Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1266 STRATFORD LN; ; CB961289; PermitBUILDING PERMIT Permit No: CB961289 01/08/97 11:05 Project No: A9601836 Page 1 of 1 Development No: Job Address: 1266 STRATFORD LN Suite: Permit Type: RESIDENTAL ADD/ALT Parcel No: 1 7164-39-00 Lot#: C-P'iT 776.0Y 1822 01/08/97 0001 01 02 Construction, Type: VN Occupancy Group,: Reference#: Status: ISSUED Description: 708 SF ADDITION SECOND STORY Applied: 07/12/96 484 SF GARAGE AND 120 SF DECK AND STAIRS Apr/Issue: 01/08/97 Entered By: MDP Appl/Ownr : WORTHING,B.A. 619 729-3965 P.0.1041 CARLSBAD, CA. 92018 *** Fees Required *Ak F esU.écted & Credits Fees: 1,029 /7 Adjustments: /.ou 00 Total Fees: 1,09. w \J 7ota1i 253.00 776.00 Fee description J , / flt-tz \f /rdt Ext fee Data ---------------- ---------------------/ ft) ( J Building Permit 559.00 Plan Check 363.00 Strong Motion Fee 8.00 BUILDING TOTAL 930.00 Enter "Y" for PlumbikEt ur izsusJ)/A t I 20.00 Y Each Plumbing Fixturor Ti\ I1 Jjj1 21.00 Each Install/Repair Lie\\%f 7.00 48.00 PLUMBING TOTAL Enter IIU for Electric I..... )INCORPORATED 10.00 1 1952 Enter "Y" for Remodel 10.00 1 20.00 * ELECTRICAL TOTAL Enter 'Y' for Mechanic 1 .-u 15.00 1 Install Furn/Ducts/Heat Pump 9.00 9.00 6.50 Each Exhaust Fan 6.50 31.00 * MECHANICAL TOTAL ANAL APPROVAL IN'T. DATE!i CLEARANCE_ CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 9W PERMIT APPLICATION -- City of Carlsbad Building Department 2075 Las PaLums Dr., CarLsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 PLAN CHECK NO. PERMIT TYPE From List I (see back) give code of Permit-Type: --------------------------------------------------------- For Residential Projects Only: From List 2 (see back) give Code of Structure-Type: CAD 6515 07/12/96 0)01 01. C Net Loss/Gain of Dwelling Units ______________________________ PROJECT INFORMATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Address Building or Suite No. 1266 STRATFORD LANE CARLSBAD, CA Nearest Cross Street LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. CHECK BELOW IF SUBMITTED: 02 Energy Calcs 02 Structural Calcs 02 Soils Report DI Addressed Envelope DESCRIPTION OF WORK SQ. Fr. 484 # OF STORIES # OF BEDROOMS # OF BATHROOMS 5. (UN IALJ P1'AtJN (if different NAME (last name first) from applicant) WORTHIN, B.A. ADDRESS P.O. BOX 1041 CITY CARLSBAD STATE CA ZIP CODE 92018 DAYTELEPHONE (619) 729-3965 APPLICANT U CONTRACIUK NAME (last name first) LI AGENT FOR WNT1IACIUR U OWNER WORTHING, B.A. ADDRESS P.O. LI AGENt FOR OWNER BOX 1041 CITY CARLSBAD STATE CA ZIP CODE 920 1 8 DAY TELEPHONE (6 1 9) 729-3965 PROPERTY OWNER NAME (last name first) EMBER, LAURA ADDRESS 1266 STRATFORD LANE CITY CARLSBAD STATE CA ZIP CODE 92008 DAY TELEPHONE (6 1 9) 434-9309 NAME (last name first) WORTHING, B.A. INC. ADDRESS P.O. BOX 1041 CITY CARLSBAD STATE CA ZIP CODE 92018 DAY TELEPHONE (6 1 9) 729-3965 STATE UC.#'9R74 LICENSE CLASS B—i CITY BUSINESS LIC. # 549200 DESIGNEK NAME (last name first) WORTHING, B.A. AUL)REbb P.O. BOX 1041 CITY CARLSBAD STATECA ZIP CODE 92018 DAYTELEPHONE 729-3965 STATE LIC. # 39-2894 WORKERS' WMPENSATION Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to self-insure issued by the Director of Industrial Relations, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admitted insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director of the insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Section 3800, lab. Q. INSURANCE COMPANY STATE FUND POLICY NO. 229-6537 EXPIRATION DATE 2/97 Certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. SIGNATURE DATE OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION Owner-Builder Declaration: I hereby affirm that 1 am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: 0 1, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). 0 1, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License law). o I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$5001). SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITh ONLY: Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? DYES 13 NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? DYES ONO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? DYES [3 NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED AFTER JULY 1, 1989 UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION (X)N11(OL DIST1UCf. ereoy affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Set 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS 10. APPLICANT CEI[I1fr1CATIUN I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL UABIIII1ES JUDGMENTS COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. 0511k An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5,0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. Expiration. Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE _______ such permit is suspended or aban 11 Id at eater , work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 303(d) Uniform Buildi/y2?, DATE: _______ 0 CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT# CB961289 FOR 04/23/97 DESCRIPTION: 708 SF ADDITION SECOND STORY 484 SF GARAGE AND 120 SF DECK AND STAIRS TYPE: RAD JOB ADDRESS: 1266 STRATFORD LN APPLICANT: WORTHING, B.A. CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: RS/TERESA/729-3965 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR AREA DC PLANCK# CB961289 0CC GRP CONSTR. TYPE VN STE: LOT: HONE: 619 729-3965 HONE: HONE: INSPECT0 TOTAL TIME: CD LVL DESCRIPTION 19t ST Final Structural 29 PL Final Plumbing 39 EL Final Electrical 49 ME Final Mechanical ACT COMMENTS 417 ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE 030597 030497 022897 022797 022697 022597 022497 