HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-08-20; Planning Commission; ; CDP 08-01 JAMES DRIVE ESTATESThe City of CARLSBAD Planning Department
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No. ( 4
P.C. AGENDA OF: August 20, 2008
Application complete July 9, 2007
date:
Project Planner: Dan Halverson
Project Engineer: David Rick
SUBJECT: CDP 08-01 - JAMES DRIVE ESTATES - Request for approval of a Coastal
Development Permit to allow for the construction of two (2) single-family
residences on two previously subdivided and vacant .20 acre lots generally located
on the east side of James Drive directly across from Tara Court within the Mello
II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and Local Facilities Management Zone
1.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6455
APPROVING Coastal Development Permit CDP 08-01 based upon the findings and subject to
the conditions contained therein.
II. INTRODUCTION
The project consists of grading for and the construction of two single-family houses on two R-l
zoned single-family lots. Pursuant to Section 21.201.030 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, the
construction of a single family home within the City's Coastal Zone requires the processing and
approval of a Coastal Development Permit (CDP). The CDP application was reviewed for
consistency with Local Coastal Program (LCP) policies and implementation. The project
complies with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance (R-l) and the Mello II Segment of the
LCP. There are no unresolved issues therefore the staff recommendation of approval with
conditions is supported by the analysis as follows.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
Project Site/Setting: The two vacant infill lots are located on the east side of James Drive,
directly across from Tara Court. The two lots were created from a previous subdivision (MS 07-
03) that split one large lot into four separate standard single-family lots. Lot 3 is 8,772 square
feet and Lot 4 is 8,795 square feet. Topographically, the lots slope gently downward from east to
west. The site is bordered to the north by Lot 2 of the subdivision which is vacant and to the
south, east and west by single-family residences. The property does not contain any sensitive
vegetation or habitat. The lot is located outside the appeals jurisdiction of the California Coastal
Commission.
Proposed Residential Construction: The applicant is proposing to construct two new two-story
single-family residences, each located above a 1,592 square foot subterranean garage and work
CDP 08-01 JAMES DRIVE ESTATES
August 20, 2008
Page 2
area. The proposed house on lot 3 is 3,191 square feet and the house on Lot 4 is 3,504 square
feet. The "Contemporary" style architecture of the two-story structures will be constructed with a
stucco finish, lap siding, and a concrete tile roof. The front of each residence will also include a
stone veneer finish mixed in with the other materials.
Proposed Grading: Based on the preliminary review of the project and the fact that underground
garages are proposed, a grading permit will be required for this project. The estimated grading
quantities for each lot include 651 cubic yards (cy) of cut and 78 cy of fill, resulting in 573 cy of
export.
Impact on Coastal Resources: The development is two single-family houses on two vacant,
previously subdivided lots; no agricultural activities, sensitive resources, geological instability,
flood hazard or coastal access opportunities exist onsite and the development does not obstruct
views of the coastline as seen from public lands or public right-of-way or otherwise damage the
visual beauty of the coastal zone.
IV. ANALYSIS
The project is subject to the following plans, ordinances and standards:
A. Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM) General Plan Land Use designation;
B. Single-Family Residential Zone (R-l-7,500)(Chapter 21.10 of the Zoning Ordinance);
C. Coastal Development Policies and Regulations for the Mello II LCP Segment and Coastal
Resource Protection Overlay Zone (CMC Chapter 21.203);
D. City Council Policy No. 44 (Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines); and,
E. Growth Management Ordinance (Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance) and Zone 1
Local Facilities Management Plan.
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's
consistency with the applicable city regulations and policies. The project's compliance with each
of the above regulations is discussed in detail in the sections below.
A. Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM) General Plan Land Use
The General Plan Land Use designation for the properties is Residential Low-Medium Density
(RLM). The RLM designation allows residential development at a density range of 0 - 4.0
dwelling units per acre. The RLM Growth Management Control Point (GMCP) is 3.2 dwelling
units per acre and is used for the purpose of calculating the City's compliance with Government
Code Section 65863. The project lots each have a net developable acreage of .20 acres and at the
GMCP would allow .64 of a unit per lot.
The project's proposed density is 5 dwelling units per acre which is above the RLM density
range of 0-4 dwelling units per acre and is above the GMCP of 3.2 dwelling units per acre.
However, there is an exception within the Land Use Element of the Carlsbad General Plan (page
16) which specifies that when the base zone (R-1-7,500) is consistent with the land use
designation (RLM) then a slightly higher yield to accommodate a single-family residence is
CDP 08-01 JAMES DRIVE ESTATES
August 20, 2008
Page 3
permitted. In these exceptional cases the City may find that the project is consistent with the
Land Use Element if it satisfies specific findings. All of the required findings can be made as
shown in Table A below:
TABLE A - GENERAL PLAN LAND USE COMPLIANCE
FINDINGS
The project must be compatible with the
objectives, policies, general land uses and
programs expressed in the General Plan Land
Use Element. Implementation Policy C.I of the
Land Use Element (Overall Land Use Pattern) -
To ensure the review of future projects places a
high priority on the compatibility of adjacent
land uses along the interface of different density
categories.
