The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP 2018-0014; 635 PINE AVENUE CONDOMINIUMS; HISTORIC STRUCTURE ASSESSMENT; 2020-10-23.. .. .. -.. .. .. .. .. - • .. ... - -.. -.. -.. - - - - HISTORIC STRUCTURE ASSESSMENT FOR 635 PINE A VENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APN 204-082-01 Submitted to: City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Prepared for: Tony Cassolato 1345 Encinitas Boulevard #813 Encinitas, California 92024 Prepared by: Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A Poway, California 92064 Brian F. Smith, M.A . Consulting Historian J.R .. Stropes, M.S., RPA Project Historian October 23, 2020 -.. - • -.. -.. • • • • .. • - • ... ... - • "' -.. • .. - -- Historic Structure Assessmentfor 635 Pine Avenue Archaeological Database Information Autlwr(s): Consulting Firm: Report Date: Report Title: Prepared for: Submitted to: USGS Quadrangle: Study Area: Key Words: Brian F. Smith, M.A., Consulting Historian and J.R.K. Stropes, M.S., RPA, Project Historian Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A Poway, California 92064 (858) 484-0915 October 23, 2020 Historic Structure Assessment for 63 5 Pine A venue, Carlsbad, California (APN 204-082-01) Tony Cassolato 1345 Encinitas Boulevard #813 Encinitas, California 92024 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 San Luis Rey, California (7.5 minute) 635 Pine Avenue USGS San Luis Rey, California topographic quadrangle; City of Carlsbad; historic structure evaluation; not historically significant; no mitigation or preservation required . • -... - ... - .. - - - -- .. - -- .. "' - I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. Historic Structure Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue Table of Contents Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 Report Organization ........................................................................................... l Project Area ........................................................................................................ I Project Personnel ............................................................................................... 2 PROJECT SETTING .............................................................................................. 2 Physical Project Setting ..................................................................................... 2 Historical OvervieH' ............................................................................................ 2 General History of Carlsbad ............................................................................... 3 METHODS AND RESULTS ............................................................................... 11 Archival Research ............................................................................................ 11 History of the Property: Ownership and Development .................................... 11 Field Survey ...................................................................................................... 26 Description of Surveyed Resources .................................................................. 26 SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATIONS ...................................................................... 51 C'RHR Evaluation .............................................................................................. 55 City of Carlsbad Historic Resources Inventory Evaluation .............................. 59 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................... 62 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................. 62 APPENDICES ....................................................................................................... 66 Appendix A: Building Development Information Appendix B: Maps Appendix C: Preparers' Qualifications ii -Historic Structure Assessment/or 635 Pine Avenue ... Figures Page Figure 1 1929 Sanborn Map ................................................................................................ 12 --Plates Plate 1 From left to right: John Frazier, his wife and daughter, Gerhard Schutte, ... Samuel Church Smith, and D.D. Wadsworth standing at the platform in front of ... Wadsworth's mansion (left) and the Carlsbad Hotel (right) ................................... 4 Plate 2 1896 map of the Kelly Grant di vision of Rancho Agua Hedionda ......................... 6 Plate 3 Historic Ramirez House ......................................................................................... 5 -Plate 4 The original pool hall at the north corner of Walnut A venue and Roosevelt Street circa 1929 to 1940 ......................................................................................... 7 Plate 5 The new pool hall at the north corner of Walnut A venue and Roosevelt Street circa 1943 ................................................................................................................ 8 -Plate 6 1943 to 1950 View of Jaure's Market at the East Comer of Walnut Avenue and Roosevelt Street ..................................................................................................... 9 -Plate 7 1945 to 1961 View of Aranda's Seven Up Market and La Cocinita Cafe on -WalnutAvenue ...................................................................................................... 10 -Plate 8 1953 Aerial Photograph ......................................................................................... 13 Plate 9 Josefa and Bibiano Gastelum ................................................................................ 14 Plate 10 1939 Aerial Photograph ........................................................................................ 15 -Plate 11 1941 Aerial Photograph ......................................................................................... 16 • Plate 12 Catarina and Elvira Amador, their children Linda and Virginia, and Elvira's • brother circa the 1940s .......................................................................................... 1 7 -Plate 13 1932 Aerial Photograph ......................................................................................... 18 -Plate 14 194 7 Aerial Photograph ......................................................................................... 19 -Plate 15 1951 Aerial Photograph ......................................................................................... 20 Plate 16 1963 Aerial Photograph ......................................................................................... 22 Plate 1 7 January 2004 Aerial Photograph ........................................................................... 24 .. Plate 18 September 2004 Aerial Photograph ....................................................................... 25 -iii .. - -... Historic Structure Assessment/or 635 Pine Avenue ... Plates (continued) Page Plate 19 View of the Northeast Corner of the Residence, Facing South ............................. 27 -Plate 20 View of the East Fa9ade of the Residence, Facing South ..................................... 28 Plate 21 View of the South Fa9ade of the Residence, Facing Northeast. ............................ 29 -Plate 22 View of the East Fa9ade of the Shed, Facing Southwest ...................................... 30 Plate 23 View of the North Fa9ade of the Residence (Left) and Carport (Right), Facing • Southeast .............................................................................................................. 31 Plate 24 2017 View of the North Fa9ade of the Building, Facing Southeast.. .................... 32 Plate 25 View of the North Fa9ade of the Residence, Facing Southeast.. ........................... 34 -Plate 26 View of the North Fa9ade of the Residence, Facing East ..................................... 35 ... Plate 27 View of the North Fa9ade of the Carport, Facing South ....................................... 36 • Plate 28 View of the North Fa9ade of the Carport, Facing Southeast.. ............................... 3 7 -Plate 29 2008 View of the North Fa9ade of the Carport, Facing Southeast.. ...................... 38 -Plate 30 2008 View of the West Fa9ade of the Carport, Facing East.. ................................ 39 Plate 31 View of the West Fa9ade of the Carport, Facing East.. ......................................... 40 Plate 32 View of the West Fa9ade of the Residence, Facing East ...................................... 41 Plate 33 View of the Northern Window on the West Fa9ade of the Residence, Facing Northeast. ............................................................................................................... 42 .... Plate 34 View of the Southern Window on the West Fa9ade of the Residence, Facing East ........................................................................................................................ 43 -Plate 35 View of the Southeast Corner of the Residence, Facing West.. ........................... .44 .. Plate 36 View of the West Fa9ade of the Carport (Left) and Shed (Right), Facing Northeast. ............................................................................................................... 4 5 Plate 3 7 View of the South Fa9ade of the Shed, Facing Southwest.. ................................. .46 Plate 38 2008 View of the West Fa9ade of the Shed, Facing Southeast.. .......................... .47 • Plate 39 View of the North Fa9ade of the Shed From Inside the Carport, Facing Southeast. ............................................................................................................... 48 • Plate 40 View of the Enclosed Outdoor Area Between the Shed and the Residence (Right), Facing North ............................................................................................ 49 iv Historic Structure Assessment/or 635 Pine Avenue -... Plates (continued) ... Plate 41 View of the Door Installed Between the Shed (Left) and Residence (Right), .. Facing Northwest ................................................................................................... 50 • • Tables • Page -Table 1 Title Records for APN 204-082-01 ....................................................................... 23 - • .. -- --.. --.. - 41 .. .. V .. .. .. ... .. - • --- -- -- ... --- .. .. .. • -.. .. - Historic Structure Assessment/or 635 Pine Avenue I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The property owners of 635 Pine Avenue in the city of Carlsbad have applied for a development permit for the removal of an existing single-family residence and a shed. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. (BFSA) was contracted to complete a historical evaluation of the single- family residence and shed located at 635 Pine Avenue in Carlsbad, San Diego County, California, which were likely constructed between 1939 and I 941. The purpose of this evaluation is to determine if the buildings constitute historic resources and whether or not their proposed removal will constitute an adverse impact, as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This project is identified as Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 204-082-01 and is situated within Section 6 of Township 12 South, Range 4 West on the USGS San Luis Rey, California topographic quadrangle. BFSA evaluated the potential architectural and historic significance of the single-family residence and shed at 63 5 Pine A venue in conformance with CEQA and City of Carlsbad historic resources eligibility criteria (City of Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 2.42). The evaluation resulted in a finding that the residence and shed are not historically or architecturally significant under any California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) or City of Carlsbad eligibility criteria. Because the buildings have been evaluated as not significant, they are not eligible for listing on the City of Carlsbad Historic Resources Inventory (HRI) or the CRHR and no mitigation measures are required for any future alterations or planned demolition for the buildings. II. INTRODUCTION Report Organization The purpose of this study is to evaluate the 63 5 Pine A venue buildings. As part of the environmental review of the proposed development, the City of Carlsbad has required an evaluation of the single-family residence and shed to determine if they are historically and/or architecturally significant and to determine whether or not they should be listed as historic structures. Because this project requires approval from the City of Carlsbad, CEQA and City of Carlsbad historic resources eligibility criteria were used for this evaluation. Therefore, criteria for listing on the CRHR and the City of Carlsbad HRI are the appropriate measures of significance for the resources that will be affected by the proposed project. Proiect Area The resources evaluated in this study are entirely within APN 204-082-01. The property is located at 635 Pine Avenue, northeast of the intersection of Pine Avenue and Roosevelt Street in the city of Carlsbad, San Diego County, California. The lot includes a single-family residence, an attached carport, a shed, and associated hardscape and landscaping . • - - .. ... - - ---- -- • - • - • .. • .. Historic Structure Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue Proiect Personnel This evaluation was conducted by Jennifer R.K. Stropes and Brian F. Smith (Appendix C). Word processing, editing, and graphics production services were provided by BFSA staff. III. PROJECT SETTING Physical Proiect Setting San Diego County lies in the Peninsular Ranges Geologic Province of southern California. The mountainous zone, which extends from northwest to southeast through the county, extends to a maximum height of 6,533 feet above mean sea level (Beauchamp 1986). Foothills and valleys, which comprise the cismontane region, extend west from the mountains. This region typically receives more rainfall than the mesas and less than the mountainous region. The coastal mesa region lies between the foothills and the coast and is cut by several large drainages originating in the mountains and foothills. The coast is characterized by large bays and lagoons, where the major rivers empty into the sea and mesas terminate at the ocean in the form of bluffs (Beauchamp 1986). The project area is located in the coastal zone in northwestern San Diego County. Geologically, the basement rocks in this area are mapped as the middle Eocene (approximately 40-to 50-million-year-old) Santiago Formation (Kennedy and Tan 2005). Additionally, much of the coastal area of northern San Diego county is overlain by thin veneers of Pleistocene marine terrace sediments; two such terraces are present along this part of the coast (the Bird Rock Terrace [approximately 80,000 years old] and the Nestor Terrace [approximately 120,000 years old]). The existing biological setting surrounding the project ranges from landscapes disturbed by previous development to coastal and inland sage scrub and other native species. The biological environment that existed prior to modern times likely included coastal and inland sage scrub species. Historical Overview Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo, commanding two Spanish exploring vessels traveling north from Mexico, arrived in the area known then as Alta (or "Upper") California on September 28, 1542. Cabrillo named the harbor they arrived in "San Miguel" (Bolton 1959). The next arrival into the San Diego area by Europeans was not for another 60 years, when an expedition commanded by Sebastian Vizcaino made an extensive and thorough exploration of the Pacific coast, arriving at the bay in November 1602 (Engstrand 1980). It was during this visit that Vizcaino renamed the bay "San Diego" (Rolle 1969). Cabrillo's voyage gave cartographers the information they needed to begin defining the western shores of the unknown land located north of Mexico. Subsequent voyages added to Cabrillo's information that, in time, permitted mapmakers to accurately depict the west coast. For the next 167 years following Vizcaino's voyage, the Spanish made no other expeditions to Alta California. The Spanish eventually developed a plan for the occupation of the claimed territory of Alta California during the reign of King Carlos III of Spain. In 1769, a joint sea and 2 .. ... ... .. - - - - - .. • - • .. Historic Structure Assessment/or 635 Pine Avenue land expedition set out from Mexico to meet up at San Diego Bay; Captain Vicente Vila led three ships and Gaspar de Portola and Father Junipero Serra commanded the land expedition (Rolle 1969). Actual colonization of the San Diego area began on July 16, 1769 (Palou 1926). Only two of the three ships commanded by Captain Vila made it to San Diego; it is believed that they anchored near what is now downtown San Diego, and that "Punta de los Muertos," or "Dead Man's Point" (an area located near the west end of H Street), derived its name from the burial of scurvy- stricken sailors at that location (MacMullen 1969). The natural attraction of the harbor at San Diego and the establishment of a military presence in the area solidified its importance to the Spanish colonization of the region and the growth of the civilian population. The initial colonization of San Diego began with the establishment of the