022497 022497 022497 012897 012897 012797 012797 012197 011797 DESCRIPTION Interior Lath/Drywall Shear Panels/HD's Insulation Rough/Topout Insulation Rough/Topout Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough/Topout Rough Electric Rough/Ducts/Dampers Shear Panels/HD's Shear Panels/HD's Roof/Reroof Shear Panels/HD's Ftg/ Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/ Piers ACT INSP COMMENTS AP DC AP DC GRG AP DC AP DC CA DC PER CONTRACTOR NR DC AP DC CO DC NEED TOPOUT ON ADDITION AP DC AP DC CO DC ND STRAPS 8:30 AP DC 10:30 AP DC NR DC AP DC CA TP PER B A WORTHING EsGII Corporation fProfessioiwJP(au Review Engineers DATE: December 18, 1996 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1289 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 1266 Stratford Lane PROJECT NAME: Ember Residential Addition O APPLICANT 0 FIRE O PLAN REVIEWER O FILE The-plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ** codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified see attached are resolved and checked by building department staff. r The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: B.A. Worthing Date contacted: (by: f) Telephone #: 729-3965 REMARKS: SEE REVISED VALUATION FORM FOR ADDTIONAL FLOOR AREA ADDED!! By: Tony Embuido Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 CM 0 EJ 0 PC 12/10/96 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 96-1289 II December 18, 1996 4. Note on the plans that battery operated smoke detectors will be provided inside all existing bed rms and corridors that provide access to the bed rms. Note should include the word "existing". p 9. Note on the roof plan that at least a Class roof covering will be installed. 11. Show on the foundation plan the thickness and reinforcing of the slab. 16. Show embedment of hold down anchors on foundation plan. Section 106.3.3. 28. The R-30 insulation shown on energy form CF-1 R will not fit in the 2X8 roof joist space. A mm. 2X1 0 is required to accommodate the R-30 insulation. a) Specify special insulation on set of plan at cross section. R-?, # of layers. 30. Due to changes and additional submittal of required items: See below for addtional corrections; A). On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. Section 106.3.2. REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO X FOUNDATION INSPECTION EXPANSION/EPDXY ANCHORS B) When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Carlsbad 96-1289 7/19/96 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1289 PREPARED BY: CHUCK MENDENHALL DATE: 7119 /96 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1266 Stratford Lane Revised 12/18/96 te BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3/U1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA (ft.2) VALUATION MULTIPLIER VALUE ($) Dwelling 484 708 94 45496 66552 Garage 484 23X 1.20 13358 Deck/stairs 120 11.50X 1.20 1656 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 60510 81,566 1991 UBC Building Permit Fee U Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 464.00 558.50 1991 UBC Plan Check Fee 0 Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 301.60 363.03 Type of Review: • Complete Review fl Structural Only LI Hourly O Repetitive Fee Applicable fl Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 241.28 290.42 Comments: Fire Services Review: fl Complete Review 0 Suppression System O Fire Alarm 1 Other: Esgil Fire Services Review Fee: $ Comments: Sheet I of I macvalue.doc 5196 EsGil Corporation Professiona(cPfan Review Engineers DATE: 7/19/96 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1289 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1266 Stratford Lane PROJECT NAME: Ember Residential Addition SET:I U APPLICANT U FIRE U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ********** codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. Li The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. N The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: B.A. Worthing P.O. Box 1041, Carlsbad, Ca 92018 N Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Li Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant (except by mail) that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone #: Li REMARKS: By: CHUCK MENDENHALL Enclosures: 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 96-1289 7/19/96 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1289 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 1266 Stratford Lane FLOOR AREA: 968 STORIES: two HEIGHT: 201-6" REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 7/12/96 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 7/19/96 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 7/15/96 PLAN REVIEWER: CHUCK MENDENHALL FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plarf review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with Title 24 and the following model codes: 1994 UBC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UPC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UMC (effective 2/23/96) and 1993 NEC (effective 12/28/95). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process. please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section. etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 1, GENERAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES WITHOUT SUPPLEMENTS (1994 UBC) r310rw.dot Carlsbad 96-1289 7/19/96 . PLANS Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, (619) 560-1468. Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply with Title 24 and the 1994 UBC, UMC and UPC and the 1993 NEC. FIRE PROTECTION When the valuation of a room addition or repair exceeds $1,000, or when sleeping rooms are created, smoke detectors shall be provided per the above, except that smoke detectors added at existing construction need only be battery powered. Section 310.9.1.2. Note on the plans that battery operated smoke detectors will be provided inside all existing bed rms and corridors that provide access to the bed rms. EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS Provide stairway and landing details. Sections 1006.3, 1006.15 and 1006.2. A. Maximum rise is 7" and minimum run is 11". When the stairs serves less than 10 occupants, or serves an unoccupied roof, rise may be 8" maximum and run 9" minimum. Handrails: Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and be continuous. The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail. Section 1006.9. ROOFING California law requires that on or after July 1, 1995, every new structure have a fire retardant roof covering that is at least Class C. When 50% or more of the roof of an Carlsbad 96-1289 7/19/96 existing structure is reroofed within a one-year period, the structure shall have a fire retardant roof covering that is at least Class C. AB 3819. FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. Provide a foundation plan. Show on the plan the thickness and reinforcing of the slab and footing details. Note on plans that wood shall be 6" minimum above finish grade. Section 1806.1. Dimension foundations per U.B.C. Table 18-I-D: Floors Footing Supported* Thickness Width Depth Stemwall one story 6" 12" 12" 6" two story 8" 15" 18" 7" Show foundation sills to be pressure treated, or equal. Section 2317.4. Show foundation bolt size and spacing. Foundation bolt size and spacing for shear walls must be clearly shown on the foundation plan. Section 1806.6. If required, show size, embedment and location of hold down anchors on foundation plan. Section 106.3.3. If hold downs are required, note on plan that hold down anchors must belied in place prior to foundation inspection. Section 108.5.2. . FRAMING Show double top plate with minimum 48" lap splice. Section 2326.11.2. Show nailing will be in compliance with Table 23-I-Q. Show or note fire stops at the following locations per Section 708: In concealed spaces of stud walls and partitions, including furred spaces, at the ceiling and floor levels and at 10 foot intervals both vertical and horizontal; This applies to the gable end studs greater than 10' high. Carlsbad 96-1289 7/19/96 Show stud size and spacing. Maximum allowable stud heights: Bearing wall: 2 x4 and 2 x 6 max. 10'; Non-bearing: 2 x 4 max. 14', 2 x 6 max. 20'. Table 23-1-R-3. Provide calculations for main vertical and horizontal framing members and footings. Section 106.3.3. this applies to the ridge beam, floor joists and the garage door header. Provide calculations for lateral loads, shear panels, shear transfer and related. Section 106.3.3. This applies to the /south Elevation of the building. ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) Show on the plan that ground-fault circuit-interrupter protection complies with 1993 NEC Art. 210-8, which reads as follows: All 125-volt, single-phase, 15- and 20- ampere receptacles installed in bathrooms, garages, basements, outdoors and within 6 feet of a kitchen sink. PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) Show that water heater is adequately braced to resist seismic forces. Provide two straps (one strap at top 1/3 of the tank and one strap at bottom 1/3 of the tank). UPC, Section 510.0 . ENERGY CONSERVATION The R-30 insulation shown on energy form CF-IR will not fit in the 2X8 roof joist space. A mm. 2X1 0 is required to accommodate the R-30 insulation. Provide a note on the plans stating "All new glazing (fenestrations) will be installed with a certifying label attached, showing the U-value." CARLSBAD S.F.D. & DUPLEX SUPPLEMENT All new residential buildings, including additions, require a soils report. Please submit two copies. Exception: If a room addition is limited to one story and 1000 sq. ft. in area, then a soils report is not required. Esgil Corporation will advise the City to place their soils notice stamp on the plans. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Carlsbad 96-1289 7/19/96 Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes El No L3 The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact CHUCK MENDENHALL at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 96-1289 7/19/96 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1289 PREPARED BY: CHUCK MENDENHALL DATE: 7/19/96 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1266 Stratford Lane BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3/U1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION MULTIPLIER VALUE ($) Dwelling 484 94 45496 Garage 484 23 X 1.20 13358 Deck/stairs 120 11.50X 1.20 1656 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 60510 1991 UBC Building Permit Fee Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 464.00 1991 UBC Plan Check Fee fJ Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 301.60 Type of Review: U Complete Review 0 Structural.-Only Hourly fl Repetitive Fee Applicable LI Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 241.28 Comments: Fire Services Review: J Complete Review J Suppression System 0 Fire Alarm U Other: Esgil Fire Services Review Fee: $ Comments: Sheet I of I macvalue.doc 5196 City of Carlsbad 1 0 . ~29 ~~w 4 S jj~ BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ____ HECK NO. CB ?17 h21'9 DATE:7 4—(t, BUILDING ADDRESS: / 'S a2Z,J PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 4- 4- 6A 4k'.Zj1O ASSESSOR's PARCEL NUMBER: /5? - l 43 ' EST. VALUE 4s 4'W ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review, has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: DENIAL Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked with 0. Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. By: Date:_________ By: Date:__________ By: Date:__________ ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON ATTACHMENTS D Dedication Application U Dedication Checklist UI Improvement Application UI Improvement Checklist UIFuture Improvement Agreement UJ Grading Permit Application UI Grading Submittal Checklist UI Right of Way Permit Application UI Right of Way Permit Submittal Checklist. and Information Sheet UISewer Fee Information Sheet NAM flLL& 7Z City of Carlsbad ADDRESS: 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 PHONE :(619) 438-1161, Ext. A-4 P:\D0CSCHKLST\8P0001 .FRM REV 04130196 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-0894 ED BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 14 SITE PLAN 1 sV012ndv' 3rd! 1DD 0 2. Show on site plan: 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: 5 North Arrow D. Property Lines Easements I " ' Existing & Proposed Structures E. Easements rvritS rv.a_'(Y\6 Y'? Existing Street Improvements F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets Drainage Patterns C. Existing Topography Existing & Proposed Slopes 12r/0 0 3. Include note: "Surface water to be directed away from the building foundation at a 2% gradient for no less than 5' or 2/3 the distance to the property line (whichever is less)." [Per 1985 UBC 2907(d)5]. On graded sites, the top of any exterior foundation shall extend above the elevation of the street gutter at point of discharge or the inlet of an approved drainage device a minimum of 12 inches plus two percent" (per 1990 UBC 2907(d)5.). El"' 0 0 4. Include on title sheet Site address Assessors Parcel Number Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: Total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION P:DOcS\CHKLS1\BFOOO1.FRM Page 1 of 4 REV 043OI96 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE lstV 2ndV 3rdV El El 0 5. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. Conditions were complied with by: Date:___________________ DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 0 6. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm V drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ -pursuant to Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8-1/2" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal. Dedication completed by Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS El 7a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ -pursuant to Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Please have a registered Civil Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist for a separate plancheck process through the Engineering Department. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal, checklist for the public improvements requirements. Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal. 1d-/—-- Improvement Plans signed by: UA)c Date: P:DOCSCHKLSfl8P0001 .FRM Page 2 of 4 REV 04/30/96 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1st,/ 2nd! 3rd' 0 0 0 7b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $_ so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Future public improvements required as follows:___________________________ Improvement Plans signed by: Date:__________ O 0 0 7c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return signed and notarized Agreement to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by:_____________________________ Date: O 0 0 7d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adiacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. O 0 0 8a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). o 0 0 8b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be Submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: 0 0 8c. No Grading Permit required. ooccM000I.F4 Page 3 of 4 FIEVo/ BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS Vv' 3rd' 0 9. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, trees, driveways, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for A separate Right-of-Way permit issued by the Engineering Department is required for the following: 0 0 10. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. O 0 ii. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of a Permit. Industrial waste permit accepted by: Date: P:OOcStCHKL81\BOO1.FRM Page 4 of 4 REVooiø PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB 9 ig Address (2 \S"ccj-;rC)t,. L1') Planner David Rick Phone (619) 438-1161 ext. 4328 (Name) APN: I/5(3-/61-3'f Type of Project and Use: Zone: 1?l Facilities Management Zone:I CFD(in$ it_________________ cirbI (If property in, complete SPECIAL TAX CALCULATION WORKSHEET provided by Building Department) Legend .7 Item Complete Item Incomplete - Needs your action 0 / O Environmental Review Required: YES NO __,TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: 4" J4D Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval Disôretionary Actin Required: YES ' NO "TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. - DATE PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval 0 0 California Coastal Commission Permit Required: YES NO DATE OF APPROVAL: San Diego Coast District, 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92108 (619) 521-8036 Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval E/D 0 Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993). :• Site Plan: ;II 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensioned setbacks and existing topographical lines. I. t. 0 2. Provide legal description of property, and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: if'o 0 1. Setbacks: Front: Required 2.o Shown 24' Int. Side: Required /0' Shown /o'4- Street Side: Required ,41'k Shown jt4 Rear: Required ZO' Shown q2. 