Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MS 16-06; CARLSBAD VILLAGE LOFTS; TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR CARLSBAD VILLAGE LOFTS -APPENDICES; 2016-11-07
• • CITY: CARLSBAD PROJECT: PTDlS-1006-01 TUESDAY -OCTOBER 13, 2015 • CARLSBAD VILLAGE -IS NB RAMPS & IS SB RAMPS • AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB • 00:00 29 15 12:00 215 230 00:15 20 9 12:15 223 235 • 00:30 10 11 12:30 237 209 00:45 17 76 6 41 117 12:45 193 868 211 885 1753 • 01:00 10 5 13:00 206 197 • 01:15 10 7 13:15 190 191 01:30 12 5 13:30 200 193 • 01:45 12 44 8 25 69 13:45 219 815 188 769 1584 • 02:00 10 5 14:00 241 187 02:15 12 8 14:15 248 190 • 02:30 5 4 14:30 223 236 02:45 6 33 3 20 53 14:45 234 946 236 849 1795 • 03:00 2 4 15:00 218 214 • 03:15 6 3 15:15 208 201 03:30 8 8 15:30 213 176 • 03:45 4 20 3 18 38 15:45 223 862 209 800 1662 • 04 :00 15 11 16:00 210 191 04:15 7 9 16:15 215 235 • 04:30 14 9 16:30 222 201 04:45 5 41 21 so 91 16:45 238 885 210 837 1722 • 05:00 19 27 17:00 220 202 • 05:15 31 24 17:15 228 189 05:30 39 44 17:30 212 212 • 05:45 33 122 65 160 282 17:45 209 869 188 791 1660 06 :00 34 69 18:00 240 185 06:15 58 82 18:15 226 173 06:30 89 105 18:30 201 165 06:45 97 278 122 378 656 18:45 214 881 177 700 1581 07:00 139 151 19:00 175 136 • 07:15 129 195 19:15 158 122 07:30 138 191 19:30 142 99 • 07:45 105 511 212 749 1260 19:45 138 613 116 473 1086 • 08:00 116 168 20:00 140 88 08:15 120 210 20:15 139 105 • 08:30 128 188 20:30 114 75 08:45 115 479 205 771 1250 20:45 108 501 84 352 853 • 09:00 198 194 21:00 95 83 • 09:15 161 181 21:15 108 82 09:30 134 207 21:30 95 51 09:45 143 636 195 777 1413 21:45 92 390 52 268 658 • 10:00 182 199 22:00 58 49 10:15 152 178 22:15 70 35 • 10:30 169 213 22:30 59 24 10:45 189 692 222 812 1504 22:45 41 228 19 127 355 • 11:00 201 209 23:00 40 31 11:15 190 203 23:15 41 24 11:30 197 194 23:30 34 26 11:45 201 789 237 843 1632 23:45 23 138 12 93 231 Total Vol. 3721 4644 8365 7996 6944 14940 Daily Totals NB SB EB WB Combined 11717 11588 23305 AM PM Split 0/o 44.5% 55.5°/o 35.9% 53.5% 46.5% 64.1% Peak Hour ·11:45 11:45 11:45 14:00 14:30 14:15 Volume B?6 . 911 1787 946 887 1799 P.H.F. 0.92 0.96 0.98 0.95 0.94 0.96 PACIFIC TECHNICAL DATA TUESDAY -OCTOBER 13, 2015 CITY: CARLSBAD PROJECT: PTDlS-1006-01 • CARLSBAD VILLAGE -IS SB RAMPS & PROJECT DWY AM PeriQg NB SB EB WB PM Periog NB SB EB we • 00:00 32 19 12:00 274 286 • 00:15 25 16 12:15 295 284 00:30 14 15 12:30 312 240 00:45 23 94 10 60 154 12:45 254 1135 259 1069 2204 01:00 10 12 13:00 279 235 • 01:15 5 8 13:15 228 226 01:30 18 7 13:30 241 223 01:45 16 49 14 41 90 13:45 247 995 227 911 1906 • 02:00 13 8 14:00 302 222 • 02:15 15 10 14:15 265 226 02:30 9 8 14:30 265 258 • 02:45 12 49 3 29 78 14:45 275 1107 258 964 2071 03:00 3 15:00 262 236 • 03:15 8 3 15:15 241 255 03:30 8 16 15:30 269 230 03:45 7 24 5 27 51 15:45 258 1030 286 1007 2037 • 04:00 12 15 16:00 251 244 • 04:15 13 10 16:15 244 289 04:30 16 9 16:30 268 288 • 04:45 10 51 29 63 114 16:45 277 1040 275 1096 2136 05:00 24 36 17:00 265 268 • 05:15 24 36 17:15 252 235 • 05:30 45 56 17:30 284 242 05:45 47 140 75 203 343 17:45 253 1054 262 1007 2061 • 06:00 67 60 18:00 313 240 • 06:15 81 73 18:15 226 201 06:30 110 87 18:30 226 199 • 06:45 109 367 109 329 696 18:45 231 996 227 867 1863 07:00 121 121 19:00 223 210 • 07:15 128 218 19:15 208 160 • 07:30 135 206 19:30 172 153 07:45 129 513 202 747 1260 19:45 179 782 159 682 1464 • 08:00 122 168 20:00 174 122 • 08:15 125 210 20:15 159 139 08:30 135 223 20:30 154 98 • 08:45 154 536 268 869 1405 20:45 139 626 110 469 1095 09:00 217 255 21 :00 143 97 • 09:15 205 208 21 :15 122 106 09:30 175 237 21:30 144 83 09:45 184 781 260 960 1741 21 :45 100 509 69 355 864 10:00 199 236 22:00 80 63 10:15 217 224 22:15 95 40 10:30 221 245 22:30 65 36 10:45 222 859 257 962 1821 22:45 40 280 34 173 453 11:00 266 272 23:00 54 44 11:15 240 257 23:15 50 41 11:30 232 246 23:30 43 34 11:45 258 996 302 1077 2073 23:45 30 177 23 142 319 Total Vol. 4459 5367 9826 9731 8742 18473 Daily Totals NB SB EB WB Combined 14190 14109 28299 AM PM s lit% 45.4% 54. % 34.7% 52.7% 47.3% 65.3% Peak Hour 11:45 11:30 11:45. 12:15 16:15 12:00 Volume 1139 1118 2251 1140 1120 2204 P.1:1.F, 0.91 0.93 0.97 Q._91 0.97 .!).95 PACIFIC TECHNICAL DATA TUESDAY -OCTOBER 13, 2015 CITY: CARLSBAD PROJECT: PTD 15-1006-01 CARLSBAD VILLAGE -PROJECT DWY & HARDING • AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB • 00:00 24 22 12:00 250 296 00:15 22 19 12:15 293 313 • 00:30 13 14 12:30 294 244 • 00:45 20 79 11 66 145 12:45 242 1079 265 1118 2197 01:00 9 11 13:00 262 248 • 01:15 10 8 13:15 223 216 01:30 11 6 13:30 232 217 • 01:45 14 44 13 38 82 13:45 243 960 218 899 1859 • 02:00 10 7 14:00 264 211 02:15 15 11 14:15 244 225 • 02:30 10 9 14:30 255 232 • 02:45 13 48 4 31 79 14:45 239 1002 258 926 1928 03:00 2 3 15:00 260 239 • 03:15 6 2 15:15 234 256 03:30 8 8 15:30 267 231 • 03:45 7 23 8 21 44 15:45 250 1011 308 1034 2045 • 04:00 13 13 16:00 251 212 04:15 12 9 16:15 235 244 • 04:30 19 14 16:30 268 251 • 04:45 9 53 17 53 106 16:45 266 1020 256 963 1983 05:00 22 43 17:00 275 242 05:15 20 32 17:15 244 205 05:30 42 44 17:30 266 242 05:45 45 129 78 197 326 17:45 245 1030 221 910 1940 06:00 61 68 18:00 282 255 06:15 73 78 18:15 212 231 06:30 108 92 18:30 226 245 06:45 109 351 106 344 695 18:45 228 948 251 982 1930 07:00 129 115 19:00 205 243 07:15 113 181 19:15 204 194 07:30 143 180 19:30 162 190 07:45 117 502 195 671 1173 19:45 173 744 173 800 1544 08:00 116 141 20:00 160 137 08:15 129 184 20:15 161 166 08:30 139 200 20:30 149 119 08:45 166 550 251 776 1326 20:45 139 609 139 561 1170 09:00 205 284 21:00 148 115 09:15 208 220 21 :15 117 122 09:30 175 255 21:30 140 97 09:45 195 783 291 1050 1833 21:45 90 495 77 411 906 10:00 194 259 22:00 88 79 10:15 228 240 22:15 79 43 10:30 203 272 22:30 70 41 10:45 228 853 267 1038 1891 22:45 41 278 43 206 484 11 :00 246 290 23:00 50 53 11:15 242 283 23:15 44 37 11:30 237 244 23:30 41 45 11:45 249 974 305 1122 2096 23 :45 27 162 23 158 320 Total Vol. 4389 5407 9796 9338 8968 18306 Daily Totals NB SB EB WB Combined 13727 14375 28102 AM PM Split % 44.8% 55.2% 34.9% SL0% 49,0% 65.1% Peak Hour 11:45 11:30 11:45 12:15 12:00 12:00 Volume 1086 1158 ·2244 1091 1118 2197 P.H.F. 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.89 0.91 PACIFIC TECHNICAL DATA I I I TUESDAY • OCTOBER 13, 2015 CITY: CARLSBAD PROJECT: PTDlS-1006-01 • CARLSBAD VILLAGE -HARDING & JEFFERSON 8M PftiQQ r:m ~B EB WB PM Period NB SB EB w~ • 00:00 27 12 12:00 195 212 • 00:15 21 8 12:15 184 192 00:30 8 13 12:30 216 167 • 00:45 16 72 3 36 108 12:45 205 800 188 759 1559 • 01:00 7 3 13:00 210 178 01:15 5 8 13:15 184 168 01 :30 12 5 13:30 177 152 01:45 10 34 7 23 57 13:45 195 766 150 648 1414 • 02 :00 4 4 14:00 165 162 • 02:15 11 8 14:15 171 168 02:30 8 6 14:30 162 156 • 02:45 9 32 3 21 53 14:45 142 640 193 679 1319 • 03:00 2 2 15:00 155 173 03:15 4 1 15:15 154 184 03:30 6 5 15:30 170 152 03:45 2 14 2 10 24 15:45 161 640 213 722 1362 04:00 6 11 16:00 168 170 • 04:15 11 7 16:15 177 161 04:30 8 8 16:30 212 215 • 04:45 9 34 11 37 71 16:45 215 772 184 730 1502 • 05:00 16 25 17:00 202 177 05:15 14 20 17:15 180 174 • 05:30 25 24 17:30 198 189 05:45 28 83 44 113 196 17:45 191 771 161 701 1472 • 06:00 41 38 18:00 210 149 • 06:15 49 47 18:15 198 145 06:30 70 54 18:30 179 163 • 06:45 75 235 70 209 444 18:45 215 802 155 612 1414 • 07:00 98 90 19:00 198 155 07:15 77 140 19:15 180 115 • 07:30 91 168 19:30 146 109 07:45 84 350 141 539 889 19:45 127 651 106 485 1136 • 08:00 81 105 20:00 139 83 • 08:15 105 155 20:15 146 89 08:30 95 131 20:30 110 67 • 08:45 121 402 168 559 961 20:45 117 512 77 316 828 • 09:00 152 188 21:00 117 56 09:15 167 148 21:15 111 82 • 09:30 149 165 21:30 111 39 09:45 141 609 192 693 1302 21:45 77 416 47 224 640 • 10:00 175 184 22:00 69 48 • 10:15 166 162 22:15 73 27 10:30 195 198 22:30 61 26 • 10:45 205 741 192 736 1477 22:45 36 239 13 114 353 11:00 194 194 23:00 36 27 • 11:15 190 197 23:15 40 21 • 11:30 217 195 23:30 33 17 11:45 197 798 215 801 1599 23:45 18 127 7 72 199 Total Vol. 3404 3777 7181 7136 6062 13198 Daily Totals NB SB EB WB Combined 10540 9839 20379 AM PM 47.4% 52.6% 35.2% 54.1% 45.9% 64.8% Peak Hour 10:45 11:15 11:15 12:15 12:00 1.2:00 Volume 806 819 1618 815 759 1559 P.H.F. 0.93 0.95 0,98 0.94 0.90 0.96 PACTFIC TECHNICAL DATA • TUESDAY -OCTOBER 13, 2015 CITY: CARLSBAD PROJECT: PTDlS-1006-01 HARDING -CARLSBAD VILLAGE & GRAND AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB • 00:00 8 1 12:00 52 50 00:15 4 3 12:15 55 34 • 00:30 0 5 12:30 55 56 • 00:45 2 14 4 13 27 12:45 52 214 43 183 397 01:00 2 3 13:00 51 36 • 01:15 0 2 13:15 38 38 01 :30 0 2 13:30 43 27 • 01 :45 2 4 3 10 14 13:45 41 173 32 133 306 • 02:00 0 1 14:00 40 43 02:15 1 1 14:15 42 46 • 02:30 0 2 14:30 57 28 • 02:45 1 2 3 7 9 14:45 65 204 44 161 365 03:00 1 0 15:00 52 41 • 03:15 1 1 15:15 40 30 03:30 4 1 15:30 55 42 • 03:45 2 8 1 3 11 15:45 40 187 42 155 342 04:00 0 3 16:00 34 41 04:15 0 3 16:15 66 44 04:30 1 s 16:30 51 58 04:45 3 4 1 12 16 16:45 so 201 40 183 384 05:00 6 2 17:00 66 59 05:15 3 4 17:15 53 49 05:30 s 8 17:30 54 55 05:45 11 25 8 22 47 17:45 44 217 46 209 426 06:00 6 15 18:00 46 47 06:15 11 12 18:15 39 34 06:30 17 18 18:30 34 32 06:45 15 49 19 64 113 18:45 39 158 28 141 299 07:00 24 30 19:00 35 22 07:15 33 21 19:15 34 20 07:30 38 33 19:30 37 24 07:45 51 146 31 115 261 19:45 26 132 38 104 236 08 :00 40 33 20:00 30 21 08 :15 31 18 20:15 24 17 08:30 40 28 20:30 18 21 08:45 32 143 26 105 248 20:45 13 85 11 70 155 09:00 51 36 21:00 20 19 09:15 32 37 21: 15 16 19 09:30 so 39 21:30 22 20 09:45 48 181 33 145 326 21:45 6 64 6 64 128 10:00 36 36 22:00 6 18 10:15 38 38 22:15 10 4 10:30 35 42 22:30 7 14 10:45 51 160 32 148 308 22:45 12 35 10 46 81 11:00 62 39 23:00 10 9 11:15 46 33 23:15 3 4 11:30 44 37 23:30 9 6 11:45 39 191 31 140 331 23:45 9 31 3 22 53 Total Vol. 927 784 1711 1701 1471 3172 Daily Totals NB SB EB WB Combined 2628 2255 4883 AM PM Split 0/o ·54.2% 45.8% ··3s,0% 53.6% 46.4% 65.0% Peak Hour 10:45 11:45 11:45 16:15 17:00 16:15 Volume 203 171 372 233 209 434 P.H.F, 0.82 0.76 0.84 0.82 0.89 0.87 PACIFIC TECHNICAL DATA I TUESDAY -OCTOBER 13, 20 15 CITY: CARLSBAD PROJECT: PTO 15-1006-01 GRAND -HOPE & PROJECT SITE 8M Period NB SB EB WB PM Pgriod NB SB EB w~ 00:00 1 1 12:00 4 2 00:15 1 0 12:15 6 5 00:30 0 3 12:30 6 5 • 00:45 4 6 3 7 13 12:45 5 21 4 16 37 • 01:00 1 2 13:00 10 4 01:15 1 0 13:15 5 3 • 01:30 1 0 13:30 0 0 01:45 0 3 0 2 5 13:45 1 16 4 11 27 02:00 0 0 14:00 7 3 02:15 1 0 14:15 9 3 02:30 0 0 14:30 5 5 02:45 2 3 1 4 14:45 9 30 4 15 45 • 03:00 1 0 15:00 5 3 03:15 1 15:15 5 4 • 03:30 1 15:30 5 4 03:45 0 3 l 3 6 15:45 11 26 8 19 45 • 04:00 1 0 16:00 5 2 • 04:15 1 0 16:15 5 6 04:30 0 16:30 4 8 • 04:45 2 4 2 3 7 16:45 6 20 7 23 43 • 05 :00 1 0 17:00 9 8 05:15 2 2 17:15 5 2 • 05:30 1 0 17:30 3 4 05:45 2 6 0 2 8 17:45 5 22 4 · 18 40 • 06:00 5 18:00 5 3 06:15 6 2 18:15 4 8 06:30 6 2 18:30 8 8 • 06:45 4 21 2 7 28 18:45 6 23 5 24 47 07:00 6 3 19:00 5 3 07:15 3 3 19:15 2 6 07:30 10 19:30 1 0 07:45 4 23 8 31 19:45 7 15 7 16 31 • 08:00 9 4 20:00 1 4 08:15 8 2 20:15 1 2 08 :30 7 1 20:30 2 1 • 08:45 6 30 3 10 40 20:45 4 8 3 10 18 09:00 2 6 21:00 6 5 • 09:15 8 7 21:15 5 3 09:30 6 2 21:30 2 2 09:45 7 23 5 20 43 21:45 2 15 8 18 33 • 10:00 11 2 22:00 3 1 10:15 4 2 22:15 1 3 10:30 6 7 22:30 3 4 10:45 5 26 4 15 41 22:45 2 9 2 10 19 11:00 8 5 23:00 6 0 11:15 9 1 23:15 2 1 • 11:30 4 9 23:30 0 2 11:45 8 29 5 20 49 23:45 0 8 2 5 13 • Total Vol. 177 98 275 213 185 398 • Daily Totals • NB SB EB WB Combined 390 283 673 AM PM SJ,?li t% 64.4% 35.6% 40.9% 53.5% 46.5% 59.1% • Peak Hour 09:15 11:30 11:00 14:00 16:15 16:15 Volume 32 21 49 30 29 53 P.H.F. 0,73 0.58 0.94 0.83 0.91 0.78 PACIFIC TECHNICAL DATA • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • :E ct :E a. :t ct :t a. DATE: 10/13/15 TUESDAY LANES: 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM VOLUMES APPROACH% APP/DEPART BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES APPROACH% PEAK HR FACTOR APP/DEPART 4:00 PM 4:15 PM ·-····-············ 4:30 PM ·······-· 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45PM VOLUMES APPROACH% APP/DEPART BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES APPROACH% PEAK HR FACTOR APP/DEPART INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: PACIFIC TECHNICAL DATA LOCATION: NORTH & SOUTH: EAST& WEST: CARLSBAD 1-5 NB RAMPS CARLSBAD VILLAGE PROJECT#: LOCATION#: CONTROL: PDTlS-1016-01 2 SIGNAL l~~''.8 T NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 1-5 NB RAMPS 1·5 NS RAMPS CARLSBAD VILLAGE CAR158AD VIUAGE NL I NT I NR SL I ST I SR EL I ET I ER WL I WT I WR 0.5 0.5 1 X X X 1 2 X X 2 0 23 0 87 56 79 134 37 48 0 65 so 73 141 72 52 0 22 73 63 143 43 78 0 38 so 58 134 51 48 2 37 47 I 70 109 31 --· 53 0 34 48 65 152 39 76 0 38 53 77 109 41 82 0 32 56 55 125 35 460 2 353 0 0 0 433 540 0 0 1,047 349 56% 0% 43% 0% 0% 0% 45% 55% 0% 0% 75% 25% 815 I 784 0 I 0 973 I 893 1 396 I 1 507 7:00 AM 201 0 212 0 0 0 229 273 0 0 552 203 49% 0% 51% 0% 0% 0% 46% 54% 0% 0% 73% 27% 0.890 0.000 0.923 0.886 413 I 432 0 I 0 502 I 485 755 I 753 76 0 48 85 I 121 117 33 94 0 42 93 121 129 42 --··· ...... ... ········· --·····-·· 84 I . .... 0 47 ...... ................. ....... 91 127 116 39 72 0 53 105 128 141 40 68 1 56 86 130 138 51 65 0 47 78 148 118 40 71 0 48 73 143 144 41 65 1 59 82 I 138 107 I 36 595 2 400 0 0 0 693 1,056 0 0 1,010 322 60% 0% 40% 0% 0% 0% 40% 60% 0% 0% 76% 24% 997 I 1017 0 I 0 1 749 I 1,456 1332 I 1 605 4:15 PM 318 1 198 0 0 0 375 506 0 0 524 172 62% 0% 38% 0% 0% 0% 43% 57% 0% 0% 75% 25% 0.950 0.000 0.945 0.921 517 I 548 0 I 0 881 I 704 696 I 842 1-5 NB RAMPS --------~-NORTH SIDE-+~-------- i i CARLSBAD VILLAGE WEST SIDE EAST SIDE CARLSBAD VILLAGE 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM ,,, _________ 8:45 AM TOTAL 4:00 PM 4: 15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM ....... 5:00.PM .... 5:15 PM 5:30 PM ··-···-··--· 5:45 PM TOTAL ! +--SOUTH SIDE-+ 1-5 NB RAMPS PEDESTRIAN CROSSI NGS N SIDE S SIDE I E SIDE I W SIDE TOTAL 4 1 I 5 1 __ ._1 __ _ 1 1 2 2 1 1 ·- 1 3 4 1 ··---y-- 1 ·1 -· 8 8 0 0 16 0 2 2 0 ,------+----+-----1-··· 0 -0 3 3 1 1 -··o··· 1 5 0 0 6 ! PEDESTRIAN ACTIVATIONS N SIDE I S SIDE E SIDE I W SIDE TOTAL 0 , __ __,_ ________ ~_~o __ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -o-· 0 ----+---+---+---____ o --o 0 ,---·---+---+----+-~0-0 0 0 0 0 0 U-TURNS TOTAL ~B I SB EB I WB TTL X X X 416 I 0 449 I ··--o-··- 396 0 409 0 344 0 391 0 394 0 385 0 3,184 0 0 I 0 I 0 0 0 1,670 0.930 0 480 0 521 0 .,. ................... 504 0 539 0 --530 0 496 0 520 0 488 0 4,078 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 0 2,094 0.971 0 BICYCLE CROSSI NGS NS I 55 I ES I WS TOTAL >----+--+--+---•--· 0 --·-0 l---+--+--+---1·--°---0 O----+--+--+---t--0- 0 1 I O I O I 0 0 l---····>···-·--+--+---1----·0 ... 0 0 7 ··-· 0 o I 1 I o I o PACIFICTEC TURNING MOV HNICAL DATA EMENT COUNTS 1-5 NB RAMPS CARLSBAD PDT15-1016-01 ALL HOURS PEAK HOUR AM 7:00AM PM 4:15 PM •. ~UcP PM Total j 1-5 NB RAMPS LJ 0 -i ~ ~ s > r c=> [ill] 00 . t (0 c=> LJ 0 -i > "O 0 ;:: s:: > r c=> ~~ ~ (0 c=> ~ ;:o ,-en OJ ► C s ,- !;: G) m ~ ;:o ,-en ~ 0 s ,-> G) m • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • CARLSBAD VILLAGE u, 0. ::r ~ ca z II) I ,.. A NORTH < WEST !NORTH/SOUTH STREET !I-5 NB RAMPS I EAST /WEST STREET !CARLSBAD VILLAGE NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR 0700 ·---t······-·-············--·-···1---•---f--------+---_._-----+---- ··--------1-----l---~--_...---1----1----1---l---+---I 1600 ll----l·---l··········--·-············!-----ll---l---+----t---+---t------i------1---1 1-----1·---l----l-········-···----+----1-----11-----t----+----t----+---t---l ----1----J---t----+-----t•---••••"• .. ••• .. •mn-.. ,1---11------<f------i---•------f----ll . ......... ·············-----•----l----f----_...---1----~------t----f---1 ■---0----+---1~------t···· ····················· ···························· ·················· ··· ·· ....... -----·-·l---1·········-············· .. ···t-----t----■ :t < :t Cl. DATE: 10/13/15 TUESDAY LANES: 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM VOLUMES APPROACH % APP/DEPART BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES APPROACH % PEAK HR FACTOR APP/DEPART 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM --5:45 PM VOLUMES APPROACH % APP/DEPART BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES APPROACH % PEAK HR FACTOR APP/DEPART INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: PACIFIC TECHNICAL DATA LOCATION: NORTH & SOUTH: EAST & WEST: CARLSBAD l-5SB RAMPS CARLSBAD VILLAGE PROJECT #: LOCATION#: CONTROL: PDT15-1016-01 3 SIGNAL ~F" T NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND I·S SB RAMPS l·S SB RAMPS CARl58AD Vll.lAGE CARl.SBAD VII.IJ\GE NL NT I NR SL I ST SR EL I ET ER WL I WT WR X X X 1.3 0.3 0.3 X 2 0 1 2 X 28 0 37 102 43 64 93 35 4 70 96 42 49 138 27 0 64 99 59 61 127 25 0 69 84 46 60 148 27 0 52 90 40 54 109 28 0 57 85 49 46 152 25 0 84 107 47 45 140 16 I 0 105 93 59 40 167 0 0 0 211 4 538 0 756 385 419 1,074 0 0% 0% 0% 28% 1% 71% 0% 66% 34% 28% 72% 0% 0 I 0 753 I 808 1141 I 967 1493 I 1612 8:00 AM 0 0 0 96 0 298 0 375 195 185 568 0 0% 0% 0% 24% 0% 76% 0% 66% 34% 25% 75% 0% 0.000 0.814 0.925 0.909 0 I 0 394 I 380 570 I 471 753 I 866 39 0 83 167 85 38 168 31 0 89 182 75 38 176 26 0 107 188 108 32 154 ........... .., . .,_ .. 20 0 99 196 86 28 174 22 0 77 204 87 31 188 33 0 83 186 76 38 146 24 0 91 198 77 34 162 23 0 110 194 78 31 157 0 0 0 218 0 739 0 1,515 672 270 1,325 0 0% 0% 0% 23% 0% 77% 0% 69% 31% 17% 83% 0% 0 I 0 957 I 942 2187 I 1,733 1 595 I 2 064 4:15 PM 0 0 0 99 0 372 0 770 356 129 692 0 0% 0% 0% 21% 0% 79% 0% 68% 32% 16% 84% 0% 0.000 0.885 0.951 0.937 0 I 0 471 I 485 1126 I 869 821 I 1064 1-5 SB RAMPS .--NORTH SIDE --------~ ~-------t t CARLSBAD VILLAGE WEST SIDE EAST SIDE CARLSBAD VILLAGE 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM ~ ......... 8:00AM. 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM TOTAL .1:QQYM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5: 15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM TOTAL ! .--SOUTH SIDE-1 I-5 SB RAMPS PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS N SIDE S SIDE I E SIDE I W SIDE TOTAL 1 1 2 l----+----'2=---t---+-----1 .... 1:. 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1---+-2 1--t---+----1---l .. _ •---+~~-+---+----• _L __ 4 4 2 14 I 0 2 4 3 2 19 I 0 16 1 --·· .. -s - 0 2 2 4 4 0 4 22 i PEDESTRIAN ACTIVATIONS N SIDE j S SIDE E SIDE W SIDE TOTAL 0 ·-o- 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 ----··-·--··· ···-····· .. -+----+---t--- 1----+---+---+----1--□-·-·-0 •---+---+---+----•-.9 __ 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 367 434 437 432 372 417 448 480 3,387 0 1,717 0.894 0 580 591 615 ·-~ 609 562 586 593 4,739 0 2,418 0.983 0 U-TURNS Nx8 I SB I EB I WB m X X X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D I o I o I o 0 0 0 0 --0 ..... 0 0 0 I I 0 0 I o I o I 0 0 BICYCLE CROSSINGS NS I ss ES I WS TOTAL 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 I 1 I 0 I 0 4 0 0 ···---1 2 3 0 0 1 6 7 ----···· 1 1 1 1 3 I 9 I 0 I 0 12 • • • • • • • • • a • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ¢=:J fglfi[;l ~L:i:J PACIFIC TEC TURNING MOV HNICAL DATA EMENT COUNTS CARLSBAD PDT15-1016-01 ALL HOURS • RAMPS TOTAL PM D, cs AM PEAK HOUR AM 8:00 AM PM 4:15 PM ~ ~ ~ c==> [ill] 00 c:=) LJ CARLSBAD VILLAGE !NORTH/SOUTH STREET !I-5 SB RAMPS !CARLSBAD VILLAGE !EAST/WEST STREET NL NT I NR SL I 0700 ST SR EL I ET ER A NORTH < WEST WL WT WR -----------------------------------------------■---+----1-------------■---+---l---■---t-----l -----ll •---1···············-·················-······· 1600 ----+------ll------+----1------+----+----------+---+-----+----■ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2: < :t 0. ~ 10/13/15 TUESDAY LANES: 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM VOLUMES APPROACH % APP/DEPART BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES APPROACH% PEAK HR FACTOR APP/DEPART 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM VOLUMES APPROACH% APP/DEPART BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES APPROACH% PEAK HR FACTOR APP/DEPART INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS LOCATION : NORTH & SOUTH: EAST& WEST: NORTHBOUND PROJECTDWY NL I NT NR 0 1 0 1 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 0 8 0 0 7 0 0 9 1 0 57 2% 0% 98% 58 I 51 8:00 AM 0 0 31 0% 0% 100% 0.861 31 I 23 0 0 11 0 1 15 0 1 14 0 1 24 0 0 9 0 0 14 0 0 12 0 0 17 0 3 116 0% 3% 97% 119 I 52 4:15 PM 0 3 62 0% 5% 95% 0.650 65 I 26 PREPARED BY: PACIFIC TECHNICAL DATA CARLSBAD PROJECT#: PROJECT DWY LOCATION #: CARLSBAD VILLAGE CONTROL: PDT15-1016-01 4 NONE 09◄ T SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PROJECTOWV CARLSBAD 1/IUAGE CARLSBAD \/lllAGE SL I ST I SR EL ET I ER WL I WT I WR 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 15 115 1 19 110 0 0 0 3 2 116 2 19 180 3 --0 0 2 1 130 2 16 174 0 0 0 2 5 107 1 17 191 2 0 0 1 2 112 2 21 137 0 0 0 1 7 115 4 24 176 1 0 0 1 6 127 3 34 195 2 0 0 2 3 146 4 27 244 2 0 0 14 41 968 19 177 1,407 10 0% 0% 100% 4% 94% 2% 11% 88% 1% 14 I 196 1028 I 1 025 1594 I 1422 0 0 5 18 500 13 106 752 5 0% 0% 100% 3% 94% 2% 12% 87% 1% 0.625 0.868 0.790 5 I 119 531 I 531 863 I 757 0 0 1 2 236 I 6 23 215 I 2 0 0 1 4 217 3 31 239 2 0 0 1 0 257 9 28 251 1 0 0 2 4 248 5 20 242 4 0 0 1 6 251 12 23 237 2 0 0 1 7 234 6 22 205 2 0 0 1 ---0 259 7 22 238 +--~-----0 0 ------2-5 231 6 ------2i--224 0 0 10 28 1,933 54 196 1,851 21 0% 0% 100% 1% 96% 3% 9% 90% 1% 10 I 250 2 015 I 2 049 2 068 I 1,861 0 0 5 14 973 29 102 969 9 0% 0% 100% 1% 96% 3% 9% 90% 1% 0.625 0.944 0.964 5 I 131 1 016 I 1 035 .1 080 I 974 PROJECT DWY ________ _,.--NORTH SIDE--+~-------- CARLSBAD VILLAGE 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM ~ ,_---=-8=:0-"--0-'--'A'-'M---l 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM TOTAL 4:00 PM ---~---4:15 PM 4:30 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM TOTAL i WEST SIDE ! -SOUTH SIDE__. PROJECT DWY PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS N SIDE I S SIDE [ E SIDE [ W SIDE TOTAL 3 4 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 6 1 1 --2- 8 I 10 23 1 1 1 3 2 ___ 4______ 1 1 6 __ l _ __ 2 ··--. ---2'---+----=---1 -S- -2='--+----=5--+--c2c--t 9-- 0 1 2 6 8 10 4 28 i EAST SIDE CARLSBAD VILLAGE ! PEDESTRIAN ACTIVATIONS N SIDE [ S SIDE [ E SIDE W SIDE TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------· -----+--- 0 0 0 I O 0 U·TURNS TOTAL ~, SB I EB I ~B TTL X X 274 0 326 o __ 333 0 331 0 282 ---0- 336 0 375 437 f---··-0 0 2,694 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 0 1,430 0.818 0 496 0 513 I __ o ___ 562 I 0 550 I 0 541 --0- 491 I __ ..Q_ 541 0 518 _______ o ______ 4,212 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 0 2,166 0.964 0 BICYCLE CROSSINGS NS I ss ES I ws TOTAL 3 3 -0 1 1 0 --0 -- 0 0 1 0 I 3 I 1 5 0 .............................. 0 _J ___ _j___ 1 o I t 4 2 7 (==:] 00 [fill (==:] (==:] ~~ (==:] PACIFIC TEC TURNING MOV:NICAL DATA MENTCOUNTS PROJECTDWY I A i~ i T:;AL 1} i :; i 1} CARLSBAD PDT15-1016-01 ALL HOURS := 1(1~ IU: TOTAi. I 1 I : 116 I ROJECT DWY I TOTAL <0 cs:Ui~iLJ AM 8:00AM PM 4:15 PM PROJECT DWY 3 I 93 LJ LJ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • CARLSBAD VILLAGE !NORTH/SOUTH STREET !PROJECT DWY I EAST /WEST STREET !CARLSBAD VILLAGE NL NT NR SL I ST SR 0700 EL ~ 0 t; w a C: a. ET ER A NORTH < WEST WL WT I WR ---1·-·-··--··-·-··--·----------+------l---+---t----t----t------1----+---1 1600 0----11----1 ----1·········-····----+----+----1---1-----+---¼----l---+----II INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: PACIFIC TECHNICAL DATA :E DATE: 10/13/15 TUESDAY I NOTES LANES: 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM --8:i5AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM °' VOLUMES APPROACH % APP/DEPART BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES APPROACH % PEAK HR FACTOR APP/DEPART 4:00 PM 4:15 PM ·····-........ 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM :E 5:45 PM c.. VOLUMES APPROACH % APP/DEPART BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES APPROACH % PEAK HR FACTOR APP/DEPART LOCATION: NORTH & SOUTH: EAST& WEST: NORTHBOUND HARDING NL I NT I NR 0 1 0 6 9 17 5 11 18 11 14 22 4 23 17 4 23 14 ·---·•·····•···· 5 9 16 5 17 25 5 17 21 45 123 150 14% 39% 47% 318 I 293 8:00 AM 19 66 76 12% 41% 47% 0.856 161 I 144 10 10 I 39 10 20 21 ......... 7 18 29 6 21 25 4 17 33 5 13 31 9 24 25 8 21 20 59 144 223 14% 34% 52% 426 I 431 4:15 PM 27 76 108 13% 36% 51% 0.977 211 I 236 CARLSBAD HARDING CARLSBAD VILLAGE SOUTHBOUND HARDING SL ST I SR 0 I l 0 21 I 6 3 13 ' 6 1 21 I 7 1 23 I 2 3 18 6 4 12 I 4 2 16 I 9 0 13 I 6 3 137 46 17 69% 23% 9% 200 I 309 59 25 9 63% 27% 10% 0.830 93 I 179 31 I 5 4 23 I 19 1 41 I 11 3 36 I 12 1 41 I 13 1 33 I 12 2 41 8 1 36 9 2 282 89 15 73% 23% 4% 386 I 386 141 55 6 70% 27% 3% 0.918 202 I 195 HARDING EL 1 3 0 3 3 4 1 1 1 16 2% 757 7 2% 412 5 6 7 4 7 7 9 2 47 3% 1512 24 3% 780 PROJECT #: LOCATION #: CONTROL: PDT15-1016--01 5 SIGNAL ~ ,, EASTBOUND WESTBOUND CARl.58AD VIUAGE CARLSBAD VIUAGE ET I ER WL WT I WR 2 0 1 2 0 86 8 15 83 11 70 5 27 139 24 89 5 19 149 20 70 3 27 123 28 n 5 24 100 17 94 8 25 134 14 93 3 33 132 24 117 8 48 149 16 696 45 218 1,009 154 92% 6% 16% 73% 11% I 983 1,381 I 1071 381 24 130 515 71 92% 6% 18% 72% 10% 0.817 0.840 I 516 716 I 543 138 8 31 156 23 .... 