HomeMy WebLinkAboutCD 2020-0009; T-MOBILE SD06367A; Radio Frequency - Electromagnetic Energy (RF-EME) Compliance Report; 2019-07-18Radio Frequency -Electromagnetic Energy
(RF-EME) Compliance Report (L600)
T-Mobile Proposed Facility
Site ID: S006367 A
West Bluff Plaza
,--,.,. .
JUL G? 2020
Cl .-r Or Cl ~ LS BAD
6994 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, California 92009
Status:
July 18, 2019
EBI Project Number:
6219003322
The proposed site will be compliant with the installation of
the mitigation measures described in Attachment I.
Remarks; See signage plan for mitigation measures to be installed upon
upgrade/installation of the site to comply with FCC and T-Mobile standards.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Executive Summary-.............................................................................................................. 3
2.0 MPE Calculations .................................................................................................................. 4
3.0 T-Mobile Antenna Inventory ............................................................................................... 5
4.0 Summary-and Conclusions .................................................................................................. 6
Attachment I: MPE Analysis and Recommended Signage ........................................................ 8
Attachment 2: RoofView® Export File ....................................................................................... 10
Appendix A: Certifications ........................................................................................................ 11
Appendix B: Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Requirements ....................... 13
2 EBI Consulting• 21 B Street• Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
1.0 Executive Summary
EnviroBusiness Inc. (dba EBI Consulting) has been contracted by T-Mobile to conduct radio frequency
electromagnetic (RF-EME) modeling for T-Mobile Site SD06367A located at 6994 El Camino Real in
Carlsbad, California to determine RF-EME exposure levels from proposed T-Mobile wireless
communications equipment at this site. As described in detail in Appendix B of this report, the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) has developed Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Limits for
general public exposures and occupational exposures. This report summarizes the results of RF-EME
modeling in relation to relevant FCC RF-EME compliance standards for limiting human exposure to RF-
EME fields. This report contains a detailed summary of the RF EME analysis for the site.
This document addresses the compliance of T-Mobile's proposed transmitting facilities independently and
in relation to all existing collocated facilities at the site.
The Maximum Composite Emissions Value is 1444.4000% of the FCC's general public limit (288.8800% of
the FCC's occupational limit) at the main roof level. The proposed site will be compliant with Federal
regulations regarding (radio frequency) RF Emissions with the installation of the mitigation measures.
At the nearest walking/working surfaces to the T-Mobile antennas on the rooftop and ground, the
maximum power density generated by the T-Mobile antennas is approximately 892.90 percent of the
FCC' s general public limit ( 178.58 percent of the FCC's occupational limit).
Based on worst-case predictive modeling, the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's
general public limit within approximately 12 feet of T-Mobile's proposed antennas at the main roof level.
Modeling also indicates that the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's occupational
limit within approximately 2 feet of T-Mobile's proposed antennas at the main roof level. There are
predicted exposures above the general public limit seen within approximately 9 feet in front of the other
carrier antennas.
Signage is recommended at the site as presented in Attachment I. Posting of the signage and installation
of other markings brings the site into compliance with FCC rules and regulations.
3 EBI Consulting ♦ 21 B Street ♦ Burlington, MA 01803 ♦ 1.800.786.2346
2.0 MPE Calculations
Calculations were completed for the proposed T-Mobile Wireless antenna rooftop facility located at 6994
El Camino Real in Carlsbad, California using the equipment information listed below. All calculations were
performed per the specifications under FCC OET 65. Because of the short wavelength of PCS services,
the antennas require line-of-site paths for good propagation, and are typically installed a distance above
ground level. Antennas are constructed to concentrate energy towards the horizon, with as little energy
as possible scattered towards the ground or the sky. This design, combined with the low power of PCS
facilities, generally results in no possibility for exposure to approach Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE)
levels, with the exception of in areas in the immediate vicinity of the antennas.
In accordance with T-Mobile's RF Exposure policy, EBI performed theoretical modeling using RoofView®
software to estimate the worst-case power density at the site rooftop and ground-level resulting from
operation of the antennas.
For this report, EBI utilized antenna and power data provided by T-Mobile and compared the resultant
worst-case MPE levels to the FCC's occupational/controlled exposure limits outlined in OET Bulletin 65.
EBI has performed theoretical worst case modeling using RoofView® to estimate the maximum potential
power density from each proposed antenna based on worst-case assumptions for the number of antennas
and power. All radios at the proposed installation were considered to be running at full power and were
uncombined in their RF transmission paths per carrier prescribed configuration.
The assumptions used in the modeling are based upon information provided by T-Mobile in the supplied
drawings and known configuration values information gathered from other sources to approximate each
additional carrier's contribution.
