1. CBC Table 1607.1, as amended by emergency building
standards. Please revise calculations to show that deck framing and support
complies. Also, please revise design criteria on sheet S-I to include deck loading.
It does not appear that trusses have been designed to accommodate the attic
FAU.
Please provide evidence that the engineer-of-record (or architect) has reviewed
the truss calculation package prepared by others for configuration and loading
(i.e., a "review" stamp on the truss calculations or a letter). CBC Section
107.3.4.1.
Please show vertical supports for girder trusses.
CONTINUED
Carlsbad CBR20 18-0077
1/23/18
31. Please justify 4x6 hips over garage and specify the size of the ridge. Additionally,
it is unclear how the intersection of the hips and ridge will be supported. Provide
complete detailing for all connections in this area (including right side of the ridge
beam and rafters to hips).
32. Nails for shear transfer connection (using A35's, etc.) may not be driven parallel to
the flanges of TJI's (i.e., along the sides), per city policy, unless specific written
approval from Truss-Joist Macmillan is first obtained. Details or notes on the plans
should make this clear. Nails may be driven perpendicular to TJI flanges. (Detail
11/8-4).
33. Please review calculations for FB5. The point loads from the roof framing over left
of garage and from girder truss above are not included.
34. The lateral calculations at several walls state, "Perforated" and the entire wall
length, including openings is used for overturning calculations. These walls are not
shown on the plans as perforated shear walls. Either show them as perforated or
use each separate wall length (between openings) for overturning calculations.
35. Please check overturning at the 21' shear wall at grid 3 lower (actually located
about grid 3.1).
36. Please review the plans for required location of drag straps so the lateral resisting
system will perform as designed. It appears that drag straps would be needed at
several locations. See for example, gridline 2, lower.
37. Shear wall line at the back of garage / back of powder and bath 4 should be
calculated separately from walls at front of garage / front of bedroom 4. They are
offset by up to 28'.
38. Regarding garage front shear walls:
The shear panel between the garage doors is called out as 2'6". There is
only 2' available.
Per Table 4.3.4. (SDPWS Section 4.3.4), the maximum height to width
ratio for plywood shear walls is 3 1/2:1. Boundary members are not detailed
for force transfer around the openings at the garage front, so the 10' plate
height should be used as the pier height, requiring a minimum shear panel
width of 210".
39. Provide knee braces in both directions and at each post or address lateral loads at
patio cover in the structural calculations.
40. Structural detailing is incomplete. Please review plans and provide and reference
details for each unique condition, including shear transfer at each shear wall
condition, support of framing and shear transfer at beams, support of patio roof
joists at bearing wall and support beams, etc.
CONTINUED
Carlsbad CBR20 18-0077
1/23/18
Please ensure that all shear transfer elements are shown on details: boundary
nailing, shear panels with edge nailing shown, shear transfer hardware, etc.
Detail I 1/S5 which is referenced at 2/S5 is missing.
Please call out all joist and truss hangers.
Please indicate on the floor framing plan that wall between kitchen and
pantry/stairs is a bearing wall.
PME
All new residential units shall include provisions specifically designed to allow the
later installation of any system which utilizes solar energy as an alternative
energy source. No building permit shall be issued unless the piping or conduit
and roof penetration details required pursuant to this section are indicated in the
building plans.
Show the minimum 30" deep unobstructed working space in front of the attic
installed furnace. Section CIVIC Section 304.1.
The access opening to attics must be large enough to remove the largest piece
of mechanical equipment and be sized not less than 30" x 22". CIVIC Section
304.4.
Note that passageway to the mechanical equipment in the attic shall be
unobstructed, have continuous solid flooring not less than 24 inches wide, and
be not more than 20 feet in length from the access opening to the appliance.
CIVIC Section 304.41.
Show a permanent electrical receptacle outlet and lighting fixture controlled by a
switch located at the entrance for furnaces located in an attic. CIVIC Section
304.4.4.
Are there two FAUs? The 65,000 BTU unit seems low for the entire house. Also,
energy design states there are 2 FAUs. If there is another one, please show its
size and location.
Specify on the plans the following information for the direct vent gas fireplace:
a) Manufacturer's name/model number and ICC approval number, or equal.
The ICC approval number specified (ESR 2074).is for automatic
foundation flood vents.
CONTINUED
Carlsbad CBR2018-0077
1/23/18
52. Include on the plans the following specifications for electrical devices installed in
dwellings: CEC Article 210 & 406 (See bold requirements for items requiring
correction).
Tamper resistant receptacles for all locations described in 210.52 (i.e., all
receptacles in a dwelling).
Arc-fault protection for all outlets (not just receptacles) located in rooms
described in NEC 210.12(A): Kitchens, laundry areas, family, living,
bedrooms, dining, halls, etc.
GFCI protected outlets for locations described in NEC 210.8(A): Laundry
areas, kitchen dishwashers, all kitchen outlets, garages, bathrooms,
outdoors, within 6' of a sink, etc.
53. Per CEC Article 210.11(C)3, note on the plans that bathroom circuiting shall be
either:
A 20 ampere circuit dedicated to each bathroom, or
At least one 20 ampere circuit supplying only bathroom receptacle outlets.
54. Show on the plans a wall receptacle within 36" of lavatory in the bathroom
(powder). CEC 210.52(D). CEC considers the powder room to be a
bathroom.
55. Include a receptacle outlet in any hallways 10 feet or more in length. CEC Article
210.52(H). Entry hall.
56. Show the T and P relief valve at the water heater and the discharge pipe size
and routing to the exterior. CPC Section 608.3.
. RESIDENTIAL GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS
The California Building Standards Commission has adopted the Green Building
Standards Code and must be enforced by the local building official. CGC Section
101.3. . Please revise or add the following notes and requirements per the 2016
code.
57. Electric Vehicle Charging. Note on the plans that electrical vehicle supply
equipment (EVSE) is required in NEW one and two family dwellings and
townhomes with attached garages. Include the following information on the
plans: A minimum size 1" conduit originating from a panel or service having a
spare 40 ampere 240 volt capacity terminating in a box located in close proximity
to the location of the future EV charger. CGC 4.106.4.
