Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP 97-25; KELLY CORPORATE CENTER; Site PlanKELLY CORPORATE CENTER NOTES ' SEE SECTION A-A, SHEET 4 \ \ \ \ AOOlnONAL R/W WIDTH REQUIRED FOR RIGHT TURN LANE O AI-Z4RA PKWY ,Jc HIOOEN VALLEY ROAD (SEE SHEETS 2 & 3) ------- BOUNDARY DATA (SEE PlJlf SHEElS FOR ~NtlG MTA) .&_ 582.64' N 8T 13'10" E Li, 167.42' N or 41•os· w A. (ITEM NO. 5,7,8 &: 22) ROAD EASEMENTS-TO REMAIN B. (ITEM NO. 10) SEWER LINE EASEMENT-TO REWIIN C. (ITEM NO. 11) PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENT-TO BE ABANDONED 0. (ITEM NO. 12 & 14) . IRREWCABLE OFFER TO DEDbTE-TO BE RELINQUISHED E. (ITEM NO. 13, 15, 28, & 34) IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE, R/W EASEMENT, & ROAD CONST. ESM'T & AGREEMENT TO BE RELINQUISHED F. (ITEM NO. 16) ORIG1NAL RESTRICTED ACCESS ALONG PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD EXCEPT AT HIDDEN VALI.EY ROAD INTERSECTION- TO REMAIN WHERE APPLICABLE G. (ITEM NO. 20 OPE~ SPACE EASEMfNT-TO REWIIN H. (ITEM NO. 23, 62 &: 63) DRAlki.GE EASEMENT-TO REIAAIN . I. (ITEM NO. 32) DEED RESTRICTION-TO REWIIN J. (NO 1Til£ REPORT REFERENCE) TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ESM'T-TO BE ABANDONED K. (NO 1Til£ REPORT REFERENl:E) SLOPE EASEMENT-TO BE ABANDONED 10' R/W Jo.--=-=--"-,-_,,., o""·.-----5"'3"'•-.JJ:.!'---5---3"'•----...,., o"'·,-,.t 4.5' 5.5' 44' 9' 9' 44' 5.5' 4.5' CONC. S/W CURB & GUTTER TYPE G-2 {TYP) R/W 6" MEDIAN CURB TYPE "B-1" 2X - PALOMAR AIRPORT RD. (EXIST/NC} '4. R/w /()' 4.5' 5.5' 6' 12" 6 6' 12' G' 5.5' 4. ' t·' MAX 1f CdNST. 6 11 COAC. CtH!JJ G-2~ ,,., MIN G" /!JASE U#P&f CIG (Tm J!JOrH s,.--, HIJJJJEN VAU!ZY RP. {EX/Srl/o/G) ------- Q PAL MAR sef SHet!f 12 fZf:'J. e.ur:i. IA(OOT' ' INDEX MAP \ EXISTING EASEMENTS (IIEM NO. PER T1Tl£ REPOR1') L (NO 1Til£ REPORT REFERENCE) iiRAlNAGE EASEMENT-TD REMAIN M. (ITEM NO. 41) S.0.G & E EASEMENT-TO RE- N. (NO 1Til£ REPORT REFERENCF'l DEmmON BASIN ENCROACHMENT-TO REMAIN 0. /ITEM NO. 47' WATJ'.R LINE EASEMEITT-PORTON WITHIN PARCEL NO. 2 TO BE ABANDONED P. (NO 1Til£ REPORT REFERENCE) DRAlf'iAGE EASEMENT-TO REMAIN Q. (NO 1Til£ REPORT REFERENCE) DRAlf'iAGE EASEMENT-TO REMAIN R. (ITEM NO. 64) SETBACK EASEMENTS-TO REMAIN S. (ITEM NO. 591 TEMPORARY SOIL EASEMENT-TO REIAAIN T. (ITEM NO. 50 PRIVATE ROAD EASEMENT-TO REMAIN U. (ITEM NO. 49) IRREVOCABLE OFFER TTJ DEDICATE-TO BE RELINQUISHED V. (ITEM NO. 46) 60' ~DAD & UTILITY ESM'T-TO REMAIN R/W 4. NON PLOTTABLE E'ASEMENIS llEM NO.S 6. PUBLIC ROAD ES!!"!. CANNOT BE PLOTTED FROM RECORD INSTRUMrn1. 40. NOT PLOTTABLE PER ORIG. DOC. (1899 RD. ESM'T) 42. BLANKET DRAINAGE & SLOPE ESM'T 43. BLANKET DRAINAGE & SLOPE ESM'T 45. rsurs FOR RD11DS PER R.O.S. # 5715 50. REPEAT OF P.T.R. ITEM NO. 13 & 14 (SEE LETTER DESIGNATION "D & t AT LEFT) 52. REPEAT OF P.T.R. ITEM NO. 16 (SEE LETTER DESIGNATION "f" AT LEFT) 53. REPEAT OF P.T.R. ITEM NOS. 13, 15, 28, & 34 {SEE LETTER DESIGNATION "E" AT LEFT) 58. REPEAT OF P.T.R. ITEM NO. 21 (SEE LETTER DESIGNATION "G" AT LEFT) 60. EXIST. RIGHT OF WAY FOR PALOMAR AIRPORT RD. 61. EXIST. RIGHT OF WAY FOR PALOMAR AIRPORT RD. 102' 4/' .f. 1. 32' 9 9' 32' 6" MEDIAN NON PLOTTABLE ENCUMBERANCES llEM NO.S 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 17, 18, 19, 20, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 33, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 44, 48, 54, 55, 56, 57, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, &: 75 R/W 1 , #.5 CONC. S/Wi\ CU/1£1 TYPE ·e-1· 2,r I 7,·.' 21' 21' MAX CU/1£1 &-GI.IT7cR C-2 {TYPf: "Cj A.C. PVM'T &-, BAS£' MIN. 6" BAS£' UNOf:11 CM STREET SECTIONS NO SCALE 15'-18' * PARKING 2X(7YP) - A WARA PARKWAY (EXISTING) 24' 12' 12' .2!.._ _gx 15'-18' PARKING ,rc7$f;'tJ,, -23 A.C. PVM'T & BASE CONST. CONC. GUTTER PER [)£TAIL HEREON PRIVATE DRIVEWAY * FOIi LOCATIONS WHEJIE PARKING IS ADJACENT TO ORMWAY AS SHOWN ON PIAN SHEET 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1. PARCEL WEST OF HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD THOSE PORTIONS OF PARCELS "A",'8" & 'c" OF PARCEL MAP NO. 2993, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CAUFORNL-\, FILED IN llHE OFFICE Of THE COUNTY RECORDER, AUGUST 23, 1974 AS FILE NO. 74-230326 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS SHOWN AS PARCEL 1 OF CERTIFICATE OF COUPLIANCE RECORDED MAY 9,1997 AS FILE NO. 97-0215970 OF OFFICL-\L RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. 2. PARCEL ADJACENT TO & EAST OF HIDDEN VALLEY RD. THAT PORTION OF PARCEL "C" Of PARCEL MAP NO. 2993, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY Of SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE Of THE COUNTY RECORDER AUGUST 23, 1974, AS FILE NO. 74-230326 OF OfflCl,IL RECORDS SHOWN AS PARCEL 2 OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED MAY 9,1997 AS FILE NO. 97-0215971 OF OFFICIAL RECOROS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. 3. PARCEL ADJACENT TO & WEST OF AVIARA PARKWAY THOSE PORTIONS OF PARCELS "c" & "o" OF PARCEL MAP NO. 2993 IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, FILED IN lliE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER AUGUST 23, 197 4 AS FILE NO. 74-230326 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AND A PORTION OF LOT "G' OF RANCHO AGUA HEDIONDA OF MAP NO. 823 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER SHOWN AS A PORTION OF PARCEL 2 PER CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED FEBRUARY 15, 1990 AS FILE NO. 90-085877 OF OFFICl,IL RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. APPLICANT KELLY RANCH CORPORATE CENTER I , LLC 4365 EXECUTIVE DR. ,STE. 850 SAN DIEGO , CA. 92121-2130 (619) 550-1930 BENCHMARK DESCRIPTION: STD. U.S.C. & G.S. 'ROCK" LOCATION: NAD 83 COORDINATE N 1,985,685.284 S 6,240,676.744 RECORDED: SAN DIEGO COUNlY CONTROL BOOK PG. 124, 1991 ELEVATION: 323.619 DATUM: MSL: OWNER PARCELS 1 & 2 KELLY RANCH CORPORATE CENTER I , LLC 4365 EXECUTIVE DR. ,STE. 850 SAN DIEGO , CA. 92121-2130 (619) 550-1930 PARCEL 3 KELLY FAMILY TRUST , TRUST 3 2770 SUNNYCREEK RD. · CARLSBAD, CA. 92008 1.s· I ,.s· ' ·-(: ~-,•, DETAIL: CONCRETE SWALE NO SCALE VICINITY MAP Ql'ESSJ Q NO SCALE EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: GENERAL PLAN: PROPOSED LAND USE: ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS: AREA WITHIN BOUNDARY: SEWER: WATER: STORM DRAINS: G/>S & ELECTRICllY: TELEPHONE: FIRE PROTECTION: ZONING ORDINANCE: LEGEND SITE BOUNDARY PROPOSED LOT LINE PAD ELEVATION FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION P-M-Q, E-A, RD-M-Q P-M-Q, E-A, RD-M-Q P L OS, UA, RM OFFICE 212-040-35,48,54 & 55 25.Z8AC. CITY OF CARLSBAD CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT CllY OF CARLSBAD SAN DIEGO GAS. & ELECTRIC PACIFIC BELL CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT SECTION 21.53.230 ; SEE LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLANS FOR LAND USE, LAND- SCAPED AREAS AND UNDEVELOPED AREA. ----- PAD-100.0 F'F-100.5 2: 1 SLOPE (UNLESS OTI-IERWISE SHOWN) DAYLIGHT LINE v v STREET GRADE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR TOP OF CURB/FLOWLINE ELEVATIONS FINISH SURFACE ELEVATION HIGH POINT ELEVATION DIRECTION OF FLOW SEWER LINE WATER LINE STORM DRAIN FIRE HYDRANT STREET LIGHT HANDICAP PARKING SLOPE (EXISTING) CITY HIKING / BIKE TRAIL 100 YR. LIMITS OF INNUNDA TION --70-- --.... e<IO-- 100.5 T.C. 100.0 F.L F.S. H.P. -0-S- -W-- y = y .............. ········= ..., ··~--...... BIKE RACK BY CREATIVE PIPE,/!C.11'Ti37(71?,/KE.'J). SITE DATA PR'l:-PAINTEO W/./ITE AREA WITHIN BOUNDARY: TOTAL AREA OF SITE TO BE GRADED: AMOUNT Of CUT: AMOUNT OF FILL: ALLllVIAL R.R. SURCHARGE GRADING MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF PROPOSED fu:L st'.oPES: 25.26 AC. 15.34 w:.. 27,000 C.Y. 27,000 C.Y. 86,300 C.Y. . 72,600 C.Y. 11 rr.(2:1) s FT.(2:1) MAXIUUM HEIGHT OF PROPOSED CUT SLOPES: . APPROVED THIS IS THE APPROVED T!;c,ITATIVE MAP/SITE: PLAN PER CONDITION NO.~ __ Of..PLAN NI NG COMMISSI N RESOLUTION NO.__g(.,Q._2~- CROSBY MEAD BENTON 8' ASSOCIATES ~ZkE~ Engineer,, , Planners • Surveyors 5650 El Camino Ree.I, Suite 200 Carlsbad, Cal11ornia 92008 (760) 43B -1210 "' 8 No. 1459 0:: XI). 3-31-2 2-24-9 RE\/1SED PER CITY COMMENTS LU CITY OF CARLSBAD 4-30-98 RE\/1SED PER CITY COMMENTS 1-::2:-_-;:1 o;:-_-::9-::ig ---+::R:::-E\/1c::-S==E=D-:P::::E=R-=c:::,TY::-:-:C::::O::-:M::-:M::-:EN7:T=s-------+--+---11----+----1 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT i=s=-_.:ci:15=--9-=9-:+-----1-R=-e-'="v.=c~==:sc::e:-=e-':-M~P."':1.-..tJ"°Y~i.,;aa=.p,a-a:4c:ar~"''O""'A"'A':"''.E'."'A"'9,.----+---+----11----+----1 SHEETS f'L SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF CA\_\~ AP.PR,PVAL.., 4rtr. 5 ro f'f'. KELLY CORPORATE CENTER ENGINEER OF WORK APPROVED: LLOYD B. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER RCE 23889 EXP. 12 31 97 DATE DATE INITIAL ENGINEER OF WORK REVISION DESCRIPTION DA TE INITIAL DA TE INITIAL OWN BY: ---1 CHKD BY: __ _ RVWD BY: PROJECT NO. OTHER APPROVAL CITY APPROVAL I DRAWING NO. SOP97-25 JN,117-002 "4 --. tJi1 ✓ Ji,(~ C"-1. ~ I.CJ ,...:.. u "" ~ ~ ~ G '---~ ~ ~ G -0 ~ a--->- q,__ ~ ,q j U) ~ ...... j ,.,.,.,._ -I(... .::-~=' '1 ,_ II e~· 7e FF 75.5 PAD 75.0 >o " . 5;:,, b'Ji>No PARCEL 11 1 ", ' (11.37 AC.) ' I I I I . EMPlOYEe -=-le: LUNCH PA7'IO$ ~ , . ~ ,, LIM/rs IJj O~·...,_½fc.!::..1...L..1..1 '\\, •"o ~ ' Gf? ·:=,:., \ ;,., Iv[) \ BUILDING 1 '•!!.~;-?; . \PHASE 1 "36,370 SF (fi]" OOR F'OOT~/Nr,J I I // 14 .,,,,,'/· ...::. / '"-. I /~~ / ·,fy I ~ I I "---'--'j ' rr-.--1i-• I ' , z ~ \ 1 •,-~ 1-.. j ji .• --::-:-· ·\-.111't-,.,..;tl,11 I . !) <9 ~--~ I; ro; '9o ' ' ' . :' .,,., --F7 I ' ' ' -•--., .. ...:.,' I , -----+- ' t--~.__:j' --' , I , I . • ! --.....: -·--f ' ' Oliiiiiiiiiiiiit~011111111111111111..0liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii190 FT) GRAPHIC SCALE APPROVED THIS IS THE APPROVED TI;J)ITATIVE MAP/SITE PLAN PER CON OITION NO ... .'L_ QF,J'J~N N ING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.· 'ifil¥, --· ~ &AM /QA'F,/qq pr ...... NNIN~ OF:FI \MTb ENGl1£ER CF ~~LQ I DATE 2//~tf.• S-31-2001 I R.C.E. 141194 EXP. ' ·':,:c'"...:':::~.=.1----+,c../;?-=E:.:.V.cc'/,c.'S_e-._',CJ-=.P,cc'E._',(?cc_c.z_TY __ a:i_lM._;i,f._1!':_N_TS'_. ------,---i----t----; I S,H·, 2EET I ~4-'!J0-88 REVISED PFIR CITY COMMENTS. :2.-IO·J' /(£Vt.S£D ?ER C,ITY COMMENTS. CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPAR1MENT 8·"6•'f't REVt9E li!MPLtrrl!:l! PATIO ARl!:AS DATE INITIAL DATE INI AL DATE INl11AL ENGINEER OF WORK REVISION DESCRIPTION OTHER APPROVAL CITY APPROVAL KELLY CORPORATE CENTER APPROVED: LLOYD B. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER RCE 23889 EXP. 12 DWN BY: PROJECT NO. CHKD BY: __ _ RVWD BY: JN:117-001 31 97 DATE I DRAWING NO. . 50P97-25 t.·24-!lf 0 SCALE 1"= 40, zo 40 \ \ \ \ EQUIPMENT EMJLOGUl<E l . TYP.) -- PF=80.0 PAD=79.5 DATE INITIAL ENGINEER OF WORK ----SO.FT =3 (1st FLOO . 8, 7 R FOOTPRINT) ---- 1.'. . ,,.,,_ .. ,__ ".Jt,' , .\· \ 1-\ ' ' REVISION DESCRIPTION DA TE INITIAL OTHER APPROVAL DATE INITIAL CITY APPROVAL APPROVED: CITY ENGINEER DWN BY· CHKD BY· RVWD BY; JN:117-O02 -... - ' 6-,' -.., I . , ~~-~-:,, /I . 111 I// //\ r"""' I '/J , //\ \ I \ i ./I\()~'· n__,(_) .• . I I • I ' ---l /II: I ' f--f.,>- 1 I~ ' I t-' I N;1 .· I Ii I / 1/-. / .fl t°""-' /lS , // fl l .1 LLOYD B. HUBBS RCE 23889 EXP · 12 31 I PROJECT NO. I ~7 ""-·c I •••~• ~r•"•_..- 1-UJ . w ~xc, . . ], 'cw--~-w ·--, ... -~. VI irr ,!J :\ " I -- ----~--· - 97 DATE I DRAWING NO. SDP57-25 2-24-88 ~ I.I. <> ""' ()() p If ~ ti ~ ~ ('.t- ~ ~ "<t: ~ ~t I -e " 1)--::,.. ~ ::l ~ ~ • 0 z 1-w w ::r: (/) w w (/) ,• •''\. :. -'-.. \ I_ I .. ) ,,__.,,.! . ' / -f-0•--)u., ,· ...., • 0 z ...J w u c::: 4: a.. \ 0 20 40 SOFT GRAPHIC SCALE "' - , AS r f fcbr,i N •• + 19<9/\lj'itlt•T,/\,N+-, ' ,.c. SEC. A-A TYPICAL PAD OVEREXCAVATION SURCHARGE SEE INDEX MAP SHT 1 SCALE= HORIZ: 1"=150' VERT: 1"=15' APP-ROVED ' ' " . , ofESS/ /;; I,! 1!J Fi w No.14594 ,.,, ENGINEER OF WORK ~ xp. 3-31-;;o BY DATE 2/IS/tl'I BENTON ~ ' R.C.E. EXP. 3-31-2001 2-17-98 THIS SHEET--.-AD"D,,..ED-PE_R_c_,TY_COM_M_EN_rs_+---+---tt----t--'1 / SH4EET / CITY OF CARLSBAD SH ,.. :::::::::::~=::::::E::N::Gl::N~EE::R::IN::G::D::E::PA::R::lM:;::::EN::T=:::::+:=:11..;;:;;;~ SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN KELLY CORPORATE CENTER APPROVED: LLOYD B. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER RCE 23889 EXP. 12 31 97 DATE DATE INlllAI. REVISION DESCRIPTION DATE INlllAL DATE INlllAL ENGINEER OF WORK OTHER APPROVAL CITY APPROVAL DWN BY: __ _ CHKD BY: __ _ RVWD BY: I DRAWING NO. SDP97-25 '------------' PROJECT NO. JN: 117-002 2-11-99 PLA.'INlNG COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 460) A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM TO CONSTRUCT FOUR TWO-STORY MlJLTI-TENANT OFFICE BUILDINGS WITH A TOTAL AREA OF 250,093 SQUARE FEET ON A 25.28 ACRE SITE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD EXTENDING FROM AN AREA WEST OF HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD ON THE WEST TO AVIARA PARKWAY ON THE EAST IN THE COASTAL ZONE AND LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONES CASE NAME: CASE NO.: KELLY CORPORA TE CENTER $DP 97-25/CDP 97-52 WHEREAS, Kelly Ranch Corporate Center I, LLC, "Developer", has· filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Kelly Ranch Corporate Center I, LLC and the Kelly Family Trust, Tru•t 3, "Owner", described as Parcels 1 &2 of City of Carlsbad Boundary Adjustment No. 494 & Parcel 2 of City of Carlsbad Boundary Adjustment No. 388, excepting therefrom the portion lying easterly of Aviara Parkway ("the Property"): and WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation monitoring and Reporting Program was prepared in conjunction with said project; and WHEREAS, the Transportation Analysis for the project Included an assumption that Cannon Road Reaches 1 and 2 would be constructed prior to the opening of the project and It bas become apparent recently that Reach 2 may not be complete as previously assumed In the study, additional background information and a condition of approval bas been added to the Environmental Impacts As<essment Form -Part II and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to address this timing issue. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 1st day of September, 1999, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors relating to the Mitigated Negative Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby APPROVES the Mitigated Negative Declaration according to Exhibit "ND" dated August 6, 1999, and "PU" dated May 5, 1999 and ~be Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings: FlndiDKS: I. The Plannin& Commission of the City of Carlsbad has reviewed, analyzed and considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the environmental impacts therein identified for this project and said comments thereon, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, on file in the Planning Department, prior to APPROVING the project. Based on the EIA Pan II and. comments thereon, the Planning Commission finds .that there is no substantial evidence the project will have a significant effect on the environment and hereby APPROVES the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 2. The Planning Commission does hereby find that the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been prepared in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines and the Environmental Protection Procedures of the City of Carlsbad. · 3. The Planning Commission finds that the Mltlg"ted Negative Declaration reflects the independen!judgment of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad. 4. The Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or proiect alternatives identified in the MEIR 93-01 which are appropriate to this project have been incorporated into the project. PC RESO NO. 4601 -2- Conditions: I. The Developer shall implement, or cause the implementation of the Kelly Corporate Center Mitigation Monitoring and Reponing Program. PASSED, APPROVED A.ND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the !st day of September 1999, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Chairperson Heineman, Commissioners Campas, L 'Heureux, Trigas and Welshans Commissioners Nielsen and Segall COURTNEY E. HEINEMAN, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: Planning Director PC RESO NO. 4601 .3. City of Carlsbad I AFI 11,11 ,t·l•IJ·EI ii, ,IJ ,I I AMENDED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project Address/Location: South side of Palomar Airpon Road extending from an area west of Hidden Valley Road on the west to A viara Parkway on the east Project Description: A Site Development Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit to construct four two-story multi-tenant office buildings with a total area of 250,093 square feet. Individual building areas are 72,593 square feet, 50,000 square feet, 50,000 square feet, and 77,500 square feet. A total ofl,006 at grade parking spaces will be provided. The total site area is 25.28 acres. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) identified potentially significant effects on the environment, but (1) revisions in the project plans or proposals made by, or agreed to by, the applicant before the proposed negative declaration and initial study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment would occur, and (2) there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the City that the project "as revised" may have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration with supponive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Depanment within 20 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Don Neu in the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4446. DATED: CASE NO: CASE NAME: PUBLISH DATE: AUGUST 6, 1999 SOP 97-25/CDP 97-52 KELLY CORPORATE CENTER AUGUST 6, 1999 MICHAELJ. H Planning Director 2075 La Palmas Dr.• Carlsbad. CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-0894 ENVTRON"MENTAL IMPACT ASSFSSMENT FORM. PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO: SOP 97-25/CDP 97-52 DATE: May 5, 1999 BACKGROUND l. 2. 3. CASE NAME: Kelly Corporate Center APPLICANT: Kelly Ranch Corporate Center I, LLC ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 4365 Executive Drive, Suite 850, San 92 4. 5. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: ~N~ov~e...,m.,b"'er....._17"--Ll9....,9'-'7 _________ _ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A Sjte Develqpment Plan and Coastal Development Permit to construct four two-stoa multi-tenant office bmldings with a total bµilding area of 250,093 square feet Individual building areas are 72,593 square feet 50,000 square feet. SQ,000 square feet and 77 500 sqµare feet. A total of 1 006 at grade parking spaces will be provided. The total site area is 25.28 acres-Toe pr01ect site is located on the south side of Palomar Airport Road and extends from an area west of Hidden Valley Road on the west to Aviara Parkway on the east SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this proJect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Sigmficant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. 0 Land Use and Plannin11 D Population and Housing 0 Geological Problems Owater [8J Air Quality DETERMINATION. [8J Transportation/Circulation ~ Biological Resources 0 Public Services 0 Utilities & Service Systems D Energy & Mineral Resources O Aesthetics 0Hazards (8JNoise [8J Cultural Resources 0 Recreation 0 Mandatory Findmgs of Significance 1 Rev. 03/28/96 (To be completed by the Lead Agency) 0 I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 0 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 0 I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, [8J I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one potentially significant effect I) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. 0 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier Master Environmental Impact Review (MEIR 93-01) pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been voided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier Master Environmental Review {MEIR 93-01), including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared. Planner Signature Date Planning Director's Signature Date ~ r-----.,, ,:zevi~10i,.,J : s-t0-04 ADceD fi:Hf. IZ. Rev. 03128/96 ENGINNER OF WORK: GEORGE L. BENTON R.C.E. 14594 EXP. 3-31-2001 CROSBY KB.AD BBNTON & AJIIIOOJ~Tma Enafneera • Planners • Suneyora 15650 El Camino Reai Suite 200 Carlabad, California 92008 (760) 438 -1210 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Anicle 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Repon (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except ''No Impact" answers that are adequately supponed by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supponed if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporatiGn of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. • • • • "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. Based on an "EIA-Part II", if a proposed project could have a potentially significant effect on the environment, but .!Ill potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required (Prior Compliance). When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily requirtd to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier ElR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier ElR. A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence ttiat the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. 3 Rev. 03/28/96 • If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant. and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. • An EIR !!!Jill be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is n~t possible to detennine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENT AL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. APPROVED THIS IS THE APPROVED T'y'TATIVE MAP/SITE PLAN PER CONDITION NO. ~NNING. COMMISSION RESOLUTION NQ. __ =o,.,. ___ _ -()in..~ ~Ntl\lG DEPT OATE Rev. 03128/96 I SH~ET I CITY OF CARLSBAD ~SHEETS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT / 1'L --,.,_ KIEll Y CORPORATIE CIENTIER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I Pt.ANNING COMMISSION RESOLllTION NO. -4801 DWN BY: I PROJECT NO. I DRAWING NO. CHKD BY: SOP 97-25 RVWD BY: I Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:. a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (Source #(s): (#1:Pgs 5.6-1 -5.6-18) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or polic1es adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (#1:Pgs 5.6•1 -5.6-18) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? (#1:Pgs 5.6-1 · 5.6-18) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or fannlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses? (#1:Pgs 5.6-1 -5.6-18) e) Disrupt or divule the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low.income or mmority community)? (#1:Pgs 5.6-1 -5.6-18) II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: III. IV. a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? (#1 :Pgs 5.5-1 -5.5-6) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.a;. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (#1:Pgs 5.5-1 • 5.5-6) c) a) b) c) d) e) f) g} h) i) a) b) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? {#1 :Pgs 5.5• 1 • 5.5•6) GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal ~ult in or expose people to potential impacts involving: Fault ruprure? (#1 :Pgs 5.1-1 -5.1-15; #7) Seismic ground shaking? ((#1 :Pgs 5.1-1 -5. 1-15; #7) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ((#! :Pgs 5.1-1 -5. 1.15; #7) Seiche, uunami, or volcanic hazard? (#1:Pgs ~i.1-1 • 5.1-15;#2: Pgs III-112 -III-118; #7) Landslides or mudflows? (#I :Pgs 5.1-1 • 5. l• 15; #7 Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill'! (#l:Pgs 5.1-1-5.1-15; #7) Subsidence of the land? (#1:Pgs 5.1-1-5.1-15; #7) Expansive soils? (#1:Pgs 5,1•1 · 5.1•15; #?) Unique geologic or physical features? (#1:Pgs 5.1•1 - 5.1-15; #7) WATER. Would the proposal result in: Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? (#1 :Pgs 5.2• l • 5.2- 11: #8; #9) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? ((#1:Pgs 5.2-1 • 5. 2-11; #8; #9) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperarure, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? ((#1 :Pgs 5.2-1 -5. 2-11; #8: #9) 5 Issues (and Supponing Information Sources). d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? ((#1 :PllS 5.2-1 -5. 2-11: #8; #9) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? ((#1:Pgs 5.2-1 -5.2-11; #8; #9) t) Changes m the qua.ti.city of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interceprion of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability" ((#1:Pgs 5.2-1 -5.2-11; #8; #9) &) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ((#1:Pgs 5.2-1 -5. 2-11; #8; #9) b) Impacts to groundwater quality? ((#1:Pgs 5.2-1 -5. 2- 11; #8; #9) i) · Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ({#1 :Pgs 5.2-1-5.2-11;#8;#9) V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (#1:Pgs 5.3- 1 -5.3-12) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (#1:Pgs 5.3-l -5.3-12) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? ((#1:Pgs 5.3-1 -5.3-12) d) Create objectionable odors? ((#1:Pgs 5.3-1 -5.3-12) VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (#1:Pgs 5.7-1 -5.7.22; #5; #o) b) Hazards to safety from design fearures (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. fann equipment)? (#1:Pgs 5.7-1-5.7.22; #5) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? (#1:Pgs 5.7-1 -5.7.22; #5) . d) Insufficient parking capacity on•site or off-site? (#1:Pgs 5.7-1-5.7.22; #2: Pgs III-58 -IIJ-69) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (#1:Pgs 5.7-1-5.7.22; #5) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnoutS, bicycle racks)? (#1:Pgs 5.7-1 -5.7.22; #5) g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? (#1:Pgs j_7 .. J - 5.7.22; #5) VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitau (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals. and birds? (#1:Pgs 5.4-1-5.4-24; #2; #3) b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? (#1:Pgs 5.4-1-5.4-24: #2; #3) 6 Potentially Significant !mpac[ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ § □ 8 § □ □ □ Po1cnrially Significant Impact □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 0 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ § □ 8 □ □ □ Potentially Significant Unless Mit1ga11on lncorporatcd □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ Less Than Significant Impact □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ No iml'acr 0 0 0 0 0 □ 0 □ 0 Rev. 03128196 Less Than No Signtfo:ant Impact Impact □ 0 □ 0 □ 0 □ □ □ 0 □ 0 □ 0 □ □ □ 0 □ 0 □ 0 □ 0 □ 0 □ 0 □ □ Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Support:lng Information Sources). c) Locally designated naru.ral commurunes (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (#1:Pgs 5.4-1 -5.4-24; #2; #3) d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? (#1:Pgs 5.4-1 -5.4-24; #2: Pgs III-37 -IIJ-58; #3) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (#1 :Pgs 5.4. 1 -5.4-24; #2; #3) VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal? a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (#1:Pgs 5.12.1-1-5.12.1-5 & 5.13-1 -5.13-9) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? (#1:Pgs 5.12._l-1 -5.12.1•5 & 5.13• l • 5.13-9) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? (#1:Pgs 5.12.1-1 -5.12.1-5 & 5.13-1 • 5.13-9) IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals orradianon)? (#1:Pgs 5.I0.1-1 -5.l0.1-5) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? {#l:Pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-5) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazards? (#1:Pgs 5.10.1-1 -5.10.1-5) d) Exposure of people to existing . .sources of potential health hazards? (#1:Pgs 5.10.1-1 -5.10.1-5) e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? (#1:Pgs 5.10.1-1 -5.10. l-5) X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (#1:Pgs 5.9·1 -5.9- 15) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (#1:Pgs 5.9- 1-5.9-15) XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? (#1 :Pgs 5.12.5-1 -5.12.5-6) b) Police protection? {#J :Pgs 5.12.6-1 -5.12.6-4) c) Schools? (#1:Pgs 5.12.7.1-5.12.7-5) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (#1, pgs 5.12.1-1-5.12.8-7) e) Other governmental services? (#1:Pgs 5.12.l-l • 5.12.8-7) 7 [ssues (and Suppomng Information Sources). XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: •J Power or narural gas? (#1:Pgs 5.12.1-1 -5.12.1-5 & 5.13-1-5.13-9) b) Communications systems? (#1; pgs S.12.l•l • 5.12.S--7) c) Local or regional water treatment or distnbutioo facilities? (#1:Pgs 5.12.2-1. 