Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
4015 JAMES DR; ; AS010047; Permit
7/28/22, 3:06 PM Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Lot#: Reference No.: PC#: Project Title: Applicant: AS010047 Permit Data City of Carlsbad Sprinkler Permit Permit No: AS010047 4015 JAMES DR Status: ISSUED SPRINK Applied 2/13/2001 2074400100 Approved: 3/13/2001 0 Issued: 3/13/2001 Inspector: JAMES CANYON ESTATES Owner: Fees($) 1,920 l Add'I Fees($) 0 t- l Total($) 1,920 -t- about:blank 1 /1 THERE ARE NO PLANS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PERMIT F 0() Jltf f CARLSBADFIREPROTECT1f::i!J5or 0017 Permit Submittal Form A. Check or fill in pertinent information for type of permit you are submitting. , ~. ) AS -Automatic Sprinklers · ✓ /)~ Commercial______ Residential._-+-1\.~--j ,v11.f' r l(/1ZJ ?/4,-,t.8,f,NumberofHeads per System: / Jff' System# / Heads /q System # __ Heads /'(fw,,.~Bfsystem# 1. Heads .;t{e System# He"-ds-- '/O l'J[~stem # !J Heads _dJ_ System# Heads .../f/'i~t ~ .b( · Underground included for approval ~ Underground included for reference only _ ____,;;;,___ .. . .. ,·• ..... FA -Fire Alarm 10 devices or less Over 10 devices __ r#: TotalF~;; # of devices ____ - FS -Fixed Sy;rems (Circle One) Hood & Duct, Halon, Special Chemical Agent, Standpipe, Spray Booth, ~! Appliance. Tota1Fees~ .. ~ 'l f oltJ,OU There may bee an aµditional fee of $50.00 per ½ hour for Failed Inspections. B. Addressofjobsite -'.' V Oi~ -:5"~ ~r--~, .I_ suite# ____ _ Building Permit# CB . -:sa_ VV\ e S ~vv ~D V\ . ·c S \ Ct. "t°"e..S C. Contractor Information c-8 ~ 0 0 3 / Y, t Name ~-c-e Sv-c \""-~ \e"' ~ST~:> .~ ... :.:~=.:'"". Address 9 ~ G ~cP-c<"er._ Se-r--... ... ____ __ .City,~tate,Zip csc~v--&,J>o G4. C]zo?-°1 ······-,- Kind ofLicense andnum~er CI lo -~~tffooo Phone 7CoD -7YO-(pCe,Ss;- Certificate of Insurance on file with Fire Dept.? @ r N Business License o filr with ity? a:or N Date I I.. ASo\ool-1 7 , [° 1F E J!IC O l---4-I __ S_PE_C_IF_IC_AT_IO_N_S_HE_E_T _80_5Y__,;.(_¾_" _2 ........ ") I Model 805Y (¾" throug h 2") 1 Double Check Backflow Prevent~r For Non-Toxic Service Features • Low head loss. • Spring loaded "Y" type check valves. • Flow curve generated by the Foundation for Cross-Connection Control and Hydrallic Research at th+ University of Southern California. ., • Simple service procedures. all internal parts are servciceable inline. .. • Meets all specifications of AWWA and ASSE. Approved by the Foundation for Cross-Connection Control and Hydraulic Research at the University of Southern California. • Bronze bodies, caps, shut-off valves and test cocks. Operation In a nonflow condition the check valves hold 1 PSI minimum · in the direction of flow. In a flow condition the check valves are open, proportional to the flow demand. In a backflow condition both checks will close until the resumption of · I normal flow. Typical Specifications The Double Check Valve assembly ¾" through 2" shall consist of a bronze body with bronze caps. The body shall be a "Y" pattern design incorporating two spring loaded, center guided check assemblies. The assembly shall include threaded inlet and outlet, full port ball valve shut-off valves and four ball valve test cocks. All internal parts shall be of corrosion resistant materials. All Double Check Valves shall be constructed so all internal par'ts can be serviced without removing the assembly from the line. Seat discs shall be reversible. The assembly shall _ I operate when installed in any position. Double Check Valves shall be rated to 175 PSI water working pressure and water / temperature from 32°F to 140°F. The assembly shall meet the requirements of ASSE Standard 101 5, A WW A Standard C506-78, and USC Foundation to Cross Connection Control and Hydraulic Research, Sixth Edition. Typical Applications Double Check assemblies are used to prevent backflow of pollutants that are objectionable but not toxic, Double checks may be installed under continuous pressure service FILE