Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD 2018-0008; CHESTNUT AVENUE RESIDENCE; HYDROLOGY STUDY; 2018-07-02•• John P. Strohminger Hydrology Study 1161 Chestnut Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Chestnut Avenue Residence PD 2018-0008 DWG 511-2A GR 2018-0012 Prepared for: Irwin Goldman 810 East Dyer Road Santa Ana, CA 92705 Prepared By: John P. Strohminger RCE 55187 RECEIVED JUL O 3 2018 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING dba Pacific Overland Engineering & Surveying 635 Via Columbia Vista, CA 92081 Date: July 2, 2018 Date 1 ..... C ' I • 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Project Description ................................................................................................................................ 2 2.1 Existing Condition ......................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Proposed Condition ...................................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Soil Characteristics ........................................................................................................................ 3 3 Rational Method Description ................................................................................................................ 3 4 Hydrology Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 4 5 Water Quality ........................................................................................................................................ 4 6 Hydromodification ................................................................................................................................ 4 7 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 5 8 Attachments .......................................................................................................................................... 5 9 References ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project is a 0.22 acre residential parcel located at 1161 Chestnut Avenue in the City of Carlsbad. It is a panhandle lot. Chestnut Avenue is a public street that connects with Adams Street to the west and Highland Drive to the east. The existing site was graded to create a buildable pad from Grading Plan Drawing Number 398-GA. There are no structures onsite. Proposed improvements consist of a single- family detached dwelling unit and driveway. Existing retaining walls along the east property line will remain in place. The site's APN number is 205-210-96-00. The legal description is Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 19764. A Vicinity Map is in the attachments. 2.1 ExlSTING CONDITION The existing site has a graded pad for a single-family residence and driveway at an average elevation of 110 feet above Mean Sea Level (MSL). The elevation of the street fronting the property pan handle is at 100 feet MSL. There are two 4 foot high retaining walls along the rear property line to the east. To the south is an existing single-family residence one foot higher than the proposed structure. To the north is an existing single family residence three feet lower than the proposed structure. To the west is an existing single family residence six feet lower than the proposed structure. To the rear is an existing single family residence 12 feet higher than the proposed structure. Storm water from the site surface flows to the panhandle, continues down the driveway to an existing Brooks Inlet at the right of way with Chestnut. From there the storm water is taken by underground 2 • I conduit to an existing curb inlet in Chestnut and westerly in a storm drain system in the street. The site does not take on any flows from neighboring properties. 2.2 PROPOSED CONDITION The proposed project creates a single-family residence with a driveway, patio, and front yard hardscape. The improvements and grading will disturb 6,499 square feet of area. The amount of new and replaced impervious surface will be 4,305 square feet. The new drainage pattern is similar to the existing drainage pattern. Initial storm water starts at the slope and wall system in the rear yard to the east. From there it is routed around both sides of the house to a confluence at the beginning of the panhandle portion of the lot. Flows then continue on the surface of the existing driveway to the existing inlet mentioned above. 