HomeMy WebLinkAboutLFMP 02; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 02; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 2; 1987-05-20Number
1
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
ZONE 2
City Council Resolution No. 9123
Dated June 16, 1987
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2660
Dated May 20, 1987
AMENDMENTS
Date I Reso. No. Subject(s)
8/3/87 CC/9144 Foote Development Agreement
I I
AMENDMENT # 1
(10 pages}
AGREEMENT FOR PROVISION OF PUBLIC
FACILITIES AFFECTING ISSUANCE AND USE
OF BUILDING PERMITS.
THIS AGREEMENT is made this ~ day of ~ ,
1987, between the CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal corporation of
the State of California, hereinafter referred to as CITY, and the
FOOTE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY hereinafter referred to as DEVELOPER.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City's Growth Management Plan provide.s that
building permits may not issue until all necessary public
facilities are constructed or otherwise guaranteed as required by
the Local Facilities Management Plan; and
WHEREAS, a Local Facilities Manaqernent Plan has been
approved by the City Council for Zone 2 which identifies certain
public facilities deficiencies which must be remedied prior to
the issuance of any building permits; and
WHEREAS, developer has secured a final map for CT 84-35,
a 151 unit residential subdivision located in Zone 2; and
WHEREAS, developer wishes to assume responsibility for
the correction of all the existing deficiencies and wishes to
obtain building permits for his project so that the houses can be
constructed at the same time the necessary public facilities are
being constructed recognizing that the houses will not be
occupied until all the necessary public facilities are available
thereby avoiding a further burdening of the City's public
facilities capacities and ensuring compliance with the Growth
Management Ordinance.
-1-
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals and
mutual obligations of the parties as herein expressed, City and
Developer agree as follows:
1. Developer will pay the City $42,500.00 for
improvements to the intersection of Elm Avenue at
El Camino Real as required by the Local Facilities
Management Plan for Zone 2. The City will use this
money to supplement the existing construction
contract for work in the area and will assume the
responsibility for completing the improvements.
2. Developer will deposit $270,000.00 with the City,
which is the estimated cost of making the
improvements to the intersection of Tamarack Avenue
at El Camino Real as required by the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 2. City will
assume responsibility for constructing these
improvements. When the Citywide Traffic Study is
completed a judgement will be made by the City
Council as to the exact nature and extent of these
improvements. The existing estimate will be
refined at that time. Any deposit in excess of the
refined estimate will be returned to developer. If
the deposit is not sufficient to cover the refined
estimate then Devel~per shall promptly deposit any
additional funds required. Any payments by
developer pursuant to this section shall satisfy
his obligation for the improvements.
-2-
3. Developer shall immediately commence construction
of any necessary upgrades to the El Camino Real
Kelly Sewer Interceptor to accommodate flows from
Zone 2 and Zone 7 to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer. This work shall be diligently pursued to
completion by developer. Developer shall guarantee
the construction of the sewer improvements by
furnishing a Letter of Credit in a form acceptable
to the City Attorney in the amount of $75,000.00.
In connection with the construction developer shall
maintain a liability insurance policy naming the
City as an additional insured as required by the
Risk Manager covering all aspects of the work to be
performed by developer or a sub-contractor,
developer may obtain the release of the posted
security on completion of the project in accordance
with the City Standard Subdivision Practice. Upon
completion and acceptance of the work, the City
will pay developer $29,427.00 which the parties
agree is the City's share of the project.
4. After this agreement is executed and after
developer pas deposited the funds required by ·
Sections 1 and 2 and furnish the security required
by Section 3 then subject to compliance with all
applicable laws, the City shall issue building
permits for developer's project.
-3-
s. Developer shall not occupy or allow occupancy of
any of the houses constructed pursuant to building
permits issued in accordance with this agreement
and shall neither request, secure or permit:
(a) A final building inspection of the structure1
(b) Installation of a water meter1 or
(c) Installation of any gas or electric meter for
any of the houses, until completion of both the
sewer improvements required by paragraph 3 and the
Elm and El Camino Real street improvements required
by paragraph 1 has been certified in writing by the
City Engineer as complete and operational.
Temporary electric power for construction will be
permitted only from temporary construction poles or
.pedestals. Developer agrees to comply with all of
the provisions of the Local Facilities Management
Plan for Zone·2 and the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan.
6. Further, developer understands the City Building
Department will not schedule the foundation
inspection or framing inspection on any of the
houses to be constructed by developer unless the
City Engineer certifies in writing that adequate
progress is being made by developer toward
completing the sewer improvements. Prior to the
utilities inspection and release of utilities the
City Engineer.must certify that all of the public
improvements ieauired by this agreement have been
-4-
completed. No units will receive final inspection
prior to this certification.
7. Developer understands that this agreement
notwithstanding should any of the public facilities
necessary to serve this project fall below the
adopted Citywide Performance Standard in the future
all previously available but unissued building
permits will not be issued until those deficiencies
can be corrected.
B. If developer wishes to sell any of the houses prior
to final inspection he must comply with the
disclosure provisions of this section. Any
prospective purchasers must be made aware of the
fact that they may not ~e able to occupy the house
on it's completion because of the provisions of
this agreement at the time a specific buildiing
permit is issued. A copy of this agreement shall
be available to each prospective buyer and
developer shall obtain a signed acknowledgment and
receipt that the buyer has read and understands the
agreement. The receipts must be filed with the
Community Development Director. After completion
of the sewer improvements and the Elm Avenue
improvements and provided no other public
facilities deficiencies have been identified prior
to building permit issuance, then the Community
Development Director shall have authority during
the time that situation prevails of waiving the
-s-
disclosure requirement for any particular house.
9. This agreement is intended to resolve any possible
dispute between developer and City in regards to
his development. Developer waives the right to
litigate anything that's happened in the past in
regards to this development and agrees to hold the
City harmless and waive any rights to litigate in
the future any matters arising out of this
agreement.
10. Developer shall be entitled to a credit against the
traffic impact fees required to be paid as a
condition of the issuance of his building permits.
The amount of the credit shall be equal to the
monies required to be paid by developer pursuant to
this agreement. As each building permit for the
development is pulled the traffic impact fees due
shall be deducted from this amount. When the
project is complete and the credit has otherwise
been adjusted as necessary for the Tamarack and El
Camino Real improvements, then the City Engineer
shall determine the amount remaining to be
reimbursed to developer. City agrees to use it's
best efforts to collect traffic impact fees from
other developers building in Zone 2 and agrees to
pay any amounts received on a monthly basis to
developer until the remaining reimbursement amount
has been satisfied. This reimbursement would
include any additional funds collected from other
-6-
developers in Zone 2 should the permanent traffic
impact fee be established. at a higher rate than the
interim fee. No interest will be due on the
reimbursement amount.
ll. Developer expressly warrants that he is the owner
of record or duly authorized agent of the owner of
record of the land subject to this agreement and
described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a
part hereof (•The Property•).
12. Applicant shall record this agreement as affecting
title to the property in the office of the County
Recorder, County of San Diego, California and
provide the City with a copy of the recorded
agreement prior to the issuance of any building
permits.
13. Provided all requirements of the Growth Management
Plan have been satisfied the City shall provide the
Developer with a written release of this agreement
for each house upon completion of the iroprovements
required by this agreement. The form of (the
release) agreement shall be prepared by Foote
Development Company's Title Company and be approved
by the City within 45 days of this agreement.
14. No amendment, modification, supplement, termination
or waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall
be effective unless executed in writing by both
parties and then only in the specific instance and
for the specific purposes given.
-7-
15. Any demand upon or notice required or permitted to
be given by one party to the other party shall be
in writing. Except as otherwise provided by la~,
any demand upon or notice required or permitted to
be given by one party to the other party shall be
effective (a) on personal delivery, (b) on the
second business day after mailing by certified or
registered United States mail, return receipt
requested, or (c) on the succeeding business day
after mailing by Express mail or after deposit with
a private delivery· service of general use (e.g.,
Federal Express) postage or fee paid as
appropriate, addressed to the party at the address
shown below.
Developer:
City:
Michael J. Foote
Foote Development Company
5205 Kearny Villa Way, Suite 211
San Diego, California 92123
City of Carlsbad
Community Development Office
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, California 92009
Attention: Community Development
Director
Notice of change of address shall be given by written
notice the manner set forth in this paragraph.
16. This Agreement and all rights and obligations
contained herein shall be in effect whether or not
any or all parties to this Agreement have been
succeeded by another entity, and all riqhts and
-8-
obligations of the parties signatory to this
Agreement shall be vested and binding on their
successor of interest.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed
this agreement on the day and year first written above.
CITY OF CARLSBAD
A Municipal Corporation of the State oiC?/i~j , ~· :
By: ~,c' ;· Y(( -/' ~-7
~DE A. LEWIS, Mayor
City of Carlsbad
CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NO. 202
! State of California
County of San Diego
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• : Q OFFICIAL SEAL :
: .·-KAREN R. KUNDTZ :
: ' NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFO~NIA :
: . . SAN o:EGo COUNTY •
• My Comm. E•P. Sept. 27. 1989 : ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
On this the 3rd day of
Karen R. Kundtz
----'A=u"'g=-u-=s-=t _____ 19..!!Z_, before me,
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
Aletha L. Rautenkranz
131 personally known to me
D proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) who executed the within instrument as
City Clerk oron behalf of the corporation therein
named, and acknowledged to me that the corporation executed it.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
~na~tt
7120 122 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION• 23012 Ventura Blvd. • P.O. Box 4625 • Woodland Hills, CA 91364
C'll Ml"-C r~"-'IC Ut:.YLLVrrY11...1,1 '-'-'•, 11-.'-•t l"'-...... , ..,.., ...................... -. ........ _ •. ---
and acknowJedgPd to me that such corporation executed the within instrument pur~uant to its
bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
OFFICIAL 'SEAL
r'ATRICJA G C ABERNATHY
NOTARY PUBLIC • CALIFORNIA
SAN D1£GO COUNTY
My romm. expires AUG 4, I 989 l-::~""""'-=--=--...:,,.;....~ .......... -._,~ _,.._.
~~ ~ C . ~~
Patricia G. c. Abernathy
-Y-
Map 11672
Lots 98 to 189 inclusive of Carlsbad Tract No. 84-35 Unit 2, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof
No. 11672, filed.in the Office of the County Recorder, December 11, 1986.
Map 11673
Lots 190 to 248 inclusive of Carlsbad Tract No. 84-35 Unit 3, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof
No. 11673, filed in the Office of the County Recorder, December 11, 1986.
-10-
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
ZONE 2
Plan Sponsor:
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(619) 438-5621
Preparer:
Planning 0Ppartment
City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
(619) 438-1161
Hay 20, 1987
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Executive Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
II. Introduction •••••• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
III. Buildout Projections. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
IV. Phasing •••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
V. Zone Requirements for Public Facilities
VI.
and Services ...•.••.••..•••••..••••....
Analysis of Public Facilities and Improvements
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11 •
City Administrati.ve Facilities •••••••••••
Adequacy Findings •••••••••••••••••••
Li brar)' .•.•.•.•..••...••.••..
Adequacy Findings •••••••••• . . . . . . . . .
Wastewater Treatment Capacity.
Adequacy Findings ••••••••
. ....
Parks ••.••••.••..••••• :. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....
Adequacy Findings ••
Drainage ................ .
Adequacy Findings ••• . . . ....... .
Circulation •••••••••••••••
Adequacy Findings •• . . . . . . . .
Fire ••..•••••••.••••..•• . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adequacy Findings ••
Open Space ••••••••••••••
Adequacy Findings ••
Schools .•••••••..••••••• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adequacy Findings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Collection System ••••••••••••• Sewer
Adequacy Findings ••••••••••••
Distribution System. Water
Adequacy Findings ••••
i
. . . . . . ...........
Page No.
1
9
16
23
27
29
36
38
44
47
51
54
61
63
68
69
73
79
82
83
86
88
92
94
100
108
112
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
VII. Appendices
Appendix 1 -Glossary.......................... 115
Appendix 2 -Growth Management Ordinance....... 122
Appendix 3 -Heference Sources................. 145
Appendix 4 -Acreage Summary................... 147
Appendix 5 -Buildout Arterial Improvements.... 149
Appendix ,,
0 -Planning Commission
Resolution No. 2665 ............. . 154
-City Council
Resolution No. 9123.............. 157
ii
CHARTS, MAPS, TABLES AND
EXHIBITS
Local Facilities Management Plan Map ••••••••••••••••••••
Publi.c Facilities Summary Sheet •••••••••••••••.•••••••••
Local Facilities Management Plan Map/Zone 2 •••••••••••••
General Plan -Land Use Map ••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••
Zoning Map •••.•••••••••••••.••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••
Existing Land Use Categories, Exhibit A •••••••••••••••••
Approved Development Projects by
Land Use Categories, Exhibit 8 ••••••••••••••••••.••••
Approved Development Projects, Exhibit C ••••••••••••••••
Vacant Land Use Categories, Exhibit D •••••••••.•••••••••
Buildout Population Projections •••••••••••••••••••••••••
Residential Phasing •••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Non-Residential Phasing ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••
City Administrative Facilities
Page No.
2
5
12
13
14
18
19
20
21
22
25
26
Map............................................ 30
Summary Sheet.................................. 31
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis........ 32
Five-Year CIP.................................. 33
Dwelling Unit and Population Projections,
Exhibit E................................... 34
City Administrative Facilities, Exhibit F...... 35
Zone 4 Demand Comparison, Exhibit G............ 37
Library
Map. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 39
Summary Sheet.................................. 40
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis........ 41
Planning Projections, Exhibit H................ 43
Zone 4 Demand Comparison, Exhib 1 t I •••••••••••• · 46
iii
CHARTS, MAPS, TABLES AND
EXHIBITS
(Continued)
Wastewater Treatment
Parks
Drainage
Map •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••. • •••
Summary Sheet •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis •••• ~ ••
Service Area Demand and Treatment Capacity ••••
Park District Boundary Map ••••••••••••••••••••
Map •••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Summary Sheet ••••••••••••••••••••••.••••••••••
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis •••••••
Park Demand, Park District 2, Exhibit J •••••••
Park Demand, Zone 2, Park District 2,
Exhibit K •••••••.•••••••••••••••..••...•...
Drainage, Exhibit L •••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Drainage Areas, Exhibit M •••••••••••••••••••••
Summar)' Sheet ......••..••••••••...•.••••......•
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis ••.••••
Circulation
Fire
Map •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Summary Sheet •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis ••.••••
Propose Improvements
El Camino Real at Elm Avenue •••••••••••••••
El Camino Real at Tamarack Avenue ••••••••••
Map •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Summary Sheet •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis •••••••
Open Space
Map ••••••••••• · •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Summary Sheet ••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis ••••••••
iv
Page No.
48
49
50
52
55
56
57
58
59
60
64
65
66
67
70
71
72
76
77
80
81
82
84
85
86
Schools
CHARTS, MAPS, TABLES AND
EXHIBITS
(Continued)
School District Boundary Map •••••••••••••••••••
Map ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Summary Sheet ...•••......•••..•................
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis ••••••..
Page No.
89
90
91
92
Sewer Collection System
Sewer District Boundary Map • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • 9 5
Map............................................ 96
Summary Sheet.................................. 97
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis........ 98
El Camino Real/Kelly Drive Sewer
System, Exhibit P........................... 102
Sewer Collection............................... 103
Sewer Demand, Table 2.......................... 104
Capacity of Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor,
Table 3..................................... 105
Capacity of El Camino Real/Kelly Drive
Sewer System, Table 4. •••••••••••...•••••••• 106
Capacity of North Agua Hedionda I~terceptor,
Table 5..................................... 107
Water Distribution System
Water Service Boundary Map..................... 109
Map............................................ 110
Summary Sheet.................................. 111
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis........ 112
Appendices
Appendix 1
Traffic Impact Fee.......................... 120
Bridge and Thoroughfare District............ 121
Appendix 4
Acreage Summary Chart....................... 148
Appendix 5
Circulation Element......................... 153
V
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
18
ZONE 2
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
2
Cltw o1c., .. ..,
0,owrft u-..mem Prot,.,..
JANUARY 1987
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 2 was
prepared pursuant to the City's Growth Management Program, Title
21, Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The contents
of the plan follow the outline established by Section 21.90.110
of the Growth Management Ordinance. The Zone 2 plan ls
consistent with the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan,
and it implements the Citywide plan adopted September 23, 1986.
The Zone 2 plan begins with the assumptions used to
generate the buildout projections for residential and non-
residential development within the Zone. The plan then phases or
estimates the Zone's development on a yearly basis until
bulldout. The phasing ls done to predict future facility
demands. Each facility that is required to be addressed is then
analyzed. The analysis includes an inventory of existing and
proposed facilities, a phasing schedule that establishes the
timing for the provision of facilities in relationship to demand,
and a financing plan that establishes various methods of funding
facilities and improvements that are Identified by the plan as
needed. Since this Zone plan is a regulatory document, each
facility section also contains conditions to ensure that public
facilities will conform to the adopted performance standards.
The conditions will be adopted as part of the Zone 2 approval,
and mandatory compliance will regulate future development within
the zone.
The purpose of the summary chart shown below is to provide
a brief synopsis of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone
2.
City Ad■inlstratlve
Library
SUMMARY CHART
Existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard until the year
2005.
Library space ls currently below
standard. Until this ls brought
into conformance, no residential
development may occur in Zone 2 or
in the City.
3
Wastewater
Treat ■ent Capacity
Parks
Drainage
Circulation
Fire
Open Space
Schools
Sewer Collection
Syste ■
Water Distribution
Existing facilities meet the adopted
performance·standard.
Park District 2 conforms with the
adopted performance standard until
the year 1996.
Existing facilities currently meet
the adopted performance standard.
Two intersections in Zone 2 do not
meet the adopted performance stan-
dards. Until this is brought into
conformance, no development shall
occur.
Existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard to buildout of
Zone 2.
Existing open space meets the adop-
ted performance standard to buildout
of Zone 2.
Existing school facilities currently
have the capacity to meet the
the demand generated by Zone 2.
The School District has indicated
that it will be able to provide
capacity to buildout of Zone 2.
Existing sewer trunk line capacity
does not comply with the adopted
performance standard. Until this is
brought into conformance, no deve-
lopment shall occur in Zone 2.
Water service to Zone 2 meets the
adopted performance standard to the
buildout of the Zone.
4
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
N/A
PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARY SHEET
Conformance with Adopted Standard
Cit~wide Quadrant Zone 2
City Administrative Facilities Yes N/A N/A
Library No* Presently below standard
Wastewater Treatment Yes**
Parks N/A Yes N/A
Drainage N/A N/A Yes
Circulation N/A N/A No*
Fire N/A N/A Yes
Open Space N/A N/A Yes
Schools N/A N/A Yes
Sewer Collection System N/A N/A No*
Water Distribution System N/A NIA Yes
= Not Applicable
* These facilities do not conform with the adopted performance standards.
Mitigation to bring these facilities into conformance are found in the
next section "Special Conditions for Zone 211 , Pages 7 and 8 and
discussed in further detail in each applicable Chapter.
** Based on Council adoption of interim wastewater treatment capacity
policy.
5
GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. All development within Zone 2 shall conform to the
provisions of Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code
and to the provisions and conditions of this Local
Facilities Management Plan.
2. All development within Zone 2 shall be required to pay a
public facility fee pursuant to the standards adopted by the
City Council on April 22, 1986, and all other applicable
fees. Development in Zone 2 shall also be responsible for
any additional fees to be incorporated into this plan that
are found to be necessary to enable facilities to meet the
adopted performance standard.
3. The City of Carlsbad shall monitor all facilities in Zone 2
pursuant to Subsections 21.90.130(c), (d) and (e) of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
4. All development in Zone 2 shall be in conformance with the
adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan as adopted
by City Council Resolution 8797.
5. Periodic amendment to the Zone 2 Local Facilities Management
Plan is anticipated to incorporate newly acquired data, to
add conditions and upgrade standards as determined through
the required monitoring program. Amendment to this Plan may
be initiated by action of the Planning Commission or City
Council at anytime.
6. If a public facility or service is found not to be in
conformance with an adopted performance standard during the
yearly monitoring, or at any other time, the matter will be
immediately brought before the City Council. If the City
Council determines that a non-conformance does exist then no
future building or development permits, which would impact
the facility, shall be issued until those facilities are
brought into conformance with the adopted performance
standard.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 2
The following Special Conditions apply specifically to
development in Zone 2 and must be complied with in addition to
the General Conditions for Zone 2. These conditions are also
listed separately under the analysis discussion of each
facility.
City Ad ■lnlstratlve Facilities
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
6
Library
No residential building or development permits shall be
issued in Zone 2 including those projects previously exempt under
Section 21.90.030(c} of the Carlsbad Municipal Code until the
City Council takes action approving measures which provide for
library services to meet the adopted performance standards.
Wastewater Treat•ent Capacity
Development in Zone 2 must comply with City Council policy
adopted by Resolution No. ____ , on May 19, 1987, which makes
provisions for interim wastewater treatment capacity.
Parks
Although the performance standard is being met for Zone 2,
several conditions are applicable to assure future planning of
adequate park facilities in Zone 2:
1. Phase II development of Calavera Hills Park must be
completed before 4,357 residential untis have
received building permits within Park District 2.
2. Development shall continue to pay Park-In-Lieu fees
and Public Facility Fees for Park District 2 to
mitigate the future incremental parks demand within
the District.
Drainage
No building or development permits shall be issued for any
portion of Zone 2 which drains to the Buena Vista Creek unless it
incorporates into the design of the project all conditions of the
Buena Vista Lagoon and Watershed Sediment Control Plan, as
prepared by June Applegate and Associates on September 3,
1985.
Circulation
The following intersections will require mitigation:
1. El Camino Real/Elm Avenue improvements include
widening Elm Avenue at the intersection to provide an
additional eastbound and westbound lane and widening
El Camino Real at the intersection to the full width
of a prime arterial (three through lanes and one
left-turn-only. lane). This mitigation must be
guaranteed for construction before any development in
Zone 2 is allowed to proceed.
7
2. El Camino Real/Tamarack Avenue -improvements consist
of restriping to provide optional through and turn
lanes for the east and west approaches, widening of
the southbound approach to provide one additional
lane and widening the northbound approach to provide
two left-turn-only, two right-turn-only and three
through lanes. This mitigation must be guaranteed
for construction before any development in Zone 2 is
allowed to proceed.
All future development within Zone 2 shall continue to pay
Traffic Impact Fees and Public Facilities Fees.
Fire
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
Open Space
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
Schools
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
Sewer Collection Syste■
Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor -Subbasin 2A
Reaches E-4, F-1, and F-2 of the Vista/Carlsbad
interceptor fail to meet the standard. No further development
shall. proceed in Subbasin· 2A until agreement has been reached
with the City of Vista and a schedule ls established for
upgrading of the deficient reaches.
