Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LFMP 01; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 01; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 1; 1987-07-15
CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 1 City Council Resolution No. 9221 Dated September · 1, 198 7 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2672 Dated July 15, 1987 AMENDMENTS ,,. CITY Of CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 1 Plan Sponsor: City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 (619) 434-2820 Preparer: Planning Department City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 July 15, 1987 **Final EIR ERRATA - September 1987 I. II. III. IV. v. VI. - TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary •• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Introduction ••••••• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Buildout Projections. ........................... Phasing ....•.•.....•.•............•............. Zone Requirements for Public Facilities and Services .......................... . Analysis of Public Facilities and Improvements 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11 • City Administrative Facilities •••••••••• Adequacy Findings •••••••••••••• ... Library •....•••.•...•••.••. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adequacy Findings ••••• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Wastewater Treatment Capacity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adequacy Findings •••••••• . . . . . . . . . . . Par ks •••••••.••••••.••• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adequacy Findings •• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Drainage ••..••....•......••...•............ Adequacy Findings ••••••••••••••••••••• Circulation ••••••••••••• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adequacy Findings •• . . . . . . . . . . . Fire •••.••••••••.••••.•••• •. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adequacy Findings •• . . . . . . Open Space ••••••••••••••••••••••• . ...... . Adequacy Findings .•••••••••. School's ................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adequacy Findings •• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sewer Collection System. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adequacy Findings •• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Water Distribution System •••••••••••••••• Adequacy Findings ••••••••••••••••••• i Page No. 1 11 17 24 29 32 39 41 47 49 53 56 64 66 75 78 83 110 113 114 117 118 125 127 136 142 146 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. VII. Appendices Appendix 1 -Glossary.......................... 149 Appendix 2 -Growth Management Ordinance....... 156 Appendix 3 -Reference Sources................. 179 Appendix 4 -Acreage Summary................... 181 Estimated Commercial Square Footage Appendix 5 -Agenda Bill for Southern library Site.......................................... 184 Appendix 6 -Buildout Arterial Improvements.... 196 Appendix 7 -Sewer Facilities Correspondence... 202 Appendix 8 -Planning Commission Resolution No. 2672.............. 208 ii -CHARTS, MAPS, TABLES AND EXHIBITS local Facilities Management Plan Map ••.••••••••••••.•••• Public Facilities Summary Sheet ••••••••••••••••••••••••• local Facilities Management Plan Map/Zone 1 ••••••••••••• General Plan -Land Use Map •••••••••..•••••••••••••.•••• Zoning Map ••••••.••••••••••.••••••••.•••••••••••••••.••• Existing Land Use Categories, Exhibit A ••••••••••••••••• Approved Development Projects E)(hibit B •••••.••.••••.••••.•..••..•••..•.••••..•.•.. Potential Future Development •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Buildout Population Projections ••••••••••••••••••••••••• Residential Phasing ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Non-Residential Phasing •••••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••• City Administrative Facilities Page 2 5 14 15 16 19 20 22 23 26 27 Map.. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 33 Summary Sheet.................................. 34 Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis........ 35 Five-Year CIP.................................. 36 Dwelling Unit and Population Projections, Exhibit C................................... 37 City Administrative Facilities, Exhibit D...... 39 Zone 1 Demand Comparison, Exhibit£............ 40 Library Map • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 42 Summary Sheet.................................. 43 Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis........ 44 Planning Projections, Exhibit F................ 46 Zone 1 Demand Comparison, Exhibit G............ 48 iii No. CHARTS, MAPS, TABLES AND EXHIBITS (Continued) Wastewater Treatment Parks Drainage Map ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Summary Sheet ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis ••••••• Service Area Demand and Treatment Capacity Table 1 .•.•...••.••••....••.••....••••••...•• Park District Boundary Map •••••••••••••••••••• Map •••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Summary Sheet ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis ••••••• Park Demand, Park District 1, Exhibit H ••••••• Park Demand, Zone 1, Park District 1, Exhibit I .•.•.••••.••.•••••.••.•••••••••••• Drainage Facilities Map ••••••••••••••••••••••• Summary Sheet ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis ••••••• Drainage Area Hap ••.•••.•••••••..••••..•.••••• Drainage Zone 1, Table 2 •••••••••••••••••••••• Cost Estimate for Future Zone 1 Drainage Facilities, Table 3 •••••••••••••••••••••••••• Circulation Map ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Summary Sheet ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis ••••••• Proposed Improvements Intersection Levels of Service, Chart A •••••• Failure Projections, Chart B ••••••••••••••••• Impacted Roads and Intersections ••••••••••••• Improvements Needed Today Carlsbad Village Drive at Southbound I -5, Exhibit J •••••••••.••..••.••..•••..•. Improvements Needed Within 1-3 Years El Camino Real at Carlsbad Village Drive, Exhibit K ••••••••••••••••••••••••• Improvements Needed in 4-6 Years El Camino Real at Kelly Drive, Exhibit L •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Carlsbad Village Drive at Jefferson Street, Exhibit M •••••••••••••••••••••••• iv Page No. 50 51 52 54 57 58 59 60 62 63 67 68 69 74 76 77 79 80 81 84 85 86 88 89 90 91 ,,-- I CHARTS, MAPS, TABLES ANO EXHIBITS (Continued) Page No. Circulation (Continued) Fire Improvements Needed in 7-10 Years El Camino Real at Tamarack Avenue, Exhibit N •••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••• Carlsbad Village Drive at 1-5 Northbound and Southbound, Exhibit 0 ••••• Improvements Needed Before Bulldout Carlsbad Boulevard at State Street, Exhibit P .••............................. El Camino Real at Marron Road, Exhibit Q •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Carlsbad Village Drive at Southbound 1-5, Exhibit R •...••••..••••..••••...•••..•... Carlsbad Village Drive at Jefferson Street Exhibit S .•...••.•..•••....•..•....•..... Carlsbad Village Drive at State Street, Exhibit T .••...••.....••................. Las Flores Drive at Northbound 1-5, Exhibit U •••••...••••..•..••.••.•...•..•. Las Flores Drive at Southbound I-5, Exhibit V ••..•.....•••..••.••....••...... Northbound 1-5 at Tamarack Avenue, Exhibit W •••.••••••••••.•••••.••••••••••• Circulation Improvement Costs, Exhibit X •••••• 92 93, 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 105 Map........................................... 111 Summary Sheet................................. 112 Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis....... 113 Open Space Map............................................ 115 Summary Sheet.................................. 116 Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis........ 117 Schools School District Boundary Map................... 119 Map............................................ 120 Summary Sheet.................................. 121 Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis........ 122 V 94 CHARTS, MAPS, TABLES AND EXHIBITS (Continued) Page No. Sewer Collection System Sewer District Boundary Map.................... 128 Sewer System................................... 129 Map............................................ 130 Summary Sheet.................................. 131 Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis........ 132 Sewer Demand................................... 133 Capital Improvement Program Buena Vista Pump Station, Table S-1........ 137 Agua Hedionda pump Station, Table S-2...... 137 Vista/Carlsbad Intercekptor, Table S-3..... 138 Carlsbad Capacity in the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor, Table S-4..................... 139 Carlsbad Capacity in the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor, Table S-5............ 140 Water Distribution System Water Service Boundary Map..................... 143 Map. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 144 Summary Sheet.................................. 145 Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis........ 146 Appendices Appendix 1 Traffic Impact Fee.......................... 154 Bridge and Thoroughfare District............ 155 Appendix 4 Acreage Summary Chart....................... 182 Commercial Square Footage Chart............. 183 Appendix 6 Needed Arterial Improvements, Exhibit Y.... 198 Existing and Proposed Improvements......... 201 Appendix 7 Sewer System................................ 205 vi Final EIR ERRATA - September 1987 Local Facilities Management Plan -Zone 1 Updated Information 1. Under General Conditions on page 6 -add General Condition: 7. After the adoption of this Plan by the City Council, no 1 building permits will be allowed unless the performance standards are complied with. This includes all projects which were exempt under Section 21.90.030 (c) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 2. Under Special Conditions on page 8, the existing mitigatidn needed at I-5 Southbound and Carlsbad Village Drive has been completed and the following typographic changes should be made: ■ Improvements Needed Within 1-3 Years (by 1991) -not 1994 as shown. ■ Improvements Needed Within 4-6 Years (by 1994) -not 1999 as shown. 3. The Parks Inventory on page 61 should delete Maxton Brown · Ext. of 2.1 Special Use Area acreage. On page 64, the total Special Use Acreage should be 37. o instead of 39.1. on page 64, the total Park District #1 acreage should be 79.2 instead of 81.3 and the Surplus is then 10.05 acres. This change allows the Parks standard to be complied with until 1989-1990 instead of 1992. POC:09/01/87 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15 ZONE 1 16 . •o 17 18 ZONE 1 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLANS --2- 11 T City of Carl1bed Growtft Manegement Pr09am -JANUARY 1987 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1 was prepared pursuant to the Ci~y•s Growth Management Program, Title 21, Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The contents of the plan follow the outline established by Section 21.90.110 of the Growth Management Ordinance. The Zone 1 plan ls consistent with the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, and it implements the Citywide plan adopted September 23, 1986. The Zone 1 plan begins with the assumptions used to generate the buildout projections for residential and non- residential development within the Zone. The plan then phases or estimates the Zone's development on a yearly basis until buildout. The phasing is done to predict future facility demands. Each facility that is required to be addressed is then analyzed. The analysis includes an inventory of existing and proposed facilities, a phasing schedule that establishes the timing .for the provision of facilities in relationship to demand, and a financing plan that establishes various methods of funding facilities and improvements that are identified by the plan as needed. Since this Zone plan is a regulatory document, each facility section also contains conditions to ensure that public facilities will conform to the adopted performance standards. The conditions will be adopted as part of the Zone 1 approval, and mandatory compliance will regulate future development within the zone. The purpose of the summary chart shown below is to provide a brief synopsis of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1 • City Ad ■inistrative Library Wastewater Treat ■ent Capacity SUMMARY CHART Existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard until the year 2005. Library facilities meet the adopted performance standard until the year 2003. Existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard. -3- Parks Drainage Circulation Fire Open Space Schools Sewer Collection Syste ■ Water Distribution Park District 1 conforms with the adopted performance standard until the year 1992. Existing facilities currently meet the adopted performance standard. One intersection in Zone 1 does not meet the adopted performance stan- dard at the present time. Until the performance standard is met, no development shall occur. With existing plus committed impacts, five intersections will fall below standard. At buildout, seven inter- sections are projected to fall below the City's adopted performance standard unless mitigating improve- ments occur. Existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard to buildout of Zone 1. Existing open space meets the adopt- ed performance standard to buildout of Zone 1. Existing school facilities currently have the capacity to meet the the demand generated by Zone 1. The School District has indicated that it will be able to provide capacity to buildout of Zone 1. Existing sewer trunk line capacity complies with the adopted perform- ance standard. Capacity problems are projected with existing plus committed projects. A mitigation strategy has been established for the affected facilities. Water service to Zone 1 meets the adopted performance standard to the buildout of the Zone. -4- ,-. r' ZONE 1 PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMNARY SHEET Conformance with Adoeted Standard Cit~wide QuacJrant Zone 1 1) City Administrative Facilities Yes N/A N/A 2) Library Yes* 3) Wastewater Treatment Yes** 4) Parks N/A Yes N/A 5) Drainage N/A N/A Yes 6) Circulation N/A N/A No*** 7) Fire N/A N/A Yes 8) Open Space N/A N/A Yes 9) Schools N/A N/A Yes 10) Sewer Collection System N/A N/A Yes 11) Water Distribution System N/A N/A Yes N/A = Not Applicable ~ased on City Council action of 7/7/87, as discussed on Pages 46 and 47. **See Special Conditions on Page 55. ***These facilities do not conform with the adopted performance standards. Mitigation to bring these facilities into conformance are found in the next section Special Conditions for Zone 1, Pages 8 through 10 and discussed in further detail in the applicable Chapter. -5- _,,--- 1 • GENERAL CONDITIONS All development within Zone provisions of Section 21.90 of and to the provisions and Facilities Management Plan. 1 shall conform to the the Carlsbad Municipal Code conditions of this Local 2. All development within Zone 1 shall be required to pay a public facility fee pursuant to the standards adopted by the City Council on April 22, 1986, and all other applicable fees. Development in Zone 1 shall also be responsible for any additional fees to ije incorporated into this plan that are found to be necessary to enable facilities to meet the adopted performance standard. 3. The City of Carlsbad shall monitor all facilities in Zone 1 pursuant to Subsections 21.90.130(c), (d) and (e) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 4. All development in Zone 1 shall be in conformance with the adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan as adopted by City Council Resolution 8797. 5. Periodic amendment to the Zone 1 Local Facilities Management Plan is anticipated to incorporate newly acquired data, to add conditions and upgrade standards as determined through the required monitoring program. Amendment to this Plan may be initiated by action of the Planning Commission or City Council at anytime. 6. If a public facility or service is found not to be in conformance with an adopted performance standard during the yearly monitoring, or at any other time, the matter will be immediately brought before the City Council. If the City Council determines that a non-conformance does exist then no future building or development permits, which would impact the facility, shall be issued until those facilities are brought into conformance with the adopted performance standard. SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 1 The following Special Conditions apply specifically to development in Zone 1 and must be complied with in addition to the General Conditions for Zone 1. These conditions are also listed separately under the analysis discussion of each facility. -6- City Ad■inlstrative Facilities No special conditions are necessary at this time. Library No special conditions are necessary at this time. Wastewater Treat ■ent Capacity The following actions shall be pursued by the City to ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity throughout a five (5) year pe·riod. Parks a. Monitor Encina Treatment Plant flows on a monthly basis to determine actual flow rates and to have an early warning of capacity problems. b. Actively pursue acceleration and phasing of treatment plant Phase IV expansion to provide adequate capacity. c. When Carlsbad's share of Encina flows reach 5.25 MGD, actively seek leased capacity from other Encina agencies. d. When Carlsbad Encina flows reach 5.45 MGD, proceed to activation of the Calavera Hills Reclamation/Treatment Facility. Plant to be activated when more cost effective treatment measures are no longer feasible and Carlsbad capacity at Encina has been reached. Although the performance standard is being met for Zone 1, development shall continue to pay Park-In-Lieu fees and Public Facility Fees for Park District 1, to mitigate the future incremental parks demand within the District. Drainage No building or development permits shall be issued for any portion of Zone 1 which drains to the Buena Vista Creek north of Jefferson Street unless it incorporates into the design of the project all conditions of the Buena Vista Lagoon and Watershed Sediment Control Plan, as prepared by June Applegate and Associates on September 3, 1985. -7- The following circulation improvements shall be implemented within five phases of time: immediately, within 1-3 years, 4-6 years, 7-10 years, and before buildout. Improvements Needed Today 1 • Carlsbad Village Drive·at Southbound I-5 Restrip the southbound approach to provide a right-turn only and an optional right-turn/left-turn and restripe the eastbound approach to provide an optional through or right-turn lane. No building permits shall be issued in Zone 1 until the restriping has occurred. Improvements Needed Within 1-3 Years (by 1994) 1 • El Camino Real at Carlsbad Village Drive Widen Carlsbad Village Drive for an additional eastbound and westbound lane and widen El Camino Real to the full width of a prime arterial (three through lanes and one left-turn-only lane). Improvements Needed Within 4-6 Years (by 1999) 1. El Camino Real at Kelly Drive 2. Widen El Camino Real to prime arterial standards, redesign the signal, and add a separate southbound right-turn lane. Carlsbad Village Drive at Jefferson Street Restripe Jefferson widen or additional the northbound and southbound approaches of Street to provide separate left-turn lanes and restripe Carlsbad Village Drive to provide an through lane in each direction. Improvements Needed Within 7-10 Years (1998) 1. El Camino Real at Tamarack Avenue Restrlpe Tamarack Avenue to provide optional through and turn lanes for the east and west approaches, widen El Camino Real southbound approach to provide one additional lane and widen the northbound approach to provide two left-turn only, two right-turn-only and three through lanes. -8- ,.- 2. Carlsbad Village Drive at 1-5 Northbound and Southbound At the southbound approach, widen Carlsbad Village Drive to provide an additional westbound through lane and a separate eastbound right-turn-only lane. For northbound, widen the eastbound approach to provide an additional through lane and widen the northbound off-ramp to provide three lanes. Improvements Needed Before Buildout 1. Carlsbad Boulevard at State Street Add one northbound through lane. 2. El Camino Real at Marron Road 3. 5. Add one eastbound left-turn lane, one eastbound right-turn lane, one soutfibound right-turn lane, and add one northbound right-turn lane. Carlsbad Village Drive at Southbound 1-5 Modification of the intersection approaches consists of adding one westbound left-turn lane and restriping the southbound right turn for an optional left turn plus right turn. Carlsbad Village Drive at Jefferson Add one eastbound left-turn lane. Carlsbad Village Drive at State Street Add one westbound right-turn lane. 6. Las Flores Drive at Northbound 1-5 Add one eastbound left-turn lane, one westbound right-turn lane, one eastbound through lane, one westbound through lane, and restripe the northbound for a shared right plus left-turn lane. 7. Las Flores Drive at Southbound I-5 8. Add two westbound left-turn lanes and one southbound left- turn lane. Northbound 1-5 at Tamarack Avenue Restripe the northbound lanes for an optional right-turn and left-turn lane. -9- All future development within Zone 1 shall continue to pay Traffic Impact Fees and Public Facilities Fees. Fire No special conditions are necessary at this time. Open Space No special conditions are necessary at this time. Schools No special conditions are necessary at this time. Sewer Collection Syste ■ No special conditions are necessary ·at this time. Water Olstrlbutloa Syste■ All development within Zone 1 shall pay the required Costa Real Municipal Water District fees. -10- 11 INTRODUCTION I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this local Facilities Management Plan is to complete the second phase of the overall Growth Management Plan for Zone 1 within the City of Carlsbad. Phase One of the Growth Management Program established the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan based upon a phased buildout of the City's existing General Plan. For purposes of public facilities analysis, the City has been separated into 25 local Facilities Management Zones as shown on "Local Facility Management Plan Boundaries", on Page 2. LOCAL PLAN OVERVIEW This plan for Zone 1 provides a detailed description and analysis of how this area of the City will develop from its current status to buildout. The plan also demonstrates how and when each facility and improvement will be constructed in order to accommodate development within the Zone (phasing). It also provides a complete description of how each facility and improvement will be financed when mitigation is necessary. The body of the plan is divided into separate sections for each public facility. In each section there will be a summary sheet which highlights the important information described in the analysis. This summary is broken down into three categories: Existing, Existing plus approved, and Future. The demand column in each of these categories will show two numbers: Demand The top number (1) represents the Citywide, Quadrant or Zone demand, depending upon the public facility being evaluated. The lower number (2) represents the specific zone demand for the public facility, i.e., in this case, Zone 1. Following the summary sheet will be the detailed analysis and additional information for the public facility. If a facility is not conforming with the adopted performance standard, there will be a discussion describing this situation, a mitigation or alternatives section, and a financing discussion. Each facility subsection will include a subsection, "Adequacy Findings". That section will summarize whether or not the public facility conforms with the adopted performance standard. Each section will conclude with a mitigation section and special conditions, if necessary. -12- ,-- ZONE 1 -OVERVIEW The plan for Zone 1 is consistent with all aspects of the Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan and ensures that the adopted performance standards shall be complied with as development occurs. Zone 1 comprises the older and originally developed areas of Carlsbad. The area encompasses approximately 3,500 acres, and is located between Buena Vista Lagoon to the north, Agua Hedionda Lagoon to the south, and to the east and west, between El Camino Real and the Pacific Ocean, respectively. It ls the largest of the 25 Local Facilities Management Zones, and is considered "in-fill" because much of the zone has already been built, i.e., there is only a minimal amount of developable vacant land remaining in the zone. Portions of the zone are currently in -the process of developing or redeveloping. Within Zone 1's boundaries are a variety of existing landmark areas, such as the City's redevelopment area and downtown, City Hall and the main City Library, Plaza Camino Real Shopping Center, the beach area, Hosp Grove, the two lagoons mentioned earlier, and the City's only high school. The dominant land use in Zone 1 is residential; scattered throughout are commercial, schools, tourist, office, and recreational areas. There is no industrial land use in Zone 1, except for a small area downtown, next to the railroad tracks. Future development could include a few residential projects on vacant land in the eastern portion of the zone; "infill" development throughout the interior areas of the zone, i.e. splitting of larger lots, conversion of small agricultural operations; redevelopment of the downtown and beach areas; and, intensification of commercial/office/tourist uses in downtown and the beach area. The map, "General Plan Land Use", shown on Page 15, denotes the General Plan Land Use for Zone 1. The accompanying Land Use Zoning is shown on Page 16. -13- -✓ 15 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 16 oo 17 I I 18 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLANS -14- 11 t CH• D1Carl111H -"'--"'·~- -JANUARY 1987 I-' Ln ZONE 1 P■ctllc. Ocean LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ) GENERAL PLAN IISIDINTIAL RL LOW DENSITY (0-1 5) RLM LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY(0-4) RM MEDIUM DENSITY (4-8) RMH MWIIIM HIGH DENSITY (8· 15) RH lll<,IIUENSITY(l5-U)" COMMIICIAL RRI IN IENSIVE IEGl<>NAL RETAIL (Cl-Plan Camino At;al) RAE f.X lfNSIVf REGIONAL RETAIL (q. Cat Counlry C.:irldud) RS REGll tNAl SEI\VKE C <:OMMUNITY <:OMMEICIAL N NEIGIIROlllltM)OCOMMEll(:IAL TS TMVU SERVICES COMMERCIAL 0 PROFES..~IONAL REUTED COD CENTRAL 8llSINE.~ DISTRICT Pl PI.ANNEO INDUSTRIAL G G<JVERNMfNTFACIUTIES U PUBLIC UTILITIES RC RECREATION COMMERCIAL SCHOOLS E EI.EMENTARY J JUNIOR HIGH H IIHill SCHOOL P PRIVATE US OPEN SPACE ZONE 2 ZONE& I Clly of C•l1bea Growth Manag•manl Program JANUARY 1887 I .... °' I ZONE 1 Oceenalcle Peclllc Ocean LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN P.C l·A 1-E •·• 1-J 1-3 1-3l ID·M ID-II IMIIP .. , KT .,, 0 C·I C·J C·T C-M M P·M ,_, l,C OI P.U .~ --Y-1 ZONEI ZONING IIIIDINTIAL PIANNED COMMIINm ZUNI IESIDENllAI. AGIICIJmlMI.ZONE IUIW. lf5IDEN11Al l!Slllll! ZONl! (-·FAMILY IIESlllENllAL ZONE Til{l-FAMILY IIESIDEN11Al ZONE MIILllPLE fAMIIY ll&'IIIJEN11AI. ZONE UMI nm Mllrll-FAMILY llf.SIDEN11AI. ZONE RESIDENllAL DENSITY-MUL11PLE 7.oNE RESIDENllAI. OENSITY·IIIGII ZONE RllSIUF.N llAI. MOBIU IK)ME PARK ZONE IF.SIUEN.I IAI. PROFF.5SIONAL ZONE RESll>ENllAL TOIJIUST ZONE IESIDENllAL WA-.-Y ZONE COMMIIICIAL OfflCEZONE NEIGIIBOUIOOD CllMMF.MJAL ZONE Gl!NEIIAl Cl>MMEllflAL 7.0NE COMMER<:LU-TOUIUSr ZONE HEAVY COMMEICIAL-IJMITED INDtJSTIW. ZONE INDUSTliLU. ZONE PLANNED INDlJS'llUAL ZONE Ortll■ FlOOOl'IAIN CJVWAY ZONE IJMrnDCONDOL OftNSPMJ! l'WUC lll1Un' WNI QUAUflEO-OVEIIIAYZONE SCENIC nESEIIIIITION CJValAY ZONE YIUM"d! -ENT ZONE ZONE& CMyolC• ..... G,owlh M~ Prag,MI -JANUARY 1887 17 BUILDOUT PROJECTIONS II. BUILDOUT ASSUMPTIONS AND PROJECTIONS To properly assess and plan for public facilities and services in Zone 1, it is necessary to project the level of development that can be anticipated at the ultimate buildout of this Zone. Buildout projections are used to determine potential demand for public facilities and services. The ultimate buildout of Zone 1 has been determined by examining: 1. The amount of existing land use, 2. The amount of approved, yet undeveloped land uses, and 3. The vacant land which still can be developed. The methodology used to compile the buildout projections is consistent with that used in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. Assumptions and methodologies are described below: 1 • 2. Existing Land Uses Surveys and analysis were conducted to determine the acreage of each land use category within Zone 1. Field checks, aerial photographs and subsequent research generally ascertained how each parcel was being utilized as well as the square footage of existing commercial/office structures. Exhibit A, "Existing Land Use Categories", on Page 19 details this information. Because Zone 1 is an infill area and much of the land has been developed, only gross acreages are shown on Exhibit A. For informational purposes, the 100% constrained areas and 25-40% slopes are included in the appendix. Approved But Undeveloped Land Exhibit a, "Approved Development Projects" on Page 20 includes land uses which have approved projects but which have not been developed as of January 1, 1987. Buildout is constrained by approved projects because the land has been committed to a particular use or density, even though it is presently vacant. Approved projects are those which have received discretionary approval by the Planning Commission and/or City Council. Also included in the table is the total amount of individual single family homeowner building permits awaiting issuance as of 1/1/87. -18- --- EXHIBIT A ZONE 1 EXISTING LAND USE CATEGORIES Listed below are the type and acreage of each land use category within Zone 1. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGHATION RESIDENTIAL: RL Low Density (0-1.5) RLM Low-Med Density (0-4) RM Medium Density (4-8) RMH Med-Hi Density (8-15) RH High Density (15-23) COMMERCIAL: CBO Central Business District C Community N Neighborhood RC Recreation TS. Travel Services 0 Professional & Related RRE Extensive Regional Retail RRI Intensive Regional Retail RS Regional Service nmuSTRIAL: PI Planned Industrial OTHER: E J H HC p G u NRR OS RR FW MAJ MIN COL Elementary School Junior High School High School Continuation School Private School Government Facility Public Utilities Non-Residential Reserve Open Space Railroad Freeway Major Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Street TOTAL ACREAGE -19- ACRES 1460.9 184.2 325.0 169.7 70.1 7.6 3.2 42.2 38.8 118.5 26.6 50.8 22.4 35.1 3.9 17.0 10.3 610.3 37.6 81.4 22.8 47.2 85.0 3470.6 1/87 PROJECT NO. MS 730 CT 8207 CT 8428 CT 8433 CT 8434 CT 8513 CT 8523 MS 718 CT 7702 CT 8014 CT 8018 CT 8019 CT 8119 CT 8123 CT 8150 CT 8206 CT 8219 CT 8304 CT 8320 CT 8323 CT 8413 CT 8442 CT 8518 CT 8536 APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ZONE 1 TENTATIVE FINAL MAP MAP 3 46 5 77 6 8 104 4 65 19 5 9 65 4 8 85 5 130 73 22 10 4 140 19 MISCELLANEOUS TOTALS 249 + 667 + -20- EXHIBIT B BUILDING PERMITS 292 292 = 1208 3. Vacant and Potentially Developable Land The process of estimating potential development on vacant or underdeveloped land in Zone 1 was done in a number of ways. For the area east of 1-5, aerial photographs, assessors parcel maps and zoning maps were utilized and field checks were made to ascertain the parcels of land that would likely subdivide, convert to residential use, or develop on existing vacant land. Because of the large number of small, scattered parcels throughout this area, an actual constraints map was not prepared. Instead, constraints were estimated on a percentage basis for each parcel to determine net developable acreage. Net acreages were then multiplied by the appropriate growth points in the density ranges to yield total future (buildout) projections. Constraints in the area east of 1-5 generally are steep slopes, or local Coastal Program regulations that protect coastal resources, e.g., along Agua Hedionda lagoon. Several large vacant parcels near El Camino Real (approximately 15 acres or more) actually were mapped for environmental constraints and are on file in the Planning Department. General Plan land Use Designation Rl RlM RM RMH RH Growth Management Control Point (du/ac) 1. 