163 5 35 157 I 41 201 1 28 192 25 194 12 23 167 34 175 5 31 170 36 174 6 19 164 32 179 9 31 173 24 185 10 43 156 25 1,409 56 241 1,335 240 93% 4% 13% 74% 13% I 1,914 1 816 I 1,409 733 23 117 686 136 94% 3% 12% 73% 14% 0.929 0.958 I 982 939 I 719 _______ __,+--NORTH SIDE--+ .__ ______ _ CARLSBAD VILLAGE 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM ~ _ ..... J!_:O_O_A_M _ __, 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM TOTAL 4:00 PM 1-----·-···-· 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM ~ ,_~5~:0~0 PM .... 5:15 PM ....... 5:30 PM 5:45 PM TOTAL t WEST SIDE L +--SOUTH SIDE--+ HARDING PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS N SIDE s SIDE I E SIDE I W SIDE TOTAL 3 5 0 0 8 4 2 3 2 11 3 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 2 ........ -5- 3 1 1 5 10 4 0 0 3 7 3 2 1 0 6 ---·-· 8 2 l 3 14 29 I 13 I 7 I 15 64 9 1 0 4 14 -3-· ..... ,, ... ,,,. ....... ··--·····-· 1 0 0 4 4 4 1 2 ....... 11 3 s l 6 15 -· 13 0 7 2 22 9 6 3 2 20 5 l 0 0 6 3 l 0 0 4 49 I 19 I 12 I 16 96 t EAST SIDE CARLSBAD VILLAGE L PEDESTRIAN ACTIVATIONS N SIDE I s SIDE I E SIDE I W SIDE TOTAL ......... ........ o 0 0 .. 0. 0 0 0 ·--------0 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 --+-0 0 0 0 0 0 ······-·---0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 268 319 361 326 296 324 358 404 2,656 0 1,382 0.855 0 460 501 563 535 533 498-- 533 517 4,140 0 2,132 0.947 0 U-TURNS ~B I s: I EB I WB TTL X X I 2 2 7 7 5 5 5 5 2 2 3 2 5 4 4 7 7 O I o I 5 I 32 37 I 1 4 5 1 2 3 6 6 4 4 8 8 2 _2 __ 2 5 7 6 __ 6 ____ o I o I 4 I 37 41 BICYCLE CROSSINGS NS I ss I ES I WS TOTAL 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ·a 0 0 0 0 2 --T ·- 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 3 - 2 3 0 4 9 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 .... 1 0 0 J .. 0 1 0 0 ___ 1 ____ 4 2 0 1 . 7 _, ..... 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 5 I 7 0 4 16 • • • • • • • Cl • • • ~ e-1 -• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • w (!) :3 ..J > I 32 I ~~ PACIFIC TE TURNING MOeHNICAL DATA EMENT COUNTS HARDING I I TOTAL I~ I :: LJ I ::: I CARLSBAD PDT15-1016-01 ALL HOURS AM <=u D cP PM 45 1 HARDING (f I TOTAL --PM LJ ciid* DE:=] lJ cs AM PEAK HOUR AM 8:00AM PM 4:15PM AM <=u D cP PM 19 7 HAR LJ ~ ~ ~ c=,) moo c::=> ~ ~ 8 ► c=,) ~~ r==> CARLSBAD VILLAGE !NORTH/SOUTH STREET I EAST /WEST STREET NL NT I 0700 1600 !HARDING !CARLSBAD VILLAGE NR SL ST SR EL ET ER A NORTH < WEST WL WT WR t-------t----t----f---t---·t----+---1···-············----f----lf---1 --··········-·-···-····1---+----1---11---+----l----l·---+----lf---l ----l-----l-----1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ::E < ::E 0.. ::E < ::E 0.. DATE: 10/13/15 TUESDAY LANES: 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM ... ........ -.. 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM VOLUMES APPROACH% APP/DEPART BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES APPROACH% PEAK HR FACTOR APP/DEPART ·-·····4:00.PM .............. 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM VOLUMES APPROACH % APP/DEPART BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES APPROACH % PEAK HR FACTOR APP/DEPART INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS LOCATION: NORTH & SOUTH: EAST& WEST: NORTHBOUND JEFFERSON NL NT I NR 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 l 4 0 2 2 0 ·-.. 3 .. ·•··· l 0 1 3 0 2 3 1 5 9 2 I 6 8 3 22 32 5% 39% 56% 57 I 180 8:00 AM 3 14 23 8% 35% 58% 0.625 40 I 99 3 6 7 0 s 6 1 s 8 4 3 9 1 18 I 5 1 7 6 3 7 s 1 4 3 14 55 49 12% 47% 42% 118 I 292 4:15 PM 6 31 28 9% 48% 43% 0.677 65 I 152 PREPARED BY: PACIFIC TECHNICAL DATA CARLSBAD JEFFERSON CARLSBAD VILLAGE SOUTHBOUND JEFFERSON SL ST I SR 0 1 0 22 7 9 13 12 20 13 11 11 12 19 14 14 11 13 8 10 12 13 8 9 23 14 11 118 92 99 38% 30% 32% 309 I 139 58 43 45 40% 29% 31% 0.760 146 I 73 36 11 18 32 17 10 33 18 16 29 16 12 35 16 15 17 10 12 41 18 10 28 13 19 251 119 112 52% 25% 23% 482 I 161 129 67 53 52% 27% 21% 0.929 249 I 91 JEFFERSON EL 1 3 2 7 PROJECT#: LOCATION #: CONTROL: PDTlS-1016-01 6 SIGNAL .... N s 'Q1!llrEft' ., EASTBOUND WESTBOUND CARJ.58AD VJUAGE CARLSBAD VJUAGE I ET I ER WL I WT I WR 2 0 1 2 0 I 71 1 3 85 5 64 0 2 125 8 82 0 3 21 ........ ........ . .. I _121 6 62 l 7 I 116 21 ....... ......... _ . 7 79 2 6 94 16 5 88 2 5 121 13 6 78 2 6 111 16 12 105 2 5 121 10 48 629 10 37 900 110 7% 92% 1% 4% 86% 11% 687 I 779 1,047 I 1,002 30 350 8 22 447 55 8% 90% 2% 4% 85% 10% 0.815 0.942 388 I 431 524 I 495 24 141 1 5 151 I 21 19 153 0 9 148 14 11 161 0 6 i85 9 22 192 1 5 159 19 13 163 1 2 154 14 5 168 2 2 149 14 12 166 1 3 I 178 10 18 168 I 2 2 I 157 12 124 1,312 8 34 1,281 113 9% 91% 1% 2% 90% 8% 1444 I 1612 1,428 I 1407 65 669 2 22 646 56 9% 91% 0% 3% 89% 8% 0.856 0.905 736 I 826 724 I 705 -------~-NORTH SIDE___.~------- t i CARLSBAD VILLAGE WESTSIDE EAST SIDE CARLSBAD VILLAGE i .--SOUTH SIDE___. JEFFERSON PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS N SIDE I S SIDE I E SIDE I W SIDE TOTAL 7:00 AM ·-·-~·· .. 2 l 2 ... L·-··· 7:15 AM 4 1 0 1 6 7:30 AM 0 2 0 l 3 7:45 AM 1 2 1 0 4 8:00 AM 1 o o o ...... T--- 8:15 AM o 1 0 2 3 8:30 AM l 3 1 0 S ·······-8:45 AM 1 6 1 4 12 TOTAL 10 17 I 4 I 10 41 4:00 PM 8 4 2 7 21 ·-. 4:15 PM -2 0 0 2 ..... 4···-····· 4:30 PM 7 2 2 2 13 4:45 PM ·-3·---· __ .1 ·-L ,_ l __ -· 6·-····· 5:00 PM 6 6 2 2 16 -·-5:15 PM ·-4 ---·· 9 0 1 -·14···-- 5:30 PM 0 4 4 0 8 5:45PM 7 0 0 0 7 TOTAL 37 26 11 15 89 i PEDESTRIAN ACTIVATIONS N SIDE S SIDE I E SIDE I W SIDE TOTAL 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 --···---.-0- i 0 0 0 ·-o- 0 0 TOTAL 210 251 279 262 246 269 264 319 2,100 0 1,098 0.861 0 424 413 453 471 437 393 454 427 3,472 0 1,774 0.942 0 U-TURNS NB SB EB I WB TTL X X X X 0 0 0 ··-o- Q_ 0 0 0 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... 0 ·-·-·· 0 0 ---·-···-·· 0 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 BICYCLE CROSSINGS NS SS I ES WS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 I 1 I O 0 TOTAL 0 o· 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 .1 0 ... 2 ... T ·o o .... o 1 3 6 0 0 9 1 0 l O -2- 0 2 o o ······-2-· 5 1 11 2 0 18 -¢::=i fgl~ EJ rn PACIFIC TEC TURNING MOV~NICAL DATA MENTCOUNTS CARLSBAD PDT15-1016-01 ALL HOURS :1~1~1a:>1 TOTAL i 17 . 49 _ JEFFERSON M M PEAK HOUR AM 8:00AM PM 4:15 PM JEFFERSON 77 81 Drn LJ ~ ~ ~ c=> ~00 c=> • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • CARLSBAD VILLAGE I NORTH/SOUTH STREET I EAST /WEST STREET NL NT 0700 1600 !JEFFERSON !CARLSBAD VILLAGE NR SL ST SR EL z 0 CJ) a: ILi u. u. ILi ..., ET ER A NORTH < WEST WL WT WR ·············-··-······· -··-------t---1----1---+------lf------+---+----+---+------1---1 . ············-······•·-···1-----t---t--------------• -t---■---+----½----1---+----•···················----· . .......... --------·-·····---···-··-······-··--···1----■ ::E ~ 10/13/15 TUESDAY LANES: 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM Cl: VOLUMES APPROACH % APP/DEPART BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES APPROACH% PEAK HR FACTOR APP/DEPART 4:00 PM 4: 15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM ::E 5:45 PM Q. VOLUMES APPROACH% APP/DEPART BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES APPROACH% PEAK HR FACTOR APP/DEPART 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM ::E 8:00 AM < 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM TOTAL 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM ::E 5:00 PM a. 5:15 PM .. 5:30 PM 5:45 PM TOTAL INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: PACIFIC TECHNICAL DATA LOCATION: NORTH & SOUTH: EAST & WEST: NORTHBOUND HARDING NL I NT I NR 0 1 0 16 0 1 32 1 2 18 5 4 34 2 2 19 2 2 32 1 3 36 2 3 26 3 s 213 16 22 85% 6% 9% 251 I 27 7:45 AM 121 7 10 88% 5% 7% 0.841 138 I 13 21 2 5 60 2 4 40 2 5 47 1 8 44 l 12 40 0 2 43 3 4 38 2 6 333 13 46 85% 3% 12% 392 I 34 4:15 PM 191 6 29 85% 3% 13% 0.856 226 I 20 CARLSBAD HARDING GRAND SOUTHBOUND HARDING SL I ST I SR 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l 0 0% 100% 0% 1 I 198 0 1 0 0% 100% 0% 0.250 1 I 95 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 : 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 33% 67% 0% 3 I 316 1 1 0 50% 50% 0% 0.500 2 I 170 HARDING -NORTH SIDE__. PROJECT#: LOCATION#: CONTROL: , EASTBOUND GRANO EL I ET I ER WL 0 1 0 0 1 2 20 10 0 4 16 11 1 2 12 9 0 2 21 6 l 1 13 9 l 4 16 8 3 2 14 7 2 2 20 5 9 19 132 65 6% 12% 83% 48% 160 I 41 135 5 9 64 30 6% 12% 82% 45% 0.848 78 I 19 66 3 3 21 7 1 10 35 5 4 8 38 6 3 6 30 9 4 7 40 6 3 · 1 30 3 1 4 39 6 0 3 36 3 19 42 269 45 6% 13% 82% 40% 330 I 89 112 12 31 143 26 6% 17% 77% 41% 0.912 186 I 61 63 PDT15· 1016·01 7 STOP WESTBOUN D GRANO I WT WR 1 0 10 0 11 0 I 5 0 12 0 5 0 11 0 7 1 7 1 68 2 50% 1% I 281 35 1 53% 2% 0.868 I 156 6 I 0 9 1 I 8 0 9 l 9 0 7 0 11 0 6 0 65 2 58% 2% I 398 35 2 56% 3% 0.829 I 226 -------~ ~-------t GRAND WEST SIDE ! +-SOUTH SIDE__. HARDING PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS N SIDE [ S SIDE [ E SIDE I W SIDE TOTAL 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 ·T ·- 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 6 0 5 0 3 8 0 2 0 1 3 0 3 0 6 9 ·-0 16 0 2 18 1 I 29 I 2 I 16 48 _1 ___ 3 1 2 .. 7 ................ 2 6 0 3 11 0 1 0 1 2 0 7 0 3 10 0 2 2 0 ·•--4-· 0 2 0 l 3 3 3 1 2 9 0 l 1 1 3 6 I 25 I 5 13 49 t EAST SIDE GRAND ! PEDESTRIAN ACTIVATIONS N SIDE I S SIDE I E SIDE I W SIDE TOTAL 0 0 1----+---t---+---t-.9-~-= 2 ,_.l __ , 0 2 2 1---'4--+-----l---+---•-·-·~L-1 1 7 2 I 0 I 0 9 2 1 3 1 1 2 2 - 1 1 1 ____ l _____ _ 1 2 8 0 0 0 11 TOTAL 60 77 56 79 52 77 75 71 547 0 283 0.896 0 68 127 112 114 124 86 111 95 837 0 477 0.939 0 U·TURNS Nx8 I SB I EB I WB TTL X X X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I O I o I 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 I 0 2 I o I o I 0 2 BICYCLE CROSSINGS NS I ss ES ws TOTAL 0 1 0 0 1 J_L_ JL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L 0 0 0 0 0 I 1 I 0 0 1 L 1 0 0 __ _!__ ___ 0 0 0 0 _.Q__ ___ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 L 0 0 0 -·~a·-- 0 0 R 0 0 ·o 0 0 -·-o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PACIFIC TEC TURNING MOV HNICAL DATA EMENT COUNTS HARDING PM AM CARLSBAD PDT15-1016-01 ALL HOURS HARDING I O I 2 HARDING 2 -I 1 I I 1 I TOTAL dJ D 1cs1:: u BB PEAK HOUR AM 7:45 AM PM 4:15PM AM <=u D a=> PM 7 10 Total 6 13 D D GRAND !NORTH/SOUTH STREET !HARDING I EAST/WEST STREET !GRAND NL NT NR SL I ST I SR EL I I I I I I 0700 ············ ....... 1600 ........ ·-·· ET I ER I ·- /\ NORTH < WEST WL I WT I I ········-· ··············-··-···················- WR • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Row 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F • ••• INTERSECTION: CVD & Harding Group Assignment: CVD Field Master Assignment: NONE System Reference Number: 47 Change Record Chance Bv Date Change Drop Number 1 <CI0+0 +0> Zone Number 0 <CI0+0 +1 > Area Number 0 <CI0+0 +2> • • Bv Date N/S Street Name: Not Assigned E/W Street Name: Not Assigned Notes: Manual Plan O = Automatic 1·9 = Plan 1·9 14 = Free 15 -Flash Manual OMse1 0 :z Automatic 1 • OllsetA 2 -Ottsel B 3= Ollsel C Flash Start Red Revert 0 5.0 Area Address QuicNet Channel 145 <CI0+0 P:8100:10.241.0.j +3> (QuicNet) Manual Plan <CI0+A+ 1> t-M_a_n_u_a_l _O_ff-s-et----t~----t<C/O+B+ 1> All Red Start FYA Red Revert 5.0 2.0 Communrcat1on Addresses ~M...,,...a_n_u_a....,I_S,,..e-1,....e-c-t.,..io-n~-~ OVLP CHG Red 6.0 Start I Revert Times Phase Column Numbers •···> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D Phase Names ---> WBLT EB SB EBLT WB NB Ped Walk 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 . . -. -. . -. -.. . -. Ped FDW 0 18 0 23 0 18 0 23 Phase 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 Min Green 4 10 0 4 4 10 0 4 Phase 2 20 0 0 0 0.0 Type 3 Disconnect 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Phase 3 0 0 0 0 o.o Added per Vehicle 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 o.o Phase 4 20 0 0 0 o.o Veh Extension 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 Phase 5 0 0 0 0 0.0 Max Gap 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 Phase 6 20 0 0 0 0.0 Min Gap 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 Phase 7 0 0 0 0 0.0 Max Limit 20 50 0 25 20 50 0 25 Phase 8 20 0 0 0 0.0 Max Limit 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adv./ Delay Walk 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 Max Initial PE Min Ped FDW 0 18 0 23 0 18 0 23 Alternate Walk Cond Serv Check 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Alternate FDW Reduce Every 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 Alternate Initial Yellow Chance 3.5 3.6 0.0 3.6 3.5 3.6 0.0 3.6 Alternate Extension Red Clear 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 Phase Timing -Bank 1 Alternate Timing <C+0+F=1> Printed on 11/3/2015 9:17 AM Timing Sheet Version: 233 RV3 ••••••••••••• Page 1 (of 9) Last Database Change: 9/1 5/2015 16:38 <F/1+0+E> <F/1+0+F> <F/1+C+0> <F/1+0+5> <F/1+0+3> RR-1 Delay RR-1 Clear EV-A Delay EV-A Clear EV-B Delay EV-8 Clear EV-C Delay EV-C Clear EV·D Delay EV-D Clear RR-2 Delay RR-2 Clear View EV Delay View EV Clear View AA Delay View AR Clear 0 10 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 10 ... ... -. - . -. Preempt Timing Exclusive Walk Exclusive FDW All Red Clear 0 0 0.0 <F/1+0+0> <F/1+0+ 1> <F/1 +0+2> Exclusive Ped Phase (Outputs specified in Assignable Outputs at E/127 +A+E & F) F Row Permit 12 456 8 Red Lock Yellow Lock Min Recall 2 6 Ped Recall 2 6 View Set Peds ----- Rest In Walk Red Rest Dual Entry 4 8 Max Recall Solt Recall Max2 Cond. Service Man Cntrl Calls Yellow Start 4 8 First Phases 2 6 Phase Functions <C+0+F=1> Revision: 60322 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 II A B C D E F ••• INTERSECTION: CVD & Harding Row 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D I:: F Row 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A 8 C D E F Column Numbers----> Overlap Name--> Load Switch Number Veh Set 1 -Phases Veh Set 2 -Phases Veh Set 3 -Phases Neg Veh Phases Neg Ped Phases Green Omit Phases Green Clear Omit Phs. Overlap Recall Queue Jump Phase Queue Jump Time Minimum Green Maximum Green Green Clear Yellow Change Red Clear Column Numbers --> Exclusive Phases RR-1 Clear Phases RR-2 Clear Phases RR-2 Limited Service Prot / Perm Phases Flash to PE Circuits Flash Entry Phases Disable Yellow Range Disable Ovp Yel Range Overlap Yellow Flash EV-A Phases EV-B Phases EV-C Phases EV-D Phases Extra 1 Config. Bits IC Select (Interconnect) Configuration Printed on 11/3/2015 9:17 AM 1 0 N 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 o.o E 2 5 4 1 6 1 3 5 2 2' 3 4 0 0 0 N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Overlap Assignments Ext. Permit 1 Phases Ext. Permit 2 Phases Exclusive Ped Assign Preempt Non-Lock Ped for 2P Output Ped for 6P Output Ped for 4P Output Ped for 8P Output Yellow Flash Phases Low Priority A Phases Low Priority B Phases Low Priority C Phases 8 Low Priority D Phases Restricted Phases Extra 2 Config. Bits Configuration • •••••••••• Overlap 5 6 -7 8 0 0 0 0 N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 F Fast Green Flash Phase Green Flash Phases Flashing Walk Phases Guaranteed Passage Simultaneous Gap Term 2 Sequential Timinq 6_ Advance Walk Phases 4 8 Delay Walk Phases 4 8 External Recall Start-up Overlap Green Max Extension Inhibit Ped Reservice Semi-Actuated Start-up Overlap Yellow Start-up Vehicle Calls 4 Start-up Ped Calls <C+O+E= 125> Specials Timing Sheet Version: 233 RV3 Extra 1 Flags 1 = TBC Type 1 2 = NEMA ExL Coord 3 = Aulo Daylight Savings 4 = Solid FDW on EV 5 = Ex1ended Status 6 • International Ped 7 • Flash -Clear Oulpuls 8 = Split Ring Exira 2 Flags 1 • AWB During Initial 2 = Reserved 3 -Disable Min Walk 4 = QuicNet System 5 -Ignore PIP on EV 6 = Manual Hold in FDW 7 • Allow QuicNet PE 8 = Flash Gm B4 YeUow F 12345678 ~& PE Non-Lock 1 •EVA 5= RR 1 Page 2 (of 9) ~ EV-A 0 EV-B 0 EV-C 0 EV-D 0 RR-1 • ... RR-2' ... SE-1 0 SE-2 0 Preempt Priority <C+O+E=125> ( • RR-1 is always Highest, and RR-2 is always Second Highest ) ~ Phase 1 15 Phase 2 30 Phase 3 0 Phase 4 26 Row O· ,, : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F Row 2-EV B 6• RR 2 Phase 5 15 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A 8 C D E F 4 8 12345678 12345678 3 • EV C 7 • SE 1 4=EVD 8 •SE2 IC Select Flags 1 - 2. Modem 3 = 7-Wlre Stave 4= s- 6 = Simplex Master 7- 8 = Oftsel lnlerrupter Phase 6 30 Phase 7 0 Phase 8 26 Coordination Transition Minimums <C+O+C=5> Revision: 60322 •••••••••••• ••••• • Row B C D E F Row A B C D E F •••••• INTERSECTION: CVD & Harding Column Numbers ---> 1 Plan Name ---> Cycle Length 100 Phase 1 -ForceOff 52 Phase 2 -ForceOlf 0 Phase 3 -ForceOff 0 Phase 4 -ForceOff 34 Phase 5 -ForceOff 52 Phase 6 -ForceOff 0 Phase 7 -ForceOtr 0 P·hase 8 -ForceOff 34 Ring Offset 0 Offset 1 93 Offset 2 0 Offset 3 0 Perm 1 -End 5 Hold Release 255 Reserved 0 Ped Adjustment 0 Perm 2 -Start 0 Perm 2 -End 0 Perm 3 -Start 0 Perm 3 -End 0 Reservice Time 0 Reservice Phases Pretimed Phases Max Recall Perm 1 Veh Phase 12345678 Perm 1 Ped Phase 12345678 Perm 2 Veh Phase Perm 2 Ped Phase Perm 3 Veh Phase Perm 3 Ped Phase Printed on 11/3/2015 9:17 AM 2 100 52 0 0 34 52 0 0 34 0 92 0 0 5 255 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12345678 12345678 • •• • Plan 3 4 5 6 7 100 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 0 0 0 0 74 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 255 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Coordination • Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 Coordrnat,on • Bank 2 Timing Sheet Version: 233 RV3 •••••••••••••••• ti 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12345678 12345678 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12345678 12345678 Row 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F Page 3 (of 9) ~ 1 • Programmed WALK Time for Sync Phases 2 -Always Terminate Sync Phase Peds Plan 1 -Sync Plan 2 -Sync Plan 3 -Sync Plan 4 -Sync Plan 5 -Sync Plan 6 -Sync Plan 7 -Sync Plan 8 -Sync Plan 9 -Sync NEMA Sync NEMA Hold Free Lag Plan 1 -Lao Plan 2 -Lag Plan 3 -Lag 1 Plan 4-Lag Plan 5 -Lag Plan 6 -Lag Plan 7 -Lag Plan 8 -Lag Plan 9 -Lag External Lag Lag Hold Lag Phases E 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 6 F 2 4 6 8 2 4 6 8 2 4 6 8 4 6 8 2 4 6 8 2 4 6 8 2 4 6 8 2 4 6 8 2 4 6 8 2 4 6 8 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F Revision: 60322 INTERSECTION: CVD & Harding Page 4 (of 9) Row Column 8 Column 9 Column A Column B ColumnC -" ColumnD Column E ColumnF Row One-Shot Timer 0 Laich 1 Set 0 NOT-3 0 Max 2 0 Pretimed 0 Set Monday 0 Dial 2 17-Wire) 0 Sim Term 0 AND-5 (a) 0 Latch 1 Reset 0 NOT-4 0 Reserved 0 Plan 1 0 Ext. Perm 1 0 Dial 3 (7-W••l 0 EV-A 71 AND-5 (b) 0 Latch 2 Set 0 OR-4(a) 0 Reserved 0 Plan 2 0 Ext. Perm 2 0 Offset 1 (7-Wue) 0 EV-8 72 AND-6 (a) 0 Latch 2 Reset 0 OR-4 (b) 0 Reserved 0 Plan 3 0 Gate Down 0 Offset 2 t7-Wlre) 0 EV-C 73 AND-6 (b) 0 NAND-3 (a) 0 OR-S(a) 0 Reserved 0 Plan 4 0 Set Clock 0 Offset 3 (7-Wi,e) 0 EV-D 74 Reserved NAND-3 (b) 0 OR-S(b) 0 Reserved 0 Plan 5 0 Stop Time 82 Free t7-Wire) 0 RR-t 51 Reserved NAND-4(a) 0 OR-6(a) 0 Reserved 0 Plan 6 0 Flash Sense 81 Flash (7-Wire) 0 RR-2 52 Reserved NAND-4 (b) 0 OR-6 (bl 0 Reserved 0 Plan 7 0 Manual Enable 53 Exel. Ped Omit 0 Spec. Event 1 0 Spec. Funct. 1 0 OR-7(a) 0 EXTMR 0 Reserved 0 Plan 8 0 Man. Advance 80 NOT-1 0 Spec. Event 2 0 Spec. Funct. 2 0 OR-7(b) 0 Reserved Max Inhibit (nema) 0 Plan 9 0 External Alarm 0 NOT-2 0 External Lag 0 Spec. Funct. 3 0 OR-7(c) 0 AND-4 (a) 0 Force A (nema) 0 DELAY-A 0 Phase Bank 2 0 OR-1 (a) 0 AND-1 (a) 0 Spec. Funct. 4 0 OR-7 (d) 0 AND-4 (b) 0 Force B (nema) 0 DELAY-B 0 Phase Bank 3 0 OR-1 (b) 0 AND-1 (b) 0 Reserved OR-8 (a) 0 NAND-1 (a) 0 C.N.A. (nema) 0 DELAY-C 0 Overlap Set 2 0 OR-2(a) 0 AND-2(a) 0 Reserved OR-8 (b) 0 NAND-1 (b) 0 Hold (nema) 0 DELAY-D 0 Overlap Set 3 0 OR-2(b) 0 AND-2(bl 0 Reserved OR-B(c) 0 NAND-2 (a) 0 Max Recall 0 DELAY-E 0 Detector Set 2 0 OR-3 (a) 0 AND-3 (a) 0 Reserved OR-B(d) 0 NAND-2 (b) 0 Min Recall 0 DELAY-F 0 Detector Set 3 0 OR-3(b) 0 AND-3(b) 0 Assignable Inputs <C+O+E:126> Columns Column9 Column A Column B ColumnC ColumnD ColumnE ColumnF Reserved Phase ON -1 0 Preempt Fail 0 Flasher 0 0 Free 0 NOT-1 0 TOD Out 1 0 Dial 2 (7-Wke) 0 Reserved Phase ON -2 0 Sp Evnt Out 1 0 Flasher 1 0 Plan 1 0 OR-1 0 TODOut2 0 Dial 3 (7-Wke) 0 Reserved Phase ON -3 0 Sp Evnt Out 2 0 Fast Flasher 0 Plan 2 0 OR-2 0 TOD 0 ut3 0 Offset 1 (7-Wlre) 0 Reserved Phase ON -4 0 Sp Evnt Out 3 0 EXTMR 0 Plan 3 0 OR-3 0 TODOut4 0 Offset 2 (7-Wlre) 0 Reserved Phase ON -5 0 Sp Evnt Out 4 0 One-Shot Timer 0 Plan 4 0 AND-1 0 TODOutS 0 Offset 3 (?•Wire) 0 Reserved Phase ON -6 0 Sp Evnt Out 5 0 Reserved Plan 5 0 AND-2 0 TODOut6 0 Free (7-Wire) 0 Reserved Phase ON-7 0 Sp Evnt Out 6 0 Latch 1 0 Plan 6 0 AND-3 0 TOD Out7 0 Flash (7-Wire) 0 Reserved Phase ON-8 0 Sp Evnt Out 7 0 Latch 2 0 Plan 7 0 NOT-2 0 TOD Outs 0 Preempt 0 Flh Yell Arrow 1 0 Ph. Check-1 0 Sp Evnt Out 8 0 NOT-3 0 Plan 8 0 EV-A 0 Adv_ Warn -1 0 Low Priority A 0 Green 1 0 Ph. Check -2 0 Coord On 0 NOT-4 0 Plan 9 0 EV-B 0 Adv. Wam-2 0 Low Priority B 0 Flh Yen Arrow 3 0 Ph. Check-3 0 Detector Fail 0 OR-4 0 Spec. Funct. 3 0 EV-C 0 DELAY-A 0 Low Priority C 0 Green3 0 Ph. Check -4 0 Spec. Funct. 1 0 OR-5 0 Spec. Funct. 4 0 EV-D 0 DELAY-B 0 Low Priority D 0 Flh Yell Arrow 5 0 Ph. Check-5 0 Spec. Funct. 2 0 OR-6 0 NAND-3 0 RR-1 0 DELAY-C 0 AND-5 0 Green 5 0 Ph. Check-6 0 Central Control 0 AND-4 0 NAND-4 0 RR-2 0 DELAY·D 0 AND-6 0 Flh Yett Arrow 7 0 Ph. Check-7 0 Exel. Ped OW 0 NAND-1 0 OR-7 0 Spec. Event 1 0 DELAY-E 0 Reserved Green 7 0 Ph. Check-8 0 Exel. Ped WK 0 NAND-2 0 OR-8 0 Spec. Event 2 0 DELAY·F 0 Reserved Assignable Outputs Printed on 11/312015 9:17 AM Timing Sheet Version: 233 RV3 Revision: 60322 •• • • • • • •••• ••• • ••• •••••••• •••• INTERSECTION: CVD & Harding Row 9 A B C D E F A B C D E F Column Numbers •·-> Phase Names ---> Ped Walk Ped FDW Min Green Type 3 Disconnect Added per Vehicle Veh Extension Max Gap Min Gap Max Limit Max Limit 2 Adv./ Delay Walk PE Min Ped FDW Cond Serv Check Reduce Every Yellow Change Red Clear Ped Walk Ped FDW Min Green Type 3 Disconnect Added per Vehicle Veh Extension Max Gap Min Gap Max Limit Max Limit 2 Adv./ Delay Walk PE Min Ped FDW Cond Serv Check Reduce Everv Yellow Change Red Clear Printed on 11 /3/2015 9:17 AM 1 0 0 3 0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 17 30 0 0 0 1.0 3.0 0.0 1 0 0 3 0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 17 30 0 0 0 1.0 3.0 0.5 Phase 2 3 4 5 7 0 7 0 10 0 10 0 7 3 7 3 0 0 0 0 1.2 0.0 1.2 0.0 3.5 0.5 3.5 0.5 5.0 0.5 5.0 0.5 2.0 0.5 2.0 0.5 40 17 40 17 70 30 70 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 0.5 0.0 1.0 o.o Phase Timing -Bank 2 2 3 4 .s 7 0 7 0 10 0 10 0 7 3 7 3 0 0 0 0 1.2 0.0 1.2 0.0 3.5 0.5 3.5 0.5 5.0 0.5 5.0 0.5 2.0 0.5 2.0 0.5 40 17 40 17 70 30 70 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Phase Trmmg -Bank 3 6 7 8 7 0 7 10 0 10 7 3 7 0 0 0 1.2 o.o 1.2 3.5 0.5 3.5 5.0 0.5 5.0 2.0 0.5 2.0 40 17 40 70 30 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 0.5 0.0 1.0 6 7 8 7 0 7 10 0 10 7 3 7 0 0 0 1.2 0.0 1.2 3.5 0.5 3.5 5.0 0.5 5.0 2.0 0.5 2.0 40 17 40 70 30 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 • • 9 A B C ------------ Phase 1 0 0 0 0 Phase 2 0 0 0 0 Phase 3 0 0 0 0 Phase 4 0 0 0 0 Phase 5 0 0 0 0 Phase 6 0 0 0 0 Phase 7 0 0 0 0 Phase 8 0 0 0 0 Max Initial Alternate Walk Alternate FDW Alternate lni1ial Alternate Extension Alternate Timing 9 A Im B C --------. --. Phase 1 0 0 0 0 Phase 2 0 0 0 0 Phase 3 0 0 0 0 Phase 4 0 0 0 0 Phase 5 0 0 0 0 Phase 6 0 0 0 0 Phase 7 0 0 0 0 Phase 8 0 0 0 0 Max Initial Alternate Walk Alternate FDW Alternate Initial Alternate Extension Alternate Timing Timing Sheet Version: 233 RV3 • D --- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 D --- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ••••••••••• Tran5itign Type O.X • Shortway 1.X = Lengthen X.1 thru X.4 • Number of cycles when lengthing Daylight Savings ~ If set to ah zeros, standard dates will be used. Page 5 (of 9) !Transition Type II 0.3 !<C/5+ 1 +9> TBC Transition l ~H..,.a_wk....,..S_e,..1e...,c,...t __ ~_o~j=t1+0+4> Hawk Select 200 = Mid-Block, 201 = Hawk Address O Select Parity 0 AB3418 Comm 2 Beoin Month 3 Begin Week 2 End Month 11 End Week 1 <C/1+0+6> <C/1+0+5> 0 = No Parity, 1 = Even <C/5+2+A> <Cl5+2+B> <C/5+2+C> <C/5+2+D> Dayltght Savings Time Time B4 Yellow 0.0 <F/1+C+E> Phase Number 0 <F/1 +C+F> Advance Warning Beacon -Sign 1 Time B4 Yellow 0.0 · Phase Number O <F/1+D+F> Advance Warning Beacon -Sign 2 Offset nme o <C/5+2+E> Max Cycle nme 20 <Cl5+2+F> Yellow Yield Coordination 12345678 !Omit Alarm I! 12345678 !