70 0.. Lot Coverage: Required Shown 4 IO/D 'I Height: Required Shown 23' Parking: Spaces Required 2 Shown 2. (ei, 0=4— Guest Spaces Required Shown Additional Comments Per 21. 10. oço (DY1)(e) (F) cc 44.t ?QPII(c - 4e(PSSo. bL4All ' wiod. ILV Lait OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DATE 4 K:\ADMIN\cOUNTER\PLANCK.FRM 1-17-96 COAST GEOTECHNIcAL CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS January 20, 1997 Laura Ember 1266 Strafford Lane Carlsbad, CA 92008 Reference: PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Proposed Second Story Addition Over Garage 1266 Stratford Lane Carlsbad, California Prepared by Coast Geotechnical Dated November 1, 1996 NOTICE OF FOOTING EXCAVATION OBSERVATION The footing excavations were saturated from the prolonged rain on January 12, 1997. The footings were subsequently deepened to remove saturated materials. The continuous wall footing underpin excavation along the west side of the garage and the column pad excavations (interior and exterior) have been observed by this firm. The footing excavations are founded into terrace deposits, as recommended in the above referenced report. 779 ACADEMY DRIVE • SOLANA BEACH • CALIFORNIA 92075 (619) 755-8622 • FAX (619) 755-9126 January 20, 1997 W. 0. G-244096 Page 2 The footing excavations are approved by this firm provided al/ loose deposits are removed from the base of the excavation prior to pouring concrete. The footing excavations were not reviewed for compliance with structural plans and location. No new utility lines are proposed in the garage footprint. The two planter areas along the front of the garage should be sealed along the base to prevent irrigation water from infiltrating into footing subsoils (see referenced report). If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact our office. Reference to our Job No. P-244096 will help expedite a response to your inquiry. Respectfully submitted, COAST GEOTECHNICAL A41401~-Iell Mark Burwell Geologist COAST GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS November 26, 1996 Laura Ember 1266 Stratford Lane Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: SUPPLEMENTAL EXPLORATION 1266 Stratford Lane Carlsbad, CA 92008 Reference: PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Proposed Second Story Addition Over Garage 1266 Stratford Lane Carlsbad, California Prepared by Coast Geotechnical Dated November 1, 1996 Dear Ms. Ember: This report presents the results of our supplemental exploration on the subject property. Two areas of the concrete slab, adjacent to the garage foundation, were saw cut and removed. The areas are located along the west, Test Pit 1-A and east, Test Pit 2-A, sides of the garage. EXISTING FOOTINGS Test Pit 1-A suggests that the western garage footing is approximately 11 inches wide and is founded approximately 5.5 inches below the base of the adjacent concrete slab, see 779 ACADEMY DRIVE • SOLANA BEACH • CALIFORNIA 92075 (619) 755-8622 • FAX (619) 755-9126 - - November 26, 1996 W.O. P-244096 Page 2 Plate A. The upper 5.5 inches of the earth materials encountered in Test Pit 1-A is composed of brown silty sand in a loose condition. The base of the footing appears to be resting on the surface of the underlying Terrace Deposits. Test Pit 2-A suggests that the eastern garage footing is founded approximately 20 inches below the base of the adjacent concrete slab. However, the upper 8.0 inches of the earth materials is composed of loose silty sand deposits. The effective depth of embedment of the footing is approximately 12 inches. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on exposures in Test Pit 2-A, the eastern footing for the garage is founded approximately 12 inches into moderately dense to dense sandy deposits. Based on the assumption that the embedment depth is continuous and the width of the footing is at least 11 inches, the eastern footing appears to be adequate from a geotechnical viewpoint, for slight increases in loading as per our discussion with Trang Huynh, project structural engineer. The western footing should be underpinned as recommended in the referenced report. However, the depth of embedment into competent terrace deposits may be reduced to 12 inches. November 26, 1996 W.O. P-244096 Page 3 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at 755-8622. This opportunity to be of service is appreciated. Respectfully submitted, COAST GEOTECHNICA.L 782 L1t Exp. 12-31-97 Mark Burwell Geologist OF C Vithaya Geotechnical Engineer Enclosures: Plate A Laboratory Test Results Site Plan TEST PIT 1-A WEST SIDE 3.5" SLAB I -1 fFZA~-. 3.5 " 5 5" si/a' #4ma4fcre 11" ?rrcL€c Oe,o'-s' 's: "9217 / J,l1e a lal -.9 ,e / TEST PIT 2-A EAST SIDE 3.50' SLAB ITT 6"-oJn S/~y s4.C724St, /66SC 8" fDLJ7 .St2'2t7, #77O/..57, S c I 1i 12" i 4 W/I1 7Cr,12CC /.SflS 4 Pc Ds:\ L 5rnc-., ,,,7e-e1 Jd-W S/F94''/ 77'.s', dc,isc P-244096 SITE SKETCH LEGEND KI TEST PIT LOCATION (approx.) BORING LOCATION (approx.) IT P.244096 U COAST GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS I ' c,.