5.12.3-7) d) Sewer or septic tanks' (#1 :Pgs 5.12.3-1 -5.12.3-7) e) Sronn waterdramage? (#1:Pg 5.2•8) fJ Solid waste disposal? (#1:Pgs 5.12.4-1 -5.12.4-3) g) Local or regional water supplies? (#1:Pgs 5.12.2-1 5.12.3-7) XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a} Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? (#-l:Pgs 5.11-1 • 5.11-5) b) H~ve· a demonstrate negatiYe aesthetic effect? (#1:Pgs 5.11-1 -5.11-5) c) Create light or ala.re? (#1:Ps• 5.11-1-5.11-5) XIV. CUL '!URAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal, Disturb paleontological resources? (#1:Pgs 5.8.J -S.8- 10) a) b) c} d) e) xv. a) b) Disturb archaeological resources? (#1:Pgs 5.8-1 • S.8- IO; #4) Affect historical resources? (#1 :Pp 5.8-1 -5.8-10) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (#1:Pgs 5.8-1-5.8-10) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? (#1 :Pgs 5.8-1 -5.8-10) RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal: Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? (#1 :Pgs 5.12.8·1 - 5.12.8-7) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (#1 :Pgs 5.12.8-1 • 5.12.8-7) XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIF!CANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or "wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaren to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate im.porta.nt ex.amples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? 8 Potentially Sigmfkant lmpacf □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ Potentially Significant Impact □ 8 □ □. □ □ □ 8 □ □ □ □ Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation lnco!"J'lorated 0 0 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 0 □ Potentially Significant Unless Mitigatioo Incorporated □ 8 □ □ □ □ □ B □ □ □ Less Than Significant Impact □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ No Impact □ □ 0 0 0 0 0 □ Rev. 03128/96 Less Than Significant Impact □ 8 □ □ □ □ □ B □ □ □ □ No Impact □ Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supponing Information Sources). b) Does the project have impacts that are individually lirruted, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projecu, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable furore projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause the substantial adverse effects on human bemgs, either directly or indirectly? 9 XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Potcnnally S1gnifican1 Impact 0 □ Potenttallv less Than No Signifi~I Significant Impact Unless Impact Mitigation [ncorporated □ □ □ □ □ Rev. 03/28/96 Earlier analysis of this proposed multi-tenant office building project has been completed through the General Plan Update (GPA 94-01) and related Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR 93-01). The MEIR is cited as source #1 in !he preceding checklist. This proposal is consistent with the applicable portions of !he General Plan and is considered a project that was described in MEIR 93-01 as within its scope. All feasible mitigation measures identified in MEIR 93-01 which are appropriate to the project have been incorporated into this projecl. The project incorporates additional mitigation measures identified in site specific technical studies prepared to evaluate potential impacts and feasibility of !he proposal as it relates to biological resources; archaeological resources, lransportation system impacts, geotechnical feasibility, hydrology/drainage and that no additional significant unmitigated impacts beyond those identified by the Program EIR will result from this project. The following environmental evaluation briefly explains the basis for this determination along with identifying the source documents which support the environmental determination. APPROVED 10 Rev. 03,28/96 /""~~ (_ 5~/0 ·04 Aoix:D SHr. 12 L-ENGINNER OF WORK: GEORGE L BENTON R.C.E. 14594 EXP. 3-31-2001 CROSBY MBI.A.D BBINTON &ANOm£-r. Engjne•rs • Planneni • Surveyora 06IIO El Co.mlno Real, Suite 200 Carlsbad, California 92008 (?60) 438 -1210 DISCUSSION OF ENv'IRONMENTAL EVALUATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The project site is approximately 25.28 acres in size and is located on the south side of Palomar Airport Road and extends from an area west of Hidden Valley Road on the west to Aviara Parkway on the east. The project consists of four two-story multi-tenant office buildings with a total building area of 250,093 square feet. Individual building areas are 72,593 square feet, 50,000 square feet, 50,000 square feet, and 77,500 square feet. A total of 1,006 at grade parking spaces will be provided. The project includes detention basins adjacent to Palomar Airport Road. Routine maintenance of the basins will occur to maintain their function. The site has historically been used for agriculture and is bordered or bisected by roadways. Encinas Creek runs through the southern and western areas of the project site. The property contains four vegetation communities. These include southern willow scrub, coastal and valley freshwater marsh, eucalyptus woodland, and ruderal vegetation. The areas of the site proposed to be developed are relatively level and range from a low of 66 feet in the northwest corner to 83 feet in the northeast comer. II. B. V. 11 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSTS Environmental Impact Discussion a) AIR.QUALITY Re1.• 03/28/96 The implementation of projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles !raveled. These subsequently resull in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since !he San Diego Air Basin is a "non~attainment basin", any additional air emissions are considered cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in the updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region. To lessen or minimize the impact ~n air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a variety of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand Management; 3) provisions to encourage alternative modes of transportation including mass transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5) participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either b.een incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project is located within a "non-attainment basin", therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for air quality impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all projects within the scope of the General Plan's Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of air quality impacts is required. This document is available at the Planning Department. · YI. a) TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION The implementation of projects that fall within the scope of and are included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased trafnc volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersecti9n~ will. be severely impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City. has i\o 'iurisci,ictjo~l .control. These generally include all freeway interchange areas-and maJ6r intersections along Carlsbad Boulevard. Even with the implementation of rO.idWay improVemetits: a rillmbef .. of intersections are projected to fail the City's adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout. To lessen or minimize !he impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numerous mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR.. These include: I) measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions lo develop alternative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes. additional sidewalks, pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation 12 Rev. 03128196 . I SH~ET I CITY OF CARLSBAD wSHEETJ ~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ' 1t. ~ofESS10 KIEll Y CORIPORA TE CIENTIER CONDITIONS OF APPRCN/iJ.. ~ 'i /;l No. 1459 ~ "' "' I PI.Al\tllNG COMMISSION I RESOLUTION NO . .t801 OWN BY; I PROJECT NO. I DRAWING NO. CHKD BY; SOP 97-25 RVWD BY; w ---. ~ 6'tJp I'-<' ~ I r-'.. 1-) I!!--~ ~ t "-r" ~ ~ ~ l7ll'. .,3 K cy-. ')-. ~ ---l. ~ ~ LL) ':::I.. strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic from a failing Interstate or State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the junsdiction of the City to control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the failure of intersections at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through-traffic, therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for circulation impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all projects that fall within the scope of the General Plan's Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of circulation impacts is required. A study by Urban Systems Associates titled "Transportation Analysis for Kelly Corporate Center", dated March I, 1999 has been accepted by the Engineering Department. The study concluded that no significant traffic impacts should result from the project as a multi-tenant office site, and no additional cumulative circulation mitigation measures should be needed beyond those identified in the City of Carlsbad Master EIR and the LFMP Zone 13 Traffic. Environmental Review. The study recommends the following which is included on the project plans: I) The Palomar Airport Road at Hidden Valley Road and Palomar Airport Road at Aviara Parkway intersections shall be designed with right tum only lanes for the eastbound to southbound right tum. A vehicle storage length of two hundred and fifty feet with transition designed to CAL TRANS specifications is recommended at Aviara Parkway and one hundred and fifty feet with transition at Hidden Valley Road. Fully designed and engineered improvement plans shall be prepared for these conditions for approval by the City Engineer. Since the time traffic count information was obtained for the project's traffic analysis the city received the annual growth management traffic monitoring report. This project could have a potentially significant negative cumulative traffic impact on the Palomar Airport Road/El Camino Real intersection. However, this project has been conditioned to pay its fair share of the "short-term improvements" thereby, guaranteeing implementation of a mitigation measure that reduces the potential impact to a level of insignificance. The following is the required mitigation measure: 2) The Developer shall pay his fair share for the "short-term improvements" to the El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Road intersection prior to the issuance of any building permits. The amount shall be determined by the methodology ultimately selected by Council, including but not limited to, an increase in the city-wide traffic impact fee; and increased or new Zone 5 LFMP fee; the creation of a fee or assessment district; or incorporation into a Mello-Roos taxing district. The Urban Systems Associates study titled, "Transportation Analysis for Kelly Corporate Center", dated March I, 1999 included an assumption that Cannon Road would be constructed from its current western terminus to El Camino Real (Reaches I & 2). Due to recent events it has been determined that Reach 2 of Cannon Road may not be complete prior to the project opening. Therefore, to provide adequate mitigation in the event Reach 2 of Cannon Road is not 13 Rev. 03/28/96 complete prior to the project opening the Engineering Department is proposing the addition of the following traffic mnigation measure: 3) "Prior to issuance of a building permit, construction of Cannon Road Reach 2 shall be underway to the satisfaction of the City Engineer." The proposed mitigation measure is not a new item in that the traffic study assumed the improvement would be in place. It primarily addresses the issue of timing between the opening of the proj eel and the completion of Cannon Road. The availability of Cannon Road will permit persons working in the business parks north of Palomar Airport Road to utilize that new roadway thereby freeing up capacity on Palomar Airport Road which would be available for vehicle trips generated by the Kelly Corporate Center Project. VII. a, c. & d) BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES A report titled, "Kelly Corporate Center Biological Resources Report", dated August 4, 1998 and "Kelly Corporate Center Riparian Mitigation Plan", dated April 21, 1999 both by Helix Environmental Planning, Inc. have been prepared for the project. The determination of the biologist in surveying the site is that four vegetation communities are found on the property. These include southern willow scrub, coastal and valley freshwater marsh, eucalyptus woodland, and ruderal vegetation. No species listed as threatened or endangered were observed or are expected to occur on site. Routine maintenance of the detention basins on site adjacent to Palomar Airport Road is permitted to ensure their function. Imnacts The project as currently proposed will completely avoid direct impacts to Encinas Creek. A majority of the remainder of the site will be impacted by the project. This will result in direct impacts to southern willow scrub of approximately 0.30 acre of habitat including 0.26 acre along Palomar Airport Road for the recontouring of the slope for the construction of the proposed detention basins and 0.04 acre of impacts to other areas along Encinas Creek. No freshwater marsh vegetation will be impacted. Impacts to the southern willow scrub are considered significant. Mitigation The United States Fish and Wildlife Service recommended that impacts to southern willow scrub be mitigated at a 2:1 ratio. As sufficient area does not exist to