<C/5+F+O> Local Alarm Disable Revision: 60322 • Row 9 A 8 C D E F Row INTERSECTION: CVD & Harding C olumn Numoers --> 0 1 C1 Pin Detector Name Number Attributes 39 45 7 40 45 7 41 45 7 42 45 7 43 45 7 44 45 7 45 45 7 46 45 7 47 67 48 67 49 67 50 67 55 45 7 56 45 7 57 45 7 58 45 7 4 5 C1 Pin Detector Name Number Attributes 59 45 7 60 45 7 61 45 7 62 45 7 63 45 7 64 45 7 65 45 7 66 45 7 67 2 68 2 69 2 70 2 76 45 7 n 45 7 78 45 7 79 45 7 r 2 PhaseCsl 2 6 4 8 2 6 4 8 2 6 4 8 5 1 7 3 6 Phase(s) 5 1 7 3 2 6 4 8 2 6 4 8 4 8 2 6 4 8 Detector Assignments <C+0+E= 126> Printed on 11/3/2015 9:17 AM I • 3 1 -Assian Delay 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 o.o 7 2 ~ Assign Delay 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 123 0.0 3 Carry- over 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ,4 Carry- over 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 Detector Attributes 1 = Full Time Delay 2 • Ped Call 3 = Overlap 4 • Count 5. Extension 6 • Type 3 7 = Calling 8 = Alternaie Del. Assignments l•Det.Sel1 2 -Del. Set 2 3-Det. Set 3 4 • 6. Failure -Min Recall 7 • Failure -Max Recan 8 • Report on Failure Timing Sheet Version: 233 RV3 •• Page 6 (of 9) Ped / Phase / Overlap Column Numbers --> 1 2 3 Walk 0 0 0 Don't Walk 0 0 0 Phase Green 0 0 0 Phase Yellow 0 0 0 Phase Red 0 0 0 Overlap Green 0 0 0 Overlap Yellow 0 0 0 Overlap Red 0 0 0 n•4 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Row 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 Redirect Phase Outputs <C+0+E=127> !Cabinet Type !! 0 !<E/125+0+0> Enable Redirection (Enable Redirection = 30) Max OFF (minutes) 20 <D/0+0+1> Max ON (minutes) 7 <D/0+0+2> Chatter Fail Time O <D/0+0+4> Detector Failure Monitor ••• • •• '°"B Row One-Shot 0 Ext. Timer 0 DELAY-A 0 DELAY-8 0 DELAY-C 0 DELAY-D 0 DELAY-E 0 DELAY-F 0 Delay Logic Times <C+0+D=0> (seconds) 8 9 A B C D E F Revision: 60322 • • • • .B C 0 , E F Row 0 1 2 3 4 5 · 6 7 C D E F ••••• INTERSECTION: CVD & Harding ----=;r- C ~ "' Day of Week Time a: 0 00 :00 0 0 06 :45 1 A 23456 08 :30 2 A 23456 11 : 30 3 A 23456 13 : 30 3 B 23456 16 : 00 3 A 23456 18 :30 2 A 23456 22 :00 E A 1234567 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 TOD Coordination <C+0+9=0.1> (Bank 1) C: a, ., "' ., Day of Week Time a: 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :OD D D 00 :00 0 D 00 :00 0 0 DD :OD D D 00 :00 D D 00 :00 D D 00 :00 0 0 00 :DO 0 0 TOD Coordination <C+D+9=0.2> (Bank 2) Prin ted on 11 /312015 9:17 AM ......,... u C Column 4 • Time :, Dav of Week u.. Phases/Bits 00 :05 E 1234567 78 23 :50 E 1234567 06 :00 4 1234567 2 6 21 :58 4 1234567 00 :00 0 00 :00 D 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 TOD <C+0+7=0.1> <C+0+E=27> Function ~ C: Column4 Time :, Holiday Type lL Phases/Bits 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 00 :00 0 Holiday <C+0+7=0.2> <C+0+E=28> TOD Function :. ., ,-. C: "' a, 0 Holiday Type 0 >-:::. 00 00 D 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 Holiday Dates <C+0+B=1 .1> (Bank 1) :a := ,-. C: "' ., 0 Holidav Type 0 >-:::. 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 Holiday Dates <C+0+8=1.2> (Bank 2) Month Select: October = A, November= 8, Decmber a C Timing Sheet Version: 233 RV3 •• iii ]l ., Time a: 0 Holiday Type 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 20 :00 0 0 50: 00 0 0 Holiday Events <C+0+9=1.h (Bank 1) C: ., "' ~ Holiday Tvoe Time a: 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 Holiday Events <C+0+9=1.2> (Bank 2) • Page 7 (of 9) T o.o. Functions o- 1 • Red Lock 2 • Yellow Lock 3 • Veh Min Recall 4 • Ped Recall 5 - 6 = Rest In Walk 7 • Red Rest 8 • Double Enlry 9 = Veh Max Recall A = Veh Soft Recall B-Maximum 2 C • Conditional Service D • Free Lag Phases E • Bil 1 -Local Override Bit 4 -Disable Detector OFF Monitor Bit 5 -Disable Low Priority Preempt Bil 6 -FV A Inhibit Bit 7 -Detector Count Monitor Bit 8 -Real Time Split Monitor F • Output Bits i thru 8 ~ 1 thru 9 c Coordination Plan 1 thru 9 14 or E = Free 15 or F. Rash Offset Select A = Ottset A B -Ottset B C = Offset C Revision: 60322 INTERSECTION: CVD & Harding Row 9 A B C D E F 9 A B C D E F 6 Clear 6 Clear ~ 7 Time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Printed on 11/3/2015 9:17 AM •••••• • 8 9 A Ped Call Hold Advance Special Event Schedule •· Table 1 8 9 A Ped Call Hold Advance Special Event Schedule -Table 2 •• B C D E F Force Off Vehicle Call Permit Phases Ped Omit Outout B C D E F Force Off Vehicle Call Permit Phases Ped Omit Outout <C+O+E~28> Timing Sheet Version: 233 RV3 • ••••••••••• Page 8 (of 9) Notes: LLl<Ef27+5+F> Limited Service Interval Notes: CD<El28+5+F> Limited Service Interval Revision: 60322 ••••••••• • INTERSECTION: CVD & Harding !Min Time (seconds) 0 l<F/1+0+8> Min Green Before PE Force Off I Max Time (minutes) II 255 l<F/1 +0+9> Max Preempt Time Before Failure I Min Time (seconds) ii O I <F/1 +0+A> Min Time Between Same Preempts (Does Not Apply To Railroad Preempt) I Low Pri. Channel l<E1125+C+8> Disable Low Priority Channel Low Priority 1 = Channel A 2 = Channel B 3 a Channel C 4 = Channel D Printed on 11/3/2015 9:17 AM • fRowJ G Bus Headway 0 .. ,D ' Bus Delay 0 E Max EarlyGrn 0 F MaxGrn Ext. 0 Prioritv Parameters <F/1 +A+ROW> >, C: ca 3: g 'O 0 ca ~ Q) Time J: 6 Day of Week 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 00 :00 0 0 Headway Schedule <C+0+9=2.1 > Low Priority Preemption (Bus Priority) Page 9 (of 9) Headway Time (minutes) 1 thru9 -11hru9 A=10 8=11 C = 12 D = 13 E= 14 F = 15 Note: Also see "Time of Day Functions", Function E, B~ 5 (Disable Low Priority) Timing Sheet Version: 233 RV3 Revision: 60322 ----··--•-»-•-----•»---------- LOCATION: RTE 5 NB @ CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE CAI.TRANS C8 Version 3 DATE: 12/10/14 PAGE 1 F PAGE INTERVAL PHASE TIMING PRE-EMPTION F FOC LONG FAILURE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 E FLAGS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 FOD SHORT FAILURE 0 WALK 7 1 7 1 CLK RST EV SEL . 0 PERMIT -. ., . 2 · 5 '6 ' ~t 0 i ~ FOE I 0 1 DONT WALK 10 1 10 1 RRl CLR 15 RED LOCK 5 8 l FOF I 5 2 MIN GREEN 6 5 5 5 EVA DLY 0 YEL LOCK 2 3 TYPE 3 DET 0 0 0 0 EVA CLR 5 V RECALL 2 6 3 FCO 3 4 ADD/VEH 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EVB DLY 0 p RECALL 4 FCl 3 5 PASSAGE 2.0 2.0 2 .0 3.0 EVB CLR 5 PED:PHASES : :.:'. r·· ... -.-. , .. .6 .. :1:: ~·ro1:-~· .2 · ._ ;,t.~f 5 . ,. .. . .i!'l! . FC2 10 6 MAX GAP 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 EVC DLY 0 RT OLA 6 FCA 0.0 7 MIN GAP 2 .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 EVC CLR 5 RT OLB 7 FCB 0.0 B MAX EXT 30 35 30 30 EVD DLY 0 DBL ENTRY 8 FCC 0.0 9 MAX 2 YR EVD CLR 5 MAX 2 PHASES 9 FCD O'. 0 A :MAX 3 MO MAX EV 255 LAG PHASES ~-:~. -. · ~}~ _::':REAB~t~~t ·:_:~!1$~ A B DAY RR2 CLR 15 RED REST B FDO TB SELECT l · C REDUCE BY 0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.1 'DOW REST-IN-WALK C FD3 PED SELECT 0 -D EVERY 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 HR MAX 3 PHASES D FD4 7 WIRE 0 E YELLOW 4.1 3.7 4.1, 4.1 MIN YEL START OP 2 6 E FDS PERMISSIVE 0 F RED 2 .0 1.0 2.0 1.0 SEC FIRST PHASE 8 F FD8 OS SEEKING 1 3.5 PED XING FT 53 48 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BIKE XING FT 65 .,J; .. . . 56 . ·.,.~ ,.,,·, . ': •:, ' . COS FLASH TYl'E 1 CC2 DOWNLOAD 1 NOTES: ENTRIES IN THESE LOCATIONS CAN BE CHANGED IN CC1 FLASH ONLY ~ 0 0 0 ••••• ••• ••• • •••• ••••••••••••••• ••• LOCATION: RTE 5 NB@ CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE CALTRANS CB Version 3 DATE: C PAGE CONTROL PLANS 0 CYCLE LENGTH 1 FZl GRN FCTR 2 3 FZ3 GRN FCTR 4 FZ4 GRN FCTR 5 FZS GRN FCTR 6 7 FZ7 GRN FCTR 8 ]i"'ZS GRN FCTR 9 MULTI CYCLE A OFFSET A B OFFSET B C OFFSET C D FZ 3 EXT E FZ 7 EXT F OFFSET INTRPT COl MANUAL CP CO2 MASTER CP 1 100 0 0 0 30 0 24 0 87 87 87 2 3 4 5 100 100 100 0 0 0 e 0 0 -0 0 0 30 30 30 0 0 0 24 24 30 0 0 0 92 88 ·as 92 88 88 92 88 88 C03 CURRENT CP C04 LAST CP C07 TRNSMT CP SYSTEM MAST.ER: RTE 5 SB RAMP COD Jilf..ANUAL OFFSET CAO LOCAL CYCLE TIMER CEO MASTER CYCLE TIMER CAA LOCAL OFFSET CEA MASTER OFFSET 6 FEATURE 7 8 9 OFF ON 2···· 3 .>· 4 .. ·· .' 5 >):?t 6 ~?f!ttJ 7 t'?~~!:; s ihfF,;~-.. 5/12/14 Y-COORD C D PERM TIME LAG OFFSET FORCE OFF LONG GRN NO GREEN OFFSET LOCATION OFF ON 1 0 2 3 ;:;;?~~~:. 4 i_r .. ,. 5 ~~~s;'.i.;r 6 Ffl~'r 8 ~)%/i; coo= z LAG PHASE E GAPOUT CPl 1 GAPOUT CP2 1 GAPOUT CP3 1 GAPOUT CP4 1 GAPOUT CP5 . GAPOOT CP6 GAPOUT CP7 GAPOUT CPS GAPOOT CP9 PAGE 2 FLAGS F 1 2 3 4 5 6 LAG FZ FREE 2 6 LAG FZ CP 1 2 5 LAG FZ CP 2 2 5 LAG FZ CP 3 2 5 LAG FZ CP 4 2 5 LAG FZ CP 5 LAG FZ .CP 6 LAG FZ CP 7 LAG FZ CP 8 -LAG F!il CP 9 LAG C COORD LAG D COORD COORD FAZES 2 6 I 2 3 4 5 6 CCB/CDB OFFSET TIMER CCC/CDC LAG GREEN TIMER CCD/CDD FORCE OFF TIMER CCE/CDE LONG GREEN TIMER CCF/CDF NO GREEN TIMER 7 7 0 8 8 0 8 1 8 2 8 3 8 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F 8 LOCATION : RTE 5 NB @ CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE CALTRANS CS Version 3 D PAGE D FLAGS E FLAGS -0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F MAX · 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MIN 1 2 3 4 RCL RCL . CP 1 CP 1 CP·2 CP 2 CP 3-CP 3 CP 4 CP 4 CP 5 CP 5 CP 6 CP 6 CP 7 CP 7 CP 8 CP 8 CP 9 CP 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3· 4 LAST POWER FAILURE REGISTER HOUR = D-A-E MINUTE = D-B-E DAY = D-C-E LAST FLASH TIME REGISTER HOUR = D-A-F MINUTE = D-B-F DAY = D-C-F 5 6 5 _ 5 5 5 5 6 7 8 8 .a ft! 8 7. 8 DATE: 5/12/14 PAGE 3 E PAGE F FLAGS E FLAGS F FLAGS PED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 FUNCTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 FUNCTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 RCL 0 CODE 4 0 CP 1 1 CODE 5 1 CP 2 2 C-RECALL 2 CP 3 3 0-RECALL 3 CP 4 4 CP 5 5 CP 6 6 CP 7 7 CP 8 8 CP 9 9 RCL 1 RCL 2 B OLB NOT C · OLC NOT . E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 345 6 78 RCL 1 = TIME OF DA~ MAX RECALL (1ST SELECT) PHASES (CALL ACTIVE LIGHTS) RCL 2 = TIMI;:, OF DAY MAX RECALL (2ND SELECT) PHASES (CALL ACTIVE LIGHTS) D-E-E = CB VERSION NUMBER D-E-F := LITHIUM BATTERY CONDITION 84 = BAD 85 == GOOD () E F (_) ••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••• LOCATION: RTE 5 NB @ CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE CALTRANS C8 Ver s ion 3 DATE: 5/12/14 7 PAGE TIME OF DAY ACTIVITY TABLE 7+EVENT+HR+M:rN+ACT+"EfT+ON/OFF+DOW ON/ s M . T HR MIN ACT OFF 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E 05 30 E 1 2 3 F 22 00 E ON 1 2 3 ACTIVITY CODE 1 TYPE OF MAX TERMINATION 2 MAX 2 3 MAX 3 4 COND SERV {1ST SELECT) 5 COND SERV (2ND SELECT} 6 ENERGIZE AUX OUTPUT-RED w 4 4 4 7 ENERGIZE AUX OUTPOT--GREEN T 5 5 5 LTS F s 6 7 6 7 6 7 9 PAGE jco9 = a or 1 1 CONTROL PLAN TIME OF DAY 9+EVENT+HR+MIN+CP+OS+E+DOW s -M T w T F s HR MIN CP OS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 05 30 2 A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 06. 45 1 A 2 3 4 5 6 2 OB 30 2 A 2 3 4 5 6 3 11 30 4 A 2 3 4 5 6 4 13 30 2 A 2 3 4 5 6 5 16 00 3 A. 2 3 4 5 6 6 18 30 2 A 2 3 4 5 6 7 22 00 E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F 8 ENERGIZE AUX OUTPUT-YELLOW 9 TIME OF DAY MAX RECALL (1ST SELECT) A TRAFFIC ACT. MAX 2 OPERATION B TIME OF DAY MAX RECALL (2ND SELECT) C YELLOW YIELD COORDI NATION D YELLOW YI~LD COORDINATION E TIME OF DAY FREE OPERATION F FLASHING OPERATION C) PAGE 4 9 PAGE CONTROL PLAN TIME OF DAY 9+EVENT+HR+MIN+CP+OS+E+DOW s M T w T F s HR MIN CF OS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F 0 BEST IMAGE POSSIBLE ~---·----·--·-----------.,----------- > s _, ► ~ " > ~ .. "' .. > .. .. "' Q ~ 5 •' > .. _, 0 ,,_ ,_ om w m ~o B j,;! il~ E ... ~ .... 5 uo i I i . ~ w o: w lll•--= ::l ! ffi E ~ 6 ~ z · C, ~ <I) w Q j ~ ~ .J u. u. < C: I- ~cY •j ~ t;;; ;~ ~~ ...... -EXISTING 7BC ---I OLC TO REMAIN ---~30•1 ◄ 31110 10 OlC ---INSTALL I NTERCONHECT CABLE ~---EXISJl~G 7SC ___ 2 OlC TO R(IMl>I ---fill 3~=:~ 10 01.C INST..\LL INTtRCONtlECT CABLE CARLSBAD EX[STING 7BC 4 OLC TO REMA.IN !jg 30•1◄ · 3•10 10 DLC INSTALL IMTERCONl'IECT CABLE OlSTIHG ◄IC -,t1TH: 5• 14 2•10 2•6 EXISTING POLE ANO EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE ST.AfrriDARO VrH SIG MTC PEO S ICNA.L. NO Typ1 Sia M, A, Lun M.A. Mo,t Pole urc Ann • 1-AOO') ---TV· I SP· 1 ·T B 11-I •70 20' 12' w.s SV-::?-TD SP· 1-T C IS' -12' -Slf·I-T - @ l·Atl0'I ---TV-3-T sp .. z-T @ 19-◄·BO 30' 12' ~~T W.5 sv-1-T SP-2-T F 1-A(!O') -TV-1-T SP· 1 ·T C 11-1-70 20' 12' ~AS SV'2·l0 SP· 1-T H 15' -12' -SV·l·T -.:: l·ACI0' J ---TV•J·T SP·2·T @ l!-4-90 • J 2' Cl:l>IH SY-1-T 30' ®MAS SP-2-T MOTE, I. UNL.E:SiS Dit>-!OT[O O'THERWISE. ALL 01)14£N$10NS FOA J./EASUR8.ENT Of lrnGTH SHOWN OH iH IS PLAN .A.RE IN M!;T£RS. . 1'!'.8 . HPS fJ •Rliow Ll.l,ONAIRE 2 __ .,.... 2 -w-250 -250 2 --~ ~ • --250 "'- _, ' --• ----250 • --.__ 2 --•-ta. -2'0 SPECIAL PEOUIREJ.IO'ITS PEU (SIGN TYPE> PHASE DIAGRAM '.NoornSCIJNO !LOCATION 2) fiP ·/. I I -o--~ : I 6-4:------' l .s : _:2 r~ ! 1r - ,q---c,. I .q,---~ I a ' 2P I 2P ____ ,!. _____ _ · FOR SIGNAL AHO LIGHTING PROJECT PK>TES • CONOUIT Al/0. CO!IOUCTOR SCHEOUI.E SEE SHEET E-6 SIGNAL AND '-lGHTING · !liODIFYl LOCATION 2 SIGNAL NO. P&0.118 · sc:•LE , 1,zoo nns ~LAM ACCURATE FOR EL£CTRlCAL woruc. Otl.Y FOl'I 111:DUCrD M,..OI.!. Dl'llllHAL · IC:.,.Llt 1:11 IN lotlLL!J4"TEft! ..... .. " ! EA 05150"1 ••••••••••••••••••• ••• LOCATION: RTE 5 SB @ CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE CALTRANS CS Version 3 DATE: 12/10/14 PAGE 1 F PAGE INTERVAL PHASE TIMING PRE-EMPTION F FOC LONG FAILURE 1· 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 E FLAGS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 FOO SHORT FAILURE 0 WALK 1 7 1 7 CLK RST Ev· SEL 0 PERM:ttr' ·y ;z 4 ' ~ .·· -. ... 0 FOE I 0 1 DONT WALK 1 10 . 1 12 RRl CLR 15 RED LOCK 1 4 1 FOF I 5 2 MIN GREEN 5 6 5 6 EVA DLY 0 YEL LOCK 2 3 TYPE 3 DET 0 0 D ·O EVA CLR 5 V RECALL 2 6 3 FCO 3 .4 ADD/VEH · o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 EVB DLY O · p RECALL 4-FCl ~ 2.0 2.0 2.0 5 PED .?HASES ~2; . ~- .. 5 5 PASSAGE 2.0 EVB CLR ,. FC2 10 6 MAX GAP 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 EVC DLY 0 RT OLA 6 FCA 0.0 7 MIN GAP 2.0 2.0 2 .0 2.0 EVC CLR 5 RT OLB 7 · FCB 0.0 8 MAX EXT 35 30 ~o 30 EVD-DLY 0 DBL ENTRY 8 FCC 0.0 9 MAX 2 ·XR EVD CLR 5 MAX 2 PHASES 9 FCD 0,(1 A MAX 3 MO MAX EV 255 LAG PHASES :,;tifB,tREAri ''o~'!t:+:1 ',;~-; A ·g DAY RR2 CLR 15 RED REST B FOO TB SELECT 1 C REDUCE BY 0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DOW REST-IN-WALK C FD3 PED SELECT 0 -D EVERY 1.0 1. 0 LO 1.0 HR MAX 3 PHASES D FD4 7 WIRE 0 E YELLOW 3.7 4.1 4.1 4.1 MIN YEL START UP 2 6 E FD5 PERMISSIVE 0 F RED 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 SEC FIRST PHASE 4 F FDB OS SEEKING 1 3.5 PED XING FT 43 58 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BIKE XING FT -:· .. 69 67 .. -. '. ' -COS FLASH TYPE 1 CC2 DOWNLOAD 1 NOTES~ ENTRIES IN XHESIC LOCAXIONS CAN BE CHJlNGED IN CC1 FLASH ONLY fffil ' 0 0 -·-·-------·------. ·------.. --·----· LOCATI ON: RTE 5 SB @ CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE CALTRANS cs Versi on 3 DATE : 5/12/14 PAGE 2 C PAGE CONTROL PLANS Y-COORD LAG PHASE FLAGS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 C D E F 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 CYCLE LENGTH 100 100 100 100 LAG FZ FREE 2 4 6 0 1 .FZl GRN FCTR 30 30 30 30 GAPOUT CPl 1 LAG FZ CP 1 1 4 6 1 2 GAPOOT CP2 1 LAG FZ CP 2 1 4 6 2 3 FZ3 GEN FCTR 0 0 -0 0 GAPOUT CP3 1 LAG FZ CP 3 1 4 6 " 3 4 FZ4 GRN FCTR . 18 18 18 1B PERM TIME C',APOUT CP4 1 LAG FZ CP 4 1 4 6 4 5 FZS GRN FCTR 0 0 0 0 LAG OFFSET GAPOUT CPS LAG FZ CP 5 5 6 FORCE OFF · GAPOUT CP6 LAG FZ CP 6 6 7 FZ7 GRN FCTR 0 0 0 0 LONG GRN GAPOIJT CP7 LAG FZ CP 7 7 8 FZ B GRN FCTR 0 0 0 0 NO GREEN GAPOIJT CPS LAG FZ CP 8 8 9 MULTI CYCLE a 0 0 0 GAPOUT CP9 LAG FZ CP 9 9 A ·oFFSET A 0 0 0 0 OFFSET LAG C COORD A B OFFSET B 0 0 0 0 LAG D COORD B .c _OFFSET C 0 0 0 0 COORD FAZES 2 6 C D FZ 3 EXT D E FZ 7 EXT E F OFFSET INTRPT F 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B col MANUAL CP FEATURE OFF ON LOCATION OFF ON CCB/CDB OFFSET TI.MER CO2 MASTER CP 1 _;-· . 1 -~~~~I-~~ CCC/CDC LAG GRE:EN TIMER C03 CURRENT CP SYSTEM MASTER: 2 \{~-/-: 2 :<· ":.•i -~--.1. CCD/CDD FORCE OFF TIMER C0 4 LAST CP RTE 5 SB RAMP 3 1t½:f.'.'i 3 ii:f+-i CCE/CDE LONG GREEN TI.MER C0 7 TRNSMT GP 4 ~r~·~1l 4· f~t1it: CCF/CDF NO GREEN TIMER COD MANUAL OFFSET 5 t.-~~~-p; s fl~ CAO LOCAL CYCLE TIMER 6 ;_<i~:-.-: 6 ~t~t~f)1 CEO MASTER CYCLE TI 111JER 7 :ti: 7 ?~~1·~~ CAA LOCAL OFFSET B }X<: a tfl:" CEA MASTER OFFSET coo -1 n 0 0 ' . .._/ •• •••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••• •••• LOCATION: RTE 5 SB @ CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE CALTRANS CS Ve rsion 3 D PAGE D FLAGS E FLAGS MAX l 2 3 -4 5 6 7 8 MIN 1 2 3 4 5 6 -· 0 RCL RCL l · CP l CP 1 1 4 2 CP 2 CF 2 1 4 3 CP 3 CP 3 1 4 4 CJ? 4 -CF 4 1 4 5 CP 5 CP 5 6 CP 6 CP 6 7 CF 7 CP 7 8 CP B CF 8 9 Cl' 9 CP 9 A B C D E F .1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 LAST POWER FAILURE REGISTER HOUR MINUTE DAY D-A-E D-B-E = D-C-E LAST FLASH TIME REGISTER HOUR = D-A-F MINUTE D-B-F DAY D-C-F 7 8 7 8 DATE: 5/12/14 PAGE 3 E PAGE F FLAGS E FLAGS F FLAGS PED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 FUNCTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 FUNCTION 1. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 RCL 0 CODE 4 0 CP 1 l CODE 5 1 CP 2 2 C-RECALL 2 CF 3 3 D-RECALL 3 CP 4 ·CF 5 . CP 6 CF 7 CP B CP 9 9 9 RCL l RCL 2 E F 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 123 4 5678 RCL 1 -TIME OF DAY MAX RECALL (1ST SELECT) PHASES (CALL ACTIVE LIGHTS) RCL 2 = TIME OF DAY MAX RECALL (2ND SELECT) PHASES (CALL ACTIVE LIGHTS) D-E-E = CB VERSION NUMBER D-E-F = LITHIUM BATTERY CONDITION 84 = BAD 8-5 = GOOD 0 E F 12345678 0 -----------···--·~---------------~ LOCATION: RTE 5 SB @ CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE CALTRANS CB Version 3 DATE: 5/12/14 7 PAGE 9 PAGE -lco9 ~ o or 1 1 TIME OF DAY ACTIVITY TABLE 7+EVENT+HR+MIN+ACT+"E"+ON/OFF+DOW LTS ON/ s M T w T F s HR MIN ·ACT OFF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 ·4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E 05 30 E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 F 22 00 E ON 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ,. ACTIVITY CODE 1 TYPE OF MAX TERMINATION 2 MAX 2 3 MAX 3 4 COND SERV (1ST SELECT) 5 COND SERV ( 2ND SELECT) 6 ENERGIZE AUX OUTPUT-RED 7 ENERGIZE AOX OUT POT-GREEN () CONTROL PLAN TIME OF DAY 9+EVENT+HR+MIN+CP+OS+E+DOW s M T w T F s HR MIN CP as· 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 05 30 2 A l 2 3-4 5 6 7 1 06 45 1 A 2 3 4 5 6 2 08 30 2 A 2 3 4 5 .6 3 11 30 4 A 2 3 4 5 6 4 13 30 2 A 2 3 4 5 6 5 16 00 3 A 2 3 4 5 & 6 18 30 2 A 2 3 4 5 6 ·7 22 00 E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 . A B C D E F 8 ENERGIZE AOX OUTPUT-YELLOW 9 TIME OF DAY MAX RECALL (1ST SELECT) A TRAFFIC ACT. MAX 2 OPERATION B TIME OF DAY MAX RECALL {2ND SELECT) C YELLOW YIELD COORDINATION D YELLOW YIELD COORDINATION E TIME OF DAY FREE OPERATION F FLASHING OPERATION 0 PAGE 4 9 PAGE CONTROL PLAN TIME OF DAY 9+EVENT+HR+MIN+CP+OS~E+DOW s M T w T F s HR MIN CP OS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 . 8 9 A B C D E F 0 •••• ••••••••••••••••••••••• r-_,.;=:=------------------ CONOUCTOR AND CONOU I T SCHEDULE. ... ----------- l5 z C, 0) w 0 ~ (.) LL u.. CZ: It I- , ... SIU : " ' ' CIRCUIT 'IU,l.lOOtl'TWAU. "'"""" "" Sl"All:U "'' .,, "" . NOTE.~ • O ISTlrtG COHOIJIT Rt.ti l SIZE l ] l J INI •5 •• 1•1S •l •l ' ' J ' l otlJ Jtll •l •l I Uf!Sruvl •z •l 1 tH12 "'" I. UHLESS OENOTEO OTHERWISE, All DIME.NSIDtlS FOR MEASUREMENT Of-" l EHGfH SHOWN OM THIS PLAN ARE IN METERS, SIGNAL AND LIGHT I NG PROJECT NOTES \ \ \ PHASE DIAGRAM SOUTH80UNO (LOCATION 11 6P I To-~--I • ..,_ ___ I I .. I ·-I -JL-6....--I I I r l I I I I -2 I I I I I 2P I I ---I ol I I /. I NS TALL 2 OLC FOR Pa..~ SCHEDUt[ AHri PHASE OIACRAM SEE -SHEET E·l TH IS PLAN AC~.'1E F'OA ElECTR I CAL 'HORk ONL. Y . . ,. .. .. BEST IMAGE POSSIBLE l !;/ I I • I . I .. i I / I i I I • J ! ! i ; I i ! SIGNAL AND LIGHTING CMOOIFY} LOCATION 1 SIGNAL NO. 50,1"07 ~,CAL.£ , 1,200 EA 05_1501 E-6 I Cars per Sec./ (per lane) Total Location (I.D.) Route Dir Period cireen Cvcle Veh./hr #lanes Carlsbad VillaQe Dr (211) 5 SB 0530 -0930 2 7.2 -11 .5 996 -626 1 The meters normally operate in a traffic responsive mode. There are 15 separate rates or steps between the slowest and the fastest discharge rate that depend on the mainlane volumes. I-5 SB On Ramp (Caltrans) •••• I • •• •• HOV No L; C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C ,.. Carlsbad VIiiage Lofts AGC Develo~t •. !f APPENDIXB ( y C Urban Systetft/1 .A6sociates, Inc. ~vember 7, 2016 .5 EXISTING IN'I'ERSECTION LOS WORKSHEETS B 005615-Report_D HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Grand Ave. & Hardin~ St. ntersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.8 ovement NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations 4+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 121 7 10 Future Vol, veh/h 121 7 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade,% 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 132 8 11 a·or/Minor Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 125 125 10 • Stage 1 21 21 Stage 2 104 104 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 5.42 5.52 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 5.52 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 870 765 1071 Stage 1 1002 878 Stage 2 920 809 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 849 0 1071 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 849 0 Stage 1 999 0 Stage 2 901 0 ff,. roach NB • HCM Control Delay, s 10 HCM LOS B inor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NET NERNBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1571 -863 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 -0.174 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 10 HCM Lane LOS A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh 0 0.6 Baseline SBL SBT SBR EL 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop Free -None 0 0 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 5 Ma'or1 39 4.12 2.218 1571 1571 NE 0.5 SWL SWT SWR 1610 0.02 7.3 0 A A 0.1 NET NER 4' '(' 9 64 9 64 0 0 Free Free -None 0 0 0 92 92 2 2 10 70 0 0 Existing AM 6/26/2016 s SWT SWR 4t 30 35 1 30 35 1 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 33 38 1 Ma'or2 10 0 0 4.12 2.218 1610 1610 SW 3.3 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Harding St. & Carlsbad Village Dr. ~ t r ~ + ) ) ,Movemen Lane Configurations Traffic Volume {vph) 19 66 76 59 25 9 7 Future Volume {vph) 19 66 76 59 25 9 7 Ideal Flow {vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.94 0.99 1.00 Flt Protected 0.99 0.97 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1734 1781 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.59 0.95 Satd. Flow (eerm) 1665 1084 1770 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow {vph) 21 72 83 64 27 10 8 RTOR Reduction {vph) 0 39 0 0 5 0 0 Lane Groue Flow (veh) 0 137 0 0 96 0 8 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot Protected Phases 8 4 5 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.7 12.7 0.9 Effective Green, g {s) 12.7 12.7 0.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.01 Clearance Time {s) 4.6 4.6 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap {vph) 282 183 21 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 c0.09 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.52 0.38 Uniform Delay, d1 28.1 28.3 36.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 1.3 4.2 Delay (s) 29.5 29.6 40.9 Level of Service C C D Approach Delay (s) 29.5 29.6 Approach LOS C C ntersection Summa!}'. HCM 2000 Control Delay 14.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.37 Actuated Cycle ength {s) 74.9 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.4% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period {min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Baseline ,If /l ( t~ 381 24 130 381 24 130 1900 1900 1900 4.6 4.5 0.95 0.99 1.00 1.00 3508 1770 1.00 0.95 3508 1770 0.92 0.92 0.92 414 26 141 3 0 0 437 0 141 NA Prot 2 1 33.3 15.2 33.3 15.2 0.44 0.20 4.6 4.5 3.0 2.0 1559 359 0.12 c0.08 0.28 0.39 13.2 25.9 1.00 1.00 0.4 0.3 13.6 26.1 B C 14.1 B B 13.7 A Existing AM 6/26/2016 JI' t,, WT t~ 515 71 515 71 1900 1900 4.6 0.95 0.98 1.00 3475 1.00 3475 0.92 0.9 560 77 7 0 630 0 NA 6 47.6 47.6 0.64 4.6 3.0 2208 c0 .18 0.29 6.1 1.00 0.3 6.4 A 10.0 A Synchro 9 Report Page 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • HCM 2010 TWSC Existing AM 3: Carlsbad Villa9e Dr. & Project Drivewa~ 6/26/2016 ntersection Int Delay, s/veh SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET Lane Configurations .,, .,, "I ti. ~ Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 5 0 0 31 18 500 13 106 752 5 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 5 0 0 31 18 500 13 106 752 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None -None -None Storage Length 0 0 150 200 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 5 0 0 34 20 543 14 115 817 5 a·or/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Ma"or1 Ma"or2 Conflicting Flow All -411 -279 823 0 0 558 0 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy -6.94 -6.94 4.14 4.14 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 Follow-up Hdwy -3.32 -3.32 2.22 2.22 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 590 0 0 718 803 1009 Stage 1 0 0 0 0 Stage 2 0 0 0 0 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -590 -718 803 1009 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 • roach SE NW NE SW • HCM Control Delay, s 11.2 10.3 0.3 1.1 HCM LOS 8 8 • inor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NET NERNWLn1 SELn1 SWL SWT SWR Capacity (veh/h) 803 -718 590 1009 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 -0.04 7 0.009 0.114 • HCM Control Delay (s) 9.6 -10.3 11.2 9 HCM Lane LOS A 8 8 A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 0 0.4 • • • • Baseline Synchro 9 Report • Page 2 • • • • • • HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing AM • 4: 1-5 SB On Rame/1-5 SB Off Rame & Carlsbad Villaae Dr. 6/26/2016 t r ~ + ; ) ( JI t/ • .