2.3 SOIL CHARACTERISTICS The following soil group definitions come from Technical Release 55 (TR-55) by the United States Department of Agriculture: Group A soils have low runoff potential and high infiltration rates even when thoroughly wetted. They consist chiefly of deep, well to excessively drained sand or gravel and have a high rate of water transmission (greater than 0.30 in/hr). Group B soils have moderate infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consist chiefly of moderately deep to deep, moderately well to well drained soils with moderately fine to moderately course textures. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission (0.15-0.30 in/hr). Group C soils have low infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consist chiefly of soils with a layer that impedes downward movement of water and soils with moderately fine to fine texture. These soils have a low rate of water transmission (0.05-0.15 in/hr). Group D soils have high runoff potential. They have very low infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consist chiefly of clay soils with a high swelling potential, soils with a permanent high water table, soils with a clay pan or clay layer at or near the surface, and shallow soils over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very low rate of water transmission (0-0.05 in/hr). The conservative approach is assuming Group D soils for the site. 3 RATIONAL METHOD DESCRIPTION The rational method, as described in the 2003 San Diego County Hydrology Manual, was used to generate surface runoff flows, which were then used to size the drainage facilities. The basic equation: Q = CiA Q = Peak Flow of Storm Water in Cubic Feet per Second (cfs) C = runoff coefficient (varies with land use) 3 i = Intensity (in/hr) A = Area (acres) The 6 hour and 24 hour rainfall isopluvial maps are found in the 2003 San Diego County Hydrology Manual. Adjusted PG calculations can be found in the Attachments. Initial travel time calculations (T1) are set on a minimum S minutes as prescribed by the City and County. 4 HYDROLOGY ANALYSIS The table below summarizes the pre-and post-construction 100-year flows. The outfall points are shown on the Existing and Proposed Drainage Exhibits included in this report. Description A (ac) Q (cfs) Existing 100-Yr Node #102 0.173 0.41 Total 0.173 0.41 Proposed 100-Yr Node #203 0.173 0.48 Total 0.173 0.48 Table 1 Summary of existing and proposed stormwater runoff. The total pre-development 100 year flow is 0.41 cfs. The total post-development 100 year flow is 0.48 cfs. The additional 0.07 cfs will be mitigated by routing flows through the front-yard planter as shown on the Proposed Condition drawing. The Analysis and Exhibit for the pre-development condition and for the post-development condition is in the Attachments. 5 WATER QUALllY This project is a Standard Development Project per the completed Storm Water Standards Questionnaire (E-34) provided in the attachments. This project is therefore not required to submit a Storm Water Quality Management Plan (SWQMP). 6 HYDROMODIFICATION This project is exempt from Hydromodification requirements since it is not a Priority Development Project. 4 7 CONCLUSION The existing condition discharges 0.41 cubic feet per second of storm water at the northwest corner of the property. From there is flows on the surface 90 feet to the north to a Brooks Box inlet and on to the Pacific Ocean in an underground conduit. The proposed condition discharges 0.48 cubic feet per second of storm water at the northwest corner of the property. From there is flows on the surface 90 feet to the north to a Brooks Box inlet and on to the Pacific Ocean in an underground conduit. 8 ATTACHMENTS Includes: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Existing Drainage Map 3. Existing Drainage Spreadsheet Analysis 4. Proposed Drainage Map S. Proposed Drainage Spreadsheet Analysis 6. Table 3-1, Runoff Coefficients for Urban Areas 7. 100 Year 6 Hour lsopluvial 8. 100 Year 24 Hour lsopluvial 9. Figure 3-1, Intensity-Duration Design Chart 10. Manning's Nomograph for Swale Flows 11. E-34, Storm Water Standards Questionnaire 12. E-36, Standard Project Requirement Checklist 9 REFERENCES 1. City of Carlsbad Engineering Design Manual by the City of Carlsbad 2. San Diego County Drainage Design Manual by the County of San Diego, May 2005. 3. San Diego County Hydrology Manual by the County of San Diego, June 2003. 4. Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds TR-55 by the United States Department of Agriculture, June 1986. 5. Low Impact Development Handbook by the County of San Diego, December 31, 2007. 6. Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region, April 25, 2007. 7. Stormwater Best Management Practice Handbook by California Stormwater Quality Association, September 30, 2004. s Park r., ,::; ""' r.:, , .. - Iii -0 «;) Librnry Learning Center 1161 Chestnut Avenue chestnut /\ve Cher,rnut Ave El Ta\lmua Senior Apartments Cinnamon /\parlments El Econo Lodge lnr1 & SuilP'.-, Near Ll:'golcmd Vicinity Map 1161 C'hestnut Ave . \ SHEET Till.£: 1161 Chestnut Avenue Basin Area= a1606 AC Existing Drainage 1161 Chestnut A venue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 John P. Strohmlnger Englneerlng C:\Users\John Strohmingel\Dropbo>t\Engineering and Surveying\Active Jobs\1161 Chestnut Avenue\Drawing Files 1161 Chestnut\Orainage Existing Conditton.dwg, 7/2/201810:49:32 AM ~~-Basin Area = ao124 AC DATE: 4-4-2018 Pre-Development Hydrology 1161 Chestnut Avenue, Carlsbad, Ca, 92008, April 3, 2018, John P. Strohminger Engineering Nodes Iner. Total Soil Land C Iner. Total Flow Slope Over-Kirpich Manning Tc I Q=CIA Notes Area Area Gp Use C*A C*A Path, % land Ti Ti min, in/hr Q, cfs. ac. ac. ft. Ti, min. min. cum. min 100-101 0.012 0.012 D Veg 0.35 0.004 0.004 10 50.00 5 6.59 0.03 Initial Tc 5 minutes 101-102 0.161 0.173 D Veg 0.35 0.061 0.065 132 1.5 0.32 5.3 6.33 0.41 Total Flow at Node 101 0.41 CFS lsopluvial Data: P6= 2.5 Adjusted P6 = 2.5 P24= 4.0 P6/P24= 63% I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1/ \ SHEET Till£: 203 0100=0.48cfs Proposed Drainage 1161 Chestnut A venue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 John P. Strohminger Engineering C:\UsersVohn Strohmingef'\DropboK\Engin~ring and Surveying\Actlve Jobs\1161 Chestnut Avenue\Drawing Files 1161 Chestnut\Dfainage Proposed Condirion.dwg. 7/2/201B 10:54:54 AM DATE: 4-4-2018 Post-Development Hydrology 1161 Chestnut Avenue, Carlsbad, Ca, 92008, April 3, 2018, John P. Strohminger Engineering Nodes Iner. Total Soil Land C Iner. Total Flow Slope Over-Kirpich Manning Tc Q=CIA Notes Area Area Gp Use C*A C*A Path, % land Ti Ti min. min, in/hr Q, cfs. ac. ac. ft. Ti, min. cum. min 200-201 0.014 0.014 D R 4.3 0.35 0.005 0.005 5 5.0 6.59 0.03 Initial Tc 5 minutes min 201-202 0.07 0.084 D R4.3 0.35 0.025 0.029 135 2.00 0.320 5.32 6.33 0.19 Cobble swale to front 202-203 0.089 0.173 D R4.3 0.52 0.046 0.076 41 4.5 0.0148 5.33 6.32 0.48 Total Flow at Node 203 0.48 CFS lsopluvial Data: P6= 2.5 Adjusted P6 = 2.5 P24 = 4.0 P6/P24= 63% San Diego County Hydrology Manual Date June 2003 Table 3-1 Section: Page RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS FOR URBAN AREAS Land Use Runoff Coefficient "C" Soil T e NRCS Elements Count Elements %IMPER A B Undisturbed Natural Terrain (Natural) Permanent Open Space o• 0.20 0.25 Low Density Residential (LOR) Residential, 1.0 DU/A or less IO 0.27 0.32 Low Density Residential (LOR) Residential, 2.0 DU/A or less 20 0.34 0.38 Low Density Residential (LOR) Residential, 2.9 DU/A or less 25 0.38 0.41 Medium Density Residential (MOR) Residential, 4.3 DU/A or less 30 0.41 0.45 Medium Density Residential (MOR) Residential, 7 3 DU/A or less 40 0.48 0.51 Medium Density Residential (MOR) Residential, I0.9 DU/A or less 45 0.52 0.54 Medium Density Residential (MOR) Residential, 14.5 DU/A or less 50 0.55 0.58 High Density Residential (HOR) Residential, 24.0 DU/A or less 65 0.66 0.67 High Density Residential (HOR) Residential, 43.0 DU/A or less 80 0 76 0.77 Commercial/Industrial (N. Corn) Neighborhood Commercial 80 0.76 077 Commercial/Industrial (G Corn) General Commercial 85 0.80 0.80 Commercial/Industrial (O.P. Com) Office Professional/Commercial 90 0.83 0.84 Commercial/Industrial (Limited I.) Limited Industrial 90 0.83 0.84 Commercial/Industrial General I. General Industrial 95 0.87 0.87 C 0.30 0.36 0.42 0.45 0.48 0.54 0.57 0.60 0.69 0.78 0.78 0.81 0.84 0.84 0.87 3 6 of26 D 0.35 0.41 0.46 0.49 0.52 0.57 0.60 0.63 0.71 0.79 0.79 0.82 0.85 0.85 0.87 *The values associated with 0% impervious may be used for direct calculation of the runoff coefficient as described in Section 3.1.2 (representing the pervious runoff coefficient, Cp, for the soil type), or for areas that will remain undisturbed