Presidio of San Diego and Mission San Diego de Alcala on Mission Hill, overlooking Mission Bay and the San Diego River to the north. The location was chosen for its commanding view, defensive location, and proximity to a large Native American village located directly north of the presidio on the south side of the San Diego River. This Kumeyaay village site has been recorded using the place name of Co soy, Kosaii, or Kosa' aay. The camp at Presidio Hill was the first Spanish military establishment in California (Smythe 1908). As settlers arrived, grants of land were made to those who filed an application, but many tracts reverted back to the government due to lack of use. As an extension of territorial control by the Spanish, each mission was placed in a way that enabled them to command as much territory and as large a population as possible. While primary access to California during the Spanish Period was by sea, the route of El Camino Real served as the land route for transportation and commercial and military activities, linking all missions and military establishments (Rolle 1969). Mission San Diego de Alcala was moved from the presidio approximately six miles inland to its present location in 1773 due to the need for agricultural fields and to distance it from the military influence at the presidia. As time progressed into the early 1800s, the Spanish soldiers at the presidia could not rely upon Mexico for regular supplies because of mounting resistance by Mexicans toward Spanish rule. More and more, the military garrison relied upon the self-sufficient mission for food, supplies, and even workers. By 1817, the presidia itself was in a ruinous condition, and its population dropped to only 55 men (Smythe 1908). About this time, residential and commercial development began in what is now Old Town; in fact, most structures built outside the presidia were constructed after 1820. By 1821, Mexico had gained independence from Spain, and the northern territories were subject to significant change. General History of Carlsbad Mission San Luis Rey de Franca was constructed in 1798 near present-day Oceanside. The mission's lands encompassed present-day Carlsbad north to the current location of Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, east to Santa Ysabel, and south past present-day Encinitas. The establishment of the mission had detrimental effects upon the Native American communities in the area, as the fathers focused upon religious conversion and utilization of Native American labor 3 f-ltstoric Structure Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue to develop and maintain the cattle ranches, orchards, and water systems necessary for the mission's operation (Carlsbad Historical Society n.d.). In 1821, Mexico gained independence from Spain and the missions were soon secularized, which resulted in the mission lands being divided up and granted to prominent Mexican families by the Mexican government (Stropes and Gallegos 2005). Juan Maria Marron II was granted 13,311 acres in 1842 and named the land grant Rancho Agua Hedionda. The grant included present-day Carlsbad and Carlsbad Ranch. After Marr6n's death in 1853, the ranch was divided up among his family; however, financial troubles eventually led to the land being sold to Francis Hinton in 1865. Hinton then hired Robert Kelly, who later inherited the ranch from Hinton (Stropes and Gallegos 2005). In 1880, Kelly granted the Southern California Railway a coastal right-of-way that allowed for a connection between San Diego and Los Angeles. In 1883, John Frazier and his family settled on 160 acres near the railroad line, just south of Buena Vista Lagoon. Unfortunately, a lack of potable water made it difficult for Frazier to farm the land. As a result, he hired expert well borers, the Mull Brothers, to dig a well on his property in 1885. The boring for the well resulted in the discovery of both mineral and artesian water at 245 feet, which increased the value of the land by 50 percent. After discovering the water, Frazier constructed a platform near the rail line called Frazier's Station and gave water to passengers (Carlsbad Historical Society n.d.). The water from Frazier's well was tested and found to match the mineral content of Well Number Nine in the Karlsbad Bohemia Spas. After hearing about Frazier's well, Gerhard Schutte, 0.0. Wadsworth, Henry Nelson, and Samuel Church Smith came to the area in 1886 and formed a real estate investment group (the Carlsbad Land and Water Company) in order to associate the land with the famous Karlsbad Bohemia Spas. Once formed, the Carlsbad Land and Water Company purchased 270 acres of land from Frazier and 130 acres of coastal lands, all located Plate l : From left to right: John Frazier, his wife and daughter, Gerhard Schutte, Samuel Church Smith, and D.D. Wadsworth on the platform in front of Wadsworth's mansion (left) and the Carlsbad Hotel (right). (Photograph courtesy of the San Diego History Center) 4 outside of the Kelly Rancho Agua Hedionda Land Grant. The company drilled additional wells and water was piped throughout the newly which purchased Schutte lands, and Wadsworth platted as a new townsite. They also built the Carlsbad Hotel in 1888, which was destroyed by a fire m 1896 (Carlsbad Historical Society n.d.) (Plate 1). H,ston c Structure Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue Despite Frazier's well and the efforts of the Carlsbad Land and Water Company, in the late 1890s, drought forced farmers in the region to implement dry farming as the primary method of agriculture. When Robert Kelly died in 1890, Rancho Agua Hedionda passed to his brother Matthew's nine children, who subsequently divided up the land between them (Plate 2) (Moyer 1969). The Kelly heirs raised livestock and dry-farmed beans, corn, and hay (Stropes and Gallegos 2005). Not only did the drought necessitate a change in agricultural practices, but it also resulted in a land bust. The population of Carlsbad dwindled to nearly 150 people and even Samuel Church Smith and his family left Carlsbad for National City. Alexander Shipley purchased the Smith home in the 1890s, relocating to the area with his family from Calistoga (Carlsbad Historical Society n.d.). In 1906, the waterworks sourced by Frazier's well were no longer operational and Shipley paid to get the pipelines back up and running. In 1914, the South Coast Land Company drilled wells in the San Luis Rey Valley and began piping water to Carlsbad. The South Coast Land Company had also purchased all of the Carlsbad Land and Water Company lands. The new availability of water caused Carlsbad to grow once again. People, particularly farmers, began arriving in Carlsbad in great numbers and in 1916, the first avocado grove was planted. The avocado did so well in the area that the South Coast Land Company began selling larger tracts of land for the new owners to use for agriculture (Carlsbad Historical Society n.d.). History o{Barrio Carlsbad As a result of the increased agriculture in Carlsbad, farm workers and their fami lies moved to the area. Many of the families came from Mexico after fleeing the country during the Mexican Revolution between 1910 and 1920. Most of the field workers lived in tents and other temporary structures to the south of downtown near the intersection of 2nd (now Roosevelt) Street and Walnut Avenue. Pablo Ramirez, one of the first permanent settlers, built his home at the south corner of Walnut Avenue and Roosevelt Street in 1918. The house has been added onto since its initial construction, but is still standing in its original location. The Carlsbad Historical Preservation Society placed a plaque in front of the house describing its importance to the history of the community (Plate 3). Other early settlers include the Trejo family , who moved to the neighborhood just after 1920, and the Acufia, Aguilar, Alcaraz, Cantabrana, Flores, Gastelum, Mata, Soto, and Villasenor fami lies, who had settled by 1924 (Sprague- Bentley 2009). 5 Plate 3: Historic Ramirez House. (Photograph courtesy of Realtor.com) ,, \ Historic Structure Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue ( ,I "v .tf,, ·, L o t D L,z~.y--< if~~] , .. J I j r: r' I • ~· Lo C ~~\ I L ot h Plate 2: 1896 map of the Kelly Grant division of Rancho Agua Hedionda. (Map co11rtesy of the Carlsbad History Room, Carlsbad City Library) 6 \ I I I I Historic Structure Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue Around the same time the families began arriving in the area, French immigrant Alex Labeta created the first subdivision in Carlsbad. Labeta purchased much of the land south of downtown Carlsbad, subdivided it into small lots upon which he built small frame houses, and sold the homes to the agricultural workers. Many of the residences, which were sold at $500 per lot, were constructed from repurposed lumber and did not have plumbing or electricity. The neighborhood created by Labeta was referred to as Barrio Carlos, meaning Carl Neighborhood, and later Barrio Carlsbad (Sprague-Bentley 2009). By 1929, the neighborhood also contained small businesses, including a grocer on the west corner of Walnut Avenue and Roosevelt Street and a church next door to the Ramirez House. Between 1929 and 1936, a pool hall was constructed on the north corner of Walnut Avenue and Roosevelt Street (San Diego Union 1936). The original pool hall bui lding (Plate 4) was first operated by the Villasenor family. In 1940, the building burned down (San Diego Union 1940a). Two months later, Salvador Villasenor built a new structure in the same location (San Diego Union 1940b) (Plate 5). In I 942, the Villasefiors opened another store on Hill Street in Oceanside and by I 943, the new pool hall building had been later taken over by the Gastelum family, who owned the 635 Pine Avenue property from 1943 to 1947 (San Diego Union 1943). Plate 4: The original pool hall at the north corner of Walnut Avenue and Roosevelt Street circa 1929 to 1940. (Photograph courtesy of the Barrio Museum, Carlsbad) 7 Historic Structure Assessment/or 635 Prne Avenue Plate 5: The new pool hall at the north corner of Walnut Avenue and Roosevelt Street circa 1943. (Photograph courtesy of the Barrio Museum, Carlsbad) The Jauregui family moved to the area from Orange County in 1943 and purchased the market located on the east corner of Walnut A venue and Roosevelt Street. Reyes and Dolores {Lola) Jauregui named the market Jaure's Market (Plate 6). After World War II, Lola's brother, Baltazar Aranda, purchased the new pool hall building from the Gastelums and turned it into a market called Aranda's Seven Up. A small cafe, La Cocinita Cafe, also operated out of the building (Plate 7) (Cox 2006). In 1961 , Aranda 's Seven Up was relocated across Walnut A venue to a vacant parcel behind Jaure's Market and Aranda constructed a new building in its place. The new store opened in 1962, but Aranda passed away in 1966. The Jauregui family assumed ownership of the building and renamed it Lola's 7-Up Market. The Jaureguis operated both stores until Reyes Jauregui passed away in 1980 (Cox 2006). The market properties were sublet from 1980 to 1985, during which time the buildings fell into disrepair. In 1986, the three daughters of Reyes and Lola Jauregui, Ofie, Connie, and Frances, remodeled Lola's 7-Up Market and added a delicatessen. They renamed the business Lola's 7-Up Market & Mexican Deli, which is still in operation today. The Jaure's Market building was subsequently revitalized and turned into the Barrio Museum, which houses early photographs and stories about the neighborhood's history (Cox 2006; Barrio Museum n.d.). 8 \C) 1:. I ".'"~\~,;,\;-.G:'.-.. ~-"!' Ah. '"-','\ r~• ,R.\ \ ... 't i~ :}Ji: 1943 to 1950 View of Jaure's Market at the E~st Corner of Walnut Avenue and Roosevelt Street ~ ~~-635 PmeAvenue ~-'""' Plate 6 (Photograph courtesy of the Barrio Museum, Carlsbad) -0 Ofe ·~·&wnllp ---- " _, -,,__ ii ~. Plate 7 1945 to 1961 View of Aranda's Seven Up Market and La Cocinita Cafe on Walnut Avenue 635 Pine Avenue (Photograph courtesy of the Barrio Museum, Carlsbad) .. -... -- - ""' ... -.. ---.. -- Historic Struc/llre Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue IV. METHODS AND RESULTS Archival Research Records relating to the ownership and developmental history of this project were sought with a view to not only fulfill the requirements of this report, but to identify any associated historic or architectural significance. Records located at the BFSA research library, the San Diego Assessor/Recorder/County Clerk, the San Diego History Center, and the Carlsbad Historical Society were accessed for information regarding the building. Title records for the property were also obtained. Appendix B contains maps of the property, including historic and current USGS maps, the original subdivision map, and the current Assessor's parcel map. History ofthe Property: Ownership and Development Lots 15 and 16 of Block 41, where the 635 Pine Avenue residence was later constructed, were initially owned by the Carlsbad Land and Mineral Water Company. In 1887, the company sold the land, which included a frame house, to Mrs. Nettie Fancher (San Diego Union 1887). At the time of the sale, Nettie Fancher lived with her husband, Alexander, in Monterey (Ancestry.com 2011 ). The Fanchers do not appear to have ever resided at the 635 Pine Avenue property. Further, it is unclear when the "frame house" referenced in the sale of the property was constructed and if it was retained for any amount of time afterward. No structures are present on the 635 Pine Avenue property on the 1929 Sanborn Map (Figure 1) and no evidence could be located on aerial photographs indicating that any structures were present until 1953 (Plate 8). Between 1898 and 1900, the Fanchers relocated from Monterey to Upper Sandy, Mohave, Arizona Territory, where Alexander Fancher worked as a cattle driver for his brother, James, on whose ranch they lived (Ancestry.com 2004). Franklin Aldin Davis purchased the property in 1896 and retained ownership until his death in 1901 (San Diego Union 1896; Ancestry.com 2017a). Davis was born in Massachusetts in 1946 . In 1868, he married Frances Ellen Simmons in Pembroke, Massachusetts. Following their marriage, the couple had six children, one of which died in infancy. In 1887, the family relocated to San Diego County and by 1900 they had settled in Escondido where Franklin Davis worked as a merchant. Based upon the inscription on his gravestone in Oak Hill Memorial Park in Escondido, Davis passed away in 1901. The deed transferring ownership of the 635 Pine A venue property to Adam Layer could not be located; however, in 1913, Layer sold the property to real estate developer Herman N. Cable (San Diego Union 1913). By 1926, Cable appears to have sold the property to Frank N. Davis, the son of Frank A. Davis, as Davis owed property taxes on the property (San Diego Union 1926). In 1928, Rosa Munoz owed taxes on the property, which was "to be sold at public auction June 30, 1928" (San Diego Union 1928). In 1930, Frank N. Davis again owed taxes on the property (San Diego Union 1930). While the younger Davis owned the property, he was recorded on the 1930 census as living alone in Escondido with no occupation (Ancestry.com 2002). 11 I / <' LJ .. ~ a Ii I ~ □ 11 .. , ,v· .. I i Q ,..,, 7tl ,, ": I 131 . ~ ' ~7.1) G ~j f ' JUNC.1929 ' -· =-~ ~ ; ,' ~ ' {CARLSBAD) ~ ' ~ ' ' CAL. 4 'i I •~r ~ : ,, ' I'; I t ~-GJ, ~ l 136 I ' !:: I ci3, ' \ •r:i .. ~ ' ~ 8 r;i ~ ' \ ~ 0 [] ·, , ,. ~ : :1 L2 . G 1-, ~ I ' ; t,; . G ., ' ,• ., " ·, . --. "• I "- • -· ,., ,,, ~ I ., ., ., .,. .. ., ' ------;:-; -. -----------... -..... .-l ... ,f'-"'!' .. :..t _ -. . . ---------. -. ----PINE -""•-V AV. i,l -----------------------1 ;, ,. ',! . --· . . ' ~ . i, ; G:l GB ~ ~ r ' ~ ' . ., . ~ • [~l ~ I ' < ,: ~ 'LB ~ ' lkJ I ' ·, ,, -----1: I iGJ GJ ~ I ' '• , ., ' , ; ; 0 ~ ., ' GJ ' , I •, ., ' < ' -' --~ I Q' ,, . ~ ' : . r:-, ~ I 154 . ~ I > 155 , ~ r ----~ ' I .ll?} .:1: ,,,GJ 156 I ., ~ ,[:] ,.. '· ) I .:''J ~ ..... ~ I ~ G • ,, .s,;Q~ " , .. r: ~ I ·, : ... . .. I ' . ~ I 0 I ' 1✓; .. ;:_. I ·' □ ,. GJ . ~ G sf " ,, r -~ I . ,, ~~rel:J .... -· (3 • ·:.r, . ,; .. .,.A • ~ ! ;Jo~ .. ~ .. ' :,, :? ' ' ' ~ ' "' . .. :tJ ~ ~ :;, ii -::.: I ~ I I ~ I ' •·, I ' I ~ I I ~ I 1 . l'l I . ~ I . ~ I ' Legend I 1 : D Project Boundary I 1 ' I ; ,, ' '-'l N r ; i:;i G ' ., .. ., ~ . ·~] ~ I J~ : : ~ : ,. . ,. ' ,, . ' : ' I N'j GJ ~ ~ .. ' 0 0 . '• ; 1 G ' ~ ---. ~ Figure 1 1929 Sanborn Map 635 Pine Avenue 12 ~ (11 Q GJ ,_, ,, ·~ . , .. " ., ,,. .., WALNUT AV. ~ --7 0 ~ ~ ,. 