El Camino Real/Kelly Interceptor -Subbasin 28
The El Camino Real/Kelly interceptor currently falls to
meet the performance standards. No further development shall be
allowed in Subbasln 2B until agreements or contracts have been
executed to upgrade the deficient reaches.
Water Distribution Syste ■
All development within Zone 2 shall pay the required Costa
Real Municipal Water District fees.
8
9
INTRODUCTION
I. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this Local Facilities Management Plan is
to complete the second phase of the overall Growth Management
Plan for Zone 2 within the City of Carlsbad. Phase One of the
Growth Management Program established the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan based upon a phased buildout of the City's
existing General Plan. For purposes of public facilities
analysis, the City has been separated into 25 Local Facilities
Management Zones as shown on "Local Facility Management Plan
Boundaries", on Page 2.
LOCAL PLAN OVERVIEW
This plan for Zone 2 provides a detailed description and
analysis of how this area of the City will develop from its
current status to buildout. The plan also demonstrates how and
when each facility and improvement will be constructed in order
to accommodate development within the Zone (phasing). It also
provides a complete description of how each facility and
improvement will be financed when mitigation is necessary.
The body of the plan is divided into separate sections for
each public facility. In each section there will be a summary
sheet which highlights the important information described in the
analysis. This summary is broken down into three categories:
Existing, Existing plus approved, and Future. The demand column
in each of these categories will show two numbers:
Demand
li?3l
The top number (1) represents the Citywide, Quadrant or
Zone demand, dependin~ upon the public facility being evaluated.
The lower number (2) represents the specific zone demand for the
public facility, i.e., in this case, Zone 2.
Followinq the summary sheet will be the detailed analysis
and additional information for the public facility. If a
facility is not conforming with the adopted performance standard,
there will be a discussion describing this situation, a
mitigation or alternatives section, and a financing discussion.
Each facility subsection will conclude with a subsection,
"Adequacy Findings". This section will summarize whether or not
the public facility conforms with the adopted performance
standard.
10
The plan for
Citywide Facilities
adopted performance
development occurs.
ZONE Z -OVERVIEW
Zone 2 is consistent with all aspects of the
and Improvement Plan and ensures that the
standards shall be complied with as
Zone 2 comprises about 800 acres in the northeast quadrant
of the City. Bordered almost entirely by major roadways, i.e.,
El Camino Real to the west, Highway 78 to the north, Elm Avenue
to the east, and Tamarack Avenue to the south, Zone 2 is
considered an "in-fill" zone because much of it has been built,
or ls in the process of developing.
Zone 2 has within its boundaries existing developments
such as the Von's and former Handyman shopping centers, the
Tanglewood condominiums, and Larwin Park. A major powerline
easement bisects the zone. Two recently approved housing
developments, Falcon Hills (CT 84.-35) and Tamarack Point (CT 85-
14), are under construction in the southern portion of Zone 2.
Future development could include some office uses along El Camino
Real, and residential development between Haymar and Marron
Roads, and at the corner of Elm Avenue and El Camino Real.
The map, "General Plan Land Use", shown on Page 13,
denotes the General Plan Land Use· for Zone 2. The accompanying
land Use Zoning ls shown on Page 14.
1 1
ZONE 2
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
12
t
Clly at Carlallilld
0,owtfl MWIIQel'lent Pr°"wn
5
JANUARY 1987
ZONE 1
IISIDlNTIAL
RL UtW UF.N'iill"Y (O· l.'l
11.M l.l>W•MFIHIIM IJF.N~HY(0-4)
RM Mfllll1M UF.N~HY(4·R)
I
I
I
RMII MFIJIITM IIIC.11 0f.NSHY (8-1')
IUI UHill l>FNSlrt' ( 1'·23)
COMMERCIAL Rltl IN I i!N'iil\.f. RFC.IONAL RETAIL (f'II Plara C:amlnn a.an IRE f'I( ll'N~l\'P RF(il(JNAI. REU,IL(«'II-CM (:uunt:rr cart,bad)
R.11 RF.«;11,NAI.SFR\l'l("I!
(; r:o,.tl!.ll'NI rY t;OMMEftC IAL
N NfltillRtUUll>O0 (:ClMMF.RUAL
11 I RAHi. SFR'f'lt F.~ O,lM~IF.RC.:tAL
(J rRc.JI f'-Clf)NAI. RF.I.Al El> CAI> ('fNIKAl.811SINF,Sl)l,;;AJCT
Pl PI.ANNfl) INIJltSIRIAl
(i Cil)\.'fRNllilf.Nff1\l:IUTIIE5
11 Pl'fll.lC UIIUIIH
Jtr. RF< RF\IICtNCOMMEIICIAL
SCHOOLS F. EU':MF.NTA.RV
ZONE 2
ZONE 21
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
13
GENERAL PLAN
RLM
ZONE! 7
I
I
I
I
I .
I
I / /
.ca,a1,;--Grow111 MaNgernenl Proe,NI
JANUARY 1887
ZONE 1
IISIDINTIAL
PC PUNNr1,c·(1MMl'NIT'Y7(lNF.
R·.\ Rf~IDFNll,\I ,\(;RIClllJllRAJ.1.0NE
A-£ lll'RAL RESlhFN JL.\I f.~ O,lE ZONE R· 1 ONF. FAMH.l Af:~IDF~ f!AL ZONE
R-l nn rAMILY 11:f'lillJENflAI.Zt>NE
A-, Ptfl'f:llPI.F. FAMIIYRE$ll)fNIIAl.7.CJNIE
I
I
I
1t 'L LIMI IF.I) Ml'I n-F.\MJI.,· Rf~ll)FNllAl ZC)NE
Rll-M Rr~ll1F.N-IIAI. IH-:Nir;I I"! Ml11.lll'I I: 7.f>NE
Rll II RFSIIJl:N 11.\1. l>fN<;;l (Y.IIH,II Zl •NF.
RliotllP RP~IIJF.NIIAI.J\llllHIF. IHIME rARKZONE
lt.P RF.Slllf.N ll.-\1. PRt: ,.p:o;,l(JNAL l.UNE
RT ftfSIIJF.NllA.1.Tl,t RtSrZ<lNI!
llW RF .... tllfN 114,I_ \1:UERWAY ZONE
CO-IIICIAL
0 otnt:F.ZUNF.
Cl Nf.lGURt.lRlkJOl>CO\fMF.tl<:lALZONE
C l GF.NF.RAL COMMER< 1AI. lONF. C-T U>MI\IERUAlTOl RJH 7.0NE
C·M llf.AVY t:UMMERCLAL-UMITED INDUfi1UAL ZONE M INUIJS ["RIAL ZONE P·M PI.ANNF.D INOtrSTRIAl ZONE
OTHII
F·P FlfX)UPf.AIN OVF.IU.AY ZONE
L·C lJMll'tD COflflllOL OS OPl:N SPACE
ZONE 2
ZONE 211
R-A-10
R-1-9
R-1-a
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
14
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ZONING
Cffy ol C•llbacl
Growth Managam1nt Pr~•"'
JANUARY 1887
15
BUILDOUT PROJECTIONS
II. BUILDOUT ASSUMPTIONS AND PR03ECTIONS
To properly assess and plan for public facilities and
services in Zone 2, it ls necessary to project the level of
development that can be anticipated at the ultimate buildout of
this Zone. Buildout projections are used to determine existing
residential and non-residential land uses and to assess the
ultimate potential that may be reached at the time Zone 2 is
completely developed. The ultimate buildou~ of Zone 2 has been
determined by examining:
1. The amount of existing land use,
2. The amount of approved, yet undeveloped land uses, and
3. The vacant land which can still be developed.
The methodology used to compile the buildout projections
is consistent with that used in the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan. Assumptions and methodologies are described
below:
1 •
2.
Existing Land Uses
Surveys and analysis were conducted to determine the
acreage of each land use category within Zone 2. Field
checks and subsequent research ascertained how each
parcel was actually being utilized as well as the square
footage of existing commercial/office structures.
Exhibit A, "Existing Land Use Cateqories", on Page 18
details this information. Because Zone 2 is an infill
area and much of the land has been developed, only gross
acreages are shown on Exhibit A. For informational
purposes, the 100% constrained areas and 25-40% slopes
are included in the appendix.
Approved But Undeveloped Land
Exhibit B, "Approved Development Projects By Land Use
Category", on Page 19 includes land uses which have
approved projects but which have not been developed as
of January 1, 1987. Bulldout ls constrained by approved
projects because the land has been committed to a
particular use or density, even though it is presently
vacant. Approved projects are those which have received
discretionary approval by the Planning Commission and/or
City Council. In this case, two residential projects,
Tamarack Point and Falcon Hills, have final maps
recorded, have received building permits for all or
portions of the· .projects, and portions are under
construction. Exhibit C, "Approved Projects", on Page
20, shows the status of these projects.
16
3. Vacant Land
All vacant land was inventoried by land use type to
determine ultimate buildout of the zone. The Citywide
Plan directed all environmentally constrained land to be
subtracted from the gross acreage figure for vacant
land. Exhibit D, "Vacant Land Use Categories", on Page
21, shows potential future development based on the
remaining parcels of vacant land in Zone 2. Mapping of
the environmental constraints is on file in the Planning
Department. A set of assumptions regarding site
coverage for commercial/office development was applied
to the net developable acreage figures. Basically,
every net developable acre of commercial/ office would
result in a maximum square footage yield of 40%.
Currently, there are 1,993 existing residential units, and
451 approved/committed units. However, when applying the growth
control yield densities to the residentially designated land
within Zone 2, this results in a theoretical yield of 2,161
units. The number of existing and committed residential units
(2,444) exceeds the growth control yield and the future buildout
of this zone will add an additional 134 units. At buildout, Zone
2 will exceed the growth control yield by 417 units. However, it
is important to note that most of Zone 2 was developed before the
growth control points were established, so some discrepancies are
expected. Actually, at buildout, the RLM designated acreage
meets the control point of 3.2 du/ac. The difference is in the
RM acreage, which shows an overall density of 10.1 du/ac, instead
of the required control point of 6 du/ac.
The units which exceed the growth control point will be
offset in other zones in the northeast quadrant. These zones
include 7, 14, 15, and 25. Two other zones in the quadrant, 5
and 16 have no residential land. Growth in the northeast
quadrant will be consistent with the Carlsbad Municipal code as
amended pursuant to the approval of Proposition Eon November 4,
1986. Therefore, growth will be in conformance with the
residential quadrant cap.
17
EXHIBIT A
ZONE 2
EXISTING LAND USE CATEGORIES
Listed below are the type and acreage of each land use category within
Zone 2.
GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION
RESIDENTIAL:
RL Low Density (0-1.5)
RLM Low-Med Density (0-4)
RM Medium Density (4-8)
RMH Med-Hi Density (8-15)
RH High Density (15-23)
COMMERCIAL:
CBD Central Business District
C Community
N Neighborhood
RC Recreation
TS Travel Services
0 Professional & Related
RRE Extensive Regional Retail
RRI Intensive Regional Retail
RS Regional Service
INDUSTRIAL: .
PI Planned Industrial
OTHER:
E
J
H
HC
p
G
u
NRR
OS
Elementary School
Junior High School
High School
Continuation School
Private School
Government Facility
Public Utilities
Non-Residential Reserve
Open Space
Park
Easements
MAJ Major Arterial
MIN Minor Arterial
COL Collector Street
TOTAL ACREAGE
18
ACRES
525.9
135.3
ACRES
. 24.3
10.2
13.4
58.3
22.3
19.9
809.6
22.2
36.1
1/87
EXHIBIT B
ZONE 2
APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS BY LAND USE CATEGORIES
Listed below are the type and acreage of each land use category with
approved, but unbuilt, projects within Zone 2.
GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION
RESIDENTIAL:
RL Low Density (0-1.5)
RLM Low-Med Density (0-4)
RM Medium Density (4-8)
RMH Med-Hi Density (8-15)
RH High Density (15-23)
COMMERCIAL:
CBD Central Business District
C Community
N Neighborhood ·
RC Recreation
TS Travel Services
0 Professional & Related
RRE Extensive Regional Retail
HRI Intensive Regional Retail
RS Regional Service
INDUSTRIAL:
PI Planned Industrial
OTHER:
E
J
H
HC
p
G
u
NRR
OS
Elementary School
Junior High School
High School
Continuation School
Private School
Government Facility
Public Utilities
Non-Residential Reserve
Open Space
DWELLING
UNITS
451
ACRES
* See Exhibit C "Approved Projects" on Page 20 for a further breakdown of
specific projects.
19
EXHIBIT C
ZONE 2
APPROVED PROJECTS
Building
Total Permits
City File Project Dwelling Not Yet Units Under
Number
CT 84-35
CT 84-14
Name Units Pulled Construction
Falcon Hills
Phase I 97 17 43
Phase II & III 151 151
Tamarack Point 377 0 240
Total 625 168 283
As of January 1, 1987, the total number of approved u,its was
451, including those units under construction and those without
building permits. The 174 units that were built by January 1,
1987 were included in ·the existing dwelling unit count.
20
Units
Built
37
137
174
EXHIBIT D
ZONE 2
VACANT LAND USE CATECORIES
As of January 1, 1987, the following types and amounts of land use are vacant
and not in the development process.
GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION
RESIDENTIAL:
RL low Density (0-1.5)
RLM low-Med Density (0-4)
RM Medium Density (4-8)
RMH Med-Hi Density (8-15)
RH High Density (15-23}
COMMERCIAL:
CBD Central Business District
C Community
N Neighborhood
RC Recreation
TS Travel Services
0 Professional & Related
RRE Extensive Regional Retail
RR! Intensive Regional Retail
RS Regional Service
INDUSTRIAL:
PI Planned Industrial
OTHER:
E
J
H
HC
p
G u
NRR
OS
Elementary School
Junior High School
High School
Continuation School
Private School
Government Facility
Public Utilities
Non-Residential Reserve
Open Space
* Assumes 4~ square footage yield.
GROSS
VACANT
ACRES
13. 76
31.07
9.0
99.3**
NET
VACANT
ACRES
9.26
18.0
3.6
99.3
** Includes other open space easements throughout the zone, in
addition to General Plan designated open space.
21
POTENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT
26 DU's
108 DU's
156,815 Sf*
BUILDOUT PROJECTION
Residential
The
Management
generation
existing,
breakdown,
residential buildout population projection for
Zone 2 was determined by applying a population
rate of 2.471 persons per dwelling unit to the
approved and potential future units. The population
therefore, is as follows:
Units
Existing 1,993 X
Approved 451 X
Future 134 l(
Total 2,578 X
Rate
2.471
II
II
II
=
=
=
=
Population
4,925
1,114
331
6,370
The buildout population projections are used consistently
throughout this plan for the purpose of predicting demand for
public facilities and improvements.
Non-Residential
The non-residential bulldout projection for Management
Zone 2 was determined by totaling the existing, approved and
potential future square footage by use category. Building
permit files were researched to determine the existing and
approved square footage. Vacant land square footage was
calculated by multiplying the gross vacant acres (shown on
Exhibit D, "Vacant Land Use Categories", on Page 21) by 40%. The
non-residential buildout breakdown, therefore ls as follows:
Existing
Approved
Future
Non-Residential Buildout Projection
22
Square Footage
266,449
0
156,815
423,264
23
PHASING
III. PHASING -AN OVERVIEW
It is necessary to provide a phasing schedule of
development for the entire City, each quadrant, and each of the
25 Local facilities Management Zones for the purpose of:
1. Projecting future demands for public facilities on a
yearly basis; and
2. Establishing the thresholds which identify when a
public facility is needed; and
3. Assisting with the development of the City's Capital
Improvement Program budget.
In the Citywide Plan, phasing of residential development
was 1,250 dwelling units per year. These projections were based
on a review of the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG)
projections along with those utilized in the City's Capital
Improvement Program and the Public Facilities Management Systems,
Monitoring Report of April, 1986.
In each Local Plan a key element will be the projected
phasing schedule of development within that specific zone. These
schedules are presented for the purpose of establishing
thresholds for demand and future demands for public facilities.
By projecting these future public facility and improvement
demands the appropriate funds may be allocated into the Capital
Improvement Budget to assure that the needed facilities are in
place as development occurs. The phasinq schedule is not
presented to establish a rate of growth within the City. It will
be used to assure that growth occurs only as public facilities
are available to ensure compliance with the adopted performance
standards.
The specific phasing schedule presented in this plan is
provided to accomplish the three purposes of phasing which were
discussed above. These projections have been established by
reviewing development in the pipeline which have tentative and
final maps. The projections also consider pending applications.
The same type of phasing has been prepared for SANDAG's Series
VII for the entire City and will be utilized to review phasing
projections presented in this and other local plans to determine
the overall impact on public facilities and services.
Zone 2 -Phasing Schedule
Phasing for Zone 2 incorporates the Citywide projections
as well as localized factors unique to the Zone. These localized
circumstances include:
1. The amount and type of developing projects:
-Final Maps
-Tentative Maps
-Applications Pending
24
2. The ultimate type and amount of land use potential.
3. The amount of development that can be reasonably
absorbed into the market in a given time frame.
The specific residential phasing schedule for Zone 2 is
shown below. The schedule assumes the zone will be completely
built out by the end of 1995. The schedule phases those projects
identified in the developing process beginning in 1987 through
1995. During this time period it ls estimated that a total of
585 additional residential units will be built in Zone 2.
Year
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
RESIDENTIAL PHASING
Zone 2
Yearly
Dwelling
Increase
225
226
0
0
36
36
36
21
5
Total
Dwelling
Units
1,993
2,218
2,444
2,444
2,444
2,480
2,516
2,552
2,573
2,578
In Zone 2 the non-residential land uses will be phased
based upon previous growth trends, location of parcels, and
current applications being considered by the Planning
Department.
The phasing schedule assumes that the vacant or under
developed parcels within the zone that have no applications
pending will be developed beginning in 1987 and phased through
the buildout of the zone. In all, a total of 2,578 residential
dwelling units will exist at the buildout of Zone 2. This
residential total, although above the growth control point, is in
compliance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code as modified by the
passage of Proposition E on November 4, 1986 because future
development potential ls minimal and it will be balanced out in
zones 7, 14, 15 and 25 in the northeast quadrant.
25
The
by 1990.
The total
D, "Vacant
YEAR
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
non-residential land uses will be completely built out
This assumes a phasing schedule which begins in 1987.
vacant non-residential land uses are shown on Exhibit
Land Use Categories" on Page 21.
NON-RESIDENTIAL PHASING
Zone 2
OFFICE SQ. FT.
40,249
116,566
Total Square Footage
Phasing Summary
It ls estimated that the remaining residential units in
Zone 2 will develop by 1995. Yearly residential growth is
expected to range from a high of 226 units in 1988 to a low of
five units in 1995. Non-residential development of Zone 2 was
estimated to build out by 1990.
The specific phasing of Zone 2, is presented for the
purpose of determining future annual demand and thresholds for
public facilities. It is impossible to predict the exact way
development will occur in this Zone, but through these phasing
projections the City will be able to establish a direct link
between development and the need for public facilities. This
link will allow the City to ensure compliance with the adopted
performance standards at all times as growth occurs. And if
compliance is not maintained, development will be stopped until
it conforms with the adopted performance standards.
26
27
ZONE
REQUIREMENTS
IV. ZONE REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
The Management Plan for Zone 2 addresses eleven separate
facilities:
1. City Administrative Facilities
2. Library
3. Wastewater Treatment Capacity
4. Parks
5. Or ainage
6. Circulation
7. Fire
8. Open Space
9. Schools
10. Sewer Collection System
11. Water Distribution System
Each of these facilities will be evaluated to determine
conformance with the adopted performance standard. The
evaluation will be made in three stages based on existing demand,
approved or committed demand, and future demand at buildout.
For each of these facilities and ·services the following is
provided:
1. An illustrative map showing what is existing and what
will be needed as the zone develops to its ultimate
buildout;
2. District boundary maps where facilities are provided
by special districts (le., school, water, sewer);
3. Adopted service level performance standards which
must be complied with at all times as growth occurs;
and
4. A detailed facility planning and adequacy analysis
for each of the public facilities and services.
The Citywide facilities, which include City Administrative
Facilities, Library, and Wastewater Treatment, have been analyzed
in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. These will
also be included in the Local Facilities Management Plan to show
compliance or to suggest alternatives to assure conformance with
the adopted standard.
In any case, t~is analysis will show how each of the
adopted performance standards will be compiled with as
development occurs within the City, quadrant, and zone. This
plan includes financing of all public facilities and services
where non-conformance with the standard requires mitigation. It
also includes a complete phasing schedule for all development
within the zone.
28
29
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE
FACILITIES
ZONE 2
LOCAL
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES
• CITY AOMINIITRATION-EXIITINCI
Q QTY AOMINISTRATION-.. LANNEO
I \ ',, __ __
~ l c,.""",,
'
2
--r----... "7t I
I I I t to
, ... -(o_""T' __
•o
CO s r A.
0 l I YE NH A IN
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
30
CltyotC...._,
Growlll .......,.._.. Pl'CH7am
~
JANUARY 1987
LOCAL "FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 2
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES
SUMMARY SHEET
BUILDOUT DEMAND PROJECTION SUPPLY ADEQUACY (Ccn.a11a .. wlat■ldllrd) MITIGATION FUNDING
86,539
EXISTING 106,084 YES N/A N/A
(SQUARE FEET)
7,387
118,867*
APPROVED 168,084 YES N/A N/A
(SQUARE FEET
C, 1,672 z -Cf)
< ::c 202,371
0.
FUTURE 168,084** YES*** N/A N/A
(SQUARE FEET
9,555
* As of January 1, 1987, 32,328 square feet of demand has ·been approved.
** In the year 2005 this facility will no longer conform to the adopted
performance standard.
*** Zone 2 is scheduled to phase out all of its residential land by 1995.
31
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Fifteen hundred square feet per 1,000 population must be
scheduled for construction within a five-year period.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
The purpose of this
not the performance standard
Zone 2 complies with the
Administrative Facilities.
analysis is to determine whether or
is being met, and if the demand for
overall Citywide analysis of City
A. Inventory
1. Facility Demands:
Existing (as of 1/1/87)
Buildout
Population
(Citywide/Zone)
57,495/4,925
134,914/6,370
2. Existing City Administrative Facilities:
SQUARE FEET
City Hall Facilities
City Hall
Finance Dept. Modular
Purchasing/Risk Management
Modular
Leased Space
Redevelopment
Community Development Dept.
Las Palmas Facility
Square Footage
Permanent Space
12,899
Public Safety and Service Center
Phase I
Police and Fire Depts.