accomplish the creation of 0.6 acres of habitat within the project area, the 2:1 ratio will be met through the creation of0.3 acres of riparian woodland {l:l), with the balance to be aclueved through off-site mitigation. Mitigation for impacts to southern willow scrub will be mitigated by restoration of this habitat type on site at a I: I ratio (0.30 acre). The mitigation will occur in the southwestern comer of the site adjacent to Encinas Creek. This mitigation site is considered superior to the existing habitat on site being impacted because it will be located at least 400 feet south of Palomar Airport Road and will be graded down to create a natural hydrological regime that will not require a permanent water source. The following are the biological mitigation measures required for the project: l) Mitigation for impacts to southern willow scrub shall be mitigated by restoration of this habitat type at a I :1 ratio within the southwestern corner of the site as depicted on Figure 4, "Mitigation Location -Kelly Corporate Center" of the Kelly Corporate Center Riparian Mitigation Plan dated April 21, I 999 prepared by Helix Environmental Planning, Inc. A 14 Rev. 03/28/96 2) 3) 4) 5) detailed restoration plan must be developed and approved by the California Department of Fish and Game. The restoration plan must identify a planting plan. including plant palette and seed mixes, and develop success criteria for restoration. A maintenance and monitoring period, usually five years, will be required to assure that the restoration area meets with identified success criteria and restoration goals. Offsite mitigation for 0.3 acres of riparian woodland shall be achieved through the establishment and placement of initial funds into a non-wasting fund approved by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. This fund would allow for various management activities which benefit wetlands and the least Bell's vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus; vireo) within Encinas Creek to take place in perpetuity. The exact amount of this initial funding shall be determined by the USFWS. This amount, along with fund establishment and the identification of the entity charged with fund management, shall be approved by the USFWS prior to occupancy and written confirmation from USFWS shall be provided to the Planning Director. Prior to grading plan approval areas of the site to be preserved in their existing condition shall be clearly demarcated on the grading plans to the satisfaction of the Planning Director and City Engineer. A habitat protection fence detail approved by the Planning Director and City Engineer shall be included on the grading plan along with the location for its installation. These areas shall be fenced in the field by a qualified biologist who shall also submit to the Planning Director a letter attesting to the accuracy of the fencing location prior to the issuance of a grading permit. To assure that no direct impacts to the least Bell's vireo occur during project grading, all grading that creates noise in excess of 60 dB Leq at the western property boundary shall occur outside of the vireo breeding season (March 15 -September 15). Alternatively, grading noise levels shall be reduced to below 60 dB Leq by the construction of noise attenuation devices during the breeding season. Grading that creates noise in excess of 60 dB Leq at the western property boundary during the vireo breeding season would be alJowed if it can be shown, based on focused surveys by a qualified biologist, that no least Bell's vireos are using habitat in areas where the 60 dB Leq threshold is exceeded. Alternatively, a noise barrier that reduces grading noise to below 60 dB Leq could also be used to reduce impacts to below a level of significance. A noise monitoring program indicating the type of equipment to be used to measure noise levels, the monitoring location, responsible personnel and the frequency of monitoring as its relates to the grading schedule shall be submitted for Planning Director and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service approval prior to the issuance of a grading permit unless the focused surveys indicate that no least Bell's vireos are using habitat that would be impacted by noise levels exceeding 60 dB Leq. If it is determined that indirect impacts cannot be avoided, "take" would need to be authorized as part of a section 7 consultation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. To minimize indirect impacts to Encinas Creek, the proposed SO foot setback shall be revegetated using native upland plant species. This shall be included in the landscape plans for the project which must be approved prior to the approval of a grading plan. Review and approval of the landscape plans for the buffer area by the USFWS is also required prior to grading plan approval. Limited encroachment into the 50 foot setback where access to the site is gained from Aviara Parkway is acceptable to allow for appropriate traffic spacing on Aviara Parkway and is shown on the project plans. 15 Rev. 03128196 6) An exterior lighting plan including parking areas shall be submined for Planning Director and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service approval prior to building permit issuance. All lighting shall be designed to reflect downward and avoid any impacts on adjacent homes or property. The maximum height of all light fixtures shall not exceed 30 feet. X. b) NOISE The majority of the project site is located within the 65 to 70 decibel CNEL noise contours identified in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for McClellan-Palomar Airport with an area of the northeast comer of the site falling within the 70 to 75 decibel CNEL noise contour. SAND AG prepared a site specific plot of the noise contour lines in relation to proposed buildings and it was determined that no structures will be located within the 70 to 75 decibel CNEL noise contour. Office buildings are listed on the McClellan-Palomar Airport Noise/Land Use Compatibility Matrix as conditionally compatible in the 65 to 70 decibel CNEL noise level with the following mitigation measures: 1) Proposed office buildings shall be noise attenuated to an interior level of 50 decibels CNEL based on an acoustical study submitted along with building plans. Concurrent with the submittal of building plans the applicant shall submit an acoustical study documenting what construction materials or measures must be utilized to meet required. interior noise levels. A letter signed by the acoustical engineer and the project architect which contains the architects registration stamp and certifies that the recommendations of the acoustical study have been incorporated into the building plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director prior to building permit issuance. 2) Prior to the issuance of building permits the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property may be subject to noise impacts from the proposed or existing Transponation Corridor, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and City Attorney (see Noise Form #I on file in the Planning Department). 3) Prior to the issuance of building permits the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property is subject to overflight, sight and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney (see Noise Form #2 on file in ~e Planning Department). 4) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Developer shall record an Avigation Easement for the property to the County of San Diego and file a copy of the recorded document with the Planning Director. 16 Rev. 03128196 III. EARLIER ANALYSES USED The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning Department located at 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California, 92009, (760) 438-1161, extension 4446. I. "Final Master Environmental Impact Report for the City of Carlsbad General Plan Update" (MEIR 93-01), dated March 1994, City of Carlsbad Planning Department. 2. "Kelly Corporate Center Biological Resources Report", dated August 4, 1998, Helix Environmental Planning, Inc. 3. "Kelly Corporate Center Riparian Mitigation Plan", dated April 21, 1999, Helix Environmental Planning, Inc. 4. "Kelly Corporate Center Trail: Archaeological Resources", dated August 14, 1998, Hertiage Resources. 5. ''Transportation Analysis for Kelly Corporate Center" , dated March 1, 1999, Urban Systems Associates, Inc. 6. "Growth Management Plan, City of Carlsbad, California, 1998 Traffic Monitoring Program", Valley Research And Planning Associates. 7. "Geotechnical Investigation for Kelly Ranch Corporate Center", dated April 1997, Robert Prater Associates. 8. "Hydraulic Analysis of Encinas Creek for Kelly Corporate Center", dated November 7, 1997, Crosby Mead Benton & Associates. 9. "Preliminary Drainage Report Kelly Corporate Conte(, dated November 7, 1997, Crosby Mead Benton & Associates. 17 Rev. 03/28/96 LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES I) The Palomar Airport Road at Hidden Valley Road and Palomar Airport Road at Aviara Parkway intersections shall be designed with right tum only lanes for the eastbound to southbound tight tum. A vehicle storage length of two hundred and fifty feet with transition designed to CAL TRANS specifications is recommended at Aviara Parkway and one hundred and fifty feet with transition at Hidden Valley Road. Fully designed and engineered improvement plans shall be prepared for these conditions for approval by the City Engineer. 2) The Developer shall pay his fair share for the "short-term improvements" to the El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Road intersection prior to the issuance of any' building permits. The amount shall be determined by the methodology ultimately selected by Council, including but not limited to, an increase in the city-wide traffic impact fee; and increased or new Zone 5 LFMP fee; the creation of a fee or assessment district; or incorporation into a Mello-Roos taxing district. 3) Mitigation for impacts to southern willow scrub shall be mitigated by restoration of this habitat type at a 1: I ratio within the southwestern comer of the site as depicted on Figure 4, "Mitigation Location -Kelly Corporate Center" of the Kelly Corporate Center Riparian Mitigation Plan dated April 21, 1999 prepared by Helix Environmental Planning, Inc. A detailed restoration plan must be developed and approved by the California Department of Fish and Game. The restoration plan must identify a planting plan, including plant palette and seed mixes, and develop success criteria for restoration. A maintenance and monitoring period, usually five years, will be required to assure that the restoration area meets with identified success criteria and restoration goals. 4) Offsite mitigation for 0.3 acres of riparian woodland shall be achieved through the establishment and placement of initial funds into a non-wasting fund approved by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. This fund would allow for various management activities which benefit wetlands and the least Bell's vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus; vireo) within Encinas Creek to take place in perpetuity. The exact amount of this initial funding shall be determined by the USFWS. This amount, along with fund establishment and the identification of the entity charged with fund management, shall be approved by the USFWS prior to occupancy and written confirmation from USFWS shall be provided to the Planning Director. 5) Prior to grading plan approval areas of the site to be preserved in their existing condition shall be clearly demarcated on the grading plans to the satisfaction of the Planning Director and City Engineer. A habitat protection fence detail approved by the Planning Director and City Engineer shall be included on the grading plan along with the location for its installation. These areas shall be fenced in the field by a qualified biologist who shall also submit to the Planning Director a letter attesting to the accuracy of the fencing location prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 6) To assure that no direct impacts to the least Bell's vireo occur during project grading, all grading that creates noise in excess of 60 dB Leq at the western property boundary shall occur outside of the vireo breeding season (March 15 -September 15). Alternatively, grading noise levels shall be reduced to below 60 dB Leq by the construction of noise attenuation devices during the breeding season. Grading that creates noise in excess of 60 dB Leq at the western property boundary during the vireo breeding season would be 18 Rev. 03/28/96 ENGINNER OF WORK: • • GEORGE L. BENTON R.C.E, 14594 EXP. 3-31-2001 CROSBY KB.AD BENTON & £1U!OOI.A.T .. Ena:tneers • Planners • Surveyors 5650 El Com.Ina Reol, Suite 200 Carlabod. CaWornla 92008 (760) 438 -1210 allowed if it can be shown, based on focused surveys by a qualified biologist. that no least Bell's vireos are using habitat in areas where the 60 dB Leq threshold is exceeded. Alternatively, a noise barrier that reduces grading noise to below 60 dB Leq could also be used to reduce impacts to below a level of significance. A noise monitoring program indicating the type of equipment to be used to measure noise levels, the monitoring location, responsible personnel and the frequency of monitoring as its relates to the grading schedule shall be submitted for Planning Director and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service approval prior to the issuance of a grading permit unless the focused surveys indicate that no least Bell's vireos are using habitat that would be impacted by noise levels exceeding 60 dB Leq. If it is determined that indirect impacts cannot be avoided, "take" would need to be authorized as part of a section 7 consultation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 7) To minimize indirect impacts to Encinas Creek, the proposed 50 foot setback shall be revegetated using native upland plant species. This shall be included in the landscape plan_s for the project which must be approved prior to the approval of a grading plan. Review and approval of the landscape plans for the buffer area by the USFWS is also . required prior to grading plan approval. Limited encroachment into the 50 foot setback where access to the site is gained from Aviara Parkway is acceptable to allow for appropnate traffic spacing on Aviara Parkway and is shown on the project plan. 8) An exterior lighting plan including parking areas shall be submitted for Planning Director and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service approval prior to building permit issuance. All lighting shall be designed to reflect downward and avoid any impacts on adjacent homes or property. The maximum height of all light fixtures shall not exceed 30 feet. 9) Proposed office buildings shall be noise attenuated to an interior level of 50 decibels CNEL based.on an acoustical study submitted along with building plans. Concurrent with the submittal of building plans the applicant shall submit an acoustical study documenting what construction materials or measures must be utilized to meet required interior noise levels. A letter signed by the acoustical engineer and the project architect which contains the architects registration stamp and certifies that the recommendations of the acoustical study have been incorporated into the building plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director prior to building permit issuance. I 0) Prior to the issuance of building permits the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property may be subject to noise impacts from the proposed or existing Transportation Corridor, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and City Attorney (see Noise Form #1 on file in the Planning Department). 