#) ;If /l • NBL NBT NBR BT • Lane Configurations ~ ft tt Traffic Volume {vph) 0 0 0 96 0 298 0 375 195 185 568 0 • Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 96 0 298 0 375 195 185 568 0 • Ideal Flow (vRhpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.1 5.1 6.1 4.7 6.1 • Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 00 0.95 • Frt 0.92 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 • Satd. Flow (prot) 1592 1504 3358 1770 3539 • Flt Permitted 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (eerm) 1592 1504 3358 1770 3539 • Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 • Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 104 0 324 0 408 212 201 617 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 86 178 0 59 0 0 0 0 • Lane Graue Flow (veh) 0 0 0 0 135 29 0 561 0 201 617 0 • Turn Type Split NA Prat NA Prat NA Protected Phases 4 4 4 2 1 6 • Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 10.8 10.8 30.2 20.8 55.7 • Effective Green, g (s) 10.8 10.8 30.2 20.8 55.7 • Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.39 0.27 0.72 Clearance Time (s) 5.1 5.1 6.1 4.7 6.1 • Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 • Lane Grp Cap (vph) 221 209 1305 473 2536 v/s Ratio Prat c0.08 0.02 c0.17 c0.11 0.17 • v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.61 0.14 0.43 0.42 0.24 Uniform Delay, d1 31.5 29.4 17.4 23.5 3.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.5 0.1 1.0 0.2 0.2 Delay (s) 34.9 29.5 18.5 23.7 4.0 • Level of Service C C B C A Approach Delay (s) 0.0 32.3 18.5 8.8 Approach LOS A C B A ntersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 17.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.46 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 77.7 Sum of lost time (s) 15.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 • C Critical Lane Group • • • Baseline Synchro 9 Report • Page 2 • • • • • • • HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Carlsbad Villa~e Dr. & 1-5 NB Off Rame/1-5 NB On Rame "'l t r ~ ! J ) ovement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR NEL Lane Configurations 4' .,, "I Traffic Volume (vph) 201 0 212 0 0 0 229 Future Volume (vph) 201 0 212 0 0 0 229 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.1 5.1 4.7 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 Said. Flow (pro!) 1770 1583 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 Said. Flow (eerm) 1770 1583 1770 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 218 0 230 0 0 0 249 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 191 0 0 0 0 Lane Groue Flow (veh) 0 218 39 0 0 0 249 Turn Type Split NA Prot Pro! Protected Phases 8 8 8 5 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 17.0 17.0 19.1 Effective Green, g (s) 17.0 17.0 19.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.19 Clearance Time (s) 5.1 5.1 4.7 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 300 269 338 v/s Ratio Pro! c0.12 0.02 c0.14 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.73 0.15 0.74 Uniform Delay, d1 39.3 35.3 38.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 7.2 0.1 7.0 Delay (s) 46.5 35.4 45.1 Level of Service D D D Approach Delay (s) 40.8 0.0 Approach LOS D A ,Intersection Summa!}'. HCM 2000 Control Delay 27.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.2% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Baseline J' /l ( NET NER SWL t-t 273 0 0 273 0 0 1900 1900 1900 6.1 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1.00 3539 0.92 0.92 0.92 297 0 0 0 0 0 297 0 0 NA 2 71 .8 71 .8 0.72 6.1 2.0 2541 0.08 0.12 4.3 1.00 0.1 4.4 A 23.0 C C 15.9 C Existing AM 6/26/2016 JI' t/ SWT SW f+ .,, 552 203 552 203 1900 1900 6.1 6.1 0.95 0.95 0.99 0.85 1.00 1.00 1760 1504 1.00 1.00 1760 1504 0.92 0.92 600 221 1 102 621 97 NA Perm 6 6 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 0.48 0.48 6.1 6.1 2.0 2.0 844 721 c0.35 0.06 0.74 0.13 20.9 14.5 1.00 1.00 5.7 0.4 26.6 14.8 C B 23.7 C Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Grand Ave. & Hardin9 St. nfersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.9 Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 191 29 0 Future Vol, veh/h 191 29 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade,% 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 208 7 32 0 a·or/Minor Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 156 157 34 Stage 1 60 60 Stage 2 96 97 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 5.52 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 5.52 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 835 735 1039 Stage 1 963 845 Stage 2 928 815 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 813 0 1039 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 813 0 Stage 1 954 0 Stage 2 911 0 ~eeroach NB HCM Control Delay, s 11 .1 HCM LOS B inor Lane/Major Mvmt CaP.acity (veh/h) 1570 -837 1578 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 -0.293 0.018 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 -11.1 7.3 HCM Lane LOS A A B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 1.2 0.1 11/16/2015 Baseline 0 0 12 0 0 12 0 0 0 Stop Stop Free Free Free -None -None 0 0 0 0 0 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 13 34 155 0 0 4.12 2.218 1570 1570 NE 0.5 SWT SWR 0 A Existing PM 6/26/2016 SWR 26 2 26 2 0 0 Free Free Free -None 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 28 38 2 0 0 4.12 2.218 1578 1578 SW 3 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Hardin9 St. & Carlsbad Villa9e Dr. ~ t r ~ ! ) ) ovement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR NEL Lane Configurations ~ 4t-.,, Traffic Volume (vph) 27 76 108 141 55 6 24 Future Volume (vph) 27 76 108 141 55 6 24 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost lime (s) 4.6 4.6 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri 0.93 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.99 0.97 0.95 Said. Flow (pro!) 1723 1792 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.53 0.95 Said. Flow (eerm) 1643 979 1770 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 29 83 117 153 60 7 26 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 42 0 0 2 0 0 Lane Groue Flow (veh) 0 187 0 0 218 0 26 Turn TyRe Perm Perm NA Pro! Protected Phases 4 5 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green , G (s) 20.8 20.8 1.9 Effective Green, g (s) 20.8 20.8 1.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.02 Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 394 235 38 v/s Ratio Pro! 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 c0.22 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.93 0.68 Uniform Delay, d1 28.2 32.2 42.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 38.9 33.5 Delay (s) 29.1 71 .1 75.6 Level of Service C E E Approach Delay (s) 29.1 71.1 Approach LOS C E nterseclion Summa!}'. HCM 2000 Control DelaY. 24.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.64 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 86.6 Sum of lost time s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.9% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group 11/16/2015 Baseline JI /l ( NET NER SWL t~ "'i 733 23 117 733 23 117 1900 1900 1900 4.6 4.5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 0.95 3523 1770 0.95 3523 1770 0.92 0.92 25 127 0 0 0 127 NA Pro! 2 1 35.0 17.1 35.0 17.1 0.40 0.20 4.6 4.5 3.0 2.0 1423 349 c0.23 c0.07 0.58 0.36 20.0 30.0 1.00 1.00 1.7 0.2 21.7 30.3 C C 23.4 C C 13.7 C Existing PM 6/26/2016 JI ~ SWT SWR tt+ 686 136 686 136 1900 1900 4.6 0.95 0.98 1.00 3451 1.00 3451 0.92 0.9 746 148 13 0 881 0 NA 6 50.2 50.2 0.58 4.6 3.0 2000 c0.26 0.44 10.3 1.00 0.7 11.0 B 13.4 B Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Carlsbad Villa9e Dr. & Project Drivewai'. ntersection Int Delay, s/veh Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 62 Future Vol, veh/h 5 0 0 62 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 67 a·or/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All -532 -545 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy -6.94 -6.94 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 Follow-up Hdwy -3.32 -3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 492 0 0 482 Stage 1 0 0 0 0 Stage 2 0 0 0 0 Platoon blocked,% Mov Cae-1 Maneuver -492 -482 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 ~eeroach SE HCM Control Delay, s 12.4 13.7 HCM LOS B B vmt NEL NET SWT Capacity (veh/h) 482 492 636 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.14 0.011 0.174 HCM 13.7 12.4 11 .9 HCM Lane LOS B B B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 0.6 11/16/2015 Baseline f+ 14 973 29 14 973 29 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 150 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 15 1058 32 0 0 4.14 2.22 651 651 0.1 Existing PM 6/26/2016 l+ 102 969 9 102 969 9 0 0 0 Free Free Free 200 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 111 1053 10 0 0 4.14 2.22 636 636 1.1 Synchro 9 Report Page 2 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing PM 4: 1-5 SB On Rame/1-5 SB Off Rame & Carlsbad Villa~e Dr. 6/26/2016 ~ t r ~ ! ) ) JI /l ( JI t/ ovement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations 4+ .,, t~ l'j tt Traffic Volume {vph) 0 0 0 99 0 372 0 770 356 129 692 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 99 0 372 0 770 356 129 692 0 Ideal Flow {vphP.I 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.1 5.1 6.1 4.7 6.1 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.91 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 1581 1504 3371 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (eerm) 1581 1504 3371 1770 3539 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 108 0 404 0 837 387 140 752 0 RTOR Reduction {vph) 0 0 0 0 84 208 0 50 0 0 0 0 Lane Graue Flow (veh) 0 0 0 0 178 42 0 1174 0 140 752 0 Turn Type Split NA Prat NA Prot NA • Protected Phases 4 4 4 2 1 6 Permitted Phases • Actuated Green, G (s) 14.4 14.4 47.1 14.4 66.2 • Effective Green, g (s) 14.4 14.4 47.1 14.4 66.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.51 0.16 0.72 • Clearance Time (s) 5.1 5.1 6.1 4.7 6.1 • Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap {vph) 248 235 1729 277 2552 • v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.03 c0.35 c0.08 0.21 • v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.72 0.18 0.68 0.51 0.29 • Uniform Delay, d1 36.8 33.6 16.7 35.4 4.5 • Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 7.9 0.1 2.2 0.5 0.3 • Delay {s) 44.7 33.7 18.9 36.0 4.8 • Level of Service D C B D A Approach Delay {s) 0.0 39.3 18.9 9.7 • ApJ:)roach LOS A D B A • ntersection Summa!}'. HCM 2000 Control Delay 19.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service B • HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65 • Actuated Cycle Length (s) 91 .8 Sum of lost time (s) 15.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.8% ICU Level of Service E • Analysis Perioa min 15 • C Critical Lane Group • • • • • 11/16/2015 Baseline Synchro 9 Report • Page 2 • • • -- HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Carlsbad Village Dr. & 1-5 NB Off Ramp/1-5 NB On Ramp .#) t r ~ + ) ) ovement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR NEL Lane Configurations 4' 'f' lj Traffic Volume (vph) 318 1 198 0 0 0 375 Future Volume (vph) 318 1 198 0 0 0 375 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.1 5.1 4.7 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 Said. Flow (pro!) 1774 1583 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 Said. Flow (eerm) 1774 1583 1770 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 346 1 215 0 0 0 408 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 169 0 0 0 0 Lane Graue Flow (veh) 0 347 46 0 0 0 408 Turn Type Split NA Pro! Pro! Protected Phases 8 8 8 5 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 21 .0 21 .0 25.3 Effective Green, g (s) 21.0 21 .0 25.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 5.1 5.1 4.7 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 375 335 451 v/s Ratio Pro! c0.20 0.03 c0.23 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.93 0.14 0.90 Uniform Delay, d1 38.3 31.7 35.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 27.8 0.1 20.9 Delay (s) 66.1 31 .8 56.6 Level of Service E C E Approach Delay (s) 53.0 0.0 Approach LOS D A ntersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 38.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.91 Actuated Cycle Length s) 99.1 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.8% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group 11/16/2015 Baseline /I /l ( 506 0 0 506 0 0 1900 1900 1900 6.1 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1.00 3539 0.92 0.92 0.92 550 0 0 0 0 0 550 0 0 NA 2 66.9 66.9 0.68 6.1 2.0 2389 0.16 0.23 6.2 1.00 0.2 6.4 A 27.8 C D 15.9 E Existing PM 6/26/2016 JI' -!/ SWT f+ 524 172 524 172 1900 1900 6.1 6.1 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1761 1504 1.00 1.00 1761 1504 0.92 0.92 570 187 1 105 588 63 NA Perm 6 6 36.9 36.9 36.9 36.9 0.37 0.37 6.1 6.1 2.0 2.0 655 560 c0.33 0.04 0.90 0.11 29.3 20.4 1.00 1.00 17.4 0.4 46.8 20.8 D C 41.0 D Synchro 9 Report Page 3 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • c;; C C C C. C c! C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C m C C C C • • • • • • • • ~ Carls~ V:~age Lo.IP: • · AGC Develop,ten4 pif .. · APPENDIXC. , C Urban S,Steta Associates, !itc. .~7.2016 ~ .. , SA.NDAG SERIES ll FORECAST YEAR 2020, 2035 ~ ~O & GROWTH RATE CALCULATIONS C 005615-Report_D j • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Carlsbad Village Mixed-Use Development Growth Rate Calculation Road I Street Segment I Year 2020 ADT I Year 2050 ADT I % Growth Per Year ,\ ·•\--t-,t.L •I •• ,,_, •' I ,, ,._,,_.... A ,, ...-• \ c"l \ ,\,,\Jo,.~ ,t ,~ ,-• .,, •• • • •• ,. -,. , .... , .... ,, ... ,..,.,,.,'-,, ....... """•~ .... •\e,•• • , .. ~,\, IJ .•. T~ ~ .,. •• ll •• ·o\-,\ ....... '--',.>•-••· ,\" ,¥ ,\ Carlsbad Village Drive I Harding to 1-5 SB Ramps I 2s,100 I 32,100 I o.41% Road I Street Segment I Existing I Year 2035 ADT I % Growth Per Year •~11''.\t~"l:ti;'\..II , 1.1:.,:0::.-~•--t¥-,..1.'C;t~ ,:J':'. ,1"' .-i:~rl\'_,, ;. ~ ,\'.-\;cl::,.._• •~' ;.i:.•";c~;•~ ;l~µ:?'"; 1-\;.i•~':;p • ,p,,:s:r.;;,v,,~!.." ,,r~· ,lt" ,,;-;;rt;;.,•;,i.t~,\-4;icr'r,,r.1.-,uv,:i""1;!~1ITT,i!";.,!' ,1r"",oi:~r"',1,!~ 'l.1ir,t;;:l1\,:tl \t-?~ ~~:v~;•u'!'\r\,-i.r£'-l:rt' ,1•;,.1•' .n-;:Li:;:t':,.!1,.,t1,., tL,:t\· ,n'-,...1.~;..i• Carlsbad Village Drive I Harding to 1-5 SB Ramps I 28,299 I 32,100 I 0.67% ADT= Average Daily Traffic Applied Yearly Growth Rate Forecast Model SAN DAG Series 12 005615 + Basemaps • BEST IMAGE POSSIBLE ------' er between 1 ~ ' ~., \i '¢'?) I \ \ • ,e • •••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••• + Basemaps •• BEST IMAGE POSSIBLE + Basemaps •• ••• • •••• ~ ; -,:/120 i 1.:. 1·r / I! ~~~~~~~~§;;;,;ii '::Or:::::: T:-· --=-===---rr~~N"e::;:~==~ ', ~~ BEST IMAG1E POSSIBLE ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• --c C C C C C C C C C C C C C e C C e C C C C C C C • • • • C c/ C. C C er C C C C C C C Carlsbad Ytllt1gt1 Lofts AGC Deve/opman!; UC, , .) / I 0 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. November 7, 20)6 APPENDJXD EXISTING WITH PROJECT LOS·WORDHEE'FS ' I D 005615-Report_D HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Grand Ave. & Harding St. ntersectlon Int Delay, s/veh 5.8 ovement NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations 4+ TrafficVol, veh/h 121 7 10 0 Future Vol , veh/h 121 7 10 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 ~o 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # . -0 Grade,% 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 132 ~ 8,:"' 11 0 Major/Minor inor1 Conflicting Flow All 129 130 8 Sta_ge 1 18 18. Stage 2 111 112 Critica_l Hdwy 6.42 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 5.42 5.52 Critic~! Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 5J52 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 865 761 1074 Stage 1 1005 880 Stage 2 914 803 Platoon blocked , % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 843 0 1074 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 843 0 Stage 1 1002 0- Stage 2 894 0 Y\!)Qroach NB HCM Control Delay, s 10.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Ma·or Mvmt NEL NET NERNBLn1 SWL Capacity (veh/h) 1563 -857 1612 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 -0.175 0.021 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 -10.1 7.3 HCM Lane LOS A A B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.6 0.1 SBT SBR NEL 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 Q 0 Stop Stop Free • None 0 92 -. 9_2 92 2 2 2 0 0 5 Ma1or1 45 4.12 2.218 1563 1563 NE 0.5 SWT SWR 0 A NET 4' 7 7 0 Free Existing + Project AM 11/2/2016 ER SWL SWT SWR .,, 4+ 64 31 40 1 64 31 40 1 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Free -None -None . 100 0 0 0 0 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 8 70 34 43 1 Major2 0 0 8 0 0 4.12 2.218 1612 1612 SW 3.1 Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing + Project AM 2: Hardin~ St. & Carlsbad Villa~e Dr. 11/2/2016 ~ t r ~ + ~ ) ,JI /l " ( JI' ovement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR NEL NET Lane Configurations +ft +ft "i tf+ ?i tf+ Traffic.Volume (vph) 19 66 75 60 25 9 7 380 24 4 133 517 Future Volume (vph) 19 66 75 60 25 9 7 380 24 4 133 517 Ideal Flowjyphg_l) 19QO~ 190Q 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 19.Q.O 1900 1900 19 0 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.6 kane Util. ~c,tor .J QO ·--1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Fri 0.94 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.99 0.97 0.95 f.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 1735 1781 1770 3508 1770 3475 Flt P~mitted 0.95 0.59 0.95 1.()() 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (eerm) 1665 1082 1770 3508 1770 3475 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 21 72 82 65 27 10 8 413 26 4 145 562 B,TOR Reguction (vph) 0 40 -0 0 5 Q o_ 4 0 0 0 7 Lane Groue Flow (veh) 0 135 0 0 97 0 8 435 0 0 149 632 Jurn Ty_p Perm NA Pe.rm NA Prot NA Pr9t Pro NA Protected Phases 8 4 5 2 1 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.8 12.8 0.9 33.2 15.8 48.1 Effective G@.~n1 g {s) 12.8 12.8 0.9 33.2 15.8 48.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.01 0.44 0.21 0.64 Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.6 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 282 183 21 1542 370 2213 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.12 c0.08 c0.18 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 c0.09 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.53 0.38 0.28 0.40 0.29 Uniform Delay, d1 28.3 28.6 37.0 13.5 25.8 6.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 1.5 4.2 0.5 0.3 0.3 Delay (s) 29.6 30.1 41 .2 14.0 26.0 6.4 Level of Service C C D B C A Approach Delay (s) 29.6 30.1 14.5 10.1 Approach LOS C C B B nterseclion Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 15.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.38 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 75.5 Sum of lost time (s) 13.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Harding St. & Carlsbad Village Dr. ovement La~onfigurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) . Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Said. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted • Said. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Tyf:)e Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Lev~! of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS )ntersection Summary SWR 71 71 1900 0.92 77 0 0 Existing + Project AM 11/2/2016 Synchro 9 Report HCM 2010 TWSC Existing + Project AM 3: Carlsbad Villa~e Dr. & Project Drivewa~ 11/2/2016 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 SEL SET SER N NWR El: NEI NER Lane Configurations .,, .,, .., tf+ Traffic Vol, veh/~ 0 0 13 0 0 31 16 505 13 3 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 13 0 0 31 16 505 13 3 Conflicti,ng Pe,ds, #/hr . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Chann~!lzed • None • None • None • None Storage Length 0 0 150 200 Yeh /ti Mediqn· Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 MvmtFlow b 0 14 0 0 34 17 549 14 115 817 3 a·or/Minor Minor2 Minor1 M ·or Ma"or2 Conflicting Flow All . 410 282 821 , 0 0 563 0 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy 6.94 . 6.94 4.14 4.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy SJg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 3.32 3.32 2.22 2.22 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 591 0 0 715 804 f005 Stage 1 0 0 0 0 Stage 2 0 0 0 0 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver . 591 . 715 804 1005 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 eeroac s NW NE SW HCM ControrDelay, s 11.2 10.3 0.3 1.1 HCM LOS B B inor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NET NERNWLn1 SELn1 SWL SWT SWR Capacity (veh/h) 804 715 591 1005 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.022 · 0.047 0.024 0.115 HCM Control Dela{(s) 9.6 . 10.3 11 .2 9 HCM Lane LOS A B B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 "·' 0.1 0.1 0.4 Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing + Project AM 4: 1-5 SB On Ramp/1-5 SB Off Rame & Carlsbad Villa1;1e Dr. 11/2/2016 .#) t r lJf ! i-) ;,I /l ( ;I ~ Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR NEL NET NER S L SWT SWR Lane Configurations 4+ 7' t~ .,, tt Traffic ,Yolume (vph) 9~ 0 0 96 ~ 0 298 0 377 198 185 567 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 96 0 298 0 377 198 185 567 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900' -1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 19QO 1900~ 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.1 5.1 6.1 4.7 6.1 Lane Uti~ Factor 0.95 0.95 . 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.92 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 1592 1504 3357 1770 3539 Flt Permitted = -0.9f f oo 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (eerm) 1592 1504 3357 1770 3539 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.9f 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 104 0 324 0 410 215 201 616 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 86 178 0 59 0 0 -0 0 Lane Groue Flow (veh) 0 0 0 0 135 29 0 566 0 201 616 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 4 4 4 2 1 6 P~rmitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 10.8 10.8 30.2 20.8 55.7 Effe_ctive Green, _g (s) 10.8 10.8 30.2 20.8 55.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.39 0.27 0.72 Clearance Time (s) 5.1 5.1 6.1 4.7 6.1 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 221 209 1304 473 2536 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.02 c0.17 c0.11 0.17 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.61 0.14 0.43 0.42 0.24 Uniform Delay, d1 31.5 29.4 17.5 23.5 3.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.5 0.1 1.1 0.2 0.2 Delay (s) 34.9 29.5 18.5 23.7 4.0 Level of Service C C B C A Approach Delay (s) 0.0 32.3 18.5 8.9 Approach LOS A C B A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 17.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.46 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 77.7 Sum of lost time (s) 15.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing + Project AM 5: Carlsbad Villa~e Dr. & 1-5 NB Off Rame/1-5 NB On Rame 11/2/2016 ~ t r ~ + ~ ) J' /t ( JI t/ ovement NBL NBT NBR SB SBT SBR E NET NER SW!3 Lane Configurations 4' .,, l\ tt f+ .,, Traffic Volume (vph) 200 0 212 0 0 0 230 274 0 0 552 203 Future Volume (vph) 200 0 212 0 0 0 230 274 0 0 552 203 ldeaJ Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1~06 1fr00 1900 1900 19QO j}loo 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.1 5.1 4.7 6.1 6.1 6.1 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected. 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 3539 1760 1504 Flt Permitted 0--'95 . 1.6]) 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (eerm) 1770 1583 1770 3539 1760 1504 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 . --Adj. Flow (vph) 217 0 230 0 0 0 250 298 0 0 600 221 RTOR4Redu~ion (vQ!l} 0 0 190 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 118 Lane Groue Flow (veh) 0 217 40 0 0 0 250 298 0 0 621 81 Turn Type Split NA. Prot prot NA NA Perm Protected Phases 8 8 8 5 2 6 PermJttecf Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 14.5 14.5 19.2 56.9 33.0 33.0 Effectjye Gr~en, g (sJ 14.5 14.5 19.2 56.9 33.0 33.