in perpetuity. Justification must be given that the area will remain natural forever (e.g., the area is located in Cleveland National Forest). DU/A= dwelling units per acre NRCS = National Resources Conservation Service 3-6 ~·30'---,"=-:::::.::-4r--""-7:Sm ---+-------+-------l----------l-----------l----~"30' • .. / ._ ,1_.: ····· . ~.: };::f :. Riverside County ;)I;~~<i:· MeX 32"311 ii! ~ f ~ :: ~ ----+----------1---------+------------1---------1-----------+-----32"311 ~ ~ County of San Diego Hydrology Manual • Rainfall Isopluvials 100 Year Rainfall Event-6 Hours lsopluviel (Inches) N ~ ...... MtMlla)wmo.,tw.,,Ml,IIWO,Mlr....,,.MHBIIEFMN 4 =~~-=-~~~.wwmES oa,,,w.81P01.M ... ,._,.,,._ -~ ...................... WCW)-.,..,., E :-'_:=:-.,,-::::-" ...... -. .. -.......................................... ... ,..........,.,.._.,.._.,._ s 3 0 3 MIies F- 33'1 32'30' i;i ::: 0 Cl <.l) l)l ':) ., ;: Me ~ ~ 32'30' County of San Diego Hydrology Manual • Rainfall Isop/uvials 100 Year Rainfall Event-24 Hours lsopluvial (inches) 10 0 90 80 7 0 60 4.0 = I = p6 = D = EQUATION 7.44 P6 D-0.645 Intensity (tn/hr) 6-Hour Precipitation (1n) Duration (min) •·······ti··· :::::::::i;:: ........ ,µ .. •-.. •HO_,• •••• ············ ·-·· ·~-·. .. . ········· .. . ............. 2.0 1 5 1 0 01L-----+------,---1---...i..+---1----,--1----..i..----.----i.--.... -.... --1 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 30 Minutes 40 50 Duration 2 3 Hours 4 5 6 Intensity-Duration Design Chart -Template Directions for Application: ( 1) From precipitation maps determine 6 hr and 24 hr amounts for the selected frequency. These maps are included in the County Hydrology Manual (10. 50. and 100 yr maps included in the Design and Procedure Manual). (2) Adjust 6 hr precipitation (if necessary) so that it is within the range of 45% to 65% of the 24 hr precipitation (not applicaple to Desert). (3) Plot 6 hr precipitation on the right side of the chart. (4) Draw a line through the point parallel to the plotted lines. (5) This line is the intensity-duration curve for the location being analyzed. Application Form: (a) Selected frequency 100 year (b) P6 = [iu in .. P24 = 4.6 .:6 = I fi7 I %121 24 (c) Adjusted P612> = 2.5 in. (d) tx = __ S_ min (e) I= ~ in./hr. Note This chart replaces the Intensity-Duration-Frequency curves used since 1965. .-------~---·---.. ---~--------··-------·-·----------·-. --·- P6 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 Our.1tion 5 2 63 3 9:i :., 27 6 ~Jg ? 90 9 22 10 S4 11 86 1 ~ 1 7 1,1 -19 1', 81 7 2 12 :J18 4 24 5 30 6 35 142 8 48 9 S4 1060 11 66 12 12 10 1 68 2 :,3 3 ]7 4 ?1 ,:°)O!l ;; 90 6 74 ; S8 8 42 9 27 10 11 15 1 30 l 95 2 59 3 2·1 3 89 4 5,1 5 ~ 9 S84 6 49 7 1:l 7 78 20 1 08 1 67 2 15 2 69 :i 23 :1 77 4 31 4 8:, 5 :19 "9:l 6 46 25 0 93 1 40 1 87 2 33 2 80 :l 27 3 73 4 20 4 67 5 13 5 60 30 0 S3 1 24 1 66 ? 07 ;> 49 2 90 3 32 3 73 4 15 4 56 4 98 40 0 69 1 03 1 38 1 72 2 07 :>41 ? 76 3 10 3 4S 3 79 4 13 50 060 0 9'J 1 19 1 49 1 ;g 2 09 ;> 39 ?69 2 98 3 28 3 58 60 ()',:l 0 80 1 06 , :n 1 ~" 1 86 ✓ 1? ? 39 ? 65 ? 92 318 90 0 .1: 0 61 0 8;.> 1 o;, 1 23 1 4:1 1 63 1 84 204 2 ?5 ;; 4r, 120 'J 3-1 051 0 68 0 85 1 02 1 19 1 36 1 53 1 70 I 87 2 04 150 0 29 Q .14 0 S9 on 088 1 03 1 18 1 32 1 47 I 62 1 76 180 0 26 0 39 0 :,? 0 6S 0 78 0 91 I 04 1 18 I 31 1 44 1 57 240 022 0 33 0 43 O!A 06'.) 0 16 0 87 0 98 1 08 1 19 : :;i I 300 019 o 2s o :is 0 47 0 ~,6 0 66 0 /~1 0 85 0 94 1 03 360 0 Ii 0 2,, 0 33 Q .12 0 50 0 58 0 6/ 0 7S 084 0 92 1 00 i F I G u R 3-1 E "-.-.-- EQUATION: V = 1di R213 s1'2 0.3 0.2 0.15 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.001 0.0009 0.0008 0.0007 0.0006 0.0005 0.()004 0.0003 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.9 1.0 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 SOURCE: USDOT, FHWA. HDs-3 (1961) n I 4~;; i,, -·----·-·-·1 ·--,-·,---..-----· ---- " ~ <?~ " GENERAL SOLUTION Manning's Equation Nomograph 2 1.0 0.9 o.e 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.01 0.02 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.2 0.3 0.4 FIGURE .~ / {1t ( -ditot!KM t f\ 1(/-e. l_ City of Carlsbad I INSTRUCTIONS: STORM WATER STANDARDS QUESTIONNAIRE E-34 Dev e Io em en t_ Services Land Development Engineering 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-2750 www.carlsbadca.gov To address post-development pollutants that may be generated from development projects, the city requires that new development and significant redevelopment priority projects incorporate Permanent Storm Water Best Management Practices (BMPs) into the project design per Carlsbad BMP Design Manual (BMP Manual). To view the BMP Manual, refer to the Engineering Standards (Volume 5). This questionnaire must be completed by the applicant in advance of submitting for a development application (subdivision, discretionary permits and/or construction permits). The results of the questionnaire determine the level of storm water standards that must be applied to a proposed development or redevelopment project. Depending on the outcome, your project will either be subject to 'STANDARD PROJECT' requirements or be subject to 'PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT' (PDP) requirements. Your responses to the questionnaire represent an initial assessment of the proposed project conditions and impacts. City staff has responsibility for making the final assessment after submission of the development application. If staff determines that the questionnaire was incorrectly filled out and is subject to more stringent storm water standards than initially assessed by you, this will result in the return of the development application as incomplete. In this case, please make the changes to the questionnaire and resubmit to the city. If you are unsure about the meaning of a question or need help in determining how to respond to one or more of the questions, please seek assistance from Land Development Engineering staff. A completed and signed questionnaire must be submitted with each development project application. Only one completed and signed questionnaire is required when multiple development applications for the same project are submitted concurrently. PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT NAME: T~. d..L,hCIL PROJE ADDRESS: I & I Vl (AJ2. The project is (check one): New Development D Redevelopment The total proposed disturbed area is: 4'1414 ft2 ( 0 • (-¥} Z.) acres The total proposed newly created and/or replaced impervious area is: 4 301:::> ft2 (() .oqBb ) acres If your project is covered by an approved SWQMP as part of a larger development project, provide the project ID and the SWQMP # of the larger deverl pment project: Project ID 1'\ _b SWQMP #: ______________ _ Then, go to Step 1 and follow the instructions. When completed, sign the form at the end and submit this with your application to the city. E-34 Page 1 of 4 REV02/16 STEP1 TO BE COMPLETED FOR ALL PROJECTS To determine if your project is a "development project", please answer the following question: YES NO Is your project LIMITED TO routine maintenance activity and/or repair/improvements to an existing building □ Ji or structure that do not alter the size (See Section 1.3 of the BMP Design Manual for guidance)? If you answered "yes" to the above question, provide justification below then go to Step 5, mark the third box stating "my project is not a 'development project' and not subject to the requirements of the BMP manual" and complete applicant information. Justification/discussion: (e.g. the project includes only interior remodels within an existing building): If vou answered "no" to the above auestion, the oroiect is a 'development proiect', ao to Step 2. STEP2 TO BE COMPLETED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS To determine if your project is exempt from PDP requirements pursuant to MS4 Permit Provision E.3.b.(3), please answer the following questions: Is your project LIMITED to one or more of the following: YES NO 1. Constructing new or retrofitting paved sidewalks, bicycle lanes or trails that meet the following criteria: a) Designed and constructed to direct storm water runoff to adjacent vegetated areas, or other non- erodible permeable areas; □ Jef b) Designed and constructed to be hydraulically disconnected from paved streets or roads; c) Designed and constructed with permeable pavements or surfaces in accordance with USEPA Green Streets guidance? 2. Retrofitting or redeveloping existing paved alleys, streets, or roads that are designed and constructed in □ j6 accordance with the USEPA Green Streets guidance? 