0 3.2 6.0 11. 5 19.0 For the area west of 1-5, two studies and several assumptions were used in computing future potential development. A land use study was done in the Beach Area, which projected a high and low estimate of future residential units--the midpoint between these projections is used in this facilities plan. The Beach Area is that area west of the AT&SF railroad tracks, between Buena Vista and Agua Hedionda lagoons, excluding Redevelopment. The area as defined lies within the City's Beach Area Overlay Zone. The Redevelopment Area also had a land use and economic study conducted which projected future residential, commercial and office uses in the Redevelopment Area. The numbers used in the Redevelopment study were assumed as a maximum case for Zone 1 future development. Several assumptions also were used for other areas west of I-5. In the area south of Redevelopment between approximately Oak Street and Magnolia Avenue, most of the lots are small, about 15' x 140', and the density per lot would not allow more than one unit. Therefore, if each lot had less than one unit, it was considered underdeveloped. In this area, and also along Jefferson Street near Buena Vista lagoon, it also was assumed that in some cases, lots could merge and the number of future dwelling units would be higher than if every lot developed separately. Constraints were estimated on parcels adjacent to Buena Vista lagoon similarly to Agua Hedionda--based on steep slopes, and the Local Coastal Program requirements. -21- The future potential number of dwelling units for the areas as generally described above are shown in the following table. POTENTIAL FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Area east of I-5 Area west of I-5 Beach Area (650) Redevelopment (89) Remaining (414) Total 847 1153 2000 For future commercial/office uses, the Redevelopment Area study projections were used for the downtown area. These projections assumed 30 percent building coverage and a combination of two-and three-story buildings. Other commercial uses in Zone 1 were projected using a 40 percent square footage yield based on net developable acreage. The total projected non- residential uses are shown below. POTENTIAL FUTURE NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Commercial Hotel/Motel Office Total (Square Footage) 1,777,260 341,000 230,560 2,348,820 square feet A detailed breakdown of existing and future commercial areas throughout Zone 1 is found in the appendix. Summary As of January 1, 1987, there were 9,012 existing residential units and 1208 approved/committed units. Future buildout of the zone will add 2000 more units, for a total of 12,220 dwelling units. When applying the growth control yield densities to the residentially designated land within Zone 1, this results in a theoretical yield of 12,409 units. Thus at buildout, Zone 1 will be below the growth control point by almost 200 units. Growth in the northwest quadrant will be consistent with the Carlsbad Municipal Code as amended pursuant to the approval of Proposition E on November 4, 1986, and will be in conformance with the residential quandrant cap. -22- BUILDOUT PROJECTION Residential The residential buildout population projection for Management Zone 1 was determined by applying a population generation rate of 2.471 persons per dwelling unit to the existing, approved and potential future units. The dwelling unit and population breakdown, therefore, are as follows: Units Existing 9,012 X Approved 1,208 X Future 2,000 X Total 12,220 X Rate 2.471 " " " = = = = Population 22,269 2,984 4,942 30,195 The buildout population projections are used consistently throughout this plan for the purpose of predicting demand for public facilities and improvements. Non-Residential The non-residential buildout projection for Management Zone 1 was determined by totaling the existing, approved and potential future square footage by use category. Building permit files were researched to determine the existing and approved square footage. Vacant land square footage was calculated by multiplying the gross vacant already subdivided acres by 40~ or as obtained in existing land use studies • The non-residential buildout breakdown, therefore is as follows: Existing Approved Future Non-Residential Buildout Projection Square Footage 2,230,160 154,360 2,194,460 4,578,980 The approved plus existing square footage equals 2,348,820 square feet, as referenced on the previous page. -23- 24 PHASING III. PHASING -AN OVERVIEW It is necessary to provide a phasing schedule of development for the entire City, each quadrant, and each of the 25 Local Facilities Management Zones for the purpose of: 1. Projecting future demands for public facilities on a yearly basis; and 2. Establishing the thresholds which identify when a public facility is needed; and 3. Assisting with the development of the City's Capital Improvement Program budget. In the Citywide Plan, phasing of residential development was 1,250 dwelling units per year. These projections were based on a review of the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) projections along with those utilized in the City's Capital Improvement Program and the Public Facilities Management Systems, Monitoring Report of April, 1986. In each Local Plan a key element will be the projected phasing schedule of development within that specific zone. These schedules are presented for the purpose of establishing thresholds for demand and future demands for public facilities. By projecting these future public facility and improvement demands the appropriate funds may be allocated into the Capital Improvement Budget to assure that the needed facilities are in place as development occurs. The phasing schedule is not presented to establish a rate of growth within the City. It will be used to assure that growth occurs only as public facilities are available to ensure compliance with the adopted performance standards. The specific phasing schedule presented in this plan is provided to accomplish the three purposes of phasing which were discussed above. These projections have been established by reviewing development in the pipeline which have tentative and final maps. The projections also consider pending applications. The same type of phasing has been prepared for SANDAG's Series VII for the entire City and will be utilized to review phasing projections presented in this and other local plans to determine the overall impact on public facilities and services. Zone 1 -Phasing Schedule Phasing for Zone 1 incorporates the Citywide projections as well as localized factors unique to the Zone. These localized circumstances include: 1. The amount and type of developing projects: -Final Maps -Tentative Maps -Applications Pending -25- 2. The ultimate type and amount of land use potential. 3. The amount of development that can be reasonably absorbed into the market in a given time frame. The specific residential phasing schedule for Zone 1 is shown below. The schedule assumes the zone will be built out by the year 2013. The schedule phases those projects identified in the developing process beginning in 1987 through 2013. During this time period it is estimated that a total of 3208 additional residential units will be built in Zone 1. Year 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 The developed RESIDENTIAL PHASING Zone 1 Yearly Dwelling Increase 508 305 292 92 48 94 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 phasing schedule assumes parcels within the zone -26- Total Dwelling Units 9,012 9,520 9,825 10,117 10,209 10,257 10,351 10,440 10,529 10,618 10,707 10,796 10,885 10,974 11,063 11,152 11,241 11,330 11,419 11,508 11,597 11,686 11,775 11,864 11,953 12,042 12,131 12,220 that the vacant or under that have no applications - pending will be developed beginning in 1987 and phased through the buildout of the zone. In all, a total of 12,220 residential dwelling units will exist at the buildout of Zone 1. This residential total is in compliance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code as modified by the passage of Proposition Eon November 4, 1986. In Zone 1 the non-residential land uses will be phased based upon previous growth trends, location of parcels, and current applications being considered by the Planning Department. The non-residential land uses will be built out by 2013. This assumes a phasing schedule which begins in 1987. NON-RESIDENTIAL PHASING (SQUARE FEET) ZONE 1 ------------------------------------------------------~---------------------YEAR COMMERCIAL HOTEL/MOTEL OFFICE YEARLY ROOMS SQ.FT. TOTAL ----------------------------------------------------------------1987 113,500 26,000 139,500 1988 47,560 so 27,500 10,000 85,060 1989 80,000 25 13,750 20,000 113,750 1990 5,000 5,000 1991 10,000 so 27,500 7,000 44,500 1992 42,900 12,500 55,400 1993 15,000 13,000 28,000 1994 35,000 50 27,500 5,000 67,500 1995 55,000 7,000 62,000 1996 55,000 10,000 65,000 1997 55,000 so 27,500 12,500 95,000 1998 55,000 40 22,000 77,000 1999 55,000 7,000 62,000 2000 75,000 13,560 88,560 2001 30,000 so 27,500 8,000 65,500 2002 5,000 60 33,000 38,000 2003 20,000 8,000 28,000 2004 75,000 75,000 2005 62,550 100 55,000 10,000 127,550 2006 75,000 75,000 2007 75,000 75,000 2008 62,550 20,000 82,550 2009 62,550 50 27,500 4,000 94,050 2010 62,550 55 30,250 4,000 96,800 2011 182,700 10,000 192,700 2012 182,700 13,000 195,700 2013 182,700 40 22,000 10,000 214,700 ---------------------------------------------------------------- TOTALS 1,777,260 620 341,000 230,560 2,348,820 -27- The specific phasing of Zone 1 is presented for the purpose of determining future annual demand and thresholds for public facilities. It is impossible to predict the exact way development will occur in this Zone, but through these phasing projections the City will be able to establish a direct link between development and the need for public facilities. This link will allow the City to ensure compliance with the adopted performance standards at all times as growth occurs. And if compliance is not maintained, development will be stopped until it conforms with the adopted performance standards. -28- 29 ZONE REQUIREMENTS IV. ZONE REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES The Management Plan for Zone 1 addresses eleven separate facilities: 1. City Administrative Facilities 2. Library 3. Wastewater Treatment Capacity 4. Parks 5. Drainage 6. Circulation 7. Fire 8. Open Space 9. Schools 10. Sewer Collection System 11. Water Distribution System Each of these facilities will be evaluated to determine conformance with the adopted performance standard. The evaluation will be made in three stages based on existing demand, approved or committed demand, and future demand at buildout. For each of these facilities and services the following is provided: 1 • An illustrative map showing what is existing and what will be needed as the zone develops to its ultimate buildout; 2. District boundary maps where facilities are provided by special districts (le., school, water, sewer); 3. Adopted service level performance standards which must be complied with at all times as growth occurs; and 4. A detailed facility planning and adequacy analysis for each of the public facilities and services. 5. A list of special ensure conformance standard. conditions for each facility to with the adopted performance 6. A discussion of mitigation measures and financing mechanisms relevant to each facility. The Citywide facilities, which include City Administrative Facilities, Library, and Wastewater Treatment, have been analyzed in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. These will also be included in the Local Facilities Management Plan to show compliance or to suggest alternatives to assure conformance with the adopted standard. 30 In any case, this analysis will show how each of the adopted performance standards will be complied with as development occurs within the City, quadrant, and zone. This plan includes financing of all public facilities and services where non-conformance with the standard requires mitigation. It also includes a complete phasing schedule for all development within the zone. -31- 32 CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES ZONE 1 LOCAL CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES • CITY ADIIN8TltATION-IX .. TING Q CITY A-TRATION~ FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN -33- JANUARY 198 LOCAL. FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 1 CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES SUMMARY SHEET BUILDOUT ADEQUACY PROJECTION-DEMAND SUPPLY (CClllb••• w18t■ldard) MITIGATION FUNDING 86,539 EXISTING 106,084 YES N/A (SQ. FT.) 33,404 118,867 APPROVED 168,084 YES N/A (SQ. FT) C, z 4,477 -en < .202, 371 J:: 0. FUTURE 168,084** NO*** N/A (SQ. FT) 45,293 * As of January 1, 1987, 32,328 square feet of demand has been approved. N/A N/A N/A **In the year 2005 this facility will no longer conform to the adopted performance standard. *** Zone 1 will not be built out until the year 2013. · -34- CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Fifteen hundred square feet per 1,000 population must be scheduled for construction within a five-year period. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS The purpose of this not the performance standard Zone 1 complies with the Administrative Facilities. analysis is to determine whether or is being met, and if the demand for overall Citywide analysis of City A. Inventory 1. Facility Demands: Existing (as of 1/1/87) Buildout Population (Citywide/Zone) 57,495/22,269 134, 914/30, 195 2. Existing City Administrative Facilities: SQUARE FEET City Hall Facilities City Hall Finance Dept. Modular Purchasing/Risk Management Modular Leased Space Redevelopment Community Development Dept. Las Palmas Facility Square Footage Permanent Space 12,899 Public Safety and Service Center Phase I Police and Fire Depts. Vehicle Maintenance Totals 53,700 10,358 76,957 Total Existing Facilities 106,084 * Year-to-Year Option Temporary Space 2,700 1,800 4,500 Required S~uare Footage ( itywide/Zone) 86,539/33,404 202,371/45,293 Leased Space Lease Expiration Date 2,000 3/31/83* 22,627 7/31/90** 24,627 ** On 6/23/87, the City Council authorized the City Manager to proceed with the purchase of the Community Development Building. -35- As indicated on the table on the previous page, approximately 231 of existing administrative facilities are leased and 4.2~ are temporary (portable modular units). If the rental leases are terminated or the modulars are no longer used, the existing square footage of City Administrative Facilities will be reduced. At that time, the Management Plan for Zone 1, as well as the Citywide Plan, will need to be amended to modify the phasing assumptions in order to plan for more City Administrative Facilities at an earlier time. 3. Facilities in City's Five Year Capital Improvements Program: Item Sq. Ft. Year Amount Source a. Public Safety Center Phase II* Design Construction 86-87 62,000 89-90 $ 255,000 PFF** $3,455,000 PFF/S/W** b. Total Facilities in City's 5 Year Capital Improvements Program. 62,000 square feet * ** Public Safety Center Phase II. Yard offices, Maintenance shops, and Purchasing warehouse for the use of Utility Maintenance, Parks & Recreation Maintenance, Street Maintenance and Purchasing. Approximate size is 62,000 square feet. This includes a two-story Yard office and Purchasing warehouse with a 6,400 square foot mezzanine. PFF -Public Facilities Fee S -Sewer W -Water Enterprise -36- r From the population projections, a demand for City Administrative Facilities has been assessed. The specific phasing for Zone 1 is being projected based on the number of projects which are currently pending review, have received tentative approvals, or have received final approvals. The exact timing of these specific projects may vary, however, the timing of necessary public facility improvements would also vary accordingly. This will assure that the adopted performance standards will be met as development occurs. Exhibit E is provided as a projection of growth throughout the City of Carlsbad on a yearly basis. YEAR 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 EXHIBIT C PLANNINC PR03ECTIONS ONLY DWELLING ONff ARD POPOLATfoA PROJECTIONS ASSUMING A BUILDING RATE OF 1250 UNITS PER YEAR AND 2 •• 71 PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT EXISTING D.U. '5 23,348 24,598 25,848 27,098 28,348 29,598 30,848 32,098 33,348 34,598 35,848 37,098 38,348 39,598 40,848 42,098 43,348 44,598 45,848 47,098 48,348 49,598 50,848 52,098 53,348 54,598 54,599 REMAINING D.U. 'S 31,251 30,001 28,751 27,501 26,251 25,001 23,751 22,501 21,251 20,001 18,751 17,501 16,251 15,001 13,751 12,501 11,251 10,001 8,751 7,501 6,251 5,001 3,751 2,501 1,251 1 0 PROJECTED GROWTH 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1 -37- BEGINNING YEAR POP. 57,693 60,782 63,870 66,959 70,048 73, 137 76,225 79,314 82,403 85,492 88,580 91,669 94,758 97,847 100,935 104,024 107,113 110,202 113,290 116,379 119,468 122,557 125,645 128,734 131,823 134,912 ENDING YEAR POP. 60,782 63,870 66,959 70,048 73,137 76,225 79,314 82,403 85,492 88,580 91,669 94,758 97,847 100,935 104,024 107,113 110,202 113,290 116,379 119,468 122,557 125,645 128,734 131,823 134,912 134,914 r- Adoption of this plan ensures the construction of adequate sewer facilities required to ensure compliance with the adopted performance standard through buildout of the Zone. A. Financing The required sewer improvements discussed in this Local Facilities Management Plan serve two sewer agencies, the City of Vista and the City of Carlsbad. The sewer shortfalls as indicated in this plan are the responsibility of both sewer agencies. There are existing agreements between these agencies which indicate the percentage of responsibility for financing needed improvements as required to serve each agency through buildout. This plan identifies a schedule of required sewer improvements and an estimated cost of the construction of facilities needed to provide conformance with the adopted performance standard. The City's funding will come from the Sewer Fund which originates from developer paid connection fees. -38- B. Phasing Population projections for the entire City were made within the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan which have been updated and are shown on the previous page. The following exhibit shows the yearly demand for City Administrative Facilities as well as the yearly demand created by Zone 1 based on the projected Citywide phasing. EXHIBIT D ·p LANN ING PROJECTIONS ONLY YEAR -----------------------------------------------CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES ASSUMING A BUILDING RATE OF 1250 UNITS PER YEAR AND 2.471 PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT (1,500 SQUARE FEET PER 1,000 POPULATION) ZONE 1 ZONE 1 CITYWIDE EXISTING CONFORMS/ POP. DEMAND DEMAND FACILITIES (NON- BEGINNING BEGINNING CONFORMING) 01/01/YR 01/01/YR ------------------------------------------------------------------ 1987 22,269 33,403 86,539 106,084 19,545 1988 23,524 35,286 91,172 106,084 14,912 1989 24,278 36,416 95,806 106,084 10,278 1990 24,999 37,499 100,439 168,084 67,645 1991 25,226 37,840 105,072 168,084 63,012 1992 25,345 38,018 109,705 168,084 58,379 1993 25,577 38,366 114,338 168,084 53,746 1994 25,797 38,696 118,971 168,084 49,113 1995 26,017 39,026 123,604 168,084 44,480 1996 26,237 39,356 128,237 168,084 39,847 1997 26,457 39,685 132,871 168,084 35,213 1998 26,677 40,015 137,504 168,084 30,580 1999 26,897 40,345 142,137 168,084 25,947 2000 27,117 40,675 146,770 168,084 21,314 2001 27,337 41,005 151,403 168,084 16,681 2002 27,557 41,335 156,036 168,084 12,048 2003 27,777 41,665 160,669 168,084 7,415 2004 27,996 41,995 165,302 168,084 2,782 2005 28,216 42,325 169,936 168,084 (1,852) 2006 28,436 42,654 174,569 168,084 (6,485) 2007 28,656 42,984 179,202 168,084 (11,118) 2008 28,876 43,314 183,835 168,084 (15,751) 2009 29,096 43,644 188,468 168,084 (20,384) 2010 29,316 43,974 193,101 168,084 (25,017) 2011 29,536 44,304 197,734 168,084 (29,650) 2012 29,756 44,634 202,367 168,084 (34,283) 2013 30,196 45,293 202,371 168,084 (34,287) -39- These projections were based on a review of the San Diego Association of Governments (SANOAG) projections along with those utilized in the City's Capital Improvement Program and the Public Facilities Management Systems, Monitoring Report of April, 1986. Currently, Zone 1 has 9,012 dwelling units which generate 33,404 square feet of demand for City Administrative Facilities. As of January 1, 1987, the existing Citywide demand for City Administrative Facilities was 86,539 square feet, of which the existing demand for Zone 1 is included. Zone 1 has the potential to create an additional 11,889 square feet of demand by the time it is built out. C.Adequacy Findings City Administrative Facilities based phasing of Citywide development and that of with the adopted standard until the year Exhibit, "City Administrative Facilities", existing and committed facilities, projected Zone 1's phased demand. III.MITIGATION A. Special Conditions for Zone 1 upon the projected Zone 1, will conform 2005. The following on Page 40 shows the Citywide demand, and No However, shortage could be special conditions are necessary at this time. if the annual monitoring report indicates a pending �f administrative facilities, development in Zone 1 halted until the performance standard was achieved. B. F inane ing Currently administration facilities supply exceeds the performance standards. Therefore, no immediate financing mechanism is required. Public Facilities Fees (PFF) are continuing to be collected Citywide and in Zone 1 and it is assumed that these fees will be adequate to finance future needs. Future residential development in Zone 1 will create a demand of approximately 10 percent of the total future Citywide administrative facilities, which ls a relatively small demand. Therefore, it ls assumed that the minimal proportionate share required of this zone will be financed by Public Facilities Fees paid by future Zone 1 development. However, if adequate PFF funds are not available when the need arises, ot her financin� mechanisms will have to be imposed in order to allow development to proceed. In other words, no other financing mechanism will be required at this time as a condition of development relative to adequate City Administrative Facilities. -39A- ) CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES ZONE 1 COMPARISON 210 200 190 180 170 168.084 168.084 168,084 161.084 160 SUPPLY 150 1-10 • 00" la.,, 130 I QC a 120 ti! �o 110 ... e. 100 90 80 70 60 50 45.293 40 JO m )( 1990 1995 2000 2005 2013 --DEMAND BY YEAR -f m 41 LIBRARY ZONE ZONE 1 1 ■ L-AIIIE8-aXlaTIN8 □ LlllltAllll~NNID ------r ----,_..,t I I I I LIBRARY --- I •o JANUARY 1987 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN -42- LOCAL"" FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 1 LIBRARY SUMMARY SHEET BUIL"DOUT DEMAND PROJECTION SUPPLY ADEQUACY (COilfaru_.. w181■..,d) MITIGATION FUNDING 46,154 EXISTING 31,500 YES* ------ (SQ. FT.) 1 7 Q 1 c;. , APPROVED 63,396 85,000 YES ------ (SQ. FT) C, z ,_~RR -Cl) C ::c 107,931 Cl. FUTURE ---NO** ------ (SQ. FT) 24,156 *Based upon action of the City Council on 7/7/87 to schedule and finance the construction of additional Library space, the adopted performance standard is being complied with. **By the year 2003, there could be a shortage of Library facilities. -43- LIBRARY I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD 800 square feet per 1,000 population of Library must be scheduled for construction within a five year period. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS The purpose of this analysis is to determine whether or not the performance standard is being met and, if the demand for Zone 1 is consistent with the overall Citywide analysis of the Library. A. Inventory 1. Facility Demand: Existing (as of 1/187) Buildout 2. Existing Facilities: Civic Center Library Adult Learning Center La Costa Area Library Warehouse Total Population (Citywide/Zone) 57,495/22,269 134,914/30,195 Owned Sq. Ft. 24,600 24,600 Total owned and leased space Required S~uare footage ( itywide/Zone) 46,154/17,815 107,931/24,156 Leased Sq. Ft. 400 4,500 2,000 6,900 31,500 Sq.Ft. The Main City Library is located within Zone 1, at 1250 Elm Avenue. The La Costa area library lease will terminate when a new City library ls constructed. 3. Facilities in the five year Capital Improvement Program: -44- B. The adopted Five Year C.I.P. includes $650,000 for the design of a main library in the southern part of the City. The City Council took further action on July 7, 1987, by approving a library site and directing the City Manager to acquire the site and by earmarking funds for construction, beginning in the 1987-88 C.I.P. Design of the building will occur upon purchase of the site. Purchase is anticipated during 1988. The following time schedule has been developed: Description Land Acquisition Grading Design Construction Fiscal Year 1988-89 1988-89 1988-89 89-90 to 90-91 The library construction will involve building a 58,000 square foot facility of which 48,000 square feet will be occupied for library use in 1991. The additional 10,000 square feet will be leased until it is needed. It is projected this additional space would be needed in 1998 or 1999. Phasing Population projections for the entire City were prepared on a yearly basis and are shown in Exhibit C, "Dwelling Unit and Population Projections" on Page 37. These projections are based on a review of the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) projections along with those utilized for the City's Capital Improvements Program and the Public Facilities Management System, Monitoring Report of April, 1986. The specific phasing for Zone 1 is being projected based on the number of projects which are currently pending review, have received tentative approvals, or have received final approvals. -45- EXHIBIT F P L A N N I N G P R O J E C T I O N S O N L Y LIBRARY FACILITIES ASSUMING A BUILDING RATE OF 1250 UNITS PER YEAR AND 2.471 PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT (800 SQUARE FEET PER 1,000 POPULATION) YEAR ZONE 1 ZONE 1 CITYWIDE EXISTING POP. DEMAND DEMAND FACILITIES CONFORMS/ (NON- BEGINNING BEGINNING CONFORMING) 01/01/YR 01/01/YR ------------------------------------------------------------------ 1987 22,269 17,815 46,154 31,500 * 1988 23,524 18,819 48,625 31,500 * 1989 24,278 19,422 51,096 31,500 * 1990 24,999 19,999 53,567 31,500 * 1991 25,226 20,181 56,038 75,000 18,962 1992 25,345 20,276 58,509 75,000 16,491 1993 25,577 20,462 60,980 75,000 14,020 1994 25,797 20,638 63,451 75,000 11, 549· 1995 26,017 20,814 65,922 75,000 9,078 1996 26,237 20,990 68,393 75,000 6,607 1997 26,457 21,166 70,864 75,000 4,136 1998 26,677 21,342 73,335 75,000 1,665 1999 26,897 21,517 75,806 85,000 9,194 2000 27,117 21,693 78,277 85,000 6,723 2001 27,337 21,869 80,748 85,000 4,252 2002 27,557 22,045 83,219 85,000 1,781 2003 27,777 22,221 85,690 85,000 (690) 2004 27,996 22,397 88,161 85,000 (3,161) 2005 28,216 22,573 90,632 85,000 (5,632) 2006 28,436 22,749 93,103 85,000 (8,103) 2007 28,656 22,925 95,574 85,000 (10,574) 2008 28,876 23,101 98,045 85,000 (13,045) 2009 29,096 23,277 100,516 85,000 (15,516) 2010 29,316 23,453 102,987 85,000 (17,987) 2011 29,536 23,629 105,458 85,000 (20,458) 2012 29,756 23,805 107,929 85,000 (22,929) 2013 30,196 24,156 107,931 85,000 (22,931) * BASED UPON ACTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ON 7/7/87 TO SCHEDULE AND FINANCE THE CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONAL LIBRARY SPACE, THE ADOPTED PERFORMANCE STANDARD IS BEING COMPLIED WITH. -46- c. Adequacy findings The City Council, on July 7, 1987, earmarked funds for the acquisition of a site and construction of a 58,000 square foot facility to be built by 1991. This action brings the Citywide Library facility into compliance with the performance standard. It is projected this additional space will enable the City to comply with the Library standard until the year 2003. III. MITIGATION A. Special Conditions for Zone 1 No the City facilities This action 1 • 2. 3. 4. conditions are necessary for library in Zone 1 because Council has taken action to provide needed Library in accordance with the adopted performance standard. includes: Approved a Library site. Directed the City Manager to negotiate an agreement to acquire the site. Earmarked funds to guarantee the financing needed for site acquisition and construction of a 58,000 square foot Library facility. Construction is to be completed by 1991. Attached as an appendix is the Agenda Bill to the City Council which also describes the action taken and provides background information. B. financing The City Council has earmarked sufficient funds to acquire the site and to construct a 58,000 Library facility as part of the action taken on July 7, 1987. The City Council has guaranteed the necessary funds to accomplish this project, although the specific long-term financing mechanism has not been determined. -47- ) ) ) LIBRARY ZONE 1 COMPARISON 130 120 110 100 Q 90 I M,000 80 Q~ 75,000 SUPPLY ' ... ,, QC 70 .i:,-a 00 I ti! ~o 60 ... t ea ~ 0 -10 U) 30 20 10 ZONE 1 m )( 0 :c -m 1990 1995 2000 2005 2013 --t DEMAND BY YEAR G) 49 WASTEWATER ZONE 1 ENCINA WASTEWATER T·AEATMENT PLANT ZONE 1 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN -50- WASTEWATER I lD / t CityofC•laoect Growtfl Manaoemant Pror,arn ~ JANUARY 1987 BUILDOUT LOCAL. FACILITIES MAN·AGEME NT PLAN-Zone 1 WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY Carlsbad Service Area SUMMARY SHEET ADEQUACY PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (CcJarll ... w/8tllldlrd) MITIGATION FUNDING 4.7 EXISTING 5.7 NO SEE PAGE SEE PAGE MGD 55 55 a 6.7d APPROVED 8.6b,d YES N/A N/A MGD C, z ----"' < 7,. 7c, d :c CL FUTURE 8.6c,d YES NIA N/A MGD --- a. Buildout assumptions are for the entire sewer service area which includes Zone 1. The following analysis of a citywide facility, therefore, focuses on the entire sewer service area, and not just on Zone 1. b. Assumes Phase IV expansion of Enclna. c. Demand and Supply, as of 1995. d. Demand and Supply, as of 1991. -51- -- WASTEWATER TREATMENT ~APACITY I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Sewer plant capacity is adequate for at least a five year period. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS A. Inventory Sewer service in the City of Carlsbad is provided by three separate and independent agencies, Leucadia County Water District, San Marcos County Water District, and the City of Carlsbad. Sewer service for Zone 1 is provided entirely by the City of Carlsbad. 1. Buildout Assumptions (Carlsbad Sewer Service Area): Wastewater Treatment Demands Carlsbad Population Current Buildout 40,356 95,669 * EDU -Equivalent Dwelling Units EDU* Current Buildout 21,354 47,800 MGD** Current Buildout 4.7 11.8 ** MGD -Million Gallons per Day -Average Dry Weather Flow (AOWF) 2. Existing Facilities The City of Carlsbad has capacity available at two treatment plant facilities. Secondary treatment capacity is provided through the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility (WPCF) which ls a regional facility owned by six member agencies. The current rated capacity of the plant is 22.5 MGD of which Carlsbad retains ownership of 25.4 percent (5.7 MGD). The City of Carlsbad also holds title to the Calavera Hills Treatment Plant which has a capacity of 1.2 MGD. The Calavera Facility is not operational at this time and will require the expenditure of $1.1 to $1.5 million to make it functional. Operation of the Calavera Hills Plant is estimated to cost $360,000 per year. Comparable treatment at the Encina WPCF is estimated at $135,000 per year. The Calavera Hills Plant is not economical to operate for treatment capacity except in the absence of needed capacity at Encina. -52- 3. Facilities in the City's Five Year Capital Improvements Program: The adopted CIP includes two items which will be financed from the sewer fund which affect wastewater treatment capacity: B. a. Encina WPCF -Phase IV expansion, scheduled to begin in 1989, and completed in 1991 -$6,500,000 Carlsbad's share of this facility is 2.9 HGO. b. Calavera Hills $2,000,000 for 1986-87 and the 1990-91 Fiscal Years. Construction to be phased to correspond to capacity needs. Phasing and Service Demand Based on data maintained by the City Development Processing Services Department, on March 31, 1987, 22,965 EDU's had been permitted by the City. Utilizing 246 GPO per EDU and the adopted 3$ vacancy factor, 985 EDU's of capacity remain to be issued prior to reaching Carlsbad's share of capacity at the Encina WPCF. The Citywide Facilities Management Plan is based on phased growth of 1,250 dwelling units per year plus non- residential development. Using a similar phasing for the portion of the City within the Carlsbad Sewer Service Area an annual ,,,-growth rate of 1,143 EDU's per year (905 residential EDU's and 238 non-residential EDU's) is projected. This phasing would indicate that Carlsbad's wastewater treatment allocation could be exceeded within a year. Staff has just completed an analysis of Carlsbad's wastewater flows to Encina WPCF to determine the actual flow value of an EDU. As of March 30, 1987, 21,354 equivalent dwelling units (EDU's) were connected and being billed by the City for sewer service. Flow corresponding to these EDU's has been measured at 4.69 MGD. That flow divided by the currently billed EDU's yields an actual flow rate of 220 gallons per day (GPO) per EDU. However, for planning purposes the City of Carlsbad has adopted a flow rate of 246 GPO per EDU. Evaluation of available capacity varies significantly depending on the value of flow per EDU utilized. As can be seen from Table 1 on Page 54, utilizing 220 GPD per EDU, treatment capacity at Encina WPCF would be available until 1990 with plant expansion expected to be completed in 1991. c. Adequacy Findings Based on analysis ~f existing flow data and a range of projections it is likely that current treatment capacity will be reached between 1988 and 1990, and that additional interim capacity will be required to meet the performance standard. Options exist to provide interim treatment capacity which would allow the Zone as well as the City's Sewer Service Area to meet -53- .llAB. 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 01 1992 ,I:--1993 .I 1994 1995 TAILE 1 CAILSIAD SEIVICE AIEA DEIIAID AID AVAILAILE IIAITEVATEI TIEATNEIT CAPACITY FLOW PROJECTIONS1 EQUIVALENT DWELLING FLOW I 220 FLOW I 246 UNITS <EDU'S> GAL/EDU <N§P>2 GAL/EDU <NGD> ENCINA <NGD> 21,354 4.69 5.25 5.71 23,3843 5.14 5.75 5.71 24,492 5.40 6.03 5. 71 25,600 5.63 6.29 5. 71 26,708 5.87 6.57 8.57 27,816 6.12 6.84 8.57 28,924 6.36 7.12 8.57 30,032 I 6.60 7.38 1.57 31,140 6.15 7.66 1.57 TREATMENT CAPACITY LAKE CALAVERA HILLS <NGD> TOTAL <NGD> o.o 5.71 0.6 6.31 0.7 6.41 0.7 6.41 o.o 8.57 o.o 8.57 0.0 1.57 0.0 1.57 0.0 8.57 1 NOTE: 1989 to 1995 EDU's are expanded 1,143 per veer. This represents 905 dwelling units and 238 EDU's of comercial and industrial. (421,400 sq. ft. at 1,800 sq. ft. per EDU.) Each year is projected to July 1 to correspond to fiscal year budgeting and adjusted for a 3X vacancy. 2 MGD = Millions of Gallons Per Day 3 1988 EDU'S • 22,965 EDU'S issued 3·31·87 + 1,143 per Note 1 adjusted for 3X vacancy (22,965 + 1,143) X 0.97 • 23,384 the performance standard. These alternatives are incorporated into the proposed special conditions outlined in the following Mitigation section. III. A. B. MITIGATION Special Conditions for Zone 1 1. The following actions shall be pursued by the City to ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity throughout a five (5) year period: a. Monitor Encina Treatment Plant flows on a monthly basis to determine actual flow rates and to have an early warning of capacity problems. b. Actively pursue acceleration and phasing of treatment plant Phase IV expansion to provide adequate capacity. c. When Carlsbad's share of Encina flows reach 5.25 MCD, actively seek leased capacity from other Encina agencies. d. Financing When Carlsbad Encina flows reach 5.45 MGD, proceed to activation of the Calavera Hills Reclamation/Treatment Facility. Plant to be activated when more cost effective treatment measures are no longer feasible and Carlsbad capacity at Encina has been reached. Sewer connection fees provide the primary source of funding for both sewer line upgrades and expansion of treatment plant capacity. The timing of sewer facilities upgrades and the mechanism of financing are critical to analysis of the adequacy of funding for plant expansion. A complete financial and cash flow analysis should be conducted in conjunction with the Citywide Sewer Master Plan update. This analysis will provide a basis to evaluate development phasing within sewer basins and each Growth Management Zone. Priority for funding should be given to wastewater treatment capacity. -55- 56 PARKS ZONE 1 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN -57-•f PARK DISTRICTS ,o 4 t City ~I CartaNO Gtowlf'I ~--Pt-ogram -JANUARY 1987 ZONE 1 COMMUNITY PARKS □ EXISTING • FUTURE * SPl!CIAL USE AREA LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN -58- I \ ' PARKS ', . ,, ', ' \ I I CH Clttt afC•RMa Gtowt,_ .........,__ PrOQram -JANUARY 1987 LOCAL· FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 1 PARKS \ PARK DISTRICT 1 SUMMARY SHEET BUILDOUT ADEQUACY MITIGATION PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (Ccalfw;; ... .,._..,d) 69.15 EXISTING 81.3 YES N/A ACRES 66. 8 .. APPROVED 78.32 81.3 YES N/A ACRES CJ z 9.0 -en -c X l18.44 a. FUTURE 81.3** NO ACRES 90.6 ** Based upon the projected phasing for Park District 1, the standard will not be met in 1992. At that time, or prior to 1992, additional park acreage will be necessary. -59- FUNDING N/A N/A --- r PARKS I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Three acres of Community Park or Special Use Area per 1,000 population within a park district, must be scheduled for construction within a 5-year period. Special Considerations The Citywide Plan divides the City into four park districts which are the same as the four City quadrants. Zone 1 is located within Park District 1 (NW Quadrant). The parks listed under existing inventory for Park District 1 reflect the park standards in effect at the time this area was developed and may not reflect the new Park and Recreation standards adopted in 1981. It would be difficult to apply the new Parks and Recreation Standards for community parks to this quadrant because Park District 1 is largely developed and there are no remaining parcels over 200 acres (the minimum standard for land dedication) as required in the City's Park and Recreation Element. Therefore, future community parks of 20 acres or more are not likely to be developed in Park District 1. PARK DISTRICT 1 II. FACILITY PLANNING ANO ADEQUACY ANALYSIS The purpose of this analysis is to determine whether or not the park demand for Zone 1 complies with the adopted performance standard. A. Inventory Existing Facilities Community Parks (Developed) Holiday Ownership Acres Hosp Grove Laguna Riviera Magee City City City City -60- Active Natural/Passive Active Active Total Developed 5.4 27.0 6.8 3.0 42.2 Inventory (Continued) Special Use Areas Buena Vista Ownership CUSD SDG&E City City CUSD City CUSD CUSD CUSD City City City CUSD City City City CUSD Active Active Passive Active Active Acres 2.3 1. 7 1.0 2.3 3.0 1. 0 2.6 2.8 4.2 1. 4 2.1 0.4 2.0 0.8 1.0 3.0 7.5 B. Cannon Park Car Country Chase Field CHS Tennis Courts Harding Community Center Jefferson Elementary Kelly Elementary Magnolia Maxton Brown Maxton Brown Extension Oak Pine Elementary Pio Pico Rotary Swim Complex Valley Jr. High School SDG&E -San Diego Gas & Electric Community Center Active Active Active Passive Passive Passive Active Passive Passive Active Active Total 39. 1 CUSD -Carlsbad Unified School District Proposed Future Facilities Ownership ~ Acres Cannon Lake City Active 6.7 Pine School CUSD Active 7.0 Macario City Active 25.0 Pine Jr. Center CUSD Community Center 3.0 (All facilities owned by CUSD have one year joint-use agreements, renewable yearly with a 60 day cancellation clause which may be initiated by either party. The SDG&E Special Use Area originally had a 10 year lease which expired on May 31, 1973; however, the lease also provided for an automatic yearly renewal which is still in effect.) Phasing 1. Buildout Assumptions (1/1/87) Park District 1 Zone 1 Population Current 23,049 Buildout 39,479 Current 22,269 Buildout 30,195 -61- Required Acres 69.15 118.44 66.8 90.6 Phasing (Continued) 2. Park Demand (Park District 1) Listed below is the demand for parks generated by resi- dential development in Park District 1. Demand was determined by using the following formula: Yearly Dwelling Units x 2.471 = Population Population x Park Standard= Park Demand (by year) Supply ls determined by analyzing existing parks and any parks scheduled for construction. This is compared with the demand to determine if the performance standard ls being met. EXHIBIT H P L A II II I R G P R O J B C T :I O R S O II L Y PARIIC DISTRICT 1 PARIIC ACRBAGE COMPARISOII o• DEMAND -VS-SUPPLY 3 ACRBS o• COMMUNJ:TY PARK OR SPECIAL USB ARBA PBR 1 1 000 POPULATION WITJIIII THE PARK DISTRICT --------------------------------------------------------------------------YEAR DWELLING TOTAL POP. TOTAL PARKS TOTAL CONFORMS/ UNITS DWELLIIIG POP. DEMAND SUPPLY (RON- UNITS CONFORMIIIG) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/1/87 9,328 9,328 23,049 23,049 69.15 81.30 12.15 1987 539 9,867 1,332 24,381 73.14 81.30 8.16 1988 308 10,175 761 25,142 75.43 81.30 5.87 1989 355 10,530 877 26,020 78.06 81.30 3.24 1990 192 10,722 474 26,494 79.48 81.30 1.82 1991 188 10,910 465 26,959 80.88 81.30 0.42 1992 227 11,137 561 27,520 82.56 81.30 (1.26) 1993 167 11,304 413 27,932 83.80 81.30 (2.50) 1994 303 11,607 749 28,681 86.04 81.30 (4.74) 1995 156 11,763 385 29,066 87.20 81.30 (5.90) 1996 277 12,040 684 29,751 89.25 81.30 (7.95) 1997 268 12,308 662 30,413 91.24 81.30 (9.94) 1998 281 12,589 694 31,107 93.32 81.30 (12.02) 1999 162 12,751 400 31,508 94.52 81.30 (13.22) 2000 262 13,013 647 32,154 96.46 81.30 (15.16) 2001 258 13,270 637 32,791 98.37 81.30 (17.07) 2002 236 13,506 582 33,373 100.12 81.30 (18.82) 2003 225 13,731 555 33,928 101.78 81.30 (20.48) 2004 225 13,955 555 34,483 103.45 81.30 (22.15) 2005 225 14,180 555 35,038 105.12 81.30 (23.82) 2006 225 14,405 555 35,594 106.78 81.30 (25. 48) 2007 225 14,629 555 36,149 108.45 81.30 (27.15) 2008 225 14,854 555 36,704 110.11 81.30 (28. 81) 2009 225 15,078 555 37,259 111.78 81.30 (30.48) 2010 225 15,303 555 37,814 113.44 81.30 (32.14) 2011 225 15,528 555 38,369 115.11 81.30 (33.81) 2012 225 15,752 555 38,924 116.77 81.30 (35.47) 2013 225 15,977 555 39,479 118.44 81.30 (37.14) -62- 3. Park Demand (Zone 1 Only) below is the demand for parks generated residential development in Zone 1 and not the Demand for Zone 1 was reached by using the Listed specifically by entire quadrant. following formula: Yearly Dwelling Units x 2.471 = Population Population x Park Standard= Park Demand (by year) EXHIBIT I P L A R R I R G P R O J B C '1' I O R S O R L Y IORB 1 PARK ACRBAGB COMPARISOR OP DBDRD -vs-SUPPLY 3 ACRBS OP COJIIIURI:'l'Y PARK OR SPBCI:AL USB ADA PBR 1 1 000 POPULA'l'I:OR WI:'l'HI:R 'l'BB PARK DI:S'l'RI:C'l' --------------------------------------------------------------------------YBAR DWBLLI:RG 'l'O'l'AL POP. 'l'O'l'AL PARKS 'l'O'l'AL CORPORMS/ URI:'l'S DWBLLI:RG POP. DBDRD SUPPLY (ROB- URI:'l'S CODORKI:RG) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/1/87 9012 9,012 22,269 22,269 66·.91 81.30 14.49 1987 508 9,520 1,255 23,524 70.57 81.30 10.73 1988 305 9,825 754 24,278 72.83 81.30 8.47 1989 292 10,117 722 24,999 75.00 81.30 6.30 1990 92 10,209 227 25,226 75.68 81.30 5.62 1991 48 10,257 119 25,345 76.04 81.30 5.26 1992 94 10,351 232 25,577 76.73 81.30 4.57 1993 89 10,440 220 25,797 77.39 81.30 3.91 1994 89 10,529 220 26,017 78.05 81.30 3.25 1995 89 10,618 220 26,237 78.71 81.30 2.59 1996 89 10,707 220 26,457 79.37 81.30 1.93 1997 89 10,796 220 26,677 80.03 81.30 1.27 1998 89 10,885 220 26,897 80.69 81.30 0.61 1999 89 10,974 220 27,117 81.35 81.30 (0.05) 2000 89 11,063 220 27,337 82.01 81.30 (0.71) 2001 89 11,152 220 27,557 82.67 81.30 (1.37) 2002 89 11,241 220 27,777 83.33 81.30 (2.03) 2003 89 11,330 220 27,996 83.99 81.30 (2.69) 2004 89 11,419 220 28,216 84.65 81.30 (3. 35) 2005 89 11,508 220 28,436 85.31 81.30 (4 .01) 2006 89 11,597 220 28,656 85.97 81.30 (4. 67) 2007 89 11,686 220 28,876 86.63 81.30 (5.33) 2008 89 11,775 220 29,096 87.29 81.30 (5.99) 2009 89 11,864 220 29,316 87.95 81.30 (6.65) 2010 89 11,953 220 29,536 88.61 81.30 (7. 31) 2011 89 12,042 220 29,756 89.27 81.30 (7. 97) 2012 89 12,131 220 29,976 89.93 81.30 (8.63) 2013 89 12,220 220 30,196 90.59 81.30 (9.29) -63- 4. Evaluation of Zone 1 within Park District 1 Listed below are the demand and supply of existing park acreage. Existing Community Parks Special Use Areas Acres Required Total Surplus Acres 42.2 39.1 81.3 69.15 12.15 Currently, in Park District 1 a surplus of 12.15 park acres exists. Based on phasing, it is anticipated that in 1992 an additional 1.27 acres of park will be needed to meet the quadrant demand. At that time, funding must be approved for construction of additional park acreage in Park District 1 within five years (See Financing Section). c. Adequacy Findings Park .District 1 currently conforms with the adopted performance standard and will continue to do so until 1992. At that time, or in advance of 1992, additional park acreage will be needed or development will be stopped in Park District 1. III. MITIGATION Currently, Park District 1 conforms with the adopted performance standard and needs no mitigation, although it is projected that a shortage will occur in 1992. Zone 1 is projected to phase its residential development through 2013. Given this phasing, in 1992 Zone 1's residential development would be stopped until additional park acreage ls added in the City's CIP or until another zone(s) solved this shortage. It is important to note that Park District 1 currently (January 1987) has $680,743 in park-in-lieu fees. Phased development of Zone 1 to 1992 (assuming an average fee of $655 per unit) would add approximately $877,000 park-in-lieu fees. Phased development of the other zones in Park District 1 would add another $159,000 in park-in-lieu fees, totaling $1,036,000. The collected park-in-lieu fees supplemented with PFF fees could be used to either develop Cannon Lake Park (6.7 ac) or to construct a special use area that would bring parks into conformance with the performance standard, or some other option. At this time, no specific mitigation is required and, therefore, no recommendation is provided. -64- A. Special Conditions for Zone 1 There are park facilities standards. B. Financing no conditions necessary at this time because in Park District 1 meet the adopted performance Public Facility Fees and Park-in-Lieu Fees are continuing to be collected and no additional financing plan is needed at this time. Development will be monitored and when it appears that park acreage could fall below the standard, the City Council will have to consider options to increase developed park acreage. -65- 66 DRAINAGE I "' ...... I - c::::;, EXISTING STORM DRAINS & SIZE OPEN CHANNEL CONCRETE LINED CHANNEL CONCRETE BOX CULVERT ~=::, DEBRIS BASIN ..-, BASIN BOUNDARY SUB BASIN BOUNDARY ZONE 1 Oceanalde Pacific Ocean LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAINAGE . ) FACIL1 rlES Buena Vlata Creek Otr Of c.tt,Hd Growlft Managentenl Program JANUARY 1887 LOCAL. FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 1 BUILDOUT DEMAND PROJECTION EXISTING --- APPROVED --- C, z -"' < J: ~ FUTURE * DRAINAGE SUMMARY SHEET ADEQUACY SUPPLY (Cc:»Nillllll» wAll■ldard) ---YES ---YES * YES MITIGATION . N/A N/A ** FUNDING N/A N/A ** * Specific drainage facilities will be required as individual projects are approved in Zone 1. ** Construction of improvements, phasing and financing mechanism will be identified in drainage master plan update. -68- r DRAINAGE I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Drainage facilities must be provided as required by the City concurrent with development. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS As indicated in the Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan, drainage is distinguished from.all other public facilities and improvements because by its very nature it is more accurately assessed as specific development plans are finalized. However, certain facilities may be necessary which are larger than those required from a single development project and, therefore, need to be identified so that proper funding can be collected for the construction of the facilities. A. Inventory 1) Existing Facilities Drainage occurs in numerous basins and sub-basins within Zone 1. Generally the northern half of Zone 1 drains north into the Buena Vista Creek watershed. The southern half of Zone 1 drains south into Agua Hedionda lagoon. Additionally, a small coastal strip flows west directly into the Pacific Ocean. Each of these basins is served by a broad network of existing storm drains and drainage facilities. The existing facilities are as shown in the "Existing Drainage Facilities" on Page 67. A description of the major existing drainage facilities within Zone 1 is as follows: Buena Vista Creek Watershed Buena Vista Creek flows within a rock lined drainage channel along the extreme north edge of Zone 1. Prior to reaching the Ocean, Buena Vista Creek opens up into the Buena Vista Lagoon. This 'lagoon' is actually a fresh water lake created years ago by the installation of a wier structure at the creek's outlet to the ocean. The Buena Vista Creek is a major watershed area which drains not only Zone 1 but portions of Zones 2, 7 and 25, together with large areas of the cities of Oceanside and Vista. The feeder on the currently basins to lines identified as lines AA, AB, AC and AD "Existing Drainage Facilities" Exhibit carry drainage flows from the Zone 1 sub- the Buena Vista Creek and lagoon. -69- Agua Hedionda Lagoon Watershed The dominate feature of the southern Zone 1 drainage system ls the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Unlike the other Carlsbad lagoons, Agua Hedionda is a true saltwater lagoon subject to tidal actions. The Agua Hedionda Lagoon drains a large watershed area which includes all or portions of Zones 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15, and 16, together with portions of Oceanside, Vista and San Marcos. Most of the southern portion of Zone 1 flows within numerous small sub-basins directly into the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. These sub-basins are served by exfsting drainage facilities identified in the "Existing Drainage Facilities" Exhibit as BA, BB and BC. In addition, along the southeast portion of Zone 1 there is a major concrete lined drainage channel located adjacent to Kelly Drive which drains portions of Zones 1, 2, 7 and 14. This channel flows beneath Park Drive within a box culvert and empties into the Agua Hedionda marshland within Zone 8. Coastal Strip The northern portion of the coastal strip is characterized by numerous small public and private storm drains which take drainage from developments along the bluff and empty directly onto the beach. The recently constructed Carlsbad Blvd. storm drain along the southwestern portion of Zone 1 intercepts the coastal strip drainage sub-basins and empties at one location onto the beach just south of Tamarack Avenue. 2) Future Facilities The Master Drainage Plan identifies several areas within Zone 1 where future drainage facilities will be needed. These facilities are shown on the "Future Drainage Facilities" on Page 74. There are currently seven drainage fee areas established by City touncll within Zone 1 to pay for the cost of these future facilities. Each of these Zones has been identified on the "Future Drainage Facilities" Exhibit. It should be noted that no fee was established for drainage areas 1, 2 and 8. In addition to the proposed master drainage facilities staff is recommending the addition of several new storm drains to alleviate drainage problems ~ot previously identified on the Master Drainage Plan. These additional facilities are as shown on the "Future Drainage Facilities" Exhibit and are described below, together with the proposed Master Drainage Plan Facilities. -70- Besides the above mentioned storm drain improvements, there will be a need to construct future improvements to the Buena Vista Creek channel in accordance with the guidelines adopted by Council on May 20, 1986 as part of the Buena Vista Lagoon Watershed Sediment Control Plan prepared by June Applegate. This report presents general guidelines for the development of the Buena Vista Creek Channel to prevent additional future sedimentation of the Buena Vista Lagoon. In order to assure compliance with these guidelines staff will be recommending a special condition be applied to future developments within Zone 1 which drain to the Buena Vista Creek north of Jefferson Street. Line AA-2 and AA-3 on Laguna Drive and Madison St. The Master Drainage Plan proposes the installation of a new storm drain facility within Laguna Drive from State Street to Madison Avenue and within Madison Avenue up to approximately Arbuckle Street. This facility will replace an undersized storm drain on Laguna Drive and will eliminate the street flooding problem which occurs on Madison Avenue during times of rain. Line AA on Oak Avenue This proposed master drainage facility would extend from the existing State St. storm drain at Elm Avenue south within State Street to Oak Ave. Once in Oak Avenue the storm drain would be extended east to Harding Street. Staff may be recommending redirection of this drainage facility from the business district storm drain in State Street to Master Facility BA which flows south along the AT & SF Railroad tracks and empties into the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. The existing drainage within the sub-basin currently drains along this route. The issue of diversion will be addressed in the update to the Master Drainage Plan. Staff is also recommending extension of the proposed Oak Street storm drain from Harding Street to I-5 to connect to existing storm drains which carry drainage from the east side of the freeway. This extension will eliminate flooding of Pine Avenue, Oak Street and Harding Street during rainstorms. -71- line BA in the AT & SF Railroad Right-of-Way Presently drainage in this area flows south within an unlined open channel from Oak Street to Tamarack Avenue. At Tamarack Avenue the drainage is collected within an existing underground storm drain pipe which empties into the middle lagoon of Agua Hedionda. The Master Drainage Plan proposes to underground the existing aboveground drainage. Preliminary studies done by staff indicate it may be feasible to widen the existing aboveground channel at a substantial savings to undergrounding the facility. This alternative will require approval of the AT & SF Railroad for the added easement required to widen the aboveground channel. The various alternatives will be discussed in more detail in the Master Drainage Plan Update. Staff also recommends installation of additional lateral drainage facilities from line BA which would eliminate the ponding and localized flooding which occurs on the west side of the tracks in the railroad right-of-way. line BB James Drive The Master Drainage Plan proposes the extension of the existing James Drive storm drain from Tamarack Avenue to Chestnut Avenue. Construction of this facility would reduce maintenance costs of the open channel and associated drainage facilities. lack of _an existing facility does not present a flooding problem for any existing structures, houses or city streets. The City has completed preparation of detailed design plans for the construction of this facility. line AB Highland Drive North This proposed Master Drainage Plan facility would complete the storm drain system on Highland Drive from Forest Avenue to the Buena Vista lagoon. It is needed to eliminate minor street flooding and to reduce erosion and subsequent sedimentation into the Buena Vista lagoon. line AC Monroe Street This proposed Master Drainage Plan facility would complete the storm drain adjacent to Monroe Street within the Hosp Grove area which the City is in the process of purchasing from the landowner. The existing drainage in this location flows in an unlined -72- open channel which exits into a large temporary desiltation basin at the southwest corner of Monroe St. and Marron Road. The existing eroded channel presents potential stability problems to the adjacent hillside and roadway fill. The Master Drainage Plan update will review these potential problems and attempt to prioritize the need for the construction of this facility. Line BC East of El Camino Real This proposed master drainage facility is located on the east side of El Camino Real and north of Tamarack Avenue. It is located just outside of Zone 1 within Zone 2 but includes areas to be drained within Zone 1. As noted in the Zone 2 Facility Plan this storm drain is located within Drainage Fee Area 8 which by previous Council action is a no ~ee zone. The facility generally serves lands which have been previously developed. The timing and financing of this facility will be addressed in the revised Master Drainage Plan. Line AA-4 & AA-5 Carlsbad Village Drive Storm Drain (Elm Ave) Staff is recommending construction of a new storm drain in Carlsbad Village Drive from Harding Street to the existing business district storm drain at State Street. An existing storm drain now collects Carlsbad Village Drive drainage ·at the I-5 overpass and carries it to a point just west of Harding Street where the drainage outlets back onto the surface of Carlsbad Village Drive. This drainage flows down Carlsbad Village Drive to a point where it merges with other storm waters to create localized flooding of the street and intersections. This occurs even in moderate rain storms. The proposed facility will complete the underground link between the upstream drain and the business district storm drain, thus eliminating the flooding of Carlsbad Village Drive. The City Redevelopment Department has contracted for design of this drainage facility as an intergral part of the Carlsbad Village Drive enhancement project. The estimated cost of the proposed facility is $500,000 and will be paid for with Redevelopment funds. -73- I ..... t BASIN BOUNDARY SUB BASIN BOUNDARY FUTURE DRAINAGE FACILITY © DRAINAGE FEE AREA Ocaanelda ·, Peclflc OcHn ZONE 1 p i # \, # 84 8' RP "" \, ) ) FUTURE DRAINAGE ..... .... •· ··········· ··~······· 0 ····· \ \ .. \ 42• ··· ... \ .. ·· ... \ ··· ... ····· ····· ····· .... .......... ~················· .... LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ) FACILITIES City of Cerl1t,ed G,awlfl Man.gemenl Pro~•,,. -JANUARY 1887 r - B. Phasing Most of the demand for future drainage facilities within Zone 1 will be localized and therefore be addressed as development occurs. There are, however, several major improvements which are larger than those which can be constructed with a single project. The phasing of these improvements will be addressed in the Master Drainage Plan update. c. Acequacy Findings Drainage facilities within Zone 1 currently meet the adopted performance standard. There are however several drainage facilities which are necessary but are larger than those required for a single development. Some of these facilities are located within drainage fee areas for which the City is collecting fees for installation of the facility. Several of the facilities are in no fee areas for which no funding mechanism has previously been identified. Table 2 on Page 76 summarizes the remaining major drainage facilities together with the drainage fee area, whether it is a fee or no fee area, and the cost of the facility. Generally, the lack of these future facilities does not create any major flooding problems which would seriously threaten private property interests. In most cases the lack of a facility creates a situation where temporary flooding occurs within the street and the accompanying City right-of-way. During a 50 or 100 year storm, flooding may be more extensive, however, this would be the case in flat urbanized areas with or without underground storm drains. Because the area is urbanized, the construction of infill developments does not significantly add to the existing drainage runoff. III. MITIGATION A. Special Condition for Zone 1 No building or development permits shall be issued for any portion of Zone 1 which drains to the Buena Vista Creek north of Jefferson Street unless it incorporates into the design of the project all conditions of the Buena Vista Lagoon and Watershed Sediment Control Plan, as prepared by June Applegate and Associates on September 3, 1985. B. Financing As shown on Table 1, facilities within "No fee" areas or facilities that were not identified on the Master Drainage plan have at the present no means of funding construction costs. -75- ,,--. The areas with an adopted drainage fee have generated funds as development occurred and will continue to do so; however, inflation of construction costs since the adoption of the fee (1980) has a two fold effect: current construction costs are higher than the construction costs used for establishing these fees, thus, currently collected fees create a deficit of funds to meet updated construction costs. The updating of adopted drainage fees as well as the financing mechanism for facilities within "No fee" areas will be addressed in the proposed Master Drainage Plan revision. TABLE 2 Drainage Estimated facilit~ fee Cost* Drainage fee Area No. 1 "AA" (Expanded) No fee $ 951,682 "AA-2" No fee 359,559 "AA-3" No fee 128,340 New facilities within "AA-4" N/A 491,625 Area No. 1 but not "AA-5" N/A 106,398 on Master Drainage Plan "AA-6" N/A 175,950 "AA-7" N/A 256,680 Drainage Fee Area No. 2 "BA" (Expanded) No fee 2,373,255 Drainage Fee Area No. 3 "AB" 3,808/A.C. 283,278 Drainage Fee Area No. 4 "AC"(Portion of) 1,686/A.C. 43,263 Drainage Fee Area No. 5 "BB"(Portion of) 2,658/A.C. 461,196 Drainage fee Area No. 7 None 2,273/A.C. N/A Drainage fee Area No. 8 "BC"** No Fee 399,209 *Updated cost to 1987 unit prices. **This facility ls located within Zone 2; however, portions of Zone 1 drain into this facility. -76- Facilit2:'. AA-2 & M-3 AA AA-4 & AA-5 BA BB AB AC BC TABLE l COST ESTIMATE FOR-FUTURE ZONE 1 DRAINAGE FACILITIES Drainage Fee Location Fee Area Collected Laguna & Madison St. 1 No Oak St. (includes extension to I-5) 1 No Carlsbad Village Dr.(Elm Ave.) 1 No AT & SF Railroad ROW (includes additional Lateral) 2 No James Drive 5 Yes Highland Dr. North 3 Yes Monroe Street 4 Yes East side El Camino Real 8 No Cost Estimate* $ 488,000** $1,128,000** $ 500,000*** $2,500,000** $ 462,000 $ 283,000 $ 180,000 $ 348,000** *Cost estimates are preliminary and subject to change as detailed engineering studies and plans are prepared. **The updated Master Drainage Plan will address the financing of these improvements. ***To be financed by Redevelopment funds. -77- 78 CIRCULATION I -..J \0 I ZONE 1 \ '"' .. Ocean■~ ~ ! 13 -·-· / .., .. , .. , \ CIRCULATION S, 1TEM General Plan Z:ONE 2 z:ONE 14 \"'·\ .... . ~~ '~:r~r..-.,--- • I Pacific ocean ,.., •.•. J ~ ,· ' >--~" _;-·-· . .. <::-.-... ""• ,,_ --I '1 '.. '-~\ ~,,,,. • ~ ~~ <.110.,., :, ' ' ~ --, ,. ~· ·-· City ot Ca,l1bad Growth Management Program JANUARY 1987 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN L O C A L -F A C I L I T I E S M A N-A G E M E N T P L A N -z O ne 1 BUIL-DOUT DEMAND PROJECTION EXISTING * APPROVED * C, z -"' < J: Q. * FUTU.RE CIRCULATION SUMMARY SHEET ADEQUACY SUPPLY (Cedar~ w/8t■mrd) * NO** * NO** * NO** MITIGATION See Page 87-88 See Page 89-94 See Page 95-102 * Page 83, Adequacy Findings chart summarizes Zone 1 intersections that fall below the adopted performance standard. FUNDING See Page 103-105 See Page 103-105 See Page 103-105 **Each of identified failing intersections or road segments will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation. -80- CIRCULATION I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD No road segment or intersection in the zone nor any road segment or intersection out of the zone which is impacted by development in the zone shall be projected to exceed a Service level C during off-peak hours, nor Service level D during peak hours. Impacted means where twenty percent or more of the traffic generated by the Local Facilities Management Zone will use the road segment or intersection. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS The purpose of this analysis is to determine whether or not the circulation system within Zone 1 conforms to the adopted performance standards for the management zones. It will also address all Circulation Element roads and intersections outside of Zone 1 impacted by twenty percent or more of the traffic generated by Zone 1 to ensure conformance with the adopted performance $tandard. Improvements needed to completely develop the Circulation Element Roads, such as sidewalks, street lights, etc. are discussed separately for informational purposes in Appendix 6, Page 196. A. Inventory The following circulation element roads and intersections are located within Zone 1: Number of lanes Roads Existing Buildout Classification Marron Rd. (Hwy 78 to El Camino Real) 4 4 Secondary Arterial Monroe St. (Marron Rd. to Elm Avenue)* 2 4 Secondary Arterial Carlsbad Village Dr. (Carlsbad Blvd. to El Camino Real) 2 4 Secondary Arterial Carlsbad Blvd. (North City limits to Power Plant) 2/4 4 Major Arterial El Camino Real (Hwy 78 to north of Cannon Rd.) 4/6 6 Prime Arterial Tamarack Ave. (Carlsbad Blvd. to El Camino Real) 2/4 2/3/4** Collector/ Secondary Arterial *Elm Avenue has been renamed Carlsbad Village Drive and will be referred to as such--some maps still refer to the street as Elm Avenue. **The classification and lane requirements change along different links of Tamarack Ave. -81- Intersections 1. Carlsbad Blvd. at Carlsbad Village Drive 2. Carlsbad Blvd. at Tamarack Ave. 3. El Camino Real at Marron Rd. 4. El Camino Real at Tamarack Ave. 5. El Camino Real at Carlsbad Village Drive 6. Carlsbad Village Drive at Monroe St. 7. Carlsbad Village Drive at Hwy. 5 8. Marron Rd. at Monroe St. 9. Tamarack Ave. at Hwy. 5. 10. Carlsbad Blvd. at State Street 11. El Camino Real at Kelly Dr. 12. Carlsbad Village Drive at State Street 13. Carlsbad Village Drive at Jefferson 14. Las Flores at I-5 (north and southbound) As can be seen on the circulation exhibit on Page 86 with the exception of Interstate 5 there are no road segments or intersections outside of Zone 1 which are impacted by Zone 1 traffic. This is due to the large number of access points for traffic to flow into and out of this zone. B. Phasing Although Zone 1 is considered an infill zone, there ls still a considerable amount of development and redevelopment potential remaining in this zone. It is estimated there will be approximately 3,200 new units, 2,118,000 square feet of commercial, and 230,500 square feet of office constructed within Zone 1 between January 1987 and buildout. In addition because Zone 1 contains a regional shopping center, tourist commercial property and prime beach areas, traffic generation will increase with the growth of the region as a whole. The Barton-Aschman traffic study which is the source for this traffic analysis was set up to analyze traffic at three threshold points; existing development, existing plus committed, and bulldout. Previous zone plans for infill areas with little development potential did not attempt to phase needed improvements, but based the timing of the needed improvements at one of these three thresholds. Due to the significant development potential of Zone 1, this plan has been prepared with a modified phasing program. The Zone 1 plan still recognizes the three thresholds of existing, existing plus committed and buildout. However, the existing plus committed category has been separated into three phases: 1 • 2. 3. Improvements needed in 1 Improvements needed in 4 Improvements needed in 7 3 years 6 years 10 years The buildout phase of Zone 1 is projected to be from 1987-2013. -82- c. Adequacy Findings Chart A on Page 84 lists the intersections studied within this report and indicates the existing, existing plus committed and buildout levels of service for each of the intersections. Currently all intersections and road segments within Zone 1 or impacted by Zone 1 traffic meet the adopted performance standard with one exception. The Carlsbad Village Drive/ southbound Interstate 5 intersection fails to meet the performance standard during the P.M. peak hour. As noted in the mitigation section, minor restriping of the off ramp lanes will bring this intersection into conformance with the adopted performance standard. With existing plus committed traffic it is projected that five intersections within Zone 1 will fail to meet the adopted performance standard. At buildout it is projected that seven intersections will fail the performance standard. These intersections are identified in tabular form on Chart Bon Page 85. This chart also presents an estimated time to failure in the four separate periods as discussed previously under phasing. -83- CHART A ZONE 1 INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------Existing Co11111itted Buildout -------------------------------------------------------------------------------AM PM AM PH AM PH Carlsbad Blvd/State St. A B A D C F* Carlsbad Blvd./Carlsbad Vill. Dr. A A A A A C Carlsbad Blvd./Tamarack Ave. A A A A B D El Camino Real/Marron Rd. A B A D E* F* El Camino Real/Tamarack Ave. A A F* F* A(2) A(2) El Camino Real/Kelly A A D F* A A(2) El Camino Real/Carlsbad Vill. Dr. A A B F* B 0(2) Carlsbad Vill. Dr./State St. A B A D E* E* Carlsbad Vlll. Dr./Monroe st. A A A A B B Carlsbad Vill. Dr./I-5 Northbound B D E* F* 0(2) 8(2) Carlsbad Vill. Or./1-5 Southbound C E* C F*(1) D F*(2) Carlsbad Vill. Dr./Jefferson Blvd A B A F* A E*(2) Marron Rd./Monroe St. A A A B A B Tamarack Ave./I-5 Northbound A A A D C E* Tamarack Ave./I-5 Southbound A B B B Las Flores Dr./I-5 Northbound A A A A A F* Las Flores Dr./1-5 Southbound A A A A A F* *The intersection falls below the adopted performance standard. Discussion of mitigating measures follows. (1)Assumes that improvements required to accommodate existing traffic have been implemented. (2)Assumes that.improvements required to acco11111odate existing plus committed traffic have been implemented. -84- 00 V, CHART B ZONE 1 FAILURE PROJECTIONS Carlsbad Blvd/State El Camino Real/Tamarack El Camino Real/Kelly El Camino Real/Carlsbad Village Dr. El Camino Real/Marron Carlsbad Village Dr./1-5 Southbound Carlsbad Village Dr./1-5 Northbound Carlsbad Village Dr./Jefferson Carlsbad Village Dr./State Las Flores Dr./1-5 Northbound Las Flores Dr./1-5 Southbound Tamarack Ave./1-5 Northbound TIME TO FAILURE Existing 1-3 Years 4-6 Years 7-10 Years Before Buildout -----------------------------------------------------X ---------------------------------------X --------------------------X --------------X -----------------------------------------------------X ----X----------------------------------X-------------X ---------------------------------------X --------------------------X--------------------------X -----------------------------------------------------X -----------------------------------------------------X -----------------------------------------------------X -----------------------------------------------------X I 00 °' l IMPROVEMENTS Q EXISTING Cl o-aVPR8 ~ -VENl8 ■ 7-10VENl8 • IEFORE BUILDOUT . .,_,.: FUTURE ROAD ZONE 1 '\ \ -\ -- Oce■nalde - \ -~ .. ~ - \\ ' Pacific Ocean •-■-■-■-·-·-~ ' ' ., . ·. ~ , . . ~· LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 2 -) CIRCULATION Impacted Roads and Intersections ZONE 14 ZONEI III. MITIGATION The proposed mitigation is divided into three sections. The first section will indicate what is needed to mitigate the existing traffic condition. The second section will deal with the mitigation needed to accommodate existing plus committed traffic and the third section will deal with mitigation for buildout traffic demands. All the intersection mitigation improvements are taken directly from the mitigation recommendations presented in the Barton-Aschman traffic study. The cost estimates have been altered to better reflect existing field conditions. It should be understood that all cost estimates presented in this plan are preliminary in nature and will need further refinement as the actual scope of work, utility needs and right-of-way dedications are determined. Mitigation for the various intersections and road segments have been grouped in accordance with the phasing parameters discussed previously. For easy reference the report includes a matrix on Page 105 which summarizes the project mitigation phasing groups, cost and alternative financing mechanisms. A. Special Condition for Zone 1 No building or development permits shall be issued in Zone 1 until the restriping mitigation necessary to bring the intersection of Carlsbad Village Drive at I-5 Southbound into compliance with the performance standard is accomplished. -87- EXHIBIT J A. Improvements Needed Today Carlsbad Village Drive at Southbound I-5 The level of service analysis determined that this intersection currently operates at Level of Service C during the morning peak hour and Level of Service E during the afternoon peak hour. The afternoon Level of Service Eis the result of a heavy eastbound through trip demand conflicting with the westbound left turn. There is also a heavy southbound-to-westbound right-turn demand. Redesignation of the southbound approach to provide a right-turn only and an optional right-turn/left-turn and restriping of the eastbound approach to provide an optional through or right-turn lane would result in a Level of Service of Band C during the respective morning and afternoon peak hours. Estimated cost is negligible. CD en &t) I - J + . -·· -- CARLSBAD VILLA ~ ... GE --DRIVE +- +- r ... -88- EXHIBIT K B • Improvements Needed Within 1-3 Years El Camino Real at Carlsbad Village Drive It is anticipated that this intersection will operate at Level of Service B and F during the morning and afternoon peak periods, respectively. To provide Level of Service A and D during the respective peak periods, the improvements shown in Figure should be implemented. The improvements include widening for an additional eastbound and westbound lane and widening El Camino Real to the full width of a prime arterial (three through lanes and one left-turn-only lane). The improvements required to mitigate this intersection are currently in progress. Two adjacent developments are providing the required widening to El Camino Real and the City is in the process of constructing the traffic signal and the design of the Elm Avenue widening. Estimated cost is $42,500. MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNDER BANK CONSTRUCTION ~ l l ~ .. CARLSBAD-VILLAGE _... It-· DRIVE .s. r _r-_, ( ~ ~ ..., . ,.- SINGLE FAMILY ~ "' t t i. RESIDENTIAL i VACANT UNDER I CONSTRUCTION u ~ Ill -89- EXHIBIT L C. Improvements Needed in 4-6 Years El Camino Real at Kelly Drive It is anticipated that this intersection will operate at Levels of Service D and F during the respective peak periods. Widening of El Camino Real to prime arterial standard, signalization, and separate southbound right-turn lane would result in Levels of Service B and C, respectively. The proposed intersection configuration is shown below. Estimated cost is $200,000. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL KELLY.DA ~ ~ SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL J l l l ~ " -90- _, < "' a: i VACANT < CJ _, w ~ t t t EXHIBIT M Carlsbad Village Drive at Jefferson Street It is anticipated that the afternoon levels of service will be F for the existing plus committed condition. Restriping of the northbound and southbound approaches to provide separate left- turn lanes and widening or restriping of Carlsbad Village Drive to provide an additional through lane in each directton would improve conditions to Level of Service D (see Figure below). The morning level of service would be A with or without the improvements. Estimated cost is negligible. BANK BANK C A Fti S B A D V ILL A GE A DRIVE .... J r ... COMMERCIAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL -91- EXHIBIT N D. Improvements Needed in 7-10 Years El Camino Real at Tamarack Avenue Without mitigation measures, it is anticipated that this intersection will operate at Level of Service F during both peak periods. In order to mitigate the unacceptable levels of service, the improvements shown below should be provided. These improvements consist of restriping to provide optional through and turn lanes for the east and west approaches, widening of the southbound approach to provide one additional lane and widening the northbound approach to provide two left-turn only, two right- turn-only and three through lanes. The result of these improvements would be Level of Service D during the peak periods. The Barton-Aschman study recommended a dual right turn lane· configuration from northbound El Camino Real to eastbound Tamarack Avenue. Staff recommends that prior to implementation of this configuration the use of a free right turn ramp together with an additional merge lane on Tamarack Avenue be investigated. Dual right turn lanes are not common and will present problems to drivers making the turn. Installation of a free right lane would increase the cost of mitigation by about $70,000. Cost of mitigation: $200,000. Free right turn/merge lanes option: $70,000 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY _. RESIDENTIAL ; I al -92- SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TAMARACK AVE "- 47 r VACANT EXHIBIT 0 Carlsbad Village Drive at I-5 Northbound and Southbound For the existing plus committed condition, it is anticipated that the morning levels of service at I-5 southbound and Carlsbad Village Drive will be C and F, respectively. To mitigate the unacceptable afternoon level of service, the improvements shown in the Figure on the next page should be implemented. The level of service resulting would be C -nd D during the respective peak hours. The improvements consist of widening Carlsbad Village Drive to provide an additional westbound through lane and a separate eastbound right-turn-only lane. For the northbound ramps, the anticipated levels of service for the existing plus committed condition are E and F, respectively. Widening of the eastbound approach to provide an additional through lane and widening of the off-ramp to provide three lanes would result in Levels of Service Band C, respectively. It ls apparent from a field review that installation of a protected right turn lane will adversely affect the existing Texaco gas station located on the southwest corner of Elm and Interstate 5. The traffic circulation around the existing pump station islands directs the gas station patrons directly onto Carlsbad Village Drive via two driveways. Both of these driveways pose traffic hazards and would seriously reduce the effectiveness of the proposed protected right turn lane. Further design review will be necessary to determine the actual effects this proposal will have on the Texaco property as well as the Boll Weevil restaurant property to the west. Engineering staff's prelimirary review indicates it is very likely that installation of this mitigation will require condemnation or reconfiguration of the gas station. This will add significantly to the cost estimate presented. The following cost estimate does not include provision for condemnation of property or reconfiguration of the existing gas station. The Carlsbad Village Drive enhancement program curently being designed does not propose to construct this improvement; however, provision is being made to reduce the impact the proposed mitigation will have on the improvements to be constructed with the Village Drive enhancement project. Estimated cost of construction (only) $112,000. -93- EXHIBIT 0 Carlsbad Village Drive at I-5 Northbound and Southbound (Continued) Ill t PARKS & RECREAT ION RESTALIIANT 11! SERVICE STATION .i. DEPT J .& A-0-W CARLSBAD YILL AGE ~ 1.s. DRIVE ------------------------,_ -r J j MEDIAN -·-I -------------------------------. .. ._ r A-0-W SERVICE STATION I SERVICE STATION .. .a. -94- EXHIBIT P E. Improvements Needed Before Buildout Carlsbad Boulevard at State Street This intersection is projected to operate at Level of Service C and F during the morning and afternoon peak periods, respectively, for buildout conditions. The necessary improvements to allow this intersection to operate at an acceptable level of service include adding one northbound through lane. This is consistent with the Circulation Plan and no costs are involved. As a result, the Level of Service will result in B and C in the morning and afternoon peak periods, respectively. See Figure below. Estimate: $-0- l ~ _, al C < f al "' t _, a: < 0 t -95- r EXHIBIT Q El Camino Real at Marron Road It is projected that at buildout conditions, this intersection will operate at Level of Service E and F during the morning and afternoon peak periods, respectively. The Figure below indicates the improvements necessary to allow this intersection to operate at an acceptable level of service. The improvements include adding one eastbound left-turn lane, adding one eastbound right- turn lane, adding one southbound right-turn lane, and adding one northbound right-turn lane. As a result of these improvements, it ls projected this intersection will operate at level of Service C and D during the morning and afternoon peak periods, respectively. Cost Estimate: $143,700. ~ ~ i < J l i l l ~ (.) -' .J LI.I ... I .,_ +- .J r J 'I "MARRON RO " ... t t t (' AO -96- EXHIBIT R Carlsbad Village Drive at Southbound I-5 The intersection of Carlsbad Village Drive at the southbound ramps of 1-5 is expected to operate at Level of Service D and F during the morning and afternoon peak periods, respectively. Modification of the intersection approaches as shown on the Figure below consists of adding one westbound left-turn lane and restriping the southbound right turn for an optional left turn plus right turn. As a result of these improvements, the intersection ls projected to operate at Level of Service A and D during the morning and afternoon peak periods, respectively. Cost Estimate: $37,200. ,) a.. '- ,I ... ... -91- II) I -Q z :::> . i J: § (,/) ... ... ... r ,r- CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE ,-· EXHIBITS Carlsbad Village Drive at Jefferson Street It is anticipated that the level of service for this intersection at buildout conditions will be A and E during the morning and after peak periods, respectively. The Figure below shows the improvement necessary to allow the intersection to operate at an acceptable level of service. The improvement necessary at this intersection is to add one eastbound left-turn lane and the resulting level of service will be A and C during the morning and afternoon peak periods, respectively. Cost Estimate: $37,200. w 2 w > < z 0 Cl) cc w u. u. .. Yij .... .s. ... ... -~ i----~----.. CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE -98- - EXHIBIT T Carlsbad Village Drive at State Street The level of service analysis indicated the intersection will operate at level of Service E during both the morning and afternoon peak hours for buildout conditions. The improvement shown on the Figure below would result in an acceptable level of service. This improvement includes adding one westbound right- turn lane and the resulting level of service would be D for both the morning and afternoon peak periods. Cost Estimate: $35,600. + I I -99- I-w w a: t; w ~ t; .... '- - r CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE EXHIBIT U Las Flores Drive at Northbound 1-5 The intersection of Las Flores Drive at the northbound ramps of I-5 is expected to operate at Level of Service A and F during the morning and afternoon peak periods, respectively. The improvements shown on the Figure below would result in the intersection operating at an acceptable level of service. These improvements include adding one eastbound left-turn lane, adding one westbound right-turn lane, adding one eastbound through lane, adding one westbound through lane, and restriping the northbound for a shared right plus left-turn lane. As a result of these improvements, the level of service at this intersection for buildout conditions will operate at Band A for the morning and Afternoon peak periods, respectively. Cost of Estimate: $147,000. J ~ ~ -, y (' -100- '° I - a ~ a: 0 z .... "LAS FLORES DR EXHIBIT V Las Flores Drive at Southbound 1-5 The intersection of Las Flores Drive at the Southbound ramps of I-5 is expected to operate at Level of Service A and F during the morning and afternoon peak periods, respectively. the Figure below shows the improvements necessary to bring this intersection up to an acceptable level of service. These improvements include adding two westbound left-turn lanes and one southbound left-turn lane. As a result, it ls projected that this intersection will operate at Level of Service A during both the morning and afternoon peak period. Cost Estimate: $111,500. &t) I -C z :::::> 0 C0 :c .... J l. l. B en _.. ... .... r r I LAS FLORES DR -101- EXHIBIT W Northbound I-5 at Tamarack Avenue The level of service analysis indicated that this intersection will operate at level of Service C and E during the morning and afternoon peak periods, respectively. The Figure below shows the necessary improvements to allow this intersection to operate at an acceptable level of service. These improvements are consistent with the Circulation Plan with the exception of restriping the northbound lanes for an optional right-turn and left-turn lane. As a result of this restriping, the projected level of service is C for both morning and afternoon peak periods. Cost Estimate: -0-(Restriping costs only) +- I ..., -. -. .. ,.,TAMARACK A VE " f (' -102- B. Timing and Financing of Mitigation Each of the needed improvements have been separated into four categories which indicate a specific time range for the improvements to be made. These categories are more specific than the three levels of analysis which were done for the Barton- Aschman Traffic Study. Those were existing, existing plus committed, and buildout. Exhibit X, "Circulation Improvement Costs," on Page 105 summarizes these categories. The matrix classifies all improvements in terms of the year in which the improvement is projected to be needed, i.e., specific improvements needed by 1991, 1994, and 2013. The financing A summary identified 1 • 2. 3. 4. exhibit options shows in each further identifies av a'i 1 ab 1 e to prov id e the cost estimate to category as follows: Constructed by 1991 Constructed by 1994 Constructed by 1998 Constructed by 2013 Total the estimated cost and each of the improvements. complete the improvements $ 42,500 200,000 382,000 512 2820 $1,137,320 These cost estimates will be reviewed and updated as improvement plans are prepared. Exact timing of these improvements has been related directly to staff's phasing of the Zone. There ls the potential for this schedule to be modified as individual development projects are proposed which vary from staff's projected phasing. Under whatever phasing scenario actually occurs, the adopted performance standard will be maintained or no development shall be allowed to proceed. The financing of these needed circulation improvements can be acomplished through a number of available financing alternatives. Each alternative will have different advantages and disadvantages which must be evaluated prior to selecting the best method for a given improvement. The specific advantages and disadvantages change over time so that selecting a precise financing method today for a future improvement may create unforseen consequences. For that reason, staff has developed a flexible financing matrix which priortizes the best financing options available today for each needed improvement as identified. Other financing options may be available and more appropriate as these improvements are needed in the future. -103- Where the City is currently collecting a fee for a specific improvement, this financing source has been identified as the City's first priority. However, because there is a lag time between fees collected and the need for improvements, funds from these sources may not be available to finance an improvement concurrent with need. Therefore, another source must be found such as a developer contribution or some other innovative financing alternative. If no other options exist, then development must wait until the City can finance the improvement. This plan will establish a sound basis for the City to ensure needed circulation improvements are made in accordance with the adopted performance standard. It also sets in place adaptable financing options that can be used to select the best alternative funding mechanism available when the improvement is needed. -104- I .... 0 IJl I ) CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT COSTS PROJECT ---------------TO-ii-CONSTiUCTiD-NOi _______________ _ ----------------------------------------------------1. CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR./I-5 SOUTHBOUND -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY 1991 ----------------------------------------------------1. EL CAMINO REAL/ELK -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY 1994 ----------------------------------------------------1. EL CAMINO REAL/KELLY DRIVE 2. CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR./JEFFERSON BLVD. TOTAL BY 1994 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY 1998 ----------------------------------------------------1. EL CAMINO REAL/TAMARACK 2. CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR./I-5 NORTHBOUND & SOUTHBOUND TOTAL BY 1998 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY 2013 ----------------------------------------------------1. CARLSBAD BLVD./STATE STREET 2. EL CAMINO REAL/MARRON 3. CARLSNAD VILLAGE DR./I-5 SOUTHBOUND 4. CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR./JEFFERSON BLVD. 5. CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR./STATE STREET 6. LAS FLORES DRIVE/I-5 NORTHBOUND 7. LAS FLORES DRIVE/I-5 SOUTHBOUND 8. I-5 NORTHBOUND/TAMARACK TOTAL BY 2013 ------------_ ___ gQ!!~---- 0 --------------------- 42,500 --------------------- 200,000 0 ------------200,000 ---------------------- 270,000 112,000 ----3a2;000----------------------- 0 143,700 37,200 37,820 35,600 147,000 111,500 0 ----si2;a20- FINANCING PRIORITIES --oiiioi_i ___ ---oiiioi_i __ ------------~~----------CITY ----------------------------------------------- T.I.F. ------------------------------------------- T.I.F DEVELOPER CITY ---------------------------------------------- T.I.F DEVELOPER T.I.P. DEVELOPER ----------------------------------------------- CITY T.I.P. DEVELOPER T.I.F. DEVELOPER T.I.P. DEVELOPER T.I.F. DEVELOPER T.I.F. DEVELOPER T.I.F. DEVELOPER CITY ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COSTS 1,137,320 m )( :c -m --t )( IV. Additional Circulation Discussion The purpose of this section is to provide additional discussion regarding circulation items within Zone 1 which do not fail to meet the adopted performance standard, but may leave significant impacts upon the City's overall circulation system. These items which will be discussed below will require specific monitoring and added study to fully determine the best course of action to be taken by the City. Furthermore, these items will be folded into and addressed in greater detail as the Citywide Traffic Study is brought forward for adoption. 1 • Carlsbad Blvd. between Mt. View Drive and the Northern City Limits Carlsbad Blvd. is a major arterial road which pursuant to the Circulation Element would require four traffic lanes and a median. The Barton-Aschman Study indicates that at buildout the peak hour traffic flows along this portion of Carlsbad Blvd. may not warrant construction of four traffic lanes. Further study needs to be done to determine the ultimate configuration of Carlsbad Blvd. at this location as well as the funding mechanism should improvements be necessary. 2. Tamarack Ave. from Interstate 5 to Carlsbad Blvd. Tamarack Avenue has been designated a two lane collector street along this portion of roadway. There is a need to widen the existing two lane facility to provide additional room for vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians. The recently completed North Beach Planning/Traffic Study prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc. makes the following recommendations: "Although the City has an existing engineering design for Tamarack Avenue between I-5 and Carlsbad Boulevard, the City should reconsider and expand this study to include design solutions which would not work against the residential character of the street. Specific features of this design should include as a minimum: a. One travel lane in each direction plus left turn provisions; protected right-of-way for ultimate widening to two travel lanes in each direction. b. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities. c. A 'residential scale' median with appropriate landscaping and left turn provision, or a two-way left turn lane. -106- d. Right-of-way landscaping as necessary to soften the traffic and visual impact. e. Structural solution impact on abutting fences, walls, etc.). as necessary to soften the residential areas, (i.e., f. In some instance acquisition of excess right-of- way. Residential structures should not remain in a highly undesirable or substandard relation to the road. In these cases it may be appropriate to remove the structure, rather than try to save it. Purchased right-of-way might be used for landscaping, parking, pedestrian or bicycle facilities, etc." City staff ls currently studying the above recommendations to determine the most appropriate course of action. 3. 4. Monroe Street from Hosp Way to Marron Road The City has designated this section of Monroe Street as a secondary arterial requiring four through traffic lanes. This stretch of road presently contains two lanes of traffic. Due to the recent Hosp Grove ballot issue the City will be the primary land owner on both sides of this roadway. There appears to be no other development which can be conditioned to install these improvements. City staff will monitor this section of road to determine at what point in the future the improvements will need to be installed. Carlsbad Village Drive from Carlsbad Blvd. to Interstate 5 The circulation element lists Carlsbad Village Drive (Elm Ave.) as a secondary arterial requiring four through traffic lanes. The existing road configuration is wide enough to accommodate four lanes. However, due to the presence of on street parking only two lanes of traffic exist from Harding Street west to Carlsbad Blvd. The City ls currently in the process of preparing plans for the enhancement of Carlsbad Village Drive. The plans will include recommendations t~ improve circulation in the City's downtown area. The recommendations will address the parking issue as well as the interconnecting of signals to improve traffic flow. -107- 5. 