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.18 0.23 0.69 0.40 0.40 Clearance Ti:me (s) 5.1 5.1 4.7 6.1 6.1 6.1 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ~ane ·Grp Cap (vph) 310 277 411 2437 703 600 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.03 c0.14 0.08 c0.35 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.15 0.61 0.12 0.88 0.14 Uniform Delay, d1 32.0 28.8 28.3 4.4 23.0 15.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.5 0.1 1.8 0.1 15.0 0.5 Delay (s) 37.5 28.9 30.1 4.5 38.0 16.2 Level of Service D C C A D 8 Approach Delay (s) 33.1 0.0 16.2 32.8 Approach LOS C A B C ntersection Summar HCM 2000 Control Delay 27.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 82.6 Sum of lost time (s) 15.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group Synchro 9 Report HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Grand Ave. & Harding St. Int Delay, s/veh 5.7 Existing With Project PM 11/2/2016 wr1&-~nEm■m:m-•~~mam:~a;w~~ Lane Configurations 4+ 4' 'f' 4+ T(afftc~V§lJ ehlh.;:'_·_;;\:;J~!'.::cl;'tj 9f;~t'}6;:? ·2_g;';';;;_-;t;/?;,o;X::~:o~:/)o;;'.'~.\C'.;i;>i2 ;,.~ .. ·A.7 J,,,143;;7·y.·',·});29:·;,;.5d:·tr,~2 FutureVol,veh/h 191 6 29 0 0 0 12 47 143 29 50 2 Cqn~ 1Ct1nQ~eect's;:fllhr.·.L~~;~~Y;: -~:~t--~P ;,i~~--J.~o-~~->~t~~:b l\~jJ~::j~·.~;;i§~ Oj~:t:~· Q::~f ~;r$ o~~:~~~~s~-}~·i::~:~~~-o·::L~=?;.j~;o~~£}i~ltt~ ~~.7:_:.j~·:1--~1~~-~0.1~~~~~~~0 -t~--;~j·;K:·o Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free B!t9b~D~~tft.~i~fi~!Z.iJ~~il.~[;)?/!i01t~tztt~[~~:2.t~;;fI;~t&:0lfiiWJt;f \&,~Pff ~::fu:}j;jt~~:;:J;¼?~~~{j;:1:ittNO.Il~i~:ii:~i~:;~&~it:~¾i~l~E!-~:~ ~~~J~:.~~~1~J-~.t~~ii§~ttc:.;~~'tc1~,,:~:<~.::~~tJ:~';:J::::tz:1~5:L;;;_~:~~iii::.:::x:~,,---~::'..,,,:::::~~=-:~:.-~t .. ~.;.·:s±~~:tt,=2::::'.2~r~~::::w;fg;J:~Egj Grade, % 0 0 0 0 E~~K[~4i:t~;§l§f;f~~-:~;,~~;~;r~:~J~i.~I:];~,:.[?;:;:~:~?::;:i~-;;;:~~!2~S~?~.2.::~~g~~~;.$~~;i~::::~~=:r,:.:-::~.;]~~J:~:]z:~;;]1~~UE~I:S:911E~:~~b~.~~ Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mitnt~l?Vf.:jr1t:1r95:.~\;}~irfJ.~1EJl{~?.9.§·1ftitf{;:~I:]·?;.r1~?.~;1;~~fst~~-};:;}j~Qt-i~:f111t;Q.i1i~3/:{{9.Jtif.t~i~tff ~;~~t~~;1~LlQJ:liflfg9:~;i~f~ti~Jt'i~?ti;iI~q~i~~:;i] Platoon blocked, % M.faQ~P-J.M~b:ei!'{~(:;:,":~f.i,::ZZP~---~-~9.,:.JQU,;,~"2.f .. ,'..L>..:::;:td:,;,._,.'.f: .. s..::..~0:.'.,..:1_;;~7:;;:~.,;_'._-:2:';, .. ;.:~5.£XL1~9.~J~ .. ;:.Ls. .. ;,;f; Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 770 0 Stage 2 888 0 HCM Lane LOS A A B A A Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Harding St. & Carlsbad Village Dr. Existing With Project PM 11/2/2016 Satd. Flow (perm) 1642 962 1770 3523 1770 3452 gejiffi'oit[f~~tor?r8C''~·t·/-\)'·9z\:t·p.92 Jv·o:92'><::g·,f!ii<·,012:~'ffoJt,'5~ggz •~ifo:stt':,•;o.w·~--~,0·92z··J1.9~:;;';-os? Bioo~~;ef.t~t~r((ypbJt:~~;0,:;t ~~::?t:·:~~~t .. x3.~~;@~;;:~~~:·~::11i.~1~:r;;;tf:L~;::.-~~1:tif.~l:,~';J?~·,;tl:;;:·~~:~ ~2.1}~ :.sh~~-:~;.]~~~ Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 194 0 0 222 0 26 826 0 0 146 886 LidLrllXP.~~EL~: . :·t~:Tt.:>,::,: . .e~rmL;:'. ~-;·_N.6,;;'~,~-L:~}):::';,l'..P.,e.futt:,z1r: N&~; £,,,::Jc1k~d~@:tli ! ~J-~6;,<,{:.;. T:;-~~:;f.rgt; i~')?,(9f~:~-;i'.NJ\ Protected Phases 8 4 5 2 1 1 6 : · . ~M+ .o·eonlf6f blJaf!if;Wf.4Y1-1il:i:~t'!£:ft};~i;i,';~/1::lf2 . ., HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68 ?59.tQ~!~]i9Yltt;~'.fi~t~~({) ir~i£~;~1:y([li}~i\1'j111.}tiNl:.JU1~.lirt:~iffe:;~~~ 6l~i,l9]l~ttD:¥.:;{§),f!tr£t:~4t~ff;~i~t!stfi.fiJ;)~1#$}?t\}tff~;1~;1t~t~t~:f·~t:~~~:f5~ Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.7% ICU Level of Service C ~~.~Y~!§~R?JL~~L!m1n);~;i~~•;~;s ~;~-:~'i\.::;[;j;;J,;~;-ii-~?~~~~~~·-~-~:;{-~ti~-_:;_.,g\~J __ ~J.i~J;;.:~~;:i~f~,1i~,,i;_;ii:~~~,1i?J:~t:l~:~~S/¥:?~: :i: }~;~;~>-_:.;:. r~:~~~;T.·-~~{~-~.{ '.·~-:-~~-'~,:,.J!·~]~::;:1::~-1~; -~~~, _: ---~~:'.~~~:: '-;:;:--·:_ .. :.r.~ :'.·-·:~/-.~~; c Critical Lane Group Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Harding St. & Carlsbad Village Dr. Fri Existing With Project PM 11/2/2016 IT d rn~Jyp fo-.t'l?F>f :\•~:-::·;· _:!~ '.;:~: ~-.r f ?T(~:(::i'"~~·~?~/7 :-.. ~\\--: --~~~-~-~ ;:✓ .···:;:~:··~{--_:··,,>f: ~:'.: ··-;:;-~~;t~:~~--~r_::~-<).-+:_..s;{~~-:~,-.. ~~--(~ '/'\~_1 ;£_ e :~~; . .-:.~-/1R; :~:;. .. ,·:.·~~ ·-i\ ... < .. :-~~t-~ ~>r~ :_:·:c·--' y 7~:'.t~ Protected Phases ~-~~t§~pgap(Y,p_h)":·:)t;_',;;:-:::LtJL.•';',l':.:r.·;~•i''S,;;//:;'f:;}.\.-k/c'.\tL -~~:+•c.c./•.,:~~L.tt,::•;;:.:';J v/s Ratio Prot v1s··1;sai/1>""Perm'.~'.}2:f}•·•-~-•,< v/c Ratio Progression Factor Jti~(¢.rn~.fil£JJ?~l9y/dJ':f/I'.~ilAr~;,:\t>:stff.:1½.Ls/l\l~.;;:tiG,;;6~'.:l}f;\·rLt:i(•,./c.\\:;;;HU:,:(i:•:.;;;J:.;,:;.;_x:;..0£:/'. Delay (s} ~.,...,,..,, •· '•· -, -.,. ,¥,• ., >-' ,--~. --~ .. ~--·· .. _ • .,. "., ►' ,_. -~"'•-,,-• --··,-. "· ._.,.. •• , · ... ~ .. ~,•• ?~-· ~' ..... ,... • ,.. , ••• ....,, .. _.,..-,••--~ '/"#•-, """ ~ .._ ••• __ ,..•"·"• ... --.-r . ~-.n--,.,,--.,. --.--·: .,,.,-----.,--~-••· --~ ••.~-pi,.. -· •• LeveL,of_.$ervi_ce :,._ .·,. ·/_ .. /<.:,·:-' . .-,:.;{!,/;; .. ,, .. ,, ,:_•,,, , ... • :·, ,.,.,; ·:<J,:-.;·:.:• ,:,,/,•:·_,.,_, ,·.,,:· ,., .:::;,.,,~ .. ~ ·: •••• :,.;.;-_,~,~--•. :-,:;::;,J:.-:: ,'..,::,.;, ::\",;;:•>~:.: -~ ..::_ .•,'.<: >,;: ~6(6:~~~01:r):)?:::~\1[/?77'.1\i'h·::t,:'".:.1.i?;:~{~>.:;:'.;~>·t::?.:r;;::<i:'.C:"L~t>;j_·,.>>-:4(;yl;,~ .. :t;rjl'•,<t·x;::,_:·; Synchro 9 Report HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Carlsbad Village Dr. & Project Driveway Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Platoon blocked, % Mov t. -~ HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.047 0.176 HCM Lane LOS B B B B Existing With Project PM 11/2/2016 Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: 1-5 SB On Ramp/1-5 SB Off Ramp & Carlsbad Village Dr. Existing With Project PM 11/2/2016 ) ( ;I t/ 1>8t-am~-J3]IISJfBi-rJ.dllim _____ Mi_iffi Lane Configurations 4+ 7' · 'tl+ ~ 'tt tratt1c:Vornrne-Tvool::;s::::{:E:gfr£~;;;,~o';~'"~r?.:::;o"li,:~;;-r;;o·~::~7(;:~~9;n'~:;::{;o:,;;::r;1-37s_:~f~-1Fo~:.(~;~011.~i:;i'~;:,$6.3ti*-{~29:f£:e+~d o·3~:,;_:;:~t:a Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 99 0 375 0 776 363 129 703 0 ldeµIJlowX vpb'pl):;l!i:<< :y :1~;,·H,1_90O-~:; }}I tlpo;.Yt~·1900 .'v}j:199dt),?L1900<.>' 190dSL5i;1·goo·~;~frW 900,:f2~~1 ~odJW:t9QO JX1 goq;g;,::~1~00 t~~~v(i1~~~10W"·., .. :>~1:r"'<1··,:-,~.,,,::·~'·'·~/"7·•··<·•'s·:::,~•'•:··,·p1P~~·?s:yo~~-,'T:.·;,~,:,:2::q6~~,,,·.rt·,:y·,•(:'""'11·U::"r·"o~~h:•::"'·c .. :~ Fri 0.91 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said. Flow (pro!) 1581 1504 3370 1770 3539 EtI a~~(tnitl~~~~s:·g~_~/.~--;: __ ;::c;_:~':,~.~~~~-~:i.; ~?}?: .,: ::~~£ L.~~~A;;.;.J:·:~;_.·.,~~{-.~ -~-!.~ }·:-~· · :~.~~:t·~-.tELQ.~~~~~~ ·-, ~: .. JiQ9;::~:~~: .. ·_;·-r•~~ :~-~-~:~,-?~~;~.11Q..Q;,f~:~:::~~~ ;:~ -~-::~~q~.-~-~ ;~ :~~~2f ][~f?~~ .. -~~~;_ e~·-! Satd. Flow (perm) 1581 1504 3370 1770 3539 ee~k:_houtta,ctor1'~MF~-~·~\-_'.;'~·:,'0]2>./~6}2{·t:,::ojz;.;-.Jrg2:?'·/9:~:(';?:o··g:t ;?·o §f 7t6'§zj/;:~'o··~2 '.;··.{:,0l2{·Lo:§2~-'2·:·u'g2 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 108 0 408 0 843 395 140 764 0 RTO8BeducJig,n:"(vpo};~.:·~;~-~:::o::t:?)':';;:·::p·:zrJ:''·9>:::',.~;''0'''-•1;0,:1~8~?-~:;i:-20(:f~';';:o:;:"'.:'~:'~-1:,~~/f·;~~of~;;:~:£~;}•\c,~,."p;;t'.;-,::·:J J LaneGroupFlow(vph) 0 0 0 0 178 45 0 1187 0 140 764 0 Tuq1_Jype:;:_:,,.,~\:-~;1,·'f:::~;,:.';,, • f:_",,<:"o:'J:;_'·,,,_:_,.Spltt :,'//NA:,,..;{P,roff >\{'"':'"'·tt. Nfi.·; :·;::···.< ,·:• 'pro(';( N~i>·•\·•·:.,.';:1 Protected Phases 4 4 4 2 1 6 Actuated Green, G (s) . . . . . . . .. . 14.3 . R3 . . . 48.1 .. . . . 14.4 67.2 .Efl~,c,!Lv~,.G!~~D}'g·_(~).~~:•:&:'':::'.::f;j,,~';_c:~~r:~'.:·•::'.'T ; tj:'.:Xi',~·::~t :·;;;,::'.''.; '.'ti,.~ :\:Jl~-~>:. ;};; :~~iti':48.f D: ,;::~·:~~;,L, ~,ilA:1>:'.::'~Z::g ;f':~ :~·~>;,; Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.52 0.16 0.72 .q·leiFa,ri'geJ}inr(sf1~:'t~'{}'.:l~';:\;:f7J~;;:s1\SSt·•:;t·r":•1:~•·;r$;f ;:!{ 1·:~.'i,Jf, •t t;·;i • ;,,>o;t· i,:\:;+::.::_.::-,:s.,.,, ...... '""•--··' .. ,; Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 L~ne'l3rp_:G,aR: (vph) (,,;~;,,r;;j/;'.\:."I ·ji(,L;;~(;::}'::~ :·:.: { • \:)?C:·L?4~}\'·:f~2 j// ,\Fl f{ Fif~~~JtY2i}Jt~.ZAt½:,?.5g5};,!, ',~: ;-, v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.03 c0.35 c0.08 0.22 HcM :200·0 coiifro ;'o·e,a ,_;,-;, ... •••·•~•••·•••, ... c,a,· .IN~'-~,' HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.66 A9t~at~d:oycle·.lerfofn''.(s)Jt.1!1W~i~M:.{m~;i~;:;fl~~{f.1i,);C92.?-7.M•N:.i'.S@;@{;cif,l§s.t;ffriif(s)tf{q(rf~J;·t,;:'•/:(1~~~\C.\2{<'.f-J>1'5.9 /;~;:;}~t#'i'.'Ji;;~:-~H,Yj~,/i,/~11 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.6% ICU Level of Service E £Sb.~ly~~Rfil19.9J ~!_rj Ltf ;,·,:_\}~!~; ,· ·~ ~~~-~;i1:\2t~~ -.~t:~ ,~;,:,~:t1.~>:t?.,.~--]~-~i~.;:::~,~~-\~~:.~~ -~C. 22/:.~;~:.r~-:Z~;~.~~.l?J.·) ~;E~::{~~:2d.r:1J/i ~\~ tL<~ .. ·::f c~~-~~::~~;~_':,, :: .f .. ~~t'.~· ~~;::;,::{~ c Critical Lane Group Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Carlsbad Village Dr. & 1-5 NB Off Ramp/1-5 NB On Ramp t Protected Phases 8 8 8 ) 5 2 Existing With Project PM 11/2/2016 { v 6 v/c Ratio 0.91 0.23 0.93 0.11 .~fi~ci@'t>.~Jiy~~j;'.;~ :;l-;-:;'.t~;:;;;.s·:2:: -~~/ .. :??.J~:[.:.I(Q~: ·.· :•';; .. }T:~,:~;~::?t;:;:_;g1;,:.:;;~.~~IT.'..;:~:s.}i.~::·;.;:::§.~§~:;:E;,'::;:::~·:,~ ~;.:;~ ,~·-·:1-:~9_:~~:~Tf:.~g~~ Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ).ri_c:,r~m~n.1§1_,Q~~j,' .9 2;0,_,iL~: ~':'_;, ·.·:':.2.1,§.0 .. · . :.DJL<:.L .. '.:1;~~:.,;~}t~-~ ,!,_~'··;:,;, ;,)J.~:· 5.sc;:'_og: i :t' :, ~~-'. ·--~ = '.'t.:.. _(,. ,2f 1::.,.:;,3.q._4 Delay (s} . . ... . . . .. · .. 62.4 31.1 56.8 6.7 51.6 21.3 [~,lffi(¢}?e/vi&;~~:.;.:;~:~~.:•;;~:•··• ...... ,. , ',_,. .,,~e·•·•, .. •i"''·" •.c\•h;,;,;;;,,:V.'r•.Y'oc·A•'~•.•,,·,.,,.:,,•, . ..i .• ···:.,i::•:;.:, ·;,,:,.:;;-· )J::i:,::".:,::t ~~~~~}~~~1;~/~t;zM;·,i;>;\,'.?'r\•'.~:·i><·•;f:r•/!\:i.,:-«:·<J°:t <•:,t>~-.J~C,:, >~cd:6.~1'.'"•~r·-.·<~-~,':f''~;;;:;4¢:3x:·;;<: H.Q.t~L?_QQR· • .,... Ji11lSJJ£8QM:?.QQQD£.(~.:9_._ ~t1l~f§t .J HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 ~9t~_9l$..9~YfJ ~t~JJ.filij~{§);:;;~~:·~-~00~. -~~::\;_\i-.··l#Y: :;;rJg§;. ~--. --~.: .. ·.: ,:~~: \~~m:~9.l,ti~t~m~~t~ J.-1Jdf:.~·#·~:-\~).:~~---:~~\\t~ I :1§.~'~w;~~ ;~~~;-~:.::t ~~£;~:::2--~t:t~-~-~---, ~.~ Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.6% ICU Level of Service E c Critical Lane Group Synchro 9 Report -.; IC. C C C C c· C C C C C C C C c, C C C C c· C C C • • • • . , • e C c, j C C C C C C C C e • '~ CiJrls/Jad Village Lofta, A<1CDevd<>~.·UC . ' . . ' . ''.' APPENDIXE c. C!~n Syatetn1 .4aaopiates. Inc. . · , Nrrnm,her 7, 2016, . ' . NEAR•TEDl·.A NEAR TERM WITH PROJECT INTERSECTIONL~ ~RkSDETS E 005615-Report_D , I HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Grand Ave. & Harding St. Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.8 Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations 4+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 123 7 10 0 Future Vol, veh/h 123 7 10 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade,% 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 134 8 11 0 Major/Minor Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 128 129 10 Stage 1 21 21 Stage 2 107 108 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 5.42 5.52 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 5.52 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 866 762 1071 Stage 1 1002 878 Stage 2 917 806 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 844 0 1071 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 844 0 Stage 1 999 0 Stage 2 897 0 :A.eeroach NB HCM Control Delay, s 10.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NET NER NBLn1 SWL Capacity (veh/h) 1570 858 1610 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 0.177 0.021 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 10.1 7.3 HCM Lane LOS A A B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.6 0.1 11/16/2015 Baseline SBT SBR NEL NET NER +t .,, 0 0 5 9 65 0 0 5 9 65 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Stop Free Free Free -None -None -100 0 0 0 0 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 5 10 71 Major1 40 0 0 4.12 2.218 1570 1570 NE 0.5 SWT SWR 0 A Near Term AM 6/26/2016 SWL SWT SWR 4+ 31 36 1 31 36 1 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 34 39 1 Major2 10 0 0 4.12 2.218 1610 1610 SW 3.3 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Hardin~ St. & Carlsbad Villa~e Dr. .#) t r ~ + ) ) Movement NB[ NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR NEL Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ .,, Traffic Volume (vph) 19 67 78 60 26 9 7 Future Volume (vph) 19 67 78 60 26 9 7 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.94 0.99 1.00 Flt Protected 0.99 0.97 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1733 1782 1770 Flt Permitted 0.96 0.58 0.95 Satd. Flow (eerm} 1665 1066 1770 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 21 73 85 65 28 10 8 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 41 0 0 5 0 0 Lane Groue Flow (veh) 0 138 0 0 98 0 8 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot Protected Phases 8 4 5 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.9 12.9 0.9 Effective Green, g (s) 12.9 12.9 0.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.01 Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 282 180 20 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 c0.09 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.54 0.40 Uniform Delay, d1 28.6 28.9 37.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 1.8 4.7 Delay (s) 29.9 30.7 42.0 Level of Service C C D Approach Delay (s) 29.9 30.7 Approach LOS C C Intersection Summa!}'. HCM 2000 Control Delay 15.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.38 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 76.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.0% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Criti cal Lane Group 11/16/2015 Baseline ? /l NET NER t~ 389 24 389 24 1900 1900 4.6 0.95 0.99 1.00 3508 1.00 3508 0.92 0.92 423 26 4 0 445 0 NA 2 34.2 34.2 0.45 4.6 3.0 1578 0.13 0.28 13.2 1.00 0.4 13.6 B 14.1 B B 13.7 A Near Term AM ( SWL ?i 133 133 1900 4.5 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 145 0 145 Prot 1 15.2 15.2 0.20 4.5 2.0 354 c0.08 0.41 26.5 1.00 0.3 26.8 C 6/26/2016 ;/ t/ SWT SWR tf+ 525 72 525 72 1900 1900 4.6 0.95 0.98 1.00 3475 1.00 3475 0.92 0.92 571 78 7 0 642 0 NA 6 48.5 48.5 0.64 4.6 3.0 2217 c0.18 0.29 6.1 1.00 0.3 6.4 A 10.1 B Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Carlsbad Villa~e Dr. & Project Drivewal Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations .,, .,, Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 5 0 0 32 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 5 0 0 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 5 0 0 35 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All -420 -284 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy -6.94 -6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy -3.32 -3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 582 0 0 713 Stage 1 0 0 0 0 Stage 2 0 0 0 0 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -582 -713 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 :Aeeroach SE NW HCM Control Delay, s 11 .2 10.3 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NET NERNWLn1 SELn1 SWL SWT Capacity (veh/h) 791 -713 582 1000 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 -0.049 0.009 0.117 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.7 -10.3 11 .2 9.1 HCM Lane LOS A B B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.2 0 0.4 11/16/2015 Baseline NEL NET NER ~ ti. 18 510 13 18 510 13 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 150 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 20 554 14 Major1 839 0 0 4.14 2.22 791 791 NE 0.3 SWR Near Term AM 6/26/2016 SWL SWT SWR ""i tf+ 108 767 5 108 767 5 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 200 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 117 834 5 Major2 568 0 0 4.14 2.22 1000 1000 SW 1.1 Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: 1-5 SB On Rame/1-5 SB Off Rame & Carlsbad Villa~e Dr. ~ t r ~ + ) ) ovement NSL NST NSR SSL SST SSR NEL Lane Configurations 4t-.,, Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 98 0 304 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 98 0 304 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.1 5.1 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.92 0.85 Flt Protected 0.98 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1592 1504 Flt Permitted 0.98 1.00 Satd. Flow (eerm) 1592 1504 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 107 0 330 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 86 181 0 Lane Groue Flow (veh) 0 0 0 0 140 30 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 4 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 11 .0 11.0 Effective Green, g (s) 11.0 11.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 5.1 5.1 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 224 212 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm vie Ratio 0.63 0.14 Uniform Delay, d1 31 .5 29.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.9 0.1 Delay (s) 35.4 29.4 Level of Service D C Approach Delay (s) 0.0 32.5 Approach LOS A C Intersection Summa!J'. HCM 2000 Control Delay 17.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.47 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 77.9 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.4% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group 11/16/2015 Baseline ,If /l NET NER t~ 383 199 383 199 1900 1900 6.1 0.95 0.95 1.00 3358 1.00 3358 0.92 0.92 416 216 58 0 574 0 NA 2 30.2 30.2 0.39 6.1 2.0 1301 c0.17 0.44 17.6 1.00 1.1 18.7 S 18.7 B B 15.9 C Near Term AM ( SWL 'i 189 189 1900 4.7 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 205 0 205 Prot 1 20.8 20.8 0.27 4.7 2.0 472 c0.12 0.43 23.7 1.00 0.2 23.9 C 6/26/2016 JI t/ SWT SWR tt 579 0 579 0 1900 1900 6.1 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1.00 3539 0.92 0.92 629 0 0 0 629 0 NA 6 55.7 55.7 0.72 6.1 2.0 2530 0.18 0.25 3.8 1.00 0.2 4.1 A 9.0 A Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Carlsbad Villal;]e Dr. & 1-5 NB Off Rame/1-5 NB On Rame ~ t r ~ + J ) Movement NBL NBT BR SBL SBT SBR NEL Lane Configurations 4' .,, "'I Traffic Volume (vph) 205 0 216 0 0 0 234 Future Volume (vph) 205 0 216 0 0 0 234 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.1 5.1 4.7 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 Said. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 Said. Flow (eerm) 1770 1583 1770 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 223 0 235 0 0 0 254 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 198 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 223 37 0 0 0 254 Turn Type Split NA Pro! Prot Protected Phases 8 8 8 5 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 15.4 15.4 19.8 Effective Green, g (s) 15.4 15.4 19.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.20 Clearance Time (s) 5.1 5.1 4.7 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 281 251 361 v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.02 c0.14 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.79 0.15 0.70 Uniform Delay, d1 39.3 35.2 35.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 13.4 0.1 5.0 Delay (s) 52.6 35.3 40.9 Level of Service D D D Approach Delay (s) 43.7 0.0 Approach LOS D A ntersection Summa~ HCM 2000 Control Delay 28.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 97.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 71 .4% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group 11/16/2015 Baseline J' /l NET NER tt 278 0 278 0 1900 1900 6.1 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1.00 3539 0.92 0.92 302 0 0 0 302 0 NA 2 70.4 70.4 0.73 6.1 2.0 2568 0.09 0.12 4.0 1.00 0.1 4.1 A 20.9 C C 15.9 C Near Term AM ( SW[ 0 0 1900 0.92 0 0 0 6/26/2016 JI' ~ SWT SWR f+ .,, 563 207 563 207 1900 1900 6.1 6.1 0.95 0.95 0.99 0.85 1.00 1.00 1760 1504 1.00 1.00 1760 1504 0.92 0.92 612 225 1 106 634 96 NA Perm 6 6 45.9 45.9 45.9 45.9 0.47 0.47 6.1 6.1 2.0 2.0 832 711 c0.36 0.06 0.76 0.13 21.0 14.4 1.00 1.00 6.5 0.4 27.6 14.8 C B 24.5 C Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Grand Ave. & Hardin9 St. ntersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.9 Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations ~ Traffic Vol, veh/h 195 6 30 0 Future Vol, veh/h 195 6 30 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade,% 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 212 7 33 0 Major/Minor Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 160 161 35 Stage 1 61 61 Stage 2 99 100 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 5.42 5.52 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 5.52 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 831 731 1038 Stage 1 962 844 Stage 2 925 812 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 808 0 1038 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 808 0 Stage 1 953 0 Stage 2 907 0 '.Aeeroach B HCM Control Delay, s 11.2 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NET NERNBLn1 SWL Capacity (veh/h) 1568 -833 1576 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 -0.301 0.019 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 -11.2 7.3 HCM Lane LOS A A B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 1.3 0.1 11/16/2015 Baseline SBT SBR NEL 0 0 12 0 0 12 0 0 0 Stop Stop Free -None 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 0 0 13 Major1 41 4.12 2.218 1568 1568 NE 0.5 SWT SWR 0 A NET NER 4" .,, 32 146 32 146 0 0 Free Free -None 0 0 0 92 92 2 2 35 159 0 0 Near Term PM 6/26/2016 SWL SWT SWR 4+ 27 36 2 27 36 2 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 29 39 2 Major2 35 0 0 4.12 2.218 1576 1576 SW 3 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Hardin~ St. & Carlsbad Villa~e Dr. ~ t r ~ + ) ) Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR NEL Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ .,, Traffic Volume (vph) 28 78 110 144 56 6 24 Future Volume (vph) 28 78 110 144 56 6 24 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.93 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.99 0.97 0.95 Said. Flow (prot) 1723 1792 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.53 0.95 Said. Flow (eerm) 1641 975 1770 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 30 85 120 157 61 7 26 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 42 0 0 2 0 0 Lane Graue Flow (veh) 0 193 0 0 223 0 26 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prat Protected Phases 8 4 5 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 21.2 21.2 1.9 Effective Green, g (s) 21.2 21.2 1.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.02 Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 404 240 39 v/s Ratio Prat 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 c0.23 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.93 0.67 Uniform Delay, d1 27.7 31.7 41 .8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 39.2 28.5 Delay (s) 28.6 70.9 70.3 Level of Service C E E Approach Delay (s) 28.6 70.9 Approach LOS C E Intersection Summa~ HCM 2000 Control Delay 24.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.66 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 86.1 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.9% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group 11/16/2015 Baseline JI /l NET NER tf+ 748 23 748 23 1900 1900 4.6 0.95 1.00 1.00 3523 1.00 3523 0.92 0.92 813 25 2 0 836 0 NA 2 34.1 34.1 0.40 4.6 3.0 1395 c0.24 0.60 20.6 1.00 1.9 22.5 C 23.9 C C 13.7 C Near Term PM ( SWL ""i 119 119 1900 4.5 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 129 0 129 Prat 1 17.1 17.1 0.20 4.5 2.0 351 c0.07 0.37 29.8 1.00 0.2 30.1 C 6/26/2016 " "t/ SWT SWR tf+ 700 139 700 139 1900 1900 4.6 0.95 0.98 1.00 3451 1.00 3451 0.92 0.92 761 151 14 0 898 0 NA 6 49.3 49.3 0.57 4.6 3.0 1976 c0.26 0.45 10.6 1.00 0.8 11.4 B 13.7 B Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Carlsbad Villa~e Dr. & Project Drivewal Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement SEL SET SER NWL Lane Configurations .,, Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 5 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 5 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized -None Storage length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade,% 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 5 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All -547 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy -6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy -3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 481 0 Stage 1 0 0 0 Stage 2 0 0 0 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -481 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 ;t,.eeroach SE NW HCM Control Delay, s 12.6 13.9 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NET NERNWLn1 SELn1 Capacity (veh/h) 633 -475 481 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 -0.144 0.011 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.8 -13.9 12.6 HCM Lane LOS B B B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.5 0 11/16/2015 Baseline NWT NWR NEL .,, "I 0 63 14 0 63 14 0 0 0 Stop Stop Free -None 0 150 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 0 68 15 Major1 -555 1095 -6.94 4.14 -3.32 2.22 0 475 633 0 0 -475 633 NE 0.1 SWL SWT SWR 624 0.181 12 B 0.7 NET NER t~ 992 30 992 30 0 0 Free Free -None 0 0 92 92 2 2 1078 33 0 0 Near Term PM 6/26/2016 SWL SWT SWR "'i ti. 104 998 9 104 998 9 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 200 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 113 1085 10 Major2 1111 0 0 4.14 2.22 624 624 SW 1.1 Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: 1-5 SB On Rame/1-5 SB Off Rame & Carlsbad Villa9e Dr. ~ t r ~ + ) ) ovement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR NEL Lane Configurations ~ .,, Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 101 0 379 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 101 0 379 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.1 5.1 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.91 0.85 Flt Protected 0.98 1.00 Said. Flow (pro!) 1581 1504 Flt Permitted 0.98 1.00 Satd. Flow (eerm) 1581 1504 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 110 0 412 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 84 207 0 Lane Graue Flow (veh) 0 0 0 0 183 48 0 Turn Type Split NA Pro! Protected Phases 4 4 4 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 14.5 14.5 Effective Green, g (s) 14.5 14.5 Actuated giC Ratio 0.16 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 5.1 5.1 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 246 234 vis Ratio Prat c0.12 0.03 vis Ratio Perm vie Ratio 0.74 0.21 Uniform Delay, d1 37.4 34.