CONTINUED
Carlsbad CBR20 18-0077
1/23118
Storm water drainage/retention during construction. Note on the plans:
Projects which disturb less than one acre of soil shall manage storm water
drainage during construction by one of the following: A. Retention basins. B.
Where storm water is conveyed to a public drainage system, water shall be
filtered by use of a barrier system, wattle or other approved method. CGC
Section 4.106.2.
Grading and paving. Note on the plans that site grading or drainage system will
manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering buildings (swales,
water collection, French drains, etc.). CGC Section 4.106.3. Exception:
Additions not altering the drainage path.
Recycling. Note on the plans that a minimum of 65% of construction waste is to
be recycled. CGC Section 4.408.1. Please revise Green Building Standards
Code note 5 on sheet A-9.
Recycling. Note on the plans that the contractor shall submit a Construction
Waste Management Plan, per CGC Section 4.408.2. Please submit the
completed Carlsbad Special Form for Waste Management Plan (included).
Note on the plans that the gas fireplace(s) shall be a direct-vent sealed-
combustion type. CGC Section 4.503.1.
Please revise California Green Standards note 2g to 1.2 GPM for lavatory
faucets, per 2016 requirements.
Note on the plans that prior to final inspection the licensed contractor, architect
or engineer in responsible charge of the overall construction must provide to the
building department official written verification that all applicable provisions
from the Green Building Standards Code have been implemented as part of the
construction. CGC 102.3.
. ENERGY CONSERVATION
Include on the Title Sheet of the plans the following statement: 'Compliance with
the documentation requirements of the 2016 Energy Efficiency Standards is
necessary for this project. Registered, signed, and dated copies of the
appropriate CFI R, CF2R, and CF3R forms shall be made available at necessary
intervals for Building Inspector review. Final completed forms will be available for
the building owner."
Provide a gas piping design for the entire building (isometric or pipe layout)
based upon a minimum input of 200,000 btu/hr for water heater. ES 150.0(n)
CONTINUED
Carlsbad CBR20 18-0077
1/23/18
Instantaneous water heaters shall have isolation valves on both the cold and the
hot water piping leaving the water heater complete with hose bibs or other fittings
on each valve for flushing the water heater when the valves are closed. ES 110.3
All domestic hot water piping to have the following minimum insulation installed:
1/2" pipe (1/2" insulation); %" pipe (I" insulation); 1" to 144" pipe (144"
insulation). CPC 609.11 & ES 150.00) Additionally, the ½" hot water pipe to the
kitchen sink, and the cold water pipe within 5' of the water heater both require 1"
minimum insulation. ES 150.00)
Below grade hot water piping is required to be installed in a waterproof and non-
crushable sleeve or casing that allows for replacement of both the piping and
insulation.
Residential Energy Lighting Requirements (please update notes to indicate the
following):: ES 150.0(k)
Dimmers or vacancy sensors shall control all LED style luminaires. Two
exceptions: Fixtures installed in hallways or (closets under 70 square feet).
. MISCELLANEOUS
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item
has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc.
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result
of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them
and where they are located in the plans.
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list?
Please indicate:
Yes No L3
The jurisdiction has contracted with EsGil, located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite
208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the
plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review
items, please contact Tamara Fischer at EsGil. Thank you.
Carlsbad CBR2018-0077
1/23/18
[DO NOT PAY - THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE]
VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK #.: CBR2018-0077
PREPARED BY: Tamara Fischer DATE: 1/23/18
BUILDING ADDRESS: 1781 Skimmer Court
BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 / U
BUILDING
PORTION
AREA
(Sq. Ft.)
Valuation
Multiplier
Reg.
Mod.
VALUE ($)
SFD 3380 141.76 479,149
Gar 672 36.98 24,851
Coy Patio 370 12.33 4,562
Fireplace 1 3,373.05 3,373
Air Conditioning 3380 5.39 18,218
Fire Sprinklers 4052 4.01 16,249
TOTAL VALUE 546,401
Jurisdiction Code 1cb IBY Ordinance
1997 UBC Building Permit Fee V
1997 UBC Plan Check Fee
Type of Review: 177,J Complete Review Structural Only
U Other
Repetitive Fee
V Repeats U Hourly *
EsGil Fee I
I $2,178.261
I $1,415.871
I $1,241.611
Sheet 1 of 1
EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION
AND ENGINEERING, INC.
10925 HARTLEY ROAD, SUITE "1"
SANTEE, CALIFORNIA 92071
(61.9)258-7901
Fax 258-7902
James M. Snyder April 4, 201.8
10612 Prospect Avenue Project No. 1.8-.1127E5
Sarftee, California 92071.
.1
Subject: Foundation Plan, and. Details Review
Proposed Single-Family Residence
1781 Skimmer Court
Carlsbad, California 92011
Reference: 'timited Geotechni.cal investigation, Proposed Single-Family Residence, 1781
Ski,.mnier Court, Carlsbad, California 92011". Project No. 18-1i27E5, Prepared by
East County Soil, Consultation and Engineering, Inc., Dated March 1, 2018.
Dear Mr. Snyder:
In accordance with your request, we have reviewed the foundation, plan and details prepared by
Roy Johnson. Architect of La Mesa, California for the proposed single-family residence at the
subject site.
The foundation plan and details were -:found to be in accordance with the recommendations
provided , in the referenced geotechnical report. Our firm should observe the foundation
excavations for proper size and embedment into competent bearing soils.
If we can. he of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Respectfully Submitted,
Man adou Saliou Diallo. P.E.
RCE .54071, GE 2704
MSD/md.
Q,c2o(- 0011.
RECEIVED
EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION
AND ENGINEERING, INC.
10925 HARTLEY ROAD, SUITE "1"
SANTEE, CALIFORNIA 92071
(619) 258-7901
Fax 258-7902
MAR 20 2018
CITY OF CARLSBAD
BUILDING DIVISION
James M. Snyder March 1, 2018
10612 Prospect Avenue Project No. 1,8-1.127E5
Santee, California 92071
Subject: Limited Geotechnical investigation
Proposed. Single-Family Residence
17.81 Skimmer Court
Carlsbad, California 92011
Dear Mr. Snyder:
In accordance with your request, we have performed a limited geotechnical investigation at the
subject site to discuss the geotechnical aspects of the project and provide recommendations for the
proposed residential development.
