Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2022-07-26; City Council; ; Semiannual Transportation Report and Options to Reprioritize the Sustainable Mobility Plan Implementation Program
CA Review _RMC_ Meeting Date: July 26, 2022 To: Mayor and City Council From: Scott Chadwick, City Manager Staff Contact: Subject: Districts: Tom Frank, Transportation Director/City Engineer tom.frank@carlsbadca.gov, 442-339-2766 Semiannual Transportation Report and Options to Reprioritize the Sustainable Mobility Plan Implementation Program All Recommended Actions 1.Receive the Semiannual Transportation Report. 2.Adopt a resolution reprioritizing implementation of the Sustainable Mobility Plan program in the Capital Improvement Program. Executive Summary Semiannual Transportation Report The City Council directed staff in 2018 staff to provide the City Council with a report twice each year on the progress of the city’s initiatives to encourage multimodal transportation, which supports not just vehicle travel, but all means of getting around the city. As detailed below, staff made significant gains in advancing the city’s multimodal transportation goals in early 2022 despite facing continuing challenges because of the continuing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. This report is the eighth semiannual update on the Transportation Department’s multimodal efforts. Sustainable Mobility Plan implementation The city’s Sustainable Mobility Plan is intended to help reduce the mileage people travel by vehicles, mitigate the impacts of growth and development and shift how people get around the city from single-occupied private automobiles toward modes of travel that are more livable, cleaner and healthier. The City Council approved a motion on June 7, 2022, directing staff to return at a future City Council meeting with options to reprioritize the Sustainable Mobility Plan implementation program. This report provides an overview of the broad range of programs and projects identified in the plan and their status, and proposes specific repriortization options for the City Council’s consideration. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 1 of 204 Discussion Semiannual Transportation Report The following update provides each division’s accomplishments over the last six months and goals for the next six months. Transportation and Drainage Engineering and Asset Management Division Past six-month accomplishments include: • Completed update of the city’s Engineering Standards • Completed construction of the Carlsbad State Beach Energy Dissipater Replacement Project • Completed construction of the FY 2020-21 Concrete Repair Project • Advertised for construction bids for the 2021 Slurry Seal and Fog Seal Project • Awarded construction contract for the El Camino Real and Cannon Road Improvements Phase I Project and started construction support activities • Advertised for construction bids for the El Camino Real and Cannon Road Improvements Phase II Project • Awarded contract to an engineering design consultant firm for design of the Avenida Encinas Coastal Rail Trail and Pedestrian Improvements Project • Completed construction of the El Camino Real and College Boulevard Intersection Improvements Project • Initiated preliminary engineering and environmental assessment of the College Boulevard Extension Project • Received draft 60%-complete engineering design and continued environmental studies of the Terramar Area Coastal Improvements Project • Completed 50%-complete engineering design and continued environmental studies of the Beach Access Repairs from Pine Avenue to Tamarack Avenue Project • Completed quarterly vegetation maintenance of the Lake Calavera Dam • Completed annual vegetation clearing and trash removal of the Buena Vista Creek Channel Maintenance District Project • Completed Agua Hedionda Creek vegetation removal between the bridges of Cannon Road and El Camino Real • Completed the final engineering design of the Corrugated Metal Pipe Replacement Project north of Encinas Creek • Completed the final engineering design of the corrugated metal pipe replacement on six sites in the northwest quadrant • Completed engineering design of the 2021 Sidewalk Improvement Project • Prepared and processed a variety of annual reports to various transportation agencies including the San Diego Association of Governments, the California Department of Transportation, and the California Transportation Commission to secure funding for transportation Capital Improvement Program projects • Created, edited and added asset inventory data associated with transportation, drainage, facilities, parks and recreation assets • Produced a variety of atlas books, mapping products and data analysis for use by design, maintenance and operations staff • Selected consultant firm and initiated engineering design and environmental services of the Merwin Drive Drainage Improvements Project July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 2 of 204 • Selected consultant firm for engineering design and environmental services of the Drainage Master Plan Facility BFB-U, El Camino Real Channel Restoration Project • Released request for qualifications for engineering design of the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvements Project • Completed engineering design and advertised for construction bids for Phase I - Magnolia Avenue Storm Drain Improvements Project • Completed engineering design of the Highland-Hoover Storm Drain Realignment Project • Advertised for construction bids and initiated construction of the FY 2020-21 Americans with Disabilities Act Improvements Project • Completed construction of the Segovia Way Pavement Distress and Drainage Improvements Project • Completed construction of the Surface Drainage Improvements Project in the northwest portion of the city • Inspected 34,000 feet of storm drain pipelines with closed-circuit television technologies • Installed perforated underdrains along an El Camino Real slope to alleviate groundwater pressure and constructed gravel drainage pads to convey slope runoff across an existing dirt maintenance access road • Presented the following projects to the Traffic and Mobility Commission for review: o Village and Barrio Traffic Circles o El Camino Real and Cannon Road Improvements o El Camino Real Widening from Sunny Creek Road to Jackspar Drive o Avenida Encinas Widening South of Palomar Airport Road o 2021 Slurry Seal and Fog Seal Project o Park Drive Street and Drainage Improvements o Kelly Drive and Park Drive Complete Street Improvements o El Camino Real Roadway Improvements from Arenal Road to La Costa Avenue o Traffic Calming for Magnolia Avenue from Brady Circle to Valley Street • Sent an additional public outreach newsletter for the Village and Barrio traffic circles and barrio lighting projects • Installed 14 streetlights for the Barrio Lighting Phase 1 project. Seven streetlights were energized, and staff coordinated with San Diego Gas & Electric to schedule energizing the remaining streetlights. • Conducted a Utilities Coordination Committee meeting with utility firms such as SDG&E and telecommunication service providers to provide project updates and coordinate efforts Six-month goals include: • Continue with designs of the projects included in the Transportation and Drainage Capital Improvement Program Project Status Update provided in Exhibit 2 • Award a professional services agreement and initiate engineering design and environmental assessment processes of the Treatment Control Best Management Practices Program July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 3 of 204 • Complete subsurface geotechnical investigation of the section of El Fuerte Street, between Faraday Avenue and Loker Avenue • Continue completing a variety of annual reports to various transportation agencies including SANDAG, Caltrans and the California Transportation Commission and working with these regional agencies and others such as the North County Transit District to secure funding for transportation Capital Improvement Program projects, including the railroad tracks trenching project, as directed by the City Council during the Capital Improvement Program prioritization workshop • Continue adding asset inventory data associated with transportation, drainage, facilities parks and recreation assets • Continue producing a variety of atlas books, mapping products and data analysis for use by design, maintenance and operations staff • Complete construction of the Highland-Hoover Storm Drain Realignment Project • Conduct another Utilities Coordination Committee meeting in fall 2022 Streets and Storm Drain Maintenance Division Past six-month accomplishments include: • Completed the first year of a multi-year contract with Cannon Pacific Services (dba Pacific Sweeping) for the city’s street-sweeping services • Completed the first year of a multi-year contract with Urban Corps of San Diego for citywide pressure washing services, graffiti and trash removal services • Initiated a new agreement for high-priority storm drain maintenance and inspections • Successfully bid and established a contract to replace street signs with failing reflectivity • Mobilized response crews related to COVID-19 incidents • Completed 384 work orders related to damaged signs from vehicle collision incidents • Inspected high-priority storm drain inlets, which resulted in removing over 16 tons of storm drain sediment and debris for the current fiscal year • Continued managing 1,800 lane miles of street sweeping per month resulting in removal of approximately 424 tons of debris from roadways • Completed 1,313 streetlight and electrical maintenance service requests • Completed 41 storm drain maintenance requests and 24 storm drain emergency responses • Completed 60 sidewalk work orders and 67 asphalt work orders within the right of way, which consisted of approximately 31,000 square feet of surfaces replaced • Completed installation of 54 LED fixtures Six-month goals include: • Continue to safely maintain all levels of service during the pandemic recovery period and beyond • Continue implementation of the annual roadway restriping program by purchasing a replacement long-line striping truck • Continue with the annual maintenance programs July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 4 of 204 • Continue with Phase II of the citywide streetlight LED fixtures replacement program along collector and industrial streets Traffic Division Past six-month accomplishments include: • Completed update of the city’s Engineering Standards in accordance with the General Plan’s Mobility Element • Completed design of the Carlsbad Boulevard Pedestrian Improvements Project and submitted a request to Caltrans for Highway Safety Improvement Program funding allocation • Completed a citywide analysis of traffic safety and collision data as part of the Local Roadway Safety Plan project, conducted two stakeholder group meetings and initiated development of roadway safety recommendations • Initiated effort on updating the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program • Continued design effort to restripe southbound Carlsbad Boulevard from Manzano Drive to Island Way to better serve all roadway users • Continued implementation and configuration of Cubic/Trafficware traffic signal controller software • Provided engineering support and solutions for the new fiber optic communications network • Established a new traffic signal maintenance contract and transitioned service to a new contractor • Provided traffic signal modification construction inspection assistance at the El Camino Real/College Boulevard intersection including controller, pole and mast arm relocation and rewiring to accommodate removal of southbound right-turn island. This will allow for a third southbound through lane and a dedicated southbound right-turn lane. • Provided design assistance for traffic signal modification of the El Camino Real/Arenal Road intersection to provide a new preemption pattern for the Fire Station 2 reconstruction project • Provided design assistance for traffic signal modification of Palomar Airport Road/College Boulevard/Aviara Parkway intersection including controller, pole and mast arm relocation to accommodate new southbound through lane • Provided design assistance for traffic signal modification on El Camino Real to provide third southbound through lane from Arenal Road to north of La Costa Avenue • Initiated contact with Caltrans to facilitate/maintain traffic controller clock synchronization between Caltrans and the city as Caltrans migrates its traffic central system software and upgrades outdated signal controllers • Complete installation of permanent speed feedback signs on College Boulevard • Complete construction of traffic calming projects on Segovia Way and Harwich Drive Six-month goals include: • Prepare traffic studies associated with reported traffic concerns and identify proposed improvements • Begin construction of the Carlsbad Boulevard Pedestrian Improvements Project July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 5 of 204 •Initiate design of the Sustainable Mobility Plan implementation projects to enhance bike safety on La Costa Avenue, Jefferson Street and Cannon Road •Continue effort on updating the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program •Continue implementation of traffic calming improvements on residential streets in accordance with the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program •Complete the Local Roadway Safety Plan Project •Complete design plans to restripe southbound Carlsbad Boulevard from Manzano Drive to Island Way to better serve all roadway users •Complete construction of a pedestrian hybrid beacon crossing signal on Tamarack Avenue at Valley Street •Continue the process for integrating traffic signal controller and other signal components into the city’s high-speed fiber network •Work with the Information Technology Department to identify opportunities to improve the traffic communications network •Continue to address communications and detection requirements to maximize capabilities of Cubic/Trafficware traffic signal controller software •Coordinate with Caltrans to maintain clock synchronization and coordination as upgrades to its central system software and controllers occur •Continue to explore efficiencies related to traffic signal contractor utilization Transportation Planning and Mobility Division Past six-month accomplishments include: •Continued as the staff liaison to the Traffic and Mobility Commission •Prepared the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Work Plan for the Traffic and Mobility Commission, which is soon to be presented to the City Council for approval •Continued to lead the Transportation Demand Management Program – intended to reduce single-occupant vehicle trips – including outreach to local employers and continued review and monitoring of its mandatory programs •Continued management and development of the city’s Transportation Demand Management Program website, carlsbadcommuter.com, to provide Carlsbad businesses and residents with access to alternative transportation information and services •Initiated key program recommendations from the Sustainable Mobility Plan, including the active transportation monitoring program, cycling education and safety training, and Safe Routes to School planning activities •Finalized the annual Growth Management Plan monitoring report for FY 2020-21 and initiated an update of the methodology used to determine the multimodal level of service of city streets with an ad hoc subcommittee of the Traffic and Mobility Commission •Initiated an update of the city’s Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines with an ad hoc subcommittee of the Traffic and Mobility Commission •Continued development of the planning and engineering design process for the Avenida Encinas Coastal Rail Trail project July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 6 of 204 • Continued to lead review of all transportation impact analysis reports of development projects provided by the Community Development Department’s Land Development Engineering Division • Launched “Move Carlsbad”, a project supporting the city’s Age-Friendly Carlsbad Initiative, including a four-part series of interactive workshops featuring presentations by local mobility experts on how residents can use alternative modes of transportation Six-month goals include: • Subject to further City Council direction, continue to develop the Transportation Demand Management Program and create community-wide awareness to try to inspire change in commuter travel behavior • Incorporate data-driven metrics to create both qualitative and quantitative updates • Finalize updates to the multimodal level of service methodology, in collaboration with the Traffic and Mobility Commission • Subject to further City Council direction, finalize updates to the Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, in collaboration with the Traffic and Mobility Commission, for adoption by the City Council • Review and update the city’s Vehicle Miles Traveled Guidelines • Subject to further City Council direction, finalize the review and update of the Transportation Demand Management Ordinance and handbook • Initiate update of the city’s traffic impact fee program with selection of a qualified consultant and conduct initial program outreach • Continue to develop and promote the city’s bicycle education and training program with emphasis on student education, smart cycling classes and e-bike specific training opportunities • Complete the annual active transportation monitoring program • Initiate development of high-priority projects identified in the Village & Barrio Master Plan, including the Grand Avenue Promenade feasibility study and study of Tyler Street complete street improvements • Evaluate the city’s current bike parking and identification of new bike parking infrastructure needs at recreational and commercial destinations citywide Traffic and Mobility Commission The Transportation Department is focused on implementing projects in a timely, well-vetted and cost-effective manner. Staff look forward to continuing to work with the Traffic and Mobility Commission to optimize the public input process and publicly vet projects to help produce the best projects possible. The semiannual transportation report was presented to the Traffic and Mobility Commission on June 6, 2022. The approved minutes from that meeting are attached as Exhibit 3. A representative of the commission will provide comments on the report after staff’s presentation of this item to the City Council. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 7 of 204 Sustainable Mobility Plan Implementation Background On June 7, 2022, during the preliminary presentation of the city’s Capital Improvement Program budget, staff recommended delaying the Sustainable Mobility Plan projects in the FY 2022-23 Capital Improvement Program budget for one year because of a lack of staffing resources needed to accommodate all of the City Council-directed high-priority projects. Those projects are on Cannon Road, Jefferson Street, La Costa Avenue, Las Flores Street and Tamarack Avenue, as detailed below. The City Council removed this proposed delay from staff’s recommendation in a motion that directed staff to return at a future City Council meeting with options to reprioritize the Sustainable Mobility Plan’s implementation program. Those options are presented below. The City Council adopted the Sustainable Mobility Plan on Jan. 12, 2021. The staff report that recommended that action is provided as Exhibit 4. It includes a detailed description of development of the Sustainable Mobility Plan, which includes a suite of coordinated programs, infrastructure projects, design guidelines and policies. Implementation plan and related studies The city is preparing to create a plan to implement the Sustainable Mobility Plan. One of the most over-arching tasks involved in that is the creation of a multimodal transportation impact fee program. This fee, which would be collected from developers for the impacts their projects will have on the city’s transporation network, will become a funding source for the Sustainable Mobility Plan. As part of this effort, the city will also study how to establish a new fee mitigation program, which will enable the city to charge different fees to developers as appropriate. The request for proposal for consulting services to help create the implementation plan and develop the new programs is provided in Exhibit 5. Staff received three proposals on July 7, 2022, and are currently reviewing and evaluating them based on the selection criteria. The request for proposals includes details of the specific tasks to be included in the Sustainable Mobility Plan’s implementation. The implementation plan will build upon the project prioritization process identified in the Sustainable Mobility Plan and serve as a blueprint for a phased implementation of the multimodal improvement projects identified in the plan. This strategy will include an engineering feasibility analysis of the plan’s top-priority projects and programs, covering the preliminary cost estimates, conceptual improvement plans and roadway cross-sections. It will focus on devising realistic funding strategies for the design and construction of recommended Sustainable Mobility Plan projects. The multimodal transportation impact fee program to be developed would provide a mechanism to modernize the city’s current fee program to collect funds for construction of the improvements identified and prioritized in the Sustainable Mobility Plan and the Capital Improvement Program. The current schedule for the Sustainable Mobility Plan Implementation Plan is to award an agreement by August 2022 and complete the work by fall 2024. The public, the Traffic and July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 8 of 204 Mobility Commission and the City Council will have numerous opportunities to provide input on options to develop the multimodal transportation impact fee and the other elements of the plan described above. Other programs in the plan The Sustainable Mobility Plan also includes the following other programs: • Safe Routes to School - Staff have initiated work on the city’s first Safe Routes to School plan with Hope Elementary School to establish and refine the Safe Routes to School Planning Framework that was provided in the Sustainable Mobility Plan. The Hope Elementary effort will function as a pilot program, an example for future plans, and help the city develop a larger Safe Routes to School program for rollout at other Carlsbad schools. Staff estimate that the current budget should fund development of the program for four to five more schools throughout the next one to two years. • Transportation Demand Management - Staff are currently conducting a comprehensive update to the Transportation Demand Management Handbook. This update will include additional transportation demand management measures based on recent industry best practices, enforcement options and new requirements for new residential development projects. Subject to further City Council direction, the proposed update is currently targeted for review at the Sept. 6, 2022, Traffic and Mobility Commission meeting. • Cycling education - The city currently offers bicycle training classes and education events in collaboration with the San Diego County Bicycle Coalition including Smart Cycling classes, e-bike specific training classes conducted in collaboration with the Carlsbad Police Department and area schools and in response to city e-bike ordinance updates, as well as various events to encourage bicycling throughout the year. • Local Roadway Safety Plan - Staff are finalizing this plan, which identifies key collision hot spots and traffic safety concerns throughout the city and subsequent prioritization of roadway safety improvements. These will be included as projects in the Capital Improvement Program and specified in the Multimodal Transportation Impact Fee Program. This will be the city’s first local roadway safety plan and will function as a living document that will be continually reviewed and updated every three to five years to reflect the city’s changing needs and priorities. • Active Transportation Monitoring Program - Staff recently completed the city’s first Active Transportation Monitoring Program, which includes a citywide study of traffic volumes by mode including fully multimodal counts of people walking, biking, taking transit and driving automobiles. The results of this study, which were presented to the Traffic and Mobility Commission on March 7, 2022, will be used to track annual changes in multimodal traffic volumes throughout the city, review how implementation of transportation projects influence multimodal travel, and provide data for other planning efforts such as the city’s Climate Action Plan, Transportation Demand Management program and the and Multimodal Transportation Impact Fee Program. The program will be updated on an annual basis with new traffic count data and reporting metrics. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 9 of 204 • Complete Streets Design Guidelines and Roundabout Policy - The city has implemented the adopted Sustainable Mobility Plan design guidelines and roundabout policy on all current transportation infrastructure projects and as part of the recent updates to the city’s Engineering Standards. • Capital Improvement Program projects - Staff have initiated work on several of the transportation infrastructure projects identified in the Sustainable Mobility Plan. These are o Pedestrian improvement projects to construct sidewalks where gaps in the sidewalk network currently exist on Tamarack Avenue south of Carlsbad Village Drive and on Monroe Street north of Marron Road o Avenida Encinas Coastal Rail Trail: Implementation of approximately 2.75 miles of new buffered bike lanes and pedestrian facility enhancements on Avenida Encinas between Palomar Airport Road and Carlsbad Boulevard o Kelly and Park Drive Complete Street Infrastructure Improvements: Mobility improvements in the residential neighborhood around Kelly Elementary School on Kelly Drive from El Camino Real to Park Drive and along Park Drive from Kelly Drive to Neblina Drive o Terramar Area Coastal Improvement Project: Design and construction of new walking and biking paths, parking spaces and a roundabout at Cannon Road and Carlsbad Boulevard, which has been delayed by one year as part of the City Council Capital Improvement Program prioritization process o Sustainable Mobility Program Project: As part of the FY 2022-23 Capital Improvement Program budget, the City Council approved roadway resurfacing and restriping projects to provide bike lane and pedestrian enhancements at the following locations: FY 2022-23 projects Jefferson Street between Las Flores Street and the Interstate Highway 5, or I-5, bridge including “climbing bicycle lanes” in the uphill directions on each side of the bridge La Costa Avenue between El Camino Real and I-5, which includes striping improvements at the intersections of El Camino Real, Saxony Road, Piraeus Street and the La Costa Avenue Park and Ride lot Carlsbad Boulevard between Manzano Drive to Island Way, including a reduction in vehicle travel lanes, wider buffered bike lanes, and space for pedestrians Cannon Road between I-5 and Paseo Del Norte, including new bike lane treatments to better facilitate bike travel on Cannon Road under the I-5 overpass Anticipated FY 2023-24 projects Tamarack Avenue, including potential removal of travel lanes in each direction and implementation of buffered bike lanes and pedestrian improvements July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 10 of 204 Las Flores Street at I-5, including improvements to the bike lanes to better facilitate bike access on Las Flores past the I-5 ramps It should be noted that through the Sustainable Mobility Plan Implementation Plan described above, additional infrastructure improvement projects will be added to this list based on each project’s final prioritization and feasibility studies. Transportation Planning and Mobility Division workload and priorities The Transportation Planning and Mobility Division is staffed with two full-time positions, the Transportation Planning and Mobility Manager and an Associate Engineer, as well as one part- time staff member who assists with the Transportation Demand Management program. Most of the division’s workload is dedicated to completing transportation impact analysis reviews and Transportation Demand Management programs for all private land development applications and Capital Improvement Program projects. The division’s remaining staff time is focused on supporting the Traffic and Mobility Commission, including implementation of the commission’s annual work plan priorities. The high-priority projects in the Traffic and Mobility Commission’s annual work plan include: • The Growth Management Program • Annual monitoring reports • Safe Routes to School improvements • Major updates to the current guidelines for private development transportation impact studies including: o Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines o Transportation Demand Management Handbook o Methodology used to determine the multimodal level of service of city streets o The Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis Guidelines o A study of the city’s multimodal transportation impact fee In addition to the Sustainable Mobility Plan projects and programs identified above, Transportation Planning and Mobility Division staff work closely with agency partners at Caltrans, SANDAG and NCTD on regional projects and long-term planning studies. Staff also perform conceptual planning analysis and public outreach efforts as part of multimodal transportation infrastructure improvement projects. The latter part of the engineering design and permitting phase of SMP projects are managed by the traffic and transportation engineers in other divisions. Options to reprioritize Sustainable Mobility Plan implementation may therefore potentially impact two other teams within the Transportation Department: Traffic and Transportation Engineering. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 11 of 204 Options Proposed priorities for the Transportation Planning and Mobility Division for fiscal years 2022-23 and 2023-24 Staff propose the following priorities for continued implementation of the Sustainable Mobility Plan projects and programs based on the current workload demands as described above and in response to the City Council’s request for prioritization of the Sustainable Mobility Plan: • Completion of the Sustainable Mobility Plan Implementation Plan, the multimodal transportation impact fee study and the Vehicle Miles Traveled Mitigation Fee Program study • Completing the Sustainable Mobility Plan projects included in the current Capital Improvement Program for FY 2022-23 • Once the Sustainable Mobility Plan MTIF is completed, schedule the future Sustainable Mobility Plan projects in the Capital Improvement Program, including a re-assessment of impacts on city staffing needs and long-term maintenance costs Options to reprioritize implementation of the Sustainable Mobility Plan Program in the Capital Improvement Program Completing the studies on the multimodal transportation impact fee and the Vehicle Miles Traveled Mitigation Fee Program is one of the Planning and Mobility Division’s highest priorities. Staff offer the following options to reprioritize the Sustainable Mobility Plan’s implementation for the City Council’s consideration: Option 1: Delaying implementation of the Sustainable Mobility Plan FY 2023-24 Capital Improvement Program projects by one year. Option 2: Keeping the projects in Option 1 above as scheduled and delaying or scaling back on other mobility planning goals including: o Delaying planning tasks associated with updates to the Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines and the Transportation Demand Management Program o Reduce involvement in regional transportation and mobility projects and planning studies An option not being proposed at this time, but one the City Council may wish to consider, is to add a full-time employee to focus on implementing the Sustainable Mobility Plan’s Capital Improvement Program projects. If the City Council desires to significantly accelerate completion of the Sustainable Mobility Plan projects, staff could present this proposal with associated costs for a full-time employee for the City Council’s consideration as part of the midyear budget review. However, staff would need City Council direction to do so. Considering the current workload to develop the MTIF and other related programs, staff recommend changing the workload priorities as identified in Option 2, which will allow staff to focus on the Sustainable Mobility Plan implementation projects as identified above but delay other mobility planning goals, including updates to the Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines and the Transportation Demand Management program. Staff would also spend less time on planning tasks associated with regional programs. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 12 of 204 Fiscal Analysis This item is a presentation on the work related to management of the city’s transportation assets and it has no fiscal impact. Next Steps Staff will continue to provide updates on workload and schedule as part of future semiannual transportation reports. The next semiannual transportation report is expected to be in early 2023. Environmental Evaluation This action does not constitute a project within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act under Public Resources Code section 21065 in that it has no potential to cause either a direct physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. Public Notification This item was noticed in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act and was available for public viewing and review at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting date. Exhibits 1.City Council resolution 2.Transportation and Drainage Capital Improvement Program Project status update as of June 2022 3.Approved Minutes of the June 6, 2022, Traffic and Mobility Commission meeting 4.Jan. 12, 2021, staff report regarding adoption of the city’s Sustainable Mobility Plan 5.Request for Proposals for the Sustainable Mobility Plan Implementation Plan, Multimodal Transportation Impact Fee, and Vehicle Miles Traveled Mitigation Fee program July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 13 of 204 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-196 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, REPRIORITIZING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY PLAN PROGRAM IN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Sustainable Mobility Plan, or SMP, is a comprehensive planning document intended to guide future development of the city's multimodal transportation network; and WHEREAS, the SMP furthers the community's vision to enhance walking, biking, public transportation and connectivity throughout the city, and to enhance mobility through increased connectivity and intelligent transportation management; and WHEREAS, the SMP is a key element in implementing the General Plan Mobility Element adopted in 2015, and will help meet the greenhouse gas, or GHG, reduction goals of the Climate Action Plan (CAP) by shifting community members away from private automobiles toward modes that are more livable, cleaner and healthier; and WHEREAS, on June 7, 2022, during the preliminary presentation of the city's Capital Improvement Program budget, staff recommended delaying SMP projects in the FY 2022-23 Capital Improvement Program budget for one year because of a lack of staffing resources needed to accommodate all of the City Council-directed high-priority mobility projects; and WHEREAS, the City Council directed staff to return at a future City Council meeting with options to reprioritize implementation of the SMP program; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Transportation Department's current workload in implementing the broad range of programs and projects identified in the SMP, including efforts to develop the Multi modal Transportation Impact Fee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows: 1.That the above recitations are true and correct. 2.That the City Council hereby reprioritizes the Sustainable Mobility Plan implementation program by delaying or scaling back the following mobility planning activities: a.Delaying planning tasks associated with updates to the Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines and the Transportation Demand Management Program. Exhibit 1 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 14 of 204 b.Reducing involvement in regional transportation and mobility projects and planning studies. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 26th day of !H]y, 2022, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Hall, Blackburn, Bhat-Patel, Acosta, Norby. None. None. MATT HALL, Mayor k'z,AVIOLA M� Services Manager {SEAL} July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 15 of 204 Exhibit 2 Semiannual Transportation Report Transportation and Drainage Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Status Update as of June 2022 •College Boulevard Reach A Extension – CIP Project No. 3636 o On May 5, 2020, City Council directed staff to pursue a city-led financing program, planning, and environmental review for construction of the College Boulevard extension, which would include the city undertaking a preliminary design and engineering assessment o On Nov. 2, 2020, staff presented the scope of work to the Traffic and Mobility Commission and solicited the commission’s input and feedback on the project o On Aug. 17, 2021, the city entered into an agreement with a consultant team to complete preliminary design and environmental services o Consultant has initiated preliminary engineering and environmental review process o Coordinated right-of-entry agreements to perform field investigations for preliminary engineering and environmental assessment o Initiated field investigations, including biological surveys and geotechnical investigation to o Finalizing Traffic Operations Analysis report and draft cross section alternatives for College Boulevard Extension Design Study Project o Target schedule – Traffic & Mobility Commission meeting for design alternatives recommendations (fall 2022), preliminary design, 30% complete plan (late-2023) •Pavement Management Program – CIP Project No. 6001 o 2020-21 Pavement Overlay – Project will resurface El Camino Real between Cannon Road and College Boulevard, El Camino Real between Arenal Road and Levante Street, and Batiquitos Drive between Poinsettia Lane and Camino De Las Ondas Plans and specifications were approved by City Council on Sept. 15, 2020 City Council awarded a construction contract on Aug. 31, 2021 Staff revisited and modified resurfacing methodology for this project in early 2022 Target schedule – Currently in construction phase, anticipated completion (late 2022) o 2021 Slurry Seal and Fog Seal - Project will resurface streets throughout the city using slurry seal and fog seal treatments (Attachment A provides a list of streets included in 2021 Slurry Seal and Fog Seal Project) Staff presented the project to Traffic and Mobility Commission in June 2021 Plans and specifications were approved by City Council on Aug. 31, 2021 Awarded construction contract in February 2022 Target schedule – Currently in construction phase, anticipated completion (late 2022) o 2021 Pavement Assessment – Finalizing citywide pavement condition assessment and analysis. The final report is expected by June 2022 o Initiated the selection and preliminary design phase of the 2022-23 Slurry Seal Project •Beach Access Repairs from Pine Avenue to Tamarack Avenue – CIP Project No. 3896 o Project will repair sidewalks, handrails, stairways, retaining walls and seawall o Currently in environmental phase and 70%-complete engineering design o Coordinating repairs with State Parks staff to obtain approvals of repairs o Presented the project updates at HMP resource agency coordination meeting July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 16 of 204 Semiannual Transportation Report Transportation and Drainage Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Status Update as of June 2022 o Target schedule – Approval of plans and specifications and authorization to bid (mid-2023), award of construction contract (late 2023) •Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Pedestrian Improvements – CIP Project No. 6058 o Project will widen sidewalk, add crosswalks, improve Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) access and improve traffic flow and transit stop o Request for Qualifications for final design advertised in June 2021 o Project requires right-of-way coordination/resolution with State Parks o Selected consultant and initiated engineering design and environmental services o Received approval from SANDAG’s Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee and Transportation Committee for a second Active Transportation Grant Program extension o Consultant performing traffic counts in May and June to have both weekday and summer peak volumes o Target schedule – Approval of plans and specifications and authorization to bid (early 2024), award of construction contract (mid-2023) •El Camino Real Widening from Arenal Road to La Costa Avenue – CIP Project No. 6051 o Widen southbound El Camino Real from Arenal Road to La Costa Avenue to prime arterial standards, add sidewalk and widen bridge o Prepared 90%-complete improvement plans including environmental and supporting documents o Target schedule – Approval of plans and specifications and authorization to bid (late 2023), award of construction contract (early 2024) •El Camino Real and Cannon Road Improvements – CIP Project No. 6042 o Construct a new bridge for pedestrian connectivity over the Agua Hedionda Creek along El Camino Real and widen the sidewalk on the west side of the El Camino Real bridge, and add an additional northbound through lane o Project presented to Traffic and Mobility Commission in April 2020 and September 2020 o Project approved by Planning Commission in August 2020 o City Council approved the project plans and specifications and authorized bidding in August 2021 o City Council awarded a construction contract in January 2022 o Target schedule: Phase I: Currently in construction, anticipated completion (mid-2022) Phase II: Construction completion (late 2022) •El Camino Real and College Boulevard Improvements – CIP Project No. 6071 o The project included enhancement to intersection for pedestrian and bicycle form of mobility and ADA improvements o Construction completed in late 2021, project closed out April 2022 •Kelly Drive and Park Drive Complete Street Improvements – CIP Project No. 6075 o Provide traffic calming on Kelly Drive and Park Drive, enhance biking with dedicated bike path, and add trails and improvement pedestrian access July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 17 of 204 Semiannual Transportation Report Transportation and Drainage Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Status Update as of June 2022 o Project in final engineering design phase o Presented to Traffic and Mobility Commission in August 2021 o Conducted public outreach efforts including online survey, email blast, mailers and virtual community workshop o Target schedule – Finalize environmental documents (Initial Study (IS)/Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)) for public review (late 2022), Planning Commission approval (early 2023), City Council approval of plans and specifications and authorization to bid (mid-2023), award of construction contract (late 2023) •El Camino Real Widening from Poinsettia Lane to Camino Vida Roble – CIP Project No. 6072 o Federally funded project to widen El Camino Real to the city standards and provide an additional northbound through lane from Cinnabar Way to Camino Vida Roble to increase capacity. The project also adds new sidewalks and medians. o Presented to Traffic and Mobility Commission in November 2020 o Next steps are to get Caltrans approval on the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) due to federal funding requirement, determine California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process, conduct property appraisal for acquisition o Presented to Planning Commission June 2022 o Target schedule – City Council approval of plans and specifications and authorization to bid (late 2022), award of construction contract (early 2023) •Palomar Airport Road and College Boulevard Improvements – CIP Project No. 6028 o Provide operational improvements to vehicles by adding an additional southbound through lane and improvement bike lanes o Construction plans are at 90%-complete o Presented to Traffic and Mobility Commission in June 2020 o Currently finalizing plans and preparing environmental/CEQA documents for public circulation o Target schedule – Planning Commission approval (late 2022), City Council approval of plans and specifications and authorization to bid (early 2023), award of construction contract (mid-2023) •Palomar Airport Road and Melrose Drive Improvements – CIP Project No. 6034 o Provide operational improvements to vehicles by adding an additional southbound through lane and improvement to bike lanes o Presented to Traffic and Mobility Commission in May 2020 o Project design at 100%-complete with no environmental impacts o Target schedule – Approval of plans and specifications and authorization to bid (late 2022), award of construction contract (early 2023) •El Camino Real Widening from Sunny Creek Road to Jackspar Drive – CIP Project No. 6094 o Project will widen El Camino Real to the city standards and provide an additional northbound through lane to increase capacity. The project also adds new sidewalks. o Presented to Traffic and Mobility Commission in September 2021 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 18 of 204 Semiannual Transportation Report Transportation and Drainage Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Status Update as of June 2022 o Project design is 100%-complete o Finalizing environmental/CEQA documents o Target schedule – Approval of plans and specifications and authorization to bid (early 2023), award of construction contract (mid 2023) •Avenida Encinas Widening South of Palomar Airport Road – CIP Project No. 6004 o Project will provide multimodal improvements including new bike lanes, sidewalks and traffic calming features o Selected consultant and initiated engineering design and environmental services o Presented to Traffic and Mobility Commission in June 2021 o Caltrans approved city’s State-only Funding request, which changed the Active Transportation Program (ATP) grant funding from a federal program to a state program o Staff is working with Caltrans and California Transportation Commission (CTC) staff to rescope the project to meet the grant funding deadline o Target schedule: Segment 1 (between Cannon Rd and Palomar Airport Rd): Complete Segment 2 (between Poinsettia Station to Carlsbad Blvd): Approval of plans and specifications and authorization to bid (late 2022), award of construction contract (early 2023) Segment 3 (Palomar Airport Rd and Poinsettia Station): City Council approval of plans and specifications and authorization to bid (early 2024), award of construction contract (mid-2024) •Village and Barrio Traffic Circles – CIP Project No. 4015 o Traffic calming and pedestrian improvement features at eight intersections in the Village/Barrio area to calm traffic as shown in the Village and Barrio Master Plan o Construct five traffic circles, two other traffic calming improvements, and one high-visibility continental crosswalk o Project is in final engineering design and environmental review process o Presented to Traffic and Mobility Commission in April 2020 and again in September 2021 o Public outreach newsletters mailed out in November 2020 and November 2021 o Representative Levin has secured $5 million dollars of federal funding from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Local Transportation Priorities Account and under the Highway Infrastructure Program for traffic circles and street lighting projects o Staff plan to delay going to City Council until funds are ready to be disbursed o Target schedule – Approval of plans and specifications and authorization to bid (early 2023), award of construction contract (mid-2023) •Terramar Area Coastal Improvement Project – CIP Project No. 6054 o Construct roundabout at intersection of Cannon Road and Carlsbad Boulevard, sidewalks, crosswalks, increased parking and bluff improvements o Traffic analysis completed in December 2021 o Engineering design at 60%-complete o Coordinating with utility companies on undergrounding overhead utilities July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 19 of 204 Semiannual Transportation Report Transportation and Drainage Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Status Update as of June 2022 o Target schedule – Draft CEQA document targeted for submittal to the city (late 2022), Planning Commission approval (mid-2023), Coastal Development Permit from California Coastal Commission (early 2024), City Council approval of plans and specifications and authorization to bid (mid-2024), award of construction contract (late 2024) •Valley Street and Magnolia Avenue Complete Streets – CIP Project No. 6019 o Construct sidewalks, bike paths, green street features and underground overhead utilities along a portion of Valley Street and Magnolia Avenue o Currently in engineering design phase o Ongoing coordination with SDG&E and Communication Companies for 20A undergrounding occurring in conjunction with this project o Presented to Traffic and Mobility Commission in December 2020 o Target schedule – Additional public outreach (late 2022), finalize design and coordination with utilities for undergrounding and gas main relocation (mid-2023), approval of plans and specifications and authorization to bid (late 2023), award of construction contract (early 