•L•. November 1, 1996 U U Laura Ember 1266 Stratford Lane Carlsbad, CA 92008 U I Subject: PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Proposed Second Story Addition Over Garage 1266 Stratford Lane Carlsbad, California U Dear Ms. Ember: I In response to your request and in accordance with our Proposal/Agreement dated July 22, 1996, we have performed a preliminary geotechnical investigation on the subject site I for the proposed residential addition. The findings of the investigation, laboratory test results and recommendations for foundation design and site development are presented in this report. From a geotechnical point of view, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for the proposed development, provided the recommendations in this report are implemented during the design and construction phases. However, the existing garage footings should be underpinned in order to adequately support additional loads. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at 755-8622. This opportunity to be of service is appreciated. Respectfully submitted, COAST GEOTECHNICAL tag~4td~ Geologist j çOFESSIo * P-'41-! Vithay Singhanet, P.E. Geotechnical Engineer 779 ACADEMY DRIVE • SOLANA BEACH • CALIFORNIA 92075 (619) 755-8622. FAX (619) 755-9126 I PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION I . I Proposed Residential Addition I Carlsbad, 1266 Stratford Lane California I . I Prepared For: I Laura Ember 1266 Stratford Lane Carlsbad, California I I November 1, 1996 W.O. P-244096 I I Prepared By: COAST GEOTECHNICAL 779 Academy Drive I Solana Beach, California 92075 TABLE OF CONTENTS VICINITY MAP INTRODUCTION 5 SITE CONDITIONS 5 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 5 SITE INVESTIGATION 6 LABORATORY TESTING 6 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS 7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9 A. GENERAL 9 B. FOUNDATIONS 10 C. DRAINAGE 11 D. OBSERVATIONS 11 E. PLAN REVIEW 12 F. LIMITATIONS 12 APPENDIX LABORATORY TEST RESULTS TEST PIT LOG BORING LOG SITE SKETCH VICINITY MAP kUE4 '\y_ Mag 15.00 Scale 1:15,625 (at center) Sat Nov 02 15:26 1 M Secondary SR, Road, Hwy Ramp November 1, 1996 W.O. P-244096 Page 5 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering investigation on the subject property. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the nature and characteristics of the sedimentary units underlying a portion of the property, the engineering properties of the surficial deposits and their influence on the construction of the proposed residential addition over the detached garage. SITE CONDITIONS The subject property is located east of Pio Pico Drive, along the north side of Stratford Lane, in the city of Carlsbad. The site includes a residence and detached garage situated on gently sloping terrain. Except for two small planter areas, the garage perimeter is surrounded by concrete. The two planter areas are located along the east and west corners of the garage door opening. Drainage is generally directed to the street. Vegetation consists of residential landscaping including grass, shrubs and trees. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Plans for the second story addition were prepared by B Worthing Plan Service. The proposed second story addition will be constructed over the existing garage. The existing foundation in the planter area of the garage includes a stem wall footing and a slab on grade (See enclosed Test Pit Log). November 1, 1996 W.O. P-244096 Page 6 SITE INVESTIGATION Two exploratory borings were drilled on the site with a 4.0 inch diameter auger to a depth of 7.5 feet. Due to limited accessibility, only one test pit was excavated adjacent to the foundation to evaluate footing embedment and the characteristics of the supporting soils. Earth materials encountered were visually classified and logged by our field geologist. Undisturbed, representative samples of earth materials were obtained at selected intervals. Samples were obtained by driving a thin walled steel sampler into the desired strata. The samples are retained in brass rings of 2.5 inches outside diameter and 1.0 inches in height. The central portion of the sample is retained in close fitting, waterproof containers and transported to our laboratory for testing and analysis. LABORATORY TESTING Classification The field classification was verified through laboratory examination, in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. The final classification is shown on the enclosed exploratory Logs. Moisture/Density The field moisture content and dry unit weight were determined for each of the undisturbed soil samples. The dry unit weight was determined in pounds per cubic foot. The field moisture content was determined as a percentage of the dry unit weight. Both November 1, 1996 W.O. P-244096 Page 7 are shown on the enclosed Exploratory Logs. This information is useful in providing a gross picture of the soil consistency between exploratory excavations and any local variations. GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS The subject property is underlain at shallow depths by Pleistocene terrace deposits. Soil and minor fill deposits cover the sedimentary unit. A brief description of the earth materials encountered on the Site is discussed below. Artificial Fill Minor amounts of fill, up to 1.0 foot, are present along the rear of the existing garage. The minor fill deposits were probably generated during finish grading and landscaping, and are composed of organic tan to brown silty and fine-grained sand. In the planter area along the front of the garage, approximately 2.0 feet of organic fill and soil was encountered. These deposits are in a saturated condition. Terrace Deposits The site is underlain by Pleistocene terrace deposits composed of reddish grey brown silty and fine-grained sand. Locally these sedimentary deposits are very moist to wet and weathered. The weathered zone along