Vehicle Maintenance
Totals
53,700
10,358
76,957
Total Existing Facilities 106,084
* Year-to-Year Option
32
Temporary
Space
2,700
1,800
4,500
Required
Square Footage
{Citywide/Zone)
86,539/7,387
202,371/9,555
Leased
Space
2,000
22,627
24,627
Lease
Expiration
Date
3/31/83*
7 /31/90
As indicated on the table on the previous page,
approximately 23% of existing administrative facilities are
leased and 4.2% are temporary (portable modular units). If the
rental leases are terminated or the modulars are no longer used,
the existing square footage of City Administrative Facilities
will be reduced. At that time, the Management Plan for Zone 2,
as well as the Citywide Plan, will need to be amended to modify
the phasing assumptions in order to plan for more City
Administrative Facilities at an earlier time.
3. Facilities in City's Five Year Capital Improvements
Program:
Item 3.~ Year Amount Source
a. Public Safety Center
Phase II*
Design
Construction 62,000
86-87
89-90
$ 255,000
$3,455,000
PFF**
PFF/S/W**
b. Total Facilities in City's 5 Year Capital Improvements Program.
62,000 square feet
* Public Safety Center Phase II. Yard offices,
Maintenance shops, and Purchasing warehouse for
the use of Utility Maintenance, P~rks &
Recreation Maintenance, Street Maintenance and
Purchasing. Approximate size is 62,000 square
feet. This includes a two-story Yard office and
Purchasing warehouse with a 6,400 square foot
mezzanine.
** PFF -Public Facilities Fee
S -Sewer
W -Water Enterprise
33
From the population projections, a demand for City
Administrative Facilities has been assessed. The specific phasing
for Zone 2 is being projected based on the number of projects
which are currently pending review, have received tentative
approvals, or have received final approvals. The exact timing of
these specific projects may vary, however, the timing of necessary
public facility improvements would also vary accordingly. This
will assure that the adopted performance standards will be met as
development occurs. Exhibit E is provided as a projection of
growth throughout the City of Carlsbad on a yearly basis.
YEAR
EXHIBIT E
P L A N H I N G P R O J B C T I O N S O N L Y
-----------------------------------------------DWELLING UNIT AND POPULATION PROJECTION~
ASSUMING A BUILDING RATE OF 1250 UNITS PER YEJ.R
AND 2.471 PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT
EXISTING REMAINING PROJECTED BEGINNING ENDING
D. 0 • IS D. U • I 5 GROWTH YEAR YEAR
POP. POP.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1987 23,348 31,251 1,250 57,693 60,782
1988 24,598 30,001 1,250 60,782 63,870
1989 25,848 28,751 1,250 63,870 .66,959
1990 27,098 27,501 1,250 66,959 70,048
1991 28,348 26,251 1,250 70,048 73,137
1992 29,598 25,001 1,250 73,137 76,22!>
1993 30,848 23,751 1,250 76,225 79,314
1994 32,098 22,501 1,250 79,314 82,403
1995 33,348 21,251 1,250 82,403 85,492
1996 34,598 20,001 1,250 85,492 88,580
1997 35,848 18,751 1,250 88,580 91,669
1998 37,098 17,501 1,250 91,669 94,758
1999 38,348 16,251 1,250 94,758 97,847
2000 39,598 15,001 1,250 97,847 100,935
2001 40,848 13,75·1 1,250 100,935 104,024
2002 42,098 12,501 1,250 104,024 107,113
2003 43,348 11,251 1,250 107,113 110,202
2004 44,598 10,001 1,250 110,202 113,290
2005 45,848 8,751 1,250 113,290 116,379
2006 47,098 7,501 1,250 116,379 119,468
2007 48,348 6,251 1,250 119,468 122,557
2008 49,598 5,001 1,250 122,557 125,645
2009 50,848 3,751 1,250 125,645 128,734
2010 52,098 2,501 1,250 128,734 131,823
2011 53,348 1,251 1,250 131,823 134,912
2012 54,598 1 1 134,912 134,914
2013 54,599 0
34
B. Phasing
Population projections for the entire City were made within
the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan which have been
updated and are shown on the previous page. The following exhibit
shows the yearly demand for City Administrative Facilities as well
as the yearly demand created by Zone 2 based on the projected
Citywide phasing.
EXHIBIT F
P L A N N I N G P R O J E C T I O N S O N L Y
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES
ASSUMING A BUILDING RATE OF 1250 UNITS PER YEAR
AND 2.471 PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT
(1,500 SQUARE FEET PER 1,000 POPULATION)
YEAR ZONE 2
POP.
ZONE 2
DEMAND
BEGINNING
01/01/YR
CITYWIDE
DEMAND
BEGINNING
01/01/YR
EXISTING CONFORMS/
FACILITIES (NON-
CONFORMING)
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
4,925
5,481
6,039
6,039
6,039
6,128
6,217
6,306
6,358
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
7,387
8,221
9,059
9,059
9,059
9,192
9,326
9,459
9,537
9,555
9,555
9,555
9,555
9,555
9,555
9,555
9,555
9,555
9,555
9,555
9,555
9,555
9,555
9,555
9,555
9,555
9,555
86,539
91,172
95,806
100,439
105,072
109,705
114,338
118,971
123,604
128,237
132,871
137,504
142,137
146,770
151,403
156,036
160,669
165,302
169,936
174,569
179,202
183,835
188,468
193,101
197,734
202,367
202,371
106,084
106,084
106,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
19,545
14,912
10,278
67,645
63,012
58,379
53,746
49,113
44,480
39,847
35,213
30,580
25,947
21,314
16,681
12,048
7,415
2,782
(1,852)
(6,485}
(11,118}
(15,751}
(20,384)
(25,017)
(29,650)
(34,283)
(34,287)
These projections were based on a review of the San Diego
Association of Governments (SANDAG) projections along with those
utilized in the City's Capital Improvement Program and the Public
Facilities Management Systems, Monitoring Report of April, 1986.
35
Currently, Zone 2 has 1,993 dwelling units which generate
7,387 square feet of demand for City Administrative Facilities.
As of January 1, 1987, the existing Citywide demand for City
Administrative Facilities was 86,539 square feet, of which the
existing demand for Zone 2 is included. Zone 2 has the potential
to create an additional 2,168 square feet of demand.
C. Adequacy Findings
City Administrative Facilities based upon the projected
phasing of Citywide development and that of Zone 2, will conform
with the adopted standard until the year 2005. The following
Exhibit, "City Administrative Facilities", on Page 37 shows the
existing and committed facilities, projected Citywide demand, and
Zone 2's phased demand.
III. MITIGATION
A. Special Conditions for Zone 2
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
B. Financing
Public Facilities Fees are continuing to be collected
Citywide and in Zone 2. Future residential development will
create a relatively small demand for City Administrative
Facilities (2,168 sq. ft. of additional demand at buildout).
Th f e, it is assumed that the minimal proportionate share
required of this zone will be adequately financed by Public
Facilities Fees paid by future Zone 2 development. In other
words, no other financing mechanism will be required as a
condition of development relative to adequate City Administrative
Facilities.
36
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES
ZONE 2 COMPARISON
210
200
190
180 168,084 168,084 168.084 170
160 SUPPLY
0 150 z 140 < ~ 130 LIJ o.-• 120 la. "'O oc 0 110 w ti~ '-I 100 ~o
LIJt 90
~ 80
:::, 70 a u, 60
50
40
30
20 9,059 9,537 9,555 9,555 9,555
10
0 m
)(
1990 1995 2000 2005 2013 :c -m -DEMAND BY YEAR -I
G)
38
LIBRARY
ZONE 2
LOCAL
ZONE 2
V -------..---LN
I \ ',,_ ---Al C◄..,.',
'
LIBRARY
.. -r--------.... :1 I
I I
I I IO
, , -(o, --ir-~-
■ Ll■IIAAll!S-EXISTING
D u■IIAIIIH-411.ANNll!D
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
39
PLAN
City of C••ltted
0,owrf\ ~ P.-~am
-JANUARY 1987
LOCAL. FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 2
LIBRARY
SUMMARY SHEET
BUILDOUT DEMAND ADEQUACY
PROJECTION SUPPLY (Cc.NIWI» MITIGATION FUNDING w18t■mrd)
46,154
EXISTING 31,500 NO* SEE PAGE 44 SEE
(SQUARE FEET) PAGE 45
3,940
63,396
31, s·oo NO* ------APPROVED
(SQUARE FEET)
C, 892 z -(I)
c(
J:
0..
197,931
FUTURE ------------
(SQUARE FEET
5,096
* Until this facility conforms with the adopted performan~e standard, no
residential development may occur in the City. With existing plus
committed demand, this facility is short 31,896 square feet.
40
LIBRARY
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
800 square feet per 1,000 population of Library must be
scheduled for construction within a five year period.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
The purpose of this analysis is to determine whether or
not the performance standard is being met and, if the demand for
Zone 2 is consistent with the overall Citywide analysis of the
Library.
A. Inventory
1. Facility Demand:
Existing (as of 1/187)
Buildout
2. Existing Facilities:
Civic Center library
Adult Learning Center
La Costa Area Library
Warehouse
Total
Population
(Citywide/Zone)
57,495/4,925
134,914/6,370
Owned
Sq. Ft.
24,600
24,600
Total owned and leased space
Required
Square Footage
(Citywide/Zone)
46·, 154/3,940
107,931/5,096
Leased
Sq. Ft.
400
4,500
2,000
6,900
31,500 Sq.Ft.
3. Facilities in the five year Capital Improvement
Program:
The adopted Five Year C.I.P. includes $650,000 for the
design of a main library in the southern area of the City.
Also, in Appendix A of the C.I.P. "To be Considered Capital
Projects", the construction of this library is estimated at
$6,900,000 to be funded by the Public Facilities Fee.
4. Other Information:
The City Council
report entitled,
on August 26, 1986 approved the final
"A Strategic Plan & Space Needs Study of
41
B.
the City of Carlsbad City Hall & libraries" which was
prepared by Michael Feerer & Associates. The Council
,adopted option #5 of the library portion of the study which
directed staff to initiate a site selection study to be
returned for Council consideration by January 1, 1987.
Several sites have been determined to be suitable for a
southern library location. Staff is attempting to negotiate
an agreement for a site at this time.
Phasing
Population projections for the entire City were prepared on
a yearly basis and are shown in Exhibit E, "Dwelling Unit and
Population Projections" on Page 34. These projections are based
on a review of the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG)
projections along with those utilized for the City's Capital
Improvements Program and the Public Facilities Management System,
Monitoring Report of April, 1986.
The specific phasing for Zone 2 is being projected based
on the number of projects whi hare ~urrently pending review,
have received tentative approvals, or have received final
approvals.
42
EXHIBIT ·H
PLANNING PROJECTIONS ONLY
LIBRARY FACILITIES
ASSUMING A BUILDING RATE OF 1250 UNITS PER YEAR
AND 2.471 PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT
(800 SQUARE FEET PER 1,000 POPULATION)
YEAR
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
ZONE 2
POP.
4,925
5,481
6,039
6,039
6,039
6,128
6,217
6,306
6,358
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
6,370
ZONE 2
DEMAND
BEGINNING
0l/01/YR
3,940
4,385
4,831
4,839
4,851
4,856
4,861
4,866
4,868
4,871
4,871
4,871
4,871
4,871
4,871
4,871
4,871
4,871
4,871
4,871
4,871
4,871
4,871
4,871
4,871
4,871
4,871
CITYWIDE
DEMAND
BEGINNING
01/01/YR
46,154
48,625
51,096
53,567
56,038
58,509
60,980
"63,451
65,922
68,393
70,864
73,335
75,806
78,277
80,748
83,2i9
85,690
88,161
90,632
93,103
95,574
98,045
100,516
102,987
105,458
107,929
107,931
EXISTING CONFORMS/
FACILITIES (NON-
CONFORMING)
31,500 (14,654)
CURRENTLY
NON-CONFORMING
Exhibit H shows that as
Library Facilities in Zone 2
currently has 31,500 square feet
shortage of 14,654 square feet.
by approved projects the library
square feet.
of January 1, 1987 the demand for
is 3,940 square feet. The City
of library space with an existing
With additional demand generated
shortage will increase to 31,896
43
C. Adequacy Findings
Library space is currently below standard and there are no
adopted or guaranteed plans to bring this into conformance with
the adopted performance standard. Until it does comply no
development may occur in Zone 2 or the City. Exhibit I, "Zone 2
Demand Comparison", on Page 46 shows the existing and committed
facilities, projected Citywide demand and Zone 2's phased demand.
The Library Director has determined that the proportional
impacts of commercial and industrial development on library
facilities is mitigated entirely through the collection of PFF
funds. Only the development of residential projects should be
stopped if the standard is not being complied with.
Staff is
alternative No. 1
year CIP be amended
in excess of the
another, is chosen
Zone 2 or the City.
III. MITIGATION
recommending that the City Council follow
under "Mitigation" section and that the five
to include funding for new library facilities
current shortage. Until this alternative, or
no residential development may be allowed in
There are a number of alternatives which could be
considered to bring the City's library space into conformance
with the adopted standard.
1. Amend the current five year CIP to include funding for
new library facilities, which could require deleting
other projects. Until this is done, development cannot
occur in Zone 2;
2. Put a measure on the ballot that would raise the
necessary money to fund the building of a new library
facility through the use of General Obligation Bonds.
This would require a 2/3 approval for the bonds and would
mean that no development could occur in the interim; or
3. Direct staff to attempt to bring the City's library space
into conformance with the a opted standard based on the
Local Facilities Management Plans which will be received
for zones other than 1 through 6.
It is recommended that the City approve Alternative No. 1
and amend the CIP to include funding for new library facilities.
It should be noted that the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan utilized leased library space in assessing
compliance with the adopted performance standard. This space
should be considered temporary and may not always be available for
use by the Library. If a lease were not renewed, it could cause a
shortage in library space. Additional mitigation would be
necessary.
44
A. Special Conditions for Zone 2
No residential building or development permits shall be
issued in Zone 2 until the City Council takes action approving
measures which provide for library services to meet the adopted
performance standards.
8. Financing
The City currently collects a Public Facility Fee (PFF)
which is set at 2.5$ of permit valuation. This fee is paid at
the time of building permit issuance. The adopted Capital
Improvement Budget includes $650,000 of PFF funds to design a new
library facility. Other possible funding sources could be:
Issuance of General Obligation Bonds, Certificates of
Participation, General Capital Construction funds, Revenue
Sharing, State or Federal grants.
At the present time there are no funds appropriated for
the construction of additional library space.
45
LIBRARY
ZONE 2 COMPARISON
130
120
110 107,931
100
a 90 z <(
~ 80 w
C"" • 70 IL "O QC
.s,-. 0 60 °' ti ~ WO IL .C 50 wt
~ 40 ::> 31,500 31,500 31,500 31,500 31,500 0 (/) 30 SUPPLY
20
10 4,839 4,868 4,871 4,871 4,871
0 ZONE 2
m
-10 X
:c
1990 1995 2000 2005 2013 -· ttJ -
DEMAND BY YEAR -I
WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY
47
ENCINA
WASTEWATER
TREATMENT
PLANT
ZONE 2
ZONE 2
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
48
WASTEWATER
,
•o I
t
OtyofCart ....
Cifowrfl w..oem .. PIL-ogrant
-JANUARY 198
BUILDOUT
L O C A L . F A C I L I T I E S M A N ·A G E M E N T P L A N -Z o n e 2
WASTEWATER TREAT~ENT CAPACITY
Carlsbad Service Area
SUMMARY SHEET
ADEQUACY
PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (Ca-lormalce w/Staidard) MIT/GA T/ON FUNDING
4.7
EXISTING 5.7 NO SEE PAGE 53 SEE MGD PAGE a
6.6d
APPROVED 8.6b,d YES N/A NIA
MGO
(!J ---z -en
< ::c 7 .• 7c a.
F~GbU.RE 8.6c,d YES N/A N/A
---
a. Buildout assumptions are for the entire sewer service ar~a which
includes Zone 2. The following analysis of a citywide facility,
therefore, focuses. on the entire sewer service area, and not just on
Zone 2.
b. Assumes Phase IV expansion of Encina.
c. Demand and Supply, as of 1995.
d. Demand and Supply, as of 1991.
49
53
WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Sewer plant capacity is adequate for at least a five year
period.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
A. Inventory
Sewer service in the City of Carlsbad is provided by three
separate and independent agencies, Leuradia County Water
District, San Marcos County Water District, and the City of
Carlsbad.
Sewer service for Zone 2 is provided entirely by the City
of Carlsbad.
1. Buildout Assumptions (Carlsbad Sewer Service Area):
Wastewater Treatment Demands
Carlsbad
Population
Current Bulldout
40,356 95,669
* EDU -Equivalent Dwelling Units
EDU*
Currentlruildout
21,354 47,800
MGD**
Current Bulldout
4.7 11.8
** MGD -Million Gallons per Day -Average Dry Weather Flow (ADWF)
2. Existing Facilities
The City of Carlsbad has capacity available at two
treatment plant facilities. Secondary treatment capacity ls
provided through the Encina Water Pollution Cont~ol Facility
(WPCF) which is a regional facility owned by six member agencies.
The current rated capacity of the plant is 22.5 MGD of which
Carlsbad retains ownership of 25.4 percent (5.7 MGD).
The City of Carlsbad also holds title to the Calavera
Hills Treatment Plant which has a capacity of 1.2 MGD. The
Calavera Facility is not operational at this time and will
require the expenditure of $1.1 to $1.5 million to make it
functional. Operation of the Calavera Hills Plant is estimated
to cost $360,000 per year. Comparable treatment at the Encina
WPCF is estimated at $135,000 per year. The Calavera Hills Plant
ls not economical to operate for treatment capacity except in the
absence of needed capacity at Enclna.
50
3. Facilities in the City's Five Year Capital
Improvements Program:
The adopted CIP includes two items which will be financed
from the sewer fund which affect wastewater treatment capacity:
B.
a. Encina WPCF -Phase IV expansion, scheduled to begin
in 1989, and completed in 1991 -$6,500,000
Carlsbad's share of this facility is 2.9 MGD.
b. Calavera Hills $2,000,000 for 1986-87 and the
1990-91 Fiscal Years. Construction to be phased to
correspond to capacity needs.
Phasing and Service Demand
Based on data maintained by the City Development
Processing Services Department,· on March 31, 1987, 22,965 EDU's
had been permitted by the City. Utilizing 246 GPO per EDU and
the adopted 3% vacancy factor, 985 EDU's of capacity remain to be
issued prior to reaching Carlsbad's share of capacity at the
Encina WPCF. The Citywide Facilities Management Plan is based on
phased growth of 1,250 dwelling units per year plus non-
residential development. Using a similar phasing for the portion
of the City within the Carlsbad Sewer Service Area an annual
growth rate of 1,143 EDU's per year (905 residential EDU's and
238 non-residential EDU's) is projected. This phasing would
indicate that Carlsbad's wastewater treatment allocation could be
exceeded within a year.
Staff has just completed an analysis of Carlsbad's
wastewater flows to Encina WPCF to determine the actual flow
value of an EDU. As of March 30, 1987, 21,354 equivalent
dwelling units {EDU's) were connected and being billed by the
City for sewer service. Flow corresponding to these EDU's has
been measured at 4.69 MGD. That flow divided by the currently
billed EDU's yields an actual flow rate of 220 gallons per day
(GPO) per EDU. However, for planning purposes the City of
Carlsbad has adopted a flow rate ·of 246 GPO per EDU. Evaluation
of available capacity varies significantly depending on the value
of flow per EDU utilized. As can be seen from Table 1 on Page
52, utilizing 220 GPO per EDU, treatment capacity at Encina WPCF
would be available until 1990 with plant expansion expected to be
completed in 1991.
c. Adequacy Findings
Based on analysis of existing flow data and a range of
projections it is likely that current treatment capacity will be
reached between 1988 and 1990, and that additional interim
capacity will be required to meet the performance standard.
Options exist to provide interim treatment capacity which would
allow the Zone as well as the City's Sewer Service Area to meet
51
ill!
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
U1 N 1994
1995
T A B L E 1
CARLSBAD SERVICE AREA DEMAND
AND
AVAILABLE MASTEYATER TREATMENT CAPACITY
FLOW PROJECTIONS1
EQUIVALENT DWELLING FLOW al 220 FLOW al 246
UNITS (EDU'S) GAL/EDU (MGD)2 GAL/EDU (MGD) ENCINA {MGD)
21,354 4.69 5.25 5. 71
23,3843 5.14 5. 75 5. 71
24,492 5.40 6.03 5. 71
25,600 5.63 6.29 5.71
26,708 5.87 6.57 8.57
27,816 6.12 6.84 8.57
28,924 6.36 7 .12 8.57
30,032 6.60 7.38 8.57
31, 140 6.85 7.66 8.57
TREATMENT CAPACITY
LAKE CALAVERA
HILLS CMGD) TOTAL (MGO)
0.0 5. 71
0.6 6.31
0.7 6.41
0.7 6.41
0.0 8.57
0.0 8.57
0.0 8.57
0.0 8.57
o.o 8.57
1 NOTE: 1989 to 1995 EDU 1s are expanded 1,143 per year. This represents 905 dwelling units and 238 EDU•s of
commercial and industrial. (428,400 sq. ft. at 1,800 sq. ft. per EDU.) Each year is projected to
July 1 to correspond to fiscal year budgeting and adjusted for a 3X vacancy.
2 MGD = Millions of Gallons Per Day
3 1988 EDU'S = 22,965 EDU'S issued 3·31·87 + 1,143 per Note 1 adjusted for 3X vacancy
(22,965 + 1,143) X 0.97 = 23,384
performance standard.
the proposed special
Mitigation section.
These alternatives are incorporated into
conditions outlined in the following
III.
A.
B.
MITIGATION
Special Conditions for Zone 2
1. The following actions shall be pursued by the City to
ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity
throughout a five (5) year period:
a. Monitor Encina Treatment Plant flows on a
monthly basis to determine actual flow rates and
to have an early warning of capacity problems.
b. Actively pursue acceleration and phasing of
treatment plant Phase IV expansion to provide
adequate capacity.
c. When Carlsbad's share of Encina flows reach 5.25
MGD, actively seek leased capacity from other
Encina agencies.
d. When Carlsbad Encina flows reach 5.45 MGD,
proceed to activation of the Calavera Hills
Reclamation/Treatment Facility. Plant to be
activated when more cost effective treatment
measures are no longer feasible and Carlsbad
capacity at Encina has been reached.
Financing
Sewer connection fees provide the primary source of
funding for both sewer line upgrades and expansion of treatment
plant capacity. The timing of sewer facilities upgrades and the
mechanism of financing are critical to analysis of the adequacy
of funding for plant expansion. A complete financial and cash
flow analysis should be conducted in conjunction with the
Citywide Sewer Master Plan update. This analysis will provide a
basis to evaluate development phasing within sewer basins and
each Growth Management Zone. Priority for funding should be
given to wastewater treatment capacity.