2024) •Barrio Lighting Project – CIP Project No. 4013 o Phase 1 of the project included installation of 14 streetlights to dark areas in the Barrio o 11 streetlights installed and energized in late 2021/early2022 o 3 streetlights installed on existing SDG&E power poles need to be energized via trench and conduit SDG&E has notified city staff that they are not able to energize 2 of the 3 installed streetlights due to existing infrastructure on poles on Pine Ave and Tyler Street Staff working with SDG&E for alternative location to install a new pole to be energized 3rd location on Palm Ave is currently with planning by SDG&E o Coordination ongoing with SDG&E planning staff to complete remaining streetlights of Phase 1 o Phase 2 of the project, which will install pedestrian lighting to the Barrio, will be phased over the next four fiscal years o Public outreach newsletter mailed out in November 2020 and November 2021 o Awarded a professional services agreement for Barrio Lighting Phase 2 Pedestrian Lighting Project o Outreach survey for pedestrian lighting completed in February 2022 o Existing lighting assessment conducted in late March and April 2022 o Representative Levin has secured $5 million dollars of federal funding from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Local Transportation Priorities Account and under the Highway Infrastructure Program for Village and Barrio Traffic Circles and Barrio Lighting projects o Staff plan to delay going to City Council until funds are ready to be disbursed o Target schedule: Phase 1 – Construction complete (late 2022) Phase 2A – Approval of plans and specifications and authorization to bid (early 2023), award of construction contract (mid-2023) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 20 of 204 Semiannual Transportation Report Transportation and Drainage Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Status Update as of June 2022 •Drainage Master Plan Project BCB – Magnolia Avenue Drainage Improvements – CIP Project No. 6608 o Proposed 30-inch diameter storm drain pipeline on Magnolia Avenue from Brady Circle to Monroe Street o Project split into two separate phases that will be constructed during the summer months due to the proximity of several nearby schools Phase I will construct the main trunk of the storm drain on Magnolia Avenue and replace/relocate several sections of potable water main Phase II will provide full street pavement resurfacing, speed humps, curb bulb- out/extensions and a storm drain lateral section on Valley Street o Presented traffic calming measures to Traffic and Mobility Commission in August 2021 o Completed design of Phase I and awarded construction contract o Target schedule: Phase 1 – Construction to commence in June 2022 with completion by Aug. 24, 2022 (start of school year) Phase II – Approval of plans and specifications (fall 2023), award of construction contract (winter 2024), construction to commence in June 2024 •Buena Vista Creek Concrete Channel Maintenance Project – CIP Project No. 6619 o Proposed dredging of debris and clearing of vegetation within the concrete-lined portion of Buena Vista Creek between the bridges of South Vista Way to approximately 200 feet upstream of the El Camino Real bridge o Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) determined to be appropriate CEQA document by Planning Division, Community Development Department in fall 2021 Issued Task Order to update topographic survey in February 2022 •survey work completed in April 2022 Issued Task Order to prepare PEIR in February 2022 Issued Task Order to update engineering design in May 2022 o Target schedule: PEIR currently being prepared and is expected to be circulated for public review (early 2023) Applications for resource agency permits to be submitted upon PEIR recordation Channel clearing and dredging to occur in fall 2024 •Park Drive Street and Drainage Improvements – CIP Project No. 6611 o Remove and replace 500 feet of existing retaining wall and repair back slope with 2,000 cubic yards of imported fill. Project also includes brow ditch and storm drain improvements, and sidewalk replacement. o 0.75 acre of compensatory habitat mitigation required offsite due to impacts to coastal sage scrub. Five-year maintenance and monitoring required upon completion of initial planning and six-month plant establishment period. o Minor Conditional Use Permit, Minor Hillside Development, and Minor Habitat Mitigation Plan permit applications approved by the city’s Planning Division, Community Development Department on March 30, 2022 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 21 of 204 Semiannual Transportation Report Transportation and Drainage Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Status Update as of June 2022 o Submitted Notice of Determination to County of San Diego in April 2022 o Submitted application for a Coastal Development Permit to the California Coastal Commission in February 2022 o Target schedule – Final engineering design (early 2023), approval of plans and specifications and authorization to bid (mid-2023), award of construction contract (late 2023) •Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP) Replacement North of Encinas Creek – CIP Project No. 6607 o Removal of 200 feet of CMP and replacement with reinforced concrete pipe storm drain within Carlsbad Boulevard north of Encinas Creek. Project includes installation of one standard curb inlet, pipe replacement, outlet improvements and slope repair/stabilization. o Design and environmental services contracts executed in December 2020 for creation of final plan and environmental studies o Final design completed in March 2022 o Target schedule – Approval of plans and specifications and authorization to bid (summer 2022), award of construction contract (fall 2022) •Surface Drainage Improvements Project – CIP Project No. 6608 o Project improved surface drainage conditions on several streets within the northwest quadrant area of the city. Improvements included installation of concrete curbs, gutters, swales and gravel to reduce erosion and improve drainage o Construction of 2020-21 Surface Drainage Improvements Project completed in August 2021 o Targe Schedule – Assess and prioritize sites for next round of Surface Drainage Improvements and negotiate task order (late 2022) •Merwin Drive Storm Drain Improvements – CIP Project No. 6608 o Project will improve surface drainage conditions and reduce the potential for ponding on Merwin Drive during and following storm events o Construction of temporary drainage improvements completed in December 2020 o City Council approved authorization for engineering and environmental services and contract fully executed in September 2021 o Design options analysis completed in early 2022 o Target schedule – Final engineering design (late 2022), environmental processing and permitting (mid-2023), approval of plans and specifications and authorization to bid (late 2023), award of construction contract (early 2024) •Drainage Master Plan Update – CIP Project No. 6623 o Update to the city’s 2008 Drainage Master Plan (DMP). Effort will update the list of master planned projects, create a new fee schedule and amend existing Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) document o Geographic Information System (GIS) updates to the entire city drainage inventory completed in fall 2020. Drainage modeling supported by the GIS update, providing an updated analysis of proposed projects from the 2008 DMP and a recommended list of new projects to be added to the plan July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 22 of 204 Semiannual Transportation Report Transportation and Drainage Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Status Update as of June 2022 o Received draft Drainage Master Plan update from consultant in March 2022, which included draft fiscal analysis and amendment to Programmatic EIR o Target schedule – City Planning response to Early Assessment submittal (mid-2022), City Council adoption of the Drainage Master Plan update (mid-2023) •Calavera Dam Vegetation Maintenance – CIP Project No. 5049 o Vegetation removal from the embankment, spillway and outlet of the Lake Calavera Dam o Last clearing occurred on Sept. 27-28, 2021 o Currently vegetation being monitored for next clearing event. Vegetation will also be cleared in advance of the contractor mobilizing for the Lake Calavera Outlet Replacement Project (CIP Project No. 5054) so that a work area can be established o Associated compensatory mitigation site in year 5 of 5 of mitigation. Annual report will be created and submitted to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, or CDFW, in May 2022 and will request sign-off of mitigation site •Agua Hedionda Creek Vegetation Maintenance – CIP Project No. 6629 o Budget increased for FY 21-22 to allow for two additional vegetation clearing events per year. Existing maintenance contracts will be renewed to accommodate additional services o Half-acre section of Agua Hedionda Creek between the bridges of Cannon Road and El Camino Real cleared of vegetation in September 2021 to improve creek conveyance capacity o Completed Monitoring Report for the Agua Hedionda Creek vegetation removal between the bridges of Cannon Road and El Camino Real in May 2022 o Vegetation regrowth being monitored throughout winter months. Additional maintenance events maybe requested if regrowth is determined to be significantly prohibit stream flows o Target Schedule - Vegetation clearing anticipated (September 2022) •Buena Vista Creek Assessment District – Operating Budget No. 1636312 o In November 2021, one acre of vegetation was removed from the northern half of Buena Vista Creek upstream of Jefferson Street bridge (year 2 of 5). Vegetation also cleared around the areas of three storm drain outfalls. Trash removal and non-native treatment of the entire 11.2-acre site occurred in September and November 2021 o Coordination with homeless outreach team to remove several encampments and concentrated areas of trash within stream corridor o Completed Monitoring Report for the Buena Vista Creek vegetation clearing and submitted to California Department of Fish and Wildlife in May 2022 o Vegetation regrowth being monitored throughout winter months. Additional maintenance events maybe requested if regrowth is determined to be significantly prohibiting stream flows o Target Schedule - Vegetation clearing anticipated (September 2022) •Romeria Street Drainage Channel Replacement – CIP Project No. 6604 o Compensatory mitigation consists of one plot within the Romeria Preserve and two plots within the Lake Calavera preserve. All plots are in mitigation year 4 of 5 and are on track for agency approval in spring 2022. Annual report will be submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 23 of 204 - Semiannual Transportation Report Transportation and Drainage Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Status Update as of June 2022 Engineers, or USACE, and Regional Water Quality Control Board, or RWQCB, in May 2022 for review o Target schedule: Mitigation fulfilled in spring 2022, submitted final completion report to USACE and RWQCB and awaiting mitigation sign-off (project complete) •Drainage Master Plan Project BFB-Upper – CIP Project No. 6622 o Proposed project includes drainage improvements and slope stabilization to an existing city- owned earthen drainage channel on the east side of El Camino Real from Chestnut Avenue to Tamarack Avenue o The objective of the project is to restore the channel by stabilizing slopes to mitigate against erosion during storm events and help reduce sediment transport to Agua Hedionda Lagoon o Contract negotiations with design consultant finalized in August 2021, and fully executed with the City Council approval in September 2021 o Topographic survey performed in February 2022 o Cultural resources study performed in April 2022 o Draft Hydrology & Hydraulics Report & proposal for updated geotechnical consultant scope and fee received in May 2022 o Target schedule – Final engineering design and environmental permitting (late 2023), approval of plans and specifications and authorization to bid (mid-2024), award of construction contract (late-2024) •Storm Drain Maintenance and Repair Program FY 2021-22 – CIP Project No. 6607 o Removal of five CMP pipe drainage pipe systems throughout the city and replacement with reinforced concrete pipe systems o Target schedule – Approval of plans and specifications and authorization to bid (late 2022), award of construction contract (early 2023) •Highland-Hoover Storm Drain Realignment Project – CIP Project No. 6607 o Project will reroute an existing storm drain through several private properties to relocate point off a private property (no city easements recorded) to city right-of-way o Design completed in fall 2021 o Awaiting authorization of permanent storm drain easements and right of entry agreements o Target schedule – Advertisement for construction bids (late 2022) •Storm Drain Condition Assessment Program – CIP Project No. 6620 o Completed 34,000 feet of storm drain pipeline inspections with CCTV technology by July 2021 o Inspection results will create list of repair and maintenance projects to be executed by CIP Project No. 6607 o Program is also used on an as-needed basis to inspect drainage systems requiring immediate inspection o Target schedule – Issue task order to develop a list of sites for next 5 rounds of CCTV storm drain inspections and potential locations for storm drain maintenance and repair (mid- 2022), Issue separate task order and initiate/complete next round of inspections (late 2022) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 24 of 204 Semiannual Transportation Report Transportation and Drainage Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Status Update as of June 2022 •Sidewalks Improvement Program – CIP Project No. 6002 o Program to design and construct missing links of sidewalk throughout the city o Finalized design phase for FY 2022 project. FY 2022 project locations are: Garfield Street (east side) between Redwood Avenue and Tamarack Avenue Monroe Street (east side) between Marron Road and southern mall driveway entrance (near bus stops) Tamarack Avenue (north side) between Kirkwall Avenue and Edinburgh Drive o Target schedule Approval of plans and specifications and authorization to bid (mid-2022), award of construction contract (late 2022) Finalize FY 2023-24 sidewalk improvement locations (late 2022), present to Traffic and Mobility Commission (early 2023), issue a Task Order to initiate engineering design (mid-2023) •Concrete Repairs Program – CIP Project No. 6013 o Miscellaneous concrete repairs to sidewalks, curb and gutter, pedestrian ramps, driveway approaches and cross gutters o Construction completed in early 2022 •ADA Ramp Improvement Program – CIP Project No. 6049 o Construction of FY 2020-21 ADA Improvements completed in May 2022 o Final striping targeted for completion by summer 2022 •Public Parking Lots ADA Improvements – CIP Project Nos. 6049/6052 o ADA and parking lot improvements at nine public parking lots in downtown Carlsbad and three city parks o Currently in design phase o Target schedule: Approval of plans and specifications and authorization to bid (late 2022), award of construction contract (early 2023) •Parking Lot Maintenance Program – CIP Project No. 6052 o Maintenance of city’s parking lots and driveways to provide access to the city parks, fire stations, libraries and facilities o Work under this program is being performed in conjunction with Public Parking Lots ADA Improvements, CIP Project No. 6049 •Roadway Slope Stabilization Program – CIP Project No. 6081 o El Fuerte Street Project Construct roadway improvements to address pavement distress issues along El Fuerte Street between Faraday Avenue and Loker Avenue Subsurface geotechnical investigation completed early 2022 Additional goal to evaluate both a short term and long-term repair options. Also perform traffic study and other preliminary evaluations to determine “road diet” feasibility July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 25 of 204 Semiannual Transportation Report Transportation and Drainage Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Status Update as of June 2022 •Trash Capture Amendment Compliance Program – CIP Project No. 6626 o Design Regional Trash Capture Best Management Practices (TCBMPs) to improve storm water quality, achieve compliance with watershed permit and reduce maintenance costs o Coordinated with Maintenance and Environmental Management and prepared conceptual TCBMP designs at six to 10 locations (early 2022) o Selected the following six sites for 1st round of program: State Street – proposed regional downstream TCBMP Agua Hedionda discharge – proposed regional downstream TCBMP Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte – retrofit 4 exiting TCBMPs o Target schedule – Issue three separate Task Orders for design of the six selected TCBMP sites (late 2022), Initiate engineering design and environmental review on first round of TCBMPs (early 2023) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 26 of 204 Page 1 of 10 Council Chambers 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 June 6, 2022, 4:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER: 4 p.m. ROLL CALL: Perez, Linke, Penseyres, Fowler, Coelho and Newlands Absent: Proulx PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Chair Perez led the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of the Regular Meeting held March 7, 2022. Motion by Acting Chair Linke, seconded by Commissioner Fowler to approve the minutes for the March 7, 2022, meeting as presented. Motion carried, 6/0/0/1 (Absent: Commissioner Proulx) Minutes of the Regular Meeting held April 4, 2022. Motion by Acting Chair Linke, seconded by Commissioner Fowler to approve the minutes for the April 4, 2022, meeting as presented. Motion carried, 6/0/0/1 (Absent: Commissioner Proulx) PUBLIC COMMENT: Cindy Beauchamp requested that staff install on Plum Tree Road a third stop sign, or speed bumps to slow the traffic speed, a pedestrian crosswalk, and a permanent traffic feedback device. Jim Young spoke representing Tim Morgan and Michael Zepeda requesting a revision on the current pedestrian improvements on Tamarack Avenue and Valley Street. The group believes the current project is out of character of the neighborhood and has had very little community input. The project currently fails to address the root cause of the issues which are safety, speed and visibility. Tom Gibbs requested that the staff and the commissioners consider adding a safe crosswalk on Tamarack Avenue between College Boulevard and the Hope Elementary School. The visibility is difficult in this location and unsafe for pedestrians. CONSENT CALENDAR: None PUBLIC HEARING: 1.FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN / GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT CIRCULATION SECTION, ADOPTION OF GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FINDINGS, DETERMINATION OF DEFICIENT STREET FACILITIES - Support staff’s recommendation to City Council to: 1.Receive and file the attached Growth Management Plan, or GMP,/General Plan Annual Monitoring Report Circulation Section, prepared pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code, or CMC, § 21.90.130(d) and Gov. Code § 65400. EXHIBIT 3 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 27 of 204 TRAFFIC AND MOBILITY COMMISSION Minutes Page 2 of 10 2. Recommend that the City Council adopt resolutions to: A. Determine the following street facilities to be deficient pursuant to CMC § 21.90.130(c) because they do not meet the vehicular level of service, or LOS, component of the city’s circulation performance standard in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, or CFIP: 1. Eastbound Aviara Parkway between Manzanita Street and El Camino Real 2. Westbound Aviara Parkway between El Camino Real and Manzanita Street B. Determine the following street facilities to be built out and exempt from the vehicular LOS performance standard, in accordance with General Plan Mobility Element Policy 3- P.9 and the CFIP Circulation Performance Standard: 1. Eastbound Aviara Parkway between Manzanita Street and El Camino Real 2. Westbound Aviara Parkway between El Camino Real and Manzanita Street (Staff Contact: Nathan Schmidt Staff’s Recommendations: Take public input, close the public hearing and support staff’s recommendations. Transportation Planning & Mobility Manager Schmidt presented the report and reviewed a PowerPoint presentation (on file in the Office of the City Clerk) Commissioner Newlands asked about exempted facilities and if staff will ever study this facility again to see if it can be unexempted. Transportation Planning & Mobility Manager Schmidt replied that the city could revisit a location that is exempt in the future. To date, the city has not unexempted a location, but the plan is to include exempted facilities as part of the annual review. Commissioner Penseyres inquired about potential of improving the bike lane. Transportation Planning & Mobility Manager Schmidt replied that improvements to the bike lane could be done as part of a work order by staff. This could be added as part of the recommendation. Vice-Chair Linke inquired about whether a field study was done and if it was accessed to see if there are any recommendations to be done for the intersections. Were the intersections analyzed? He also asked about the intersections on the overview picture which show that eastbound on Aviara Parkway the cars are getting 475 feet. Were the cars not able to get into the turn lanes and that causes the backup? Transportation Planning & Mobility Manager Schmidt replied that they did not collect traffic intersection volumes and that is what would be needed to a high level of analysis. In the overview picture it was a combination of both the cars not getting into the turn lanes and cars had to wait. Vice-Chair Linke said that he would like to see more of an intersection analysis so that we can be improving conditions on these streets. Assistant City Attorney Contreras clarified that 3.P.11 states that after an intersection is exempted that then is the time to look at doing TDM and TSM measures. Vice-Chair Linke agreed with Assistant City Attorney Contreras, but the fact is that there will be no new projects going into this area that will fund TDM and TSM. Is this accurate? Transportation Planning & Mobility Manager Schmidt replied that this is accurate. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 28 of 204 Page 3 of 10 Vice-Chair Linke commented that this is the sixth annual report that has come out since the MMLOS has been required to be in the report and again MMLOS is not included in the monitoring report. He does not want to recommend acceptance of the overall report because the MMLOS is not included in the report. Vice -Chair Linke inquired a commissioner could go to the City Council meeting when this report is presented to ask for staff to make this a priority. Transportation Director Frank said the department is working diligently to get the MMLOS item updated as soon as possible. They can’t set an exact deadline, but they can say they are trying to do this within six months to a year. They can’t foresee the challenges that may come up with the ad-hoc committee. Assistant City Attorney Contreras said there are only a limited amount of times where a commissioner has attended a City Council meeting and provided comment relative to the item that was before City Council. These are usually the Semiannual Transportation Report and the T&MC Work Plan. There is no rule about expanding that and sending a commissioner about a different report. Chair Perez opened the duly noticed Public Hearing at 4:53 p.m. Hearing no one wishing to speak, Chair Perez closed the duly noticed Public Hearing at 4:53 p.m. Motion by Commissioner Fowler, seconded by Commissioner Coelho to support staff’s recommendation to City Council to receive and file the Growth Management Plan/General Plan Annual Monitoring Report Circulation Section prepared pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code, § 21.90.130(d) and Gov. Code §65400. Motion carried: 4/2/0/1 (No: Vice-Chair Linke and Commissioner Penseyres; Absent: Commissioner Proulx) Vice-Chair Linke and Commissioner Penseyres voted NO because the need for the inclusion of the Multimodal Level of Service monitoring in the annual Growth Management Plan monitoring report. Motion by Vice-Chair Linke, seconded by Commissioner Penseyres to support staff’s recommendations to City Council to adopt resolutions to: A. Determine the following street facilities to be deficient pursuant to CMC § 21.90.130(c) because they do not meet the vehicular level of service, or LOS, component of the city’s circulation performance standard in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, or CFIP: a) Eastbound Aviara Parkway between Manzanita Street and El Camino Real b) Westbound Aviara Parkway between El Camino Real and Manzanita Street B. Determine the following street facilities to be built out and exempt from the vehicular LOS performance standard, in accordance with General Plan Mobility Element Policy 3- P.9 and the CFIP Circulation Performance Standard: a) Eastbound Aviara Parkway between Manzanita Street and El Camino Real b) Westbound Aviara Parkway between El Camino Real and Manzanita Street Motion carried: 6/0/0/1 (Absent: Commissioner Proulx) Motion by Commissioner Coelho, seconded by Commissioner Newlands to nominate Vice-Chair Linke to represent the commission at City Council meeting on July 12, 2022, to discuss the need for the inclusion of the Multi-Modal Level of Service monitoring in the annual Growth Management Plan monitoring report. Motion carried: 5/1/0/1 (No: Commissioner Fowler; Absent: Commissioner Proulx) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 29 of 204 Page 4 of 10 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS: 2. POLICE REPORT REGARDING TRAFFIC & MOBILITY RELATED MATTERS DURING THE MONTH OF MAY 2022 – (Staff Contact: Lieutenant Jason Jackowski, Police Department) Staff’s Recommendation: Receive a presentation Lieutenant Jackowski presented the report and reviewed a PowerPoint presentation (on file in the Office of the City Clerk) 3. THE AVENIDA ENCINAS COASTAL RAIL TRAIL AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT –– Receive and consider public comments for Avenida Encinas Coastal Rail Trail and Pedestrian Improvements, CIP Project No. 6004 that were inadvertently omitted from the April 4, 2022, meeting of the Traffic & Mobility Commission. (Staff Contact: Brandon Miles and Hossein Ajideh, Public Works) Staff’s Recommendation: Receive and consider public comments and provide input to staff based on the project and public comments PUBLIC COMMENT: David Pierce requested that staff revise the proposed traffic lanes width on the rail trail segment on Avenida Encinas and the mixing zones and crossover for the right turn lanes. He suggested protected bicycle intersections. Lance Schulte requested that staff replies to the email from Chas Wick regarding ADA accessibility. Please consider the request to landscape the excess pavement along Avenida Encinas by creating a barrier promoting safety for bicycles. Vice-Chair Linke mentioned that last month he asked questions on this topic on behalf of public commenters. Does he need to repeat those questions today to get them on the record? Assistant City Attorney Contreras said that the item requires that input be provided to staff and that was the reason for receiving these extra public comments. We need input from the Commission as well. Relative to the public comments that have been provided, does the commission have any input that they wish to provide to staff? The material that was presented in April is part of the agenda, and the comments that were received today are also part of the agenda. Commissioner Coelho asked about segments two and three in which the design is still underway. Engineering Manager Ajideh responded that is correct for segment two the design is being finalized. For segment three we are in the early stages. Vice-Chair Linke brought up the raised landscaping which is not in the current budget. This was a request from the public. Engineering Manager Ajideh responded that the project has a limited scope and budget. We arefinalizing the design to meet the deadline for the grant. Raised landscaping is not a possibility at this point. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 30 of 204 Page 5 of 10 Vice-Chair Linke asked about westbound Avenida Encinas looking north on Carlsbad Boulevard. Some commenters were concerned about the right hand, left-turn lane and that the cars come into the bike lane. Is it possible to make another set of guidelines to guide the right most left- turn lane so they don’t swerve into the bike lane? Associate Engineer Miles responded that the “cat tracks” can be included to help follow the lane lines. This is a level of detail that we can add to the intersection. Vice-Chair Linke commented on the crosswalk on Avenida Encinas crossing over Ponto Drive. There is no pedestrian crossing control on Avenida Encinas. The public is concerned about having to cross on an uncontrolled crosswalk. Traffic Engineer Kim responded that Avenida Encinas is uncontrolled, and the crosswalk could be updated to include a high visibility crosswalk but would remain uncontrolled. With new development coming in we could do an analysis on this intersection. Vice-Chair Linke asked about Avenida Encinas where it crosses the train tracks near the Batiquitos Lagoon. There is a private trail on the other side and the public would like to see something put in this location. Traffic Engineer Kim responded that they looked to see if adding a marked crosswalk would be appropriate in the location. Since the trail on the north side is private, staff did not think that a crosswalk at this location would be the best use of public funds. Vice-Chair Linke inquired about the reduction to a single lane going southbound on Avenida Encinas at Poinsettia Lane. There are two left turn lanes on the plan. There are two lanes that immediately merge, so the concern is that the traffic is heavy. Will this be able to contain the traffic? Traffic Engineer Kim said that they are working the design of this section, and they intend to preserve, to the extent possible, two southbound lanes between Poinsettia Lane and the shopping center driveways. Chair Perez asked about northbound on Avenida Encinas, on the corner there is a high pitch. If a cyclist was going to turn onto that lane then it is a challenge to cut over and climb up to make the right turn. Commissioner Newlands commented that the private trail on the other side of the Batiquitos Lagoon is actually not locked and it gets a lot of pedestrian traffic. Could they reconsider this location? Traffic Engineer Kim said that staff will take another look. Commissioner Coelho reiterated that it would be great if staff could look at the Poinsettia Lane and Avenida Encinas left turn. This is a high traffic area and we want to make sure we aren’t creating a bigger problem on Poinsettia Lane coming off the freeway 4. NORTH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE MULTIMODAL CORRIDOR PLAN – Receive a report and provide input to staff on the proposed draft project for the North County Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan. (Staff Contact: Nathan Schmidt, Public Works) Staff’s Recommendation: Receive a presentation and provide input to staff on the plan. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 31 of 204 Page 6 of 10 Transportation Planning & Mobility Manager Schmidt presented the report and reviewed a PowerPoint presentation (on file in the Office of the City Clerk) Vice-Chair Linke talked about the Class II bike lane versus Class IV bike lanes for Palomar Airport Road, it looks like Class IV was planned for the entire length. However, for El Camino Real it states in the Strategy Page that Class IV lanes were prepared for the entire length. However, the Preliminary Program and Projects Locations page indicates that Class II bike lanes was planned for the entire length. Will we receive clarification on this from SANDAG? The Commission has a consensus that Class II bike lane is better when there are a lot of conflicts and where there are not a lot of conflicts then Class IV bike lanes is better. He also commented on the flex lanes and that the Transit Priority Lanes are not going to work well in Carlsbad. Assistant City Attorney Contreras asked for a motion to reflect the feedback provided by the commissioners. Motion by Vice-Chair Linke, seconded by Commissioner Penseyres to support staff recommendations and provided the following input: a) The report should clarify inconsistencies within the document between the recommended bikeway facility types such as Class-II versus Class-IV bikeways b) Class-II buffered bike lanes are the preferred bikeway facility type for roadways within the city c) The commission disagrees with the implementation of transit priority lanes within the city. Motion carried: 6/0/0/1 (Absent: Commissioner Proulx) 5. INCLUSION INTO THE CARLSBAD RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION CHANGE FOR PARK DRIVE –– Support staff’s recommendation to: 1) Include Park Drive between Monroe Street and Tamarack Avenue into the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program; and, 2) Submit a request to the California Department of Transportation of a functional classification change on California Road System maps for Park Drive between Monroe Street and Hillside Drive. (Staff Contact: Miriam Jim and John Kim, Public Works Staff’s Recommendation: Support staff’s recommendations. City Traffic Engineer Kim and Senior Engineer Jim presented the report and reviewed a PowerPoint presentation (on file in the office of the City Clerk) PUBLIC COMMENT: Anthony Wisneske complained about speeding on Park Drive and requested that staff consider making Park Drive safer for bicycles, pedestrians and all the residents. Commissioner Fowler asked about the consequence of this project. He also inquired about a speed limit change. Senior Engineer Jim said that with the T&MC approval of Park Drive as an exception to the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program, staff will work with the public to come up with traffic calming measures that will address residents’ speeding concerns. In order to allow the Police Department to enforce the speed limit of 25mph on Park Drive, it would require a functional classification change to a Local Street on California Road System maps. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 32 of 204 Page 7 of 10 City Traffic Engineer Kim said that portions of Park Drive are posted at 25mph but are currently not enforceable. We need to change the classification so that the 25mph speed limit would be enforceable. Commissioner Penseyres clarified that staff is only asking for one segment to go into the CRTMP program. Why are we not doing this for the whole street? Senior Engineer Jim said that in order to consider the whole street they would need a request from residents. As of right now there have been no requests for the portion between Tamarack Avenue and Hillside Drive. This portion of Park Drive is also classified as a Major Collector on California Road System maps. City Traffic Engineer Kim said that if the T&MC would like to request all of Park Drive to be included into the CRTMP program that staff would be open to that as well. Staff just needs to receive a request for the whole street to initiate the CRTMP process. Commissioner Penseyres commented that once traffic calming measures have been applied on that one Segment, it is likely that staff will receive complaints for the other section of Park Drive. Chair Perez said that there are five schools in the area of Park Drive. There is a lot of congestion near the schools and there are lots of e-bikes in this location as well. He believes that we should really focus on safety and enforcement in this area. Motion by Commissioner Coelho, seconded by Chair Perez to support staff’s recommendations and added item c) below: a) Include Park Drive between Monroe Street and Tamarack Avenue into the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program; and, b) Submit a request to the California Department of Transportation of a functional classification change on California Road System maps for Park Drive between Monroe Street and Hillside Drive; and, c) Include Park Drive between Tamarack Avenue and Hillside Drive as an exception into the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program. Motion carried: 6/0/1 (Absent: Commissioner Proulx) 6. TRAFFIC AND MOBILITY COMMISSION FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 WORKPLAN – Provide input to staff on the commission’s draft work plan that identifies activities that the commission anticipates undertaking in the coming year. (Staff Contact: Nathan Schmidt, Public Works) Staff’s Recommendation: Discuss the proposed workplan and provide input to staff. Transportation Planning and Mobility Manager Schmidt presented the report and reviewed a PowerPoint presentation (on file in the office of the City Clerk) Vice-Chair Linke inquired about the Advanced Signal Coordination Program, when the first batch of street deficiencies were disclosed in 2019 staff made a presentation to City Council which included the adaptive signal program. This was supposed to be in place by the end of 2020. City Traffic Engineer Kim said that he believes that staff did bring an update of the signal system to the Traffic & Mobility Commission. They are evaluating signal performance and not tying the City of Carlsbad July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 33 of 204 Page 8 of 10 to adaptive program, but this will be reported as we move forward. The Covid situation has adopted traffic patterns and we need to assume that traffic conditions will again change from this point forward. We are coming up with signal strategies based on the data we are receiving now. We will bring an update to the T&MC in the future. Vice-Chair Linke asked about the TDM program update which has been on the work plan for the past two years. On the last work plan update a year ago it said that the Commission would get an update by September 2021. What is the status of this now? Is the program being left on the work plan? Transportation Planning and Mobility Manager Schmidt replied that the TDM Program is currently being worked on by Community Development and an update should be provided in the next three months. Vice-Chair Linke asked about the TIA Guidelines which has been on the workplan for at least two years. Is that still in process? Transportation Planning and Mobility Manager Schmidt replied yes, this is still in process. Vice-Chair Linke suggested there should be a performance review with some metrics to evaluate the TDM Program. What has the current program been doing? He would like the Commission to receive an annual report on how the TDM program is performing. How many solo drivers have been eliminated? What are the performance metrics that would be used. Transportation Planning and Mobility Manager Schmidt replied that an annual report on the performance of the TDM Program is a good suggestion. We have multiple sources that could be presented to the Commission. Vice-Chair Linke commented that the City Council is in the process of deciding Capital Improvement Projects priorities. The Sustainable Mobility Plan is a tool that could be used to help prioritize projects. The City Council was not presented with the deficiencies that could be addressed on our prioritization list. He suggested that the T&MC be involved in advising the City Council on what we think should be prioritized. The CIP project list should be provided to the Commission to provide input prior to next year’s CIP prioritization meeting. Transportation Planning and Mobility Manager Schmidt replied that as part of the update to the City’s Traffic Impact Fee Program, the first phase of that program was looking at prioritization of all of the projects identified in the SMP. It was a high-level plan, and we don’t have tangible cost data or construction feasibility data. The TIF was intended to take a closer look at those projects to provide a more realistic prioritization list. Chair Perez reiterated that looking forward those five commissioners have terms ending in 2022. There is a lot of material that will be moving over to 2023. It would be nice to see everything we can with the months that we have left with this Commission. Motion by Vice-chair Linke, seconded by Commissioner Newlands to add the following input: a) Include annual Transportation Demand Management performance updates; and, b) Remove the request to live stream the Traffic & Mobility Commission meeting. Motion carried: 6/0/0/1 (Absent: Commissioner Proulx) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 34 of 204 Page 9 of 10 7. SEMIANNUAL TRANSPORTATION REPORT – Receive a report regarding the accomplishments of each division of the Transportation Department on the past six months and goals for the next six months. (Staff Contact: Tom Frank, Public Works) Staff’s Recommendation: Receive the report. Transportation Director and City Engineer Frank presented the report and reviewed a PowerPoint presentation (on file in the office of the City Clerk) Motion by Vice-Chair Linke, seconded by Commissioner Penseyres to nominate Chair Perez to represent the Traffic & Mobility Commission at City Council meeting on July 26, 2022, and nominated Commissioner Coelho as an alternate. Motion carried: 6/0/0/1 (Absent: Commissioner Proulx) PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEM CONTINUATION: Robert Beauchamp spoke about Plum Tree Road and encourages everyone to read the email with input from his wife Cindy Beauchamp who spoke earlier in the meeting. He believes the road design is too narrow. The community is requesting a third stop signs or speed bumps, a crosswalk, and a permanent traffic feedback device. CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER COMMENTS: Traffic Engineer Manager Kim mentioned that his presentation about the westbound bike lane on Aviara Parkway at Manzanita Street was folded into the GMP presentation provided by Nathan Schmidt. Transportation Planning and Mobility Manager Schmidt informed the T&MC that the Council Chambers may not be available for the August 1, meeting due to scheduled renovations. Staff will let the T&MC know if a cancelation of the meeting will be necessary. TRAFFIC AND MOBILITY COMMISSION COMMENTS: Transportation Planning and Mobility Manager Schmidt reminded the T&MC that due to the holiday the July meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday, July 5, 2022. Assistant City Attorney Contreras said that he will not attend the July 5, meeting but that his colleague Allegra Frost will attend. Commissioner Penseyres commented on Tamarack Avenue and Valley Street and the need to address the issues. Could staff put together a history of the public request on this issue and how we got to where we are currently. We have spent a lot of money and time designing this. However, the public does not seem satisfied on this issue. How are we going to move forward and address the issues? Assistant City Attorney Contreras said the T&MC can ask staff to agendize the history of the public requests on Tamarack Avenue and Valley Street. Motion by Vice-Chair Linke, seconded by Commissioner Penseyres to request staff to agendize a future item to review the installation of a HAWK crossing at the intersection of Valley Street and Tamarack Avenue based on comments received during the public comments portion of the agenda. This item shall include: July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 35 of 204 Page 10 of 10 1) An overview of the history of the project review and approval process and 2) Potential options for traffic calming at the intersection Motion carried: 6/0/0/1 (Absent: Commissioner Proulx) Vice-Chair Linke brought up a comment about the Poinsettia Lane, Aviara Parkway intersection. We have heard about this in the past. After the completion of Poinsettia Lane there is more through traffic. A commenter stated that they think that an additional through lane might be better than the second right turn lane should be considered. Another non agenda item brought up by the public was status of the No Large vehicle parking on Madison Street. Traffic Engineer Manager Kim mentioned that staff works with the police department on any parking complaints, and rely on the Police Department for these issues. ADJOURNMENT: Chair Perez adjourned the Traffic & Mobility Commission Meeting on June 6, 2022, at 7:30 p.m. ___________________________ Eliane Paiva, Minutes Clerk July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 36 of 204r t Meeting Date: Jan. 12, 2021 To: Mayor and City Council From: Scott Chadwick, City Manager Staff Contact: Nathan Schmidt, Transportation Planning and Mobility Manager nathan.schmidt@carlsbadca.gov, 760-637-7183 Subject: Adoption of the Carlsbad Sustainable Mobility Plan Districts: Citywide Recommended Action Adopt a resolution adopting the Carlsbad Sustainable Mobility Plan. Executive Summary The Sustainable Mobility Plan presents a comprehensive look at current active travel and transit conditions, as well as previous planning efforts to consolidate findings and recommendations into a single master plan document. The plan presents recommendations for reducing vehicle miles traveled to mitigate the impacts of growth and development, as well as shifting how residents get around the city away from private automobiles towards modes that are more livable, cleaner and healthier. For just over a decade, the City of Carlsbad has been actively developing and implementing a series of stand-alone documents, technical analyses and recommendations relating to improving mobility for all modes of travel within the city. The Sustainable Mobility Plan is designed to help the city integrate and synthesize these previous planning efforts. It is a key element in implementing the General Plan’s Mobility Element and will help meet the greenhouse gas reduction goals of the Climate Action Plan by shifting community members away from private automobiles toward modes that are more livable, cleaner and more healthful. The Sustainable Mobility Plan examines alternative transportation options in a comprehensive and interwoven way to present an existing and a future network. The plan was developed with input from the business community, hospitality industry, the Carlsbad Unified School District, regional transportation agencies and community partners. The Sustainable Mobility Plan will develop modal “blueprints” to evaluate, plan, expand and fund such initiatives as: •Bicycle and pedestrian improvements •Safe routes to schools and parks •Transit •Mobility hubs featuring car-share and bikeshare services •Transportation Demand Management •Improvements in the communities that need it most Exhibit 4 CA Review __RMC__ July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 37 of 204 As the city builds this network, it intends to empower all residents with choices that improve commuting, recreation and getting around the city overall, while accomplishing these important benefits: •Increased safety •More convenient options •Healthier travel options •Better traffic flow •Reductions in greenhouse gases Staff recommends the City Council approve the Sustainable Mobility Plan to carry out the goals established in the Mobility Element. Discussion Overview To achieve the goals established in Carlsbad’s Mobility Element, its transportation planning document, the city needs a clearer view of the existing transportation options for residents, workers and visitors and to identify how to improve those options. Since the city adopted the Mobility Element as part of its General Plan in 2015, city staff have been developing and implementing a series of stand-alone documents, technical analyses and recommendations related to walking and bicycling. The Sustainable Mobility Plan is designed to serve as a “plan of plans,” consolidating these multiple planning efforts made over the previous 12 years into a single plan to achieve the city’s overall goals for sustainable transportation. A dozen planning documents have been integrated into the Sustainable Mobility Plan: 1.Bicycle Master Plan (2007) 2.Pedestrian Master Plan (2008) 3.ADA Transition Plan (2013) 4.Livable Streets Assessment (2013) 5.Carlsbad Active Transportation Strategy (2015) 6.Climate Action Plan (2015) 7.General Plan Mobility Element (2015) 8.Coastal Mobility Readiness Plan (2016) 9.Village and Barrio Master Plan (2018) 10.Draft Transit and Transportation Demand Management Blueprint (2018) 11.Trolley Feasibility Study (2019) 12.Trails Master Plan (2019) The Sustainable Mobility Plan consolidates the planned, unbuilt projects from these plans into a single prioritized database, giving city staff a roadmap for the implementation of these multiple planned networks. (The complete plan can be viewed at carlsbadca.gov/services/depts/pw/traffic/mobilityplan.asp) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 38 of 204 Contents of the Sustainable Mobility Plan The plan is designed to provide the information city staff will need now and in the future to implement the goals of the Mobility Element. Chapter 1 - Provides an overview of recent state legislation that calls for local governments to improve the walking, cycling and transit environments within their jurisdictions. Over 15 pieces of state legislation have been adopted since 2006 to reduce vehicle miles traveled and greenhouse gas emissions, improve the safety of our most vulnerable travelers and encourage planning practices that result in sustainable outcomes rather than making it easier for people to drive. The plan is in line with these directives from the state of California as well as with the desires of community members who share these concerns. Chapter 2 - Highlights existing travel conditions and the need to address several shortcomings for people walking, riding a bike and using transit. All roadways in the city were evaluated