3. Ground Mounted Solar Array that meets the criteria provided in section 1.4.2 of the BMP manual? □ ~ If you answered "yes" to one or more of the above questions, provide discussion/justification below, then go to Step 5, mark the second box stating "my project is EXEMPT from PDP ... " and complete applicant information. Discussion to justify exemption { e.g. the project redeveloping existing road designed and constructed in accordance with the USEPA Green Street guidance): If you answered "no" to the above questions, your project is not exempt from PDP, go to Step 3. E-34 Page 2 of 4 REV 04117 STEP3 TO BE COMPLETED FOR ALL NEW OR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS To determine if your project is a PDP, please answer the following questions (MS4 Permit Provision E.3.b.(1 )): YES NO 1. Is your project a new development that creates 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surfaces ~ collectively over the entire project site? This includes commercial, industrial, residential, mixed-use, □ and IJUblic development projects on public or private land. 2. Is your project a redevelopment project creating and/or replacing 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface collectively over the entire project site on an existing site of 10,000 square feet or □ ~ more of impervious surface? This includes commercial, industrial, residential, mixed-use, and public development projects on public or private land. 3. Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates and/or replaces 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface collectively over the entire project site and supports a restaurant? A restaurant is fJ a facility that sells prepared foods and drinks for consumption, including stationary lunch counters and □ refreshment stands selling prepared foods and drinks for immediate consumption (Standard Industrial c1ass1ricat1on {SIG) code 5812). 4. Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates 5,000 square feet or more of impervious /J surface collectively over the entire project site and supports a hillside development project? A hillside □ development project includes development on anv natural slope that is twentv-five percent or areater. 5. Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates and/or replaces 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface collectively over the entire project site and supports a parking lot? A parking lot is □ Jr a land area or facility for the temporary parking or storage of motor vehicles used personally for business or for commerce. 6. Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates and/or replaces 5,000 square feet or more I of impervious street, road, highway, freeway or driveway surface collectively over the entire project □ site? A street, road, highway, freeway or driveway is any paved impervious surface used for the transoortation of automobiles, trucks, motorcycles, and other vehicles. 7. Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates and/or replaces 2,500 square feet or more of impervious surface collectively over the entire site, and discharges directly to an Environmentally /J Sensitive Area (ESA)? "Discharging Directly to" includes flow that is conveyed overland a distance of □ 200 feet or less from the project to the ESA, or conveyed in a pipe or open channel any distance as an isolated flow from the project to the ESA O.e. not commingled with flows from adjacent lands).* 8. Is your project a new development or redevelopment project that creates and/or replaces 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface that supports an automotive repair shop? An automotive repair □ ~ shop is a facility that is categorized in any one of the following Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes: 5013, 5014, 5541, 7532-7534, or 7536-7539. 9. Is your project a new development or redevelopment project that creates and/or replaces 5,000 square feet or more of impervious area that supports a retail gasoline outlet (RGO)? This category includes □ Ji RGO's that meet the following criteria: (a) 5,000 square feet or more or (b) a project Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 100 or more vehicles oer day. 10. Is your project a new or redevelopment project that results in the disturbance of one or more acres of land □ % and are expected to generate pollutants post construction? 11. Is your project located within 200 feet of the Pacific Ocean and (1) creates 2,500 square feet or more of □ ti impervious surface or (2) increases impervious surface on the property by more than 10%? (CMC 21.203.040) If you answered "yes" to one or more of the above questions, your project is a PDP. If your project is a redevelopment project, go to step 4. If your project is a new project, go to step 5, check the first box stating "My project is a PDP ... II and complete applicant information. If you answered "no" to all of the above questions, your project is a 'STANDARD PROJECT.' Go to step 5, check the second box statina "Mv project is a 'STANDARD PROJECT' ... " and complete aoolicant information. E-34 Page 3 of 4 REV04/17 STEP4 TO BE COMPLETED FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS THAT ARE PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS (PDP) ONLY Complete the questions below regarding your redevelopment project (MS4 Permit Provision E.3.b.(2)): YES NO Does the redevelopment project result in the creation or replacement of impervious surface in an amount of less than 50% of the surface area of the previously existing development? Complete the percent impervious calculation below: Existing impervious area (A) = ___________ sq. ft. Total proposed newly created or replaced impervious area (8) = ___________ sq. ft. Percent impervious area created or replaced {B/A)*100 = _____ % □ □ If you answered "yes", the structural BMPs required for PDP apply only to the creation or replacement of impervious surface and not the entire development. Go to step 5, check the first box stating "My project is a PDP ... " and complete appli~Qnt information. If you answered "no," the structural BMP's required for PDP apply to the entire development. Go to step 5, check the check the first box statin "M ro·ect is a PDP ... "and com lete a licant information. STEPS CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX AND COMPLETE APPLICANT INFORMATION 0 My project is a PDP and must comply with PDP stormwater requirements of the BMP Manual. I understand I must prepare a Storm Water Quality Management Plan (SWQMP) for submittal at time of application. My project is a 'STANDARD PROJECT' OR EXEMPT from PDP and must only comply with 'STANDARD PROJECT' stormwater requirements of the BMP Manual. As part of these requirements, I will submit a "Standard Project Requirement Checklist Form E-36" and incorporate low impact development strategies throughout my project. Note: For projects that are close to meeting the PDP threshold, staff may require detailed impervious area calculations and exhibits to verify if 'STANDARD PROJECT' stormwater requirements apply. 0 My Project is NOT a 'development project' and is not subject to the requirements of the BMP Manual. Applicant Information and Signature Box Applicant Title: C 1V / L-eN. 4 fN ta= ~ Date: r-Z-Z0\8 • Environmentally Sensitive Areas include but are not limited to all Clean Water Act Section 303(d) impaired water bodies; areas designated as Areas of Special Biological Significance by the State Water Resources Control Board (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (1994) and amendments); water bodies designated with the RARE beneficial use by the State Water Resources Control Board (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (1994) and amendments); areas designated as preserves or their equivalent under the Multi Species Conservation Program within the Cities and County of San Diego: Habitat Management Plan; and any other equivalent environmentally sensitive areas which have been identified by the City. This Box for City Use Only YES NO City Concurrence: □ □ By: Date: Project ID: E-34 Page 4 of 4 REV 04/17 ( City of Carlsbad Project Name: STANDARD PROJECT REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST E-36 Source Control BMPs Develoe_m_ept _Services Land Development Engineering 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-2750 www.carlsbadca.gov -00 z.. All development projects must implement source control BMPs sc-1 mrougn SC-6 wnere applicable and feasible. see Chapter 4 and Appendix E.1 of the BMP Design Manual (Volume 5 of City Engineering Standards) for information to implement source control BMPs shown in this checklist. Answer each category below pursuant to the following. • "Yes" means the project will implement the source control BMP as described in Chapter 4 and/or Appendix E.1 of the Model BMP Design Manual. Discussion/justification is not required. • "No" means the BMP is applicable to the project but it is not feasible