All of the necessary infrastructure must be in
place to support the project.
The proposed density must not exceed the
maximum density allowed at the top of the
range by more than an additional 25%.
COMPLIANCE
The proposed project is two single-family
residences on two legally created lots. The
surrounding area is predominantly single-
family residences on similar sized lots and
density.
The project either incorporates the necessary
infrastructure or is conditioned to provide it.
The maximum density of the RLM
designation is 4 du/acre. The proposed project
density is 5 du/acre, which is a 25% increase.
B. Single-Family Residential Zone (R-l-7,500)(Chapter 21.10 of the Zoning Ordinance)
The project meets all of the requirements of the R-l zoning regulations. All required setbacks,
building height, and lot coverage established for the zone have been reviewed for compliance
with the required standards as outlined in Table B below:
TABLE B - R-l ZONE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
STANDARD
Front Yard Setback
Side Yard Setback
Rear Yard Setback
Max Building Height
Lot Coverage
REQUIRED/ALLOWED
20 feet minimum
Not less than 10% of lot width;
Lot 3 minimum setback: 6.8 feet
Lot 4 minimum setback: 6.6 feet
Twice the required side yard setback
(13.6 minimum)
30 feet if minimum roof pitch is 3:12
40% of the lot
PROPOSED
20 + feet for both lots
Lot 3 is 6.8 feet
Lot 4 is 6.6 feet
60 + feet for both lots
Both houses have at least a
3:12 pitched roof and are
below 30 feet in height.
24%
C. Coastal Development Policies and Regulations for the Mello II LCP Segment and
'Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (CMC Chapter 21.203).
The project site is located within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and is not in
the appeal jurisdiction. The site is also located within and subject to the Coastal Resource
CDP 08-01 JAMES DRIVE ESTATES
August 20, 2008
Page 4
Protection Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.203) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The project's
compliance with each of these programs and ordinances is discussed below:
1. Mello II LCP Segment
The subject site has an LCP Land Use Plan designation of RLM (Residential Low-Medium
Density). The projects consistency with the RLM Land Use designation was analyzed in Section
B above.
The proposed two-story, single-family residences are consistent with the surrounding
development of one and two-story single-family structures. The two-story residences will not
obstruct views of the coastline as seen from public lands or the public right-of-way, nor
otherwise damage the visual beauty of the coastal zone. No agricultural uses currently exist on
the site, nor are there any sensitive resources located on the property. The proposed single-family
residences are not located in an area of known geologic instability or flood hazard. Since the site
is not located in close proximity to the coast, no public opportunities for coastal shoreline access
are available from the subject site. The residentially designated site is not suited for water-
oriented recreation activities.
2. Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone
The project is consistent with the provisions of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone
(Chapter 21.203 of the Zoning Ordinance) in that the project will adhere to the City's Master
Drainage Plan, Grading Ordinance, Storm Water Ordinance, Standard Urban Storm Water
Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) and Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Program (JURMP) to
avoid increased urban run off, pollutants and soil erosion. No development is proposed in areas
of steep slopes (coastal bluff) and no native vegetation is located on the subject property. The site
is not located in an area prone to landslides, or susceptible to accelerated erosion, floods or
liquefaction.
D. City Council Policy No. 44 (Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines)
New single-family residential projects of two to four homes are required to comply with
provisions 1-4, 9-11, and 13-18 of City Council Policy No. 44 - Neighborhood Architectural
Guidelines. The purpose and intent of the guidelines is to ensure that a variety of architectural
elements are incorporated into single-family homes so that they: a) are visually interesting; b)
have sufficient building articulation to reduce bulk and mass; c) are in scale to their lot size, and;
d) contribute to the creation of livable neighborhoods.
The buildings floor plans, elevations, and plotting for the two proposed single-family homes
comply with City Council Policy No. 44 as shown in Table C below.
CDP 08-01 JAMES DRIVE ESTATES
August 20, 2008
PageS
TABLE C - CITY COUNCIL POLICY 44 COMPLIANCE
Architectural Guideline Compliance Comments
Floor Plans and Elevations
1 All residential projects shall be required to have a
minimum number of different floor plans, different front
and corresponding matching rear elevations with
different color schemes as identified below:
[X] 2-4 dwelling units shall provide 1 floor plan and 2
different elevations.
I I 5-12 dwelling units shall provide 2 different floor
plans and 2 different elevations.
I | 13-20 dwelling units shall provide 2 different floor
plans and 3 different elevations.
O 21+ dwelling units shall provide 3 different floor
plans and 3 different elevations.
The two residences proposed have
reversed floor plans and have
different front elevations. The
homes differ in several areas
including second-story off-sets,
window moldings, and decorative
rafter tails.
Every house should have a coherent architectural style.