using tested transportation measurements that reflect the overall comfort for pedestrians and cyclists. As shown in this analysis, there are several gaps in these networks, and critical locations across the city suffer from poor quality walking and cycling environments and a sparse transit network. Chapter 3 - Provides an overview of guiding planning principles and emerging mobility concepts that framed the process of developing the plan. These principles are largely focused on ensuring equitable access and safety to all modes of travel, regardless of age or physical ability. Chapter 4 - Summarizes the spectrum of community-outreach activities that were undertaken as part of the planning process, which are described in the Public Notification and Outreach section below. Chapter 5 - Presents the four planned networks for walking, trails, cycling and transit. These recommendations were combined into what’s called a transformative corridor network, which provides a well-connected, comfortable backbone transportation system allowing for more sustainable travel across the city. Chapter 6 - Focuses on recommended programs, such as Safe Routes to Schools, and enhancements to existing programs, such as Transportation Demand Management.1 These programs hold strong promise for helping two core city subpopulations — schoolchildren (or who takes them to school) and workers — change their behavior to use less polluting, more healthful modes of travel. Chapter 7 - Presents the Sustainable Mobility Plan’s action plan. This includes a presentation of the plan’s database of projects and how the items on it were prioritized. The database reflects a comprehensive consolidation of planned unbuilt project recommendations from 10 prior mobility planning efforts over the past 12 years, combined with new recommendations. The project database lists 246 recommended 1 This refers to strategies intended to cut down on vehicle travel, especially that of motorists driving alone, by creating and sponsoring options to driving such as transit, ridesharing, walking, biking, and teleworking July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 39 of 204 bicycle, pedestrian and transit projects across the city and establishes priorities for their implementation. Key themes from the Sustainable Mobility Plan planning process Based on evaluation of the City of Carlsbad’s safety, infrastructure and community perspectives as discussed in detail in the Sustainability Mobility Plan, the following key themes and plan priorities were developed: • Enhance existing bikeways along major arterials The city already has many miles of bicycle infrastructure. The challenge facing the city is how to retrofit this infrastructure, which is mostly standard bike lanes, to not only protect existing cyclists but to attract new users. This can be achieved through implementation of buffered or protected bikeways or bike trails, particularly along high- speed roadways. • Improve freeway crossings and intersections Many freeway crossings and intersections at major roadways create physical and psychological barriers because people do not feel safe walking or cycling through these areas. The Sustainable Mobility Plan provides recommendations that will help bridge these existing gaps in the bicycle or pedestrian networks between neighborhoods that currently lack these key connections. • Plan for vulnerable users Development of an “8 to 80” network in which people can comfortably walk and bike is critical to shifting mode choice away from driving. This can be achieved by planning and designing for those who are likely to benefit the most from protection on roadways, the children and the elderly, those from 8 to 80 years old and beyond. • Innovate and make use of the city’s desirable location to attract visitors, employees and employers The city has long sought a highly skilled and highly educated workforce, with an emphasis on technology and the pursuit of an active, enjoyable quality of life. With the emergence of multiple new technologies, the city’s transportation network should reflect this innovation, along with strong workplace commuter programs and a focus on maintaining the city’s status as a family-oriented destination for people from all over the world. Public outreach and feedback Public participation was a major component of the planning process, and the feedback collected aided staff in drafting the Sustainable Mobility Plan. Staff collected input through an engagement process that included online surveys, a project website, pop-up events, focus group interviews and numerous meetings with key project stakeholders, as summarized in Chapter 4 of the document. The Sustainable Mobility Plan Stakeholder Working Group guided the initial development of the plan and served to provide insights to the city and project team on methodology and the prioritization of projects. More than 25 community representatives attended four working group meetings conducted at key points in the project planning process. The working group July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 40 of 204 was comprised of representatives from the business community, hospitality industry, Carlsbad Unified School District, regional transportation agencies and community partners. After the completion of the Traffic and Mobility Commission’s ad-hoc planning committee’s review, which is detailed below, the revised draft Sustainable Mobility Plan was released community wide for public review from Nov. 9 - Dec. 7, 2020. The city’s website was updated with an informative video and fact sheet and a public feedback survey that contained several questions regarding the plan’s recommendations and proposed mobility programs. In all, 312 survey responses were submitted, and over 450 unique comments on the plan were provided. The results of this survey were tabulated and are provided in Appendix E of the Sustainable Mobility Plan. Respondents were generally in support when asked questions about the Sustainable Mobility Plan’s overarching philosophy. Of those who took the survey, 78% agreed that the plan increases access to travel options through enhanced walking, bicycling and public transportation. Traffic and Mobility Commission review The draft Sustainable Mobility Plan was first presented to the Traffic and Mobility Commission on April 6, 2020. (Exhibit 2) Commission members raised several concerns with the plan, including its project recommendations and priorities. Rather than recommending City Council approval of the plan as staff had presented, the commission created an ad hoc committee to help guide the project team in updating the plan. Since then, city staff has held several meetings with the committee to review and update the plan. Staff made the following key revisions to the plan in response to the ad hoc committee’s input: • Numerous editorial revisions to the plan text, maps, and graphics • Updated the existing conditions sidewalk maps • Clarified the multimodal level of service2 used in the Sustainable Mobility Plan • Revised and expanded the analysis of mobility hubs3 and recommendations • Revised and updated the Transportation Demand Management section • Added a policy to consider roundabouts on all existing city streets where they can effectively address safety or traffic operations issues • Extensively revised the recommended projects list, including revaluating proposed improvements to bikeways across the city • Added a more extensive Safe Routes to School planning framework to better assist local schools in developing their own plans in close collaboration with students, parents, school administrators and residents from surrounding neighborhoods • Develop a citywide monitoring program to measure various performance measures that would reveal whether more people are changing their travel behaviors from driving alone to walking, biking, or taking transit. These indicators would also measure greenhouse gas emissions and safety through analysis of traffic collision data. 2 Multimodal level of service estimates the auto, bus, bicycle, and pedestrian level of service on an urban street to assess how well it serves those who use it. 3 Mobility hubs are places where different travel options, walking, biking, transit and other options, come together. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 41 of 204 • Refined the transformative corridors in the city, those backbone roadways with viable pedestrian, cycling and transit options, to focus on a set of corridors that provide connections to key destinations throughout the city • Extensively modified the project prioritization analysis to include a more equal distribution of recommended projects throughout the city • Added a new section on the economic benefits of active transportation and mobility improvements • Updated the city’s Complete Streets Guidelines regarding the design of bicycle and pedestrian facilities • Conducted additional public outreach and review to provide the community with sufficient time to review and comment on the revised final document The Traffic and Mobility Commission recommended adoption of the Sustainable Mobility Plan Dec. 7, 2020. The commission emphasized the plan’s ability to serve as a consolidated database of multi-modal transportation projects, while highlighting some limitations of the plan because it was scaled back from the original scope of work. To help ensure timely implementation of the Sustainable Mobility Plan, the commissioners urged the city to perform the following additional tasks: • Determine the feasibility and estimated costs for the plan’s project list • Develop and implement: o Multi-modal level of service methodologies that reflect actual conditions and promote multi-modal projects o Safe Routes to Schools program o Active transportation monitoring program o Mobility safety monitoring program o Sustainable Mobility Plan progress reporting process • Review: o Transportation Demand Management program o Transit conditions and identification of first mile/last mile access gaps o Sustainable Mobility Plan implementation timeline The motion was approved by the Traffic and Mobility Commission by a vote of 6/0/1 with Commissioner Wanamaker being absent. The minutes are attached as Exhibit 3 and a video of the meeting is available on the city’s website. Fiscal Analysis There is no direct or immediate fiscal impact associated with the recommended actions. Staff recommends developing a detailed implementation strategy, as described below, that would include obtaining engineering cost estimates and developing funding strategies for the recommended projects and programs identified in the Sustainable Mobility Plan. Staff will continue to analyze resource allocation for these projects and request additional resources as needed in future budget cycles. All facilities proposed on private property will be funded and constructed by private property owners or developers at the time of development. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 42 of 204 Next Steps With the council’s approval, and in compliance with the General Plan, the Transportation Department intends to use the adopted Sustainable Mobility Plan as the principal roadmap to guide the future development of the city’s active transportation and mobility network. After the plan is finalized, staff intends to develop a more detailed implementation strategy with a focus on devising realistic funding strategies for design and construction of recommended projects. The implementation strategy will build upon the project prioritization process and serve as a blueprint for the city for a phased implementation of the multimodal improvement projects identified in the plan. This strategy will include an engineering feasibility analysis of top-priority projects covering the preliminary cost estimates, conceptual improvement plans, roadway cross sections and identification of funding sources. The identified top priority projects will then be added into the Capital Improvement Program for future implementation, with the council’s approval. Environmental Review Future actions described in the plan will be subject to further environmental review on a project-by-project basis. A notice of exemption has been prepared by the city planner and will be filed with the office of the San Diego County Clerk for a 30-day public review period. Public Notification Public notice of this item was posted in keeping with the Ralph M. Brown Act and it was available for public viewing and review at least 72 hours before the scheduled meeting date. Exhibits 1. City Council Resolution 2. Approved Traffic and Mobility Commission meeting minutes (April 6, 2020) 3. Approved Traffic and Mobility Commission meeting minutes (Dec. 7, 2020) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 43 of 204 1 CITY OF CARLSBAD REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN, MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE STUDY, AND VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED MITIGATION PROGRAM Release of Request for Proposals June 2022 RFP22-1865TRAN PROPOSALS DUE: 5 P.M. July 7, 2022 CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION ATTN: GRAHAM JORDAN, CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR 1635 FARADAY AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CA 92008 THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ENCOURAGES THE PARTICIPATION OF MINORITY AND WOMEN-OWNED BUSINESSES Exhibit 5 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 44 of 204 -I 1 -Bidd1" -ng 2 GENERAL INFORMATION The City of Carlsbad (City) is requesting proposals from qualified professional consulting firms to prepare the Implementation Plan for the City’s Sustainable Mobility Plan (SMP) and a Multimodal Transportation Impact Fee (MTIF) Study to update the City’s current Traffic Impact Fee program. These studies are needed to re-evaluate future transportation improvements in Carlsbad in association with potential growth and planned multimodal infrastructure improvements. If adopted, the Multimodal Transportation Impact Fee Program will replace the City’s current Traffic Impact Fee program. The scope of services, the content of the proposal, and the selection process are described in this Request for Proposal (RFP). The professional consulting firm to be awarded the contract shall be known as the “Consultant” and shall be retained through the completion of the project, including any contract time extensions. The Consultant shall provide one lead individual who shall be available to report and coordinate directly to the city’s Project Manager for this project. The ideal consultant team will possess the demonstrated experience in: • Multimodal transportation planning • Developing goals and metrics to assess the city’s circulation system • Community engagement • Project prioritization techniques • Conceptual civil engineering designs and cost estimates • Developing multimodal impact fee programs BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The city is seeking to update and develop two overlapping programs as described below. Multimodal Traffic Impact Fee (MTIF) Update This first program concept is a traditional impact fee program in compliance with the mitigation fee act. The nexus for the MTIF fee would be a vehicle mile traveled (VMT) reduction goal consistent with Senate Bill 743. The City of Carlsbad Sustainable Mobility Plan was adopted by City Council in January 2021 and presents recommendations for reducing VMT, mitigating the impacts of growth and development, and shifting how residents get around the city away from private automobiles toward modes that are more livable, cleaner and healthier. This plan document builds upon important prior planning work in the city, including the City of Carlsbad General Plan Mobility Element, the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plans, the Village and Barrio Master Plan, the Carlsbad Active Transportation Strategy, and recent initiatives such as the Climate Action Plan and the passage of the Transportation Demand Ordinance. The City of Carlsbad’s current Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a facility impact fee program designed to fund needed circulation improvements within the city. The genesis of the program is the Carlsbad General Plan which requires that the city ensure the provision of an adequate circulation infrastructure to serve its projected population. One of the stated objectives listed in the Circulation Element of the General Plan Mobility Element Policy 3-P.5 which states, “Require developers to construct or pay their fair share toward improvements for all travel modes consistent with this Mobility Element, the Growth Management Plan, and specific impact associated with their development”. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 45 of 204 3 The SMP implementation strategy will focus on devising realistic funding strategies for design and construction of recommended projects. The implementation strategy will build upon the project prioritization process and serve as a blueprint for the city for a phased implementation of the multimodal improvement projects identified in the plan. This strategy will include an engineering feasibility analysis of top-priority projects and programs covering the preliminary cost estimates, conceptual improvement plans, roadway cross sections and identification of funding sources. An additional program to consider for funding is an all-electric flexible fleet on-demand rideshare program. Following the development of the SMP implementation strategy, the Multimodal Transportation Impact Fee program would provide a mechanism to modernize the city’s current fee program to collect funds towards the construction of the improvements identified and prioritized in the SMP and Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The MTIF program update will also address the requirements included in the TransNet Extension Ordinance approved by San Diego County voters in November 2004 (TransNet Extension Ordinance). For the City of Carlsbad to remain eligible to receive its local share of the TransNet Extension sales tax revenue, the City must comply with Section 9 of the TransNet Extension Ordinance which is known as the Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Plan (RTCIP). More information on the City’s Sustainable Mobility Plan and current Traffic Impact Fee program is available on the City’s website here: • https://www.carlsbadca.gov/departments/streets-traffic/biking- walking/mobility/sustainable-mobility-plan • https://library.qcode.us/lib/carlsbad_ca/pub/municipal_code/item/title_18- chapter_18_42?view=all • https://cityrecords.ci.carlsbad.ca.us/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=4865138&dbid=0&repo= CityOfCarlsbad&searchid=668f5683-7d38-441c-8c50-31635cc03c6c Vehicle Mies Traveled (VMT) Mitigation Fee Program This second program concept is to develop a mitigation program for use by the city to reduce a VMT significant impact to a less than significant by choosing VMT-measurable mitigations. To help implement the analysis of project related transportation impacts, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3), the city developed VMT Analysis Guidelines consistent with the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research advisories. These guidelines have been in place since July 2020 and last revised in September 2020. To provide more options to help mitigate for project related VMT impacts, the city is seeking to develop a mitigation fee program and/or in-lieu fee program that new development projects would pay a VMT reduction credit to assist in alleviating (mitigating) significant VMT impacts (which may include, among other things, a VMT exchange program or VMT mitigation bank). This VMT Mitigation Fee Program is anticipated to include relevant transportation demand management (TDM) and VMT-reducing projects within the city to be funded by future developments that trigger potentially significant VMT impacts under CEQA Potential VMT-reducing measures may include providing active transportation network improvements identified in the SMP implementation plan and other city-run programs to incentivize the use of alternative travel modes. Consultant should propose specific tasks and deliverables, but anticipated tasks would be study of VMT impacts and potential mitigation projects, evaluation of future VMT impacts in the city’s General Plan, and a Nexus study to determine proportionality. Consultant should provide recommendations for evaluation under the CEQA for approval of the fee and subsequent discretionary actions. For the program to qualify as a CEQA mitigation program, the discretionary action to adopt the program requires CEQA review. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 46 of 204 4 More information on the City’s Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Guidelines is available on the City’s website here: • https://www.carlsbadca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/312/637425981341500000 SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY: • Project management (under the supervision of the Transportation Planning and Mobility Manager) • Assistance with local data and records • Staff liaison to the Traffic & Mobility Commission and Planning Commission • Staff reports and presentations at public hearings, assisted by the consultant • Public hearing notices • Coastal Act and CEQA filings (if necessary) • Assistance with communications and logistics from city communication staff SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of services requested are described in Exhibit “A” and are intended to summarize the minimum scope of work needed. Each consultant may modify the scope of services to be provided; however, all modifications shall be clearly identified in the Consultant’s proposal. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Date Request for Proposals Advertised June 13, 2022 Pre-submittal Questions Due June 22, 2022 Proposals Due July 7, 2022 Virtual Interview (if necessary) July 2022 Award Agreement July/August 2022 Notice to Proceed August 2022 Project Completion Fall 2024 CONTENTS OF THE PROPOSAL The proposal should be electronic PDF and no longer than 35 pages in length, exclusive of appendices. The proposal shall include the following items in the order listed: 1. Executive Summary – A one to two-page overview of the entire proposal describing highlights of the proposal. 2. Consultant Experience – An outline of the consultant’s background, qualifications, and ability to perform the services required. Provide a summary of at least three projects that are similar in scope to the subject project. The summary should include a brief description of past projects, the name of your project manager and staff that worked on the project, and the name and current phone number of the client's project manager. Include any subconsultants, if necessary. Provided references which can confirm your teams experience in efficiently completing this type of project. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 47 of 204 5 3. Project Team – Provide the names and qualifications of the key individuals that will be responsible for the coordination and production of project tasks, their respective roles, and the organizational structure of the team. This would include a resume for each team member. Technical support staff should be included if they will perform a significant role in the preparation of the work products. Provide the contact person, legal name, and address of the company. Indicate the approximate percentage of billed time each team member will be committed towards the subject project. If teaming or subcontracting, include an outline for each individual firm. 4. Project Approach – A summary of the Consultant’s proposed approach to efficiently manage the project and accomplish the expected results. The scope of work of this RFP should be addressed in the summary, but can also include other approaches, items or considerations that the Consultant considers to be warranted to meet the desired project goals. Specific tasks and deliverables to complete each of the projects should be identified and itemized in the Cost Estimate. 5. Schedule – A response to the tentative schedule provided above, with comments on Consultant’s ability to provide the required services. This response should describe Consultant’s current workload and the availability of key personnel that will be assigned to this project. 6. Cost Estimate - Provide an estimate of the total direct and indirect costs to complete the task identified. The estimate shall include of the number of hours for the prime and sub- consultant(s), if any. This estimate shall include the personnel classification for the anticipated level of effort to complete the work. The hourly estimate will be used as a basis for determining Consultant’s understanding of the scope of work. 7. Appendix • A complete resume for each team member. • An Hourly Rate Schedule that will be used as a basis for payment under the contract. INFORMATION TO OFFERORS 1. All proposals must be made in accordance with the conditions of this RFP or any addendum issued thereafter. Failure to address any of the requirements may be grounds for rejection of this proposal. 2. Proposals should include any additional information that the respondent deems pertinent to the understanding and evaluation of the proposal. 3. If a proposer takes any exceptions to any part of these specifications as written, or as amended by any addenda subsequently issued, they must do so in writing at the time of proposal submission. Failure to do so will be construed as acceptance of all provisions of the specifications. The city will review the objections and content of any such objection in the proposal evaluation process. 4. All information should be complete, specific, and as concise as possible. Respondents are liable for all errors or omissions contained in their submittals. The proposer shall not be relieved from assuming all responsibility for properly estimating the difficulties and the cost of performing the services required with this specification, because of failure to investigate the conditions or the proposer’s failure to become acquainted with all the information concerning the services to be performed. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 48 of 204 6 5. Each proposer, by the submission of a proposal, assents to each and every term and condition set forth within this specification and attached agreement and, upon award, agrees to be bound thereby. Proposals may not be modified after the due date. All proposals shall constitute firm offers valid for ninety (90) days from the due date. All proposals should be signed by an authorized representative of the bidder. See Certification of Proposer (Exhibit “C”). 6. The city, at its option, may interview proposers. The interviews will be for the purpose of clarifying the proposals. Submittal of new proposal material at an interview will not be permitted, unless specifically requested by the city. Interviews may involve a presentation and/or a question-and-answer session. 7. The cost for developing the proposal is the responsibility of the proposer and shall not be chargeable to the city. 8. The city encourages the participation of minority and women-owned businesses. 9. The successful firm will be asked to sign a Personal Services Contract (“Consulting Agreement”) with the city and the consulting agreement must be fully executed prior to being given notice to proceed. A copy of the city’s standard consultant agreement is attached (Exhibit “D”) for your review. Please do not respond to this RFP if you cannot agree to all terms of the city’s agreement. The city will not change or modify the hold harmless and liability clauses included in the agreement. 10. Consultant shall be required to comply with all requirements as stipulated in Exhibit “D”, Agreement for Professional Services, including the following: 1. Compliance with insurance requirements – Section 10 (see Exhibit “D”) 2. Current City Business License – Section 11 CONFLICT OF INTEREST No person performing services for the city, in connection with the establishment of any agreements or any projects resulting from this solicitation, shall have a financial or other personal interest other than employment or retention by the city, in any contract or subcontract in connection with this solicitation or any resulting project. No officer or employee of such person retained by the city shall have any financial or other personal interest in any real property acquired for this list or resulting project, unless such interest is openly disclosed upon the public records of the city and such officer, employee, or person has not participated in the acquisition of such property for or on behalf of the city. PROHIBITED CONTRACTS The city shall not contract with and shall reject any Proposal submitted by the persons or entities specified below, unless the city Council finds that Special Circumstances exist which justify the approval of such a contract. • Persons employed by the City of Carlsbad and any public agencies for which the City Council are the governing body; • Profit-making firms or businesses in which employees described in this solicitation serve as officers, principals, partners or major shareholders; July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 49 of 204 7 • Persons who, within the immediately preceding twelve (12) months, came within the provisions this solicitation and who (1) were employed in positions of substantial responsibility in the area of service to be performed by the contract, or (2) participated in any way in developing the contract or its service specifications; • Profit-making firms or businesses in which the former employees described in this solicitation serve as officers, principals, partners or major shareholders; and • Person who currently serve on a city Board or Commission per CMC 2.15.030. The submitter certifies that the consultant firm has complied with the above provisions, and that any ensuing contract will be valid. LIST OF SUBMITTALS The following items must be submitted with your proposal. Omissions may be caused to consider your proposal non-responsive in the City’s sole discretion. • Submit one (1) electronic copy of bid proposal package • Certification of Proposer (Exhibit “C”) EVALUATION OF PROPOSAL 1. In accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code, awards shall be based on a best value evaluation. Criteria used for the evaluation will include: cost, technical experience of bidder, capability of bidder (equipment, staff qualifications, length of time in business, company resources etc.), ability to provide timely service, professionalism of bidder (references), ability to meet the city’s contract requirements, and other qualifications and unspecified value-added offerings by the bidder. The awarding authority’s determination and selection shall be final. SELECTION PROCEDURE Consultants will be reviewed and ranked by a selection committee composed of city staff members using the criteria in the table below. Consultants will be scored using a point rating system: system rating Scores will then be applied to each of the criteria and final scores tallied encompassing a weighted average approach: Criteria Maximum Points Rating Project Approach and Schedule 25 Cost (total value of bid) 15 Experience 20 Innovation 20 Knowledge (City, State, and Federal guidelines, standards, and procedures) 20 Total 100 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 50 of 204 8 Selection will be based on the contents provided in previous sections. The ideal Consultant should have a history of working experience on recent relevant projects and a proven team. The Consultant selected will be asked to enter into negotiations for the Professional Service Agreement. In the event that a fee cannot be agreed upon with the highest-ranking Consultant, the city will terminate negotiations and enter into negotiations with the next highest-ranking Consultant. Please note that the city reserves the right to take any or no action based on responses to this request for proposal, including the acceptance or rejection of proposals and the inclusion and deletion of any combination of the work items for the project. The City of Carlsbad reserves the right, before awarding the contract, to require a consultant to submit such evidence of qualifications as deemed necessary and may consider information available to it of the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a consultant, including past performance with other governmental agencies in making award in the best interest of the City of Carlsbad. The City expects that it will enter into a one-year contract with the optional four one-year performance-based extensions that may be awarded upon annual evaluation of program and subject to satisfactory performance. Based upon that annual review and consultant performance, the program outlined below may be modified. Any modifications would require City and consultant agreement. ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL ELECTRONIC FORMAT RECEIPT AND OPENING OF RFP’S: Submittals will be received in electronic format (eBids) EXCLUSIVELY) at the City of Carlsbad’s electronic bidding (eBidding) site at City of Carlsbad - Contracting & Purchasing and are due by the date and time specified on the cover of the solicitation. 1.1. PROPOSERS MUST BE PRE-REGISTERED with the City’s bidding system and possess a system- assigned Digital ID in order to submit and electronic proposal. The City’s proposal/electronic bidding (eBidding) system will automatically track information submitted to the site including IP addresses, browsers being used and the URLs from which information was submitted. In addition, the City’s bidding system will keep a history of every login instance including the time of login, and other information about the user's computer configuration such as the operating system, browser type, version, and more. Because of these security features, Proposers who disable their browsers’ cookies will not be able to log in and use the City’s bidding system. Upon entry of their proposal, the system will ensure that all required fields are entered. The system will not accept a proposal for which any required information is missing. This includes all essential documentation and supporting materials and forms requested or contained in these solicitation documents. 1.2. PROPOSALS REMAIN SEALED UNTIL DUE DATE AND TIME. eBids and eProposal’s are transmitted into the City’s bidding system via hypertext transfer protocol secure (https) mechanism using SSL 128-256-bit security certificates July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 51 of 204 9 issued from Verisign/Thawte which encrypts data being transferred from client to server. Proposals submitted prior to the Due Date and Time are not available for review by anyone other than the submitter, who will have until the Due Date and Time to change, rescind or retrieve its proposal should they desire to do so. 1.3. PROPOSALS MUST BE SUBMITTED BY DUE DATE AND TIME. Once the deadline is reached, no further submissions are accepted into the system. Once the Due Date and Time has passed, bidders, proposers, the general public, and city staff are able to immediately see the results on line. City staff may then begin reviewing the submissions for responsiveness, compliance and other issues. 1.4. PROPOSALS MAY BE WITHDRAWN by the Proposer prior to, but not after, the time set as Due Date and Time. 1.4.1. Important Note: Submission of the electronic proposal into the system may not be instantaneous. Due to the speed and capabilities of the user’s internet service provider (ISP), bandwidth, computer hardware and other variables, it may take time for the proposer’s submission to upload and be received by the City’s eBidding system. It is the proposer’s sole responsibility to ensure their proposals are received on time by the City’s eBidding system. The City of Carlsbad is not responsible for proposals that do not arrive by the Due Date and Time. 2. ELECTRONIC SUBMISSIONS CARRY FULL FORCE AND EFFECT The Proposer, by submitting their electronic proposal, agrees to and certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the certification, forms and affidavits submitted as part of this proposal are true and correct. 3. PROPOSALS ARE PUBLIC RECORDS Upon receipt by the City, proposals shall become public records subject to public disclosure. It is the responsibility of the Proposer to clearly identify any confidential, proprietary, trade secret or otherwise legally privileged information contained within the proposal’s General references to sections of the California Public Records Act (PRA) will not suffice. If the Proposer does not provide applicable case law that clearly establishes that the requested information is exempt from the disclosure requirements of the PRA, the city shall be free to release the information when required in accordance with the PRA, pursuant to any other applicable law, or by order of any court or government agency, and the Proposer agrees to hold the City harmless for any such release of this information. 4. SUBMISSION OF QUESTIONS 4.1 All questions must be received prior to June 22, 2022, at 5 p.m. 4.1.1. All questions related to this solicitation shall be submitted to Graham Jordan via email to: graham.jordan@carlsbadca.gov. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 52 of 204 10 4.1.2. Questions received after June 22, 2022, may not be considered. 4.1.3. Questions or clarifications deemed by the city to be material shall be answered via issuance of an Addendum and posted to the city’s online bidding service. 4.1.4. Only questions answered by formal written addenda shall be binding. Oral and other interpretations or clarifications shall be without legal effect. It is the Proposer's responsibility to be informed of any Addenda that have been issued and to adjust its Proposal accordingly. 5. REVISIONS TO THE RFP The City, at its option, may respond to any or all questions submitted in writing via the City’s eBidding web site or received via email in the form of an addendum. No other responses to questions, oral or written, shall be of any force or effect with respect to this solicitation. Any changes to the Contract Documents through addendum are made effective as though originally issued with the RFP. The Proposer shall acknowledge the receipt of Addenda at the time of Proposal submission. Submissions via e-mail or fax will not be accepted. The city is open to receiving responses from single entities or from entities that represent multi- ventures. The city may, in its sole discretion, consider the information submitted in response to this RFP during the development of a competitive solicitation, if one is pursued. Please clearly indicate if any designs, materials or other submitted information is proprietary. Based upon responses, the city may contact submitting entities with questions and/or may request additional information. Thank you for your interest, and we look forward to hearing from you regarding this RFP. GRAHAM JORDAN Contract Administrator, City of Carlsbad Attachments: Exhibit A – Scope of Services Exhibit B – Existing Traffic Impact Fee Program Exhibit C – Certification of Proposer Exhibit D – Agreement for Professional Services (Sample) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 53 of 204 1 EXHIBIT “A” The city anticipates the scope of work will include the following specific tasks. Consultants may propose additional or modified tasks they feel are necessary to complete the project within the available budget and project schedule. SCOPE OF SERVICES Task 1: Project Management Plan and maintain ongoing communication with the project team to include bi-weekly virtual meetings. • Bi-weekly meetings with City staff • Formation of a city stakeholder outreach group • Develop public outreach plan Task 2: Project Background / Kick-Off Meeting The consultant will review the city’s current TIF program, SMP, CIP project list, and other relevant information and attend one either in-person or virtual kick-off meeting with city staff. The meeting shall be attended by all key personnel. The kick-off meeting may include discussion with the city Communications Department to discuss the project public outreach and stakeholder engagement plan identified in Task 3. • Task 2 Deliverables: o Kick-off meeting agenda, minutes, and meeting materials Task 3: Public and Stakeholder Outreach Development a public outreach and stakeholder engagement plan including a series of meetings and workshops with the Traffic & Mobility Commission, Planning Commission, City Council and key program stakeholders. At a minimum, these events will include: • Attendance at up to four (4) Traffic & Mobility Commission Meetings o Study Session Meeting (1) o Progress Update / Check-In Meetings (2) o Final presentation (1) • Attendance at up to two (2) Planning Commission Meetings o Study Session Meeting (1) o Final presentation (1) • Attendance at up to three (3) City Council Meetings o Study Session Meeting (1) o Mid-project check-In workshop (1) o Final presentation (1) • Attendance at up to four (4) Stakeholder Outreach Events • Task 3 Deliverables: o Draft and Final public outreach and engagement plan o Stakeholder List o Participation in identified outreach events, agendas, meeting materials, and summary of comments received o Outreach Summary Technical Memo July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 54 of 204 2 Task 4: Existing Conditions Review The Consultant will conduct a review of all applicable city programs, policies, documents, and studies relevant to the Transportation Impact Fee program. Applicable Reference Documents: • 2008 Traffic Impact Fee Study • General Plan Mobility Element • Growth Management Plan • Growth Management Plan Circulation Element Monitoring Program • Capital Improvement Program • Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis Guidelines (Sept 2020) • Sustainable Mobility Plan • Village and Barrio Master Plan • Local Coastal Program • Housing Element Update Task 5: Sustainable Mobility Plan Implementation Plan The purpose of this task will be to build upon the Sustainable Mobility Plan’s prioritized set of multimodal transportation improvements that the City can use as a basis for the MTIF and as a guide for feasibility analysis and design of projects that will deliver the greatest degree of benefit to the City. Task 5.1: Review of Previously Identified Projects and Programs: The consultant will develop a detailed analysis of strategies to implement policies and programs identified from prior planning efforts. This will include a detailed matrix of near-term and long-term multi-modal Capital Improvements based on project recommendations from the existing TIF, CIP and the SMP. Task 5.2: Prioritize Sustainable Mobility Plan Recommendations: The consultant will develop a prioritized action plan for implementing the projects identified in the SMP based on the prior prioritization analysis, conceptual plans, cost estimates, and construction feasibility. The consultant will work with city staff to reprioritize the projects identified in the SMP to form connected multimodal corridors and address other key mobility goals including addressing key gaps in the multimodal transportation network, enhancing access to transit and providing access to key destinations such as schools, beaches, recreation areas, and the Village and Barrio planning area. Task 5.3: Prepare Planning Level Conceptual Plans and Cost Estimates: The consultant will develop conceptual plans, roadway cross sections, and Opinions of Probable Construction Costs (OPCC) for the projects identified in Task 5.2. The conceptual designs will consist of 15% plan sheets for the highest priority project corridors. The consultant shall provide an approximate scope of the conceptual plans that can be produced based on the available project budget such as estimated total mileage or other quantifiable metric. The conceptual plans will include proposed transportation facilities, striping, and curb lines on aerial photographs. The concepts will be presented to the City for review and comment. The concepts will also be presented to the Traffic & Mobility Commission at one of the meetings identified in Task 3. Up to two rounds of revisions may be required with one round for staff review and a second round based on Traffic & Mobility Commission comments. For specific projects, quantities will be derived for major cost items including roadway paving materials, sidewalks, bike lanes with enhanced striping treatments such as buffered bike lanes July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 55 of 204 3 and green conflict zones, protected bikeways, enhanced crosswalks, Class-I multiuse trails, retaining walls, bridge structures, and traffic signal modifications. For general treatments, quantities will be estimated on a per unit length basis, or for a typical application that could be installed at several locations. Task 5.4: Develop detailed implementation and funding strategy: Develop a detailed implementation strategy with a focus on devising realistic funding strategies for design and construction of recommended projects. The implementation strategy will build upon the project prioritization process developed in Task 5.2 and serve as a blueprint for the city for a phased implementation of the multimodal improvement plans. This strategy will include an engineering feasibility analysis of top-priority projects covering the preliminary cost estimates, conceptual improvement plans, roadway cross sections and identification of funding sources. The identified top priority projects will then be added into the Capital Improvement Program for future implementation, with the council’s approval. • Task 5 Deliverables: o Project matrix of both near-term and long-term projects o Reprioritized Sustainable Mobility Plan Project list o Conceptual plans, cross-sections, and Opinions of Probable Costs o Implementation and Funding Strategy Plan Memorandum Task 6: White Paper on Best Practice Research on Transportation Impact Fees and VMT Mitigation Programs This task may be conducted concurrently with the Nexus Study as developed in Task 8. The Consultant will perform an analysis of best practices in Transportation Impact Fees and VMT mitigation strategies throughout the State of California. Best practice examples will have a similar fee nexus to the City of Carlsbad in Task 6. At a minimum, the white paper will include methodologies to structuring a Transportation Impact Fee, examples of projects funded, strategies to obtain political and community support for the fee, application of new and innovative analysis techniques such as the city’s Multi-Modal Level-of-Service (MMLOS) criteria and lessons learned from execution of the TIF after adoption. The consultant will also conduct a peer agency review of up to four other California agencies to determine how VMT mitigation strategies are being implemented including online documentation review and virtual interviews with the selected peer agencies. The information gathered from this review will be clearly documented in the white paper. • Task 6 Deliverable: o White Paper on the Latest Best Practice Research on Transportation Impact Fees and VMT mitigation fee programs Task 7: Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Mitigation Program Task 7.1: Identification of VMT Reduction Strategies Quantify total VMT reduced as a result of implementation of the projects identified in Task 5. Calculation of the VMT reduction shall be in accordance with the “Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity” (GHG Handbook) or other methods supported by substantial evidence. The consultant will review this list of strategies and provide suggested revisions or additions to the list as needed based upon the white paper analysis. For each of the identified strategies, the consultant will provide a detailed discussion and applicability to the city and the anticipated VMT reduction amount. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 56 of 204 4 Task 7.2: VMT Reduction Cost Analysis The consultant will determine the total VMT that will be reduced per MTIF on a dollar basis. The calculation will associate the MTIF payment to a total VMT reduction on a project basis. The MTIF fee will be derived in Task 9. • Task 7 Deliverable: o Total VMT reduction calculation for SMP projects o VMT reduced per MTIF Task 8: Nexus Study Pursuant to AB 1600, the Consultant will prepare a Nexus Study to ensure that adoption of a new Transportation Impact Fee and VMT Mitigation Fee program in the City of Carlsbad demonstrates the proper “nexus” or link between the fees being charged, the benefit of the facilities to mitigate new development impacts, and the proportional cost allocation. The Consultant will assess the following items, at a minimum, as part of the Nexus Study: • Existing Land Use • Projected Future Land Use Development and Demand Variables through 2035 • Existing Transportation Infrastructure • Project future facilities and transportation infrastructure needs through 2035 • Evaluation and consideration of a Citywide Transportation Impact Fee versus a district- based fee. • Compliance with the SANDAG Transnet Extension Ordinance • Net VMT benefits • Cost allocations between existing and new development and between different land use types After completion of the analysis, the Nexus Study will then identify the maximum transportation impact fee the City of Carlsbad can legally charge, eligible uses for mitigation fee funds, reporting requirements, and administrative and monitoring costs. The Consultant will also assess and offer guidance on re-calibrating the existing City of Carlsbad fees and standards to accommodate a Transportation Impact Mitigation Fee. • Task 8 Deliverable: o Nexus Study for Transportation Impact Fee and VMT Mitigation Program Task 9: Transportation Impact Fee and VMT Mitigation Program Ordinance and Fee Calculation Tool Based on the findings and deliverables in prior tasks, the Consultant will prepare a memorandum that details the development of a Transportation Impact Fee and VMT Mitigation Program. The memorandum, at a minimum, will include: • Future facilities eligible for Transportation Impact Fee funding per the Nexus study results • A methodology of the fee and fee structure by applicable land use category • Updated administrative, monitoring, and reporting requirements • Ordinance language for the Transportation Impact Fee • Up to two rounds of staff review of ordinance and methodology July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 57 of 204 5 In addition, the Consultant will develop an interactive tool that will provide separate calculations for the TIF and VMT mitigation fee(s). This tool will have the capability to estimate fees for new developments based on VMT. • Task 9 Deliverables: o Memorandum on the Transportation Impact Fee o Interactive TIF and VMT Mitigation Fee Calculation Tool o Final Transportation Impact Fee and VMT Mitigation Fee Program Ordinance Task 10: Environmental Analysis (Draft and Final) If a land development project causes a significant VMT impact, the project is required to mitigate its direct, indirect and cumulative impacts. A “program approach” to VMT mitigation expands feasible mitigation options to include off-site strategies that can extent from the project site to elsewhere in the city. These strategies may take the form of infrastructure expansion such as new pedestrian or bicycle facilities, or programs and services that influence travel demand behavior. The scope of work associated with this RFP includes an update to the development impact fee and to explore how this might work in practice through VMT-based MTIF, VMT exchange, and VMT bank programs. The goal is to allow for full mitigation for projects consistent with a General Plan for which the MTIF, VMT exchange, and/or VMT bank program was designed to mitigate a VMT impact in the General Plan EIR. Further discretionary approval is necessary for the city to adopt a MTIF, VMT exchange, and/or VMT bank program. Therefore, a subsequent or supplemental EIR is required to be prepared to support this work program. The consultant shall prepare an environmental document to cover the following: • Impact analysis and mitigation of new transportation projects identified to build the long- term CIP. • Properly administer MTIF, VMT exchange, and/or VMT bank programs to streamline review of later land development projects. Special attention shall be paid to enable the city to avoid duplicative reconsideration of basic policy considerations, which can be addressed comprehensively in the environmental document. The consultant, or team of consultants, will prepare all related and required environmental documentation in compliance with CEQA. The level of CEQA documentation shall be recommended by the consultant team. The timing and completion of draft and final document, noticing, public review, and approval shall coincide with the release of the draft and final MTIF, VMT exchange, and/or VMT bank program resolution or ordinance. • Task 10 Deliverables: o CEQA Intiation: Provide rational basis and substantiate with written documentation how the anticipated environmental document to be prepared will be used to promote streamlining environmental review for certain types of projects, including infill development (PRC Section 21094.5; CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.3) and some housing projects (PRC Sections 21159.21, 21159.22, 21159.23, 21159.24, 21159.25, 21159.28) and for projects consistent with zoning/general plan for which an EIR was certified (PRC Section 21083.3, CEQA Guidelines Section 15183). o CEQA Noticing: Provide all required CEQA notices for the project, beginning with the Notice of Preparation (NOP) consistent with Section 15082 of the CEQA Guidelines. The NOP will include the noticing for the NOP Public Scoping Meeting. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 58 of 204 6 Other CEQA notices will include the Notice of Availability (NOA), Notice of Completion (NOC), Notice of Determination (NOD), and the OPR Summary Form for distribution to the State Clearinghouse. Bidder will also prepare the tribal notification letters. o CEQA Scoping Meeting: Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15206(b)(1), the project qualifies as a project of statewide, regional or areawide significance. As such, a PEIR scoping meeting is required as described in CEQA Guidelines section 15082(c)(1). The scoping meeting will be noticed as part of the NOP. o Preparation of Draft PEIR: Prepare Administrative Draft PEIR with Technical Appendices o Preparation of final PEIR CITY OBLIGATIONS The city will provide all reports and other documents available. In addition, the city can provide topographic, flood zone, aerials, and other land use information. The city will provide a hard copy of any as-built construction plans and relevant environmental documents to the selected Consultant. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 59 of 204 1 EXHIBIT “B” CITY OF CARLSBAD TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 60 of 204 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 61 of 204 AB# 19,392 MTG. 4/08/08 DEPT. ENG CITY OF CARLSBAD -AGENDA BILL 2008 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM UPDATE AND DESIGNATION OF FUNDING FOR THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION CONGESTION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM RECOMMENDED ACTION: CITY ATTY. CITY MGR. Introduce Ordinance No. NS-885 amending Title 18, Chapter 18.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code Establishing a Traffic Impact Fee. Adopt Resolution No. 2008-102 approving the Traffic Impact Fee Update Study, dated March 2008 and designating the circulation improvements to be funded by the Traffic Impact Fee. Adopt Resolution No. 2008-103 revising the credit against the Traffic Impact Fee imposed by Chapter 18.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code for properties within the boundaries and subject to taxation by Community Facilities District No. 1. ITEM EXPLANATION: The Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Program is a facility impact fee program designed to fund needed circulation improvements throughout the City. The current citywide TIF Program was established by the City Council in October of 1991. In June of 1991, the City Council established Community Facilities District 1 (CFO #1). CFO #1 includes a set of roadway segments, 1-5 interchanges, and civic facilities projects. Some of the roadway segment projects included in CFO #1 were also included in the 1991 TIF Program project list and, therefore, to adjust for the fact that two different funding programs have these projects in common, the TIF Program provides a fee credit to developers that are in CFO #1. This credit mechanism ensures that developers do not pay twice for the same project. The existing TIF fees are based on the original fees which were calculated based on the project list and cost estimates included in the TIF Program as adopted in 1991, and subsequent annual adjustments for inflation implemented in conjunction with the adoption of the Operating and Capital Improvement Program budgets. The existing TIF, as listed in the City of Carlsbad Development Fees effective September 1, 2007, is shown below in Table 1. TABLE 1 EXISTING TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE I • PEVE[Q~MENT . .·•·· ·tft!E":SA61Jt' Residential $115/ADT* Single Family Condominium Apartment Commercial/Industrial $46/ADT* * = Average Daily Trip FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONLY COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED i;:( DENIED D CONTINUED D WITHDRAWN D AMENDED D , .... m., , . IN ~f;D f:'f~ : :~IN C.FD #1'; TIF.,CRE~IT $1150/unit $750/unit $400/unit $920/unit $600/unit $320/unit $690/unit $450/unit $240/unit 46/ADT* I 30/ADT* $16/ADT* CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC □ -----CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN □ RETURNED TO STAFF □ OTHER -SEE MINUTES □ 6 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 62 of 204 Page 2 The 1991 TIF Program project list included 12 arterial roadway segments, 14 arterial intersection improvements, the sidewalk construction program, and the City's Transportation Management and Monitoring Program. The total cost of the improvements included on the project list was valued at $39.9 million (in 1991 dollars). Many of the projects on the 1991 TIF Program project list have been completed, including 6 of the 12 arterial road segments and 11 of the 14 arterial intersections. In addition to the location-specific projects, the TIF revenues have been used to fund construction of the sidewalk improvements throughout the City and to prepare annual Traffic Monitoring Program reports which are used to identify the roadway segment and intersection improvement needs of the City. CFO #1 funded the TIF Program's share of various roadway segment projects due to the timing of the projects and at this time the TIF Program owes the CFO #1 program approximately $2.9 million for the La Costa Avenue widening and Olivenhain Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road projects. To ensure that the TIF Program collects the necessary fees to fund these outstanding reimbursements to the CFO #1 program, the updated project list includes these two projects which were on the 1991 project list. The TIF Program requires periodic updating to accommodate completed projects, changes in construction costs, patterns of development, growth projections, and infrastructure needs. Since the adoption of the existing program in 1991, each of these categories has changed. To assess the current and future needs, the City completed a review and analysis of the roadway segments and intersections included in the 1991 TIF Program. The review included the analysis of 58 key intersections throughout the City as identified and described in Appendix A of Exhibit 2. Of these 58 intersections, 34 met the Level of Service (LOS) performance standards in their existing configurations and 13 intersections will meet LOS performance standards because of planned improvements currently included in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) or an approved development project. The remaining 11 intersections were found to operate at a LOS E or worse during one or both of the peak hour periods and, therefore, they require additional improvements beyond what is currently planned. Additional improvements were recommended and new analyses were performed to ensure that each of these intersections would meet acceptable LOS standards after the construction of the additional improvements. The current estimated cost to complete these needed intersection improvements is $8.4 million. In addition to the intersection analysis, the adequacy of the roadway segments throughout the City was evaluated against the Circulation Element classifications. There are a number of roadway segments that are not fully-constructed in accordance with their classifications and need to be completed to comply with the City's Growth Management circulation performance standard. Some of these segment improvements are located along fully-developed properties and others are adjacent to properties which cannot be developed and, therefore, a supplemental funding program such as the TIF Program is required to improve these segments. The current estimated cost to complete the roadway segment improvements is $39.4 million. As a result of this review and analysis, as more fully-described in the Traffic Impact Fee Update Study attached as Exhibit 2, the recommended 2008 TIF Program update project list, attached as Exhibit 1, was developed. The total estimated cost to complete the recommended project list is $54.6 million, which includes the intersection improvements, roadway segment improvements including the CFO #1 reimbursements, and the continuation of the Sidewalk Improvement and Traffic Monitoring Programs. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 63 of 204 Page 3 In conjunction with the 2008 TIF Program update, this item includes recommended amendments to Chapter 18.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code which establishes the Traffic Impact Fee. The amendments include provisions relating to the Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program (RTCIP). The RTCIP is a provision in the TransNet Extension Ordinance as approved by the voters of San Diego County in November 2004. The RTCIP is described in Section 9 of the TransNet Extension Ordinance, which is attached as Exhibit 3. In general terms, the RTCIP requires each local agency to collect an impact fee of $2,000 for each newly-constructed residential housing unit. These RTCIP funds are to be used to fund improvements on the Regional Arterial System (RAS). The following 12 roadways as listed below in Table 2 are listed in City of Carlsbad section of the current countywide RAS. TABLE 2 RAS ROADWAYS IN CARLSBAD REGIONAL ARTERIAL LIMITS OF REGIONAL ARTERIAL SYSTEM (RAS) ROADWAY 1) Cannon Road Carlsbad Boulevard to Buena Vista Drive 2) Carlsbad Boulevard Eaton Street to La Costa Avenue 3) Carlsbad Village Drive 1-5 to Carlsbad Boulevard 4) Colleoe Boulevard City Limits to Palomar Airport Road 5) El Camino Real SR 78 to Olivenhain Road 6) Faraday Avenue Melrose Drive to College Boulevard 7) La Costa Avenue 1-5 to El Camino Real 8) Melrose Drive City Limits to Rancho Santa Fe Road 9) Palomar Airport Road Carlsbad Boulevard to Easterly City Limits 10) Poinsettia Lane Carlsbad Boulevard to Melrose Drive 11) Rancho Santa Fe Road Melrose Drive to Olivenhain Road 12) Olivenhain Road Los Pinos Circle to Rancho Santa Fe Road Furthermore, the TransNet Extension Ordinance notes that if an agency does not provide the full monetary contribution, which will be confirmed on an annual basis, it will not be eligible to receive Transnet Local Streets and Roads funding for the immediately following fiscal year. To lend some perspective to the value of this penalty, the City of Carlsbad is projected to receive $2.9 million in Transnet Local Streets and Roads funding in FY 2007/08. Similar to the City's TIF Program, the RTCIP is intended to ensure that future development provides its proportional share of the funding needed to construct the RAS on a regional basis. To take advantage of the fact that 18 of the 24 projects on the recommended TIF Program project list are on the RAS, staff has developed two options which update the existing TIF Program as needed to reflect the current status of development in the City and in accordance with the requirements of the RTCIP. This approach will enable the City to efficiently implement the requirements of the RTCIP as a part of an existing program, 3 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 64 of 204 Page 4 Option 1 This option would set the TIF for residential units at the level included in the RTCIP section of the TransNet Extension Ordinance, as supported by the RTCIP Impact Fee Nexus Study dated November 26, 2007 prepared for SANDAG, which requires the collection of $2,000 for each new residential housing unit regardless of type. Accordingly, the residential fees would be adjusted to a rate of $2,000 per residential unit and the commercial and industrial fees would stay the same as the existing program since they are not impacted by the RTCIP requirements. The resulting fees are shown below in Table 3. TABLE 3 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE UPDATE-OPTION 1 DEVELOPMENT FEE BASIS NOT IN CFD#1 IN CFD#1 TIF CREDIT Residential $2000/unit SinQle-Family $2400/unit $2000/unit $400/unit Condominium $2320/unit $2000/unit $320/unit Apartment $2240/unit $2000/unit $240/unit Com mercial/I nd ustrial $46/ADT* 46/ADT* 30/ADT* $16/ADT* *=Average Daily Trip Please note that the TransNet Extension Ordinance does not distinguish between the different types of residential development and, as such, the residential fees noted above do not lend themselves to a direct comparison to the existing fees which are based on the type of residential development and the corresponding trip generation factors. Based on the current development projections, this option would generate $16.3 million in future fee revenue. When added to the current balance of unspent TIF funds, which is approximately $11.4 million, the total funding would equal $27.7 million. The current estimated cost for the remaining projects from the 1991 TIF Program project list is $37.1 million. The 2008 update project list includes $17.5 million in costs for new/additional projects for a total of $54.6 million ($37.1 +$17.5=$54.6) in costs. This option would not generate sufficient revenue to fully fund the entire 2008 TIF update project list nor would it fully fund the subset of projects that remain from the 1991 project list that are included on the 2008 update project list. Option 2 -(Staff Recommendation) This option would set the Traffic Impact Fee at a level that will generate the revenue needed to fund the TIF update project list, attached as Exhibit 1 and as more fully-described in the Traffic Impact Fee Update Study, attached as Exhibit 2. The project list consists of all the projects identified as a result of the traffic intersection analysis, the review of the circulation element roadway segments, the remaining TIF Program reimbursement to the CFO #1 program, and the ongoing Sidewalk and Transportation Management and Monitoring Programs. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 65 of 204 Page 5 The list of roadway segment projects includes three projects which are recommended to be funded at a prorated/percentage share of the total estimated cost. These three roadway segment projects are Cannon Road Reach 4, Carlsbad Boulevard -Mountain View to the northerly city limits, and Palomar Airport Road from Avenida Encinas to Carlsbad Boulevard. The costs included for these projects has been set at a value equal to 20% of the total estimated costs to reflect the regional nature of the projects, their location relative to adjacent cities and/or 1-5, and the percentage of trips that will be generated by future development in the City relative to the total number of trips generated by the City at build-out. The new Traffic Impact Fees based on this approach are shown below in Table 4. These fees represent a 207% increase over the existing fees. TABLE 4 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE UPDATE-OPTION 2 DEVELOPMENT FEE BASIS NQTINCFD#1 IN CFD#1 TIF CREDIT Residential $353/ADT* Single-Family $3530/unit $3130/unit $400/unit Condominium $2824/unit $2504/unit $320/unit Apartment $2118/unit $1878/unit $240/unit Commercial/Industrial $142/ADT* 142/ADT* 126/ADT* $16/ADT* * = Average Daily Trip Based on the projected mix of residential development and the projected percentage of development within CFO #1, this option will generate an average of $2,938 per residential unit which satisfies the RTCIP requirement of $2,000 per newly-constructed residential unit. By establishing the fees as noted in Table 4, the TIF Program will be able to generate the revenue needed to fund the project list and satisfy the requirements of the RTCIP. Therefore, staff recommends the introduction of the Ordinance and adoption of the Resolutions as prepared in accordance with this Option 2. Introduction and ultimately adoption of the Ordinance will amend the Traffic Impact Fee as established in Chapter 18.42 of the Municipal Code by updating the fee values and establishing the funding methodology needed to comply with the RTCIP. The Resolutions identify the updated project list and the adjustment to the TIF Program credit mechanism for development within CFO #1 as needed to reflect the changes in the project list and the associated changes in the project costs. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Staff has determined that the 2008 Traffic Impact Fee Program update and fee increase does not constitute a "project" and, therefore, is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act. The roadways included in the program are part of the roadway network included in the Circulation Element of the Carlsbad General Plan and as they are developed as individual projects they will be subject to environmental review and approval pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act and or the National Environmental Policy Act. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 66 of 204 Page 6 FISCAL IMPACT: The estimated cost of the recommended TIF Program project list as noted above is $54.6 million. Cost estimates of the projects are included on the 2008 Traffic Impact Fee Update -Project List attached as Exhibit 1 Option 1 would generate $16.3 million in future TIF revenue which when added to the current fund balance of $11.4 million would total $27.7 million. This total of $27.7 million would leave a shortfall of $26.9 million when compared to the $54.6 million in project costs. To complete the projects this shortfall in funding would have to be funded via other sources which are not available at this time. Option 2 would result in $43.2 million in future TIF revenue which when added to the current fund balance of $11.4 million would total $54.6 million. This total of $54.6 million matches the estimated project costs and therefore all the project costs as included in the TIF project list would be funded via the TIF Program. Updating the TIF program based on Option 2 would provide a mechanism to fully fund the recommended TIF project list as needed to accommodate future development. The scheduling of the construction will be evaluated in conjunction with the City's Growth Management Program, development activity and the City's Capital Improvement Program. EXHIBITS: 1. 2008 Traffic Impact Fee Update -Project List. 2. Traffic Impact Fee Update Study, March 2008. 3. TransNet Extension Ordinance, Section 9 -Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program. 4. Ordinance No. NS-885 amending Title 18, Chapter 18.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code updating the Traffic Impact Fee. 5. Redline/strikeout version of Ordinance No. NS-885 amending Title 18, Chapter 18.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code updating the Traffic Impact Fee. 6. Resolution No. 2008-102 approving the Traffic Impact Fee Update Study, dated March 2008, and designating the circulation improvements to be funded by the Traffic Impact Fee. 7. Resolution No. 2008-103 revising the credit against the Traffic Impact Fee imposed by Chapter 18.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code for properties within the boundaries and subject to taxation by Community Facilities District No. 1. DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Marshall Plantz, (760) 602-2766, mplan@ci.carlsbad.ca.us July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 67 of 204 Exhibit 1 I July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 68 of 204 2008 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE UPDATE -PROJECT LIST RTCIP ESTIMATED # ELGIBLE IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION COSTS seaments 1 No Avenida Encinas Widen soutn ot 1-'alomar Airport Road $5,045,000 2 Yes Carlsbad Boulevard Widen from Manzano Dnve to 600 $5,360,000 Feet north of Cannon Road 3 Yes El Camino Real Widen from l amarck Avenue to $8,078,000 Chestnut Avenue 4 No Carlsbad Village Drive Widen from Pontiac to Victoria $4,841,000 5 Yes El Camino Real Widen from La Costa Avenue to $2,305,000 Arenal Road 6 Yes Cannon Road Reach 4 Cannon Road from 1200' east of $5,400,000 * Colleqe to the easterly city limits 7 Yes Carlsbad t:loulevard State Street north to the city limits $2,541,200 * Palomar Airport Road realignment 8 Yes Palomar Airport Road / and construction from Avenida $3,527,400 * Carlsbad Boulevard Encinas to Carlsbad Boulevard Drive 9 Yes Poinsettia Lane Widen trom 1-'aseo LJel Norte to $2,290,000 Batiauitos Lane No La Costa Avenue Widen from 1-5 to El Camino Real $1,500,000 ** 10 No Olivenhain Road and W1den/Realiin Rancho Santa Fe $1,400,000 ** 11 Rancho Santa Fe Road Road/Oliven ain Road Intersections 1 Yes Palomar Airport Road - Paseo Del Norte . Road widening for a n~ht-turn lane along PAR from Arma a to Paseo Del Norte $1,244,000 2 Yes Palomar Airport Road - Colleqe Boulevard Road widening for a ~ht-turn lane from S/B Colleqe to B PAR $587,000 3 Yes Palomar Airport Koad-1:::1 Camino Real Aaa nght-turn lane trom E/1::3 PAR to S/8 ECR $568,000 4 Yes Palomar Airport Koad -1:::1 Fuerte Street Koad wIdenin~ tor a niht-turn lane from W/B PA to N/B I Fuerte $916,000 5 Yes Palomar Airport Road - Melrose Drive Add ngnt-turn lane from E/B PAR to S/B Melrose Drive • $88,500 Yes Melrose Drive -Palomar Road widening for a nght-turn lane $410,000 6 Airport Road from S/8 Melrose Drive to W/B PAR 7 Yes Melrose Drive -Alga Road Add dual left-turns on all $946,000 aooroaches 8 Yes El Camino Real -Add dual left-turns in NIB and S/B $865,000 Carlsbad Villaae Drive directions alona ECR Yes El Camino Real -Cannon Add Nit:! to 1:::/t:l nght-turn lane. $2,205,000 9 Road Widen bridJe structure. Add second N/ and SIB turn lanes. 10 Yes El Camino Real -Alga Road Modcyqnght-turn from N/B t:.CK to E/B A a Road $335,000 11 Yes 1:::1 Camino Keal -Add second N/t:l to W/t:l lett-turn $253,000 Tamarack lane Programs -\;1tvwide 1 No Sidewalk Program Complete sidewalks at various locations throuahout the Citv $2,440,000 Program to facilitate Transportation Demand Transportation Management (TOM) strategies, 2 No Management and to annually review $1,440,000 effectiveness of TIF Monitoring Program improvement program and to facilitate annual programming of TIF fundinq * -1 ne estimated cost tor this ro·ect re p j p resents 20% ot the total ro·ect estimated costs to reflect the p j prorated share to be funded by future development. ** -The estimated cost for this project represents the remaining portion of the total project costs which were fronted by the CFO #1 program fund and which are to be reimbursed by the TIF program fund. I July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 69 of 204 Exhibit 2 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 70 of 204 CITY OF CARLSBAD TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE UPDATE March 2008 /0 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 71 of 204 CITY OF CARLSBAD TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE UPDATE TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1 II. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES AUTHORITY AND JUSTIFICATION ................... 3 Ill. PURPOSE OF THE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ............................................... 4 IV. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE UPDATE METHODOLOGY ................................... 4 V. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION ................................................................. 11 Appendix A TIF Technical Support January 2006 by RBF Consulting B. Project Cost Estimates If July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 72 of 204 I. INTRODUCTION General The Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a facility impact fee program designed to fund needed circulation improvements within the City. The genesis of the program is the Carlsbad General Plan which requires that the City ensure the provision of an adequate circulation infrastructure to serve its projected population. One of the stated objectives listed in the Circulation Element of the General Plan is "To implement and regularly update developer fee programs for the financing of circulation facilities." Prior to 1978, City road improvements were funded through a combination of sources including property tax revenues, Federal and State Grants, Assessment Districts and direct developer construction. In 1978, the California State voters passed Proposition 13 seriously reducing the amount of property tax revenues that could be generated and used to fund road construction projects. From 1978 to 1986, the reduction in road construction funding combined with rapid growth in land development produced serious deficiencies in the City's circulation infrastructure. The resulting traffic congestion was a prime motivator in the development of the City's Growth Management Program (GMP) in 1986. The GMP was designed to ensure that development does not occur unless and until adequate public facilities and services exist or will be provided concurrent with the new development. Specific performance standards were established for each of eleven critical public facilities needed to serve development including circulation facilities. Adoption of the GMP performance standards, combined with the loss of property taxing authority brought about by Proposition 13, significantly shifted the financial burden for constructing new roads onto new development. In addition to an increased use of assessment district financing, new methods of developer funding were implemented including the use of Community Facility Districts (CFO), Bridge and Thoroughfare Districts (B&TD) and Traffic Impact Fees (TIF). This report addresses updating the City's TIF program. The first City TIF was adopted in April of 1986 to fund needed circulation improvements for the southern third of the City. In July of 1986, a second TIF was adopted by the City Council to fund needed circulation improvements for the remaining northern two thirds of the City. In October of 1991, the two TIF programs were consolidated into the current citywide TIF program. Page 1 I f". 1/. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 73 of 204 This update to the TIF program adopted in 1991 is needed to reflect numerous changes which have taken place since 1991 including: • Completion of projects on the 1991 TIF project list • Revision to City and regional land use development patterns • Changes in transportation network construction assumptions • Changes in transit ridership and multimodal transportation use assumptions • Improvements in traffic modeling programs • Voter approved TransNet Extension Ordinance TransNet Extension In addition to establishing an updated fee program as needed to fund the improvements, this update to the TIF program also addresses one of the requirements included in the TransNet Extension Ordinance approved by San Diego County voters in November of 2004 (TransNet Extension Ordinance). The TransNet Extension Ordinance extends the current half-cent sales tax to fund regional transportation improvements for another 40 years starting in April of 2008. The TransNet Extension Ordinance is projected to generate $14 billion in revenues for local and regional transportation improvement projects. For Carlsbad to remain eligible to receive its local share of the TransNet Extension sales tax revenue, the City must comply with Section 9 of the TransNet Extension Ordinance which is known as the Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Plan (RTCIP). The RTICP requires each local agency in the San Diego Region to contribute $2,000 in exactions from the private sector for each newly constructed residential housing unit excluding affordable housing units as defined in the Ordinance, to ensure that future development contributes it share of the funding needed to pay for the Regional Arterial System. The Regional Arterial System (RAS) is a list of arterial roadways throughout the County which is adopted by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG). The current RAS as adopted by SANDAG includes 12 roadways in Carlsbad, as listed on Table 1 below. TABLE 1 RAS ROADWAYS IN CARLSBAD NAME LIMITS Cannon Road Carlsbad Boulevard to Buena Vista Drive Carlsbad Boulevard Eaton Street to La Costa Avenue Carlsbad Village Drive 1-5 to Carlsbad Boulevard Colleoe Boulevard City Limits to Palomar Airport Road El Camino Real SR 78 to Olivenhain Road Faraday Avenue Melrose Drive to College Boulevard La Costa Avenue 1-5 to El Camino Real Melrose Drive City Limits to Rancho Santa Fe Road Palomar Airport Road Carlsbad Boulevard to Business Park Drive Poinsettia Lane Carlsbad Boulevard to Melrose Drive Rancho Santa Fe Road Melrose Drive to Olivenhain Road Olivenhain Road Los Pines Circle to Rancho Santa Fe Road Page 2 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 74 of 204 Funds collected in conformance with the RTCIP must be used to construct improvements on the Regional Arterial System. By identifying a portion of the fees collected via the TIF program for use in conformance with the RTCIP, the City will be programming the funds for use on RAS roadways in the City of Carlsbad. As described below, this report recommends updating the TIF program to include eleven roadway segment projects, eleven intersection projects, and the ongoing sidewalk construction program and the City's Transportation Management and Monitoring Program. Seven of the eleven roadway segment projects and all ten of the intersection projects are on the RAS and, therefore, the recommended fee update will enable the City to fund the needed improvements while at the same time satisfying the requirements of the RTCIP. II. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES AUTHORITY AND JUSTIFICATION The authority for updating the TIF is derived from City Code and State law. Chapter 18.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code establishes the Traffic Impact Fee. As part of this update, the sections of Chapter 18.42 that define the fee and use of the fees are proposed to be amended. Under City Code Section 18.42.010 Purpose and Intent subsection (a), it states that "It is the city council's intention to review the designation of circulation and the amount of the fee on an annual basis. In reviewing the improvements and amount of the fee, the city council shall consider, among other things, any changes to the land use designations or intensity of development, changes in the amount of traffic generated or anticipated, inflation and increases in cost of materials and labor." The annual review is conducted each year during the preparation and approval of the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget and typically consists of the adoption of the CIP budget and approval of the annual construction cost index increase to the TIF. Because of the accumulation in changes in land use since 1991, the recent surge in construction costs and the implementation of the RTCIP, this year's review requires an update to the TIF program. The State requirements governing levy, increase and use of facility impact fees are contained ·within various sections of the State Government Code collectively known as the Mitigation Fee Act. The Mitigation Fee Act requires that any City action to establish, increase or impose a fee as a condition of a development project requires the following: • Identify the purpose of the fee • Identify the use to which the fee is put • Determine that there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed • Determine there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed • Determine there is a relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development project on which the fee is imposed Page 3 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 75 of 204 The Mitigation Fee Act includes numerous other provisions regarding the procedures for establishing and increasing facility impact fees and for using and accounting for facility impact fee revenues. Of particular note is the requirement that the establishment or increase of a facility impact fee requires that the City hold a public hearing at which oral or written presentations can be made prior to adoption of the fee or an increase in the fee. The City must place any facility impact fee revenues into a separate fund and use the fee revenues exclusively for the purpose for which they were created. Every five years, the City must make certain findings with respect to the fund and whether the funds are committed or uncommitted. Ill. PURPOSE OF THE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE The purpose of the TIF is to provide a mechanism to mitigate for direct and indirect traffic impacts caused by new development, expansion of new development, or redevelopment on property located within the City of Carlsbad. For purposes of this study, direct traffic impacts are those impacts caused by a development that directly lead to a failure in a circulation performance standard necessitating the construction of new road or intersection improvements. In most cases, construction of mitigating improvements for direct impacts is required pursuant to a condition of development approval prior _to or concurrent with the recordation of a final map or issuance or a building permit for the development. Although a development's traffic impacts may directly lead to a circulation failure, traffic from other developments may still have cause to share in the need to mitigate for such failure. Indirect traffic impacts are those impacts caused by development which, in combination with traffic generated by other future developments, leads to (but does not directly cause) a circulation performance standard failure. Mitigation for indirect traffic impacts is typically accomplished through payment of a TIF or other similar facility impact fee. Construction of the actual mitigating improvement(s) for indirect traffic impacts is undertaken at a future time by City contract using TIF revenues or by another developer utilizing a TIF reimbursement agreement. IV. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE UPDATE METHODOLOGY General In general terms and as described below, the update methodology includes a traffic analysis to determine which roadways segments and intersections require additional improvements, the preparation of current costs estimates for the need improvements, and the distribution of these costs based on the traffic volumes generated by development. Page4 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 76 of 204 Traffic Analysis The City of Carlsbad Growth Management Standard for circulation provides that: "No road segment or intersection in the zone nor any road segment or intersection out of the zone which is impacted by development in the zone shall be projected to exceed a Service Level C during off-peak hours, nor Service Level D during peak hours. Impacted means where twenty percent or more of the traffic generated by the Local Facilities Management Zone will use the road segment or intersection." For purposes of this analysis, only Circulation Element roadway segments and intersections are evaluated. Circulation Element roadways are the backbone of the City's circulation network and thus provide certain benefit to all developing properties in the City. Providing benefit to a property is a prerequisite for establishment of a facility impact fee such as the Tl F. Evaluation of the adequacy of road segments and intersections and segments involves evaluating projected LOS values using buildout traffic volumes and planned City standard improvements. Where the projected LOS falls below the City's adopted performance standards, additional improvements are recommended that will bring the LOS into compliance with the standards. As part of the evaluation process, the City commissioned the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) to prepare an updated traffic model to develop traffic projections for Carlsbad's existing and proposed circulation element roadways. The traffic model known as the Series 10 Sub-area Traffic Model (Traffic Model) was updated by SANDAG on March 5, 2004. The Traffic Model was completed in conjunction with adjacent cities and contained detailed sub-area modeling of the cities of Carlsbad, Vista, San Marcos, and Oceanside. The City also entered into a contract with the firm of RBF Consulting to review the Traffic Model and conduct additional analysis to evaluate the adequacy of 58 arterial to arterial intersections located throughout the City. The results of the analysis were compiled into a report entitled "Traffic Impact Fee Technical Support" prepared by RBF Engineering dated January 2006, and attached as Appendix A. Project List The 1991 TIF project list, as shown on Table 2 below, included 12 arterial roadway segments, 14 arterial intersection improvements, the sidewalk construction program, and the City's Transportation Management and Monitoring Program. The total cost of the improvements included on the project list was valued at $39,900,000 (in 1991 dollars). Many of the projects on the 1991 TIF project list have been completed including 6 of the 12 arterial road segments and 11 of the 14 arterial intersections. In addition to the location, specific projects the TIF revenues have been used to fund construction of the sidewalk improvements throughout the City and to prepare annual Traffic Monitoring Program report used to identify the roadway segment and intersection improvement needs of the City. The results of the monitoring report help to gage effectiveness of the constructed circulation improvements and to prioritize future project construction needs. Page 5 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 77 of 204 TABLE 2 1991 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM PROJECT LIST # Improvement Description Status Road Seaments 1 Alga Road Widen south side from Mimosa Drive In use to El Camino Real 2 Avenida Encinas Widen south of Palomar Airport Road FY 2012-17 3 Carlsbad Boulevard Widen from Manzano Drive to 600 FY 2017-22 feet north of Cannon Road 4 Carlsbad Village Drive Widen from Pontiac Drive to Victoria FY 2017-22 Avenue 5 Carlsbad Villaae Drive Widen east of El Camino Real In use 6 El Camino Real Widen from Tamarack Avenue to FY 2008-09 Chestnut Avenue 7 El Camino Real Widen from La Costa Avenue to FY 2012-17 Arenal Road 8 La Costa Avenue Widen from 1-5 to El Camino Real In use 9 La Costa Avenue Mitiqation for wideninq In use 10 Leucadia Boulevard Construct from existing terminus east In use to El Camino Real 11 Olivenhain Road and Rancho Santa Fe Road Widen from El Camino Real to In use Melrose Drive 12 Poinsettia Lane Widen from 1-5 to Batiauitos Lane FY 2017-22 Intersections 1 Cannon Road -1-5 Road and ramp widening, signal In use installation 2 Cannon Road -Paseo Del Norte Add one thru lane each direction In use 3 El Camino Real -Alga Road Add dual left turn, signal modifications In use 4 El Camino Real -Cannon Road Add southbound right-turn lane In use 5 El Camino Real -Camino Vida Roble Left-turn lanes In use 6 El Camino Real -Carlsbad Village Drive Dual left on El Camino Real FY 2017-22 7 El Camino Real -Faraday Avenue Dual left-turn lanes on ECR, right-turn In use lanes on all leqs Intersection reconstruction, add 8 El Camino Real -Palomar Airport Road left-turn, thru and right-turn lanes on FY 2009-10 all legs Close free right-turn lane, signal 9 El Camino Real -Tamarack Avenue modifications for dual left and left-turn In use phasing 10 Faraday Avenue -Orion Street Traffic Signal In use 11 Faraday Ave -College Boulevard Dual left-turn northbound and In use southbound 12 Melrose Drive -Alaa Road Dual left-turn lanes all leas 2017-22 13 Palomar Airport Rd -Colleqe Boulevard Dual left-turn lane southbound In use 14 Palomar Airport Rd -Paseo Del Norte Dual left-turns all leqs In use Programs 1 Sidewalk Program Complete sidewalks at various Ongoing locations throuqhout the Citv Program to facilitate Transportation Demand Management (TDM) 2 Transportation Management and Monitoring strategies, to annually review Ongoing Program effectiveness of TIF improvement program and to facilitate annual programming of TIF fundinq Page 6 11 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 78 of 204 To prepare the project list for the 2008 TIF update, each of the 58 intersections noted above were analyzed to determine the projected level of service (LOS) during the morning (AM) and afternoon (PM) peak hour periods utilizing buildout traffic projections. The analysis assumed existing base intersection geometries, except in cases where there were planned improvements programmed in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) or an approved development project. In such cases, the planned improved geometry was used as the basis for determination of intersection LOS. Of these 58 intersections, 34 meet LOS performance standards in their existing configurations and 13 intersections will meet LOS performance standards because of planned improvements currently included CIP or an approved development project. The remaining 11 intersections were found to operate at a LOS E or worse during one or both of the peak hour periods and therefore they require additional improvements beyond what is currently planned. Additional improvements were recommended and new analyses were performed to ensure that each of the failed intersections would meet acceptable LOS standards after the construction of the additional improvements. Roadway segment adequacy was evaluated against the Circulation Element classification. There are a number of roadway segments that are not fully constructed in accordance with their classifications and need to be completed and/or realigned to comply with the City's Growth Management circulation performance standard. Some of these segment improvements are also located along fully-developed or properties which cannot be developed and, therefore, a supplemental funding program is be required for these facilities to be fully constructed to meet traffic demands generated by citywide growth. Based on the results of the traffic analysis and evaluation as described above, a set of new projects is recommended for inclusion in the TIF project list. Table 3 identifies the new roadway segment and intersection improvements recommended for the 2008 update of the TIF program and notes the proposed/programmed schedule for start of construction. Page 7 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 79 of 204 TABLE 3 2008 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM -NEW PROJECTS Start # Improvement Description Construction Road Segments Cannon Road from 1200' east 1 Cannon Road Reach 48 of College to the easterly city FY 2018-2023 limits 2 Carlsbad Boulevard State Street north to the city FY 2018-2023 limits Roadway realignment and 3 Palomar Airport Road -Carlsbad construction from Avenida FY 2018-2023 Boulevard Encinas to Carlsbad Village Drive Intersections Palomar Airport Road -Paseo Del Road widening for a right-turn FY 2008-1 Norte lane along PAR from Armada to 2009 Paseo Del Norte Palomar Airport Road -College Road widening for a right-turn 2 Boulevard lane from S/8 College to W/B FY 2013-2018 PAR Palomar Airport Road -El Fuerte Road widening for a right-turn FY 2013-3 lane from W/8 PAR to NIB Street El Fuerte 2018 Melrose Drive -Palomar Airport Road widening for a right-turn FY 2010-4 lane from S/8 Melrose Drive to Road W/8 PAR 2011 Add N/B to E/B right-turn lane. 5 El Camino Real -Cannon Road Widen bridge structure. Add FY 2010-2011 second N/8 and S/8 turn lanes. In addition to the new projects as listed above and the remaining projects from the 1991 TIF project list, the La Costa Avenue widening and Olivenhain Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road projects from the 1991 TIF project list, both of which are in use, are included on the 2008 TIF project list. These projects are included on the project list to account for an outstanding reimbursement amount of $2.9 million that the TIF program owes the CFO #1 program. This reimbursement is a result of the CFO #1 program advancing the TIF's share of these project costs as it relates to fee collected from development not in CFO #1. By including these projects on the project list, the TIF program will collect the necessary fees to reimburse the CFO #1 program. By combining the future projects, remaining projects and the two remammg fund transfer projects as noted above the 2008 Tl F update Project List as shown below in Table 4 is created. The 2008 Tl F update project list consists of 11 roadway segments, 11 intersection improvements, and the continuation of the City's sidewalk construction program and the City's Transportation Management and Monitoring System. Page 8 14 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 80 of 204 TABLE 4 2008 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE UPDATE -PROJECT LIST RTCIP ESTIMATED # ELGIBLE IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION COSTS ::seaments 1 No Avenida Encinas vvIaen soutn of Palomar Airport Road $5,045,000 2 Yes Carlsbad Boulevard WIaen from Manzano Drive to ouu $5,360,000 Feet north of Cannon Road 3 Yes El Camino Real WIaen from T amarcK Avenue to $8,078,000 Chestnut Avenue 4 No Carlsbad Village Drive Widen from Pontiac to Victoria $4,841,000 5 Yes El Camino Real WIaen from La Costa Avenue to $2,305,000 Arenal Road 6 Yes Cannon Road Reach 4 cannon Road from 1 zuv east of $5,400,000 * Colleae to the easterlv citv limits 7 Yes c.;arIsoaa tsouIevara ~rate ~treet nortn to tne cIrv 11mIts $2.541.2UU w Palomar Airport Road / Palomar Airport Koad realignment 8 Yes and construction from Avenida $3,527,400 * Carlsbad Boulevard Encinas to Carlsbad Boulevard Drive 9 Yes Poinsettia Lane WIaen from Paseo LJel Norte to $2,290,000 Batiauitos Lane No La Costa Avenue Widen from 1-5 to El Camino Real $1,500,000 ** 10 No 01Ivenhain Road and Wiaen/Realiin Rancho Santa Fe $1,400,000 ** 11 Rancho Santa Fe Road Road/Oliven ain Road Intersections Yes Palomar Airport Road -Road widening for a ri~nt-turn lane $1,244,000 1 alon~ PAR from Arma a to Paseo Paseo Del Norte Del orte 2 Yes Palomar Airport Koaa - Colleae Boulevard Koaa wIaen1ng for a ~ht-turn lane from SIB Colleae to B PAR $587,000 3 Yes Palomar Airport Road-El Camino Real Add right-turn lane from E/B PAR to S/B ECR $568,000 4 Yes Palomar Airport Road -El Fuerte Street Road widenin~ tor a riint-turn lane from W/B PA to N/B I Fuerte $916,000 5 Yes 1-'alomar Airport Koad - Melrose Drive Add rignt-turn lane trom t:./'d 1-'AK to SIB Melrose Drive $88,500 Yes Melrose Drive -Palomar Koad widening for a rignt-turn Iane $410,000 6 Airport Road from S/B Melrose Drive to W/B PAR 7 Yes Melrose Drive -Alga Road Add duaI Ien-turns on all $946,000 aooroaches 8 Yes El Camino Real -Add duaI Ien-turns in NIB and SIB $865,000 Carlsbad Villaae Drive directions alona ECR Yes El Camino Real -Cannon Add NIB to E/'d ngnt-turn lane. $2,205,000 9 Road Widen bridJe structure. Add second N/ and S/B turn lanes. 10 Yes El Camino Real -Alga Road Mod:zyqrignt-turn from NIB t:.c.;R to E/B A a Road $335,000 11 Yes El Camino Real -Add second N/'d to W/'d Ien-turn $253,UUU Tamarack lane t'roarams -'-'hvw1ue 1 No Sidewalk Program Complete sidewalKs at various locations throuahout the Citv $2,440,000 Program to tac111tate Transportation Demand Transportation Management (TDM) strategies, No to annually review $1,440,000 2 Management and effectiveness of Tl F Monitoring Program improvement program and to facilitate annual programming of TIF fundina * -1 ne estimated cost for this ro ect re p 1 p resents zuu/o of the total ro ect estimated costs to reflect the p 1 prorated share to be funded by future development. ** -The estimated cost for this project represents the remaining portion of the total project costs which were fronted by the CFD #1 program fund and which are to be reimbursed by the TIF program fund. Page 9 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 81 of 204 Project Costs After the projects were indentified, cost estimates as attached in Appendix B, were prepared and assembled. The cost estimates were based on the current project descriptions and recent bid prices for similar items of work. For roadway segment projects 6, 7, and 8 as listed on Table 4 above, it is recommended to limit the value for inclusion in the TIF program to 20% of the estimated costs. Each of these projects will convey a significant percentage of traffic volumes generated at the regional level and as such it is appropriate to reduce the fee on development within Carlsbad to reflect the regional nature of these facilities. The value of 20% is equal to the percentage of trips that will be generated by future development in Carlsbad compared to the number of trips generated by Carlsbad at buildout. Traffic Volumes Once the estimated project costs for the TIF program are generated, they are apportioned to residential, commercial, and industrial development based on the volume of traffic created. The traffic volumes were calculated based on the 2008 growth projections which are prepared in conjunction with the adoption of the Operating Budget and the Capital Improvement Program. The projections indicate from FY 2008/09 through buildout there will be 4,574 residential units, 4,754,000 square feet of commercial development, and 5,770,000 square feet of industrial development constructed. These values are then used to calculate the number of average daily trips (ADT) generated by future development. The ADT generation for residential land use is based on an estimated mixture of 65% single-family and 35% condominium development which results in an average of 9.3 ADT/unit. For commercial development, the generation rate of 40 ADT/1000 sf was used and for industrial development the generation rate of 8 ADT /1000 sf was used. Consistent with the 1991 TIF Program, it is recommended that Commercial and Industrial trip generations be adjusted to reflect double-counting. The recommended approach adjusts Commercial and Industrial trips to 40% of the generation rate. This adjustment reflects the judgment that 60% of the trip ends assigned to Commercial and Industrial uses originate from residences within the City. Page 10 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 82 of 204 Updated Fee Calculation The TIF fee was calculated by multiplying the ADT for each land use, both within and not within CFD#1, by a projected fee and then checking the total fee revenue against the quantity of the remaining funds needed. The respective fees for each land use are governed by the two features as follows: 1) The value of the fee for Commercial/Industrial is equal to 40% of the Residential fee to account for double counting as described above, and; 2) The credit given to development within CFD #1 is equal to the absolute value of the current fee credit which is equal to $40/ADT for Residential and $16/ADT for Commercial/Industrial. Through an iterative process, the TIF fees needed to generate the funding for the project were calculated. The result of these calculations which is summarized in Table 5 below, is the recommended fee based on the 2008 TIF update described herein. TABLE 5 2008 TIF UPDATE FEE $353/ADT* $3530/unit $3130/unit $400/unit Condominium $2824/unit $2504/unit $320/unit A artment $2118/unit $1878/unit $240/unit Commercial/Industrial $142/ADT* 142/ADT* 126/ADT* $16/ADT* * = Average Daily Trip V. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION The steps used to prepare this update to the TIF Program included the following: 1. Review and assessment of the current TIF Program 2. Update the City's buildout traffic projections 3. Evaluate the Circulation System 4. Develop the list of improvements to include in the TIF Program 5. Develop cost estimates 6. Develop a projection of average daily trips generated by future development 7. Calculate the fee As a result of this analysis, the updated fee of $353/ADT for residential and $142/ADT for Commercial and Industrial development has been calculated. Based on current estimates of growth and project costs, the implementation of these updated fees in conjunction with the TIF program will be sufficient to fund the necessary improvements to ensure that the growth management standards relating to the roadway circulation system are satisfied in an efficient manner and in conjunction with the future development of the City. Page 11 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 83 of 204 APPENDIX A TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE -TECHNICAL SUPPORT July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 84 of 204 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE TECHNICAL SUPPORT Prepared for City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Prepared by P.' .if CONSULTING 5050 Avenida Encinas, Suite 260. Carlsbad, CA 92008 CONTACT: ROBERT DAVIS 760.476.9193 rdavis@rbf.com January 2006 JN 55-100214 001 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 85 of 204 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary ................................................................. ., .......................................................... 1 Exhibit 1: Study Intersection Location Map ......................................................................... .4 Exhibit 2: Study Intersections That Require Improvements ................................................ 5 Exhibit 3: Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes ......................................................... 6 Table 1 : Intersection Level of Service and Improvement Summary ..................................... 10 Intersection Data Collection Monitoring Sheet. ..................................................................... 31 Intersections 1-59 (Individually Tabbed) ............................................................................... 34 APPENDIX A: TECHNICAL METHODOLOGY APPENDIX B: SANDAG 2030 NODE NUMBERS July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 86 of 204 January 16, 2006 Mr. David Hauser CITY OF CARLSBAD 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 • • • CONSULTING Subject: Summary of TIF Intersection Analysis Findings Carlsbad TIF Traffic Engineering Support Services Dear David: JN 55-100214.001 RBF Consulting has completed the anarysis of the 58 intersections included in the Carlsbad TIF program based on SAN DAG Series 1 O traffic forecast data. As discussed with you, we have re-packaged the results of the 2005 TIF intersection analysis results to better serve your needs in developing the new TIF program. The analysis of 2030 traffic forecast data at the study intersections and the ICU level of service analysis have been conducted for: 1. Existing Intersection Geometry or 2. Capital Improvement Program, TIF, or Developer Funded Intersection Geometry Where Appropriate. The location of intersections included in the 2005 TIF program analysis is illustrated in Exhibit 1. Included below is a brief discussion of the findings of our analysis. We have prepared the following attachments that illustrate and summarize the analysis findings. • Exhibit 1 -Study Intersection Location Map • Exhibit 2 -Study Intersections That Require Improvements • Table 1 -TIF Intersection Level of Service and Improvement Needs Summary • Exhibit 3 -Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes As shown in Table 1 , the 2030 ICU analysis determined that 11 intersections operate at LOS E or worse during one or both of the peak-hour periods. These intersections will require additional improvements beyond existing lane geometries or what is currently planned for the ClP, TIF, or any approved developer funded improvements in order to maintain LOS D or better. The following intersections were determined to be deficient: 1. #3 Cannon Road/Paseo Del Norte 2. #10 Carlsbad Boulevard/Cannon Road 3. #22 El Camino Reavramarack Avenue 4. #26 El Camino ReaVPalomar Airport Road 5. #30 El Camino Real/La Costa Avenue 6. #41 Palomar Airport Road/Avenida Encinas 7. #44 Palomar Airport Road/College Boulevard 8. #47 Palomar Airport Road/Melrose Drive 5050 A,-.;inida Encinas . .Si..i'.,, 200. c>irtsbad, Ga!ifomia s2ooe • 750.476.9193 • FAA 760 476.9'00 Offices !oca!ed tr-:u,y;i:-owt Caiifo~ia .. 411.::ona & Nevada • YH~11HBF ro!'l) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 87 of 204 D. Hauser January 16, 2006 Page2 9. #51 Olivenhain Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road 10. #54 Rancho Santa Fe Road/La Costa Avenue 11. #56 Rancho Santa Fe Road/Melrose Drive JN: 55-100214.001 For these intersections, additional improvements have been identified that will maintain LOS D or better during peak periods. Needed improvements are graphically depicted in Exhibit 3. It is recognized the nature of the improvements identified will have significant right-of-way implications and may ultimately be determined either infeasible and/or impractical. In some cases, it may be physical!y impossible to improve the intersection to the point needed to achieve LOS D or better. Understanding that the analysis herein does not examine the feasibility of the identmed improvements, they should be considered and tentative and subject to revision. Thirty-four (34) intersections included in the 2030 TIF analysis were found to operate at LOS D or better with existing intersection geometries. These intersections, listed below, will not require any additional improvements: 1. #1 Alga Road/Alicante Road 2. #2 Cannon Road/Avenida Encinas 3. #5 Cannon Road/Faraday Avenue 4. #7 Carlsbad Boulevard/State Street 5. #8 Carlsbad Boulevard/Garlsbad Village Drive 6. #9 Carlsbad Boulevardffamarack Avenue 7. #12 Carlsbad Boulevard/Poinsettia lane 8. #13 SB/NB Carlsbad Boulevard/Avenida Encinas 9. #14 Carlsbad Village Drive/Tamarack Avenue 10. #15 Carlsbad VUlage Drive/Monroe Street 11. #16 College Boulevard/Tamarack Avenue 12. #17 College Boulevard/Carlsbad Village Drive 13. #18 College Boulevard/Faraday Avenue 14. #19 El Camino Real/Marron Road 15. #20 El Camino Real/Carlsbad Village Drive 16. #21 El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue 17. #29 El Cami'lo Real/Alga Road 18. #31 El Camino Real/Calle Barcelona 19. #32 El Camino ReaVOlivenhain Road 20. #33 El Fuerte Street/Alga Road 21. #34 El Fuerte Street/Poinsettia Lane 22. #36 La Costa Avenue/Camino De Los Coches 23. #37 Marron Road/Monroe Street 24. #38 Marron Road/Jefferson Street 25. #39 Melrose Drive/Poinsettia Lane 26. #43 Palomar Airport Road/Armada Drive 27. #45 Palomar Airport Road/Camino Vida Roble 28. #48 Poinsettia Lane/Avenida Encinas 29. #49 Poinsettia LaneJPaseo Del Norte 30. #50 Poinsettia lane/Aviara Parkway 31. #52 Rancho Santa Fe Road/Calle Barcelona 32. #53 Rancho Santa Fe Road/Camino De Los Coches 2 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 88 of 204 D. Hauser Januaiy 16, 2006 Page 3 33. #57 Rancho Santa Fe Road/Calle Acervo 34. #58 El Camino Real/Levante Street JN: 55-100214.001 Thirteen intersections included in the 2030 TIF analysis were found to operate at LOS D or better with 2030 Base intersection geometries, which include CIP, TIF, or developer funded geometries. These intersections, listed below, will not require any additional improvements: 1. #4 Cannon Road/LEGOLAND Drive 2. #6 3. #11 4. #23 Cannon Road/College Boulevard Carlsbad Boulevard/Palomar Airport Road El Camino Real/Cannon Road 5. #24 6. #25 7. #27 8. #28 9. #35 10. #40 11. #42 12. #46 13. #55 El Camino Real/College Boulevard El Camino Real/Faraday Avenue El Camino Real/Camino Vida Roble El C;-imino Real/Poinsettia Lane El Fuerte Street/Faraday Avenue Melrose Drive/ Alga Road Palomar Airport Road/Paseo Del Norte Palomar Airport Road/El Fuerte Street Rancho Santa Fe Road/San Elijo Road Proposed intersection geometries for intersections to be considered for the 2005 TIF are graphically shown in Exhibit 3. Exhibit 2 illustrates which of the study intersections require improvement. If the intersection improvement needs are entirely consistent with planned improvements in the CIP, they have been identified as such. Exhibit 2 summarizes the findings the 2005 TIF intersection analysis. The exhibit classifies the 2030 analysis status for each 2005 TIF Study intersection as follows: Existing Geometry Sufficient Base Geometry Sufficient (CIP, TIF, or Developer Funded) Recommended Improvements/ Modifications If you have any questions concerning the findings of the 2005 TIF Program Intersection analysis, please feel free to call me at (760) 476-9193. Sincerely, Robert A. Davis Interim Project Manager Transportation Services H'\POt\T,,.~'005-T!P.Carlsbad TIF Findings.doc 3 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 89 of 204 0 LEGEND 2005 TIF Study Intersection Future Road ______ lf'l!::t,, ~-.. ____ ..,._ , , • CaminoDe Los Coches 2005 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ~-SS-,h,,-);:1-1,00-1'" .-o.::c ..... ,ern-b!l/_20_05 __ S_T_U_D_Y_I N_T_E_R_S_E_C_T_l_o_· N_L_o_c __ ~l,.,\ ..... J ........ 1_q_~-~-~~~ ,z__ ti July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 90 of 204 \.a Costa Avenue Legend G) 2005 TIF Study Intersection Future Road Existing Geometry Sufficient CIP, TIF, or Developer Funded Geometry Sufficient Improvements Needed -----a ...---w-------- 1 • Camino De LosCoches Leucadi~io~--.1.---t:,lC;f--;::;::::-7=~--::'1..,. -sou\e\/3 0 "§ al <O 0 0::: 0::: DAl:' 11 11 11 _::-,._ 10 .... '.,;·-,:="'~"" 1 , ..... 1 .c"""".,.,.--,e,--,t,.,,-, 2 -(~ 5 -T_U_D_Y_IN_l .... ·E_R_S_E_C_T_I_O_N_S_T_f-_fA_T_R_E_Q_U_IR_E_IM_P_R_O_V_"""',E_'fv_1E_N_T_S I~ EXHiBIT2 30 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 91 of 204 \j,_j ,,,,. \. ,i ·.__:::;::-_. " ttl 0 0:: "' c -~ < .... "O "' 0 a:; iU cr, <( "' "' C ·o C UJ "' J;! C GI .:J: ..... "O ttl 0 0:: C 0 C C 8 ~ 0 z <ii Cl 0 "' m fO a.. -"O "' 0 a: g C "' (.) • • ill -Existing Geometry G) .1.. ...., .,,, --Alga Rd. -• ' ~ ~ I ® ~ -~ + \..\.. f Cannon Rd. 0 J .. 'ltY -~ ' ] ri 'O .i£ ◄--•-l2l r Cannon Rd. r -., "" r ' I ~ $ ct': JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 CD Year 2030 Volume N O'; l" N N ,-'-32/3 ~ S ~ -975/721 ~ ~ \.. r1a14e 2 Alga;~~19 _j T 'I t /" ("').,-0 912/1028 -1ci 89/383, ~ ~co~ -,.._ ::iE m M ~ AM/PM I ("") ::E ~ ® ~ ~-~ \...a11aa ~ ~ ~ -238/553 ~ • \.. r 3a1134a Cannon Rd. 8 t _j " r' 22/12 .. N a, <O 293122s --I ~ ~ ~ 64/4 7 '-w M ,-0 :::E '"N ~o.. .., .... AM/PM < ~ ® (0 NM .,.. .-,.. ... se ~ £::! , 131142 ~ ~ ~ -519/1437 ~ + \... , 1211101 Cannon Rd. 355/69 _j ., 'I f (" 5 l"-<.OCO 1569/952-~ u; ~ ~ .9 --'<t -389/214 "'\. O lO '<t CO ~ , 8 o..-m a_ AM/PM :_ N ~ Base Analysis Geometry (CIF!TIF or Qt:veloper Fees) CD Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. ® Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis . 0 .). ----'f "-~ r Cannon Rd i jj """'-H"' ' -;; Cl i 11. Future roadway extensions require changes to the intersection configuration. Recommended Improvements/ Modifications CD ® 0 Existing geometry sufficient Existing geometry sufficient ~ -.,._ ~~'--~ r Cannon Rd. l ""' Y j i -iii '~ £ Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes EXHIBIT 3 (page 1 of 20) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 92 of 204(,~: -~ ~/ ~=---f:xisting Geometry 0 Ql > ◄-·-= 0 -Q z ~ < _J 0 el w Cannon Rd. _J '""" !' ..... -"O Q fi -Ill 0 ovlp' ~ i et:: C 0 0 C C, C: UJ "' _, <.) ® ~ C: 1... Ql -> < >, "' u "' ~ ~ r ~ Cannon Rd. IQ! -"O "' & C: g C "' <.) J -' t < ~ ~ "' u. ®_J] 'C U) ~ e "' ~ > .l!1 j! 0 :, . () s ,.I ~ ~ Cannon Rd. _j <.) C: g r~ <11 0 'i"'"'Y '-._}.J~ ,~ ■ IJ Ill JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 Year 2030 Volume © -855/1289 r3101200 Cannon Rd. " I' 1180/1563-c5 C")'<:J" 778/195, OlM .., C: 0 ::t <11 -s ..-..-ai ,...._ j r-... ..-AM/PM ® '--212 ~ $ ~ 1-864/526 ,,,; t '--r 14115 cannonRd. IJ 8/18_} . 'i t I" 329/1170-~ ~!::'.co 742/198, f ~,... ~ AMIPM if ~ ®..-U) o..-~ ~ ~ \.. 36/42 ~ io g -570/522 ,,,; • '--r 5351405 Cannon Road 193/190 _I 'i t I" ::. 3 < :E ~ < · N LO'¢ 4091542-i g i ~ 22/86 , j, tP ~ ~ ::s AMIPM ;s O'l 'q" I Base Analysis Geometry (CIP,TIF or Develo er Fees) © --~ 0 Cannon Rd. .: "" rr --ovlp' 0 -"' ~ C: " _, c:, j ® Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. ® " ...... ...... ,..Jff "-~ Cannon Rd. g•i----;J -g ,Hr ..... iii ' l Future roadWay extensions require changes to the Intersection configuration, I Recommended Improvements/ Modifications f© I ® ® Base geometry sufficient Existing geometry sufficient Base analysis geometry sufficient Intersection Geomet,!I and Traffic Volumes EXHIBIT 3 (page 2 of 20) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 93 of 204,-~; \~/ -·® QI ~ (/) <ll N V) -E Ill I "O ~ ,:: Ill (.) ~I® QI 0) .ll! Existing Geometry p, -g {; .: " u \.... tree ! ~H" , "' ~ 'E gi ~ Carl "\ tr--J .,; <ll :'i s "' ~ ,:: '" (.) 2 'al I a ~1® QI ~ u E! ffl E ~ -E §! <ll =i 0 co ) .. (J t .t: .!-.JH"-, Beach Pkg. Loi ..4.. Tamarnck Ave. .,;"\tY ffi free 1\ ,.. I) c3 jlDAa:: I~ JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 Year 2030 Volume 0 N NC.O .-oo .-('f') --o..-.-o r--('f') t '--I '-3s21366 AM/PM ® ~ om ..... ~-.:t "" .... ,... ..,, cJ; ~ 2! ~ c.o d ~ '-84/114 -37/131 ~o~ '<t CO lO ~ t \... ~ , 234/271 :!i I Carlsbad Village Cr. · t "\ t r" 18/44 J .,; -.:t Cl') ..-2 "<t ll) '<t 37/117-al ci5 2;! ~ 14/33, I N ~ ~ ~ .. :e AM/PM o -t ® M $:! cJ; ~ ~ a5 t.: \.... 79/244 -43/72 ..-T"" (Y) '<t 0) 0) ~ ♦ " ~ ,T:~:!~~e. Beach Pl<g. Lot l "\ t r" 44/58 J -g ~ ~ ~ 52/37 -in m ;: t':! 58/63 ....._ l N in ~ ~ ''.! o.-~ AM/PM d 0) <( Base Analysis Geometry (CIP.TIF or Developer Fees) 0 Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. ® Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. ® Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. Recommended Improvements/ Modifications 0 t \-., i J ~ ~ Callrall:$ signal warrants have been met. Intersection is listed on tho City's Traffic Evaluation Policy. ® ® Existing geometry sufficient Existing geometry sufficient Intersection Geomet!LJlndiraffic Volumes EXHIBIT 3 (page 3 of 20) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 94 of 204 ~ ~ '.']/ ~.::.·,.:,)'' u @) 11' 0 a:: C: 0 C: C IC <..) ' 'O ro t '3 0 ro u ru ~ r;, c..) 11@ t ! lii E .Q 3:. --'E ti} t :5 s u ~ ~ ~1® ., Existing Geometry 4 \.. tit tit \._o,lp , 8 Cannon Rd. t r' 'O ~ a:) 'O i .. (.) GRADE-SEPARA TEO INTERSECTION -.5 ·1¥ I ~ -) II '--'--~ > 'P. ~ •l> ::j 0 sIJ u "' :::, <fl 'C "' (..) ,.-u,~ t "1 IV ' 'C ffl i 0 (.) • • • JN; 55-100214.001 December 2005 Year 2030 Volume @) Ol O'St' I N~ ,-.... C'\lo \._ 108/563 :;;~ ♦ \.. , 109/219 0 Cannon Rd. 8 t r' .,; ~ Ol CO a) 00 'ti ,-,-.2l ..--?5 ~ ,l! mo a. .. ~ ,-~ AM/PM (.) <I: @ (!) :t("') ..-(") -N ra co \... 2eo1339 ~ ~ , 240/723 ♦ \.._ 0 Palomar Airport Rd. . t r 1? N 0 m NO "'O)N 21 B --.. a. "' 0) ..._,. -AM/PM ,:: -.t CX) ~ l5 t-1.0 < @ ~,-'lt'I"-0.... .... \. IQ~ co "'--118/163 ~ ~ ~ -010 ,.J t \.. , 276/491 Poinsettia Lan:, ~ t f' 8/2 ,.; .... ,... 0 1011e -ffi ~ ro ~ 't1 c-,...._-.. 4/13, j g ~ 2 -,... T'" Cl: AM/PM l's ..-~ c( Base Analysis Geometry !Cl~TIF or Develoeer Fees} I@ Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. @ \.. " " I tM'""' Rd ,.; t t, 2: ID .., j Capital Improvement Project (Future Geometry) @ Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. I Recommended Improvements/ f@ @ @ Modifications \_OVID f t \... , Cannon Rd. t t,,-.,:; ~ ID ] Base geometry sufficient Existing geometry sufficient Intersection Geomet,!1 and Traffic Volumes EXHIBIT 3 (page 4 of 20) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 95 of 204 \)J \..5' 0 • • • Existing Geometry ~@ n, ·~ c:: UJ n, t t" ~ 12 1-.; "' > -<( -"' ttr ~ :,. 'C ,, _g,, .? " :, "' m 0 " "O ID .. ! .::, 'O ./!! 1l ;; 13 .se iJ tii m Cl IJ) z u ~@ a, -7( ~ ""' 0 !:! ....{" -Ill , E .to ... Carlsbad Village Or. 8 --. -~ ,ii "\tr 0 _j 0, Cl .!!! 5 'O i ~ t) ~,@ ~ "' e -~ ... ' " r; ~ r2 "1-a , ~ ._ -Cl. > 0 j it-" ,i; Ol Jl1 5 u <ti j J --' jvi ~ 5 :i u. i JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 Year 2030 Volume ® C") 0 ,-.. .,... -(X) 0 ('I') '-18/21 .,... --"¢ in rM ,230/227 • ~ 0 Avenide Encin11$ 8 t ,,.., ,:; NN .2 a:, a, M I (X) N ----C0 (0 ",f c:o ij NM At-lJPM ..-@ co '<t (") "¢ '-34/143 ~ !: 0 ,-.. N -1001223 "¢(") ... .) t " 0 ,72/167 Carlsbad Village Or. 0 14/49 .,I "\ t ,,.., 4i in O C"l 174/159-; --('t') 0 in-.-N-. 5/5, i .,... 0) N .,... AM/PM t!! @co r--.co ~ ~ ~ l'-95/52 N ~ ffi -348/428 .,.J t ~ ,e11a 393/279 _,/ O M N :-:to..,... :a I <( :E a. :E <( Qirlsbad Viilage Dr.lo ""\ t ("" 183/503 -uS M ~ ~ 27/73--... ~ "¢ ~ ~ " a SE AM/PM ::! <C @ Base Analysis Geometry {CIP,TIF or Develoeer Fees) Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. @ Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. ® Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. Recommended Improvements/ Modifications @ @ @) Existing geometry sufficient Existing geometry sufficient Existing geometry sufficient Intersection Geomet~ and Traffic Volumes EXHIBIT 3 (page 5 of 20) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 96 of 204 \)J {;' ,: ' :,). .. ,,,._.~ :e1@ 2 1 Tl ff) iii E Existing Geometry \ -4+'--~ T ~ ITarnarackAve (south}~ "\ t r" l "E ltl > 2 :, Jl ~ 2 8 i1@ ,u -4 Q j a 0 ~ 5 i ~4•\... t-~ Curisbad Village Or. -·o iii > 2 ::, 0 m .,., en .!! 0 I.) J, :! ] ovlp' ~ j 8 .!,.. -, "\"\ t v JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 • • • ® Year 2030 Volume l() M (0 m:-::::2 l\. ;:: ~ ;:: "'--148/65 g ~ ~ -35/10 .) t \i.. ,215/65 -o N<ON Ta~r~::::~11. "\ t (' 18/3 -ia ~ ~ ;? 40/13, j ~ ~ ~ ~ AM/PM B :g ~ ... @ ct) ~ NO ~ ~" l'--15/3 M CO ..-$! ~ C\i ..-5/2 .) + \... ,.., ,s12 caosbad Village Or. I '\ t (' 448/303 J ,:; f2 ~ ~ 1/6-..i: ..-O'> N (Cl ---. 145/81, J g E AM/PM @NM N O'> I.O ~~~ (0 <.O tO '--82/383 ~ ~ ~ -333/411 ,.J t \... , 2041421 Faraday Ave. "\ t (' 64/275 _j . ,-... (0 M 179/388 -] ~ f.'.:: gj :a 0. ~ m -.... -... -.... 99/194--..... & i.o -.;i-co :::e ' J c::ira~ 11. AM/PM 8 i Base Analysis Geometry (CIP,TIF or Developer Fees) ® Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. ® Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. @ Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. Recommended Improvements/ Modifications ® @ @ Existing geometry sufficient Existing geometry sufficient .!,.. ,.J H\...\... r Faraday Ave. _j "\"\Hr -1-g ' ii'i 8, .!!! 0 0 •operational Intersection Geomet!:l and Traffic Volumes EXHIBIT 3 (page 6 of 20) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 97 of 204 ~ (,-~\ "!= ,:, OS 0 ~ C ~ :I: --<ii ~ 0 C: ·e ro <.) iii Existing Geometry ® .!,.. AH"" r Marron Rd. 8-1-----J ~ "\"\HY -ii! ' -~ d iii ~1® 0 I 5 -0 ro A••\... ~ ◄-, i Carl, · e "\ ft V (.) _j ., ._ er m -g <IJ ·-0::: ' i g ~ •;:: w t: <O u iiJ i -s ~ <IJ J:. (.) ._ re 0::: ·I ('0 (.) w @ ., )Ill'-P· Cheslnut Av~ 'j "\ t t Y Free, 1~ -~ 8 w JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 • • • Year 2030 Volume ~ ~ \!...::) Mr--lO M,....M ~ ~ l£ l \.. 389/370 ~ r:i ~ -711127 ,_) • \... f 117/218 2 96/182 ..J 11 "\ t /' 66 cr t.OMr--/269-0 ,-.. "f" (0 Marron Rd. ···] C ~ c-")........_ 521248 '""'-·1: ci5 -!.: ~ ~ "I 8 N<O..-n. AM/PM iii ~ i < ..... ® Ol ~en o -.-N £':! o ~ \.. 289/163 ~ m N ...-221/215 ........... ,_) ♦ " f 73124 Carlsbad ViUage Or. "\ t /' 1111,2s ..J i ~ ~ ra 73/257 -'; ..-r--. m <: .......... 201/115 .E go,... ~ ' d NS5 ~ AM/PM w ..-< @ ~ ~ :<::: \() ~ ~ t:: ?iL.,, M \..ao13s -255/86 .-.-M 30/13 .-J+\..., CheslnutAve. "") t /' 257/58 ..J J co co s;: cr ,... co .. , 83/112-~ £:!, N 253/205 '""'--~ ~ ~ .,.. ~ "I Q .-N :E AM/PM w ~ < @) Base Analysis Geometry (CIP,Tlfor Developer Fees} Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. ® Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. @ Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis . Recommended Improvements/ Modifications @) ® @ Existing geometry sufficient Existing geometry sufficient Existing geometry sufficient lntersectiOJl Geometry and Traffic Volumes EXHIBIT 3 (page 7 of 20) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 98 of 204 1._}) ~ QJ :, C <l,/ ~ u !!! "' E J!!! .... ,;; a, 0::: 0 C "i~ "' (.) w -0 ~ 0:: g § !U (.) -"' ., 0::: g ·e ~ w Existing Geometry @ ~ -,..J H \... r 0 Tamarack Ave. _j .. ~HI" ll> -IX 0 ' -~ d ijj @ ~ Q. )IH'--f~ Cannon Rd:J li ~ t f /" IX -' 0 " .E 8 iii Year 2030 Volume @ m C") -=t .... N-C"'l \...24151 (0 ~ I.() .._ --0 0) .... -127/220 C"') .... 'Ct ,.I t \... r3n1116 Tamaraclc Ave. t _) -~ I" 40/37 I M o, r,.. a: co (0 r,.. 132/180 -• g c.o ,.__ ,q-386/147 , S ~ j :g ~ AM/PM iii ..-LO ! .... ~ o @ N "t:.::;1(0..-(0 £:.-! «5 !:: '-118/181 ~ :£ ~ -488/444 C') ........ ,.1 • \... , 334111 -....... --,8,i-----Cannon Rd. o_ "'\ t /" 202/243 _) ~ -.r o I/) IX 10 ..-'St 276/669 -0 .... 'q" !:: 137/125, j ~ ~ :£ ~ -'<t :E AM/PM w ..-<i I Base Analysis Geometry (CIP, TIF or Developer Fees) I@ .l--..-f H \... r Tamarack Ave . l ~ tf ti" _) IX -·I ' (1) u iu @ l.. ,.. -~ ,.; t t + \...\... f Cannon Rd.~ 8 ii~ f ff /" ..,,. ~ -g '.E 8 iii Recommended Improvements/ Modifications @ ~ -.-it+\...~, TamorackA: 1r,~ , ,, I" -0 ovlp , -~ @ d iii Base geometry sufficient E® @ MM i .:: .... :i ill @ I 1~ )i -,: N ;:: \... 7651775 \... ••• '¢Y co .A I I l -M CO .,.. ...-<11 -, , --...--... r '<t (0 r---1321,1s1s -f -~=o::::;-l!)f---,.1 + '--r 1191s8 --4 • \...\... 7 u El Camino Real E,ii,c::;;;;;i•::::;;::-::---iQI-----.._ arr1no Real ---. J ..I • ',', I Y 24139 ../ . ~ I I' e•c='M""'' I j Base 97~metry /,~.' -~ :::: 0 1703/1171-li :1J ~ ~ ../ ,; ...,..., j t' suff1c1ent \. llrJ ~ fr<'1l --,,_ ! 8351245 --... ~ w ;:;:: ~ ..,, -£ ~=-'? U ' =: ' j!' I.O N <.o "" -a, w 8 AM/PM 8 C\I "'1' ~ ..,_. j' <( tree , 8 Dovoloper Funded ~'Ell~-Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes JN: 55-100214.001 December2005 EXHIBIT 3 (page 8 of 20) • • • July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 99 of 204 ~ ./·,. ,, ~ ~/ II ■ Existing Geometry ~ C <II @ 1.. ~ >-"' -0 ~ H \...\... 7 ~ "' LJ. ..._ Faraday Ave. r.i <ll 0::: .j I"'\"'\ tt r-g E ~ w =t j iii -0@ ~ I'll f}_ f 1 ) t H '---'---::: "' ,i Palomar Airport Rd. '°'\ t t t ("'/' 0.. ,I --'J -i ro _,,,. o <II -~ -• -~ ' c3 jjj ~·® £ ~ ~H .E o g I ~ Camino Vida Roble -. iii <II a:: 0 C: 1 I"" tt ' ·I E Ill (.) ui ~ w JN: 55-100214.001 Oec,imber2005 Year 2030 Volume 12& ~ \t.::::/ (0 ..... C") ,.--.:t ~ 0 ~ '-242/603 LOO.-~ ~ ~ -509/268 .,; t \... rs21ss Faraday ve. gi-----29/72 ...I "i "'\ t I' 317/426-~ a) o ~ C ..-'<q" -201/495---.,__ ~~ N ~ ~ ~ ' u N I.O ...-e: AM!PM -(X)(O :i w (X) <( ..-@) (X) g 00 <ONO ........... ,,.. \. ~ (2; ~ '-1090/784 ~ ~ ~ -1360/700 ,,_1 • \... , 477;993 Palomar Airporl Rd. § 149t467 ..J ,. " t r "' o, V C'? 1020/1807-oc t::: N tO o CIO a, r--,. 102/84 , -~ "' c::i <'i :,; ' <JS V '('"" a. AM/PM :! LO <O :3E l1J ..... <( @ ~ ~ ~ ~ \.. 27/28 ~~a; -14/9 N ...-N 11/24 .,It\..., Camlno Vida Roble 8 '°'\ t ("' 63/266 _j i r-,. O v a: N C.O ""'° 10/9-0 ""'" ..... ~ 104/655 ·~ § ~ C'1 ~ ' (.) co..-~ AM/PM w ~ <: @ . Base Analysis Geometry (CIP,TIF or Developer Fees.} \. ....... -.-If t t \...\... , Faraday Ave. -3 J """" t t Y ::t ·I TIF Funded •Op<,rational ® (.) [i Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. ® --4H"-} 0 Camino Vida Roble g----J r 1 "'\~ tt;..-0:: 0 ·~ d w Future road\1vay extensions niquire changes to the intersectiOn configuration. Recommended Improvements/ Modifications @ @) Base geometry sufficient \.. tree ---..-, H \..\..."Ji ~ ·-~Rd.II"'\ ttf ("'/" -.~ t -E; ...... ls ' w @ Base geometry sufficient Intersection Geomet!l and Traffic Volumes EXHIBIT 3 (page 9 of 20) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 100 of 204~,-Ur _:'+--Existing Geometry Year 2030 Volume @ @ (0 0 a, QJ 1.. ("')...--\... 95/21 C N co CO '° ..J ._ ~ v ie -64/143 i f (0 ..... c:() ,.J + + \..\.. ("') .......... ,-219/830 Q) .) t \.. "' ·8 8 a. Poinsetha Ln. Poinsettia Ln. --"'\ t I' .; j 1 "\"\ H t I' 132/32..J QJ &'J Or--. CO er " a:: 288/133-n: ..-<.or--C: -0 0 ...-.... :"<t .E ' ·~ 196/42, .E it5 ~~ !ill J "' E 0) LO C") ll. (.) c'J 0) 'V :i! w (jj AM/PM w LO < N @) v t@ "'~ ~ '-308/132 cl: 1.. ~ g co -478/312 !'!! ◄-O> O N 748/403 .!!! ,-;._ I.()..-..-r ~ -4 H \..\.. 1 ,.J t \.. Alga Rd. ] o Alga Rd. Aviara Pkwy. "'\ t /' ~ Avi.iraPkW/, Ht 108/105..) 1 ro~~ ~ ~ 1 "\"'\ ( 224/506 -~ ~ ~ ~ ..... ../ n: I!: .!i ..--co l..O :ii iii -g "' 308/452 , ~ co lO <.o 9: £ -► ·E u (")I.OL.O :E -~ oslp'°'\ ~ AM/PM w N < E w 8 Ci] @ \_ ,. __ ◄-.) H + \...\.. , la Costa Ave. iij QJ j 0:: !""I"\ tf y 0 .E E -0 C: J -·i;: ' 8 ii] ~ ~ \::::.:J,-..o..--NN...--t:::: ci5 ~ '--404/236 ~ U) M ........ 472/406 ; * ~ , 189/167 La Costa Ave. "'\ f r"' 1126/629 ..J 1a a, a, r-.. 372/617 -~ ~ ~ ~ 324/277 "'\. .EE ~ ~ M !ll ' 8 ~~(Y') ~ AM/PM w ~ ,ct; ~ -... JN: 55-100214_001 December 2005 Base Analysis Geometry (C!P,TIF_or Developer Fees) @ 1.. ........ "1 H \..\.. r Poinsetlia Ln. j 1 "'\"\ f ff I' a:: -·I ""'t c'J w @ Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. @ Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. Recommended Improvements/ Modifications @ @) ® 0. Base geometry sufficient Existing geometry sufficient \_ ovlp ........ J +H\..\...~ 7 La Costa Ave.1 "'\"'\ t t Y j j .L g -E lll ' ~ w Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes EXHIBIT 3 {page 10 of 20) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 101 of 204i'} ~ ~ .,,.-.,, C 0 1i 0 J3 a., j ._ ro a., er -~ E (3 [l Existing Geometry @ .!,,.. --4 H \...\... r Calle Barcelona _; "\"\ t t y -' 0 l iii ~@ 1-. '6 ~ -:, ◄--5 f -4t H \...\... "'O er C 8 Olivenhafn Rd. ·a; Leucadia Blvd . .c 1; "\"\ tt t /' C :J QI ,;;: 0 0:: n --0 6 iii --~ QI -"' er u 0 ' w C .E ro 0 ii} ® .1.. "O .,, 0 -0: ..; t " ro r 9} <( 8 -· ci Alga Rd. 0 o.• "\ t I' Gi _; ~ -in '1) ' Q) :, ,:; LL Q) ijJ a: iil JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 I @ Year 2030 Volume M (Q ,..__ I'--c:o gp:::~ l ... ;:: ~ ?;J '-170/166 ~ ('~ ;: -222/179 .,.; • \... r 22s11a6 ~;;:~~i-~ 88/267--~ 36/168, ! AM/PM w "\ t I' 0 ,,.. (0 lO,,.. ('t) ..-"<"" N co~m :!? N<OCO a. r--. ~ ~ <( @co~ 1.()..-0') ..-aS co '-403/79 ._MN ON~ --972/685 ..-.... I ,,.; • " r 1281685 Olivenhain Rd. I Leucadia Blvd. '°"\ t /' 105/248 _I j <0 Mo 9 (<') 0,,.. 540/88 -g ~ ~ ~ 191/172, ~ l:,; c-; ~ a: '<t lO !E. AM/PM iii ~ < I@ I 0, M 0 (") '-311/64 .... (0 '<I' ffi ~ ~ -587/950 ,,.; + \... r a312aa I 8 Alga Rd. O '°"\ t /' 145/82 _; ,..._ 0 0 ..; ,... .... i:.o 1104/663-~ te ~ 'in 10/39, i C'lCON :; :, N ~ u. AM/PM iij <( ®) Base Analysis Geometry (CIP, TIF or Developer Fees) Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. I@ I I Existing geometries I used for year 2030 analysis. I® I I Existing geometries I used for year 2030 analysis. Recommended Improvements/ Modifications @ I@ I I® I Existing geometry sufficient Existing geometry sufficient Existing geometry sufficient Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes EXHIBIT 3 (page 11 of 20) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 102 of 204 ~ v :') ~.;' Cl) C .'.3 <O 'E ~ ·o a. -v t!:! ({) (I) 1:'. Q) :, LL ijj ~ C <I) ~ >-~ ~ if -ui OJ (75 t ::, LL w Existing Geometry @) ~ -,4 t \..._ r 8 Poinsettia Ln. 0 'It y @ _j iii -.g ' ., ::, u. w FUTURE INTERSECTION 11@ u 0 0 "' .s -(I) r 0 -~ La Costa Ave. th E ., <U ~ ~ I' (.) ---' .9 (I.) ::, C 8 (I) > <C ~ "' "'zyj u 0 0 o:r ...J ..L Year 2030 Volume @) N o .... \._31/69 r--t: 0) t: ~ 00 -176/814 (0 M .,.J t \..._ ,121191 Poinsettia Ln. 65/12..J "'\ t I' M (0 N 636/504-iii f/2 ~ ::!:· ., O> M IO ::1< 13/37, t: ., (.0 co (0 Q. ii: U) .... -. AM/PM iij @ .... 0 0 \._ 13/5 ,..... ~ ,-(0 ?-i io -787/941 ,,.J + \... , s11221 0 Faraday Ave. t 15/5.,J ~NI 1205/655-iii £:! o ~ QI (0 ..... r,.. :E <( 62/3'\0""-i '<:t"N '<t' :E ' !l ~ Q. u. ..... AMIPM w ~ @) La Cosla Ave. 54/128-454/176, AM/PM -61/85 ,54/25 J "'\ /"J... 8 M 0 "' '<t N 0 ... -_, --.... ~ gj IO 8 N :E Q. :E <( @ Base Analys,s Geometry {CIP, TIF or Developer Fees) Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. @ I ~ ...... + 8,, Farnday Ave. 0 ,tr .I ....... vi ~ ., ;;: ! ... w Capilal lmprovemont Project {Future Geometry) @ Existing geometry sufficient I I I Recommended Improvements/ Modifications ® I® I ...._ r@ Existing geometry sufficient Base geometry sufficient Existing geometry sufficient Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 EXHIBIT 3 (page 12 of 20) • • • July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 103 of 204 ..s:: ,y (,1:: '--:::.J!~' • • • ai ~ u5 ., ~ 0 :: -"Cl rt! 0 0:: C e iii :a .:; ~ u5 C ~ ~ QI -, ·-,:) "' 0 Cl:'. C: g ~ ii) C Ill .J .!!! :I:: 3l C: ~ -., ·l= 0 :ls e 1l 2 Existing Geometry ® .':... ...,_ ...{ t \.. r Marron Rd. _J "t y -vi ' e C: 0 ::. @ \... -r ,,.) • ♦ '-. \... g North Count Plaza Jefferson St. _J "tv ' ~ g "' ~ @) .9, .':... ~ ..; tH\.. r PaseoCorto Polnsel1 ia Ln. j ""'·d t v "' -0 ' ~ .; ~ JN: 55-100214.001 December2005 Year 2030 Volume ® LO ..-'--341127 ,-0 (X) N,... O> c-1 c-1 a, -147/352 N,...,... ,,.) t '-. 0 ,96/475 Marron Rd. 8 " t (' 62/114 _j LO O'l N 143/339-in CON-:S-............ 109/377, ~ -.,....._,.._ :E: a -:t-C"1 n. j ,... C"')C"') -C"') ("') !? AM/PM <( @N~~ '-67/385 re lO ~ ._ N ,___ -18/42 «) r--co ~N..-r 211149 ,,.) t \... North County Plaza Jefferson St. " t (' 100/262 _j (X) '° (X) 0) LO f€ 19/62-,:; -c.oC"') et: o;::::,___ ::E 29/78, C IO Ol ll. g N ~ ~ <( AM/PM @ .... ~ r--C") ~ ~ ~ '--19/4 ~ ~ o3 -23/12 ,,.; + '--r 3s11 s ____ __,;,SI Paseo Corto ;~~~;~tj O ~ l t 9/36-c5 36/99, 1 £2 '° ~ co ~ a ~..-.... :!: 0 0. ~ 2 <( " AM/PM ::i: I Base Analysis Geometry (CIP,TIF or Developer Fees) I@ I I Existing geometries j used for year 2030 analysis. @ Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. @ Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. Recommended Improvements/ f® I @ @) Modifications Existing geometry sufficient Existing geometry sufficient Existing geometry sufficient Intersection Geomet!I and Traffic Volumes EXHIBIT 3 (page 13 of 20) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 104 of 204 + _s:;:__ ('} .. JI Existing Geometry @ "O ., -4it'--0 Q'. (I) .Q> <( ---Alga Rd. <I> -~ _I 0 5! 1 e -a; :E ~1® ·o C: w ~ ·c _.) +---\... I ~ , ~tty a ~ i \__ -, l --g PalomarAirpor1 Rd. 81------! _1 ,~tr .e: ' ·g <( UJ ... "' E .2 t:. ~1@ ~ ~ i J \...ovlp ---0 ~ 4+'-..\... ( -~ Palomar Ai,port Rd. ! ..-1 ~ ~"itY g_ ./ ~ ~ :: 8 lo ~ 8 E ' "' ~ r a. ~ JN: 55.100214.001 December 2005 I Year 2030 Volume f®m~ NO ~!::'<:I' \... 24/10 (X) ,-N 0 ..--.. -17/12 C') (0 Lt') _.) t \... 0 ,21/14 0 Alga Rd. ~tr 555/348 _I CO IO (") 3/33-c5 <.O ;1j N ~-M 843/739, SI ,-.. 0) ~ __g OHO (;!; AM/PM ., "t ('I') ::! :E ,-<( @ ,-..-men IOOM \. ~ !:: ?;i "-316/313 IO 'Ot 00 N CO ..--299/576 _.) t \... 1 360/276 Pa1o7;;;;rt j· ~ ).1 r 1051351 --I ~ ~ ~ 155/34 ...__ UJ ;,; M ?-J :t ' .; c:o O"l AM/PM -g ...-~ <t < @'OT '<:I' (")O)C') ~ ~ ~ \... 236/229 ~ c5 ~ -967/2535 ... co ... _.) ♦ '-.. 1105/311 Palomar Airport Rd. "'\ t r 220/329 __j ~ 0 CJ) N ~ CO'O:tM 2314/1249-11 ~ ,-,-3 o "ti?l?; :t 170/57 ........ 2 (") .... (0 a. 'ill NMN :E AM/PM &_ <i: Base Analysis Geometry {(::If! TIF or Developer Fees) @ J,._ --1 ♦ ♦ '-.. \.. ~ .--:--;~ -, 8 Alga Rd. ~ "\"'\ t f y ~ ci j TIF handed @ Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. @ \...ovlp ..... ---.-4 t \...\... ~ f Palomar Airport Rd. le "'\'\ f F ~ I -;s - i ' ~ Recommended Improvements/ Modifications @ @ Base geometry sufficient \__ .... -,.~~~ ~--'--@ J ~ "itr ..... C ·a \ C w .g ~ Base geometry sufficient Intersection Geomet!!, and Traffic Volumes EXHIBIT 3 (page 14 of 20) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 105 of 204Existing Geometry "' @ ..: \._ovlp > ·c: 0 0 -8 -<V "' "ti I -"' -e ,..J • "" r <( -Palomar Airport Rd. 8 "ti :-g 8 '\'\ y a: j ,::: ~ : < --w m -0 E u ovlp' 't, 0 8 ni a.. 1:: @ \._ "' 'ti > ~ .l!: -ti) s 8. --(I) ~ f 0) ,..1-4 " 8 .!!! 0 0 0 -Palomar Airport Rd. "O '\"ft(' Ill 0 -j a:: t:: I 0 e--► [I. <( -e <ii -.\ll E ' < ..Q "' a.. L__ ~ @ 0 a: IC ~I~ 1 ~ -0 5 0 -~ "' 0 ..... ···~·~~~Ir ~~y g a:: t:: -fl. 0 ~~ -.. <( ' ~ !,-}) .... . S "' E E ..Q "' ~-IC u a. \ ~-= ---JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 \..}" Year 2030 Volume @ ;g (0. MoNd\._ o ~ :::!: .g 367/141 ~; ~ ! -1123/2147 ,..J i \i.. < , 105/285 Palomar Airport Rd. 8 '\ t r 301/184 _j C C") ""' ..-2406/1122 ··-t ~CHO -co~ w 140/152, j ~ N r-,.. ::i Ll) ~ AM/PM < @r--. lO 'ti ~ i M ~ "'44179 .._ i?.i ,-... ti) ..._ ~ ..-iN :i -914/1838 v..--lD.., ,) t \i.. u , 61/260 Palomar Airport Rd. ') t (' 948/410.,J . ;:!: ~ ~ 1149111ee-I !'.: ~ ~ 67/243-.,_ !! ?i5 ~ N ~ 'I -~ N I() N i AM/PM <t < fA?i ~ CO O CO ~ ;: ~ \._ 177 /49 ----gJ ~ ~ -889/947 ,) ♦ \.. , 173/94 Palomar Airport Rd. '1 t (' 119/56 _j .!! N OH'J 1287/1185-i ; g ~ 500/256 -.,_ ~ g ~ g :! 'I o N e; AM/PM ·j ~ t3 Base Analysis Geometry (CIP, TIF or Develo_eer Fees) @ Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. @ . ..., \._ ~ -ID -i --,..1.-4 "" 8 f Palomar Airport Rd. '\'\ t t (' :J l --Q. -l! ' "' ~ TIF Funded @ Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. Recommended Improvements/ Modifications @ Existing geometry sufficient @ -ci \._ .,: -ltl-f-..,.1.4' "" B f Palomar Airport Rd. '\'\ t t (' j t --Q. -I! ' .lli ~ @ Existing geometry sufficient Intersection Geome!!l and Traffic Volumes EXHIBIT 3 (page 15 of 20) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 106 of 204 (~; ··="" Existing Geometry C)@ ~ J.._ (/) "' ,:: -<I) ;;, -u. ~ t \..\.. r m ._ 't) Palomar Airport Rd. lll 0 "\"\ t y 0:: j 'I:! £ u5 -" -t: tu -..• ()J :, E ' II. ..Q (jj lll a. <I) @ -~ -0 -$ -r e <ii :E -fQl "I ~ :ll Palomar Airport Rd. O ~ -"\"\ ('(' 0 e-:a: '-"' E 0 <ii a. ~ ·g w ~ ·c <I) < -2! to .J Jll ~ & ~ 11 I @ \_ --.) t \... ~ Poinsol1ia Ln. gi-----..J 2 ~ti' -1j -" ' ~ ~ __s:::.-~ JN: 55-100214.001 DecornbeT 2005 ·G"' I~ Year 2030 Volume @ co .... ~,-.. § ~ ~ l '-415/46 Pd N ~ -2853/2080 ,,,.) } \.. ,641151 ~,--~i 581/86 ..J "\ f (' 1738/3012 -~ ~ ~ ~ 22/286 , J ~ ~ i ::ie Ii. C'? NI'--{!: AM@M w I @c-,l?;,-.. r----ct 0 ,.._ «-.,.. ""-0, co C\l "--245/71 ffi ~ ~ -1697/1291 .) • " r 2501ss3 0 Palo-ma-rA...,.irp_o_rt R-d-', gi---f--723/385 _j ~ u, ! 120011397-cS N ~ ~ 19112s2, t ~ ~ ~ ::ie -a, inco~ ~ AM/PM :i: «-~ tia\ (0 '::::::JO"d",... ~ ~ ~ '-242/241 0 ~ N ...,__ 296/364 '<t -.... .-1 • " , 2921414 Poinsettia Ln. "\ t /' 58/64 _j '" ,-._ N "-! c.o..-co 153/349 -·g ix; ~ ~ 39112 -... w ~ ~ ~ l 'i ..--ll) ~ AM/PM < ~ Base Analysis Geometry (CIP,T!F orDevelo~r Fees) @ . " ..... -~ t \..\.. -~ § Palomar Airport Rd. "\"\ t y j -(,I) -" "t:: -~ ' w Developer Funded -@ I\._ -0. -> -0 _..,,,, .... f Palomar Airport Rd "\"\ift (' ., Q. ... -g -C -21 .... 0 ' I lmprov&ments based on Year 2030 volumes for the future turning movements @ Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. Recommended Improvements/ Modifications I f@ I I Base geometry sufficient @ \_ -t --.) Ht\...\.. ,;-Palomar Airport Rd. "\"\ t tt t (' j @ ..: C --I -e ' ! Existing geometry sufficient .s-g Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes EXHIBIT 3 (page 16 of 20) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 107 of 204Existing Geometry @) ., .!-1:: 0 z --a:; r 0 -4 \... 0 ., IJ) "' a. Poinsettia Ln. --., j I"';, C: "' -l "' -~ :a -1A ' ~ -~ ~ CL @ >, n:, ! ~ "' -a. f! ,4 t \... r .!!! > <( Poinsettia Ln. -., "'\"'\ t y C j .'.:I t C1J E -a. ., avlp :\ (/J !'! C ·o ' .ll' ~ a.. 11® e "' \... ~ --~ GI u. .m C ~ ~ g n:, a:: --g ~ '.~·~.. -~ i -"' ~ I •l ~ \~"' = ~✓ 0 1:11 ~ . . . . <( 0 -. e -4 E r "' u Rancho Saf\ta Fe Rd. Olivanhain Rd. _j -! "t t' I.I. " ' fl ! i (/) _g <J C: /}, JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 Year 2030 Volume @ ... O') M '<t ... \... 51/36 o'i sq ..... M::!tO ('I') '<t -st -1052/1134 ,..) t \... ,-1129 Poinsettia Ln. 8 iJ "'\ t 647/504..,/ I' 0 m co se z 799/1069-a .-a5 M ~(')t'? ~ 20/83, i AM/PM .. ~ Cl. <( @) ... 0) r--. tO 0) <O r--. \...107159 £::! in -!: Ol .-C0 -300/637 r--. ... 0:) ,..) t \... 1a124 Poinsettia Ln. " t 535/218 ..,/ I' 0 r--. tO 435/313-t l.O ...... -('I') £::! ct) 228/463, Q.. (\I CJ) ~ e r--. o Q: .Ii C') l.O AM/PM ~ :ii <( @) e T" i \...13/23 ~ S ~ S -1137/978 ..-N N ~ 1458/504 ,..) ♦ \... Rancho Santa Fe Rd. Olivenhain Rd. 10/15 _j ~ "'\ t /' 4) (") co o:::) 984/1212-~ ~ ~ ~ 71/468, j ~ ~ :z AM/PM I .::,-(D i "' a: @) Base Analysis Geometry (CIP, TIF or Developer Fee~ Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. @) Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. @) Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. Recommended Improvements/ Modifications @ @ ® Existing geometry sufficient Existing geometry sufficient \... e .. ii --0 -~ f 48 Olivenhain Rd. g Rancho Santa Fe Rd, ~ ,"t r _j -:f : .... i'l a: ' C ~ .g C, /}, Intersection Geomet~ and Traffic Volumes EXHIBIT 3 {page 17 of 20) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 108 of 204 _,S._ N !~~ u/ Existing Geometry 11® ... e 81 J!1 8 --,:J j,._ 7--4 + t \.... ~ r i a:: Ql I.I. Calle Barcek>n~ t '"'\ t t Y' ~ ts i C "' oc -Ii:: ' ~ ., II) 0 J ~I@ I <h .3 '-~ :: -I I • + + 1.... J --"U m Cmo. De Los Coches ~ ttv "' ~ QI u.. ., .!!! u.. C: .'!! n, C (f) ., 0 II) £ _g C g "' .. c:: ct g1® ~ <( .!,... ~ 8 -"' _, ._ "t) "' 0 a:: i1'. 2 C: ~ _g g 8!. --4•+" ' La Cosio Ave. ..) -' ~ ~ _g j JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 • • • Year 2D30 Volume ® ~ co ..-Cl') (j) -0 ... ~ ~-!: '-115/38 ..-~ ~ -119/68 ~ t ¼.. 1278/1D8 0 Ca--::rle--:B=-a-rce_to_na--'8•1-----132/116 _) ~ '"'\ t I' 132/113-~ ~ ~ 8 97/63...,. i ~ l ~ :! "I tJ) t'I N o. AM/PM i ;'i; N ~ g .... <( ~ @) M ;'i; .--co c=.:i ~ '-163/72 ~ K:· , 4s111s3 t \.... 0 Cmo. Do Los Coches AM/PM (§0)~ ,.__ ..-...; t r ct ON ci IO v u.. C'"l N ~ ~C\I ., co 0) tJ) lO IO 0 (!) i ..-~ ~ § ~ \... 73/46 ~ ~ f2 -125/188 ~ t \.... , 10/59 La Costa Ave. 8 t 428/202 ..) ri1 ~ 10 t 153/192-if ~ ~ ~ I <( s ...._.....__-c--176/84----. c: CO~ N :i "I Jl 0) t--I!: AM/PM 0 ..-:E ii <( C & ® Base Analysis Geometry (CIP, TIF or Developer Fees} Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. @ Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. @) Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. Recommended Improvements/ Modifications ® @) @) Existing geometry sufficient Existing geometry sufficient .!,... ~ .. "" ~-;:: La Costa Ave. l ..J ~''""HF -u. ' I (J) i &! Intersection Geomet_!X and Traffic Volumes EXHIBIT 3 (page 18 of 20) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 109 of 204 ---··-.,--~--,.,S,) 11:,\ ' lfi ~ ~ • • • -g,@ &. 0 = w C: n, v, -"O "' 0 0::: QJ LI. <13 C: "' (/) 0 .r; 0 C: "' 0:: .~,@ 0 ~ 'al ::E -"0 Existing Geometry \...ovlp • t \... r § San Elijo Rd. tr 'ti 0: a: 1 ., i: "' (/) 0 'fi ; tr 1--r :g Melrose Dr. 0::: Q) LI. Cl} c j .. ~ttr -e ~, , Ii 0 ., C: 0:: !1. Intersection is located in the City of San Marcos -~ ~I ~ Q) 'ii () ._ "0 !IJ ® ,.I • " £ I Avda, De La Posla Q) LI. 19 C: <13 (,f) _g 0 C: n, 0:: -4 t-CaHeAoorvo ~~y if !JI c:; ~ ,g u C: ;}_ JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 @ Year 2030 Volume 0 ..-:,; ~ ~ \... 370/186 --.<"'0 M CIJ ..--9/42 ..-r--"'<t ,.) t \... 1 609/196 -----18 San Elli Rd, 0 87/20 _I -c" t r' 36J-l6 -I; o o Lt') u. ... 0 ,q-10/10 , s o ~ S!2 ~ ..-co~ AM/PM ,fi Lt') M :: {}_ @o~ O)f'-0 ~ ~ $ \... 106/150 re~~ -611154a .) t \... ,so12s Melrose Or. 7521381 _I :<i " t ,' ::E ~ < o: 0 0) 0 419/622-~ ~ ~ !Q 445/825 --.,_ ~ "1 !:: ~ :!!: 'ts Si~ Q;: AM/PM o m :i 8 < ® «> 0 ..-co .. 0: LO I'--...-\.._ 61/39 E i ~ -114139 Ol I \ 142/75 ,./ f -... f CalleAcen,o Avda. De La Posla . "'\ t (' 51120...I ~ ~ ~ ~ 34/8-'; 'c-J !::::: !:: 23/9' J M ~ re ~ r---.... :E AM/PM I <( i @ Base Analysis Geometry [CIP, TIF or Developer Fe<?~) \... .... .... ~ ' f t \.._ "! ~an E:lijo Rd . ! ,,Htr ~ I~ i I & Developer Funded @) .l. .... ~.) tt t "'"! f Me1rose0j 1~,~ tt f'" --~ Developer Funded ® i -6 ~ Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. Recommended Improvements/ Modifications @ @ Base geometry sufficient \. .... -..;_.1 Ht\...'-.. ~ MelroseOr. j ~ ""\ tt tr ® --~ u. i ~ "' a: Existing geometry sufficient Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes EXHIBIT 3 (page 19 of 20) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 110 of 204\'}( "!!= ..,S\ a; !!! (/) ~ C ~ 3 -1 a:: g .E J iii a • ■ ■ Ill Existing Geometry @) '---4tt\... r Levanto St. _j " tt y ' Legend ..... Geometry Mitigation .... Existing Geometry XX/XX AM/PM Peak Hour Turning Movements ~ Signalized Intersection ovlp Right-turn Overlap free Free Right-turn .... Stop Sign • ..J Future Roadway ExL JN: 55-100214.001 December 2005 Year 2030 Volume @ ~ .... ~(") ~ ~ ~ l '-165/87 ~ ~ ~ .--4/3 ,.J • \... Q , 1901100 78/15_) J " t !" 213-o m ~ ~ Levante s1. 1 C --O)-r-76/21 , ! ~ ~ @ ~ AM/PM w ~ :lE ..-<( @ Base Analysis Geometry (CIP,TIF or Developer Fees) Existing geometries used for year 2030 analysis. Recommended Improvements/ Modifications @ Existing geometry sufficient Intersection Geometry and Traffic Volumes EXHIBIT 3 (page 20 of 20) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 111 of 204Table 1 TIF intersection Level Of Service and Improvement Summary CitvQf Carl~bad 2005 TIF Year 2030 VIC • LOS Year 2()30 ICU Results Assumed 2030 Geometry: With Recommended/ Intersection VIC ·LOS Existing ot Base Geometry ( TIF, Additional Improvements Required? Improvements shown in Developer, or CIP Fees} Exhlbit2 AM PM AM PM 1) Alga Rd./ Allcante Rd. 0.628· 8 0.620-6 Existing Geometry. No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) 2) Cannon Rd. / Avenida Encinas 0.346-A 0.533·A Existing Geometry. No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) 3) Cannon Rd./ Paseo Del Norte 0.788 • C 0.966 • E Base Geometry. Yes (See Exhibil 3) 0.788 • C 0.854 • D 4) Cannon Rd. I LEG OLAND Dr. 0.683 • 8 0.850-0 Base Geometry. No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient) (See Exhibit 3) 5) Cannon Rd./ Faraday Ave. 0.611 • B 0.695-8 Existing Geometry. No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) 6) Cannon Rd./ College Blvd. 0.623-8 0.697-B Base Geometry. No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient) (See Exhibit 3) 7) Carlsbad Blvd. I State St 0.735-C 0.811 • D Existing Geometry. No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) 8) Carlsbad Blvd. I Carlsbad Village Dr. 0.581 ·A 0.709-C ExistJog Geometry. No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) 9) Carlsbad Blvd. I Tamarack Ave. 0.826 • 0 0.846-0 Exlsling Geomeuy. No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) 10) Carlsbad Blvd. l Cannon Rd. 0.824 • D 0.967 ·E Existing Geometry. Yes (See Exhibit 3) 0.642 • 8 0.751 • C 11) carlsbad Blvd. I Palomar Airport Rd. 0.723 • C 0.632-8 Base Geometry. No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient) (See Exhibit 3) 12) Carlsbad Blvd./ Poinsettia Ln. 0.578 • A 0.745-C Existing Geometry. No {Existing Geometry Sufficient) 13) SB Carlsbad Blvd./ Avenida Encinas 0.516 • A 0.589-A Existing Geometry. No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) 13) NS Cartsbad Blvd./ Avenida Encinas 0.381 • A 0.292 •A Existing Geometry. No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) 14) Carlsbad Village Dr. /Tamarack Ave. 0.329 • A 0294 •A Existing Geometry. No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) 15) Carlsbad Village Or, I Monroe St. 0.513 ·A 0.590-A Existing Geometry. No (Existfng Geometry Sufficient) 16) College Blvd./ Tamarack Ave (south) 0.871 • 0 0.742-C Existing Geometry. No {Existing Geometry Sl!fficlent) 17) College Blvd. I Carlsbad Village Or. 0.569-A 0.748-C Existing Geometry. No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) 1,..s\ Note: Ueficienl intersection operation ind1e<1ted !11 bold - July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 112 of 204 --S\. ~ Table 1 TIF Intersection Level Of Service and Improvement Summary Citv oICarlsbad __ 2QQ5 T!F Year 2030 ICU Results Assumed 2030 Geometry: Intersection VIC ·LOS Existing or Baso Geometry ( TIF, Developer, or CIP Fees) AM PM 16) College Blvd. / Faraday Ave. 0.661 • 8 0.707 • C Existing Geometry. 19) El Camino Rea! I Marron Rd. 0.763· C 0.788· C Existing Geometry. 20) El Camino Real/ Carlsbad Village Dr. 0.829·0 0.771 • C Existing Geometry. 21) El Camino Real/ Chestnut Ave. 0.726-C 0.519-A Existing Geometry. 22) El Camino Real / Tamarack Ave. 0.960 • E 0.920 • E Base Geometry. 23 J El Camino Real/ Cannon Rd. 0.653-B 0.607 • 8 Base Geometry. 24) El Camino Real I College Blvd. 0.756-C 0.811-D Existing Geometry. 25) El Camino Real/ Faraday Ave. 0.875•0 0.823 • D Base Geometry. 26) El Camino Real/ Palomar Airport Rd. 0.854 • D 1.088 • F Existing Geometry. 27) El Camino Real/ Camino Vida Roble 0.637 • B 0.758-C Base Geometry. 28) El Camino Real/ Poinsel!ia Ln. 0.704 ·C 0.754-C Base Geometry. 29) El Camino Real/ Alga Rd. 0.806 -0 0.876• D Existing Geometry. 30) El Camino Real/ La Costa Ave. 1.029 ·F 0.859· D Existing Geometry. 31) El Camino Real I Calle Barcelona 0.822-0 0.807 • D Existing Geometry. 32) El Camino Reai / Olivenhain Rd. 0.507 • B 0.805 • D Existing Geometry. 33) Ei Fuerte St. I Alga Rd. 0602 • B 0.717 -C Existing Geometry. 34) El Fuerte St. / Poinsettia Ln. 0.516 -A 0.608 • B Existing Geometry. 