to implement. Discussion/justification must be provided. Please add attachments if more space is needed. • "NIA" means the BMP is not applicable at the project site because the project does not include the feature that is addressed by the BMP (e.g., the project has no outdoor materials storage areas}. Discussion/justification may be rovided. Source Control Requirement SC-1 Prevention of Illicit Discharges into the MS4 Discussion/justification if SC-1 not implemented: SC-2 Storm Drain Stenciling or Signage Discussion/justification if SC-2 not implemented: SC-3 Protect Outdoor Materials Storage Areas from Rainfall, Run-On, Runoff, and Wind Dispersal Discussion/justification if SC-3 not implemented: E-36 Page 1 of 4 Applied? 0 No O NIA D Yes O No N/A □Yes D No ')/NIA Revised 09/16 I • Source Control Requirement (continued) Aoolied? 'SC-4 Protect Materials Stored in Outdoor Work Areas from Rainfall, Run-On, Runoff, and □Yes 0 No ,tNJA Wind Dispersal Discussion/justification if SC-4 not implemented: , SC-5 Protect Trash Storage Areas from Rainfall, Run-On, Runoff, and Wind Dispersal ~Yes □No 0 N/A Discussion/justification if SC-5 not implemented: " SC-6 Additional BMPs based on Potential Sources of Runoff Pollutants must answer for each source listed below and identify additional BMPs. (See Table in Appendix E.1 of BMP Manual for auidance). □ On-site storm drain inlets □Yes D No O§N/A □ Interior floor drains and elevator shaft sump pumps □Yes □No •~NIA bs(Yes .-~ ~ Interior parking garages □No □NIA -'t).\ 1;!f Need for future indoor & structural pest control ¢'Yes □No 0 N/A ,P, Z. iig-Landscape/Outdoor Pesticide Use MYes □No □ N/A □ Pools, spas, ponds, decorative fountains, and other water features I ,kj'N/A □Yes □No □ Food service □Yes □No ~N/A ~ ¢ Refuse areas Jm'Yes □No 0 NIA □ Industrial processes □Yes □No X) NIA □ Outdoor storage of equipment or materials □Yes □No 11 ~ N/A D Vehicle and Equipment Cleaning □Yes □No Zf'N/A □ Vehicle/Equipment Repair and Maintenance □Yes □No D{N/A □ Fuel Dispensing Areas □Yes □No ~N/A D Loading Docks □Yes □No JXI NIA ~ Qd" Fire Sprinkler Test Water }d'Yes □No 0 N/A □ Miscellaneous Drain or Wash Water □Yes ONO ~NIA ~ IX! Plazas, sidewalks, and parkina lots IXYes □No 0 N/A For "Yes" answers, identify the additional BMP per Appendix E.1. Provide justification for "No" answer~. t,, '' e. Pll~/.1 "~ !!) I\ cv-J!. ~ th,, c1 /ll\,v-t.. 4 ~ (}-(,(,4,( w.> , .0~•"'-b-t-\~ ,oo-J ~ ,aTt-\~O .o~ j 't). '2. ~ J~ t ~t -p.2~-o 1 j'IA,Ua' ~ j~ j ,v,..i j W Ji ,,_., 1 t.w., p..t.ot-.AW; 0 t,i,,. t p P 61/'v 'f '° , 'f'M ~~ t'i"" + • /)'\-U,v ~, 9 .. 1/\C,0h, C:&-v~ iA ~Pit\~¥> N. T..hi" ~ i-c e l!(/Vl \ ~J t f CA..-+ flh ~titth, i-AA-j ,o~ ; . h.~et~ +o be LJ l-v'e-f) T. E-36 Page 2 of 4 Revised 09/16 ... Site Design BMPs All development projects must implement site design BMPs SD-1 through SD-8 where applicable and feasible. See Chapter 4 and Appendix E.2 thru E.6 of the BMP Design Manual (Volume 5 of City Engineering Standards) for information to implement site design BMPs shown in this checklist. Answer each category below pursuant to the following. • "Yes" means the project will implement the site design BMPs as described in Chapter 4 and/or Appendix E.2 thru E.6 of the Model BMP Design Manual. Discussion/ justification is not required. • "No" means the BMPs is applicable to the project but it is not feasible to implement. Discussion/justification must be provided. Please add attachments if more space is needed. • "NIA" means the BMPs is not applicable at the project site because the project does not include the feature that is addressed by the BMPs (e.g., the project site has no existing natural areas to conserve). Discussion/justification may be provided. Site Design Requirement I Applied? ~ SD-1 Maintain Natural Drainage Pathways and Hvdrologic Features I □Yes I □ No 1-dj N/A Discussion/justification if SD-1 not implemented: I , SD-2 Conserve Natural Areas, Soils, and Vegetation I □Yes I □No l~N/A Discussion/justification if SD-2 not implemented: I ,I. SD-3 Minimize Impervious Area I 159. Yes I D No I □ N/A Discussion/justification if SD-3 not implemented: I I SD-4 Minimize Soil Compaction I .QI Yes I D No I □ NIA Discussion/justification if SD-4 not implemented: / I SD-5 Impervious Area Dispersion I ~es I D No I □ NIA Discussion/justification if SD-5 not implemented: / E-36 Page 3 of 4 Revised 09/16