Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 2017-0024; HIGHLAND JAMES SUBDIVISION; FINAL SOILS REPORT; 2022-06-08Geotechnical C Geologic C Coastal C Environmental 5741 Palmer Way C Carlsbad, California 92010 C (760) 438-3155 C FAX (760) 931-0915 C www.geosoilsinc.com June 8, 2022 W.O. 8132-B/C/D-SC Veck Building Group PO Box 2085 Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Ms. Elizabeth Temple Subject: Final Grading Report for Building Pads Construction (Lots 1 and 2), at 3970 and 3980 Highland Drive, Carlsbad, California 92008 Dear Ms. Temple: In accordance with your request, and as required by the City of Carlsbad, GeoSoils, Inc. (GSI) has prepared this final compaction report for the grading and construction services provided during construction of the proposed residences (Lots 1 and 2) at 3970 and 3980 Highland Drive, Carlsbad, California. Observations with field compaction testing and construction services for the specific construction tasks occurred periodically between May 26, 2021 and June 3, 2022. Grading was observed and fill was selectively tested by a representative of GSI, on a part-time, as-needed basis. The scheduling of such was solely determined by your field representative. GSI relied on their proper notification. Line and grade was provided by others and not GSI. Unless specifically superceded herein, the conclusions and recommendations in the referenced geotechnical report and update report prepared by Construction Testing Engineers, Inc.(CTE; 2017, 2020) remain valid and applicable and should be appropriately implemented during the balance of construction. Purpose of Grading The primary purpose of grading was to mitigate potentially compressible soils within the influence of the planned new single-family residences (2) at the subject subdivision property. Engineering Geology The geologic conditions exposed in excavations during the process of remedial grading for the planned residential structures were observed on a part-time basis by a representative from our firm. Earth materials encountered during grading consisted of existing colluvial soils (topsoil) overlying Quaternary-age old paralic deposits (considered formation or bedrock). Evidence of adverse geologic structure was not observed in the earthwork excavations. The grading plan prepared by REC Consultants (REC, 2020) was used as base for the Field Density Location Map (Plate 1). GeoSoils, Inc. Groundwater Regional groundwater was not encountered within the earthwork excavations, is expected to be deeper than 50 feet, and therefore is not anticipated to be a major factor in the future performance of the planned residential structures, provided the recommendations contained in this and our prior reports are properly incorporated into the balance of construction and post-development landscape practices. Due to the nature of the site earth materials, perched groundwater conditions may manifest in the future along zones of contrasting permeabilities and densities (i.e., fill/bedrock deposits contacts, fill lifts, geologic discontinuities), as a result of excessive precipitation, over-irrigation, and/or damaged underground utilities. The potential for perched groundwater occurrence should be anticipated and disclosed to all interested/affected parties. Should such conditions occur in the future, GSI could provide recommendations for mitigation. Geotechnical Engineering Remedial Earthwork 1. Prior to grading, existing vegetation was removed and hauled offsite. 2. During grading, potentially compressible unsuitable soils (i.e., existing undocumented fill , colluvium and any weathered bedrock/formation) were removed to expose suitable formational soils. The depth of excavations necessary to remove potentially compressible soils varied from approximately 3 feet to 10 feet below the existing grade. The removal of unsuitable soils was completed to at least 5 feet outside the limits of the building pads, except on the south property line where removals are approximately 3 to 4 feet outside the limits was achieved on Lot 2, due to adjacent property constraints. 3. Prior to fill placement, the bottoms of the remedial grading excavations (i.e., removals) were scarified, moisture conditioned to slightly above optimum moisture conditions, and then re-compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (ASTM D 1557), where tested. 4. All processing of original ground in areas to receive fill, as shown on Plate 1, were observed by a representative of GSI. 5. Earthwork was performed to provide uniform building pads for the planned two (2) new single-family residences. Any planned, settlement-sensitive improvements spanning these transitions, and/or located within areas beyond the limits of fill placed under the purview of this report, will be subject to an elevated potential for adverse soil movement and associated distress, if these conditions are not mitigated in the future. Additional recommendations for treatment of soils in these areas may be provided on request. Veck Building Group W.O. 8132-B/C/D-SC 3970 and 3980 Highland Dr., Carlsbad June 8, 2022 File:e:\wp21\8100\8132bcd.fgr Page 2 GeoSoils, Inc. ENGINEERED FILL PLACEMENT (PHASE B - GRADING) Engineered fill materials predominately consisted of the onsite soils derived from the remedial grading excavations. During grading, engineered fills were placed in approximately 6- to 8-inch lifts, moisture conditioned, mixed to achieve slightly greater than optimum moisture conditions, and mechanically compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent of the laboratory standard (ASTM D 1557), where tested. In general, the thickness of engineered fill placed under purview of this report was generally a minimum of 3 feet beneath the building footprints for Lots 1 and 2 and Lot 1 keyway; and up to about 10 feet at Lot 2 in the slope keyway area. Also, driveway approach base compaction testing was completed to a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent of the laboratory standard (ASTM D 1557), in the driveway areas, as requested by the City of Carlsbad. Field Testing 1. Field density tests were performed using the nuclear method in general accordance with ASTM test method D 6938-10 (Procedure A). The compaction test results are presented in Table 1. The approximate locations of the field density tests performed during grading operations are presented on Plate 1. 2. The field dry densities of the engineered fill were evaluated as a percentage of the maximum dry density attained in the laboratory for the representative soil types encountered during grading. Where field density testing indicated inadequate compaction or moisture content, the failure area was reworked until at least 90 percent of the laboratory standard for grading areas and 95 percent for offsite utility and driveways, or slightly greater than optimum moisture (ASTM D 1557) was achieved. 3. Field density tests were taken at periodic intervals and selected locations to check the compaction and moisture content of the engineered fill placed by the contractor. LABORATORY TESTING Maximum Density Testing The laboratory maximum dry density and optimum moisture content, for the major soil type encountered during grading, were evaluated in general accordance with test method ASTM D 1557. The following table presents the results: Veck Building Group W.O. 8132-B/C/D-SC 3970 and 3980 Highland Dr., Carlsbad June 8, 2022 File:e:\wp21\8100\8132bcd.fgr Page 3 GeoSoils, Inc. SOIL TYPE MAXIMUM DENSITY (PCF) MOISTURE CONTENT (PERCENT) A - Dark Brown, Silty Sand (topsoil)126.1 9.9 B - Reddish Brown, Silty Sand (Paralic deposits) 129.7 9.2 C - Dark Reddish Brown, Silty Sand (import)128.7 8.3 D - Recycled Base, Sandy Gravel (import)120.5 11.0 Expansion Potential Expansion testing was performed on a representative sample of site soil, during the geotechnical evaluation of the site, in general accordance with ASTM D 4829. The results of expansion testing are presented in the following table. LOCATION AND DEPTH (FT) EXPANSION INDEX EXPANSION POTENTIAL Building Pad Lot 1 @ 0-1.5'<10 Very Low Saturated Resistivity, pH, and Soluble Sulfates, and Chlorides CTE (2016) conducted sampling of onsite earth materials for general soil corrosivity, soluble sulfates, and chlorides testing. Site soils were found to be neutral with respect to soil acidity/alkalinity, moderately corrosive to exposed, buried metals when saturated; presents a negligible (“not applicable” or S0 per ACI 318-14) sulfate exposure to concrete; and chloride levels are low. Reinforced concrete mix design for foundations, slab-on-grade floors, and pavements should minimally conform to “Exposure Class C1” in Table 19.3.1.1 of ACI 318-14, as concrete would likely be exposed to moisture. GSI does not consult in the field of corrosion engineering. The client and project architect should agree on the level of corrosion protection required for the project and seek consultation from a qualified corrosion consultant as warranted. ONSITE SERVICES (PHASE C - FOOTING OBSERVATIONS) Onsite services for this project consisted of the footing excavation observations for Lots 1 and 2. The footing observations were performed on September 7, 2021. The footing dimensions were evaluated to conform to the approved building plan. In addition, the footing bottoms were probed to determine having non-yielding, bearing soils. Veck Building Group W.O. 8132-B/C/D-SC 3970 and 3980 Highland Dr., Carlsbad June 8, 2022 File:e:\wp21\8100\8132bcd.fgr Page 4 GeoSoils, Inc. OFFSITE UTILITIES (PHASE D - SEWER, WATER, GAS/ELECTRIC) Offsite services for this project consisted of compaction testing during the installation of underground utilities within the street and right-of way areas for sewer, water, and gas/electric. During utility installation, engineered fills were placed in approximately 6- to 8-inch lifts, moisture conditioned, mixed to achieve slightly greater than optimum moisture conditions, and mechanically compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent of the laboratory standard (ASTM D 1557), where tested CONCLUSIONS The work performed to date appears to be in general conformance with the preliminary recommendations contained in referenced reports by CTE, GSI’s field recommendations, Appendix Chapter J of the 2019 California Building Code, and with the grading guidelines of the City of Carlsbad, from a geotechnical standpoint. Field testing indicates that fills placed during grading, under the purview of this report, have been minimally compacted to at least 90 percent of the laboratory standard, and offsite utilities and driveway subgrades have been minimally compacted to at least 95 percent of the laboratory standard (ASTM D 1557), where tested. Based on the observation and compaction testing performed during grading and construction, GSI concludes that the residential building pads, Lots 1 and 2, constructed under GSI observation and testing, is suitable for its intended use. Unless superceded herein, or as provided in the field during grading, the conclusions and recommendations regarding site construction, including foundation design and construction recommendations presented in the referenced reports by CTE (2016, 2020) are still considered valid and applicable. REGULATORY OPINION OF COMPLIANCE The engineering geologic and soils engineering conditions present during the process of site grading were observed by a representative from our firm. Based on our observations and testing, the soil engineering and engineering geologic aspects of the construction appear to be in compliance with approved geotechnical reports (CTE; 2016, 2020). As such, GSI will certify1 that the soil engineering and engineering geologic aspects of the grading plan by REC Consultants (REC, 2020) are in compliance with the approved geotechnical reports (CTE; 2016, 2020), for this project. 1As defined in the California Business and Professions Code, Division 3, Chapter 15, Article 5, Section 8770.6. Veck Building Group W.O. 8132-B/C/D-SC 3970 and 3980 Highland Dr., Carlsbad June 8, 2022 File:e:\wp21\8100\8132bcd.fgr Page 5 GeoSoils, Inc. LIMITATIONS The conclusions and recommendations presented herein are professional opinions. These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice, and no warranty, either express or implied, is given. Standards of practice are subject to change with time. GSI assumes no responsibility or liability for work or testing performed by others, or their inaction; or work performed when GSI is not requested to be onsite, to evaluate if our recommendations have been properly implemented. Use of this report constitutes an agreement and consent by the user to all the limitations outlined above, notwithstanding any other agreements that may be in place. In addition, this report may be subject to review by the controlling authorities. Veck Building Group W.O. 8132-B/C/D-SC 3970 and 3980 Highland Dr., Carlsbad June 8, 2022 File:e:\wp21\8100\8132bcd.fgr Page 6 GeoSoils, Inc. The opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully submitted, GeoSoils, Inc. Todd M. Page Stephen J. Coover Engineering Geologist, CEG 2083 Geotechnical Engineer, GE 2057 TMP/SJC/JPF/sh Attachments: Table 1- Field Density Test Results Appendix - References Plate 1 - Field Density Test Location Map Distribution: (3) Addressee (2 wet signed, 1 copy, and PDF via email) Veck Building Group W.O. 8132-B/C/D-SC 3970 and 3980 Highland Dr., Carlsbad June 8, 2022 File:e:\wp21\8100\8132bcd.fgr Page 7 Table 1 FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS TEST UTILITY DATE TEST LOCATION TRACT ELEVATION MOISTURE DRY RELATIVE TEST SOIL NO.TYPE OR DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE TYPE(ft)(%)(pcf)(%) PHASE B GRADING 1 5/27/21 South Key Way 3970/3980 Highland Dr 150.4 11.3 118.4 91.3 ND B 2 5/27/21 Center Key Way 3970/3980 Highland Dr 150.4 9.4 122.0 94.1 ND B 3 5/27/21 South Key Way 3970/3980 Highland Dr 152.5 9.3 120.1 92.6 ND B 4 5/17/21 North Key Way 3970/3980 Highland Dr 152.5 10.1 125.1 96.6 ND B 5 5/28/21 South Key Way Lot 2 3970/3980 Highland Dr 154.2 9.5 126.6 97.7 ND B 6 5/28/21 North Key Way Lot 2 3970/3980 Highland Dr 154.0 9.3 123.1 94.9 ND B 7 6/1/21 South Key Way Lot 2 3970/3980 Highland Dr 152.0 9.6 123.8 95.5 ND B 8 6/1/21 North Key Way Lot 2 3970/3980 Highland Dr 151.5 9.7 120.0 92.5 ND B 9 6/2/21 North Key 3970/3980 Highland Dr 154.0 9.6 129.3 99.7 ND B 10 6/2/21 Center Key 3970/3980 Highland Dr 156.0 9.8 126.0 97.1 ND B 11 6/2/21 South Key 3970/3980 Highland Dr 158.0 10.1 125.6 96.8 ND B 12 6/2/21 Lot 1 North Key Way 3970/3980 Highland Dr 153.5 9.3 118.5 91.3 ND B 13 6/2/21 Lot 1 South Key Way 3970/3980 Highland Dr 153.0 10.0 121.5 93.7 ND B 14 6/2/21 Lot 2 Center 3970/3980 Highland Dr 160.0 9.9 119.7 92.2 ND B 15 6/3/21 North Key Lot 1 Key Way 3970/3980 Highland Dr 155.0 9.6 127.1 98.0 ND B 16 6/3/21 South Key Lot 1 Key Way 3970/3980 Highland Dr 155.5 9.4 128.0 98.7 ND B 17 6/10/21 South Key Way Lot 1 3970/3980 Highland Dr 157.5 9.8 123.1 94.9 ND B 18 6/10/21 North Key Way Lot 1 3970/3980 Highland Dr 157.0 9.6 117.8 90.9 ND B 19 6/10/21 South Key Way Lot 1 3970/3980 Highland Dr 159.0 9.6 120.7 93.1 ND B 20*6/10/21 North Key Way Lot 1 3970/3980 Highland Dr 158.5 8.0 115.2 88.8 ND B 20A 6/10/21 North Key Way Lot 1 3970/3980 Highland Dr 158.5 9.8 122.2 94.3 ND B 21 6/11/21 Center Lot 1 3970/3980 Highland Dr 158.0 9.7 119.7 92.3 ND B 22 6/11/21 Northeast Corner Lot 1 3970/3980 Highland Dr 158.5 9.8 118.7 91.5 ND B 23 6/14/21 Lot 1 Center 3970/3980 Highland Dr 160.0 10.0 118.4 91.3 ND B 24 6/14/21 Lot 1 Southeast Corner 3970/3980 Highland Dr 160.0 9.3 121.3 93.5 ND B 25 6/14/21 Lot 1 Center 3970/3980 Highland Dr FG 9.7 120.4 92.8 ND B 26 6/25/21 Lot 2, Northeast Corner Pad 3970/3980 Highland Dr 161.5 9.4 122.9 94.7 ND B 27 6/25/21 Lot 2 Center 3970/3980 Highland Dr FG 9.5 127.6 98.4 ND B 28 6/25/21 South Slopeface Lot 2 3970/3980 Highland Dr 161.0 9.8 119.3 92.0 ND B 29 6/25/21 Center Slopeface Lot 1/2 3970/3980 Highland Dr 158.0 10.1 126.9 97.8 ND B 30*6/25/21 North Slopeface Lot 1 3970/3980 Highland Dr 155.0 8.4 108.9 84.0 ND B 30A 7/7/21 Northeast Slope Lot 1 3970/3980 Highland Dr 155.0 9.6 123.8 95.4 ND B 31 7/6/21 North Slope at Northeast Corner 3970/3980 Highland Dr 153.0 9.5 127.9 98.6 ND B 32 7/6/21 North Slope Center 3970/3980 Highland Dr 153.5 9.8 129.1 99.5 ND B 33 7/6/21 North Slope at Northeast Corner 3970/3980 Highland Dr 155.5 9.4 126.2 97.3 ND B 34 7/6/21 North Slope West 3970/3980 Highland Dr 156.0 9.6 128.2 98.8 ND B 35 7/7/21 North Slope East Lot 1 3970/3980 Highland Dr 157.0 9.3 119.2 91.9 ND B 36 7/7/21 North Slope West Lot 1 3970/3980 Highland Dr 158.0 9.6 119.0 91.7 ND B 37 7/7/21 North Slope Center Slope Face Lot 1 3970/3980 Highland Dr 158.0 9.4 118.7 91.5 ND B DRIVEWAY APPROACH GRADING/SUBGRADE 1 4/11/22 South Driveway 3970 Highland Dr -1.5 9.5 124.2 95.7 ND B 2 4/11/22 South Driveway 3970 Highland Dr -1.5 10.1 123.5 95.2 ND B 3 4/11/22 South Driveway 3970 Highland Dr -1.0 9.7 123.8 95.4 ND B 4 4/11/22 South Driveway 3970 Highland Dr -1.0 9.4 124.1 95.6 ND B 5 4/11/22 South Driveway 3970 Highland Dr SG 9.6 123.9 95.5 ND B 6 4/11/22 South Driveway 3970 Highland Dr SG 9.7 124.4 95.9 ND B DRIVEWAY IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY 1 B 6/3/22 Drive in Right of Way Lot 1 3970 Highland Dr BG 13.2 115.0 95.8 ND CMB 2 B 6/3/22 Drive in Right of Way Lot 1 3970 Highland Dr BG 13.4 117.0 97.5 ND CMB PHASE D GAS/ELECTRIC STREET CROSSING 1*SG 1/7/22 3970 Highland Drive East 3970/3980 Highland Dr -1.2 11.0 120.3 92.7 ND B 1A SG 1/13/22 3970 Highland Northbound 3970/3980 Highland Dr -1.2 11.4 126.0 97.1 ND B 2 SG 1/7/22 3980 Highland Drive East 3970/3980 Highland Dr -1.2 10.7 124.2 95.7 ND B 3 B 1/7/22 3980 Highland Drive East Side 3970/3980 Highland Dr -0.5 11.6 117.2 97.3 ND RB1 4 B 1/7/22 3970 Highland Drive East Side 3970/3980 Highland Dr -0.5 13.2 114.8 95.2 ND RB1 5 SG 1/7/22 3980 Highland Drive West Side 3970/3980 Highland Dr -1.2 11.3 117.1 90.2 ND B 5A SG 1/12/22 3980 Highland Drive Southbound 3970/3980 Highland Dr -1.2 9.2 124.5 96.0 ND B 6*SG 1/7/22 3970 Highland Drive West Side 3970/3980 Highland Dr -1.2 12.5 114.4 88.2 ND B Veck Building Group 3970 and 3980 Highland Drive, Carlsbad File: C:\excel\tables\8100\8132b/d.tbl 1 GeoSoils, Inc. W.O. 8132-B/D-SC June, 2022 Page 1 Table 1 FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS TEST UTILITY DATE TEST LOCATION TRACT ELEVATION MOISTURE DRY RELATIVE TEST SOIL NO.TYPE OR DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE TYPE(ft)(%)(pcf)(%) 6A SG 1/7/22 3970 Highland Drive West Side 3970/3980 Highland Dr -1.2 12.1 117.5 90.6 ND B 6B SG 1/12/22 3970 Highland Drive Southbound 3970/3980 Highland Dr -1.2 10.2 123.3 95.0 ND B 7*B 1/7/22 3980 Highland Drive West Side 3970/3980 Highland Dr -0.5 12.3 112.7 93.5 ND RB1 7A B 1/7/22 3980 Highland Drive West Side 3970/3980 Highland Dr -0.5 11.5 115.4 95.7 ND RB1 8 B 1/7/22 3970 Highland Drive West Side 3970/3980 Highland Dr -0.5 11.7 116.0 96.2 ND RB1 9 SG 1/12/22 3980 Highland Drive Southbound 3970/3980 Highland Dr -0.5 12.2 116.8 96.8 ND RB1 10 SG 1/12/22 3970 Highland Drive Southbound 3970/3980 Highland Dr -0.5 11.5 119.3 99.0 ND RB1 11 SG 1/13/22 3970 Highland Northbound 3970/3980 Highland Dr -0.5 12.8 117.0 97.1 ND RB1 SEWER LINE CROSSING 12*SM 2/3/22 West End Street 3970 Highland Dr -2.5 10.6 120.7 93.1 ND B 12A SM 2/3/22 West End Street 3970 Highland Dr -2.5 10.6 127.5 98.3 ND B 13 SM 2/3/22 East End Landscaping Area 3970 Highland Dr -1.0 9.3 117.2 90.4 ND B 14 SM 2/3/22 West End Street 3970 Highland Dr -1.0 9.6 123.2 95.0 ND B 15 SM 2/3/22 East End Landscaping Area 3970 Highland Dr FG 9.5 120.7 93.1 ND B WATER CROSSING (HIGHLAND DRIVE) 16*WM 2/8/22 Subgrade, West Side 3970 Highland Dr -1.0 8.0 116.4 89.7 ND B 16A WM 2/8/22 Subgrade, West Side 3970 Highland Dr -1.0 8.2 123.5 95.2 ND B 17 WM 2/8/22 Subgrade, West Side 3970 Highland Dr FS 11.0 115.9 96.1 ND RB1 LEGEND * = Failing Test A = Retest B = Base BG = Base Grade FG = Finish Grade FS = Finish Surface ND = Nuclear Densometer Test SM = Sewer Main SG = Subgrade WM = Water Main Veck Building Group 3970 and 3980 Highland Drive, Carlsbad File: C:\excel\tables\8100\8132b/d.tbl 1 GeoSoils, Inc. W.O. 8132-B/D-SC June, 2022 Page 2 GeoSoils, Inc. APPENDIX REFERENCES American Concrete Institute, 2014a, Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-14), and commentary (ACI 318R-14): reported by ACI Committee 318, dated September. _____, 2014b, Building code requirements for concrete thin shells (ACI 318.2-14), and commentary (ACI 318.2R-14), dated September. _____, 2004, Guide for concrete floor and slab construction: reported by ACI Committee 302; Designation ACI 302.1R-04, dated March 23. California Building Standards Commission, 2019a, California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of 2, based on the 2018 International Building Code, effective January 1, 2020. _____, 2019b, California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 1 of 2, Based on the 2018 International Building Code, effective January 1, 2020. Construction Testing Engineers, 2020, Update to Geotechnical Investigation and Plan Review, Highland James Subdivision, 3970 & 3980 Highland Drive, Carlsbad, California, CTE Job No.:10-12998G, dated December 21. _____, 2016, Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed 5-Unit Residential Subdivision, 3980 Highland Drive, Carlsbad, California, Job No.:10-12998G, dated November 9. GeoSoils, Inc., 2021, Geotechnical report of grading for building pads construction (Lots 1 and 2), at 3970 and 3980 Highland Drive, Carlsbad, California 92008, W.O. 8132-B-SC, dated July 16. REC Consultants, 2020, Precise Grading Plans For: Highland James Subdivision, (Highland Drive Portion) 3970 & 3980 Highland Drive, Carlsbad, California, 92008, 7 sheets, Project No. CDP-0024, -0025, Drawing No. 483-6D, plotted December 10. Plate 1 SCALE: See Bar Scale DATE: 6/22 W.O. 8132-A-SC ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE This document or e-file is not part of the Construction Documents and should not be relied upon as being an accurate depiction of design. FIELD DENSITY LOCATION MAP Figure adapted from: Precise Grading Plan by REC Consultants, Inc. (2020) GSI LEGEND Approximate Location of Finish Grade Field Density Test X-37 Approximate Limits of Compacted Fill Placed Under the Purview of this Report Approximate Elevation of Removals (in feet) Approximate Location of Field Density Test X-27 FG 159.5 Approximate Limits of Keyway Excavation 149.5 X-15 152.4 145.4 148.0 X-10 X-28 X-22 X-11 X-26 X-27 FG X-18 X-19 X-13 X-16 X-14 X-2 X-7 X-6 X-3 X-1 X-12 X-9 X-8 X-5 X-4 159.0 159.5 155.9 154.1 151.5 X-35 X-33 X-24 X-31 156.0 X-34 X-36 X-30,A X-21 X-23 X-37 X-32 X-25 FG X-20,A X-17 X-29 Artificial Fill—Compacted Quaternary-age Old Paralic Deposits, Circled Where Buried Qop Afc Qop Qop Qop Afc Qop Afc Approximate Geologic Contact Qop Qop -- ----m: -=---r: -,-- ---___ -~-::-=----q_----llr--------¼1 I -----i-----~.;_;;;----' -- HIGHLAND DRIVE•-w-• ~ •--w--fl lf'ill,-'1111" I'~. : ,, . ~~ ' :t~ ~'W'• • -•-~-:::•--· • . •. • ••• , --. ' -~. T I ,, ..... ET -I T, 1t:2m:rd: I LOT 2 ' I PER MAP 11J.2J.4 I APN-207-1 A(OF lF \ 1 (I FT' , VELOP OJ • 10,tNI - 0 1 I 'P r 'f Civil Engi11e~ring •Envir<1n e:M'al Lond 5ur,ciing 2442 ~•~:I J.....et',.J~ (~\f ~J2:9S~ ~~~;3)2J2-9210 Fax