35) 1:.1 Fuerte St./ Faraday Ave. 0.650 ·B 0.551-A Base Geometry. Note Delic,ent intersection operation indicalell in bold. Year 2030 VIC • LOS With Recommended/ Additional Improvements Required? Improvements shown in Exhiblt2 AM PM No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No {Existing Geometry Sufficient) Yes (See Exhibit 3) 0.861 • D 0.731 - C No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient} (See Exhibit 3) No (2030 Base Goomelry Sufficient) (See Exhibit 3) No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient) (See Exhibit 3) Yes {See Exhibit 3} 0.720·C 0.868· 0 No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient) (See Exhlbll 3) No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient) {See Exhibit 3) No (EXistlng Geometry Sufficient) Yes (See Exhibit 3) 0.859-D 0.772•C No (Eltisting Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient} No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient) (See Exhibit 3) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 113 of 204 -5' ~ Table 1 TIF Intersection Level Of Service and Improvement Summary CJtv of Carlsbad 2Q05-TIE Year 2030 ICU Results Assumed 2030 Geometry: Intersection VIC-LOS Existing or Base Geometry ( TIF, Developer, or CIP Fees) AM PM 36) La Costa Ave, / Camino De Los Coches 0.509 • A 0.291 • A Existing Geometry. 37) Marron Rd./ Monroe St. 0.419-A 0.796 - C Existing Geometry. 38) Marron Rd./ Jefferson SL OA14 •A 0.742 • C Existing Geometry. 39) Melrose Dr. I Poinseltia Ln. 0.679·6 0.604 • B Existing Geometry. 40) Melrose Dr. I Alga Rd. 0.679 • B 0,836 • D Base Geomeby. 41) Palomar Airport Rd. / Avenida Encinas 0.924-E 0.806· 0 Existing Geometry. 42) Palomar Airport Rd. I Paseo Del Norte 0.767 -c 0.766-C Base Geometry. 43) Palomar Airport Rd./ Armada Or. 0.618 • B 0.790-C Existing Geometry. 44) Palomar Airport Rd./ College Blvd. 0.697 • B 0.910 • E Base Geometry. 45) Palomar Airport Rd./ Camino Vida Roble 0.662 • B 0.601 • B Existing Geometry. 46) Palomar Airport Rd. I El Fuerte St 0.854 • D 0.782 •C t:::xlsling Geometry. 47) Palomar Alrpcrt Rd. I Melrose Dr. 0.912 • E 0.881 • D Base Geometry. 48) Poinsettia Ln. / Avenida Encinas 0.62T • B 0.739-C Existing Geometry. 49) Poinsettia Ln. I Paseo Del Norte 0.817 ·D 0.873· D Existing Geometry. 50) Poinsetlia Ln. I Aviara Pkwy. 0.558·A 0.721 • C Existing Geometry. 51) Olivenhain Rd./ Rancho Santa Fe Rd. 0.926 -E 1.085. F Existing Geometry. 52) Rancho Santa Fe Rd. I Calle Barcelona 0.672 • B 0.566-A Exisling Geometry. 53) Rancho Santa Fe Rd./ Camino De Los 0.685 • B 0.497 • A Existing Geometry. Coches Nn!o: Oeficien! intersection operation indicated in bold. Year 2030 VIC • LOS With Recommended/ Additional Improvements Required? Improvements shown in Exhlbit2 AM PM No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient} No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient) {See Exhibit 3) Yes (See Exhibit 3) 0.685· B 0.697 • B No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficlent) (See Exhibit 3) No {Existing Geometry Sufficient) Yes (See Exhibit 3) 0.665-B 0.787 • C No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (2030 Base Geometry Sufficient} (See Exhibit 3) Yes (See Exhibit 3) 0.780-C 0.798-C No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) Yes (See Exhibit 3) 0.632· 8 0.674 • B No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 114 of 204Table 1 TIF Intersection Level Of Service and Improvement Summary Citv of Carlsbad 2005 TtF Year 2030 VIC • LOS Year 2030 ICU Results Assumed 2030 Geometry: With Recommended/ Intersection VIC -LOS Exi&tlng or Base Geometry ( TIF, Additional Improvements Required? lmprovementt shown in Developer, or CJP Fees) Exhlbit2 AM PM AM PM 54) Rancho Santa Fe Rd. I La Costa Ave. 0.90S ·E O.r:J • C Existing Geometry. Yes (See Exhibit 3) 0.728-C 0.678 • 8 55} Rancho Santa Fe Rd./ San Elijo Rd. 0.698 • B 0,523 • A Base Geometry. No (2030 Base Geometry sumcient) (See Exhibit 3) 56) Rancho Santa Fe Rd./ Melrose Dr. 0.903 • E 0.680-B Base Geometry. Yes (See Exhibit 3) 0.857-D 0.631 • B 57) Rancho Santa Fe Rd./ Calle Acervo 0.839-0 0.761 • C ExlsUng Geometry. No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) 58) El Camino Real/ Levante SI. 0.633 • B 0.636 • 8 Existing Geometry. No (Existing Geometry Sufficient) ~ Note: Deflcienl Intersection operation indiC,Hed in bold. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 115 of 204 \.n t__,\ TIF Intersection Data Collection Monitoring Sheet Int# north-south east-west Count Data Geometry Post..Procass Worksheet Alicqnte Alga 0 21 ~ 2 Avenida Encinas Cannon 0 0 0 3 Paseo Del Norte Cannon Road 0 0 0 4 LegoLand Cannon 0 0 0 5 Faraday Avenue Cannon Road 0 0 0 6 College Cannon 0 0 0 7 Carlsbad Blvd State Street 0 0 0 8 Carlsbad Blvd Carlsbad Village Drive 0 0 0 9 Carlsbad Blvd Tamarack 0 0 0 10 Carlsbad Blvd Cannon 0 0 0 11 Carlsbad Blvd Palomar Airport Road 0 0 0 12 Carlsbad Blvd Poinsettia 0 0 0 13 Carlsbad Blvd Avenida Encinas 0 0 0 14 Tamarack Carlsbad Village Drive 0 0 0 15 Monroe Street Carlsbad Village Drive 0 0 0 16 College Tamarack (S) 0 0 0 17 College Carlsbad Village Drive 0 0 0 18 College Faraday 0 0 0 19 El Camino Real Marron 0 0 0 20 El Camino Real Carlsbad Village Dr 0 0 0 Friday, January 13, 2006 Report: Intersection List 2 ICU WorkSbeet Mitigation 0 □ 0 D 0 0 0 □ 0 D 0 0 0 D 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 D 0 D 0 D 0 D 0 D 0 □ 0 □ 0 □ Page 1 of 3 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 116 of 204 ..._0 -s--Int# north-south 21 El Camino Real 22 El Camino Real 23 El Camino Real 24 El Camino Real 25 El Camino Real 26 El Camino Real 27 El Camino Real 28 El Camino Real 29 El Camino Real 30 El Camino Real 31 Calle Barcelona 32 Olivenhein 33 El Fuerte 34 El Fuerte 35 El Fuerte 36 Camino de ios Caches 37 Marron 38 Marron 39 Melrose Drive 40 Melrose Drive 41 Avenida Encinas 42 Paseo Del Norte Foday,January13,2006 Report; Intersection List 2 east-west Count Data Chestnut 0 Tamarack @ Cannon @ College @ Faraday @ Palomar Airport Road @ Camino Vida Roble 0 Poinsettia @ Alga @ La Costa @ El Camino Real @ El Camino Real 0 Alga @ Poinsettia (Future) □ Faraday (Future) □ La Costa Avenue 21 Monroe @ Jefferson @ Poinsettia @ Alga @ Palomar Aiport Road @ Palomar Airport Road @ Geometry Post-Process Worksheet ICU Worksheet Mitigation @ @ @ D @ @ @ @ 0 @ @ D @ @ @ □ @ @ @ □ 0 21 21 @ @ @ @ □ @ @ @ □ @ @ @ D @ @ @ @ @ @ @ D @ @ @ □ 21 @ 0 □ @ @ 0 □ 21 @ 0 D @ @ @ D @ @ @ □ @ @ 0 □ 0 @ @ □ @ 21 @ D @ 21 @ @ @ 0 @ □ Page 2 of 3 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 117 of 204 \]'\ ~ lllt# north-south 43 Armada/Costco 44 CoHege-Aviara 45 Camino Vida Roble 46 El Fuerte 47 Melrose Drive 48 Avenida Encinas 49 Paseo Del Norte 50 Aviara 51 Rancho Santa Fe 52 Calle Barcelona 53 Camino de los Coches 54 La Costa 55 Rancho Santa Fe 56 Rancho Santa Fe 57 Rancho Santa Fe 58 E! Camino Rear Friday, January 13, 2006 Report: 1nte1seclion list 2 east-west cuuntoata Palomar Airport Road 0 Palomar Airport Road ~ Palomar Airport Road 0 Palomar Airport Road 0 Palomar Airport Road 0 Poinsettia lane 0 Poinsettia 0 Poinsettia 0 Olivenhain•Camino Al 0 Rancho Santa Fe 0 Rancho Santa Fe 0 Rancho Santa Fe 0 San Ehjo Road 0 Melrose Dr 0 CalleAcervo 0 Levante 0 Geometry Post.Prouss Worksheet ICU Worksheet Mitigation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 □ 0 0 0 □ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 □ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 @ □ 0 0 @ □ Page3of 3 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 118 of 204 APPENDIX B TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE-COST ESTIMATES July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 119 of 204 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM -2008 UPDATE COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Project Title: Intersection PAR and Paseo Del Norte Project Description: Widen EB PAR from PDN to Armada to provide a right turn only lane. Estimated By: City of Carlsbad Date: 3/08 Preliminary Cost Estimate ITEM ESTIMATED NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT 1 Mobilization @l 5% 1 LS. 2 Schedule 4 MO 3 Field Office 4 MO 4 SWPPP Preparation 1 LS. 5 SWPPP Maintenance 4 MO 4 Traffic Control 1 LS 5 Clear and Grub 0.2 AC 6 Sawcut 1,550 LF 7 Remove and Relocate Fencing 1,500 LF 8 Remove AC Pavement & Base 0 SF 9 Remove Curb & Gutter 1,500 LF 10 Remove Median Curb 0 LF 11 Remove Sidewalk 7,500 SF 12 Removal of Exist. Curb Inlet 2 EA 13 Cold Planina 15' wide\ 0 SF 14 Remove Trees 0 EA 15 Remove Parkway Landscape 6,100 SF 16 Remove Median Hardscape/Landscape 0 SF 17 Unclassified Excavation 2,330 CYD 18 Exported Soils 2,330 CYD 19 Retainina Wall 0 SF 20 Local PCC DePressions <DS-1\ 0 SF 21 Curb Inlet 2 EA 22 Storm Drain Cleanout 0 EA 23 Pipe Collar 0 EA 24 18" RCP (D1350) 0 LF 25 24" RCP (01350) 24 LF 26 4"PVC 0 LF 27 Modifv C.I./C.O. 0 EA 28 6" PCC Curb and Gutter 1,500 LF 29 8" PCC Curb Onlv 0 LF 30 PCC Sidewalk 7,500 SF 31 PCC Driveway 0 SF 32 Cross Gutter 0 SF 33 Pedestrian Ramp 2 EA 34 Aggregate Base 0 T 35 Asphalt Concrete 675 T 36 AC Overlay 1,890 T 37 Median Paving 0 SF 38 Median Landscaping 0 SF 39 Slope Planting 12,000 SF 40 Relocate Fire Hydrants 1 EA 41 Relocate Water Meter 0 EA 42 Relocate Backflow Preventer 0 EA 43 Relocate Air Vacuum 0 EA 44 Relocate Vents 0 EA 45 Adi. Exist. MH to orade 0 EA 46 Adiust X-Pull Box MH 0 EA 47 Adiust Vault to Grade 0 EA 48 Street Light 2 EA Intersection 1 -PAR 1nd Paseo Del Norte to Armada 3 08.xls UNIT ITEM PRICE COST $38,144.05 $38,144 $1,000.00 $4,00C $5,000.00 $20,000 $15,000.00 $15,000 $1,000.00 $4,000 $40,000.00 $40,000 $2,000.00 $400 $2.00 $3,100 $15.00 $22,500 $2.00 $0 $10.00 $15,000 $10.00 $0 $10.00 $75,000 $1,000.00 $2,000 $1.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $2.00 $12,200 $4.00 $0 $30.00 $69,900 $15.00 $34,950 $80.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $7,000.00 $14,000 $5,000.00 $0 $1,000.00 $0 $108.00 $0 $144.00 $3,456 $24.00 $0 $3,000.00 $0 $18.00 $27,000 $15.00 $0 $5.00 $37,500 $5.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $1,500.00 $3,000 $30.0C $( $95.00 $64,125 $95.00 $179,550 $6.00 $0 $2.00 $0 $1.00 $12,000 $500.00 $500 $300.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $1,500.00 $0 $400.00 $0 $175.00 $0 $2,000.00 $0 $5,000.00 $10,000 1 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 120 of 204 49 Traffic Siana! (one lea) 0.25 LS $190,000.00 $47,500 50 Traffic Video Detection (four leQs) 0 L.S. $30,000.00 $0 51 Relocate SiQns 6 EA $200.00 $1,200 52 Install Bridae Sian 1 EA $40,000.00 $40,000 53 Install Sian Complete 0 EA $250.0C $0 54 Remove Stripina 0 LF $2.00 $0 55 Stripina 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000 56 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $801,025 57 Construction Continaencv at 15% 1 L.S. $120,150.00 $120,150 58 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $921,175.05 59 Riaht of Wav Acauisition 0 SF $10.00 $0 60 Plannina/Permittina at 5% 1 L.S. $46,060.00 $46,060 61 Desian at 15% 1 L.S. $138,180.00 $138,180 62 Const. Admin., Inspection and testing at 15% 1 L.S. $138,180.00 $138,180 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST==> $1,244,000 Intersection 1 -PAR and Paseo Del Norte to Armada 3 08.xls 2 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 121 of 204 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM -2008 UPDATE COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Project Title: Intersection -Palomar Airport Road and College Blvd / Aviara Parkway Project Description: Add 500 foot southbound right turn lane, lengthen right turn pocket and transitions Estimated By: City of Carlsbad Date: 3/08 Preliminary Cost Estimate ITEM ESTIMATED UNIT NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE 1 Mobilization @. 5% 1 LS. $17,080.00 2 Schedule 4 MO $1,000.0C 3 Field Office 0 MO $5,000.00 4 SWPPP Preoaration 1 LS. $15,000.00 5 SWPPP Maintenance 4 MO $1,000.00 6 Traffic Control 1 LS $40,000.00 7 Clear and Grub 1 AC $2,000.00 8 Sawcut 1,500 LF $2.00 9 Remove AC Pavement & Base 1,500 SF $2.00 10 Remove Curb & Gutter 1,500 LF $10.00 11 Remove Median Curb 0 LF $10.00 12 Remove Sidewalk 4,000 SF $10.00 13 Removal of Exist. Curb Inlet 0 EA $1,000.00 14 Cold Planina 15' wide) 0 SF $1.00 15 Remove Trees 0 EA $500.00 16 Remove Parkwav Landscaoe 0 SF $2.00 17 Remove Median Hardscape/Landscape 0 SF $4.00 18 Unclassified Excavation 550 CYD $30.00 19 Exoorted Soils 550 CYD $15.00 2Q Retainina Wall 400 SF $80.00 21 Local PCC Deoressions /DS-1) 0 SF $5.00 22 Curb Inlet ·O EA $7,000.00 23 Storm Drain Cleanout 0 EA $5,000.00 24 Pipe Collar 0 EA $1,000.00 25 18" RCP (D1350) 0 LF $108.00 26 24" RCP (D1350) 0 LF $144.00 27 4"PVC 0 LF $24.00 28 Modify C.I./C.O. 0 EA $3,000.00 29 6" PCC Curb and Gutter 1,500 LF $18.00 30 8" PCC Curb Only 0 LF $15.00 31 PCC Sidewalk 4,000 SF $5.00 32 PCC Driveway 0 SF $5.00 33 Cross Gutter 0 SF $5.00 34 Pedestrian Ramp 1 EA $1,500.00 35 Aggregate Base 300 T $30.00 36 Asohalt Concrete 450 T $95.00 37 AC Overlav 0 T $95.00 38 Median Pavina 0 SF $6.00 39 Median Landscaoina 0 SF $2.00 40 Relocate Fire Hvdrants 0 EA $500.0C 41 Relocate Water Meter 0 EA $300.0C 42 Relocate Backflow Preventer 0 EA $500.00 43 Relocate Air Vacuum 0 EA $300.00 .-44 . -Relocate Vents 0 EA $1,500.00 -· 45 Adj. Exist. MH to arade 0 EA $400.00 46 Adjust X-Pull Box MH 0 EA $175.00 47 Adjust Vault to Grade 0 EA $2,000.00 48 Street Licht 0 EA $5,000.00 49 Traffic Sianal (four way) 0.25 LS $190,000.00 50 Traffic Video Detection (four legs) 0 L.S. $30,000.0C Intersection 2 -PAR at College and Aviara 3 OS.xis ITEM COST $17,08( $4,000 $0 $15,000 $4,000 $40,000 $2,000 $3,000 $3,000 $15,000 $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $C $0 $0 $16,500 $8,250 $32,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,000 $0 $20,00C $0 $0 $1,500 $9,000 $42,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $47,500 $0 1 I July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 122 of 204 51 Relocate Siqns 0 EA $200.00 $0 52 Install Siqn Complete 6 EA $250.00 $1,500 53 Remove Stripina 3,000 LF $2.00 $6,000 54 Strioina 3,600 LF $1.00 $3,600 55 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $358,680 56 Construction Continqencv at 15% 1 LS. $53,800.00 $53,800 57 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $412,480 58 Riqht of Wav Acauisition 3,000 SF $10.00 $30,00C 59 Plannina/Permittina at 5% 1 LS. $20,620.00 $20,620 60 Desian at 15% 1 LS. $61,870.00 $61,870 61 Const. Admin. , Inspection and testing at 15% 1 LS. $61,870.00 $61,870 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST==> $587,000 Intersection 2 -PAR at College and Aviara 3 08.xls 2 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 123 of 204 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM -2008 UPDATE COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Project Title: Intersection 3 -El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road Project Description: Construct 250 long, 10 foot wide free right turn lane from east bound PAR to south bound ECR, construct 120 foot taper, modify traffic signal mast arm Estimated By: City of Carlsbad Date: 3/08 Preliminary Cost Estimate ITEM ESTIMATED UNIT ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST 1 Mobilization @ 5% 1 L.S. $17.412.21 $17,412 2 Schedule 3 MO $1,000.0C $3,00C 3 Field Office 0 MO $5,000.0C $0 4 Traffic Control 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000 5 Clear and Grub 0.19 AC $2,000.00 $386 6 Remove and relocate 2 mailboxes 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000 7 Sawcut 420 LF $2.00 $840 8 Remove AC Pavement & Base 840 SF $2.00 $1,680 9 Remove Curb & Gutter 420 LF $10.0C $4,200 10 Remove Median Curb 0 LF $10.00 $0 11 Remove Sidewalk 1,890 SF $10.00 $18,900 12 Removal of Exist. Curb Inlet 0 EA $1,000.00 $0 13 Cold Planinq (5' wide) 0 SF $1.0C $0 14 Remove Trees 2 EA $500.00 $1,000 15 Remove Parkway Landscape 0 SF $2.00 $0 16 Remove Median Hardscaoe/Landscape 0 SF $4.00 $0 17 Unclassified Excavation 933 CYD $30.00 $28,000 18 Exported Soils 933 CYD $15.00 $13,995 19 Retaining Wall 1,250 SF $80.00 $100,00C 20 Local PCC Depressions (DS-1) 0 SF $5.00 $0 21 Curb Inlet 0 EA $7,000.00 $0 22 Storm Drain Cleanout 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000 23 Pipe Collar 0 EA $1,000.00 $0 24 18" RCP (D13501 0 LF $108.00 $0 25 24" RCP ID1350) 420 LF $144.00 $60,480 26 4"PVC 0 LF $24.00 $0 27 Modifv C.1./C.O. 0 EA $3,000.00 $0 28 6" PCC Curb and Gutter 420 LF $18.00 $7,560 29 8" PCC Curb Onlv 0 LF $15.00 $0 30 PCC Sidewalk 2,100 SF $5.00 $10,500 31 PCC Drivewav 0 SF $5.00 $0 32 Cross Gutter 0 SF $5.00 $0 33 Pedestrian Ramp 1 EA $1,500.00 $1,500 34 Aooreqate Base 508 T $30.00 $15,246 35 Asphalt Concrete 182 T $95.00 $17,243 36 AC Overlay 0 T $95.00 $0 37 Median PavinQ 0 SF $6.00 $0 38 Median Landscaping 0 SF $2.00 $0 39 Relocate Fire Hydrants 0 EA $500.00 $0 40 Relocate Water Meter 0 EA $300.00 $0 41 Relocate Backflow Preventer 0 EA $500.00 $0 42 Relocate Air Vacuum 0 EA $300.00 $0 43 Relocate Vents 0 EA $1,500.00 $0 44 Relocate irriQation control! and power service 2 EA $200.00 $400 45 Redo parkway irriQation 1 LS $1,500.00 $1,500 46 Adi. Exist. MH to orade 0 EA $400.00 $0 47 Adjust X-Pull Box MH 5 EA $175.00 $875 48 Adjust Vault to Grade 0 EA $2,000.00 $0 49 Street Liqht 0 EA $5,000.00 $0 Intersection 3 -El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road 3 OB.xis July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 124 of 204 50 Traffic Siana! (four way) 0 LS $190,000.00 $0 51 Traffic Video Detection (four legs) 0 LS. $30,000.00 $0 52 Traffic sianal mast arm and pole reolacement 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000 53 Relocate Signs 2 EA $200.00 $400 54 Install Sien Comolete 0 EA $250.00 $0 55 Remove Strioina 370 LF $2.00 $740 56 Strioina 1 LS $3,800.00 $3,800 57 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $365,656 58 Construction Continaency at 15% 1 LS. $54,850.00 $54,850 59 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $420,506.38 60 Riaht of Way ACQuisition 0 SF $10.00 $0 61 Plannina/Permittina at 5% 1 LS. $21,030.00 $21,030 62 Desian at 15% 1 LS. $63,080.00 $63,080 63 Const. Admin. , Inspection and testing at 15% 1 LS. $63,080.00 $63,080 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST==> $568,000 Intersection 3 -El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road 3 08.xls July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 125 of 204 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM-2008 UPDATE COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Project Title: Intersection -Palomar Airport Road and El Fuerte Street Right Turn Lane Project Description: Widening and Right Turn Only Lane for Westbound PAR Estimated By: City of Carlsbad Date: 3/08 Preliminary Cost Estimate ITEM ESTIMATED NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT 1 Mobilization ~ 5% 1 LS. 2 Schedule 3 MO 3 Field Office 0 MO 4 Traffic Control 1 LS 5 Clear and Grub 1.25 AC 6 Sawcut 600 LF 7 Remove AC Pavement & Base 0 SF 8 Remove Curb & Gutter 600 LF 9 Remove Median Curb 0 LF 10 Remove Sidewalk 3,000 SF 11 Removal of Exist. Curb Inlet 0 EA 12 Cold Planim:i (5' wide) 0 SF 13 Remove Trees 20 EA 14 Remove Parkway Landscape 0 SF 15 Remove Median Hardscape/Landscape 0 SF 16 Unclassified Excavation 315 CYD 17 Exoorted Soils 315 CYD 18 Retaining Wall 4,160 SF 19 Local PCC Depressions IDS-1) 0 SF 20 Curb Inlet 0 EA 21 Storm Drain Cleanout 0 EA 22 Pioe Collar 0 EA 23 18" RCP /D1350l 0 LF 24 24" RCP ID1350) 0 LF 25 4"PVC 0 LF 26 Modifv C.1./C.O. 0 EA 27 6" PCC Curb and Gutter 600 LF 28 8" PCC Curb Onlv 0 LF 29 PCC Sidewalk 3,000 SF 30 PCC Drivewav 0 SF 31 Cross Gutter 0 SF 32 Pedestrian Ramp 1 EA 33 Aaareaate Base 450 T 34 Asohalt Concrete 160 T 35 AC Overlav 0 T 36 Median Pavino 0 SF 37 Median Landscapinq 0 SF 38 Relocate Fire Hydrants 0 EA 39 Relocate Water Meter 0 EA 40 Relocate Backflow Preventer 0 EA 41 Relocate Air Vacuum 0 EA 42 Relocate Vents 0 EA 43 Adi. Exist. MH to grade 0 EA 44 Adjust X-Pull Box MH 0 EA 45 Adiust Vault to Grade 0 EA 46 Street Lioht 1 EA 47 Traffic Siana! (four way) 0 LS 48 Traffic Video Detection (four legs) 0 LS. 49 Relocate Siqns 5 EA 50 Install Sion Complete 2 EA Intersection 4 -PAR and El Fuerte 3 08.xls UNIT PRICE $27,163.75 $1,000.00 $5,000.0C $30,000.0C $2,000.00 $2.00 $2.00 $10.0C $10.00 $10.00 $1,000.00 $1.00 $500.00 $2.00 $4.00 $30.00 $15.00 $80.00 $5.00 $7,000.00 $5,000.00 $1,000.00 $108.00 $144.00 $24.00 $3,000.00 $18.00 $15.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $1,500.00 $30.00 $95.00 $95.00 $6.00 $2.00 $500.00 $300.00 $500.00 $300.00 $1,500.00 $400.00 $175.00 $2,000.00 $5,000.00 $190,000.00 $30,000.00 $200.00 $250.00 ITEM COST $27,164 $3,000 $0 $30,000 $2,500 $1,200 $0 $6,000 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $9,45( $4,725 $332,80( $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,800 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $1,500 $13,500 $15,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $47,500 $0 $1,000 $500 1 / 0 lP July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 126 of 204 51 Remove Strioina 1,000 LF $2.00 $2,000 52 Strioina 1,600 LF $1.00 $1,600 61 6' Chain Link Fence 550 LF $15.00 $8,250 61 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $570,439 61 Construction Continaencv at 15% 1 L.S. $85,570.00 $85,570 61 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $656,009 61 Riaht of Wav Acauisition 3,000 SF $10.00 $30,000 61 Plannina/Permittina at 5% 1 L.S. $32,800.00 $32,800 61 Design at 15% 1 LS. $98,400.00 $98,400 61 Const. Admin. , Inspection and testing at 15% 1 LS. $98,400.00 $98,400 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST==> $916,000 Intersection 4 -PAR and El Fuerte 3 OS.xis 2 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 127 of 204 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM -2008 UPDATE COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Project Title: Intersection -PAR and Melrose Drive Project Description: PAR EB RT on to SB Melrose Avenue Estimated By: City of Carlsbad Date: 3/08 Preliminary Cost Estimate ITEM ESTIMATED NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT 1 Mobilization @ 5% 1 LS. 2 Schedule 2 MO 3 Field Office 0 MO 4 Traffic Control 1 LS 5 Clear and Grub 0.50 AC 6 Sawcut 600 LF 7 Remove AC Pavement & Base 0 SF 8 Remove Curb & Gutter 580 LF 9 Remove Median Curb 0 LF 10 Remove Sidewalk 2,900 SF 11 Removal of Exist. Curb Inlet 0 EA 12 Cold Planing (5' wide) 0 SF 13 Remove Trees 0 EA 14 Remove Parkway Landscape 6,000 SF 15 Remove Median Hardscape/Landscape 0 SF 16 Unclassified Excavation 690 CYD 17 Exoorted Soils 0 CYD 18 Retainina Wall 0 SF 19 Local PCC Deoressions IDS-1) 0 SF 20 Curb Inlet 0 EA 21 Storm Drain Cleanout 0 EA 22 Pipe Collar 0 EA 23 18" RCP (D1350) 0 LF 24 24" RCP /01350) 0 LF 25 4" PVC 0 LF 26 Modifv C.1./C.O. 0 EA 27 6" PCC Curb and Gutter 560 LF 28 8" PCC Curb Onlv 0 LF 29 PCC Sidewalk 2,800 SF 30 PCC Drivewav 0 SF 31 Cross Gutter 0 SF 32 Pedestrian Ramp 1 EA 33 Aaareaate Base 920 T 34 Asohalt Concrete 315 T 35 AC Overlay 0 T 36 Median Pavino 0 SF 37 Median Landscaoino 0 SF 38 Relocate Fire Hydrants 0 EA 39 Relocate Water Meter 0 EA 40 Relocate Backflow Preventer 0 EA 41 Relocate Air Vacuum 0 EA 42 Relocate Vents 0 EA 43 Adi. Exist. MH to arade 0 EA 44 Adjust X-Pull Box MH 0 EA 45 Adjust Vault to Grade 0 EA 46 Utilitv Relocations 1 LS 47 Street Light 0 EA 48 Traffic Signal (four way) 0 LS 49 Relocate Signal Pole Tvoe A 1 LS 50 Traffic Video Detection (four legs) 0 LS. Intersection 5 -PAR and Melrose Drive 3 OS.xis UNIT ITEM PRICE COST $9,925.25 $9,925 $1,000.00 $2,000 $5,000.00 $0 $20,000.00 $20,000 $2,000.00 $1,000 $2.00 $1,200 $2.00 $0 $10.00 $5,800 $10.00 $0 $10.00 $29,000 $1,000.00 $0 $1.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $2.00 $12,000 $4.00 $0 $30.00 $20,700 $15.00 $0 $80.00 $0 $5.00 $C $7,000.00 $0 $5,000.00 $0 $1,000.00 $0 $108.00 $0 $144.00 $0 $24.00 $0 $3,000.00 $0 $18.00 $10,080 $15.00 $0 $5.00 $14,000 $5.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $1,500.00 $1,500 $30.00 $27,600 $95.00 $29,925 $95.00 $0 $6.00 $0 $2.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $1,500.00 $0 $400.00 $0 $175.00 $0 $2,000.00 $0 $10,000.00 $10,000 $5,000.00 $0 $190,000.00 $0 $10,000.00 $10,000 $30,000.00 $0 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 128 of 204 51 Relocate SiQns 0 EA $200.00 $0 52 Install SiQn Complete 0 EA $250.00 $0 53 Remove StripinQ 600 LF $2.00 $1,200 54 Striping 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $208,430 1 Construction Contirn:iencv at 15% 1 L.S. $31,260.00 $31,260 2 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $239,690 3 Rioht of Wav Acauisition 3,000 SF $10.00 $30,000 4 Plannino/Permittino at 5% 1 L.S. $11,980.00 $11,980 5 Desian at 15% 1 L.S. $35,950.00 $35,950 6 Const. Admin. , Inspection and testing at 15% 1 L.S. $35,950.00 $35,950 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST==> $354,000 Intersection 5 -PAR and Melrose Drive 3 08.xls 2 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 129 of 204 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM -2008 UPDATE COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Project Title: Intersection -Melrose SIB Right Turn Lane to W/B PAR Project Description: PAR EB RT on to SB Melrose Avenue Estimated By: City of Carlsbad Date: 3/08 Preliminary Cost Estimate ITEM ESTIMATED NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT 1 Mobilization @ 5% 1 L.S. 2 Schedule 2 MO 3 Field Office 0 MO 4 Traffic Control 1 LS 5 Clear and Grub 0.50 AC 6 Sawcut 675 LF 7 Remove AC Pavement & Base 0 SF 8 Remove Curb & Gutter 650 LF 9 Remove Median Curb 0 LF 10 Remove Sidewalk 3,300 SF 11 Removal of Exist. Curb Inlet 0 EA 12 Cold Planirn:l (5' wide) 0 SF 13 Remove Trees 0 EA 14 Remove Parkway Landscape 0 SF 15 Remove Median Hardscape/Landscape 0 SF 16 Unclassified Excavation 1 LS 17 Exported Soils 0 CYD 18 Retaining Wall 0 SF 19 Local PCC Depressions (DS-1) 0 SF 20 Curb Inlet 0 EA 21 Storm Drain Cleanout 0 EA 22 PiPeCollar 0 EA 23 18" RCP <D1350\ 0 LF 24 24" RCP (D1350) 0 LF 25 4"PVC 0 LF 26 Modify C.I./C.O. 0 EA 27 6" PCC Curb and Gutter 650 LF 28 8" PCC Curb Only 0 LF 29 PCC Sidewalk 3,300 SF 30 PCC Driveway 0 SF 31 Cross Gutter 0 SF 32 Pedestrian Ramp 1 EA 33 Aooreaate Base 955 T 34 Asphalt Concrete 295 T 35 AC Overlay 0 T 36 Median Paving 0 SF 37 Median Landscaping 0 SF 38 Relocate Fire Hydrants 0 EA 39 Relocate Water Meter 0 EA 40 Relocate Backflow Preventer 0 EA 41 Relocate Air Vacuum 0 EA 42 Relocate Vents 0 EA 43 Adi. Exist. MH to orade 0 EA 44 Adjust X-Pull Box MH 0 EA 45 Adiust Vault to Grade 0 EA 46 Utilitv Relocations 0 LS 47 Street Lioht 0 EA 48 Traffic Siona! (four way) one leo 1 LS 49 Relocate Signal Pole TYPe A 0 LS 50 Traffic Video Detection (four legs) 0 L.S. Intersection 6 -Melrose RT to WB PAR 3 08.xls UNIT ITEM PRICE COST $11,661.25 $11,661 $1,000.00 $2,000 $5,000.00 $0 $20,000.00 $20,000 $2,000.00 $1,000 $2.00 $1,350 $2.00 $0 $10.00 $6,500 $10.00 $0 $10.00 $33,000 $1,000.00 $0 $1.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $2.00 $0 $4.00 $0 $25,000.00 $25,000 $15.00 $0 $80.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $7,000.00 $0 $5,000.00 $0 $1,000.00 $0 $108.00 $0 $144.00 $0 $24.00 $0 $3,000.00 $0 $18.00 $11,700 $15.00 $0 $5.00 $16,500 $5.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $1,500.00 $1,500 $30.00 $28,650 $95.00 $28,025 $95.00 $0 $6.00 $0 $2.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $1,500.00 $0 $400.00 $0 $175.00 $0 $2,000.00 $0 $10,000.00 $0 $5,000.00 $0 $50,000.00 $50,000 $10,000.00 $0 $30,000.00 $0 1 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 130 of 204 51 Relocate Sians 0 EA $200.00 $0 52 Install Sian Comolete 1 LS. $5,000.00 $5,000 53 Remove Strioina 0 LF $2.0C $0 54 Strioina 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $244,886 1 Construction Continaencv at 15% 1 LS. $36,730.00 $36,730 2 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $281,616 3 RiQht of Way Acquisition 3,000 SF $10.00 $30,000 4 PlanninQ/PermittinQ at 5% 1 LS. $14,080.00 $14,080 5 Desian at 15% 1 LS. $42,240.00 $42,240 6 Const. Admin. , Inspection and testing at 15% 1 LS. $42,240.00 $42,240 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST ==> $410,000 Intersection 6 -Melrose RT to WB PAR 3 08.xls 2 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 131 of 204 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM -2008 UPDATE COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Project Title: Dual Left Turn Lanes at Melrose Drive and Alga Road Project Description: Dual Left Turn Lanes for NB and EB (Re-striping only for SB) Estimated By: City of Carlsbad Date: 3/08 Preliminary Cost Estimate ITEM ESTIMATED NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT 1 Mobilization @ 5% 1 L.S. 2 Schedule 3 MO 3 Field Office 0 MO 4 Traffic Control 3 LS 5 Clear and Grub 0 AC 6 Sawcut 2,850 LF 7 Remove AC Pavement & Base 5,040 SF 8 Remove Curb & Gutter 0 LF 9 Remove Median Curb 2,800 LF 10 Remove Sidewalk 0 SF 11 Removal of Exist. Curb Inlet 0 EA 12 Cold PlaninQ (5' wide) 0 SF 13 Remove Trees 7 EA 14 Remove Parkway Landscape 0 SF 15 Remove Median Hardscape/Landscape 19,950 SF 16 Unclassified Excavation 560 CYD 17 Exoorted Soils 560 CYD 18 Retainino Wall 0 SF 19 Local PCC Depressions /DS-1) 0 SF 20 Curb Inlet 0 EA 21 Storm Drain Cleanout 0 EA 22 Pipe Collar 0 EA 23 18" RCP /D1350) 0 LF 24 24" RCP /D1350) 0 LF 25 4"PVC 0 LF 26 Modify C.1./C.O. 0 EA 27 6" PCC Curb and Gutter 0 LF 28 8" PCC Curb Only 2,800 LF 29 PCC Sidewalk 0 SF 30 PCC Driveway 0 SF 31 Cross Gutter 0 SF 32 Pedestrian Ramp 0 EA 33 AQQreQate Base 795 T 34 Asphalt Concrete 283 T 35 AC Overlay 0 T 36 Median Paving 16,250 SF 37 Median Landscaoina 0 SF 38 Relocate Fire Hvdrants 0 EA 39 Relocate Water Meter 0 EA 40 Relocate Backflow Preventer 0 EA 41 Relocate Air Vacuum 0 EA 42 Relocate Vents 0 EA 43 Adi. Exist. MH to Qrade 0 EA 44 Adiust X-Pull Box MH 0 EA 45 Adjust Vault to Grade 0 EA 46 Street LiQht 0 EA 47 Traffic SiQnal (four way) 0 LS 48 Traffic Video Detection (four leQs) 1 LS. 49 Relocate Sians 3 EA 50 Install Sien Comolete 0 EA Intersection 7 -Melrose and Alga 3 08.xls UNIT ITEM PRICE COST $28,111.00 $28 111 $1,000.00 $3,000 $5,000.00 $0 $30,000.00 $90,000 $2,000.00 $0 $2.00 $5,700 $2.00 $10,080 $10.00 $0 $10.00 $28,000 $10.00 $0 $1,000.00 $0 $1.00 $0 $500.00 $3,500 $2.00 $0 $4.00 $79,800 $30.00 $16,800 $15.00 $8,40C $80.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $7,000.00 $0 $5,000.00 $0 $1,000.00 $0 $108.00 $0 $144.00 $0 $24.00 $0 $3,000.00 $0 $18.00 $0 $15.00 $42,000 $5.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $1,500.00 $0 $30.00 $23,850 $95.00 $26,885 $95.00 $0 $6.00 $97,500 $2.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $1,500.00 $0 $400.00 $0 $175.00 $0 $2,000.00 $0 $5,000.00 $0 $190,000.00 $47,500 $30,000.00 $30,000 $200.00 $600 $250.00 $0 1 11 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 132 of 204 51 Remove Striping 15,020 LF $2.00 $30,040 52 Striping 1 LS $16,000.00 $16,000 53 Pavmt Mrkas (Two-Coat Paint) 855 SF $3.0C $2,565 54 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $590,331 55 Construction Contingency at 15% 1 LS. $88,550.00 $88,550 56 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $678,881 57 Riaht of Way Acquisition 3,000 SF $10.00 $30,000 58 Planning/Permitting at 5% 1 LS. $33,940.00 $33,940 59 Desion at 15% 1 LS. $101,830.00 $101,830 60 Const. Admin., Inspection and testing at 15% 1 LS. $101,830.00 $101,830 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST==> $946,000 Intersection 7 -Melrose and Alga 3 08.xls 2 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 133 of 204 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM -2008 UPDATE COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Project Title: Intersection -Dual Left Turn Lanes on El Camino Real at Carlsbad Village Drive Project Description: Dual Left Turn Lanes for NB and SB Estimated By: City of Carlsbad Date: 3/08 Preliminary Cost Estimate ITEM ESTIMATED NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT 1 Mobilization @ 5% 1 L.S. 2 Schedule 2 MO 3 Field Office 0 MO 4 Traffic Control 1 LS 5 Clear and Grub 0 AC 6 Sawcut 2,740 LF 7 Remove AC Pavement & Base 5,360 SF 8 Remove Curb & Gutter 0 LF 9 Remove Median Curb 2,700 LF 10 Remove Sidewalk 0 SF 11 Removal of Exist. Curb Inlet 1 EA 12 Cold Planina (5' wide) 0 SF 13 Remove Trees 9 EA 14 Remove Parkwav Landscape 0 SF 15 Remove Median Hardscape/Landscape 18,920 SF 16 Unclassified Excavation 1,070 CYD 17 Exported Soils 1,070 CYD 18 Retaining Wall 0 SF 19 Local PCC Depressions (DS-1) 0 SF 20 Curb Inlet 1 EA 21 Storm Drain Cleanout 0 EA 22 Pipe Collar 0 EA 23 18" RCP <01350) 0 LF 24 24" RCP <D1350l 0 LF 25 4"PVC 0 LF 26 Modify C.I./C.O. 0 EA 27 6" PCC Curb and Gutter 0 LF 28 8" PCC Curb Onlv 2,700 LF 29 PCC Sidewalk 0 SF 30 PCC Drivewav 0 SF 31 Cross Gutter 0 SF 32 Pedestrian Ramp 0 EA 33 Aggreaate Base 641 T 34 Asphalt Concrete 228 T 35 AC Overlay 0 T 36 Median Paving 18,440 SF 37 Median LandscaPina 0 SF 38 Relocate Fire Hvdrants 0 EA 39 Relocate Water Meter 0 EA 40 Relocate Backflow Preventer 0 EA 41 Relocate Air Vacuum 0 EA 42 Relocate Vents 0 EA 43 Adi. Exist. MH to arade 2 EA 44 Adiust X-Pull Box MH 0 EA 45 Adiust Vault to Grade 0 EA 46 Street Liaht 0 EA 47 Traffic Sianal (four wav) 0 LS 48 Traffic Video Detection (four legs) 1 L.S. 49 Relocate Sians 2 EA 50 Install Sian Complete 0 EA Intersection 8 -ECR and CVD 3 08.xls UNIT ITEM PRICE COST $25,622.50 $25,623 $1,000.00 $2,000 $5,000.00 $0 $30,000.00 $30,000 $2,000.00 $0 $2.00 $5,480 $2.00 $10,720 $10.00 $0 $10.00 $27,000 $10.00 $0 $1,000.00 $1,000 $1.00 $0 $500.00 $4,500 $2.00 $0 $4.00 $75,680 $30.00 $32,100 $15.00 $16,050 $80.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $7,000.00 $7,000 $5,000.00 $0 $1,000.00 $0 $108.00 $0 $144.00 $0 $24.00 $0 $3,000.00 $0 $18.00 $0 $15.00 $40,500 $5.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $1,500.00 $0 $30.00 $19,230 $95.00 $21,660 $95.00 $0 $6.00 $110,640 $2.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $1,500.00 $0 $800.00 $1,600 $250.00 $0 $2,000.00 $0 $5,000.00 $0 $190,000.00 $47,500 $30,000.00 $30,000 $200.00 $400 $250.00 $0 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 134 of 204 51 Remove Striping 9,000 LF $2.00 $18,000 52 Stripinq 1 LS $1.00 $9,500 53 Pavmt Mrkqs (Two-Coat Paint) 630 SF $3.00 $1,890 54 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $538,073 55 Construction Contingency at 15% 1 L.S. $80,710.00 $80,710 56 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $618,783 57 Riqht of Way Acquisition 3,000 SF $10.00 $30,000 58 Planninq/Permittinq at 5% 1 L.S. $30,940.00 $30,940 59 Desiqn at 15% 1 L.S. $92,820.00 $92,820 60 Const. Admin. , Inspection and testing at 15% 1 LS. $92,820.00 $92,820 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST==> $865,000 Intersection 8 -ECR and CVD 3 OS.xis 2 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 135 of 204 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM -2008 UPDATE COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Project Title: Intersection -El Camino Real and Cannon Road Project Description: Modify existing ECR NB to include one left lane three through lanes, a bike lane and one free right turn lane (extend southerly improvements to south of bridge) and southbound add one additional left turn lane to eastbound Cannon Road for a total of two left turn lanes Estimated By: City of Carlsbad Date: 3/08 Preliminary Cost Estimate ITEM ESTIMATED UNIT ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST 1 Mobilization l11l 5% 1 L.S. $66,711.12 $66,711 2 Schedule 5 MO $1,000.00 $5,000 3 Field Office 0 MO $5,000.00 $0 4 SWPPP Preparation 1 L.S. $15,000.00 $15,000 5 SWPPP Maintenance 5 MO $1,000.00 $5,000 6 Traffic Control 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000 7 Clear and Grub 0.5 AC $2,000.00 $1,000 8 Sawcut 1,385 LF $2.00 $2,770 9 Remove AC Pavement & Base 740 SF $2.00 $1,480 10 Remove Curb & Gutter 90 LF $10.0C $900 11 Remove Median Curb 1,385 LF $10.0C $13,850 12 Remove Sidewalk 450 SF $10.00 $4,500 13 Removal of Exist. Curb Inlet 0 EA $1,000.0C $0 14 Cold Planing (5' wide) 0 SF $1.0C $0 15 Remove Trees 0 EA $500.00 $0 16 Remove Parkway Landscape SF $2.00 $0 17 Remove Median Hardscape/Landscape 8,824 SF $4.00 $35,296 18 Unclassified Excavation 17,700 CYD $30.0C $531,000 19 Excorted Soils 17,700 CYD $15.0C $265,500 20 Retainina Wall 0 SF $80.00 $0 21 Widen Bridge 1 LS $175,000.0C $175,000 22 Local PCC Depressions (DS-1) 0 SF $5.00 $0 23 Curb Inlet 0 EA $7,000.00 $0 24 Storm Drain Cleanout 0 EA $5,000.00 $G 25 Pioe Collar 0 EA $1,000.00 $0 26 18" RCP /D1350) 0 LF $108.00 $0 27 24" RCP /D1350l 0 LF $144.00 $0 28 4"PVC 0 LF $24.00 $0 29 Modifv C.1./C.O. 0 EA $3,000.00 $0 30 6" PCC Curb and Gutter 0 LF $18.00 $0 31 8" PCC Curb Only 1,385 LF $15.00 $20,775 32 PCC Sidewalk 0 SF $5.00 $0 33 PCC Driveway 0 SF $5.00 $0 34 Cross Gutter 0 SF $5.00 $0 35 Pedestrian Ramp 1 EA $1,500.00 $1,500 36 Aggregate Base 763 T $30.00 $22,888 37 Asphalt Concrete 254 T $95.00 $24,159 38 AC Overlay 0 T $95.00 $0 39 Median Paving 7,704 SF $6.00 $46,224 40 Median Landscaoing 1,120 SF $2.00 $2,240 41 Relocate Fire Hydrants 0 EA $500.00 $0 42 Relocate Water Meter 0 EA $300.00 $0 43 Relocate Backflow Preventer 0 EA $500.00 $0 44 Relocate Air Vacuum 0 EA $300.00 $0 45 Relocate Vents 0 EA $1,500.00 $0 46 Adj. Exist. MH to arade 1 EA $400.00 $400 47 Adiust X-Pull Box MH 0 EA $175.00 $0 Intersection 9 -EICamino Real and Cannon Road 3 OS.xis 1 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 136 of 204 48 Adjust Vault to Grade 0 EA $2,000.00 $0 49 Street Light 0 EA $5,000.00 $0 50 Traffic Signal (four way) 0.50 LS $190,000.00 $95,000 51 Traffic Video Detection (four legs) 0 LS. $30,000.00 $0 52 Relocate Sians 0 EA $200.00 $0 53 Install Sian Comolete 0 EA $250.00 $0 54 Remove Strioina 4,070 LF $2.00 $8,140 55 Striping 1 LS $6,600.00 $6,600 56 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $1,400,933 57 Construction Contingency at 15% 1 LS. $210,140.00 $210,140 58 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $1,611,073 59 Riaht of Wav Acauisition 3,000 SF $10.00 $30,000 60 Plannina/Permittina at 5% 1 LS. $80,550.00 $80,550 61 Desian at 15% 1 LS. $241,660.00 $241,660 62 Const. Admin. , Inspection and testing at 15% 1 LS. $241,660.00 $241,660 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST==> $2,205,000 Intersection 9 -EICamino Real and Cannon Road 3 OS.xis 2 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 137 of 204 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM -2008 UPDATE COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Project Title: Intersection -El Camino Real and Alga Road Project Description: Modify right turn from NIB ECR to E/B Alga Road Estimated By: City of Carlsbad Date: 3/08 Preliminary Cost Estimate ITEM ESTIMATED NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT 1 Mobilization @ 5% 1 LS. 2 Schedule 6 MO 3 Field Office 0 MO 4 Traffic Control 1 LS 5 Clear and Grub 0.50 AC 6 Sawcut 200 LF 7 Remove AC Pavement & Base 3,000 SF 8 Remove Curb & Gutter 650 LF 9 Remove Median Curb 100 LF 10 Remove Sidewalk 1,500 SF 11 Removal of Exist. Curb Inlet 0 EA 12 Cold Planing (5' wide) 0 SF 13 Remove Trees 0 EA 14 Remove Parkwav Landscape 0 SF 15 Remove Median Hardscape/Landscape 0 SF 16 Unclassified Excavation 1 LS 17 Exoorted Soils 0 CYD 18 Retainina Wall 0 SF 19 Local PCC Depressions (DS-1\ 0 SF 20 Curb Inlet 0 EA 21 Storm Drain Cleanout 0 EA 22 Pipe Collar 0 EA 23 18" RCP /D1350\ 0 LF 24 24" RCP /D1350) 0 LF 25 4"PVC 0 LF 26 Modify C.1./C.O. 0 EA 27 6" PCC Curb and Gutter 350 LF 28 8" PCC Curb Onlv 0 LF 29 PCC Sidewalk 4,000 SF 30 PCC Drivewav 0 SF 31 Cross Gutter 0 SF 32 Pedestrian Ramo 1 EA 33 Aaareaate Base 140 T 34 Asphalt Concrete 110 T 35 AC Overlay 0 T 36 Median Pavina 0 SF 37 Median Landscaping 0 SF 38 Relocate Fire Hydrants 0 EA 39 Relocate Water Meter o EA 40 Relocate Backflow Preventer 0 EA 41 Relocate Air Vacuum 0 EA 42 Relocate Vents 0 EA 43 Adi. Exist. MH to arade 0 EA 44 Adjust X-Pull Box MH 0 EA 45 Adiust Vault to Grade 0 EA 46 Utility Relocations 0 LS 47 Street Liaht 0 EA 48 Traffic Siana! (four wav\ one lea 1 LS 49 Relocate Siona! Pole Tvoe A 0 LS 50 Traffic Video Detection (four legs) 0 LS. Intersection 10 -El Camino Real and Alga Road 3 08.xls UNIT ITEM PRICE COST $9,667.50 $9,668 $1,000.00 $6,000 $5,000.00 $0 $30,000.00 $30,000 $2,000.0C $1,000 $2.00 $400 $2.0( $6,000 $10.00 $6,500 $10.00 $1,000 $10.00 $15,000 $1,000.00 $0 $1.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $2.00 $0 $4.00 $0 $25,000.00 $25,000 $15.00 $0 $80.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $7,000.00 $0 $5,000.00 $0 $1,000.00 $0 $108.00 $0 $144.00 $0 $24.00 $0 $3,000.00 $0 $18.00 $6,300 $15.00 $0 $5.00 $20,000 $5.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $1,500.00 $1,500 $30.00 $4,200 $95.00 $10.450 $95.00 $0 $6.00 $C $2.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $1,500.00 $0 $400.00 $0 $175.00 $0 $2,000.00 $0 $10,000.00 $0 $5,000.00 $0 $50,000.00 $50,000 $10,000.00 $0 $30,000.00 $0 1 ,1 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 138 of 204 51 Relocate Sians 0 EA $200.00 $0 52 Install Sian Comolete 1 L.S. $5,000.00 $5,000 53 Remove Strioina 0 LF $2.00 $0 54 Striping 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $203,018 1 Construction Continaencv at 15% 1 L.S. $30,450.00 $30,450 2 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $233,468 3 Right of Way Acauisition 2,000 SF $10.00 $20,000 4 Planning/Permitting at 5% 1 LS. $11,670.00 $11,670 5 Desian at 15% 1 LS. $35,020.00 $35,020 6 Const. Admin., Inspection and testing at 15% 1 L.S. $35,020.00 $35,020 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST==> $335,000 Intersection 10 -El Camino Real and Alga Road 3 08.xls July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 139 of 204 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM -2008 UPDATE COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Project Title: Intersection -El Camino Real and Tamarack Avenue Project Description: Add 350 foot northbound left turn lane and extend existing Estimated By: City of Carlsbad Date: 3/08 Preliminary Cost Estimate ITEM ESTIMATED NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT 1 Mobilization @ 5% 1 L.S. 2 Schedule 2 MO 3 Field Office 0 MO 4 Traffic Control 1 LS 5 Clear and Grub 0 AC 6 Sawcut 1,400 LF 7 Remove AC Pavement & Base 4,000 SF 8 Remove Curb & Gutter 0 LF 9 Remove Median Curb 0 LF 10 Remove Sidewalk 0 SF 11 Removal of Exist. Curb Inlet 0 EA 12 Cold Planino /5' wide) 0 SF 13 Remove Trees 0 EA 14 Remove Parkway Landscaoe 0 SF 15 Remove Median Hardscaoe/Landscaoe 0 SF 16 Unclassified Excavation 0 CYD 17 Exported Soils 0 CYD 18 RetaininQ Wall 0 SF 19 Local PCC Depressions (DS-1) 0 SF 20 Curb Inlet 0 EA 21 Storm Drain Cleanout 0 EA 22 Pipe Collar 0 EA 23 18" RCP (D1350) 0 LF 24 24" RCP (D1350) 0 LF 25 4"PVC 0 LF 26 Modifv C.1./C.O. 0 EA 27 6" PCC Curb and Gutter 0 LF 28 8" PCC Curb Onlv 1,100 LF 29 PCC Sidewalk 0 SF 30 PCC Drivewav 0 SF 31 Cross Gutter 0 SF 32 Pedestrian Ramo 0 EA 33 Aooreoate Base 0 T 34 Asohalt Concrete 0 T 35 AC Overlay 0 T 36 Median Paving 4,000 SF 37 Median Landscaping 0 SF 38 Relocate Fire Hydrants 0 EA 39 Relocate Water Meter 0 EA 40 Relocate Backflow Preventer 0 EA 41 Relocate Air Vacuum 0 EA 42 Relocate Vents 0 EA 43 Adj. Exist. MH to orade 0 EA 44 Adjust X-Pull Box MH 0 EA 45 Adjust Vault to Grade 0 EA 46 Street Liqht 0 EA 47 Traffic Sianal /four wav) -0.25 LS 48 Traffic Video Detection /four leas) 0 L.S. 49 Relocate Signs 1 EA 50 Install SiQn Complete 1 EA Intersection 11 -22 -ECR and Tamarack 3 08.xls UNIT ITEM PRICE COST $6,851.0( $6,851 $1,000.0C $2,000 $5,000.0C $0 $30,000.00 $30,000 $2,000.00 $0 $2.0C $2,800 $2.00 $8,000 $10.00 $0 $10.00 $0 $10.0( $0 $1,000.00 $( $1.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $2.00 $C $4.00 $0 $30.00 $0 $15.00 $0 $80.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $7,000.00 $0 $5,000.00 $0 $1,000.00 $0 $108.00 $0 $144.00 $0 $24.00 $0 $3,000.0C $0 $18.00 $0 $15.00 $16,500 $5.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $1,500.00 $0 $30.0C $C $95.00 $0 $95.00 $0 $6.00 $24,000 $2.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $1,500.00 $0 $400.00 $0 $175.00 $0 $2,000.00 $0 $5,000.00 $0 $190,000.00 $47,500 $30,000.00 $0 $200.00 $200 $250.00 $250 1 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 140 of 204 51 Remove Strioina 2,000 LF $2.00 $4,000 52 Strioina 1,500 LF $1.0C $1,50( 53 Pavmt Mrkas CThermoolaslic\ 90 SF $3.00 $270 54 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $143,871 55 Construction Continaencv at 15% 1 L.S. $21,580.00 $21,580 56 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $165,451 57 Riaht of Wav Acauisilion 3 000 SF $10.00 $30,00( 58 Plannina/Permittina at 5% 1 LS. $8,270.00 $8,270 59 Design at 15% 1 L.S. $24 820.00 $24,820 60 Const. Admin., Inspection and testing at 15% 1 LS. $24,820.00 $24,820 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST==> $253,000 Intersection 11 -22 -ECR and Tamarack 3 08.xls 2 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 141 of 204 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM -2008 UPDATE COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Project Title: Road Segment -Avenida Encinas from PAR to EWPCF Project Description: Widen Avenida Encinas to secondary arterial (84 foot right of way, 64 foot curb face to curb face) Estimated By: City of Carlsbad Date: 3/08 Preliminary Cost Estimate ITEM ESTIMATED UNIT NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE 1 Mobilization @ 5% 1 LS. $78,966.83 2 Schedule 6 MO $1,000.00 3 Field Office 6 MO $5,000.00 4 SWPPP Preoaration 1 L.S. $15,000.00 5 SWPPP Maintenance 6 MO $1,000.00 4 Traffic Control 1 LS $60,000.00 5 Clear and Grub 1 AC $2,000.00 6 Sawcut 1,768 LF $2.00 7 Remove AC Pavement & Base 3,200 SF $2.00 8 Remove Curb & Gutter 0 LF $10.00 9 Remove Median Curb 0 LF $10.00 10 Remove Sidewalk 0 SF $10.00 11 Removal of Exist. Curb Inlet 0 EA $1,000.00 12 Remove brow ditch 125 LF $25.00 $ 13 Cold Planina 15' wide\ 0 SF $1.00 14 Remove Trees 0 EA $500.00 15 Remove Parkway Landscape 0 SF $2.00 16 Remove Median Hardscape/Landscape 0 SF $4.0G 17 Unclassified Excavation 4,000 CYD $30.00 18 Exoorted Soils 0 CYD $15.00 19 Retainina Wall 9,600 SF $80.00 20 Local PCC Deoressions (DS-1) 0 SF $5.00 21 Curb Inlet 2 EA $7,000.00 22 Storm Drain Cleanout 5 EA $5,000.00 23 Pioe Collar 0 EA $1,000.00 24 18" RCP (01350) 1,200 LF $108.00 25 24" RCP (01350) 0 LF $144.00 26 4"PVC 0 LF $24.00 27 Modifv C.I./C.O. 0 EA $3,000.00 28 6" PCC Curb and Gutter 1,600 LF $18.00 29 8" PCC Curb Onlv 0 LF $15.00 30 PCC Sidewalk 11,600 SF $5.00 31 PCC Driveway 2 SF $5.00 32 Cross Gutter 0 SF $5.00 33 Pedestrian Ramp 0 EA $1,500.00 34 Aaareaate Base 2,822 T $30.00 35 Asphalt Concrete 840 T $95.00 36 AC Overlay 6 T $95.00 37 Petromat (Mirifi 600X fabric) 329 SF $1.00 38 Median Paving 0 SF $6.00 39 Median Landscapinq 0 SF $2.00 40 Relocate Fire Hydrants 0 EA $500.00 41 Relocate Water Meter 0 EA $300.00 42 Relocate Backflow Preventer 0 EA $500.00 43 Relocate Air Vacuum 0 EA $300.00 44 Relocate Vents 0 EA $1,500.00 45 Adi. Exist. MH to arade 3 EA $400.00 46 Adiust X-Pull Box MH 0 EA $175.00 47 Adjust Vault to Grade 2 EA $2,000.00 48 Street Light 0 EA $5,000.00 Road Segment 1A -Avenida Encinas -PAR to EWPCF (1600') 3 08.xls ITEM COST $78,967 $6,000 $30,000 $15,000 $6,000 $60,000 $2,938 $3,536 $6,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 3,125.00 $0 $0 $0 $G $120,000 $0 $768,000 $0 $14,000 $25,000 $0 $129,600 $0 $0 $0 $28,800 $0 $58,000 $10 $0 $0 $84,672 $79,800 $586 $329 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $( $0 $1,200 $0 $4,000 $0 1 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 142 of 204 49 Traffic Sional (four wav) 0 LS $190,000.00 $0 50 Traffic Video Detection (four leqs) 0 LS. $30,000.00 $0 51 Relocate Sions 5 EA $200.00 $1,000 52 Install Sion Complete 10 EA $250.00 $2,500 53 Remove Stripinq 2,320 LF $2.00 $4,640 54 Stripino 1 LS $24,000.00 $24,000 55 Pavmt Mrkos (Two-Coat Paint) 0 SF $3.00 $0 56 Monitorint Wells 2 EA $100.00 $200 57 Underoround utilities 1 LS $100,000.0C $100,00C 58 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $1,658,303 59 Construction Continoencv at 15% 1 LS. $248,750.00 $248,750 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $1,907,053 61 Right of Way Acauisition 3,000 SF $10.00 $30,00C 62 Planning/Permitting at 5% 1 LS. $95,350.00 $95,350 63 Desion at 15% 1 LS. $286,060.00 $286,060 64 Const. Admin. , Inspection and testing at 15% 1 LS. $286,060.00 $286,060 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST ==> $2,605,000 Road Segment 1A-Avenida Encinas -PAR to EWPCF (1600') 3 08.xls 2 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 143 of 204 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM -2008 UPDATE COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Project Title: Road Segment -Avenida Encinas from EWPCF to Embarcadero Project Description: Improvements from Station 40+20 to 53+00, half street improvements Estimated By: City of Carlsbad Date: 3/08 Preliminary Cost Estimate ITEM ESTIMATED NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT 1 Mobilization @l 5% 1 L.S. 2 Schedule 4 MO 3 Field Office 4 MO 4 SWPPP Preoaration 1 L.S. 5 SWPPP Maintenance 4 MO 4 Traffic Control 1 LS 5 Clear and Grub 0.6 AC 6 Sawcut 4,585 LF 7 Remove AC Pavement & Base 9,170 SF 8 Remove Curb & Gutter 0 LF 9 Remove Median Curb 0 LF 10 Remove Sidewalk 0 SF 11 Removal of Exist. Curb Inlet 0 EA 12 Cold Planini:i (5' wide) 0 SF 13 Remove Trees 0 EA 14 Remove Parkway Landscaoe 0 SF 15 Remove Median Hardscaoe/Landscaoe 0 SF 16 Unclassified Excavation 12,800 CYD 17 Exported Soils 12,800 CYD 18 Retainini:i Wall 0 SF 19 Local PCC Deoressions (DS-11 0 SF 20 Curb Inlet 2 EA 21 Storm Drain Cleanout 5 EA 22 Pioe Collar 0 EA 23 18" RCP (D1350) 1,280 LF 24 24" RCP (D1350) 0 LF 25 4"PVC 0 LF 26 Modify C.1./C.O. 0 EA 27 6" PCC Curb and Gutter 4,525 LF 28 8" PCC Curb Only 0 LF 29 PCC Sidewalk 22,625 SF 30 PCC Driveway 0 SF 31 Cross Gutter o SF 32 Pedestrian Ramo 0 EA 33 Aggregate Base 1,971 T 34 Asphalt Concrete 1,971 T 35 AC Overlav 51 T 36 Petromat (Mirifi 600Xl 2,700 SF 37 Median Pavina 0 SF 38 Median Landscaoina 0 SF 39 Relocate Fire Hvdrants 0 EA 40 Relocate Water Meter 0 EA 41 Relocate Backflow Preventer 0 EA 42 Relocate Air Vacuum 0 EA 43 Relocate Vents 0 EA 44 Adi. Exist. MH to i:irade 0 EA 45 Adjust X-Pull Box MH 0 EA 46 Adiust Vault to Grade 0 EA 47 Street Liaht 5 EA 48 Traffic Sianal (four way) 0 LS Road Segment 1 B -Avenida Encinas -EWPCF to Embarcadero (1600') 3 OS.xis UNIT ITEM PRICE COST $73,909.08 $73,909 $1,000.0C $4,00C $5,000.00 $20,00C $15,000.00 $15,00C $1,000.00 $4,00C $40,000.00 $40,000 $2,000.00 $1,175 $2.00 $9,170 $2.0( $18,340 $10.00 $0 $10.00 $0 $10.00 $0 $1,000.00 $0 $1.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $2.00 $0 $4.00 $0 $30.00 $384,000 $15.00 $192,000 $80.