53
54
PARKS
ZONE 2
ZONE 2
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
55
PARK DISTRICTS
ID
4
t
01,o1e-Gto••"~""°"am
-JANUARY 1887
HOSP GROVE
ZONE 2
LAG
RIVIERA
c "'"'!!,9.p,l-,,,.,., -.......... ______ _ ,,,,. _1.,!:? .-
PARKS
--r---
-----.. -:'-I
ZONE 2
COMMUNITY PARKS
0 EXISTING
• FUTURE
,r SPECIAL USE AREA
I \ ', .... ---4't c,.""",,
' \'-(o --.---
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
56
I I
I I to
I
\ ', . ' .........
' ' ' \
I I
C•ly ot C•ltDecl
G,owtP'I Ma'\aget,lant Pr09.1m
-JANUARY 198
LOCAL ·FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 2
BUILDOUT DEMAND PROJECTION
25.35
EA~~~JING
14.77
36 .1
APPROVED
ACRES
C, 18. 11 z -ti')
c(
l: 62.53
0.
FUTURE ACRES
19.11
PARKS
Park District 2
SUMMARY SHEET
SUPPLY ADEQUACY (Ca ... 11•a w,._.,d)
30.3 YES
42.3* YES
42.3** NO
MITIGATION
N/A
N/A
N/A
FUNDING
N/A
N/A
N/A
* Includes Phase II of Calavera Hills (10 ac) and a joint-use agreement
with the Carlsbad Unified School District for two acres at Hope
Elementary School.
** Based on the projected phasing for Park District 2, the standard will
be met until 1996. Zone 2 is projected to be built out by 1995 or
before any potential park shortages occur.
57
PARKS
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Three acres of Community Park or Special Use Area per
1,000 population within a park district, must be scheduled for
construction within a five-year period.
Special Considerations
The Citywide Plan divides the City into four
districts which are the same as the City's four quadrants.
2 is located entirely within Park District 2 (NE Quadrant).
PARK DISTRICT 2
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
park
Zone
The purpose of
not the park demand
performance standard.
this analysis is to determine whether or
for Zone 2 complies with the adopted
A. Inventory
Existing Facilities:
Community Parks
Calavera Hills
larwin
Special Use Area
larwin
B. Phasing
Ownership Type
Active
Passive
City
City
City Passive
Total Acreage
1. Buildout Assumptions (1/1/87)
Park District 2
Zone 2
Current
Buildout
Current
Buildout
Population
8,451
20,843
4,925
6,370
58
Acreaqe
8.0
18.3
26.3
4.0
30.3
Required Acres
25.35
62.53
14.77
19. 11
2. Park Demand (Park District 2)
Listed below is the demand for parks generated by
projected residential development in Park District 2. Demand was
determined by using the following formula:
Yearly Dwelling Units x 2.471 = Population
Population x Park Standard= Park Demand (by year)
Supply is determined by analyzing existing parks and any
parks scheduled for construction. This is compared with the
demand to determine if the performance standard is being met.
EXHIBIT J
PARK DISTRICT 2
PLANNING PROJECTIONS ONLY FOR ZONE 2
PARK ARCEAGE COMPARISON OF DEMAND -V-PARK SUPPLY
3 ACRES OF COMMUNITY PARK OR SPECIAL USE AREA
PER 1,000 POPULATION WITHIN THE PARK DISTRICT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------YEAR DWELLING TOTAL POP. TOTAL PARKS TOTAL TOTAL CONFORMS/
UNITS DWELLING POP. DEMAND DEMAND SUPPLY (NON-
UNITS CONFORMING)
-------------------------------------~-----------------------------------EXISTING
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
3,420 3,420 8,451 8,451 25.35 25.35 30.30
*
474 3,894 1,171 9,622 3.51 28.87 30.00
266 4,160 657 10,279 1.97 30.84 42.30
173 4,333 427 10,707 1.28 32.12 42.30
213 4,546 526 11,233 1.58 33.70 42.30
249 4,759 526 11,759 1.58 35.28 42.30
229 5,008 615 12,375 1.85 37.12 42.30
224 5,237 566 12,941 1.70 38.82 42.30
184 5,461 554 13,494 1.66 40.48 42.30
144 5,645 455 13,494 1.36 41.85 42.30
139 5,789 356 13,949 1.07 42.91 42.30
Assumes completion of Phase II of Calavera Hills (10
acres) plus two acres of Hope Elementary School
Special Use Area.
59
4.95
1.13
11.46*
10.18
8.60
7.02
5.18
3.48
1.82
0.45
(0.61)
3. Park Demand (Zone 2 Only)
Listed below is the demand for parks generated
specifically by residential development in Zone 2 and not the
entire quadrant. Demand for Zone 2 was reached by using the
following formula:
Yearly Dwelling Units x 2.471 = Population
Population x Park Standard= Park Demand (by year)
EXHIBIT K
ZONE 2
PLANNING PROJECTIONS ONLY FOR ZONE 2
PARK ARCEAGE COMPARISON OF DEMAND -V-PARK SUPPLY
3 ACRES OF COMMUNITY PARK OR SPECIAL USE AREA
PER 1,000 POPULATION WITHIN THE PARK DISTRICT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------YEAR DWELLING TOTAL POP. TOTAL PARKS TOTAL TOTAL CONFORMS/
UNITS DWELLING POP. DEMAND DEMAND SUPPLY (NON-
UNITS CONFORMING) -------------------------------------------------------------------------EXISTING 1,993 1,993 4,925 4,925 14.77 14.77 30.30 15.53
1987 225 2,218 556 5,481 1.67 16.44 30.30 13.86
1988 226 2,444 558 6,039 1.68 18.12 42.30 24.18
1989 0 2,444 0 6,039 o.oo 18.12 42.30 24.18
1990 0 2,444 0 6,039 o.oo 18.12 42.30 24.18
1991 36 2,480 89 6,128 0.27 18.38 42.30 23.92
1992 36 2,516 89 6,217 0.27 18.65 42.30 23.65
1993 36 2,552 89 6,306 0.27 18.92 42.30 23.38
1994 21 2,573 52 6,358 0.16 19.07 42.30 23.23
1995 5 2,578 12 6,370 0.04 19.11 42.30 23.19
60
4. Evaluation of Zone 2 Within Park District 2
Listed below are the demand and supply of existing park
acreage.
Existing
Community Parks
Special Use
Required Acres
Total
Surplus
Acres
26.3
4.0
30.30
25.35
4.95
As shown above, Park District 2 has 4.95 acres more than
it needs to meet the performance standard. As Zone 2 develops to
buildout, the approved plus future park acreage requirement will
be an additional 4.34 acres.
The approved 1986-87 CIP has appropriated funds for two
park projects in the northeast quadrant. Phase II of the
Calavera Hills Park ($2.5 million) includes additional active and
passive areas and a community center (10 acres). The other
project, which also was appropriated $2.5 million, is for the
future acquisition of park land in the northeast quadrant (20
acres minimum). In addition, a feasibility study is underway to
determine the future develop-ability of the existing Larwin
community park area. Finally, with the opening of Hope
Elementary School in September, 1987, the City will have a joint-
use agreement with the School District for two acres of Special
Use Area.
In conclusion, based on phasing, it is anticipated that
Zone 2's residential development will bulldout by 1995 and not
until 1996, will Park District 2 require more acreage to meet the
quadrant demand. At that time, funding must be approved for
construction of additional park facilities in Park District 2
within five years.
C. Adequacy Findings
Park
performance
1996.
District 2 currently conforms with the adopted
standard and is projected to continue to do so until
Special Considerations
An
been the
considered
Park was
issue which has been mentioned in other zone plans has
determination of what types of park land should be
developed under the Growth Management Program. larwin
dedicated to the City before the current standards for
61
City parks were adopted. Therefore, this park site ls designed
as passive/natural in the parks inventory and ls considered
developed, although most of it is steep slopes. Dedication of
Larwin Park was consistent with the Parks and Recreation Element
and the General Plan in effect at that time.
III. MITIGATION
Currently, Park District 2 conforms with the adopted
performance standard and needs no mitigation, although it ls
projected that a shortage will occur in 1996. Zone 2 ls
projected to phase its residential development through 1995. If
the phasing schedule varies from this plan, park demand and
supply would have to re-evaluated, perhaps sooner than 1996.
Another potential issue is the question of whether to
consider larwin Park as developed park land. If the
determination is made that larwin Park is not usable under the
Growth Management Plan1 then the existing supply would not meet
the performance standard, and additional mitiqation would be
necessary prior to any residential development in Park District
2.
A. Special Conditions for Zone 2
Although the performance standard is being met for Zone 2,
several conditions are applicable to assure future planning of
adequate park facilities in Zone 2:
B.
1. Phase II development of Calavera Hills Park must be
completed before 4,357 residential units have
received building permits within Park District 2.
2. Development shall continue to pay Park-In-Lieu fees
and Public Facility Fees for Park District 2 to
mitigate the future incremental parks demand within
the District.
Financing
Public Facility Fees and Park-In-Lieu Fees are continuing
to be collected and no additional financing plan is needed at
this time. Development will be monitored and when it appears
that park acreage_ could fall below the standard, the City Council
will have to consider options to increase developed park
acreage.
62
63
DRAINAGE
7p A VISTA CREIEK
--Hl0"1','U•t -I -I --·~ .. ~ ...... •
'•,,. , / , .. , .. ..
I I I
,/
; ZONE 29
I I
\ I I I I I I I I , .... .... .... ....
\
1\ ZONE I ', \ \ I I I
\ I I I I I I I I I I • I I I I • I .. •· 1-····· • I I I I I I
\
\
' \ DIIAINAGI ,,.c,un ·ec· \..,.
"-.... ----------------ZONE 2 --.. _
-
DRAINAGE
EXHIBIT L
EXISTING STORM DRAINS & SIZE
OPEN CHANNEL
~ CONCRETE LINED CHANNEL
c:==:J CONCRETE BOX CULVERT
SUB BASIN BOUNDARY ----BASIN BOUNDARY
DEBRIS BASIN
01E" SEDIMENT BASIN
01., of Carlabad
Gra•tft Menag•ment ProgrMI
-JANUARY 1887
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
64
JEFFERSON SEDIMENT BASIN
(
! i I \ \ __ _
\ ' I • • ' I I \
ZONE 1
\\
\ \ • I I I I I I I I I I I : I : : --: _ _,--,-
I I \ \ I I \
\
'
I
I
I
I
"-
'\
DRAINAGE AREAS
EXHIBIT M
' '\ .. ZONE 211 ' ... -...
'~' I ~,-~
SOUTH COAST SEDIMENT BASIN
-\ Z<>NE 7
\ -\
-\
I -·
. ------.-----------i-i
\ AREA #9 I \ I ' \ I \
\
' \ \ I I
14
\
' DRAINAGE FACILITY ', .. , ·ac· : I
ZONE 2
, .. , ..
\ \ , \,__ ,·
-----------------~
I~· , .
·ae· SEDIMENT ■AIIN
i~ ' , "
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
65
City el c .. 1,,,.
0,owNI MINQeffllfll ,,0.1111
JANUARY 198 i
LOCAL "FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 2
BUILDOUT
PROJECTION DEMAND
EXISTING *
---APPROVED
CJ z -"' c(
J:
0.
FUTURE ---
DRAINAGE
SUNN.ARY SHEET
ADEQUACY SUPPLY (Co•na1:e wllttndard)
* YES
---YES
---YES**
MITIGATION
N/A
N/A
I
**
FUNDING
N/A
N /.A
**
* Specific drainage facilities will be required as individual projects
are approved in Zone 2.
** Specific improvements and financing mechanism will be identified in
Drainage Master Plan update.
66
DRAINAGE
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Drainage facilities must be provided as required by the
City concurrent with development.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
As was indicated in the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan, drainage is distinguished from all other
public facilities and improvements because by its very nature it
is more accurately assessed as specific development plans are
finalized. However, certain facilities may be necessary which
are larger than those required from a single development project
and, therefore, need to be identified so that proper funding can
be collected for the construction of these facilities.
A. Inventory
1. Existing Facilities
Existing storm drain facilities are shown on "Drainage"
Exhibit L on Page 64. There are two predominant sub-basins .
within this Zone, the first drains generally north towards Buena
Vista Creek. The second sub-basin drains south and joins an
existing concrete lined channel that parallels Tamarack Avenue.
It continues southerly and then westerly, finally emptying at
Agua Hedionda Lagoon.
Zone 2 includes portions of Master Plan Drainage Fee Areas
5, 8, and 9. All master plan facilities impacted by Zone 2 have
been constructed with the exception of storm drain facility ''BC"
and desiltation basin "BE". (Shown on Exhibit M "Drainage" on
page 65.) These future facilities will be discussed below.
2. Future Facilities
As mentioned above, there are two master planned drainage
facilities impacted by Zone 2 which remain to be constructed.
Drainage facility "BC'' is a proposed 36 inch storm drain to be
located along the east side of El Camino Real, north of Tamarack
Avenue. This faciliy is located within Drainage Fee Area 8 which
by previous Council action is a no fee zone. This proposed
facility will almost exclusively serve previously developed
lands. As such, the installation of this facility will not be
conditioned upon future development within Zone 2. The timing
and financing will be determined in the revised Master Drainage
Plan currently in process.
67
Desiltation basin BE ls located within Drainage Fee Area
9. Adequate funds exist within this fee zone to install this
facility when desired by the City. Basin BE is located within
Zone 14 and was intended to service areas within Zones 2, 7 ~nd
14. Silt generation within Zone 2 is partially mitigated by an
existing permanent siltation basin located north of Tamarack
Avenue and east of Pontiac Drive. Engineering staff has
determined existing siltation control within this portion of Zone
2 to be adequate and have, therefore, not requested installation
of basin BE. Basin BE will be further addressed with Zones 7 and
14.
In addition, to the above mentioned master planned
facilities there will be a need to construct future improvements
to the Buena Vista Creek channel in accordance with the
guidelines adopted by Council on May 20, 1986 as part of the
Buena Vista Lagoon Watershed Sediment Control Plan prepared by
~une. Applegate. This report presents general guidelines for the
development of the Buena Vista Creek Channel to prevent
additional future sedimentation of the Buena Vista Lagoon. In
order to assure compliance with these guidelines staff will be
recommending a special condition be applied to future
developments within Zone 2 which drain to the Buena Vista Creek.
B. Phasing
Since the demand for future drainage facilities within
Zone 2 will be localized and generated by specific development,
it will be addressed as the development occurs.
C. Adequacy Findings
Drainage facilities within Zone 2 currently meet the
adopted performance standard. Staff is recommending one special
condition which will assure that future development within Zone 2
which drains to the Buena Vista Creek will comply with the
adopted sediment control guidelines.
III.
A.
MITIGATION
Special Condition for Zone 2
No building or development permits shall be issued for any
portion of Zone 2 which drains to the Buena Vista Creek unless it
incorporates into the design of the project all conditions of the
Buena Vista Lagoon and Watershed Sediment Control Plan, as
prepared by June Applegate and Associates on September 3, 1985.
B. Financing
No special financing ls required since projects will
incorporate mitigation within their design.
68
69
QRCULATION
CIRCULATION
Roads and Intersections
ZOHE t
Q PFF TRAFFIC SIGNAL
ZONE 2
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
70
I
I
I -I
I
I -I
Cll y of Cart11bad
Growrh ~Qilfflet'H Proa,a,n
JANUARY 1987
BUILDOUT
LOCAL "FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 2
CIRCULATION
SUMMARY SHEET
ADEQUACY
PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (Ccdat,IWl&::e w/8tamrd) MITIGATION FUNDING
EXISTING * *· YES NIA NIA
APPROVED ** ** NO SEE PAGE 76 SEE
PAGE 80
(!J z -(/)
< J: ..
~
FUTURE
*** *** ---NIA NIA
* All impacted road segment or intersections conform with the adopted
performance standard.
** Two impacted intersections are non-conforming at traffic levels
generated with existing plus approved projects. (See Pages 76 and
77.)
*** Zone 2's buildout is so minimal it will not affect the circulation
service levels of any impacted road segment or intersections.
71
CIRCULATION
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
No road segment or intersection in th~ zone nor any road
segment or intersection out of the zone which is impacted by
development in the zone shall be projected to exceed a service
level C during off-peak hours, nor service level D during peak
hours. Impacted means where twenty percent or more of the
traffic generated by the Local Facilities Management Zone will
use the road segment or intersection.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
The purpose of this analysis is to determine whether or
not the circulation system within Zone 2 conforms to the adopted
performance standards for Zone 2. It will also address all
Circulation Element Roads and Intersections outside of Zone 2
impacted by twenty percent or more of the traffic generated by
Zone 2 to ensure confor~ance with the adopted performance
standard. Improvements that will be needed to completely develop
the Circulation Element roads such as sidewalks, street lights,
etc., are discussed separately for informational purposes, in
Appendix 5, Page 149.
A. Inventory
The following Circulation Element Roads and Intersections
meet the impacted criteria for Zone 2. See Page 72 for
"Circulation Element Roads and Intersections" that are located
within Zone 2.
Roads
1. Pontiac (Elm to Tamarack)
2. El Camino Real (Hosp Way to Highway 78)
3. Elm (El Camino Real to Avenida de Anita)
4. Haymar (El Camino Real east)
5. Marron (El Camino Real east)
Intersections
1 • El Camino Real/Marron
2. El Camino Real/Hosp Way
3. El Camino Real/Elm
4. El Camino Real/Chestnut
5. El Camino Real/Tamarack
6. Pontiac/Elm
7. Pontiac/Tamarack
72
B. Phasing
Zone 2 is an infill zone with a small amount of
development potential remaining to completely buildout the Zone.
There are currently 451 approved residential units of which 151
cannot pull building permits until a Local Plan is approved.
Additionally, there ls the potential for 134 more residential
units. The residential development in this Zone has been phased
out through 1995.
There are no approved non-residential land uses in this
Zone, although there are four remaining parcels totaling nine
acres that have the projected potential of developing 156,815
square feet of commercial uses. The non-residential phasing of
this remaining vacant land is projected to be completely built
out in 1990.
The Zone 2 Circulation section has not been phased on a
yearly basis which is consistent with the plans for Zones 1
through 6. Those zones were not phased on a yearly basis because
the Barton-Aschman traffic study, which is the source for this
analysis, was set up to analyze traffic at three threshold
points; at existing development, at existing plus committed
development, and at bufldout. For this reason, plus the fact
that the zone is almost built out, staff determined this method
of analysis was consistent with the phasing requirement outlined
in Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
c. Adequacy Findings
The following chart indicates the existing and existing
plus committed levels of service for each of the road segments or
intersections impacted by Zone 2. These levels of service were
obtained from the preliminary draft traffic study prepared by
Barton-Aschman Associates.
Existing Existing/Committed
A.M. P.H. A.M. P.M.
Peak Peak Peak Peak
El Camino Real/
Marron A B A D
El Camino Real/
Elm A A B F*
El Camino Real/
Chestnut A B A B
El Camino Real/
Tamarack A A F* F*
73
El Camino Real/
Hosp Way
Pontiac/Elm**
Pontiac/Tamarack**
Existing
A.M. P.M.
Peak Peak
A
A
A
A
A
A
Existing/Committed
A.M. P.M.
Peak Peak
A
B
C
A
C
D
* At existing plus committed these intersections fall below
the adopted performance standard. See below for
mitigation measures.
** level of service determined by City staff.
Existing levels of service are based on actual traffic
counts at these intersections. The existing plus committed
levels of service are projected based upon a sophisticated
modeling technique that determines traffic assignments f~om
committed projects. These trip assignments are added to actual
traffic volumes to determine existing plus committed levels of
service.
All impacted road segments and intersections currently
comply with the adopted performance standard. At the existing
plus committed phase, all impacted road segments continue to
comply with the adopted standard, however, two intersections are
projected to fall below the adopted performance standards. These
intersections are:
1. El Camino Real/Elm
2. El Camino Real/Tamarack
III. MITIGATION
The Barton-Aschman traffic report recommends the following
improvements to these impacted intersections which will enable
them to conform with the adopted performance standard.
El Camino Real at Elm Avenue
It is anticipated that this intersection will operate at
level of Service Band F during the morning and afternoon peak
periods, respectively. To provide level of service A and D
during the respective peak periods, the improvements shown in
Figure 3-16 should be implemented. The improvements Include
widening Elm Avenue at the intersection to provide an additional
eastbound and westbound lane and widening El Camino Real at the
74
intersection to th~ full width of a
lanes and one left-turn-only lane).
the intersection would meet the
buildout.
Estimated cost is ~42,500.
El Camino Real at Tamarack Avenue
prime arterial (three through
With the proposed mitigation
performance standard through
Without mitigation measures, it is anticipated that this
intersection will operate a Level of Service F during both peak
periods. In order to mitigate the unacceptable levels of
service, the improvements shown in Figure 3-15 on the following
page should be provided. These improvements consist of
restriping to provide optional through and turn lanes for the
east and west approaches, widening of the southbound approach to
provide one additional lane and widening the northbound approach
to provide two left-turn-only, two right-turn-only and three
through lanes. The result of these improvements would be level
of Service D during the peak periods. With the proposed
mitigation the intersection would meet the performance standard
through buildout.
Estimated cost is $179,000.
A. Timing of Mitigation
Th~ two intersections that are projected to fall below the
adopted performance standard (El Camino Real at both Tamarack
Avenue and Elm Avenue) will do so as a result of existing plus
approved traffic. Therefore, before any development in Zone 2
(including approved but not constructed) ls allowed to proceed,
improvement as listed in the mitigation above must be guaranteed
for construction.
B. Financing
The intersections that have been identified as not meeting
the adopted performance standard are Traffic Impact Fee
intersections. To date, adequate impact fees needed to fund the
recommended mitigations have not been collected. It is
recommended that prior to any new construction in Zone 2 the
developer(s) be required to finance the mitigation projects to
bring the Tamarack/El Camino Real and Elm/El Camino Real,
intersections into conformance with the performance standard.
Since future intersection improvements were to be financed out of
traffic impact fees, the developer(s) may request a reimbursement
agreement for the costs of improving the intersection.
75
MUL TIF AMIL V
RESIDENTIAL
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION 6i. l l t..
J .. It..
'-
.s.
'
J • ( _.
V
""I .. ~
SINGLE F AMIL V _, '\ t t 1-<
RESIDENTIAL UJ a:
UNDER 0
CONSTRUCTION ~ I 0 _,
w
EXHIBIT N
....
\.._170(420)
0 -10 0 C\I II) .... ... I") 0 -... ... 0 0 -,... ,;t 4 70( 110) 0 10 C\I
) l l ,90(80)
0(0) _j l t (
60(110) __,. .... -.... 0 0 0 co ,;t ... -II) ...