8 ~ .. , • Q ~ ' 0 w 0 50 100 ft 0 12 25 Ill . r. p:, r -\;a D Project Boundary Plate 8 1953 Aerial Photograph 635 Pine Avenue Historic Strncture Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue After Frank N. Davis passed away in San Diego in 1947 (San Diego Union 1947), the property appears to have been repurchased by Herman Cable circa 1930; however, Cable died in 1930 (Ancestry.com 2013). In 1936, as part of Cable's will, ownership of the property was transferred to Carlsbad realtor Claud J. Fennel, who, that same year, with his wife Lou sold the property to M. and Rosario Castelo. The Castelos only held title to the property for two years, at which point they sold it to E.J. Yan Yleet in 1938. Van Vleet sold the property a year later to Esteban "Steve" and Evangeline Chavoya. Steve Chavoya was born in Arizona in 1899, where he lived until the 1910s (Ancestry.com 2002, 2006). He had moved to Livermore, California by I 924 (Ancestry.com 2017b), where he met his wife, Evangeline Gastelum of Carlsbad, while she was in the Santa Clara area working for the canneries. The couple was married circa 1925 and afterward they settled in Carlsbad to be close to Evangeline's family, whose parents, Bibiano and Josefa Gastelum (Plate 9), "lived next door" to them on 2nd Street (Ancestry.com 2002; Howard-Jones 2004). Since there are no buildings present on the 1929 Sanborn Map at the northeast or southeast corners of Pine A venue and 2nd Street, it is most likely that the Chavoyas and Gastelums lived on the west side of 2nd Street. This is further substantiated by newspaper articles indicating that the Chavoyas owned Lot 20 of Block 3 1 (southwest corner of Pine Avenue and 2nd Street) (Blade-Tribune 1948), where the 1929 Sanborn Map shows several buildings. Further, the Gastelums did not own Lots 13 and 14 of Block 41 , which would have been the Plate 9: Josefa and Bibiano Gastelum. (Photograph courtesy of Ancestry.com) property "next door" to the 635 Pine Avenue parcel (Lots 15 and 16 of Block 41 ). Steve Chavoya worked as a nurseryman specializing in bulbs while living in Carlsbad (Ancestry.com 2002). In 1938, the year before the Chavoyas purchased the 635 Pine Avenue property, Steve Chavoya began to advertise services for a woodyard that he operated in Carlsbad (San Diego Union 1938; Blade-Tribune 1938). While it is likely that the subject property served as the storage area for the woodyard, this could not be substantiated by newspaper articles or oral histories. An aerial photograph from 1939 does not show any structures on the property; however, in 1941 , objects that may be small outbuildings or stacks of wood are visible in the future location of the 635 Pine Avenue building (Plates 10 and 11 ). It is unknown how long the woodyard operated, as advertisements ceased after 1938. 14 -u, Legend D Project Boundary Plate 10 1939 Aerial Photograph 635 Pine Avenue ._ "\ .... °' D Project Boundary Plate 11 1941 Aerial Photograph 635 Pine Avenue H1s1oric Str11c1ure Assessment for 635 Pine Aven11e In 1944, the Chavoyas sold the property to Evangeline's parents, Bibiano and Josefa Gastelum, and moved to the Santa Clara area (Howard-Jones 2004). The Gastelums owned the property until 1947 (Blade-Tribune 1947). Bibiano Ochoa Gastelum was born in Sonora, Mexico in 1874. He immigrated to the United States in 1890 and he lived in Arizona with his parents Guadalupe and Margarita Gastelum. In 1901, he married Josefa Marquez Andrade in Santa Cruz, Arizona. In 1920, Bibiano was granted 160 acres outside of Santa Cruz, Arizona (BLM 2020). By 1930, they had moved to Carlsbad where Bibiano worked as a laborer. In 1930 and 1940, the Gastelums lived on 2nd Street (now Roosevelt Street); however, the street number of their residence was not provided in directories or census records. Plate 12: Catarino and Elvira Amador, their children Linda and Virginia, and Elvira's brother circa the 1940s. (Photograph courtesy of Sprague-Bentley 2009) In 1943, "Joe" Gastelum was granted a permit (San Diego Union 1943) to operate the new pool hall at the corner of Walnut and Roosevelt Street (see Plate 5). After World War II, Balthazar Aranda purchased the pool hall and turned it into Aranda's Seven Up market. Catarino and Elvira (nee Padilla) Amador (Plate 12) purchased the 635 Pine Avenue property from the Gastelums in 1947. Catarino Amador was born in Texas in 1918. He and his wife Elvira moved to Carlsbad from Texas after World War II. Catarino Amador "worked for the San Diego Labor Union for over 33 years and after retiring enjoyed traveling worldwide" (North County Times 2012). In 1944, their address was listed as "Box 91 " on 2nd (Roosevelt) Street (Ancestry.com 2017b). El Gato Negro Cafe (see Plate 12), which was owned by the Alcaraz family, was located on Lots 13 and 14 of Block 41 , south of the 635 Pine Avenue property. The Blade-Tribune (1945) advertised the restaurant as being located at "Second and Pine." Between 1932 and 1939 (see Plates 10 and 13), no buildings were present on the east side of APN 204-082-01 (the current 635 Pine Avenue property). Between 1941 and 1953 (see Plates 8, I 0, 11 , and 13 to 15), only small outbuildings or stacks of lumber were present, and in 1941, a residence-sized structure and shed were present at 3206 Roosevelt Street (the west side of the parcel) (see Plate 11). Prior to 1953, it is likely that the 635 Pine Avenue address did not exist, but instead, the address 3206 Roosevelt Street referenced the entirety of APN 204-082-01 . 17 J < < < < \ .. \ t r (( ~ \( ( {~\ \ <. ~· ' ( .c Q., ~ a. el) 0 0 ::s ~ ..... ~ 0 0 ~ .c < ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ -~ ~ ..... -.... ii. ~ a. ~ If') < M \0 N ~ 0'. ~ 18 -IQ D Project Boundary Plate 14 1947 Aerial Photograph 635 Pine Avenue N 0 D Project Boundary Plate 15 1951 Aerial Photograph 635 Pine Avenue .. -.. -... .. .. • • - Historic Structure Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue In October 1953, a permit was issued to Catarina Amador to move the dwelling located at 3206 Roosevelt Street (Blade-Tribune 1953a) and another permit was issued in November 1953 to "move and convert" another dwelling at the same address (Blade-Tribune 19536). Based upon published permits and information provided on the building record, it can be surmised that the original residence and shed located at 3206 Roosevelt Street were constructed between 1939 to 1941, they were moved to the east side of APN 204-082-01, the residence was remodeled in 1953 (Blade-Tribune 1953a, 19536), and the property given a new address of 635 Pine Avenue. The Residential Building Record for 635 Pine A venue lists permits for the construction of a carport and an addition to the residence, the work of which is likely part of the October and November permits published in the Blade Tribune in 1953. After the relocation of the 1939 to 1941 3206 Roosevelt Street building to the east side of the parcel, a second residence was moved onto the west side of property, where that residence had stood. In 1954, Amador was issued a permit to install a chain-link fence around the 635 Pine Avenue building (Blade-Tribune 1954). The Residential Building Record for the second 3206 Roosevelt Street building lists that it was constructed in 1929; however, since it is not shown on the 1929 Sanborn Map or early aerial photographs, it was likely constructed in a different location and then moved. No permits or alterations are listed on the building record. In 1963, the building present at 3206 Roosevelt Street was much smaller than it appeared in 1953 (see Plates 8 and 16), which supports it being moved to that location, and the 635 Pine Avenue residence (minus the carport addition) and shed were relatively the same size and shape as the buildings seen at 3206 Roosevelt Street in 1953, which further substantiates their being moved. In 1973, the Amadors sold the subject property to Richard and Ramona Nevett and relocated to Oceanside (North County Times 2012). In 1974, the Nevetts sold the property to Samuel and Lynn Hall; however, no records could be located indicating that the Nevetts ever lived in the 63 5 Pine A venue residence. Although the deed transferring ownership back to the N evetts could not be located, in 1976, the Nevetts sold the property to Larry and Christine Campbell and Sally Donaldson under the company name Sallee Imports, Inc. Sally Donaldson changed her last name to Keukens when she married Leo Keukens in 1981. No records could be located indicating that the Campbells or the Keukens lived in the 635 Pine Avenue residence. In 1985, the Campbells and Keukens sold the property to Stephen Maloy and Robert Chamberlain, who, in 1987, sold it to John Wigmore. No records could be located indicating that Maloy, Chamberlain, or Wigmore lived at the residence. In 1990, Wigmore sold the property to Mark and Edee Luper. In the 1990s, the Lupers were recorded as residing at 3206 Roosevelt Street and no records could be located to indicate that they lived at the 635 Pine Avenue residence (Ancestry.com 2010). In 2002, the Lupers sold the property to Betty Lee Maggio, who, in 2003, sold it to Patrick Young. According to the building record, in 2003, while owned by Young, the 635 Pine Avenue building was remodeled. In 2004, Young sold the property to Thomas and Jennifer Vogel. 21 N N D Project Boundary Plate 16 1963 Aerial Photograph 635 Pine Avenue /-/1storic Structure Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue While owned by the Vogels, in 2004, the second 3206 Roosevelt Street building ( constructed in 1929) was demolished (Plates 17 and 18). In 2006, ownership of the property was transferred to Jennifer Vogel, and in 2017, she sold it to Anne Woodward Cassolato, the current owner. Records indicate that Vogel may have resided at 635 Pine Avenue during her period of ownership. Full ownership records for the property are provided in Table 1. Table l Title Records for APN 204-082-01 Seller Buyer Year Carlsbad Land and Mineral Water Company Nattie Facher 1887 Nattie Fancher Frank A. Davis Ca. 1896 Frank A. Davis Adam Layer Post-1901 Adam Layer Herman N. Cable 1913 Herman N. Cable Frank N. Davis 1913-1926 Frank N. Davis Rosa Munoz Ca. 1926 Rosa Munoz Frank N. Davis Ca. 1928 Frank N. Davis Herman N. Cable Ca. 1930 Herman N. Cable C.J. Fennel 1936 Claud J. Fennel and Lou W. Fennel M. Castelo and Rosario 0. Castelo 1936 M. Castelo and Rosario Castelo E.J. Van Vleet 1937 E.J. Van Vleet Steve Chavoya and Evangeline Chavoya 1939 Stephen A. and Evangeline Chavoya Bibiano 0 . and Josefa A. Gastelum 1944 Bibiano 0. and Josefa A. Gastelum Catarino L. and Elvira Amador 1947 Catarino L. Amador and Elvira Amador Richard B. and Ramona A. Nevett 1973 Richard B. Nevett and Ramona A. Nevett Samuel R. Hall, Jr. and Lynn J. Hall 1974 Sallee Imports, Inc. (Richard B. Nevett and Larry G. and Christine Campbell and 1976 Ramona A. Nevett) Sally L. Donaldson Larry G. and Christine Campbell and Leo L. Stephen A. Maloy and Robert W. 1985 and Sally L. Keukens Chamberlain Stephen A. Maloy and Robert W. John G. Wigmore 1987 Chamberlain Dina Wigmore John G. Wigmore 1987 John G. Wigmore Mark S. Luper and Edee A. Luper 1990 Mark S. Luper and Edee A. Luper Betty Lee Maggio 2002 Betty Lee Maggio Patrick Young 2003 Patrick Young Thomas E. Vogel and Jennifer J. Vogel 2004 Thomas E. Vogel and Jennifer J. Vogel Jennifer J. Vogel 2006 Jennifer J. Vogel Anne Woodward Cassolato 2017 23 ~ D Project Boundary Plate 17 January 2004 Aerial Photograph 635 Pine Avenue N VI D Project Boundary Plate 18 September 2004 Aerial Photograph 635 Pine Avenue - ... .. ... ... ... .. ,.. Historic Structure Assessment/or 635 Pine Avenue Field Survey BFSA conducted a photographic documentation survey on September 29, 2020. Preparation of architectural descriptions was conducted in the field and supplemented using the photographic documentation. Additional information was drawn from supplemental research efforts and incorporated into this report. Description of Surveyed Resources Based upon aerial photographs, building permits, and the Residential Building Record, the single-family residence and shed located at 635 Pine A venue were likely constructed at 3206 Roosevelt Street between 1939 and 1941, moved to the east side of the parcel in 1953 (see Plate 8), and given an address of 635 Pine A venue. The building record provides a construction date of 1923 with an effective year of 1930; however, the building is not present on the parcel on the 1929 Sanborn Map (see Figure 1 ), nor is it visible in 1932 or 1939 aerial photographs (see Plates 10 and 13 ); a structure is first present at 3206 Roosevelt Street in 1941 (see Plate 11 ). In 1963 (see Plate 16), the 635 Pine Avenue residence (minus the carport addition) and shed were relatively the same size and shape as the buildings seen at 3206 Roosevelt Street in 1953, which further substantiates their being moved to the east side of the parcel. The single-story residence located a 63 5 Pine A venue exhibits standard frame construction on a concrete foundation with wood floor joists. The building currently exhibits features of the Ranch architectural style, but this is likely a result of various modifications made in the 1950s after its relocation, rather than its original design. Currently, the building possesses a side-gabled roof with a wide eave overhang and simple, exposed rafters and an asymmetrical, rectangular footprint; however, the original footprint was irregular. The building record indicates that an addition was constructed onto the southwest corner of the building in 1956 and another at the northeast corner in 1964. These additions infilled areas of the building to create the rectangular footprint. Currently, the entire building is clad in asbestos shingle siding, except for the 1964 addition at the northeast corner, which possesses vertical tongue and groove siding on the east fac;ade and is easily discerned from the original portion of the building (Plates 19 and 20). It is likely that the siding on the entire building was replaced in or after 1956, as there is no differentiation in the asbestos shingle siding on the 1956 addition and the original building (Plate 21 ). The original siding likely matched the shed, which currently exhibits horizontal shiplap siding with cornerboards (Plate 22). The original gable end is also present on the east fac;ade but is overlapped by the roof of the 1964 addition (see Plates 19 and 20). The main entrance to the residence is located beneath a recessed porch on the northwest corner of the north fac;ade (Plate 23 ). The porch is supported at the northwest corner by a single 4x4-inch beam. A simple railing constructed from 2x4-inch boards is present along the western edge of the porch. Immediately west of the front door beneath the roof of the front porch is a single-hung, vinyl window and a wood-framed, fixed-pane window. The vinyl-framed window replaced an aluminum-framed, louvered window after 2017 (Plate 24). 26 N -.J Plate 19 View of the Northeast Corner of the Residence, Facing South 635 Pine Avenue N 00 Plate 20 View of the East Fa~ade of the Residence, Facing South 635 Pine Avenue N \0 Plate 21 View of the South Fa~ade of the Residence, Facing Northeast 635 Pine Avenue w 0 Plate 22 View of the East Fa~ade of the Shed, Facing Southwest 635 Pine Avenue ..,. --- Plate 23 View of the North Fat;ade of the Residence (Left) and Carport (Right), Facing Southeast 635 Pine Avenue ..,. 1-,..) Plate 24 2017 View of the North Fa~ade of the Building, Facing Southeast 635 Pine Avenue (Image courtesy of Google Street View) .. - -.. .. - .. .,. ... - Historic Structure Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue East of the front porch on the north fa9ade is a large, wood-framed, fixed-pane picture window flanked by two single-hung, vinyl-framed windows (Plate 25). Like the other vinyl-framed window under the front porch, the two flanking, single-hung, vinyl-framed windows replaced aluminum-framed, louvered windows after 2017 (see Plate 24). East of these windows is an aluminum-framed, horizontal-sliding window (Plate 26). A carport was constructed onto the west fa9ade of the building in 1953 (Plates 27 and 28). At an unknown date prior to 2008, the north fa;:ade was enclosed with plywood boards (Plate 29). A plywood fence built prior to 2008 partially encloses the west fa9ade of the carport (Plates 30 and 31 ). The west fa9ade of the residence beneath the carport features an aluminum-framed, louvered window at the northern end and an aluminum-framed, horizontal-sliding window at the southern end (Plates 32 to 34). The south fa9ade of the residence features three aluminum-framed, horizontal-sliding windows and one vinyl-framed, horizontal-sliding window (see Plates 21 and 35). It is unknown if the westernmost window was added as part of the 1956 addition (see Plate 21). The east fa9ade of the building features two entry doors and an aluminum-framed, horizontal-sliding window (see Plate 20). The southern portion of the east fa9ade consists of the original building and features one of the entry doors. The northern portion of the east fa9ade consists of the 1964 kitchen addition and features the other door and the window. The 1964 addition is discernable from the original building due to the presence of the vertical tongue and groove siding and the additional roofline (see Plates 19 and 20) . The shed, which was likely moved from 3206 Roosevelt Street with the residence in 1953, is located to the southwest of the carport (Plate 36). The shed exhibits horizontal ship lap siding with corner boards and a shed-style roof (see Plate 22). The shed originally featured windows on the south and west fa9ades (see Plates 36 and 37); however, the window on the west fa9ade has been boarded over since at least 2008 (Plate 3 8) and the window on the south consists of a nonoriginal, aluminum-framed, horizontal-sliding window. A single, nonoriginal, multi-pane French door is present on the north fa9ade of the shed, which replaced a set of double doors (Plate 39). The second door opening was enclosed using plywood boards. The east fa9ade of the shed is entirely unadorned (see Plate 22). A small outdoor area is present to the east of the shed between the shed and the residence (Plate 40). A door was installed between the two structures by the current tenant, leading to the carport and serving to create an enclosed "room" with no roof. A tarp is currently present over the space (Plate 41) 33 w ~ Plate 25 View of the North Fa~ade of the Residence, Facing Southeast 635 Pine Avenue t..,J u, Plate 26 View of the North Fa~ade of the Residence, Facing East 635 Pine Avenue y) °' Plate 27 View of the North Fa~ade of the Carport, Facing South 635 Pine Avenue I;.