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $7,000.00 $14,000 $5,000.00 $25,000 $1,000.00 $0 $108.00 $138,240 $144.00 $0 $24.00 $0 $3,000.00 $0 $18.00 $81,450 $15.00 $0 $5.00 $113,125 $5.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $1,500.00 $0 $30.00 $59,141 $95.00 $187,281 $95.00 $4,809 $1.00 $2,700 $6.00 $0 $2.00 $( $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $1,500.00 $0 $400.00 $0 $175.00 $0 $2,000.00 $0 $5,000.00 $25,000 $190,000.00 $0 1 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 144 of 204 49 Traffic Video Detection (four legs) 0 LS. $30,000.00 $0 50 Relocate Signs 20 EA $200.00 $4,000 51 Install Sign Complete 15 EA $250.00 $3,750 52 Remove Striping 0 LF $2.00 $0 53 Striping 1 LS $32,000.00 $32,000 54 Pavmt Mrkas <Two-Coat Paint\ 0 SF $3.00 $0 55 Underground overhead electric 1 LS $100,000.00 $100,000 56 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $1,552,091 57 Construction Contingencv at 15% 1 LS. $232,810.00 $232,810 58 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $1,784,901 59 Riaht of Wav Acauisition 3,000 SF $10.00 $30,000 60 Plannina/Permittina at 5% 1 LS. $89,250.00 $89,250 61 Design at 15% 1 LS. $267,740.00 $267,740 62 Const. Admin. , Inspection and testing at 15% 1 LS. $267,740.00 $267,740 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST==> $2,440,000 Road Segment 1 B -Avenida Encinas -EWPCF to Embarcadero (1600') 3 08.xls 2 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 145 of 204 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM -2008 UPDATE COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Project Title: Road Segment -Carlsbad Blvd. from Manzano to Tierra del Oro Project Description: Widen to provide two lanes in each direction, (Arterial configuration) Estimated By: City of Carlsbad Date: 3/08 Preliminary Cost Estimate ITEM ESTIMATED NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT 1 Mobilization @ 5% 1 L.S. 2 Schedule 6 MO 3 Field Office 6 MO 4 SWPPP Preparation 1 LS. 5 SWPPP Maintenance 6 MO 6 Traffic Control 1 LS 7 Erosion Control 1 LS 8 Clear and Grub 1 LS 9 Sawcut 0 LF 10 Remove AC Pavement & Base 65,000 SF 11 Remove Curb & Gutter 0 LF 12 Remove Median Curb 0 LF 13 Remove Sidewalk 0 SF 14 Removal of Exist. Curb Inlet 0 EA 15 Cold Planinq /5' wide) 0 SF 16 Remove Trees 0 EA 17 Remove Parkway Landscape 0 SF 18 Remove Median Hardscape/Landscape 0 SF 19 Unclassified Excavation 15,000 CYD 20 Exported Soils 13,000 CYD 21 Retaininq Wall 0 SF 22 Local PCC Depressions (DS-1) 0 SF 23 Curb Inlet 6 EA 24 Storm Drain Cleanout 0 EA 25 Pipe Collar 0 EA 26 18" RCP (D1350) 0 LF 27 24" RCP (D1350) 260 LF 28 4"PVC 0 LF 29 Modifv C.1./C.O. 0 EA 30 6" PCC Curb and Gutter 7,000 LF 31 8" PCC Curb Only 6,500 LF 32 Metal Beam Guard Rail 1,200 LF 32 PCC Sidewalk 35,000 SF 33 PCC Driveway 9,600 SF 34 Cross Gutter 0 SF 35 Pedestrian Ramp 11 EA 36 Aggregate Base 16,820 T 37 Asphalt Concrete 6,600 T 38 AC Overlay 0 T 39 Median Pavina 30,000 SF 40 Median Landscaping 5,600 SF 41 Relocate Fire Hydrants 0 EA 42 Relocate Water Meter 0 EA 43 Relocate Backflow Preventer 0 EA 44 Relocate Air Vacuum 0 EA 45 Relocate Vents 0 EA 46 Adi. Exist. MH to orade 38 EA 46 Adiust X-Pull Box MH 0 EA 47 Adjust Valve Can to Grade 24 EA 48 Adjust Vault to Grade 0 EA Road Segment 2 -Carlsbad Blvd. Manzano to Tierra Del Oro 3 08.xls UNIT ITEM PRICE COST $163,472.00 $163,472 $1,000.00 $6,000 $5 000.00 $30,000 $15,000.00 $15,000 $1,000.00 $6,000 $80,000.00 $80,000 $30,000.00 $30,000 $2,000.00 $2,000 $2.00 $0 $2.00 $130,000 $10.00 $0 $10.00 $0 $10.00 $0 $1,000.00 $0 $1.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $2.00 $0 $4.00 $0 $30.00 $450,000 $15.00 $195,000 $80.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $7,000.00 $42,000 $5,000.00 $0 $1,000.00 $0 $108.00 $0 $144.00 $37,440 $24.00 $0 $3,000.00 $0 $18.00 $126,000 $15.00 $97,500 $12.00 $14,400 $5.00 $175,000 $5.00 $48,000 $5.00 $0 $1,500.00 $16,500 $30.00 $504,600 $95.00 $627,000 $95.00 $0 $6.00 $180,000 $2.00 $11,200 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $1,500.00 $0 $400.00 $15,200 $175.00 $0 $175.00 $4,200 $2,000.00 $0 1 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 146 of 204 49 Street Light 12 EA $5,000.00 $60,000 50 Traffic Signal (Three way) 2 LS $170,000.00 $340,000 51 Traffic Video Detection (four legs) 0 LS. $30,000.00 $0 52 Relocate Signs 27 EA $200.00 $5,400 53 Install Sion Complete 0 EA $250.00 $0 54 Remove Striping 0 LF $2.00 $0 55 Stripino 1 LS $21,000.00 $21,000 56 Pavmt Mrkos (Two-Coat Paint) 0 SF $3.00 $( 57 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $3,432,912 58 Construction Continoencv at 15% 1 LS. $514,940.00 $514,940 59 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $3,947,852 60 Right of Way Acauisition 3,000 SF $10.00 $30,000 61 Planning/Permitting at 5% 1 LS. $197,390.00 $197,390 62 Design at 15% 1 LS. $592,180.00 $592,180 63 Const. Admin., Inspection and testing at 15% 1 L.S. $592,180.00 $592,180 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST ==> $5,360,000 Road Segment 2 -Carlsbad Blvd. Manzano to Tierra Del Oro 3 OS.xis 2 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 147 of 204 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM -2008 UPDATE COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Project Title: Road Segment -ECR from Tamarack to Chestnut Project Description: Widen to full Prime Arterial Standards Estimated By: City of Carlsbad Date: 3/08 Preliminary Cost Estimate ITEM ESTIMATED NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT 1 Mobilization @ 5% 1 L.S. 2 Schedule 6 MO 3 Field Office 6 MO 4 Traffic Control 1 LS 5 SWPPP Preoaration 1 LS 6 SWPPP Maintenance 6 MO 7 Erosion Control 1 LS 8 Clear and Grub 9 AC 9 Sawcut 3,000 LF 10 Remove AC Pavement & Base 0 SF 11 Remove Curb & Gutter 0 LF 12 Remove Median Curb 0 LF 13 Remove Sidewalk 0 SF 14 Removal of Exist. Curb Inlet 0 EA 15 Cold Planino (5' wide) 0 SF 16 Remove Trees 0 EA 17 Remove Parkwav Landscaoe 0 SF 18 Remove Median Hardscaoe/Landscaoe 0 SF 19 Unclassified Excavation 81,600 CYD 20 Exoorted Soils 21,800 CYD 21 Retainino Wall 0 SF 22 Local PCC Deoressions <DS-1) 0 SF 23 Curb Inlet 20 EA 24 Storm Drain Cleanout 0 EA 25 Pioe Collar 0 EA 26 18" RCP (D1350) 500 LF 27 24" RCP (D1350) 900 LF 28 36" RCP (D1350) 800 LF 29 4"PVC 0 LF 30 Brow Ditch 4,900 LF 31 Rio Rao 80 CYD 32 Headwall/Outlet 8 EA 33 Modifv C.1./C.O. 0 EA 34 6" PCC Curb and Gutter 2,900 LF 35 8" PCC Curb Only 1,000 LF 36 8" PCC Curb and Gutter 7,300 LF 37 PCC Sidewalk 14,500 SF 38 PCC Drivewav 0 SF 39 Cross Gutter 0 SF 40 Pedestrian Ramo 2 EA 41 Aggregate Base 3,310 T 42 Asohalt Concrete 1,280 T 43 AC Overlay 730 T 44 Median Pavino 51,000 SF 45 Median Landscaping 17,000 SF 46 Slooe Planting 390,000 SF 47 Relocate Fire Hydrants 0 EA 48 Relocate Water Meter 0 EA 49 Relocate Backflow Preventer 0 EA 50 Relocate Air Vacuum 0 EA Road Segment 3 -ECR Tamarack to Chestnut 3 08.xls UNIT ITEM PRICE COST $246,862.50 $246,863 $1,000.00 $6,000 $5,000.00 $30 000 $60,000.00 $60,000 $15,000.00 $15,000 $1,000.00 $6,000 $30,000.00 $30,000 $2,000.00 $18,000 $2.00 $6,000 $2.00 $( $10.00 $0 $10.00 $0 $10.00 $0 $1,000.00 $0 $1.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $2.00 $0 $4.00 $0 $30.00 $2,448,000 $15.00 $327,000 $80.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $7,000.00 $140,000 $5,000.00 $0 $1,000.00 $0 $108.00 $54,000 $144.00 $129,600 $216.00 $172,800 $24.00 $0 $15.00 $73,500 $80.00 $6,400 $5,000.00 $40,000 $3,000.00 $0 $18.00 $52,200 $15.00 $15,000 $20.00 $146,000 $5.00 $72,500 $5.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $1,500.00 $3,000 $30.00 $99,300 $95.00 $121,60( $95.00 $69,350 $6.00 $306,000 $2.00 $34,000 $1.00 $390,000 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 1 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 148 of 204 51 Relocate Vents 0 EA $1,500.00 $0 52 Adj. Exist. MH to arade 15 EA $400.00 $6,000 53 Adjust X-Pull Box MH 0 EA $175.00 $0 54 Adjust Vault to Grade 0 EA $2,000.00 $0 55 Street Licht 9 EA $5,000.00 $45,000 56 Traffic Sianal /four way) 0 LS $190,000.00 $0 57 Traffic Video Detection (four legs) 0 LS. $30,000.00 $0 58 Relocate Signs 0 EA $200.0C $( 59 Install Sign Complete 0 EA $250.00 $0 60 Remove Striping 0 LF $2.00 $0 61 Striping 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000 62 Pavmt Mrkas (Two-Coat Paint) 0 SF $3.00 $0 63 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $5,184,113 64 Construction Continaencv at 15% 1 LS. $777,620.00 $777,620 65 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $5,961,733 66 Riaht of Wav Acauisition 3,000 SF $10.00 $30,000 67 Planning/Permitting at 5% 1 LS. $298,090.00 $298,090 68 Design at 15% 1 LS. $894,260.00 $894,260 69 Const. Admin., Inspection and testing at 15% 1 LS. $894,260.00 $894,260 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST==> $8,078,000 Road Segment 3 -ECR Tamarack to Chestnut 3 08.xls 2 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 149 of 204 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM -2008 UPDATE COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Project Title: Road Segment -Carlsbad Village Drive from Pontiac to Victoria Project Description: Widen to provide two lanes in each direction, (Major Arterial configuration) Estimated By: City of Carlsbad Date: 3/08 Preliminary Cost Estimate ITEM ESTIMATED NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT 1 Mobilization @ 5% 1 LS. 2 Schedule 12 MO 3 Field Office 12 MO 4 SWPPP Preparation 1 L.S. 5 SWPPP Maintenance 6 MO 6 Traffic Control 1 LS 7 Erosion Control 1 LS 8 Clear and Grub 1 LS 9 Sawcut 3,500 LF 10 Remove AC Pavement & Base 17,000 SF 11 Remove Curb & Gutter 3,400 LF 12 Remove Median Curb 0 LF 13 Remove Sidewalk 3,150 SF 14 Removal of Exist. Curb Inlet 2 EA 15 Cold Planing (5' wide) 0 SF 16 Remove Trees 0 EA 17 Remove Parkway Landscape 0 SF 18 Remove Median Hardscape/Landscape 0 SF 19 Unclassified Excavation 15,000 CYD 20 lmoort 50,000 CYD 21 Retainina Wall 0 SF 22 Local PCC Depressions <DS-1\ 0 SF 23 Curb Inlet 2 EA 24 Storm Drain Cleanout 2 EA 25 Pioe Collar 0 EA 26 18" RCP <D1350) 200 LF 27 24" RCP (D1350l 0 LF 28 4"PVC 0 LF 29 Modify C.1./C.O. 0 EA 30 6" PCC Curb and Gutter 3,400 LF 31 8" PCC Curb Only 7,800 LF 32 Metal Beam Guard Rail 900 LF 32 PCC Sidewalk 16,500 SF 33 PCC Drivewav 9,600 SF 34 Cross Gutter 0 SF 35 Pedestrian Ramo 0 EA 36 Aaareaate Base 5,200 T 37 Asohalt Concrete 4,700 T 38 AC Overlay 0 T 39 Median Paving 50,000 SF 40 Median Landscaoing 5,600 SF 41 Relocate Fire Hvdrants 0 EA 42 Relocate Water Meter 0 EA 43 Relocate Backflow Preventer 0 EA 44 Relocate Air Vacuum 0 EA 45 Relocate Vents 0 EA 46 Adi. Exist. MH to arade 10 EA 46 Adjust X-Pull Box MH 0 EA 47 Adiust Valve Can to Grade 0 EA 48 Adiust Vault to Grade 0 EA Road Segment 4 -Carlsbad Village Drive -Pontiac to Victoria 3 OS.xis UNIT ITEM PRICE COST $147,565.00 $147,565 $1,000.00 $12,000 $5,000.00 $60,000 $15,000.00 $15,000 $1,000.00 $6,000 $120,000.00 $120,000 $60,000.00 $60,000 $20,000.00 $20,000 $2.00 $7,000 $2.00 $34,000 $10.00 $34,000 $10.00 $0 $10.00 $31,500 $1,000.00 $2,000 $1.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $2.00 $0 $4.00 $0 $30.00 $450,000 $15.00 $750,000 $80.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $7,000.00 $14,000 $5,000.00 $10,000 $1,000.00 $0 $108.00 $21,600 $144.00 $0 $24.00 $0 $3,000.00 $0 $18.00 $61,200 $15.00 $117,000 $12.00 $10,800 $5.00 $82,500 $5.00 $48,000 $5.00 $0 $1,500.00 $0 $30.00 $156,000 $95.00 $446,500 $95.00 $0 $6.00 $300,000 $2.00 $11,200 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $500.0C $0 $300.00 $0 $1,500.00 $0 $400.00 $4,000 $175.00 $0 $175.00 $0 $2,000.00 $0 1 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 150 of 204 49 Street Liaht 8 EA $5,000.00 $40,000 50 Traffic Siana! /Three wav) 0 LS $170,000.00 $0 51 Traffic Video Detection (four leas) 0 L.S. $30,000.00 $0 52 Relocate Sians 0 EA $200.00 $0 53 Install Signs Complete 1 L.S. $10,000.00 $10,000 54 Remove Strioina 0 LF $2.00 $0 55 Stripina 1 LS $17,000.00 $17,000 56 Pavmt Mrkgs (Two-Coat Paint) 0 SF $3.00 $0 57 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $3,098,865 58 Construction Contimiencv at 15% 1 L.S. $464,830.00 $464,830 59 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $3,563,695 60 Riaht of Wav Acauisition 3,000 SF $10.00 $30,000 61 Plannina/Permittina at 5% 1 L.S. $178,180.00 $178,180 62 Desian at 15% 1 L.S. $534,550.00 $534,550 63 Const. Admin .• Inspection and testing at 15% 1 L.S. $534,550.00 $534,550 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST==> $4,841,000 Road Segment 4 -Carlsbad Village Drive -Pontiac to Victoria 3 08.xls 2 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 151 of 204 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM -2008 UPDATE COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Project Title: Road Segment -ECR, Arenal to La Costa Ave. Project Description: Widen to the west to full Prime Arterial Standards with a RT at La Costa Estimated By: City of Carlsbad Date: 3/08 Preliminary Cost Estimate ITEM ESTIMATED NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT 1 Mobilization @l 6% 1 L.S. 2 Schedule 6 MO 3 Field Office 6 MO 4 SWPPP Preoaration 1 L.S. 5 SWPPP Maintenance 6 MO 6 Traffic Control 1 LS 7 Erosion Control 1 LS 8 Clear and Grub 3 AC 9 Sawcut 0 LF 10 Remove AC Pavement & Base 0 SF 11 Remove AC Berm 500 LF 12 Remove Metal Beam Guardrail 2,500 LF 12 Remove Curb & Gutter 0 LF 13 Remove Median Curb 0 LF 14 Remove Sidewalk 0 SF 15 Removal of Exist. Curb Inlet 0 EA 16 Cold Planina /5' wide) 9,000 SF 17 Remove Trees 0 EA 18 Remove Parkwav Landscaoe 0 SF 19 Remove Median Hardscaoe/Landscaoe 0 SF 20 Unclassified Excavation 1,600 CYD 21 Exparted Soils 1,600 CYD 22 Bridae Exoansion 2,400 SF 23 Retainina Wall 0 SF 24 Local PCC Deoressions (DS-1) 0 SF 25 Curb Inlet 1 EA 26 Storm Drain Cleanout 0 EA 27 Pioe Collar 0 EA 28 18" RCP ID1350) 0 LF 29 24" RCP ID1350) 0 LF 30 4" PVC 0 LF 31 Modify C.1./C.O. 0 EA 32 6" PCC Curb and Gutter 1,800 LF 33 8" PCC Curb Only 0 LF 34 Metal Beam Guard Rail 500 LF 34 PCC Sidewalk 9,000 SF 35 PCC Driveway 0 SF 36 Cross Gutter 0 SF 37 Pedestrian Ramo 1 EA 38 Aaareaate Base 1,770 T 39 Asohalt Concrete 705 T 40 AC Overlay 0 T 41 Median Pavina 0 SF 42 Median Landscaping 0 SF 43 Relocate Fire Hydrants 0 EA 44 Relocate Water Meter 0 EA 45 Relocate Backflow Preventer 0 EA 46 Relocate Air Vacuum 0 EA 47 Relocate Vents 0 EA 48 Adi. Exist. MH to grade 0 EA Road Segment 5 -ECR Arenal to La Costa 3 08.xls UNIT ITEM PRICE COST $82,948.50 $82,949 $1,000.00 $6,00C $5,000.00 $30,000 $15,000.00 $15,000 $1,000.00 $6,000 $60,000.0C $60,000 $30,000.00 $30,000 $2,000.00 $6,000 $2.00 $0 $2.00 $0 $10.00 $5,000 $5.00 $12,500 $10.00 $0 $10.00 $0 $10.00 $0 $1,000.00 $0 $1.00 $9,000 $500.00 $0 $2.00 $0 $4.00 $C $30.00 $48,000 $15.00 $24,000 $375.00 $900,000 $80.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $7,000.00 $7,000 $5,000.00 $0 $1,000.00 $0 $108.00 $0 $144.00 $0 $24.00 $0 $3,000.0C $C $18.00 $32,400 $15.00 $0 $12.00 $6,000 $5.00 $45,000 $5.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $1,500.00 $1,500 $30.00 $53,100 $95.00 $66,975 $95.00 $0 $6.00 $0 $2.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $1,500.00 $0 $400.00 $0 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 152 of 204 49 Adjust X-Pull Box MH 0 EA $175.00 $0 50 Adjust Vault to Grade 0 EA $2,000.00 $0 51 Street Light 3 EA $5,000.00 $15,000 52 Traffic Signal (four way) 0 LS $190,000.00 $0 53 Traffic Video Detection (four legs} 0 L.S. $30,000.00 $0 54 Relocate Sians 0 EA $200.00 $0 55 Install Sign Comolete 0 EA $250.00 $0 56 Remove Striping 0 LF $2.00 $0 57 Striping 1 LS $4,000.00 $4,000 58 Pavmt Mrkgs (Two-Coat Paint) 0 SF $3.00 $( 59 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $1,465,424 60 Construction Contingency at 15% 1 L.S. $219,810.00 $219,810 61 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $1,685,234 62 Riaht of Wav Acauisition 3,000 SF $10.00 $30,00( 63 Plannina/Permittina at 5% 1 L.S. $84,260.00 $84,260 64 Desian at 15% 1 L.S. $252,790.00 $252,790 65 Const. Admin. , Inspection and testing at 15% 1 L.S. $252,790.00 $252,790 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST==> $2,305,000 Road Segment 5 -ECR Arenal to La Costa 3 08.xls July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 153 of 204 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.6 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4 4.1 4.2 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 6 6.1 6.2 6.3 CITY OF CARLSBAD CANNON ROAD REACH 4 Central Alternative DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE QUANTITY EARTHWORK Mobilization (5%) I LS Clear&Grub $1,000 I AC 22.45 Excavatio11_~.~ompaction $21 cv· ,__ 94,140 -,-Export $5 / CY ____ 14,~00 ... -·-··-----Remedial & Corrective Grading $2 / CY 6~lOOQ -r·--.. -·-·------·--·--Fine Grading $0.25 I SF 486,660 -Subtotal- STRUCTURAL SECTION W"'""~-•-••-" ·-----Construct AC Pavement $5 / SF 407,150 .. Construct Curb & Gutter $15 I LF 13,232 --... Li= Construct Median Curb $11 / 13,250 Construct PCC Sidewalk $4 / SF 61,050 Construct Concrete Median---~ ------------ $6 / SF 2,900 -Subtotal- -~-,--·---··------•-~B»-~ ---TRAFFIC Traffic Signal System/Intersection ~140,000 I EA 0.50 Signing, Striping & Marking $4 / LF 6,616 Street Lights (Intersections only) $41000 I EA 4 ... Traffic Control (2%) I LS -Subtotal- ... -"" DRAINAGE . --Catch Basin (include 18J'_RCP) ~6,500 I EA 211 -. 6,616 24" RCP $721 LF -Subtotal- SPECIAL TY ti'EMS Construct Bridge $155 / SF 69,630 .. Construct Median Landscapingf!>arkway $10 / SF 155,220 --···--. ... $2 / SF Slope Landscapiri-g 338,160 Erosion Control $1,000 /_AC 22.45 Utility Protection I LS -Subtotal- CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL FEES ----·········- Design Engineering/Administration Costs(10%) ·-····--·--········· Construction Engineering Costs/Administration {15%) -----Contingency (25%) ·········--·-·-·-·-·-·-···············-·········---Subtotal- TOTAL PROJECT COST May 10, 2005 ITEM COST $842,200 22,500 188,300 73,000 I· --132,000 121,700 -----~ ,379,700 ------·--- .. -~~ .. ~32,20Q __ 198,500_ .. 145,800_ 244,200 -17:400 $2,438,100 ------···-··--··-·---····- $70,000. 26,500 ----- 16,000 336,900 $449,400 ______ ,, -·-----~ ----$136,5QQ, 476,400 $612,900 --- ---,_ ----------.~ -$10,792,700 1,552,200 . . 676,30Jl .. 22,500_ 100,000 $13,143,700 $18 023.800 . -·-·-·----· $1,802,400_ ----·--....J.J03,60_()_ 4,506,000 $9,012,000 $27 036.000 $27 Million Central Alternative h:\capital improvement program\3814 cannon road reach 4b\design\cost estimates~une 2 2005 cost estimate.xis q) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 154 of 204 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM -2008 UPDATE COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Project Title: Road Segment -Carlsbad Blvd. From Mountain View to North City Limits Project Description: Widen to provide two lanes in each direction, (Major Arterial configuration) Estimated By: City of Carlsbad Date: 3/08 Preliminary Cost Estimate ITEM ESTIMATED NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT 1 Mobilization @ 5% 1 L.S. 2 Schedule 12 MO 3 Field Office 12 MO 4 SWPPP Preparation 1 L.S. 5 SWPPP Maintenance 12 MO 6 Traffic Control 1 LS 7 Erosion Control 1 LS 8 Clear and Grub 1 LS 9 Sawcut 2,500 LF 10 Remove AC Pavement & Base 8,000 SF 11 Remove Curb & Gutter 3,480 LF 12 Remove Median Curb 0 LF 13 Remove Sidewalk 9,305 SF 14 Removal of Exist. Curb Inlet 0 EA 15 Remove Existing Wall 1,800 SF 16 Cold Planing (5' wide) 0 SF 17 Remove Trees 0 EA 18 Remove Parkwav Landscape 0 SF 19 Remove Median Hardscaoe/Landscape 0 SF 20 Unclassified Excavation 3,250 CYD 21 Fill 38,000 CYD 22 Retaining Wall 0 SF 23 Local PCC Depressions (DS-1) 0 SF 24 Curb Inlet 12 EA 25 Storm Drain Cleanout 5 EA 26 Storm Drain Headwall 3 EA 27 Pipe Collar 0 EA 28 18" RCP /D1350) 705 LF 29 24" RCP /D1350) 0 LF 30 4"PVC 0 LF 31 Modifv C.1./C.O. 0 EA 32 6" PCC Curb and Gutter 5,800 LF 33 8" PCC Curb Onlv 1,910 LF 34 Metal Beam Guard Rail 2,200 LF 35 PCC Sidewalk 25,000 SF 36 PCC Driveway 2,500 SF 37 Cross Gutter 1,100 SF 38 Pedestrian Ramp 12 EA 39 Temporarv Paving 1,333 SY 40 Aggregate Base 4,600 T 41 Asphalt Concrete 4,000 T 42 AC Overlav 0 T 43 Median Pavina 0 SF 44 Landscaping 1 LS 45 Bridae over railroad tracks 18,000 SF 46 Bridae over laaoon' 8,400 SF 47 Relocate Fire Hvdrants 0 EA 48 Relocate Water Meter 0 EA 49 Relocate Backflow Preventer 0 EA 50 Relocate Air Vacuum 0 EA Road Segment 7 -Carlsbad Blvd. Mountain View to north city limits 3 08.xls UNIT ITEM PRICE COST $388,804.75 $388,805 $1,000.00 $12,000 $5,000.00 $60,00C $15,000.00 $15,000 $1,000.00 $12,000 $60,000.00 $60,000 $30,000.00 $30,000 $20,000.00 $20,000 $2.00 $5,000 $2.00 $16,000 $10.00 $34,800 $10.00 $0 $10.00 $93,050 $1,000.00 $C $10.0C $18,000 $1.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $2.00 $0 $4.00 $0 $30.00 $97,500 $15.00 $570,000 $80.00 $0 $5.00 $0 $7,000.00 $84,000 $5,000.00 $25,000 $2,500.00 $7,500 $1,000.00 $0 $108.00 $76,140 $144.00 $0 $24.00 $0 $3,000.00 $0 $18.0C $104,40C $15.00 $28,650 $12.00 $26,400 $5.00 $125,000 $5.00 $12,500 $5.00 $5,500 $1,500.00 $18,000 $35.00 $46,655 $30.00 $138,000 $95.00 $380,000 $95.00 $0 $6.00 $0 $100,000.00 $100,000 $200.00 $3,600,000 $200.00 $1,680,000 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 1 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 155 of 204 51 Relocate Vents 0 EA $1,500.00 $0 52 Adi. Exist. MH to arade 0 EA $400.00 $0 53 Adiust X-Pull Box MH 0 EA $175.00 $0 54 Adiust Valve Can to Grade 0 EA $175.00 $0 55 Adiust Vault to Grade 0 EA $2,000.0C $0 56 Street Liaht 15 EA $5,000.00 $75,000 57 Traffic Siana! /Three wavl 1 LS $170,000.00 $170,000 58 Traffic Video Detection /four leas) 0 L.S. $30,000.00 $0 59 Relocate Sians 0 EA $200.00 $0 60 Install Sian Comolete 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000 61 Remove Striping 0 LF $2.00 $0 62 Striping 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000 63 Pavmt Mrkas /Two-Coat Paintl 0 SF $3.00 $0 64 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $8,164,900 65 Construction Continaencv at 15% 1 LS. $1,224,730.00 $1,224,730 66 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $9,389,630 67 Right of Wav Acauisition 3,000 SF $10.00 $30,000 68 Plannina/Permitting at 5% 1 L.S. $469,480.00 $469,480 69 Design at 15% 1 LS. $1,408,440.00 $1,408,440 70 Const. Admin., Inspection and testing at 15% 1 LS. $1,408,440.00 $1,408,440 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST==> $12,706,000 Road Segment 7 -Carlsbad Blvd. Mountain View to north city limits 3 08.xls July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 156 of 204 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM -2008 UPDATE COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Project Title: Segment -Palomar Airport Road from Avenida Encinas to Carlsbad Boulevard Project Description: Remove existing grade seperated intersection and construct at-grade "T" intersection. Construct approximately 900 feet of PAR including a 170 foot bridge over railraod right of way. PAR dimensions are 92' including 5 'sidewalk, 8' bike lane, two 12' travel lanes in each direction and an 18' median. Carlsbad Boulevard is 2,700 • of new roadway constructed to major arterial standards tapering in to secondary arterial standards five hundred feet south of Manzano Dr. Additional right of way will be required to construct southerly side of westerly bridge emabankment. Some grading for westerly embankment on NCTD right of way. Improvements from westerly Interstate 5 on-ramps and off-ramps to Carlsbad Blvd and on Carlsbad Blvd between Manzano and Island Way. Improvements may need to extend south of Island Way. Estimated By: City of Carlsbad Date: 3/8/08 Preliminary Cost Estimate ITEM ESTIMATED UNIT ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST 1 Mobilization @ 5% 1 LS. $540,064.14 $540,064 2 Schedule 18 MO $1,000.0C $18,000 3 Field Office 18 MO $5,000.00 $90,000 4 SWPPP Preoaraton 1 LS. $15,000.0C $15,000 5 SWPPP Maintanence 18 MO $1,000.00 $18,000 6 Traffic Control 1 LS $250,000.00 $250,000 7 Clear and Grub 16 AC $2,000.00 $32,00C 8 Sawcut 500 LF $2.00 $1,000 9 Remove AC Pavement & Base 240,000 SF $2.00 $480,000 10 Remove Curb & Gutter 5,000 LF $10.00 $50,000 11 Remove Median Curb 0 LF $10.00 $0 12 Remove Sidewalk 0 SF $10.00 $0 13 Removal of Exist. Curb Inlet 10 EA $1,000.00 $10,000 14 Cold Planina (5' wide) 0 SF $1.00 $0 15 Remove Trees (larael 40 EA $500.00 $20,000 16 Remove trees (small) 65 EA $150.00 $9,750 17 Remove Parkwav Landscaoe 50,000 SF $2.00 $100,000 18 Remove Median Hardscape/Landscaoe 0 SF $4.00 $0 19 Unclassified Excavation 50,000 CYD $30.00 $1,500,000 20 Exported Soils 0 CYD $15.00 $0 21 Impart 60,000 CYD $20.00 $1,200,000 22 Retainina Wall 1,000 SF $80.00 $80,000 23 Local PCC Deoressions (DS-1) 0 SF $5.00 $0 24 Curb Inlet 6 EA $7,000.00 $42,000 25 Storm Drain Cleanout 9 EA $5,000.00 $45,000 26 Pipe Collar 0 EA $1,000.00 $0 27 18" RCP (01350) 2,700 LF $108.00 $291,600 28 24" RCP (01350) 0 LF $144.0C $( 29 4"PVC 0 LF $24.00 $0 30 Modifv C.1./C.O. 0 EA $3,000.00 $0 31 6" PCC Curb and Gutter SDRSD G-2 6,130 LF $18.00 $110,340 32 8" PCC Curb Only SDRSD GS-18 4,150 LF $15.00 $62,250 33 PCC Sidewalk 25,650 SF $5.00 $128,250 34 PCC Driveway 0 SF $5.00 $0 35 Cross Gutter 0 SF $5.00 $0 36 Pedestrian Ramp 7 EA $1,500.00 $10,500 37 Aaareaate Base 8,250 T $30.00 $247,500 38 Asohalt Concrete 7,700 T $95.00 $731,500 39 AC Overlay 6 T $95.00 $613 40 Median Pavina 53,170 SF $6.00 $319,020 41 Median Landscaoina 4,480 SF $2.00 $8,960 42 Relocate Fire Hvdrants 0 EA $500.00 $0 43 Relocate Water Meter 2 EA $300.00 $600 Road Segment 8 -Carlsbad Boulevard and Palomar Airport Road 3 08.xls 1 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 157 of 204 44 Relocate Backflow Preventer 1 EA $500.00 $500 45 Relocate Air Vacuum 0 EA $300.00 $0 46 Relocate Vents 0 EA $1,500.00 $0 47 Adi. Exist. MH to arade 0 EA $400.00 $0 48 Adiust X-Pull Box MH 1 EA $175.00 $175 49 Adiust Vault to Grade 0 EA $2,000.00 $0 50 Remove Streetliaht 8 EA $500.00 $4,000 51 Street Liaht 8 EA $5,000.00 $40,000 52 Traffic Siana! /four wav) 1 LS $190,000.00 $190,000 53 Traffic Video Detection /four leas) 3 LS. $30,000.00 $90,000 54 Traffic Signal reconfigure 2 LS $100,000.00 $200,000 55 Relocate Signs 80 EA $200.00 $16,000 56 Install Sign Complete 50 EA $250.00 $12,500 57 Remove Striping 1,400 LF $2.00 $2,800 58 StriPina 1 LS $28,000.00 $28,000 59 Sianina/lSNS sians 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000 60 Bridae /Railroad Overhead) 17,484 SF $200.00 $3,496,800 61 Seismic Retrofit 1 LS $500,000.00 $500,000 62 Metal Beam Guardrail 900 LF $45.00 $40,500 63 Erosion control landscaping 13.2 acres $15,000.00 $198,000 64 Utilitv relocations 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000 65 Remove metal beam guardrail 405 LF $25.00 $10,125 66 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $11,341,347 67 Construction Contingencv at 15% 1 L.S. $1,701,200.00 $1,701,200 68 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $13,042,547 69 Riaht of Wav Acauisition 3,000 SF $10.00 $30,000 70 Plannina/Permittina at 5% 1 L.S. $652,130.00 $652,130 71 Design at 15% 1 L.S. $1,956,380.00 $1,956,380 72 Const. Admin., Inspection and testing at 15% 1 L.S. $1,956,380.00 $1,956,380 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST==> $17,637,000 Road Segment 8 -Carlsbad Boulevard and Palomar Airport Road 3 OB.xis 2 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 158 of 204 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM -2008 UPDATE COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Project Title: Road Segment -Poinsettia Lane from Paseo Del Norte to Batiquitos Lane Project Description: Widen to provide three lanes in each direction, (Arterial configuration) Estimated By: City of Carlsbad Date: 3/08 Preliminary Cost Estimate ITEM ESTIMATED NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT 1 Mobilization C1ll 5% 1 LS. 2 Schedule 6 MO 3 Field Office 6 MO 4 SWPPP Preparation 1 LS. 5 SWPPP Maintenance 6 MO 6 Traffic Control 1 LS 7 Erosion Control 1 LS 8 Clear and Grub 1 LS 9 Sawcut 0 LF 10 Remove AC Pavement & Base 65,000 SF 11 Remove Curb & Gutter 2,900 LF 12 Remove Median Curb 0 LF 13 Remove Sidewalk 10,000 SF 14 Removal of Exist. Curb Inlet 2 EA 15 Cold Planing (5' wide) 0 SF 16 Remove Trees 0 EA 17 Remove Parkwav Landscape 0 SF 18 Remove Median Hardscape/Landscape 0 SF 19 Unclassified Excavation 1,500 CYD 20 ExPorted Soils 100 CYD 21 Retaining Wall 1,750 SF 22 Local PCC Depressions (DS-1) 0 SF 23 Curb Inlet 4 EA 24 Storm Drain Cleanout 2 EA 25 Pipe Collar 0 EA 26 18" RCP /01350\ 300 LF 27 24" RCP /01350\ 150 LF 28 4"PVC 0 LF 29 Modify C.1./C.O. 0 EA 30 6" PCC Curb and Gutter 2,900 LF 31 8" PCC Curb Only 0 LF 32 Metal Beam Guard Rail 300 LF 32 PCC Sidewalk 10,500 SF 33 PCC Drivewav 9,600 SF 34 Cross Gutter 0 SF 35 Pedestrian Ramo 4 EA 36 Aaareaate Base 1,600 T 37 Asohalt Concrete 860 T 38 AC Overlav 0 T 39 Median Pavina 30,000 SF 40 Median Landscaoina 5,600 SF 41 Relocate Fire Hydrants 0 EA 42 Relocate Water Meter 0 EA 43 Relocate Backflow Preventer 0 EA 44 Relocate Air Vacuum 0 EA 45 Relocate Vents 0 EA 46 Adi. Exist. MH to grade 10 EA 46 Adiust X-Pull Box MH 0 EA 47 Adiust Valve Can to Grade 10 EA 48 Adiust Vault to Grade 0 EA Road Segment 9 -Poinsettia Lane Paseo Del Norte to Batiquitos Lane 3 08.xls UNIT ITEM PRICE COST $70,147.50 $70,148 $1,000.0C $6,000 $5,000.00 $30,000 $10,000.00 $10,000 $1,000.00 $6,000 $40,000.00 $40,000 $15,000.00 $15,000 $10,000.00 $10,000 $2.00 $0 $2.00 $130,000 $10.00 $29,000 $10.00 $0 $10.00 $100,000 $1,000.00 $2,000 $1.0C $0 $500.0C $0 $2.0C $0 $4.0C $0 $30.00 $45,000 $15.00 $1,500 $80.00 $140,000 $5.00 $0 $7,000.00 $28,000 $5,000.00 $10,000 $1,000.00 $0 $108.00 $32,400 $144.00 $21,600 $24.00 $0 $3,000.00 $0 $18.00 $52,200 $15.00 $0 $12.00 $3,600 $5.00 $52,500 $5.00 $48,000 $5.00 $0 $1,500.00 $6,000 $30.00 $48,000 $95.00 $81,700 $95.00 $0 $6.00 $180,000 $2.00 $11,200 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $500.00 $0 $300.00 $0 $1,500.00 $0 $400.00 $4,000 $175.00 $0 $175.00 $1,750 $2,000.00 $0 1 qg July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 159 of 204 49 Street Light 6 EA $5,000.00 $30,000 50 Traffic Signal 1 LS $210,000.00 $210,000 51 Traffic Video Detection (four leas\ 0 LS. $30,000.00 $0 52 Relocate Sians 1 LS. $10,000.00 $10,000 53 Install Sian Comolete 0 EA $250.00 $C 54 Remove Strioina 0 LF $2.0C $0 55 Striping 1 LS $7,500.00 $7,50( 56 Pavmt Mrkgs (Two-Coat Paint) 0 SF $3.00 $0 57 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $1,473,098 58 Construction Continoencv at 15% 1 LS. $220,960.00 $220,960 59 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $1,694,058 60 Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $10.00 $( 61 Planning/Permitting at 5% 1 LS. $84,700.00 $84,700 62 Design at 15% 1 LS. $254,110.00 $254,110 63 Const. Admin. , Inspection and testing at 15% 1 LS. $254,110.00 $254,110 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST==> $2,287,000 Road Segment 9 -Poinsettia Lane Paseo Del Norte to Batiquitos Lane 3 OS.xis 2 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 160 of 204 Exhibit 3 tao July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 161 of 204 SECTION 9. REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION CONGESTION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (RTCIP): A. New Development Exactions Starting on July 1, 2008, each local agency in the San Diego region shall contribute $2,000 in exactions from the private sector, for each newly constructed residential housing unit in that jurisdiction to the RTCIP. These exactions shall ensure future development contributes its proportional share of the funding needed to pay for the Regional Arterial System and related regional transportation facility improvements, as defined in San Diego Association of Governments' (SANDAG's) most recent, adopted Regional Transportation Plan. New residential housing units constructed for extremely low, very-low, low, and moderate income households, as defined in California Health and Safety Code Sections 50105, 50106, 50079.5 and 50093, will be exempted from the $2,000 per unit contribution requirement. The amount of contribution shall be increased annually, in an· amount not to exceed the percentage increase set forth in the Engineering Construction Cost Index published by the Engineering News Record or similar cost of construction index. Each local agency shall establish an impact fee or other-revenue Funding Program by which it collects and funds its contribution to the RTCIP. Each local agency shall be responsible for establishing a procedure for providing its monetary contribution to the RTCIP. The RTCIP revenue will be used to construct improvements on the Regional Arterial System such as new or widened arterials, traffic signal coordination and other traffic improvements, freeway interchange and related freeway improvements, railroad grade separations, and improvements required for regional express bus and rail transit. This action is predicated on the desire to establish a uniform mitigation program that will mitigate the regional transportation: impacts of new development on the Arterial system. While the RTCIP cannot and should not fund ~II necessary regional transportation network components and improvements, the RTCIP will establish a new revenue source that ensures future development will contribute its pro rata share towards addressing the impacts of new growth on regional transportation infrastructure. B. Oversight, Audit and Funding Allocations The Regional Transportation Congestion lmprovemtnt Program (RTCIP) shall be overseen by SANDAG and implemented by each local agency, with the objective of developing a consolidated mitigation program for the San Diego region as a funding source for the Regional Arterial System. The RTCIP and each local agency's Funding Program shall be subject to an annual review and audit to be carried out by the SANDAG and the Independent Taxpayers Oversight Committee, as defined in Section 11 of this Ordinance. Any local agency that does not provide its full monetary contribution required by Section 9(A) in a given fiscal year will not be eligible to receive funding for local streets and roads under section 4(0)(1) of the TransNet Ordinance for the immediately following fiscal year. Any funding not allocated under 4(D)(1) as a result of this requirement shall be reallocated to the remaining local agencies that are in compliance with this Section. C. Implementation of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTCIP) Provisions for implementation of the RTCIP are described in the document titled "TransNet Extension · Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program," vvhich is hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 162 of 204 1 2 3 4 5 6 ORDINANCE NO. NS-885 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 18, CHAPTER 18.42, OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE UPDATING THE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE. The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, hereby ordains as follows: SECTION 1: That Title 18, Chapter 18.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code is amended 7 by the revision of Section 18.42.050(a) to read as follows: 8 9 10 11 "18.42.050 Fee. (a) A traffic impact fee of three hundred fifty-three dollars for each average daily trip generated by a residential project and a traffic impact fee of one hundred forty-two dollars for each average daily trip generated by a commercial or industrial project, pursuant to Section 18.42.020(e), shall be paid by the owner or developer prior to the issuance of any building permit 12 or occupancy permit for a project. Traffic impact fees shall be adjusted annually as part of the 13 City's Capital Improvement Program budget process, by two percent or the annual percentage 14 change in the Caltrans Construction Costs Index, (12-Month Index), whichever is higher." 15 SECTION 2: That Title 18, Chapter 18.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code is amended 16 by the revision of Section 18.42.070 to read as follows: "18.42.070 Use of Fees. 17 (a) All of the fees collected for a commercial or industrial project shall be allocated to a 18 circulation improvement account and shall be expended only to build or finance circulation 19 improvements serving the city. 20 (b) All of the fe_es collected for each newly constructed residential unit, excepting the 21 portion defined in paragraph (c), shall be allocated to a circulation improvement account and shall 22 be expended only to build or finance circulation improvements serving the city. 23 (c) A portion of the fees collected for newly constructed residential housing units, excepting the fees collected for newly constructed housing units constructed for extremely low, 24 very-low, low and moderate income households as defined in California Health and Safety Code 25 Sections 50105, 50106, 50079.5 and 50093, during the forty year period starting July 1, 2008 shall 26 be allocated to a separate circulation improvement sub account and shall be used to build or 27 finance circulation improvements to the Regional Arterial System as adopted by the San Diego 28 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 163 of 204 1 Association of Governments Board. For the year from July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009, said portion 2 shall equal two thousand dollars per residential housing unit. Said portion shall be adjusted 3 annually as part of the City's Capital Improvement Program budget process, by two percent or the annual percentage change in the Caltrans Construction Costs Index, (12-Month Index), whichever 4 is higher." 5 EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance was adopted at a noticed public hearing at which 6 time the City Council of the City of Carlsbad also considered the Traffic Impact Fee Update Study 7 which study and associated information was available to the general public for a period of at least 8 fourteen (14) days prior to the public hearing. The fee established by this ordinance shall apply to 9 the issuance of any building permit, for any residential development issued sixty (60) days 1 o following this ordinance's adoption and for all other types of development within thirty (30) days 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 following its adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Carlsbad within fifteen ( 15) days after its adoption. Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill /f' July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 164 of 204 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City Council on the 8th day of April, 2008, and thereafter. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the __ day of _______ , 2008, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY RONALD R. BALL, City Attorney CLAUDE A LEWIS, Mayor ATTEST: LORRAINE M. WOOD, City Clerk (SEAL) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 165 of 204 1 2 3 4 5 6 ORDINANCE NO. NS-885 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 18, CHAPTER 18.42, OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE UPDATING THE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE. The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, hereby ordains as follows: S~CTION 1: . That Title 18, Chapter 18.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code is amended 7 by the revision of Section 18.42.050(a) to read as follows: 8 9 10 11 "18.42.050 Fee. (a) A traffic impact fee of se1Ienty seven three hundred fifty-three dollars for each average daily trip generated by a residential project and a traffic impact fee of thirty one one hundred forty-two dollars for each average daily trip generated by a commercial or industrial project, pursuant to Section 18.42.020(e), shall be paid by the owner or developer prior to 12 issuance of any building permit or occupancy permit for a project. Traffic impact fees shall be 13 adjusted annually as part of the city's capital improvement program budget process, effeGti11e July 14 1, 1881, according to the Engineering News Record Los Angeles Construction Cost lnde* with a 15 base year inde* of 5830." by two percent or the annual percentage change in the _Caltrans 16 Construction Cost Index, (12-Month Index), whichever is higher." 17 18 19 SECTION 2: That Title 18, Chapter 18.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code is amended by the revision of Section 18.42.070 to read as follows: "18.42.070 Use of Fees. All of the fees collected shall be allocated to a circulation impro11ement account and shall be 20 e*pended only to build or finance circulation impro11ements serving the city." 21 (a) All of the fees collected for a commercial or industrial project shall be allocated to a 22 circulation improvement account and shall be expended only to build or finance circulation 23 improvements serving the city. 24 25 26 (b) All of the fees collected for each newly constructed residential unit, excepting the portion defined in paragraph (c), shall be allocated to a circulation improvement account and shall be expended only to build or finance circulation improvements serving the city. (c) A portion of the fees collected for newly constructed residential housing units, 27 excepting the fees collected for newly constructed housing units constructed for extremely low, 28 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 166 of 204 1 very-low, low and moderate income households as defined in California Health and Safety Code 2 Sections 50105, 50106, 50079.5 and 50093, during the forty year period starting July 1, 2008 shall 3 be allocated to a separate circulation improvement sub account and shall be used to build or finance circulation improvements to the Regional Arterial System as adopted by the San Diego 4 Association of Governments Board. For the year from July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009, said portion 5 shall equal two thousand dollars per residential housing unit. Said portion shall be adjusted -6 annually as part of the City's Capital Improvement Program budget process, by two percent or the 7 annual percentage change in the Caltrans Construction Costs Index, (12-Month Index), whichever 8 is higher." 9 EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance was adopted at a noticed public hearing at which 10 time the City Council of the City of Carlsbad also considered the Traffic Impact Fee Update Study 11 which study and associated information was available to the general public for a period of at least 12 fourteen (14) days prior to the public hearing. The fee established by this ordinance shall apply to the issuance of any building permit, for any residential development issued sixty (60) days 13 following this ordinance's adoption and for all other types of development within thirty (30) days 14 following its adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to 15 be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Carlsbad within 16 fifteen ( 15) days after its adoption. 17 Ill 18 Ill 19 Ill 20 Ill 21 Ill 22 Ill Ill 23 Ill 24 Ill 25 Ill 26 Ill 27 Ill 28 tOl? July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 167 of 204 1 INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a Regular Meeting of the Carlsbad City Council on 2 the ___ day of ___________ , 2008, and thereafter. 3 4 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of 5 Carlsbad, California, on the day of __________ , 2008, by the following vote, to wit: 6 AYES: 7 NOES: 8 ABSENT: 9 10 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RONALD R. BALL, City Attorney CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor ATTEST: LORRAINE M. WOOD, City Clerk (SEAL) July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 168 of 204 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2008-102 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE CITY OF CARLSBAD TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE UPDATE STUDY, DATED MARCH 2008 AND DESIGNATING THE CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS TO BE FUNDED BY TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES. WHEREAS, a report entitled the "City of Carlsbad Traffic Impact Fee Update Study, March 2008", hereinafter referred to as the "Study", has been prepared; and WHEREAS, the Study estimates the cost to construct improvements necessary to implement the City's Circulation Program; and WHEREAS, fees to implement the construction of those improvements are set forth in the Study; and WHEREAS, the fees set forth do not exceed the reasonable costs of constructing the facilities and the fees are not levied for general revenue purposes; and WHEREAS, the Study was available for public inspection and review fourteen (14) days prior to this public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Finance Director is directed to establish a fund or funds necessary to collect the fees so imposed and to maintain said fund or funds and the interest collected therein and to authorize expenditures for only those projects, bond payments, or other construction activities set forth in the Traffic Impact Fee Update Study. The fee deposited in the fund or funds shall not be commingled with any other funds or revenue of the City. The Finance Director is further directed to make a report, at least annually, and within sixty (60) days of the close of the fiscal year determining the beginning and ending balances for the fiscal year and the fees, interest, and other income and the amount of expenditure on each public facility. The Finance Director is further directed to make this information available to the public and report to the City Council not less than fifteen (15) days after making said information available to the public. The Finance Director shall monitor these funds so that, if required, the City Council may make written findings that all or a portion of the fee remaining unexpended or uncommitted in the fund for five (5) or more years are still necessary for the purpose to which the fees is to be expended and demonstrate a reasonable relationship between that fee and the cost of the improvements. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 169 of 204 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, 2 California, as follows: 3 1. The City Council of the City of Carlsbad approves the "City of Carlsbad Traffic 4 Impact Fee Update, March 2008". 5 2. That pursuant to Chapter 18.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code the circulation 6 improvements as shown on Exhibit 1 attached hereto and made a part hereof shall be funded with 7 the fees collected under said chapter. 8 3. The fee collected pursuant to Chapter 18.42 shall be placed in a general fund 9 account designated for use for the improvements designated by this resolution or any subsequent amendments hereto. Funds shall be allocated for specific projects during the annual 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Capital Improvement Program budgeting process. 4. The City Council of the City of Carlsbad may advance money from any available source or fund for the construction of the improvements listed in this resolution or any amendment hereto and repay the source or fund from the account established pursuant to this resolution. 5. The list of projects contained in Exhibit A, attached to Resolution No. 91-326 adopted by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on October 1, 1991, is hereby superseded by the list attached hereto as Exhibit 1. Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill hq July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 170 of 204 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 8th day of April, 2008, by the following vote to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Packard and Nygaard. NOES: Council Member Hall. ABSENT: None. ATTEST: July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 171 of 204 (3x 1-1, I!> 1 r· j fu ~-PSo/u ho,J 1,Jo 20%..-102. 2008 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE UPDATE -PROJECT LIST RTCIP ESTIMATED # ELGIBLE IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION COSTS •,•'''-, v' r· •·. ,. . ·a1 1umenn;···. . o• ,. . , 1 No Avenida Encinas wIaen south of Palomar Airport Road $5,045,000 2 Yes Carlsbad Boulevard wIaen trom Manzano Drive to ouu $5,360,000 Feet north of Cannon Road 3 Yes El Camino Real vvIaen from TamarcK Avenue to $8,078,000 Chestnut Avenue 4 No Carlsbad Village Drive Widen from Pontiac to Victoria $4,841,000 5 Yes El Camino Real wIaen rrom La c.;osta Avenue to $2,305,000 Arena! Road 6 Yes Cannon Road Reach 4 Cannon Road from 12uu· east or $5,400,000 * Colleqe to the easterly city limits 7 Yes Carlsbad Boulevard State street norm to me city 11mIts $:l,b41,LUU w Palomar Airport Road / t-'aIomar Airport Koad realignment 8 Yes and construction from Avenida $3,527,400 * Carlsbad Boulevard Encinas to Carlsbad Boulevard Drive 9 Yes Poinsettia Lane wIaen rrom 1-'aseo ueI Norte to $2,290,000 Batiquitos Lane No La Costa Avenue Widen from 1-5 to El Camino Real $1,500,000 ** 10 No OIIvenhain Road and Widen1Kea11in Rancho Santa Fe $1,400,000 ** 11 Rancho Santa Fe Road Road/Oliven ain Road ... · . 1ntersect1ons Palomar Airport Road -Road widening tor a ri~ht-turn lane 1 Yes alon~ PAR from Arma a to Paseo $1,244,000 Paseo Del Norte Del orte 2 Yes 1-'alomar Airport Koaa - Colleqe Boulevard Koad widening for a~nt-turn lane from S/B Colleqe to B PAR $587,000 3 Yes 1-'alomar Airport Roaa-t:.I Camino Real Aaa right-turn lane from E/B 1-'AK to S/B ECR $568,000 4 Yes Palomar Airport Road -1::1 Fuerte Street Road wIdenin~ tor a riiht-turn lane from W/B PA to NIB I Fuerte $916,000 5 Yes 1-'alomar Airport Koad - Melrose Drive Ada right-turn lane from t:.tts 1-'AK to SIB Melrose Drive $88,500 Yes Melrose Drive -Palomar Road widening tor a right-turn lane $410,000 6 Airport Road from S/B Melrose Drive to W/B PAR 7 Yes Melrose Drive -Alga Road Add dual left-turns on all $946,000 aooroaches 8 Yes El Camino Real -Add dual lett-turns In N/B and S/1::3 $865,000 Carlsbad Villaqe Drive directions alono ECR Yes El Camino Real -Cannon Add N/1::3 to t:./1::3 rignt-turn lane. $2,205,000 9 Road Widen bridJe structure. Add second N/ and S/B turn lanes. 