All elevations of a house, including front, side and rear,
should have the same design integrity of forms, details
and materials.
Each house has a coherent
architectural style which is
represented on all elevations.
In addition to the previous requirements, design details
should reinforce and enhance the architectural form and
style of every house and differ from other elevations of
the same floor plan. A minimum of 4 complimentary
design details, including but not limited to those listed
below, shall be incorporated into each of the front, rear
and street side building fa9ade(s) of the house.
Design Details
Balconies
Decorative eaves and
fascia
Exposed roof rafter tails
Arched elements
Towers
Knee braces
Dormers
Columns
Exterior wood
elements
Accent materials (i.e.;
brick, stone, shingles,
wood or siding)
Each elevation style contains a
minimum of four design details
from the approved list which are
compatible with the specific
architectural style. These elements
are specified on front and rear
elevations of each dwelling unit.
Each dwelling unit has a
combination of decks, fascia, rafter
tails, window elements, knee
braces, dormers, corbels, deck
railings, lap siding, and accent
materials like stone veneer siding.
Floor plans in a project shall exhibit a variety of roof
ridges and roof heights within a neighborhood.
Both floor plans have a variety of
roof ridges, hips, and valleys
incorporated into the design.
CDP 08-01 JAMES DRIVE ESTATES
August 20, 2008
Page 6
TABLE C - CITY COUNCIL POLICY 44 COMPLIANCE CONTINUED
Architectural Guideline Compliance Comments
Single Story Requirements
The remaining total number of homes shall comply with
one of the following guidelines:
The home shall have a single-story building edge
with a depth of not less than 8 feet and shall run the
length of the building along one side except for
tower elements. The roof covering the single-story
element shall incorporate a separate roof plane and
shall be substantially lower than the roof for the
two-story element. Porches and porte-cochere
elements shall qualify as a single-story edge.
Houses with courtyards that are a minimum of 15
feet wide located along the side of the house and
setback a minimum of 15 feet from the property line
are not required to have a single-story building edge.
Both residences have a 12 foot
deep covered front porch that
creates and extends a single-story
edge along the front elevation.
Multiple Building Planes
10 For at least 66% of the homes in a project, there shall be
at least 3 separate building planes on street side
elevations of lots with 45 feet of street frontage or less
and 4 separate building planes on street side elevations
of lots with a street frontage greater than 45 feet.
Balconies and covered porches qualify as a building
plane.
The minimum offset in planes shall be 18 inches and
shall include, but not be limited to, building walls,
windows, porches and roofs. The minimum depth
between the faces of the forward-most plane and the
rear plane on the front elevation shall be 10 feet. A
plane must be a minimum of 30 sq. ft. to receive credit
under this section.
Both residences have at least 4
different building planes on the
front elevations which include:
garage entry ways offset; front
porches, windows, and roofs.
The forward most plane on each
house is approximately 14 feet off-
set from the rear plane on the front
elevation or the garage.
11 Rear elevations shall adhere to the same criteria
outlined in Number 10 above for front elevations except
that the minimum depth between front and back planes
on the rear elevation shall be 4 feet. Rear balconies
qualify as a building plane.
Both residences have at least 4
different building planes on the
rear elevations with a minimum
depth of 4 feet between front and
back planes which include: roofs
and overhangs, recessed windows,
and building off-sets.
CDP 08-01 JAMES DRIVE ESTATES
August 20, 2008
Page?
TABLE C - CITY COUNCIL POLICY 44 COMPLIANCE CONTINUED
Architectural Guideline Compliance Comments
Windows/Doors
13
14
At least 66% of exterior openings (door/windows) on
every home in the project shall be recessed or projected
a minimum of 2 inches and shall be constructed with
wood, vinyl or colored aluminum window frames (no
mill finishes).
Windows shall reinforce and enhance the architectural
form and style of the house through, the use of signature
windows and varied window shapes and sizes.
Both homes provide windows and
doors that are boxed out and
recessed a minimum of 2 inches.
Both homes have a variety of sizes
and shapes of windows.
Front Porches
15 Fifty percent (50%) of the homes shall be designed with
a covered front porch, open courtyard, or balcony (each
with a minimum depth of 6 feet and a minimum area of
60 square feet) located at the front of the dwelling. The
minimum depth for a covered front porch shall be
measured from the front fa9ade of the home to the inside
of any supporting porch posts. The front and sides of
porches shall be open except for required and/or
ornamental guardrails. A variety of roof elements shall
be provided over porches. Porches may not be converted
to living space.
Both homes include front porches
that exceed the standards set forth.
Front Entries
16 Seventy-five percent (75%) of the homes must have a
front entry to the home that is clearly visible from the
street. Walkways from the front door to the street are
encouraged.
Both homes include front
entryways visible from the street.
Chimneys
17 Chimneys and chimney caps shall be in scale with the
size of the home. No more than 2 chimneys shall be
allowed for homes on lots in planned developments
having an area less than 7,500 square feet.
Both homes include chimneys that
are in scale with the development.