> -.l Plate 28 View of the North Fa~ade of the Carport, Facing Southeast 635 Pine Avenue uJ 00 Plate 29 2008 View of the North Fa~ade of the Carport, Facing Southeast 635 Pine Avenue (Image courtesy of Google Street View) w IQ Plate 30 2008 View of the West Fa~ade of the Carport, Facing East 635 Pine Avenue (Image courtesy of Google Street View) .:,. 0 Plate 31 View of the West Fa~ade of the Carport, Facing East 635 Pine Avenue .i,. .... Plate 32 View of the West Fa~ade of the Residence, Facing East 635 Pine Avenue Plate 33 View of the Northern Window on the West Fa~ade of the Residence, Facing Northeast 635 Pine Avenue 42 -"" <.,J Plate 34 View of the Southern Window on the West Fa~ade of the Residence, Facing East 635 Pine Avenue t Plate 35 View of the Southeast Corner of the Residence, Facing West 635 Pine Avenue ~ V, Plate 36 View of the West Fa~ade of the Carport (Left) and Shed (Right), Facing Northeast 635 Pine Avenue Plate 37 View of the South Fa~ade of the Shed, Facing Southwest 635 Pine Avenue 46 .i,. --..J Plate 38 2008 View of the West Fa~ade of the Shed (Right), Facing Southeast 635 Pine Avenue (Image courtesy of Google Street View) .i,. 00 Plate 39 View of the North Fa~ade of the Shed From Inside the Carport, Facing Southeast 635 Pine Avenue .i:,. \0 Plate 40 View of the Enclosed Outdoor Area Between the Shed and the Residence (Right), Facing North 635 Pine Avenue Vt 0 ... _;,~''111w-' '·,.' ,:,. ~ .. ..,., Plate 41 ·------~-i ·---------..... , ,.. , ___ I I-· ---1-· __ _ ,__ ·--·--·--1----~ .§ ~\ ·.,· 'f ~·);1 • View of the Door Installed Between the Shed (Left) and Residence (Right), Facing Northwest ~ f,1, I i -~ 635 Pine Avenue .. - -.. - - -... ... -.. • - "" • • .. Historic Structure Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue V. SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATIONS When evaluating a historic resource, integrity is the authenticity of the resource's physical identity clearly indicated by the retention of characteristics that existed during its period of significance. It is important to note that integrity is not the same as condition. Integrity directly relates to the presence or absence of historical materials and character-defining features, while condition relates to the relative state of physical deterioration of the resource. In most instances, integrity is more relevant to the significance of a resource than condition; however, if a resource is in such poor condition that original materials and features may no longer be salvageable, then the resource's integrity may be adversely impacted. The seven aspects of integrity used in evaluating a historic resource are: 1. Location is the place where a resource was constructed or where an event occurred. 2. Design results from intentional decisions made during the conception and planning of a resource. Design includes form, plan, space, structure, and style of a property. 3. Setting applies to a physical environment, the character of a resource's location, and a resource's relationship to the surrounding area. 4. Materials comprise the physical elements combined or deposited m a particular pattern or configuration to form a property. 5. Workmanship consists of the physical evidence of crafts employed by a particular culture, people, or artisan, which includes traditional, vernacular, and high styles. 6. Feeling relies upon present physical features of a property to convey and evoke an aesthetic or historic sense of past time and place . 7. Association directly links a property with a historic event, activity, or person of past time and place, and requires the presence of physical features to convey the property's character. In order to assess each aspect of integrity when evaluating the buildings at 635 Pine A venue, the following steps were taken, as recommended in the National Register Bulletin: HoH' to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation (Andrus and Shrimpton 2002). This review is based upon an evaluation of the integrity of the buildings followed by an assessment of distinctive characteristics. 51 -... -... -... - - -.. - - • Historic Structure Assessmentfor 635 Pine Avenue I. Integrity of Location [refers to J the place where the historic property ·was constructed or the place ·where the historic event occurred (Andrus and Shrimpton 2002). Integrity oflocation was assessed by reviewing historical records and aerial photographs in order to determine if the buildings had always existed at their present locations or if they had been moved, rebuilt, or their footprints significantly altered. Historical research revealed that the 635 Pine A venue residence and shed were moved to their current locations in 1953. Therefore, the buildings do not retain integrity oflocation. 2. Integrity of Design [refers to] the combination of elements that create the form, plan, .space, structure, and style of a property (Andrus and Shrimpton 2002). Integrity of design was assessed by evaluating the spatial arrangement of the buildings and any architectural features present. o Residence: The 635 Pine Avenue residence was likely constructed between 1939 and 1941 and currently exhibits characteristics of the Ranch architectural style with a side-gabled roof, a recessed entry under the front porch, an attached carport, moderate eave overhangs, and a rectangular footprint. A majority of these features, however, are not original to the structure and were added after the building \Vas moved to its current location in 1953. The Residential Building Record indicates that the building originally possessed an irregular footprint and that the southwest and northeast portions of the building were infilled in 1956 and 1964, respectively, which created a rectangular footprint. Additional modifications made to the building after it was relocated include: construction of the carport onto the west fa<;:ade; replacement of all original wood-framed windows ( except the two fixed-pane picture windows on the north fa9ade) with aluminum-framed, louvered and horizontal-sliding windows; later replacement of three louvered windows on the north fa9ade with vinyl-framed windows; replacement of one horizontal-sliding window on the south fa9ade with a vinyl-framed window; and replacement of the original, likely horizontal shiplap siding, with asbestos shingle siding. Overall, the modifications impacted the building's original form, plan, space, and structure. Therefore, the residence does not retain integrity of design. o Shed: The 635 Pine Avenue shed was likely constructed between 1939 and 1941 at 3206 Roosevelt Street with the residence. It is a small structure constructed in no particular style with a rectangular footprint and a shed-style roof. Modifications made to the structure since its initial construction include: construction of the 635 Pine Avenue residence's carport along the entire north fa9ade; replacement of the original double doors on the north fa9ade with a 52 .. .. "' -- ... - 41 Historic Strncture Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue single French door; replacement of an original, wood-framed window on the south fa;ade with an aluminum-framed, horizontal-sliding window; and the boarding up of the window on the west fa;ade. Due to these modifications, the shed does not retain integrity of design. 3. Integrity of Setting [refers to} the physical environment ofa historic property. Setting includes elements such as topographic features, open space, viewshed, landscape, vegetation, and artificial features (Andrus and Shrimpton 2002). When the 635 Pine A venue residence and shed were constructed at 3206 Roosevelt Street, likely between 1939 and 1941 ( see Plates 10 and 11 ), they were located on the western portion of the parcel. At that time, the surrounding area primarily consisted of a rural setting with many of the nearby parcels undeveloped, except for the residence located immediately to the south at 3222 Roosevelt Street. By 1947 (see Plate 14), most of the parcels to the east and north had been developed. By 1953 (see Plate 8), the residence and shed had been moved from 3206 Roosevelt Street to 635 Pine A venue and a new building was relocated to 3206 Roosevelt Street, which was demolished in 2004 (see Plates 17 and 18). Because the surrounding topographic features, open space, viewshed, landscape, vegetation, and artificial features changed greatly since the two buildings were constructed, and even after they were moved, neither building retains integrity of setting. 4. Integrity of Materials [refers to} the physical elements that were combined or deposited during a particular period of' time and in a particular pattern or configuration to form a historic property (Andrus and Shrimpton 2002). Integrity of materials was assessed by determining the presence or absence of original building materials, as well as the possible introduction of materials that may have altered the architectural design of the buildings. o Residence: The 635 Pine Avenue residence was likely constructed between 1939 and 1941 and currently exhibits characteristics of the Ranch architectural style with a side-gabled roof, a recessed entry under the front porch, an attached carport, moderate eave overhangs, and a rectangular footprint. A majority of these features, however, are not original to the structure and were added after the building was moved to its current location in 1953. The Residential Building Record indicates that the building originally possessed an irregular footprint and that the southwest and northeast portions of the building were infilled in 1956 and 1964, respectively, which created a rectangular footprint. Additional modifications made to the building after it was relocated include: construction of the carport onto the west fa~ade; replacement of all original 53 - .. "' --- • Historic Structure Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue wood-framed windows (except the two fixed-pane picture windows on the north fa<;:ade) with aluminum-framed, louvered and horizontal-sliding windows; later replacement of three louvered windows on the north fa9ade with vinyl-framed windows; replacement of one horizontal-sliding window on the south fa9ade with a vinyl-framed window; and replacement of the original, likely horizontal shiplap siding, with asbestos shingle siding. Due to the introduction of varying types of new materials since the building's initial construction, as well as since its "conversion" in 1953, the residence does not retain integrity of materials . o Shed: The 635 Pine Avenue shed was likely constructed between 1939 and 1941 at 3206 Roosevelt Street with the residence. It is a small structure constructed in no particular style with a rectangular footprint and a shed-style roof. Modifications made to the structure since its initial construction include: construction of the 63 5 Pine A venue residence's carport along the entire north fa9ade; replacement of the original double doors on the north fa9ade with a single French door; replacement of an original, wood-framed window on the south fa9ade with an aluminum-framed, horizontal-sliding window; and the boarding up of the window on the west fa9ade. Due to the removal and replacement of the original double doors with a single French door and the replacement of the window on the south fa9ade, the shed does not retain integrity of materials. 5. Integrity of Workmanship [refers to} the physical evidence of the labor and skill of a particular culture or people during any given period in history (Andrus and Shrimpton 2002). Integrity of workmanship was assessed by evaluating the quality of the architectural features present in the buildings. The original workmanship demonstrated in the construction of the two buildings was average. The additions made to the residence and the modifications made to both buildings reflect a lower level of workmanship. In addition, neither building possesses the physical evidence of the labor and skill of a particular culture or people. Therefore, neither building retains integrity of workmanship. 6. Integrity of Feeling [refers to} a property's expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time (Andrus and Shrimpton 2002). Integrity of feeling was assessed by evaluating whether or not the resources' features, in combination with their setting, conveyed a historic sense of the property during the period of construction. As noted previously, the integrity of location and setting for 635 Pine Avenue were negatively impacted by the relocation of the residence and shed to their current 54 .. .. ... --- Historic Structure Assessment/or 635 Pine Avenue locations in 1953 and the demolition of the new residence at 3206 Roosevelt Street in 2004. The additions and modifications made to the buildings also negatively impacted their integrity of design, materials, and workmanship. Due to the loss of integrity of location, design, materials, workmanship, and setting, the buildings do not retain integrity of feeling. 7. Integrity of Association [refers to] the direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property (Andrus and Shrimpton 2002). Integrity of association was assessed by evaluating the resources' data or information and their ability to answer any research questions relevant to the history of the city of Carlsbad or the state of California. Historical research indicates that although the property was owned by the Chavoya, Gastelum, and Amador families, who were well known in the Carlsbad Barrio, none of these families were found to be significant in state or local history. In addition, the 635 Pine Avenue residence does not appear to have been occupied by the families and was instead likely used for a short time as a woodyard and then a rental property. Therefore, the buildings do not possess integrity of association. For a historic building to be identified as architecturally significant, it must retain as much of the original structural and architectural integrity as possible in order to convey those characteristics that would support a finding of significance. Integrity is the authenticity of a historic resource's physical identity, as evidenced by the survival of characteristics or historic fabric that existed during the resource's period of significance. The 635 Pine Avenue residence and shed were determined to not retain any of the seven original aspects of integrity due to their relocation and numerous modifications. Because this project requires approval from the City of Carlsbad, CEQA and City of Carlsbad historic resources eligibility criteria were used for this evaluation. Therefore, criteria for listing on the CRHR and the City of Carlsbad HRI were used to measure the significance of the buildings. CRHR Evaluation Under the CRHR, a historic resource must be significant at the local, state, or national level, under one or more of the following criteria: o CRHR Criterion 1: It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage. 55 .. - ,. .. • .. .. Historic Structure Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue In order to evaluate the 635 Pine Avenue buildings under Criterion 1, BFSA took the following steps as recommended by the National Register Bulletin: How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation (Andrus and Shrimpton 2002): 1) Identify the event(s) with which the building is associated through the review of the archaeological record, historic records, and oral histories. o It was discovered through historical research that no significant events could be associated with the buildings; therefore, no further evaluation for CRHR Criterion 1 was conducted . o CRHR Criterion 2: It is associated ·with the lives a/persons important in our past. In order to evaluate the 635 Pine Avenue buildings under Criterion 2, BFSA took the following steps as recommended by the National Register Bulletin: How to Apply the National Register Criteria.for Evaluation (Andrus and Shrimpton 2002): 1) Identify any important persons associated with the building through the investigation of the archaeological record, historic records, and oral histories. o Historical research indicates that although the property was owned by the Chavoya, Gastelum, and Amador families, who were well known in the Carlsbad Barrio, none have risen to a status of significance. In addition, the families did not live at 635 Pine Avenue residence and instead used it as a rental property and potentially a woodyard. Therefore, the buildings are not eligible for designation under CRHR Criterion 2. o CRHR Criterion 3: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a