10 Yes 1::.1 Camino Keal -Alga Road Moaift right-turn rrom Nits t:.l...,K to E/B Alaa Road $335,000 11 Yes El Camino Real -Add second Nit, to W/t:, lett-turn :)i:lO.j,UUU Tamarack lane nograms -,\..ttvwu:ie 1 No Sidewalk Program Complete sIdewaIKs at various locations throuohout the City $2,440,000 t-'rogram to facilitate Transportation Demand Transportation Management (TOM) strategies, No to annually review $1,440,000 2 Management and effectiveness of Tl F Monitoring Program improvement program and to facilitate annual programming of TIF fundina w -1 ne esumatea cost for this ro ect re p J p resents 20% or tne total ro ect estimated costs to rerIect tne p J prorated share to be funded by future development. ** -The estimated cost for this project represents the remaining portion of the total project costs which were fronted by the CFD #1 program fund and which are to be reimbursed by the TIF program fund. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 172 of 204 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 RESOLUTION NO. 2008-103 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, REVISING THE CREDIT AGAINST THE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE IMPOSED BY CHAPTER 18.42 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE FOR PROPERTIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF AND SUBJECT TO TAXATION BY COMMUNITY FACILITY DISTRICT NO. 1. WHEREAS, the Chapter 18.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code establishes the Traffic Impact Fee for the City of Carlsbad; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad has created Community Facilities District No. 1 to provide a funding source for the purpose of financing public improvements, some of which are funded from the Traffic Impact Fee established under Chapter 18.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate for properties within the boundaries of and subject to taxation by the Community Facilities District No. 1 to receive a credit against the Traffic Impact Fee to the extent that the projects funded through the Traffic Impact Fee are also funded through the Community Facilities District No. 1; and WHEREAS, Section 18.42.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code establishes a credit against the Traffic Impact Fee for properties within the boundaries of a subject to taxation by Community Facilities District No. 1; and WHEREAS, on June 25, 1991, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad adopted Resolution No. 91-196 establishing the amount of the credit against the Traffic Impact Fee imposed by Chapter 18.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code for properties with the boundaries of and subject to taxation by the Community Facilities District No. 1; and WHEREAS, the Traffic Impact Fee Program has been updated and therefore to retain the same credit value the methodology for establishing the amount of the credit against the Traffic Impact Fee must be revised. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, 26 California, as follows: 27 28 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 173 of 204 1 2. The properties included within the boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 1 2 that are subject to taxation by the District shall receive a credit against the Traffic Impact Fee 3 established under Chapter 18.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code to the extent projects funded 4 through the Traffic Impact Fee are funded through the Community Facilities District No. 1. 5 3. The amount of the credit against the Traffic Impact Fee shall be equal to $40 per 6 average daily trip for residential units and $16 per average daily trip for commercial and industrial development. The amount of the credit shall be adjusted annually as part of the City's Capital 7 Improvement Program budget process, by two percent or the annual percentage change in the 8 Caltrans Construction Costs Index, (12-Month Index), whichever is higher." The amount of the 9 Traffic Impact Fee due and payable for properties included within the boundaries of Community 10 11 Facilities District No. 1 that are subject to taxation by the District shall be equal to the fee as computed under Chapter 18.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code minus the credit as described 12 above. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. The amount of the credit against the Traffic Impact Fee as adopted by Resolution No. 91-196 is hereby superseded by the amount of credit established herein. Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill ll~ July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 174 of 204 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 8th day of April, 2008, by the following vote to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Packard and Nygaard. NOES: Council Member Hall. ABSENT: None. ATTEST: July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 175 of 204 9201 Spectrum Center Blvd., Suite 110 San Diego, CA 92123-1407 P 858.450.1221 F 858.5S2.1445 www.bia5andlego.org PRESIDENT Sherman D. Harmer, Jr. Urban Housing Partners, Inc. VICE PRESIDENT Andrew Murphy American Property Enterprises TREASURER/ SECRET.UV Bob Cummings Banatt American IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT Scott Brusseau Newport National Corporation CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFACU Paul A. Tryon AFFILIATES California Building Industry Association National Association of Home Builders National Association of Industrial and Office Properties April 3, 2008 Honorable Oaude Lewis Mayor City of Carlsbad 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: Proposed Transportation Impact Fee Increase Dear Mayor Lewis and Members of the City Council: AGENDAITEM# __ fo __ a Mayor CltyCouncD City Manaaer City Attornq City Clerk The Building Industry Association of San Diego County represents 1,250 member companies comprising a workforce of 150,000 San Diegans. As you are aware, the industry is in the midst of a severe housing recession. To our dismay, despite the housing recession and the economic decline cities are experiencing, communities are continuing to pursue fee increases and government agencies are continuing to layer on new regulations and requirements which make housing construction more expensive. Additional cost increases in this market will simply delay the recovery of the housing market. To the contrary, cities should be pursuing ways to reduce fees and regulatory burdens to help stimulate the recovery of the housing market. As it relates to the city's traffic impact fees, we strongly urge the city to not move forward with an increase at this time beyond implementing the Regional Transportation Development Impact Fee (RTDIF) prescribed by Transnet. 11,e city should implement only that portion of the $2,000 fee that they are not presently collecting for the Regional Arterial System (RAS) in the city. For example, the city's current traffic fee is $1,150. If $1,000 of the current fee is for RAS improvements, then the city's total fee on residential would be adjusted by $1,000 ($2,000 -$1,000) to implement the RTDIF and only for residential, making the city's new residential fee $2,150. The city's commercial and industrial fees should not be adjusted as the RTDIF only applies to residential construction. We also request that the projects that are currently in the approval process or which have already received discretionary approvals be "grandfathered" under the existing fee schedule. Thank you for your consideration of our concerns. Very, truly yours, ott Public ate ~~A:~D=ll:~ BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY CLERK'S OFFICE July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 176 of 204 April 8, 2008 Claude A "Bud" Lewis, Mayor City of Carlsbad, California 1200 Carlsbad Village Dr Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: Traffic Impact Fees Dear Mayor Lewis, On behalf of the Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce and it's over 1,700 members, which represents over 75,000 employees I am writing you to ask you to consider to not increase traffic impact fees beyond the Regional Transportation Development Impact Fees (RTDIF) prescribed by Trans net. Additional fees imposed by government agencies will only extend the uncertain times in the housing market and local economy. We believe that the City of Carlsbad should be looking at ways to reduce fees and regulatory burdens to help stimulate the local economy and housing market. The Chamber fully believes and stands behind the proposal made by the Building Industry Association of San Diego. The BIA's proposal will allow Carlsbad to gather the needed fees for the Regional Arterial System and implement the RTDIF for residential housing only, while still keeping fees low enough to help stimulate our economy during this slowing period. We would further like to see the City "grandfather" projects, which are going through or have received discretionary approvals under existing fees. The City of Carlsbad has always been fiscally sound and seen as business friendly. The Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce strongly supports and encourages you to adopt the BIA's proposal for fee increases. Thank you for your time and consideration. Please do not hesitate to contact me, or Michael Babowal, director of government affairs at (760) 931-8400. Sincerely, Ted Owen President & CEO 5934 Priestly Drive• Carlsbad, California 92008 Phone: (760) 931-8400 • fax: (760) 931-91 53 • E-mail: chamber@carlsbad.org • Web: www.carlsbad.org July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 177 of 204 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times- Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: March 25th, 2008 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at SAN MARCOS California This 25th, day of March, 2008 Jane Allshouse NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp Proof of Publication of e NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a pub-lic hearing at Ci!Y Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad VillagH Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6;00 p.m. on Tuesaay, April 81 2008, to consider amending Title 18, Chapter 18.q2 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code which establishes the Traffic Impact Fee,;_ to consider approving the Traffic Impact Fee Update ;::,tudy, dated March 2008, designating the circulation improve-ments to be funded by the Traffic Impact Fee; to consider revising the traffic impact fee imposed by Chapter 18.42 onhe C_arlsbad Municipal Code; and to consider revising the credit aQainst the traffic impact fee imposed by Chapter 18.42 of the Carlsbad Mu-nicipal Code for properties within the boundaries and subject to taxation by Community Facilities District No. 1. Copies of the Traffic lm_pact Fee Update Study are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are open to pub-lic inspection. Those persons wishing to speak on this item are cor-dially invited to attencfthe public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available after Fnday, April 4, 2008. If you have an_y questions, please contact Mar-shall Plantz, Senior Civil Engineer in the Public Works Department at 760-602-2766. If you challenge the City-Wide Traffic Impact Fee and List of Projects to be funded in court, you may be lim-ited to raising only those issues raised by you or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice1 or in written correspondence delivered to the City o Carlsbad, City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Vilrage Prive, Carlsbad, 92008, at or prior to the pub-lic heanng. APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL NCT2137348 PUB: 03/25/2008 TIF Update and the RTCIPTIF Update and the RTCIP``Existing Traffic Impact FeeExisting Traffic Impact Fee``Regional Transportation Congestion Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement ProgramImprovement Program``Traffic Impact Fee UpdateTraffic Impact Fee UpdateJuly 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 178 of 204 Existing TIF ProgramExisting TIF ProgramExisting TIF Program Existing TIF Program (Adopted in 1991)(Adopted in 1991)``Project ListProject List12 Roadway Segments12 Roadway Segments14 Intersections14 Intersections2 Programs2 Programs``1991 Cost Estimate1991 Cost Estimate$39.9 million$39.9 millionJuly 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 179 of 204 Existing TIF ProgramExisting TIF Program``Original Fees Original Fees ––Residential Residential --$77/ADT $77/ADT Commercial/Industrial Commercial/Industrial --$31/ADT$31/ADT``Current FeesCurrent FeesDevelopmentDevelopmentFee BasisFee BasisNot In CFD #1Not In CFD #1In CFD #1In CFD #1TIF CreditTIF CreditResidentialResidential$115/ADT$115/ADTSingle FamilySingle Family$1,150/unit$1,150/unit$750/Unit$750/Unit$400/unit$400/unitCondominiumCondominium$920/unit$920/unit$600/Unit$600/Unit$320/unit$320/unitApartmentApartment$690/unit$690/unit$450/Unit$450/Unit$240/unit$240/unitComm./Comm./IndustIndust..$46/ADT$46/ADT$46/ADT$46/ADT$30/ADT$30/ADT$16/ADT$16/ADTJuly 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 180 of 204 Existing TIF ProgramExisting TIF Program``Projects completed Projects completed 6 Roadway Segments6 Roadway Segments11 Intersections11 Intersections``Projects remaining Projects remaining 6 Roadway Segments6 Roadway Segments3 Intersections3 IntersectionsJuly 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 181 of 204 Existing TIF ProgramExisting TIF Program``Costs remainingCosts remaining$37.1 million$37.1 million``Funding remainingFunding remaining$23.6 million$23.6 millionJuly 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 182 of 204 Regional Transportation Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program Congestion Improvement Program ``TransNetTransNetExtension Ordinance Extension Ordinance ``Section 9 Section 9 --RTCIPRTCIP$2,000/Residential Unit $2,000/Residential Unit ““Starting on July 1, 2008, each local agency Starting on July 1, 2008, each local agency shall contribute $2,000 in exactions from the shall contribute $2,000 in exactions from the private sector, for each newly constructed private sector, for each newly constructed residential housing unit in that jurisdictionresidential housing unit in that jurisdiction””$9.2 million in funds$9.2 million in fundsSpend on Regional Arterial SystemSpend on Regional Arterial SystemJuly 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 183 of 204 Regional Transportation Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program Congestion Improvement Program ``Regional Arterial Regional Arterial System System NameNameLimitsLimitsCannon RoadCannon RoadCarlsbad Blvd. to Buena Vista DriveCarlsbad Blvd. to Buena Vista DriveCarlsbad BoulevardCarlsbad BoulevardEaton Street to La Costa AvenueEaton Street to La Costa AvenueCarlsbad Village DriveCarlsbad Village DriveII--5 to Carlsbad Blvd.5 to Carlsbad Blvd.College BoulevardCollege BoulevardCity Limits to Palomar Airport RoadCity Limits to Palomar Airport RoadEl Camino RealEl Camino RealSR 78 to Olivenhain RoadSR 78 to Olivenhain RoadFaraday AvenueFaraday AvenueMelrose Drive to College Blvd.Melrose Drive to College Blvd.La Costa AvenueLa Costa AvenueII--5 to El Camino Real5 to El Camino RealMelrose DriveMelrose DriveCity Limits to Rancho Santa Fe RoadCity Limits to Rancho Santa Fe RoadPalomar Airport RoadPalomar Airport RoadCarlsbad Blvd. to Carlsbad Blvd. to BuisnessBuisnessPark DrivePark DrivePoinsettia LanePoinsettia LaneCarlsbad Blvd. to Melrose DriveCarlsbad Blvd. to Melrose DriveRancho Santa Fe RoadRancho Santa Fe RoadMelrose Drive to Olivenhain RoadMelrose Drive to Olivenhain RoadOlivenhain RoadOlivenhain RoadLos Los PinosPinosCircle to Rancho Santa Fe RoadCircle to Rancho Santa Fe RoadJuly 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 184 of 204 Regional Transportation Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program Congestion Improvement Program ``If not implemented City loses If not implemented City loses TransNetTransNetLocal funding = Approx. $3 million/year.Local funding = Approx. $3 million/year.““Any local agency that does not provide its full Any local agency that does not provide its full monetary contribution required by Section 9(A) monetary contribution required by Section 9(A) in a give fiscal year will not be eligible to in a give fiscal year will not be eligible to receive funding for local streets and roadsreceive funding for local streets and roads……for the immediately following fiscal year.for the immediately following fiscal year.””July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 185 of 204 TIF UpdateTIF Update``Updated Project ListUpdated Project List11 Roadway Segments11 Roadway Segments11 Intersections11 Intersections2 Programs2 ProgramsJuly 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 186 of 204 TIF UpdateTIF Update``Project CostsProject Costs11 Roadway Segments11 Roadway Segments--$ 42.3 million$ 42.3 million11 Intersections11 Intersections--$ 8.4 million$ 8.4 million2 Programs2 Programs--$ 3.9 million$ 3.9 millionTotal projected Cost Total projected Cost --$ 54.6 million$ 54.6 millionJuly 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 187 of 204 TIF Update TIF Update ––Option 1 Option 1 ``FeeFee``Projected Revenue Projected Revenue --$27.7 million$27.7 million``Project CostsProject Costs--$54.6 million$54.6 million``Balance (Shortfall)Balance (Shortfall)--($26.9 million)($26.9 million)DevelopmentDevelopmentFee BasisFee BasisNot In CFD #1Not In CFD #1In CFD #1In CFD #1TIF CreditTIF CreditResidentialResidential$2000/unit$2000/unitSingle FamilySingle Family$2,400/unit$2,400/unit$2,000/Unit$2,000/Unit$400/unit$400/unitCondominiumCondominium$2,320/unit$2,320/unit$2,000/Unit$2,000/Unit$320/unit$320/unitApartmentApartment$2,240/unit$2,240/unit$2,000/Unit$2,000/Unit$240/unit$240/unitComm./Comm./IndustIndust..$46/ADT$46/ADT$46/ADT$46/ADT$30/ADT$30/ADT$16/ADT$16/ADTJuly 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 188 of 204 TIF Update TIF Update ––Option 2Option 2``Development ProjectionsDevelopment ProjectionsResidential Residential ––4600 Units4600 UnitsCommercial/Industrial Commercial/Industrial ––10.5 million SF10.5 million SF``Average Daily Trip CalculationAverage Daily Trip CalculationResidentialResidentialCommercial/Industrial Commercial/Industrial July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 189 of 204 TIF Update TIF Update ––Option 2Option 2``FeeFee``Projected Revenue Projected Revenue --$54.6 million$54.6 million``Project CostProject Cost--$54.6 million$54.6 million``Balance (Shortfall)Balance (Shortfall)--00DevelopmentDevelopmentFee BasisFee BasisNot In CFD #1Not In CFD #1In CFD #1In CFD #1TIF CreditTIF CreditResidentialResidential$353/ADT$353/ADTSingle FamilySingle Family$3,530/unit$3,530/unit$3,130/Unit$3,130/Unit$400/unit$400/unitCondominiumCondominium$2,824/unit$2,824/unit$2,504/Unit$2,504/Unit$320/unit$320/unitApartmentApartment$2,118/unit$2,118/unit$1,878/Unit$1,878/Unit$240/unit$240/unitComm./Comm./IndustIndust..$142/ADT$142/ADT$142/ADT$142/ADT$126/ADT$126/ADT$16/ADT$16/ADTJuly 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 190 of 204 TIF Update TIF Update ``Fee ComparisonFee ComparisonOption #1Option #2Not in CFD #1 In CFD #1Not in CFD #1 In CFD #1Per unitPer unit Fees Per unitPer unit FeesResidential$2,400/SF Res $2,000/SF Res 8.7 $3,350/SF Res $3,130/SF Res 13.3Commercial$1,840/1,000 sf $1,200/1,000 sf 6.1 $5,680/1,000 sf $5,040/1,000 sf 24.1Industrial$368/1,000 sf $240/1,000 sf 1.5 $1,136/1,000 sf $1,008/1,000 sf 5.8Future Revenue16.343.2Existing Funds11.411.4Total Funds27.754.6July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 191 of 204 TIF Update TIF Update ``Fee ComparisonFee ComparisonCityCitySingle Family Single Family ResidentialResidentialNeighborhood Comm. Neighborhood Comm. (100,000ksf/10AC)(100,000ksf/10AC)Industrial Park Industrial Park (50ksf)(50ksf)CarlsbadCarlsbad$3,130* $3,130* --$3,530$3,530$1,512,000$1,512,000$50,400$50,400Chula VistaChula Vista$3,243$3,243$1,459,350$1,459,350$129,590$129,590EncinitasEncinitas$2,225 $2,225 --$2,670$2,670$1,602,000$1,602,000$106,800$106,800EscondidoEscondido$2,850$2,850$504,000$504,000$16,800$16,800OceansideOceanside$2,707$2,707$3,248,400/$2,436,300$3,248,400/$2,436,300$108,280/$81,210$108,280/$81,210San MarcosSan Marcos$9,699$9,699$1,800,000$1,800,000$587,750$587,750VistaVista$2,991 $2,991 --$3,590$3,590$3,468,000$3,468,000$115,600$115,600July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 192 of 204 RecommendationRecommendation``Update Project ListUpdate Project List``Add RTCIP ProvisionsAdd RTCIP Provisions``Amend Cost Escalators Amend Cost Escalators ``Amend Credit MechanismAmend Credit Mechanism``Amend Fee Amend Fee --Option 2Option 2DevelopmentDevelopmentFee BasisFee BasisNot In CFD #1Not In CFD #1In CFD #1In CFD #1TIF CreditTIF CreditResidentialResidential$353/ADT$353/ADTSingle FamilySingle Family$3,530/unit$3,530/unit$3,130/Unit$3,130/Unit$400/unit$400/unitCondominiumCondominium$2,824/unit$2,824/unit$2,504/Unit$2,504/Unit$320/unit$320/unitApartmentApartment$2,118/unit$2,118/unit$1,878/Unit$1,878/Unit$240/unit$240/unitComm./Comm./IndustIndust..$142/ADT$142/ADT$142/ADT$142/ADT$126/ADT$126/ADT$16/ADT$16/ADTJuly 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 193 of 204 July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 194 of 204 1 EXHIBIT “C” CERTIFICATION OF PROPOSER July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 195 of 204 2 EXHIBIT “C” CERTIFICATION OF PROPOSER I certify that I have read this Request for Proposal for the Sustainable Mobility Implementation Plan, Multimodal Transportation Impact Fee Study & Vehicle Miles Traveled Mitigation Program and the instructions for submitting a Proposal. I further certify that I must submit the firm’s Proposal in response to this request and that I am authorized to commit the firm to the Proposal submitted. _______________________________ __________________________ Signature Typed or Printed Name _______________________________ __________________________ Title Company _______________________________ __________________________ Telephone Address _______________________________ __________________________ Fax Address _________________________________ Date July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 196 of 204 1 EXHIBIT “D” SAMPLE AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 197 of 204 City Attorney Approved Version 6/12/18 2 EXHIBIT “D” SAMPLE AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The awarded PROPOSER will be expected to execute this contract (or a similar version), which is offered here solely for informational purposes only, as indicated in the City’s Request for Proposal. AGREEMENT FOR (INSERT TYPE OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES) SERVICES (NAME OF CONTRACTOR) THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the ______________ day of _________________________, 20___, by and between the CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal corporation, ("City"), and ______________________________, a _______________, ("Contractor"). RECITALS A. City requires the professional services of a _______________________________ that is experienced in _______________. B. Contractor has the necessary experience in providing professional services and advice related to ___________________________. C. Contractor has submitted a proposal to City and has affirmed its willingness and ability to perform such work. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and the mutual covenants contained herein, City and Contractor agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF WORK City retains Contractor to perform, and Contractor agrees to render, those services (the "Services") that are defined in attached Exhibit "A", which is incorporated by this reference in accordance with this Agreement’s terms and conditions. 2. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE While performing the Services, Contractor will exercise the reasonable professional care and skill customarily exercised by reputable members of Contractor's profession practicing in the Metropolitan Southern California Area, and will use reasonable diligence and best judgment while exercising its professional skill and expertise. 3. TERM The term of this Agreement will be effective for a period of ________ from the date first above written. The City Manager may amend the Agreement to extend it for ____ additional ______ year periods or parts thereof. Extensions will be based upon a satisfactory review of Contractor's performance, City needs, and appropriation of funds by the City Council. The parties will prepare a written amendment indicating the effective date and length of the extended Agreement. 4. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 5. COMPENSATION The total fee payable for the Services to be performed during the initial Agreement term will be ____________ dollars ($_________). No other compensation for the Services will be allowed except for items covered by subsequent amendments to this Agreement. If the City elects to July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 198 of 204 City Attorney Approved Version 6/12/18 3 extend the Agreement, the amount shall not exceed ________________________________________ dollars ($_________) per Agreement year. The City reserves the right to withhold a ten percent (10%) retention until City has accepted the work and/or Services specified in Exhibit "A". Incremental payments, if applicable, should be made as outlined in attached Exhibit "A". 6. STATUS OF CONTRACTOR Contractor will perform the Services in Contractor's own way as an independent contractor and in pursuit of Contractor's independent calling, and not as an employee of City. Contractor will be under control of City only as to the result to be accomplished but will consult with City as necessary. The persons used by Contractor to provide services under this Agreement will not be considered employees of City for any purposes. The payment made to Contractor pursuant to the Agreement will be the full and complete compensation to which Contractor is entitled. City will not make any federal or state tax withholdings on behalf of Contractor or its agents, employees or subcontractors. City will not be required to pay any workers' compensation insurance or unemployment contributions on behalf of Contractor or its employees or subcontractors. Contractor agrees to indemnify City within thirty (30) days for any tax, retirement contribution, social security, overtime payment, unemployment payment or workers' compensation payment which City may be required to make on behalf of Contractor or any agent, employee, or subcontractor of Contractor for work done under this Agreement. At the City’s election, City may deduct the indemnification amount from any balance owing to Contractor. 7. SUBCONTRACTING Contractor will not subcontract any portion of the Services without prior written approval of City. If Contractor subcontracts any of the Services, Contractor will be fully responsible to City for the acts and omissions of Contractor's subcontractor and of the persons either directly or indirectly employed by the subcontractor, as Contractor is for the acts and omissions of persons directly employed by Contractor. Nothing contained in this Agreement will create any contractual relationship between any subcontractor of Contractor and City. Contractor will be responsible for payment of subcontractors. Contractor will bind every subcontractor and every subcontractor of a subcontractor by the terms of this Agreement applicable to Contractor's work unless specifically noted to the contrary in the subcontract and approved in writing by City. 8. OTHER CONTRACTORS The City reserves the right to employ other Contractors in connection with the Services. 9. INDEMNIFICATION Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses including attorney’s fees arising out of the performance of the work described herein caused by any negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Contractor, any subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable. The parties expressly agree that any payment, attorney’s fee, costs or expense City incurs or makes to or on behalf of an injured employee under the City’s self-administered workers’ compensation is included as a loss, expense or cost for the purposes of this section, and that this section will survive the expiration or early termination of this Agreement. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 199 of 204 City Attorney Approved Version 6/12/18 4 10. INSURANCE Contractor will obtain and maintain for the duration of the Agreement and any and all amendments, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise out of or in connection with performance of the services by Contractor or Contractor’s agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. The insurance will be obtained from an insurance carrier admitted and authorized to do business in the State of California. The insurance carrier is required to have a current Best's Key Rating of not less than "A-:VII"; OR with a surplus line insurer on the State of California’s List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers (LASLI) with a rating in the latest Best’s Key Rating Guide of at least “A:X”; OR an alien non-admitted insurer listed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) latest quarterly listings report. 10.1 Coverage and Limits. Contractor will maintain the types of coverage and minimum limits indicated below, unless the Risk Manager or City Manager approves a lower amount. These minimum amounts of coverage will not constitute any limitations or cap on Contractor's indemnification obligations under this Agreement. City, its officers, agents and employees make no representation that the limits of the insurance specified to be carried by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement are adequate to protect Contractor. If Contractor believes that any required insurance coverage is inadequate, Contractor will obtain such additional insurance coverage, as Contractor deems adequate, at Contractor's sole expense. The full limits available to the named insured shall also be available and applicable to the City as an additional insured. 10.1.1 Commercial General Liability (CGL) Insurance. Insurance written on an “occurrence” basis, including personal & advertising injury, with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 10.1.2 Automobile Liability. (if the use of an automobile is involved for Contractor's work for City). $2,000,000 combined single-limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 10.1.3 Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability. Workers' Compensation limits as required by the California Labor Code. Workers' Compensation will not be required if Contractor has no employees and provides, to City's satisfaction, a declaration stating this. 10.1.4 Professional Liability. Errors and omissions liability appropriate to Contractor’s profession with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per claim. Coverage must be maintained for a period of five years following the date of completion of the work. 10.2 Additional Provisions. Contractor will ensure that the policies of insurance required under this Agreement contain, or are endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 10.2.1 The City will be named as an additional insured on Commercial General Liability which shall provide primary coverage to the City. 10.2.2 Contractor will obtain occurrence coverage, excluding Professional Liability, which will be written as claims-made coverage. 10.2.3 This insurance will be in force during the life of the Agreement and any extensions of it and will not be canceled without thirty (30) days prior written notice to City sent by certified mail pursuant to the Notice provisions of this Agreement. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 200 of 204 City Attorney Approved Version 6/12/18 5 10.3 Providing Certificates of Insurance and Endorsements. Prior to City's execution of this Agreement, Contractor will furnish certificates of insurance and endorsements to City. 10.4 Failure to Maintain Coverage. If Contractor fails to maintain any of these insurance coverages, then City will have the option to declare Contractor in breach or may purchase replacement insurance or pay the premiums that are due on existing policies in order to maintain the required coverages. Contractor is responsible for any payments made by City to obtain or maintain insurance and City may collect these payments from Contractor or deduct the amount paid from any sums due Contractor under this Agreement. 10.5 Submission of Insurance Policies. City reserves the right to require, at any time, complete and certified copies of any or all required insurance policies and endorsements. 11. BUSINESS LICENSE Contractor will obtain and maintain a City of Carlsbad Business License for the term of the Agreement, as may be amended from time-to-time. 12. ACCOUNTING RECORDS Contractor will maintain complete and accurate records with respect to costs incurred under this Agreement. All records will be clearly identifiable. Contractor will allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor will allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement. 13. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS All work product produced by Contractor or its agents, employees, and subcontractors pursuant to this Agreement is the property of City. In the event this Agreement is terminated, all work product produced by Contractor or its agents, employees and subcontractors pursuant to this Agreement will be delivered at once to City. Contractor will have the right to make one (1) copy of the work product for Contractor’s records. 14. COPYRIGHTS Contractor agrees that all copyrights that arise from the services will be vested in City and Contractor relinquishes all claims to the copyrights in favor of City. 15. NOTICES The name of the persons who are authorized to give written notice or to receive written notice on behalf of City and on behalf of Contractor under this Agreement. For City For Contractor Name Name Title Title Department Address City of Carlsbad Address Phone No. Email Phone No. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 201 of 204 City Attorney Approved Version 6/12/18 6 Each party will notify the other immediately of any changes of address that would require any notice or delivery to be directed to another address. 16. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Contractor shall file a Conflict of Interest Statement with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of the City of Carlsbad Conflict of Interest Code. The Contractor shall report investments or interests in all categories. Yes No 17. GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS Contractor will keep fully informed of federal, state and local laws and ordinances and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by Contractor, or in any way affect the performance of the Services by Contractor. Contractor will at all times observe and comply with these laws, ordinances, and regulations and will be responsible for the compliance of Contractor's services with all applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. Contractor will be aware of the requirements of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 and will comply with those requirements, including, but not limited to, verifying the eligibility for employment of all agents, employees, subcontractors and consultants whose services are required by this Agreement. 18. DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT PROHIBITED Contractor will comply with all applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination and harassment. 19. DISPUTE RESOLUTION If a dispute should arise regarding the performance of the Services the following procedure will be used to resolve any questions of fact or interpretation not otherwise settled by agreement between the parties. Representatives of Contractor or City will reduce such questions, and their respective views, to writing. A copy of such documented dispute will be forwarded to both parties involved along with recommended methods of resolution, which would be of benefit to both parties. The representative receiving the letter will reply to the letter along with a recommended method of resolution within ten (10) business days. If the resolution thus obtained is unsatisfactory to the aggrieved party, a letter outlining the disputes will be forwarded to the City Manager. The City Manager will consider the facts and solutions recommended by each party and may then opt to direct a solution to the problem. In such cases, the action of the City Manager will be binding upon the parties involved, although nothing in this procedure will prohibit the parties from seeking remedies available to them at law. 20. TERMINATION In the event of the Contractor's failure to prosecute, deliver, or perform the Services, City may terminate this Agreement for nonperformance by notifying Contractor by certified mail of the termination. If City decides to abandon or indefinitely postpone the work or services contemplated by this Agreement, City may terminate this Agreement upon written notice to Contractor. Upon notification of termination, Contractor has five (5) business days to deliver any documents owned by City and all work in progress to City address contained in this Agreement. City will make a determination of fact based upon the work product delivered to City and of the percentage of work that Contractor has performed which is usable and of worth to City in having the Agreement completed. Based upon that finding City will determine the final payment of the Agreement. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 202 of 204 □ □ City Attorney Approved Version 6/12/18 7 Either party upon tendering thirty (30) days written notice to the other party may terminate this Agreement. In this event and upon request of City, Contractor will assemble the work product and put it in order for proper filing and closing and deliver it to City. Contractor will be paid for work performed to the termination date; however, the total will not exceed the lump sum fee payable under this Agreement. City will make the final determination as to the portions of tasks completed and the compensation to be made. 21. COVENANTS AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES Contractor warrants that Contractor has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for Contractor, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that Contractor has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration contingent upon, or resulting from, the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City will have the right to annul this Agreement without liability, or, in its discretion, to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of the fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fees, gift, or contingent fee. 22. CLAIMS AND LAWSUITS By signing this Agreement, Contractor agrees that any Agreement claim submitted to City must be asserted as part of the Agreement process as set forth in this Agreement and not in anticipation of litigation or in conjunction with litigation. Contractor acknowledges that if a false claim is submitted to City, it may be considered fraud and Contractor may be subject to criminal prosecution. Contractor acknowledges that California Government Code sections 12650 et seq., the False Claims Act applies to this Agreement and, provides for civil penalties where a person knowingly submits a false claim to a public entity. These provisions include false claims made with deliberate ignorance of the false information or in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of information. If City seeks to recover penalties pursuant to the False Claims Act, it is entitled to recover its litigation costs, including attorney's fees. Contractor acknowledges that the filing of a false claim may subject Contractor to an administrative debarment proceeding as the result of which Contractor may be prevented to act as a Contractor on any public work or improvement for a period of up to five (5) years. Contractor acknowledges debarment by another jurisdiction is grounds for City to terminate this Agreement. 23. JURISDICTION AND VENUE Any action at law or in equity brought by either of the parties for the purpose of enforcing a right or rights provided for by this Agreement will be tried in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of San Diego, State of California, and the parties waive all provisions of law providing for a change of venue in these proceedings to any other county. 24. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS It is mutually understood and agreed that this Agreement will be binding upon City and Contractor and their respective successors. Neither this Agreement nor any part of it nor any monies due or to become due under it may be assigned by Contractor without the prior consent of City, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. 25. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement, together with any other written document referred to or contemplated by it, along with the purchase order for this Agreement and its provisions, embody the entire Agreement and understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter of it. In case of conflict, the terms of the Agreement supersede the purchase order. Neither this Agreement nor any of its provisions may be amended, modified, waived or discharged except in a writing signed by both parties. July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 203 of 204 City Attorney Approved Version 6/12/18 8 26. AUTHORITY The individuals executing this Agreement and the instruments referenced in it on behalf of Contractor each represent and warrant that they have the legal power, right and actual authority to bind Contractor to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. CONTRACTOR CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal corporation of the State of California By: By: (sign here) [INSERT TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN (City Manager or Mayor or Division Director as authorized by the City Manager)] (print name/title) ATTEST: By: (sign here) BARBARA ENGLESON City Clerk (print name/title) If required by City, proper notarial acknowledgment of execution by contractor must be attached. If a corporation, Agreement must be signed by one corporate officer from each of the following two groups. Group A Group B Chairman, Secretary, President, or Assistant Secretary, Vice-President CFO or Assistant Treasurer Otherwise, the corporation must attach a resolution certified by the secretary or assistant secretary under corporate seal empowering the officer(s) signing to bind the corporation. APPROVED AS TO FORM: CELIA A. BREWER, City Attorney BY: _____________________________ Assistant City Attorney July 26, 2022 Item #12 Page 204 of 204 Ta mmy Cloud -McMinn From: Sent: To: Cc: Steve Linke <splinke@gmail.com> Tuesday, July 26, 2022 9:55 AM Council Internet Email; City Clerk Brandon Perez All Receive -A~enda Item# /:2, For the Information of the: CITY COUNCIL Date71:JJA~ -Cc ,- 59 • :Go El 1 fiGt 1 ii') / Su bject: Sustainable Mobility Plan Implementation Program (7/26/2022 Agenda Item #12) Honorable Mayor, Mayor Pro Tern, and Councilmembers: I noted the proposal to delay in the completion of the Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines (TIA) and Transportation Demand Management (TOM) Program updates, in order to prioritize some Sustainable Mobility Plan (SMP) projects. Our Traffic & Mobility Commission spent countless hours working on the SMP, and it is obviously very important to work on the list of projects contained therein. However, we also have spent countless hours working on the TIA Guidelines and TOM Program updates. And, after multiple years of effort, our work plan for FY 2022-23 (finalized just last month) included commitments to present these updates to the commission in the next few months (September/Fall). These documents help define the requirements for developers and the city to plan and fund the very types of projects in the SMP, so I think it would be shame to pull the rug on them right before the finish line. While our commission was involved in finalizing our work plan at our June meeting, this new proposal to delay these items was not raised at our June or July meeting. Accordingly, I am speaking as an individual, although I am a member of the commission. I ask that our commission be given a chance to review this proposal and its implications on our work plan, or that you at least consider retaining priority for just the next few months for the TIA Guidelines and TOM Program updates scheduled for September/Fall. Best regards, Steve Linke Vice Chair, Traffic and Mobility Commission CAUTION : Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 1 RECOMMENDED ACTION 1.Receive the Semiannual Transportation Report 2.Adopt a resolution reprioritizing implementation of the Sustainable Mobility Plan program in the Capital Improvement Program ITEM 12: SEMIANNUAL TRANSPORTATION REPORT 2 { City of Carlsbad 3 Semi Annual Transportation Report •Project highlights •Full project status update in Exhibit 2 ITEM 12: SEMIANNUAL TRANSPORTATION REPORT (cityof Carlsbad 44 El Camino Real projects •Cannon •College •Arenal Terramar Coastal Improvements •60% engineering design draft completed College Boulevard •Speed feedback signs Neighborhood traffic safety •Segovia Way •Harwich drive Notto Scale 55 14 street lights in Barrio 384 sign repairs 1,313 Electrical/street light repairs 31,000 sq ft Asphalt and concrete repair ONGOING WORK Optimizing traffic signals -,,, -,,, -,,, 66 PLANS, STUDIES, STANDARDS •Completed update of the city’s Engineering Standards •Completed a citywide analysis of traffic safety and collision data as part of the Local Roadway Safety Plan project •Finalized the annual Growth Management Plan monitoring report •Initiated an update of multimodal level of service standard •Began Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines update •Initiate Grand Avenue Promenade feasibility study and Tyler Street complete street improvements study •Evaluate bike parking infrastructure needs at recreational and commercial destinations citywide Sustainable Mobility Plan {city of Carlsbad 88 Adopted January 2021 Comprehensive strategy Many components •Safe Routes to Schools •Transportation Demand Management •Cycling education •Local Roadway Safety Plan •Active Transportation Monitoring Plan •Complete Streets Design •Capital Improvement Program projects ABOUT THE PLAN \. CITY OF CARLSBAD SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY PLAN - DRAFT DECEMBER 2020 RO!sult:saftheonlirw,urveyyi~-.-al iM/g:ht'l.llbout/;Jl'>ITWTDnitymfffl~l'lllUM anddei,-es. Tho! l\gun,totheright show5the rnagnJtudeolcomm,,ntsrf!Cll!iwdviatheon~l'II! mapping tool. and whether the comment was abauttheKhooltrip,walking.,:ydi,._tr.ansitor parkin&- Themosl~~idffltifiNIIJfcornrn<.nity members were relatedtoinnavatlon. locatlon (Of density),ppclosureandfirslllastmileservices Thereisastron,desireonthepartof™'Citv ofCa-rlSNd'sresldmtstosNttoutofslnele ocwpantvehlclestotnnslt.butaccesstotranslt i:sdiH,rolt. ChapterFiwpresenbthelourplarr.ed networbasshownonlhefollowi,.~for walking.tralls,cydingandtr.lnsit(seeF',gures ESSthroughES8).Theserecommtndatiom-..e layered and combined Into a T..-lormatiw Con.dorNetW<lf1<whichinse,,tsa-1• conntttfll.comfortablebadr.banenrtworkfor rnoresustalnabletr;ivtl;icrosstheclty.{Stt ~ip,reES9) Comment C■ttgori .. -..... \ ~\:j 99 Policies & Analysis Programs Projects IMPLEMENTATION c::::::J ....-----.. • c:::::::J CJ CJ {city of Carlsbad POLICIES & ANALYSIS 10 New guidelines for private development transportation impact studies: •Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines •Methodology used to determine the multimodal level of service of city streets •The Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis Guidelines •A study of the city’s multimodal transportation impact fee •Complete streets and roundabout policy •Active transportation monitoring •Growth management standards ITEM 12: SEMIANNUAL TRANSPORTATION REPORT 11 ITEM 12: SEMIANNUAL TRANSPORTATION REPORT rransp emen d Manag dboo . Deman Han ortatwn 14 ss lhat c~a1es work,suchas Tes1ima1ionsin '" tforoffictuses II 16 ssuchas: ces,and netdto day ndunit nanuto Points 1-5 OTHER PROGRAMS 12 •Safe Routes to Schools •Cycling education •Local Roadway Safety Plan ITEM 12: SEMIANNUAL TRANSPORTATION REPORT { City of Carlsbad 1313 PROJECTS •Pedestrian improvements •Bike lanes •Street improvements •Restriping with resurfacing •Safety enhancements Notto Scale 1414 TAMARACK •Short term solutions •Long term planning •Next steps 9 Notto Sc.le 15 •June 7 staff recommended delaying some Sustainable Mobility Plan projects by one year •The City Council instead directed staff to return with options to reprioritize the Sustainable Mobility Plan’s implementation. ITEM 12: SEMIANNUAL TRANSPORTATION REPORT TONIGHT’S DISCUSSION { City of Carlsbad OPTION 1 16 ITEM 12: SEMIANNUAL TRANSPORTATION REPORT Delay implementation of new Sustainable Mobility Plan projects currently planned to begin in FY 2023-24 by one year, so they would start in FY 2024-25 •All current work would continue •Would reduce the number of projects completed in the near term {city of Carlsbad OPTION 2 17 ITEM 12: SEMIANNUAL TRANSPORTATION REPORT Delay or scale back work on: •Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines •Transportation Demand Management Program •Involvement in regional transportation and mobility projects and planning studies •City already ahead of most jurisdictions •Would be less of an impact to the public { City of Carlsbad RECOMMENDED ACTION 1.Receive the Semiannual Transportation Report. 2.Adopt a resolution reprioritizing implementation of the Sustainable Mobility Plan program in the Capital Improvement Program. 18 ITEM 12: SEMIANNUAL TRANSPORTATION REPORT { City of Carlsbad TRAFFIC AND MOBILITY COMMISSION COMMENTS •Staff presented report on June 6 •Before the June 7 City Council motion regarding the Sustainable Mobility Plan •Commissioner Josh Coelho will provide comments ITEM 12: Semiannual Transportation Report 19 { City of Carlsbad