COPY and may be subjected to backpressure. Double Checks can be used in sprinkler irrigation systems, fire protection without chemical additives, protection of industrial plants, industrial in-plant plumbing systems and other systems requiring protection. Local codes may vary; consult authorities for specific approved applications. Installation Model 805Y Double Check Backflow Preventers should be installed with adequate clearance and easy accessibility for testing and maintenance and must by protected from freez- ing. The assembly may be installed horizontally or vertically with flow up. Refer to local codes for specific installation requirements. Some codes may prohibit vertical installation. Thermal water expansion and/or water hammer down stream of the backflow preventer can cause excessive pressure. Excessive pressure situations should be eliminated to avoid possible damage to the system and assembly. FEBCO Model 805V Water Meter Side View 30" Max. t 12" Min. Suggested . Protective Enclosure Characteristics and Materials Maximum working pressure Hydrostatic test pressure Temperature Range Fluid End Delail Main Valve Body Elastomers Springs 175PSI 350PSI 32°F to 140°F Waler Threaded ANSI B2.1 Bronze ASTM B584-78 Nil rile ASTM D-2000 seal discs t Stainless sleel. 300 series SS 805Y 11194 Dimp:;sions and Weights(U.S.-inches) NET SIZE A B C D E WT.(Lbs.) :y,• 11¾ 6'A 3:Y, 3:Y, 2 1h 7 1" 12'4 67A 3:Y. 3:Y, 2½ 7½ 1 ½. 17'4 101/-4 5'Ai 4 7A 3¾ 171h 2" 18% 10'/• 5'Ai 4 7A 3¾ 20 -· Metric (mm.) NETWT. _§!ZE A B C D E Wt.(Kgs.) 20 288.9 174.6 95.3 95.3 63.5 3.2 25 327.0 174.6 95.3 95.3 63.5 3.4 30 454.0 260.4 130.2 123.8 85.7 7.9 40 473.1 260.4 130.2 123.8 85.7 9.1 OimensK>Os shown are nominal. Allowances must be made tor normal manufacturing tolerances. E i-----1-----A B Model 805Y F OW CURVES Flow curve generaled by lhe FoundaflOO for Cross Connection ConirOI and Hydraulic Research at the Unrversily of 1hem Califo,nia. • Approved by the Foundation for Cross-Connection Control 15 and Hydraulic Research at the [ University of Southern 1il 10 California. 0 3; "o 14 _, AWWA C506 Conformance S? ASSE Listed 1015 !l! 5 CSA B-64.5 Certified 15 G) Valves must be supplied [ with resilient seated shut-off "' 10 valves and testcocks for use· 1,, 2 approval to be in effect. ~ .. UJ I c7i 15 ',;. 10 (/) 1½"g § I 5 15 ~ 10 (/) 2"§ S? w I 5 0 0 10 0 20 0 40 6 10 6 20 [fil 40 s [§) 10 80 6~ 10 10 30 60 10 120 ----·-.. -~-., ---... 20 40 15 80 160 15 15 15 50 20 100 200 20 30 (GPM) 18 (FPS) 60 (GPM) (FPS) 120 (GPM) (FPS) 240 (GPM) (FPS' /FEBCDf FLOW RATE (In GPM a~d FPS) NOTES 1 Velcc111es are calculaled for flows 1n Schedule 40 s1ee pipe 2. Typical waler sy1em flow veloc11,es of O 10 7 5 FPS sho Id be used for head loss el!,c,ency comparisons A division of CMB Industries P.O. Box 8070, Fresno, California 93747, (209) 252-0791 Telex: 33-7616 CMB FSO Fax: (209) 453-9030 cc oncv 11 lnA AU rnqfAt!AI~ r.oovnohled Printed in USA FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS 1787 ENTERPRifE COURT CORONA , CA 92880 RESIDENTIAL SPRI~KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULICS CALCU ATION REPORT FOR JAMES CANYON EST TES PLAN 1 CARLSBAD , CA Date : 2/8/2001 File No: 6136 Data File Name : PLANlU .rdf I SPRINKLER SPACING 256.0 sq. ft./spklr. (max) Min. Dist. Bet. Spklrs: 8 . 1 0 Max. Dist . Bet . Spklrs: Max. Dist . Spklr. to Wall : SPRINKLER SPECIFICATIONS Mfr: Reliable Descr: Fl/RES CCP Cone.Pend . (16x16) K=3.90 Calculated K Factor for Arm Overs & 1 .0 ft. x 0 .874 in . D op: Drops: K=3.81 (Incl . 1 Tee) 16.0 ft. 8 .0 ft . 0.0 ft. x 0.874 in . Arm-Over: K=3.79 (Incl. 1 Tee & 1 Ell) PIPE SPECIFICATIONS Type: CntlBlazMastr WATER SUPPLY HWC: 150 Source : Public Test Date: By: Static : 75.6 psi Resid: 18 .0 psi Flow:3213.0 gpm Public Main Size: 6 in Domestic Demand: 0.0 gpm at node number 0 SPRINKLER DEMAND No .Spklrs. Min Spklr. Flowing Flow 1 15.0 2 12. 0 REVIEWING AUTHORITY CARLSBAD FIRE PROTECTION Press . (psji) 15.5 9 .9 Node No . 