Our investigation has found that proposed building pad is underlain by undocumented fill soils to a
maximum depth of approximately. 3 feet below existing grade. Dense sandstone of the Santiago
Formation was encountered below the fill soils to the explored depth of 6 feet. It is our opinion
that the development of the proposed single-family residence is geotechnically feasible provided
the recommendations herein are implemented in the design and construction.
Should you have any questions with, regard to the contents of this report, please do not hesitate to
contact our office. -
Respectfully submitted,
.OFESSIok
SpQ S.
UJ GE 2704 °\MM
Cr k EXP. /
OF W 1C W
Mamadou Saliou Diallo, P.E.
RCE 54071, GE 2704
MSD/md
a I A0 1810P 4*~~
James M. Snyder! 1781 Skimmer Court/Carlsbad Project Wo. 18-1127E5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................................3
SCOPEOF SERVICES......................................................................................................................................3
SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ............ . ........................................................... 3
FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING........................................................................4
GEOLOGY.........................................................................................................................................................4
GeologicSetting .................................................................................................................................... 4
SiteStratigraphy....................................................................................................................................4
SEISMICITY......................................................................................................................................................5
RegionalSeismicity ................................................................................................................................ 5
SeismicAnalysis...................................................................................................................................5
2016 CBC Seismic Design Criteria......................................................................................................5
GeologicHazard Assessment ................................................................................................................. 6
GEOTEC1-IN1CAL EVALUATION..................................................................................................................7
CompressibleSoils................................................................................................................................7
ExpansiveSoils ................................................... . ................................................................................... 7
Groundwater..........................................................................................................................................7
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................7
GRADINGAND EARTHWORK......................................................................................................................8
Clearingand Grubbing..........................................................................................................................8
StructuralImprovement of Soils ............................................................................................................ 8
TransitionsBetween Cut and Fill . ... ..................................................................................................... 9
Methodand Criteria of Compaction......................................................................................................9
ErosionControl......................................................................................................................................9
StandardGrading Guidelines.................................................................................................................9
FOUNDATIONSAND SLABS ........................................................................................................................9
SETTLEMENT....................................................................................................... . ........................................ .10
PRESATURATIONOF SLAB SUBGRADE ................................................................................................. 10
TEMPORARYSLOPES .................................................................................................................................. 11
TRENCHBACKFILL ...................................................................................................................................... II
DRAINAGE..................................................... . ................................................................................................ II
FOUNDATIONPLAN REVIEW....................................................................................................................11
LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION .........................................................................................................12
ADDITIONALSERVICES ............................................................................................................................12
PLATES
Plate 1- Location of Exploratory Boreholes
Plate 2- Summary Sheet (Exploratory Borehole Logs) ....................................................................13
Plate 3 - USCS Soil Classification Chart
PAGE L- 1, LABORATORY TEST RESULTS..............................................................................................14
REFERENCES.................................................................................................................................................15
'II
James M Snyder! 1781 Skimmer Court! Carlsbad Project No. 18-1127E5
INTRODUCTION
This is to present the findings and conclusions of a limited geotec
h
n
i
c
a
l
i
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
a
proposed two-story, single-family residence to be located at 17
8
1
S
k
i
m
m
e
r
C
o
u
r
t
,
i
n
C
a
r
l
s
b
a
d
,
California.
The objectives .of the investigation were to evaluate the existing
s
o
i
l
s
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
recommendations for the proposed development.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The following services were provided during this investigation:
Site reconnaissance and review of published geologic, seismological an
d
g
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
r
e
p
o
r
t
s
and maps pertinent to the project area
O Subsurface exploration consisting of three (3) boreholes within the
l
i
m
i
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
a
r
e
a
of development. The boreholes were logged by our Staff Geologist.
Collection of representative soil samples at selected depths. The obtaine
d
s
a
m
p
l
e
s
w
e
r
e
s
e
a
l
e
d
in moisture-resistant containers and transported to the laboratory for subse
q
u
e
n
t
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
.
Laboratory testing of samples representative of the types of soils encount
e
r
e
d
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
f
i
e
l
d
investigation
Geologic and engineering analysis of the field and laboratory data, whi
c
h
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
t
h
e
b
a
s
i
s
for our conclusions and recommendations
Production of this report, which summarizes the results of the above anal
y
s
i
s
a
n
d
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
s
o
u
r
findings and recommendations for the proposed development
SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
The subject site is a rectangular-shaped residential lot located on the east
s
i
d
e
o
f
S
k
i
m
m
e
r
C
o
u
r
t
,
i
n
City of Carlsbad, California. The property which encompasses an
a
r
e
a
o
f
4
7
,
8
5
0
s
q
u
a
r
e
f
e
e
t
(
4
3
5
'
x 110') was occupied by a single-family residence with a detached ga
r
a
g
e
.
W
e
u
n
d
e
r
s
t
a
n
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
residence was burned down leaving the garage and the concrete founda
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
s
l
a
b
.
T
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
pad is relatively level with moderate slopes to the east. Vegetation con
s
i
s
t
e
d
o
f
g
r
a
s
s
,
s
h
r
u
b
a
n
d
trees. The parcel is bordered by Skimmer Court to the west, a simila
r
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
o
the south and vacant properties to the remaining directions.
The preliminary plans prepared by Roy Johnson, Architect of La Mesa
,
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
proposed construction will include a new single-family residence
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
o
f
t
h
e
remaining foundation and slab. The structure will be two-story
,
w
o
o
d
-
f
r
a
m
e
d
a
n
d
f
o
u
n
d
e
d
o
n
continuous and spread footings with a slab-on-grade floor.
3
James M Snyderl 1781 Skimmer court! Carlsbad Project No. 18-1127E5
FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING
On 'February 13, 2018, three (3) boreholes were excavated to a maximum depth of approximately 6
feet below existing grade with a hand auger. The approximate locations of the boreholes are shown
on the attached Plate No. 1, entitled "Location of Exploratory Boreholes". A continuous log of the
soils encountered was recorded at the time of excavation and is shown on Plate No. 2 entitled
"Summary Sheet". The soils were visually and texturally classified according to the filed
identification procedures set forth on Plate No. 3 entitled "USCS Soil Classification".