6. El Camino Real from Hosp Way to Hwy 78 This section of El Camino Real is classified a prime arterial and is presently built to City standards providing six through lanes of traffic. The Barton- Aschman traffic study indicated that all the intersections within this segment of road currently meet the adopted performance standard and will continue to meet the standard for existing plus committed traffic. Whereas each of the intersections could in isolation adequately handle the existing and proposed traffic volumes, taken together these intersections tend to become very congested during the afternoon peak hours. The City in conjunction with Caltrans and Oceanside has interconnected· each of the traff le signals on El Camino Real from Marron Road to the old Gemco entrance north of Vista Way. Simple interconnection of the signals has apparently not resolved the traffic problem. The short intersection spacing and heavy side traffic make it extremely difficult to provide an effective signal timing plan to speed traffic flow through the intersections. The City has obtained a FETSAM traffic grant from the state to establish a more sophisticated signal timing program based on computer modeling. The results of this program will be available November of 1987. If the FETSAM program is not successful, staff recommends further study of this corridor be undertaken to determine what additional improvements are possible that could reduce traffic congestion to acceptable levels in this area. Hillside Drive from Park Drive to Highland Drive Highland Drive from Hillside Drive to Tamarack Avenue and Park Drive From Hillside Drive to Tamarack Avenue These three roads form an important circulation link from the southeast portion of Zone 1 to the freeway, beach and downtown area. By City standards these roads are classified as collector streets. Hillside Drive east of Park Drive is built with a 64 foot curb to curb width which will provide for four lanes of through traffic~ Park Drive south and east of Hillside Drive is designed with a curb to curb width of 48 feet. This will provide for two through lanes, parking on both sides and a striped bike lane. -108- Both Park Drive from Hillside to Tamarack and Hillside from Park to Highland/Tamarack are two lane rural-type roads with pavement widths ranging from 20-24 feet. Eventually these roads will need to be widened to an appropriate standard to handle the traffic that is generated by the southeast section of Zone 1. Further traffic studies will need to be done to determine if the full four lane facility needs to be extended to Tamarack Avenue. Carlsbad Tract 80-14 is conditioned to build a portion of both Park Drive and Hillside Drive. The adequacy of these roads will be reviewed carefully prior to further development of the area to assure conformance with the adopted performance standard. In summary, the above circulation items do not fail to meet the adopted performance standard. However, since one purpose of the local facilities management plan is to identify potential facility inadequacies due to future development, the discussion of the above roads was included. Since the above roads meet the adopted performance standards, it is not necessary to resolve the issues identified or require any special conditions as part of this Zone 1 plan. Instead these roads will be monitored as part of the Growth Management Program and the above issues will be dealt with in greater detail as part of the adoption of the Citywide Traffic Study. -109- 110 FIRE * ,tRI STATIONI-IXISTINQ 0 ,tRE STATIONS-ll'LAN,_D Cl 111lnule) FIRE RESPONSE TIME --STATION 1 --STATION 2 •--STATION a --STATION 4 ZONE 1 -' ,--.,,,. _.!!.9.'4---- -I --■-,,----. ,, - LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN -111- I I FIRE JANUARY 1987 LOCAL. FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 1 BUILDOUT DEMAND PROJECTION EXISTING 9012 (UNITS) APPROVED 1,208 (UNITS) C, z -UJ < ::c Q. FUTURE 12,220 (UNITS) FIRE SUMMARY SHEET ADEQUACY SUPPLY (Co1G11aa wl8tamrd) * YES * YES * YES MITIGATION N/A N/A N/A * The existing Fire Station locations will guarantee compliance with the adopted performance standard at all times as the Zone builds out. -112- FUNDING N/A N/A N/A FIRE I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD No more than 1,500 dwelling units outside of a five minute response time. II. FACILITY PLANNING ANO ADEQUACY ANALYSIS A. Inventory Zone 1 is within the five minute response time of three fire stations. The majority of the Zone is served by Fire Station No. 1, located at 1275 Elm Avenue and Fire Station No. 3, at 3701 Catalina. In addition, a small area to the south could be served by Station No. 4, at 6885 Batiquitos Road. B. Phasing Because all existing plus future development in Zone 1 is within the five minute response time of Fire Stations Nos. 1 and 3, Zone 1 will conform to the fire performance standard to buildout. Therefore, it was not necessary to do a phasing analysis for fire services in Zone 1. c. Adequacy Findings During preparation of the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, it was determined that Zone 1 presently meets the fire performance standard and will continue to conform to this standard to buildout of the City. III. MITIGATION A. Special Conditions for Zone 1 No conditions are necessary for fire services in Zone 1 because Fire Station Nos. 1 and 3 are located within the required five minute response time of the entire zone. B. Financing All fire facilities are in place for Zone 1 and the required performance standard has been met and, therefore, no special funding mechanisms are required. -113- 114 OPEN SPACE I t-" t-" VI I ZONE 1 Pacific Ocean ) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN . -~-·. <<-: .:-.· :: : :-.. ,, ... ·.·.. . ... ' . . . . ~,· ) OPEN ~PACE □ OPEN SPACE ZONE 2 ZONE 14 ZONES 4ir Clly al C11l1bld Growlfl Manllgernanr Program -JANUARY 1987 -- BUILDOUT LOCAL. FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 1 OPEN SPACE SUMMARY SHEET ADEQUACY PROJECTION ·DEMAND SUPPLY (Calb11a-» wl8tllldard) MITIGATION FUNDING EXISTING * * YES N/A ... APPROVED * * YES N/A FUTURE C, z -"' < :c . 0. * * YES N/A * Zone 1, as determined in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan will conform to the adopted performance standard at all times as the Zone builds out. -116- N/A N/A N/A OPEN SPACE I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Fifteen percent of the total land area in the zone exclusive of environmentally constrained non-developable land must be set aside for permanent open space and must be available concurrent with development. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS A. Inventory During preparation of the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan it was determined that certain areas of the City are already developed or meet or exceed the requirements for Open Space and, therefore, an analysis ls not needed in the local plan. This includes Zones 1 through 10, and Zone 16. Zone 1, an infill zone, is almost completely built out with only a small amount of remaining land available for development. This eliminates the opportunity to create future permanent open space unless existing structures are removed. For these reasons, the Open Space facility for Zone 1 needs no further analysis. Of note is the City's recent acquisition of Hosp Grove as open space (50 acres). B. Phasing Because Zone 1 is an infill zone with no future opportunity to increase open space, the phasing requirements for Open Space were not addressed as required by Chapter 21.90.110(d)(2) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. c. Adequacy Findings During preparation of the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, it was determined that the adopted performance standards for Open Space in Zone 1 have already been met. III. A. B. MITIGATION Special Conditions for Zone 1 There are no special conditions which apply at this time. Financing Because Zone 1 creates a minimal amount of future development, it has been assumed this development will continue to meet the adopted performance standard. Therefore, financing was not addressed as required by Chapter 21.90.110(d)(3) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. -117- 118 SCHOOLS r CARLSBAD SAN DIEGUITO • ENCINITAS r '"ONE 1 SCHOOL DISTRICTS I RD I CHyotC•ttltd G--owtfl Manlveffl.,,. Pr~.,.. JANUARY 1987 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLA'N -119- ZONE 1 EXISTING • ELEMENTARY • JUNIOR HIGH • HIGH SCHOOL E!:lli!!!! 0 ELEMENTARY D JUNIOR HIGH 6 HIGH SCHOOL SCHOOLS --r-------,._'7t ' ~o cos r.• I I I I • D I \ ', 0 ' ', .... ' ' \ CHy ol C•lsDad Growrfl ~ Proa,•m JANUARY 1987 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN -120- LOCAL FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 1 BUILDOUT DEMAND PROJECTION EXISTING * APPROVED * C, z -(/') < J: Q. FUTURE * SCHOOLS SUMMARY SHEET ADEQUACY SUPPLY (Ca.lai,,_.. w/8t■ldard) * YES * YES * YES MITIGATION N/A N/A N/A FUNDING N/A N/A N/A * The Carlsbad Unified School District has capacity to meet the existing demands generated from Zone 1. ** The School District has indicated that it is able to provide capacity at all times as the Zone builds out. -121- SCHOOLS I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS School capacity to meet the projected enrollment within the zone as determined by the appropriate school district must be provided prior to projected occupancy. II. FACILITY PLANNING ANO ADEQUACY ANALYSIS A. Inventory Zone 1 is entirely within the boundaries of the Carlsbad Unified School District. Currently, there are 7 schools in Zone 1, which is the older, more populated area of Carlsbad. School (grades) Buena Vista Elem (K-6) 1300 Buena Vista Way Kelly Elementary (K-6) 4885 Kelly Drive Jefferson Elementary (K-3) 3743 Jefferson Street Magnolia Elem. (K-6) 1905 Magnolia Avenue Pine Elementary (4-6) 801 Pine Avenue Valley Jr. High (7-8) 1645 Magnolia Avenue Carlsbad High School (9-12) 3557 Monroe Street La Palma Continuation HS(9-12) 800 Chestnut Avenue Facilities 14 permanent classrooms 6 temporary 6 permanent classrooms 6 relocatables -lease 4 trailers 13 permanent classrooms 6 temporary 20 permanent classrooms 4 temporary 12 permanent classrooms 2 temporary 28 permanent classrooms 2 Special Ed classrooms 38 permenent classrooms 2 Special Ed classrooms 10 overage relocatables 7 trailers -temporary 4 relocatable classrooms 2 trailers Total Student Capacity 420 180 180 180 120 390 180 600 120 360 60 822 20 1, 140 20 300 210 60 5,362 Student capacity in permanent classroom facilities 1s 3,952. Student nonpermanent/temporary Carlsbad High School is 5,362. Carlsbad currently operating at capacity in leased or rented facilities including 10 relocatables at is 1,410 students. Total student capacity Unified School District facilities are capacity. -122- -Currently, the above-listed schools are the only schools in Carlsbad Unified School District, and students from the entire City, with the exception of the La Costa area, attend these schools. Hope Elementary, presently under construction, will be completed in July, 1987 and in September, 1987 will provide elementary public school services for approximately 575 northeast quadrant elementary students in the Calavera Hills area (Zones 2 and 7). Since Calavera Hills area students now attend schools in the northwest quadrant (Zone 1), the opening of Hope Elementary and the relocation of these students would make space available in the existing schools for approximately 575 additional students. The Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan identifies additional general locations for future elementary, middle, and high school sites throughout the City, including sites in Carlsbad Unified School District, San Marcos Unified School District, Encinitas Union Elementary District, and San Dleguito Union High School District. These locations were developed in the School Location Master Plan of 1982 and 1983 and are still in use for general planning purposes. (See Figures 16 and 17, pages 47 and 48 of the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan of September 23, 1986.) Carlsbad Unified School District ls in the process of computerizing and updating the School Master Location Plan to bring it into alignment with the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan -Management Zones, Planned Land Use, Phasing, and other significant factors. B. Phasing As of January 1, 1987, Zone 1 has 9,012 residential dwelling units. There is a potentlai for the zone to add an additional 1,245 units by 1992, with a total of 3,208 residential units between now and buildout. These new units could add 1,400 students to the school demand generated within Zone 1. Approximately 540 students over the next five years (1987 -1992) can be expected from the present residential phasing for Zone 1. As indicated earlier, nearly all of Carlsbad Unified School District's present school sites are located in Zone 1. The District has no plans to build additional elementary school facilities within Zone 1. Increased public school requirements within this zone will be met through additional leased or rented relocatables or trailers, prepositioned on presently owned school sites as demand dictates. To provide classrooms for 540 additional students within the next five years will require 18 relocatables at 30 students per classroom distributed over various sites. lease/rental costs would be approximately $117,000 per year and initial site preparation costs of $90,000, normally funded through developer fees. In the meantime, construction of 1,245 new residential units of about 1,500 square feet per unit could generate $2,801,250 at $1.50/square foot in fees on a one-time basis. -123- -The Carlsbad Unified School District has indicated the ability to handle the additional demand. Based upon the School District's indication, the adopted performance standard will continue to be met, and therefore, phasing of school facilities was not addressed as required by Chapter 21.90.110(d)(2) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. YEAR Existing 1/1/87 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 TOTAL BUILDOUT STUDENT GENERATION ZONE 1 PROJECTED UNITS STUDENTS 9,012 3,920 508 221 305 133 292 127 92 40 48 21 94 41 89 39 89 39 89 39 89 39 89 39 89 39 89 39 89 39 89 39 89 39 89 39 89 39 89 39 89 39 89 39 89 39 89 39 89 39 89 39 89 39 89 39 3,208 1,402 12,220 5,322 -124- c. Adequacy Findings The Carlsbad Unified School District is currently providing capacity for the existing demand generated by Zone 1. The School District has indicated its ability to provide capacity to the ultimate buildout of Zone 1 through the use of relocatables and trailers on current sites. The High School, which will always serve a number of zones, may be treated as a separate problem as each zone is developed. III. A. MITIGATION Special Conditions for Zone 1 No conditions are necessary. The Carlsbad Unified School District has indicated they will be able to accommodate the additional number of students generated through the buildout of Zone 1. No additional elementary schools are planned in Zone 1; Carlsbad High School ls presently under study for expansion. B. Financing Previously, public schools facilities financing has been possible through the use of developer fees imposed under Policy 17 of the City of Carlsbad. In September, 1986, the State signed into law new schools facilities legislation which changed not only the procedure for collecting developer fees but also established a cap of $1.50 per square foot of residential construction and $.25 per square foot of commercial/industrial development. On January 2, 1987, Carlsbad Unified School Di~trict, at a regularly scheduled meeting following a. public hearing, established its fees at the cap. This immediately resulted in a 53% reduction in developer fees collected but also made it impossible for the District to fund school facilities through developer fees. Possible options for financing facilities in Zone 1 include: a. Developer Fees -Established at $1.50 per square foot of residential "covered or enclosed" space or $.25 per square foot of commercial/industrial development. Nexus must be shown for commercial/industrial fees. Legislation is presently being developed which may again drastically change developer fees. Developer fees are used for rental/lease, lease purchase of relocatables, and trailers, as well as reconstruction of facilities. -125- b. c. d. e. State Allocation Board -Funding may be applied to construction of new facilities or reconstruction of facilities 30 years or more in age, providing the District's projects and overcrowdinq qualify for consideration. Final determination is made by the State Allocation Board, General Services Department, in Sacramento. Only limited amounts of funding are available. Time lag is 2 to 3 years on elementary projects and 3 to 5 years for secondary school projects. Reconstruction projects fund only 25$ of the cost of the project, and the District must provide the remaining. General Obligation Bonds Requires a two-thirds vote. Since this ls an older section of town, it ls questionable that adequate votes would be forthcoming. Mello-Roos requires normally such as number of Election/Bonds A Mello-Roos Election a two~thirds vote of approval. It ls not effective in heavily populated areas, Zone 1, or in areas when there are a large developers. Developer Contributions -Developer contributions in which land or facilities are provided in mitigation could be a possibility for reconstruction of certain neighborhood schools facilities. Office of the State Architect approval would be necessary for projects involving classrooms. -126- 127 SEWER SYSTEM CARLSBAD ZONE 1 ZONE 1 SEWER DISTRICTS ID ~IIHIIHNI; i I . . . . ! lhnn1n!"'"' ! ! ..................... 1 : I SAN MARCOS :11n11• \ ,,. ... i LEUCADIA COUNTY COS I.A OLIVE NHAIN Clly of Cerlstl■d Glowth Managemenr Pr~am fil JANUARY 198: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN -128- ENCINA WATER -----POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITY VISTA -CARLSBAD FOXES LANDING P. S. & FORCE MAIN NAH6 VCI ZONE I PALOMAR SEWER SYSTEM EL CAMINO REAL / KELLY OR SEWER SY.STEM NORTH AGUA HEDIONDA INTERCEPTOR Clly of C•ltbM 0-owrl'I M.,,.gemenl Ptt"g,am ?ONE 1 JANUARY 1887 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM -129- PUMP STATION AGUA HEDIONDA---' PUMP STATION LEGEND -SEWER LINE ■ PUMP STATION ----FORCE MAIN --• ZONE BOUNDARY VISTA-CARLSBAD INTERCEPTOR SEWER NORTH AGUA HEDIONDA INTERCEPTOR e11, ore.,_, ... 0,owtll Manao-ment P\'C'Qf-'"I rQNE 1 JANUARY 1 se1 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM -130- - BUILDOUT LOCAL .FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN_-Zone 1 SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM SUNNARV SHEET ADEQUACY PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPL-Y (Ca•••• w,...,d) MITIGATION FUNDING EXISTING * ** YES MGD ** * APPROVED ** NO SEE PAGE 136 SEE PAGE 138 MGD CJ z ** -u, < :::c 0. * FUTURE ** NO SEE PAGE 136 SEE PAGE 138 MGD ** *Interceptors are not monitored for existing capacity. Theoretical flows based on sewer generation rates are shown by reach on Tables S-4, and S-5. **Demand analysis for critical reaches of the North Agua Hedionda and Vista/Carlsbad Interceptors are shown on Tables S-4, and S-5. -131- SEWER COLLECTION I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Trunk line appropriate sewer development. capacity district to meet demand as determined by the must be provided concurrent with II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS Zone 1 lines entirely within and ls served by the City of Carlsbad Sewer Service District A. Facility Inventory and Description Zone 1, ls served by two major sewer interceptors shown on the Exhibit, "Sewer System", on Page 129. One of these interceptors, the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor, ls a regional interceptor serving the City of Vista and the City of Carlsbad. The other is the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor which serves only the City of Carlsbad. There are three major sewer pump stations in Zone 1. Two pump stations, the Buena Vista Pumping Station and the Agua -Hedionda Pumping Station serve the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor while the Foxes Landing Pump Station serves the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor. These pump stations are also shown on the Exhibit, "Sewer System", on Page 129. The interior of Zone 1 is served by a number of sewer lines that comprise subbaslns which flow into one of these two interceptors. Several of the subbasins also have pump stations where gravity flow cannot be maintained. The major sewer lines are shown on the Exhibit, "Sewer", Page 130. Analysis of Zone 1 ls complicated by the fact that the major interceptors running through the zone serve the City of Vista as well as other growth management zones. To simplify the analysis, only the City of Carlsbad ownership rights in these interceptors were evaluated. B. Service Demand Existing, committed, and future service collection demands are shown as follows: -132- Sewer Demand Zone 1. Demand Status Land Use Square Feet Demand (EDUs) Demand Totals (EDUs) Existing Residential 9,012 Commercial 2,241,251 1,244 10,256 Approved Residential 1,208 Commercial 154,359 86 1,294 Future Residential 2,000 Commercial 2,185,467 1,214 3,214 14,764 Facilit~ Anallsis This analysis will examine the two major interceptors serving Zone 1, i.e., the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor and the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor. Each interceptor will be assessed for its adequacy by reach (individual segments). In addition, pump stations serving the interceptor as well as major sewer lines (subbasins) feeding into the interceptor will be analyzed. The discussion will focus on any areas where --conformance to the adopted standard is a problem. 1. Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor Analysis of the Vista/Carlsbad (VC) Interceptor and the two major pumping stations indicate the existing plus approved project demands exceed capacity and will not conform to the adopted performance standard without proposed mitigation. There are ongoing projects which will mitigate these capacity problems and will ensure that these lines comply with the adopted standards. Unless otherwise stated, all City funds for financing future improvements will come from the City Sewer Construction Fund which originates from developer paid connection fees. The Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor is the major trunk system serving the northern half of the City of Carlsbad. This line, as shown on the map on Page 129, extends along Route 78 from the Emerald Avenue interchange to the Buena Vista Lagoon then along Jefferson Street and Grand Avenue to the Santa Fe railroad then extending south to the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility Treatment Plant. The Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor currently accepts flows from Growth Management Zones 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 24 and 25, as well as the City of Vista. -133- - The capacity of this facility is shown on Table S-4 "Carlsbad Capacity in the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor", on Page 140. The table shows that the interceptor currently satisfies the adopted performance standard. However, reaches VC 10 and VC 11 are projected to fall below the performance standard based upon existing plus committed (approved) flows without the proposed mitigation. Reaches VC 10 and VC 11 are located in Zone 1 along the railroad tracks south of Grand Avenue. The upgrading of this portion was included in both the City of Vista's and the City of Carlsbad's Capital Improvement Program in the 1987-88 fiscal year. Table S-3, "Capital Improvement Program for the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor", on Page 139 shows the recommended improvement program for the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor. This improvement program will mitigate the City of Carlsbad's future capacity shortfalls in the gravity sections of the interceptor. The upgrading of Se9tions VC 10 and VC 11 are scheduled for construction when flows in these reaches are measured at 70 percent of the capacity of the line. Although the upgrading of VC 10 appears to be necessary and is scheduled for 1987, actual flows are below 70 percent of the line capacity and scheduling will occur in the future. (See memo dated June 16, 1987 as-Appendix 7 for further discussion.) The Cities of Vista and Carlsbad have budgeted funds for these improvements and have agreed to a scheduli to ensure compliance with the adopted performance standard. Buena Vista Pump Station The Buena Vista Pump Station ls located at the corner of Jefferson Street and Highway 78. This pump station has a phased improvement program to meet future capacity needs. Table S-1, "Capital Improvement Program for the Buena Vista Pump Station," on Page 137, provides a brief description of future projects, the estimated date that it will be needed and the estimated construction cost to the City of Carlsbad for these projects. Agua Hedionda Pump Station The Agua Hedionda Pump station ls on the southern shore of the Agua Hedionda lagoon. Table S-2, "Capital Improvement Program for the Agua Hedlonda Pump Station," on Page 137 provides a breakdown of the future capital improvements to the Agua Hedionda Pump Station. This table provides the description of the project, the cost and dates for these recommended improvements as well as the City of Carlsbad's share of the improvement program. -134- 2. r Downtown Sewers Sewer service to the downtown section of the City of Carlsbad is served by a network of gravity sewer lines which ultimately flow into the Vista/Carlsbad interceptor. A program has been initiated which is monitoring these lines to identify sections of the downtown sewer system which will not conform to the adopted performance standard without mitigation measures. The Downtown Sewer System contains lines that predate incorporation of the City. At present it is not known whether several of the sewer lines are adequate to serve the area. This issue will be addressed in the forthcoming revision of the Sewer Master Plan. If it is found that sections of the Downtown system are inadequate, the revised Sewer Master Plan will propose both a mitigation program and financing mechanisms for these improvements. It should be noted that the analysis of the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor contained in this plan was based on potential flows from all subbaslns flowing into the interceptor. Therefore, even if an individual subbasin fails to meet the adopted standard as could be the case for the Downtown system it would not affect the analysis of the entire interceptor. Moreover, the interceptor has been sized to accommodate the potential flows (based on buildout projections). North Agua Hedionda Interceptor The North Agua Hedionda Interceptor starts at El Camino Real and flows westerly along the Agua Hedionda Lagoon to Park Drive. It then follows along Park Drive to Marina Drive where the line proceeds north along the Agua Hedionda Lagoon to the Foxes Landing pump station. The pump station then pumps flows into the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor in the vicinity of Olive Avenue. The North Agua Hedionda Interceptor ls shown on the Exhibit on Page 129. Analysis of the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor system is complicated by the fact that flows from Zone 7 have been diverted into this system. Analysis of this interceptor is shown on Table S-5, "Carlsbad Capacity in the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor," on Page 141. This analysis indicates that the gravity portions of the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor are able to accept Zone 1, 2 and 7 flows in compliance with the adopted performance standard. -135- c. Foxes Landing Pump Station Analysis of Foxes Landing Pump Station indicated that the pump station is currently operating at capacity and requires upgrading to accommodate flows from Zones 1, 2 and 7 through buildout. Construction is nearing completion on these improvements to increase the capacity from 3,512 EDUs to 6,732 EDUs. When this project is complete, the station will be able to handle projected future flows through buildout. Adequacy Findings The Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor, and Foxes Landing Pump Station will experience capacity problems with existing plus committed projects. However, a strategy to mitigate these capacity problems has been established for all of the affected facilities. This strategy will ensure compliance with the adopted performance standard. III. MITIGATION The analysis presented in this zone plan indicates certain facilities which need to be upgraded to conform to the adopted performance standard as development occurs. This Local Facilities Management Plan establishes a schedule of improvements which will bring the necessary sewer improvements into compliance with the performance standard, as shown on the following three tables. The specific timing of these improvements may be modified depending upon actual development projects in the Cities of Vista and Carlsbad which affect these facilities. -136- Table 5-1 Capital Improvement Program for Buena Vista Pump Station Carlsbad Carlsbad Recommended Percent of Capital Carlsbad Year Upgrading Project Cost, $ Capacity, MGD -------------------------------------------------------------------19.87 Add fourth pump 15.5 19,840 2.40 2010 Construct Gross 15.5 4,650 2.56 Connection 2013 Upgrade 16-inch 15. 5 54,650 2.95 force main 2013 Add fifth pump 15.5 22,940 3.88 Table S-2 Capital Improvement Program for the Agua Hedionda Pump Station Year 1987 1993 2013 Recommended Upgrading Add Third pump Add Fourth pump Relocate Station To North of Creek Carlsbad Percent of Project 38.5 38.5 38.5 -137- Carlsbad Capital Cost, $ 42,350 36,580 231,850 Carlsbad Capacity, MDG 6.55 8.47 11. 5 5 Note: Page 138 not used. Table --=s_-_a ___ • Sewer Reach Year Needed vc 5 1988 vc 6 1990 VC 8 1993 vc 9 1989 vc 10 1987 vc 11 2010 vc 13 2010 VC 14 1997 VC 15 2001 Capital Improvement Program for the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor Carlsbad Recommended Upgrade Percent of Cost, Size, in. Project $ 36 15.0 71,250 39 15.0 37,170 48 19.9 30,089 48 25.6 139,060 * 48 29.9 362,388 * 54 36.6 161,845 54 36.6 425,146 60 52.3 1,058,552 54 52.6 300,293 * Actual construction will be scheduled when flow in the reach is measured at 70 percent of the line capacity. -139- '1 I ,_. ,$:-- 0 I ) Table S-4 -----Carlsbad Capacity in the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor (Bas~d on 246 gallons per EdU and a peaking factor of 2.0) Total Existing and Projected Flows Deficit Capacity EDUs EDUs Section Exist Approved Future Exist Approved vc l -0-------------------------- vc 2 10.772 1.642 1.642 3.460 ---------- vc 3 6,098 3.225 ·3, 659 5.523 ---------- VC 41 4,878 3,225 3,659 5,523 ---------- vc 5 6,707 3,991 4,538 6,618 ---------- VC 6 7,114 3,991 4,538 6,618 ---------- VC 7 13,821 5,492 6.245 8,534 ---------- VC 8 7.724 6,203 6,964 9,332 ---------- vc 9 10,366 8,032 8,979 12,963 ---------- vc 10 10,366 10,290 11,377 16,037 -----1,011 vc 11 15,447 14,511 15,974 21,636 -----527 vc 1i2 16,260 14,511 15,974 21,636 ---------- vc 13 21,545 14,511 15,974 21,636 ---------- vc 14 21,545 16,841 20,228 42,097 ---------- vc -15 23,984 16,970 20,357 42,576 ---------- vc 16 61,809 18,042 22,312 50,701 ---------- l. Buena Vista Pump Station. 2. Agua lledi.onda Pump Station. Future ----- : ----- ----- 645 ----- ----- ----- 1,608 2,597 5,671 6,189 5,376 91 20,552 18,592 ----- I .... ~ .... I Section NAH I NAH 2 NAH 3 NAH 4 NAH 5 NAH 6~ NAH 7 \ ) Table S-5 . Carlsbad Capacity in the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor (Based on 246 gallons per EDU and a peaking facctor or 2.0) Total Capacity Existing and Projected Flows Deficit EDUs EDUs Exist Approved. Future Exist Approved 12,480 ----------------------- 9,390 428 518 618 -------- 9,390 3,330 3,678 4,508 -------- 12,780 3,330 3,678 4,508 -------- 11,504 4,221 4,597 5,599 -------- 3,512 4,221 4,597 5,599 -------- 21,342 4,221 4,597 5,599 -------- 1. Foxes Landing Lift Station. ) Future ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 142 WATER SYSTEM WATER SERVICE DISTRICTS ID -------} /SAN MARCOS l....................... ~ : .. i : '4"' OllYfNHAIN t ZONE 1 01,.,c..._ • JANUARY 11187 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN -143- I t--' .i:--.i:--I EXISTING WATER LINES PROPOSED WATER LINES A EXISTING PRESSURE REGULATING STATION 6. PROPOSED PRESSURE REGULATING STATION ZONE BOUNDARY 0 EXISTING RESERVOIR ZONE 1 Ocunalde Pacific Ocean LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN WATER FAC1 .... )r1es ZONE 2 ZONE 14 ZONES BUILDOUT LOCAL "FACILITIES MAN-AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 1 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SUNNARY SHEET ADEQUACY PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (CcduiHW wAlt■ldard) MITIGATION FUNDING EXISTING * * YES N/A APPROVED N/A FUTURE * * YES C, z -"' ,c :c . a. ** ** YES N/A * The Costa Real Municipal Water District has capacity to meet the existing demands of Zone 1. ** Because the future demands from Zone 1 will be minimal, the Water District has indicated that it will be able to provide capacity at all times as the Zone builds out. -145- N/A N/A N/A WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Line appropriate development. capacity to meet water district must demand as determined by the be provided concurrent with A minimum 10 day average storage capacity must be provided prior to any development. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS A. Inventory and Description Water service in the City of Carlsbad is provided by three independent agencies, Costa Real Municipal Water District, San Marcos County Water District, and ~he Olivenhain Municipal Water District. Water service for Zone 1 is provided entirely by the Costa Real Municipal Water District. Costa Real Municipal Water District has identified those facilities which need to be added, upgraded and improved in order to meet the needs of future growth within their service area. The facilities shown on map "Water Distribution System" on Page 144 are currently in place and servicing the existing development. B. Phasing The performance standard indicates that line capacity must meet demand as determined by the appropriate water district. Costa Real Municipal Water District has indicated that minor improvements and the upgrading of outdated facilities, such as the ones remaining in Zone 1, will be required at the time of development and the extent of those improvements cannot be determined until development occurs. Since Zone 1 is largely developed and only minor improvements are necessary to provide domestic water and fire flow needs as determined by the water district, no phasing is necessary. C. Adequacy Findings The Costa Real Municipal Water District service to Zone 1 conforms with the adopted performance standards. As indicated in the District's Water Master Plan, this. zone ls serviced by an existing water distribution system. Therefore, as Zone 1 builds out, the additional water demands will be minimal and conformance with the adopted performance standard will be maintained to the ultimate buildout of Zone 1. -146- III. MITIGATION A. Special Conditions for Zone 1 All development within Zone 1 shall pay the required Costa Real Municipal Water District fees. B. Financing determined by Costa Real Municipal Water District, a the facilities and improvements in Zone 1 may be the District. Revenues for these projects may be either developer's fees, the capital surcharge the district or reserves on deposit at the City of As portion of financed by funded from imposed by Carlsbad. -147- 148 APPENDICES ---·. ··-"-"- APPENDIX 1 -149 - ADT Average daily daily vehicle trips associated region. GLOSSARY trips. generated A guide of average, or estimated from a specific project or APN Assessor's Parcel Number. A portion of the legal description which specifically identifies each parcel of land. Buildout The year when the City of Carlsbad is completely developed with all associated public facilities in place. Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District -A district established to fund major thoroughfares and bridge improvements. These bridge improvements are at I-5, Palomar Airport Road, Poinsettia Lane, and La Costa Avenue. See Exhibit S, Page 125. CIP -Abbreviation for Capital Improvement Program. Community Park 20 -50 acres in size; designed to serve the broad recreational needs of several neighborhoods; located adjacent to secondary arterial or greater; publicly owned. Demand -The amount of needed facility generated within the zone, quadrant, or City based upon the adopted performance standard. DU -Abbreviation for dwelling unit. EDU Equivalent dwelling unit. The average amount of sewage generated by a single family household per day. Commercial and industrial developments are also converted into EDU's to assess their direct impact upon facilities. Environmentally Constrained Lands -Beaches, wetlands, floodways, other water bodies, riparian and woodland habitats, slopes greater than 251, major roadways, railroad tracks, and major powerline easements. General Plan Density Ranges Residential Land Use Allowed Units Per Acre RL RLM RM RMH RH -Residential Low -Residential Low-Medium -Residential Medium -Residential Medium-High -Residential High Growth Management Control Point 0 -1.5 0 -4.0 4.0 -8.0 8.0 -15.0 15.0 -23.0 Residential Land Use Allowed Units Per Acre RL RLM RM RMH RH 1. 0 3.2 6.0 11. 5 19.0 Established based upon the overall average land use yield in each designation or the midpoint of the density range. ICU -Abbreviation for Intersection Capacity Unit. The ratio of traffic demands to be placed on an intersection in relation to the capacity of an intersection. Level of Service The relative level of operation of an intersection or traffic signal. Level of Service (LOS) A B Description Free flow (relatively). If signalized, conditions are such that no approach phase is fully utilized by traffic and no vehicle waits through more than one red indication. Very slight or no delay. Stable flow. If signalized, an occa- sional approach phase is fully utilized; vehicle platoons are formed. This level is suitable operation for rural design purposes. Slight delay. 151 ICU Value 0.00-0.60 0.61-0.70 r Level of Service (LOS) C D E F Description Stable flow of operation. If signalized, drivers occasionally may have to wait through more than one red indication. Acceptable delay. Approaching unstable flow or operation; queues develop, but are periodically cleared. Tolerable delay. Unstable flow or operation; the inter- section has reached ultimate capacity; this condition is not uncommon in peak hours. Congestion and intolerable delay. Forced flow or operation. Intersection operates below capacity. ICU Value 0.71-0.80 0.81-0.90 0.91-1.00 1.00+ Derived from: Highway Capacity Manual, HRB Special Report 87. MGO Million gallons a day. A term used to describe flow of water or sewage. Net Vacant Acres Obtained by subtracting all of the 100% _c_o_n_s_t_r_a_1_n_e_d ___ a_c_r_e_s_ and one-half of the areas shown as 25-40% slopes. Industrlal and commercial development were then multiplied by .4 to determine net acreage (this allows for all regulations which affect overall lot coverage). Open Space Pocket parks, homeowner ball fields, planned residential development (PRO), common areas, tennis courts, or other areas containing passive or active recreational facilities, such as major power line easements. PIL Park-in-Lieu Fee. A fee paid prior to the issuance of building permits in lieu of land dedication for park purposes. PFF -Public Facility Fee. A 2.5% fee paid prior to the issuance ~ building permits. All proceeds from this fund are used for the purpose of acquiring, building, improving, expanding and equipping public property, improvements, and facilities. 152 Special Use Area -1-5 acres in size; a local facility of only one or two activity type uses, i.e., tennis court, swimming pool, etc. TIF Traffic Impact Fee. A fee paid at issuance of building permits for various traffic circulation improvements. The City is divided into two fee categories: 1) The La Costa area and 2) the remainder of the City. See Exhibit T, on Page 126. Turn Key Facility -a facility constructed by developer(s) and turned over or dedicated to the City after its completion. 153 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE / ..... '+ ZONE 1 _ __,l •• .,..MELAOSE AVI! POI_NSETTIA LN,. 1111111 AREA BOUNDARY City of c ...... a,.,. .. ...........,,., .... ZONE 1 -JANUARY 188, LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN -154- BRIDGE & THOROUGHFARE DISTRICT ZONE 1 POINSETTIA LN ,+ ~ DISTRICT BOUNDARY ZONE 1 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN -155- t City of C•ltOM Growth~ Progr•m -JANUARY 1887 APPENDIX .2 -156- l. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ll 12 Q ,c Ill I 13 -(I) ..J ~~ . U Ill ,C 14 0 u. ~ z CoZ! Z Ill 0 ► > u. 15 a5t::<-u :I ..J u.: . ..J ,c ►Ill(.) z Ill~ Q 16 w z ,c U ~ .. Ill 1111 ~::: ~ > cc ,c ,c ► (.) ... I' u 1s1! ii 19 !1 2011 211 22 23 24 25, I ·, --261 27 2al t)Pf'INANCE NO. 9808 ----- AN ORDINA~CE OF T~E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY CF CARLSBAD, CALH'(')P~lIA AMENDIMG TITLE 21 OF THE CARLSBAD ~UNICIP~L CODE ~y THE ADnITION OF CHAPTER 21. 90 ESTABLISHING A GROWTH "1ANAGE~'f.NT PROGRAM FOP THE CITY The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: That Title 21 is amended by the addition of Chapter 21.90 to read as follows: Sections: 21.90.010 21.90.020 21.90.030 21.90.031 21.90.032 21.90.033 21.90.040 21.90.050 21.90.060 21.90.070 21.90.080 21.90.090 21.90.100 21.90.110 21.90.120 21.90.125 21.90.130 21.90.140 21.90.150 21.90.160 21.90.170 21.90.180 21.90.190 "Chapter 21.90 Growth ~anage~ent Purr,ose and intent. Definitions. General prohibition, exceptions. Tolling of ti~e for consideration of applications submitted before the effective date of this chapter. . Tolling of expiration of previously issued development permits. Extensions of prior approvals prohibited. Comoliance with this· chapter required. Establishment of local facilities manage~ent fee. Special provisions for buildinq permits issued during te~porary moratoriu~. Finding of health, safety and welfare necessary for the fees imposed by sections 21.90.050 and 21.90.060. Perforniance standard. Citywide facilities and i~provements plan. Local facilities management zones. Contents of local facility management plans. Facilities management plan preoartion. Facilities management plan processinq. Implementation of facilities and imorovements requirements. Obligation to pay fees or install improvements required by any other law. Implementing guidelines. Exclusions. Council actions, fees, notice. Expiration of chapter. Severability. 1. 157 I !! 4 s' 6 1/ 8 9 10 ll 12 13 14 15 I 161 I 171 1aij I, 19 ii 2011 ii 21 1 22 23 24 25 26 27 281· 21.90.010 Puroose and intent. (a) It is the policy of the City of Carlsbad to: {l) Provide auality housina opportunities for all economic sectors of the community; {2) Provide a balanced communitv with adeauate commercial, industrial, recreational and open space areas to support the residential areas of the City; (3) Ensure that public facilities and i~provementsl meeting City standards are available concurrent with the need I created by new development; (4) Balance the housinq needs of the reoion against the public service_ needs of Carlsbad residents· and available fiscal and environmental resources; · (5) Encourage infill development in urbanized areas before allowing extensions of public facilities and improvements to areas which have yet to be urbanized; (6) Ensure that all development is consistent with the Carlsbad general plan; (7) Prevent growth unless adeauate public facilities and-imorovements are provided in a phased and loqical fashion as reauired by the general plan; .· (8) Control of the timing and location of development by tying the pace of development to the provision of public facilities and improvements at the times established by the citywide facilities and improvements plan. (b) The City Council of the City of Carlsbad has determined despite. previous City Council actions including but not limited to, aJT1endments to the land use, housing, and parks and recreation elements of the general plan, amendments to City Council Policy No. 17, adoption of traffic imoact fees, and modification of park dedication and improvement requirements, that the demand for facilities and improvements has outpaced the supply resulting in shortages ~n public facilities and improvements, including but not limited to streets, parks, open space, schools, libraries, drainage facilities and general governmental facilities. The City Council has further determine that these shortages are detrimental to the public health, safet and welfare of the citizens of Carlsbad. (c) This chapter is adopted to ensure the implementation of the policies stated in subsection (a), to eliminate the shortages identified in subsection (b), to ensure that no development occurs without providing for adeauate facilities and improvements, to regulate the pace of development thereby ensuring a continued supply of housing over a period of years and to continue the auality of life for all economic sectors of the Carlsbad community. (d) This chapter will further the policies, goals and objectives established herein by requiring identification of all public facilities and improvements required for development, by prohibiting development until adequate provisions for the public facilities and improvements are made by developers of projects within the City, and by giving development priority to areas of the City where public facilities and improvements are already in place (infill areas). 2. -158- I :1 i ,,.---. 1 2 3 4 5 6' 7 8' I' 91 I 101 11 I 12. Q < a:a I 13 (/l --..I ~ a: ; < "' ·I . (..) w < 14:! 0 .... :::, z ~ 0 ~ a: I o ►>O 15 iii!:: < \: '(..) 2 ~ ..... ..I(..) >-> w . 16 I zwgc w~,.,.< II (..) 0 -a:a ~ I:: ~ 17 !! > a: < < > (..) >-,, i3 l8i' ii ,1 ·, 19 !! I' 201! · 1! 21 Ii i' I ,, 22;i 23 24, I i 25 !i ,. ,,-.-2611 I, 27 ii :1 I! 28 II I' I I I (e) This chapter replaces the temporary moratorium on processing and approval of development projects imposed bv City Council Or-0inance No. 9791. 21.90.020 Definitions. (a) Whenever the following terms are used in this chapter they shall have the meaning established by this section unless from the context it is apparent that another meanina is intended: (1) "Citywide facilities and improvements plan" means a plan prepared and approved according to Section 21.90.090 identifying those facilities and improvements required on a citywide basis to serve the projected population of the City as established by the general plan and providing an outline and budget for financing certain facilities and improvements which will be provided by the City. (2) "Development permit" means any permit, entitlement or approval whether discretionary or ministerial issued under Title 20 or 21 of this code and any legislative actions such as zone chanqes, general plan amendments, or master plan approval or amendment. (3) "Development• means any use to which land is put, building or other alteration of land and construction incident thereto. (4) "Facilities" means any schools, parks, open space, or recreational areas or structures providing for fire, 1 ibrary, or govern:rnental services, identified in a facilities management plan. (5) "Improvement" includes traffic controls, streets and highways, including curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, bridges, overcrossings, street interchanaes, flood control or storm drain facilities, sewer facilities, water facilities and lighting facilities. (6) •Local facilities management plan" means a facilities managen,ent plan defined by Section 21.90.120 for a local facilities management zone which is established according to.Section 21.90.100. 21.90.030 General rohibition, exce tions. a Unless exempted by the provisions of this chapter no application for any building permit or development permit shall be accepted, processed or approved until a citywide facilities and improvements plan has been adopted and a local facilities management plan for the applicable local facilities management zone has been submitted and approved according to thi chapter. (b) No zone change, general plan amendment, master pla amendment or specific plan amendment which would incease the residential density or development intensity established by the general plan in effect on the effective date of this chapter shall be approved unless an amendment to the citywide facilities management plan and the applicable local facilities management plan has first been approved. 3. -1.59- i ' . ii I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ll 12 Q ~ 13 . ; I -~ C • (.) u.i C 14 8 II.::, z zOffia:: g ►>O 15 CZI !:: C ~ (,) :I ...! ~ , ...t C '""► ""u_ 16 z"" ~ Q u.i Z C (,) ~ -= i~ ~ 17 > a: C C ► (,) '"" u 18 19 2ofi 211' i 221 23 24 25 26 ,_ 27 I !I I• 2811 (c) The classes of projects or pernits listed in this subsection shall be exempt from the provision~ of subsection (a). Development permits and building permits for these projects · ·shall be subject to any fees established pursuant to the citywi<ie facilities and improvement plan and any applicable local · facilities management plan •. (1) Redevelopment projects. (2) Project·s consisting of the construction or alteration of a single dwelling structure for a family on a lot owned by the family intending to occupy the structure, or not to exceed one nonowner-occuP.ied house per individual for one or more lots owned prior to July 20, 1986. (3) Building permits and final maps for proiects identified in Section 2(F) of Ordinance No. 9791 (projects· for which construction had commenced and were desiqnated on the ~ao marked Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 9791 •as developin9"). (4) Building perm.its for projects for which all required development permits were issued or approved on or before January 21, 1986. If all reauired development permits were issued for a portion of the project only, the exemption shall apply to that portion. (5) Building perniits for projects for which all required development permits were issued or approved before July 20, 1986 and for which building perm.its could .have· been issued under Ordinance No. 9791. If all required development permits were issued for a portion of the project only, the exemption shall apply to that oortion • (6) Commercial and industrial projects with approved develop~ent perm.its or with a complete application on file with the City prior to June 11, 1986 for such permits. N~w permits for commercial and industrial projects located within an area that has been previously approved for such uses may also be processed and approved. · (7) Projects by nonprofit entities for structures and uses for youth recreational, educational or guidance progra~s such as boys and girls clubs or private schools. (8) Zone changes or general plan amendments necessary to accomplish consistency between the general plan and zoning, to implement the provisions of the Local Coastal Plan or which the City Council finds will not increase the public facilities or services and which are initiated by the City Council or Planning Commission. (9) Public utility facilities and improvement projects without accommodations for perm.anent employees are exempt from the provisions of this chapter unless the City Council determines they are of sufficient size and scale to impact public facilities. (10) Adjustment plats. (11) Development permits for minor subdivisions located in the northwest quadrant of the City as defined in Ordinance No. 9791. Building permits for commercial or industrial construction on lots in such subdivisions may be approved. Residential building perniits will not be approved for lots in such subdivisions unless otherwise exempt under this 4. -160- -- l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 lOi 11 12 13 14 15 161 I 17\ 1: 1a11 ,, 19 ~, I' 201! ! 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 chapter except one permit for a nonowner-occupied lot may be approved for each such subdivision. · (d) The provisions of this subsection apply to final .maps and other development permits for projects with a tentative map approved before July 20, 1986 which are not included in the exemptions listed in subsection (c). (1) If a tentative map or tentative parcel map wa approved on or before January 21, 1986 then, after approval of the citywide facilities plan, a final map or parcel map ~ay be processed and approved before the adoption of a local facility management plan. The expiration period for those tentative maps shall be tolled until the citywide plan is adopted. The expiration of any development permits issued in conjunction with those maps shall be tolled until the applicable local facilities management plan is approved or, two years after the date the citywide plan is approved, whichever occurs first. (2) If a tentative map or tentative parcel map wa approved after January 21, 1986 and before July 20, 1986, but th approv~~ of final map or parcel map was prohibited by Ordinance No. 9791 then approval of final maps and parcel maps is prohibited until after preparation of the applicable local facilities management plan. The expiration period of those tentative maP.s and tentative parcel maps, and any other development permits issued in conjunction with the maps shall be tolled until the local facilities management plan is approved, or two years after date the citywide facilities and improvements plan is approved, whichever occurs first. (e) The exemption for projects listed in subsection (c (3), (4), (5), and (6) shall expire on July 20, 1988. After tha date all development permits for those projects shall be fully subject to the provisions of this chapter. The exemptions for projects listed in subsection (c) (3), (4), (5), and (6) shall apply only so long as the facilities and improvements required a a condition to the issuance of final development permits have been installed or are being installed pursuant to a secured agreement. Any breach of such secured improvement agreement shall subject any remaining building permits for the project to the provisions of subsection (a). (f) Final or parcel maps for projects listed in subsection (c) (3), (4), (5), (6) and (7) which comply with all the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and Title 20 of this Code which were filed with the City before July 20, 1986 may be approved by the City Council, or City Engineer as appropriate, after July 20, 1986. Upon approval, those projects shall be subject to the exemption of subsection (c). (g) The City Council may authorize the processing of and decision making on building permits and development permits for a project with a master plan approved before July 20, 1986 subject to the following restrictions: (1) The City Council finds that the facilities an improvements required by the master plan are sufficient to meet the needs created by the project and that the master plan developer has agreed to install those facilities and improvement to the satisfaction of the City Council. 5. -161- 4 5 6 7 8 9, 10! 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1a11 11 19 !i 2oli II 211: 11 221 23 24 25 I 26 27 28 I (2) The master plan developer shall agree in writing that all facilities and improvement requirements, including but not limited to the payment of fees established bv the citywi.de facilities and manaqement plan and the applicable· local facilities management plan shall be applicable to development within the master plan area and that the master plan developer shal 1 comply with those plans. (3) The master plan establishes an educational park and all uses within the park comprise an integral part of the educational facility. ( 4) Building permits for the 129 unit residential portion of Phase I of the project may be approved provided the applicant has provided written evidence that an educational entity will occupy Phase I of the project which the City Council finds is satisfactory and consistent with the goals and intent o the approved master plan. (5) Prior to the approval of the final map for Phase I the master plan developer shall have agreed to participate in the restoration of a significant lagoon and wetland resour·ce area and made any dedications of. property. necessary to accomplish the restoration. (h) After making the findings in paragraph 1 the City Council may authorize the processing of and decision making on master plans subject to the requirements of paragraph 2. After the grant of the easement required by subparagraph (h)(iv) the tentative map for Phase I of the project, the site plan for the commercial development and the local coastal plan amendment may also be processed and approved. If such approvals a.re granted and, subject to all other provisions of this code, grading and building permits for construction of the golf course and first phase of the commercial portions of the project may be processed and approved. · · The processing and approval of all other developments and building permits within the master plan shall not occur unti after the citywide facilities plan and the local facilities management plan have been adopted by the City Counci 1 • (l)(i) That the master plan will provide all necessary public facilities for the project and will cure any facilities deficits in the area affected by the project. (ii) That the approval will not prejudice the preparation of the citywide facilities plan and will improve the level of public facilities and services in the area. (iii) That by the dedication of land and the construction of public improvements the project will make a significant contribution to the public facilities needs of the city and provide for the preservation or enhancement of sianificant environmental resources. · (2)(i) The master plan shall include all of the information required by and implementing the provisions of Sections 21.90.090 and 21.90.110 for the area covered by the master plan. (ii) The applicant shall agree in writing that al facilities and improvement requirements, including but not limited to the payment of fees established by the citywide 6. -162- - Q C ID I en ~ 9; ~ --<J w C g .. =i-zZ Z O w C:C 0 ► > :t iii !:: C -<.> ~ ~ ~-~< ► w <.> ~Wsc:i' Llol i"' C c..,o-= i I: ~ > c:c C < ► <.> ... c3 ·, .- l 21 I 3: 4 5 6 7 81 I 9i 101 11 12 13 14 15 161 I 171 t· 1a11 ,, I' 19!1 20!' 21! I 221 23 24 25 26 27 28 facilities and improvement plan and the applicable local facilities management plan shall be applicable to development within the master plan area and that the master plan developer shall comply with those requirements. (iii) The master plan applicant shal 1 agree to participate in the restoration of a significant lagoon and wetland resource area. (iv) Prior to any processing on the ~aster plan the applicant shall grant an easement over the property necessary for the lagoon restoration and the right-of-way necessary for the widening of La Costa Avenue and its intersection with El Camino Real. 21.90.031 Tolling of time for consideration of aKplications sub~itted before the effective date of this c apter. After approval of the citywide facilities and improvement plan and the applicable local facilities management plan applicatiQns for development permits which were accepted as complete before the effective date of this chapter shall have processing priority in relationship to the acceptance date. Until the approval of the plans all aQplicable time limits for processing the development pernits shall be tolled. 21.90.032 Tolling of expiration of previously issued development permits. If a discretionary development peanit, other than a development permit issued in conjunction with a subdivision map, issued prior to July 20, 1986 has an expiration period within which building permits ~ust be issued and the issuance of building permits for the project is prohibited· by_ this chapter then the expiration period shall be tolled until the applicable local facilities management pla·n is approved, or two years after the date the citywide plan is approved, whichever occurs first. 21.90.033 Extensions of erior a1provals erohibited. After approval of an applicable ocal facilities management plan an exte~sion of the expiration date of any development permit shall not be granted unless the extension is found to be consistent with the plan. The decision making body considering an extension may condition the extension upon compliance with the citywide plan and applicable local facilities management plan. 21.90.040 Compliance with this chapter. (a) No development permit shall be approved unless the approving authority finds that the permit is consistent with the citywide facilities and improvements plan and the applicable local facilities management plan. To ensure consistency the approving authority may impose any condition to the approval necessary to implement the plans. (b) No building permit shall be issued unless the fees required by this chapter, and any applicable local facilities management plan fees are first paid, and the permit is consisten 7. -163- :I l. I i 21 I ,. 311 4 5 6 7 SJ, 911 10!1 11 12 Q <( a:1 I 13 en ..I ~~ a, .uw-c 14 0 u. ~ z i O ~ a:: o ►>o 15 as=-c~ . u 2 .J.. u. . ..I u ~ ► w • 16i zwgc w l N <( (JO -a:1 ?: ~ ~ 1111 > a:: < <( ► (J " >--,. u 18i! 1: ,, ,; 19 :: 20!/ 21!1 II 221 23 24 25 i, 26 27 i1 2s 'I with the applicable local facilities management plan. As a condition to the issuance of any building permit pursuant to Section 2L.90.030(c) the applicant shall agree to pay the appropriate fees within 30 days of the date each fee is established. (c) The requirements of this chapter are imposed as a condition of zoning on the property to ensure implementation of and consistency with the general plan and to protect the public health, safety and welfare by ensuring that public facilities and improvements will be installed to serve new developroent prior to I or concurrently with need. 21.90.050 Establishment of local facilities manaoement fee. (a) A local facilities management fee is hereby established to pay for improvements or facilities identified in local facilities management plan which are related to new development within the zone and are not otherwise financed by an other fee, charge or tax on development, or are not installed by a developer as a condition of a building permit or development permit. •The fee may also be used to pay for that portion of the facilities or improvements identified in the citywide facilities and improvements plan attributed to development within the local zone which are not financed by other means. The facilities management fee shall be paid before the issuance of a building permit. The amount of the fee shall be determined based upon th estimated cost of the facility or improvement designated as necessary to accommodate additional development within the applicable local facilities management zone plus the estimated cost of facilities and improvements identified in the citywide facilities and improvement plan attributable to the local zone. The fee shall be fairly apportioned among the new development. (b) The fee required by this section is in addition to any other means of financing facilities or improvements identified by a local facilities management plan or any other tax, fee, charge or improvement requirement which may be imposed on·the development of property under the provisions of state law this code or City Council policy. (c) The amount of the fee for a local facilities management zone shall be set by City Council resolution after a public hearing, published notice of which shall be given according to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.54.060(2) and Government Code Section 54992. (d) As a condition of any building or development permit application submitted after the effective date of this chapter the applicant shall agree to pay the fee established by this section at the time a building permit is issued. (e) The fee established by this section shall be levie at the time of issuance of a building permit. 21.90.060 Special provisions for building permits issued during temporary moratorium. (a) Applicants for projects for which building permits were issued after January 21, 1986 and before July 20, 1986 shal e. -164~ I I I ! ---. l. 2 4 <I I ~, 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 141 151 I 16i i 17j I: 1811 ,I i! 19 !I Ii 2011 21 r 22 23 24 25 26 2711 28 i I I I I pay the fee established by Sect ion 21. 90. 0 50 with in 3 0 days after: the amount of the fee is determined by the City Council. Payment shall be made according to the agreement executed by the .applicant -pursuant to Section 3 of Ordinance No. 9791. 21.90.070 Finding of health, safetv and welfare necessary for the fees imposed by Sections 21.90.050 and 21.90.060. (a) The City Council hereby declares that payment of the fee established and imposed by Sections 21.90.050 and 21.90.060 and installation of the facilities and improvements identified in a facilities management plan are necessary to achieve the policies established in Section 21.90.010 and to implement the City's general plan. If the fees are not paid or the facilities or improvements are not installed the public health, safety and welfare will suffer because there will be insufficient facilities and improvements to accommodate any new development. This finding is based upon City Council Policy No. 17, City Council Ordinance No. 9791, and the evidence presented at the public hearings on the ordinance adopting this chapter. (b) If any condition imposed as a conditon of a development permit or building permit pursuant to this chapter i protested then the permit shall be suspended during the period o the protest. (c) This section is adopted pursuant to Government Cod Section 65913.S. 21.90.080 Perforniance standard. . The City Council shall adopt general performance I standards for each facility or improvement listed in Section / 21,90.090(b) or 21.90.ll0(c). Specific performance standards fod citywide facilities shall be adopted as part of the citywide facilities and improvement plan. Specific performance standards for each zone shall be adopted as part of the local facilities management plan. If at any time after preparation of a local facilities management plan the performance standards established by a plan are not met then no development permits or buildin·g permits shall be issued within the local zone until the performance standard is met or arrangements satisfactory to the City Council guaranteeing the facilities and improvements have been made. 21.90.090 Cit wide facilities and im rovements lan. a To imp ement the City s general plan by securing provision of facilities and improvements, and to ensure that development does not occur unless facilities and improvements ar available the City Council shall adopt by resolution a citywide facilities and improvements plan. The plan shall: Identify all facilities and improvements necessary to accommodate the land uses specified in the general plan and by the zoning 1 specify size, capacity and service level performance standards for the identified facilities and improvements; establish specific time tables for acquisition, installation and operation of the facilities and improvements correlated to projected population 9. -165- _,,,-- 1 2 3 4 s' 6 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 C C CD I 13 en -·ii! . ~ C a, .tJ w C 14 0 .... :, z i O ffi a: o ►>o 15 ai !: C ~ 'tJ 2 ~ ..... ~ tJ --► w -16 zw~c wZ C tJ ~ -CD 3: I: '.1 17 > a: C C ► tJ --0 18 19 11 I ,1 20'1 I: 211' 22 23 24 25 ··,r 26 27 28 growth, facility and improvement performance standards, and project~d nonresidential development: identify the financing method or _methods for each facility and improvement; and establish a facility and improvement budget for those facilities or improvements which will be constructed or financed by the · City. The plan shall encourage infill development and reduce the growth inducing impact of premature extension of facilities or improvements to undeveloped areas by establishing priorities for facility and improvement installation or financing. (b) The citywide facilities and improvement plan shall show how and when the following facilities and improvements will be installed or financed as specified in subsection {c). (1) Major sewage transmission systems and sewage treatment plants: (2) Major water transmission lines; (3) Major area wide drainage facilities; (4) Prime and Major arterials; freeway interchanges, bridges or overcrossings1 ·{S) Fire facilities; (6) Governmental administration facilities;· (7) Parks and other recreational facilities: (8) Libraries. (c) The plan shall include the following information with regard to each facility and improvement listed in subsectio ( b): (1) An inventory of present and future requirements for each facility and improvement based upon the performance standard established for each facility and improvement. Cost estimates shall be included. The inventory shall be consistent with the general plan and zoning for the area. ( 2) A phasing schedule establishing the timing fo installation or provisions of facilities or improvements in relationship to the amount of development activity {e.g. number of dwelling ·units, number of square feet of commercial space within the service area of the facility or improvement) and the facility and improvement performance standards. (3) A financing plan establishing various methods of funding the facilities and improvements identified in the plan. The plan shall identify those facilities and improvements which would otherwise be provided as a requirement of processing a development project (i.e. reauirements imposed as a condition of a development permit) or provided by the developer in order t establish consistency with the general plan or Titles 18, 20 or 21 of this Code, and those facilities and improvements for which new funding methods which shall be sufficient to ensure sufficient funds are available to construct or provide facilitie or improvements when required by the phasing schedule. (d) The City Manager shall prepare and present the pla to the City Council not later than one year from the effective date of this ordinance. 10. -166- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 181 I 19 !! 2oli II 21 22 23 24 25 I 26 21 ]i I! 28 (e) Amendments to this citywide facilities and improvements plan shall be initiated by action of the Plannina Commissio~ or City Council. · 21.90.100 Local facilities management zones. (a) The City Council shall divide the City into facilities management zones. (b) The boundaries of the zones shall be established based upon logical facilities and improvements planninq, construction and service relationships to ensure the economically efficient and timely installation of required facilities and improvements. In establishing zone boundaries the City Council shall also be guided by the following considerations: (l) Service areas or drainage basins: (2) Extent to which facilities or improvements are in place or available: plan areas; (3) ownership of property7 (4) Boundaries of existing zoning master plans: .. ( 5) Boundaries of pending zoning master plans: (6) Boundaries of potential future zoning master (7) Boundaries·of approved tentative maps; (8) Public facilities relationships, especially the relationship to the City's planned major circulation network; (9) Special district service territories: (10) Approved fire, drainage, sewer, or other I facilities or improvement master plans. · (c) The zones shall be established by resolution after a public hearing notice of which is given pursuant to Section 21.54.060(2) of this code. 21.90.110 Contents of local facility management clans. (a) A local facilities management plan shall be prepared for each facility zone and shall cover the entire zone. (b) The plan shall consist of maps, graphs, tables, narrative text and shall be based upon the general plan and zoning applicable within the local zone at the time of plan approval. The local facilities management plan shall be consistent with the citywide facilities and improvements plan shall implement the citywide facilities and improvements plan within the zone. Cc) The facilities management plan shall show how and when the following facilities and improvements necessary to accommodate development within the zone will be installed or financed as specified in subsection (d). (1) Sewer systems (2) Water (3) Drainage (4) Circulation (5) Fire facilities (6) Schools (7) Parks and other recreational facilities (8) Open space 11. -167- 4 5: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 'I 14<1 15 161 l71 I• 181J 191! I' 201! ! 21 22 23 24 25 I 26, 271! 28 ii I ,I (d) The plan shall be consistent with and implement the citywide facilities management plan and general plan and shall include the following information with regard to each facility and improvement listed in subsection (c): (1} An inventory of present and future requirements for each facility and improvement based upon the performance standard established for each facility. Because improvement reouirements for certain facilities and improvements may overlap zone boundaries a discussion of the need for coordination and a proposed coordination plan for facilities extending from one zone to another shall be included. Cost estimates shall be included. It must be shown that development in the zone will not reduce the facilities or improveroents capabilities or create facilities or improvements shortages in other zones or reduce service capability in any zone below the performance standard which is established pursuant to Section 21.90.080. The growth inducing impact of the out of zone improvements shall be assessed. (2) A phasing schedule establishing the timing for installation or provisions of facilities or improvements in relationship to the amount of development activity (e.g. number of dwelling units, number of square feet of commercial space, etc.) for the facilities management zone. The phasing schedule shall ensure that development of one area of the zone will not utilize more than ·the area's prorata share of facility or improvement capacity within that zone unless sufficient capacity is ensured for other areas of the zone at the time of the first development. The phasing schedule shall include a schedule of development within the zone and a market data and. cash flow analysis for financing of facilities and improvements for the zone. The phasing schedule shall identify periods where the demand for facilities and improvements may exceed the capacity and provide a plan for eliminating the shortfall. In those situations when demand exceeds capacity and it is not feasible t increase the capacity prior to development, no development shall occur unless a time schedule for and a means of increasing the capacity is established in the plan. (3) A financing plan establishing various methods of funding the facilities and improvements identified in the pla fairly allocating the cost to the various properties within the zone. The plan shall identify those facilities and mprovements which would otherwise be provided as a requirement of processing a development project (i.e. requirements imposed as a condition of a development permit) or provided by the developer in order t establish consistency with the general plan or Titles 18, 20 or 21 of this Code, and those facilities and improvements for which new funding methods which shall be sufficient to ensure sufficient funds are available to construct or provide facilities or improvements when required by the phasing schedule Where facilities or improvements are reauired for more than one zone, the phasing plan shall identify those other zones and the plan for each zone shall be coordinated. Coordination, however, shall not require identical funding methods. 12. -168- I I 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 91 i 101 ll 12. 13 14 1 I 1si : 16ii 11 I/ ,i 1a1• d 19 Ii Ii 20il ~ l 21!! i 22 23 24 25 I I 2611 2; 11 :1 2811 (4) A list or schedule of facilities requirements correlated to individual development projects within the zone. Ce) The local facilities management plan shall establish the proportionate share of the cost of facilities and improvements identified in the citywide facilities and improvement plan attributable to development of property on the local facilities management zone. 21.90.120 Local facilities management plan preparation. (a) A local facilities management plan may be prepared by the City or by the property owners within the zone accordina to the procedures established by this section. (b) The City Council, upon its own initiative, may by resolution direct the City Manager to prepare a facilities management plan for any zone. The City Council may assess the cost of preparing the plan to the owners with in the zone after a hearing ten days written notice of which is given to the propert owners within -the zone. The cost shal 1 be spread prorata according to acreage and development potential. •{c) All owners within the zone may jointly submit a facilities management plan. (d) For zones in which joint submission of a facilitie management plan is shown to be not. feasible any owner or group o cooperating owners within the zone may petition the City Council to allow the owner or group of owners to prepare the plan. Afte a meeting for which ten days prior written notice has been given to the property owners within the zone, the City Council may permit the owner or group of owners to prepare and submit the 1 plan. A limit based on the estimated cost of the plan shall be determined at the time of the hearing. The actual cost shall be determined when the plan is adopted and shall be assessed prorata based on acreage and development potential to property within th~ facilities management zone. The assessment shall be collected b_' the City at the time any application for a development project within the zone is submitted. The owner or owners who prepared the plan shall be reimbursed for the cost of the plan less the owner's or owners' prorata share. No reimbursement shall be mad unless the plan is approved. Cost of preparation shall not include interest. (e) As an option to preparation by the owner or group of owners as provided in subsection (d) the City Council may decide to direct the City Manager to prepare the facilities management plan. The cost of preparation shall be advanced to the City by the requesting owner or owners, assessed to all the owners and reimbursed as provided in subsection (d). 21.90.125 Facilities mana ement lan rocessin. a Fac1 1t1es management pans shall be reviewed according to the following procedure: (1) A completed facilities management plan complying with this chapter, and accompanied by a processing fee in an amount established by City Council resolution, may be submitted to the Planning Director for processing. If the 13. -169- ,-ii 1· I 11 2 ll i' :5 ! 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 11 12 13 14 15 ,I 16i I l7j 18 ii 11 19 !i 2011 'I 211 221 23 24 251 2611 11 21 I' ,I 1: 281 Planning Director determines that the plan cowplies with the provisions of Section 21.90.110 the director shall set a facilities.. management plan for public hearing before the Planning Commission within sixty days of receipt of a complete I application. · 1 (2) The hearing shall be noticed according to the provisions of Section 21.54.060(2). A staff report containing 1· recommendation on the plan shall be prepared and furnished to the public, the applicant, and the Planning Commission prior to the hearing. I ( 3) The Planning Commission sh.all hear and consider the application for a facilities manage~ent plan and shall by resolution prepare recommendations and findings for the City Council. The action of the Commission shall be filed with the City Clerk, and a copy shall be mailed to the owners within the facility zone. (4) When the Planning Commission action is filed with the City Clerk, the Clerk shall set the matter for public hearing before·,. the City Council. The hearing shall be noticed according to the provisions of Section 21.54.060(2). · (5) The City Council shall hear the matter, and after considering the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, may approve, conditionally approve or deny facilities management plan. The City Council may include in the resolution adopting the facilities management plan any fees or facilities improvement requirements which it deems necessary to impose on development projects within the zone in order to implement the citywide facilities and improvement plan and the local facilities management plan. (b) A facilities management plan may be amended I following the same procedures for the original adoption. i (c) A local facilities management plan shall be i considered a project for the purposes of Title 19 of this Code. I Environmenta·l documents should be processed concurrently with thet plan. i 21.90.130 Im lementation of facilities and im rove~ent~ reauirements. (a) To ensure that the provisions of this chapter and the general plan are met the following shall apply: (1) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter n development permit shall be approved unless the map or permit is consistent with the local facilities management plan and unless provision for all facilities and improvements related to the development project are provided or funded. (2) No building permit shall be issued unless all applicable fees, including but not limited to, public facilities fees, bridge and thoroughfare fees, traffic impact fees, facilities management fees, school fees, park-in-lieu fees, sewe fees, water fees, or other development fees identified in the citywide facilities and improvements plan and local facilities management plan and adopted by the City Council have first been paid or provision for their payment has been made to the satisfaction of the City Council. 14. -170- l 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 161 17 I 1a I 19!1 20I/ 11 I' 2lil !, 22 23 24 25 26 271/ 2ai1 (b). The citywide facilities and improvement plan and the local facility management plan process is part of the City's ongoing planning effort. It is anticipated that amendments to the plans may be necessary. Adoption of a facilities management plan does not establish any entitlement or right to any particular general plan or zoning designation or any particular development proposal. The citywide facilities and improvements plan and the local facilities management plans are guides to ensure that no development occurs unless adequate facilities or improvements will be available to meet demands created by development. The City Council may initiate an amendment to any of the plans at any time if in its discretion it determines that an amendment is necessary to ensure adequate facilities and improvements. (c) If at any time it appears to the satisfaction of the City Manager that facilities or improvements within a facilities management zone or zones are inadequate to accommodate any further development within that zone or that the performance standards adopted pursuant to Section 21.90.100 are not being met he shall immediately re~ort the deficiency to the Council.· If the Council determines that a deficiency exists then no further building or development permits shall be issued within the affected zone or zones and development shall cease until an amendment to the citywide facilities and improvements plan or applicable local facilities management plan which addresses the deficiency is approved by the City Council and the perforn,ance standard is met. (d) The Planning Director shall monitor the developmen activity for each local facilities management zone and shall prepare an annual report to the City Council consisting of maps, graphs, charts, tables and text and which includes a developmental activity analysis; a facilities and improvements adequacy analysis, a facility revenue/expenditure analysis and recommendation for any amendments to the facilities management plan. The content of the annual report shall be established by the City Council. (e) The City Council shall annually review the citywid facilities and improvements plan at the time it considers the City's capital improvement budget. 21.90.140 Obligation to pay fees or install improvements required by any other law. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as relieving a builder, developer or subdivider from any public improvement requirement, dedication requirement or fee requirement which is imposed pursuant to Titles 13, 18, 20 or 21 of this code or pursuant to any City Council policy. 21.90.150 Implementing guidelines. The City Council may adopt any guidelines it deems necessary to implement this chapter. 21.90.160 Exclusions. (a) Development proposals which consist of facilities, 15. -171- l- 2 3 i 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ll 12 Q < 51 I 13 ~ ·! 9; < • (.) II.I <C 14 8 L&. :::i z z O z cc o>~O 15 as= c != (.) :I _, ~ ' _, ~ .... > II.I • 161 z II.I~ Q I.II z <C u ! -a:a !: ~ ~ 17 > cc < < > (.) I .... 18 I u 19 !i 2oli .I 21I/ 22!1 23 24 25 26 .,..- 27 1! 2s/i or structures constructed by a city, county, special district, state, or federal government or any agency, department, or subsidiary thereof for governmental purposes are excluded from the provi~ion, of this chapter. This exclusion shall not aoolv to development proposals to which a possessory interest tax.would be applicable. {b) Tentative maps the application for which was accepted before August 6, 1985 ~ay be approved without complyina with the plans adopted pursuant to this Chapter but any other · development permits or building permits for the project shall be subject to the requirements of the plans. The tentative map shall be subject to Section 21.90.030. 21.90.170 Council actions, fees, notice. (a) Whenever this chapter requires or permits an action or decision of the City Council, that action or decision shall be accomplished by a resolution. (b) The City Council shall establish ap~lication and processing fees for the submission and processing of facilities management plans and for any other request made under Section 21.90.100, 21.90.120 or 21.90.140. (c) Whenever written notice is required to be given to property owners under this section the notice shall be mailed by first class mail to the owners shown on the last equalized assessment roll. 21.90.180 Expiration of chapter. This chapter shall expire on June 30, 2001 unless it is extended or reenacted on or before that date. 21.90.190 Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of the ordinance codified in this ! chapter is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutionalj by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance codified in this chapter. The City Council declares that it would have passed the ordinance codified in thi chapter and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phras~ thereof, irrespective of the fact that any part thereof be ! declared invalid or unconstitutional. I SECTION 2: The City Council makes the following ! findings: j 1. Since January 1985, the City of Carlsbad has been undertaking a comprehensive review of the Land Use Element-of it General Plan. As part of that review a Council appointed Citizens Committee prepared a comprehensive report and recommendation to the City Council. That report was subject to public hearings by both the Planning Commission and City Council Included in the recommendations of the Citizens Committee were recommendations that no new development should occur unless 16. -172- I ;, 10 ll 12 13 14 15 1s I 11\I I 18 ! 19 i ii 2011 !I 21li /, 22 23 24 25 26 27' !I 281· I I adequate public facilities are available concurrently with need to serve the new development. 2. On August 6, 1985, the City Council adopted Interi~ Ordinance No. 9766, imposing certain temporary land use controls on property within the City, consistent with the recommendation of the Citizens Committee. On September 3, 1985, the City Council adopted Interim Ordinance No. 9771 which extended the restrictions of Ordinance No. 9766 until July 20, 1986. On December 10, 1985, the City Council approved in concept several land use proposals not contained in the Citizens Committee report. On January 21, 1986 the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 9791 imposing a temporary moratorium on development approvals based on the findings contained in that ordinance. On April 22, 1986 the City Council revised City Council Policy No. 17, based on the findings contained therein. On May 6, 1986 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 8107 establishing a traffic impact fee for. the La Costa Area of the City. The City Council finds that all of these actions plus the adoption of Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code are necessary to ensure adequate public facilities are available to serve any new development in the City. Without Chapter 21.90 and the requirements imposed by it,_ adequate public facilities may not b available to serve new development or building. Development or building without public facilities is contrary to the City General Plan and would be dangerous to the public health and safety. 3. This action of the City Council is consistent with long standing policies and objectives of the City to ensure adequate public facilities within Carlsbad. This action will protect the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Carlsbad by ensuring safe streets, adequate water, sewer and drainage facilities, sufficient fire protection and recreation facilities. 4. This action is consistent with the City's policy to provide housing opportunities for all economic sectors of the community, because sufficient opportunities for new housing continue to exist within the City and Chapter 21.90 does not affect the number of houses which may be built. In addition, development of housing for low and moderate income persons and families would most likely occur in areas of the City which are designated for highest development priority. By encouraging development of infill areas first, where the infrastructure is already existing, the cost of housing may be reduced. s. Because any new development affects public facility availability it is necessary to impose the fees and charges whic will be used to provide public facilities on any new building inl the City. The Council finds that failure to impose the fees and charges on any new building in the City will adversely affect th public health and safety by reducing the safety of its City's . streets, increasing the burden on water, sewer, drainage and firi 11. I -173.- 81 9 10 ll 12 13 14j isl I 161 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 I 27 I .I 11 28 facilities, and by overcrowding existing schools, parks and recreational facilities. 6. Adoption of Chapter 21.90 will not adversely affect the regional welfare. By ensuring that adequate and safe public facilities and improvements will exist to serv~ all of the development in Carlsbad and because many of these facilities and improvements are used by ~ersons residing in neighborin9 areas and cities the safety and welfare of the whole region is enhanced. SECTION 3: The City Council intends to implement the growth management program contained in Chapter 21.90 by followin the work program in Exhibit A which is hereby made a part of this ordinance. The City Council may adjust the work program without ... amending this ordinance as they determine necessary to accomplis effective growth management for the City of Carlsbad. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published a least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days after its adoption. The fees created by Section 21.90.050 of this I ! ordinance shall be effective as to building permits for single o~ multifamily residential projects 60 days after the adoption of this ordinance. I : INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the I Carlsbad City Council held on the 24th day of June ~ 1986 and thereafter 18. -174- l 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 / ll 12 13 14 15 161 17 1a I 1911 2011 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ' 2al PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the __ l_s_t_ following vote, to wit: day of __ J_u~l~y ____ , 1986, by the ATTEST: AYES: Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Pettine NOES: None ABSENT: None City Attorney 19. - -175- SLER, Mayor r CUI.SBAD Ciff COO■CIL GROll'fB ll&■AGBNDT Pr.A■ --.,... .I. Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan A. Growth Control Mapping and Planning Systems 1. The General Plan will be utilized as the overall base map with a maximum residential utilization i.e. aean density. 2. A citywide map will show all current a.nd future public facilities and improvements. Each public facility and improvement will also be shown separately on a citywide map. 3. A citywide environmental constraints and open space map will be prepared. 4. These maps will also be broken down into quadrants to show greater area detail. a. Management Performance Standards 1. Establish overall performance or adequacy standards for each public facility and improvement. 2. Establish thresholds for each public facility and· improvement. c. Citywide Pinaneinq Option ■ 1. Pinancing options will be identified for each facility and improvement. 2. Budgeting for citywide public facility and iaproveaent will be in conjunction with the City's five year capital improvement budget. D. Citywide Plan 1. A Citywide Pacilitie ■ and Improvements Plan will be prepared using growth control map ■, performance standards and financing option ■• -1- -176- E. Development of Local Facility Management and Planning zones. 1. The ·city shall be divided into 25 specific zones. 2. The size of each zone shall depend upon major circulation roads, lagoons, property ownership boundaries, and other identifiable characteristics. 3. The purpose of zones: a. Requires landowners to work together in order to present development plans in accordance with the City's Growth Management Program. b. Requires landowners to provide development plans which adhere to the citywide facilities plan and t.~ relate development to adjacent zones. c. Zones allow for greater citizen review prior to development approval. 4. Each zone will have a maximum residential utilization i.e. mean density. Specific densities for individual development plans within the zone, however, will be controlled through the normal planning process. 5. Each zone must conform to the General Plan and the Growth Management Ordinance. II. Facility Management Zone Processing A. a. c. D. Landowners submit local facilities management plans for processing concurrently with normal environmental analysis. Local facilities management plans shall conform to all standard ■ of the Growth control Mapping and Planning syste■■ ud other existing City standards. Th• local plan shall provide a detailed financing plan to a■■ure adequate funding of all citywide facilities and improvements identified in the citywide plan. The local plan ■hall also provide a detailed financial plan for all public facilities and improvements located within the local facilities management zone. All development within the local facilities management zone will be phased in accordance with the facility and improvement performance standards. A public hearing on the local facilities management plan and environmental analysis will be held concurrently. Notice to all landowners within the zone as well as surrounding adjacent zone landowners. -2--177- E. After the public hearing is completed on the local facilities management zone and environmental analysis, then the specific development plans will be processed in the normal method. F. Each local facilities management plan will be reviewed annually by the City to ensure that all performance standards are being met. If they are not, development will be stopped. 6/13/86 ad -3- -178- APPENDIX 3 -179- - REFERENCE SOURCES 1. Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, City of Carlsbad, Revised September 29, 1986 2. Master Drainage Plan for the City of Carlsbad, adopted June, 1980 3. Sewer Master Plan, City of Carlsbad November, 1976 June, 1984 April, 1985 4. Costa Real Municipal Water District Master Plan, February, 1985 5. Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan, City of Carlsbad, June, 1982 6. Memo to Planning Commission from Parks and Recreation Director, dated March 26, 1987 7. Circulation Element of the General Plan, City of Carlsbad 8. Standard Design Criteria for the Design of Public Works Improvements in the City of Carlsbad, 1984 9. Draft Barton-Aschman Traffic Study, March, 1987 10. Capital Improvement Program Budget, 1986-1987 11. Capital Improvement Program, 1987-1991 -180- APPENDIX 4 -181- ,- ZONE 1 ACREAGE SUMMARY =========================================================================== GENERAL PLAN 100% 25%-40% LAND USE DESIGNATION GROSS CONSTRAINED SLOPE NET RESIDENTIAL: RL Low Density (0-1.5) RLM Low-Med Density (0-4) 1,460.9 39.0 28.5 1,407.7 RM Medium Density (4-8) 184.2 1.7 3.3 180.9 RMH Med-Hi Density (8-15) 325~0 4.3 4.8 318.3 RH High Density (15-23) 169.7 3.3 o.o 166.4 ----------------------------2,139.8 48.3 36.6 2,073.2 COMMERCIAL: CBD Central Bus. District 70.1 o.o 70.1 C Community N Neighborhood 7.6 0.2 7.4 RC Recreation 3.2 o.o 3.2 TS Travel Services 42.2 o.o 42.2 0 Professional & Related 38.8 o.o 38.8 RRE Extensive Reg'l Retail RRI Intensive Reg'l Retail 118.5 4.7 113.8 RS Regional Service 26.6 o.o 26.6 --------------------- 307.0 4.9 302.1 INDUSTRIAL: PI Planned Industrial o.o o.o o.o OTHER: E Elementary School 50.8 2.4 48.4 J Junior High School 22.4 o.o 22.4 H High School 35.1 o.o 35.1 HC Continuation School 3.9 o.o 3.9 p Private School 17.0 o.o 17.0 G Governmental Facility 10.3 o.o 10.3 u Public Utilities NRR Non-Resid'l Reserve OS Open Space 610.3 412.5 197.8 RR Railroad 37.6 37.6 o.o FW Freeway 81.4 81.4 o.o MAJ Major Arterial 22.8 22.8 o.o MIN Minor Arterial 47.2 47.2 o.o COL Collector Street 85.0 85.0 o.o ---------------------1,023.8 688.9 334.9 ========================================================================== TOTAL 3,470.5 742.1 2,710.1 ========================================================================== ASSUMPTIONS: , , , , , . 1) 100% constrained acres include Riparian areas, transmission line easements, slopes greater than 40%, and major roadways. 2) Residential: Net acres -assumes City Council adopts Hillside Ord. (Net= Gross -100% Constrained -1/2 of 25-40% Slope). 