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 10.1 0.2 Delay (s) 47.5 34.3 Level of Service D C Approach Delay (s) 0.0 41.1 Approach LOS A D Intersection Summa!}'. HCM 2000 Control Delay 20.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 92.9 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.1% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group 11i16i2015 Baseline ,J( /l NET NER tlt 785 363 785 363 1900 1900 6.1 0.95 0.95 1.00 3371 1.00 3371 0.92 0.92 853 395 50 0 1198 0 NA 2 48.1 48.1 0.52 6.1 2.0 1745 c0.36 0.69 16.8 1.00 2.2 19.0 B 19.0 B C 15.9 E Near Term PM ( SWL 'i 132 132 1900 4.7 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 143 0 143 Pro! 1 14.4 14.4 0.16 4.7 2.0 274 c0.08 0.52 36.1 1.00 0.8 36.9 D 6/26/2016 JI ti' SWT SWR tt 706 0 706 0 1900 1900 6.1 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1.00 3539 0.92 0.92 767 0 0 0 767 0 NA 6 67.2 67.2 0.72 6.1 2.0 2559 0.22 0.30 4.5 1.00 0.3 4.8 A 9.9 A Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Carlsbad Villa9e Dr. & 1-5 NB Off Rame/1-5 NB On Rame Jr:) t r ~ + ) ) ovement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR NEL Lane Configurations .f .,, "'l Traffic Volume (vph) 324 1 202 0 0 0 383 Future Volume (vph) 324 1 202 0 0 0 383 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.1 5.1 4.7 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 Said. Flow (pro!) 1774 1583 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 Said. Flow (eerm) 1774 1583 1770 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 352 1 220 0 0 0 416 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 173 0 0 0 0 Lane Groue Flow (vehl 0 353 47 0 0 0 416 Turn Type Split NA Pro! Pro! Protected Phases 8 8 8 5 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 21 .2 21 .2 25.3 Effective Green, g (s) 21.2 21.2 25.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 5.1 5.1 4.7 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 378 337 450 v/s Ratio Pro! c0.20 0.03 c0.24 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.93 0.14 0.92 Uniform Delay, d1 38.4 31.7 36.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 29.5 0.1 24.4 Delay (s) 67.9 31.7 60.5 Level of Service E C E Approach Delay (s) 54.0 0.0 Approach LOS D A Intersection Summa~ HCM 2000 Control Delay 40.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 99.3 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.1% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group 11/16/2015 Baseline ? /l NET NER tt 516 0 516 0 1900 1900 6.1 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1.00 3539 0.92 0.92 561 0 0 0 561 0 NA 2 66.9 66.9 0.67 6.1 2.0 2384 0.16 0.24 6.3 1.00 0.2 6.5 A 29.5 C D 15.9 E Near Term PM ( SWL 0 0 1900 0.92 0 0 0 6/26/2016 ;I' t/ SWT SW f+ .,, 534 175 534 175 1900 1900 6.1 6.1 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1761 1504 1.00 1.00 1761 1504 0.92 0.92 580 190 1 107 598 64 NA Perm 6 6 36.9 36.9 36.9 36.9 0.37 0.37 6.1 6.1 2.0 2.0 654 558 c0.34 0.04 0.91 0.11 29.7 20.5 1.00 1.00 19.5 0.4 49.2 20.9 D C 42.9 D Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Grand Ave. & Harding St. Int Delay, s/veh 5.8 Near Term With Project AM 11/2/2016 ---®.at--aJBM.ms~l~IMll~-t~W--111/ti Lane Configurations 4+ 4' 7' 4+ Jtaflic.Voi;;veh/11·1:;::,ii:~;'.'.;.,lt;,~.f{~1.2.$:¥RM;.i;:1:F;})1 .o .'~ :~'-'tt8{~1~JJ5oJ~·,~,!KJ,:o.;~'.!: :,r,·d, ?sn:~ic'~~i~~frtfi>t?E::l;~7,~~ g'f §5,~¾'ii:,qr{::_;\32 J -'\:@ fJ.~;#&~·il Future Vol, veh/h 123 7 10 0 0 0 5 7 65 32 41 1 Go}fflict(ng")?~ds;7#/mFi•";;;,0sw<,~~fF'6JW:t•t;O~\t'.'.Att(j'.:%f ·T~;,}}1:,::{i(/r~t¢1!6"};:;:~S9;;'7;:r;;JJlfi$fr~~;o•::rf~;'.t(f~s')~fiJIQ:T;;:5z;;y:f;r;:;1~10J;fzl'tg}'f!-St?.q Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Storage Length 100 Grade, % 0 O O O f'~aj< HourJ?c!9G";}t·:.>,. :\L::~2\/v~2. '£:,,,92 ;/}Y ><;'..:: 92 ~;::$2,; >/:~f ',,:>\:·:,;L;~i'>F .. 92}1J~2.·;· ~,:;.;,),.>_,92 /'92}!:;92, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Harding St. & Carlsbad Village Dr. Near Term With Project AM 11/2/2016 ~¥¥.&c~~~~~~[i~~;:;if(~):,J,/~~tz.~NZr~;,11-::,;gJ,~:•$¾1f~i'i:¥fr~;~~:~cg{f:'.'J•J'.~_1;~:J ~:·~·;'§;)~;;;)'.:·:~g;S(:'.~!h ti?''~ki.Hf;~.,;~;-0 ;?,;f ;;lrm;:;Q;?~d~,~~i,;'i~;:;~~:~ Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.01 0.42 0.23 0.64 Ql.~~r§rti~Tim.~·{s)·;r{\'t,'.·i:ft:;~;·~ift0::~t;1&{f·::?;;t;iti{'L\:,f:::0J;f:!0:JJ·j?i'ftlii;)1f;t_~i~}/>:i{9J{i1·:.t·::J:;,iifZ2,•··f{I'.2dt1A]J;;,{;i{4,§ Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 l,?h~:@rr5:Giiµ;(yp~)J•ifa.;)j!J'.J(;;i;:ilJ:If'1?H0;!}?Q2;f::t:·iJ:.?,:¾:;;ff\:ff)il1fiifi~li17.9:;;[If\:,.;;(J}:r6:1\1?].liI'.H~~]/;\;/;':••tt:~;f('.:i:GJ}:;'}1Q1Jtf:<~~~i~ v/sRatioProt 0.00 0.13 c0.09 c0.19 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.30 0.38 D'£itor:nioei~;~:cn1:;6:~.:-~;:_;;,,-:;rs·¥;1a1'/T{a'.:i:G,DZE(;:E:}:::";:;,1.?fG?f:°Qs]_J~-:,::.;;.;,r::;·,::1,~i;i:T:•-~1l4·:;~'-?/s.•:·,:::i~::;yr~;~t;;~;;;?~:a ~z~\'.i;J'.o Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay {s) .. .·· ..... ·.. . . . .. ·. ·. . 30.0 .··.,.. .· .. .· 31 .0 . .. 43.6 14.9 ... ·. ···. .· .. . ··. 25.1 .· 6.4 Le,veJ,c:if.Serv,ice ,-, J ,;;, ',;:•,.' ~'. '/<.' :,.Q :/',,-./~>'':-,'·: .. :,:i; ;;~,;·C,;,',,:·,,i;.'\<·'• O,V· ,,,,.S,:,::, ··. /<, ,, -~ ..• : .. ; -,;,:;Gi;_ <:>. A ~km%~¢['.g~1s~zW,:rt?:?;°;,.fci;;JJ;;:~f·~:'.(%:Y<f,:;:·!·tf.f:;)\gT:?);(~:,tp'?'vt:~>t·~r11~;;-n,';1i:t;;{',~Y;t;;;,:~;,dt;~irJi] Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Harding St. & Carlsbad Village Dr. Protected Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effet!iff9.t~~-~fg ·(~)~f,-;sr - Actuated g/C Ratio ~1i@_riilge_fimr(s)Iit~::;;::'.s ••·:::': .. :::r· :!',.,.,<iI -·-, Vehicle Extension (s} ,:·. ,,·:. :-• ,: -· ... ~~,-:.-, . .,.:, -_:::--c:_: ,:.~ .. , \{\~.::],.-'. Near Term With Project AM 11/2/2016 Synchro 9 Report HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Carlsbad Village Dr. & Project Driveway Int Delay, s/veh 1. 1 AcM.:Con1ro1 oe1af":S.\"½'!51, HCM LOS HCM Lane LOS B A B B B A Near Term With Project AM 11/2/2016 Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: 1-5 SB On Ramp/1-5 SB Off Ramp & Carlsbad Village Dr. Near Term With Project AM 11/2/2016 ~?-of~ipj;af(yi56i})/(}\/J·J/.'ft~'-?t:\1:":tr:ti:C5 ?tt\?:::?1 e "Jt2QffJ·xin ':s:i:;t~?..~ ':r:>; ·.?:J'.f;~.9i7\';2_q99 . ?L:-><: v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.02 c0.17 c0.12 0.18 ... ti910'.'tt_;:~9.~,m.:.Jtc.i ~-i X:iJf;,l{~YB.-911::?.®t;.ex~ .. , ·'"·· ~·~- HcM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.46 6qJ~.aJ~ffRiiliJJid§tti.(~l.ii;!fis:f'.::t.[h;::_~;.?Jf:t-!'.~$§.9J~:t~ref:~Y.gfg[!Q~i.,Ymf(§)l~)i~lfa't}t1JttE~~0J~~$JiitJtIH2;;/ZiI6:}~:·~~\~·;! Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.4% ICU Level of Service C c Critical Lane Group Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Carlsbad Village Dr. & 1-5 NB Off Ramp/1-5 NB On Ramp Near Term With Project AM 11/2/2016 ~(f}tef@tte:WE1b,,:Z,t,y~;';'}';f.::>V;~s;<1~~~:.2'f:·:P<,:~6/,\·f~)'.'-?:x;~:~::f.15-6~}3}';J\; .. ·•,'>l>>Y¾Q;yj;~~-~ Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 1770 3539 1760 1504 Be:a~hQu'.frta8ofITPHJr10~•1~f0~r~110·:92}0f¾i:o~~i1J'3f;f1tg2:0~n:;a:~2)~Jt~:me21FJ;\to~·~2·1iii,'.ox1z:~r~:,00:fi2~:f\to,'s2~t+'*+:o·.92Ztt:?Q:~z;;**~:0)·2 Adj. Flow (vph) 222 0 235 0 0 0 255 303 0 0 612 225 RT@.:.R.1duc.flo4XmJn••'.'~J,/:,:,,,3,,iF~§q,,,:e,;~;:,t{"Jo;~~:£,:'{9a:J""<;:5{~D,1;,?-~:$;i:o<;;;;rf:<,;:OJ;J;'.tt;•:~~:Q:1'}N;;i,·0;:12~0,.;;j;OyJ~;,f;;~Or,£1~£1•·~~fZ,~.o7 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 222 37 0 0 0 255 303 0 0 634 95 [Ur.rr~ty·pes<::t j ·-?::.~·;_;~ $ ~~<:·:\-:.: .. ·rsp11t·· :~:: _·:~:-~y,.~A~i--;·:::.~rot(··c~{~t ·<1:·01::s>~i~r¢:;t~·:_?/;~-\V: ;:::.:-f '.tJ3r9J..L::~_·:a~NA:~;).;~~>~;~~:t::h~:/..t::,:~-f-~t~~:~jN"/}'_l·::~~P~r.m Protected Phases 8 8 8 5 2 6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.21 0.73 0.47 0.47 f.l~~t?'□-~t [ifu§.(?T1t•.f .. _;._:·,,:·,'·:.tf0:'.·•·•:t? .. 1_~--y·~z:~2.'f '.:;;:,:;. j::'!'.'.:•~:'.;;::r;L"'.~,;i'::z::s'.f "1:-~'·•~'·'L4I'..:::;,:~§J/ t?·f:':'.•''.·'.~·:c,:_:'¥ "::'..•::::s·:~:!'.6.·~~-st:'. ~::2.1 .. Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 t.?fitG!P::¢ift(YP8)//'.}\ii[{:f\t{\IrFt•-ft_:@Jitf?,t?~1:2Jt;:;ttif,:tfn.'bJh;:;;f±J:i?0f{i179I.~1222§::½ft::()l;t):\:)f:~i/2t·::~~i~il'!~;;;n.Q~ v/s Ratio Prat c0.13 0.02 ,, ... ,,~-.,,,,·.,,,,-.,_,. c0.14 0.09 c0.36 Progression Factor 1.00 lnPriiiieafal•p~1ay7§2Jf<~··::.·z;>.>::+~,Si3,;'t:'!';E.:6:~i:£Yt~:•·s~.·:;:/J:·.··y::.-.tz-7i>'.1t::t~"4'.2,~'2rtoJ '."/0;~Lt>7·,·2<:~/5::6.;tf\f\,::p.4 Delay (s) 52.4 35.3 39.7 4.1 28.3 15.0 bey,et:Of Service:,: t••·f;}::;,( ,,: > ,, .. ::;; .. _,;y:·:,, ,,.;·Q,::,i>;~,;;o,-_,,;k ~::; '' .• ,<,: i;:;-~:~r-•:;:z,:c;<, :/,J ,,;,;,-.;D:.: ,i,;;,.->'~;, •• . .:~::•·•:·•.;;, .. ,,,. Approach Delay (s) 43.6 0.0 20.3 25.1 ~ptg'acn:~0s,: '.::::>~2;,~;;yn:~~j,.,k~ ;;:~;. •~;.,:-' ,y ··)::~ >iP ~:· :~\} r:~~L\<_::L:::i;.-:··-~--·•>:<::B!~.;'-~7A -~~f~3t1~:;j :\::~:::t~;:;~---•~:-~~i;j·:· -C:.'·· ,~:•J.J•-~· ;~;½ <.:~;:·· -~~ ;:: )~.,~\:~;:.~•c}t~:~A0; :\t 1 HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 8.ct~leO:Qy~1¢:{ffi.09tlfJ§l~:;~'.t~ :{~~~-":1-~~r~~ik~Jf'.1~.s-::_·:~~xd1!Jt::<:·'..· .:.:.~<]~ SJJ(n~bf£10$J·t~qt8: .. [sy:~·-u:t~'.-.~£:,;t~.;::·-:i1<4>~ 5_·.-·Q ::tt_{;:Ztir>~~~-Jdd2.-.:)M:~;+~::.,Z~ c Critical Lane Group Synchro 9 Report HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Grand Ave. & Harding St. Int Delay, s/veh 5.8 Near Term With Project PM 11/2/2016 ~1t~Jmm1w11111111t~■filelt-ms~aa1~;;;;;;JNtm:~-swsra Lane Configurations 4+ 4' '(I 4+ r·rartfoW61~§~fiJn'.-:p;·1·;;;g:_~2-: :;) es--:-J.)'~s·-~::·:30:~0'c;;;,,i':''~--~; ·tr~r;,: ;y1o"Ef {;:';9·;0_;::t~1}>/1r;c, 4? 3-~:if e ,q~-,:~,:-~z;~~)'6'1fft;s1K·,~t'~2 Future Vol, veh/h 195 6 30 0 0 0 12 48 146 30 51 2 §~hn[qfi6Ii'~e~~~j)#JtJfl[jlJ.,;;:d],;~/i:i{~;q};f;t~Vf;~1~:tl0f:hl~ti::9:'.ii}Ji::i!i {Q}:~~ii~~ltf}l:;f 3?:~}-Qif I)~.:,0/~ffbm::PI~{lq~l;;~t;;9. Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free J3J:~6.~[rkt~~~~:-:_:~c r;; .:~?_:·,~:~, :~:-:~:-:~~-:~:~-:x1·:~~-:~:,;7J~~qp~~:~~\ ~-.-:;::-~·~;~/ _:~ ~-: ::_.~~:~~M:~i2J. ::: · :2J,9.fl~ .:::~-~-:;_~r:!11:~::!~Q,,·:: t::~:,,~~E.@Q§_~~-~;~~:t·.'~~~-:~~~:~~~21;.~S:~~-:~ .~lfQ~ Storage Length 0 Y ~D.JltM.;~q t~b~§JQJ~9~:~# ~_.:. .. ~.:-~:-~ 'r·;~:-.::•~ . :;·~~~-:~:~~~~--Q;~:~;-'.,~::_~:;: ~-2:~;_:'.~~.~~:\~:.~::::~:.:~0 .. ::~L?\'.~~~~J-:: ... ::,~~-;:~,::i'~:,,L:~:~::~;~~~,:~;:-~r-~:t ~0_::~-~~~;~!,:;;·t~.:p_~t .. ·,~;; :~~:~,;~ .. ::.:~,.~; -~-~,~~X.:_;:~-~-~~:~ 1~.::;:~.:-::~VQ -~;~_.:.~~~:;·-.~ Grade,% 0 0 0 0 ?~WWH9y1J~ciof,,..1'.}~L;::v.:•·;r7,1]~·,x:~9i.n,,;;,92·~,:;:?f7;0•?§t%-~''{i2'l;'':]'~~2;;?:T"~J'[l'.f~_:,@~'G"e2·3Irgz '::,';';,5.~':';ci3~~92''f.:i':'g2~:'.J""92 Heavy Vehicles, % . . . . . . 2 . 2 . 2 . . 2 . 2 . . . 2 .· . . 2 2 . 2 . . .. . . . 2 2 2 .t0Ymf fJo~3:t,:>:-~:r:C.,.· ,'.~:-;,, -~;?12;;~~;~,,z,; ::.;~ @_3.;' (:, :f{'.;;, > :,~:Q ::},};, .9XE:";,_ o_, ;;,/::,:/~~;)~-;, ;> ;~.~· '\J /5$, :},,;~~{;,,:_:;: ;~~-~;;,"',5§ ;.~i-iL;~ Nr~frlN1i11qt0aR~ ~ -•~J~)~.-~ ~ . -~ ~ Flow All 200 201 52 58 0 0 52 0 0 HCM LOS 8 HCM Lane LOS A A 8 A A Synchro 9 Report ------------_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ --~ HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Harding St. & Carlsbad Village Dr. t r """ ) Near Term With Project PM 11/2/2016 ( t!.QM :?QO_[co,filf]?t . Jai:}if '. ,It:P"f:.l~tr;i·~:r-::1f,ih;::i 8,gM,,lOQQ}~vfl~gt S~fY.LCe,f){J\, :/ r:~r~c. HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 ~If~?~~~:9.y'§JI1¥f§1B]sJ:::~E-:·./3~;;:_~·:\;i'.'.~~-:~.';~§]'I:;·,:x~:.z::·§lJD2Pfiq1(]1'0~I~=~ffii~;~f;S:;',7:.;·,:·?s,D2.;::.z:x:~:1;2{t,;:~·.':'.:~,r;::: Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.7% ICU Level of Service C ~-6.~!Y~§.-~B~i.!Qg _Jqjid,l:;::i\; ::..~:;~~~~:&i~~20~~-~J=-~~ ~-:·~~~-,-~y;{i ~~?:/-~\~1 :?.,{:'1/.1;~~;~\:·d.~~~-~~~i~._{1i;~~;f ~1-:.f~-~:[~:r~i:-~1:~--~~~ .:~~-:~:1~:-t=~-~~~:~~;--:~~-:§fr_:~i!~~:;~~i<,:;;;~~~~~~-~=:·d!i;.: ~:~ c Critical Lane Group Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Harding St. & Carlsbad Village Dr. Frt Near Term With Project PM 11/2/2016 k_-,,.c-;,·;a,,.,;,;,"_c.,;c,.,.,.,,,,,.,,,,..,,.,.,,,,c:,,, .. .,, ... ,,-.i,,;,,.o~, ;.;ic,•: .. ;,; .. i.,i;.,.,,,.,,:;,.;,,.<',.',c ,. t [~'~r.~fte~,~~~;!.·~--~t:;'.,l~'. ;: :;~}/1~i~-~:-•~~,t;.:~;·;;1;i,:{,;1:·L'.-T:,.~·!;~;;~ __ ;;111E:t:.'.tJ~~•x::i·:2::;;;:;:;.:;~;::;[A,';;~\;:s_ :::},;,.·_, ~:_;;_",t;~;~,;;.~:~:::;; '.:.:~1;:·~~-,::~;.-~<::z~~·:,:~~r; Satd. Flow (perm) Protected Phases t.:a_nit~lb.'¢~f(y1J.hl.tf:,:;: ·::tf;}:1;;~:;;i:\rts:t.:t,:??&;\/)·/'.; -.. , .. ,<,•-,,,. v/s Ratio Prat vie Ratio Delay (s) •••·•-c• ·:• ,-,•• -• ,,•.-• , ... ••'t" • -, •:•• , ~ •••, •'/ :•; • , ,, • _.,,,,,; ''''-, ., .. ,·: ' •:. M ."".~ ' ',. ;•,·, ,,,, >":"<::•,'' '""')~': ,.., . .-•,--,_"<'·', •-:,•,•• ,•:•·-•-•!, " -"'•'·••,•, ~.,, ,,., ,,yy•, • ,-~;·• ~~• • ••••-•• ~ ... ~ •~•• •••" • ~ '•0 ~' •· ·>• -.< '··• "'''.'-'.• " ••·• •,~ ;, • ••' \' • ••,•;• :•• '"-'·"•' •~<"•7' '•••~•"",>_"•' ~ ''''"•" h~x~L,9J;,~,~_ryi9e., .. :·,;d;'cc_;:',: :::.i·:i ;;,.,,,_,_ ,;. :\{},,,_\_,:;'<,,,::,:. 'b,/;,':•,di' :._:;,..__.,~:-::: .• .c.:,J·.c.:,;;.'~ ,::ic. ,-.(\_c'.\'ci.,.-,,' ,-,,:.: .\:: .·/.:, .. ;.:,:··:. , .... i•>.i;,_,:,; .. \;,,; .:: ,,,o,.;. .. •· .,,.: .. ,.: ... : ;, .: '·'"·'"-., .• ;1 Synchro 9 Report HCM 201 O TWSC 3: Carlsbad Village Dr. & Project Driveway Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Near Term With Project PM 11/2/2016 Grade, % 0 O O 0 aea1<·Ho:m·,1=ac.tor;;:0,Y.bt.0J;:::3y:ft 92i:i~:!.a2l;~;;:,92E1g~;'i'::lt~;~:~:921¼.r~:92q;,;;:~~-Y2;'~~rf;::L~c~~;~;,921!,:;E::s2:;.rA.~2;:_,c,.si£E::,ti;s2t~~~Ji2~~•~:.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 M {m(flow}¥:.J~f'~:%ff!ol)/(f f,O;~~:~w~,;o ;'\cy;:~$0 't'.i~·:(!-t~:,f,~{/6\1/PI;;);.Ok:;i::68 ;,i'~W1~:::;f.}_,3Q \';1092-:{}'.::33;;!;~;:;;fil;t)J 13 ;.-J o7;i(~~~·:·2~ ~fi-&liwP-©'-m'.o'.~!$J_Wl._ Conflicting Flow All 549 563 1099 0 0 1125 0 0 til'.~;i{$~gfJl,tt~t:rC:,} - Stage 2 fr}fff~l:ff~NifJ:l'.fi}i~}ii;c.:.:;,;.:.~ __ :::}::i•,;'.::JI/_;.:,;,l;,;frni}'.':i]:T;\':;t~1:f(J~:.:}~i~,ff~1 ;;;1,r::. fJ,r~Di'};Offt{tl~::i,JS:f ,!{:IA.},)'ff;fl\sJ::-,; Critical Hdwy Sig 1 gr(ti6~~@~fstg2} ·.t\}F\ . Follow-up Hdwy 3.32 3.32 E<?f9iiR]'.tKa.r~~µvi~~l:;it?T', ~·•:g:_ ·::::~; o:-·::J 1{0 , .-~_ :_ >_:;;t_ :;o~:.~~ ~{,Q:·?~~q,;t:=~Y~?i,-1})1 ::,-:/: :~ Stage 1 O O O 0 ~.:}%9s11i:g':e'2 f:'.\GV;::.} -~~ ;<7} }'.cF'fc~S 6F''~;'}'··?;~. Platoon blocked, % M_qy_f.?.R1L¥~Q§:~v~?:~:·i:.:l~;:,:~.~;.f-xJ.i~;-;::·;:~·•;,·4~6',j;:~;;.;;,.:.:s::iL!:;<::!,ri;;:~;.'.:~1f.[f'.:3j•,X:;~§3,t~,{::·:::·,=,"~:~2:~:~··;; •. ::.~,~-¢jj;D'.(~.::;i~;~'.;:.:2 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ;S1~S~st~§~·W..~,~p~,,-:·-;,•.-:,,•t,w• ):>'': ,.•,:,.,"'.,",., .• .,,,.,,·,, .. 2 HCM Lane LOS B B B B Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: 1-5 SB On Ramp/1-5 SB Off Ramp & Carlsbad Village Dr . Near Term With Project PM 11/2/2016 .t.:a_ne'Q.rif.cfl~f(v12h) .':fi:t'{?!fc/\;J.,:,fa:•:':2 .. :f:-}t/:!..\.:=:t:::<.fJ?J4?.Jt-' .. :?~$:~::/·:::;\,::<;1:1.Myt/;;:;;i<}:J):c2z?-:?•;f2~5§1'':;'.• ;.::::; v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.04 c0.36 c0.08 0.22 VI§ "Ral]cf t .. ,::-:::::· i·' •,c.c;,,,., .• ;c,·;-,,:.,·•o. v/c Ratio 0.74 0.24 0.69 0.53 0.30 U~6Jf~:t1tt:Q'.e.\§Y):a.·L:~;;:=~~;·:~:::,;z~:-, ·;;>~~T~t';;.:ICYL::.·~::.D' :";:·~;:~:~.1~~,X~F.3-{~::;.~~TIE•::~?~'.:~]~1.~)g::'.::::~ ::·, •·3_fr}·~: :: · :{~ ;:·• /~-~~~ Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 !~·st~hi.~oJiLP-~8.Y1 ,g?~:f;. ,-~i",~'.,,<:G~--~~-.,. .. ~.: .. ~•,,i'(/'':~•{;:•.:.~:~<-:;~-~r~-,9,C;:c,,ig:_;z ;,,,z \;_,.';D-~ ::f:f.<_:~~-.·. ,;•: .. :.:9,.~:L·•.~·,P-}:::":~ -~ •. ·1 f iv;Ii1~s~xv1£~~:; __ ~ :~::::~;.:;:::.::;;,::,;.,:;c,., .. ·._ .. ~.;:;·;::;~;,,:::::~:;;.,~::;:.:;.:;:;_ :",c:;,,:~:~g;· ... 3~.5 19.2 37 .o 4.9 Approach Delay (s) 0.0 41.0 19.2 9.9 l'PP.tb·.~cn:t;~c>s: ~; _;::_:.£'~ -~y:;.:::·:k:~.--.~.::>-.-::~>-~r:;.'.a -2~A~. ~:.~---~:~~~:<1.~-~ -(~--~~~~;tL:ii>{./> . .Dr~: .. : _,_.: _-)~-'~:-;·:.-·-:;:~::.:)~_.-~~:Atr:/ ~~-:~,~~:.:·~4_-·2,. ~-('~·-:t:~· ·:·-··:_·:~/"~~-<--_:}_A·.·-~-~~~·:·+:.:-.':_>; HfM~~QQ◊::~Qlll9..:c:,_ , ..... ,.•-~ey~:P. ..... ~~~~1ic1J~f g1~~~2;~!~1!f i~ii~\t;J.;;3&~f1:;;\s!~J~ii10~#1:.IB:1I~~rrnmiuI1iiW:t~)iE~jlf;1:-r1::1?..;r;?;1ri,J§l.~':;?J:iftiI£t9Xt:\ItPt:i:::'::~ Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.9% ICU Level of Service E AnalyS1S ;P8n6d;{ rl)I nr(l~=~y ···~·:.:~~:2::<:1:~:-::s<:·'>~--::·:.~;$ j S:·: ;~F ·<-} ~-.-~~-~~:·-:_ J:. ~:· ·* t0~~-;' '--~ \{~: (~--~;.,_;;'~·;_~:~~-:;_:;·: _;:.:-~:t-:} __ · ·: .. '>·.,• .. ~:.·> .·r·:~. :.:·-~-~~~---.. : . ;.·; ~-_: ·/.-: .-•-.~) c Critical Lane Group Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Carlsbad Village Dr. & 1-5 NB Off Ramp/1-5 NB On Ramp Near Term With Project PM 11/2/2016 Ftt:•eroTe:&ted~~~?·•:1~$:J~-•\'•~~~r12~,:~~~~;~t~i~~~-~--1~0·~5/4;:)·~oon•!:.:~{j~<~~~2.-::;~--~-~1-✓··2~·~;,::::•:~:21_::s:;.0~95~l:~~;~f·ci6;J~~~~~~~~::~~-'-_.;f~t~~-~~:}~.:~;;1·~q9~:::0:~1-~oq ~fi~rrRil1~1±~i;Jt1.~ft:f~t§1ii;B;<;~li;:[;;[011t~1l~~Ifl;::r~Jtfi-jlt}~i)~<fidimlf!s~iJYf Ji~~:t]i8I~~J2u!i~gJ;s~ff;Ziif1!;itHJ:i& Said. Flow (perm) 1774 1583 1770 3539 1761 1504 ·~eal{;~i:hffiac:fofr1eBEJ'.f08:·H_go~~iJl:k;t o. 9~ 1: ::1 0:_9?.S'::::;o.::s.2 !~;k_,0)2:t~~ o~9't:fJ;Jo:·g2··ii:::o.~2J;:;::, o.~2 t:~r o:·9z:t~:_:~o,~,2,<~,~:o -~ Adj. Flow (vph) 361 1 220 0 0 0 420 564 0 0 585 190 RT.QR .RedLfu"tlo~.(yph LT{'.,.: ~.-}~f~,~0.-~r~~,,} ··Q:.;,: ~,>17,2>>~:; '.~,q s;:;~;;:. ,c()': .. ,s,,,,>: O"':;!.;:::,..Q;l-:~\to "A'. ,;~/0 · ,2.,'f<f-.:, o).'6:j :,,t;r•.'.{~"108 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 362 48 0 0 0 420 564 0 0 603 63 TJftn·~rYP.e tW:~~~·:;~~i:i~1p\:''~~::-~,: /;sP11_t ~:: i~~-t~ 'NA;:\~-:<J:f ot·:·?;~-i~~--:_ ,-;~~!:►::-'~; ~ ~;_,.~. ~~;,;t :·:t:· .;i. '7~_Proi ~:'~t:~~NA~:~_ ~~41 :-:~:.:7\ ·r~ l:?'~ ;::_,};NA.~~~; ... Pyim Protected Phases 8 8 8 5 2 6 v/c Ratio 0.95 0.14 0.93 0.24 0.93 0.11 ~nirorrrY 0~1ayrg 1/:t:>;: t\·~t1;:~~;J.'?,(;ti?'~8.{:f';31.5·~·.-.· ,,-;.'.::;•, "/c}:'. </ f::.,5;er·:;$6.2 L;•;:16A:"Y ·:.~ '·;.~--.,,,~~-;~v .,~::· : -_ 30.j .s·;z 20.'6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 · 1.00 1.00 1.00 J~'.~r.~ti}e6_{al p~l§'t~? -~~;.:~z:·;,t,: ~;~,t ,~'.SJ jj7]},;;_~:9J· ·~~Cc'2:}J . ~-"-.~'.:-':.-~.T.~J;;,z.;::2q::~t;;·;~;.:.;.o:_g:iJ.,":';:::,:·~.:~:::?;i; '''..:~t1J -~L~r::{o'._4 D~!ay_(s) --w~•-· . ., ····--···--.. ---✓ _ • __ • 70.0 31.5 62.4 6.6 51.4 21.1 be,_y~l9J..~e,ryl~~'"'··1.c-,,2<}i .. : ;,::.:::.;;J,.:,.,., ~ifil~ic~,~~~:r:(Jtl.;~lftL{Y.~ }'''~,;~;.:~:~:t-L~::: .>:,? ·. '</,:,;:1X~A:i<·:·· :::~.:-,/>%-:-~;.",~e~}: '..J~·:.i:::::~:3t:·:~;.,2:l/.'L 1 -.11_1t,}t4\A:i:T :J:tJIG~ 2ogo:Uve1:9(~rvice:'ii't:/'.,;ef;j:.t\IlJ) HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.93 Actuatecf:Cv'c&°:8er{'g]i\1§)J'il¾1/;1f%t';f~!'t~f;~~~;fri,99:4_i$•{:c}fi~ssum~df_l9$1•uY@;.(sg;4fg:5,~N'.:~r-f(;}T<irl}~1~.9;~iJ;f;~wgz;-J.t,i::,,~~1{;.? :> Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.9% ICU Level of Service E c Critical Lane Group Synchro 9 Report ;;;; C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C e C C C C C C C c, C e C e I) e D .: • C C C tD ·r, Carlsbad Village Lo/b .-AGC~t,UC ' ' -, • '•' a • •'• \ ( IQ ·lJrlHm Systeml Associates, Inc. I ' Noiemb, 7, 2016 APPENDIXF BUILDOU't&.~BtIILOOUT WJTH·PROJECT INTERSECTION.LOS WORKSHEETS . . /' ' . ' F 005615-Report _D HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Grand Ave. & Hardin9 St. Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.9 Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations ~ Traffic Vol, veh/h 133 8 11 0 Future Vol, veh/h 133 8 11 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade,% 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 145 9 12 0 Major/Minor Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 139 139 11 Stage 1 24 24 Stage 2 115 115 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 5.42 5.52 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 5.52 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 854 752 1070 Stage 1 999 875 Stage 2 910 800 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 830 0 1070 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 830 0 Stage 1 994 0 Stage 2 889 0 Aeeroach NB HCM Control Delay, s 10.3 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NET NER NBLn1 SWL Capacity (veh/h) 1566 844 1608 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 0.196 0.022 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 10.3 7.3 HCM Lane LOS A A B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.7 0.1 11/16/2015 Baseline SBT SBR NEL NET NER 4' "(' 0 0 6 10 70 0 0 6 10 70 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Stop Free Free Free -None -None -100 0 0 0 0 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 7 11 76 Major1 43 0 0 4.12 2.218 1566 1566 NE 0.5 SWT SWR 0 A Year 2035 AM 6/26/2016 SWL SWT SWR ~ 33 39 1 33 39 1 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 36 42 1 Major2 11 0 0 4.12 2.218 1608 1608 SW 3.3 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Hardin9 St. & Carlsbad Villa9e Dr. ~ t r ~ + ) ) Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR NEL Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ "I Traffic Volume (vph) 21 73 84 65 28 10 8 Future Volume (vph) 21 73 84 65 28 10 8 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.94 0.99 1.00 Flt Protected 0.99 0.97 0.95 Said. Flow (prot) 1734 1782 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.55 0.95 Said. Flow (eerm) 1665 1009 1770 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 23 79 91 71 30 11 9 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 40 0 0 5 0 0 Lane Groue Flow (veh) 0 153 0 0 107 0 9 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot Protected Phases 8 4 5 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 13.5 13.5 0.8 Effective Green, g (s) 13.5 13.5 0.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.01 Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 289 175 18 v/s Ratio Prat 0.01 vis Ratio Perm 0.09 c0.11 v/c Ratio 0.53 0.61 0.50 Uniform Delay, d1 29.2 29.6 38.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.9 4.4 7.7 Delay (s) 31 .0 34.0 45.9 Level of Service C C D Approach Delay (s) 31 .0 34.0 Approach LOS C C ntersection Summa~ HCM 2000 Control Delay 15.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.41 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 77.6 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.6% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group 11/16/2015 Baseline /I /l NET NER tf+ 419 26 419 26 1900 1900 4.6 0.95 0.99 1.00 3508 1.00 3508 0.92 0.92 455 28 4 0 479 0 NA 2 33.1 33.1 0.43 4.6 3.0 1496 0.14 0.32 14.8 1.00 0.6 15.3 B 15.9 B B 13.7 A Year 2035 AM ( SWL ?i 143 143 1900 4.5 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 155 0 155 Prot 1 17.3 17.3 0.22 4.5 2.0 394 c0.09 0.39 25.7 1.00 0.2 25 .9 C 6/26/2016 JI' ~ SWT SWR tf+ 567 78 567 78 1900 1900 4.6 0.95 0.98 1.00 3475 1.00 3475 0.92 0.92 616 85 8 0 693 0 NA 6 49.6 49.6 0.64 4.6 3.0 2221 c0.20 0.31 6.3 1.00 0.4 6.7 A 10.2 B Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Carlsbad Village Dr. & Project Driveway Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations .,, .,, Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 6 0 0 34 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 6 0 0 34 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 7 0 0 37 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All -453 -307 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy -6.94 -6.94 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 Follow-up Hdwy -3.32 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 554 0 0 689 Stage 1 0 0 0 0 Stage 2 0 0 0 0 Platoon blocked , % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -554 -689 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 :A.eeroach SE NW HCM Control Delay, s 11 .6 10.5 HCM LOS 8 8 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NET NERNWLn1 SELn1 SWL SWT Capacity (veh/h} 747 689 554 962 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.029 0.054 0.012 0.132 HCM Control Delay (s) 10 10.5 11 .6 9.3 HCM Lane LOS A 8 8 A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.2 0 0.5 11/16/2015 Baseline NEL NET NER 'I tt. 20 550 14 20 550 14 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 150 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 22 598 15 Major1 905 0 0 4.14 2.22 747 747 NE 0.3 SWR Year 2035 AM 6/26/2016 SWL SWT SWR "'i t~ 117 827 6 117 827 6 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 200 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 127 899 7 Major2 613 0 0 4.14 2.22 962 962 SW 1.1 Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: 1-5 SB On Rame/1-5 SB Off Rame & Carlsbad Villa9e Dr. .