Following the field exploration, laboratory testing was performed to evaluate the pertinent
engineering properties of the foundation materials. The laboratory-testing program included
moisture and density, maximum dry density and optimum moisture content, particle size analysis
and expansion index tests. These tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM
standards and other accepted methods, Page L-1 and Plate No. 2 provide a summary of the
laboratory test results.
GEOLOGY
Geologic Settin
The subject site is located within the southern portion of what is known as the Peninsular Ranges
Geomorphic Province of California. The geologic map pertaining to the area (Reference No. 6)
indicates that the site is underlain by sandstone/ claystone of the Santiago Formation (Tsa).
Site Stratigraphy
The subsurface descriptions provided are interpreted from conditions exposed during the field
investigation and/or inferred from the geologic literature. Detailed descriptions of the subsurface
materials encountered during the field investigation are presented on the exploration logs provided on
Plate No. 2. The following paragraphs provide general descriptions of the encountered soil types.
Undocumented Fill (Qufl
Undocumented fill soils were encountered in the boreholes to depths ranging from approximately 6
inches to 3 feet below existing grade. They consisted of light brown sand with silt that was dry to
moist and loose in consistency.
Santiago Formation (Tsa
Sandstone of the Santiago Formation was encountered below the fill soils. The material generally
consisted of light gray, silty sand that was dry to moist and dense in consistency.
2
James M. Snyderl 1781 Skimmer court' Carlsbad Project No. 18-1127E5
SEISMICITY
Regional Seismicity
Generally, Seismicity within California can be attributed to the regional tectonic movement taking
place along the San Andreas Fault Zone, which includes the San Andreas Fault and most parallel
and subparallel faults within the state. The portion of southern California where the subject site is
located is considered seismically active. Seismic hazards are attributed to groundshaking from
earthquake events along nearby or more distant Quaternary faults. The primary factors in
evaluating the effect an earthquake has on a site are the magnitude of the event, the distance from
the epicenter to the site and the near surface soil profile.
According to the Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones Act of 1994 (revised Alquist-Priolo Special Studies
Zones Act), quaternary faults have been classified as "active" faults, which show apparent surface
rupture during the last 11,000 years (i.e., Holocëne time). "Potentially-active" faults are those faults
with evidence of displacing Quaternary sediments between 11,000 and 1.6 million years old.
Seismic Analysis
Based on our evaluation, the closest known "active" fault is the Rose Canyon Fault located
approximately 6 miles (10 kilometers) to the west. The Rose Canyon Fault is the design fault of the
project due to the predicted credible fault magnitude and ground acceleration.
The Seismicity of the site was evaluated utilizing the 2008 National Hazard Maps from the USGS
website and Seed and Idriss methods for active Quaternary faults within a 50-mile radius of the
subject site. The site may be subjected to a Maximum Probable Earthquake of 6.9 Magnitude
along the Rose Canyon Fault, with a corresponding Peak Ground Acceleration of 0.41g. The
maximum Probable Earthquake is defined as the maximum earthquake that is considered likely to
occur within a 100-year time period.
The effective ground acceleration at the site is associated with the part of significant ground
motion, which contains repetitive strong-energy shaking, and which may produce structural
deformation. As such, the effective or "free field" ground acceleration is referred to as the
Repeatable High Ground Acceleration (RHGA). It has been determined by Ploessel and Slosson
(1974) that the RHGA is approximately equal to 65 percent of the Peak Ground Acceleration for
earthquakes occurring within 20 miles of a site. Based on the above, the calculated Credible
RHGA at the site is 0.27g.
2016 CBC Seismic Design Criteria
A review of the active fault maps pertaining to the site indicates the location of the Rose Canyon
Fault Zone approximately 10 km to the west. Ground shaking from this fault or one of the major
active faults in the region is the most likely happening to affect the site. With respect to this
hazard, the site is comparable to others in the general area. The proposed residential structure
should be designed in accordance with seismic design requirements of the 2016 California Building
James M. Snyder! 1781 Skimmer Court! Carlsbad Project No. 18-112 7E5
Code or the Structural Engineers Association of California using the following seismic design
parameters:
_ i2o6B.: $EfRE.FENcEs
Site Class D Table 20.3-1/ ASCE 7, Chapter 20
Mapped Spectral Acceleration For Short Periods,
S. 1.068g Figure 1613.3.1(1)
Mapped Spectral Acceleration For a 1-Second
Period, S1 0.413g Figure 1613.3.1(2)
Site Coefficient, F. 1.073 Table 1613.3.3(1)
Site Coefficient, F 1.587 Table 1613.3.3(2)
Adjusted Max, Considered Earthquake Spectral
Response Acceleration for Short Periods, SMS
1.146g Equation 16-37
Adjusted Max. Considered Earthquake Spectral
Response Acceleration for I-Second Period, SMI 0.655g Equation 16-38
5 Percent Damped Design Spectral Response
Acceleration for Short Periods, SDS
0.764g Equation 16-39
5 Percent Damped Design Spectral Response
Acceleration for 1-Second Period, SDI
0.437g Equation 16-40
Geologic Hazard Assessment
Ground Rupture
Ground rupture due to active faulting is not considered likely due to the absence of known fault traces
within the vicinity of the project; however, this possibility cannot be completely ruled out. The
unlikely hazard of ground rupture should not preclude consideration of "flexible" design for on-site
utility lines and connections.
Liquefaction
Liquefaction involves the substantial loss of shear strength in saturated soils, usually sandy soils with a
loose consistency when subjected to earthquake shaking. Based on the absence of shallow
groundwater and consistency of the underlying bedrock material, it is our opinion that the potential for
liquefaction is very low.
Landsliding
There is no indication that landslides or unstable slope conditions exist on or adjanent to the project
site. There are no obvious geologic hazards related to landsliding to the proposed development or
adjacent properties.
Tsunamis and Seiches
The site is not subject to inundation by tsunamis due to its elevation and distance to the ocean. The
site is also not subject to seiches (waves in confined bodies of water).
James M. Snyder! 1781 Skimmer Court! Carlsbad Project No. 18-1127E5
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
Based on our investigation and evaluation of the collected information, we conclude that the proposed
residential development is feasible from a geotechnica[ standpoint provided the recommendations
herein will be properly implemented during construction.