3) Non-Residential: Net acres= Gross acres -100% Constrained. -182- AREA NOB-RESIDENTIAL BUILDOUT PROJECTIONS ZOBEl <ESTIMATED SQUARE FOOTAGE> COIHIERCIAL HOTEL/NOTEL OFFICE ------------------------------1-------------------------1-------------------------------------1------------------- I Existing Future I Existing Future !Existing Future I lsq. ft. roou sq. ft. roou I ------------------------------1--------------------------------------------------------------1------------------- Plaza Caaino Real I 1,173,340 SW llarron/ECR 12,000 Hughes Shopping Center 154,360 58,850 Pio Pico Corridor 107 27,500 SO I 55,770 26,560 City Hall I 17,400 Rockwell/Shell Colonial llall Taaarack/1-5 Snug Harbor/Whitey's Landing Country Store Taaarack/Carlsbad Blvd. H01e/Jefferson Redevelop■ent Laguna/Jefferson 1· I 10,SOO 1,500 87,800 10,000 20,000 16,000 42,900 5,000 5,000 425,000 1,555,000 297,000 TOTALS 1,741,140 1,777,260 355,850 -183- 540 313,500 647 341,000 17,000 570 30,000 187,000 30,000 620 133,170 230,560 APPENDIX 5 -184- -t' - z 0 ~ ... c3 z = 8 CITY OF CARLSBAD -AGENDA BILL AB#. ,P,4?-#/ MTG. 7/7/87 DEPT. LIB MLE; LIBRARY SITE AND FUNDING RECOMMEN- DATION FOR A NEW LIBRARY IN SOUTH CARLSBAD RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Approve the rec01111lended library site and direct the City Manager to negotiate a purchase agreement with the owner. 2. Direct the City Manager to include funds in the CIP for land acquisition and construction of a library. 3. Direct the City Manager to evaluate alternative methods of financing and constructing the library (developer build vs. City build). ITEM EXPLANATION: On January 27, 1987 the City Council directed staff to negotiate the acquisition of a library site and/or a developer proposal to build and lease back a library facility. Council action was based upon the library site selection committee report which listed five sites for consideration. All five sites met the selection criteria reco11111ended in the Library Strategic Plan. Subsequent investigation and negotiations with Carlsbad Retail Associates has resulted in the selection of a preferred site. At its meeting of April 16, 1987 the site selection committee endorsed Site E as the best site for a new library. The library board also has endorsed the site. The asking price for the property appears to be consistent with other property in the area. Design funds of $650,000 are already budgeted in the CIP. Design of the building will occur upon purchase of the site. Purchase is anticipated during 1988. FISCAL IMPACT: The City has several alternatives available for funding the acquisition of a new library. All options depend on the City pledging public facilities fee funds, both existing and future, to this project. The ultimate decision on exactly how to finance the construction will determine the extent of public facilities fees committed to the project in future years and the effect the library will have on the timing of other improvements. The library project costs are summarized in the following table: Description Land Acquisition Grading Design Construction Total Project Cost Operations Fiscal Year 1988-89 88-89 88-89 89-90 to 90-91 90-91 and thereafter Approximate Amount Received $1.1 million 0.9 million 0.6 million 8.4 million $11. 0. million $0.5 to 0.9 million Purchse of the library site and funding grading costs prior to 1989-90 may require dedication of all available public facilities fee revenues for 1987-88 and delay of certain existing PFF projects. The list of projects to be delayed includes Palomar Airport Road improvements, park improvements in the northeast and southwest quadrants, the Public Safety Center phase II and III and many smaller projects. 185 Page 2 AB NO. ,RPd2-#/ This delay in funding other improvements is brought on by reduced PFF revenue due to the slowing of development activity. Existing resources must be allocated to only top priority projects. Staff is recommending that Council reserve funds for the acquisition of land and grading costs from 1987-88 revenue (assuming 87-88 revenues are sufficient-to cover these and other committed costs). Actual purchase of the property would not occur until 1988-89. The long term financing of the building construction costs could be done in one of three ways: 1. Building construction funded by site developer with lease back agreement -under this concept the City would enter into a lease back agreement with the site developer to build the library to City specifications. The City would then enter into a long term lease back agreement with the developer pledging up to $1 million per year of public·facilities fee revenue to lease payments over a 20 year period. The actual lease payments will depend on construction costs and interest rates during this 20 year period. By allowing the site developer to build the build- ing, the City may be able to lower total construction costs by taking advantage of certain economies of scale. 2. Certificates of Participation -The City may issue Certificates of Participation for the construction of the building. The public facilities fee fund would be pledged, along with City general fund revenues, to the repayment of the debt, as in the above approach the library debt would have first claim of PFF revenues. This alternative offers the City a lower interest rate due to our ability to issue tax exempt debt. Repayment would require up to $1 million per year for 20 years; however, due to lower interest rates, the actual cost to the City could be slightly less than alternative #1. 3. Mello-Roos District Reimbursement -Under this alternative-the City must put together a series of financing steps. First, the building could be constructed by the site developer or by the City through the use of Mello-Roos tax exempt debt. In either case the ultimate cost of the building would be supported by the Mello-Roos district. The developers supporting the district could have the annual assessment placed upon their district reduced by the amount of public facilities fees payed by that developer. The cost to the City is limited to the amount of public facilities fees paid by developers within the district. Any shortfall could be assessed against property with the district. Council is not required to select a funding alternative at this time. However, an understanding of the alternatives is necessary before the City moves forward with the project. Two important points found in all financing methods are 1) Public facilities fees are pledged to repay the 186 Page 3 AB NO. h~2 -#/ cost of the building and, 2) The City will be delaying many public facilities fee proj-ects to make way for library funding. The CIP which will be presented to Council in the next few months will detail the fiscal impact of this project. The City will require development of 400 to 600 dwelling units per year to fund the library construction. The operating costs for the new library will run from $500,000 to $900,000 per year depending on the level of operations. The City presently is unable to support this additional cost. Preliminary projections of General Fund revenue show that an operating deficit of about $1.5 million will exist in 1990-91, the first year of operations for this facility. The City must consider revenue enhancements or zone fees assessed against development to cover operating costs for the first year or two of operations. EXHIBITS: 1. Memo from Library Director to Site Selection Committee dated April 16, 1987. 2. Site plan~ 3. Letter from Johnson Wax Development Corporation to Frank Mannen date June 26, 1987. 4. Site map. 187 APRIL 16, 1987 TO: SITE SELECTION COMMITTEE FROM: Library Director LIBRARY SITE SELECTION PROGRESS REPORT Library and city staff have had six meetings with the developers who plan to build a shopping center on El Camino Real between Alga Road and Dove Lane. The result of those meetings has been the development of a tentative site plan for a library building. The next step will be to develop a final site plan. The addition of the new post office to this general site plan has caused some of the revisions we have developed. That has also required the developers to purchase an aaditional seven acres of land to accommodate both the library and the post office. The developers are in the process of purchasing the prop~rty at this time. We have also been working with some preliminary financial data to purchase the site and the building. The follow- ing options appear to be possible: 1. Purchase the land from the developer and lease back the build- ing. 2. Lease back the land and the building. 3. Purchase outright the land and the building from the developer after the building is built. Any one or a combination of these options may be feasible. More work needs to be done on various financing alternatives. This proposed site appears to be the best possible site for the library in the southern half of the city. The combination of a shopping center, post office and library will make for an ideal mix and should provide a convenient source of services to the public. The site satisfies all the major criteria we have used to evaluate various potential library sites • PAS Distribution: Geoff Armour John Cahill Bebe Grosse Michael Holzmiller Ann Kulchin Sharon Schramm Seena Trigas Fri.nlc M;innPn • 188 SOUTH CARLSBAD , LIBRARY SITES· 189 ,' ,',, / DO\'E ALGA -._ --N f ' I r J I ..... . ID ·o --~-- •·": .... ;-.... .,,_ -·-------. · . . -. ·• ~ .. ~ -·-- IRE"DATA ---.. .... ......... ..... .... --·-- / -; . ···1 ,.4 __ -------· - CARISBAD RETAIL ASSOCIATES 1601 Dove street, Suite 242 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Jun• 26, 1987 Mr. Frank Mannan Aaaiatant-City Manager City ot Carlsbad 1250 Elli Streat Carlsbad, California 92001 RE: South Carlsbad Library Sita NWC Alga & El Cuaino Real Carlsbad, Cali~ornia Dear Prank: This letter ia to ••t forth th• terms and conditions upon whi~h Carlsbad Retail Associate• would b• prepared to proceed with nagotiationa for th• City ot Carlabad to purchase a portion of th• above sit• for a City of Carlsbad Library. 1. Building size 'l'h• subject site shall accomodate a fifty eight thousand (S8,000) square foot library facility with adequate parking and on-sit• amenities. The location of the Purchaser's building on the site will b• baaically •• shown on the attached site plan. z. Parcel Oi•• ___ .. ______ __ Th• subject site ■hall contain approximately six acres. 3. Purchase Price Th• price to be paid by Purchaser to Saller for the land before 9radin9 and installation of ■it• utilities will be one Million Thirty Two Thousand Dollar•($ 1,032,000) based upon a $ 3.95 per squar• foot purch••• price. 'l'ha purchase price shall b• adjuated by $3.95 per square foot if the actual parcel is mor• or la•• than six acres. Thi• purch••• price shall be effective until September 30, 1987. Beyond September 30, 1987, the purcha•• price will increaae by Saller•• cost of carry, including but not limited to interest on the land, taxes and insurance. Purchaser shall pay for its share of escrow tees and closinq costs. Sellar ■hall pay tor Purchaser's CLTA standard policy of title insurance (excepting any special endorsements required by Purchaser), transfer tax•• and docUllantary stamps. 191 ----•-; --·--·-, ----. -. ·-~-'. -----· - -2- 4. Transaction Schedule & Conditions a. City Council approval ot a mutually acceptable purchase agraamant no later than September 30, 1987. b. Seller's purchase of approximately 9 acres from Walter J. and Wanda L. Frandsen together with approximately 7.26 acres trom Westwood Savings and Loan Association (parcels Band C, Exhibit A). c. Saller'• demonstration of its ability to provide PUrchaser with a developable library site. This ability will be demonstrated by Sallar•s implementation of its development plan for the Master Plan area according to a mutually acceptable schedule. Th• present schedule anticipates completion ot grading and installation of utiliti•• and services !or the Master Plan area by September 1, 1988. This data will become the close of escrow unl••• extended by mutual consent. d. Prior to clo■a ot escrow, th• parties shall enter into an agraamant for the development of tha property. This agreement shall survive the close ot ••crow and provide tor, among other things, the timing and cost ot all grading and site improvements for tha property, and th• ti•ely construction of a library facility in accordance with plans and specifications approved by both PUrchaser and Saller. e. Th• Pureha•er•s interest in the property shall he subject to covenants, condition■ and restrictions providing for, among other thing•, a non•excluaive reciprocal easement tor ingress, egress and parking as well a• provisions for maintenance o~ co-on drive• and par~ing areas. Purchaser shall approve •aid document■, prior to elo■a of escrow and within thirty (30) days of receipt of aue. t. PUrcha■ar i■ aware that sale of this property is physically and financially linked with th• overall Master Plan to be developed by Seller. Subject Maatar Plan will be submitted to tha City of Carlsbad for review and approval. Saller, with PUrchaaer•• assistance, ■hall pursue all governmental approvals including approvals by the City ot Carlsbad and the California coastal Commission for the proposed Master Plan. 192 _,... - q. Seller •hall aupply soil• teats to the reasonable aatistaction ot PW:'chaaar at the approximate time Purchaser c::ouancaa its plans and apeciticationa tor its buil.ding. The closing ct escrow shall be contingent upon approval ot th• soils conditions, which shall be within fifteen (15) days ot receipt ot sm. h. Sellar ■hall provide Buyer with a cultural reaource study indicating the atatu■ cf known or potential archaeological or palwontological reaourea• on •ubject parcel. 5. Selection ot E•crov and Title Company shall be at Seller•• discretion. e. Purchaser shall depoait seventy Pive Thousand Dollars ($ 75,000) into ••crow within tittaen (15) days ot execution ot the purcha•e docwaent• described herein. Said$ 75,000 shall apply to the purchase price and shall b• torfeitabl• to Seller it Purchaser terminates th• aqreemant tor any reason other than the non-satisfaction of the conditions and continqanci•• outlined herein. In tha avant PUrchaaar meats all conditions outlined herein and Seller ia unaJ::,la to deliver subject property in the condition outlined in the aqreement for development ot th• property, Sellar shall return the tull $7!,000 to Purchaser. 7. 'l'h• balance ot th• purchase price shall be paid by PUrchaser to Seller upon the clo•• of escrow. a. Seller aball provide Purchaser with a preliminary title report covering the entire center and a topographic and boundary aurvay. Th• title report shall be accompanied with copies of all it••• as exceptions thereto and a plat map with th• location of the ••••••nta akatchad thereon. PUrchaaer shall approve title within thirty (30) day■ ot receipt of the above report and exception■• Th• clo■ing of ••crow shall be contingent upon title being in the ■am• condition•• approved by Purchaser. This latter ia not intended to be contractual in nature, is not an ofter, and is to be taken only•• an exprasaion ot the general term■ and condition• upon which we would be willing to enter into purchase negotiations. Th• proposed agreement shall be ettective only upon final approval by the City ot Carlsbad, the Board of Directors of John■on wax Development corporation and final execution of docUlllenta. Pl•••• verify receipt of thia latter and your acceptance or all terms and conditions contained herein by execution of th• original where provided and returning to th• undersigned. 193 -- Jut-~ 30 • 87 1s: 01 We look forward to working wit:h you with re•pect to this purchase and are hope~l va will be able to consUJ11JRate a mutually acceptable transaction with the City ot Carlsbad•• a library would be a moat welcome addition to th• proposed La Costa Center. · Sincerely, Carlsbad Retail Asaociataa, a calitornia General Partnership . -~ . .-: . . '·( , • .J••.,f-(_./ ·. 1 A .. • , ., , (,. '·······'- Frederick T. Von der Aha £<;.w~~--- /£ugenar:~indler II The tena• and condition• indicated herein are hereby acknowledged, agreed and accapted on 1:hi• ____ day ot June, 1987. city of carl■bad By: It■: 194 p,-, , 5, : EFC;. TE!...E•:1Jp I EP 7(: 10 ; 6-:C-:37 -=·: 0-1Pr·: ; .Jtu: ,::Js,..:, '·'E::.:., :..:. JUN 30 '87 18:02 JDC COSTA MESH, O=l 2-1.2 FQ6 •• . . : • • • s ! • -. .. • ! . • ----,: • .. I '\ : • • (i) 0 (D . ..... ,. - EXHIBIT A . . ~ ! ' .. I I I -i tCAL~ , • •••••• .. 'i ol -.;.,..~~ ~-' \J'4 ... u ... ' B, Parcel A ,,,._ ... ,_, ,. • -~, Ju - "i 195 .. I ., I APPENDIX 6 -196.- ZONE 1 BUILDOUT ARTERIAL IMPROVEMENTS This appendix lists and maps the improvements that will be needed to completely develop all Circulation Element Roads in Zone 1 to their ultimate right-of-way width. Carlsbad Boulevard -Major Arterial Carlsbad Village Drive -Secondary Arterial Tamarack Avenue -Secondary Arterial Marron Road -Secondary Arterial Monroe Street -Secondary Arterial El Camino Real serves as a boundary between Zones 1 and 2. For purposes of this study El Camino Real was divided in half when assigning development requirements to Zones 1 and 2. For example, half the cost of providing the median on El Camino Real between Chestnut Avenue and Tamarack Avenue has been assigned to Zone 2 and half has been assigned to Zone 1. This is not to suggest that only half the median be constructed at any one time. When this improvement ls constructed it would be logical as well as economical to construct the entire median at one time. Some of the needed improvements will be constructed by the developers of adjacent property. Other needed improvements are --adjacent to properties that have little or no development potential or have already been developed with single family homes. Alternatives for financing these improvements are shown at the end of this section. r All of the Circulation Element Roads have been constructed to their full length within Zone 1. However, some of these roads have sections that have not been built out at their ultimate right-of-way width. Each of the arterials within Zone 1 has been broken into segments, as shown on map "Existing and Proposed Street Improvements", on Page 201. This exhibit distinguishes between fully improved and partially improved segments of the roads. Partially improved segments have been assigned a letter. Underneath this letter is a series of numbers and letters which list the needed improvements on each unimproved section. The legend on this exhibit explains what each of these letters signifies. The needed improvements, the approximate length of the needed improvements, the approximate cost of the improvements and the possible source or sources of the improvements is shown on Exhibit Y, "Needed Arterial Improvements" on Page 199. This information was obtained from a number of sources. A field -197- - determine what improvements were needed on each partially improved segment. The approximate length of the needed improvements was determined by the use of maps, recent aerial photos, or actually measuring the length of the needed improvements in the field. Financing Alternatives The City has several options for financing the improvements along the segments for which no clear funding source has been identified: 1. Add them ·to the list of projects which will be funded through Public Facilities Fees. 2. Require future development within Zone 1 and outside Zone 1 which contributes traffic to these segments to fund part or all of the cost of the needed improvements. 3. Establish Assessment Districts to pay for the needed improvements. 4. Establish traffic impact fees for all projects contributing traffic to the impacted road sections or intersections. EXHIBIT Y ZONE 1 NEEDED ARTERIAL IMPROVEMENTS A. El Camino Real (from approximately 3600 feet south of Carlsbad Village Drive to Chestnut Avenue) half width median improvements for approximately 1200 feet. Approximate cost: $69,000. Source -Public Facility Fees. Note: Adjacent development in Zone 1 is required to install half width median improvements in this area. The needed improvements are technically located in Zone 2. B. El Camino Real (from Chestnut Avenue to approximately 1,000 feet south) lane, curb gutter, sidewalk, half median, street light, street tree for approximately 1,000 feet on the west side. Approximate cost: $156,392. Source -Future development of the adjacent property. C. El Camino Real (from 1,000 feet south of Chestnut Avenue to 1,154 feet south of Chestnut Avenue) street light, street tree and half median for 154 feet. Approximate cost: $9,988. Source -Public Facilities Fees. -198- D. El Camino Real (from 1,154 feet south of Chestnut Avenue to 2,609 feet south of Chestnut Avenue) lane, curb and gutter, sidewalk, 1/2 median, street light, street tree for approximately 1,455 feet. Approximate cost: E. $228,054. Source Future development of adjacent property. Note: The required improvements will require extensive grading and it may not be financially feasible for adjacent underdeveloped properties to install them due to their low development potential. El Camino Real (from to Tamarack Avenue) feet. Approximate Facilities Fees. 2,609 feet south of Chestnut Avenue half median for approximately 1,865 cost: $117,960. Source -Public F. El Camino Real (from Tamarack Avenue to Kelly Drive) 1/2 median for approximately 700 feet. Approximate cost: $44,275. Source -Future development of adjacent property in Zone 14. G. El Camino Real (from Kelly Drive to the South side of the Country Store property) lane, curb and gutter, sidewalk, 1/2 median, street light, street tree for approximately 1,500 feet. Approximate cost: $234,547. Source -Future development of adjacent property. H. El Camino Real (mobile home park frontage) 1/2 median for approximately 700 feet. Approximate cost: $44,275. Source Future development of adjacent property in Zone 14. I. El Camino Real (from the south edge of the mobile home park to the southerly boundary of Zone 1) lane, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street light, 1/2 median, street tree for approximately 950 feet. Approximate cost: $149,105. Source -Future development of adjacent property. J. Tamarack Avenue (from Carlsbad Boulevard to approximately 150 feet east) lane, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street light and street tree on north side for approximately 150 feet. Approximate cost: $10,890. Source -Redevelopment of existing site or PFF. K. Tamarack Avenue (from 150 feet east of Carlsbad Boulevard to Linmar Lane) lanes, curb and gutters, sidewalks, street lights, street trees on both sides of existing street for approximately 2,250 feet. Approximate cost: $343,200. Source Development of adjacent property, PFF, Traffic Impact Fees. Note: The required improvements would bring the Tamarack Avenue right-of-way very close to some existing residences. -199- ;,-, L. Tamarack Avenue (from Linmar Lane to 400 feet east) same as K except curb and gutter exists on the south side. Approximate cost: $61,270. Source -Public Facility Fees. M. Carlsbad Boulevard (from northerly City limits to southerly edge of the redevelopment area Walnut Avenue) various improvements. Note: Improvements for this section will be installed as part of the Carlsbad Boulevard Streetscape Program being implemented by the Carlsbad Redevelopment Agency. N. Carlsbad Boulevard (from Walnut Avenue to Cherry Avenue) curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, street trees for approximately 1,500 feet on the west side. Note: There may not be sufficient space to install the required improvements in this area due to erosion of adjacent bluffs. It also may not be desireable to install street trees or street lights in this area because of their impacts on views of the ocean. 0. Carlsbad Boulevard (from the south side of the Agua Hedionda Bridge to the southerly boundary of Zone 1) for approximately 3,000 feet, lanes, curb and gutters, sidewalks, median and streetlights for approximately 3000'. Approximate cost: $2,500,000. Source -Caltrans Funds and San Diego Gas and Electric Co. Note: Detailed drawings have been prepared by the City and needed permits have been obtained. The improvements should be completed within a year. P. Monroe Street (from Marron Road to approximately 1,200 feet south) lane, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street light for approximately 1200 feet on each side. Approximate cost: $158,400. Source -Public Facilities Fees. Note: The adjacent property ls owned by the City of Carlsbad. Q. Marron Road (from the northerly City limits to approximately 1,600 feet east of Monroe Street) replace existing asphalt sidewalk with concrete sidewalk for approximately 3,300 feet. Note: The adjacent property ls owned by the City of Carlsbad. R. Marron Road (from approximately 1,600 feet east of Monroe Street to existing improvements) sidewalk for approximately 600 feet. Note: Construction of a sidewalk would require massive grading of established steep slopes and necessitate construction of a retaining wall. -200- I N 0 ..... I ~ Im 0 FULLY IMPROVED ROADWAYS 0 PARTIALLY IMPROVED ROADWAYS Needed Improvements Q PFF TRAFFIC SIGNAL L-LANE Ocean■lde BL-BIKE LANE Paclflc Ocean M-MEDIAN CG-CURB & GUTTER S-SIDEWALK SL-STREET LIGHT ST-STREET TREE ZONE 1 ~! -·-· l( (P) L,2CG,2S,2SL ·-·-·-·-·-·-(Q) aouth aide (B) L,CG,S, ti 2M,ST, SL ON WEST BIDE~ (D) L,CG,S,SL, LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN CIRCUL. _)-ION Existing & Proposed Improvements (C) 8T,SL, 1/2M on weu aide ZONE 2 ,' -· -I (G) r L,CG,8,8L,8T ONE 14 (I) )(~ ~ L,CG,8,8L,ST ~-t:+,-., lcH) ; ,, 1/2M ,• , ··-· ,, ZOM! a Clly ot Carlsbad Growlh Managemenl Progr:un JANUARY 1987 APPENDIX 7 -202- June 16, 1987 TO: CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY ENGINEER VISTA/CARLSBAD INTERCEPTOR UPGRADE- ZONE 2 FACILITIES PLAN The Zone 2 Facilities Plan requires that "no further development shall proceed in Subbasin 2A until agreement has been reached with the City of Vista and a schedule is established for upgrading of the deficient reaches" of the Vista/Carlsbad interceptor. Subsequent to Planning Commission approval staff has completed flow measurements in the line and agreed with Vista on a plan of action. These agreements are documented in the attached letters. At the current time flow measurements indicate that actual flows are less than calculated and that critical reaches are less than 65% of full depth flow. Under the agreed-upon action plan three actions were arrived at: 1. Carlsbad will act as lead agency for design and construction. 2. Design will begin as soon as possible. 3. Construction will be scheduled when measured peak dry weather flow reaches 70% of full depth. Both cities dgeted the project and funding is not a concern. LBH /cl Attachments -203- May 22, 1987 City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Pal.mas Drive carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 Attn: Lloyd B. Hubbs City F.ngineer Dear Mr. Hubbs: City of Vista I agree with Itans No. 1 and 2 of yew: letter dated 5/22/87 reg-arding units F-1 and F-2 of the Vista/Carlsbad inten:eptor. Item No. 3, designaticn of lead agency, shcAll.d specify the City of carlsbad since the entire project will be within carlsbad co~ra.te limits and Carlsbad will be the najority owner of these units in the ultimate flow canditicn. of Pub JJK:DLZ:se -204- 600EUCALYPTUSAVENUE • P.O.8OX1988 • VISTA.CALIFORNIA92083 • 619·726-1340 SEWER SYSTEM VISTA -CARLSBAD INTERCEPTOR Bl ZONE I ' FOXES ' LANDING P. S. 8 FORCE MAIN PALOMAR EL CAMINO REAL / KELLY DR SEWER SYSTEM NORTH AGUA HEDIONDA INTERCEPTOR LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM -205- City of C1rfsb11d 0,owth M1n"o"m,111 Ptr,g,:,rn JANUARY 1987 -- ---- 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 Office of the City Engineer May 22, 1987 City of Vista 600 Eucalyptus Ave. Vista, CA 92083 102-001/101 Attention: Joseph J. Iarrer Subject: Letter of Understanding for Upgrading of the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor As you are aware, the City of Carlsbad has adopted a growth management plan. As part of this growth management plan, the City of Carlsbad must show that they have capacity available in all public facilities for development to proceed. The Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor is in the process of being upgraded. As you are aware, Units A and B have been replaced and work is scheduled on Units F and H. The City of Carlsbad would like to agree to trigger mechanisms to start construction of the replacement line for Units F-1 and F-2 of the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor. This trigger mechanism will assure compliance with the City of Carlsbad growth management plan. In order to do this we propose the following guidelines: three 1. Flows should be months and when reaches 70% of the replacement monitored in Reach F-2 each six a measured peak dry weather flow the depth of flow construction of interceptor shall begin. 2. Design of the interceptor should commence as soon as possible and should be completed so that construction could begin immediately when flow reaches 70% of the depth of flow in the pipe. 3. The City of Vista will contract for both the design and construction of the new interceptor. These guidelines will allow us both to meet our needs for paralleling of the interceptor while allowing the City of Carlsbad to be in conformance with their growth management plan. -206- TELEPHONE (619)438-1161 ---If you feel that these guidelines are acceptable, please respond in writing. Since we have both budgeted for this project, we do not feel it is necessary to formalize these guidelines with an agreement. We have begun monitoring flows in Reach F-2 and are the meter in over the Memorial Day weekend. We will you of the measured peaks. leaving advise If you have any questions or need any information, please call. LBH:jaa cc: Richard W. Graff -207- APPENDIX 8 -208- ,,--. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ,·- 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2672 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 1 ON PROPERTY GENERALLY BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY BUENA VISTA LAGOON, SOUTH BY AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON, WEST BY THE PACIFIC OCEAN, AND EAST BY EL CAMINO REAL. APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD CASE NO.: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN -ZONE 1 WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission, and WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution No. 8797 adopting the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan establishing facility zones and performance standards for public facilities, and WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution No. 9808 requiring the processing of a Local Facilities Management Plan, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 15th day of July, 1987, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the above recitations are true and correct. -209- --· 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission APPROVES Local Facilities Management Plan -Zone 1, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1 ls consistent with the Land Use Element, the Public Facilities Element, and the other Elements contained in Carlsbad's General Plan. That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1 is consistent with Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Growth Management), and with the adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. That the Local Facilities Management Plan and the conditions contained therein will promote the public safety and welfare by ensuring that public facilities will be provided in conformance with the adopted performance standards. The Local Facilities Management Plan will control the timing and locations of growth by tying the pace of development to the provision of public facilities and improvements. The Plan will prevent growth unless public facilities and services are available in conformance with the adopted performance standards. 16 Conditions: 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 ) Ill/ /Ill /Ill /Ill /Ill Ill/ /Ill /Ill Approval ls granted for Local Facilities Management Plan -Zone 1 as contained in the Plan titled Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1, dated July 15, 1987, on file in the Planning Department and incorporated herein by reference. PC RESO NO. 2672 -210- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 15th day of July, 1987, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER PLANNING DIRECTOR PC RESO NO. 2 672 MARY MARCUS, Chairman CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION -211-