Based on drawings and aerial photography review, unknown carrier wireless antennas are also present on
the rooftop. These antennas were included in the modeling analysis.
The Maximum Emissions Value for the additional carriers included in the modeling is 1444.30% of the FCC
general public limit (288.86% of the FCC occupational limit) at the rooftop or ground walking/working
surfaces.
The data for all T-Mobile antennas used in this analysis is shown in Section 3.0. Actual antenna gains for
each antenna were used per manufacturer's specifications. All calculations were done with respect to
uncontrolled and general public threshold limits.
4 EBI Consulting ♦ 21 B Street ♦ Burlington, MA 01803 • 1.800.786.2346
Sect.or
A
A
A
A
8
8
8
8
C
C
C
C
3.0 T-Mobile Antenna Inventory
An11111111 Heip(ft) PowerPer Number of
Number Anterwa Make Antenna Model Above Nearest Azimuth(") Technology frequency Band Channel (W) Channels W....,,Surface
I Ericsson Alr21 1.7 350 GSM/UMTS PCS-1900 MHz 30 2
2 Commscope FFHH-65A-R3 1.0 350 LTE 600 MHz 30 I
2 Commscope FFHH-65A-R◄ 1.0 350 LTE 700 MHz 30 I
3 Ericsson Air 21 2.7 350 LTE AWS -2100 MHz 60 2
I Ericsson Air21 19.7 90 GSM/UMTS PCS -1900 MHz 30 2
APXVAARRl8_ ◄3-U-
2 RFS NA20 19.0 90 LTE 600 MHz 30 I
APXVAARRl8_◄3-U-
2 RFS NA20 19.0 90 LTE 700 MHz 30 I
3 Ericsson Air 21 19.7 90 LTE AWS-2100 MHz 60 2
I Commscope FFHH-65A-R3 1.0 220 LTE 600 MHz 30 I
I Commscope FFHH-65A-R◄ 1.0 220 LTE 700 MHz 30 I
2 Ericsson Air21 2.7 220 GSM/UMTS PCS -1900 MHz 30 2
3 Ericsson Air21 1.7 220 LTE AWS -2100 MHz 60 2
• This table contains an inventory of only T-Mobile Antennas and Power Values. Note that EBI uses an assumed set of antenna
specifications and powers for unknown and other carrier antennas for modeling purposes as detailed in Section 2.0.
• Based on drawings and aerial photography review, unknown carrier wireless antennas are also present on the rooftop. These
antennas were included in the modeling analysis. Information about these antennas is included in the RoofView Export
(Attachment 2).
5 EBI Consulting ♦ 21 B Street ♦ Burlington, MA 01803 ♦ 1.800.786.2346
ERP
(W)
984
572
628
1967
855
237
259
1710
587
6◄◄
1023
20◄6
4.0 Summary and Conclusions
All calculations performed for this analysis yielded results that were above the allowable limits for
exposure to RF Emissions. Based on predictive modeling, the worst-case emitted power density may
exceed the FCC's general public limit within approximately 12 feet of T-Mobile's proposed antennas at
the main roof level. Modeling also indicates that the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the
FCC's occupational limit within approximately 2 feet of T-Mobile's proposed antennas at the main roof
level. There are predicted exposures seen within approximately 9 feet in front of the other carrier
antennas. Installation of mitigation measures will bring the proposed site into compliance.
Based on drawings and aerial photography review, unknown carrier wireless antennas are also present on
the rooftop. These antennas were included in the modeling analysis.
The anticipated maximum contribution from each sector of the proposed T-Mobile facility is 892.9000%
of the allowable FCC established general public limit ( 178.5800% of the FCC occupational limit). This was
determined through calculations along a radial from each sector taking full power values into account as
well as actual vertical plane antenna gain values per the manufacturers supplied specifications for gain.
The anticipated maximum composite MPE value for this site is 1444.4% of the allowable FCC established
general public limit (288.88% of the FCC occupational limit). This is based upon worst-case modeling
performed on the rooftop and ground taking emissions contributions from all carriers present into
account. This value will determine whether the proposed site will be in compliance with regards to
electromagnetic emissions. Based on worst-case predictive modeling, there are no areas at ground level
related to the proposed antennas that exceed the FCC's occupational or general public exposure limits
at this site. At ground level, the maximum power density generated by the antennas is approximately
11.20% of the FCC's general public limit (2.24% of the FCC's occupational limit).
A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC
exposure limits and there are no RF hazard mitigation measures in place. Any carrier which has an
installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicable MPE must participate in mitigating these RF
hazards. For this facility, the composite values calculated were above the allowable I 00% threshold
standard per the federal government.