t;pe, periocf, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values. In order to evaluate the 635 Pine Avenue buildings under Criterion 3, BFSA took the following steps as recommended by the National Register Bulletin: How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation (Andrus and Shrimpton 2002): 1) Identify the distinctive characteristics of the type, period, or method of 56 ... .. - • Historic Structure Assessment/or 635 Pine Avenue construction, master or craftsman, or the high artistic value of the building. This will be done by examining the pattern of features common to the particular class of resource that the site or feature may embody, the individuality or variation of features that occur within the class, and the evolution of that class, or the transition between the classes of resources. o Residence: The 635 Pine Avenue residence was constructed in an unknown style and converted into the Ranch style after the building was relocated in 1953. The building features a side-gabled roof with a moderate eave overhang, an asymmetrical fac;ade, a rectangular floor plan, a sheltered front entry, picture windows, and an attached carport. Identifying features of the Ranch style, as provided by McAlester (2015) include: Broad one-story shape; usually built low to ground; low- pitched roof without dormers; commonly with moderate- to-\vide roof overhang; front entry usually located off- center and sheltered under main roof of house; garage typically attached to main fac;ade (faces front, side, or rear); large picture window generally present; asymmetrical fac;ade. While the 635 Pine Avenue residence currently features all of the identifying features of the Ranch style, many of these elements are not original and subsequent modifications negatively impacted the building's integrity of design, materials, workmanship, and feeling, including: construction of the carport onto the west fac;ade; replacement of all original wood-framed windows ( except the two fixed-pane picture windows on the north fac;ade) with aluminum-framed, louvered and horizontal-sliding windows; later replacement of three louvered windows on the north fayade \Vith vinyl-framed windows; replacement of one horizontal-sliding window on the south fac;ade with a vinyl- framed window; and replacement of the original, likely horizontal shiplap siding, with asbestos shingle siding. These modifications resulted in the introduction of additional roof forms and aluminum-and vinyl-framed windows and were executed using a less than average quality of workmanship. In addition, approximately 25 percent of the building is not original due to the additions on the northeast and southwest comers and the carport on the west fac;ade, which do not meet 57 .. .. -- -... .. Historic Structure Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue the Secretary of the Interior's Standards (Weeks and Grimmer 1992), specifically Standards 9 and 10, which state: 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. I 0. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. The 1956 addition, which was constructed at the southwest corner, eliminated original walls and extended the roofline. This addition could not be removed without damaging the original building. The 1964 addition, constructed onto the northeast corner, also eliminated original walls and, while visually distinct from the original building due to the siding types, created an additional roofline. This addition could also not be easily removed without damaging the original building. Further, neither addition has achieved significance in its own right, as neither addition improved the original character of the building and are not connected to any significant persons or events. As such, the 635 Pine A venue residence does not retain integrity of design, materials, feeling, or workmanship and is not considered a good example of the Ranch architectural style due to the various nonoriginal elements and a mixture of various types of nonoriginal window and siding materials. Therefore, the residence is not eligible for designation under CRHR Criterion 3. o Shed: The shed was not designed in any specific architectural style. As such, as a standalone structure, the shed is not representative of a specific type or period of construction, does not represent the work of a master, does not display any elements representative of high artistic values, and is not representative of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship. Therefore, the shed is not eligible for designation under CRHR Criterion 3. 58 - - - ... .. .... • - • His/one Structure Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue o CRHR Criterion 4: It has yielded, or may be likely to yield, iriformation important in prehistory or history. It is unlikely that the 635 Pine A venue buildings, as they presently exist, could contribute additional information beyond that which is presented in this report, which could be considered important to the history of the local area or the state. The property could not be associated with any significant persons or events and further research would not provide any additional information pertinent to the history of the city of Carlsbad or the state of California. Therefore, the buildings are not eligible for designation under CRHR Criterion 4. Citv of Carlsbad Historic Resources Inventory Evaluation For a historic resource to be considered and approved by the Carlsbad City Council for inclusion in the City of Carlsbad HRI, the resource must be found significant at the local, state, or national level, under one or more of the following criteria: • City of Carlsbad HRI Criterion A: It exempl~fies or reflects special elements of the city's rnltural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering. or architectural history. It was discovered through historical research that the 63 5 Pine A venue buildings are not reflective of the establishment or the cultural history of Carlsbad. Although owned by the Chavoya, Gastelum, and Amador families, who were well known in the Carlsbad Barrio, none have been elevated to a status of significance, nor was the 635 Pine A venue building their primary residence or place of business. In addition, due to the modifications made to the buildings since their initial construction, they also no longer reflect the original character or appearance from when they were constructed. Therefore, the buildings are not eligible for designation under City of Carlsbad HRI Criterion A. • City of Carlsbad HRI Criterion B: It is idenl{fied with persons or events significant in local, state, or national history. Historical research indicates that although the property was owned by the Chavoya, Gastelum, and Amador families, who were well known in the Carlsbad Barrio, none have been elevated to a status of significance, nor was the 635 Pine Avenue building their primary residence or place of business. In addition, no known significant events are known to have occurred at the property. Therefore, the buildings are not eligible for designation under City of Carlsbad HRI Criterion B. 59 ... - -... --.. -.. -- Historic Structure Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue • City of Carlsbad URI Criterion C: It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period, or method of construction, is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship, or is representative of a notable work of an acclaimed builder, designer, or architect. o Residence: The 635 Pine Avenue residence was constructed in an unknown style and converted into the Ranch style after the building was relocated in 1953. The building features a side-gabled roof with a moderate eave overhang, an asymmetrical fa<;:ade, a rectangular floor plan, a sheltered front entry, picture windows, and an attached carport. Identifying features of the Ranch style, as provided by McAlester (2015) include: Broad one-story shape; usually built low to ground; low- pitched roof without dormers; commonly with moderate-to- wide roof overhang; front entry usually located off-center and sheltered under main roof of house; garage typically attached to main fac;ade (faces front, side, or rear); large picture window generally present; asymmetrical fac;ade. While the 635 Pine Avenue residence currently features all of the identifying features of the Ranch style, many of these elements are not original and subsequent modifications negatively impacted the building's integrity of design, materials, workmanship, and feeling, including: construction of the carport onto the west fac;ade; replacement of all original wood-framed windows ( except the two fixed-pane picture windows on the north fac;ade) with aluminum-framed, louvered and horizontal-sliding windows; later replacement of three louvered windows on the north fac;ade with vinyl-framed windows; replacement of one horizontal-sliding window on the south fac;ade with a vinyl- framed window; and replacement of the original, likely horizontal shiplap siding, with asbestos shingle siding. These modifications resulted in the introduction of additional roof forms and aluminum-and vinyl-framed windows and were executed using a less than average quality of workmanship. In addition, approximately 25 percent of the building is not original due to the additions on the northeast and southwest corners and the carport on the west fac;ade, which do not meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards (Weeks and Grimmer 1992), specifically Standards 9 and 10, which state: 60 - .. .. • • .. ... ... -.. .. ... ... -.. - Historic Structure Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired . The 1956 addition, which \Vas constructed at the southwest corner, eliminated original walls and extended the roofline. This addition could not be removed without damaging the original building. The 1964 addition, constructed onto the northeast corner, also eliminated original walls and, while visually distinct from the original building due to the siding types, created an additional roofline . This addition could also not be easily removed without damaging the original building. Further, neither addition has achieved significance in its own right, as neither addition improved the original character of the building and are not connected to any significant persons or events. As such, the 635 Pine Avenue residence does not retain integrity of design, materials, feeling, or workmanship and is not considered a good example of the Ranch architectural style due to the various nonoriginal elements and a mixture of various types of nonoriginal window and siding materials. Therefore, the residence is not eligible for designation under City of Carlsbad HRI Criterion 3. o Shed: The shed was not designed in any specific architectural style. As such, as a standalone structure, the shed is not representative of a specific type or period of construction, does not represent the work of a master, does not display any elements representative of high artistic values, and is not representative of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship. Therefore, the shed is not eligible for designation under City of Carlsbad HRI Criterion C. • City of Carlsbad HRI Criterion D: It is an archaeological, paleontological, botanical, geological, topographical, ecological, or geographical site, which has the potential of yielding information of scientific value . 61 ... .. - .. .. ., ... .. Historic Structure Assessment/or 635 Pine Avenue The 635 Pine Avenue buildings are not archaeological, paleontological, botanical, geological, topographical, ecological, or geographical sites and, therefore, are not eligible for designation under City of Carlsbad HRI Criterion D. • City of Carlsbad HRI Criterion E: It is a geographically definable area ·with a concentration of buildings, structures, improvements, or objects linked historically through location, design, settings, materials, workmanship, feeling, and/or association, in which the collective value of the improvements may he greater than the value of each individual improvement. The 635 Pine A venue buildings are located within the Barrio neighborhood of the city of Carlsbad. Due to changes in their location and setting since their construction, which was likely between 1939 and 1941, a geographically definable area with a concentration of buildings, structures, improvements, and objects that are historically linked no longer exists. In addition, neither building retains integrity of design, materials, workmanship, feelings, or association. Therefore, the property is not eligible for designation under City of Carlsbad HRI Criterion E. VI. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The assessment of the 635 Pine Avenue property has concluded that the residence and shed are not historically or architecturally significant under any CRHR or City of Carlsbad criteria. Because the property is not eligible for listing on the local, state, or national level due to an overall lack of integrity and association, demolition of the buildings will not result in an adverse impact and no mitigation measures are required. VII. BIBLIOGRAPHY Ancestry.com 2002 1930 United States Federal Census (database online). Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc. 2004 1900 United States Federal Census (database online). Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc. 2006 1910 United States Federal Census (database online). Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc. 2010 US Public Records Index, 1950-1993, Volume 2 (database online). Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc . 62 - "' .. .. .. • - .. ... .. -.. "' -- .. Historic Structure Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue 2011 California, Voter Registers, 1866-1898 (database online). Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc. 2013 California, Death Index, 1905-1939 (database online). Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc. 2017a California, County Birth, Marriage, and Death Records, 1849-1980 (database online). Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc. 2017b California, Voter Registrations, I 900-1968 ( database online ). Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc . Andrus, Patrick and Rebecca H. Shrimpton 2002 How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation. National Register Bulletin No. 15. National Register of Historic Places. Barrio Museum N.d. Carlsbad Barrio and Museum. Electronic document, http://www.carlsbadhistorical society.com/Carlsbad%20Historical%20Society _files/Barrio.htm, accessed August 26, 2018 . Beauchamp, R. Mitchel 1986 A Flora of San Diego County, Cal(fornia. Sweetwater River Press, National City, California . Blade-Tribune 1938 For Sale: Eucalyptus, willovv, grapevine wood. 4 April:3. Oceanside, California. 1945 El Gato Negro Cafe Advertisement. 3 August:3. Oceanside, California. 194 7 Deeds. 18 August:2. Oceanside, California. 1948 Deeds. 18 October:2 Oceanside, California. 1953a Building Gain In Carlsbad Continuing. 5 October:4. Oceanside, California. 1953b Carlsbad October Building Permits Total $60,150. 4 November:4. Oceanside, California . 1954 September Carlsbad Building Permits Worth $106,074. 7 October:7. Oceanside, California. Bolton, Herbert Eugene ( editor) 1959 Spanish Explorations in the Southwest, 1542-1706. Barnes and Noble, Inc., New York. 63 -... - .. .. ... .. .. • - Historic Structure Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 2020 General Land Office Accession No. 726192, issued 1/8/1920. Electronic document, https://glorecords.blm.gov/details/patent/default.aspx?accession=726192&docClass= SER, accessed October 19, 2020. Carlsbad Historical Society N.d. Carlsbad history. Electronic document, https://www.carlsbadhistoricalsociety.com/, accessed August 26, 2018. City of Carlsbad 2018 Carlsbad Municipal Code, Chapter 2.42. On file at the City of Carlsbad, Carlsbad, California. Cox, Lillian 2006 Lola's Market Has Long History in Carlsbad Barrio. San Diego Union Tribune. 16 April. San Diego, California. Engstrand, Iris Wilson 1980 San Diego: Cal(jcJrnia 's Cornerstone. Continental Heritage Press, Tulsa, Oklahoma. Howard-Jones, Marge 2004 Magee House, Gastelum Family Reunion, Interviews with Herbert Chavoya and Fidel Chavoya, sons of Guadalupe Gastelum. On file at the Carlsbad Historical Society, Carlsbad, California. Kennedy, Michael P. and Siang S. Tan 2005 Geologic Map of the Oceanside 30' x 60' Quadrangle, California. Regional Geologic Map Series, 1: 100,000 Scale, Map No. 3, California Geological Survey. MacMullen, Jerry 1969 They Came hy Sect: A Pictorial History of San Diego Bay. Ward Ritchie Press/Maritime Museum Association, San Diego, California. McAlester, Virginia Savage 2015 A Field Guide to American Houses (Revised): The Definitive Guide to Identifying and Understanding America's Domestic Architecture. Random House, New York . Moyer, Cecil C . 1969 Historic Ranchos of San Diego. Edited by Richard F. Pourade. Union-Tribune Publishing Company, San Diego . North County Times 2012 Catarina Labrada Amador Obituary. 9 March. San Diego, California . 