In order to provide a uniform support for the proposed structure, footings should be embedded into
properly compacted fill soils or the dense sandstone of the Santiago Formation. The foundations may
consist of reinforced continuous and/ or spread footings with reinforced slabs. Recommendations and
criteria for foundation design are provided in the Foundation and Slab recommendations section of this
report.
Comnressible Soils
Our field observations and testing indicate low compressibility within the dense sandstone of the
Santiago Formation, which underlies the site. However, loose undocumented fill was encountered to a
maximum depth of approximately 3 feet below surface grades. These soils are compressible. Due to
the potential for soil compression upon loading, remedial grading of these loose soils, including
overexcavation and recompaction will be required unless footings are extended to the dense sandstone
of the Santiago Formation.
Following implementation of the earthwork recommendations presented herein, the potential for soil
compression resulting from the new development has been estimated to be low. The low-settlement
assessment assumes a well-planned and maintained site drainage system. Recommendations
regarding mitigation by earthwork construction are presented in the Grading and Earthwork
Recommendations section of this report.
Expansive Soils
An expansion index test was performed on a representative sample of the fill soils to determine
volumetric change characteristics with change in moisture content. An expansion index of 9 was
obtained which indicates a very low expansion potential for the foundation soils.
Groundwater
Static groundwater was not encountered to the depths of the boreholes. The building pad is located
at an elevation over 300 feet above Mean Sea Level. We do not expect groundwater to affect the
proposed construction. Recommendations to prevent or mitigate the effects of poor surface
drainage are presented in the Drainage section of this report.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The following conclusions and recommendations are based upon the analysis of the data and
information obtained from our soil investigation. This includes site reconnaissance; field
investigation; laboratory testing and our general knowledge of the soils native to the site. The site is
7
James M. Snyder! 1781 Skimmer Courti Carlsbad Project No. 18-1127E5
suitable for the proposed residential development provided the recommendations set forth are
implemented during construction.
GRADING AND EARTHWORK
Based upon the preliminaiy plans and the information obtained during the field investigation, we
anticipate that the proposed residence will be founded on continuous and/ or spread footings, which
are supported by properly compacted fill or dense terrace deposits. The following grading and
earthwork recommendations are based upon the limited geotechnical investigation performed, and
should be verified during construction by our field representative.
Clearing and Grubbing
The area to be graded or to receive fill and/or structure should be cleared of vegetation and concrete
waste from the demolition of the remaining foundation and slab. Vegetation and the debris from the
clearing operation should be properly disposed of off-site, The area should be thoroughly inspected
for any possible buried objects, which need to be rerouted or removed prior to the inception of, or
during grading. All holes, trenches, or pockets left by the removal of these objects should be properly
backflhled with compacted fill materials as recommended in the Method and Criteria of Compaction
section of this report.
Structural Improvement of Soils
Information obtained from our field and laboratory analysis indicates that loose, undocumented fill
soils cover the building pad to a maximum depth of approximately 3 feet below existing grade. These
surficial soils are susceptible to settlement upon loading. Based upon the soil characteristics, we
recommend the following:
All undocumented fill and other loose natural soils should be removed from the area, which is
planned to receive compacted fill and/or structural improvement. The bottom of the removal
area should expose competent materials as approved by ECSC&E geotechnical representative.
Prior to the placement of new fill, the bottom of the removal area should be scarified a
minimum depth of 6 inches, moisture-conditioned within 2 percent above the optimum
moisture content, and then recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (ASTM
D1557 test method).
Overexcavation should be completed for the structural building pad to a minimum depth of
2 feet below the bottom of the proposed footings. The limit of the required area of
overexcavation should be extended a minimum of 5 feet laterally beyond the perimeter
footing (building footprint).
* Soils utilized as fill should be moisture-conditioned and recompacted in conformance with the
following Method and Criteria of Compaction section of this report. The actual depth and
extent of any overexcavation and recompaction should be evaluated in the field by a
representative of ECSC&E.
James M. Snyder/ 1781 Skimmer Court/ Carlsbad Project No. 18-112 7135
Transitions Between Cut and Fill
The proposed structure is anticipated to be founded in properly compacted fill soils or dense sandstone
of the Santiago Formation. Cut to fill transitions below the proposed structure should be completely
eliminated during the earthwork construction as required in the previous section.
Method and Criteria of Compaction
Compacted fills should consist of approved soil material, free of trash debris, roots, vegetation or other
deleterious materials. Fill soils should be compacted by suitable compaction equipment in uniform
loose lifts of 6 to 8 inches. Unless otherwise specified, all soils subjected to recompaction should be
moisture-conditioned within 2 percent over the optimum moisture content and compacted to at least
90 percent relative compaction per ASTM test method D1557.
On-site soils, after being processed to delete the aforementioned deleterious materials, may be used for
recompaction purposes. Should any importation of fill be planned, the intended import source(s)
should be evaluated and approved by ECSCE prior to delivery to the site. Care should be taken to
ensure that these soils are not detrimentally expansive.
Erosion Control
Due to the granular characteristics of on-site soils, areas of recent grading or exposed ground may be
subject to erosion. During construction, surface water should be controlled via berms, gravel/
sandbags, silt fences, straw wattles, siltation or bioretention basins, positive surface grades or other
method to avoid damage to the finish work or adjoining properties. All site entrances and exits must
have coarse gravel or steel shaker plates to minimize offsite sediment tracking. Best Management
Practices (BMPs) must be used to protect storm drains and minimize pollution. The contractor
should take measures to prevent erosion of graded areas until such time as permanent drainage and
erosion control measures have been installed. After completion of grading, all excavated surfaces
should exhibit positive drainage and eliminate areas where water might pond.
Standard Grading Guidelines
Grading and earthwork should be conducted in accordance with the standard-of-practice methods for
this local, the guidelines of the current edition of the California Building Code, and the requirements
of the jurisdictional agency. Where the information provided in the geotechnical report differs from
the Standard Grading Guidelines, the requirements outlined in the report shall govern.
FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS
a. Continuous and spread footings are suitable for use and should extend to a minimum depth of 18
inches for the proposed two-story structure into the properly compacted fill soils or dense sandstone
of the Santiago Formation. Continuous footings should be at least 15 inches in width and reinforced
with a minimum of four #4 steel bars; two bars placed near the top of the footings and the other two
bars placed near the bottom of the footings. Isolated or spread footings should have a minimum
width of 24 inches. Their reinforcement should consist of a minimum of #4 bars spaced 12 inches
James M Snyder! 1781 Skimmer C'ourl! Carlsbad Project No. 18-1127E5
on center (each way) and placed horizontally near the bottom. These recommendations are based
on geotechnical considerations and are not intended to supersede the structural engineer
requirements.
Interior concrete slabs-on-grade should be a minimum 4 inches thick. Reinforcement should
consist of 43 bars placed at 16 inches on center each way within the middle third of the slabs by
supporting the steel on chairs or concrete blocks "dobies°. The slabs should be underlain by 2
inches of clean sand over a 10-mil visqueen moisture barrier. The effect of concrete shrinkage will
result in cracks in virtually all-concrete slabs. To reduce the extent of shrinkage, the concrete
should be placed at a maximum of 4-inch slump. The minimum steel recommended is not intended
to prevent shrinkage cracks.
Where moisture sensitive floor coverings are anticipated over the slabs, the 10-mil plastic
moisture barrier, should be underlain by a capillary break at least 2 inches thick, consisting of
coarse sand, gravel or crushed rock not exceeding 3/4 inch in size with no more .than 5 percent
passing the #200 sieve.
An allowable soil bearing value of 2,000 pounds per square foot may be used for the design of
continuous and spread footings at least 12 inches wide and founded a minimum of 12 inches into
the properly compacted fill soils or dense sandstone of the Santiago Formation as set forth in the
2016 California Building Code, Table 1806.2. This value may be increased by 400 psf for each
additional foot of depth or width to a maximum value of 4,000 lb/ft2.
Lateral resistance to horizontal movement may be provided by the soil passive pressure and the
friction of concrete to soil. An allowable passive pressure of 250 pounds per square foot per foot
of depth may be used. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 is recommended. The soils passive pressure
as well as the bearing value may be increased by 1/3 for wind and seismic loading.
SETTLEMENT
Settlement of compacted fill soils is normal and should be anticipated. Because of the type and
minor thickness -of the fill soils anticipated under the proposed footings and the light building loads,
total and differential settlement should be within tolerable limits.
PRESATURATION OF SLAB SUBGRADE
bue to the granular characteristics of the subgrade soils, presoaking of subgrade prior to concrete
pour is not required. However, subgrade soils in areas receiving concrete should be watered prior
to concrete placement to mitigate any drying shrinkage, which may occur following site
preparation and foundation excavation.
10
James M. Snyder! 1781 Skimmer Court! Carlsbad Project No. 18-1127E5
TEMPORARY SLOPES
For the excavation of foundations and utility trenches, temporary vertical cuts to a maximum height of
4 feet may be constructed in fill or natural soil. Any temporary cuts beyond the above height
constraints should be shored or further laid back following a 1:1 (horizontal to vertical) slope ratio.
OSHA guidelines for trench excavation safety should be implemented during construction.
TRENCH BACKFILL
Excavations for utility lines, which extend under structural areas should be properly backfihled and
compacted. Utilities should be bedded and backfihled with clean sand or approved granular soil to
a depth of at least one foot over the pipe. This backfill should be uniformly watered and
compacted to a firm condition for pipe support. The remainder of the backfill should be on-site
soils or non-expansive imported soils, which should be placed in thin lifts, moisture-conditioned
and compacted to at least 90% relative compaction.
DRAINAGE
Adequate measures should be undertaken after the structure and other improvements are in place,
such that the drainage water within the site and adjacent properties is directed away from the
foundations, footings, floor slabs and the tops of slopes via rain gutters, downspouts, surface swales
and subsurface drains towards the natural drainage for this area. A minimum gradient of 2 percent
is recommended in hardscape areas adjacent to the structure. In earth areas, a minimum gradient of
5 percent away from the structure for a distance of at least 10 feet should be provided. If this
requirement cannot be met due to site limitations, drainage can be done through a swale in
accordance with Section 1804.4 of the 2016 California Building Code. Earth swales should have a
minimum gradient of 2 percent: Drainage should be directed to approved drainage facilities.
Proper surface and subsurface drainage will be required to minimize the potential of water seeking
the level of the bearing soils under the foundations, footings and floor slabs, which may otherwise
result in undermining and differential settlement of the structure and other improvements.
FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW
Our firm should review the foundation plan and details during the design phase to assure conformance
with the intent of this report. During construction, foundation excavations should be observed by our
representative prior to the placement of forms, reinforcement or concrete for conformance with the
plans and specifications.
11
James M. Snyder! 1781 Skimmer court! Carlsbad Project No. 18-1127E5
LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION
Our investigation was performed using the skill and degree of care ordinarily exercised, under
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
circumstances, by reputable soils engineers and geologists practicing in this or similar localities..
N
o
other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice inc
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
this report, This report is prepared for the sole use of our client and may not be assigned to ot
h
e
r
s
without the written consent of the client-and ECSC&E, Inc.
The samples collected and used for testing, and the observations made, are believed representativ
e
o
f
site conditions; however, soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between ex
p
l
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
trenches, boreholes and surface exposures. As in most major projects, conditions reveale
d
b
y
construction excavations may vary with preliminary findings. If this occurs, the changed c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
must be evaluated by a representative of ECSC&E and designs adjusted as required or altern
a
t
e
designs recommended.
This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner
,
o
r
o
f
h
i
s
representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are broug
h
t
t
o
t
h
e
attention of the project architect and engineer. Appropriate recommendations should be inco
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
into the structural plans. The necessary steps should be taken to see that the contra
c
t
o
r
a
n
d
subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field.
The findings of this report are valid as of this present date. However, changes in the conditions o
f
a
property can occur with the passage of time, whether they are due to natural processes or the work
s
o
f
man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards ma
y
occur from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this repo
r
t
m
a
y
be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside of our control. Therefore, this report is subject
t
o
review and should be updated after a period of two years.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
The review of plans and specifications, field observations and testing under our direction are int
e
g
r
a
l
parts of the recommendations made in this report. If East County Soil Consultation and En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
,
Inc. is not retained for these services, the client agrees to assume our responsibility for any po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
claims that may arise during construction. Observation and testing are additional services, wh
i
c
h
a
r
e
provided by our firm, and should be budgeted within the cost of development.