EBl's modeling indicates that there are areas in front of the T-Mobile antennas at the rooftop level that
exceed the FCC standards for general public and occupational exposure. Based on worst-case predictive
modeling, the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's general public limit within
approximately 12 feet of T-Mobile's Sector A antennas, and 7 feet of Sector C antennas at the main roof
level. Modeling also indicates that the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's
occupational limit within approximately 2 feet of T-Mobile's Sector A and C antennas at the main roof
level. In order to alert any workers potentially accessing the site, a blue Notice sign and a yellow Guidelines
sign are recommended at the first point(s) of access to the rooftop. To reduce the risk of exposure and/or
injury, EBI recommends that access to the rooftop or areas associated with the active antenna installation
be restricted and secured where possible. Caution and/or Warning signage is recommended at the site as
presented in the Signage Plan -Attachment I. When Warning signs are required, other markings such as
painted striping, chains, stanchions, or fencing may also be used to identify the perimeter of each Safety
Zone.
6 EBI Consulting• 21 B Street ♦ Burlington, MA 01803 ♦ 1.800.786.2346
Post at Roof
Access Points
1:111111 (<••>))
~-~-
% FCC Public Exposure Limit
■ 500 < Exposure Lewi
□ 100 < Exposure Lewi s 500
■ Exposure Lewi s 100
Hi 8' 4' 0 16' ------When Warning signs are required, other markings such as painted striping. chains,
stanchions, or fencing may also be used to identify the perimeter of each Safety Zone.
*For Clarity, Other
Carrier Antennas are
Not Labeled.
■
■
T-Mobile
Antennas
Other Carrier
Antennas
Sign Sign Count Description Posting Instructions
l~l•H!I Blue Notice Sign
Used to notify individuals they are
(<i>) entering an area where the power Securely post at all access points to the site
I density emitted from transmitting in a manner conspicuous to all individuals =--~=~ antennas may exceed the FCC's MPE entering thereon. ------limit for the general public or ..... occupational exposures.
Guidelines -~ •~, Informational sign used to notify Securely post at all access points to the site
I workers that there are active antennas in a manner conspicuous to all individuals
installed and provide guidelines for entering thereon.
working in RF environments.
.ACAUTION
Securely post near areas where the general
/1 Yellow Caution Sign public or occupational MPE limit could be
Used to notify individuals that they are exceeded as shown in Attachment I at the 4 entering a hot spot where either the site in a manner that prominently alerts ---general public or occupational FCC's =--====-= occupational workers and the general =:=~--MPE limit is or could be exceeded.
public of RF emissions.
Securely post near areas where the general • Red Warning Sign public and occupational MPE limits are
Used to notify individuals that they are exceeded as shown in Attachment I at the 2 entering a hot zone where either the site in a manner that prominently alerts ---general public or occupational FCC's ::::"-:":1=:.= occupational workers and the general ~.;s=..:-:. MPE limit has been exceeded.
public of RF emissions.
The proposed site will be compliant with the installation of the mitigation
measures.
The actual number of access points may vary based on documentation provided and/or if a surve)
Notes:
was conducted. Recommended signage locations are based on T-Mobile's guidance for the worst
case scenario in each sector. The actual signage installation is dependent on accessibility of the facilicy
and antennas. Locations deemed inaccessible due to OSHA safety standards (proximity to
unprotected roof edge or slope, etc.) will be compliant upon installation of recommended signagE
at the closest accessible point.