15 15 Total Flow 15.0 24 .8 Avail. Press . 75 .6 75 .6 Req 'd Press . 50.5 61. 0 . JAMES CANYON ESTATES PLAN 1 Date: 2/8/200 1 Page 2 S :\Mi ke Lee\6136\CALC\PLANlU.rdf RESULTS Of ANALYSIS File No : 6136 PIPE & NODE DATA FIXD * FLOW ANALYSIS * 1 sprinkler flowi ng * 2 s prinklers flowing * * P # LEN ELBRCSG LOSS END EL SP *DISCH1 FLOW HWC DIA EQV.LN PUMP NOD (FT) (K) *(GPM ) VEL PF PT *DISCH FLOW PE (PSI)*(GPM) VEL PF PT PE (PSI) -----------------------==-==========*=====-===============*===================== 1 18.00 -11---- 150 0.995 10 .0 2 33.00 -4-1----9 .0 150 1.394 25.0 3 5.00 -1------4.0 150 1 .265 6 .0 4 6 .00 -113-1- 150 1.055 21.0 5 2 .00 ----1-- 150 0.874 1.0 6 3 4 .50 -2-1--- 150 0 .874 9 .0 7 74.50 --27--- 150 0.874 13.0 8 0.50 --1---- 150 0 .874 3.0 9 30 .00 --13--- 150 0.874 6 .0 10 16.50 -111--- 150 0.874 8.0 11 23 .50 ---5--- 150 0 .874 5 .0 1 135 .0 SRCE 2 135 .0 2 135.0 3 139 .0 3 139 .0 4 144.0 4 144.0 5 150 .0 5 150 .0 10 152.0 10 152 .0 11 152.0 15 .0 6 .2 15 .0 3 .2 I 15 . o I 3 . 8 15.0 5 .5 15.0 I 8. o 15 .0 8 .0 1.83 50 .5 0 .00 48 .6 0 .73 48 .6 1.73 37 .2 0 .22 37 .2 2 .17 30 .8 1. 33 30 . 8 2 .60 26 .8 0.37 26.8 0 .87 25 .6 5 .35 25 .6 0 .00 20 .3 24.7 10.2 24 .8 5 .2 24 .8 6 .3 24 .8 9 .1 4 . 62 61. 0 0 .00 56 .4 1.86 56 .4 1.73 43.8 0 .57 43 .8 2 .17 37 .1 3 .36 37 .1 2 .60 31.1 24.8 0 .93 31.1 13 .3 0.87 29.3 24.8 13 .54 29 .3 13 .3 0 .00 15 .8 11 152 .0 4.7 1 .24 20 .3 9.0 4.19 15.8 12 152 .0 2 .5 0 .00 19 .0 4 .8 0 .00 11.6 12 152.0 0 .0 0 .00 19.0 12 .8 0 .32 11 .6 13 152.0 3.81 0 .0 0 .00 19 .0 12 .8 6 .8 0 .00 11.2 12 152 .0 4.7 0 .51 19.0 -3.8 0.34 11 .6 14 152 .0 2 .5 0.00 18 .5 2 .0 0 .00 11.9 14 152 .0 15 .0 3 .01 18 .5 12 .0 1 .99 11 .9 15 152 .0 3 .81 15 .0 8.0 0 .00 15 .5 12 .0 6 .4 0 .00 9 .9 14 152 .0 -10.3 1 .76 18.5 -15.8 3.85 11.9 11 152 .0 5 .5 0.00 20 .3 8.4 0 .00 15.8 Fitting Code Letters : E=45 Ell, L=90 Ell, B=TeeBch, R=TeeR n , C=Couplg, S=SwgChk, G=GatVlv Sprinkler system has been hydraulicalll y calculated with the HASS HOUSE 2 .0 computer program (License No . R812099927) to provide an average imbalance of 0 .005 gpm at each node with one sprinkler f l owing, and 0 .0 1 3 gpm at each node 1ith 2 sprinklers flowi ng in accordance with NFPA 13 and 13D or 13R. HRS Systems, Inc. 4792 LaVis a Road Tucker, GA 30084 (770) 934 8423 JAMES CANYON ESTATES PLAN 1 Date: 2/8/2001 Page 3 File No: 6136 S:\Mike Lee\6136\CALC\PLANlU.rdf 90+ I I I 82+ WATER SUP LY CURVE I I I 75*\\\\\\\\\\A\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\C\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ I I I 68+ I I I P 60+ R E I I s I S 52+ u R E ( p s I I I 45+ I I I I 38+ ) I I I 30+ I I I 23+ I D B !============================LEGEND ---------=--==--==--======== I Static= 75.6 psi, Resid al= 18.0 psi@ 3213 gpm 15+ I I I 7.5+ (1 sprinkler flowing) A= Available Water Supply 75 .6 psi@ 15.0 gpm I B = Required Water Supply I 50.5 psi@ 15.0 gpm I (2 sprinklers flowing) C = Avail able Water Supply 75 .6 psi@ 24.8 gpm D = Required Water Supply 61 .0 psi@ 24.8 gpm II II II II 0.0++-+---+----+-----+------+-------+--------+---------+-----------+ 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 FLOW (GPM) FIRE SPRINKLE SYSTEMS 1787 ENTERPRISE COURT CORONA, CA 92880 RESIDENT I AL SPR NKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULICS CALC LATION REPORT FOR JAMES CANYON ES CARLSBAD , Date: 2/8/2001 File No : 6136 PLAN 2 Data File Name : I LAN2D.rdf SPRINKLER SPACING 256 .0 sq. ft./spklr . (max) Min . Dist . Bet. Spklrs: 8.0 SPRINKLER SPECIFICATI ONS Max . Dist. Bet. Spklrs: Max . Dist. Spklr . to Wall: Mfr: Reliable Descr: Fl/RES CCP Cone.Pend. (16x16) K=3 .90 Calculated K Factor for Ar -Overs & Drops : 1 .0 ft . x 0.874 i n . rop : K=3.81 (Incl. 1 Tee) 16.0 ft. 8 .0 ft . 0 .0 ft . x 0.874 in. rm-Over : K=3.79 (Incl . 1 Tee & 1 Ell ) PIPE SPECIFICATIONS Type: CntlBlazMastr WATER SUPPLY HW 150 Source: Public Test Date : By: Static: 75 .6 psi Resid: 18.0 psi Public Main Size : 6 in Domestic Demand: 0 .0 gpm r node SPRINKLER DEMAND I No .Spklrs . Min Spkl r . Prt Flowing Flow (p i) 1 15 .0 1 . 