Garage Doors
18 Garage doors for 3 or 4 cars in a row that directly face
the street must have a minimum of an 1 8" plane
change between the garage doors after the 2 car garage
door.
Both homes include 3 car garages
and the third garage door is offset
by the minimum of an 18" plane.
E. Growth Management Ordinance (Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance) and
Zone 1 Local Facilities Management Plan.
The project is subject to the provisions of the Growth Management Ordinance, as contained in
Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance. The project's conformance with the requirements of the
Growth Management regulations is detailed in Table D below:
CDP 08-01 JAMES DRIVE ESTATES
August 20, 2008
Page 8
TABLE D - GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE
STANDARD
City Administration
Library
Waste Water Treatment
Park
Drainage
Circulation
Fire
School Districts (Carlsbad Unified)
Sewer (Carlsbad)
Water (Carlsbad)
IMPACTS/STANDARDS
6.95 sq. ft.
3.71 sq. ft.
2EDU
.01 acre
1 CFS / Drainage Basin "B"
20ADT
Station No. 1
Elementary = 0.522
Middle School = 0.1 44
High School = 0.272
2EDU
550 GPD
COMPLY
N/A
N/A
Yes
N/A
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
The project site is located within the area covered by Local Facilities Management Zone 1.
There are no special conditions or requirements within the Zone 1 Local Facilities Management
Plan that apply to this single-family residential project. However the project is conditioned to pay
the appropriate public facility fees, water and sewer connection fees, traffic impact fees, and
school fees. All facility improvements necessary to accommodate the development will be in
place prior to, or concurrent with development. Therefore, the project is consistent with the Zone
1 Local Facilities Management Plan.
The proposed project is .72 units above what the Growth Management Control Point density for
this RLM designated properties would allow and a fraction of a dwelling unit (.72 du's) will be
withdrawn from the dwelling unit bank.
V.ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project is exempt from CEQA per Section 15303(a) of CEQA exemptions (Class 3), which
exempts the construction of one single-family residence on any legal parcel in an urbanized area,
when it can be clearly seen that there are no environmental impacts. The project consists of two
single-family structures on two legal lots and there are no habitat or sensitive resources on either
lot.
A Notice of Exemption will be filed by the Planning Director upon project approval.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6455
2. Location Map
3. Disclosure Form
4. Background Data Sheet
5. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form
6. Exhibits "A" - "Q", dated August 20, 2008
SITEMAP
NOT TO SCALE
James Drive Estates
CDP 08-01
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require
discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be
reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note: _ _ _ ; _ ,
'Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization;
corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or
other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit"
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be
provided below.^ - . - '•'<-'
1 .
2.
APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest
in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title,
addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE
THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE
BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate
officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.)
Person QlSGlt&X P.
Title
Corp/Part_
Title
Address 2£3«4 JW Address
OWNER (Not the owner's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership,
tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or
partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the
shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE
NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the
names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessary.)
Person
Title Q/UMB2,Title
Address Address
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us
3.NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit
organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust
Title Title
Address Address
4.Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months?
Yes No If yes, please indicate person(s): M^>»fli/ j^\£L,t t\
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Signature of 7 /SJ2jnatZireW applicant/date
Prfrit or type name of owner <3 •p.
Print or type name of applicant
Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date
Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 12/06 Page 2 of 2
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: CDP 08-01
CASE NAME: JAMES DRIVE ESTATES
APPLICANT: Gregory D. Maver
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for approval of a Coastal Development Permit to
allow for the construction of two (2) single-family residences on two (2) previously subdivided
and vacant .20 acre lots generally located east of James Drive directly across from Tara Court
within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program (LCP) and Local Facilities
Management Zone 1.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That Portion of Lot 14 in Block "G" of Belle Vista, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 2152, filed in
the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, March 7, 1929
APN: 207-022-04-00 Acres 0.20 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 2 lots / 2 units
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Existing Land Use Designation: RLM - Residential Low-Medium Density
Proposed Land Use Designation: N/A
Density Allowed: 0-4 du/acre Density Proposed: 5 du/acre (1 residence)*
Existing Zone: R-1-7,500 Proposed Zone: N/A
* (Allowedper the General Plan Land Use Element Page 16)
Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use:
Zoning General Plan Current Land Use
Site R-1-7,500 RLM Vacant
North R-1-7,500 RLM Single-Family
South R-1-7,500 RLM Single-Family
East R-l-7,500 RLM Vacant
West R-l-7,500 RLM Single-Family
LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
Coastal Zone: [X3 Yes |~1 No Local Coastal Program Segment: Mello II
Within Appeal Jurisdiction: | | Yes 1X1 No Coastal Development Permit: IXI Yes | | No
Local Coastal Program Amendment: I I Yes 1X1 No
Existing LCP Land Use Designation: RLM Proposed LCP Land Use Designation: N/A
Existing LCP Zone: R-l-7.500 Proposed LCP Zone: N/A
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: Carlsbad Unified Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 2 EDU
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
I I Categorical Exemption,
|~~| Negative Declaration, issued
I I Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated_
Other, Exempt Section 15303 - (Construction of single-family residences in an urbanized
area).