Roof MH Roof Max M•p Mex • Map Mex ; Y Off'°" X Off,et Number o1 e~
140 140 160 160 20 20 1 SUS41:SF> SU$41:SFXS210
. O.u,
Standlird M~thod Uptinw Sc.ale FKt, Low Thr low CoAor Mid Thr Mod Cob H4 Tlv H; Colo< Ow, Colo,,.,, Ht Muh,.,, Ht M<thod
• 2 3 l 100 1 500
It is •dvi:sabae to prOYide an 10 (•nt 1) for aU antennas
(MHz) Trans Trans Coax Coax
10 Name freq ~ Count Len Type
TMO Al GSM/UMT 1900 30 2 122 7 /8 IDf
TMOA2 LT£ 600 30 1 122 7/8 LOF
TMO A2 LTE 700 30 1 U2 7 /8 LDf
TMOA3 LTE 2100 60 2 122 7/8 LDf
TMO 81 GSM/UMT 1900 30 2 166 7/8 LDf
TMO 82 LTE 600 30 1 166 7/8 LDf
TM082 LTE 700 30 1 166 7/SLDf
TM083 LTE
TMOCl LT£
TMOCl LTE
TMOO GSM/UMT
TMOC3 LTE
UNKl Al Unknown
UNk l A2 Unknown
UNk 1 Al Unknown
UN.C 1 A4 Unknow,,
UNK 1 81 Unknown
UNK 1 82 Unknown
UNK l 83 Unknown
UNK l 80 Unknown
UNK 1 Cl Unknown
UNk 1 C2 Unknown
UN.Kl C3 Unknown
UNK l C.C Unknown
UNK2 Al Unknown
UNIC 2 AJ. Unknown
UNK 2 Al Unknown
UNIC 2 Bl Unknown
UNK2 82 Unknown
UNK 2 83 Unknoo,.,n
UNk 2 Cl Unknown
UNK2C2 Unknown
UNK 2 C3 Unknown
UNK 3 Al Unknown
UNk3 A2 Unl<nown
UNK 3 A3 Unknown
UNO M Unknown
UNK 3 81 Unknown
UNK 3 82 Unknown
UNK 3 83 Unknown
UNK 3 84 Unknown
UNK 3 Cl Unknown
UNIC 3 C2 Unkncnvn
UNK30 Unknown
UNO CO Unknown
UNIC .C Al Unknown•
UNI( 4 Al Unknown•
UNIC4A3 Unknown•
UNK4 M Unknown•
UNIC4 Bl Unknown•
UNK4 82 Unbw>wn•
UNK 4 83 Unknown•
UNK 4 M Unknown·
2100
600
700
1900
2100
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
850
60
30
30
30
60
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
" ~
" " ~
" " ~
" B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
166 7/8 LDf
178 1-5/8 LDf
178 1·5/8LDf
178 l·S/8 LDf
178 l-S/8 LDf
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other
Loss
l.S2
1.52
l.S2
1.52
1.52
1.52
1.52
1.52
1.52
1.52
1.52
1.52
3
5000 3 3 1.5
Input
Power
Cole
Power Mfg Model
28.69401 Eric:.s,on 1W 21
16.51054 Comm«<>t ffHH--65A-
16.510S4 Commsc:01 FFHH--65A-
57.38802 Ericsson Mr 21
24.95004 Ericsson />Jr 21
15.10224 RF5
15.1022• RF5
IU''INAAAR --•9.90008 Eric.sson AJr 21
16.94343 Commsco1 FFHH-6SA-
16.90~ CommK<>t fFHH-65A•
29.Ml6 Ericsson Air 21
59.68721 Ericuon Air 21
12.52968 Unknown Unknown
12.5i968 Unlcnown Unknown
12.52968 Unl<nown Unl<nown
12.52968 U<1tnown Unknown
12.52968 Unknown Unknown
12.5.2968 Unknown Unknown
12.52968 Unknown Unknown
12.52968 Unknown Unknown
12.S-2968 UnknoW11 Unknown
12.5296& Unknown Unknown
U.52968 Unknown Unknown
12.52968 Unknown Unknown
16.53918 Unknown Unknown
17.04037 Unl<nown Untnown
16.53918 Unknown Unknown
16.53918 Unknown Unknown
17.04037 Unknown Unknown
16.53918 Unknown Unknown
16.53918 Unknown Untnown
17 .04037 Unknown Unknown
16.53918 Unknown Unknown
12.52968 Unknown Unknown
12.52968 Unknown Unl<nown
U.52968 Unl<nown Unllnown
12.52968 Unknown Unknown
12.52968 Unknown Unknown
12.52968 Unknown Unknown
12.52968 Unknown Unknown
12.52968 Unknown Unknown
12.52968 Unknown Unknown
12.S2968 Unknown Unknown
12.52968 Unknown Unknown
12.52968 Unknown Unknown
12.52968 Unknown Unknown
12.52968 Unknown Unknown
12.S2968 Unknown Unknown
12.52968 Unknown Unl<nown
12.52968 Unknown Unknown
12.52968 Unknown Unknown
12.52968 Unknown Unknown
12.52968 Unknown Unknown
(ft)
X
92
97
97
102
103
143
1•J
1•3
32
31
23
15
31
35
71
7S
47
51
55
59
lll
135
139
143
58
63
68
74
74
74
93
98
103
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
1•
61
65
69
73
5
8
11
14
39
42
45
,a
(ft)
y
145
145
1•5
145
158
153
153
148
120
120
120
120
138
138
138
138
138
138
138
138
10
143
143
143
119
119
119
58
58
58
127
127
127
39
36
33
30
20
17
14
11
6
6
6
6
150
150
150
150
119
119
119
119
(ft)
1.67
2.67
19.67
19
19
19.67
2.67
1.67
l
l
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
Type
(ft) ,.,,.,
•.66
8
8
4.66
•-66
6
6
•. 66
8
a
•. 66
4.66 •
4 • 4 • 4 • • • • 4
• • • •
• • • • • • • • 4 • • • • 4 • 4 •
dBd BWdth
Gain Pt Dir
15.35 65;350
15.• 66;350
15.8 61;350
15.3S 65;350
15.35 65;90
11.95 66.1;90
12.35 63.1;90
15.35 65;90
15.4 66;220
15.8 61;220
15.35 65;220
15.35 65;220
12 63;350
12 63;350
12 63;350
12 63;350
12 63;90
12 63;90
12 63;90
U 63;90
12 63;220
12 63;220
12 63;220
12 63;220
U 63;0
12 63;0
12 63;0
12 63;120
12 63;120
U 63;120
12 63;300
12 63;300
12 63,300
12 63;30
12 63,30
12 63;30
12 63;30
12 63;150
12 63;150
12 63;150
U 63;150
12 63;270
12 63;270
U 63;270
U 63;270
12 63;30
12 63;30
U 63;30
U 63;30
12 63;150
12 63;150
12 63;150
12 63,150
Uptime
P..ofole
ON
flag
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
ON•
Appendix A: Certifications
Preparer Certification
I, Patricia Briea, state that
12
• I am an employee of EnviroBusiness Inc. ( d/b/a EBI Consulting), which provides RF-EME safety and
compliance services to the wireless communications industry.
• I have successfully completed RF-EME safety training, and I am aware of the potential hazards from
RF-EME and would be classified "occupational" under the FCC regulations.
• I am fully aware of and familiar with the Rules and Regulations of both the Federal Communications
Commissions (FCC) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) with regard
to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation.
• I have been trained on RF-EME modeling using RoofView® modeling software.
• I have reviewed the data provided by the client and incorporated it into this Site Compliance
Report such that the information contained in this report is true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge.
EBI Consulting ♦ 21 B Street ♦ Burlington, MA 01803 ♦ 1.800.786.2346
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 6219003322
Reviewed and Approved by:
sealed 19jul2019
Michael A McGuire PE
Electrical Engineer
mike@h2dc.com
Site No. SD06367A
6994 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA
Note that EBl's scope of work is limited to an evaluation of the Radio Frequency -Electromagnetic Energy (RF-
EME) field generated by the antennas and broadcast equipment noted in this report. The engineering and design of
the structure, as well as the impact of the antennas and broadcast equipment on the structural Integrity of the
structure, are specifically excluded from EBl's scope of work.
EBI Consulting
Appendix B: Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Requirements
13 EBI Consulting ♦ 21 B Street ♦ Burlington, MA 01803 ♦ 1.800.786.2346
All information used in this report was analyzed as a percentage of current Maximum Permissible Exposure
(% MPE) as listed in the FCC OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97-0 I and ANSI/IEEE Std C95. I. The FCC regulates
Maximum Permissible Exposure in units of microwatts per square centimeter (µW/cm2). The number of
µW/cm2 calculated at each sample point is called the power density. The exposure limit for power density
varies depending upon the frequencies being utilized. Wireless Carriers and Paging Services use different
frequency bands each with different exposure limits, therefore it is necessary to report results and limits
in terms of percent MPE rather than power density.
All results were compared to the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) radio frequency exposure
rules, 47 CFR I.I 307(b)( I) -(b)(3), to determine compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure
(MPE) limits for General Population/Uncontrolled environments as defined below.
General population/uncontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which the general public may be
exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made
fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore,
members of the general public would always be considered under this category when exposure is not
employment related, for example, in the case of a telecommunications tower that exposes persons in a
nearby residential area.
Public exposure to radio frequencies is regulated and enforced in units of microwatts per square
centimeter (µW/cm2). The general population exposure limit for the 700 and 800 MHz Bands is 467
µW/cm2 and 567 µW/cm2 respectively, and the general population exposure limit for the PCS and AWS
bands is I 000 µW/cm2• Because each carrier will be using different frequency bands, and each frequency
band has different exposure limits, it is necessary to report percent of MPE rather than power density.
Occupational/controlled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a
consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully
aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure.
Occupational/controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of
incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general
population/uncontrolled limits (see below), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of
the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by
some other appropriate means.
A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC
exposure limits and there are no RF hazard mitigation measures in place. Any carrier which has an
installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicable MPE must participate in mitigating these RF
hazards.
Additional details can be found in FCC OET 65.
14 EBI Consulting• 21 B Street• Burlington, MA 01803 ♦ 1.800.786.2346