5 2 12 .0 . 9 REVIEWING AUTHORITY CARLSBAD FIRE PROTECTION Flow:3213.0 gpm number 0 Node Total Avail. Req'd No. Flow Press. Press . 21 15 .0 75 .6 54.2 21 24 .7 75.6 73 .0 JAMES CANYON ESTATES PLAN 2 Date : 2/8/2001 Page 2 file No: 6136 S :\Mike Lee\6136\CALC\PLAN2D.rdf RESULTS OP ANALYSIS PIPE & NODE DATA * FLOW ANALYSIS I. * 1 sprinkler flowing * 2 sprinklers flowing FIXD * * p # LEN ELBRCSG LOSS END EL SP *DISCH /FLOW PF PT *DISCH FLOW PF PT HWC DIA EQV.LN PUMP NOD (FT) (K) *(GPM) VEL PE (PSI)*(GPM) VEL PE (PSI) -===-===============-=--------------*=====================*==============------= 1 18.00 -11----1 135.0 SRCE 15.0 1. 83 54 .2 24 .6 4.58 73 .0 150 0 .995 10.0 2 135.0 I 6.2 0 .00 52.4 10.2 0 .00 68 .5 2 33.00 -4-1----9.0 2 135.0 15.0 0.73 52.4 24.7 1. 84 68.5 150 1.394 25 .0 3 139.0 I 3 .2 1. 73 40.9 5 .2 1. 73 55 .9 3 5 .00 -1------4.0 3 139.0 15.0 0 .22 40 .9 24.7 0 .56 55 .9 150 1 .265 6 .0 4 144 .0 I 3.8 2 .17 34 .5 6 .3 2 .17 49.2 4 6.00 -113-1-4 144 .0 115. 0 1. 33 34 .5 24.7 3.33 49.2 150 1 .055 21. 0 5 150.0 5.5 2.60 30.6 9 .1 2 .60 43 .2 5 2 .00 ----1--5 150 .0 115. 0 0.12 30 .6 24.7 0.30 43 .2 150 1.101 1.0 10 152 .0 5 .1 0.87 29 .6 8.3 0 .87 42 .1 6 11. 50 -1-----10 152 .0 / 15. o 1. 91 29 .6 24 .7 4 .79 42.1 150 0 .874 4.0 11 152.0 8.0 0.00 27.7 13 .2 0.00 37 .3 7 10 .00 --1----11 152.0 / 15. o 1. 60 27 .7 24 .7 4.01 37 .3 150 0 .874 3.0 12 162.0 8.0 4.33 21. 8 13.2 4 .33 28 .9 8 27.00 -111---12 162.0 15.0 4 .30 21. 8 24.7 10.81 28.9 150 0 .874 8.0 13 162.0 8.0 0 .00 17 .4 13 .2 0 .00 18.1 9 6 .50 ---1---13 162 .0 15 .0 0.92 17.4 24 .7 2 .32 18.1 150 0.874 1.0 14 162.0 ----I 8.0 0.00 16.5 13.2 0.00 15.8 10 0 .50 ---1---14 162.0 ----1 15.0 0.18 16.5 24 .7 0 . 4 6 15.8 150 0 .874 1. 0 15 162.0 ----8.0 0 .00 16.3 13 .2 0 .00 15.3 11 6 .00 ---1---15 162.0 ----I 7 .6 0.24 16.3 12 .5 0.61 15.3 150 0 .874 1.0 16 162.0 4.0 0.00 16.1 6.7 0.00 14 .7 12 18.00 --12---15 162.0 7.4 0 .77 16.3 12.2 1. 92 15.3 150 0 .874 5.0 17 162.0 4.0 0 .00 15.6 6.5 0.00 13.4 13 10 .00 -1-----16 162 .0 7 .6 0 . 4 9 16.l 12 .5 1. 23 14.7 150 0 .874 4.0 18 152 .0 4.0 4 .33 19 .9 6.7 4.33 17.8 14 62 .00 --36---18 152.0 7.6 2 .67 19.9 12 .5 6. 76 17 . 8 150 0 .874 15.0 19 152.0 3.81 4 .0 0 .00 17.3 12 .7 6 .7 0 .00 11. 1 15 0.50 ---1---19 152 .0 3 .81 ----, 7 .6 0 .05 17 .3 12.7 -0 .2 0 .00 11.1 150 0 .874 1.0 20 152.0 ----4 .0 0.00 17 .2 0.1 0.00 11. 1 16 11 .00 --1----20 152.0 15 .0 1. 72 17.2 12.0 1. 14 11 .1 150 0 .874 3.0 21 152 .0 3.81 15 .0 8 .0 0 .00 15.5 12.0 6 .4 0.00 9 .9 17 50.00 -115---20 152.0 -7.4 2.08 17.2 -12.2 5 .18 11. 1 150 0 .874 12 .0 22 152.0 ----1 4.0 0 .00 19 .3 6 .5 0 .00 16.2 18 1.00 --1----22 152.0 -----7.4 0 .13 19.3 -12.2 0 .33 16 .2 JAMES CANYON ESTATES PLAN 2 Date : 2/8/2001 File No : 6136 Page 3 S:\Mike Lee\6136\CALC\PLAN2D .rdf 150 0 .874 3 .0 23 152 .0 17 162 .0 23 152.0 I 4 .0 0 .00 1 9 .4 6 .5 0 .00 16.6 19 1 0 .00 -1----- 150 0 .874 4.0 Fitting Code Letters : 7.4 0 .47 15.6 4 .0 4 .33 19.4 12.2 1.17 13.4 6 .5 4.33 16.6 E=45 Ell, L=90 Ell , B=TeeBch, R=TeeRur , C=Couplg, S=SwgChk, G=GatVlv Sprinkler system has been hydraulical}Y calculated with the HASS HOOS E 2 .0 computer progr am (Lice~se No . R812099927) to provide an average imbalance of 0 .003 gpm at each node with one sprinkler flowing, and 0.010 gpm at each node with 2 sprinklers flowing in accordance with NFPA 13 and 13D or 13R. HRS Systems, Inc. 4792 Lavista Road Tucker, GA 30084 (770) 934-~423 JAMES CANYON ESTATES PLAN 2 Date: 2/8/2001 File No: 6136 Page 4 S :\Mike Lee\6136\CALC\PLAN2D.rdf WATER SUPPLY CURVE 90+ I I I 82+ I I I I 75*\\\\\\\\\\A\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\C\\\\~\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ I D I I 68+ I I I P 60+ R I E I S I B S 52+ u I R I E I 45+ I p I s I I 38+ ) I I I 30+ I I I 23+ I 1----------------------------LEpEND I Static= 75.6 psi, Residubl = 18.0 psi@ 3213 gpm 15+ I I I 7.5+ I I I (1 sprinkler