40(240)' 0 -... 10 .... 0 ... 0 10 4" co
PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
AM (PM)
BANK
· ELM AVE
~
VACANT
SCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 6
EL CAMINO REAL AT ELM AVENUE n N ~BA~R~TO~N~-A~SC~HM~A~NqA~SS~O~Cl~ATr!E~S. ~IN~c.::;;:;:~;~;:;::;:;:;;;:;;:;:;:;;;;:::::::::::::::::::::~ FIGURE
(EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED CONDITIONS) U3-16
76
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
EXHIBIT 0
.... l'-60(70) ,... 0 '° 0 CD --0 .... 0 ... 0 It) .... "' .... 0 "' 0 4 160(300) '° ... If)
) l l. ,840(9490)
80(80)--' 1 t (
160(210) .. -.... ....
0 0 0 °' "' u, ,... It) CD 650(390), .... ... ....
0 ... 0 ... (") '° "' "' "' '°
PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
AM (PM)
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
i.. TAMARACK AVE
~ ._
r
"\"\tttrr
VACANT
SCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AT 6
EL CAMINO REAL AT TAMARACK AVENUE n N
:i-:e.a.=-R~TO~N~-AS~C~HM~A~N;;;.,.A~SS~OC;;;;;;IA""""T"""'ES~. 1"'"'N~C.---~~;.;..;.;.~~~-=-~;....---------__. FIGURE
(EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED CONDITION) LJ3-15
77
PAGE 78 WAS NOT USED
79
RRE
t
* FIii. ITATIONI-EXISTING
0 l'lltl STATIONl-ltLAN .. D
II mlnutel
FIRE RESPONSE TIME
--STATION 1
--STATION 2
•• -STATION I
■--STATION 4
ZONE 2
ZONE 2
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
80
I I
FIRE
e .. ,.,c ......
OrowtftW.._..,...., • .,,.
~
JANUARY 188i
L O C A L . F A C I L I T I E S M A N ·A G E M E N T P L A N -Zone 2
FIRE
. SUMMARY SHEET
BUILDOUT ADEQUACY
PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (C cdorn'alce MIT/GA T/ON FUNDING w/Standard)
EXISTING 1,993 Units * YES NIA NIA
APPROVED 451 Units * YES NIA NIA
(!)
z -Cl)
< :::c n.
FUTURE 2,578 Units * YES NIA NIA
* The existing Fire Station locations will guarantee compliance with the adopted
performance standard at all times as the Zone builds out. ·
81
FIRE
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
No more than 1,500 dwelling units outside of a five minute
response time.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
A. Inventory
Zone 2 is presently served by and within the five minute
response time of Fire Station No. 3, located at 3701 Catalina
Drive. A portion of the zone also is within the five minute
response time of Fire Station No. 1, located at 1275 Elm Avenue.
B. Phasing
Because Zone 2 is almost entirely built out and because
future development will be minimal, there will be· no impact on
conformance with the adopted performance standard. Therefore, it
was not necessary to do a phasing analysis for fire services in
Zone 2. For informational purposes, Station No. 3 is going to be
relocated to the intersection of Tamarack and Elm Avenues to
better serve those areas of the City to the east and north of the
existing location near Chestnut. The relocation has been
scheduled for 1990-91 and will be funded through Public
Facilities Fees. Zone 2 will remain within the five minute
response time of the relocated station.
C. Adequacy Findings
During preparation of the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan, it was determined that Zone 2 presently meets
the fire performance standard and will continue to conform to
this standard to buildout of the City.
III. MITIGATION
A. Special Conditions for Zone 2
No conditions
because Fire Station
minute response time
No. 1 also provides
within five minutes.
B. Financing
are necessary for fire services in Zone 2
No. 3 is located within the required five
of the entire zone. In addition, Station
back-up response to a portion of Zone 2
All fire facilities are in place for Zone 2 and the
required performance standard has beeri met and, therefore, no
special funding mechanisms are required.
82
83
OPEN SPACE
ZONE 1
k/::joPEN SPACE
ZONE 2
LOCAL FACILITIES
OPEN SPACE
-~-~:'
\ -:::::::::::::::::.:-\ -\ -\
\
MANAGEMENT
84
\ ZONE 7 -\
\ -\ -\ -\ . \ -\ -I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~-.!;!
City or C•tl•b•d
0,owth M•"-c.•mtnf Prog, tm
JANUARY 1887
PLAN
LOCAL "FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 2
OPEN SPACE
SUMMARY SHEET
ADEQUACY BU/LDOUT MITIGATION FUNDING PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (Cu.lorma1ce w/St81dard)
EXISTING * * YES N/A
APPROVED * * YES N/A
C, z -en
< :c
Q.
FUTURE * * YES N/A
* Zone 2 as determined in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan will
conform to the adopted performance standard at all times as the Zone ·builds out.
85
N/A
·-
N/A
N/A
OPEN SPACE
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Fifteen percent of the total land area in the zone
exclusive of environmentally constrained non-developable land
must be set aside for permanent open space and must be available
concurrent with development.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
A. Inventory
Open Space in Zone 2 falls into several categories: City
Park (Larwin), powerline easements, open space easements, and
miscellaneous City owned land. See the breakdown by acreage
below.
Open Space
Larwin Park
Powerline easements
Open Space easements
City owned vacant land
Miscellaneous
Acres
22.2
11.8
43.8
14.6
6.9
99.3
Although not calculated, overall consideration was given
to the Zone in terms of large residential lots (7,500 square feet
or more) providing generally more openness within the
neighborhoods of the Zone.
B. Phasing
Because Zone 2 is an infill zone with no future
opportunity to increase open space, the phasing requirements for
Open Space were not addressed as required by Chapter
21.90.110(d)(2) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
c. Adequacy Findings
During preparation of the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan, it was determined that Zone 2, as an infill
area, already exceeds the adopted performance standard for Open
Space and no further review was deemed necessary.
III.
A.
MITIGATION
Special Conditions for Zone 2
There are no special conditions which apply at this time.
86
8. Financing
Because Zone 2 creates a minimal amount of future
development, it has been determined that this development will
continue to meet the adopted performance standard. Therefore,
financing was not addressed as required by Chapter
21.90.110(d)(3) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
87
88
SCHOOLS
SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
ZONE 2
to
ZONE 2
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
89
t
CllyolC•l■-
Q,owtf, MINQeffl.,. "'•""'
5
JANUARY 1987
EXISTING
• ELEMENTARY • JUNIOR HIGH .. HIGH SCHOOL
~
0 ELEMENTARY
□ JUNIOR HIGH
~ HIGH SCHOOL
ZONE 2
ZONE 2
I I I I
I
---'a
PAl0M41t
I
I I \ 'to, ', (,
' c, ',, 0 ,,,-
',, 6,//,,
'✓
C' / ' .... , ,I' \
"°'o .,,,.-,,,, \=
I 1< ,o
I I
I
SCHOOLS
~-r--------.--:i '
I I I I ID
I
\ ' '-'-'--...
0
' ' ' \
,o
I~
I
\ .. \<'-r I
I
I I
City of C•11HO
Gto•lfl Mantge"'-'f ,._~_,,.
JANUARY 1887
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
90
LOCAL . FA C I L IT I ES MA N·A G E M E N T PL A N -Zone 2
BUILDOUT DEMAND PROJECTION
EXISTING *
---APPROVED
C, z -"' < ::c ' a.
FUTURE
**
SCHOOLS
SUMMARY SHEET
SUPPLY ADEQUACY (CCdCA11•a w/llta'ldard)
* YES
---YES
** YES
MIT/GA TION
N/A
N/A
N/A
FUNDING
N/A
N/A
N/A
* The Carlsbad Unified School District has capacity to m~et the existing
demands generated from Zone 2.
** Because the future school demand from Zone 2 ls minimal, the School
District has indicated that it ls able to provide capacity at all
times as the Zone builds out.
91
SCHOOLS
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
School capacity to meet the projected enrollment within
the zone as determined by the appropriate school district must be
provided prior to projected occupancy.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
A. Inventory
Zone 2 falls completely within the boundaries of th~
Carlsbad Unified School District. Currently, there are no
schools in the Northeast Quadrant, although in September, 1987,
Hope Elementary School in Calavera Hills is expected to open.
Elementary school students in Zone 2 attend Buena Vista or Kelly
Elementary Schools. Secondary school students attend Carlsbad
Junior and Senior High Schools.
The Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan identifies
general locations for future school sites in each school
category. The locations are a result of the School Master
location Study, completed in 1982. The Carlsbad Unified School
District is in the process of beginning to update the School
Master Location Plan.
B. Phasing
In Zone 2 there are 1,993 existing residential dwelling
units. As the zone builds out, there will be an additional 585
residential dwelling units. These units will add approximately
200 to 250 students to the school demand generated by Zone 2.
The Carlsbad Unified School District has indicated the ability to
handle the additional demand. Based upon the School District's
indication, the adopted performance standard will continue to be
met, and therefore, phasing of school facilities was not
addressed as required by Chapter 21.90.110(d)(2) of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code.
c. Adequacy Findings
The Carlsbad Unified School District ls currently
providing capacity for the existing demand generated by Zone 2.
The School District has indicated its ability to provide
capacity to the ultimate buildout of Zone 2.
The City's. General Plan shows two future elementary school
sites in Zone 2. The. site in the southern portion was never
needed by the District and other development has occurred there.
The site to the north ls partially located in Zone 25 --the area
ls undeveloped designated open space, and could be utilized as a
school site at a future date.
92
III. MITIGATION
A. Special Conditions for Zone 2
No conditions are necessary. The Carlsbad Unified School
District has indicated they will be able to accommodate the
additional number of students generated through the buildout of
Zone 2.
B. Financing
No financing options are necessary. The Carlsbad School
District has indicated that they can accommodate the additional
students generated in Zone 2 with existing facilities. Since
existing facilities can handle the additional students, no
financing alternatives for new facilities are required. All
future development will be required to pay the appropriate school
fees as determined by the District.
93
94
SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM
ZONE 2
ZONE 2
SEWER DISTRICTS
10
r-··, . -I L ....... . ~ I i nunn■n1■11n11,I I
: SAN MARCOS I : ...... ,
......
LEUCADIA COUNTY
cos,_ ..
t
JANUARY 1887
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
95
I
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
SEWER SYSTEM
71 ~
rr::;;;;:::::.._~~
--
ZONE 7
l
I
I
I
:L
CD I
I
tf Vt
Cllr ef Cerl1bed
M1neo•m•nt Proo,'"'
JANUARY 1987
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
96
BUILDOUT
L O C A L . F A C I L I TI E S M A N ·A (3 E M E N T PL A N -Zone 2
SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM
SUMMARY SHEET
ADEQUACY
PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (Contornw,ce
w/StlS!dard) MIT/GA TION FUNDING
* EXISTING **' NO SEE PAGE 100 SEE
MGD PAGE 101
**
*
APPROVED ** NO ·SEE PAGE 100 SEE
PAGE 101
MGD C,
z ** -en < :c
0. * FUTURE ** YES N/A N/A
MGD
**
* Interceptors are not monitored for existing capacity. Theoretical
flows based on sewer generation rates are shown by reach on Tables 3,
4, and 5.
** Demand analysis for critical reaches of the El Camino Real/Kelly,
North Agua Hedionda and Vista/Carlsbad Interceptors are shown on
Tables 3, 4, and 5.
97
SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Trunk line
appropriate sewer
development.
capacity to meet demand as determined by the
district must be provided concurrent with
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
A. Service Area
Zone 2 lies entirely within and is served by the City of
Carlsbad sewer service district.
Facility Inventory and Description
Zone 2 is located in the northeast quadrant of the City of
Carlsbad and is split between two major drainage basins. The
sewage generated in the northern portion of Zone 2, referred to
as Subbasin 2A, flows northward into the Vista/Carlsbad
Interceptor. The southern portion of Zone 2, referred to as
Subbasin 2B, flows south through a collection system in El Camino
Real and Kelly Drive and eventually flows into the North Agua
Hedionda Interceptor. The North Agua Hedionda Interceptor flows
westerly and is pumped through Foxes Landing Lift Station into
the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor. Thus, all flow from this Zone
eventually reaches the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor.
The interior of Zone 2 is served by a number of sewer
lines. All of these sewer lines are shown on Page 96. Near the
northern section of Zone 2 there are two connections to the
Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor. The first connection is in Haymar
Drive, east of El Camino Real. It serves the neighborhood
shopping center east of El Camino Real. The second connection is
just west of Zone 2 in the Plaza Camino Real Shopping Center.
This connection carries most of the flow from Subbasin 2A. All
flows to the south collect at the intersection of Tamarack Avenue
and El Camino Real and flow through ·the North Agua Hedionda trunk
system to the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor.
With the exception of the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor, all
sewer collection facilities within Zone 2 are owned and operated
by the City of Carlsbad. The Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor is
jointly owned by the City of Vista and the City of Carlsbad. The
Encina Water Pollution Control facility (WPCF) is responsible for
maintenance of this line. The North Agua Hedionda Interceptor
serves Zones 1 and 2 and is currently serving Zone 7.
98
B. Service Demand
Existing, committed, and future sewer collection demands
are shown on Table 2, Sewer Demand Zone 2, on Page 104. The
service demands have been divided by Drainage Basin to facilitate
analysis of sewer line capacity.
Facility Analysis
Analysis of the Vista/Carlsbad and the El Camino
Real/Kelly interceptors indicate that current demands exceed
capacity and will not conform to the adopted performance
standard. This situation will require mitigation.
Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor
The Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor is the major trunk system
serving the northerly half of the City. This line shown on the
map on Page 103, loops the northeasterly and westerly perimeters
of the City extending along Route 78 from the Emerald Avenue
interchange to the Buena Vista Lagoon then along Jefferson and
Grand Avenµe to the Santa Fe railroad then extending south to the
Encina treatment plant.
The Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor is a major regional trunk
accepting flows from Growth Management Zones 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8,
13, 14, 15, 16, 24 and 25, as well as the City of Vista. The
analysis of capacity of this facility shown on Table 3 "Capacity
of Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor", on Page 105 indicates that the
City of Carlsbad currently exceeds its capacity ownership in
reaches E-4, F-1 and F-2. These segments extend through Zone 1
along Grand Avenue, then along the railroad to approximately the
Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Replacement or paralleling of this portion
was included in both the City of Vista and Carlsbad's budgets for
construction in the 1987-88 fiscal year. The project is
estimated at $1,840,000 of which $496,000 is attributed to
Carlsbad. This project is not being actively pursued because the
line does not appear to represent a maintenance concern under
average daily flow characteristics. Capacity problems would only
manifest themselves under peak wet weather flow conditions.
North Agua Hedionda Interceptor
Flows from Subbasin 2B collect at the intersection of
Tamarack Avenue and El Camino Real where they enter the El Camino
Real/Kelly Drive reaches leading to the North Agua Hedionda
Interceptor. The lines extend southerly along El Camino Real to
Kelly Drive, then southwesterly on Kelly Drive to Park Drive,
along Park Drive to Marina where the line proceeds north along
the Agua Hedionda Lagoon to the Fox Landing lift station. The
lift station then pumps flows into the Vista/Carlsbad trunk in
the vicinity of Olive Avenue. These lines are shown the exhibit
on Page 102.
99
Analysis of the North Agua Hedionda and El Camino
Real/Kelly Interceptors systems are complicated by the fact that
flows from Zone 7 have been diverted into these systems pending
completion and activiation of the Calavera Hills reclamation
facility. Analysis of these systems are shown on Tables 4 and 5,
on Pages 106 and 107. This analysis indicates that capacity
problems currently exist in all reaches of the El Camino
Real/Kelly interceptor extending from Park Drive to Tamarack
Av~nue. The estimated cost to upgrade this line to accommodate
Zone 2 flows is $36,500. Upgrading to accept Zone 7 flows would
require an additional expenditure of $10,000.
The remainder of the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor is
able to accept Zone 1 and 2 flows in compliance with the adopted
performance standard. Should Zone 7 flows continue to be
diverted to this line, the Kelly Drive portion of the trunk will
require further upgrading at an estimated cost of $1~0,000.
Fox's Landing Lift Station
Analysis of Fox's Landing lift station indicates that the
pump station ls currently operating at capacity and requires
upgrading to accommodate flows from both Zones 1 and 2 through
buildout. Additional upgrades will be required to accommodate
increas~d flows from Zone 7 (Calavera Hills). This upgrading
will be required to be shown in the Local Facilities Management
Plan for Zone 7.
c. Adequacy Findings
Both the
Interceptor sewers
Vista/Carlsbad and El Camino Real/Kelly
are experiencing capacity problems at the
strategy to mitigate this non-conforming
be adopted prior to approval of further
Zone 2.
current time. A
situation should
development within
MITIGATION III.
A. Special Conditions for Zone 2
Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor -Subbasin 2A
Reaches E-4, F-1 and F-2 of the Vista/Carlsbad interceptor
fail to meet the standard. No further development shall proceed
in Subbasin 2A until agreement has been reached with the City of
Vista and a schedule ls established for upgrading of the
deficient reaches.
El Camino Real/Kelly Interceptor -Subbasin 2B
The El Camino Real/Kelly interceptor currently fails to
meet the performance standards. No further development shall be
allowed in Subbasin 2B until agreements or contracts have been
executed to upgrade the deficient reaches.
100
B. Financing
Funds are budgeted in
Carlsbad's portion of the
additional funds are required.
pursued with the City of Vista.
the sewer construction fund for
Vista/Carlsbad upgrading. No
The project should be actively
Upgrading of Reaches E and F of the El Camino Real/Kelly
Interceptor is currently under design and planned for
construction in early summer of 1987. The upgrading of the El
Camino Reaches are only partially funded under the adopted sewer
master plan. Funds of $19,427 have been targeted for this
upgrade. Remaining funds shall be reimbursed by the remaining
development within the subbasin. The City initially should
contribute funds to upgrade the line to accept Zone 7 flows and
receive reimbursement of those funds from Zone 7 development.
101
ZONE 2
EL CAMINO REAL/ KELLY DRIVE
SEWER SYSTEM
ABANDONED
~
N
-N.T. S.
EXHIBIT P
Cllr ol c.,,,t,1d
Gto•I" M1n.agtmtnt Pioo,,,..
JANUARY 1887
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
102
ZONE·2
FOXES
LANDING PS
8 FORCE MAIN
Bl
?Al.OMAR
SEWER COLLECTION
V lat a-Carl a bad Interceptor
2
EL CAMINO REAL / KELLY DR
SEWER SYSTEM
Agua Hedlonda
cu, or ca,11t:1d
Gllowltl Menao•,.,•"' Ptaa,1m
JANUARY 188i
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
103
.....
0 ~
.
Drainage Basin
Subbasin 2A
Vista/Carlsbad
Interceptor
Subbasin 2B
North Agua
Hedionda
Interceptor
1. EDUs
Demand Status
Existing
Committed
Future
Existing
Committed
Future
TABLE 2
SEWER DEMAND ZONE 2
Land Use Acres/Square Footage
Number of Units
Residential 955
Commercial 251,500 sq. ft .
Office 15,000 sq. ft.
N/A
Residential 129
Commercial 0
Office 156,800 sq. ft.
Residential 1,321
Residential 168
Residential 5
Equivalent Dwelling Units
Demand (EDUs) l Demand
Subtotal
(EDUs)l
955
140
8
1,103
129
0
87
216
Total 1,319
1,321 1,321
168 168
5 5
Total 1,494
....
0 VI
Section
B-1
B-2
B-3
C & D
E-1
E-2
E-3
E-.4
F-1
F-2
F-3
G
H-1
H-2
H-3
TABLE 3 -ZONE 2
CAPACITY OF VISTA/CARLSBAD INTERCEPTOR
(BASED ON 246 GALLONS PER EDU AND A PEAKING FACTOR OF 2.0}
Size Slope Total Capacity Carlsbad Carlsbad Capacity Estimated
% Ownership Carlsbad Flows
MGD EDU MGD EDU MGD EDU
36" .50% 30.0 60,976 0 0 0 0 0
42" .28% 34.0 69,106 15. 5 5.3 10,772 0 0
32" .20% 19.5 39,634 15.5 3.0 6,098 .5 1,016
Pumping 10.5 21,341 15. 5 1.6 4,878 • 5 1,016
Station &
Force Main
24 11 + 27" .80% + 36% 12.0 24,390 27.3 3.3 6,707 .5 1,016
3011 .24% 13.0 26,423 27.3 3.5 7,114 1.5 3,049
27" 1.64% 25.0 50,813 27.3 6.8 13,821 3.0 6,098
36" .10% 13.8 28,049 27.3 3.8 7,724 5.0 10,163
36" .10% 13.8 28,049 37.3 5. 1 10,366 5.5 11, 1 79
36" .10% 13,8 28,049 37.3 5.1 10,366 7.5 15,244
42" .10% 20.S 41,667 37.3 7.6 15,447 7.5 15,244
Pumping 17.5 35,569 38.5 6.7 16,260 7.5 15,244
Station &
Force Main
4211 .10% 20.5 41,667 51. 7 10.6 21,545 7.5 15,244
42" .10% 20.5 41,667 51. 7 10.6 21,545 7.5 15,244
42" .12% 22,8 46,341 . 51. 7 11 .8 23,984. 7.5 15,244
1. These flows are based on observation and pump capacities.
These numbers will be refined when flow measuring is complete.
EDUs in
Interceptor
Available Deficient
0 --10,772 --5,082 --
3,862 --
5,691 --4,065 --
7,723 ----2,439
--813 --4,878
203 --
1,016 --
6,301 --
6,301 --
8,740 --
,.....
0
°'
Reach Size Slope MGD
G 8" I.SO% .96
F 8" 1.00% .78
E 10" ,60% 1.10
D 12" .60% I. 78
C 12" 1.50% 2.82
B 12" 1.00% 2.30
A 12" .92% 2.21
TABLE 4 -ZONE 2
Capacity of El Camino Real/Kelly Drive Sewer System
(Based on 246 gallons per EDU and a Peaking Factor of 2.5)
Capacity EDU Contribution
EDU Existing Committed Potential Totals
1,554 1,391 168 5 1,564
1,268 1,101 1,022 1,473 3,596
1, 782 20 0 116 136
2,894 177 0 28 205
4,585 0 0 0 0
3,740 0 0 0 0
3,593 0 0 0 0
1. This includes 904 existing, 1,022 units committed and 1,000 units potential from Zone 7.
EDUs in Interceptor
Total Available Deficient
I, 564 -10
5, 1601 -3,892
5,296 -3,514
5,501 -2,607
5,501 -916
S,501 -1,761
5,501 -1,908
-0 ...,.