#') t r I_,,, + J ) ~ovement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR NEL Lane Configurations 4t-r Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 106 0 328 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 106 0 328 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.1 5.1 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 Fri 0.92 0.85 Flt Protected 0.98 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 1592 1504 Flt Permitted 0.98 1.00 Said. Flow (eerm) 1592 1504 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj . Flow (vph) 0 0 0 115 0 357 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 85 195 0 Lane Groue Flow (vehl 0 0 0 0 159 33 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 4 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 12.9 12.9 Effective Green, g (s) 12.9 12.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 5.1 5.1 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 232 219 v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.68 0.15 Uniform Delay, d1 35.8 32.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 6.5 0.1 Delay (s) 42.2 33.0 Level of Service D C Approach Delay (s) 0.0 37 .8 Approach LOS A D ntersection Summa!}'. HCM 2000 Control Delay 20.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 88.3 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.9% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group 11/16/2015 Baseline J' /l NET NER tf+ 413 215 413 215 1900 1900 6.1 0.95 0.95 1.00 3357 1.00 3357 0.92 0.92 449 234 63 0 620 0 NA 2 34 .0 34.0 0.39 6.1 2.0 1292 c0.18 0.48 20.5 1.00 1.3 21.8 C 21 .8 C C 15.9 D Year 2035 AM ( SWL ""i 204 204 1900 4.7 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 222 0 222 Prot 1 25.5 25.5 0.29 4.7 2.0 511 c0.13 0.43 25.5 1.00 0.2 25.8 C 6/26/2016 JI' t/ SWT SWR tt 625 0 625 0 1900 1900 6.1 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1.00 3539 0.92 0.92 679 0 0 0 679 0 NA 6 64.2 64.2 0.73 6.1 2.0 2573 0.19 0.26 4.1 1.00 0.3 4.3 A 9.6 A Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Carlsbad Villa~e Dr. & 1-5 NB Off Rame/1-5 NB On Rame ~ t r ~ i ) ) Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR NEL Lane Configurations 4' "{' "'I Traffic Volume (vph) 221 0 233 0 0 0 252 Future Volume (vph) 221 0 233 0 0 0 252 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.1 5.1 4.7 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 Said. Flow (pro!) 1770 1583 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 Said. Flow (eerm) 1770 1583 1770 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj . Flow (vph) 240 0 253 0 0 0 274 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 213 0 0 0 0 Lane Graue Flow (veh) 0 240 40 0 0 0 274 Turn Type Split NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 8 8 8 5 Permitted Phases Actuated Green , G (s) 18.8 18.8 24.4 Effective Green, g (s) 18.8 18.8 24.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.21 Clearance Time (s) 5.1 5.1 4.7 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 282 253 367 v/s Ratio Pro! c0.14 0.03 c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.85 0.16 0.75 Uniform Delay, d1 48.0 42.6 43.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 20.4 0.1 7.1 Delay (s) 68.4 42.7 50.8 Level of Service E D D Approach Delay (s) 55.2 0.0 Approach LOS E A Intersection Summa~ HCM 2000 Control Delay 33.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 117.6 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.9% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group 11/16/2015 Baseline J' /l, NET NER tt 300 0 300 0 1900 1900 6.1 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1.00 3539 0.92 0.92 326 0 0 0 326 0 NA 2 87.6 87.6 0.74 6.1 2.0 2636 0.09 0.12 4.2 1.00 0.1 4.3 A 25.5 C C 15.9 D Year 2035 AM ( SWL 0 0 1900 0.92 0 0 0 6/26/2016 JI' v SWT SWR f+ "{' 607 223 607 223 1900 1900 6.1 6.1 0.95 0.95 0.99 0.85 1.00 1.00 1760 1504 1.00 1.00 1760 1504 0.92 0.92 660 242 1 107 683 111 NA Perm 6 6 58.5 58.5 58.5 58.5 0.50 0.50 6.1 6.1 2.0 2.0 875 748 c0.39 0.07 0.78 0.15 24.3 16.0 1.00 1.00 6.8 0.4 31 .1 16.5 C B 27.6 C Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Grand Ave. & Hardin9 St. ntersection Int Delay, s/veh 6.1 Movement NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations ~ Traffic Vol, veh/h 210 7 32 Future Vol, veh/h 210 7 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized -None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade,% 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 228 8 35 Major/Minor Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 172 173 37 Stage 1 65 65 Stage 2 107 108 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 5.42 5.52 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 5.52 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 818 720 1035 Stage 1 958 841 Stage 2 917 806 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 793 0 1035 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 793 0 Stage 1 948 0 Stage 2 898 0 1'eeroach NB HCM Control Delay, s 11.6 HCM LOS B inor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NET NER B[n1 Capacity (veh/h) 1563 -818 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 -0.331 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 -11.6 HCM Lane LOS A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 1.5 11/16/2015 Baseline SSL SST SBR NEL 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop Free -None 0 0 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 14 Major1 45 4.12 2.218 1563 1563 NE 0.5 SWL SWT SWR 1574 0.02 7.3 0 A A 0.1 NET NER 4' .,, 34 157 34 157 0 0 Free Free -None 0 0 0 92 92 2 2 37 171 0 0 Year 2035 PM 6/26/2016 SWL SWT SWR ~ 29 39 2 29 39 2 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 32 42 2 Major2 37 0 0 4.12 2.218 1574 1574 SW 3 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Hardin9 St. & Carlsbad Villa9e Dr. ~ t r ~ + ) ) Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR NEL Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ "'I Traffic Volume (vph) 30 84 119 155 61 7 26 Future Volume (vph) 30 84 119 155 61 7 26 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.93 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.99 0.97 0.95 Said. Flow (prot) 1723 1792 1770 Flt Permitted 0.94 0.54 0.95 Said. Flow (eerm) 1634 994 1770 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 33 91 129 168 66 8 28 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 40 0 0 1 0 0 Lane Groue Flow (vehl 0 213 0 0 241 0 28 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot Protected Phases 8 4 5 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 23.6 23.6 2.5 Effective Green, g (s) 23.6 23.6 2.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.03 Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 455 277 52 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 c0.24 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.87 0.54 Uniform Delay, d1 25.3 29.0 40.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 23.1 5.3 Delay (s) 26.1 52.1 45.8 Level of Service C D D Approach Delay (s) 26.1 52.1 Approach LOS C D ,Intersection Summa!}'. HCM 2000 Control Delay 24.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 84.6 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.1 % ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group 11 /16/2015 Baseline /f /l NET NER tf+ 806 25 806 25 1900 1900 4.6 0.95 1.00 1.00 3523 1.00 3523 0.92 0.92 876 27 2 0 901 0 NA 2 30.5 30.5 0.36 4.6 3.0 1270 c0.26 0.71 23.2 1.00 3.4 26.6 C 27.2 C C 13.7 C Year 2035 PM ( SWL ""i 129 129 1900 4.5 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 140 0 140 Prot 1 16.8 16.8 0.20 4.5 2.0 351 c0.08 0.40 29.5 1.00 0.3 29.8 C 6/26/2016 JI' t/ SWT SWR t~ 755 150 755 150 1900 1900 4.6 0.95 0.98 1.00 3451 1.00 3451 0.92 0.92 821 163 14 0 970 0 NA 6 44.8 44.8 0.53 4.6 3.0 1827 c0.28 0.53 13.0 1.00 1.1 14.1 B 16.1 B Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Carlsbad Villa9e Dr. & Project Drivewa~ ntersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations .,, .,, Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 6 0 0 68 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 6 0 0 68 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length 0 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 7 0 0 74 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All -585 -599 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy -6.94 -6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy -3.32 -3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 454 0 0 445 Stage 1 0 0 0 0 Stage 2 0 0 0 0 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -454 -445 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 V\eeroach SE NW HCM Control Delay, s 13 14.7 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NET NERNWLn1 SELn1 SWL SWT Capacity (veh/h) 593 -445 454 578 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.027 -0.166 0.014 0.211 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.2 -14.7 13 12.9 HCM Lane LOS B B B B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.6 0 0.8 11/16/2015 Baseline NEL NET NER .., tf+ 15 1070 32 15 1070 32 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 150 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 16 1163 35 Major1 1170 0 0 4.14 2.22 593 593 NE 0.2 SWR Year 2035 PM 6/26/2016 SWL SWT SWR ""i tlt 112 1066 10 112 1066 10 0 0 0 Free Free Free -None 200 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 122 1159 11 Major2 1198 0 0 4.14 2.22 578 578 SW 1.2 Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: 1-5 SB On Rame/1-5 SB Off Rame & Carlsbad Villa9e Dr. ~ t r ~ + ) ) ~ovement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR NEL Lane Configurations 4+ .,, Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 109 0 409 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 109 0 409 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.1 5.1 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.91 0.85 Flt Protected 0.98 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 1581 1504 Flt Permitted 0.98 1.00 Said. Flow (eerm) 1581 1504 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 118 0 445 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 84 191 0 Lane Groue Flow (veh) 0 0 0 0 203 85 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 4 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 15.4 15.4 Effective Green, g (s) 15.4 15.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 5.1 5.1 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 254 242 v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.06 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.80 0.35 Uniform Delay, d1 38.7 35.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 15.0 0.3 Delay (s) 53.7 36.0 Level of Service D D Approach Delay (s) 0.0 45.0 Approach LOS A D Intersection Summa~ HCM 2000 Control Delay 21.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 95.7 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.7% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group 11/16/2015 Baseline l' /l, NET NER t~ 847 392 847 392 1900 1900 6.1 0.95 0.95 1.00 3371 1.00 3371 0.92 0.92 921 426 52 0 1295 0 NA 2 51 .6 51.6 0.54 6.1 2.0 1817 c0.38 0.71 16.5 1.00 2.4 18,9 B 18.9 B C 15.9 E Year 2035 PM ( SWL "'i 142 142 1900 4.7 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 154 0 154 Prot 1 12.8 12.8 0.13 4.7 2.0 236 c0.09 0.65 39.3 1.00 4.9 44.2 D 6/26/2016 JI' -t/ SWT SWR tt 761 0 761 0 1900 1900 6.1 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1.00 3539 0.92 0.92 827 0 0 0 827 0 NA 6 69.1 69.1 0.72 6.1 2.0 2555 0.23 0.32 4.8 1.00 0.3 5.2 A 11.3 B Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Carlsbad Villa9e Dr. & 1-5 NB Off Rame/1-5 NB On Rame ~ t r l.,t + ) ) Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR NEL Lane Configurations 4' .,, .., Traffic Volume (vph) 350 1 218 0 0 0 413 Future Volume (vph) 350 1 218 0 0 0 413 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.1 5.1 4.7 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1774 1583 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (eerm) 1774 1583 1770 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 380 1 237 0 0 0 449 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 183 0 0 0 0 Lane Groue Flow (veh) 0 381 54 0 0 0 449 Turn Type Split NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 8 8 8 5 Permitted Phases Actuated Green , G (s) 27.0 27.0 30.3 Effective Green, g (s) 27.0 27.0 30.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 5.1 5.1 4.7 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 402 358 450 v/s Ratio Prot c0.21 0.03 c0.25 v/s Ratio Perm vie Ratio 0.95 0.15 1.00 Uniform Delay, d1 45.4 36.9 44.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 31 .2 0.1 41.5 Delay (s) 76.5 36.9 85.9 Level of Service E D F Approach Delay (s) 61.3 0.0 Approach LOS E A Intersection Summa~ HCM 2000 Control Delay 49.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.96 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 119.1 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.7% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group 11/16/20 15 Baseline /f ~ NET NER tt 557 0 557 0 1900 1900 6.1 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1.00 3539 0.92 0.92 605 0 0 0 605 0 NA 2 80.9 80.9 0.68 6.1 2.0 2403 0.17 0.25 7.4 1.00 0.3 7.6 A 41 .0 D D 15.9 E Year 2035 PM ( SWL 0 0 1900 0.92 0 0 0 6/26/2016 J/ t,, SWT SW f+ .,, 576 189 576 189 1900 1900 6.1 6.1 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1761 1504 1.00 1.00 1761 1504 0.92 0.92 626 205 1 96 646 88 NA Perm 6 6 45.9 45.9 45.9 45.9 0.39 0.39 6.1 6.1 2.0 2.0 678 579 c0.37 0.06 0.95 0.15 35.5 23.9 1.00 1.00 24.7 0.6 60.2 24.4 E C 52.3 D Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Grand Ave. & Harding St. Int Delay, s/veh 5.9 Platoon blocked, % Year 2035 With Project AM 11/212016 Mo..v;c·ap~1•:t0aneuy~r.<'. ;\G,~~~~{:~:t~;:.,;_qJ;1gz~~:~;:~,:,~;;':~h,.,,;x.!:;:,:,::,'.,:~:;s;~·¼\~:·;~g~~r;;.~1§~s~,:.E;;:_qz,:i.~:;~.;;:;,;,::;f6}1 ,;~i;~;-~;;;c;,_~:; Mov Maneuver HCM Lane LOS A A B A A Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Harding St. & Carlsbad Village Dr. Year 2035 With Project AM 11/2/2016 f,[f ~f ~a~~i\h;,~.~/:;;v:{,~:nif;f~J\s:![[!1J}~~;iNt~:fa"YftiJ}J~~~tK~-~'~'t2.~~;~.~f:'f;g{~z~::~Y.~~.?f~tL~~~1?~~;i'.~f,~}[[§~'if ~:;f~5~ Satd. Flow (perm) 1667 1010 1770 3508 1770 3475 P,~a1(hbL~~fi{6for;:PfiF,li,:0~:.2;1:®. 6:e2J~~~5"6 :9~H~JZo. s2: :ff~;'d.92:fit~~cfe~~~W/o~ 92;l{~•::,b;1i2J,r;;~/f9-2~?J;t 6;s2 t.P,~;0;92.iJ.if o ~92~~..:{ifip~92 ~~q~~e~J~on;(~ph):;~·>1•:•';;:rl .~-~:s:~}?{~§~;1-Y~;';:~:s;~£~:t11r~•:·J~~-:;;;Tr::6y;:~-,~.·{:~~;-~.i;?Eg:rr;:.•r·&,r,::r:··61:·r::~iS'.'::·:~~ Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 153 0 0 108 0 9 478 0 0 163 695 I.Y1fr~!YRf ~~L~J.cS:2i:!~i .t3:·.:~J~ i~-:::=E~fiit:t~::~[~N~1i;:~~~{~~~-:,.~~~~~~:.::·::J!~r'ffi~j; :1~~---~~~e;:.~'.-~2:: .. ~~~::~~-= J~~:~-,~~~ Rig1~{:-~;::-N~~~~:_;lt}.:i}I.J~Z5I~-~iq(~:?kt f i.Qf :~~~if i~8 Protected Phases 8 4 5 2 6 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Harding St. & Carlsbad Village Dr. Year 2035 With Project AM 11/2/2016 Synchro 9 Report HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Carlsbad Village Dr. & Project Driveway Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 f1?.R~~city (x~~:& ){~f~(?f!i.\i,iJi:Z4~, ';}f:~\·i.)D;~;:t::,~:~9_§,t )f:f 5,_s93tt:, ~§?Ji r· HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.026 -0.054 0.027 0.133 HCM Lane LOS A B B A Year 2035 With Project'AM 11/2/2016 ~ tf+ }1_1j \j?7'':,: •"j: 117 827 4 Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis. 4: 1-5 SB On Ramp/1-5 SB Off Ramp & Carlsbad Village Dr. Year 2035 With Project AM 11/2/2016 P.e?k~fi6Ytt~q\Qr}f>AF},:::;.~+\J{~o}J2:.%'.o.ei~W-!ici:e2-ff~Co.92:{fy~o:§g:{'':@2 ~]:'~-f9:e2~::@to~·e2:~-·;·.:o::~2ti??;-0;§2:~1:i'·cr9z;~!t,;!-:o·,g2 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 115 0 357 0 451 237 222 678 0 FI9R.:~@~6]?f.n'JiJ3tf j ~'::.· .~: '.:?~'.;o:;;;:?,'.:.:,:Q~~~:-:,:;.:9·_.:. ~;,"'£_9_:,; ~:;·.~If;:. ',~I ~~i:.:: _·_2R::TI'.'.~~;···:::::·1; -.. :~:;:::;q:~~·:;;:~ ~9J~c:::;::·.2 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 o 159 33 0 625 0 222 678 O tuJ,6;Jyp~;.J;~;i1:1?Zi::zj;;tJt1:,:e•t)¥Eficf:t;f;lt:JfitZf $~1:tt}1:i11I1'.~~Aii\l•:{Pc{gt}l!~:.1;t?'.f' ilZcff:JA~J1lt:fI1ft:(~f_qJ·:0(:i'f .. i&(i'./l~i.l Protected Phases 4 4 4 2 1 6 .lin.i ~fpJ~aP.: CiP.bJ{;./:, < \) i}':c__;.•%if:2i_::-/::s\::. ~-":~\-/ . /,):f ·: '\l3g;•:::._.:?J9}'.~: : l<':LtJ29?);,C',,:'._·'.:, -.;E-PJJ::i/257,~ t: --· ,: v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 0.02 c0.19 c0.13 0.19 Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Carlsbad Village Dr. & 1-5 NB Off Ramp/1-5 NB On Ramp Year 2035 With Project AM 11/2/2016 ( 0.50 0.50 2.0 2.0 _L26~, G rrf. g_pp_ ·(vrirr)\c' · t:> :J'.'..J: :< ,::-:C{;;L215 ':-;z}J2,49;J;if:,\t<:i/, :/'.,{:, · ::::.: : '/i))zg~· .· 2,sq~ t. ·_,. ~;t::\fr(.'.\.)B?j '.!i:5}(ZM c0.39 v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 0.02 c0.16 0.09 v/c Ratio U.flif9rtJ\P~l~y/g1,;,ii Progression Factor I~@[ij~nJ§I.Pel?i':·i:J:?.:~t:'_J~·:.t;:·::. :-:;~_?J.LSL.JI:f:'.;;~;;'.',·_c;_~;:~-::.:~·-,.2y1,~;-·:.~·-t:irn2sr:~·Q.:1 :~::;_:_·y:>:27 •~~,-:.:e;;:~;..:z'.□-i?.:.S:~·q~1 fi~it§~fo~~ ~::,,;_;_:_········ .. ,., .. _, ...... ,n.o 43 ' 3 ...... ,, . .,. ~}t :~;,.,;!:t;:~::·i:'.._;;;~~;;;:>·;:,r:·;~~t:t;;'.:;1r; bh~t~~:~~&;:~~~2l£.':'.;:::;;1::-L~'.;tfr:Y:::&[1,~L:I'.::E~~~ffitu:1.::~~::-1~~~-Ebtt!:L.:~:~1':~:.~-.::-.~-~~-~-;~!c~~=(:~.5';·_::=:I:tL~~~:,~~'.':z,~:212·~i ,_fJJt eli~ • : .. B.cr~f4g_QQ.P§htr2f p~J.~yJ ,;(?f}\:;:j}ci;iJ16.MJQQ9J~v.£?(.2t~~-r~i~ji_:~.; ... •J()::,lfffJ'qi:;-?.Lr.~:•,:L:::f:t:2E-:f1/tJ,:;r'. R&u:~w~~¾T~t~Jt6~(~f~~~k~ri~r~·i,~t~I'f i1f;F\1:~:t)~:V~~~ZJ]:t3il}n:o[i6§1tffHe?(sf ~Tr~sf{,;f[t;;;~f;r~1;;~!lftf s]lf~>;;;1)~?t¥iK~1fa~i!sti;:~;7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.9% ICU Level of Service D c Critical Lane Group Synchro 9 Report HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Grand Ave. & Harding St. Int Delay, s/veh 6 Year 2035 With Project PM 11/2/2016 MEtiNYm:t~ia'1-~-iw- F1owA11 212 213 54 61 0 o 54 O O Platoon blocked, % r0o2 Q~r-.A,M~n~u.Yt1t.,., ... ,:m :J§.Q,.,~, .:9},··;1qJ 3 .·.•.\., :, -~ .; ..•. ':,::;/.,,, .•• · .. :L:.,;,.,~:~.~~--.:"1 ~4,2)_.,, .• : •. _ ,; :: Z.'.L,::::1.§_sJ ,J,., .... ,,' •. <.:~ Mov Maneuver 750 0 Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Harding St. & Carlsbad Village Dr. Year 2035 With Project PM 11/2/2016 Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ .'I tf+ ~ tf+ !rramc:}7.ofume](vpfii~lw;;~~~'.:;:~ff30~;:;;;t;~:~a4:\~1,~;~J2if~•Wi)t sa·z"~~~~~1;s:1~~!$~1~:.l(Jt~:26,·:~:1;a.12,:::f::_~~25_,;~~-r~toi:.£;;f3'6:>~;~:;,;;151 FutureVolume(vph) 30 84 127 158 61 7 26 812 25 10 136 . 761 JdealFf (?y?(•lpfiRlf~\-~i~;~:"(~'-)Ji~W◊Jl ;;:,J 9002;-;i;1 eoo ~~; h1 eqO.:d:;;;1Yo~;ftf~ eoq:;?~=woo~:~IrwooJ:G: rnoo/,-/J ~OOJt/5 ~oJ~¥l 900 Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.6 Lane]Jffactof :~,y:{ttli£•t;;>iif;~~;'.Ft·J:QO:J:1~;;:,;,q;-/,;;;'.:i~0?,tT~:;j .QO %{~IJ:r0'30~~~~',oo~rp;;o:9~t]~•i1\'~:~;Q;:;'~)fe,_f,,:~.t;,1:09ci0~'-~0~,95 Frt 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Elt~ef21i9i~~-~:~·?%7;:t~:~-~t~:t~:~~~~~~i;:~:~1t.~~;.-!2~?21-:f1~;;~~~~fF5~:!~11l!PjZ~~!IJt!!tS~:f;~{o~~~E~?l%ftfm ~s~~j~:~?~::dt~I.;:t:!::{::9~~[z&~1~:.® Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 1792 1770 3523 1770 3452 ~-ltf~ef~Jffe~-{_~~t:~~:I{i~\~~:~~~f{r~,;~~~:~;~~~i-~~~J)•;g4::t-r~\t;t~:<~{~j(:ir:}\i5½~~-'A~.{~j~~J.J:};·L(~o:"95];1ft:1tPO_.}fJ;~~~~~f;.·;,~~~{~~~-5;~~~>W<0]5J;~~~~~lloo Satd. Flow (perm) 1630 917 1770 3523 1770 3452 .P~~:&ffioUrlf;QJof£Hfil~t;~'i;,;¥f~◊Jl?,~;Jif{Q':g~'{P~~t{tB2>;~{-6~92~€:0;fb'.92!:flJ[O:S2'.%if~[6:~9i;~~-f bJiJ,¥f{0:923&lif,,o.·92];,~to:9z~~{~:;o:~2 ~i~~~~~1~i<m:IYhhlfil~;::,::::;c:~.~~~~ .. ::f:_~;,::tt~f~,lt2~,Q~;;:s~fj_:)~~:~\':'~.X=~T:~Qi::1J:%1·g:_~-~;~~=~◊?~~~:~~:J.6;zc!~;:::r2a~ Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 225 0 0 245 0 28 908 0 0 159 979 X~td.iTiP~~~Jt~~~~ti·t;~!~~f;}~~~5iE~~xtffi:i~i~~:,~~~B=~t~:~~;~~-::~~~~efJ1~In,J~~lti:,N~~~£3~i:~--~~l'L2t~~:r~it~~~:;i~o;:j}i~·-~!~~~R?Pr9l;~~gLqJJJ~~~.t~JB Protected Phases 8 4 5 2 1 6 ~tt~lt;i~'~;::At:~~l~1i£r,w•2';ff:t<~});;1:,~r;11-:;.t;✓twf~<f.:::t::t-@:12,·;0J,;f -~t ;*~~E:'l~\0ti~-::·t;\'~:-},:,~@;1~~~::',:ir}f ffe/:J1\?Jf,@~~~:-~/:£~1~-~~:~~ Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.03 0.38 0.21 0.56 CleaJ-atj2e;Dm~ ,(s)'.;:f(:•;.}ii,"~;<'.:it:r; ;c~·i;;--·,~4 .601,i:'\;'~cr;'.iD'~':?;~'-,!f ,~:'t:t4.o.~'):,·,:~/4''}rYJ):~ .5 -~:'j)lA.'Bi;;fj_:;•• ·:\'i ·::?~:~:;}'Z•::'.::;:'4.5::}~,•~ ·,t _(> Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 ~-a~e;grp;~{~itiiii:i_ti}m\k:;t;):;.:)I{\·J:.:,tf4.14ifikf.'tjii:\{d,)~·EtS,:?:t.~~flff•i:;LJL1,ilt~o f{;}13.482J@.\:i{;t'.\?.t'\if;d:!3Z~}hf1.941 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.26 c0.09 c0.28 y(( 89~-~~;.R~f ry, j~~-~~-~::~~c.;~(/.,•j ..... ~~ ~~ :'.:-: ::C.~~-~~"1 ;;:;·, :. ·i_~_:_' :,;; ~.~·::.,L-:~.0.-~1,~ -~~ .. ::h,;~ ,~2,_:>i:_ ;·~;;~:-: \:~:·.;·l:::~_~; , .. :.~~·::·~~,~9~.?Z~---.-,~~;,~;r~;J~::.:~~.:~~K· ::;~~:~~-=~:~~::·~~;i~,~~.[: .. ;; :,::_·,:.·: __ ~~--~:r :~.;~_:, !~·i.~:: ~~ :·'.:~~iC~~~ .. ~:z;~; !;~:::.~·-.::·~2 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.98 0.47 0.67 0.42 0.50 Uniform'Delav~'d1 l{'.'?;""'%'/~tt~·;f;,5',.:::(:-32;.3:i0';,~•'~;,n;;5.':,:s?,:'<F'is~38:0\J;?::!(~;:·>t00;749,,G'YZ&}~7[03::2:,'.,,>'t\'1":,6:'Y;':~\1ii~5:7}~:1:·14.o Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fnqf.~ffi~o.t~l. 'o,~i?Y.7~?~.<:>\'L;J;,,:: ;s;"I'..;.:Q,,~;{_,,,,<o'D,>:.t,,~_L7?I::,~J',1?.,.:~•';,,:U.,:.:~3~q_J;,"_tt,,~.I-C.: .. :, .. ,<< ,;.\ . .,:7:J~;~,-9JXL!,._o -~ Delay(s) _ ". -.. ··• ,,,,,_)3.2 89.7 52.0 29.7 36.0 15.0 t~ Y.~[pf §e,iyig_i,;:-:;: i o ,:, J •.• · ,. " , •• , .. ,, ;_ ,. ,.,,.,,,., .. "',, .• _, ,,,x.. o.c.,-..:,: .. -, ,:,.,,. ''"~""·'"'·'' ,e:::..;.,,·, c•~v,,,:-., :.<; . '. ,.-. ,.; ;;:;t:t" )/".;->;! P .,::,~c_S:,{·,:: 8, t~~i.{%~~;~;~~1r~_::tsd::.+ __ ]~i.:ix?::K~;,.~L;gLc.,L:C:,2jtkL?~~;}f:fa_,:.:,i:~:.·s:;;!3~f;2~·~£~!:tS-.:::~J:,l:J:_.;;i.'..ii::~,:I~~ HcJ0::2~6gb~C.onfrq1' qii~f ttlc;,};,;;.\ii.~'.'.£t!•;ili,5;;?i:;11},):~.3.0:~,~Fw.,:,;,(H CM' 2000:Lei~fo( s~'r,yio~' i&~r~%°:ioci~Tu~Mifi~{;~?w21tfi;I~;];~;&f ~1rift~?r]f§[½:MJ~)};JwlI~lifrf.¥t¥tifl~~ilil~f.iij}ti1(f.ti)i)i;r~f~It~Ii~t] Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.8% ICU Level of Service C c Critical Lane Group Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Harding St. & Carlsbad Village Dr. La,Mconfigurations tr.i~!Q y9.1~m.~XYr~r6'.X::,::I/\s;~~9~i;f ... ., ~-.,.-,., ... Future Volume (vph) 150 _lq_ej!,El[~{(vp_t\pJ) •• ti/;\{c,:\':AgQQ;c Total Lost time Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Satd. Flow (perm) Protected Phases Actuated Green, G Eff~ctiyJi;G.re~ntg Actuated g/C Ratio Year 2035 With Project PM 11/2/2016 G!ii~v.~f f.frnnsf ?}'.·'.·: ~::":''./,::''J"tt:~r:rrs:~.i);t}::cr'i:;)Jfa" F1'I;{·;•·r.;::·.,r::;·Irt.~~/;· ·o•:·,C;;;·;-···:;;<?;;::: \ ._,, :;r;c\:ti{;;i:::,·.,·,J Vehicle Extension (s) t~·~-Q_rf:Q~P, fiph) }};:. v/s Ratio Prot vis)~:a1Io'R~Irn:::s-J.:f r:'.''.-'.ii:f ., v/c Ratio PD1farfuJ;i~1?W:~tt:~\tl?;)~?:AYi.Yt. Progression Factor Irr~t~W-~filijU;f~lai'.'9Xl::?{it/ft,F!f~fr;f:;~StIJt:lff :~:tia;;.Ef :t?:tf:I'}}Jl,;;:'.}iiif;;_:j}~?tt!f :0f -r.:~rWf~:~l~~J{~-0;:{ :~;!,l{;;?i::?S:/::iJ. Delay (s) h~~~LQf~§~ri:lq_e,,~·,.~;:·:::·. ;~~·,.,; ~~;.<: .. ~;;_~~,:··);,,~"~;·.:::,~.;~·.;;,.~.;;.i~·~;;,·:.:~ ;,;_~:,.,~,;(:;~z:;::~~~:.: ,.,.~-":·,~---~, :~. ~, •·;•.''· ~>"<·. ,. :: . : ···:·.:~:,·:,·;::~·.· ___ :; ~,::.~.·.:; ~~~i~-~~:~~~l~~~~:;;,::-1c; •. ,,;~:~.~-~:•;~I'.~1~],t,~,-)~,d!,±~,.½;,1~;/2,dL,;~;,k);~~\i1::::t,.•.~:;L,;;;.,ti'";i~;,,:'.;,,\~.rfet\[!f,'.,;-;,)'.,;£.::l,:;(;,,;/~;~2c.,:.;.~<r?~~ .. ,,:,t?7,\,,'.:,;,;,:r,:;; Synchro 9 Report HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Carlsbad Village Dr. & Project Driveway Int Delay, s/veh 1.3 Year 2035 With Project PM 11/2/2016 n,;._@ii1-@..ml.i-a~-~- eonmcting Flow All --592 --606 1185 0 0 1212 o 0 Stage 2 :~.