Plates No. I through 3, Page L-1 and References are parts of this report.
12
James M. Snyder! 1781 Skimmer courz/ Carlsbad Project No. 18-1127E5
PLATE 140.2
SUMMARY SHEET
BOREHOLE NO. 1
DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION Y M
Surface UNDOCUMENTED FILL (Quf)
light brown, moist, loose, sand with silt
0.5' SANTIAGO FORMATION (isa)
light gray, dry to moist, medium dense to dense, silty sand
1.0' 108.7 12.5
3.0' bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater
borehole backfilled 2/13/18
BOREHOLE NO.2
DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION Y M
Surface UNDOCUMENTED FILL (Quf)
light brown, dry to moist, loose, sand with silt
1.5' SANTIAGO FORMATION (isa)
light gray, moist, medium dense to dense, silty sand
6.0' bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater
borehole backfi[led 2/13/18
BOREHOLE NO.3
DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION Y M
Surface UNDOCUMENTED FILL (Quf)
light brown, dry to moist, loose, sand with silt
1.0 88.1 9.8
3.0' SANTIAGO FORMATION (isa)
light gray, moist, medium dense to dense, silty sand
6.0' bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater
borehole backfitled 2/13/18.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Y = DRY DENSITY IN PCF M = MOISTURE CONTENT IN %
I
13
James M Snyder! 1781 Skimmer Court! Carlsbad Project No. 18-1127E5
PAGE L-1
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT (ASTM D1557)
The maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of the fill materials as determined by ASTM
D1557, Procedures A and B which use 25 blows of a 10 pound slide hammer falling from a height of. 18
inches on each of 5 equal layers in a 4 inch diameter 1/30 cubic foot compaction cylinder and Procedure C
.which uses 56 blows of a 10 pound slide hammer falling from 'a ,height of 18 inches on each of 5 equal
.
layers in a 6 inch diameter 1/13.3 cubic foot compaction cylinder are presented as follows:
OPTIMUM.
MAXIMUM MOISTURE
SOIL TYPE/ . DRY DENSITY CONTENT
PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION (PCF) (%) LOCATION
I/A . LIGHT BROWN SILTY SAND 115.0 . 12.0 BH-3 ® 1.5'
EXPANSION INDEX TEST (ASTM D4829) .
INITIAL SATURATED INITIAL DRY
MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSITY EXPANSION
CONTENT(%) CONTENT(%) (PCF) INDEX LOCATION
12.3 22.3 102.2
• ? BH-3 @ 1.5'
PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS (ASTM D422)
I"
1/2"
-
-
• -
. -
3/8" - -
#4 100 • -
#8 • 99 100.
#16 96 99
#30 90 • :94
#50 • 61 56
#100 • . 20 28
#200 9 .• 19
• USCS SP-SM • SM
James M. Snyder! 1781 Skimmer Court! Carlsbad Project No. 18-1127E5
REFERENCES
"2016 California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of 2",
Published by International Code Council.
"Geologic Map of the San Diego 30' x 60' Quadrangle, California", by Michael P. Kennedy and
Slang S. Tan, 2008.
"Concrete Engineering of Streets and Local Roads", Reference Manual, by the American Concrete
Association (acpa), Updated December 2000.
"Geotechnical and Foundation Engineering: Design and Construction", by Robert W. Day, 1999.
"Maps of Known Active Fault Near-Source Zones in California and Adjacent Portions of Nevada to
be used with 1997 Uniform Building Code", Published by International Conference of Building
Officials.
"Geologic Maps of the Northwestern Part of San Diego County, California", Department of
Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, by Slang S. Tan and Michael P. Kennedy, 1996.
"Bearing Capacity of Soils, Technical Engineering and Design Guides as Adapted from the US
Army Corps of Engineers, No. 7", Published by ASCE Press, 1994.
"Foundations and Earth Structures, Design Manual 7.2", by Department of Navy Naval Facilities
Engineering Command, May 1982, Revalidated by Change 1 September 1986.
"Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction during Earthquakes", by H.B. Seed and I.M. Idriss, 1982.
15
RECEVED ityof
AUG 23 2019 Carl sbad CITY (V
CERTIFICATION OF SCHOOL FEESPAID
This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior
to issuing a building permit. The City will not Issue any building permit without a completed school fee form.
Project # & Name: DEv2018-0032, SNYDER RESIDENCE
Permit #: CBR2018-0077
Project Address: 1781 SKIMMER CT
Assessor's Parcel #: 2150505700
Project Applicant: COOWNER SNYDER JAMES M & DRINCO DAVID
(Owner Name)
Residential Square Feet:
New/Additions: 3,380
Second Dwelling Unit:
Commercial Square Feet:
New/Additions:
City Certification: City of Carlsbad Building Division Date: 05/22/2019
Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration (Owner") certifies
under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the
best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of
payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of
dwelling units or square footage after the, building permit is issued or if the initial
determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is
the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this
declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner.
Carlsbad Unified School District
6225 El Camino Real
Carlsbad CA 92009
Phone: (760) 331-5000
Encinitas Union School District
101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd
Encinitas, CA 92024
Phone: (760) 944-4300 x1166
San Dieguito Union H.S. District
684 Requeza Dr.
Encinitas, CA 92024
Phone: (760) 753-6491 Ext 5514
(By Appt. Only)
San Marcos Unified Sch. District
255 Pico Ave Ste. 100
San Marcos, CA 92069
Phone: (760) 290-2649
Contact: Katherine Marcelja
(By Appt.only)
Vista Unified School District
1234 Arcadia Drive
Vista CA 92083
Phone: (760) 726-2170 x2222.
SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION
(To be completed by the school district(s))
THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS
FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED.
The undersigned, being duty authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder,
or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1
has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The
City may issue building permits for this project.