the surface of the terrace deposits varies in depth from approximately 3.75 to 5.5 feet. Below this zone, the terrace deposits become increasingly dense with depth. November 1, 1996 W.O. P-244096 Page 8 Expansive Soils The soil and terrace deposits encountered on the site are predominantly granular deposits which exhibit a potential expansion in the low range. Existing Footing As previously indicated, the perimeter of the garage is bounded by concrete. One test pit was excavated along the southwestern portion of the exterior foundation. The footing encountered at this location appears to be a column pad adjacent to the garage opening. Apparently, an auxiliary driveway was constructed adjacent to and 1.5 feet below the western side of the garage and original driveway. The depth of the existing garage column pad footing below the top of the auxiliary driveway appears to be limited to approximately 7.5 inches (See Test Pit Log). Groundwater Based on the exploratory borings drilled to a depth of 7.0 feet, no evidence of perched or shallow groundwater tables was encountered at the time of this study. However, very high moisture contents were encountered in the fill/soil and the upper few feet of the terrace deposits. These high moisture contents appear to be the result of over irrigation and lack of weep holes in planters. It is possible that minor seepage problems may occur after the proposed construction. These are usually minor phenomena, often associated with over-irrigation and poor drainage control. In the event that seepage or saturated November 1, 1996 W.O. P-244096 Page 9 ground does occur, it has been our experience that they are most effectively handled on an individual basis. Faults/Seismicity Based on a review of published geologic maps, no faults are located on or in the immediate vicinity of the site. The nearest active fault is the Rose Canyon Fault Zone located approximately 4 miles southwest of the site. Other active faults which could affect the site include the Coronado Bank, Elsinore, San Jacinto and San Andreas Faults. These faults are located 15 to 71 miles from the site. Although the likelihood of ground rupture on the site is remote, it is almost a certainty the property will be exposed to moderate to high levels of ground motion resulting from the release of energy, should an earthquake occur along the numerous known and unknown faults in the region. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Due to limited access and exposure of the garage foundation at this stage, the existing perimeter footing should be reviewed by a representative of this firm during construction. However, for design purposes the footing, where exposed, is not suitable for the support of second story loads. The existing footing should be underpinned with a new November 1, 1996 W.O. P-244096 Page 10 continuous wall footing or new loads transferred to column pads as recommended by the project structural engineer. Should more favorable foundation conditions be revealed during construction, additional recommendations will be presented. Foundations The following parameters may be used in analysis of existing foundations and in the design of new foundations. New underpinned footings or column pads for the proposed two-story addition should be a minimum of 12 inches wide and founded a minimum of 18 inches below the existing footing into competent terrace deposits. Proposed footings should extend below weathered and saturated zones which may be encountered. Additional depth may be required in this regard. New continuous footings designed as underpins may be constructed in alternate sections. However, undermining of the existing footing should not exceed 5.0 lateral feet for each alternate underpinned section constructed. If the existing footing is undermined for greater than 5.0 lateral feet, the existing footing should be shored. Footings founded into competent terrace deposits, as recommended above, may be designed for a bearing value of 1500 pounds per square foot. The bearing value indicated above is for the total dead and frequently applied live loads. November 1, 1996 W.O. P-244096 Page 11 This value may be increased by 33 percent for short durations of loading, including the effects of wind and seismic forces. Resistance to lateral load may be provided by friction acting at the base of foundations and by passive earth pressure. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be used with dead- load forces. A passive earth pressure. of 250 pounds per square foot, per foot of depth of terrace deposits penetrated to a maximum of 1500 pounds may be used Drainage Specific drainage patterns should be recommended by the project civil engineer or architect. However, in general, pad water should be directed away from foundations and around the structure to the street or driveway. Roof water should be collected and conducted to the driveway or street, via non-erodible devices. Pad water should not be allowed to pond. Isolated planter areas should be provided with weep holes to prevent ponding or the planters should be eliminated. Observations Structural footing excavations should be observed by a representative of this firm, prior to the placement of steel. November 1, 1996 W.O. P-244096 Page 12 Plan Review A copy of the final plans should be submitted to this office for review. Additional recommendations may be necessary at that time. LIMITATIONS This report is presented with the provision that it is the responsibility of the owner or the owner's representative to bring the information and recommendations given herein to the attention of the project's architects and/or engineers so that they may be incorporated into plans. If conditions encountered during construction appear to differ from those described in this report, our office should be notified so that we may consider whether modifications are needed. No responsibility for construction compliance with design concepts, specifications or recommendations given in this report is assumed unless on-site review is performed during the course of construction. The subsurface conditions, excavation characteristics and geologic structure described herein are based on individual exploratory excavations made on the subject property. The subsurface conditions, excavation characteristics and geologic structure discussed should in no way be construed to reflect any variations which may occur among the exploratory excavations. November 1, 1996 W.O. P-244096 Page 13 Please note that fluctuations in the level of groundwater may occur due to variations in rainfall, temperature and other factors not evident at the time measurements were made and reported herein. Coast Geotechnical assumes no responsibility for variations which may occur across the site. The conclusions and recommendations of this report apply as of the current date. In time, however, changes can occur on a property whether caused by acts of man or nature on this or adjoining properties. Additionally, changes in professional standards may be brought about by legislation or the expansion of knowledge. Consequently, the conclusions and recommendations of this report may be rendered wholly or partially invalid by events beyond our control. This report is therefore subject to review and should not be relied upon after the passage of three years. The professional judgments presented herein are founded partly on our assessment of the technical data gathered, partly on our understanding of the proposed construction and partly on our general experience in the geotechnical field. Our engineering work and the judgments given meet present professional standards. However, in no respect do we guarantee the outcome of the project. APPENDIX LABORATORY TEST RESULTS TABLE I Field Dry Density and Moisture Content Sample Field Dry Field Moisture Location Density (pcf) Content (%) TP-1/B-1 @ 2.5' 111.7 16.0 TP-1/B-1 @ 4.0' 109.5 16.2 TP-1/B-1 @ 5.3' 115.4 11.1 TP-1/B-1 @ 7.0' Sample Disturbed 17.6 B-2 @ 1.5' 106.4 18.0 B-2 @ 3.8' 106.3 15.8 B-2 @ 5.0' 110.9 14.4 B-2 @ 6.0' 111.7 17.0 P-244096 - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COAST GEOTECHNICAL TEST • PIT LOG CONSUL11NG ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS W. 0. 'c'- 2V'/O .9 Elev. Cam= '%d Dote _9-Z-9. Logged by Death- 1 Description TEST PIT EXVAVATED IN PLANTER AREA ADJACENT TO SW CORNER OF GARAGE 0-2.0' FILL/SOIL: Sand, silly and fine-grained sand, highly organic in upper foot, organics are less with depth, loose, saturated 2.0'-5.75' TERRACE DEPOSITS: Tan to reddish brown silty and fine-grained sand, weathered, very moist to wet 5.75'-7.0' TERRACE DEPOSITS.-' Tan to reddish brown silty and fine-grained sand, moist, dense —r - pLANTER - r GARAGE DRIVE/SLAB ADJ. CONC. DRIVE—\ 18 ju25 5" TEST PIT EXTENDED T-1. BY 4" dia. BORING 1' Total Depth 70' LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING NO. 2 DRILL RIG: PORTABLE AUGER PROJECT NO. P-244096 BORING DIAMETER: 4" DATE DRILLED: 9-25-96 SURFACE ELEV: 100' (assumed) LOGGED BY: M.B. I lu DESCRIPTION Q. 100.00 0.00 SM SOIL: Brown, organic, silty sand, very moist to wet, loose, roots .) ., .9..). .) 9 ___ _____________________________________________ - SM TERRACE DEPOSITS: Reddish brown silty and fine-grained sand, weathered, very Ci. C moist Ti 106.4 18.0 98.00 2.00 re tt- V. V. - 1.•C%Ci :•:• 1..,.. 106.3 15.8 96.00 A.A.. 4.00 V. V. - M. From 5.0', Terrace Deposits become increasingly dense with depth 110.9 14.4 ::•: :•:: 94.00 111.7 17.0 j44: TI 6.00 SITE SKETCH N.T.S. LEGEND 10 TEST PIT LOCATION (approx.) BORING LOCATION (approx.) P.244096 DEC-23-96 NON 09:04 CITY OF CARLSBAD COMM DE :FAX NO. 4380894 I. -.• - CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE ar CITY OF CARLSBAD Plan Check No. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DR., CARLSBAD, CA 92009 (619)438-1161 This form shall be used to determine the amount of school fees fo a project and to ve\fy that the project applicant has complied with the school fee requirements. No building permits for th projects shall be issued until the certification is signed by the appropriate school district and return 4d to the City of Carlsbad Building Department. /. SCHOOL DISTRICT: / Carlsbad Unified 801 Pine Avenue 1 Carlsbad CA 92009 (434-0661) Encinitas Union 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd. Encinitas CA 92024 (944-4300) San Marcos Unified - •. 1290 West San Marcos Blvd. San Marcos CA 92024 (744-4776) San Dieguito Union High School 710 Encinitas Boulevard Encinitas CA 92024 (753-6491) Project Applicant: , APN: fCo -/Y - 3'7. Project Address: RESIDENTIAL: SQ. FT. of living area 708 number of dwelling units SQ. FT. of covered, area . SQ. FT. of garage area COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL: SO-- . AREA Prepared by JJ Date -Z FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the School District) Applicant has complied with fee requirement under Government Code 53080 Project is subject to an existing fee agreement Project is exempt from Government Code 53080 - Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986. (other school fees paid) Other . Residential FeLevied: $ . based on sq. ft. c Comm/Indust Fee Levied: $I . 1based on...............sq. ft. J. IL Blair- - .Rime t go nJJ District Official Title .... Date