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: James Drive Estates - CDP 08-01
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: J_ GENERAL PLAN: RLM
ZONING: R-1-7,500 (Single-Family-Residential")
DEVELOPER'S NAME: Gregory D. Mayer
ADDRESS: 2234 Ivy Road. Oceanside. CA 92054
PHONE NO.: 760-889-8998 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 207-022-04
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 0.20 AC.
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: Unknown
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
City Administrative Facilities:
Library:
Wastewater Treatment Capacity
Park:
Drainage:
Demand in Square Footage - 6.95
Demand in Square Footage = 3.71
(Calculate with J. Sewer) 2 EDU
.01
1
Basin B
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
20
Demand in Acreage =
Demand in CFS =
Identify Drainage Basin =
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation: Demand in ADT =
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = No. 1
Open Space: Acreage Provided = N/A
Schools: Carlsbad Unified
(Demands to be determined by staff)
Sewer: Demands in EDU 2 EDU
Demand in GPD =Water:550
The project is .72 units over the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.
SHEET 1 OF 1
DEVELOPMENT PLAN ™P oe-oi
JAMES DRIVE ESTATES
1
^E
T \~
aENRRjr yrtTjr.c.
toot CMS *m-
tag** HAH saaumt
• mgMts -• f-t/it-t-not
JoutmttanrfMC&i •aaenrtout. MOW matter-
ffxxmurcrusoaa. WHCT •
tr KA&otftr aunt naer 43}
trnrnxnavt
E«wvrr
LROKND-
smasntcr.
usflttft fffffffrgw>Tyayj
wr fitXTKN or Lor H H BLOCK f or KLLAVST*, H mr arr arcAMOAO, CCUHTY or SMIarea, STAJT or cMjraaeA. ACCOHCHO TO IMPmotor NQ ftn rua w TNT emcc er mr
.SApTBWORK
a$'----'-'-'---aur'--tscr mer' w <
tuoatr aaaae - at et trait
taaucuKmaoc .acr
O WJHrK/DirVJfLOPXft;
-^ C,f*d°6
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
41J5 PARK DRIVE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
>JJl JOT-IM-M-on
PARCEL 3 AND 4 ,
DEVELOPMENTAL PLANS
JAMES DRIVE ESTATES
\NDRTH
I SITE PLANl
GENERAL NOTES
PROJECT DATA
PROPOSED USD SINGLE FAPJLY DWELLING
CONSTRUCTS TYPE' V ~ .NO* RATED O*D
OCCUPANCY,
CODE COHPLMCe
R-> DWELLINGS - GARAGES
nn.c ««, ani CRC.
SPECIAL INSPECTIONS, sons omiANCt cvtcN
RTOU1N0 *T SOILS REPORT)
NUHtER DT STORIES
THESE PLANS AND MLL WOK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CALIFORNIAWILDING STANDARDS CODE rQUNO IN STATE OF CALIFORNIA TITLE B4 CO*
AX AWNCCD »O AD3FTEO BY THC COUNTY OF SMt OTCSa
T« WTME POTJCCT SH*LL Om.T VJTB DC BTO EIITIM DT THE
CALtTOMlA BUTL9IM1 CODE (TITLE CO. WWCH ADOPTS THC IM7 UK,Eoaa UNC, Bora UPC AND THE egai NEC.
THE OMTRACTOR ANB/DR SmEOfTIUCTTK SHALL VCRITr ALLmfiams w THE iwviiia «n SHALL «tmrr THE ovimi «ffi «t»wIUJLBIHG DESIGN V AMY DISCREPANCIES, PRIOR TO STARTING THEIR WORK.
THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCCMTRACTORS WORK SHALL CONTORH TOALL APPIICAILE TEDERAL. STATE, AND LOCAL CODES AND ORDINANCE!.
EACH SUBCCMTftACTOt IS CONSlDrRED A SPECIALIST IN HIS
RESPECTIVE FTELD AHD SHALL* PRUH TO THE SUMSSHH OF DID ORptRnmuct or vomc. NDTITY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND OVNERITAMT wmx CAU
THAT CANNOT IE F
THE CONTRACTOR AHD/Ot SUtCOHTRACTOR SHALL DC RCSPONSIILCFOR THE APPROPRUTC •HnKUP* TO ALL UTILITIES REQU»£D TO
COMPLETE VOK.
WNEK CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ARE NOT SHDVN OR MOTCD FOR ANYPART OF THE WORK, THE DETAIL! SHALL RE THC SAME FOR OTHERSDfiLM WORK AND MUST COMPLY WITH THE 19*7 U1C.
HOT PROJECT WBJ. COHPLY WITH TIC COUNTY OF SM DltOD LIOHTMi ORWNANCE.