11) Prior to the issuance of building permits the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property is subject to overflight, sight and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney (see Noise Form #2 on file in the Planning Department). 12) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Developer shall record an Avigation Easement for the property to the County of San Diego and file a copy of the recorded document with the Planning Director. 19 Re>'. 03128196 APPLICANT CQNCUR.R!NCJ! WITH MJTIQAJlQ)'I ME A$!W 1"HlS IS TO CER.TlFY THAT I HAVE llEVIEWEn nm ABOV! MnlOAT!NG MEA.St.'11.ES AND C'.ONCUll wrra nm ADomoN Of TI!ESE ~SURES TO THE PROJECT. APPLICANT CONCJIBRENCE WITH YIID06IIQ!:l MEASJ/RE5 THJS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE A.BOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND C'.O~CUR \l,Tl1-I TIIE ADDITION OF rn.ESE MEASURES TO mE PROJECT. APPROVED THIS IS THE AP!'ROV£D TEJ,jTATIVE MAP/SITE PLANPERCONDITIONNO.~OFPLANNING COMMISS N RESOLUTION NQ._'-/Jt1'1i1!Q.JJZ"--- ,/4 ~?,,, lqlzf:1' PLANNl"IG C!EPl" OAT( - I SH~ET I CITY OF CARLSBAD ~HEETS ~ 11.. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1<0fESS10 KIELl Y CORIPOIRATIE CIEINTIER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 0 § No. 1459 o::. Exp. 3--31- I. PLANNING COMMISSION I RESOLIITION NO. -4801 C'/V I DWN BY: I PROJECT NO. I DRAWING NO. CHKD BY: SOP 97-25 RVWD BY: PROJECT NAME: Kelly Corpo,,,rcea"'te,,__,,C_,,_e,_.,nt,.,,e,,__r __________ FILE NUMBERS: SOP 97-25/COP 97-52 APPROVAL DATE: CONDITIONAL NEG. DEC.:, ____________ _ The following environmental mitigation measures were Incorporated into the Conditions of Approval for this project In order to mitigate identified environmental impacts to a level of insignificance. A completed and signed checklist for each mitigation measure indicates that this mitigation measure has been complied with and implemented, and fulfills the City's monitoring requirements with respect to Assembly Bill 3180 (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6). Mitigation Measure Monitoring Tv= 1) The Palomar Airport Road al Hidden Valley Road and Projecl Palomar Airport Road al Aviara Parkway intersections shall be designed with right turn only lanes for the eastbound to southbound right turn. A vehicle storage length of two hundred and filly feel with transilion designed to CAL TRANS specifications Is recommended at Aviara Parkway and one hundred and fifty feet with transition at Hidden Valley Road. Fully designed and engineered improvement plans shali be prepared for these conditions for approval by lhe City Engineer. 2) The Developer shall pay his fair share for the "short-Project term improvements• to the El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Road intersection prior to the issuance of any building permits. The amount shall be determined by the methodology ultimalely selected by Council, including but not limited to, an increase in the city-wide traffic impact fee; and increased or new Zone 5 LFMP fee; the creation of a fee or assessment district; or incorporalion into a Mello-Roos taxing district. Monitoring Oeoartment Engineering Engineering ' Shown on Plans Yes Verified lmnlementation Remarks lxpt1n1tlon of HHdlOAli Type= Project, ongoing, cumulath111. Monitoring Dept.= Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure. Verified Implementation • When mlllgation measure has been Implemented, Olis column will be lnilialed and dated Stiown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, Ulis column wil be inilia6ed and dated. Mitigation Measure 3} Mitigation for impacts to southern willow scrub shall be miligated by restoration of this habitat type at a 1:1 ratio within the southwestern corner of the site as depicted on Figure 4, "M1t1galion Location -Kelly Corporate Center" of the Kelly Corporate Center Riparian Mitigation Plan dated April 21, 1999 prepared by Helix Environmental Planning, Inc. A detailed restoration plan musl be developed and approved by the California Department of Fish and Game. The restoration plan must identify a planting plan, induding plant palette and seed mixes, and develop success criteria for restoration. A mainlenance and monitoring period, usually five years, will be required to assure that the restoration area meets with identified success crileria and restoration goals. 4) Offsite mitigation for 0.3 acres of riparian woodland shall be achieved through the establishment and placement of initial funds into a non-wasting fund approved by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. This fund would allow for varimJs management activities which benefit wetlands and the least Bell's vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus; vireo) wilhin Encinas Creek to lake place in perpetuity. The exact amount of this inilial funding shall be determined by lhe USFWS. This amount, along with fund establishmenl and the identification of the entity charged wilh fund management, shall be approved by the USFWS prior to occupancy and wntlen confinnation from USFWS shall be provided to lhe Planning Director. 5) Prior to grading plan approval areas of the site lo be preserved in their existing condition shall be clearly demarcated on the grading plans lo lhe satisfaclion of the Planning Director and City Engineer. A habitat protection fence detail approved by the Planning mrector and Cily Engineer shall be included on the grading plan along with the location for its installation. These areas shall be fenced in the field by a qualified biologist wt10 shall also submit to the Planning Director a letter attesting to the accuracy of the fencing location prior to lhe issuance of a nradina oermil. El(Dianatlon of Headinq1; Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative tJloniloring Dept. = Oeparlmenl. or Agency, responsible for monitoring a partk:ula, mitigaUon measure. Shown on Plans = When miligalion measure Is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and daled Monitoring Tyee Project Project Project Remart.:s = Area for describing status of ongoing mlllgallon measure, or for other Information. RD -Appeodix P. Monitorring C!_~artment Planning Planning Plann~ng Shown on Plans Verified lmolementalion Remarks Verified Implementation= When mitigation measu,e has been implemenled, this column will be inltialed and daled. Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or tor other lnformalion. RD ~ Appendix P. m z s :u 0 z s:: m z -I )> r s:: :::! G') )> :::! 0 z s:: 0 z ::i 0 :u z G') 0 :c m 0 " r: Ill -I "D )> G') m .... 0 ,, "' m ~ :u 0 z ;;: m ~ r s:: ::l ~ 0 z ;;: 0 z :::. 0 ill z G') 0 :i: m 0 ;,;; C Ch ;-:I "D )> G') m "' 0 ,, "' 6) Miligatlon Measure To assure that no direct impacts to the least Bell's vireo occur during project grading, all grading that creates noise in excess of 60 dB Leq at the western property boundary shall occur outside of the vireo breeding season (March 15 -September 15 ). Alternatively. grading noise levels· shall be reduced to below 60 dB Leq by the construction of noise attenuation devices during the breeding season. Grading that creates noise in excess of 60 dB Leq al the western property boundary during the vireo breeding season would be allowed if ii can be shown, based on focused surveys by a qualified biologist, that no least Bell's vireos are using habitat in areas where the 60 dB Leq threshold is exceeded. Alternatively, a noise barrier that reduces grading noise to below 60 dB Leq could also be used to reduce impacts lo below a level of significance. A noise monitoring program Indicating the type of equipment lo be used to measure noise levels, the monitoring location, responsible personnel and the frequency of monitoring as its relates to the grading schedule shall be submitted for Planning Director and U.S .. Fish and Wildlife Service approval prior to the Issuance of a grading permit unless the focused surveys indicate thal no least Bell's vireos are using habilal that would be impacted by noise levels exceeding 60 dB Leq. If it is determined that indirect impacts cannot be avoided, "take" would need to be authorized as part of a section 7 consultation with lhe U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Enlanation of HeadlnA■i Type = Pro1ect, ongoing, cumulative Mooitoring Dept.= Oepartmenl, Of Agency, respom1lble for monitoring a partlc~ar miligalion measure. Shown ori Plans = When mitigation measure Is shown on ptans, this OOlumn will be inihaled and dated. Mitigation Me8sure 7) To minimize indirect impacls to Encinas Creek, the proposed 50 fool setback shall be revegelaled using nalive upland plant species. This shall be included in the landscape plans for the project which must be approved prior to the approval of a grading plan. Review and approval of the landscape plans for the buffer area by the USFWS is also required prior to grading plan approval. Limited encroachment into the 50 fool setback where access to the site is gained from Aviara Parkway is acceptable to allow for appropriate traffic spacing on Aviara Parkwav and is shown on the nroiecl nlan. 8) An exterior lighting plan including parking areas shall be submitted for Planning Director and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service approval prior to building permit Issuance. All lighting shall be designed lo reflect downward and avoid any impacts on adjacent homes or properly. The maximum height of all light fixtures shall not exceed 30 feet. 9) Proposed office buildings shall be noise attenuated to an interior level of 50 decibels CNEL based on an acoustical study submitted along with building plans. Concurrent with the submillal of building plans the applicant shall submit an acoustical study documenting what construction materials or measures must be utilized to meet required interior noise levels. A letter signed by the acoustical engineer and the project architect which contains the architects registration stamp and certifies that the recommendations of the acoustical study have been incorporated into the building plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director prior to building permit issuance. Explanation of 1:1.t~ Type= Project, ongoing, cumulaliYe. Mornloling Dept. = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular m1t1gat1on measu,e. ShOwn on Plans = \Mien mlllgallon measure Is shown on plans, this column will be Initialed and daled. Monitoring Tvne Monitoring Oeoartmenl Shown on Plans Verified lmrJlementalion Remarks Projecl Moniloring Tvne Project Project Project Planning Verified Implementation• When mitigation rn&8$l#e has been implemented, lhls column wiH be Initialed and daled. Remarks = Ama for Jescrlblng status ol ongoing miligalioo measure, or for other Information. RO -Appendix P. Monitoring Deoartmenl Planning Planning Planning Shown on Plans Verified lmnlementation Remarks Verified Implementation c When mUlgallon measure has been Implemented, alis column will be Initialed and daled. Remar1<s == Arna for describing slalus of ongoing mlllgatlon measure, or for other informatiori. RD -Appendix P. m z < ::0 0 z s:: rn z ~ r s:: ::j 15 ~ 0 z s:: 0 z ::j 0 :u z G') 0 :c m 0 " r: ~ "D )> G') m "' 0 ,, 01 m z < ~ z ;;: m z ~ r s:: ::j G') ~ 0 z s:: 0 z -I 0 :u z Gl 0 :c m 0 " r ~ -: G') m ~ 0 ,, UI Mitigation Measure 10) Pnor to the issuance of building permits the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property may be subject to noise impacts from the proposed or existing Transportation Corridor, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and City Attorney (see Noise Form #1 on file In the Planning Department). 11) Prior lo the issuance of building permits the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property is subject lo overflight, sight and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney (see Noise Form #2 on file in the Planning Department)_ 12) Prior lo the issuance of building permits, the Developer shall record an Avigation Easement for the property to the County of San Diego and file a copy of the recorded document with the Planning Direclor. 13) Prior lo issuance of a building permit, construction of Cannon Road Reach 2 shall be underway lo the satisfaction of the City Engineer. ExpJanatlon of Headl11g5; Type= Projecl, ongoing, cumulaUva. Monitoring Dept. = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure. Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure Is shown on plans, this column will be lnilialed and dated. ENGINNER OF WORK: GEORGE L. BENTON R.C.E. 14594 EXP. 3-31-2001 CROSBY MDI.AD BDINTON &..aom..,'l'a8 Engineers • Planners • Suneyore 5650 El Camino Reai Suite 200 Carlsbad. California 92008 (760) 438 -1210 Monitoring Tvoe Project Monitoring Deoartment Shown on Plans Verified lmolementation Remarks Planning Verified Implementation = When millgalfon measure has been Implemented, this colurrvt wilt be Initialed and dated. Remanc.s "' Area fOf describing slatus of ongoing mlllgatlon measure. or for olher information. RO -Appendix P APPROVED 1'419 IS 1MI AflflflOV£D Tl;t,ITATl\1£ MAP/Sm! PlANPERCONDmONNO.~OfJLANNING COMMI ION RESOLUTION NO. ~02 EN E AIN: OEr~ A1 ½.Nr¼t~~ CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT m z s :u 0 z s:: m z -I ► ,- ;;: -I G') )> :::! 0 z s:: 0 z a :u z Gl 0 :c m 0 " C Ill -I .' -: Gl m UI 0 ,, "' !SHEETS 1f. ~ KEll Y CORPOAATIE CIENTIER DWN BY: CONDmONS OF APPROVAL Pl.ANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. -4601 PROJECT NO. CHKD BY: __ _ RVWD BY: DRAWING NO. SOP 97-25 I J PLANNI"IG COMllHSSION RESOLUTION NO. 4602 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANND!G COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SDP 97-25 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR TWO-STORY MULTI-TENANT OFFICE BUILDINGS CONTAINING A TOTAL AREA OF 250,093 SQUARE FEET ON A 25.38 ACRE SITE GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPOR_T ROAD EXTENDING FROM AN AREA WEST OF HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD ON THE WEST TO AVIARAPARKWAY ON THE EAST IN THE COASTAL ZONE AND LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5 CASE NAME: KELLY CORPORA TE CENTER CASE NO.: SDP 97-25 WHEREAS, Kelly Ranch Corporate Center I, LLC , "Developer", has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Kelly Ranch Corporate Center I, LLC and the Kelly Family Trust 3, "Owner", described as Parcels 1 & 2 of City of Carlsbad Boundary Adjustment No. 494 & Parcel 2 of City of Carlsbad Boundary Adjustment No. 388, excepting therefrom the portion lying easterly of Aviara Parkway ("the Property"); and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Site Development Plan as shown dn Exhibit(s) "A" -"X" dated September 1, 1999, on file in the Planning Department, KELLY CORPORATE CENTER SDP 97-25 as provided by Chapter 21.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 1st day of September, 1999, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if ahy, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Site Development Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 11 HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission APPROVES KELLY CORPORATE CENTER SDP 97-25 based on the fo!lowmg findmgs and subject to the following conditions: Findings: I. That the requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and environmental settings, is consistent with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan, will not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the area in which the proposed use is to be located, and will not adversely impact the site, surroundings or traffic circulation, in that the project design complies with the requirements of the Planned Industrial Zone (P-M). All required building• setbacks are provided, lot coverage is well below the maximum permitted, and landscaping in excess of the zone requirements will be provided. The project also complies with the provisions contained in the General Piao as it includes circulation facility improvements needed to accommodate the use, mitigation measures to achieve compliance with the noise standards of the plan and a buffer from sensitive environmental areas as required by the Open Space and Conservation Element. 2. That the ~ite for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, in that all applicable code requirements have been met including the parking and building coverage standards. Five parking spaces over the required number are planned and building coverage is Jess than half of the maximum permitted. Between 19.4 percent and 20.9 percent of the parking area will be landscaped as compared to the required 10 percent 3. That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood will be provided and maintained, in that landscaping is proposed to screen the parking areas. Adequate vehicle circulation bas been provided to accommodate truck turning movements. Access to the site will be provided by driveways onto Hidden Valley Road and Aviara Parkway. 4. That the street systems serving the proposed use are adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use, in that the project includes the addition of an eastbound right turn lane on Palomar Airport Road at its intersection with Hidden Valley Road as well as an eastbound right turn lane on Palomar Airport Road at Its intersection with Aviara Parkway. The project is conditioned to participate in funding improvements to the Palomar Airport Road/El Camino Real intersection PC RESO NO. 4602 -2- s. 6. 1. 8. 9. 10. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan. the applicable local facilities management plan and all City public facility policies and ordinances since: A. The project has been conditioned to ensure the building permits will not be issued for the project unless the District Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the District Engineer is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project. B. Statutory School fees wilJ be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the Carlsbad Unified School District. C. All necessary public improvements have been provided or are required as conditions of approval. D. The Developer has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available concurrent with need as required by the General Plan. The project has been conditioned to pay any increase in public facility fee, or new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project. This proj eel has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 5. The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for the McClellan-Palomar Airport, dated April 1994, in that, as conditioned the applicant shall record a notice that the property is subject to overflight, sight and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar Airport The project is conditionally compatible with the projected noise levels of the CLUP; and, based on the noise/land use compatibility matrix of the CLUP, the proposed land use is compatible with the airport, in that buildings on the project site will be inside the 65 CNEL noise contour and the proposed land use is a compatible use at this noise level with noise attenuation to an interior level of SO decibels CNEL. A growth management park fee of 40 cents per square foot of non-residential development will be collected at the time of building permit issuance. This fee will be used to construct recreational facilities to offset the demand created by employees within Zone 5. Thai the proj eel is consistent with the City's Landscape Manual, adopted by City Council Resolution No. 90-384. PC RESO NO. 4602 -3- 11. That this project could have a potentially significant negative cumulative traffic impact on the Palomar Airport Road/El Camino Real intersection. However, this project bas been conditioned to pay its fair share of the "short-term improvements" thereby, guaranteeing implementation of a mitigation measure that reduces the potential Impact to a level of insignificance. 12. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. Conditions: I. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Site Development Plan docurnent(s) necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. 2. The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 3. The Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Site Development Plan, (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or non- discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. 4. The Developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24" x 36", mylar copy of the site plan as approved by the final decision making body. The site plan shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The plan copy shall be submitted to the City Engineer and approved prior to building, grading, final map, or improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first. 5. The Developer shall include, as part of the plans submitted for any permit plan check, a reduced legible version of the approving resolutions on a 24" x 36" blueline drawing. Said blueline drawing(s) shall also include a copy of any applicable Coastal Development Permit and signed approved site plan. 6. Building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the District Engin~er determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. PC RESO NO. 4602 -4- Rev1s10"-1 5-10-04 Aooeo 6HT-12. "-- 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Toe Developer shall provide proof of payment of statutory school fees to mitigate conditions of overcrowding as part of the building permit application. The amount of these fees shall be determined by the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit application. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required as part of the Zone 5 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits, including, but not limited to the following: A. A growth management park fee of 40 cents per square foot of non-residential development will be collected at the time of building permit issuance. This fee will be used to construct recreational facilities to offset the demand created by employees within Zone 5. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this residential housing project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements oflaw. Approval of SDP 97-25 is granted subject to the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and CDP 97-52. SDP 97-25 is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4601 and 4603 for the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and CDP 97-52. Prior to the issuance of the Building Permit, Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of.the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a Site Development Piao and Coastal Development Permit by Resolution No. 4602 and 4603 on the real property owned by the Developer. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction, The Planning Director has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by the Developer or successor in interest. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a six-foot high masonry wall with gates pursuant to City standards. Location of said receptacles shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to building permit issuance. Enclosure shall be of similar colors and/or materials to the project to the satisfaction of the Planning Director prior to building permit issuance. PC RESO NO. 4602 13. An exterior lighting plan including parking areas shall be submitted for Planning Director and U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service approval prior to building permit issuance. All lighting shall be designed to reflect downward and avoid any impacts on adjacent homes or property. The maximum height of all light fixtures shall not exceed 30 feet. 14. No outdoor storage of materials shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire Chief. In such instance a storage plan will be submitted for approval by the Fire Chief and the Planning Director. 15. The Developer shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan in conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City's Landscape Manual. The plans shall be submitted to and approval obtained from the Planning Director prior to the approval of the final map, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first. The Developer shall construct and install all landscaping as shown on the approved plans, and maintain all landscaping in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 16. The first submittal of detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be accompanied by the project's building, improvement, and grading plans. 17. Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of identification and/or addresses shall contrast to their background color. 18. Prior to the issuance of building permits the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property is subject to overflight. sight and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney (see Noise Form #2 on file in the Planning Department). 