Signature of Authorized School District Official:
Title: Date: Qk CID
CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Name of School District:
CARLSBAD CA 92009
Community & Economic Development - Building Division
1635 Faraday Avenue I Carlsbad, CA 92008 1 760-602-2719 1 760-602-4581x I building@carlsbadca.gov
Building Fee $1,098.15
F Plan Check Fee $768.711
Strong Motion Fee $49.00
Green Bldg. Stand. Fee $8.00
Green Bldg PC Fee $170.00
License Tax/PFF 8,12j
License Tax/PFF (in CFD) $4,226.09
CFD
Land Use:
Density:
Improve. Area:
Fiscal Year:
Annex. Year:
Factor:
CREDITS
PFF and/or CFD
Explanation:
City of Carlsbad Valuation Worksheet Building Division
3rJc F cd
Address Assessor ParcerNo. Date By I
SLE
Type of Work Area of Work Multiplier VALUE
SFD and Duplexes 1,638 $141.76 $232,202.88
Residential Additions $169.50 $0.00
Remodels / Lofts $46.51 $0.00
Apartments & Multi-family $126.35 $0.00
Garages/Sunrooms/Solariums $36.98 $0.00
Patio/Porch $12.33 $0.00
Enclosed Patio $20.03 $0.00
Decks/Balconies/Stairs $20.03 $0.00
Retaining Walls, concrete, masonry $24.65 $0.00
Pools/Spas-Gunite $52.39 $0.00
TI/Stores, Offices $46.51 $0.00
TI/Medical, restaurant, H occupancies $64.72 $0.00
Photovoltaic Systems/ # of panels $400.00 $0.00
$0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
Fire Sprinkler System . $4.01 $0.00
Air Conditioning - commercial $6.47 $0.00
Air Conditioning - residential $5.31 $0.00
Fireplace/ concrete, masonry $4,961.73 $0.00
Fireplace/ prefabricated Metal $3,373.05 $0.00
$0.00
$0.00
TOTAL 5232,202.88
Valuation: $232,203
Comm/Res (CIR): C
CFD
Yes (PFF=1.82%) 0 No (PFF = 3.5%)
Plumbing $62.00
Mechanical $42.00
Electrical $41.00
iq, t24.o4
STORM WATER COMPLIANCE FORM
TIER I CONSTRUCTION SWPPP
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) SELECTION TABLE
Erosion Control Sediment Control BMPs Tracking Non-Storm Water Waste Management and Materials
BMPs . Control BMPs Management BMPs Pollution Control BMPs
.2 .2 . C C
5 0 .5 5
-D a) C a) C .9
—
. c .I- -•-' (I)
i5
•
.
CL
0 >. W 01 C
a)
U) a)
Best Management Practice* 01 £ D
- u 2 - : g a
(BMP)Description -3
C_
. 0 CL
o 0 '-6 °- '-.E o w C 0L. ao -1 >W.i-' .00 o ' 0 CC NC CC
a) (B 0 0 .1... w U) .2 -.-.
U) U) C) 2 I.e..
0 i.. (B . 0 fl> C, U)
00 I.. U) Cl. U) £ . 0 Cl)
0 L D 0 C 0.. 0 0 0.. a) > C) 0 .
U)
0 . Cl) 0. 0 Cl) C) 0 U)
0 0 0 0 0
CASQA Designation -3 r- cc 0) -. * in co r- — T ? i L? ? '
LLLJLLLLLLLJLLJJ c
,# Construction Activity .
Li Li Li L& U) Cl) Cl) U) U) U) U) U) .
rading/SoiIDistuthance
(. Trenching/Excavation
Stockpiling .. .
Drilling/Boring
Concrete/Asphalt Sawcutting
' Concrete Flatwork . — - - - . - - - - — - - — — — - - - I — NA — - - — - — -
Paving .
Conduit/Pipe Installation
. Stucco/Mortar Work
Waste Disposal
Staging/Lay Down Area
- Equipment Maintenance and Fueling - - - - - - - - — - - - — — — - - _••_• - — - - — — -
Hazardous Substance Use/Storage
Dewatering
Site Access Across Dirt
Other (list): —1-1
STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES
ALL NECESSARY EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS SHALL BE
AVAILABLE ON SITE TO FACILITATE RAPID INSTALLATION
OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPs WHEN RAIN
IS EMINENT.
THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL EROSION
CONTROL DEVICES TO WORKING ORDER TO THE SATISFACTION
OF THE CITY INSPECTOR AFTER EACH RUN—OFF PRODUCING
RAINFALL.
THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE CITY
INSPECTOR DUE TO INCOMPLETE GRADING OPERATIONS OR
UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH MAY ARISE.
ALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE IN PLACE
AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY WHEN THE FIVE (5)
DAY RAIN PROBABILITY FORECAST EXCEEDS FORTY PECENT
(407.). SILT AND OTHER DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER
EACH RAINFALL
ALL GRAVEL BAGS SHALL CONTAIN 3/4 INCH MINIMUM
AGGREGATE.
ADEQUATE. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND PERIMETER
PROTEC11ON BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE MEASURES MUST
BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED..
THE CITY INSPECTOR SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO ALTER
THIS PLAN DURING OR BEFORE CONSTRUCTION AS NEEDED
TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH CITY STORM WATER QUALITY
REGULATIONS.
Instructions:
Check the box to the left of all applicable construction activity (first column) expected to occur during construction.
Located along the top of the BMP Table is a list of BMP's with it's corresponding California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) designation number. Choose one
or more BMPs you intend to use during construction from the list. Check the box where the chosen activity row intersects with the BMP column.
Refer to the CASQA construction handbook for information and details of the chosen BMPs and how to apply them to the project.
OWNER'S CERTIFICATE:
I UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUST: (1) IMPLEMENT
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) DURING CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITIES TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE TO AVOID
THE MOBILIZATION OF POLLUTANTS SUCH AS SEDIMENT AND TO
AVOID THE EXPOSURE OF STORM WATER TO CONSTRUCTION
RELATED POLLUTANTS; AND (2) ADHERE TO, AND AT ALL TIMES,
COMPLY NTH THIS CITY APPROVED hER 1 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP
THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION WORK IS COMPLETE AND APPROVED
BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD.
r7 DATE
Page 1 of 1
PROJECT INFORMATION
Site Address: /71 ç
Assessor's Parcel Number: 2 ('• OS' -
Emergency Contdct:
Name:
24 Hour Hour Phone:
Construction Threat to Storm Water Quality
(Check Box)
MEDIUM . EJ LOW
REV 11/17