LEGAL
4135 -PARK DRIVE
CARLSBAD, CA. 92008
ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 207-022-04
PARCEL 3 BUILDING INFORMATION
MAIN FLOOR
UPPER FLOOR
GARAGE
COVERED PATIO
1781.56 SOFT
1409,56 SOFT
1593.97 SOFT
217.00 SOFT
TOTAL LIVING 3191.18 SOFT
PARCEL 4 BUILDING INFORMATION
MAIN FLOOR
UPPER FLOOR
GARAGE
COVERED PATIO
1774.07 SOFT
1730.59 SOFT
1593.97 SOFT
317.00 SOFT
.TOTAL LIVING 3504,66 SQFT
SHEET INDEX
SHEET DESCRIPTION
TITLE PAGE
BASEMENT/FDUNDATIDN-PARCEL 3
MAIN ..FiaPR. PLAN-PARCEL- 3
UPPER FLOOR PLAN-PARCEL 3
RIGHT/FRONT EliEVATION-PARCEL 3
LEFT/REAR ELEVATIONS PARCEL 3
•ROOF PLAN-P_ARCEL 3
BASEMENT/FDUNDATIDN-PARCEL 4
MAM FLDDR PLAN-PARCEL 4
UPPER FLOOR PLAN-PARCEL 4
RIGHT/FRONT, £LEVATION-PARCEL 4
LEFT/REAR ELEVATIONS PARCEL 4
ROOF PLAN-PARCEL 4
BASEMENT EXHIBIT
CQNCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN
CO 2- tt.
1
IGftRAGE PLAN I.
Z=)aL-\COH-
uu&.</)<L<.
Q-PQ
FLDOR PLAN NOTES
I MftIN FLDDR PLANl ««,,MAIN rum iTaiu SOTTIFPEH FUO» I4MM MPTGAR«C isnnr sen
. KI PUP ra* TWV •• *
'H8KW*
•9MEOMCsis a
<r_j
0.
OC
CLZ:
~5efT
3
FLDDR PLAN NOTES
I UPPER FLDDR PLAN I.MAM Fun -17IUI SOFT
Uf PCR FUnt L40-M SOFTGAUCZ sfen nrr
ucx
OLJ
QiQ.<LCL
Q_=)
CHECKED
4
ELEVATION NOTES
im «->/«•trow
It V41T HMM1XM BTJMU MMDK
A »/f 1TUCQX 9-COM. (TMSH mIMOU
tc. men ovn n n>T ruaun.
IF. CMNTTTIM WWOLO «JMO I
BA, vna RWJML KM »•. <mx iwnc MVATKK rot room RMMOBUWtx a. .m VOD ono.
a>° tt. PXTMomxM nvrtcn,
O. VMS MOJW KM M-. WO. CLCM
OfMND KTVEEH AWT ttOO tHULLUS TMH 4> <UJ£. SEC W*L
et «r van n«» T«An,
*t DMSEI <U MTOMBUTtvooa mn.
ti, wm» fuTin envoi.
tK. O* FMCK UIE X*M M.V. NWLt
PER «JT UTTER
eti mtt-i ciTimi me D
«*«•
X. WTN. MULX NO FLAtHM
» U. n>MM) AT MTORUIKH
IT WITH
i, OWTIU. m wwi VECD.
MCK HMH KTML
4C. meen wnmo nwt KCLT. »61 BTCDU VWt. l-W^ Irt- fOI rOOT AWt FKM WU
ICTAL SCCTIOM. OODR «• ntE-CUT CONC. COUNt
BUND O.L ICTAI. UWVOO (MLC * F*Llf vfXI '*"
nSm&MMITSLMH. * I««V*«HIT-OWUHUI MW <w « «. ^ Qngg^ t|ttff mmut w „«
4H tTorc VDCOI
41 Mac VOtOA* »P»UT
*rweo witwa nw rm actCLCVATDMrK tHL> WITKU. M*
CONCRETE ROOT BY EAGLE 'ftOOTIND PRODUCTS. ICW •4«60MMIKJH CLASS 'A' riW-HATCH(K APPROVED CQUAU
| FRONT EjLEVATlGNl
I RIGHT ELEVATION I
2Z
UU
a
(XCK
ELEVATION NOTES
** JCCOMIJVT JCTM. D
u. T/T rrocox KIMT. ffMSH KK
IBM MBUCTK 4NXTJU. fOt mi VEEtL
M- tTUXO DVtt MBM Wa WTM. LATH
LTO mw <• tax. HE i
a. « voa tr«M mm.
(0. tt^*Vfl VOB POT.
Ml MM J-V4- KM TKDC KLH-CIMC Vn tff *T*L BOOL aw a MMUTC
«. ITUCCS vmmi> nwM swr. ftirt
HCTM. IRT0M.