19. The Developer is aware that the City is preparing a non-residential housing impact fee (linkage fee) consistent with Program 4.1 of the Housing Element. The applicant is further aware that the City may determine that certain non-residential projects may have to pay a linkage fee, in order to be found consistent with the Housing Element of the General Plan. If a linkage fee is established by City Council ordinance and/or resolution and this project becomes subject to a linkage fee pursuant to said ordinance and/or resolution, then the Developer, or his/her/their successor(s) in interest shall pay the linkage fee. The linkage fee shall be paid at the time of issuance of building permits, except for projects involving a request for a non-residential planned development for an existing development, in which case, the fee shall be paid on approval of the final map, parcel map or certificate of compliance, required to process the non-residential PUD, whichever pertains. If linkage fees are required for this project, and they are not paid, this project will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project will become null and void. 20. The developer shall submit and obtain Planning Director approval of a uniform sign program for this development prior to occupancy of any building. The developer is aware that the City is preparing an amendment to the sign requirements of the PC RESO NO. 4602 -6- APPROVED ENGINNER OF WORK: GEORGE L. BENTON R.C.E. 14594 EXP. 3-31-2001 CROSBY MEAD BENTON & £8SOOl.l.'l'm8 Engineers • Planners • Surveyors 5850 El Camino Real, Suite 200 Carlsbad, California 92008 (760) 438 -1210 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. Planned Industrial (P-M) Zon•. In approving this proJ•ct it is the Intent of the Planning Commission that the project's uniform sign program he consistent with the sign requirements of the P-M Zone once it is amended. To achieve the desired consistency the sign program shall provide for the following: A. A maximum of one monument sign per building not to exceed an area of 3, square feet. B. A maximum of one wall sign per building frontage on a street for each lot No more than one sign per elevation. C. The maximum sign area for all signs on a lot shall not exceed 200 square feet D. An amendment to the uniform sign program can be submitted by the property owner/developer and be approved administratively by the Planning Director provided the proposed amendment causes the uniform sign program to be consistent with the new sign requirements of the P-M Zone as approved by the City Council. · Building permits for at least one of the four office buildings mnst be Issued within 24 months of the date on which the Site Development Plan receives Planning Commission approval or this approval shall expire. Building permits for any remaining buildings shown on the Site Development Plan must be issued within 5 years of the date on which the Sit• Development Plan received Planning Commission approval or the Site Development Plan will expire as it pertains to any office buildings not constructed. Prior to the issuance of building permits the Developer shall grant an open spac, easement to the City of Carlsbad for those portions of lots adjacent to Encina• Creek as shown on Exhibits "B'' and "C" dated September 1, 1999, on file In the Planning. Department, Kelly Corporate Center SDP 97-25, to prohibit any · encroachment or development except for those improvements shown on Exhibits "A" through "X" dated September 1, 1999. The easement shall specify that routine maintenance of the site area subject to the open space easement which is authorized by the City of Carlsbad, the U.S. Fish and Wildllfe Service and the California Department of Fish and Game Is a permitted activity within the open space easement. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Developer shall provide an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Carlsbad for a trail easement for lhe trail (City hiking and bike path) shown on the Site Development Plan. If the City of Carlsbad accepts dedication of the trail easement, the trail shall be constructed as a public trail and will be the maintenance and liability responsibility of the City of Carlsbad. If the City of Carlsbad does not accept dedication of the trail easement, the trail shall be constructed but it shall be constructed as a private trail and shall be the maintenance and liability responsibility of the property owner. No roof equipment shall be allowed except for vents and make-up air unit~ necessary to comply with requirements of the uniform codes (building, plumbing, electrical, and fire). Skylights are also permitted. Necessary roof vents and make- up air units shall be painted to match the roof surface which shall be gray in color. The gray roof color shall remain for the life of the project. No roof equipment shall be allowed except for vents and make-up air units necessary to comply with requirements of the uniform codes (building, plumbing, electrical, and fire). Skylights are also permitted. Necessary roof vents and make- up air units shall be painted to match the roof surface which shall be gray in color. The gray roof color shall remain for the life of the project 26. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project site plan shall be revised to include bicycle parking facilities for each building such as bicycle lockers or racks. The required site plan mylar shall reflect this revision. In addition, the floor plans for each building shall be revised to Incorporate separate men's and women's shower and locker facilities for employee use. No building permit will be issued unless the building plans incorporate these amenities. Engineering Conditions 27. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the developer shall comply with the requirements of the City's anti-graffiti program for wall treatments if and when such a program is formerly established by the City. 28. The developer shall provide an acceptable means for maintaining the private easemenls within the site and all the private: streets, sidewalks, street lights, storm drain facilities and sewer facilities located therein and to distribute the costs of such maintenance in an equitable manner among the owners of the properties within the site. 29. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction sile within this project, the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards. to the hauling operation. 30. The developer shall provide sight distance corridors at lllf project driveways in accordance with Engineering Standards and shall Include the following statement in the site plan and landscape plans: "No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object over 30 inches above the street level may be placed or permitted to encroach within the area identified as a sight distance corridor in accordance with City Standard Public Street-Design Criteria, Section 8.B.3. The underlying property owner shall maintain this condition. 31. The Developer shall pay bis fair share for the "short-term Improvements" to the El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Road intersection prior to approval of the final map or issuance of a grading permit, whichever occurs first. The amount shall be PC RESO NO. 4602 -8- -~-·- I SH~ET I CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ' ::.HEETS IL ' KELLY CORPORA TIE CENTER-, ol'ESS10 CONDmONS OF APPROVAL No. 1459 ~ ;u I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOWT10N NO. 4602 01' CAI..I DWN BY: I PROJECT NO. I DRAWING NO. CHKD BY: SDP 91-25 RVWD BY: I I ~ rJ(J .9 l..l <:, ( ~ j ~ ' t---- Cl'--~ l ~ {' ~ ~ \j ~ ~~ ~ ✓ ~~ determined by the methodology ultimately selected by Council, including but not limited to, an Increase in the city-wide traffic impact fee; an increase in the city-wide traffic impact fee; an increased or new Zone S LFMP fee; the creation of a fee or assessment district; or incorporation into a Mello-Roos taxing district. Fees/Agreements 32. 33. 34. 35. The owner of the subject property shall execute an agreement holding the City harmless regarding drainage across the adjacent property. The owner shall execute a hold harmless agreement for geologic failure. This project is located within the boundary of Bridge and Thoroughfare District (B&TD) No. 2, A viara Parkway/Poinsettia Lane, and will be required to pay a B&TD fee estimated at $260/ ADI. Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, the owner shall give written consent to the annexation of the area shown within the boundaries of the site plan into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscaping District No. I on a form provided by the City. Grading 36. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the site plan, a grading permit for this project is required. The developer must submit and receive approval for grading plans in accordance with city codes and standards prior to issuance of a building permit for the project. 37. 3S. 39. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, the developer shall submit proof that a Notice of Intention has been submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board. Upon completion of grading, the developer shall ensure that an "as-graded" geologic plan is submitted to the City Engineer. The plan shall clearly show all the geology as exposed by the grading operation, all geologic corrective measures as actually constructed and must be based on a contour map which represents both the pre and post site grading. This plan shall be signed by both the soils engineer and the engineering geologist. The plan shall be prepared an a 24" x 36" mylar or similar drafting film and shall become a permanent record. No grading for private improvements shall occur outside the limits of the project unless a grading or slope easement or agreement is obtained from the owners of the affected properties and recorded. If the developer is unable to obtain the grading or slope easement, or agreement, no grading permit will be issued. In that case the developer must either amend the Site Plan or modify the plans so grading will not occur outside the proj eel site in a manner which substantially conforms to the approved Site Plan as PC RESO NO. 4602 .9. determined by the City Engineer and Planning Director. Dedications/Improvements 40. Additional drainage easements may be required. Drainage structures shall be provided or installed prior to or concurrent with any grading or building permit as may be required by the City Engineer. 41. The owner shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and easements required by these conditions or shown on the site plan. The offer shall be made prior to issuance of any building permit for this project. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated. 42. 43. 44. 45. Hidden Valley Road shall be dedicated by the owner along the project frontage based on a center line to right-of-way width of 6S feet and in conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards. Direct access rights fur the project frontage with Hidden Valley Road, Palomar Airport Road and Aviara Parkway, except for the project _access driveways as shown on the site plan, shall be waived by separate deed document prior to building permit issuance. The drainage system shall be designed to ensure that runoff resulting from I 0-year frequency storms of 6 hours and 24 hours duration under developed conditions, are equal to or less than the runoff from a storm of the same Jrequency and duration under existin& developed conditions. Both 6 hour and 24 hour storm durations shall be analyzed to determine the detention basin capacities necessary to accomplish the desired results. The developer shall comply with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The developer shall provide best management practices as referenced in the "California Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook" to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer. Said plans shall include but not be limited to notifying prospective owners and tenants of the following: A. All owners and tenants shall coordinate efforts to establish or work with established disposal programs to remove and properly dispose of loxic and hazardous waste products. B. Toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds such as gasoline, motor oil, antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives, and other such fluids shall not be discharged into any street, public or private, or into storm drain or storm water conveyance systems. Use and disposal of pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers and other such chemical treannents shall meet Federal, State, County and City requirements as prescribed in their respective containers. PC RESO NO. 4602 46. 47. 48. 49. C. Best Management Practices shall be used lo eliminate or reduce surface pollutants when planning any changes to the landscaping and surface improvements. Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all public improvements shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In accordance with City Standards, the developer shall install, or agree to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, improvements shown on the site plan and the following improvements: A. Full Improvements of Hldden Valley Road to Collector Standards along the project frontage and southerly off-site along the easterly right-of-way line to Join eltlsting improvements. B. Half street Improvements of Palomar Airport Road to Prlme Arterial Standards along the project frontage. C. Full improvements to Avlara Parkway to Major Arterial Standards along the project frontage. Improvements listed above shall be constructed within 18 months of approval of the secured improvement agreement or such other time as provided in said agreement. The structural section for the access aisles must be designed with a traffic index of s'.O in accordance with City Standards due to truck access through the parking area and/or aisles with an ADI greater than 500. The structural pavement design of the aisle ways shall be submitted together with required R-value soil test information and approved by the City as part of the building site plan review. The design of all private stree1S. and drainage systems shall be approved by the City Engineer. The structural section of all private streets shall conform to City of Carlsbad Standards based on R-value tests. All· private streets and drainage system~ shall be inspected by the City. The standard improvement plan check and inspection fees shall be paid prior to issuance of any building or grading permit for this project. Drainage outfall end treannents for any drainage outlets where a direct access road for maintenance purposes is not provided, shall be designed and incorporated into the grading/improvement plans for the project. These end treannents shall be designed so as to prevent vegetation growth from obstructing the pipe outfall. Designs could consisf of a modified outlet headwall consisting of an extended concrete spillway section with longitudinal curbing and/or radially designed rip-rap, or other means deemed appropriate, as a method of preventing vegetation growth directly in front of the pipe outlet, to the satisfaction of the Community Services Director and the City Engineer. PC RESO NO. 4602 -11- Water Conditions 50. The Developer shall be responsible for all fees, deposits and charges which will be collected before and/.or at the time of issuance of the building permit. The San Diego County Water Authority capacity charge will be collected at issuance of application for any meter installation. 