TABLE 6 "'ZONE 2
Capacity of North Agua Hedionda Interceptor
(Based on 246 gallons per £DU and a Peaking Factor of 2.5)
·capac it J EDU Contribution
Section Size Slope HGD EDU Existing Committed Potential
NAH-1 21" .36% 6.14 9,984 590 26 110
NAH-2 24" .10% 4.62 7,512 117 0 0
NAH-3 2411 .10% 4.62 7,512 3,032 1,236 1,772
NAH-4 Siphon 2-16" 6.288 10,224 114 100 114
1-10"
NAH-5 24" .15% 5.66 9,203 835 195 195
Pu■p
Station & ----0 0 0
Force Ma in
NAH-6 18" 1.0% 10.50 17,073 0 0 0
1. These units will eventually flow to the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor.
2. This includes 904 existing, 1,022 units committed and 1,000 units potential from Zone 7.
EDUa in Interceptor
Totals Total Available
716 1 716 9,268
117 1,214 6,298
6,0402 7,254 258
328 7,582 2,642
1,097 8,679 524
0 8,679 -
0 8,679 8,394
108
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
ZONE 2
WA TEA SERVICE DISTRICTS
ZONE 2
COS I A
ID
;t .... 1tH111111111 i I
/SAN MARCOS : :: : :: , ............................... .
i : : ◄ v,
OLIVENHA/N
Cit.-at C•tlNd
Growrft Menagemenr Pro••""
D1
JANUARY 198;
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
109
ZONE 1
-EXISTING WA H,R LINES
•••• PROPOSED WATER LINES
A EXISTING PRESSURE REGULATING STATION
l:::,_ PROPOSED PRESSURE REGULATINO STATION
_,. ZONE BOUNDARY
ZONE 2
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
llO
WATER SYSTEM
ZONE 7
City arc .. 1a111ad ar .. lft Man.a•m•nt Ptogr■•
JANUARY 1887
LOCAL "FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 2
WATER .DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
SUMMARY SHEET
ADEQUACY BUILDOUT DEMAND PROJECTION SUPPLY (CCHOllmalCe MITIGATION FUNDING wl8t...,d)
EXISTING * * YES NIA
* * YES N/A APPROVED
C, z -0 < J:
Q.
FUTURE ** ** YES N/A
* The Costa Real Water District has capacity to meet the existing
demands of Zone 2.
N/A
N/A
N/A
** Because the future demands from Zone 2 will be minimal, the Water
District has lrdicated that it will be able to provide capacity at
all times as the Zone builds out.
111
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEN
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Line
appropriate
development.
capacity to meet demand as determined by the
water district must be provided concurrent with
A minimum 10 day average storage capacity must be provided
prior to any development.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
A. Inventory and Description
Water service in the City of Carlsbad is provided by three
independent agencies, Costa Real Municipal Water District, San
Marcos County Water District, and the Olivenhain Municipal Water
District. Water service for Zone 2 is provided entirely by the
Costa Real Municipal Water District.
Costa Real Municipal Water District has identified those
facilities which need to be added, upgraded, and improved in
order to meet the needs of future growth within their service
area. The facilities shown on map, "Water Distribution System"
on Page 110 are currently in place and servicing the existing
development.
The residential units remaining in Zone 2 (585 units) will
have a minimal impact on the existing water system. When the
remaining office uses develop, certain facilities will need to be
added to service this new demand. As identified by the Costa
Real Municipal Water District, these facilities will be financed
by direct developer contribution.
B. Phasing
The performance standard indicates that line capacity must
meet demand as determined by the appropriate water district.
Costa Real Municipal Water District has indicated that
improvements remaining in Zone 2, can be handled at the time the
remaining office and residential sites develop.
c. Adequacy Findings
The Costa Real Municipal Water District service to Zone 2
conforms with the adopted performance standard. Because this
zone ls almost completely built out, the additional water demands
as determined by the Costa Real Municipal Water District, will be
minimal and conformance with the standard will be maintained to
the ultimate buildout of Zone 2.
112
III.
A.
MITIGATION
Special Conditions for Zone 2
All development within Zone 2 shall pay the required Costa
Real Municipal Water District fees.
B. Financing
Remaining facilities and improvements in Zone 2 will be
financed by the Costa Real Municipal Water District's Capital
Fund. Revenues for that budget are funded from direct developer
contributions to the District.
113
114
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1
115
ADT Average daily
daily vehicle trips
associated region.
CLOSSARY
trips. A guide of average, or estimated
generated from a specific project or
APN Assessor's Parcel Number. A portion of the legal
description which specifically identifies each parcel of land.
Bulldout The year when the City of Carlsbad is completely
developed with all associated public facilities in place.
Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District -A district established
to fund major thoroughfares and bridge improvements. These
bridge improvements are at I-5; Palomar Airport Road, Poinsettia
lane, and la Costa Avenue. See Exhibit S, Page 125.
CIP -Abbreviation for Capital Improvement Program.
Community Park 20 -50 acres in size; designed to serve the
broad recreational needs of several neighborhoods; located
adjacent to secondary arterial or greater; publicly owned.
Demand -The amount of needed facility generated within the zone,
quadrant, or City based upon the adopted performance standard.
DU -Abbreviation for dwelling unit.
EDU Equivalent dwelling unit. The average amount of sewage
generated by a single family household per day. Commercial and
industrial developments are also converted into EDU's to assess
their direct impact upon facilities.
Environmentally Constrained Lands -Beaches, wetlands, floodways,
other water bodies, riparian and woodland habitats, slopes
greater than 251, major roadways, railroad tracks, and major
powerllne easements.
116
General Plan Density Ranges
Residential Land Use
Allowed
Units Per Acre
RL -Residential Low
RLM -Residential Low-Medium
RM -Residential Medium
RMH -Residential Medium-High
RH Residential High
Growth Management Control Point
0 -
0 -
4.0 -
8.0 -
15.0
1.5
4.0
8.0
15.0
23.0
Residential Land Use
Allowed
Units Per Acre
RL
RLM
RM
RMH
RH
1. 0
3.2
6.0
11. 5
19.0
Established based upon the overall average land use yield in each
designation or the midpoint of the density range.
ICU -Abbreviation for Intersection Capacity Unit. The ratio of
traffic demands to be placed on an intersection in relation to
the capacity of an intersection.
Level of Service The relative level of operation of an
intersection or traffic signal.
Level of
Service
(LOS)
A
B
Description
Free flow (relatively). If signalized,
conditions are such that no approach
phase is fully utilized by traffic and
no vehicle waits through more than one
red indication. Very slight or no delay.
Stable flow. If signalized, an occa-
sional approach phase is fully utilized;
vehicle platoons are formed. This level
is suitable operation for rural design
purposes. Slight delay.
117
ICU
Value
0.00-0.60
0.61-0.70
Level of
Service
(LOS)
C
D
E
F
Description
Stable flow of operation. If signalized,
drivers occasionally may have to wait
through more than one red indication.
Acceptable delay.
Approaching unstable flow or operation;
queues develop, but are periodically
cleared. Tolerable delay.
Unstable flow or operation; the inter-
section has reached ultimate capacity;
this condition is not uncommon in peak
hours. Congestion and intolerable delay.
Forced flow or operation. Intersection
operates below capacity.
ICU
Value
0.71-0.80
0.81-0.90
0.91-1.00
1.00+
Derived from: Highway Capacity Manual, HRB Special Report 87.
MGD Million gallons a day. A term used to describe flow of
water or sewage.
Net Vacant Acres Obtained by subtracting all of the 100% -----,---,------constrained acres and one-half of the areas shown as 25-40%
slopes. Industrial and commercial development were then
multiplied by .4 to determine net acreage (this allows for all
regulations which affect overall lot coverage).
Open Space Pocket parks, homeowner ball fields, planned
residential development (PRD), common areas, tennis courts, or
other areas containing passive or active recreational facilities,
such as major power line easements.
PIL Park-in-Lieu Fee. A fee paid prior to the issuance of
building permits in lieu of land dedication for park purposes.
PFF -Public Facility Fee. A 2.51 fee paid prior to the issuance
of building permits. All proceeds from this fund are used for
the purpose of acquiring, building, improving, expanding and
equipping public property, improvements, and facilities.
118
Special Use Area -1-5 acres in size; a local facility of only
one or two activity type uses, i.e., tennis court, swimming pool,
etc.
TIF Traffic Impact Fee. A fee paid at issuance of building
permits for various traffic circulation improvements. The City
is divided into two fee categories: 1) The la Costa area and 2)
the remainder of the City. See Exhibit T, on Page 126.
Turn Key Facility -a f aci 11 ty constructed by developer (·s) and
turned over or dedicated to the City after its completion.
119
ZONE 2
POINSETTIA lN ..
1111111 AREA BOUNDARY
ZONE 2
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
MELROSE AVE
Cny of c .. 1tbad
Gro•tft MIINlg,am.,,, Program,
JANUARY 1987
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
120
BRIDGE & THOROUGHFARE PISTRICT
· ZONE 2
~ DISTRICT BOUNDARY
ZONE 2
LOCAL FACILITIES MAN~GEMENT PLAN
121
MELROSE AVE
City of Ca,IINd
Oro.Ill M.,..""'.,., P,«, •m
JANUARY 1987
APPENDIX 2
122
l:
2 ii
3 :1
I 4!
5! I I 61
I ,I
! a: :,
9:1
1011
11I i
12,1
Q
13 ii C IZI I <II ... I
~ ~ .,
• U III C 14:, g I' °:I i : z 0
g -"' 15:f IZI □ 2 ~ "' ' ... u ~ >-... ■ 16,! z Ill ~ Q 111 Z C
U 5 -IZI ' ., ! .. ~ 17 ·1 > .. a: C C
>-u .. u 18
19
20.'
21
22,
,I
23:
' 24:
'I
25
26 I :I
27,
281:
I,
I' 1,
d ii I :1
,1RC"INANCF.: NO. 9808 -----
AN OPDINANCE OF T?E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY CF
CARLSBAD, CALIFnP~IA A~ENDI~G TITLE 21 CF T~E
CARLSBAD ~U~ICIPAt CODE ~y T?E AO~ITION OF
CHAPTEP 21. 90 ESTABLISHING A GROWTH ~NAGE~•E~T
PROGRAM FOP THE CITY
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California
does ordain as follows:
SECTION l: That Title 21 is amended by the addition ~f
Chapter 21.90 to read as follows:
Sections:
21.90.010
21.90.020
21.90.030
21.90.031
21.90.032
21.90.033
21.90.040
21.90.050
21.90.060
21.90.070
21.90.080
21.90.090
21.90.100
21.90.110
,, 21.90.120
21.90.125
21.90.130
21. 90 .140
21.90.150
21.90.160
21.90.170
21.90.180
21.90.190
"Chapter 21.90
Growth ~anage~ent
Purnose and intent.
Definitions.
General orohibition, exceotions.
Tolling of ti~e for consideration of
applications submitted before the effective
date of this chapter •
Tollina of expiration of previously issued
development permits.
Extensions of ?rior approvals orohibited.
Como!iance with this chapter reauired.
Establishment of local facilities ~anaqe~ent
fee.
Spec: al orov is ions for build i no pert" its
issued during te~porary moratoriu~.
Finding of health, safety and welfare
necessary for the fees imoosed by sections
21.90.050 and 21.90.060.
Perfor~ance standard.
Citywide facilities and imorovements plan.
Local facilities management zones.
Contents ·of local facility rnanaqe~ent plans. 1
Facilities management olan oreoartion.
Facilities manaaement plan orocessinc.
Implementation of facilities and
imorovements reauirements.
Obligation to oay fees or install
improvements reauired by any other law.
Implementing guidelines.
Exclusions.
Council actions, fees, notice.
Expiration of chapter.
Severability.
1.
123
' 5' I
61
I
71
el
91
I
101 . I
111
I
'
,,
1711
1a,:
19
20''
21 ..
22,
26.:
:!
27;
21.90.010 Puroose and intent.
(a) !t is the policy of the City of Carlsbad to:
( l) Provide auality housi.na ocportunities fer: alt
economic sectors of the cc~~unity;
(2) Provide a balanced coff'rrunitv .,.,itti adecuate
commercial, industrial, recreational and open space areas to r
support the residential areas of the City: /
(3) Ensure that public facilities and i~prove~entsl
meeting City standards are available concurre~t with the need
created by new development: I
(4) Balance the housing needs of the reaion I
aaainst the cublic service needs of Carlsbad residents and I
available fiscal and environmental resources: :
(5) Encouraae infill development in urbanized
areas before allowina extensions of public facilities and
improvements to areas which have yet to be urbanized:
(6) Ensure that all development is consistent wit~
the Carlsbad qeneral plan:
(7) Prevent growth unless adeauate public
facilities and improvements are provided in a phased and logical
fashion as reauired by the general plan:
(8) Control of the timing and location of
development by tyinq the oace of developfflent to the provision of
public facilities and improvements at the times established by
the citywide facilities and improvements plan.
(b) The City Council of the City of Carlsbad has
determined despite previous City Council actions includina but
not limited to, aJ"endments to the land use, housinq, and oar~s
and recreation elements of the general plan, amendments to City
Council Policy No. 17, adoption of tr3ffic imoact fees, and
modification of park dedication and imorovement reauirements,
that the demand for facilities and imorovements has outpaced the
supply resulting in shortages in public facilities and
improvements, includina uut not limited to streets, parks, open
space, schools, libraries, drainage facilities and general 1
governmental facilities. The City Council has further deter~ine1
that these shortages are detrimental to the public health, safet~
and welfare of the citizens of Carlsbad. i
(c) This chapter is adopted to ensure the
implementation of the policies stated in subsection (al, to
eliminate the shortages identified in subsection (bl, to ensure 1
that no,. development occurs without oroviding for adeauate
facilities and improve~ents, to regulate the oace of ceveloo~ent
thereby ensuring a continued supply of housing over a period of
years and to continue the auality of life for all econo~ic
sectors of the Carlsbad community. 1
(d) This chapter will further the policies, goals and :
objectives established herein by reauirina identification of all;
public facilities and improvements required for develop~ent, by i
prohibiting develop~ent until adeauate provisions for the public;
facilities and improvements are made by developers of projects ·
within the City, and by givinq development priority to areas of
the City where public facilities and i~provements are already i~
place (infill areas).
2.
124
I ' i
II I'
I 1! •I I
2i
3'
4
5
6
7
8 I 91
10
11
12i
131
141 :
I l5i
18 I
19·
20'
21,:
22:
ii
23ii
·1
24 I '! :1
25;
i 27,
28 ,.
(e) This chapter replaces the te~oorary ~cratoriu~ ~~
processing and approval of develop~ent projects i~posed ~v =~~'l
Council Ordinance No. 9791.
21.90.020 Definitions.
Ca) Whenever the following terms are used in this
chapter they shall have the meaning established by this section
unless from the context it is apparent that another ~eanino is
intended: -
( 1) "Citywide facilities and i?!loroverrents clan" ,
means a plan prepared and approved according to Section 21.90.0901
identifying those facilities and imorovements reauired on a
citywide basis to serve the projected population of the City as
established by the general plan and providing an outline and
budget for financing certain facilities and il1'prove~ents which
will be provided by the City.
( 2) • oevelopment pe·rmi t • means any pernii t,
entitlement or approval whether discretionary or ministerial
issued under Title 20 or 21 of this code and any leaislative
actions such as zone chanaes, qeneral plan amendments, or master
plan approval or amendment. ·
(3) •oevelopment• means any use to which land is
put, building or other alteration of land and construction
inciden~ thereto.
(4) •Facilities• means any schools, parks, ooen
space, or recreational areas or structures providina for fire,
1 ibrary, or governmental services, ide_nt if ied in a facilities
management plan.
(5) "Il1'provement• includes traffic cont.rols,
streets and highways, including curbs, gutters, and sidewalks,
bridges, overcrossings, street interchanaes, flood control or
storm drain facilities, sewer facilities, water facilities and
lighting facilities.
(6) •tocal facilities management plan" ~eans a
facilities manaael1'ent plan defined by Section 21.90.120 for a
local facilities management zone which is established accordina
to Section 21.90.100.
21.90.030 General rohibition, exceotions.
a Unless exempted by the provisions of this chapter
no application for any building permit or development oer~it
shall be accepted, processed or aporoved until a citywide
facilities and i~provements plan has been adopted and a local
facilities management plan for the applicable local Eacili:ies 1
management zone has been subriti t ted and approved accord i na to t!i is1
chapter. I
( b) No zone change, general plan aJT1endt11ent, master olan
a~endment or specific plan amend~ent which would incease the· i
residential density or development intensity established by t~e
general plan in effect on the effective date of this chaoter
shall be approved unless an amend~ent to the citywide facilities
~anage~ent plan and the applicable local f~cilities ~anace~er.t
olan has first been approved.
3.
125
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
I
14!1
151 I
16 i,
17 ii
isii
19 ii
22:,
ii 23;: 11
1:
24 !I
25 .' i
2s :I ;!
27 !'
28::
" 1,
'
I I I
I
(c) The classes of projects or permits listed in this I
subsection shall be exempt from the prov is ions of subsection (a).:
Development permits and building permits for these projects I
shall be·subject to any fees established pursuant to the citywicd
facilities and improvement plan and any applicable local
facilities management plan.
{l) Redevelopment projects.
{2) Projects consisting of the construction or
alteration of a single dwelling structure for a fa~ily on a lot
owned by the family intending to occupy the structure, or not
to exceed one nonowner-occupied house per individual for one or
more lots owned prior to July 20, 1986.
{3) Building permits and final maps for projects
identified in Section 2(F) of Ordinance No. 9791 {projects for
_which construction had commenced and were designated on the map
marked Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 9791 •as developing•).
(4) Building permits for projects for which all
required development permits were issued or approved on or befor
January 21, 1986. If all required development permits were
issued for a portion of the project only, the exemption shall
apply to that portion. ·
(5) Building permits for projects for which all
required development permits were issued or aporoved before July
20, 1986 and for which building permits could have been issued
under Ordinance No. 9791. If all required development permits
were issued for a portion of the project only, the exemption
shall apply to that portion.
(6) Commercial and industrial projects with
approved development permits or with a co~plete aoplication on I
file with the City prior to June 11, 1986 for such permits. New
permits for commercial and industrial projects located within an 1
area that has been previously approved for such uses may also be 1
processed and approved.
(7) Projects by nonprofit entities for structures
and uses for youth recreational and guidance programs such as
boys and airls clubs.
-( 8) Zone changes or general plan amendments
necessary to accomplish consistency between the general plan and
zoning, to implement the provisions of the Local Coastal Plan or
which the City Council finds will not increase the public
facilities or services and which are initiated by the City
Council or Planning Co~mission.
(9) Public utility facilities and improve~ent
projects without accommodations for permanent employees are
exempt from the provisions of-this chapter unless the City
Council determines they are of sufficient size and scale to
impact public facilities.
( 10) "Adjustment plats.
(11) Development permits for minor subdivisions
located in the northwest auadrant of the City as defined in
Ordinance No. 9791. Building permits for commercial or
l I I i
I industrial construction on lots in such subdivisions ~ay be
approved. Residential building permits will not be aoorov~d for ·
lots in such subdivisions unless otherwise exempt under this
4.
126
I
' -
I
i 11
2
3
4
5
61
7
8
9
10
111
12I
1:sl
141 I
I
15 !
1s .I
II
17 :i '
21 ·:
22 I ,I i! 23' II
24 · ,,
I
,I 2s-:
27
28 1:
I
chapter except one permit for a nonowner-occupied lot ~ay ~e
approved for each such subdivision •
. (d) The provisions of this subsection apply to final
maps and other development permits for projects with a tentative
map approved before July 20, 1986 which are not included in the
exemptions listed in subsection (c). 1
. ~ l) If a tentative map or tentative parcel rr,_ap wad
approved on or before January 21, 1986 then, after approval of 7
the citywide facilities plan, a final map or parcel mac ~ay be ·
processed and approved before the adoption of a local facilitv
management plan. The expiration period for those tentative macs ;
shall be tolled until the citywide plan is adopted. The · '
expiration of any development permits issued in conjunction with
those maps shall be tolled until the applicable local facilities
management plan is approved or, two years after the date the
citywide plan is approved, whichever occurs first.
· (2) If a tentative map or tentative parcel map wa
approved after January 21, 1986 and before July 20, 1986, but th
approval of final map or parcel map was prohibited by Ordinance
No. 9791 then approval of final maps and parcel maps is
prohibited until after preparation of the applicable local
facilities management plan. The expiration period of those
tentative maps and tentative parcel maps, and any other
development permits issued in conjunction with the maps shall be
tolled until the local facilities management plan is approved,
or two years after date the citywide facilities and improvements.
plan is approved, whichever occurs first. i
(e) The exemption for projects listed in subsection (c~
(3), (4), (5), and (6) shall expire on July 20, 1-988. After that;
date all development permits for those projects shall be fullv i
subject to the provisions of this chapter. The exemptions for ·
projects listed in subsection (c) (3), (4), (5), and (6) shall 1
apply only so long as the facilities and improvements recuired as
a condition to the issuance of final development permits have i
been installed or are being installed pursuant to a secured
agreen,ent. Any breach of such secured improvement agree~ent
shall subject any remaining building pern,its for the project to
the provisions of subsection (a).
(f) Final or parcel maps for projects listed in
subsection (c) (3), (4), (5), (6) and (7) which comply with all
the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and Title 20 of this
Code which were filed with the City before July 20, 1986 ~ay be ,
approved by the City Council, or City Engineer as appropriate,
after July 20, 1986. Upon approval, those projects shall be
subject to the exemption of subsection (c).
(g) The City Council may authorize the processinq cf
and decision making on building permits and develop~ent per~its
for a project with a master plan approved before July 20, 1986
subject to the following restrictions: ,
(1) The City Council finds that the facilities and
improvements required by the master plan are sufficient to ~eet !
the needs created by the project and that the master plan i
developer has agreed to install those facilities and i~croverr,ents·
to the satisfaction of the City Council.
5.
127
4
5
6
7
10
11
,I
121
l3i
I
' l4!i
l5 1i
1si!
ii 17 ii I,
18.: ,,
I' 19 1i
'I
21
22 I
;1
23ii
I q
24 !1 ., ,, 25 :' . I
I,
26 :: d I'.
27 i,
28 11
(2) The master plan developer shall agree in
writing that all facilities and improvement requirements,
including but not limited to the payment of fees established ~v
the citywide facilities and manaqement plan and the applicable·
local facilities management plan shall be applicable to
development within the master plan area and that the master ~lan
developer shall comply with those plans.
CJ) The master plan establishes an educational
park and all uses within the park comprise an integral part of
the educational facility.
( 4.) Building pernii ts for the 129 unit residential
portion of Phase I of the project may be approved provided the
applicant has provided written evidence that an educational
entity will occupy Phase I of the project which the City Council
finds is satisfactory and consistent with the goals and intent o
the approved master plan.
(5) Prior to the approval of the final map for
Phase I the master plan developer shall have agreed to
participate in the restoration of a significant lagoon and
• wetland resource area and made any dedications of property
necessary to accomplish the restoration.
(h) After making the findings in paragraph l the City
Council may authorize the processing of and decision making on
master plans subject to the reauirements of paragraph 2. After
the grant of the easement required by subparagraph (h)(iv) the
tentative map for Phase I of the project, the site plan for the
commercial development and the local coastal plan amendment may
also be processed and approved. If such approvals are granted
and, subject to all other provisions of this code, grading and
building permits for construction of the golf course and first
phase of the commercial portions of the project may be processed l
and approved. 1
The processing and approval of all other developments I
and building permits within the master plan shall not occur unti~
after the citywide facilities plan and the local facilities
management plan have been adopted by the City Council.