FMCU MU. MIT • L£TT
rtucaj vnffm ram nan aoOJVMIW ret HZE> mnou. cMNuncTuKn mu
t uan- nnutt. n a
CONCKCTt ROOF IT EAGLE
I LEFT ELEVATIDNI ELEVATIDNl
U
6
ATTIC VENTILATION CALCULATIONS
MX MV ROOFING SHAU. K CLASS •*• TOE Mm)
ATTIC AREA t SPACE CALOLATIONSl ATTIC AREA 2 SPACE CALCULATIONS'
•me MCA IMSM art. Mm MU iwa si
ROOF PLAN NDTES
64- EAVE OVERHANG, TYPJCAL OJ1H
IS1 GABLE OVtRHANG, TYPICAL UDJt
t. TYPICAL SUDPEP ROOF MSOOLY.
A. CONCRETE ROOT BY EAGLERQOriNG PRODUCTS. ICTO »46«0OR APPROVED EQUAL.
1. IUILDIHG FELT PER Td£ HANUT.
4« PITCH
\ /^^
c. PLYVDQD SHEATHING PER
PLAH USE PL.YVODD PANELS OR
APPROVED O5.D. EQUAL.KOF FRAHING PER STRUCTURAL.or AWLH>IUE>
2. Gl MCTAL KHMER VCHT VITH MW.100 Itt IN. FREC AREAVERIFY LOCATMN
5. TYPICAL DDVHSPOUT- VERIFT LOCATHK
7. LINE OF STRUCTURE BELOW.
& tu. METAL VALLEY FLASHING TYPICAL,
10. LI« DT CHIMNEY
U. G.L NETAL CLOAKE0 VDfT «r tfHAON
VITH KDt 98 sa W. FREE AREA.VERITY LOCATION
Cr)<
CLQi
7
t i
/sW^///////7//////J/fS/////7/f
irsaaas-'!Si"0« ir oil v*L
K95aa7-
1
V
ssssr
FLDDR PLANl HAtN FLDOR 1774JI7 SOFTUPPER rUXK 17X39 SOFT
QMtMX 159&97 SOFT
FLOOR PLAN NOTES
M, UCV COUW MJWT CMMBtx CM mm vwi. KM »• tK.
B. ttt TTW tMU. NM »• DfC
von aunt HX sax,
•••«-«~
UIa;
au.
us:ou
«EQ.OQ
8
FLOOR PLAN NOTES
1 1
f
I MAIN FLOOR PLAN ! „*« ul.MAIN FLOOR 1774.07 SQTTIFPEf) FLOW 173099 SOFTGMACC tS«,97 SOFT
'afiar&wrtxac
'^^^SfS,
gjfgsnu"
'Sneifip"
uUJ
<r
D.
U20:6«cCLS;
FLOOR PLAN NOTES
i UPPER FLDDR PLAN I KAU V4.1774.07 nri It 173U9 IQTT IU9L97 SOFT I
t IMRIT RMLM on iFUM rat rrrc Mi
SffisBg*1
•sawiHRas-
OUJ
QiCL
<COL
Q-ID
10
ELEVATION NOTES
K MM t-3/*' BOI TMCK fOLO-COC WDOI
XI U IDttDCI VtXT, »-»4'
K KTM tfETDHW. K»x ICTM. taoit MO rutnon
A U. FblUHtM AT INTCTIECTIDi
VITN
IB. T/r P«ea 9-0*1. <FMIH mtOwe*)a. *ncn> ov» ex n>r runna
IF. cnomnaut SNMUI IYJMO HMUEttOMG nOWCTl. <MtTMJ. rO
«, nTOnot uon miuic. IT
4H, fTDC VtKIB
Ok STUCCO DVD) MGH ni KTN. 1>TH
CDNCKTC ROOT BY CMLC
ROOFING PRODUCTS. 1CBO I4UOCDCRCTC ROOT Tf EACL£
RDOFllffi PRODUCTS, 1CW MAM
USE exe iWTJ-PtWBIW AT OWE
i' 11 'it i r i mt \ m\ r 11 ii I'M i'«11 r IT i' i iL
f-RDNT ELEVATIDNlCglGHT ELEVATpj]
ELEVATION MUTES
ATTIC VCNTILATION CALCULATIONS
*U- NEV fOfOC SHALL K CLASS 'A' FVt£ RATED
ATTK AREA I SPACE CALOJUrKMSi
ATTIC MIA vnun twr.
ATTIC AREA t SPACE CALCULAntBti
ATTK AttA OLa CUT.
jggag-ffBMaggp ".^ a s
TDTM. MCA DF VDITUTm RCMIU I M7JH eft^M
wnx i/y'S^axmTiin TOTM. m nUJMEUHM KttnwT MtTM.
c dooM. UMIMUIII MU *W *w Mr rMC vwnunsr v iw
S£ctnl«^.-»«nncttM^«r,^«,ttM«™,«™
\1
RDOF PLAN NOTES
S4* E*vt OVCSHWG, TYPICAL UOM
ir OAJLC OVEAiANQ. TYPICAL UOH
L TYPICAL SLOPED RODF ASSDQLT>
A. CONCRtTC RODF BY EAGLE
ROOFING PRODUCTS. ICBO »46MOR APPROVED COUAL,
i. VUlLDING FELT PER .TILE MAWJF.