flowing) A= Available Water Supply 75 .6 psi@ 15.0 gpm B = Required Water Supply 54 .2 psi@ 15.0 gpm (2 sprinklers flowing ) C = Available Water Supply 75.6 psi@ 24.7 gpm D = Required Water Supply 73.0 psi@ 2 4.7 gpm II II II II 0 .0++-+---+----+-----+------+--------+--------+---------+-----------+ 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 FLOW (GPM) FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS 1787 ENTERPRI$E COURT CORONA, CA 192880 RESIDENT I AL SPRI ~KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULICS CALCULATION REPORT JAMES FOR CANYON ESTiTES CARLSBAD , CA UP STAIRS CALC. Date: 2/8/2001 File No: 6136 PLAN 2 Data File Name : PtAN2U .rdf SPRINKLER SPACING 256.0 sq. ft./spklr . (max ) Min . Dist . Bet . Spklrs: 8 .0 SPRINKLER SPECIFICATIONS Max . Dist . Bet. Spklrs: Max . Dist . Spklr. to Wall : Mfr : Reliable Descr : Fl/RES CCP Cone.Pend . (16x16) K=3 .90 Calculated K Factor for Arm-Overs & Drops : 1.0 ft. x 0.874 in. Drop: K=3 .81 (Incl . 1 Tee) 16 .0 ft . 8.0 ft . 0.0 ft . x 0.874 in. Arm-Over: K=3 .79 (Incl . 1 Tee & 1 Ell) PIPE SPECIFICATIONS Type : CntlBlazMastr WATER SUPPLY HWC,: 150 Source : Public Test Date: By: Static: 75.6 psi Resid: 18 .0 psi Flow:3213 .0 gpm Public Main Size: 6 in Domestic Demand: 0.0 gpm at node number 0 SPRINKLER DEMAND No.Spklrs . Flowing 1 2 Min Spklr. Flow 15.0 12 .0 REVIEWING AUTHORITY CARLSBAD FIRE PROTECTION Prer,s. (psi) 15 .5 9 .9 Node No. 15 15 Total Flow 15 .0 24 .4 Avail . Press . 75.6 75.6 Req 'd Press . 53 .4 65 .1 JAMES CANYON ESTATES PLAN 2 Da t e : 2/8/20 01 Page 2 File No : 6136 S :\Mike Lee\61 36\CALC\PLAN2U .rdf RESULT S 0~ ANALYSIS PIPE & NODE DATA * FLOW ANALYSIS * 1 s p liinkler flowing * 2 s p rinklers flowing FIXD * * p # LEN ELBRCSG LOSS EN D EL SP *D I SCH FLOW PF PT *DISCH FLOW PF PT HWC DIA EQV .LN PUMP NOD (FT ) (K ) *(GPM ) VEL PE (PSI )*(GPM ) VE L PE (PSI) ====================================*===== ===============*===================== 1 18 .00 -11----1 135.0 SRCE 15 .0 1. 83 53 .4 24 .4 4 .51 65 .1 150 0.995 10.0 2 135.0 6 .2 0 .00 51. 5 10 .1 0.00 60.5 2 33 .00 -4-1----9 .0 2 135 .0 15 .0 0 .73 51. 5 24 .4 1. 81 60 .5 150 1. 394 25 .0 3 139.0 3 .2 1. 73 40 .1 5 .1 1. 73 48.0 3 5 .00 -1------4 .0 3 139 .0 15 .0 0 .22 40 .1 24 .4 0 .55 48 .0 150 1 .265 6 .0 4 1 4 4 .0 3 .8 2 .17 33 . 7 6 .2 2 .17 41. 3 4 6 .00 -113-1-4 144 .0 15 .0 1. 33 33 .7 24 .4 3 .27 41. 3 150 1.055 21. 0 5 150.0 5 .5 2 .60 29 .7 9.0 2.60 35.4 5 2 .00 ----1--5 150.0 1 5 .0 0.12 29.7 24 .4 0.30 35 .4 150 1.101 1.0 10 152 .0 5.1 0.87 28 .8 8.2 0 .87 34.2 6 11 .50 -1-----10 152 .0 15 .0 1. 91 28 .8 24 .4 4 .70 34 .2 150 0 .874 4 .0 11 152 .0 8 .0 0 .00 26 . 8 13 .1 0 .00 29 .5 7 10 .00 --1----11 152 .0 15 .0 1. 60 26 .8 24 .4 3 .94 29 .5 150 0 .874 3.0 12 162 .0 8.0 4 .33 20 .9 13 . l 4 .33 21. 3 8 27 .00 -111---12 162 .0 15 .0 4 .31 20.9 24.4 10 .62 21. 3 150 0.874 8.0 13 162 .0 3.81 8 .0 0 .00 16 .6 12 .4 13.1 0 .00 10.7 9 6 .50 ---1---13 162 .0 3 .81 15.0 0.92 16 .6 12 .4 12 .0 0 .61 10.7 150 0.874 1.0 14 162 .0 8.0 0.00 15.7 6 .4 0 .00 10 .0 10 0 .50 ---1---14 162 .0 15 .0 0 .18 15 .7 12 .0 0 .12 10 .0 150 0 .874 1.0 15 162 .0 3 .81 15 .0 8 .0 0.00 15 .5 12 .0 6 .4 0.00 9.9 11 6 .00 ---1---15 162 .0 3 .81 15 .0 0.0 0 .00 15 .5 12.0 0.0 0 .00 9.9 150 0 .874 1.0 16 162 .0 0 .0 0 .00 15 .5 0.0 0.00 9 .9 12 18 .00 --12---15 162 .0 3 .81 15.0 0 .0 0 .00 15 .5 12 .0 0 .0 0 .00 9 .9 150 0.874 5.0 17 162 .0 0.0 0 .00 15.5 0 .0 0 .00 9.9 13 10 .00 -1-----16 162 .0 0 .0 0.00 15 .5 0 .0 0 .00 9.9 150 0 .874 4 .0 18 152 .0 0 .0 4 .33 19 .8 0 .0 4 .33 14 .3 14 62.00 --36---18 152.0 0 .0 0.00 19.8 0.0 0 .00 14.3 150 0 .874 15.0 19 1 52 .0 0 .0 0 .00 19 .8 0.0 0 .00 14 .3 15 0.50 ---1---19 152.0 0 .0 0 .00 1 9 .8 0 .0 0 .00 14 .3 150 0.874 1.0 20 152 .0 0 .0 0 .00 1 9.8 0 .0 0 .00 14.3 16 11. 00 --1----20 152 .0 0.0 0 .00 19 .8 0 .0 0 .00 14 .3 150 0 .874 3.0 21 152 .0 0 .0 0 .00 19 .8 0 .0 0 .00 14.3 17 50 .00 -115---20 152 .0 0 .0 0 .00 19 .8 0 .0 0.00 14 .3 150 0.874 12.0 22 152 .0 0 .0 0.00 19.8 0.0 0 .00 14 .3 18 1.00 --1----22 152 .0 0 .0 0 .00 19 .8 0 .0 0 .00 14 .3 JAMES CANYON ESTATES PLAN 2 Da te : 2/8/2001 File No: 6136 Page 3 S :\Mike Lee\6136\CALC\PLAN2U .rdf 150 0 .874 3 .0 23 152 .0 17 162 .0 23 152 .0 0 .0 0 .00 19.8 0.0 0.00 14.3 19 10 .00 -1----- 150 0.874 4 .0 Fitting Code Letters: 0.0 0.00 15.5 0 .0 4 .33 19 .8 0 .0 0 .00 9 .9 0 .0 4 .33 14 .3 E=45 Ell, L=90 Ell, B=TeeBch, R=TeeRup , C=Couplg, S=SwgChk, G=GatVlv Sprinkler system has been hydraulical~y calculated with t he HASS HOUSE 2.0 computer program (L i cen se No . R812099927) to provide an average imbalance of 0 .001 gpm at each node with one sprinkler flowing , and 0 .006 gpm at each node w~t h 2 sprinklers flowing in accordance with NFPA 13 and 13D or 13R. HRS Systems~ Inc . 4792 Lavista Road Tucker, GA 3008 4 (770 ) 934-8423 JAMiS CANYON ESTATES PLAN 2 Date : 2/8/2001 1 Page 4 File No : 6136 S:\Mike Lee\6136\CALC\PLAN2U.rdf WATER SUPPLY CURVE 90+ I I I 82+ I I I I . 75*\\\\\\\\\\A\\\\\\\\\\\\\\C\\\\\~\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ I I I 68+ I D I I P 60+ R I E I s I S 52+ B U I R I E I p s 45+ I I I I 38+ ) I I I 30+ I I I 23+ I I============================ LE END ---------------------------- 1 Static= 75.6 psi, Residu l = 18.0 psi@ 3213 gpm 15+ I I I 7 .5+ (1 sprinkler flowing) A= Available Water Supply 75.6 psi@ 15.0 gpm (2 sprinklers flowing) C = Available Water Supply 75 .6 psi@ 24.4 gpm I B = Required Water Supply D = Required Water Supply " " " " " I 53 .4 psi@ 15 .0 gpm 65 .1 psi@ 24 .4 gpm I II 0 .0++-+---+----+-----+------+------~-+--------+---------+-----------+ 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 FLOW (GPM) FIRE SPRINKLER ,SYSTEMS 1787 ENTERPRif E COURT CORONA, CA 1 92880 RESIDENTIAL SPRI KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULICS CALCU ATION REPORT FOR JAMES CANYON EST TES PLAN 3 CARLSBAD, CA UP STAIRS Date: 2/8/2001 File No: 6136 Data File Name : SPRINKLER SPACING IALC P AN3D.r df 256.0 sq . ft ./spklr. (max) Min. Dist . Bet . Spklrs: 8.0 Max. Dist. Bet. Spklrs: Max. Dist. Spklr. to Wall : SPRINKLER SPECIFICATIONS Mfr: Reliable Descr: Fl/RES CCP Cone.Pend. (16xl6) Calculated K Factor for Arm Overs & Drops: K=3 .90 1 Tee) 16.0 ft . 8.0 ft. 1.0 ft. x 0 .874 in . Dfop: K=3 .81 (Incl . 0.0 ft. x 0.874 in . A~m-Over : K=3 .79 (Incl. 1 Tee & 1 Ell) PIPE SPECIFICATIONS Type: CntlBlazMastr HWCI: 150 WATER SUPPLY ~ Source: Public Test Date : y : Static: 75 .6 psi Resid: 18.b psi Flow :3213 .0 gpm Public Main Size : 6 in Domestic Demand: 0 .0 gpm a l node number 0 SPRINKLER DEMAND No.Spklrs. Min Spklr. Pre~s . Node Total Avail. Flowing Flow (ps.) No. Flow Press. 1 15 .0 15 .5 23 15.0 75.6 2 12 .0 9 .9 23 24.6 75 .6 REVIEWING AUTHORITY CARLSBAD FIRE PROTECTION Req'd Press. 55.9 71. 4 JAMES CANYON ESTATES PLAN 3 Date : 2/8/2001 Page 2 File No : 6136 S :\Mike Lee\6136\CALC\PLAN3D .rdf RESULTS OF ANALYSIS PIPE & NODE DATA * FLOW ANALYSIS * 1 sprinkler flowing * 2 sprinklers flowing FIXD * * p # LEN ELBRCSG LOSS END EL SP *DISCH FLOW PF PT *DISCH FLOW PF PT HWC DIA EQV.LN PUMP NOD (FT) ( K) * (G PM ) I VEL PE (PSI)*(GPM) VEL PE (PSI) ====================================*=====================*===============------ 1 18 .00 -11----1 135 .0 SRCE 15 .0 1. 83 55 .9 24 .6 4 .58 71. 4 150 0 .995 10 .0 ----2 135 .0 6 .2 0 .00 54 .0 10.2 0 .00 66 .8 2 33 .00 -4-1----13 .0 2 135.0 15 .0 0 .73 5 4 .0 24 .6 1. 84 66 .8 150 1.394 25 .0 3 139 .0 3 .2 1. 73 38 .6 5 .2 1. 73 50 .3 3 5.00 -1------4.0 3 139.0 j 15. o 0.22 38 .6 2 4 .6 0 .56 50 .3 150 1 .265 6 .0 4 14 4.0 3 .8 2 .17 32.2 6 .3 2.17 4 3 .5 4 6 .00 -113-1-4 1 44.0 115 . 0 1. 33 32 .2 2 4.6 3.32 4 3 .5 150 1 .055 21. 0 5 150 .0 I 5 .5 2.60 28.3 9 .0 2 .60 37.6 s 2 .00 ----1--5 150 .0 15.0 0 .12 28 .3 24 .6 0 .30 37 .6 150 1.101 1.0 10 152 .0 5 .1 0.87 27 .3 8 .3 0 .87 36 .4 . 6 27 .00 -2-2---10 152 .0 15 .0 1. 56 27 .3 24.6 3.90 36 .4 150 1.101 12.0 11 1 52 .0 5.1 0.00 25 .7 8 .3 0.00 32 .5 7 10 .00 -1-----11 152.0 15.0 0 .60 25 .7 24.6 1.50 32.5 150 1.101 5 .0 12 162.0 5.1 4.33 20.8 8 .3 4.33 26.7 8 8 .50 -1-----12 1 62 .0 15.0 1. 54 20 .8 24 .6 3 .85 26 . 7 150 0 .874 4.0 13 162 .0 8.0 0 .00 19 .2 13.2 0 .00 22 .9 9 11 . 50 --11---13 162 .0 6 .3 0 .38 19.2 10 .3 0 .95 22 .9 150 0 .874 4 .0 14 162.0 3 .4 0.00 18 .9 5.5 0 .00 21. 9 10 4 .50 --11---14 162.0 6 .3 0 .21 18.9 10.3 0 .52 21. 9 150 0 .874 4.0 15 162 .0 3.4 0 .00 18 .7 5 .5 0.00 21. 4 11 5 .50 ---1---15 162 .0 6 .3 0.16 18 .7 10 .3 0 . 40 21. 4 150 0 .87 4 1.0 16 162 .0 3.4 0 .00 18 .5 5.5 0.00 21. 0 12 0 .50 --1----16 162 .0 6 .3 0 .09 18 .5 10 .3 0 .21 21. 0 150 0 .874 3 .0 17 162 .0 3.4 0 .00 18 .4 5.5 0 .00 20 .8 13 5.00 --1----17 162 .0 0 .0 0 .00 18 .4 0 .0 0.00 20 .8 150 0.874 3.0 18 162.0 0 .0 0 .00 18 .4 0 .0 0.00 20 .8 14 29 .50 ---3---17 162.0 6 .3 0.80 18 .4 10 .3 1. 99 20 .8 150 0 .874 3 .0 19 162 .0 3 .4 0 .00 17 .6 5 .5 0.00 18.8 15 8 .00 ---1---19 162 .0 15.0 1.11 17 . 6 2 4.6 2 .77 18.8 150 0 .874 1.0 20 162.0 8 .0 0 .0 0 16.5 13 .2 0 .00 16.0 16 29 .00 --14---19 162.0 -8 .7 1. 63 17.6 -14 .3 4 .07 18.8 150 0 .874 7 .0 13 162.0 4 .7 0 .00 19 .2 7 .7 0.00 22 .9 17 10 .00 -1-----20 162.0 15.0 1. 72 16.5 24 .6 4.31 16 .0 150 0 .8 74 4.0 2 1 152.0 8.0 4.33 19 .1 13 .2 4 .33 16.1 18 8 .50 -2-----21 152.0 15.0 2 .03 19.1 24 .6 5 .08 16.1 JAMES CANYON ESTATES PLAN 3 Date : 2/8/2001 Page 3 S:\Mike Lee\6136\CALC\PLAN3D .rdf File No : 6136 8 .0 0 .00 17.1 12.6 13 .2 0 .00 11 .0 150 0 .874 8 .0 22 152 .0 3 .81 ---- 19 12 .00 ---1---22 152 .0 3 .81 l l5.0 1 .60 17 .1 12 .6 12 .0 1 .06 11.0 150 0.874 1.0 23 152 .0 3 .81 15 .0 8 .0 0 .00 15 .5 12 .0 6 .4 0.00 9 .9 Fitting Code Letters: E=45 Ell, 1=90 Ell, B=TeeBch, R=TeeRu , C=Couplg, S=SwgChk, G=GatVlv • Sprinkler system has been hydraulicall y calculated with the HASS HOUSE 2.0 computer program (Licehse No . R812099927) to provide an average imbalance of o .603 gpm at each node with one sprinkler flowing, and 0 .004 gpm at each node w~th 2 sprinklers flowing in accordance with NFPA 13 and 13D or 13R. HRS Systems Inc. 4792 LaVist Road Tucker, GA 30084 (770) 934-8423 JAMES CANYON ESTATES PLAN 3 Date: 2/8/2001 Page 4 File No: 6136 S:\Mike Lee\6136\CALC\PLAN3D.rdf 90+ I I I 82+ WATER SUPPLY CURVE I I I 75*\\\\\\\\\\A\\\\\\\\\\\\\\C\\\\\~\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ I I D I 68+ I I I P 60+ R I E I B s I S 52+ U I R I E I 45+ I P I s I I 38+ ) I I I 30+ I I I 23+ I 1----------------------------LEpEND I Static= 75.6 psi, Residu~l = 18 .0 psi@ 3213 gpm 15+ I I I 7 .5+ I I I (1 sprinkler flowing) A= Available Water Supply 75.6 psi@ 15.0 gpm B = Required Water Supply 55 .9 psi@ 15.0 gpm (2 sprinklers flowing) C = Available Water Supply 75.6 psi@ 24.6 gpm D = Required Water Supply 71 .4 psi@ 24 .6 gpm II II II II 0 .0++-+---+----+-----+------+--------+--------+---------+-----------+ 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 FLOW (GPM) FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS 1787 ENTERPRI E COURT CORONA, CA 92880 RESIDENTIAL SPRI ,KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULICS CALCU ATION REPORT FOR JAMES CANYON EST TES PLAN 3 CARLSBAD, CA UP STAIRS CALC Date : 2/8/2001 File No: 6136 Data File Name: SPRINKLER SPACING 256.0 sq . ft./spklr. (max) Min . Dist. Bet. Spklrs: 8 .0 Max. Dist. Bet . Spklrs: 16 .0 ft. Max . Dist . Spklr. to Wall : 8 .0 ft. SPRINKLER SPECIFICATIONS Mfr: Reliable Descr: Fl/RES CCP Cone.Pend . (16xl6) K=3 .90 Calculated K Factor for Arm Overs & Drops: 1 .0 ft . x 0.874 in . D op : K=3 .81 (Incl. 1 Tee) 0.0 ft . x 0.874 in. Am-Over: K=3 .79 (Incl. 1 Tee & 1 Ell) PIPE SPECIFICATIONS Type : CntlBlazMastr WATER SUPPLY HWC: 150 Source: Public Test Date : ~y: Static: 75.6 psi Resid : 18 .0 psi Flow:3213.0 gpm Public Main Size: 6 in Domestic Demand: 0.0 gpm at node number 0 SPRINKLE R DEMAND No.Spklrs. Min Spklr. Flowing Flow 1 15 .0 2 12 .0 REVIEWING AUTHORITY CARLSBAD FIRE PROTECTION Press. (psi) 15.5 9 .9 Node No . 18 18 Total Flow 15 .0 24 .4 Avail. Press . 75 .6 75.6 Req'd Press . 54.7 62.0 JAMES CANYON ESTATES PLAN 3 Date : 2/8/2001 Page 2 File No: 6136 S:\Mike Lee\6136\CALC\PLAN3U.rdf RESULTS OF ANALYSIS PIPE & NODE DATA * FLOW ANALYSIS * 1 spf· inkler flowin g* 2 sprinklers flowing FIXD * * P # LEN ELBRCSG LOSS END EL SP *DISCH~FLOW PF PT *DISCH FLOW PF PT HWC DIA EQV.LN PUMP NOD (FT) (K) *(GPM) VEL PE (PSI)*(GPM) VEL PE (PSI) ====================================*===== ===============*===================== 1 18.00 -11--------1 135 .0 SRCE ----15.0 1 .83 54 .7 ----24 .4 4 .50 62 .0 150 0 .995 10 .0 2 135 .0 6.2 0.00 52 .9 10.1 0 .00 57 .5 2 33.00 -4-1----13 .0 2 135 .0 15.0 0 .73 52.9 24 .4 1 .81 57.5 150 1.394 25.0 3 139.0 3 .2 1 .73 37 .4 5 .1 1 .73 41.0 3 5 .00 -1------4.0 3 139.0 15.0 0.22 37 .4 24.4 0 .55 41 .0 150 1.265 6.0 4 144 .0 3.8 2 .17 31.0 6 .2 2 .17 34.3 4 6.00 -113-1-4 144.0 15 .0 1 .33 31.0 24 .4 3 .27 34.3 150 1 .055 21 .0 5 150.0 5 .5 2 .60 27 .1 9 .0 2 .60 28.4 5 2.00 ----1--5 150.0 15.0 0 .12 27 .1 24 .4 0 .30 28 .4 15D 1 .101 1.0 10 152.0 5.1 0 .87 26 .1 8.2 0.87 27.2 6 27 .00 -2-2---10 152.0 15.0 1.56 26 .1 24.4 3.84 27.2 150 1.101 12.0 11 152.0 5.1 0 .00 24.5 8.2 0 .00 23.4 7 10.00 -1-----11 152.0 15.0 0 .60 24 .5 24.4 1 .48 23.4 150 1.101 5.0 12 162 .0 5.1 4 .33 19.6 8 .2 4 .33 17.6 8 8.50 -1-----12 162.0 15.0 1 .54 19.6 24.4 3.79 17.6 150 0 .874 4.0 13 162.0 8.0 0 .00 18.1 13 .1 0.00 13.8 9 11.50 --11---13 162.0 8 .9 0.73 18.1 15 .5 2.03 13.8 150 0.874 4.0 14 162 .0 4.8 0 .00 17.3 8 .3 0 .00 11.8 10 4 .50 --11---14 162 .0 8.9 0.40 17 .3 15.5 1.11 11.8 150 0 .874 4 .0 15 162 .0 3 .81 4 .8 0 .00 16.9 12 .4 8.3 0 .00 10.6 11 5 .50 ---1---15 162 .0 3 .81 8 .9 0 .30 16.9 12 .4 3 .1 0 .04 10.6 150 0 .874 1.0 16 162 .0 4.8 0 .00 16.6 1 .7 0.00 10 .6 12 0 .50 --1----16 162 .0 8 .9 0 .16 16.6 3.1 0 .02 10 .6 150 0.874 3.0 17 162.0 4 .8 0 .00 16.5 1 .7 0.00 10.6 13 5.00 --1----17 162.0 15.0 0.98 16.5 12.0 0.65 10 .6 150 0 .874 3.0 18 162.0 3.81 15 .0 8.0 0 .00 15.5 12 .0 6 .4 0.00 9 .9 14 29 .50 ---3---17 162 .0 -6.1 0 .76 16.5 -8 .9 1.52 10.6 150 0.874 3 .0 19 162.0 3.3 0 .00 17 .2 4.8 0.00 12 .l 15 8 .00 ---1---19 162.0 0 .0 0.00 17.2 0.0 0 .00 12.1 150 0.874 1.0 20 162 .0 0.0 0.00 17 .2 0.0 0 .00 12.1 16 29 .00 --14---19 162 .0 -6.1 0.84 17.2 -8 .9 1 .69 12 .l 150 0.874 7 .0 13 162 .0 3.3 0 .00 18 .1 4.8 0 .00 13.8 17 10 .00 -1-----20 162.0 0 .0 0.00 17 .2 0 .0 0 .00 12.1 150 0 .874 4.0 21 152 .0 0 .0 4.33 21 .6 0 .0 4 .33 16.4 18 8.50 -2-----21 152 .0 0 .0 0 .00 21 .6 0.0 0.00 16.4 JAMES CANYON ESTATES PLAN 3 Date : 2/8/2001 File No : 61 36 Page 3 S :\Mike Lee\6136\CALC \PLAN3U.rdf 150 0 .874 8.0 22 152.0 0 .0 0 .00 21 .6 0 .0 0 .00 16 .4 19 12.00 ---1---22 152.0 23 152 .0 0.0 0 .00 21.6 0 .0 0 .00 21.6 0 .0 0 .00 16.4 0 .0 0.00 16 .4 150 0 .874 1 .0 • Fitting Code Letters : E=45 Ell, L=90 Ell, B=TeeBch, R=TeeRun, C=Couplg, S=SwgChk, G=GatVlv Sprinkler system has been hydraulical~y calculated with the HASS HOUSE 2.0 comput er program (Li cense No. R812099927) to provide an average imbalance of 0 .601 gpm at each node with one sprinkler flowing , and 0.008 gpm at each node w~th 2 sprinklers flowing in accordance with NFPA 13 and 13D or 13R. f HRS Systemsr Inc. 4792 Lavista Road Tucker, GA 30084 (770) 93 4-8423 • JAMES CANYON ESTATES PLAN 3 Date : 2 / 8 / 20011 Page 4 Lee\6136\CALC\PLAN3U.rdf File No : 6136 I S :\Mike WATER SUPfLY CURVE .. 90+ I I I 82+ I I I 75*\\\\\\\\\\A\\\\\\\\\\\\\\C\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ I I I 68+ I I I D P 60+ R I E I S I B S 52+ U I R I E I 45+ I P I S I I 38+ ) I I I 30+ I I I 23+ I I :------;~~~:~-=-;~~~-~::~-;~:i~J~~N~ ~;~~-~;:-@-;;~;-;~;--------- 15+ " I I I 7 .5+ (1 sprinkler flowing) A= Available Water Supply 75.6 psi@ 15.0 gpm (2 sprinklers flowing) C = Available Water Supply 75.6 psi@ 24 .4 gpm I B = Required Water Supply D = Required Water Supply I 54.7 psi@ 15 .0 gpm 62.0 psi@ 24.4 gpm " " " " " I " 0 .0++-+---+----+-----+------+-----1--+--------+---------+-----------+ 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 FLOW (GPM)