(l)(i) That the master plan will provide all
necessary public facilities for the project and will cure any
facilities deficits in the area affected by the project.
(ii) That the approval will not prejudice the ·,1
preparation of the citywide facilities plan and will improve the
level of public facilities and services in the area. ,
(iii) That by the dedication of land and the
construction of public improvements the project wilt make a .
significant contribution to the public facilities needs of the
city and provide for the preservation or enhancement of
sianificant environmental resources.
· (2)(i) The master plan shall include all of the
information required by and implementing the provisions of
Sections 21.90.090 and 21.90.110 for the area covered by the
master plan.
(ii) The applicant shall agree in writing that ali
facilities and improvement reauirements, including but not
limited to the payment of fees established by the citywide
6.
128
I I
I 11 !I 2 :i :1
:5
4
'I
5 ii
611
I 7' I
I 8:i
9 ii
10!!
11I
I
121I I
I'
1:5 i/
I 'I
14,;
'I
15 :i
16 ,!
17 f
18:
19
20
21
22
,.
25i
I
26 ii
2,7:
28 j,
ii
ii
!I
11
facilities and improvement olan and the applicable local
facilities management plan shall be applicable to develop~ent
within the master plan area and that the master plan developer
shall comply with those requirements.
(iii) The master plan applicant shall agree to
participate in the restoration of a significant laooon and
wetland resource area. -
(iv) Prior to any processing on the ~aster plan 1
the applicant shall grant an easement over the property necessaryj
for the lagoon restoration and the right-of-way necessary for thel
widening of La Costa Avenue and its intersection with El Camino I
Real. I
21.90.031 Tolling of time for consideration of
applications sub~itted before the effective date of this
chapter.
After approval of the citywide facilities and
improvement plan and the applicable local facilities manaoement
plan applications for development permits ·which were accepted as
complete before the effective date of this chapter shall have
processing priority in relationship to the acceptance date.
Until the approval of the plans all aoplicable time li~its for
processing the development permits shall be tolled.
21.90.032 Tolling of expiration of oreviously issued
development permits.
If a discretionary development permit, ot~er than a
development permit issued in conjunction with a subdivision map,
issued prior to July 20, 1986 has an expiration period within
which building permits ~ust be issued and the issuance of
buildinq permits for the project is prohibited by this chapter
then the expiration period shall be tolled until the aoplicable
local facilities management plan is approved, or two years after
the date the citywide p~an is approved, whichever occurs first.
21.90.033 Extensions of orior a rovals orohibited.
Ater approva of an app icable local facilities
management plan an extension of the expiration date of any
develop~ent permit shall not be granted unless the extension is
found to be consistent with the plan. The decision makina body
considering an extension may condition the extension upon
compliaoce with the citywide plan and applicable local
facilities management olan. I
I
I 21.90.040 Compliance with this chanter.
(a) No develop~ent permit shall be approved unless
approving authority finds that the permit is consistent with
citywide facilities and improvements plan and the applicable
local facilities management plan. To ensure consistency the
approving authority ~ay impose any condition to the approval
the;
t~e I
necessary to implement the plans. i
(b) No building permit shall be issued unless the fees I
reouired by this chapter, and any applicable local facilities ·
management plan fees are first paid, and the oermit is.consisten~
7.
129
I I
121
I
13:
14
15't
16 i
17:1
18
19
20
21
22,
,I 23:;
25
with the applicable local facilities management plan. As a
condition to the issuance of any building permit pursuant to
Section 21.90.030(c) the applicant shall aqree to pay the
appropriate fees within 30 days of the date each fee is
established.
(c) The reauirements of this chapter are imposed as a
condition of zoning on the property to ensure implementation of !
and consistency with the general plan and to protect the public 1
health, safety and welfare by ensuring that public facilities and
improvements will be installed to serve new development prior to l
or concurrently with need. I
21.90.050 Establishment of local facilities managewe~t I
!!!.· I (a) A local facilities management fee is hereby !
established to pay for improvements or facilities identified in~
local facilities management plan which are related to new I
development within the zone and are not otherwise financed by an
other fee, charge or tax on development, or are not installed by
a developer as a condition of a building permit or development
permit. The fee may also be used to pay for that portion of the
facilities or improvements identified in the citywide facilities
and improvements plan attributed to develooment within the local
zone which are not financed by other means. The facilities
management fee shall be paid before the issuance of a building I
permit. The amount of the fee shall be determined based upon th~
estimated cost of the facility or improvement designated as I
necessary to accommodate additional development within the ·
applicable ~o7a; facili~ies manageme~t zo~e.plu~ the es~ima~ed I
cost of fac1l1t1es and improvements 1cent1f1ed in the c1tyw1de ,
facilities and improvement plan attributable to the local zone.
The fee shall be fairly apportioned among the new development. ,
(b) The fee required by this section is in addition toj
any other means of finct .. cing facilities or improvements l
identified by a local facilities management plan or any other i
tax, fee, charge or improvement requirement which may be imposed i
on the development of property under the provisions of state law~
this code or City Council policy.
(c) The amount of the fee for a local facilities
management zone shall be set by City Council resolution after a
public hearing, published notice of which shall be given
according to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.54.060(2) and
Government Code Section 54992.
(d) As a condition of any building or development
permit application submitted after the effective date of this
chapter the applicant shall agree to pay the fee established by 1
this section at the time a building permit is issued. . r
Ce) The fee established by this section shall be levied
at the time of issuance of a building permit.
Special proyisions for building permits ,1 issued tem orar moratorium.
(a Applicants for projects for which building permits:
were issued after January 21, 1986 and before July 20, 1986 shall
e.
130
l: !
2i
i
,· I 3'
4
i
51
I I
101
111 I I
1sii
16 ,I
17 1!
18 ,,
,I
19 :,
20 ,I
21::
,,
22 i
23;1 ,,
I I
24 i;
'I ·I 25 1,
!i
26 \i
27 :, .: ,,
28 •:
I' I I
' . i I pay the fee established by Sect~on 21.90.050 within 30 days afteq
the amount of the fee is determined by the City Council. Payment'
shall be made according to the agreement executed by the 1
applicant pursuant to Section 3 of Ordinance No. 9791.
21.90.070 Findin of health, safet and welfare
necessar* or t e fees imposed by Sections 21. and
21.90.06 •
(a) The City Council hereby declares that payment of
the fee established and imposed by Sections 21.90.050 and
21.90.060 and installation of the facilities and improvements
identified in a facilities management plan are necessary to
achieve the policies established in Section 21.90.010 and to
implement the City's general plan. If the fees are not paid or
the facilities or improvements are not installed the public
health, safety and welfare will suffer because there will be
insufficient facilities and improvements to accommodate any new
development. This finding is based upon City Council Policy No.
17, City Council Ordinance No. 9791, and the evidence presented
at the public hearings on the ordinance adopting this chapter.
I !
(b) If any condition imposed as a conditon of a
development permit or building permit pursuant to this chapter i
protested then the permit shall be suspended during the period o~
the protest. I
(c) This section is adopted pursuant to Government Cod1
Section 65913.5.
21.90.080 Performance standard.
The City Council shall adopt general performance
standards for each facility or improvement listed in Section
21.90.090(b) or 21.90.ll0(c). Specific performance standards foi
citywide facilities shall be adopted as part of the citywide ;
facilities and improvement plan. Specific performance standards l
for each zone shall be •oopted as part of the local facilities I
management plan. If at any time after preparation of a local I
facilities management plan the performance standards established I
by a plan are not met then no development permits or building
permits shall b~ issued within the local zone until the
performance standard is met or arrangements satisfactory to the
City Council guaranteeing the facilities and improvements have
been made.
; 21.90.090 Cit wide facilities and im rovements lan.
a To implement the C ty s general plan by securing
provision of facilities and improvements, and to ensure that !
developroent does not occur unless facilities and improvements ar~
available the City Council shall adopt by resolution a citywide I
facilities and improvements plan. The plan shall: Identify all!
facilities and improvements necessary to accommodate the land l
uses specified in the general plan and by the zoning; specify 1
size, capacity and service level performance standards for the !
identified facilities and improvements: establish specific ti~e I
tables for acauisition, installation and operation of the
facilities and improvements correlated to projected population
9.
131
l
I
2 -i
'1
'I
3 .1
j1
4:1
I
5 :i
6:1
I 71
I
el!
ii
91 1 II
10!!
11!
12
13
14
15 :i
16 .:
17 i
18.
19
20
21
22
24
'I
25
26 ::
l .:
27:
28 :;
1:
'
growth, facility and i~provement performance standards, and
projected nonresidential development: identify the financing
method or methods for each facility and improvement; and
establish a facility and improvement budget for those facilities.
or improvements which will be constructed or financed by the
1
-
City. The plan shall encourage infill development and reduce the
growth inducing impact of premature extension of facilities or i
imorovements to undeveloped areas by establishing priorities for I:
facility and improvement installation or financina.
( b) The citywide fac i 1 it ies and improvement plan shal 1 ,
show how and when the following facilities and improvements will
be installed or financed as specified in subsection (c).
(1) Major sewage transmission systems and sewage
treatment plants:
(2) Major water transmission lines:
(3) Major area wide drainage facilities:
(4) Prime and Major arterials; freeway
interchanges, bridges or overcrossings;
(5) Fire facilities:
(6) Governmental administration facilities;
(7) Par~s and other recreational facilities:
( 8) Libraries.
(c) The plan shall include the following information
with regard to each facility and improvement listed in subsectio11
( b) :
(1) An inventory of present and future
requirements for each facility and improvement based upon the
performance standard established for each facility and :
improvement. Cost estimates shall be included. The inventory
shal 1 be cons is tent with the general olan and zoning for the
area.
( 2) A phasing schedule establishing the timing fot!
installation or provisions of facilities or i~orovements in 1
relationship to the amo 1111t of development activity (e.g. number
of dwelling units, nu~ber of sauare feet of commercial space
within the service area of the facility or improvement) and the
facility and improvement performance standards. 1
(3) A financing plan establishing various methods [
of funding the facilities and improvements identified in the
plan. The plan shall identify those facilities and improvements
which would otherwise be provided as a requirement of processing
a devel9pment project (i.e. reauirements imposed as a condition
of a development permit) or provided by the developer in order ta
establish consistency with the general plan or Titles 18, 20 or i
21 of this Code, and those facilities and improvements for whichi
new funding methods which shall be sufficient to ensure I
sufficient funds are available to construct or provide facilities
or improvements when required by the phasing schedule. !
(d) The City Manager shall prepare and present the plarl
to the City Council not later than one year from the effective
date of this ordinance.
10.
132
,,
I
1 ;\ (e) Amendments to this citywide facilities and
: improvements plan shall be initiated by action of the Planninc
'I Commission or City Council. 2:
?i
I
'I 8':
I
9 ii
1oi!
11!!
•I
12
13
14,
15 I
16;:
!
17 I
18
19
20
21
22
24 ,[
25,
26 :·
27:
.21.90.100 Local facilities manaaement zones.
(a) The City -Council shall divide the City into
facilities management zones.
(bl The boundaries of the zones shall be estahlished
based upon logical facilities and improvements plannina, ,
construction and service relationships to ensure the economicall~
efficient and timely installation of required facilities and ·
improvements. In establishing zone boundaries the City Council
shall also be guided by the following considerations: i
(1) Service areas or drainage basins: i
(2) Extent to which facilities or improvements ar~
in place or available:
plan areas:
(3) Ownership of property:
(4) Aoundaries of existing zoning master plans:
(5) Boundaries of pending zoning master plans:
(6) Boundaries of potential future zoning master
(7) Boundaries of approved tentative maps:
(8) Public facilities relationships, especially
the relationship to the City's planned major circulation
network:
(9) Special district service territories:
(10) Approved fire, drainage, sewer, or other
facilities or improvement master plans.
(c) The zones shall be established by resolution after
a public hearing notice of which is given pursuant to Section
21.54.060(2) of this code.
21.90.110 Contents of local facilit mana e~ent clar.s.
a) A local fa,-::ilities management plan shall be
prepared for each facility zone and shall cover the entire zone. i
(b) The plan shall consist of maps, graphs, tables, an~
narrative text and shall be based upon the general plan and ;
zoning applicable within the local zone at the time of plan
approval. The local facilities m.anagement plan shall be ,
consistent with the citywide facilities and improvements plan and
shall impiement the citywide facilities and improvements plan
within the zone. ·
" (c) The facilities management plan shall show how and
when the following facilities and improvements necessary to
accommodate development within the zone will be installed or
financed as specified in subsection (d).
(1) Sewer systems
( 2) Water
(3) Drainage
(4) Circulation
( 5) Fire facilities
(6) Schools
(7) Parks and other recreational facilities
( 8) Open space
11.
133
ii
,1
211
3
I 4'
I
I
5 ii
I
6
7
8
I' I
9i
I I 10!
1111
12 :1
13:1
'1
16 .l
'
17 !
18 :'
19'
20
21
22
23 !!
24 :: ·I ,,
25:
(d) The plan shall be consistent with and implement t~e
citywide facilities management plan and general plan and shall
include the following information with regard to each facility 1 and improvement listed in subsection (cl:
(1) An inventory of present and future
requirements for each facility and improvement based upon the
performance standard established for each facility. Because
improvement reauirements for certain facilities and improvements
may overlap zone boundaries a discussion of the need for
coordination and a proposed coordination plan for facilities
extending from one zone to another shall be included. Cost
estimates shall be included. It must be shown that development
in the zone will not reduce the facilities or improvements
capabilities or create facilities or improvements shortages in
other zones or reduce service capability in any zone below the
performance standard which is established pursuant to Section
21.90.080. The growth inducing impac·t of the out of zone
improvements shall be assessed.
(2) A phasing schedule establishing the ti~ing for
installation or provisions of facilities or improvements in
relationship to the amount of development activity (e.g. number
of dwelling units, number of square feet of commercial space,
etc.) for the facilities management zone. The phasing schedule
shall ensure that development of one area of the zone will not
utilize more than the area's prorata share of facility or
improvement capacity within that zone unless sufficient capacity
is ensured for other areas of the zone at the time of the first
development. The phasing schedule shall include a schedule of
development within the zone and a market data and cash flow
analysis for financing of facilities and improvements for the
zone. The phasing schedule shall identify periods where the
demand for facilities and improvements may exceed the capacity
and provide a plan for eliminating the shortfall. In those
situations when demand ~xceeds capacity and it is not feasible to
increase the capacity prior to development, no development shall:
occur unless a time schedule for and a means of increasing the I
capacity is established in the ?lan. 1
(3) A financing plan establishing various methods I
of funding the facilities and improvements identified in the plan
fairly allocating the cost to the various properties within the I
zone. The plan shall identify those facilities and ll'lprovements !
which w9uld otherwise be provided as a requirement of processing i
a development project (i.e. requirements imposed as a condition
of a development permit) or provided by the developer in order ta
establish consistency with the general plan or Titles 18, 20 or I
21 of this Code, and those facilities and i~provements for which!
new funding methods which shall be sufficient to ensure I
sufficient funds are available to construct or provide ,
·facilities or improvements when required by the phasing schedule~
Where facilities or improvements are reauired for more than one 1
zone, the phasing plan shall identify those other zones and the i
plan for each zone shall be coordinated. Coordination, however, I
shall not require identical funding methods. ·
12.
134
:I
1!
I
21
3;
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
I
12
13
1411
15! i
16,
i
. 19
20
21
22.·:
23
24
25
26
27
28 :;
' I,
{4) A list or schedule of facilities reauirements
correlated to individual development projects within the zone.
(e) The local facilities management plan shall
establish the proportionate share of the cost of facilities and
improvements identified in the citywide facilities and
improvement plan attributable to develop~ent of property on the
local facilities management zone.
21.90.120 Local facilities management olan
preparation.
(a) A local facilities management plan may be preoared
by the City or by the property owners within the zone accordina
to the procedures established by this section.
(b) The City Council, upon its own initiative, may bv
resolution direct the City Manager to prepare a facilities ·
management plan for any zone. The City Council may assess the
cost of preparing the plan to the owners within the zone after a
hearing ten days written notice of which is given to the ~ropert
owners within the zone. The cost shall be spread prorata
according to acreage and development potential.
(c) All owners within the zone may jointly submit a
facilities management plan.
(d) For zones in which joint submission of a facilitie
management plan is shown to be not feasible any owner or group o
cooperating owners within the zone may petition the City Council
to allow the owner or group of owners to prepare the plan. Afte
a meeting for which ten days prior written notice has been given
to the property owners within the zone, the City Council may ,
.permit the owner or group of owners to prepare and submit the I
plan. A limit based on the estimated cost of the plan shall be 1
deterfflined at the time of the hearing. The actual cost shall be/
determined when the plan is adopted and shall be assessed ~rorata
based on acreage and development potential to property within the
facilities management zone. The assessment shall be collected by
the City at the time any application for a development project !
within the zone is submitted. The owner or owners who prepared 1
the plan shall be reimbursed for the cost of the plan less the :
owner's or owners' prorata share. No reimbursement shall be made
unless the plan is approved. Cost of preparation shall not '
include interest. ·
(e) As an option to preparation by the owner or grou9
of owners as provided in subsection (d) the City Council may
decide to direct the City Manager to prepare the facilities
management plan. The cost of preparation shall be advanced to
the City by the requesting owner or owners, assessed to all t~e
owners and reimbursed as provided in subsection (d).
21.90.125 Facilities mana· ement lan orocessina.
a Fac1l1t1es management pans shall be reviewed
according to the following procedure:
(1) A completed facilities management ~lan
complying with this chapter, and accompanied by a processing fee;
in an amount established by City Council resolution, ~ay be
submitted to the Planning Director for processing. !f the
13.
135
Q
C CII I .,,
~-~ C at
-U w C g "" i i Z Ow 0 ,. > 0 ai ':: C ~ U2~ .... ~ u
i-> "' -z.., Q w Z ~ C U ~ _ CII ~ t: '.1 > iz: C C ,. . u ..
iJ
i
ii
I
21
I I
3.
4
5
6
7
al
9
10
11!
I
121
131
14::
Ii
15 :i
:\
16 ,:
17 :1
18il
19 I,
,,
20'
21:
22,
II 23,;
Ii
2411
25 ii
26"
27
28 :;
d ;:
I:
Planning Director determines that the plan complies with the
provisions of Section 21.90.110 the director shall set a
facilities management plan for public hearing before tr.e Planni~qi
Commission within sixty days of receipt of a complete 1
application.
(2) The hearing shall be noticed according to the
provisions of Section 21.54.060(2). A staff report containina
recommendation on the plan shall be prepared and furnished to -t!"lel
public, the applicant, and the Planning Commission prior to the I
hearing.
(3) The Planning Commission shall hear and
consider the application for a facilities manage~ent plan and
shall by resolution prepare recommendations and findinqs for the
City Council. The action of the Commission shall be filed with
the City Clerk, and a copy shall be mailed to the owners within
the facility zone.
. (4) When the Planning Commission action is filed
with the City Clerk, the Clerk shall set the matter for public
hearing before the City Council. The hearing shall be noticed
according to th.e provisions of Section 21.54.060(2).
( 5) The City Council shall hear the matter, .and
after considering the findings and recommendations of the
Planning Commission, may approve, conditionally approve or deny
facilities management plan. The City Council may include in the
resolution adopting the facilities management plan any fees or
facilities improvement requirements which it deeffls necessary to
impose on development projects within the zone in order to
implement the citywide facilities and improvement plan and the
local facilities management plan.
(b) A facilities management plan may be amended
following the same procedures for the original adoption. i
(c) A local facilities management plan shall be :
considered a project for the purposes of Title 19 of this Code. I
Environmental documents snould be processed concurrently with th~
plan. i
i
21.90.130 Implementation of facilities and imcrove~ents
reauirements.
(a) To ensure that the provisions of this chaoter and ,
the general plan are met the following shall apply: I
(1) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter nd
development permit shall be approved unless the map or i:,e rm it is ·
consistent with the local facilities management plan and unless
provision for all facilities and improvements related to the
development project are provided or funded.
(2) No building.permit shall be issued unless all
applicable fees, including but not limited to, public facilities
fees, bridge and thoroughfare fees, traffic impact fees,
facilities management fees, school fees, park-in-lieu fees, sewer
fees, water fees, or other development fees identified in the ·
citywide facilities and improvements plan and local facilities
management plan and adopted by the City Council have first ~een
paid or provision for their payment has been made to the
satisfaction of the City Council.
14.
136
i
11 I i 2: I
I
3'
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
Q C m I 131 en if.
9; C . U 1M C 14 g II,,~ i
z0~~ 0>>0 15 -"" Cw. Ill G 2 i
II,, • ... u ~ >, "" -16;1 z "' I a 11,1 z i
r.J ! -,1
3i .. '1 11il >.. ~ C C ,. <J .. G 1s,:
19 ;1
1,
20'! ,,
21!:
22 i
1!
231i
I
24 ~I
25 11
26 :;
27
28 !:
11
1· 1,
'i
'I
(b) The citywide facilities and improvement plan and
the local facility management plan process is part of the Citv's
ongoing planning effort. It is anttcipated that amend~ents to
the-plans may be necessary. Adoption of a facilities management
plan does not establish any entitlement or right to any
particular general plan or zoning designation or any particular
development proposal. The citywide facilities and improvements
plan and the local facilities management plans are guides to
ensure that no development occurs unless adequate facilities or
improvements will be available to meet demands created by
development. The City Council may initiate an amendment to any
of the plans at any time if in its discretion it determines that
an amendment is necessary to ensure adeauate facilities and
improvements.
(c) If at any ti~e it appears to the satisfaction of
the City Manager that facilities or ~provements within a
facilities management zone or zones are inadequate to accommodate
any further develop~ent within that zone or that the performance
standards adopted pursuant to Section 21.90.100 are not being met
he shall immediately reoort the deficiency to the Council. If
the Council determines that a deficiency exists then no further
building or development permits shall be issued within the
affected zone or zones and development shall cease until an
amendment to the citywide facilities and ~provements plan or
applicable local facilities management plan which addresses the
deficiency is approved by the City Council and the perfornance
standard is met •
(d) The Planning Director shall monitor the developmen
activity for each local facilities management zone and shall
prepare an annual report to the City Council consisting of maps,
graphs, charts, tables and text and which includes a
develop~ental activity analysis, a facilities and improvements
adequacy analysis, a facility revenue/expenditure analysis and
reco~mendation for any amendments to the facilities management
plan. The co~tent of the annual report shall be established by
the City Council.
(e) The City Council shall annually review the citywid1
facilities and improvements plan at the time it considers the
City's capital improvement budget. ,
21.90.140 Obligation to pay fees or install I
improvements reauired by any other law.
Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as
relieving a builder, developer or subdivider from any public
improvement requirement, dedication reauirement or fee
requirement which is imposed pursuant to Titles 13, 18, 20 or 21
of this code or pursuant to any City Council policy.
21.90.150 Implementina guidelines.
The City Council may adopt any guidelines it deems
necessary to implement this chapter.
21.90.160 Exclusions.
{a) Development proposals which consist of facilities,.
15.
137
I 51
6
7
I I
8!1
9!1
1011
11
12i
1311
14::
'I
15 11
I
16 ii
I II
17 ii I,
19 1
20
21
22 I
II
231: ',
27 :;
28 :1
ii I'
ii
11
!1
or structures constructed by a city, county, special district,
state, or federal government or any agency, department, or
subsidiary thereof for governmental purposes are excluded from
the provisions of this chapter. This exclusion shall not aoolv
to development proposals to which a possessory interest tax-~oulc'
be applicable. j
(b) Tentative maps the application for which was
accepted before August 6, 1985 ~ay be approved without complyina
with the plans adopted pursuant to this Chapter but any other ·
development permits or building permits for the project shall be
subject to the reauirements of the plans. The tentative map
shall be subject to Section 21.90.030.
21.90.170 Council actions, fees, notice.
(a} Whenever this chapter requires or permits an
action or decision of the City Council, that action or decision
shall be accomplished by a resolution.
(b) The City Council shall establish aoolication and
processing fees for the submission and processin~-of facilities
management plans and for any other request made under Section
21.90.100, 21.90.120 or 21.90.140.
(c} Whenever written notice is required to be given
to property owners under this section the notice shall be mailed
by first class mail to the owners shown on the last equalized
assessment roll.
21.90.180 Expiration of chapter.
This chapter shall expire on June 30, 2001 unless. it is
extended or reenacted on or before that date.
21.90.190 Severability. If any section, subsection,
sentence, clause or phrase of the ordinance codified in this
chapter is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional
by the decision of any rourt of competent jurisdiction, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions
of the ordinance codified in this chapter. The City Council 1
declares that it would have passed the ordinance codified in this
chapter and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase
thereof, irrespective of the fact that any part thereof be '
declared invalid or unconstitutional.
~ SECTION 2: The City Council makes the following
findings:
1. Since January 1985, the City of Carlsbad has been ,
undertaking a comprehensive review of the Land Use Element of its
General Plan. As part of that review a Council appointed \
Citizens Committee prepared a comprehensive report and i
recommendation to the City Council. That report was subject to :
public hearings by both the Planning Commission and City Council.
Included in the recommendations of the Citizens Committee were
recommendations that no new development should occur unless
16.
138
3J ii 4:1
,I
5 ii
6 11 7:i .. a:1
9:1
1oll
nJI
12:I
ii
13i! !
14:i
15'1
16 ::
,I .,
17 ii
18 1
19
20,
21
22 I
24 ': ,,
25 :,
!,
2s !I
I,
27 :.
28 ii
ii
II II
ii
adequate public facilities are available concurrently with need
to serve the new development.
2. On August 6, 1985, the City Council adopted Interi~
Ordinance No. 9766, imposing certain temporary land use controls
on property within the City, consistent with the recommendation
of the Citizens Committee. On September 3, 1985, the City
Council adopted Interim Ordinance No. 9771 which extended the
restrictions of Ordinance No. 9766 until July 20, 1986. On
December 10, 1985, the City Council approved in concept several
land use proposals not contained in the Citizens Committee
report. On January 21, 1986 the City Council adopted Urgency !
Ordinance No. 9791 imposing a temporary moratorium on develop~entj
approvals based on the findings contained in that ordinance. On I
April 22, 1986 the City Council revised City Council Policy No. i
17, based on the findings contained therein. On May 6, 1986 the
City Council adopted Ordinance No. 8107 establishing a traffic
impact fee for the La Costa Area of the City. The City Council
finds that all of these actions plus the adoption of Chapter
21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code are necessary to ensure
adequate public facilities are available to serve any new
development in the City. Without Chapter 21.90 and the
requirements imposed by it, adeauate public facilities may not b
available to serve new development or building. Development or
building without public facilities is contrary to the City
General Plan and would be dangerous to the public health and
safety.
3. This action of the City Council is consistent with
long standing policies and objectives of the City to ensure
adequate public facilities within Carlsbad. This action will i
protect the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of!
Carlsbad by ensuring safe streets, adequate water, sewer and !
drainage facilities, su~~icient fire protection and recreation i
facilities. '
to I
I
4. This action is consistent with the City's policy
provide housing opportunities for all economic sectors of the
community, because sufficient opportunities for new housing
continue to exist within the City and Chapter 21.90 does not
affect the number of houses which may be built. In addition,
develop~ent of housing for low and moderate income persons and
families would most likely occur in areas of the City which are ,
designated for highest development priority. By encouraging 1
development of infill areas first, where the infrastructure is 1
already existing, the cost of housing may be reduced. i
I s. Because any new development affects public facility!
availability it is necessary to impose the fees and charges whic~
will be used to provide public facilities on any new building ini
the City. The Council finds that failure to impose the fees and!
charges on any new building in the City will adversely affect the
public health and safety by reducing the safety of its City's
st~eets, increasing the burden on water, sewer, drainage and fit"e
17.
139
1
2
31
4\i
'I ·I
5 ij
I 6;
11
:1 a,: !I ,,
9 :1
1011
111I
l1
12!1
C ii C m I 13 11 II> ... = = ~c ell
• '"""' C 14 g 'z
z '! 0 , .,,. 15 ii cij':C'= u 2 :t ... .. u ,_ ► l,,M • 16 ,! Z,... ~ C ,...z ~ u ~ -~... ~ 17 ·i > ... = C C
► CJ ... u 18:
19
20
21
22.
:'
23.
24
I
25 ·;
26 :;
I .,
27 ,.
28 ·:
!; ,.
'! ,,
I
facilities, and by overcrowding existing schools, parks and
recreational facilities.
6. Adoption of Chapter 21.90 will not adversely affect
the regional welfare. By ensuring that adeauate and safe ~ublic
facilities and improvements will exist to serve all of the
development in Carlsbad and because many of these facilities and
improvements are used by persons residing in neighborina areas
and cities the safety and welfare of the whole region is
enhanced.
SECTION 3: The City Council intends to implement the
growth management program contained in Chapter 21. 90 by followi~~I
I the work program in Exhibit A which is hereby made a part of this
ordinance. The City Council may adjust the work program without
amending this ordinance as they determine necessary to accomplis
effective growth management for the City of Carlsbad.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective
thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify
to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published a
least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days after its I
I
I adoption. The fees created by Section 21.90.050 of this ,
I
I ordinance shall be effec::ive as to building permits for single o~
I
multifamily residential projects 60 days after the adoption of
this ordinance.
INTRODUCED ANO FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the
Carlsbad City Council held on the ,,
1986 and thereafter
18.
140
24th day of June 11 --------
,1
1:
2!
811 ,,
9:1
1011 /
I
111 i I
121 I
13!
'
14ii
' 16d
,I
11 ii
1a1:
19'
20"
21.:
22:
ii
23;1
24
25
26
27
28
,1
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City
Council held on the 1st day of __ J_u_l_v ____ , 1986, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Peccine
NOES: ~one
ABSENT: ~one
APPPOVED AS
V
ATTEST:
~
ALETHA
LEGALITY
City Attorney
19.
141
Mayor
r
-~--· .... . .. _a,.••..,.,. -• ,"'\
CUL8BAD Ciff COU■CIL Gaorra JIA■AGBNB■T PLA■
~■ana9in9 a aeapoaaible aa4 Pr09reaai•• Carlabad Putare•
WOU PLAII
I. Citywide Pacilities and Improvement Plan
A. Grow·th Control Mapping and Planning Systems
1. The General Plan will be utilized as the overal~
base map with a maximum residential utilization
i.e. mean den~ity.
2. A citywide map will show all current and future
public facilities and improvements. Each public
facility and improvement will also be shown
separately on a citywide map.
3. A citywide environmental constraints and open space
map will be prepared.
4. These maps will also be broken down into quadrants
to show greater area detail.
·a. Management Performance Standards
t. Establish overall performance or adequacy standards
for each public facility and improvement.
2. Establish thresholds for each public facility and
improvement.
c. Citywide Pinancing Options
1. PinaAcin9 options will be identified for each
facility and improvement.
2. ~Bud9etin9 for citywide public facility and
improvement will be in conjunction with the City's
five year capital improvement budget.
o. Citywide Plan
1. A Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan will be
prepared using growth control maps, performance
standards and financing options.
-1-
142
E. Development of Local Facility Management and Planning
Zones.
1. The City shall be divided into 25 specific zones.
2. The size of each zone ■hall depend upon major
circulation roads, lagoons, property ownership
boundaries, and other identifiable characteristics.
3. The purpose of zone ■a
a. Requires landowners to work together in order to
pre ■ent development plan■ in accordance with the
City's Growth Management Program.
b. Requires landowners to provide development ~lans
which adhere to the citywide facilities plan and
to relate development to adjacent zones.
c. Zones allow for greater citizen review prior to
development approval.
4. Each zone will have a maximum residential
utilization i.e. mean density. Specific densities
for individual development plan• within the zone,
however, will be contro~led through the normal
planning process.
s. Each zone must conform to the General Plan and the
Growth Management Ordinance.
II. Facility Management Zone Processing
A. Landowners submit local facilities management plans for
processing concurrently with normal environmental
analysis.
a. Local facilities management plans shall conform to all
standard• of the Growth control Mapping and Planning
systems and other existing City standards.
c. The local plan shall provide a detailed financing plan
to assure adequate funding of all citywide facilities
and improvements identified in the citywide plan. The
local plan shall also provide a detailed financial plan
for all public facilities and improvements located
within the local facilities management zone.
All development within th• local facilities management
zone will be phased in accordance with the facility and
improvement performance standards.
D. A public hearing on the local facilities management plan
and environmental analysis will be held concurrently.
Notice to all landowners within the zone as well as
surrounding adjacent zone landowners.
-2-
143
E. After the public hearing is completed on the local
facilities management zone and environmental analysi.s,
then the specific development plans will be processed in
the normal method.
P. Each local facilitie■ management plan will be reviewed
annually by the City to ensure that all performance
standards are being met. If they are not, development
will be stopped.
6/13/86
ad
-3-
144
APPENDIX 3
145
-
REFERENCE SOURCES
1. Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, City of Carlsbad,
Revised September 29, 1986
2. Master Drainage Plan for the City of Carlsbad, adopted June,
1980
3. Sewer Master Plan, City of Carlsbad
November, 1976
June, 1984
April, 1985
4. Costa Real Municipal Water District Master Plan, February,
1985
5. Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan, City of
Carlsbad, June, 1982
6. Memo to Planning Commission from Parks and Recreation
Director, dated March 26, 1987
7. Circulation Element of the General Plan, City of Carlsbad
8. Standard Design Criteria for the Design of Public Works
Improvements in the City of Carlsbad, 1984
9. Draft Barton-Aschman Traffic Study, March, 1987
10. Capital Improvement Program Budget, 1986-1987
11. Capital Improvement Program, 1987-1991
146
APPENDIX 4
147
ZONE 2
ACREAGE SUMMARY ==========================================================================
GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION
RESIDENTIAL:
RL Low Density (0-1.5)
RLM Low-Med Density (0-4)
RM Medium Density (4-8)
RMH Med-Hi Density (8-15)
RH High Density (15-23)
COMMERCIAL:
CBD Central Bus. District
c Community
N Neighborhood
RC Recreation
TS Travel Services
o Professional & Related
RRE Extensive Reg'l Retail
RRI Intensive Reg'l Retail
RS Regional Service
INDUSTRIAL:
PI Planned Industrial
OTHER:
E
J
H
HC
p
G u
NRR
OS
RR
FW
MAJ
MIN
COL
Elementary School
Junior High School
High School
Continuation School
Private School
Governmental Facility
Public Utilities
Non-Resid'l Reserve
Open Space
Railroad
Freeway
Major Arterial
Minor Arterial
Collector Street
GROSS
525.9
135.3
--------661.2
24.3
10.2
34.5
o.o
13.4
58.3
22.3
19.9
113.9
100% 25%-40%
CONSTRAINED SLOPE
30.3
32.6
-------62.9
1.0
o.o
1.0
o.o
1.8
19.1
22.3
19.9
63.l
5.3
11.1
-------16.4
NET
493.0
97.2
590.l
23.3
10.2
33.5
o.o
11.6
39.2
o.o
o.o
50.8 ========================================================================== TOTAL 809.6 127.0 16.4 674.4 ====-=====================================================================
ASSUMPTIONS: l) 100% constrained acres include Riparian areas, transmission line easements, slopes greater than 40%, and major roadways.
2) Residential: Net acres -as~umes City council adopts Hillside Ord. (Net= Gross -100% Constrained -1/2 of 25-40% Slope).
3) Non-Residential: Net acres= Gross acres -100% Constrained.
148
APPENDIX 5
149
ZONE 2 -BUILDOUT ARTERIAL IMPROVEMENTS
This appendix lists and maps the improvements that will be
needed to completely develop all Circulation Element roads in
Zone 2 to their ultimate right-of-way width. The following roads
serve as boundaries between Zone 2 and other zones.
El Camino Real -Zones 2 and 1
Tamarack Avenue -Zones 2 and 14
Elm Avenue -Zones 2 and 7
For purposes of this study these roads have been split
down the middle when assigning development requirements to a
particular zone. For example, half the cost of providing the
median on El Camino Real between Chestnut Avenue and Tamarack
Avenue has been assigned to. Zone .2 and half has been assigned to
Zone 1. This is not to suggest that only half the median be
constructed at any one time. When this improvement is
constructed it would be logical as well as economical to
construct the entire median at one time.
Some of the needed improvements will be constructed by the
developers of adjacent property. Other needed improvements are
adjacent to properties that have little or no development
potential or have already been developed with single family
homes, none of which gain access from El Camino Real.
Alternatives for financing these improvements are shown at the
end of this section.
All of the Circulation Element
to their full length within Zone 2.
have sections that have not been
right-of-way width.
Roads have been constructed
However, all of these roads
built out to their ultimate
Each of the arterials within Zone 2 has been broken into
segments, as shown on map "Existing and Proposed Street
Improvements", on Page 153. This exhibit distinguishes between
fully improved and partially improved segments of the roads.
Partially improved segments have been assigned a letter.
Underneath this letter ls a series of numbers and letters which
list the needed improvements on each unimproved section. The
legend on this exhibit ·explains what each of these letters
signifies.
The needed improvements, the approximate length of the
needed improvements, the approximate cost of the improvements and
the source of the improvements is shown on Table 6, "Needed
Arterial Improvements" on Page 152. This information was
obtained from a number of sources. A field survey was done by
staff to determine
150
what improvements were needed on each partially improved segment.
The approximate length of the needed improvements was determined
by the use of maps, recent aerial photos, or actually measuring
the length of the needed improvements in the field.
None of the needed arterial improvements within Zone 2 are
included in any existing assessment district. The cost for these
improvements given in this section are only approximations. They
were obtained by estimating an approximate cost estimate per
linear foot for various portions of a Circulation Element
roadway.
It should be noted that all of the estimated costs for the
needed improvements are based on 1987 costs. Future inflation
rates could substantially increase the cost of these improve-
ments. In addition, unforseen soils problems necessitating
excessive amounts of grading could substantially increase the
cost of the needed improvements. This is especially so for
sections that need excessive amounts of grad~ng or remedial
improvements since no detailed engineering studies have been
completed for these areas.
Financing Alternatives
The City has several options for financing the
improvements along the segments for which no clear funding source
has been identified:
1. Add them to the list of projects which will be funded
through Public Facilities Fees.
2. Require future development within Zone 2 and outside
Zone 2 which contributes traffic to these segments to
fund part or all of the cost of the needed
improvements.
3. Establish Assessment Districts to pay for the needed
improvements.
4. Establish traffic impact fees for all projects
contributing traffic to the impacted road sections or
intersections.
151
TABLE 6
ZONE 2
NEEDED ARTERIAL IMPROVEMENTS
(A) Marron Road (east of commercial area adjacent to El
Camino Real) 2 lanes, bike lane, curb and gutter,
sidewalk, streetlight, street tree for approximately 700
feet on north side. Approximate cost $100,595. Source
-Future development of property.
(B) Elm Avenue (east of El Camino Real) -2 lanes, bike
lane, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlight, street
trees for approximately 1,056 feet on south side.
(Massive grading required.) Approximate cost $172,101.
Source -Future development of the property.
(C) Tamarack Avenue (east of El Camino Real) -sidewalk for
approximately 200 feet on north side. Approximate cost
$3,000. Source -See Alternatives.
(D) El Camino Real (from Elm Avenue to approximately 1,200
feet to the south) -street lights, sidewalk, street
trees for approximately 1,200 feet on east side.
Approximate cost $37,125. Source -Future development
of the property.
(E) El Camino Real (1,200 feet -south of Elm Avenue to 1,900
feet south of Elm Avenue) street trees for approximately
700 feet on the east side. Approximate cost $1,485.
Source -See Alternatives.
(F) El Camino Real (1,900 feet south of Elm Avenue to
Chestnut Avenue) sidewalk, street lights, street trees
for approximately 1,000 feet on east side. Approximate
cost $30,442. Source -See Alternatives.
(G) El Camino Real (Chestnut Avenue to approximately 600
feet to the south) half median. Approximate cost
$37,950. Source -See Alternatives.
(H) El Camino Real (approximately 600 feet south of Chestnut
for approximately 600 feet on the east side) -lane,
half median, sidewalk, curb and gutter, street light,
street tree. Approximate cost $92,647. Source -Future
development of property.
(I) El Camino Real (approximately 1,200 feet south of
Chestnut to Tamarack Avenue on the east side) -half
median, street trees for approxim~tely 3,600 feet.
Note: Improvements will have to be made to the unlined
open drainage channel adjacent to the sidewalk along
this section, it eventually will undermine the sidewalk.
Approximate cost $235,125. Source -See Alternatives.
152
(A) !:',JsL, ~ ....... ..
ZONE 1
(Dl 8, ST, IL on out old•
ZONE 2
(F) S, SL,
ST on •••• aide
(H) L, 1/1 M, I, CG,
SL, ST on ·••1 .....
(■) 2L, ■L, I,
( CG,IL,
~ IT on eouth
I'
CIRCULATION ELEMEN7
ZONE te
1ld1
(I) 1/2 M, ST on ... , 1ld1
0 FULLY IMPROVED ROADWAYS
0 PARTIALLY IMPROVED ROADWAYS
N••d•d lmp,ovem•nts
Q PFF TRAFFIC SIGNAL
L-LA NE
BL-BIKE LANE
M-MEDIAN
CG-CURB & GUTTER
S-SIDEWALK
SL-STREET LIGHT
ST-STREET T.REE
ZONE 7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CH, ol C•l•boll
Growlfl M1n1a•m-"f Pro••"'
JANUARY 188
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
153
APPENDIX 6
154
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
City of
·PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2665
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL
.FA-CILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 2 ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 78, NORTH OF TAMARACK
AVENUE, EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL GENERALLY TO ELM AVENUE.
APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD
CASE NO.: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN -ZONE 2
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the
Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission, and
WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution No. 8797
9 adopting the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan establishing
10
11
12
13
14
15
facility
and
requiring
and
zones and performance standards for public facilities,
WHEREAS, the City Council passed Ordinance No. 9808
the processing of a Local Facilities Management Plan,
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 9808 requires the Planning
16 Commission to hold a public hearing to consider the application for
l? a Local Facilities Plan and shall make recommendations and findings
18 for the City Council; and
19 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 20th day of
20 May, 1987, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law
21
22
23
24
25
26
to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 2.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
2? Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
28
-155-
1 A)
2 B)
3
That the above recitations are true and correct.
That based on.the evidence presented at the public hearing,
the Commission APPROVES Local Facilities Management Plan -
Zone 2, based on the following findings and subject to the
following conditions: ·
4 Findings:
5 1)
6
7
8 2)
9
10
11
12
3)
13 4 >
14
15 5 )
16
17 6 )
18
That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 2 ls
consistent with the Land Use Element, the Public Facilities
Element, and the other Elements contained in Carlsbad's
General Plan.
That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 2 is
consistent with Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code
(Growth Management), and with the adopted Citywide Facilities
and Improvements Plan.
That the Local Facilities Management Plan and the conditions
contained therein will promote the public safety and welfare
by ensuring that public facilities will be provided in
conformance with the adopted perfocmance standards.
The Local Facilities Management Plan will control the timing
and locations of growth by tying the pace of development to
the provision of public facilities and improvements.
The Plan will prevent growth unless public facilities and
services are available in conformance with the adopted
performance standards.
This Plan will not cause any significant environmental
impacts and a Negative Declaration has been issued by the
Planning Director on May 8, 1987 and approved by the Planning
Commission on Hay 20, 1987.
19 I Conditions:
20
21
22
1)
23 I I I I
24 / / / /
25 /II I
26 / / / /
Approval ls granted for Local Facilities Management Plan -
Zone 2 as contained in the Plan titled Local Facilities
Management Plan Zone 2, dated May 20, 1987, attached hereto,
and incorporated herein by reference.
27 / / / / ' PC RESO NO. 2665 -2-
28 -156-
1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
2 Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on
3 the 20th day of May, 1987, by the following vote, to wit:
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AYES: Chairman Marcus, Commissioners Schlehuber, Hall,
Schramm, Holmes.
NOES: Commissioners Mcfadden and McBane.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
CUS, Chairman
0 PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
/JA&l~, MI CHAEL.J.LZMiER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 2665 -3-
-157-
l.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
·17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION ~O. 9123
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA APPROVING A LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 2.
WHEREAS, a Local Facilities Management Plan has been
prepared for Local Facilities Management Zone 2 in accordance with
Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on May 20, 1987 hold
a duly noticed public hearing as required by law to consider said
plan and at the conclusion of the hearing adopted Resolution No.
2665 making findings and recommending that the City Council adopt a
plan; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was issued by the:Plannlng
Director on May 8, 1987 indicating that the Local Facilities
Management Plan ls not anticipated to have any significant adverse
impact on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council at their meeting of June 16,
1987held a duly noticed public hearing and considered all testimony
and arguments of anyone desiring to be heard,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council
of the City of Carlsbad, California as follows: .
1 • That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the findings of the Planning Commission in
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2665 constitute the findings of
the City Council.
3. That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 2
dated May 20, 1987 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated
-158-
1 herein by reference ls hereby approved. Any development occurlng
2 within the boundaries of Zone 2 shall comply with all the terms
3 and conditions of said plan.
4 PASSED, APPROVED ANO ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
5 Carlsbad· City Council held on the 16th . day of June
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1987 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and Larson
t~OES: None
ABSENT: None
CLAUDE Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
(SEAL)
2.
-159-
,
, ...