C, PLYVOQD SHEATHWa PER FRAHNC
PLAH USE PLYVOOO PAULS ORAPPROVES B1J. EOML.ROT FRAHMQ PER STRUCTURAL.OF APPLJCABLD
E. &L ICTAL DDRKER VENT VITH MM.10D sa Di FREE AREA.
VCX1FY LOCATION
3. C4, METAL FLASHING AND SADDLEAT ROOF TO CHtMNEr.
*. Gl. MO-AC RAW GUTTERS AT EAVES<OPTtOKAL)
5. TTPICAL OOWOTOUT- VERIFY UJCATHK
6. STUCCO wrrn BELOW vrm snapATTIC VENTHa; AS REQUIRED.
7. UNE DF STJIUCTUBE SELDV.
«. GJ. METAL VALLEY .FLASHING TYPICAL.
9. GJ. HETAL VALLEY FUSMWOAND 1UILT-UP CRICKET.
10, LINE OF CHIMNEY
:c§-;i. - - j
CII
D
•#'
^7
Q
PLAN I,
LJua:
13
SHEET 1 OF 1
DEVELOPMENT PLAN CDP oa-oi
JAMES DRIVE ESTATES
. - -ill AU/tC pXUT AliOKD ttt
H/*
ufO saua. asmer
CWLSMO juwonK Jtuer
arrcrunsev
THAT PORTION OF LOT 14 H BLOCK V Of OCUA\tsTA, H me air or ewissna COUNTY OF swswrr er CAUFOWIA. ACCOKDHG TONO. sts*. mo IN mrcowrr xccomet or SAN ueeo COUNTY, IMIKHf. 1939
wmw rtf aouNCwtifS ofs* 4A*e roet oaantD mmmr mnrnov of THC oasmo werM- souiHHfsr comai or PAIKCL
_____ _______lANDSGVWG BCrOKMO omesT coNNfcnoH m m*vsa>STOW QRAtl
BY6UP TO LWDSQVf SUKFACf ASSNOW
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
PARK DRIVE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
BASEMENT EXHIBIT
JAMES DRIVE ESTATES
t mtr.
CALCULATIONS:
mtf.
mtf.
BASEMENT EXHIBIT
JAMES DRIVE ESTATES
CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA
"• «n-«»-M-»i
Parcel 3 & 4 of MS07-03
ZONE 4 UNDISTURBED
ZONE 3 SLOPE PLANTING
/'>c,-v>\ \--'-'' \ ^ \\ *
NOTES-
GENERAL:
1. SM E««ln«ar'« rita plan fcr *p«dflo ar«4*a
and •taiaUa. talarmaltan.
WATER CONSERVATION:
Landscape Concept Plan for:
James Drive Estates
4135 Park Drive, Carlsbad, Ca. 92008
PLANTING LEGEND
5-VMBOl.•jepgEfiffs
-IYACRUS ROMANZOrTlAKUM
SLOPE TREES SUCH At
-OUERCUS WHOM ANAHmSSS!,**
ooo
-JACARANOA WM09FOUA
ACOMT TREES SUCK A*
OftUS ROMANZOmAHUM
-UAGNOU* C- tlTTLI OCM*
-OUCEN PALM
-UTTLE COt MAGNOLIA
-LAMTANA b—-CEAMOTHUS-COTONEASTER LACTEUS
UPRIGHT SHRUflS
-PHOTMU FRASCRI
-ANI002ANTNOS FIAV03V5 , -
PODOCARPuruACROPHTLUJS -YEW'
COMMON SAME
-JACAflANOA
t PALM
•LAN TAN A•MESTOm LUAC•COTONEASTER
•NEW ZEALAND FLAXI-KANCAACO PAW
zw 3 _ Noturaflttot Landteeaaif 1*10 a.f (+/- 1S.1X)Zwi« 4 - Math*: 1.230 a.f. (•*>/- «-**)
«-
.2en* 3 - Ua than «TI*. 4 - mji.tHM***
datfgn •* conform lo Olj al Calrabad Landcem* ''.HirtSli'r.
Inaha* of araonla mwlah ahan< alanunt araai **O> otoaM«i. wiara ad|iMni M *"*•, tha nwMlm«y le»ar dawn ta OM aiah mMnum.toot ay t «>ainto4 ia^amlrt Mai— alanl metarMi and htttafl*
water, Zan« I riw>Ui4 v
M)tr *r (wtMtrivi «•«•Uw franl and mr yard*.Turf wW •• HI*O In Una* laaatlvu and IMHad
4, Plant MMtartala ahovn an plan ara apprearlati
lor thtfr te«-woHr damand. Fkid MMlton* a/a
. • .t* »>• «• rii k. « wltnwUNlIr*wrSi