·; .. ~~~-~-:}:).~4~~~~#~~£~:~~!:~~ii_~i-~ 2ti~.~:,~;t:;);;~ . .r0:~ilr.~~'.:1;;;;·:~i,~L~~ ~~::.:-:'.~i-~£~:·~·J,:>~.¢SJ;~~;~~;:~~~~:.~~:~;£z.~~i~ .. ;~:~.~~0ii:Jtf;::t~:::~~L:;~:~ ~ :5~2!~d~~~J;;:.~~S<~z~;~~~~~~ : HCM Lane LOS B B B B Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: 1-5 SB On Ramp/1-5 SB Off Ramp & Carlsbad Village Dr. Year 2035 With Project PM 11/2/2016 P.~,a~:b§~?!f~tfort~BF~?{i2~00'.~irEb:§grf~~:oJ[2::;;,;;,~'Q:9i;f'.•L'.◊:92:,:{~:.0;92;~~:::KoJi~JfMo:9.2$f{Wo:9~~-~o~u2:,~~rM2 \ t:•o:·ggj~L.'0,92 Ai6~0J'e~tc%h(YPPtr·.•··;-.?_-s~v:·<->t · <·,.~:0~11~.\<:'{'·8~jc'>1:;"-};·~::;~~{,;~i-::_~:.,~.ro . .:>r~6-"',~/"-~b·'','.,':?··~ Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 D D O 204 92 0 1308 0 154 839 0 It!UlcT.YR~.jt'!;J:.t,~~". ? :'.;,tr,,:,:;s.,' '. :·:>;~F <· .,':'(.!. -'\.t' SPltt :.,h>~ NA,f:LE.Pron-'.:,;:,f.'.;'.-1:·1:~1~1,+N.f\~;~J::;,(·,tjy};-,;,.Prots,,/\NA:::-,(;;;;,;'. j Protected Phases 4 4 4 2 1 6 -~, ;Zt~{~irui:ff~iri~l1i~~!ii~:~~~11~Iij1f,t}i;i:1r.~'t3f$.Q~_'.pf!9~fiI~,;:cs.ii{tl¼~~~lrJ{Ei};¥:}tlfl5-:~?c:c1~~:¥fJf{ff{Jiif);{tij Intersection Capacity Utilization . . 90.5% ICU Level of Service E 8Q.j~Y§.tf:e~n~9:xm~n'1~;;.r~2fl:.f::···:~i121:~:~:.:~,;:L·~¥:·::~~~:·~J-~;~~~:-:_-iZ~:~:1~;: .. ~-);2{1~:'.:}~:r.::)>~i2r:}1:~J-:l!:{~:.~2~:~:~~~~:fZ·:st,~;-~:~:-.·~-:f:'.::.';~.~=;2~i~E~~Tyt~~; ·;·~:T:.:~ c Critical Lane Group Synchro 9 Report HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Carlsbad Village Dr. & 1-5 NB Off Ramp/1-5 NB On Ramp Year 2035 With Project PM 11/2/2016 Said. Flow (prot) 1774 1583 1770 3539 1761 1504 FRP~aiijtte'.a;;'·<:@:S'c::;;0'!~:;;~~'~/ci';•;•'.'.·0•9§~:,.;7-,r-g:g.~tA~{~!~11'-if':;';:;i){.:·\n,.:;to·g§lt:::1~00-.;9c'_,";?:~'"~··?:~<~1].9ff?~fo~o Satd.Flow(perrn) 1774 1583 1770 3539 1761 1504 ·rffiey·1<:~oa~'rae.tor;if?8ti~$~~;;'?.:rn.~gt.in::=0~9pt2?~~.0Ji2,Ji:~0~92tl1rf:o:'9~~,¥Q',si{et;o:§25~:l#o.s2.z1~so';92tJi1;~~0:s2 ~i;;to:etlf~(§2 B_~QR:;ef~1fill'.@:ERtil :]rt:f":~'.1 .. i~; :\::=..c:~:~~-:~§.~~:t5~c;.tP.:.~t ::S~:-~,1~l0.'.~:. £;.:ffilLt.%3~~C}r;;<~~ ~!~ ·::;z~Z~~Jt~Jl@::,~~ Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 390 76 0 0 0 452 609 0 0 650 107 ~YrD:J:ypfi:·:·~(i~t;;#; ... ~;~-::-:;~~~~;;:sPlJt:~1[~;-~.A:.~\~t-~PJP1:<tLr~I'.:~;;~t~~J;J~~--:~-:~.>~::f·~~,~~~~~~::.~i.cit.~J.J1t·:t{A.;1~;;~v<~:;L.:.)~~~<t.t·~;;:;~lJ8i:,_fJ;.~rffi Protected Phases 8 8 8 5 2 6 Ratio 0.97 0.21 0.18 .~nJ@fo.P.~ll~i:1i.U.~.~Lt:tL~r<,:-±,f~::,.~;PZ:P:,;£~.f~"t~.~? .. ;,::;2~:::L,.:~r<~::,"~-;.t,~~--··.:~.53:~,,.',.;,':..?.:,~.< :::.:;·.~ ,.,L:~:·,,L:~f')i1:2!.;:sl:J~~4, Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Jiitilirneniar:oeiafai=~~:::ry;,~&~t~;::~,::3K·~::;:~~?~J1F:.:}sry,,;r:Jt:S;¥~;-~St~:~; .. ~:-J1.s~:·rr\o:i':~2:J.::T;::;;:•:g:;r':-~r:2f~6;~~:1ro~z Q.~l~yJ~t .... , ......... " ' .... ,. .. , . "' ' ~?L .' 1.~:8._ 80.8 8.5 . , ..• ····----~-... , .. -.. ,~~~9 _,,}0.·.q L,Et'{~j,RJ_ S~Q!.if.~,,:,,~.; i~t:}.:.,, '.:.• .. , Liic,:;.,::,.d;: •. ·,tJ::i;•,'.,,:,~-i!'.p, c;:,.,,,J;.-~,.~"··<;::.,~; . .,:n""<,,,.,.,..-i,•,.::c1.,_·,;:idss~,:;;: ;,;, , ~-.. i,:-:;.,,. ._,._:;_,;.£.~1> ; , .• >:: ,Q ~{~~§; :f ~;!:l:-it.t~;~~:;.¢iJJt11iiiI!~]i~Jt✓:I~*-1\J:-ifr.t~:!:~:6'~5{Ji11.8:T;tf~~:~:P:lEi{;tiff:JE:Jt.idT:':!fti~ig~}J::j c Critical Lane Group Synchro 9 Report ~ C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C • C C C C C C C C C C C • C C C C C C r, C.arlsbad Village Loft, ' AGC Devdop/netJt; L!£, . ) APPENDIX G ) t0 Urbtz,n Sy~ems Associates, Inc. ·. · November 7, 2016 EIR EXCERPTS FOil THE CITY OF CARLSBAD GE$RAL J>LAN . . ', ., ., ' . . , , & TRANSIT INFORMATION G 005615-Report _D • • • • • • • • Dra~ Program Environmental Impact Report for the Carlsbad General Plan Update Chapter 3.13: Transportation oo LOS D borders on unstable flow. Speeds and ability to maneuver are severely restricted because of traffic congestion. oo LOS E represents unstable operating conditions at or near the capacity level where maneuverability is severely limited. oo LOS F is used to define forced or a breakdown traffic flow. The street segment capacities utilized to evaluate vehicle-prioritized streets are summarized in Table 3.13-1 below. Table 3.13-1: Daily Street Segment Capacity Street Typology Typical Lane Level of Service Con {igu ration LOS A LOS B LOS C LOS D LOSE Arterial 6 lanes 25,000 35,000 50,000 55,000 60,000 Arterial 4 lanes 15,000 21 ,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 Industrial 4 lanes 10,000 14,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 Industrial 2 lanes 5,000 7,000 10,000 12,500 15,000 Connector 4 lanes 10,000 14,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 Connector 2 lanes 5,000 7,000 10,000 13,000 15,000 Freeway Mixed-F low Lane<2> 17,600 19,800 22,000 Freeway HOV Lanes(2> 14,400 16,200 18,000 <1> LOS thresholds were calculated based on VIC ratios of the daily threshold volumes for the corresponding street classification. <2> Per lane capacities presented. Note -These are general capacities for planning purposes. Specific operational characteristics, such as signal coordination, can enhance operations significantly. Source: SANTEC/ITE Guidelines (or Traffic Impact Studies in the San Diego Region, 2000. Method to Evaluate Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Level of Service The Carlsbad MM LOS approach identifies attributes of a location and identifies a qualitative LOS grade based on the attributes of the pedestrian, bicycle or transit facility. Each attribute contributes to a point system that, when the total points for all attributes are added together, corresponds to a qualitative letter grade as shown in Table 3.13-2 below. The specifics for each MMLOS component are further described below . 3.13-16 Pedestrian MMLOS Criteria (each side of the street gets individual score) "MMLOS = D" Standard Applies "MMLOS = o· Standard Does Not Apply Employment/ Arterial Neighborhood Transit Local/ Connector Connector Connector Neighborhood Industrial Typology Identity Streets Village Streets Streets Street Street Coastal Streets School Streets Street Arterial Streets Streets Criteria Points Sidewalk meets ADA unobstructed width requirements 25 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ Ramps and landings within segment meet ADA 20 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ Accessibility requirements and Sidewalk segments meet ADA requirements {cross functionality slopes and trip hazards) 15 ◊ ◊ ◊ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Meets recommended sidewalk widt~ for typology and adjacent land uses along frontage according to 10 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ 0 0 ◊ ◊ 0 Mobility Element 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian 15 ◊ 0 0 ◊ ◊ ◊ 0 0 0 0 5 ◊ 0 ◊ Street 5 0 ◊ 0 ◊ ◊ characteristics Meets apparent standard stopping sight distance at all intersections and pedestrian crossings 5 0 0 0 0 ◊ ◊ 0 ◊ 0 0 Permanent traffic calming devices installed on 5 ◊ ◊ segments posted at 30 mph or below 20 ◊ 0 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk is high visibility (continental markings) 5 ◊ ◊ ◊ 0 0 0 ◊ ◊ ◊ 0 Traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width Crossing (pedestrian refuge, bulbouts, chokers, pork chop 10 ◊ 0 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ 0 ◊ ◊ characteristics island) Presence of intersection enhancements for pedestrians (pedestrian-friendly signal phasing, 5 ◊ ◊ 0 ◊ 0 ◊ 0 ◊ 0 0 pedestrian countdown heads, signage, etc.) 5 ◊ 5 ◊ On-street parking or landscaping provides 'buffer' 5 ◊ ◊ 0 0 ◊ 0 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ between edestrians and travel way Active building frontages on 80% of street curbline Other Elements (pedestrian attracting frontages such as active 5 ◊ 0 0 5 Street furniture oriented toward businesses or attractions 5 ◊ ◊ ◊ Decorative lighting 5 ◊ 0 ◊ Criteria applicable Criteria applicable with approval ····································--- •••••••• Bicycle MMLOS Criteria MMLOS = D Standard Does "MMLOS = D" Standard A lies Not A Employment/ Arterial Neighborhood Transit Local/ Connector Connector Connector Neighborhood Industrial Typology Identity Streets Village Streets Streets Street Street Coastal Streets School Streets Street Arterial Streets Streets Criteria Points Speed limit is 25 mph 30 ◊ ◊ ◊ Street Speed limit is 30 mph 20 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ Characteristics Residential street with ADT < 1000 20 Street with ADT < 4,000 10 Class I facility (off-street path), Class IV (cycle track), 25 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ Facility (points or multiuse path earned for each Class II facility that meets minimum width of 5' (on-10 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ street bicycle lanes) side of the Class Ill facility {bike route designated by signage or street} paint only) 5 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ Bicycle buffer is provided 5 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ Bikeway meets or exceeds the Bicycle Master Plan 20 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ Bikeway is at least 6' wide from face of curb 10 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ Bikeway1 Bicycle facilities have signage and striping in place 20 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ that meet design guidelines • ◊ Design Good pavement condition for bikeway (no visible potholes) 5 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ Free of infrastructure that obstructs bike facility {e.g. 5 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ grates) Bikeways on side streets are consistent with Bicycle ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ Connectivity/ Master Plan along segment Contiguity Bike lanes exist on both sides of all intersections along roadway segment 10 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ No on-street parking 10 ◊ ◊ ◊ Adjacent Back-in angled parking 5 ◊ ◊ ◊ Vehicle Parking Parallel parking with door-side buffered bike lane 5 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ Enhanced bicycle detection or video detection is 5 ◊ ◊ ◊ Other Elements provided at intersections ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ Bicycle racks are provided along segment 10 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ Criteria applicable Criteria applicable with approval t.: Until the city develops design guidelines, use the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans Highway Design Manual Chapter 1000, and AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities (2012) 1: Bikeway· A generic term for any road, street, path, or way which in some manner is specifically designated for bicycle travel, regardless of whether such facilities are designated for the exclusive use of bicycles or are to be shared with other tansportation modes (AASHTO Guide/or the Development of Bicycle Facilities} Transit and Ridesharing MMLOS Criteria "MMLOS = D" Standard Applies "MMLOS = D" Standard Does Not Apply Employment/ Transit Arterial Neighborhood Local/ Connector Industrial Connector Connector Neighborhood Typology Arterial Streets Street Streets Identity Streets Village Streets Streets Street Coastal Streets School Streets Street Criteria Points Existing Transit Route Located within 1/4 Mlle Walk from Roadway Section No greater than 1/4 mile walk to the nearest transit 40 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ stop -,_ No greater than 1/2 mile walk to the nearest transit - Access stop 20 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ No greater than 1 mile bicycle ride to the nearest 10 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ transit stop --ADA compliant connections to transit stops 20 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ Multiple transit routes stop on segment 10 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ 1 ~ provides a direct link to a COASTER station or ,_ - Connectivity mobility hub 30 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ -Route provides for a single transfer to reach a 15 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ COASTER station or mobility hub Dedicated right of way -5 ◊ ◊ ◊ • • . • . . • Transit priority Transit priority during peak hours 5 . . . . . • • . • . Headways of-15 minutes between 6:30-8:30 am and 4· 20 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ 6 pm on weekdays -Headways of 30 minutes between 6:30-8:30 am and 4-10 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ 6 pm on weekdays --Headways of 1 hour between 6:30-8:30 am and 4-6 Service 5 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ pm on weekdays -No more than 2 hour headways between 6 am and 7 5 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ pm on weekdays --,_ -No more than 2 hour headways between 9 am and S 5 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ pm on weekends Covered bus stops 20 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ • I~ 20 -◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ -◊ ◊ -- Amenities Well-lit stop that provides a sense of security 20 ◊ ◊ ◊ 0 ◊ ◊ 0 ◊ ◊ ◊ ,~ ---Trash cans s ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ 0 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ • - Bus stop located within a block of commercial services 5 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ Bicycle Bike parking available at the bus stop 10 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ 0 ◊ 0 0 0 • Accommodations Buses that provide on-board bike racks 5 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ No Existing Transit Route Located within 1/4 Mlle Walk from Roadway Section (or by approval of the City Traffic Engineer) Documented TOM measures are in place that promote 60 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ Ridesharlng ridesharing - Potential On demand service is subsidized for trips to transit 60 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ service -Segment within FLEX service area 60 ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ Criteria applicable Criteria applicable with approval ···································--- • • MMLOS Point System and LOS Rating Point Score LOS 90-100 A 80-90 B 70-80 C 60-70 D 50-60 E 0-50 F Existing Pedestrian -MUTCD compliance SEGMENT Requ irement Carlsbad Village Drive: carlsbad Village Drive: S. Harding St. to S. Project Dwy. Project Dwy. to 1-5 SB Ramos Crosswalk markings 12 in-24 in white solid YES YES Gap between white solid lines> 6 feet YES YES Crosswalk lines extend to edge of intersecting crosswalk YES YES marking 6 feet clearance from curb return (no parking) for N/A N/A unsignalized 30 feet clearance from curb return (no parking) for YES YES signalized Signal controller cabinet does not obstruct the sidewalk YES YES Accessible pushbuttons not more than 5 feet from crosswalk lines & 6 feet (max 10 feet when 6 not possible YES YES or unsafe). Pushbuttons 3.5 feet to 4 feet above sidewalk YES YES Ped Clearance determined based on 3.5 feet/sec walking YES YES speed Red signal when walk or flash don't walk displayed YES YES Pedestrian signals recognizable to pedestrians YES YES Height of signal 7 to 10 feet above sidewalk level YES YES Seperation betweeen pedestrian phase signal head and YES YES vahicle signal head mounted on same support Indication which crosswalk is actuated by button YES YES Pedestrian -ADAAG compliance (ADA) SEGMENT Requirement Carlsbad Village Drive: Carlsbad Village Drive: S. Harding St. to S. Project Dwy. Project Dwy. to 1-5 SB Ramos Minimum walkway path 36" wide. No obstructions YES NO Ramps width at least 36". YES YES Landing provided at crosswalks. Recommended ramp YES YES slope 8.33% , max 10%. Excesive changes in level (caused by roots, cracks etc.) NO NO Landing provides at least clear level space of 36in NO NO Curb ramps not obstructed by parked vehicles YES YES Curb ramps at crossings shall be wholly contained within YES YES the markings, excluding flared sides Diagonal curb ramps have flares 24in wide YES N/A Max flare slope 10% YES YES Diagonal curb ramps have 48in clear space within sidewalk NO NO markings Sound, texture contrast at ramps (pedestrians with visual YES YES impairment requirement) Presence of landing for perpendicular curb ramps NO NO Pedestrian -Mobility Element Requirement SEGMENT Requirement Carlsbad Village Drive: Carlsbad Village Drive: S. Harding St. to 5. Project Dwy. Project Dwy. to 1-5 SB Ramos Sidewalk width for Identity street should be 10-12 feet (recommended) or 8 feet when not possible adjacent to YES YES retail use. Next to residential areas sidwalk width should be min of 6 feet. Min 5 feet wide sidewalk for village streets N/A N/A Grand Ave: Harding St. to Eastern terminus N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Grand Ave: Harding St. to Eastern terminus NO YES NO NO NO NO N/A YES YES N/A N/A NO Grand Ave: Harding St. to Eastern terminus N/A NO • • • • I I • I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Existing AASHTO Bicycle Facilities Guide/ CAMUTCD SEGMENT Requirement Carlsbad Village Drive: Harding Carlsbad Village Drive: S. Grand Ave: Harding St. to St. to S. Project Dwy. Project Dwy. to 1-5 SB Ramps Eastern terminus Bike lane markings placed after each signalized YES YES N/A intersection ("BIKE LANE" or Bicycle symbol) TYPE II Minimum Bike lane width of S feet -Type II YES YES N/A Painted sharrows -Type Ill N/A N/A NO Bicycle lane sign placed at the beginning of a bike N/A NO N/A lane (per CAMUTCD) Bike lane striped to the right of right turn lane (if N/A N/A N/A present) Carlsbad Bicycle Master Plan SEGMENT Requirement Carlsbad Village Drive: Harding Carlsbad Village Drive: S. Grand Ave: Harding St. to St. to S. Project Dwy. Project Dwy. to 1-5 SB Ramps Eastern terminus Minimum Bike lane width of 4 feet (no gutter) and S YES YES N/A feet (with gutter or onstreeet parking)-Type II Consistent with Bicycle System Plan (2013) YES YES NO 3 2 5 I Carlsbad Village to College Blvd. SPRINTER Station M-F • SA LEGEND /Leycnda Mop nol lo scolc/,',\apo rJ esli c escab -Route/Ruta ~ Street/Colle • • • Tomorack trips/Viojes por Tomorock 0 Time Point/Punto de Tiempo • Londmork/Seiiul D Tronsfer/Tronsbordo ♦ SPRINTER Station/ Estaciones del SPRINTER See Route 302 for Sunday/Holiday service. Poro servicio en dies festivos, ver el horario de lo Ruta 302. Norin Co,mty / Coastal Career Center :' • Oceanside Blvd. Rady Children's Hospital -. John Landes Park ~ TO 5PRIIITEK ~ .,.~-1 ---➔::~ 154 NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT Rider's Guide I GoNCTD.com EFFECTIVE August 23, 2015 • • • • I I I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 3 2 5 I Carlsbad Village to College Blvd. SPRINTER Station -------------------- Bold denotes P.M. times/Horarios en negritos son en lo tarde :t\:j\_;{i:}/ii);'.(i;~ii~~i~~,:~~ltt:tI~~f ttif Ailti~t{f i)It\i~1:{ :,/ Chestnut Ave. Oceanside Bl. & Plaza Camino Vista Way Thunder Dr. & Carlsbad Monroe St. Real Transit & Mira(osta & Avenida Village Station (Carlsbad HS) Center Via Esmorco College Vista Woy Del Oro 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 I 5:22 -5:34 5:39 5:49 5 :56 6:060 5:52 -6:04 6:09 6: 19 6:26 6:36 6:12 6:25 6:32 6:37 6:47 6:54 7:04 6:52 -7:05 7:10 7:20 7:28 7:38 7:12 7:29 7:37 7:42 7:52 8:00 8:10 7:52 -8:05 8:10 8:20 8:28 8:39 8: 12 8:27 8:34 8:39 8:49 8:57 9:08 8:52 -9:06 9: 11 9:2 1 9:29 9:40 9: 12 9:27 9:34 9:39 9:48 9:55 10:06 9:52 -10:06 10: 11 10:20 10:27 10:38 10: 12 10:27 10:34 10:39 10:48 10:55 11 :06 10:52 -11 :07 11 : 12 11 :21 11 :28 11 :39 11: 12 11 :27 11 :34 11 :39 11 :48 11 :55 12:06p 11 :52 -12:07 12:12 12:21 12:28 12:39 12:12 12:29 12:36 12:42 12:51 12:58 1:08 12:52 -1:07 l: 13 1:22 1:29 1:39 l :12 l :29 1:36 1:42 1 :51 1:58 2:08 1:52 -2:08 2:14 2:23 2:32 2:42 2:12 2:30 2:39 2:45 2:54 3:03 3:13 2:52 -3:08 3:14 3:23 3:33 3:46 3:18 3:34 3:41 3:47 3:56 4:05 4:18 3:52 -4:08 4:14 4:23 4:32 4:45 4:12 4:28 4:35 4:41 4:50 4:59 5:12 4:52 -5:08 5:14 5:23 5:32 5:45 5:27 -5:43 5:49 5:58 6:07 6:20 5:54 -6:09 6:15 6:24 6:33 6:46 6:16 6:32 6:39 6:45 6:54 7:03 7:16 6:52 -7:05 7:10 7:18 7:26 7:38 7:26 -7:39 7:44 7:52 8:00 8:12 8:22 -8:34 8:39 8:47 8:55 9:07 Route 325 does not operate on Sundays or holidays. La Ruta 325 no ofrece servicio domingos o dias fe stivos. VALIDA 23 de agosto de 2015 NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT Rider's Guide I GoNCTD.com 155 3 2 5 I Carlsbad Village to __ _ _ _ _ Col_leg_e Blvd. SPJUNT~_R St(!lion _ Bold denotes P.M. times/Horarios en negritas son en la tarde 5 :23 5:30 5:37 5:43 5:50 5:56a 5:53 6:00 6:07 6: 13 6:20 6:26 6:39 6:24 6:31 6:38 6:44 6:51 6:58 6 :54 7:01 7:08 7:14 7:21 7:33 7:46 7:24 7:31 7:38 7:44 7:51 7:58 7:54 8:02 8: 11 8:18 8:25 8:31 8:44 8:24 8:32 8:41 8:48 8:55 9:03 8:54 9:02 9: 11 9: 18 9:25 9:31 9:44 9:24 9:32 9:41 9:48 9:55 10:03 9:57 10:05 10: 14 10:21 10:28 10:34 10:47 10:24 10:32 l 0:41 10:48 10:55 11 :03 l 0:54 11 :02 l l : 1 1 11 : 19 11 :27 11 :32 11 :45 11 :24 11 :32 11 :41 11 :49 11 :57 12:06p 11 :54 12:02 12: 11 12:19 12:28 12:33 12:45 12:24 12:32 12:41 12:49 12:58 1:07 12:54 1:02 1: 11 1:19 1:28 1:33 1:45 1:24 1 :32 1:41 1:49 1:58 2:07 1:54 2:02 2:11 2:19 2:28 2:33 2:45 2:24 2:32 2:41 2:49 2:57 3:06 2:46 2:54 3:03 3:11 3:19 3:26 3:39 3:24 3:32 3:41 3:49 3:57 4:06 3:54 4:02 4:11 4:19 4:27 4:34 4:47 4:24 4:32 4:42 4:50 4:58 5:06 4:54 5:02 5:12 5:20 5:28 5:36 5:24 5:31 5:40 5:48 5:56 6:02 6:13 5:54 6:01 6:10 6:18 6:26 6:34 6:24 6:31 6:39 6:46 6:54 7:02 6:54 7:01 7:09 7:16 7:24 7:32 7:24 7:31 7:39 7:46 7:54 8:01 8:24 8:31 8:39 8:46 8:54 9:01 Route 325 does not operate on Sundays or holidays. La Ruta 325 no ofrece servicio domingos o dias festivos. '# Board westbound route 325 buses on sou.th side of Oceanside Blvd. by Panda · . Express. · Aborde autobuses de lo rulo 325 hacia el oesfe en el lado sur de Oceanside . Blvd. cerca de Panda Express. 156 NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT Rider's Guide I GoNCTD.com EFFECTIVE August 23, 2015 • I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 3 2 5 I Carlsbad Village to College Blvd. SPRINTER Station ------------------- Bold denotes P.M. times/Horarios en negritas son en la tarde Carlsbad Village Station 1 7:22 8:22 9:12 10:22 11 :22 12:12 1:22 2:22 3:12 4:22 5:22 6:22 I Chestnut Ave. & Monroe St. (Carlsood HS) 2 - - 9:29 - - 12:30 - - 3:31 -- - : : : Plaza Camino Real Transit Canter 3 7:35 8:36 9:37 10:36 11 :37 12:37 1:38 2:38 3:39 4:38 5:37 6:37 I Vista Way & Via Esmarca 4 7:42 8:43 9:44 10:44 11 :45 12:45 1:45 2:45 3:46 4:45 5:44 6:44 I MiraCosta College 5 7:51 8:52 9:53 10:53 11 :54 12:54 1:54 2:54 3:55 4:54 5:53 6:53 Route 325 does not operate on Sundays or holidays. La Ruta 325 no ofrece servicio damingos o dfas festivos. I Thunder Dr. & Vista Way 6 7:56 8:57 9:58 11 :00 12:01 1 :01 2:00 3:00 4:01 5:00 5:59 6:59 Oceanside Bl. & Avenida Del Oro 7 8:08a 9:09 10:10 11 :12 12:13p 1: 13 2:10 3:10 4:11 5:10 6:09 7:09 VALIDA 23 de ago,to de 2015 NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT Rider's Guide I GoNCTD.com 157 3 2 5 I Carlsbad Village to _ Co~lege Blvd~ SPR!~TER Station Bold denotes P.M. times/Horarios en negritas son en la tarde 7:22 7:30 7:39 7:46 7:55 8:22 8:30 8:39 8:46 8:55 9:22 9:30 9:39 9:46 9:55 10:20 10:28 10:37 10:44 10:53 11 :22 11 :31 11 :40 11 :47 11 :58 12:22 12:31 12:40 12:47 12:58 1:19 1 :28 1:37 1:44 1:55 2:23 2:31 2:40 2:47 2:58 3:23 3:31 3:41 3:47 3:57 4:23 4:31 4:41 4:47 4:57 5:23 5:31 5:41 5:47 5:57 6:23 6:31 6:41 6:47 6:57 Route 325 does not operate on Sundays or holidays. La Ruta 325 no ofrece servicio domingos o dias festivos. Chestnut Ave. & Monroe St. Carlsbad (Carlsbad HS) Village Station 8:030 9:05 10:05 11 :00 11 : 12 12:0Sp 1:08 2:00 2:12 3:08 4:06 5:03 5:15 6:06 7:06 -# B~ard westbound route 325 bus~s on·south side-~f-Oceonside Blvd. by Panda Express. · _ ' Aborde outobuses de lo rvta 325 hacio el oeste en el lado sur de Oceanside Blvd, cerca de Panda Express. _ -· 158 NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT Rider's Guide I GoNCTD.com EFFECTIVE Avgvst 23, 2015 I I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • BREEZE Ridership BREEZE On-Time Performance 900,000 91.0% 800,000 90.0% 700,000 600,000 -89.0% - 500,000 88.0% - 400,000 - 300,000 87.0% - 200,000 - 86.0% 100,000 - 0 85.0% Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun ■ FYlS ■ FY16 BREEZE Reliability ■FYlS ■ FY16 (Miles Between Mechanical Failure) 18,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 - 10,000 8,000 - 6,000 - 4,000 - 2,000 - 0 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun ■ FYlS ■ FY16 W E M O V E P E O P L E \ C:Oi=ISTen a~i:c:2c SPnlNTen North County Transit District 810 Mission Avenue, Oceanside, CA 92054 (760) 967-2828 • www.GoNCTD.com ! Grand Avenue Street Sections Existing (Between Madison Street and Hope Avenue) 70% Motoring Space 30% People Space Proposed 27% Motoring Space 73% People Space 21' 23' Angled Parking --1 12' Travel Lane Lane 100' Figure Al.4: Grand Avenue Street Sections 18' Travel Lane Existing Right-of-way \7\7\7~1· ~i~ ~-r-1~1 < 14' ► arkin Travel Travel Lane Lane 100' I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •