Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-01-15; Planning Commission; ; CT 02-13|CP 02-08|CDP 02-32|SDP 02-14 - FARBER JEFFERSON STREET CONDOme City of Carlsbad Planning Departm,* A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. (6 P.C. AGENDA OF: January 15, 2003 Application complete date: July 19, 2002 Project Planner: Anne Hysong Project Engineer: Bob Wojcik SUBJECT: CT 02-13/CP 02-08/£DP 02-32/SDP 02-14 - FARBER JEFFERSON STREET CONDO - Request for approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Tentative Tract Map, Condominium Permit, Coastal Development Permit and Site Development Plan to allow the airspace subdivision and development of 11 condominium units including 2 affordable housing units on an existing 1.15 acre lot located at the northeast corner of Jefferson Street and Las Flores Drive in Local Facilities Management Zone 1. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 5335 ADOPTING a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5336, 5337, 5338, and 5339 APPROVING CT 02-13, CP 02-08, CDP 02-32, and SDP 02-14 based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The applicant proposes to demolish an existing single-family residence and construct a new 11 unit, two and three-story condominium project that includes two affordable housing units, a roof deck, and underground parking garage on a 1.15 acre infill lot located on the northeast corner of Jefferson Street and Las Flores Drive. Access to the project will be taken from Las Flores Drive via a driveway entry to an underground parking structure. The development of the condominium project requires the processing and approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Condominium Permit, Coastal Development Permit and Site Development Plan. The site lies within the Mello II segment of the Local Coastal Program; therefore, approval of a Coastal Development Permit by the City is required. The project's proposed density of 11 dwelling units per acre is slightly below the 11.5 dwelling units per acre density allowed by the growth management control point for the property's Residential Medium High (RMH) General Plan designation. As designed and conditioned, the project is consistent with all applicable standards and policies, and the necessary findings to approve the project can be made. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The multi-family project is proposed at the northeast corner of Jefferson Street, a collector street, and Las Flores Drive, just west of the Las Flores/I-5 off-ramp in the City's northwest quadrant. o CT 02-13/CP 02-08/CDPW-32/SDP 02-14 - FARBER JEFFERSIP STREET CONDO January 15, 2003 Page 2 The 1.15-acre lot is designated by the General Plan for RMH density development (8-15 du/acre with 11.5 du/acre growth control point) and zoned R-3 (Multiple Family Zone). The site is currently occupied by a single story, single family residence, and surrounding development includes single family development to the north and southeast and single family and multiple family units to the south and west. The existing building pad rises above Jefferson Street approximately 12' - 13' from an elevation of 63' on Jefferson to 75' at the top of slope and 76' - 77' at the center of the site. The building pad is separated from Jefferson Street approximately 20' - 40' by an existing driveway that provides access to the adjacent property to the north and a combination of retaining wall and 2:1 manufactured slope. The buildable pad is separated from the northern interior property line by a 10' - 25' exclusive use easement granted to the adjacent property owner in which no structure is allowed. A triangular shaped Caltrans easement separates the property from Las Flores Drive. The result of these intervening improvements and/or easements is that the buildable pad area is a greater distance from the right-of-way lines/property lines, where required building setbacks are typically measured, thereby increasing the distance between roadways/property lines and the proposed development. The condominium project consists of two-story, stacked condominiums within three buildings that are connected by second and third floor decks. The buildings are two and three story; two story buildings are located adjacent to Las Flores Drive and the northern property line and buildings transition to three-story toward the interior of the site (Refer to Sheet 3 of 3/Exhibit "C"). A subterranean parking structure accessed by a driveway on Las Flores Drive will provide resident and guest parking. Although the building pad would be raised approximately 1.5' - 2.5' above existing grade to enable driveway access to a subterranean parking garage, the building pad would not expand beyond the existing pad area. An existing driveway easement that parallels Jefferson Street and provides access to the adjacent single-family residence to the north will be utilized for emergency access through granting of a reciprocal access easement for emergency vehicles. The two-story condominium units range in size from 1,894 square feet to 2,134 square feet and all units have private patios and/or decks. Common areas are provided by yards, passive seating areas, and second and third story decks; however, due to the proximity of the 1-5 freeway, only a portion of the private and passive recreation areas that comply with the City's noise standard can be used to meet the common and passive recreational requirements of the Planned Development Ordinance. Private patios and decks that are enclosed by 5' - 6' masonry/plexiglass noise walls and located on the west side of the buildings satisfy the noise standard. Grade level yards, a fire pit/seating area located between the proposed structures and Jefferson Street, and a third story deck enclosed by masonry/plexiglass noise walls satisfy the project's common passive recreational requirement. The proposed architecture is a variation of English Tudor style similar to the San Malo project in Carlsbad. Architectural enhancements include steep roof pitches with imitation slate and tile ridges and stucco and wood siding with brick and river rock trim elements. The project is subject to the following regulations and requirements: CT 02-13/CP 02-08/CDPW-32/SDP 02-14 - FARBER JEFFERS^ STREET CONDO January 15,2003 Page 3 A) General Plan - RMH (Residential Medium High Density) designation; B) R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) Zone, and Condominium Permit (Planned Unit Development) regulations (Chapters 21.16, and 21.45 respectively of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); C) Local Coastal Program (Mello n segment); D) Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code) E) Inclusionary Housing (Chapter 21.85 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); and F) Growth Management (Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code). IV. ANALYSIS The recommendation for approval for this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable City regulations and policies. The project's compliance with each of the above regulations is discussed in detail in the sections below. A) General Plan The proposed project is consistent with the policies and programs of the General Plan. The property has a General Plan designation of RMH. The RMH designation allows the development of multi-family residential units at a density of 8 - 15 dwelling units per acre. The growth control point is 11.5 dwelling units per acre. Development at the growth control point would allow 11.5 units on the property. The proposed project is for 11 condominium units at a density of 11 dwelling units per acre. The project complies with all the Elements of the General Plan as outlined in the table below: GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE ELEMENT Land Use Housing USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL OBJECTIVE OR PROGRAM Site is designated for Residential Medium High density - (8 - 15 du/acre) (Growth Control Point - 1 1.5 du/acre). 15% inclusionary housing requirement per Objective 3.6 PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS Multi-family residential units at 1 1 du/acre. Project conditioned to reserve 2 affordable units or purchase credits in combined affordable project COMPLY Yes Yes CT 02-13/CP 02-08/CDPW-32/SDP 02-14 - FARBER JEFFERSSff STREET CONDO January 15, 2003 Page 4 GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE - CONTINUED ELEMENT Public Safety Open Space & Conservation Circulation USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL OBJECTIVE OR PROGRAM Provide project review that allows consideration of seismic and geologic hazards. Minimize environmental impacts to sensitive resources within the City. Utilize Best Management Practices for control of storm water and to protect water quality. Requires new development to construct improvements needed to serve proposed development. PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS Project improvements will not significantly impact or be impacted by geologic or seismic conditions. Project site is previously developed and devoid of sensitive resources. Project will conform to all NPDES requirements. All public facilities including curb, gutter and sidewalk exist along the property frontage. COMPLY Yes Yes Yes B) R-3 Zoning/Condominium (Planned Unit Development) The proposed project is subject to the R-3 Zone regulations and the Planned Unit Development (PUD) regulations. (The PUD regulations are the development standards for condominium projects.) Although the site and properties directly to the north, south, and west are designated and zoned for multi-family development, the surrounding neighborhood consists of single-family development to the north and southeast and a combination of single family and multi-family development to the south and west. The project is consistent and compatible with the surrounding single family and multiple family development through its design. Important land use compatibility considerations between single family and multi-family developments are development intensity (i.e., building coverage and building height). The proposed structure consists of two and three story stacked condominiums with an underground parking structure that results in 32% building coverage on the 1.15-acre parcel. Much of the site design, which is not considered in the coverage calculation, consists of outdoor living area including yards and patios. The building coverage and outdoor living areas are consistent with single-family development. To ensure building height compatibility with adjacent one and two-story structures, the project transitions from two story units (29') along the interior side and street side (Las Flores) property lines, to three stories units (35') in the central portion of the site. Additionally, the buildings are setback between 46' - 120' from the Jefferson Street right-of-way, 30' - 40' from the Las Flores Drive right-of-way line, and 24' - 40' from the northern interior property line. Compatibility is therefore ensured through limited building coverage, increased setbacks, and placement of two CT 02-13/CP 02-08/CDpfP-32/SDP 02-14 - PARSER JEFFERSWf STREET CONDO January 15,2003 Page 5 story units along property lines and orientation of units on the site so that greater separation from existing development and roadways is provided. Also, a single driveway on Las Flores Drive will provide access to an underground parking garage that provides both resident and guest parking thereby avoiding the need for onsite surface parking typically associated with multiple family development. All public facilities including curb, gutter and sidewalk exist along the property frontages. The proposed architecture with wood and stucco elements is compatible with surrounding Mediterranean style development. Table A (below) illustrates how the project complies with the applicable R-3 zoning and PUD development regulations. Table A: R-3 ZONING AND PUD (CONDOMINIUM) STANDARDS COMPLIANCE STANDARD Min. Lot Size Max. Lot Coverage (R-3) Min. Front Setback (PUD) Min. Street Side Setback (R-3) Min. Interior Side Setback Max. Building Height Resident Parking (PUD) Visitor Parking (PUD) Recreational Space (PUD) 1. Private 2. Common passive Storage Space PERMITTED/ REQUIRED N/A 60% 15' average (public street) measured from ROW 10' 10' 35' 22 covered spaces .5 space/unit - 0 - 10 units .4 space/unit - > 1 0 units Required: 6 spaces 10'xlO' patio or 6'xlO' balcony 200 sq. ft. /unit x 11 =2,200 sq. ft. 392 cubic feet/unit PROPOSED 1 acre 32% Minimum -46' Maximum- 120' 10' Minimum 25' 29' to 32' - 2 stories 35' -3 stories 2 car garage/unit 8 spaces Exceeds minimum standard per unit for a total of 3,127 sq. ft. (balconies & patios). 2,210 sq. ft. 480 cubic feet/unit C) Local Coastal Program compliance The proposed project site is located outside the appeal area of the City's Coastal Zone and lies within the Mello II segment of the Local Coastal Program (LCP). CT 02-13/CP 02-08/CDPW-32/SDP 02-14 - FARBER JEFFERsW STREET CONDO January 15, 2003 Page 6 Mello II Segment The proposed project is consistent with the-Mello n segment of the LCP which contains land use policies for development and conservation of coastal land and water resources within the segment boundaries. The policies of the Mello n segment emphasize topics such as preservation of agriculture and scenic resources, protection of environmentally sensitive resources, provision of shoreline access and prevention of geologic instability and erosion. The project is consistent with the coastal act policies as follows: 1) no agricultural lands exist on the project site, therefore no impacts to such will occur; 2) the site does not contain environmentally sensitive habitats, water or marine resources; 3) the site is geologically stable and the proposed grading for the site has been limited to the area necessary to develop the site; 4) the project has been designed to reduce the amount of off-site runoff by surface drains and has been conditioned to implement the NPDES standards to avoid adverse impacts to water quality; 5) the project meets the parking requirements of the zoning ordinance; 6) the project does not preclude any recreational opportunities or shoreline access as the property is not a shorefront property; and 7) the development does not obstruct views of the coastline as seen from public lands or public rights-of-way. Given the above, the project is consistent with the Mello II segment land use policies. D) Subdivision Ordinance The Engineering Department reviewed the proposed tentative map and concludes that the subdivision complies with all applicable requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The project is conditioned to install all infrastructure improvements concurrent with development. Access to the site will be from a private driveway off of Las Flores Drive. The proposed ample building setbacks will allow for adequate air circulation and the opportunity for passive heating and cooling. E) Inclusionary Housing The City's Inclusionary Housing regulations require that a minimum of 15% of all approved units in any residential project be made affordable to lower income households. The inclusionary housing requirement for this project is 2 dwelling units. The project is proposing to reserve two units (I and J) as affordable to low income households, unless prior to final map, a combined inclusionary project is approved in the northwest quadrant. Since the project is small, the applicant wishes to purchase credits in a combined project when inclusionary units become available. F) Growth Management The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 1 in the Northwest quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and its compliance with the adopted performance standards, are summarized in Table B below. CT 02-13/CP 02-08/CDP^ January 15, 2003 Page 7 r-32/SDP 02-14 - PARSER JEFFERSOW STREET CONDOIP: Table B: GROWTH MANAGEMENT STANDARD City Administration Library Waste Water Treatment Parks Drainage Circulation Fire Open Space Schools Sewer Collection System Water IMPACTS 38.24 20.4 11EDU .08 ac Basin A 88 ADT Stations No. 1 & 3 N/A CUSD 11EDU 2,420 GPD COMPLIANCE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes The project is .5 dwelling units below the Growth Management Dwelling Unit allowance of 11.5 dwelling units for the subject property. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Staff has conducted an environmental impact assessment to determine if the project could have a potentially significant effect on the environment pursuant to CEQA Guidelines and the Environmental Protection Ordinance (Title 19) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. A potentially significant environmental impact was identified for noise. The developer has agreed to mitigation measures to reduce the identified noise impact to below a level of significance in accordance with CEQA. In consideration of the foregoing, the Planning Director issued a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project on December 9, 2002. No comments were received during the 30-day public review. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5335 (Mitigated Neg. Dec.) 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5336 (CT) 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5337 (CP) 4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5338 (CDP) 5. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5339 (SDP) 6. Location Map 7. Background Data Sheet 8. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form 9. Disclosure Statement 10. Reduced Exhibits 11. Exhibit "A" - "L" dated January 15, 2003 SITE FARBER JEFFERSON STREET CONDO CT 02-13/CP 02-08/CDP 02-32/SDP 02-14 BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO:CT 02-13/CP 02-Q8/CDP 02-32/SDP 02-14 CASE NAME: Farber Jefferson Street Condo APPLICANT: Curt Farber REQUEST AND LOCATION: A tentative map, condominium permit, coastal development permit, and site development plan to allow the airspace subdivision and development of 11 condominium units including 2 affordable housing units on an existing 1.15 acre lot located at the northeast comer of Jefferson Street and Las Flores Drive. The project requires the demolition of an existing single story residence. Access to the project will be taken from Las Flores Drive via a driveway entry to an underground parking structure. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of Tract 2 of Laguna Mesa Tract, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1719. filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, June 20, 1921. APN: 155-180-31 Acres: 1.15 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 1 Lot/11 Units GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation: Residential Medium High (RMH) Density Allowed: 11.5 du/acre Density Proposed: 11 du/acre Existing Zone: R-3 Proposed Zone: Same Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: General Plan Site North South East West R-3 RMH R-3 RMH R-3/R-1 RMH/RLM 1-5 T-C R-3 RMH Current Land Use SF Residence SF Residence Multi-Family/Single Family Residences L-5 Single Family/Multi- Farnily Residences PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: Carlsbad Unified Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 11 EDU ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT /\ Mitigated Negative Declaration, issued December 9. 2002 CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: Farber Jefferson Street Condo - CT 02-13/CP 02-08/CDP 02-32/SDP 02-14 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 1_ GENERAL PLAN: RMH ZONING: R-3 DEVELOPER'S NAME: Curt Farber ADDRESS: 2235 Encinitas Blvd.. #104, Encinitas. CA 92024 PHONE NO.: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 155-180-31 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 1.15 AC./11DU ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: Unknown A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 38.24 B. Library: Demand in Square Footage = 20.4 C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 11 EDU D. Park: Demand in Acreage = .08 E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = Identify Drainage Basin = Basin A F. Circulation: Demand in ADT = 88 (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 1 &3 H. Open Space: Acreage Provided = N/A... I. Schools: Elementary School .99 Middle School .44 High School .54 J. Sewer: Demands in EDU 11 K. Water: Demand in GPD= 2.420 L. The project is .5 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. of_C% r Is bad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project, cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit" Agents may sign this document; however, the legal provided below. and entity of the applicant and property owner must be 1 . 2. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publiclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of- the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person. Title Title Address 99/<£/T? qf?.*rwJ Address OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e. partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv- owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Title /"4XT/1/&?Title Address Address 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 6O2-8559 NON-PROFIT ^JANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. NonProfit/Trust Non Profit/Trust Title Title Address Address Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? Yes X No.If yes,please indicate person(s): NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of ovflSer/date Signature of applicant/date Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent ' H:ADMIN\COUNTER\D(SCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 CT 02-13 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP: CT 02-13 CONDOMINIUM PERMIT: CP 02-08COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT: CDP 02-32 SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT: SDP 02-14 TENTATIVE MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN OWNJSR/SUBDIWIDSR:SHEET 1 OF 3 SHEETS DVTIM UHUTYPOfumrrr DL WLL EX. KMUMB EX. MPKMHEHTB EX. FME HYDMHT E4SEMCTTS *mcAito) 9t sjaaan nm «Mfl rurofs fa ooaaarr*" xtam UMCH a ma tammxr m 1000-OIIIIBH ON. SHEET INDEX: 7r, SHEET 1- EXISTING CONDITIONS SHEET e- PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHEET 3- DETAIL AMD SUIOURT PREPARED Br: FRO KNGINKKROTG B30 BOABDWLt SOTTH *D*SIN HABCOS, a. matt (Sit) 744-3700 RC.I. 24000 TMfl HI MBT* TiCTcnr m CT 02-13 TENTATIVE MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES TENTATIVE TRACT MAP: CT 02-13 CONDOMINIUM PERMIT: CP 02-08 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT: CDP 02-32 TvS7Tnr»our» ivmrinwuiuuivrr DT AIVTOSITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT: SDP 02-14 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT PLANS QMOTE UMTS i * j J.KC SFfOfiEp AS OTIjnSt/SUBDIVUJXR: HUH: SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS MULT mono pm'iiiiniup.A uunrau unnn> MinimmipKM nOKRU BOBUTUD. SOm 104noNiiiB, u noMPEOXI m.: (TM) Tts-saas t. LKUt ummiynun; i panmv or nucr i or ugmu uu nucri. rAaum Muummn ion : icm or CUUBID4. DID DBimcT: OTT OT C1RUUD •. KBOOI ranroci (»): anuniD onnra SCHOOL minm i. auraia u BBomB. vna. ion:t. npo DAT* BURnm)-a/a/BB10. mncm or GaxDaxmiiif U/UM-H 1. AUTOIAHC HRE SPRINKLER SY31DJS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL STRUCTURES. N01&m-mi umnaantCAIT OF TCP or DaviMa UPC ran. PITER FLO-OARD onotr i THE DRIVEWAY SHALL BE POSTED AS A FIRE LANE. 1 ALL UNITS SERVED BY THE DRIVEWAY SHALL, BE ADDRESSED ON JETTERSON ST. 4. A MONUMENT SUN SHALL BE PROVIDED AT DfflVEWAY ENTRANCEINDICATOR UNITS SERVED BY THE DRIVEWAY. B. THE DRIVEWAY SATE SHALL BE REVIEWED AND MOORED OR REPLACEDTO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT.MMWKY VMU. (KZ PUN} PKPOXD AMHICOTURAL W*1<K1 HJK) PRV. OBttCHON OF DUMMZ REFERENCE STATE OF CAUFORNIA DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (JULY 1MO) AND STANDARD PLANS (JULY 1888) CUT: 4,000 C.Y. FILL: BOO CT. C.T. mm: •comnuiMn MAP vor APPUCABU* PIRO JTtf WMKR/NC 830 BOASDWALX. SUITS mD~SAJV MARCOS. CA. 92069 744-3700 v JKKFEHflON Parking Garage (Basement) (Third Level) Grade (First Level) (Roof Level) (Second Level), Private Use Areas Common Use Areas Detail and Summary Plans Site / Plot Plan Index Al COVER SHEET A2 PARKING GARAGE BAESMENT A3 FIRST STORY FLOOR PLAN A4 SECOND STORY FLOOR PLAN A5 THIRD STORY FLOOR PLAN A6 ROOF DECK AND ROOF PLAN A7 ELEVATIONS A8 SECTIONS LI LANDSCAPE PLAN Units Square Footage Unit Deck Patio and Fenced Yard A 1894 166 Yes B 2134 Yes C 1894 480 D 1894 452 E 1894 96 Yes F1894 576 G 1894 280 H 2134 Yes I 1894 192 Yes J 1894 192 Yes K 1894 192 Yes 21314 2626 Common Area Decks 5124 Parking Garage 13392 Site Address: 1106 Las Floras Drive, Carlsbad, Calilifornia 92009 APN: 155-180-31 These Plans are Conceptual and Not for Construction Cover Sheet PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT (Sub-Grade)Parking Garage TO D2 5 Tl LUe> Tl Tl LU r>H ivNOiivonag visgaoinv NV xg Scale 1/8"=1'0" Garage Basement CD Scale 1/8"=1'0"First Story Floor Plan § •CO ?, 1 Js a> • ^ U_ 5 f; ';• UJ ^^ iHm LJJ 00 A3 LJJe> Scale 1/8"=1'0" LU m Second Story Floor Plan Scale 1/8"=1'0" Third Story Floor Plan 6 , Sfj I i d §™ ! !•; M LJJ LJJ m A5 T_S is9> -j >•; IS! LLJ LU IDm Scale 1/8"=1'a' Roof Deck and Roof Plan A6 Front (South West) Elevation (Jefferson Street) "it nnrn Tl Back (North East) Elevation (15) Left (North West) Elevation Right (South East) Elevation (Las Flores) ELEVATIONS ' 6 :' ,! £ LJJ LJJ ID QQ i<i! LLJ CD 2 LLJ QQ These Plans arc Conceptual and Not for Construction A8 Patio F Residence Garage _ sc«,.",M-.fo- Section A PLANT LEDGER r Tentative Plant Schedule ^Iflll^fl;1®;* ;w^'' ••'- ^K^^&llil^fc^'nF-'.,-, «'Wi. -^<^g^^^p^»^^^^^^mv^- : Landscape Concept Plan ^Se LUe> LU 00 LI