5 I. The Developer shall provide detailed information to the District Engineer regarding water demand, irrigation demand, fire flow demand in gallons per minute, and projected sewer flow in million gallons per day. 52. The entire potable water system, recycled water system and sewer system shall be evaluated in detail by Developer and District Engineer to insure that adequate capacity, pressure and flow demands can be met. 53. 54. 55. All District pipelines, pump stations, pressure reducing stations and appurtenances required for this project by the District shall be within public right-of-way or within easements granted to the District or the City of Carlsbad. Sequentially, the Developer's Engineer shall do the following: A. Meet with the City Fire Marshal and establish the fire protection requirements. B. Prepare and submit a colored recycled water use area map and submit this map to the Planning Department for processing and approval by the District Engineer. C. Prior to the preparation of sewer, water and recycled water improvement plans, the Developer shall submit preliminary system layouts to the District Engineer for review, comment and approval. The following note shall be placed on the site plan. "This project is approved upon the expressed condition that building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the District serving the development has adequate water and sewer capacity available at the time development is to occur, and that such water and sewer capacity will continue to be available until time of occupancy." 56. All potable water and recycled water meters shall be placed within public right of way. 57. A public fire flow system shall be required for this industrial development, and it shall be constructed as a looped pipeline system. General Conditions 5S. If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, 10 be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so PC RESO NO. 4602 -12- implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Site Development Plan. CODE REMINDERS The project is subject to all applicable provisions oflocal ordinances, including but not limited to the following: 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer. Some improvements shown on site plan and/or required by these conditions are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the owner has sufficient title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of title or interest. The developer shall conform to Section 20.16.095 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Toe Developer shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein. The project shall comply with the latest non-residential disabled access requirements pursuant·to Title 24 of the State Building Code. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated and concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets, in substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. S0-6, to the satisfaction of the Directors of Community Development and Planning. Compact parking spaces shall be located in large groups, and in locations clearly marked to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. All landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape Manual and submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the Planning Department. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and the sign program required for the project and shall require review and approval of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs. PC RESO NO. 4602 -13- 68. The developer shall pay all current fees and deposits required. 69. Developer shall p•y the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), and the Citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy #17, subject to any credits authorized by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 5, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such taxes/fees shall be paid at issuance of building permit If taxes/fees are not paid, this approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void. 70. Prior to issuance of a gradlng or building permit, the property owner shall pay the Master Drainage Fee in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 15.08. NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise . expired. PC RESO NO. 4602 ~ 'f" '-----..... ( T<E.VISI01'../ ( s-10-04 AooeD 6HT. 12 ~ -. -14- ENGINNER OF WORK: GEORGE L. BENTON R.C.E. 14594 EXP. 3-31-2001 CROSBY IIBIA.D BBINTON !c .AINIOCU.Tma F.naJneen • Plannen • SuneyOl'II 56!50 El Camino Real, Suite 200 Carlllbad, California 92008 (760) 438 -1210 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the !st day of September 1999, by the following vole, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Chairperson Heineman, Commissioners Comp as. L 'Heureux, Trigas, and Welshans Commissioners Nielsen and Segall COURTNEY E. BEINEMA.',/, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: MICHAELI.HO. Planning Director PC RESO NO. 4602 -15- APPROVED mis IS THE APPROVED T£:l)ITATIV£ MAP/Sl'tE PLAN P~. N0fTION NO._!L_Qf_P_L,AN NNNIINNGG COMMl/ON RESOLUTION NO.~-~ ;~ -kn. k(?fhl ffiriNii OEPT\ f;F 7AJNIN0 t)rP'T, OA'rE ,.,. '"'' ; il ~ CIJNINE~:N_G ~t~~~]AD, r SH;~TS ~ '--' Kell Y OOR~ORA lE CIENllER CONDmONS OF AP'PR.OV1L PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLU110N NO. <1602 OWN BY: __ _ PROJECT NO. CHKD BY: __ _ RVWD BY: I DRA \lv1 NG NO. . $DP 97-25 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4603 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. CDP 97-52 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR TWO-STORY MULTI-TENANT OFFICE BUILDINGS CONTAINING A TOTAL OF 250,093 SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING AREA ON A 25.38 ACRE SITE GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD EXTENDING FROM AN AREA WEST OF HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD ON THE WEST TO AVIARA PARKWAY ON THE EAST IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5. CASE NAME: KELLY CORPORA TE CENTER CASE NO: CDP 97-52 WHEREAS, Kelly Ranch Corporate Center I, LLC , "Developer'', has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Kelly Ranch Corporate Center I, LLC and the Kelly Family Trust J, "Owner", described as Parcels l & 2 of City of Carlsbad Boundary Adjustment No. 494 & Parcel 2 of City of Carlsbad Boundary Adjustment No. 388, excepting therefrom the portion lying easterly of Aviara Parkway ("the Property"); and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Coastal Development Permit as shown on Exhibits "A"• "X" dated September l, 1999, on file in the Planning Department, KELLY CORPORATE CENTER CDP 97-52 as provided by Chapter 21.201.040 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did; on the 1st day of September 1999, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Coastal Development Permit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) B) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission APPROVES KELLY CORPORATE CENTER CDP 97-52 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: I. 2. 3. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Certified Local Coastal Program and all applicable policies in that the project is in compliance with the relevant policies of the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program, the Coastal Agricultural Overlay Zone, and the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone. The project site is located In the Coastal Agricultural Overlay Zone, according to Map X of the Land Use Plan, certified September, 1980, and will pay the Agricultural Conversion Mitigation Fee as required by the Coastal Agricultural Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.202 of the Zonin11 Ordinance). The project ls consistent with the provisions of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.203 of the Zoning Ordinance) in that the project will adhere to tbe City's Master Drainage and Storm Water Quality Management Piao and Grading Ordinance to avoid increased runoff and soil erosion and the site is not prone to landslides or susceptible to accelerated erosion, flood or liquefaction. Conditions: I. 2. 3. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the document(s) necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. Building permits for at least one of the four office buildings must be Issued within 24 months of the date on which the Site Development Plan receives Planning Commission approval or this approval shall expire. Building permits for any remaining buildings shown on the Site Development Plan must be issued within 5 years of the date on which the Site Development Piao received Planning Commission approval or the Site Development Piao will expire as it pertains to any office buildings not constructed. Approval of CDP 97-52 is granted subject to the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and SDP 97-25. CDP 97- 52 is granted subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4601 and 4602 for the Mitigated Negative 'Declaration, Mitigation Monitorioe and Reporting Program and SDP 97-25. 4. If a grading permit Is required, all grading activities are prohibited from March 15th lo September 15th for the least Bell's Vireo breeding season unless written approval of the City Engineer and the responsible wildlife agencies (CDFG/USFWS) is PC RESO NO. 4603 -2- obtained. Grading activities are therefore, allowed during a portion of the "rainy season". All erosion control and revegetatioo measures must be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to grading. 5. To offset the conversion of non-prime a2ricultural land to urban land uses per the requirements of the Mello II Local Coastal Program, the applicant shall provide payment of an agricultural mitigation fee, the amount of which shall not be less than $5,000 nor more than S10,000 for each net converted acre of non-prime agricultural land. The amount of the fee shall be paid by the applicant prior to approval of a final map, Issuance of a grading permit or Issuance of any building permit, whichever occurs first and shall be consistent with the provisions of Carlsb~d's LCP. NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as .. fees/exactions." You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a). and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFffiD that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute oflimitations has previously otherwise expired. PC RESO NO. 4603 -3- PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the !st day of September 1999, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: l. )• I Chairperson Heineman, Commissioners Campas, L 'Heureux, Trigas and Welshons Commissioners Nielsen and Segall ~ COURTNEY~,d, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: MICHAELJ.H Planning Director PC RESO NO. 4603 -4-,,..--...._~----"------~\ll'SION ......... --.......,_ 5-10-04 ADDro SI-IT 12 ' ENGINNER OF WORK: GEORGE L. BENTON R.C.E. 14594 EXP. 3-31-2001 CROSBY MEAD BENTON & .&SIIOCIJI.TB■ Engineers • Planners • Surveyors 5650 El Camillo Rea~ Suite 200 Carlsbad, California 92006 (760) 438 -1210 APPROVED THIS IS THE APPROVED T'y'TATIVE MAP/SITE PLAN PER CONDITION NO. OFPLANNING COMM~ION RESOLUTION NO. _':lf,QZ, 1/ A J...21,, AA!fl NEt:FHNG OE , ~ Qli,t . PLANNING DEFT· OAT& ··-···--------------- CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SHEETS 11. KIELL Y CORPORA TIE CIEINJTIER CONDmONS OF APPROVAL I PLANNING COMMISSION I RESOLUTION NO. 4603 1· ;:;;;:;:;:==;;::;:::==::;-;::====;-;::::::::::= OWN BY: ---1 PROJECT NO. I DRAWING NO. CHKD BY: ---SOP 9.7-25 '-'R"-'V"W'=D'---"B"Y,._: === ~--------- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti... \j °' ~ ~ ~ It ~ ~ ~ Q:: ~ h. 0\ ~ Q. ....., ....., Q ~ Cl) ' I \ ------ ----- --·----·,,, .. -..... ,. -,--_,·~:,\__ -------------------.,..,, --- \ ,o \' \ \ \ ' I \ \--, :, -----1 --------~ -~ \ \ I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ,, -~· ' DRAINAGE ------;::.._ ____ CHANNEL ___ --:--------76 ---- \ -)'~---_j '"\,, SEWER LA~RAL (PRIVATE) \ \. LIMIT OF EXISTING, PAD '-(79.5) S:\ACADLDD\Land_Projects\ 1724-00\dwg\dwg\ 1224-SP-12.dwg 7/20/2004 3:28 27 PM PST '\,.,_ \\, ·\_ WATER SE (PRIVATE) PROPOSED WATER ··•. . .. EASEMENT '>y/ WATER AND ACCESS EASEMENT PER DWG. PR 01-38 FF. 80:0, PAD 79.5 i "l":;r:.:.:---i'...J:' ,, (· -.: ,f I ~&I i~ -------------- -------------- ·~ I I , _ __,, I DR/Vt c-I ~~,, ,---....; 1 mr-,C,,,-;+-_i I I I / \ I I ... ' I ;{ . \ g,~ ACI( I I, • // l;i I 1 I I I I I I I ) I I I ' I i I ;f 1; 1j .. • ..• : I .. ······, J: .. I I I ------ I I I ◄ !Lliet&I ■MflDIII a: J,.,.J LEGEND PROPOSED WATER EASEMENT t.M DESIGNATES COMPACT STALLS J'".,~""'l©,...1.,,~"'"·"".,.....,i""1.., c~T~t~T STANDARD STALLSJ HANDICAPPED STALLS PARKING LIGHTING GRAD I NG NOTE; iiifl IL IUil 9 A "PRECISE" GRADING PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE AN PARCEL 4. STORM WATER STANDARDS CONSTRUCTION SITE CATEGORY: HIGH PRIORITY. SEE WATER QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT (WQTR) FOR PERMANENT BMP'S AND NPDES/STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) REPORT FOR CONSTRUCTION BMP'S, PREPARED FOR THE PROJECT. SCALE: 1 "=30' : .• ' ·• :.: ·iltt' : :. < PREPARED BY oVE:SSJo CDS CIVIL ENGINEERS 10763 WOODSIDE AVENUE, SUITE A SANTEE, CA. 92071 (619) 448-6666 BY:~ Pf @t1&lDATE:~ BROB.CALLU, R.C.E. 59412 ,::, .... !!} 'Z-~ No.C5941 i::J ct . 12-31-2 ;o ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD ~ 1--__j~--t----------------t---t--t---i--i ::~=2==-':==::E:::N::::G::;IN;'E~ER::l::N::::G::::D~E::PA~R:::T:::M~E=NT::==::::..:~==2~ SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN "l---+--+------------------.,---4--,----r--, KELLY CORPORATE CENTER t=====t====t================================~====~====~~====~====~ ~C;:';;l:;;:TY~E~N:::G::::IN:::E:::ER::'::::::::;-;P:::E::::===::;:::::EX:::P::::.::==:::;-;::~::D:::A=TE==::;:; DWN BY: ___ PROJECT NO. DRAWING NO. DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL CHKD BY:___ S0P97-25 OTHER APPROVAL CITY APPROVAL RVWD BY: I APPROVED DATE INITIAL ENGINEER OF WORK REVISION DESCRIPTION , 'I ~9 w~ WN z .- (!) .. zO wZ ....I cc >Q (.) en co 0 co t) ~ ' .. co w-.:t-~ -.:I" <(a, z .-~ en .. c:: 0 wz Ww Zz C>O ZI w a.. ,