64 - - -... .. - ... - Historic Structure Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue Palou, Fray Francisco 1926 Historical Memoirs ofNeiv California. Edited by Herbert Eugene Bolton ( 4 Volumes). University of California Press, Berkeley. Rolle, Andrew F. 1969 California: A Hist01y (Second Edition). Thomas Y. Crowell Company, New York. San Diego Union 1887 Real Estate Transactions: Carlsbad Land and Mineral Water Company to Mrs. Nettie Fancher. 3 November:8. San Diego, California. 1896 Real Estate Taxes: 234 7 -F. A. Davis. 4 June:20. San Diego, California. 1913 Real Estate Transfers: Adam Layer ot ux to Herman N. Cable. 25 April: 14. San Diego, California. 1926 Volume Number Twenty-Eight in Carlsbad School District: 34717 -Davis, Frank N. 7 June:37. San Diego, California. 1928 Real Estate Taxes: 70453-Munoz, Rosa. 8 June:41. San Diego, California. 1930 Real Estate Taxes: 3375-Davis, Frank N. 7 June: 109. San Diego, California. 1936 Biter Faces Trial. 12 September. San Diego, California. 1938 Cow Dragger Gets 30 Days, $50 Fine on Cruelty County. 19 February:5. San Diego, California. 1940a Carlsbad Bar, Pool Hall Destroyed by Fire. 19 June. San Diego, California. 1940b Building Boom Takes Place in Carlsbad. 18 August. San Diego, California. 1943 Board Favors Continuation of Road Work. 28 September. San Diego, California. 1947 Frank N. Davis, Former Escondidan, Dies In San Diego. 10 January:2. San Diego, California . Smythe, William E. 1908 Histo,y of San Diego, 1542 to 1908: An Account of the Rise and Progress of the Pioneer Settlement on the Pacific Coast of the United States. San Diego History Company, San Diego . Sprague-Bentley, Jeannie 2009 Images of America: Carlsbad. Arcadia Publishing, Charleston, South Carolina. 65 - ... -... -.. - - Historic Structure Assessment/or 635 Pine Avenue Stropes, Tracy A. and Dennis R. Gallegos. 2005 Cultural Resource Data Recovery and Indexing and Preservation Program for the Grand Pacific Resorts Site CA-SDI-8797 Area A, City of Carlsbad, California. Gallegos & Associates. Unpublished report on file at the South Coastal Information Center at San Diego State University, San Diego, California. Weeks, Kay and Anne Grimmer 1992 The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Electronic document, https://v..ww.nps.gov/tps/standards/rehabilitation/rehab/stand.htm, accessed August 26, 2018. VIII. APPENDICES Appendix A: Building Development Information Appendix B: Maps Appendix C: Preparers' Qualifications 66 Historic Structure Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue APPENDIX A Building Development Information ... ... ... - -... -- . ~ .... 1111111 2040820100 , ,-o'R "''"' ~ ' ;-..,· ·,v 1V• ADDRESS ,. :?r} E ,rrvc-a ... ~ I ,,__.. ___ SHEETS DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING :uss It SHAfflCONSTRUCTIONI STRUCTURAL 1 EXTERIOR I ROOF I LIGHTING . 1..il8 CONDITION ROOII AND" FINISH DET_AIL Li ltl F,o,,,. St~uo Off I Fla! Ai!Pli.th w,nn. Htol111<1e. ie,o:;"91 FLOORS. OOR· FINISH TR/Ill [ .!!'TE!IOlf FINISH - ~ ....--t ROOMS -:-r::--· X J11~tOl'dortl X •" • ~ 11eNr ~,4• ,,Y Jc;y'I'.,,. Cort1111 ,.,,ud _!f=~a~·q B I : z 4RCHITECTUREI jJto11dard I jS1t,:olhi119~Qs;~ ~-·i_ j LH,p ,(~ I je.x. I IC<tb,'r I JG:c~!~ !H,:,.-j,t!AII I ixl I Not,rlol . 61011, I Woll& f C.1/r°i!J._-s . Ato•r•Sfondord Cour,lr Sloe} \/ ,tr,: .r-vr..:., S~ed 4! Fixt ures >( ~ia/1 Ur.ii I n i::r(. i I I , 4 / Sforiu T.rp,c,al 8 4 a J Jr~ G Cutlip Fp., ! lch,ao c::•"wll i I I j 111111111111111111111111111111 --TYPE l /lr,c! S!l,ttqlr C:,r""!•rs A•~-I IMrd FJaor/Jnif ljy,na I 71 I E _J -~ . .al ,t<,.,~::-:?::-.1£.:.:c.>··t'~ --- BR -US#I I oes1r,n FOUNDATION Adob• St,a/.rr --,.J._~fr.z_·J( c":~~ ,ikn, I !Sorciai la,,.Unrt Dininq I I i · (fs,1741~ I)( X)Ca,,u,tlf' X FioorJoi1I, Baa.I Ir.BG. (;i,ftpn wtra/• I j j I "0413" .--, !Jouble IR•lnforced X 1••1_2_:,,~ ~• ~. PL.UMBING ~•d I 1_5'' · =----.----I I I Ouolr1t /Jr,cA z-• •. t 8ric1< s.~,,,qre !J•d / IA , ,,..,nl Wood Sub,Floar Jtcn,. Shoir ,__,.._.._..,___ Oil ~~rr,~ I i ! j I I I • F1DI-Co11,I I P,irr s Concrtd • /"loo, t/llNOOWS i;·,-,,. I J M~,,, i I I I i I jD..'(. x,c~~~,i I:;;, ,r,,,,, I 1Lcut7drv I ,.., . ., ru I I i i i X'!Wafer-H•i-·Auta. I lr.r~fa.-.. jl"itchf'n i r7 /1t311foloedCe,~!J j,v,,.,, So,.~ Comoo.; jt-,,u!aft d Woll~ I X'lscrarns I ,ttco.,oo Sh,,.11:-! Wct,er-Jofrnt1r _ ~'!..I _b:.,1t1 ; iffeovx CONSTRUCT/ON RECORD ---·---------·· --------EFFEC. APPlt NORMAL % GOOO RATING (E;G-;A7,P) Oroin /Jd.l Mafural: ~ .LI. .,p_B_'y' Lvtll, '_;;;. f"f j.5ptosh1 ~ -u L.,,, ~./ r:> IATH OlTAIL ,,.,.,;, Doi YEAR YEAlt Aq ~'"~I r. bl •-• C. d Are,._ Fi.unc., Con• ~-,.'-,-;-!--'--i Ft, I No FINIS!f__J ..... ·. FlX-T1J11£S . $#O•t• No. For All'IOIHII • ' I l,lt • 0 r ._1__-• on_ · Affr .. Plan larm • f"loors ~lfc Lo.1ltb Ty~ Gratk f NA' ,,,,,;,, /J'..10. /917 . ~.........,..-...... ~·-·P. ;:: .A F _f_A.__~·n.·+-----+------+-~------+----+-+-........ -- ,-t-__.....,..._+-"._~ ___ ..... t.t.. ___ ~_ ,.. -" ./ ...£. I ~-=-I I 1.5'!' ·»,,Tjl";rt/T ;.::.::,~_...~~ ·-· ..L~-A+ I i_ .. L _l_ -~ +- I I I --...... , _,A1o1JmQo1 ,,< 1 ---· __ + ;. __ A · I . _-,~ • • !"""A Cons ~Jll.~--~i.d£.-...~~4-.!.L.l..~I-J'. ~-;:/_· -ts( Zf -;-I 1---·.s_h_ufoPf...;_rs...;_ __ ..,:.;~~--~..:.;;...~~-'------- ===--=-=---=----===-=--=--=!c=--a==!:.--=----= ·~ c..-COM PU TA norl~ =· L. ~ v.,.::-~'~".;;tln~•lf~ .. ~~ ... ...;;;;;;;.;;;;.;;;;;;;,=-4..=6======-- •-f ~,I f~(..,,,, Apprais~r 8 Oat~ //-Z7-.)Z r..1LU,e. --<!'/! ~-;J.L r:-A'II. . ~ -unir , ·un11 co , -u,.,t-Co•t ~'; co11t · ~;:i I t••t A n co,t c;m-, Cost co"' t Cost Cost co,t Cost • Ctnt o, Unit r•a Ca.t ost __ _;_ ___ -:t",,~·1..e:a2~~~-=:t-~--,. • - z .;u I f P_ 1 ----+-----+---~ g7~ AOO 3(,,a . rc,j --.,. i --- f'i".s"J L ~ '3S-1 ~ """<: ..L -• --½ ··-r-;·· H-, ,-., ··•r ,-, r ~ I-H+t-14-TTTI .-,,-r, , ... ,.. ,-,. ,- ,- C ~ ' -r-r-r r-,.. 1-·• -r - ,-r;·---r-' -[ ·-r-. .... --r- ·•r~r-r-,-r, r• l r-r-r· ,-r ,-r-, • I L .! r·· ,- "• ,- .. r ,- :·r . r r :- ··r- r-r. . I -,---r-',.. ~-t"'r-""r-t""'r ,-i,. , .. r- -4-++•t'-f-t-"t""'t'"t'TII:L :-----• t .. t-<r,·• r---,-,, , .... , .. -.·-,--,--, 1-·~ ,--~·-,-,,-,-,--~ r--r--r-r-i,r,-r ,++ot--r-r,~,-T r-r-t"" r-r-- r-·"-1·-·-1 -r--=-·c-r ,.. r- ,. .1..l .. l . .l J l i' -: --t--,.-r-,·,-1 r• I -,- ..L J. y_ -, -. llL -,--,-•=r---, .. ___. . O•E.u-~:c;o ~"' ... 1i:=-o'r,., .... ~S':L ,.'.!~-", .... t . o , ,vu, -----L{) o. ; .. :: I',: l ;\l. ADDRESS '2L;Uf'o /I Q0~.£1/'E,L.c--;>-V 4 j.<;H££J __ -.,.... __ qf' -_ . __ w __ Ji DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING -~--1 1 CLASS a SHAPE CONSTRUCTION STRUCTURAi. EXTERIOR ROOF LJ6HTIN6 'AIR CONDITION ROOII AND FINISH DETAIL J I ~ .../> ~-~~ Llqbf X F,om, Stite~O on 'FIOf . ,! DJ/:!_ -;r..Wlrmg l ~ 'ka_fill(. 'Coo:iM, ROOMS FI.OORS __ IF_,':,O_FR FINISH TRIii _)!!_TERJ.~R _FIJtl_SJ!J I t 'J _,, , , .~ Sub-.5tot1dard ·~ -. ··11 ~--✓-.L"· • i )( Gobi~ A M xw.-r:-r Car.du,. Forc,1 l!iatt'9 r 8 . I 2 Mat,r/t,f 6ra,h . Walla Ct:1/lno-1 I r ARCHITECTUlf£ Jfondard Shtofhinq Sldi11q •A " ii,~ 8 X. Cohf~ Grc,•iti l,JlrJmiil. ,411 vi . ,, • • r '::J.~ ;,,_ D .. _,..y..,.. 4,,_.1;,.,rA Abo•r·Sta11dord Concr,1, Bloc• ~iAe..c,. s.,v~ I~ SW 4 .t.. FIXftJres 'f,'o/1 Ua11 · I I J / Jfo,iu Sprt:i'ttl d4 Bl Ir 4 6 Cut tJp l:X ,.,,., 'X' Ch•o.o :ntf/JII I I i TYPE t,rict S11i11qlr Dc•mus A~a. /l!ed Flo,ortJr,,t l.l~ina I ,/ ~ -~~~~51 •n FOUNDATION !."?..I>• Shok11 I) Rolf r'x~"..j__4 -~n1 s,,.cio, Zal'#Umf Dinino ·.· I I '< Sint1le X Co,,c,•te ~ Floor.Joi11f: '164.I .: T..46. Gufff!•S Cuilra.r• l Ooubltt Rcinlart:1td -)c , .. ,.2,,, C'-1!!¢ PLlJMBIN8 ·,r-JPA<:t." o.~ /Jed ~ -·i Duz,lu IJ.ri,:A 2~ _,,, ..,_ Srtcic Shiro•·• X r-l ~.f ~~""' ~ed j AL1<Jr/,,,.nl 'llood Sull·l'loor St-.Sha*• 0,1 Bur~r i I f"IM-Co11rf Y Piers CM>Crd1t Flrlor WINDOWS T.Je 'X Sink ·i I Mofttl )I O.ll 1 ~m~1 , 7ii, """ L aundrr M!f!, T. U. I Jnsufoled viJ,n,n ltl111t1' .Soslt ~-Campo.; Y Wa!u l#Hl/11l c. •Fireplac11 Kitch•n / • , ,11 I /fln/111 Light I !Heavy /n1ulol11d Wo¼ X ScrNns C0111p0.Jl/i1>Qle )< Wnter -Sf'fm.r . I. Drair8d, Ma;,ufol; ~O ILqlb, _i;,, Fl S#U011!u ,(/e.-J,e-I ' CONSTRUCTION RECORD ·EFFEC. APPR. NORMAL % GOOD RATING (E,G,A,F,P) BATH DETAIL I '. (. - t:H_E.:: Ptnnlt . [)Q YEAR YEAR .._. IPM,a;,,·9 7i bl, ,y. C d Arc11 l'unc.,Ca,,• Jt~-s-• 111,rA• Fl N FINISH FIXT-,URES SHOWER) Na. For A.v,ount 1' ,_,~ Lifr o • • on ' AH,. Plan" farm ~pbalaun "1'11Jh, ' o. FIODr, Woll~ a'; !o. li.b 7.,;,,, (i~ ~! Ql ~l F/111'sl hs /~~ /Y?' /91i'7 R.Q ·.:t.,fl-!~~%~.£./,: ..c:: -'= ,c", A .c ,,;: ,c / / ~.,..,.,. .... i,L,,.,.,,%.1_,, / / ·~ ~ IL-'.:~ 2 q j ,.-l'if 1 ~"'..) ,!J-~ 1--.. _,.:;,-+--+--+--+---+---+-----+--+--+--L-----+---+--+-.;.-1-----;I /'-Y._ !..~-2../_ I~ A'~.rc, -1,,( -~ .E. ,:: . /9--,ft-1--E. .. 1=.: .. _ -+---~---I ----t----,---+-----+----1./...,,,._ "°t;..I'-::,.,-_ 17 /?..!"eO 4l-, /J A P /· _, A · ~ ,r:-I ---•+-___ __,_ _________ ;_ --.J12I_ __ ,_. • ·-_1,__..__f...-+---+--o1---~~ SPECIAL FEATURES . I 7i . a. _,__,_ ~oolt. Co:su .• __ L_ &.-lt~i-1 . Jv~~ft<Z,'1 l!lil'O't ; ___ ..,J... ___ ..,J... ____ 4-__ -4-__ ....., __ 4-__ ~---+--...;'---+----1---1--1---11--., $fluHw,.r ·i--i., ,, (),;~,, f,'l.(oltc1T 1 --=~= ..... -==-=-===.....,=======~==~---==~ ==-.::='-=. _ .. _ t._ :,r'l ,~. ll!l!!Jfl'--'~" 1 .. • DISINudsh«r , 1 ', a.,.,; ~ C COMPUTATION I'_ I Appraiser a Date //-e7.Jt:. /vl.GIJ,t'!_ ..:?/('.' , " · F W~ le ~ -~o."j'" ~-"'"~~..;.~;~ . .-: --~--! ' A vn11 I C f un,f C t t;!fllT Co f -,1,m C t urm C Unit C IJnit --c UnTf Unit r•a Co•t 0• co,t 011 co11t. ' Cost 0 • Co., o,t Cost 0•t Cod ost l!o1t Coll, h.r. -~~·±t4 d~ .5.<! ...!i..:t:.9.-!~~~6o q,~f.R. ~-to_ -47.S-8 --'-·--. -·-e-~--·-t---. : _&A!,,L~}--/,..LJ.> /.,Zg, _.../t!:f-_ . ./4.Y1 l_j_p_ ~..:.!~--,4!1-d . _z~ _.2::1_'!._ ___ -----=,-., -~-i--. -, .. -I --· ; dl,o;, f;,r,,,:-;?4<) ., ll.,,, .. ' ! +-----+ ~ "' I : -·---------I "'. ~+--__ ._,..q_rx --=--t ____ ---..,,, . ~ ----~ ~ ---·-,. -·--'---·--i --------~ ·--~~ -~~ ~----··. ---:___ ----=-~-4---•~ --$?[; ~ __ .....,_ ____ ,..__ -1 -------4-------+----~---4----+-----lf---➔----~ -. -.. _ ----~--~ .0.:;¼~--1 ! ---+----I I I ,-----I t I : I -------------+---4-.----. --~-----il---4------+--. ' I • . I _ TOTAL --~-_ f ,z ""' ~---1.:;..1....!..;.: t.r.t, ~L _ 4??8 __ . -------,-.-I NORMAL% 600D --~ . .L. <J.. < -'· · · 1 \ --...,__ -........ -.-~ •-~.-------~-------•••--------------::--:-___ _,,___,_... I -~ R.C.L:__N..!!_ _A;.. • 2..JS.f -_/i:.__J_J7') C. -k_\.~ !_ () 7'f ~ ~-l.7f ___ ·-'----..-• Blade Tribune, 5 October 1953 Back Building Gain In Carlsbad Continuing I n111c11111• p•1mlh ,~,1,,1 ,, I I m""' I In '·"'"' •• I 1111 11 ,t 11 !~t 11 ,lt..-llnr fr 111 lnr ~il,1 UOJ 1, 1i-1I In Aur.u•• 1;1 n,J tnt 11 ' 11( Sl • ':'J ':'1n In t111thl1n,• 1 rn 11 .. ' I ,~ 114'1 n 1••111 t t in, lh11 t r•I "'''"'"'' f'• rmlta '1111 r,· I• uf' I .11 ~, 11111H I r to II, ~y \'111•••1 :11 n : fr I ,. IUA~f" ~•11), I~ 1.1t ,·,, t '1, ~·u ('rd r ,,., kif ,, r-1\, I ri 11) 11 1111 , 1.' ,7 Ill hl11nrl ,t tJon $'I!\; c,,. ,,. Bm ,,..., t 1 • •n ,. dwl'llln S I '· C I'' , 'r1I, \I rlln ~ !'l JI '~ ') I I I'!" 1nrv ~-11 hid rrr,rl' .,. ( (' 4 ,il,-.tr T,'.,, \\ ,I • n fr.-n1.-11 I 11•r 11 ,{1n Si<•l. ('M, rml,u 2'r.l IAlf' ~Irr( I ,, • .,, •It,,. frnnt 111 'lh,., "'' lit!,..-rn lr't~ r:1• f rl f 111,, •1111 • •I f.o11 I\ I I Ju ,n l{Q11rlr,uP1 :\.'II ,1,,1,v111 , ~•r •·I. tnl'I ti r, nrr «,,. \ I 1111\ I 1'•711 II h''"'"' 1n1. rn ,1.--,•JI 1 lni· t:,T1t , \m ,tor I ;»·1 JI',• \I I l • n, fnr ,. ,IHI I tlnn :r;!i, Vr ),""' r If 11hr• 11:? ,, r ~tnu -' 1111 f frn S 1111 I I F Cohn Jll I f'ln,-Strrrt f r r ~ #) \\ \\ H fl 11 I I , !-I •r ~ llrl\r , f t J • ,\ 11 tf'r • n l J-t lf'or1llt111fl,I on I'•.;" • • Blade Tribune, 4 November 1953 Back /Carlsbad October Building Permits Tot.al $60 ,150 l°Arlab HI bull!llnr r rm11 h root rrPft ir•, SIC•l ; • 1;, YT•• u,, ,utd tlurln t bt-t I talNt h11IC '""" f lotf' t>r ''"' A • thfl amount ,,.., 1M1 rturlrc th,. up, 1), J It Uurl n, 1~ ,m,. mnnll'1 la t > ar 'h'tmll Vall•> ~1. fr• t ,s C 1.,.1 I ,,orth 5,1,} 1-,0 •rf> I u d In ()l_ l>en f'\tr In,. l ll V llf'1, t• 1ohrr -uh I• t > r'11 total t r rar<' rt r11lr 11 l ,, 8 KrCM" n thf' tnf' m nl/1 FT rhlnJ SUI tltml()(' . ham dl' 11 . ~ 1 Ill ' '\ A. 6 ·!'i AcAdf'm) II • v UH l't mllt<i '" r, 1,;u(• t 11, l) l''f'""· ~nd rnn""' a,1tlillon ( ha• K1 m1 1'111 t,rantl AH · S2 , r~ ~ A1 111lar ffl'l ~IIIP nuf' rf'tll &l •J. Wrn J . l lllnfr, ~n-t"I r.mo\f' putllllln, $1 Irr IJ'.l Marlf' ffllllf' d ',,.Sit . '\ T Mortlll ffll J lmwoo'1 M'· c,.-., \\. I> 1 ahnon, l?rramu. pl• parll11i-,n !Al. f~lyn \\ I a 11.n I(' . SI t • J l' urnrr, f'). ltr"3 Vall > l. • lltr I ~ I HO Atilt•• .,, , furn., r1, 11 . I hl'I ,..., f'lrlill l I, ti r JJ'('fl 1",: J J. Rh hull. '"· ;-1,,.,1 Adi r I{ \t')t fflll\f' 11 0 C''Orl\f'II s1 , rrarnl" .i le . $10 1:1, Ch• 11 t lll"I ,.-, . ~ r Ounn. J.l1rha1'11. II l I •un llfh I nr, IIIChlo1nt1 H". ff'n:?, a ' .. Historic Structure Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue APPENDIXB Maps 1 1 1 ! 1 0 500 Ill 0 1000 2000 ft 1931 USGS Map 635 Pine Avenue USGS Oceanside Quadrangle (l :62500) ....... 0 1 I 0 500 Ill 0 1000 2000 ft Carlsbad (BM 44) 0 ~ 'i:~, ~~~'SJ~ 1948 USGS Map 635 Pine Avenue d I (7 5-minute series) USGS San Luis Rey Qua rang e . D f 0 0 1000 0 I I 500m 2000ft Carlsbad (BM 44) 0 ~ 1955 USGS Map 635 Pine Avenue USGS San Luis Rey Quadrangle (7.5-minute series) 0 ' 0 0 • I I I I I I -t I I I I I I I d) ! I I ~ I I ~ !0 __::.._ It -.I I I I I I 500 Ill C. 'C' ~ --- ,. 1000 2000 ft ,~ Current USGS Map 635 Pine Avenue USGS San Luis Rey Quadrangle (7.5-minute series) Original 1888 S . . . ubd1v1sion Ma 635 Pine A P venue _,,/ ,/ # ~--- Legend MAD I SON I 0 50 PAR 1 @ l8 ,._ i 8 ZS Cl. 50 ZS TYLER _J ZS I I 25 5 60 UJ > c{ 16 II ~ I Z5 14 12.. II ~I I I ST ST BLK 46 9 8 Kvl @I I I 10 6 ®1 @I I 4 8 4 3 2 13 9 ,~ I I 25 I '/'•10 s.,,~~;---=i--......,.-r-r--,---,--+-r-::--,-,~~~r-:;2::-5 r--r.2=5 :o 04 • N ~ w ? \;~: R ! I I ~ I z w 2· PAR 1 25 E 0 E 15 ' a. ~ :~gi: @ i I I ~ I 13 ~ :A 01 : I 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 · 80 ,.s\-........ '--""":'::':-:-'r:f ~,o 1-,., 25 ZS 80 w > c{ t- :> z ..J c{ ~ 1'0 F ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS D Project Boundary ASSESSOR'S PARCELS 0 50 100 ft UILDING ORDINANCES. Current Assessor's Parcel Map 635 Pine Avenue MA E::::3=:==3 RQSL:.o~CTl"T"2 _2_5_m_-" Historic Structure Assessment for 635 Pine Avenue ... - APPENDIX C Preparers' Qualifications ... ---.. ... .. .. ... .. .. .. ... ... .,. ... .. .. • .. • E>rian F. Smith, MA Owner, Principal Investigator 5rian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14-010 Powa~ Road • Suite A • Phone: (858) 679-8218 • Fax: (858) 679-9896 • E-Mail: bsmith@bfsa-ca.com education Master of Arts. History, University of San Diego, California Bachelor of Arts, History, and Anthropology, University of San Diego, California Professional Memberships Society for California Archaeology Experience Principal Investigator Brian F. Smith and Associates. Inc. 1982 1975 1977-Present Poway, California Brian F. Smith is the owner and principal historical and archaeological consultant for Brian F. Smith and Associates. Over the past 32 years, he has conducted over 2,500 cultural resource studies in California, Arizona, Nevada, Montana, and Texas. These studies include every possible aspect of archaeology from literature searches and large-scale surveys to intensive data recovery excavations. Reports prepared by Mr. Smith have been submitted to all facets of local, state, and federal review agencies, including the US Army Corps of Engineers, the Bureau of Land Management, the Bureau of Reclamation, the Department of Defense, and the Department of Homeland Security. In addition, Mr. Smith has conducted studies for utility companies (Sempra Energy) and state highway departments (CalTrans). Professional Accomplishments These selected major professional accomplishments represent research efforts that have added significantly to the body of knowledge concerning the prehistoric life ways of cultures once present in the Southern California area and historic settlement since the late 18th century. Mr. Smith has been principal investigator on the following select projects, except where noted. QQ~ntown San Di~gg_Mitigation and MQnitQ[j.fl__g Reporting J:'IQ.QIQ_[lls: Large numbers of downtown San Diego mitigation and monitoring projects, some of which included Broadway Block (2019), 915 Grape Street (2019), 1919 Pacific Highway (2018), Moxy Hotel (2018), Makers Quarter Block D (2017), Ballpark Village (2017), 460 16th Street (2017), Kettner and Ash (2017). Bayside Fire Station (2017), Pinnacle on the Park (2017), IDEA 1 (2016), Blue Sky San Diego (2016). Pacific Gate (2016), Pendry Hotel (2015). Cisterra Sempra Office Tower (2014), 15th and Island (2014), Park and G (2014). Comm 22 (2014), 7th and F Street Parking (2013). Ariel Suites (2013), 13th and Marker (2012), Strata (2008), Hotel Indigo (2008), Lofts at 707 10th Avenue Project (2007). Breeza (2007), Bayside at the Embarcadero (2007), Aria (2007), Icon (2007), Vantage Pointe (2007), Aperture (2007), Sapphire Tower (2007), Lofts at 655 Sixth Avenue (2007), Metrowork (2007), The Legend (2006), The Mark (2006), Smart Corner (2006). Lofts at 677 7th Avenue (2005), Aloft on Cortez Hill (2005), Front and Beech Apartments (2003), Bella Via Condominiums (2003), Acqua Vista Residential Tower (2003), Northblock Lofts (2003), Westin Park Place Hotel (2001 ), Parkloft -.. - ... - - - -- - - ---.. --.. - .. - .. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 2 Apartment Complex (2001 ), Renaissance Park (2001 ), and Laurel Bay Apartments (2001 ). 1900 and 1912 Spindrift Drive: An extensive data recovery and mitigation monitoring program at the Spindrift Site, an important prehistoric archaeological habitation site stretching across the La Jolla area. The project resulted in the discovery of over 20,000 artifacts and nearly 100,000 grams of bulk fauna! remains and marine shell, indicating a substantial occupation area (2013-2014). San Diego Airport Development Project: An extensive historic assessment of multiple buildings at the San Diego International Airport and included the preparation of Historic American Buildings Survey documentation to preserve significant elements of the airport prior to demolition (2017-2018). Citracado Parkway Extension: A still-ongoing project in the city of Escondido to mitigate impacts to an important archaeological occupation site. Various archaeological studies have been conducted by BFSA resulting in the identification of a significant cultural deposit within the project area. Westin Hotel and Timeshare (Grand Pacific Resorts): Data recovery and mitigation monitoring program in the city of Carlsbad consisted of the excavation of 17 6 one-square-meter archaeological data recovery units which produced thousands of prehistoric artifacts and ecofacts, and resulted in the preservation of a significant prehistoric habitation site. The artifacts recovered from the site presented important new data about the prehistory of the region and Native American occupation in the area (2017). The Everly Subdivision Project: Data recovery and mitigation monitoring program in the city of El Cajon resulted in the identification of a significant prehistoric occupation site from both the Late Prehistoric and Archaic Periods, as well as producing historic artifacts that correspond to the use of the property since 1886. The project produced an unprecedented quantity of artifacts in comparison to the area encompassed by the site, but lacked characteristics that typically reflect intense occupation, indicating that the site was used intensively for food processing [2014-2015). Ballpark Village: A mitigation and monitoring program within three city blocks in the East Village area of San Diego resulting in the discovery of a significant historic deposit. Nearly 5,000 historic artifacts and over 500,000 grams of bulk historic building fragments, food waste, and other materials representing an occupation period between 1880 and 1917 were recovered (2015-2017). Archaeology at the Padres Ballpark: Involved the analysis of historic resources within a seven-block area of the "East Village" area of San Diego, where occupation spanned a period from the 1870s to the 1940s. Over a period of two years, BFSA recovered over 200,000 artifacts and hundreds of pounds of metal, construction debris, unidentified broken glass, and wood. Collectively, the Ballpark Project and the other downtown mitigation and monitoring projects represent the largest historical archaeological program anywhere in the country in the past decade (2000-2007). 4S Ranch Archaeological and Historical Cultural Resources Study: Data recovery program consisted of the excavation of over 2,000 square meters of archaeological deposits that produced over one million artifacts, containing primarily prehistoric materials. The archaeological program at 4S Ranch is the largest archaeological study ever undertaken in the San Diego County area and has produced data that has exceeded expectations regarding the resolution of long-standing research questions and regional prehistoric settlement patterns. Charles H. Brown Site: Attracted international attention to the discovery of evidence of the antiquity of man in North America. Site located in Mission Valley, in the city of San Diego. Del Mar Man Site: Study of the now famous Early Man Site in Del Mar, California, for the San Diego Science Foundation and the San Diego Museum of Man, under the direction of Dr. Spencer Rogers and Dr. James R. Moriarty. - ... - - - ---.. -- Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. ? Old Town State Park Projects: Consulting Historical Archaeologist. Projects completed in the Old Town State Park involved development of individual lots for commercial enterprises. The projects completed in Old Town include Archaeological and Historical Site Assessment for the Great Wall Cafe (1992), Archaeological Study for the Old Town Commercial Project ( 1991), and Cultural Resources Site Survey at the Old San Diego Inn (1988). Site W-20, Del Mar, California: A two-year-long investigation of a major prehistoric site in the Del Mar area of the city of San Diego. This research effort documented the earliest practice of religious/ceremonial activities in San Diego County (circa 6,000 years ago), facilitated the projection of major non-material aspects of the La Jolla Complex, and revealed the pattern of civilization at this site over a continuous period of 5,000 years. The report for the investigation included over 600 pages, with nearly 500,000 words of text, illustrations, maps, and photographs documenting this major study. City of San Diego Reclaimed Water Distribution System: A cultural resource study of nearly 400 miles of pipeline in the city and county of San Diego. Master Environmental Assessment Project, City of Poway: Conducted for the City of Poway to produce a complete inventory of all recorded historic and prehistoric properties within the city. The information was used in conjunction with the City's General Plan Update to produce a map matrix of the city showing areas of high, moderate, and low potential for the presence of cultural resources. The effort also included the development of the City's Cultural Resource Guidelines, which were adopted as City policy. Draft of the City of Carlsbad Historical and Archaeological Guidelines: Contracted by the City of Carlsbad to produce the draft of the City's historical and archaeological guidelines for use by the Planning Department of the City. The Mid-Bayfront Project for the City of Chula Vista: Involved a large expanse of undeveloped agricultural land situated between the railroad and San Diego Bay in the northwestern portion of the city. The study included the analysis of some potentially historic features and numerous prehistoric Cultural Resources Survey and Test of Sites Within the Proposed Development of the Audie Murphy Ranch, Riverside County, California: Project manager/director of the investigation of 1,113.4 acres and 43 sites, both prehistoric and historic-included project coordination; direction of field crews; evaluation of sites for significance based on County of Riverside and CEQA guidelines; assessment of cu pule, pictograph, and rock shelter sites, co-authoring of cultural resources project report. February-September 2002. Cultural Resources Evaluation of Sites Within the Proposed Development of the Otay Ranch Village 13 Project, San Diego County, California: Project manager/director of the investigation of 1,947 acres and 76 sites, both prehistoric and historic-included project coordination and budgeting; direction of field crews; assessment of sites for significance based on County of San Diego and CEQA guidelines; co- authoring of cultural resources project report. May-November 2002. Cultural Resources Survey for the Remote Video Surveillance Project, El Centro Sector, Imperial County: Project manager/director for a survey of 29 individual sites near the U.S./Mexico Border for proposed video surveillance camera locations associated with the San Diego Border barrier Project-project coordination and budgeting; direction of field crews; site identification and recordation; assessment of potential impacts to cultural resources; meeting and coordinating with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Border Patrol, and other government agencies involved; co-authoring of cultural resources project report. January, February, and July 2002 . Cultural Resources Survey and Test of Sites Within the Proposed Development of the Menifee West GPA, Riverside County, California: Project manager/director of the investigation of nine sites, both prehistoric and historic-included project coordination and budgeting; direction of field crews; assessment of sites E>rian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 4 for significance based on County of Riverside and CEQA guidelines; historic research; co-authoring of cultural resources project report. January-March 2002. Cultural Resources Survey and Test of Sites Within the Proposed French Valley Specific Plan/EIR, Riverside County, California: Project manager/director of the investigation of two prehistoric and three historic sites-included project coordination and budgeting; survey of project area; Native American consultation; direction of field crews; assessment of sites for significance based on CEQA guidelines; cultural resources project report in prep. July-August 2000. -Cultural Resources Survey and Test of Sites Within the Proposed Development of the Menifee Ranch, Riverside County, California: Project manager/director of the investigation of one prehistoric and five historic sites-included project coordination and budgeting; direction of field crews; feature recordation; historic structure assessments; assessment of sites for significance based on CEQA guidelines; historic research; co-authoring of cultural resources project report. February-June 2000. ... ... -.. -.. Salvage Mitigation of a Portion of the San Diego Presidio Identified During Water Pipe Construction for the City of San Diego, California: Project archaeologist/director-included direction of field crews; development and completion of data recovery program; management of artifact collections cataloging and curation; data synthesis and authoring of cultural resources project report in prep. April 2000. Enhanced Cultural Resource Survey and Evaluation for the Tyrian 3 Project, La Jolla, California: Project manager/director of the investigation of a single-dwelling parcel-included project coordination; assessment of parcel for potentially buried cultural deposits; authoring of cultural resources project report. April 2000. Enhanced Cultural Resource Survey and Evaluation for the Lamont 5 Project, Pacific Beach, California: Project manager/director of the investigation of a single-dwelling parcel-included project coordination; assessment of parcel for potentially buried cultural deposits; authoring of cultural resources project report. April 2000. Enhanced Cultural Resource Survey and Evaluation for the Reiss Residence Project, La Jolla, California: Project manager/director of the investigation of a single-dwelling parcel-included project coordination; assessment of parcel for potentially buried cultural deposits; authoring of cultural resources project report. March-April 2000. Salvage Mitigation of a Portion of Site SDM-W-95 (CA-SDl-211 l for the Poinsettia Shores Santalina Development Project and Caltrans, Carlsbad, California: Project archaeologist/ director-included direction of field crews; development and completion of data recovery program; management of artifact collections cataloging and curation; data synthesis and authoring of cultural resources project report in prep. December 1999-January 2000. Survey and Testing of Two Prehistoric Cultural Resources for the Airway Truck Parking Project, Otay Mesa, California: Project archaeologist/director-included direction of field crews; development and completion of testing recovery program; assessment of site for significance based on CEQA guidelines; authoring of cultural resources project report, in prep. December 1999-January 2000 . Cultural Resources Phase I and II Investigations for the Tin Can Hill Segment of the Immigration and Naturalization Services Triple Fence Project Along the International Border, San Diego County, California: Project manager/director for a survey and testing of a prehistoric quarry site along the border-NRHP eligibility assessment; project coordination and budgeting; direction of field crews; feature recordation; meeting and coordinating with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; co-authoring of cultural resources project report. December 1999-January 2000. .. .. - - - .. .. -- - .. ... -- ... .. -.. -.. .. - .., E>rian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 5 Mitigation of a Prehistoric Cultural Resource for the Westview High School Project for the City of San Diego, California: Project archaeologist/ director-included direction of field crews; development and completion of data recovery program including collection of material for specialized fauna! and botanical analyses; assessment of sites for significance based on CEQA guidelines; management of artifact collections cataloging and curation; data synthesis; co-authoring of cultural resources project report, in prep. October 1999-January 2000. Mitigation of a Prehistoric Cultural Resource for the Otay Ranch SPA-One West Project for the City of Chula Vista, California: Project archaeologist/director-included direction of field crews; development of data recovery program; management of artifact collections cataloging and curation; assessment of site for significance based on CEQA guidelines; data synthesis; authoring of cultural resources project report, in prep. September 1999-January 2000. Monitoring of Grading for the Herschel Place Project, La Jolla, California: Project archaeologist/ monitor- included monitoring of grading activities associated with the development of a single-dwelling parcel. September 1999. Survey and Testing of a Historic Resource for the Osterkamp Development Project, Valley Center, California: Project archaeologist/ director-included direction of field crews; development and completion of data recovery program; budget development; assessment of site for significance based on CEQA guidelines; management of artifact collections cataloging and curation; data synthesis; authoring of cultural resources project report. July-August 1999. Survey and Testing of a Prehistoric Cultural Resource for the Proposed College Boulevard Alignment Project, Carlsbad, California: Project manager/director-included direction of field crews; development and completion of testing recovery program; assessment of site for significance based on CEQA guidelines; management of artifact collections cataloging and curation; data synthesis; authoring of cultural resources project report, in prep. July-August 1999 . Survey and Evaluation of Cultural Resources for the Palomar Christian Conference Center Project, Palomar Mountain, California: Project archaeologist-included direction of field crews; assessment of sites for significance based on CEQA guidelines; management of artifact collections cataloging and curation; data synthesis; authoring of cultural resources project report. July-August 1999. Survey and Evaluation of Cultural Resources at the Village 2 High School Site, Otay Ranch, City of Chula Vista, California: Project manager/director-management of artifact collections cataloging and curation; assessment of site for significance based on CEQA guidelines; data synthesis; authoring of cultural resources project report. July 1999 . Cultural Resources Phase I, II, and Ill Investigations for the Immigration and Naturalization Services Triple Fence Project Along the International Border, San Diego County, California: Project manager/director for the survey, testing, and mitigation of sites along border-supervision of multiple field crews, NRHP eligibility assessments, Native American consultation, contribution to Environmental Assessment document, lithic and marine shell analysis, authoring of cultural resources project report. August 1997-January 2000 . Phase I, II, and II Investigations for the Scripps Poway Parkway East Project, Poway California: Project archaeologist/project director-included recordation and assessment of multicomponent prehistoric and historic sites; direction of Phase II and Ill investigations; direction of laboratory analyses including prehistoric and historic collections; curation of collections; data synthesis; coauthorship of final cultural resources report. February 1994; March-September 1994; September-December 1995 . .. ... .. .. ----- -... - -.. -.. .. Jennifer R.K. Stropes, MS, RPA Senior Archaeologist/Historian/Fauna! Analyst Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road• Suite A• Phone: (858) 484-0915 • Fax: (858) 679-9896 • E-Mail: jenni@bfsa-ca.com Education Master of Science, Cultural Resource Management Archaeology St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, Minnesota Bachelor of Arts, Anthropology University of California, Santa Cruz Specialized Education/Training Archaeological Field School Pimu Catalina Island Archaeology Project Research Interests California Coastal / Inland Archaeology Historic Structure Significance Eligibility Human Behavioral Ecology Zooarchaeology Historical Archaeology Taphonomic Studies 2016 2004 2014 -Experience ... .. -.. .. • .. Senior Archaeologist/Historian/Fauna! Analyst Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc . November 2006-Present Writing, editing, and producing cultural resource reports for both California Environmental Quality Act and National Environmental Policy Act compliance; recording and evaluating historic resources, including historic structure significance eligibility evaluations, Historical Resource Research Reports, Historical Resource Technical Reports, and Historic American Buildings Survey /Historic American Engineering Record preparation; fauna!, prehistoric, and historic laboratory analysis; construction monitoring management; coordinating field surveys and excavations; and laboratory management. UC Santa Cruz Monterey Bay Archaeology Archives Supervisor Santa Cruz, California December 2003-March 2004 Supervising intern for archaeological collections housed at UC Santa Cruz. Supervised undergraduate interns and maintained curated archaeological materials recovered from the greater Monterey Bay region . .. ... .. --.. - • • -- ... .. - - ,.. - -... ... .. .. .. • • -- Faunal Analyst, Research Assistant University of California, Santa Cruz Jennifer R.K. Stropes Page 2 June 2003-December 2003 Intern assisting in laboratory analysis and cataloging for fauna! remains collected from CA-MNT-234. Analysis included detailed zoological identification and taphonomic analysis of prehistoric marine and terrestrial mammals, birds, and fish inhabiting the greater Monterey Bay region . Archaeological Technician, Office Manager Archaeological Resource Management January 2000-December 2001 Conducted construction monitoring, field survey, excavation, report editing, report production, monitoring coordination and office management. Certifications City of San Diego Certified Archaeological and Paleontological Monitor 40-Hour Hazardous Waste/Emergency Response OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120 (e) Scholarly Works Big Game, Small Game: A Comprehensive Analysis of Fauna/ Remains Recovered from CA-SD/-11,521, 2016, Master's thesis on file at St. Cloud University, St. Cloud, Minnesota. Technical Reports Kraft, Jennifer R. 2012 Cultural Resources Monitoring Report for the Pottery Court Project (TPM 36193) City of lake Elsinore. Prepared for BRIDGE Housing Corporation. Report on file at the California Eastern Information Center . Kraft, Jennifer R. and Brian F. Smith 2016 Cultural Resources Survey and Archaeological Test Plan for the 1492 K Street Project City of San Diego. Prepared for Trestle Development, LLC. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center . 2016 Focused Historic Structure Assessment for the Fredericka Manor Retirement Community City of Chula Vista, San Diego County, California APN 566-240-27. Prepared for Front Porch Communities and Services -Fredericka Manor, LLC. Report on file at the City of Chula Vista Planning Department. 2016 Historic Structure Assessment for 8585 la Mesa Boulevard City of la Mesa, San Diego County, California. APN 494-300-11. Prepared for Silvergate Development. Report on file at the City of La Mesa Planning Department. .. -... - .. -.. ,. - -.. - .. .. .. ... ... .. - • Jennifer R.K. Stropes Page 3 2016 Phase I Cultural Resource Survey for the 9036 lajolla Shores lane Project City of San Diego Project No. 471873 APN 344-030-20. Prepared for Eliza and Stuart Stedman. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. 2016 Phase I Cultural Resources Survey for the Beacon Apartments Project City of San Diego Civic San Diego Development Permit #2016-19 APN 534-210-12. Prepared for Wakeland Housing & Development Corporation. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center . 2016 A Phase I Cultural Resources Study for the State/Columbia/Ash/A Block Project San Diego, California. Prepared for Borne! San Diego Equities, LLC. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. 2015 Cultural Resource Monitoring Report for the Sewer and Water Group 687B Project, City of San Diego. Prepared for Ortiz Corporation. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. 2015 Cultural Resource Testing Results for the Broadway and Pacific Project, City of San Diego. Prepared for BOSA Development California, Inc. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center . 2015 Historic Structure Assessment for the StorQuest Project, City of la Mesa, (APN 494-101-14-00). Prepared for Real Estate Development and Entitlement. Report on file at the City of La Mesa. 2015 Mitigation Monitoring Report for the 1905 Spindrift Remodel Project, la Jolla, California. Prepared for Brian Malk and Nancy Heitel. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. 2015 Mitigation Monitoring Report for the Cisterra Sempra Office Tower Project, City of San Diego. Prepared for SDG-Left Field, LLC. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. 2015 Results of a Cultural Resources Testing Program for the 15th and Island Project City of San Diego. Prepared for Lennar Multifamily Communities. Report on file at the City of San Diego Development Services Department. 2014 Cultural Resource Monitoring Report for the Cesar Chavez Community College Project. Prepared for San Diego Community College District. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. 2014 Cultural Resource Monitoring Report for the Grantville Trunk Sewer Project, City of San Diego . Prepared for Cass Construction, Inc. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. 2014 Cultural Resource Monitoring Report for the Pacific Beach Row Homes Project, San Diego, California. Prepared for Armstrong Builders, Inc. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center . 2014 Cultural Resource Monitoring Report for the Sewer and Water Group 761 Project, City of San Diego . Prepared for Burtech Pipeline. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center . 2014 Cultural Resource Monitoring Report for the Sewer and Water Group 770 Project (Part of Group .. ... - ·-... --- --- - -... -- -- Jennifer R.K. Stropes Page 4 3014 }, City of San Diego. Prepared for Ortiz Corporation. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. 2014 Historic Structure Assessment, 11950 El Hermano Road, Riverside County. Prepared for Forestar Toscana, LLC. Report on file at the California Eastern Information Center. 2014 Historic Structure Assessment, 161 West San Ysidro Boulevard, San Diego, California (Project No. 342196; APN 666-030-09). Prepared for Blue Key Realty. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. 2014 Historic Structure Assessment for 8055 la Mesa Boulevard, City of la Mesa {APN 470-582-11-00). Prepared for Lee Machado. Report on file at the City of La Mesa. 2014 Historic Structure Inventory and Assessment Program for the Watson Corporate Center, San Bernardino County, California. Prepared for Watson Land Company. Report on file at the San Bernardino Archaeological Information Center. 2014 Mitigation Monitoring Report for the Celadon (9th and Broadway) Project. Prepared for BRIDGE 2014 2014 2014 2013 2013 2013 Housing Corporation. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. Mitigation Monitoring Report for the Comm 22 Project, City of San Diego. Prepared for BRIDGE Housing Corporation. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. Mitigation Monitoring Report for the Pinnacle 15th & Island Project, City of San Diego. Prepared for Pinnacle International Development, Inc. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center . Phase I Cultural Resource Study for the Altman Residence Project, 9696 la Jolla Farms Road, la Jolla, California 92037. Prepared for Steve Altman. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. Cultural Resource Monitoring Report for the Alvarado Trunk Sewer Phase III Project, City of San Diego. Prepared for Ortiz Corporation General Engineering Contractors. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. Cultural Resource Monitoring Report for the Alvarado Trunk Sewer Phase IIIA Project, City of San Diego. Prepared for TC Construction, Inc. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. Cultural Resource Monitoring Report for the F Street Emergency Water Main Replacement Project, City of San Diego. Prepared for Orion Construction. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. 2013 Cultural Resource Monitoring Report for the Harbor Drive Trunk Sewer Project, City of San Diego. Prepared for Burtech Pipeline. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center . 2013 Cultural Resource Monitoring Report for the Old Town Community Church Project, 2444 Congress Street, San Diego, California 92110. Prepared for Soltek Pacific, Inc. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. 2013 Historic Structure Assessment, 2603 Dove Street, San Diego, California {APNJ 452-674-32). .... -... -- .... - - --- .. - .. - Jennifer R.K. Stropes Page 5 Prepared for Barzal and Scotti Real Estate Corporation. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. 2013 Historic Structure Assessment at the Western Christian School, 3105 Padua Avenue, Claremont, California 91711 (APN 8671-005-053). Prepared for Western Christian School. Report on file at the City of Claremont. 2013 Mitigation Monitoring Report for the 7th and F Street Parking Project, City of San Diego. Prepared for DZ! Construction. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. 2013 Mitigation Monitoring Report for the 1919 Spindrift Drive Project. Prepared for V.J. and Uma Joshi. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. Smith, Brian F. and Jennifer R. Kraft 2016 Historical Resource Research Report for the 2 314 Rue Adriane Building, San Diego, California Project No. 460562. Prepared for the Brown Studio. Report on file at the City of San Diego Development Services Department. 2016 Historical Resource Research Report for the 4921 Voltaire Street Building, San Diego, California Project No. 4 71161. Prepared for Sean Gogarty. Report on file at the City of San Diego Development Services Department. 2016 Historical Resource Research Report for the 5147 Hilltop Drive Building, San Diego, California Project No. 451707. Prepared for JORGA Home Design. Report on file at the City of San Diego Development Services Department. 2016 Historical Resource Research Report for the Midway Drive Postal Service Processing and Distribution Center 2535 Midway Drive San Diego, California 92138 Project No. 507152. Prepared for Steel wave, LLC. Report on file at the City of San Diego Development Services Department. 2016 Historic Resource Technical Report for 9036 la Jolla Shores lane la Jolla, California Project No. 471873. Prepared for Eliza and Stuart Stedman. Report on file at the City of San Diego Development Services Department. 2015 Cultural Resource Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Urban Discovery Academy Project. Prepared for Davis Reed Construction, Inc. Report on file at the City of San Diego Development Services Department. 2015 Cultural Resource Survey and Archaeological Test Plan for the 520 West Ash Street Project, City of San Diego. Prepared for Lennar Multifamily Communities. Report on file at the City of San Diego Development Services Department. 2015 Cultural Resource Survey and Archaeological Test Plan for the 1919 Pacific Highway Project City of San Diego City Preliminary Review PTS #451689 Grading and Shoring PTS #465292. Prepared for Wood Partners. Report on file at the City of San Diego Development Services Department. 2015 Historical Resource Research Report for 16929 West Bernardo Drive, San Diego, California. Prepared for Rancho Bernardo LHP, LLC. Report on file at the City of San Diego Development Services Department. 2015 Historical Resource Research Report for the 2002-2004 El Cajon Boulevard Building, San Diego, ... Jennifer R.K. Stropes Page 6 California 92014. Prepared for T.R. Hale, LLC. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. 2015 Historical Resource Research Report for the 4319-4321 Florida Street Building, San Diego, California 92104. Prepared for T.R. Hale, LLC. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. 2015 Historic Resource Technical Report for 726 Jersey Court San Diego, California Project No. 455127. Prepared for Chad Irwin. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. 2015 Islenair Historic Sidewalk Stamp Program for Sewer and Water Group 3014, City of San Diego. Prepared for Ortiz Corporation. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. 2014 Historical Resource Research Report for 2850 Sixth Avenue, San Diego, California {Project No. 392445). Prepared for Zephyr Partners -RE, LLC. Report on file at the City of San Diego Development Services Department. Smith, Brian F., Tracy A. Stropes, Tracy M. Buday, and Jennifer R. Kraft -2015 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the 1900 Spindrift Drive-Cabana and landscape - - -... - ... - • -.. - Improvements Project, la Jolla, California. Prepared for Darwin Deason. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. 2015 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the 1912 Spindrift Drive -landscape Improvements Project, la Jolla, California. Prepared for Darwin Deason. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. Stropes, J.R.K. and Brian F. Smith 2020 Historical Resource Research Report for the 4143 Park Boulevard Building, San Diego, California 92103. Prepared for Bernardini Investments, LLC. Report on file at the City of San Diego . 2020 Historical Resource Research Report for the 6375 Avenida Cresta Building, San Diego, California 92037. Prepared for Jeffrey and Anne Blackburn. Report on file at the City of San Diego. 2019 Mitigation Monitoring Report for the 915 Grape Street Project, City of San Diego. Prepared for Bayview SD, LlC. Report on file at the City of San Diego Development Services Department. 2019 Cultural Resources Survey Report for the Grove Residences Project, Rancho Santa Fe, San Diego County, California. Prepared for Beach City Builders, Inc. Report on file at the County of San Diego. 2019 Historical Resource Analysis Report for the 169 and 171 Fifth Avenue Buildings, City of Chula Vista, San Diego County, California. Prepared for Turner Impact Capital. Report on file at the City of Chula Vista . 2019 Historic Structure Assessment for the 1409 South El Camino Real Building, San Clemente, California. Prepared for Shoreline Dental Studio. Report on file at the City of San Clemente. 2019 Historical Resource Research Report for the 212 West Hawthorn Street Building, San Diego, California 92101. Prepared for Jacob Schwartz. Report on file at the City of San Diego. -- -.... -.. ... ·- 2019 Jennifer R.K. Stropes Page 7 Historical Resource Research Report for the 1142-1142 ½ Prospect Street Building, San Diego, California 92037. Prepared for LLJ Ventures. Report on file at the City of San Diego. 2019 Historical Resource Research Report for the 3000-3016 University Avenue/3901-3915 30th Street Building, San Diego, California 92037. Prepared for Cirque Hospitality. Report on file at the City of San Diego. 2019 Historic Structure Assessment for the 125 Mozart Avenue Building, Cardiff, California. Prepared for Brett Farrow. Report on file at the City of Encinitas. 2019 Cultural Resources Study for the Fontana Santa Ana Industrial Center Project, City of Fontana, San Bernardino County, California. Prepared for T&B Planning, Inc. Report on file at the California South Central Coastal Information Center. 2019 Historical Resource Technical Report for 817-821 Coast Boulevard South, la Jolla, California. Prepared for Design Line Interiors. Report on file at the City of San Diego. 2019 Historical Resource Research Report for the 3829 Texas Street Building, San Diego, California 92014. Prepared for Blue Centurion Homes. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. 2018 Historical Resource Research Report for the 3925-3927 Illinois Street Building, San Diego, California 92104. Prepared for Park Pacifica, LLC. Report on file at the City of San Diego. Contributing Author/ Analyst 2015 Fauna! Analysis and Report Section for Cultural Resource Data Recovery and Mitigation Monitoring Program for Site SD/-10,237 locus F, Everly Subdivision Project, El Cajon, California by Tracy A. Stropes and Brian F. Smith. Prepared for Shea Homes. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. 2011 Fauna! Analysis and Report Section for A Cultural Resource Data Recovery Program for SD/-4606 locus B for St. Gabriel's Catholic Church, Poway, California by Brian F. Smith and Tracy A. Stropes. Prepared for St. Gabriel's Catholic Church. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center . 2010 Fauna! Analysis and Report Section for An Archaeological Study for the 1912 Spindrift Drive Project, La Jolla, California by Brian F. Smith and Tracy A. Stropes. Prepared for Island Architects. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. 2010 Fauna! Analysis and Report Section for Results of a Cultural Mitigation and Monitoring Program for Robertson Ranch: Archaic and late Prehistoric Camps near the Agua Hedionda lagoon by Brian F. Smith. Prepared for McMillan Land Development. Report on file at the California South Coastal Information Center. 2009 Fauna! Identification for "An Earlier Extirpation of Fur Seals in the Monterey Bay Region: Recent Findings and Social Implications" by Diane Gifford-Gonzalez and Charlotte K. Sunseri. Proceedings of the Society for California Archaeology, Vol. 21, 2009